Slashdot Mirror


How Motherboards Are Made

mikemuch writes "Reporter Mark Hachman recently took a tour of a motherboard manufacturing facility operated by Gigabyte in Taiwan, and has posted a complete slideshow of the process. He was surprised by how much still had to be done by hand, but the company is still able to produce 1.5 million motherboards a month."

141 comments

  1. Sad truth... by PatrickThomson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sad truth is, unlike car assembly lines (which he mentions), it's cheaper to use trained humans to assemble low-value products like these, especially in a market based almost entirely on price (for consumer items at least).

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    1. Re:Sad truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. not sure why you think it's sad, unless you're heartless bastard who would love to fire thousands of workers

      2. low value has nothing to do with the fact that it's cheaper to use humans instead of robot, if robots can make a better product, faster, cheaper then human counterparts, they'll use robots. regardless if the end product is cheaper or not.

    2. Re:Sad truth... by mrbluze · · Score: 0

      it's cheaper to use trained humans to assemble low-value products like these

      A very interesting observation, in light of the current expose of child labour being used in factories in China. One has to wonder what conditions exist in factories where people don't get guided tours.

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    3. Re:Sad truth... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wrong. It is currently cheaper in the short to medium term to continue to use humans instead of investing in research to create a machine to do the job.

      A better example than motherboards is clothing. Take T-shirts for example. The textiles industry was historically the first to become industrialized, yet here we are 250+ years later, and there are still people in sweatshops making the simplest items of clothing. Why? Because it's technically too difficult to automate clothing manufacture? Whatever.

      The reality is that no motherboard, clothing, or any other company is willing to actually spend money and innovate. Find ways of making basic items by the millions, quickly, reliably, cheaply. And the reason they're not willing to do it is because they can still find cheaper and cheaper sources of labour. On China, they're current strategy when wages on the east coast get too expensive, is just to move 100km inland, rinse and repeat.

      There is lack of innovation in the manufacturing sector. It's caused an oversupply of cheap labour. Simply put, there is no pressure on factory owners to continue the industrial revolution, and human progress. Instead there's an incentive to use quasi, and what the hell, full blown slave labour.

      I harp on China, but it's happening all over. It's happening a lot closer to home than you think. Our society is back-peddling, and it's down to the fact that rabid (no so)free market capitalism has become the dominant ethos of our politics and media, where it is assumed that no matter what the issue problem or injustice is, the omnipresent "market" will find a solution to all our ills.

      I'm not some fanatical anti-globalisation, anti-capitalism protester. I just think that too much power, not money, power, is being concentrated into the hands of private companies. I don't like big government either, but I still think that corporations should be reigned in. If we don't, your children or grandchildren could find themselves like those Chinese brickworkers, force to work at the barrel of a privately owned gun.

      P.S.
      I believe in a free and fair market. Why should workers here have to compete against countries with lower standards?

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    4. Re:Sad truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad truth is, unlike car assembly lines (which he mentions), it's cheaper to use trained humans to assemble low-value products like these, especially in a market based almost entirely on price (for consumer items at least).

      Don't feel too bad. In most cases, nobody's forcing them to go to work. The people in that factory weren't restrained or anything. And if it weren't for jobs like that, a whole lot of people in China wouldn't have jobs at all. Those motherboard workers seemed to be doing a lot better than the starving, jobless people in Africa.

      Of course, everything changes if people are being forced to work the job.

    5. Re:Sad truth... by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But most of the assembly IS automated, that's what the pick-and-place machines are for, and the reflow ovens.

    6. Re:Sad truth... by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's discouraging. I've watched America go from robotic car washes to "100% hand wash" over the last 25 years.

      The assembly line for the Macintosh IIci was more automated than this one. Back in the 1980s, when consumer electronics came from Japan, the Japanese makers were frantically trying to automated enough to keep their labor costs down. Seiko and Sony developed some beautiful technologies for making small consumer electronics items untouched by human hands.

      Now everybody has those long lines of low-paid women in some low-wage area.

    7. Re:Sad truth... by encoderer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In light of the current expose of child labor?

      You make it sound as though you found yourself at a breakfast table, croissant in one hand, Le Monde in another, with a stunned expression on your face having just learned that all the cheap clothing and shoes and furniture and electronics that we in the first-world just LOVE were manufactured by a bevy of tiny little hands in sweatshops.

      I'm sorry, but wasn't that entirely obvious? Hasn't this issue been on the tip of our humanitarian tongues for at least twenty years? And when you went on to say "One has to wonder what conditions exist in factories where people don't get guided tours" all I could think is "NO! One does NOT have to wonder" because one should already KNOW.

      These conditions are deplorable.

      But the GP said that it's "sad" that human labor like this is cheaper than machinery. Well, perhaps, but I disagree slightly. Until we put all those people to work, until we bring them into the global economy, their situations will never improve. Only after we hire these people will we begin to see upward pressure on wages. Only after this generation--and perhaps the next--work painstaking hours to produce our shiny toys will you begin to see what more closely resembles a living wage in these countries.

      My then-girlfriend did her Graduate thesis in Ecomonics on this 2 years ago and her research led her to believe that in 25 years you'll see the average Chinese worker making $2/hr in 2005 dollars. That would be a stunning change in the world economy, in terms of both cost-of-production and consumer markets.

    8. Re:Sad truth... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight, you're slamming capitalism for giving people too many jobs?

      When you say everything can be automated, I think you overestimate the state of robotics.

    9. Re:Sad truth... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      The REAL sad truth is that they visited a Gigabyte factory. Given the ridiculously poor quality control that company is known for, I think it's safe to assume that more reputable manufacturers like Asus and MSI have more advanced facilities and refined processes.

      Just because you know how a McDonalds burger is made, doesn't mean you know how Hard Rock Cafe makes theirs.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    10. Re:Sad truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll put those lazy Africans to work soon, too, once the Asians start demanding more money.

    11. Re:Sad truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe your blaming conditions in China on free market Capitalism! Man talk about brinwashing..

    12. Re:Sad truth... by be-fan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While sweatshop labor is not something that spoiled westerners find particularly comfortable, there is a flip-side to the issue. That flip-side is that at least these people are working, and usually at least making enough to feed their families. The alternatives are worse, to say the least.

      Bleeding-heart westerners often this ridiculous notion that workers should be treated well everywhere in the world. This is an idealism that does more harm than good. It is far preferable to have 100 workers working for a barely livable wage than to have 20 workers working for a fair wage. The simple fact is that the cost of progress is high, but the cost of allowing progress to pass you by is even higher. Consider the textile industry in a place like Bangladesh (where my parents are from). Most westerners would look at the working conditions in these places and be appalled. Yet, most Bengalis will tell you that the textile industry has been on the whole good for the country. It has employed women who would otherwise be toiling away in rural areas for no pay at all. It brings them into urbanized areas, which as filthy as they are, are still preferable to the rural backwaters which they left behind. It brings them closer to clinics and schools, however poor they are, wheras before they would've had no access to these services at all.

