Slashdot Mirror


Whirling Twirling Propeller Trike

hankmt writes "A student at MIT has built a tricycle that applies force to a giant rear fan, instead of directly to the wheels. The effect...well, it's best to look for yourself, but it would be pretty useful on the post-apocalyptic roads of the Australian Outback. The blades of the trike even have built in LED lights which display colored patterns...and also warn pedestrians of their impending deaths."

136 comments

  1. OSHA wouldn't like that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  2. If this trike concept became popular by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    There would be a lot more room to ride on Multi-Use Paths...

    1. Re:If this trike concept became popular by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      You've got a whirling blade of death there, you can make your own room.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
  3. Crazy by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Those crazy MIT guys are lucky that Massachusetts just made health insurance mandatory!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's really crazy, is that when someone at MIT takes a brown shit - it's front page news as a golden egg. :/

  4. First prize for impracticality by trolltalk.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the looks of it after watching the vide, its terrible at transforming pedal energy into forward motion, and I'd really hate to see what would happen in any sort of wind. At least a "real bike" you can get off and walk. Add bird strikes to the blades, the excess width, etc., and you've got a real problem.

    Unless,of course, you're Wiley Coyote, and ride it off a cliff - you could autogyro down, I guess.

    1. Re:First prize for impracticality by Speare · · Score: 1

      I don't think the guy is trying to transform the energy debate, he just thought it would be fun. It reminded me of the bicycle in Miyazaki's "Castle in the Sky" (aka Laputa). And by the way, that's "Wile E. Coyote".

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:First prize for impracticality by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 4, Informative

      The for the record, it's 'kiki's delivery service' that has the bicycle!

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    3. Re:First prize for impracticality by timeOday · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh well, millions of people per year spend good money on devices that do nothing *but* waste energy, such as elliptical machines, treadmills, and exercycles. And you can't even hack people to pieces with those.

    4. Re:First prize for impracticality by More_Cowbell · · Score: 1
      autogyro down?

      Did you ever actually watch the cartoon?? if there is ONE thing Wile E. Coyote excelled at, it was falling off the cliff!

      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    5. Re:First prize for impracticality by trolltalk.com · · Score: 4, Funny

      But in this case, he'd autogyro down, with that big sh*t-eating grin on his face, holding up a sign saying "PHEW!" and just as he gets to ground level - BAM! a truck driven by the RoadRunner runs into him and creams him.

    6. Re:First prize for impracticality by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Actually the original Bowflex exercise machine used to do a good job at hacking people to pieces...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    7. Re:First prize for impracticality by hszp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Disclaimer: I would not want to pedal that sh!t uphill under any circumstances.

      But it's simply great. How many of you would have thought such speed was possible in such an unefficient way? Sure: he could be three times as fast with an everyday ( "run-off-the-mill"? ) bike, but that's only better by a factor of 3.

      Add a big helium-filled balloon to the thing and next thing you see he's flying (don't try this at home kids, you're not coming down the way you think you would).
      Or build something similar for a glider plane (for braking, of course =))

      Under certain circumstances, a personal carrier like this can prove to be the most efficient way of transportation. Where drag-force exceeds gravitational force by some constant. So: moon-buggy - no, underwater-vehicle - maybe, somethingcompletelydifferent - yes.

      Catch my drift?

    8. Re:First prize for impracticality by pmac2322 · · Score: 1

      In any case, it doesn't use gas, elecricity, biodiesel, or any other fuel. IMHO, this is pretty cool, if he gets his safety aspects together, and works on gear drive, it could be a neat little invention that he might be able to sell. It seems like something that Leonardo would have drawn plans for. Anybody else think so?

    9. Re:First prize for impracticality by barry99705 · · Score: 1

      Unless the blades are variable pitch, he ain't even going to autogyro down. The way it works is to unclutch the rotor from the engine, the airflow spins the rotor up. At the correct time, i.e. right before you pancake into the ground, you pull up on the collective. That increases the pitch of the blades which creates more lift. The down side of this is that it slows down the rotor.

