Slashdot Mirror


Best Places To Work In IT

jcatcw writes "Computerworld's annual summary of the best places to work in IT lists companies that excel in five areas of employment: career development, retention, benefits, diversity, and training. According to the scorecard, the top five retention methods are: competitive benefits; competitive salaries; work/life balance; flexible work hours; and tuition reimbursement. Of the top 100 companies, 64 expect the number of U.S.-based IT staffers to increase in 2007, on average by 7%. Here is the whole list. The top three are Quicken Loans, University of Miami, and Sharp HealthCare."

69 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. Do people take these seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My company is on the list, top 20 even, and I'm sorry but it's a joke. This is a miserable place to work, with most people answering these things positively because if they don't they get subjected to even worse "morale improvement" exercises.

    1. Re:Do people take these seriously? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since you posted as "Anonymous Coward" why didn't you share your employer's name with us?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Do people take these seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quicken Loans.

    3. Re:Do people take these seriously? by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

      Read between the lines, he obviously works for Slashdot.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    4. Re:Do people take these seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Since you posted your employer's name, why don't you share your name with us? :P just to confirm, you know..

      Sd,


      HR Mgr,

      Quicken Loans Inc

    5. Re:Do people take these seriously? by Null+Nihils · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Monsanto was on there at #27. Monsanto are the people that patent genes, have lobbied to have certain legislation* added to the new Iraq constitution, have engineered plants that are sterile and can't be replanted so people have to keep buying new seeds... that's not even the half of it, and lets not even get started on their history of litigation.

      Once I saw them on there, I promptly closed the browser tab.


      * Note: the article I linked came at the top of the Google search, but it may not be the most correct or objective.

    6. Re:Do people take these seriously? by mrbooze · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Amusingly, there is a point to be made here. Unrelated to this survey, but at my own company we have regular employee satisfaction surveys, and the inevitable result is that whatever areas on the survey are considered to be low-scoring, the company response is to implement new policies, training, or processes that are far more annoying than any perceived complaints before.

      For example, a common complaint is "feedback", some employees feel they don't get enough feedback. First, this is incredibly ambiguous as to what this really means or if it's even really true that employees don't get enough feedback, even if some think they don't. Second, it's very possible that even if "feedback" is the lowest score on the survey, it still is easily high enough to suggest that 80+% of the employees don't consider it a problem.

      And yet, in that special MBA approach to things, whatever the lowest score is must be a problem to be focussed on. So the company keeps implementing increasingly onerous mandatory review and feedback processes. At this point we now have twice yearly reviews of personal goals, yearly 360 reviews, yearly "official" reviews from our manager. At least three "all-hands" quarterly meetings every quarter. It sometimes seems that you can't get any actual work done because of all mandatory "Let's make everyone happier" procedures that keep coming up. And many of these things are not even cheap! I've been told that 360 Reviews, for example, are actually fairly expensive.

    7. Re:Do people take these seriously? by StarvingSE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is truly another Survey of Dubious Quality (tm). If they wanted to take real measurements of retention and employee satisfaction, they would ask the top 1% of the talent at said companies. Why is Google, Microsoft, IBM, and all the other big players in the industry? Not a single one is on the list, yet they continue to attract, hire, and keep the best talent.

      There is no way job at Quicken Loans is better than Google or Microsoft by any stretch of the imagination.

      --
      I got nothin'
    8. Re:Do people take these seriously? by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is no way job at Quicken Loans is better than Google or Microsoft by any stretch of the imagination. Accurate and insightful... my bet is that the people at Google or Microsoft are too busy making new products / putting out fires to take surveys like this.
      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    9. Re:Do people take these seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like where I work, which happens to ALSO be on this list, and ALSO in the top 20.

      My favorite part of the survey that apparently scored low in my sections was "I have a best friend at work".

      Apparently not enough people had a "best friend". So we were basically told that, should the question appear on the survey again, to please lower our standard for "best friend". Really.

    10. Re:Do people take these seriously? by Venik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agree. Money is why I have a job. Don't give me a "Thank you" card or the "Employee of the month" coffee mug. I appreciate the extra attention, but let the dollars do the talking. I don't care who I work with - whites, blacks, males, females, transvestites, or hermaphrodites. If they know their stuff and do what they've been hired to do, we'll get along just fine. They can be loud, rude, ugly, and smelly. If I don't have to do their jobs for them - I will love them with all my heart.

      As to the questioners on which this and similar ratings are based - what a bunch of hogwash. I know people who spent their best years in a dead-end IT job. They desperately grab on to anything positive about their situation - like a new water filter in the lunch room coffee maker. Isn't it wonderful to work for a company that replaces water filters at least once a year? I am sure it creates a real family atmosphere.