      Westerners remember with horror the days when their own cities were like this, and feel that allowing such conditions to exist in the modern world is not acceptable. But the world is not modern for everybody. While it's 2007 for people in the US and Europe, it's 1920 for people in places like Bangladesh. There is no alternative for these societies but to deal with the price of progress, in the hopes that one day they can enter the modern world. If they are successful in this endeavor, then decades from now they too can have the luxury of being able to turn down work just because the conditions are below standard.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:Sad truth... by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >> Back in the 1980s, when consumer electronics came from Japan, the Japanese makers were frantically trying to automated enough to keep their labor costs down.

      >> Now everybody has those long lines of low-paid women in some low-wage area.

      First, it's not a bad thing to provide employment for people. You might recall the auto unions terrified that robots would replace workers. So using people to assemble things is not a bad thing.

      It's actually pretty difficult to make an automated machine that can assemble parts. Some of the ones we have cost nearly $1 million. At that price, we can only afford to use them where the product doesn't change, and/or there are serious hazards to having a human do the job.

      Since motherboards change a lot, using automated equipment would add delays, increase capital expense, and require a highly skilled team to keep them running. If you put 20 robots in a continuous line, a failure of one shuts down the line. If you only get 3 failures per year per robot, your line is down 60 times per year. You can retrain humans quickly, and they adapt quickly to design changes. Humans are a good thing...

      You'll see a lot of humans in a Toyota plant. They were never automated, just well run and well managed.

      --
      Place nail here >+
    14. Re:Sad truth... by mcfedr · · Score: 1

      Yea, its sad because it is possible to pay people so little...it would never be cheaper to do in america because you would have to pay people a real wage, these people probably live of less than $100 a month...probably alot less also, yea it give the person a job, but what kinda life is it to spend all day everyday sticking some component on a board so that some rich american can spend all day playing counter strike

    15. Re:Sad truth... by Verte · · Score: 0

      If they had machines doing that work, then those people could be doing something else, effectively doubling their contribution. At least, if China were a REAL communist country, that logic would hold.

      --
      We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.
    16. Re:Sad truth... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What's so sad about repetitive hand labor like placing components on a PC board? I've done this sort of stuff, and it's some of the easiest, most absorbing and satisfying work possible. At the end of the day, I went home happy and energized, ready to tackle the real problems in my life, or play, or relax.

      This is not physically strenuous work. It won't cause poisoning or RSI or heat stroke. There's no high likelihood of disease or injury. The main downside is that it doesn't pay well.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    17. Re:Sad truth... by jon287 · · Score: 0

      If you did innovate and create machines to do this work, people everywhere would call you the worst sort of villain for putting greed over human well being and destroying their jobs and livelyhoods in a mad lust for profit.

      This idea also is a from the same "data" of the industrial revolution in textiles.

      --
      To boldly use to and too two times and get it right too! They're not gonna believe their eyes when they see it there!
    18. Re:Sad truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for a private company's R&D department. As it stood when I arrived, the company had roughly 40 employees performing a critical task, representing about 60% of the company's profits. That is, the old automated system could deal with doing 40% of the work. Now it can do 90% of the work. Did they lay off a substantial portion of their work force? No, of course not. They just tripled the volume of jobs they processed.

    19. Re:Sad truth... by Ozan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The market being based on price has little to do with it. It is simply not feasible to use highly integrated automation with products with lifecycles of 6-12 months max. Setting up the automatized process is costly and needs well trained workers, and any revision requieres it to be done again. Plus it is not easily adaptable to changing demand, whereas with manual labor you just shift your workers.

    20. Re:Sad truth... by thyrf · · Score: 1

      Something tells me they'd use robots if they were better. There's nothing quite like having many humans to manually check on the condition of a board - you can't always rely on machines. You think they ship cars without some sort of human intervention to test them?

    21. Re:Sad truth... by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

      > It's discouraging. I've watched America go from robotic
      > car washes to "100% hand wash" over the last 25 years.

      That's because hand-washing a car generally does a better (and gentler) job of washing the grime off your car, and you employ a few people to do that while you're otherwise shopping and needing to have your car parked somewhere.

      Prior to the robotic car-wash facilities your only choice was to wash it yourself, or to get a family member to do it for pocket money.

      Now you can actually give a lesser skilled (ie thick) person a chance to actually earn a living.

    22. Re:Sad truth... by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      That works great, when you can do that. Sometimes, there's a limit on the output other than the people. Take a look at the PS3 problems from the stocks of Blue-Ray lasers being depleted. Most businesses depend on something else, and increased automation will only change to a different bottleneck. Sometimes, you won't even get a production increase, because there are multiple limiting factors at the same level.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    23. Re:Sad truth... by Torvaun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it a better life to die of starvation because some machine took away that money you were living on?

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    24. Re:Sad truth... by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      Yes, the numbers are clear. Industrialization causes famine.

    25. Re:Sad truth... by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      My aunt lives in Bangladesh. She's a missionary/nurse. Believe me when I tell you that famine is a very real thing for the people there. In America, we had enough space for our population boom, and much of it was arable. There, no such luck. Toss in the most corrupt government in the world (Guinness Book of Records, 2007) and a monsoon season, and you've got a miserable little hellhole that's not going to get better. If anything, they need -more- technology, especially things to improve farm yield. Right now 66% of the Bengali working population is working on a farm, and the country is barely surviving.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    26. Re:Sad truth... by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      I was using heavy sarcasm against the parent. The reason we aren't having famines in the western world is part free market and part industrialization.

      I agree with you completely. To say that industrialization is bad in any other way than the shortest term is madness (it may also be Sparta according to a recent documentary I saw).

    27. Re:Sad truth... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      When you say everything can be automated, I think you overestimate the state of robotics.

      By using the word robotics, I'm lead to think you're completely unqualified to make any statement regarding the state of industrial process automation.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    28. Re:Sad truth... by bdjacobson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's so sad about repetitive hand labor like placing components on a PC board? I've done this sort of stuff, and it's some of the easiest, most absorbing and satisfying work possible. At the end of the day, I went home happy and energized, ready to tackle the real problems in my life, or play, or relax.


      This is not physically strenuous work. It won't cause poisoning or RSI or heat stroke. There's no high likelihood of disease or injury. The main downside is that it doesn't pay well.

      You need to stop kidding yourself. I've worked at McDonalds for a year. Nothing energizing or satisfying about doing your best for $5.50/hour only to be turned down a raise after a whole year of work. Why should they give me a raise? They can just get rid of me and hire the next person that applies for the same $5.50.

      I've talked with some [engineering] friends who have worked the assembly line at GM. Open chassis, insert part, close chassis. For 8 hours. The only people I know that would call that absorbing and satisfying would be the very dumbest of people. And yes, if the process does not _exactly_ follow the natural movements of your body, you _will_ get repetitive strain injury.

      But I'd be far more concerned about the psychological irritability caused by such a job than the physical strain. Clearly you never worked such a job for more than a few hours, let alone several weeks.