    10. Re:First prize for impracticality by tylernt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gyroplanes (or gyrocopters, if you wish) auto-rotate all the time and can still do a zero-roll landing without a collective. The rotor speed is controlled by the angle of attack to the relative wind so you come in at speed and then flare at the last moment... not that that would really help a guy going down in this trike though, as he would have no control surfaces.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    11. Re:First prize for impracticality by barry99705 · · Score: 1

      See this thread isn't completely useless. I just learned something new. :)

    12. Re:First prize for impracticality by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

      The thing has no gears. I bet it would be much more effective if it had shimano gears, and 5x more dangerous!

    13. Re:First prize for impracticality by E++99 · · Score: 1

      In any case, it doesn't use gas, elecricity, biodiesel, or any other fuel. IMHO, this is pretty cool, if he gets his safety aspects together, and works on gear drive, it could be a neat little invention that he might be able to sell. It seems like something that Leonardo would have drawn plans for. Anybody else think so?

      If you mean DiCaprio, absolutely. Da Vinci, OTOH, would probably have given his right arm to have invented the internal combustion engine. In any case, he was smart enough to realize that traction with the ground would be far more efficient, WITHOUT being necessarily noisier -- claims to the contrary notwithstanding. I can only imagine how people DENIED entrance to MIT must be feeling right now.
    14. Re:First prize for impracticality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing has no gears. I bet it would be much more effective if it had shimano gears, and 5x more dangerous!

      Look closer when he adds the propeller blades.

    15. Re:First prize for impracticality by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Maybe he needs to mount this to a lawn chair tied to a bunch of weather balloons. Don't forget the BB gun.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  5. No science by tsa · · Score: 1

    This isn't science, this is technology. Very cool machine though; I especially like the complete lack of any safety measures concerning the big spinning blades! Can I hire that thing to get rid of my evil enemy Mr. Naughty?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:No science by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can I hire that thing to get rid of my evil enemy Mr. Naughty? Well, Hans Reiser is otherwise occupied, so yeah, why not go with Plan B?

      (cue the smell of burning karma courtesy of humorless mods)...
    2. Re:No science by tsa · · Score: 1

      You got me laughing!

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:No science by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      This is the type of thing that should have been done by M5 Industries (the company behind Mythbusters) like years ago. :-)

  6. Imagine a beowulf ... oh .... by yfarren · · Score: 1

    forget it....

    1. Re:Imagine a beowulf ... oh .... by Tatisimo · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our air-propelled tricycle riding overlords.

      --
      Give Kashyyyk back to the Wookies
    2. Re:Imagine a beowulf ... oh .... by yfarren · · Score: 1

      you mean Hitler?

    3. Re:Imagine a beowulf ... oh .... by yfarren · · Score: 1

      Sorry, wrong article...

    4. Re:Imagine a beowulf ... oh .... by erbmjw · · Score: 1

      "powered by these" .... that's what you were trying to say, right?

  7. The big question is why... by scatters · · Score: 1

    It should be pretty obvious that the effeciency of a propeller driven bike is way less than a bike driven by it's wheel, particularly one with multiple gear ratios. Just watch the video, the guy is pedalling pretty damn hard for not much speed (maybe he talks about that later in the video, I got bored half way through...)

    I guess this proves that just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should.

    --
    A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
    1. Re:The big question is why... by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Maybe he wants to use those blades to display '3-D' images with his LEDs?

      I am not sure if this is what he does, maybe not, since it isn't that easy to figure out how to wire up enough LEDs in a line and update those based on their angular position. A mechanical engineering undergrad that can use microcontrollers?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  8. Re:Dumbass Rolled Up Pant Leg by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know what also is funny? The way he rolls up one of his pant legs to be 'in style.' Real original, is he an MIT gangsta?

    Actually, the bike pulls to the right. So by rolling up his right pant leg that side creates less drag, which helps trim the bike back to the left.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  9. As impractical as the Bede fan car by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 1

    This thing couldn't even get started on an uphill, or with more than a light breeze for a headwind. Forget climbing out of a pothole.

    It's a very clever toy, nothing more.

    1. Re:As impractical as the Bede fan car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is more. They have discovered things such as how large and fast the blades have to be, what sort of speeds you can expect to attain, how difficult hill starts are; all sorts of information.