    11. Re:Do people take these seriously? by jerryasher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who moderated the parent up? Do you have any proof that:
      a) that anonymous coward is the same anonymous coward from the grandparent?
      b) that the anonymous coward actually works for quicken loans and not say, for Countrywide or Microsoft?

      Why is the parent "5 informative" and not "5 funny?"

    12. Re:Do people take these seriously? by twiddlingbits · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you may not like the things they make but how does that invalidate they may have a Great IT department that people actually ENJOY working at? That's really really bad logic.

    13. Re:Do people take these seriously? by rossz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since Google was rated the #1 company to work for by Fortune, they only explanation for their complete absence in the Computerworld survey is Google's failure to purchase a full page ad in this months issue of the magazine.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    14. Re:Do people take these seriously? by etnu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's because this was a survey for "IT people". This means system admins and other menial technology related fields. It doesn't mean "Engineering" or the like.

    15. Re:Do people take these seriously? by Null+Nihils · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry, but I wouldn't enjoy working for a company like that.

      But then again, I don't kill kittens for fun in my spare time.

      Reminds me of a scene from Clerks:

      Blue-Collar Man: Excuse me. I don't mean to interrupt, but what were you talking about?
      Randal: The ending of Return of the Jedi.
      Dante: My friend is trying to convince me that any contractors working on the uncompleted Death Star were innocent victims when the space station was destroyed by the rebels.
      Blue-Collar Man: Well, I'm a contractor myself. I'm a roofer... (digs into pocket and produces business card) Dunn and Reddy Home Improvements. And speaking as a roofer, I can say that a roofer's personal politics come heavily into play when choosing jobs.
      Randal: Like when?
      Blue-Collar Man: Three months ago I was offered a job up in the hills. A beautiful house with tons of property. It was a simple reshingling job, but I was told that if it was finished within a day, my price would be doubled. Then I realized whose house it was.
      Dante: Whose house was it?
      Blue-Collar Man: Dominick Bambino's.
      Randal: "Babyface" Bambino? The gangster?
      Blue-Collar Man: The same. The money was right, but the risk was too big. I knew who he was, and based on that, I passed the job on to a friend of mine.
      Dante: Based on personal politics.
      Blue-Collar Man: Right. And that week, the Foresci family put a hit on Babyface's house. My friend was shot and killed. He wasn't even finished shingling.
      Randal: No way!
      Blue-Collar Man: (paying for coffee) I'm alive because I knew there were risks involved taking on that particular client. My friend wasn't so lucky. (pauses to reflect) You know, any contractor willing to work on that Death Star knew the risks. If they were killed, it was their own fault. A roofer listens to this... (taps his heart) not his wallet.

    16. Re:Do people take these seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can assure you that it was totally me.

      I swear...

    17. Re:Do people take these seriously? by wikinerd · · Score: 2, Informative

      If a company doesn't treat its customers well, there is a good chance that its employees will suffer as well.

    18. Re:Do people take these seriously? by compro01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      just because they're a pain to deal with from the outside doesn't mean it isn't fun from the inside (can't you imagine how entertaining it is to be able to be an asshole to people 8 hours a day?)

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  2. Somethings wrong... by egoproxy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was expecting to see Computerworld in that list.

  3. Drug surveys by ushering05401 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Kinda like the drug surveys we had to take in high school. They told us that all results would be anonymous... the information was only to help people understand what the 'real deal' was with teens and drugs. Then two weeks later all the kids who believed them got their lockers raided.

    Regards.

    1. Re:Drug surveys by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those were for real? I always answered that I did lots of drugs... my immature humor thought it was funnier that way.

    2. Re:Drug surveys by ushering05401 · · Score: 5, Informative

      They were for real. My ass was saved by a 2600 reader who knew I was into code.

      Your name was not required on the form, but the teachers issued specific instructions about how to hand the forms forward, but only *after* we had finished filling them out (my school had seating charts for every class). All of the forms were to be handed forward with the student in front placing their form on top of the student in back. Why should that have mattered if the results were to be anonymous?

      I thought I was fucked after I heard that. Then I got a whap on the back of the head in the hallway after class. It was the kid who sat in front of me. He called me a fuck-wad and told me he had scratched the shit out of my form.

      Other kids got expelled for telling the truth.

      After word got around they discontinued the surveys and just brought in drug sniffing dogs. Yes, I was in one of *those* school districts. Too much cash and too little brains.

      Regards.