      Never think yourself above any others. Of all the workers in the world, I probably have the most respect for these factory workers-- how they can endure the most mind numbing of tasks for hours, days, weeks, months, and years on end is far beyond my comprehension; not to mention my ability to replicate it...
    29. Re:Sad truth... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Taiwan isn't China. The average quality of life in Taiwan is much much higher than in China, and I don't think that there are sweatshops in Taiwan. They most just manufacture lots of computers. If you thought the Gigabyte factory was a sweatshop, then you have no idea what a real sweatshop is--watch Walmart: The High Cost of Low Prices if you don't understand. There are sweatshops in China because there's lots of low skill cheap labor from the countryside and cheap land for foreign companies to build large factories on. These conditions simply don't exist in Taiwan. I'd venture to say that there are more sweatshops in the US than there are in Taiwan (yes, there are hidden sweatshops in the U.S.).

    30. Re:Sad truth... by encoderer · · Score: 1

      1. I think CHINA would disagree with your opinion that Taiwan isn't part of China. I support your intrepretation (also shared by the US Govt) but it's worth mentioning that it's not quite as cut and dry as you alluded to.

      2. I didn't say anything about Taiwan. In fact, I was addressing the other factories that make our shiny trinkets, not the one featured in the story. I said that.

      3. Taiwan offers a lot better opportunities than the main land does, but you're making it out to sound like Japan. Maybe someday, but not yet. Taiwan still has a lot of the same problems that China has, which is not entirely unexpected.

      4. The only reason any business locates in Taiwan and not the main land is the PR value. For that reason I imagine a company would have a lot of incentive to build 9 main land factories and plop one in Taiwan so they can look like a Company That Cares.

      5. Of course sweatshops have to do with large labor pools. THAT WAS MY POINT. Once you put thse people to work (in sweatshops) and the labor pool dries up a bit, it's going to put upward pressure on wages.

      6. We see eye to eye on most this, it seems, so I'm a little confused by your adversarial tone.

    31. Re:Sad truth... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      this article is about a factory in Taiwan run by a Taiwanese company. also, please get a clue about Taiwanese history and its political situation. i happen to be Taiwanese and have lived in Taiwan for many years. i also have a Taiwanese passport coincidentally and have had to travel on it before I received my American passport. i know all about the nominal dispute between Taiwan and China. the fact is they are, and have always been, two completely different political entities and independent societies with very different cultures. both claims that Taiwan is a province of China or that the Taiwanese government is the political leadership of China are a complete joke to anyone familiar with Taiwanese/Chinese history.

      when has the China collected any taxes from a single Taiwanese citizen? when has Chinese law ever been enforced in Taiwan? aside from a few political threats made against Taiwan openly declaring independence, China has never exerted any direct or indirect political influence on Taiwan and has never intervened in Taiwanese affairs. i did not want to get into this debate, but it's annoying when someone completely ignorant of the situation tries argue about it.

      also, i wasn't trying to take an adversarial tone with you, just correcting a misconception that you and many other posters seem to share. otherwise, why bring up Chinese sweatshops on an article about a Gigabyte factory in Taiwan? Do a search on human rights violations in Taiwan and do a similar search on China if you do not believe me. better yet, travel to Taiwan and China to see the difference in cultures yourself.

    32. Re:Sad truth... by encoderer · · Score: 1

      1. I didn't bring up chinese sweatshops. The person I REPLIED TO brought them up. So you've directed your ire at the wrong post, bro. Go back and re-read the thread.

      2. Are you actually suggesting that it's not the official position of Bejing that Taiwan is part of China? You don't have to be Taiwaneese to understand the very clear language they've used.

    33. Re:Sad truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think if I had one of those "place component A in spot B" jobs for 8+ hours a day I'd go insane.

    34. Re:Sad truth... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I worked in a small pcb factory one summer and it was mental torture after a few weeks. Only people who can shut their brains off can stand it. The workers who chatted while they did it usually had too many product defects. I can see someone appreciating a job like this in a country where most jobs are dangerous, exhausting, or simply don't exist but I sure as hell wouldn't call it energizing.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    35. Re:Sad truth... by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Sad truth is, unlike car assembly lines (which he mentions), it's cheaper to use trained humans to assemble low-value products like these, especially in a market based almost entirely on price (for consumer items at least).
      What a crock: motherboard manufacturing is one of the world's most highly automated industries, with robotic pick-and-place machines doing all the component assembly. Only the inspection process is done manually because machine vision is not that good yet. And low value product? Motherboards are the extreme of high-value: the board costs a couple of dollars to make, and sells for over a hundred.

      Futhermore, car assembly involves hundreds of manual steps. Ever heard of the United Auto Workers? What do you think they do?

      Are you actually suggesting that it's not the official position of Bejing that Taiwan is part of China?
      Who gives a fuck what Bejing's official policy is? China and Taiwan are completely different cultures and economies. The women shown in the GigaByte factory are well-trained and well-paid technicians, not sweat-shop workers.
    36. Re:Sad truth... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      i chose to respond to you because your post was a continuation of a false premise laid by the poster before you--i understand that. i figured you and the original poster would both read my post if i responded to you rather than the first post.

      secondly, the position the chinese government takes on many issues diverge from reality. that was the point i was making.

    37. Re:Sad truth... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Wage slaves are sometimes cheaper than machines. That's why the legal limit on usury keeps going up.

      Best to keep the masses in debt up to their eyeballs, chasing after that $1000 HDTV... otherwise they might not want to work!

      --
      +++OK ATH
  2. How motherboards are made by 6Yankee · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Well, first the grandfatherboard and the grandmotherboard have to love each other very much. And then they have a very special cuddle, and the grandfatherboard puts his pin into the grandmotherboard's socket, and then there's a motherboard."

    1. Re:How motherboards are made by Xinef+Jyinaer · · Score: 1

      Awww, damnit man! Have some decency there could be children reading this!!!! Won't somebody please think of the children [ I assure you, I only say that to prevent someone else from doing it after].

      --
      Some days I just get bored and Troll post all the memes I can think of...
    2. Re:How motherboards are made by solafide · · Score: 4, Funny

      And then the motherboard meets a fatherboard, and the result is a board.

    3. Re:How motherboards are made by Chronowerx · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That about sums up the reporters knowledge of the process - why they didn't send someone with an ounce of insight into the process escapes me!
      "I don't know what this machine does, maybe it makes the boards" - it's the damn screen printer that pastes the solder onto the board, and the woman isn't "removing the edges" she's stuck in a tiny booth all day removing flux from the through hole components.
      I can think of heaps of peole, myself included, who would have loved a trip like this, and could have made a detailed write up that made sense, and did justice to the hard work and conditions those people work in.
      /rant over

    4. Re:How motherboards are made by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 1

      Butbutbut... I was told they came from the motherboard stork...

      -Stephen

    5. Re:How motherboards are made by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      "Well, first the grandfatherboard and the grandmotherboard have to love each other very much. And then they have a very special cuddle, and the grandfatherboard puts his pin into the grandmotherboard's socket, and then there's a motherboard."