  10. Pfft.... by Digitus1337 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That thing blows.

    1. Re:Pfft.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Technically, half of it sucks.

    2. Re:Pfft.... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      It slices! It dices!

  11. Re:Dumbass Rolled Up Pant Leg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seriously? He rolled it up so it won't get caught in the chain.

  12. Many bicycle riders do this by benhocking · · Score: 5, Informative

    It helps keep the pants leg from getting caught in the chain. Don't let that get in the way of your "gangsta" knowledge, however.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 1

      It makes you wonder if any of these posters ever rode a bicycle with long pants. As usual, there's nothing quite like a non-application of Occam's Razor. Example: "My car won't start! Rogue clowns from Venus must have stolen my spark plugs!"

      Why he/she interpreted the rolled up pants leg as the MIT guy trying to be "gangsta"is beyond me. For crap's sake, it isn't even "gangsta" anymore. LL Cool J popularized that in the late 80s. Since it is a covert form of communication, by definition if suburban white folks know about it, it's passe in the hood. For example, teaching your two-year-old to "hit the rock" is probably not going to get you any street cred down on MLK boulevard.

    2. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by stdarg · · Score: 1

      I've heard that before but I just don't get it. I've ridden bikes my whole life without rolling up my pants and I've never had a chain accident. Is this unique to "high performance" bikes or something?

    3. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by fbartho · · Score: 0

      Hold on a sec, see, most consumer bikes I saw until I was 20 all came with chain guards. Even serious Trek mountain bikes had these plastic disks on the outside of the gears that prevented your pants leg from getting casually covered in grease, or actually caught in the gears and chain. It wasn't until a spectacular highspeed accident I had, that involved a large flat clear sidewalk with no obstacles in sight, a broken laptop bag strap, and a front flip or two, that I had that plastic disk broken away. The bike lives again through a good deal of unbending and rebalancing, but I found out that most fully assembled bikes come with that disk, however every single gear stack has slightly different attachments, size, etc and because of that, none of the 3 bike shops I visited could offer me any other solution than to: a) buy a new gearset (possibly with the bike) b) roll up my pants leg c) use a pants strap -- a goofy neon yellow reflector attached piece of velcro I get to carry with me whenever I don't want to damage my clothes while riding my bike. The manufacturers don't have a standard attachment or two for those disks (wtf) so they just don't ship them without the bike. Anyways, until that point I would have just thought the guy was nuts trying to be in some weird pseudo style, so I'm not surprised he [gp] hasn't been in contact with a bike with an exposed chain+gearset, and so might not know to expect that explanation.

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    4. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by Fusen · · Score: 1

      I've had bikes that have ranged from $1500 to $300 and all of them had the same issue, except the very few that used gear guards which are basically just plastic circular plates put between the leg and gear :P I'm currently wearing track suit bottoms that are spotlessly clean on the right leg and have about 3 years worth of bike grease on the left leg which won't come out no matter how you wash them. I've only ever ripped around 2-3 pairs of trousers and it usually happens when the wind is blowing your trouser legs into the gears. Where as the oil and crap stuck to the gears is transferred to pretty much any set of trousers I wear when cycling :/

    5. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Happened to me twice when I was a kid in the 80's. I took the chain guard off my little Huffy because I thought it looked stupid. I was going slow both times it happened so I didn't wreck that badly, but I had a friend who was going about 20 mph when it happened to him on a nice hot asphalt road. There's something to be said for using your own skin as an ablative braking device...ouch!

    6. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Even serious Trek mountain bikes had these plastic disks on the outside of the gears "Serious" mountain bikes most certainly DO NOT have plastic chainguards. They'd just break the first time you ride over a log, and possibly get the broken bits jammed in the chain. Some of them have metal chainguards, but those are to protect the outer chainring from impact, not to keep your pants out of the chain (mountain bikers don't care about getting dirty, anyway).
    7. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      Your pants are clean on the right leg but greasy on the left? Either you have a unique bike with the drivetrain on the left, or you sit on your bike facing backwards.

    8. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your last name happens to rhyme with "hoop" as in basketball hoop, then I'm gonna have to find you and kick your ass....

    9. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by Scoldog · · Score: 1

      It helps keep the pants leg from getting caught in the chain. Don't let that get in the way of your "gangsta" knowledge, however.