    3. Re:Drug surveys by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seems like it was probably the most important lesson of your school years - don't trust anyone with institutional authority, if it can, it will be abused.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Drug surveys by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sorry but it has to be said... In Soviet Russia, drugs take you!

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    5. Re:Drug surveys by bladesjester · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your name was not required on the form, but the teachers issued specific instructions about how to hand the forms forward,

      That's when you "accidently" drop the forms on the floor, scattering them.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    6. Re:Drug surveys by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Still, it's disadvantageous (if you're a student who does drugs and just wants to be left alone) to respond to the surveys honestly.

      If answering "yes, I use drugs" causes the people giving the survey to spend more time or money investigating who's using drugs, making the respondent's life difficult, then there's no reason for them to respond that way.

      More generally: why should one person, who knows that their goals are diametrically opposed to someone else's, ever help that other person accomplish something, when they know it'll only come at their own expense?

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:Drug surveys by BigDogCH · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, our whole class found it quite fun to say that we smoked weed 2-3x per week, and drank pretty much every day. It should have been obvious we were lying given the amount of coke we claimed to have used (we were poor). I am quite sure that everyone in our class had fun with those surveys.........though now I know why the dare program was pushed so hard right afterwards. We had an entire DARE class, taking up an entire hour of our already watered down school day. DARE = Drug Abuse Resistance Education......and it is really lame.

      LOCAL COP: Let me summarize DARE for those of you who never suffered through it.
      Hi kids, here is a list of drugs that you should never do, never try, and squeal on anyone who offers them or uses them. Here is a list of drugs that are just as dangerous, addictive, and harmful, but they are OK to take if your doctor suggests you use them.
      THAT ONE KID IN EACH CLASS THAT THINKS ON THEIR OWN: How can we have a list of legal and illegal drugs, when both have similar lists of positive and negative results? And why is alcohol legal, when it clearly kills more people than the rest? Aren't more people killed each year by legal drugs than illegal ones?
      LOCAL COP: Quiet you! Just say NO damn-it! Have a sticker.....and eat your Ritalin!

      Hmmm, now maybe we know why the average American is popping prescription drugs like tic-tacs?

  4. The list skews to larger corporations by hellfire · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Frankly, I've always enjoyed in smaller companies, because the beauracracy is far less annoying and you can be more personable with the people in the company. They never really include those companies, because if they actually tried, they'd have thousands of companies to interview and it would take too much time. But if they really wanted a list that made sense they'd include smaller businesses. Expand the definition a little more and stop making such a big deal about being a huge corporation.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:The list skews to larger corporations by FraterNLST · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to agree, but it seems to depend on the businesses themselves. I used to work at a big comapany that felt like a small one because of the immaturity of its it department (they had only just moved from total outsourcing) and it was great fun at first. As it got bigger and tried to be more "corporate" then things went really downhill.

      However I've also worked at a smaller company that was awful to work for. The manager cared about nothing but the bottom line, employees who tried to leave were threatened and new employees were bullied into taking far less than they were worse simply because they didn't know any better.

      Now I work at what is considered a large IT company for the area and i'm having a great time. The work is interesting, my co-workers and managers know their stuff and are great people to boot.

      Size really doesn't matter, its all about the people.

      --
      Doublethink is basically the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both
    2. Re:The list skews to larger corporations by Anrego · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I find that while smaller companies can have some major advantages, they also have some major disadvantages.

      Probably the biggest disadvantage in my opinion is the lack of opportunity for advancement. If you _are_ the software development department... there really isn't a whole lot of room for career growth.

      And while some people list bureaucracy and excessive policies as one of the major disadvantages of a larger company, I find that sometimes having a standard method of doing everything kind of comforting. In a smaller company, applying for an increase in pay tends to be an awkward, nerve wracking experience.. in a larger company, there is usually some kind of application process or annual performance review in which to bring it up.

      Further, and I suppose this really depends on what you do at your company, but working at a larger company can provide a bit of comfort from knowing that you are just a small cog that at worst is going to slow down the machine a little. If you are the only programmer in a small 5 person operation, and they are depending on you to make a deadline lest they loose _the_ contract and go bankrupt (costing 4 people their jobs)... that can put a little pressure on you.

      This all being said, most of those points have an inverse advantage. Ie. being a small cog means that you don`t usually get a lot of say in what happens. Being _the_ cog can be really nice, because you pretty much have free reign in how you do things in your little corner of the office.

      Ultimately I think everyone should try to experience both environments at some point in their career.