      And when the motherboard is mated into a system she also gets a daughterboard.

    6. Re:How motherboards are made by Machtyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm fairly certain it will be a daughterboard.

    7. Re:How motherboards are made by ultrasound · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There was a much better slide show on /. last year. The pictures and descriptions are far more detailed and the guy actually knew what he was looking at.

      Also there was much more detail on the ATE and soak testing.

    8. Re:How motherboards are made by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I can think of heaps of peole, myself included, who would have loved a trip like this, and could have made a detailed write up
      > that made sense, and did justice to the hard work and conditions those people work in.

      So true. If I was forced by circumstance to work for pennies a day dully repeating the same task over and over again like a soulless automaton, breathing in noxious vapours and having nothing to look forward to in my working life but countless hours of soldering, I know that my biggest concern would be making sure that nerds on /. weren't confused by the minutia of my job due to a poorly-written-up slideshow.

    9. Re:How motherboards are made by bronzey214 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The fact that this was modded insightful and not funny makes me believe that Slashdot can only afford untrained monkeys to do it's modding.

    10. Re:How motherboards are made by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks for that. I've never thought highly of ECS boards... but that slide show seems to show they have a more modern production facility than Gigabytes. Although their facilities may be more modern and that doesn't relate to the features of the board, the two companies quality assessments may be completely different. I've personally never had any problems with Gigabyte and from the main posts sideshow they appear to have a fair bit of human-in-the-loop to pick up on quality issues.

      I'll maybe consider an ECS board.... maybe.

    11. Re:How motherboards are made by Funkcikle · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm fairly certain it will be a daughterboard.
      In China, these daughterboards are discarded. The sonboards are the desired product.
    12. Re:How motherboards are made by AI0867 · · Score: 1

      you must be new here

      joking aside, funny doesn't give karma, insightful does and many jokes also are insightful in a way.

    13. Re:How motherboards are made by emptybody · · Score: 1

      you were so close.
      > And then the motherboard meets a fatherboard, and the result is a board.

      And then the motherboard meets a fatherboard, and the result is a daughterboard.

      --
      comment directly in my journal
    14. Re:How motherboards are made by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      And when the daughterboard meets someone, and has offspring of her own, it'll certainly be a chip off the old block.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    15. Re:How motherboards are made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eek! Eek! Eek, You insensitive clod!

    16. Re:How motherboards are made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet China, motherboard assembles you!

    17. Re:How motherboards are made by pavon · · Score: 1

      In China, these daughterboards are discarded. And sold to the US at bargin value!

      The sonboards are the desired product. So that's why you never see sonboards here in the states. Always wondered about that.
    18. Re:How motherboards are made by razpones · · Score: 1

      ultrasound writes: "There was a much better slide show on /. last year. The pictures and descriptions are far more detailed and the guy actually knew what he was looking at." A way more detailed and explained article than the original one. The ECS facilities seemed a little more organized and neater than gigabite's. Thanx for the link, i too would buy one of this boards, I don't know why I tended to think ECS boards were not very good (probably because they sell cheaper at my local Microcenter), after this pictures I stand corrected. The article is more technical and the pictures are better. I wonder why is it that women are better suited for this type of work than men, is it because they complain less, or is it easier to pay them less money, more attention to detail?. I imagine a combination of all.

    19. Re:How motherboards are made by Tsagadai · · Score: 1

      Now I feel like I have created incestuous spawn plugging my daughterboard into my otherboard.

    20. Re:How motherboards are made by Tsagadai · · Score: 1

      I tried to write motherboard and click preview, moderation officer. Please I have a wife and kids just let me off this once or better yet why don't you take a look over hear in the glovebox. How did that money get there, it's not mine you better take it...

    21. Re:How motherboards are made by fonetik · · Score: 1
      "...grandfatherboard puts his pin into the grandmotherboard's socket, and then there's a motherboard."

      You missed a perfect opportunity to point out that the grandmotherboard has a ZIF socket.

    22. Re:How motherboards are made by Prune · · Score: 1

      Comments like these: "Although it may seem odd, passive components (resistors, etc.) are shipped to companies like Gigabyte in what are essentially tape reels." make me astonished at his ignorance of what he was seeing. This guy knows absolutely nothing of what he was seeing. The last person that should have been touring an electronics manufacturer.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    23. Re:How motherboards are made by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I assume those "tape reels" are ribbons of components for feeding into the componet placing robots (sort of like machine gun belts)?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    24. Re:How motherboards are made by Prune · · Score: 1

      Anyone that's ever ordered electronic components knows that small ones always come in tape reels. I've yet to place an order from Digikey from example for surface mount stuff that doesn't send me cuts of tape reel, even if I order in small quantities (say 5x).

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  3. Willy Wonka... by JazzyMusicMan · · Score: 0, Funny

    Oompah Loompahs mix the chocolate by hand and look at how many Wonka Bars are produced a year! I wonder what the silicon valley equivalent of a chocolate river is...

    1. Re:Willy Wonka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I wonder what the silicon valley equivalent of a chocolate river is...

      Microsoft Windows, except it flows out of Redmond and isn't chocolate...

      captcha = unclean

    2. Re:Willy Wonka... by Arclight17 · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly!
      The chocolate is mixed by waterfall.
      And it's the only chocolate in the world mixed by waterfall, did you know that?

      --
      All men can fly, but sadly, only in one direction--Down.
  4. Mr. Rogers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when we need him most. :/

  5. Cheaper by hand by denoir · · Score: 4, Informative
    Many of the things don't have to be made by hand, but it is simply cheaper. And it's not just in Taiwan.

    A few years ago I worked on a project at ABB Robotics (largest maker of industrial robots) and had the chance to often see their production lines. Once upon a time their assembly lines were automated to a large degree, until they realized that their throughput wasn't big enough to benefit from robots doing the work. People were cheaper and needed less maintenance. When you built a new robot model, you could use the same people - with little extra education required. Robots on the other hand required expensive reprogramming and testing for each small change.

    When I was there they were just dismantling the last robot in the line - the one that painted new robots. Instead they outsourced it and now three guys in gas masks spray paint them manually.

    1. Re:Cheaper by hand by ikea5 · · Score: 1

      Maybe Gigabyte only produces small number of high-end boards and/or pilot production broads in Taiwan. Therefor automation doesn't make it any cheaper nor fixable. The boards for the masses would be made in China where giant machines and endless lines of (mechanized) workers cranking out those $39.99 newegg specials. Think Rolls-Royce and Chevy.

  6. Extra hyperlink by the_kanzure · · Score: 1

    In this case, the Wikipedia fabrication article is rather useful. And as for the images from the article, it would be especially nice if we could do tagging in order to identify the machinery. What are they using? And how can we design similar machines?

    1. Re:Extra hyperlink by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Captions/tags would be useful. For example, are they saving their urine in bottles in this picture?