      Considering where that chain is running, I'd say his pants legs are on the bottom of the list of things to worry about being caught in the chain.
      --
      This space for rent
    10. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by Fusen · · Score: 1

      oops! I thought I'd wrote it the other way around :P

    11. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by vivtho · · Score: 1

      Or he's wearing his pants on back to front!

    12. Re:Many bicycle riders do this by austinpoet · · Score: 1

      you've played backsie-frontsie before I see!

  13. I can't believe Slashdot. by pclminion · · Score: 5, Funny

    This guy builds a trike with great glowing, whirling blades of death on the back and actually manages to ride it around for a while without getting shipped to Gitmo, and people just complain how it's not practical?

    You people fail utterly at nerd-dom.

    1. Re:I can't believe Slashdot. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      It's impending DOOM dammit.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    2. Re:I can't believe Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean impending DNF?

  14. Looks like something for Burning Man by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Burning Man crowd likes stuff like that. It's too late for this year's Department of Mutant Vehicles registration, though.

    By playa standards, this is unambitious. Check out the Neverwas Haul, a steam-powered 3-story Victorian house on wheels that moves under its own power.

    1. Re:Looks like something for Burning Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw the DMV. It's pedal powered. They've got no jurisdiction.

    2. Re: Looks like something for Burning Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The Burning Man "Department of Mutant Vehicles" doesn't need to get involved because it's not a motor vehicle; so I'll be keeping my eyes out for the big, glowing, spinning fan blades of certain death/concussion/brokenarms.

      Also: the Neverwas Haul, while very cool to look at, was not self-powered. It was towed by a steam tractor (which is still pretty cool). Perhaps they've modified it since last year and, if so, I hope to see it out on the playa again.

  15. Position of the chain... by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1

    Look at where the chain is... What if he hit a pebble or something and flew forward?

  16. Um by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    You noticed he's walking it?

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should watch the video where he actually rides it?

  17. Reminds me of a pilot... by iknownuttin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Actually, the bike pulls to the right. So by rolling up his right pant leg that side creates less drag, which helps trim the bike back to the left.

    I once knew a pilot for parachutists and he would trim the plane so well that all he did to turn was to lean in the direction he wanted to go. I believe it was a C172 or something small like that.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
  18. Fan cage? by dfay · · Score: 1

    It seems like if he build a simple lightweight fan cage, he'd probably solve most of the problems with unhappy police or others. It also could save him money and trouble if he ever tips over, cuts a corner too close, hits a bird, etc. I'm sure fiberglass over foam wouldn't hold up too well to a sudden interruption.

    That said, it's still pretty cool. I wonder how it compares to normal bicycle drive for efficiency.

    1. Re:Fan cage? by neuro.slug · · Score: 1

      A regular bike is much, much, much more efficient. I don't know exactly how much without a wattage output vs. distance measurement, but there's no way this could be anywhere as efficient as a normal bike.

      However, it is really awesome. :)

    2. Re:Fan cage? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Weight! If he tips over the blades should be able to support their portion of the bikes' weight - the operator simply falls out. Fiberglass is rediculously easy to repair. An enclosure for the fan would probably increase the weight of the bike by 20% or more if it was at all load bearing.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Fan cage? by orlanz · · Score: 1

      The fiberglass over foam actually holds up pretty well. It may crack, but won't break off into pieces that go flying all over the place (if it was going fast enough to do that, then it would be making a ruckus like an airplane propeller).

      And it is probably far more inefficient than a normal bicycle. Constantly pulling air from in front of you faster than it is flying by your whole vehicle in order to create thrust has to be less efficient.

      Also, bicycling is the most efficient mode of transport there is. More efficient than walking/running on two or four legs. The thing that runs these three modes is the most efficient, flexible engine we have at our disposal; the human body. What puts the bike ahead is the terrain. Legs are designed for multiple terrains and thus aren't optimized to any one. Bikes on the other hand; well if you know your physics, it doesn't get much simpler than a wheel rolling over a flat surface.

      I could go on with the inertia involved and such, but I think I got the point across. Google it, its fun stuff.

    4. Re:Fan cage? by bobscealy · · Score: 1

      I'm sure fiberglass over foam wouldn't hold up too well to a sudden interruption.