  5. Quickenloans by z-man · · Score: 5, Funny

    From TFA:
    Why it's the best
    "Celebration galas at this online loan company are star-studded: Kid Rock performed at the 2006 holiday gala and The Black Eyed Peas were featured performers at the company's 20th anniversary party."

    Judging by that line-up of artists I wouldn't even want to work in an adjacent area!

  6. The 0th best place to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the beach, with my laptop, sipping a Corona, watching the babes.

    And then I woke up.

  7. Nothing on that list for me... by Tomy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe my standards are different, but the companies on that list don't seem very interesting.

    It reminds me many years ago ('97) when I and a coworker decided we had had enough of the company we were working for, and decided to make a top ten list of companies we wanted to work for. Both of us landed jobs with our number one choice, but our top ten lists were very different. Mine was a list of coolest companies to work for, and mostly startups (Cygnus Solutions being at the top of my list), and his were more "nicest" companies to work for (SAS being at the top of his list, they have a 35 hour work week, pianist in the cafeteria, gyms, etc).

    Perks are great and all, but if the work is not intellectually challenging, or just patience-challenging, and I'm not pushing the envelope, I'm going to be bored out of my skull and not improving my skills, which is a terrible way to spend almost one third of your life.

    Exactly what groundbreaking technologies are being developed at a loan website, besides finding new ways to get past my spam filters?

    1. Re:Nothing on that list for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only perk and benefit I want is more money. Don't try and distract me from shitty pay that has been artificially reduced by unfair injection into the workforce by foreign labor by paying me less and giving me a gym membership. Just give me more fucking money. I'm there to work. In exchange for money. It's not a fucking barter system and I'm not in kindergarten.

    2. Re:Nothing on that list for me... by Bucc5062 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      there comes a point where one discovers that a job is a means to an end, and not the means. I used to live for the next project, the cool new "thing". If you work in corporate USA that moment is so rare is is better to try for the lottery. Find somethng outside of work and life for that. Company X, the best place in the world to work, will can your ass the moment the numbers do not add up for keeping you.

      Start up a company and one day you'll experience the moment when you need to "downsize" and those that had the rose colored glasses will get them stripped off their eyes.

      I've spent 28 years in the IT industry, from mainframes, to minis, to Client Server, and what I have learned the most is that the love of a woman far outways a fucking promotion, the joy of doing something you enjoy far outways making the boss happy on Sunday fucking afternoon, that taking time for ones self has a better life expectancy then dieng a slow death for the fucking "Company".

      Best places to work for? I had two and they got sold, chewed up and turned into shit holes, so please stop thinking that dragging you're ass to a cube every day, even if they had piano playing in the lobby is going to bring some sort of satisfaction in life. Google is no better no worse then the sweat shop in china. They just give you shinier trinkets to distract you.

      Six months ago I rescued a horse from possible auction to slaughter. Today she is healthy, happy, and helping me learn to ride. The job helps me help her have a better life. That is more real, more a sense of accomplishment then pleasing some exec in an irovy tower. Piano bars, flex time, treats tossed from on high as our mouths hang open...slight of hand. To quote Mr Heston "Soylent green is Man"... Better to live outside of the job then think it will define you.

      There is not best place to work other then that which fills the soul, and makes us feel like we did goo that day. a janitor may be a king compared to most IT professionals.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    3. Re:Nothing on that list for me... by JNighthawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yay for bitterness!

      I'm sorry. I *enjoy* what I do and would be doing it in my spare time if I weren't being paid to do it. I work for a THQ studio (Volition) as a game programmer. I don't know if working at a game studio owned by THQ would be classified as corporate (THQ is *huge*, though).

      So far, I've spent about 4 months in the industry and I've loved it.

      My job is both the means and the end.

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    4. Re:Nothing on that list for me... by gatesvp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, it is a fucking barter system. You have time and skills, and they trade you currency for some combination of those. Part of the deal is them trying to give you deals where they can trade you value for less dollars than it would cost you for that same value.

      Now admitedly, the gym membership may seem like a flaky waste of money, but in the same respect so would parking spots or healthcare or dentalcare or "visioncare". How about 401k (or RRSP) matching plans? You may want more money, but if you're saving for retirement and the company is offering up to $200 / month tax-free (RRSP), then that's a way better deal than the $100 they can afford to give you otherwise.

      Of course, by your logic (all I want is more money), "perks" like telecommuting are no good. Even though you are bartering skill and time for money, you seem to have no regard for the value of either of these.

    5. Re:Nothing on that list for me... by gatesvp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So why the hell are you not doing what you love everyday? Why do you spend your days doing stuff that doesn't fill the soul? If you really love your horse, then why don't you become a professional horse trainer? Then you can spend time with her everyday.