  7. oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Russian components, American components, ALL MADE IN TAIWAN!

    1. Re:oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice!!!

  8. Business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Select electrolytic capacitors that will fail within 2 years
    2. ????
    3. Profit


    Does anybody know what the missing step is? I'd investigate myself but I'm having all these bizarre intermittent problems with my computers, guess I'll have to upgrade my systems again.
    1. Re:Business model by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Does anybody know what the missing step is?
      Sure do! It's "2. Do not stress the importance of a clean, reliable power source."

      That'll kill a motherboard faster than anything but liquid or toddlers. Get a decent, non-generic UPS, and run any cable/modem/network cabling through it as well. We had a similar issue out at a client of ours... Turns out that the juice at two stations, due to an ANCIENT voltage converter box, were only running at 96 volts. Make sure you've got 110v [US] or a good 220v for Europe.
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    2. Re:Business model by mink · · Score: 1

      I suspect they can not use machines because they refuse to use substandard parts in their brethren.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  9. funny. by overcaffein8d · · Score: 1

    funny..... my gigabyte motherboard just died.

    --
    Those of us who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.
    1. Re:funny. by aonifer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, did the show the part where they make one of the USB ports not work, like my first Gigabyte MB? How about the part where they make the memory controller really flaky and crash all the time, like my second Gigabyte? That one I bricked trying to upgrade the BIOS in the hope it would fix the memory controller. Apparently I had the right model, but the wrong "revision". Yeah, I think I'm done with Gigabyte motherboards.

  10. The unknown steps by Poingggg · · Score: 4, Informative

    An educated guess at what the two unknown steps in de slideshow were:

    I think the first step where the author did not know what happened showed a machine for applying the glue for the surface mounted devices on the pcb. This step comes before the smd's are actually placed on the board. The glue keeps the components in place until they are soldered. I believe the glue is removed afterward, but I'm not sure.

    The second 'interesting looking' thing looked like a device for transferring BIOS-IC's from plastic, tube-like containers to tape-rolls for the pick-and-place machines.

    --
    What person will donate an airborne act of love?
    1. Re:The unknown steps by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Probably solder paste too - I'd imagine that the application of the solder paste is automated.

    2. Re:The unknown steps by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      It's a solder paste applying machine. They put a stencil over the board and drag a squeegee across the top to spread the paste through the holes in the stencil onto the board. You can see the silver-grey solder paste and the squeegee in the picture. Here's how you do the exact same thing at home:
      http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/present.php?p=Ste nciling

      Nowadays, SMT devices are soldered using a hot oven or hot air. Back in the day they just dipped the entire thing in solder or used wave soldering, which means the components had to be stuck on. This is no longer necessary, as the board is kept upright and the viscosity of the solder paste acts as a weak glue to keep the components in place until the entire thing is baked.

  11. The result is a baby ATX.... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

    Technically speaking, the result is a Baby ATX....only later does it grow up to become a full-grown motherboard.

    --
    No sig today...
  12. Safer not - Re:Cheaper by hand by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ....Oh... I think recent news on "Skynet" http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/ 10/1337226 freaked out the industry of building robots with robots...

    Or maybe programmers are just charging to damn much....

  13. Not much of an article... by Mike1024 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This article isn't very impressive in terms of research, spelling or photographic quality. This is slashdot though, so I guess I can't complain.

    When the author says "To be honest, I'm not sure what this machine does", from what I can see of the tiny photo, he's looking at a machine which stencils solder paste onto the exposed pads of the PCB.

    When he says "The adhesive needs to be hardened, so the components won't fall off" he means the solder paste is melted then allowed to cool with the components in it, thereby attaching the components to the PCB electrically and mechanically.

    When he says "BIOS Taping Area, I'm not quite sure what went on here" I would guess they are writing the BIOS code into the flash memory.

    As he doesn't really explain, the reason people are putting connectors on the board manually even after the automated component placement stage is because the plastic connectors would melt in the heat of the oven, before the solder melted. So there are two processes: first the small, high tech chips are put on and soldered in the oven, then people manually insert the funny-shaped easy to melt parts, and they are soldered separately.

    And now you know!

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    1. Re:Not much of an article... by NixieBunny · · Score: 1
      I too was apalled that the reporter didn't do *any* research to find out what the various steps of the process were. It seems that the advent of desktop journalism has produced a caliber of journalist that doesn't even realize that an informative article full of "I don't know..." is not good.

      You are right about the solder paste squeegee machine and the soldering oven (the "adhesive" is solder) and BIOS programmer and hand-stuffing of connectors. The automatic assembly only works for brick-shaped surface mounted parts.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    2. Re:Not much of an article... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1
      This article isn't very impressive in terms of research, spelling or photographic quality. This is slashdot though, so I guess I can't complain.


      Oh, you can complain. Just don't expect anything to be done about it.

      Well, OK that's not entirely fair... you'll get modded to 5, but that's about it.
      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:Not much of an article... by dovgr · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the technical quality of the slide show is really low.

      I personally had a good laugh at the picture at:

      http://www.extremetech.com/slideshow_viewer/0,1205 ,l=&s=1670&a=209248&po=9,00.asp

      which says "Motherboards are made from printed circuit boards (PCBs), which, as the name suggests, need to be printed or etched. Here's where that happens.", and an unknown machine is shown. No, that's not where the PCB's are made. The PCB construction is a very complex and accurate chemical process that involves laminates, copper foil, plotters, photo resist layers, etching, stripping, build up layers, optical inspection, repair, etc. That production is usually outsourced and the motherboard producer is then doing the final assembly step, which is partly depicted in the slide show.

    4. Re:Not much of an article... by 1gig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lets see if I can shed some light on this process. First off I'm an ex process Eng. that worked in a contract SMT manufacturing facility here in the US before every thing moved offshore. Actually started at Compaq the Motorola then did a stint with a little contract house then moved on to one of the big contractors. So what all this means is I know what I'm talking about.

      1) The above poster is correct in that the first pic we have is a Screen printer. It's function is to apply solder paste to the PCB. The machine next to it in the same pic is a laser and vision solder inspection station. It's job is to make sure the screen print is good. It checks both the hight, registration and coverage of the past. Approximately 90% of all defects in a good SMT manufacturing process are cause at this point due to clogged solder stencils so in high volume shops you put a solder past inspection system in place to catch those errors while it is very easy to recover from them. You just wash the PCB and run it again plus clean the stencil before you have to many bad boards.

      2) The next machine he takes a picture of is a Pick and Place machine which means he missed one. The actual next step after solder inspection is the chipshooter and as the name implies its job is to place the passive components on the board. When I left the business about 5 years ago the current state of the art was able to place about 10 components per second. This machine is basically a big gattling(sp) gun type of design. In that the placement heads rotate around a turret and the board moves (That is why you can only place small devices with it). After the chips are placed we normally also placed the smaller IC's with the chipshooter as well. You just have to slow it down to do that part or the IC's will slide off the board as it moves (it moves very fast normally about 12 inches per second and from dead stop to full velocity in under .01 sec's).