      You have never been smashed on the head by your surfboard, have you?

  19. Not technology either... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Art maybe.

  20. Miyazaki did it first... by Arctech · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or at least drew it first in Kiki's Delivery Service.

  21. If it comes with a hands free iphone kit by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    I'll take one

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  22. OK by ewhenn · · Score: 0

    From the article title I was wondering what would make it Slashdot worthy. Sadly, after reading it, I confirmed that my suspicions were true - it's essentially a large fan on the back of a tricycle. Nothing groundbreaking or earth shattering about it. In fact, it is way less efficient than a normal tricycle. Also, call me crazy - but I don't feel comfortable with large unshielded fans behind my head.

    1. Re:OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, call me crazy - but I don't feel comfortable with large unshielded fans behind my head. Well what do you know, OMGPONIES!!! -did- increase the number of 12-year-old girls posting!
    2. Re:OK by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      Seeing as he is studying at MIT, riding around on the public road with an unducted fan, could almost be considered criminal. That being said ... throw in some blade pitch control and proper gearing (without the chain) and I would want one. In red please.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    3. Re:OK by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      It depends. If he took the time to optimize the fan blades (that's a fun aerospace problem), that would be cool. Especially if he had the ability to feather the blades. He obviously also rigged gearing in an interesting way (watch the video). Maybe not revolutionary, but interesting.

      Far more interesting than the stupid computer 'hacks' that show up here all the time, which take little skill or imagination to pull off.

  23. Brakes? by colfer · · Score: 1

    Go slow, use legs.

    1. Re:Brakes? by mcarp · · Score: 1

      well if he REALLY needs breaks he can simply turn the fan in reverse you imbeciles. altho at the speeds he's traveling i doubt breaks are much of a concern. its just cool ok?

      if anybody wonders why he built it then look at your stupid case mods.

    2. Re:Brakes? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      That's the next step of the project - being able to put the prop into beta. Either that or thrust reverser buckets!

    3. Re:Brakes? by diskis · · Score: 1

      You ever heard about inertia? Stopping and reversing the blades requires a lot of energy. I learned the concept of inertia when I got my first gearless tricycle at the age of 3, and nearly broke my leg when suddenly trying to brake and the pedals kept on turning.

    4. Re:Brakes? by invisik · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps a small parachute?

      --
      http://www.invisik.com
    5. Re:Brakes? by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      Here's a simple test for you. Try driving your car at about 20 km's an hour... and instantly jamming it into reverse. Those gears that are now lying on the road behind you? That'd be what's left of your knees if you tried the same thing on the bike.

      I'm sure it'd be easy to have a hand-brake to lock the rear tires, and just slide to a stop that way... or perhaps a disk-brake system for the spinning fan itself... but simply attempting to reverse the blades... being helped along with movement mind you by the air passing over them... isn't going to happen without either the chain, the gears, or your legs breaking first.

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    6. Re:Brakes? by Almenius · · Score: 1

      It might be a fixed gear, so all he would have to do to slow the blades is pedal slower or stop pedaling all together to stop the blades.

      --
      Oh no, not again.
    7. Re:Brakes? by ifishfortorque · · Score: 1

      You just put your feet down on the ground. If you pedal backwards, the chain falls off.

  24. Re:Reminds me of a pilot... by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only old Koreans would lean to turn a C172. It's all the rage now to do it in an Antonov, n00bs maybe can get away with a Starlifter

  25. But is it linear with speed? by colfer · · Score: 1

    Are these fan-driven things any better once they get going at a good speed? Compared to a traditional bike, you lose the drag of the drive train, if there is any. But the big advantage would be if you could get the wheels off the ground. But I don't see how disconnecting the chain from the wheels allows enough design freedom to improve the aerodynamics much.

    1. Re:But is it linear with speed? by cannon+fodder+0109 · · Score: 1

      Compared to a traditional bike, you lose the drag of the drive train

      In which case, what does the rider of the propeller trike use to translate pedel rotations into fan rotations?