      Sure your current job allows you to "help her have a better life.", but that doesn't mean that you couldn't give her a better life while doing something that "fills the soul". I mean, it's great to hear nuggets of wisdom like this one: "Company X, the best place in the world to work, will can your ass the moment the numbers do not add up for keeping you.", until you realize that that's pretty much how everything works out in life. (didn't take me 28 years in the field BTW) If my SO doesn't get her cut in the relationship deal she leaves, if my boss doesn't pay me enough or treat me well, I leave, if I can't carry my own weight at the company, then I get dumped, if I can't pick up the rebounds then coach benches me. It's pretty darn simple.

      So I go to a job I love doing every day. And as a direct result of the fact that I love my job I'm not worried about getting canned b/c I'll find another. Just b/c some company dumps me doesn't mean that I can't find deep spiritual enjoyment in my work. Being fired doesn't mean I'm inadequate at what I do either, it's just a wrong time/place. Heck your beloved horse is going to die someday soon, probably before you will, how's that any different than getting "downsized" from a job that you love?

      You may be a horse whisperer masquerading as an IT guy and for that you have my deepest sympathies. But I'm an IT guy and that's tattoed on my breast. It sounds really corny, but that's what I do, I'm not here to "die a slow death for some company", I'm here to throw in my 2 cents the best way I can find. I have loves outside of work, but I surprise the most people and do the most good in this world by solving and automating complex processes and problems. If I'm "dying" at a company, then I'm not really contributing as best as I can and it's time for me to go.

      So if you're pissed off at companies and the job in general after 28 years, then you're just in the wrong field or suffering some major emotional breakdown. Cash out now, take the retirement money and go train horses. I mean, isn't that what you're saving for anyways? So that you can "retire" and spend the days with your girl? So if that's where you want to be, if that's what you're good at, if that's what you're "passionate" about, then you'll find a way to make the money from working with horses. You said it yourself, this money is just a "means to an end", so why not use your means and find an end you enjoy? Why not pick a life and then make it happen instead of picking a job and then hoping that you can find a life?

    6. Re:Nothing on that list for me... by Bucc5062 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well that got a good chuckle out of me today. It was passionate. Off the mark, but passionate. I would not be 28 years in this industry if I did not have a passion for my work. I love solving problems. I find art in writing code. I am an "IT Guy" though it may not be tattooed on my breat.

      I was mainly commenting on the thought that "perks" make a better company. They help, but was makes the job a positive experience is good management, being recognized for ones effort, for helping others get the job done, and great reward in a heartfelt thank you.

      When I started I could not believe I was getting paid to do what I love. 28 years later there are still moments like that, but less and less because I have watched the shift of business from employee centric to customer centric. This translates into less consideration for the employee needs as those considerations will impact the bottom line (customers can include stock holders). Spend less, get less.

      As to horses, that I could wotk with the all the time would be wonderful. That I have the time to learn how to be a professional horse trainer, not likely. Life is trade offs, compromises as it were so I work in the IT world (somwhat jaded) and find better satisfaction of life in things outside IT. That you find the same feeling in IT is great.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    7. Re:Nothing on that list for me... by jafac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      YES.

      Last job I left;
      In my exit interview, they asked why I left, what they could do (and could they offer me more money).

      I told them that for the past 3 years, I have continually brought up the issue to my supervisors, that I need more money. Yes; I made some shitty decisions and overextended myself in certain areas - but the bottom line is, it costs x dollars to live in this area. And they just don't pay that.

      Every single time I brought it up, they wheeled out the charts and stats that said that people at my level, in my discipline, make a certain amount of money - period.

      Then I worked very, very hard, and earned an internal promotion, to a new, higher-level position. And they gave me a really crappy (IMO) increase, and said; it was HR policy that nobody in the entire company could get more than a 6 percent increase without VP-level or above approval. Even from an internal hire.

      So I worked my new job for a few months.
      Then I left.

      I got a job at another company - and with it, a 15% increase.

      So that's what I told them in my exit interview:
      I said: you can't afford me. Yes, money would have kept me - but your own HR policies say that you CAN'T get me that much. So just forget it. I have a family, I have kids, I have a house payment. I will need to save for my kids' college. I will need to save for retirement. This stuff isn't cheap.

      I believe that there is a certain myopia, among those who are coming up with pay rates and job market statistics. And I think that there are some players who are just WAY OFF. There's especially a big fuzzy grey box that they put people in, called "Systems Engineer" - and it's way too vague in terms of skill-set and competence valuation. My new employer didn't hire me as a "Systems Engineer" - my new employer hired me based on the story my resume told me. My new employer did their homework, and actually READ my resume before calling me into an interview. He knew what I would be worth, and was willing to pay it. To my former employer's detriment.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  8. PFFT by yamamushi · · Score: 4, Informative

    USAA Is on the list, and its considered one of the WORST places to work. My Company was voted #1 place to work in San Antonio, OVER USAA, and guess what? We're a TECH company (Rackspace Managed Hosting). I'm glad I don't base my career choices off of lists like these.

    --
    - Aetheral Research -
  9. Noticeably Absent... by EtherAlchemist · · Score: 3, Interesting


    ...Google. Weird. I really expected to see them.

    --
    R(k)
    1. Re:Noticeably Absent... by Odo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I work for Google, and I gotta tell you, it's a pain to have to research an answer and type up a page of results within 0.17 seconds of a user hitting the Search button. Someone help!

    2. Re:Noticeably Absent... by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I work for Google, and I gotta tell you, it's a pain to have to research an answer and type up a page of results within 0.17 seconds of a user hitting the Search button. Someone help!

      Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard? They're supposed to be faster.

      Hope this helps.

      Peter

  10. From the Best to the Worst by macaroo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I worked for a Fortune 100 company for 25 years before retiring and starting my own computer repair business. I saw this company go from the best to the worst in that quarter of a century. I was one of the lucky ones and got something from them before they imploded; a mire shadow of once an industry giant. The last several years were tough, but by then I had too much of my career invested to leave voluntarily. I am much happier now that I can dance to my own tunes.

  11. #17, Philip Morris by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hear that one of the perqs at Philip Morris is free smokes for the whole family.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:#17, Philip Morris by GreggBz · · Score: 4, Informative

      I used to work at Altria. No smokes for the whole family, only for you the employee. You scanned your badge in front of a giant vending machine with every brand they made, selected what you wanted, and out popped your ciggies, one pack a day. Also, you could smoke in your cubicle after 5pm and before 8am. Everything was nice to, like brass fixtures in the mens room and giant leather couches everywhere. Total IBM shop, only the best and most expensive.

      It was a very nice atmosphere to work in, relaxed and just challenging enough. No one made any apologies for being in the tobacco business. They had a cafeteria like a five star restaurant, with humorously extravagant meals each day; really I barely functioned after lunch. And a company store were you could get all sorts of Kraft food goodies at ridiculesly low prices. Oh, and heated sidewalks, lol.

  12. Really? by Wiarumas · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...top five retention methods are: competitive benefits; competitive salaries; work/life balance; flexible work hours; and tuition reimbursement"

    Free World of Warcraft gold is conspicuously missing from the list.

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
  13. How these surveys traditionally work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hi, we'd like to consider you for our "n best places in X to work."

    For a single fee of $5,000, we will investigate your employees opinions of the company. We're limiting the number of companies we're accepting to n so you can be sure of a place within the top n.

    For a single fee of $10,000, we will carry out a more in depth analysis of the company. In this higher tier, we're limiting it to only 0.5n entries. We're confident a more in depth analysis will reveal greater strengths of the company, ensuring it a place in the top 0.5n.

    For a fee of $25,000, we will additionally listen to executive feedback about your company. This gives us a greater insight in to your company. Whilst it would be unethical to promise a slot in the top 0.2n, this option is strictly limited and it is certainly very likely.

    Finally, for a fee of $50,000, we will send someone to your offices to gather employee feedback. Only 0.1n companies will be accepted for this most rigorous of investigations. Again, we would never imply that buying such an in depth examination would guarantee a slot in the top 0.1n but it would certainly be a very good investment. Amazingly, those who cough up the highest fee get to put on their ads that they're in the top 10 places in their field to work. Whilst there's absolutely no way *wink*wink* that they could buy such standing, the thorough level of investigation they so kindly covered the costs for ensured that their best features came out and that really helped with the win.

    This is also exactly how ClearChannel is rumored to get around "payola" claims. Instead of paying to play - which is illegal - music companies buy listener review sessions. It's pure coincidence that those who buy the most get the most airtime.
  14. Start a business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The best place to work is your own, start a business.

  15. I think I found a new correlation... by Ignignokt_the_dead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a top-tier UNIX support guy that supports a bunch of these IT groups in the list. We save their bacon when they have a "senior" moment and screw the pooch. Or our software breaks or fails. In that theater, everyone gets to earn their bones. You get to know "organizations" instead of individuals, because you are an outsider. You never get just one guy on the phone, crying in his mountain dew. The "system" may have from 3 to as many as 20 heads, all siloed in their perfect knowledge of "how it's supposed to work". This may be the first time some of them have met. On the field of desperation. The help you HAVE to provide a customer like this tells much about what they really know about "How it works". The list almost seems an upside-down chart of my most "clueless" customers to more and more competent. Really. It scared me. To Know that IT nirvana is inversely proportional to operational competence. And now somebody wants me to think that's good? My head exploded. Ya wanna know what scared me more? I was quizzed by the same rating company (ramdomly?) last week at MY company. I'm REALLY hoping this ain't a trend. It's too many years till retirement :(

  16. The best place to work in IT is from your own car by grapeape · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After being with several corporations from small local companies to fortune 500, I have found the best place to work in IT is on your own. Make some business cards, invest in a van or other vehicle with room for parts, build an overhead of replacement parts and supplies, then hit the pavement and get the word out. Signage on a vehicle can be a good way to get the word out as well. I get most of my customers via word of mouth but have more work than I can handle most of the time. What I cant handle I pass on to others I know doing the same thing. Clients are happy because they get individual attention and someone to call that they can depend on. I am happy because they treat me like im really helping them rather than as some flunky who is beneath them. The money is much better than the average IT job and with the occasional unavoidable emergency, I pretty much set my own hours. It's not for everyone, you have to be self motivated, people friendly and confident in your skills, but its well worth it.

  17. Bullshit list by r_jensen11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm all for Minneapolis, but honestly, how the hell does General Mills get on the list for Minneapolis, but they exclude other companies like Seagate? Where the hell is Honeywell? And what does General Mills do that qualifies as IT? I would imagine the Mayo Clinic would be more IT than GM, and much of a better place at that, and that's not on the list? Who's willing to place bets that these are companies that the authors' friends and families work at?

    1. Re:Bullshit list by SnowZero · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I imagine that General Mills has some computers and computer systems, and just maybe they have people to build and maintain said systems. I heard those computers all have cereal ports too. Nice perk IMO.
  18. obvious claptrap by Kooshman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is obviously a thinly researched fluff piece, considering it doesn't have National Instruments mentioned anywhere. It's been on the Forbes best 100 places to work list for eight years running. It's happy to send its employees to the University of Texas for additional education, and actively encourages its employees to move around within the company.

  19. Quicken CEO & Cavs... by southpolesammy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know many (most?) Slashdotters don't follow sports to any large degree, however this one jumped out at me. From within TFA:

    [Quicken Loans] founder Dan Gilbert, who also owns the NBA's Cleveland Cavaliers, invites employees to travel to Cleveland to see the team in action via the Cavs Express.

    Ummm....the company is headquartered in Livonia, Michigan -- big-time Detroit Pistons territory. Might as well offer your employees tickets to see the Ohio State Buckeyes or Chicago Bulls -- equally hated rivals of Michigan sports fans...

    [ObDisclaimer -- I'm a big Ohio State fan...give me the tickets!]

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  20. Best place to work in IT by MrCopilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Home.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  21. The White House by ring-eldest · · Score: 4, Funny

    The current administration provides the best IT jobs... All you have to do is delete a few emails a day!

  22. Work/Life Balance by toleraen · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can't speak for quicken specifically, but at my job they thoroughly sell this about working there. It basically comes down to flexible hours. As long as you get your 40 in, its all good. Then again my company is more engineering than IT, so who knows.

  23. What they're not accounting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work for a top-tier IT consulting firm, and while my company's not on the list (but all of our competitors, except our nemesis, IBM, made the list), I've actually worked on client projects in nine of the companies on the list. Save for one of the companies, I could not believe that these were the best IT companies to work for. Then I re-read the criteria -- competitive salaries, work/life balance, flexible work hours, and tuition reimbursement -- then it all made sense. A lot of these companies are where the driftwood wash ashore and hang out until they catch a bigger wave out, or just rot away being happy deadwood.

    Let me explain.

    My current client's IT department (in top 30 on the list) has one of the lowest morale I've seen. Projects are rarely ever delivered as promised, and even if they hobble across the finish line, the solutions are often half-baked and incur undue additions to the already ridiculously heavy production support cost. Business runs the show, but are increasingly dissatisfied with IT's delivery (why does it cost so much?) and rely more and more on consultants or "heros" to get things done. Good, standard processes erode away and management throws on more and more bureaucracy onto the eroding base, thinking that having three Project Managers on a project will get things delivered faster. The "heroes" either turn into lawless cowboys that run the show however they like, or if they're really actually competent and sharp, leave on the first train out that offer them better positions. The deadwood never drift out (company's pride is that they never let people go), so what you get over the years is accumulation of deadwood.

    So let's go back to the criteria: competitive salaries, work/life balance, flexible work hours, and tuition reimbursement. This spells, "overpaid staff that leave at 5 on-the-dot, working from home on random days, minimal effort on the job, steady paycheck, perhaps get an MBA or certifications to get even better paid." Meets all the criteria, but I would NOT work here. What they didn't figure into the equation were "challenging and interesting work" and "solid mentoring and career development."

  24. Re:This is not a shock to me. by caspper69 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Right, but Quicken Loans is not owned by Intuit anymore. The gentleman that founded the company (originally Rock Financial), Dan Gilbert, bought the company back from Intuit (they may still hold a small stake) for $375 million a few years back. He also owns the Cleveland Cavaliers. Quicken Loans still does business as Rock Financial in Michigan, and is one of the largest sponsors of the Detroit Pistons. Mr. Gilbert is also a graduate of my alma mater, Michigan State.

  25. Survey says: 80% of software engineers... by patio11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... believe they are in the top 1% of the talent at their company.

    For what its worth, I'm in the other 20%. I have no illusions that I am the best hacker I've ever met, or even the 47th best. I produce code which, on a great day, has bits of brilliance, on a good day, is solid and worksmanlike, and on a bad day is junk which I'll have to replace the next day... just like almost every other programmer I have ever met.

  26. How about joy? by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but the most important ranking criteria is missing. How about working on a product that, in itself, gives you joy? Let's face facts. Most of us spend the best part of waking hours, at least 5 of 7 days per week, pouring all available energy into this job. If you don't love it and you don't have an emotional alignment with the product then that effort is unhealthy for you.

  27. How about setting up on your own? How About China? by Bit-Simple · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes I know this about companies and great working environments, but isn't one of the great joys of I.T. the daily challenges that you have to face? Geeks want to learn new geeky things, for many of us it is why we do the job we have chosen. If an employer can't provide the challenges you need to get your daily fix then all a trays of blue M&Ms in the world won't fix that.

    I was getting those challenges for many years for a good company back in the UK, they also treated us pretty well. But problems/projects started getting a bit samey. So I took a career break off to teach English in China for a year, and ended up starting an IT company up there.

    Now it is fair to say that the perks I give myself are much less impressive than I got in the past. But I can't complain that things are boring. I see every possible technology and industrial sector coming in through the door, from customers all over the world. I have to be lead consultant, I have to recruit and train people, I can offer pretty good local salaries and pick the cream of local graduates.

    I also find that people here are pretty fun to work with, once you get over the language problems.

    Would I go back to the old life? The workload is high but so are the benefits in terms of lifestyle, sense of adventure, the feeling of being an individual, so the trade off remains in favor of staying here.

    I am not exactly recommending that everyone move to China to start their own company, but I am saying that in choosing an employer you should look at the bigger picture. Murals on the walls may make things more pretty but I you don't get a sense of accomplishment and purpose from what you are doing, then you are still just working for the man?

  28. Ah, shuddup by bryan1945 · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least ya all got jobs.

    Cranky guy

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  29. Allow me to disagree. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am willing to take a cut on my pay for many other factors: location, atmosphere of the area where the office is (it really weighs you down to go to the office day in day out in the middle of an industrial dump or a neighborhood with no amenities or unsafe), kind of work.

    The money does a lot of the talking, but should by no means be the only thing whispering on you ear.

    I do agree about not caring about who people I work with, but I don't agree about working with unpleasant people. If there is somebody rude, loud or smelly either they change or one of us has to go. As simple as that (and since I am more senior, the few times this has happened it wasn't me doing the walking. Morale for you newbies: be polite, take a shower every day and you'll have the old farts in your side).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  30. Re:Breaking IT news: by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just pooped my cute little pants. It's odd; PurifyYourMind is a relatively established account that has gone from being a normal poster to concentrating on blatant repetition trolls.

    It's possible that they're experimenting with a new alternative fuel source; burning karma.
    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  31. Define IT by jshriverWVU · · Score: 2, Insightful
    When I started college there was Computer Science who where mainly programmers dealing with the soft side of the spectrum, and computer engineers that dealt with the hard side.

    Seems around 2000/2001 the term IT came about. What is it? I'm amazed Google wasn't #1, but I'm guessing it's more of a Computer Science company rather than IT. At least around here IT tends to mean networking, maintenance, basically to keep systems running without actually creating any software or hardware that does the jobs. So it IT == computer maintenance person?