      3) Now comes the pick and place machine that he did take a picture of. It's purpose is to place the larger components on the board. In this machine the placement head moves not the board. All components are both vision tested(leg bend left right test) and laser (for leg flatness or bend up down tested) before the component is placed on the board. Depending on the part and the number of heads on the machine the pick and place can place parts on the board at about the 4 per second range. Larger parts take longer mostly due to there size and or weight. Basically if you move the head to fast the part will fall off or become missaligned.

      4) The next machine he takes a pic of he got right it what it does. It visually checks to make sure all of the parts are on the board. It will also check alignment and if the part has some distinctive feature it will make sure it is the right part as well.

      5) The next picture is the reflow oven. It is basically a big convection oven the better ones are forced air ovens. The problem with his description is that he states that it heats the board up to 200c which is not correct it gets a little hotter than that. How hot you have to heat the board and components depends on the solder past and the components you are using. Now that most SMT manufacturing has moved to lead free paste it is mostlikly getting closer to 250c.

      6) Visual inspection. Yes this is still done by humans. There are many issues with doing this by machine at this point that are not easy to solve. You can machine check components but we already did that before we put the board in the oven so why do that again. What the girls are looking at are the solder joints mostly. If the oven has lost a zone or the air flow is not right for some reason then the solder joints will change in color and how it looks. Again this is a very hard problem to solve with a machine because it is hard to see fillets and hills (the solder wick up the side of a component) with a camera no matter how high of a resolution you have because to see it you have to have light and the light will cause brigh

    5. Re:Not much of an article... by lordlod · · Score: 1

      The pick and place machines can't do through-hole components. This basically means that the larger components are handplaced after the SMD stage. Typically this would include the large capacitors and external sockets. After hand placing the components they use wave soldering (basically bath the underside) to fix all the components in place.

      My understanding is that the through-hole work is done by hand because of limitations in the accuracy of the pick and place machines and you can't use solder paste so you need a second solder stage anyway.

      The hand work does cost more and is less reliable, regardless of where it's done. That's why most components these days are SMD and machine placed. Circuit board designers go to a lot of effort to reduce the number of through hole components whenever they can.

    6. Re:Not much of an article... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      >When he says "The adhesive needs to be hardened, so the components won't fall off" he means the solder paste is melted then allowed to cool with the components in it, thereby attaching the components to the PCB electrically and mechanically.

      This is a late reply, but one interesting thing about the pick-and-place machines is that they're putting several G's of acceleration laterally on the boards when they're placing components. What this means is that even though the board has solder paste on all the pads, and the components are stuck in the solder paste, if any part isn't set well or even just heavy or with a high center of gravity -- particularly big tantalum capacitors -- it'll come loose because of the lateral acceleration and will very rapidly clean off the rest of the board as it bounces around. Then you have to pull the board and scrape off all the components, wash it, and start it over, and all those components are wasted because it's absolutely not worth the effort to sort them.

      So what they do is, for some boards or sometimes just for some components, they put down little dabs of contact adhesive on the board after solder stencil but before pick-n-place, and that'll keep the big components down on the board. Then all the components are placed, and then it runs through the reflow oven (that melts the solder paste and permanently attaches the components to the board) and then, depending on the design, through a solder-wave to work any through-hole components, and then maybe even another trip through soldermask/pick-n-place to load the other side of the board. If you're careful you can get it through the reflow ovens a second time to do the backside of the board, without losing all the parts on the frontside of the board.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    7. Re:Not much of an article... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised he didn't point out the wave solder machine. Those things are extremely sensitive temperature wise.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  14. Heresy!!!!!!! by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

    We all know that long ago in the Garden of Silicon the Divine Circut created the first FatherBoard in his own image. Then because the FatherBoard was lonely the Divine Circut took a rib logic gate from the FatherBoard and used it to create a MotherBoard to be the FatherBoards companion. Now MotherBoards can only be created within the sanctity of a Printing Process approved by the Holy Surface Mount Church.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  15. Does Visioneer still build scanners in San Jose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article skipped that detail.

  16. 1,249 patents!!??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA "Interestingly, the company(Gigabyte) has also filed for 1,249 patents"

    Does that seem odd to anyone else?

  17. Been done before... by FinchWorld · · Score: 1
    ... as seen here . Used this last year as part of a presentation at uni (I was given PCB production), or as I like to think of it as "How many of you can use the internet the night before this needs to be presented" test.

    More indepth for those who care. The flowing solder is (to me) th emost interesting and sparse par however, though AMD (did) have a few interesting articles on how mass automated soldering is done.

    --
    "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    1. Re:Been done before... by itwerx · · Score: 1

      Been done before...

      And the article linked to in the parent's comment is much more detailed and informative! This is what should have been submitted instead!

  18. Another shitty hardware review article by sdguero · · Score: 1

    I love it, a dude who doesn't know what a PCB is trying to explain how they are manufactured. Articles like this constantly lower my opinion of the slashdot crowd...

  19. Last picture by adenied · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The last picture is possibly the best... "Nutrition Carrier egg yolk pie"?!? That sounds simultaneously disgusting and wonderful.

    1. Re:Last picture by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      No kidding - I was simultaneously revolted and curiously attracted to that particular culinary delight. The overtly treat-your-employees-like-robots sound of 'nutrition carrier' juxtaposed with something as delicious-sounding as "Egg Yolk Pie" creeped me out.


      A link to a blog entry re: this product: http://toshuo.com/2006/truth-in-advertising-ii-the -nutrition-carrier/
      Another brand of EYP: http://fuma.en.alibaba.com/offerdetail/57475826/Se ll_Egg_Yolk_Pie_32pcs_.html

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  20. mmm feet on the assembly line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to sniff then I want sniff this lady's sandaled feet, then lay down under this one's feet and jack off over her soles.

    captcha: intimacy

  21. I thought it was common knowledge by Wiarumas · · Score: 1

    I thought it was common knowledge that motherboard were made in Anduril, Flame of the West, and forged from the shards of Narsil. And there is only one power supply, secretly forged in Mount Doom, to control all others.

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    1. Re:I thought it was common knowledge by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was common knowledge that motherboard were made in Anduril, Flame of the West, and forged from the shards of Narsil.

      Well, the Elves were whispering about unionizing so it got outsourced.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  22. Elitist commentary by jihadist · · Score: 0, Troll

    "So industrious, those Taiwanese!"

    I'm the last person to be cultural coach out there, but I caught a lot of the rich American city person finding it quaint that those little squinty-eyed people did things in such an IMPOVERISED, uneducated (no MBAs), unfamiliar-with-the-hip-joints-in-NYC way. That commentary... I detest the word "racist," (and I know that every one of you ARE racist, even if you think you're not) and I don't think that's what's going on here, but definitely condescending. America isn't the center of the universe, yo.

    It's a dying empire that still has some bux to blow!

    1. Re:Elitist commentary by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yup, I'm racist. I think the Taiwanese are smarter than we are, statistically speaking.