      I guess it would be a drivetrain, which will have similar bend/straighten frictional losses in the chain compared to a regular bike.
      --
      Pick up the bread knife and carve your way into forensic history
    2. Re:But is it linear with speed? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Compared to a traditional bike, you lose the drag of the drive train, if there is any. There isn't. Not appreciably, anyway. And this thing's frontal area is monstrous. This thing's big advantage is its whirly choppy blades of doom.
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  26. Brakes? by invisik · · Score: 1

    Anyone see any brakes on the thing? Or does the driver just start blowing air out of their mouth forward?

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
  27. Re:Dumbass Rolled Up Pant Leg by rrosales · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe the reason why he pulled his right pants leg is so that it doesn't get caught in the gears.

  28. LED images? by Eevee · · Score: 1

    Already been done. Go to Hokey Spokes and take a look at the demo video.

    1. Re:LED images? by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Great link, thanks. I did think he might try something along these lines since the rotation plane is actually more suitable for displaying it to traffic (perpendicular to the road and would work when the bike is stationary or moving slowly). Too bad TFA is not saying what exactly he does with the LEDs.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  29. Just one word by niceone · · Score: 1

    Cool.

  30. "durr, they jump out of the way even..." by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (from the video) "...and they jump out of the way even if they're 20 feet away."

    That's pretty smart on their part. Pay close, careful attention to how he restrains these spinning blades: A FUCKING PIPE CLAMP.

    Maybe if he's so smart with matlab, he can work out the pulling force at a few hundred RPMs on those blades, frighten himself, and put a bolt through the blade and hub shaft.

    Also, the design of the frame is pretty sketchy, with no bracing; he's relying purely on the static-load-bearing capacity of the tubing and his welds. If he collides with anything, the frame is going to come apart, and he stands a good chance of getting a chromalloy chest transplant.

    1. Re:"durr, they jump out of the way even..." by brycef · · Score: 1

      They are not even pipe clamps. They are hose clamps. YIKES!!!

    2. Re:"durr, they jump out of the way even..." by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      Given his complete disregard for safety, I could care less if he impales himself. I'd be more concerned of the blades breaking off and slicing through the air towards some poor bastards out for a walk in the area. Maybe if he finds himself with only one lung or a colostomy bag, he might thing twice before making some dumbass murdercycle again :P

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    3. Re:"durr, they jump out of the way even..." by ifishfortorque · · Score: 1

      There are metal safety wires that go across the hub between opposing pairs of blades; even if the hose clamps come off, the blades will just come out a little and wobble.

  31. I'm not so sure about this. by PPH · · Score: 1

    Hwever, adapting the LEDs to beanie propellors could be cool.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:I'm not so sure about this. by Loligo · · Score: 1


      On the upside, you wouldn't have to pedal nearly as fast for a little tiny beanie propellor.

      On the downside, you'd have to look down for people to see if it made a cool pattern.

      On the unrealistic expectations side, if you could pedal really really fast and had a strong chin strap, you could fly around the room.

  32. Fan or Propeller? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's no fan. Contrary to the OP's mangling of the English language, it's a propeller. At least the MITers know the diff.

  33. Research Funded By by florescent_beige · · Score: 1

    The American Society of Civil Lawyers "Suing The Pants Off^w^w^w Everybody Since 1969"

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
    1. Re:Research Funded By by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Well, he has lost one pant leg after all!

  34. MIT press.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that any douche from MIT who makes something completely, utterly useless.. gets on slashdot?

  35. It also depends on how wide trousers are at ankle by blorg · · Score: 1

    ...I know I've ripped wide-ankled trousers more than once because I didn't roll them up or use clips. So yes, absolutely, it is a risk. An alternative is to tuck the trouser bottoms into your socks. I can only presume that people who don't see the need exclusively wear narrow-ankled trousers (or don't cycle much!)

  36. Re:Fan cage? Fully enclosed... by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm, if he fully encloses the fan and adds a vacuum pump, then the fan will spin much easier and his forward speed will be pretty much the same...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  37. Twirly rotors, that's nice by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    The real question: can you use it to decapitate zombies? Because if not, phbbt, don't waste my time.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  38. MIT Project List..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    1. Propeller-powered tricycle. -DONE-
    2. Button to order pizzas in an emergency. -DONE-
    3. Empty Bathroom Stall internet alert system. -DONE-
    4. Sledgehammer/Bowling Pin sharpener.
    5. Validating/Confirming Scientology.
    6. Wind Turbines for delivering green power to moon bases.
    7. Candle powered gasoline pump, for pumping gas during power outages.
    8. Knee pads so people can chew gum safely while they walk.
    9. Submarine with a screen door.
    10. Solar Powered flashlight.
    11. Bathroom Webcams.

    One would think that with the level of intellect those students have, they would be able to differentiate between an elementary school science project/unnecessarily hazardous/useless/pointless project and an innovative/useful project.

    And people said I wasted my time in my middle school Spanish class drawing up a simpler, more efficient RTG.....

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    1. Re:MIT Project List..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solar powered flashlights work great.

    2. Re:MIT Project List..... by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      I suppose that's a passable list, at least after that guy from Duke stole the beer-launching fridge. I know that there are a great many people who are interested in the bathroom webcams, especially if they are small and hard to detect.

      With a little more seriousness, a material that allows air to pass at 1 atmosphere of pressure but doesn't allow water to pass regardless of pressure would be pretty cool.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    3. Re:MIT Project List..... by indigoid · · Score: 1

      Solar-powered flashlights do exist, in fact they are becoming pretty widely available in Australia. Charge in daytime, use at night

      --
      P-plate adventurer
  39. It had to be said... by dinther · · Score: 1

    "Whirling Twirling Propeller sTrike"

  40. Re:Dumbass Rolled Up Pant Leg by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

    Maybe his mom got gunned down during a meth lab robbery by the local Knitting Devils gang

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  41. Re:Only in MA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And MA is the only state with "mandatory" health insurance.

  42. Very Cutesy. Would like to have one, but.... by supertsaar · · Score: 1

    Did you all forget about the Gossamer Albatross?

    --
    The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
  43. From TFA.... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I spend a month a year working on a commercial fishing boat with a loud diesel engine, and the greatest sound in the world is to hear it turn off," says Damon Vander Lind, the creator of a soothingly quiet trike"

    As opposed to a normal trike, which operates with ear-shattering volume?

    --
    -Styopa
  44. Giant Blade of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if I should be impressed by a machine that replaces the simple act of directly driving the wheels via pedaling and inserts what seems to be a less efficient giant, decapitating fan blade.

  45. Re:Dumbass Rolled Up Pant Leg by colmore · · Score: 1

    dress and fashion are inherently silly no matter how you slice it. some people like playing with it, some people just wear whatever everyone else is wearing.

    the "dumbasses" are the people who let it bother them to any great degree.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  46. See the Dog-powered one! by rapidweather · · Score: 1

    I looked through the other entries besides the "winning" propeller bike, the last one being a "Dog-powered" scooter. They have a large frisky dog hooked up to it, on the side, so the driver can steer the scooter, rather than give commands to the dog. Looks ok, if we can use dogs to power sleds, then this one would do also. Only problem is when the dog goes after a cat, then you are in for a wild ride.

  47. In other news... by jd · · Score: 1

    ...the Department of Defence has just announced the purchase of 10,000 tricycles of doom, to be issued to Iraqi troops without any other form of ammunition.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:In other news... by mikael · · Score: 1

      They already have the Ford Pickup truck of Doom, and the GMC Truck of Doom, so a tricycle of doom won't be out place.

      Do wings come extra?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  48. And we have to ask... by martin_henry · · Score: 1

    ...can he control it with Linux?

    --
    www.purevolume.com/martyd
  49. Prior art. by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Uh, yeah - this was about a year of Bryan Allen, Paul, Tyler, and Parker MacCready's time before the Gossamer Condor left the ground.

    Please tell me 2.0 will have a cage around the fan.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  50. My Question by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Could one upend the propeller,add a tail rotor and hope to achieve flight?
    Would a more dramatic gearing be required/probable?
    Was Davinci on to something?
    Wouldn't it be a kick to see the inevitable extreme sports tricks attempted on one?
    (Wildly dangerous for the public,it would probably be distributed as plans on the net)
    Imagine this in the general publics hands and imagine the chaos and fun.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  51. Re:Dumbass Rolled Up Pant Leg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what also is funny? The way he rolls up one of his pant legs to be 'in style.' Real original, is he an MIT gangsta?