      Reality is racist. Deal with it.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:Elitist commentary by Eideewt · · Score: 2, Funny

      (and I know that every one of you ARE racist, even if you think you're not) and I don't think that's what's going on here, but definitely condescending. America isn't the center of the universe, yo. It's a dying empire that still has some bux to blow!

      Well it's a good thing we have nice guys like you to straighten us racists out!

  23. Got to love this image by mrjb · · Score: 4, Funny

    This made me chuckle-
    1. Be more responsible
    2. Complain less
    3. Be more attentive
    4. Make lesser mistakes

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    1. Re:Got to love this image by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      That is good advice

    2. Re:Got to love this image by karbonKid · · Score: 1

      I know you're trying to be funny, but the statement is actually gramatically correct. You're expecting it to read 'make less mistakes', but the word lesser also makes sense in the statement, changing it to mean 'make mistakes of lower magnitude' rather than 'make fewer mistakes.'

    3. Re:Got to love this image by nlitement · · Score: 1

      "Lesser" is valid, just like "littler."

    4. Re:Got to love this image by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      If you're going to cock everything up, make sure it's not cocked up too badly.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    5. Re:Got to love this image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be smug about this. Most native English speakers would write "less", which is not even grammatical. At least "lesser" is a valid comparative in this context.

      If the intent was to describe a smaller quantity of mistakes, the correct word is "fewer".

  24. Your forgot the second rule of taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2. Complain less.

    Back to the re-education center with you communist.

  25. In Soviet Russia.. by newr00tic · · Score: 1

    Captions/tags would be useful. For example, are they saving their urine in bottles in this picture?
    In Soviet Russia, Urine saves you.
    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  26. Now that's interesting... by theorem4 · · Score: 1

    That's a DDR3 board. Also Anandtech has a good article showing the actual assembly a bit better. http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=2080&p=5

  27. Never Underestimate... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    how much still had to be done by hand, but the company is still able to produce 1.5 million motherboards a month.

    Never underestimate the power of 10 million low-paid Chinese.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  28. That was a pretty article by xx01dk · · Score: 1

    with lots of pictures but no real "meat". This one from 2004 is far superior; They even have pictures of the solder wave machine which this article didn't even include at all. BTW that first machine that the author couldn't name is a solder paste screen printer. The other machine the athor hinted at (the one with the reels) is apparently a bios chip testing station. Really, for such a good site I'm suprised they bothered to type this one up when it's been done so well before... I think Gigabyte does this every year or couple of years as a pretty decent PR op. My advice: RTFA Extremetech's first, then go to the link above for a lot more detail if you're still interested.

    --
    There is simply too much glass..
  29. Manufacturing. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To me this is no surprise whatsoever. I think what would surprise people even more is that a lot of companies in Japan, Europe and the United States still use manual labor. The problem seems to be that when someone mentions manual labor done in Asia people automatically assume people are being exploited. I agree it's a serious issue in China. However, this hasn't been the case in Taiwan for decades now. There are numerous laws in Taiwan protecting workers and they are enforced.

    And in my experience they are very industrious workers. I've heard surveys quotes that Americans are among the most productive works in the World. They work hard, but honestly, I don't believe it. Either other nations don't bother doing adequate surveys or American companies inflate productivity. I did also hear another survey that said American workers were complainers, the French and British are worse. I believe that too. Taiwanese are much like the Japanese. There's a job to be done, they get in there and do it. And they do it quickly. They have an excellent work ethic, and take any job they do seriously. It's why you can walk into a Starbucks or McDonalds in Taiwan and the place is spotless and service excellent.

    It also helps that managers at technology companies there tend to have engineering backgrounds. Unlike American companies where we get stuck with business and marketing idiots making important decisions. I can't count the times I've had to deal with guys here who don't know what they're talking about and end up making fools of themselves in meetings. Even worse, they don't care to learn because they think it's all beneath them. So they end up managing based on emotion, almost like children.

    Not that there aren't problems there. I think Taiwanese in general are underpaid. And there's this ideal there too many people have that once you're in management you basically get to screw around all day. Some managers, especially in office environments, can get verbally abusive with employees. It's the sort of thing that no way in hell would ever fly in the US.

    Anyway, I had the opportunity while working there to visit a few companies, and I got to see some cool stuff. Like I said, it's mostly manual labor. I was disappointed when I first saw that; I was hoping to see these giant robotic arms swinging around, going about their business. But it's not the case. It would just be too expensive to purchase and then set up this equipment. And then having to retool for other products would be another hassle.

    I also did some work for a company that sold and installed semi-conductor manufacturing equipment. That was one business where companies didn't want employees directly handling the product. So business was good for this company.

    Taiwan has two of the largest contract semi-conductor foundries in the world. Now that was impressive. The company I visited a few years ago had just recently completed this new facility in southern Taiwan. This was when companies were first starting to move over to 300mm wafers. So they installed this transport in the ceiling to transport these wafers around from machine to machine. The wafers are carried in this case which is something like 1.5ft all around. It has handles so it could be carried. And people did used to carry them around. But given that a case full of at least 10 wafers can be worth hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars they decided they didn't want to risk having people drop these. Hence the transport system. In fact, the facility had relatively few people there, most were responsible for ensuring everything was running properly or setting up new equipment. All in all, it was impressive.

    1. Re:Manufacturing. by Toffins · · Score: 1

      I agree that Taiwan has built up an impressive electronics manufacturing industry, though there have been some very sub-standard products along the way, e.g. the 2002-2003 epidemic of faulty Taiwanese capacitors destroying motherboards.

  30. Smarter automation by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

    Painting robots are getting smarter. I've seen some R&D work where a LIDAR scanner looks at the thing to be painted, the software builds a 3D model, a painting plan is generated, and a robot paints the thing, moving around to get all the surfaces and crevices. You just hang whatever needs to be painted on a conveyor chain going into the paint booth, and the robot does the rest.

    We need more technology like that to stop the downward wage spiral.

  31. Wrong by your own logic by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    What you just admitted is that capitalism creates jobs and makes people more wealthy. So wealthy in fact that companies have to move to find cheaper labor. Eventually that means everyone will be rich and able to demand a high wage. Richer people demand more services since they're kids will be better educated they can invest and contribute to a vibrant economy (increased demand and supply capability of cars, housing construction, health care, recreation crap, transportation infrastucture, energy, and mining etc.)

  32. Taiwanese != Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    TFA is about a company in Taiwan and Taiwan has about 23 million people.

    I fail to see the relevance of a comment about "10 million low-paid Chinese."

  33. He was surprised... by kbox · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...by how much still had to be done by hand. Everything is done by hand in Taiwan.

    Why pay for robots when you have an endless supply of poor people willing to work for 1% of the cost of one mother board a week.

    1. Re:He was surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Excuse me sir? How can you actually make that kind of number up? 1% of the cost of one motherboard a week?

      You may want to do some research before you look down on other races, sir.