    You've never ridden a bike, have you? The chain is on the right side of the frame. If you commute regularly and don't roll your right pant leg up, then it will get a really nice grease stain pretty quickly. Once in a while, a leg can get caught in the chain, which very quickly ruins a pair of pants. Look around, and you'll see many bicyclists with one leg rolled up. It's not for style.

  52. Nice by flink · · Score: 1

    He should totally join SCUL.

  53. One word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hill.

  54. Fuel by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    The fuel it uses is the cheeseburger you had for lunch.

    --

    +++ATH0
  55. i have an idea to improve efficiency by dario_moreno · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't this genius invert the propeller and add a sail in front of the bike ? It would surely be even more efficient...

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
  56. Beaten to it by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

    They made motor powered versions on Scrapheap Challenge a while back.

  57. Now this is an idea... by Photonic+Shadow · · Score: 1

    1.) Remove the wheels 2.) Attach to jon boat 3.) Haul to Everglades 4.) Advertise to eco-tourist as Everglades rickshaw 5.) Profit!!!!$$$$$!!!! PH

  58. Do you really need to go to MIT to invent this?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow an air driven tri-cycle thats bloody impressive... (rolleyes)

    Someone get this kid a noble prize STAT!

  59. He's not done by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

    Not by a long shot. He still needs to attach wings, a tail boom and a vertical and horizontal stabilizer. Presto Chango - the flying bicycle.

  60. Re:Reminds me of a pilot... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    For the record that's the case with most small planes. You can get a C152 or Piper Tri-Pacer to go where you want via weightshift, if you're willing to spend some time doing it: climb/dive, turn, just fly slow so your turning radius is tighter. It does require a well-rigged aircraft, however. On one of my cross-countries in a particularly foul 152 we called Pumpkin-Butt (it had a truly horrible orange/white paint scheme from 1978) the plane, which had encountered a building during a bad landing and had been poorly repaired, continually wanted to turn left. It had elevator trim, but no rudder/aileron, so it just kept turning left. I found that by hanging a lunchbag on the right horn of the right control input, and loading it with one orange, one 6" crescent wrench, and one pair of pliers, I could trim it to fly straight for over 80 miles with only a few degrees' divergence, which I could easily counteract by leaning.

    Now, the claim that a 'chute plane could do this is more impressive: most chute planes are considerably heavier. Some people use 182's, which are still pretty beefy airplanes, but most jump planes weigh well more than a ton and a little bit of weightshift isn't going to go very far. But I've read terrifying stories about aircraft crashing because of weight-shift disasters: poorly loaded I-beams shifting backwards on takeoff, leaving the airplane in an uncorrectable nose-up and stalling, or airplanes with loads of goats that get loose, let each other loose, and then begin running in groups back and forth in the plane, causing uncontrollable oscillations. (and let me tell you from personal experience, having a dog loose in an airplane when you hit any actual turbulence is an Incredibly Bad Idea. And, by 'actual turbulence' I don't mean light chop, the sort that everyone gets upset about in jets, I mean the sort of turbulence where the dog is bouncing alternately off the seats and the ceiling of the plane, which is only 'moderate' turbulence. Actual, honest-to-goodness 'severe' turbulence means the plane is no longer able to stay either wings-level or on-course, which is to say it's tumbling.)

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  61. Hrmm... by Valdez · · Score: 1
    Am I the only one who noticed that he was connecting the blades to the hub with worm-gear hose clamps? They're not even t-clamps, they're worm gears.

    Granted, he should be perfectly safe (the blade will be ejected tangentally when the worm-gear gives out)... but sooner or later the angry mob is going to catch up with him.

  62. Re:Fan cage? Fully enclosed... by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Or something like those new vertical fans they're now selling for household use. In fact he might be able to mount 3 or 4 of those side by side without going beyond the vehicle's wheelbase width ... the engineering might get more complex but the added power and maneuverability might be worth it.

    Also would probably have less negative effect from headwinds.

    Regardless, it's cool and I want one. :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  63. Caution: Logic Ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Gangsta style" is the most retarded thing in the world. MIT students are not retards. Therefore, the MIT student's rolled-up pants leg is not "gangsta style". QED, PWN3D.