      1% of 1 mother board per week is 1% x $100 / week, which is $1/week, which is 4 dollars US per month.

      I truly believe that it doesn't take one to find that the minimum wage of a Taiwanese is $487.

      While I don't want to be offensive, it is your kind of bigotry that show the ignorance of humanity. Perhaps next time you will do some research before trolling.

      And to the moderator who modded him insightful- Sir, you can't possibly believe what he claimed, right? (Apparently not...)

    2. Re:He was surprised... by mcfedr · · Score: 1

      the more important point...living off less than $500? would you be happy with that much money?

    3. Re:He was surprised... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Minimum wage is minimum wage. If you think less than $500 is bad, you should see minimum wage for waiters in the USA.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    4. Re:He was surprised... by kbox · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This clown would rather argue figures given simply to higlight the pitiful conditions these people work in because he knows that they do work for shit money in shit conditions.

      And the fact that he tacked a "sir" on to every sentence make me think he's a pompus cretin who doesn't even care what shit these poor people are living in, As long as he gets his cheap mother boards.

      $500 a month? I make over 3 times that a week. So don't have the cheek to make out that these people are in some way fairly compensated for thier labour. They work for shit money in shit conditions and the only reason the compamny doesn't buy fucking robots is because orphan kids are cheaper.

  34. Western Economic Hypocracy... by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

    > While sweatshop labor is not something that spoiled westerners find
    > particularly comfortable, there is a flip-side to the issue. That
    > flip-side is that at least these people are working, and usually at
    > least making enough to feed their families.

    How horrid it must be for people earning $0.10 a day(!) to find that some Westerners (such as yourself) deem it acceptable to purchase things made by people earning so little for their effort; while those same Westerners would not even get out of bed to pee for less than $9.99 excl tax.

    1. Re:Western Economic Hypocracy... by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Cost of Living, dammit! Yes, someone who earns an average of $0.10 a day here is independently wealthy, or living in a cardboard box. But that's livable money there. I go through this same argument with a friend of mine on a regular basis, only that one's about Wal-Mart in India. First, it costs a lot less to live there than it does here. Second, unemployment is huge, so if every worker in the factory died of a heart attack Friday night, the factory could easily be fully staffed by Monday.

      You want to know what I find amazing? That there aren't a lot more motherboards that fail before leaving the factory, considering the nature of static electricity, and the measures that aren't being taken to neutralize it in the factory.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    2. Re:Western Economic Hypocracy... by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I go through this same argument with a friend of mine on a regular
      > basis, only that one's about Wal-Mart in India. First, it costs a
      > lot less to live there than it does here.

      Sorry - wrong.

      A person in China wanting to purchase a CD (from for example, Amazon.com) would not be able to afford it - because that CD would still cost the same US$$ to purchase from China/India/Fiji/Indonesia that it would to purchase it from the UK or from the USA.

      What you are actually advocating is that people in the "Third World" should not expect the same standard of living as people in the "First World"

      > Second, unemployment is huge, so if every worker in the factory
      > died of a heart attack Friday night, the factory could easily be
      > fully staffed by Monday.

      That is not a valid argument for an international corporation paying a subsistence wage to someone in China/India so that people in the First World can buy sweatshopped cheap merchandise.

      Those corporations should be required to pay the same wages in US$$ as they should be paying in Europe or the USA.

    3. Re:Western Economic Hypocracy... by be-fan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why shouldn't I find it acceptable? Out of a sense of guilt for being born into a different class of society? Where is the rationality in feeling guilt for the workings of random chance? Is it fair that I make more in an hour than a Bengali textile worker does in a month? No, but that's just the nature of the world. There is no point in pretending that the world can be some sort of utopian place where the efforts of all are rewarded on the same level. By sheer bad luck, many people in the world will get a very bad lot in life. The only things that can be done is to maximize the quality of life of these people within the scope of what is realistic. And in that context there is no reason to feel guilty for buying shoes made by someone making $25 a month, because the brutal reality is that the alternative for her would've been working just as hard on a small village farm, just to feed herself.

      And the real issue is way beyond the short-term comparison between a low-paying job and even lower-paying farm work. Industrialization, as painful as it is, is the only way to move a country like Bangladesh forward. Urbanization, commerce, industry, serve not only immediate monetary needs, but change the fundamental nature of society, modernizing it, disabusing people of backwards notions, integrating people within the larger world in which we live. Fifty years ago, most Bengalis were working hard for low pay in village farms. Now, many are working hard for low pay in industry, but belong to unions and can get to a hospital in an emergency and maybe send their children to school. Fifty years hence, who knows?*

      *) Fifty-years hence Bangladesh will probably still be exceedingly poor, but for reasons completely unrelated to economics. The government is fantastically corrupt, and eating into a large portion of whatever progress industry and commerce have been bringing to the country.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Western Economic Hypocracy... by be-fan · · Score: 0, Troll

      A person in China wanting to purchase a CD (from for example, Amazon.com) would not be able to afford it - because that CD would still cost the same US$$ to purchase from China/India/Fiji/Indonesia that it would to purchase it from the UK or from the USA.

      A person in China working in a sweatshop is not in the market for CDs.

      What you are actually advocating is that people in the "Third World" should not expect the same standard of living as people in the "First World"

      Of course they shouldn't. What the hell planet do you live on where everyone can expect the same standard of living?

      Those corporations should be required to pay the same wages in US$$ as they should be paying in Europe or the USA.

      Then you'd have a few factory workers living like kings*, and a whole lot of unemployed people who would otherwise have work now being unable to sustain their families. Yeah, that's a great idea!

      *) A median American salary of $45,000 is enough to buy a house in the most exclusive gated community in Bangladesh, send your children to private English schools, and maintain a cook, a maid, a nanny, and someone to handle odd-jobs.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:Western Economic Hypocracy... by robaal · · Score: 1

      Those corporations should be required to pay the same wages in US$$ as they should be paying in Europe or the USA.

      OK, but why would those corporations choose to build factories in the poor countries instead of EU/US in that case (assuming the products would be intended for the US/EU market)?
    6. Re:Western Economic Hypocracy... by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

      > OK, but why would those corporations choose to build factories
      > in the poor countries instead of EU/US in that case (assuming
      > the products would be intended for the US/EU market)?

      They shouldn't be manufacturing products in one place that they intend to sell on the other side of the world.

      A complete waste of resources transporting goods all that way when they could be manufactured perhaps even within the same city that they will be sold in.

    7. Re:Western Economic Hypocracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A complete waste of resources transporting goods all that way when they could be manufactured perhaps even within the same city that they will be sold in.

      And yet, they make a profit... which is the goal of capitalism.

      Don't like it? Don't buy. Or better, reward the companies that do follow your strictures.

  35. Then there's the Eddie Murphy special... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    A big, black, mother...board

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  36. Will it be on "How It's Made?" by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    So, when is this going to be on "How It's Made," one of my favorite TV shows?

  37. Widgets by MECC · · Score: 1

    Each little capacitor and other widget

    Went downhill from there...

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran