Slashdot Mirror


Google to Acquire Postini

Dynamoo writes "Google has announced that it is to acquire Postini, company best known for its corporate spam filtering and security service, but also active in Instant Messaging and compliance area. The deal is to purchase Postini for $625m in cash. The acquisition is slated to enhance Google's application portfolio, and Google will also acquire several very large Blue Chip customers that have previously eluded it."

111 of 147 comments (clear)

  1. Coming soon: Google Airlines by LibertineR · · Score: 3, Funny
    Hey! It could happen!

    No lines, no waiting, free food and drinks, but the windows are replaced with screens showing advertisements 100% of the time.

    1. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by SolusSD · · Score: 1

      shh!! dont *give* google these ideas!! they come up w/ them on their own fast enough! At least charge a consulting fee!

    2. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by hey! · · Score: 1

      Nope. The next step is Google Enhanced Reality. You strap on goggles that make everything so much more convenient and simple, but you get ads floating in your peripheral vision like a bashful maiden.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by iago-vL · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe you mean "strap on the googles".

    4. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google would run an airline if doing so would give its computers access to all of the mail and data emanating from random users. Postini software screens the e-mails received by thousands upon thousands of employees of huge corporate entities. Depending on the licensing agreement Postini has in place with its customers, Google may be acquiring a huge database of mail to run its search algorithms through.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    5. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by kypper · · Score: 1

      That's actually a fantastic idea.

      With the introduction of RyanAir and EasyJet in Europe, air travel has taken off, forcing the standard companies such as British Airways to drop their prices and offer more affordable travel. A passenger on there one said to me, "I travel home to Rome once a month because it's cheaper than driving there."

      My point being, nothing here in North America comes close; we are desperately in need of a discount airline that provides affordable travel. Google could leverage this need with their advertising model to produce something pretty damned reasonable, and they ARE the types to do something that radical.

    6. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by LibertineR · · Score: 1

      I know. I wasnt kidding. This is the future.

    7. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by PPCzee · · Score: 1

      Enhanced reality....and interesting concept for the world of SEO and PPC....

    8. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the distances are short. I can get a $145 round trip ticket from NY to Ft. Lauderdale, FL, which is nearly 200km further. I don't know how much that fare is to Rome, but $77 each way for 1700km is cheaper than the price of gas here in the US for an efficient sedan.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    9. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Did you know that the windows are actually the weakest part of the airplane, so this wouldn't be such a bad idea. As long as you can still pull the curtains across, of course.

    10. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by MalHavoc · · Score: 4, Funny

      And when you buy your ticket, you can click "I'm feeling lucky" and end up in the middle of nowhere. Awesome!

    11. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by j79zlr · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing, you can pretty much fly anywhere in the continental 48 for less than $200 with an advanced purchase of a month or more.

      --
      I'm not not licking toads.
    12. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by rand0mbits · · Score: 1

      After flying American Airlines recently, I wouldn't mind your scenario at all.

      --
      If only one could get that wonderful feeling of accomplishment without having to accomplish anything.
    13. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by djrok212 · · Score: 1

      It could happen. Perhaps that is the real reason Larry Page and Sergey Brin (googles co-founders) bought a Boeing 767. http://digg.com/tech_news/Google_Founders_Buy_a_76 7_Jumbo_Jet

    14. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      Except, of course, that low cost comes with other prices.

      Baggage fees, for example - at 5 pounds/kg over weight for checked luggage, if you're traveling for more than a couple days, you're going to be hosed on that one.

      More importantly, perhaps, Ryan Air saves costs at all levels. I was recently in Bristol International for a Ryan Air flight to Shannon. It was cheap - ~70 euro for myself and my wife (not counting the overweight baggage fees). We were scheduled to leave at 1805, and we even boarded a little early. But a warning light came on, and the flight crew couldn't fix it.

      So we deboarded and sat in the terminal. The board indicated "more information" at 2215. Upon asking, we found out the delay was that Ryan Air wouldn't pay Bristol International for the on-site engineer to look at the plane; they had to fly out one of their engineers from Dublin. On a flight which was delayed. We eventually got into Shannon at 0130.

      Not that delays are peculiar to Ryan Air by any stretch, but it's not like it's the same thing only cheaper. Their cost savings can come back to bite you.

      I will say that the flight itself was comfortable, and their service otherwise impeccable; the flight from Dublin to Edinburgh was in all ways satsifactory.

      Also they've got super hot stewardesses.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    15. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by RxScram · · Score: 1

      ... at 5 pounds/kg over weight ... That one took me a second to decipher :-)
    16. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      It didn't look real good as I typed it, to be honest, but I couldn't be bothered to look up the keycode for the actual pound symbol (or the euro, for that matter), so I just let it slide.

      Although if it really were 5 pounds (force) per 1 kg (mass), I imagine the US would adopt metric much faster than we are. I mean, a woman could say her weight was 30 instead of 150. That'd have to be a hit.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    17. Re:Coming soon: Google Airlines by radish · · Score: 1

      Ryan Air is crazily cheap (to the point where I have no idea how they make money). I took a quick look on their site and they list prices from the Birmingham (UK) to Rome - a 2100km journey by car - at around $35 each way.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  2. Additional commentary by babooo404 · · Score: 1

    There is some additional commentary on the deal on Centernetworks.

  3. Re:what does Google want with a male stripper? by hey! · · Score: 1

    You've got that wrong. They're acquiring a truly nasty coffee substitute made from burned wheat flour and molasses. Obviously, they're afraid of their geeks getting coffee nerves.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  4. OT but yikes by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1

    Mark me as OT, but damn. I really wish I could make a startup and sell it to google for $1million let alone the $500M+ these smaller companies seem to be getting.

    1. Re:OT but yikes by hey · · Score: 1

      I agree, that seems like waaaay to much for a spam filter.

    2. Re:OT but yikes by rumith · · Score: 1

      Why, making a startup and earning the said $1million by yourself is no longer an option? Just curious.

    3. Re:OT but yikes by jshriverWVU · · Score: 2, Informative

      Especially when they have their own wonderful top of the line spam filters. The first year I used gmail I never received a single spam. Then I started using my email more publically and after a couple years I might get 2-3 a day but they end up in my spam folder. In the past couple years I can say probably less than 20 spam emails have made it into my inbox. So not sure why they would want to buy this, unless it was to keep competition low. While I like google, and hope this isn't the case, I dont see any other reason.

    4. Re:OT but yikes by MontyApollo · · Score: 1

      You get a quicker payoff if someone buys you out. For a million dollar buyout, the company might only be making profits of $200K/year or so.

      I think there is also the perception of Google buying companies to add to their portfolio, not necessarily ones that generate a good profit. I think there might be some hope that you could come up with an interesting idea, not necessarily a very profitable one, and Google would buy you out for the cool factor alone.

    5. Re:OT but yikes by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well they're 8 years old and they passed 10 million users and a billion messages a day last year, so they're a bit more than a startup.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    6. Re:OT but yikes by tommertron · · Score: 1

      I was stupid enough to provide my gmail address as a mailto: link in a Slashdot submission that got accepted. I now get about 200 spam messages a day in my inbox. Luckily, there seem to be few false positives, and probably only about 0.5% slips through to my inbox. It seems to learn really well.

      --
      Random rants about technology: http://technorants.blogspot.com
    7. Re:OT but yikes by bberens · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for a while the image spam was making it through google's spam filter, but now it appears to be PDF spam. I average 1 per day in my in-box. *mutter*

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    8. Re:OT but yikes by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      I work for a Postini competitor that was also acquired recently, and we went for a lot more than what Google paid (nyaanyaanyaanyaaaaanya ), so 615 million is not really high. Also, like others in this business, they're more than just a spam filter.

  5. In cash? by krazo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google will acquire Postini for $625 million in cash

    Mr. Postini: You have the briefcase, Page?

    Brin pulls an uzi from under his jacket.

    Page: Just sign the papers, Postini.

  6. Hmm... by js290 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The institution I work has been using Postini for almost a year now. It works pretty well. But, I've also used DSPAM and Spamassassin, and Postini is definitely not $625M better than either of those two.

    --
    "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    1. Re:Hmm... by bjourne · · Score: 1

      They don't buy it because it is superior technology. They pay for the customers. Aquiring thousands of customers to which you can sell a product you didn't even have to develop yourself is worth a lot. They are probably also trying to cultivate those customer relationships. Maybe some of those that wants a Google Postini might also want a Google Search or a Google Office?

    2. Re:Hmm... by smchris · · Score: 1

      The institution I work has been using Postini for almost a year now. It works pretty well. But, I've also used DSPAM and Spamassassin, and Postini is definitely not $625M better than either of those two.

      I'm guessing you're the one who's right. Results talk. The local ISP I use has been pretty sharp and customer-responsive. They just completed their move AWAY from Postini (I could almost say the other "day" for amusing timing) after several years to a product they believe will be more flexible and responsive.

    3. Re:Hmm... by *weasel · · Score: 1

      Yes but DSPAM and Spamassassin don't fit perfectly into Google's plan to co-opt small to mid-size corporate email.

      As a spam-filtering go-between, Google gets right back to their earlier push to get corporate users using for-pay gmail. But now it's a value-added service and doesn't require that you give up exchange (initially).

      When the rest of the google apps catch up, it'll be that much easier to pitch a cut-over.
      I'd imagine the next step would be more application-glue to integrate exchange calendars and public folders with google apps.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    4. Re:Hmm... by Penguin+Programmer · · Score: 1

      But it's $625M more enterprisey!

    5. Re:Hmm... by C_Kode · · Score: 1

      Umm. Postini != DSPAM + Spamassassin.

      Postini is a fully managed service. DSPAM and Spamassassin is not.

      I have used Spamassassin and Postini (not DSPAM) Postini is a cakewalk, Spamassassin while good, is not. Postini offers many things that DSPAN and Spamassassin does not. Like email spooling among other things. I think the best part of Postini is that I don't have to manage the hardware and software. I create Postini accounts and thats about it.

      Also, I do not allow any connections originating from the outside to connect to our Exchange servers except Postini's. That alone to me is worth the price by itself. Top it off with virus and spam filtering and I'm happy. I have almost zero management concerning virus and spam filtering.

    6. Re:Hmm... by dave562 · · Score: 1

      We use Postini here too. One of the benefits is that Postini's servers deal with all of the spam and it never even hits the perimeter of your network. They also give your domain some level of obfuscation because your MX records point to Postini's servers instead of your own.

  7. Postini's been around a while by winkydink · · Score: 2, Informative

    They have a large customer base and I am told that they were preparing to go public. So this isn't 2 guys in a garage, more like 300 people or so.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Postini's been around a while by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Funny

      So this isn't 2 guys in a garage, more like 300 people or so. Must be a large garage
      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  8. Google buys by symes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Googling "google buys" provides a pretty rich and varied list of Google's acquisitions: YouTube, Grand Central, Feedburner, Measure Map... and on and on and on. There's even rumours in some parts that a tie up between Google and Apple might be on the cards. Sorry, but it's getting to the point where "Google buys" stories just aren't informative anymore.

    1. Re:Google buys by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but it's getting to the point where "Google buys" stories just aren't informative anymore.

      Just you wait until they launch their gBuy service...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Google buys by shaggy43 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, they are to some people....

      I read this, and IM'ed one of my friends who works for Postini, and they found out about the deal from me. :(

    3. Re:Google buys by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I mean, it's not like Postini is touting the buyout on the front page of their website or anything...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    4. Re:Google buys by 3mpire · · Score: 1

      So when do the "they can't innovate so they just buy their way into new markets" comments start?

    5. Re:Google buys by shaggy43 · · Score: 1

      Do you wake up and immediately check your company's web site every morning for news of a takeover or merger? Or do you assume there will be an internal, all-hands type of meeting to tel you *before* your friends find out?

      If your answer is the first one, you either haven't worked yet, or need to go find a better job, fast.

    6. Re:Google buys by shawngarringer · · Score: 1

      No, I have alerts programmed on Google News to alert me to when the name of my company is in a news story. So far I've known several days in advance to all the major things our company has done compared to when the rest of the employees are notified.

    7. Re:Google buys by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      It's still informative, just not interesting. I was informed by reading this article that Google bought Postini, but I don't care anymore.

    8. Re:Google buys by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      I would assume that I'd receive some sort of internal notification. However, I've also worked with a bunch of people who trash most internal messages without reading them first. I've witnessed co-workers being surprised to find out some big new days after everyone else who bothered to read their email did. I'm not saying that's what happened to your friend, but it does happen...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    9. Re:Google buys by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but it's getting to the point where "Google buys" stories just aren't informative anymore.
      You are correct in general, but wrong about this particular case.

      Google Apps is Google's attempt to make money from Corporate America, selling software-as-a-service. Were this ever to work, it might be a very lucrative venture, and finally wean Google off of their single money-making business (ads). It would also mean that Google is competing directly with Microsoft in Microsoft's home turf. So, the reason why this purchase is interesting is because Postini is described by Google as a way to achieve that goal. Aside from anti-spam, Postini offer services to large corporations that need to comply with various regulatory practices, which Google Apps currently doesn't offer.

      Google reports 'thousands' of small businesses using Google Apps, but apparently very few if any large ones (where the big money is). Perhaps Postini is their way to reach that market; time will tell.
    10. Re:Google buys by Aliriza · · Score: 1

      I am afraid google is going to buy slashdot and we won't be able comment , Lol

    11. Re:Google buys by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      They will indeed be competing directly with MSFT on MSFT's turf. Some of you will recall that Microsoft bought FrontBridge Technologies, Postini's biggest competitor, in 2005. The business models and service line-ups are pretty much identical. Anti-spam, anti-virus, archiving for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, etc.

      I bet steveb threw a chair not only across the office when he heard the news, but straight through his window :)

    12. Re:Google buys by Mr.+Jaggers · · Score: 1

      No. They tell everyone at the same time. Why? Well, those with investments in the company (stocks & options) will be watched prior to the sale by the SEC for evidence of "speculative trading" (that's what I like to call "insider trading"). A multi-hundred-million dollar buyout is a big deal and moves slowly. Be sure that the execs and the BOD have been cooking this up for months. I believe Postini is privately held, which makes the sale easier, but there is still the opportunity for all sorts of insider behaviour (speculation on how this could affect their publicly-traded clients, and trades based on that knowledge, etc., etc...)

      --

      When I grow up, I want to have Christopher Walken hair.
  9. Sometimes by Jaaay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if big companies awash with cash wouldn't be better off doing stuff themselves instead of paying ridiculous premiums. The other interesting thing is how profitable this company is and if google would've earned more buying 625 million $ of government bonds than whatever they'll make during the next few years of this.

    But this isn't always the case, I remember reading "you idiots" comments after news ltd bought myspace for 300(?) million and then reading a few months later how google was paying 800(?) million for their search box and other stuff to go on myspace, that was truly mind-boggling.

    It's like they feel the need to spend cash if it makes sense or not sometimes.

    1. Re:Sometimes by mveloso · · Score: 1

      Google is paying for the customer base, not the tech. Getting customers is the hard part, not the engineering.

  10. Oh, well... by mrcgran · · Score: 1

    "The acquisition is slated to enhance Google's application portfolio,"

    ... hope they do not become another Jotspot and vanish into thin air.

  11. Good News by Rydian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We've been using Postini for the past few years, and have had great results with it. I just hope the Google interface design team does some work with Postini. Not that the Postini interface is horrible, but it could use more of the polish that Google brings to their apps.

    --
    chown -R us. /base
    1. Re:Good News by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Not that the Postini interface is horrible, but it could use more of the polish that Google brings to their apps.

      I wasn't aware that Google outsourced their interface design to Poland...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Good News by cyberjunkie98 · · Score: 1

      These guys have down a pretty decent job with their interface. http://ownwebnow.com/

  12. Re:Name change for Postini by Dekortage · · Score: 1

    Googlini

    Yeah, it has a better sound to it than some of the alternatives. Anybody wanna Poogle?

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  13. Re:In cash!? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    Does "in cash" really mean what I think it means? (Posting as AC, as I am too embarassed to admit I don't get this language as much as I thought I did)

    No, it doesn't mean that they'll show up with a suitcase (or truck) full of bills. It simply means that the purchase will happen with currency of some sort (likely bank transfers and such), rather than paying for it with Google stock (the value of which fluctuates--well, it fluctuates moreso than hard currency).

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  14. Google to acquire Jet Ski maker by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    It is hoped that the speed of the jet ski will help it jump the shark really well.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Google to acquire Jet Ski maker by Afecks · · Score: 1

      What did you say? I can't hear you over the noise of this rising stock price!

  15. Damn Microsoft by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Always buying companies instead of innovating.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Damn Microsoft by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1
      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  16. Re:In cash!? by x_MeRLiN_x · · Score: 1

    It doesn't mean cash as in coins or notes; a cheque or bank transfer is very easily converted to cash in comparison to paying with shares. Google bought YouTube for $1.65bn in shares for example.

  17. Oops by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is Google. Nevermind. This is the greatest news of the week! Yea, Google!

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Oops by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

      You've misunderstood, people hate Microsoft because its felt they buy competitors products put there own spin on them and then release them, Microsoft is no longer seen as an innovative company. Google a company widely recognised as innovative products and dozens of Beta's has been buying up a lot of small start-ups the OP was pointing out how similar Google is getting to Microsoft as all Google seem to be doing lately is buying small companies just like Microsoft!

    2. Re:Oops by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Yup. I must have totally misunderstood what the OP was pointing out. Thanks for clarifying that.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  18. We use Postini and it is GOOD. by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2, Informative

    We use Postini here and it's really really good. It reliably filters out nearly all the spam that arrives, and it's fairly inexpensive ($1 per mailbox per month). Scaling it to the size of Google will make it even better. I'm looking forward to it.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  19. Cash? by caluml · · Score: 1

    Cash - so a suitcase of dollar/euro/pound notes then?

    1. Re:Cash? by palfreman · · Score: 1

      Cash in this context means a bank transaction, as opposed to buying for so many Google shares

    2. Re:Cash? by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      As was noted in another thread:

      "Any sufficiently advanced sarcasm is indistinguishable from offtopic" (or ignorance in this case)

      Hopefully I'm not giving too much credit to the grandparent.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    3. Re:Cash? by edmicman · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure it's really a suitcase with bills and c-notes. The suitcase probably *does* have a Google logo on it, though. Really. I've seen these things in movies.

  20. Re:Italian or gay? by enjerth · · Score: 1

    At first, I was thinking it was some type of pasta.

  21. Scale comparison by vigmeister · · Score: 1

    Postini was bought for an amount roughly 83 times the price AMD paid of Transmeta. That just completely screws with my perceptions of scale regarding the value of companies. And I thought I had a pretty good idea of the number system we use.

    Maybe these companies should just start publishing these numbers in milliards and crores and I would still grasp the value of the transaction about as well...

    Cheers!

    --
    Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    1. Re:Scale comparison by Horn · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this is because AMD only invested in Transmeta and didn't buy them out?

    2. Re:Scale comparison by vigmeister · · Score: 1

      True... I forgot that but even so, the difference in the relative values of the companies seems unworldly... Worse is that it makes logical sense to me economically (Postini on the up, Transmeta down and out for the count), but just the fact that I can't really visualize or internalize it is bothering me. Whatever happened to the days when code was cheap?

      Cheers!

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
  22. Google OS by Diabolus+Advocatus · · Score: 1

    It's most likely another step towards Google creating their own OS, where all machines are thin-clients and applications are run from a server such as the way Google Apps are at the moment.


    From the article:

    Like Google Apps, Postini's services are entirely hosted, eliminating the need to install any hardware or software.

    Personally I wouldn't go for it, but it makes sound economic sense to a lot of companies. Thin clients are alot cheaper than standard PC's and instead of paying thousands of euro to microsoft for licensing, they can pay a small subscription to Google instead. Maybe they will receive the service free from Google, with Google making money from advertising within it's OS.

  23. Re:Name change for Postini by vigmeister · · Score: 1

    How about Postle? Usage:"I have a Postle running on my email account to filter out all my spam except for unobtrusive,targeted ones specifically catering to my internet usage".

    Cheers!

    --
    Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
  24. Re:what does Google want with a male stripper? by MindKata · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wish it was just nasty coffee. Google owning a company that handles things like email "information security" is like a wolf owning a Chicken Farm. So I guess that means the emails etc.. will be secure (provided you don't mind Google also taking a look as well).

    So Google takes one more step along the road from "Do No Harm" to "1984 Big Brother"

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
  25. Re:Name change for Postini by ZaSz-RH · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a pokemon :/

  26. Re:Doesn't make any sense by ezekieldas · · Score: 1

    Sir, just mind your own business please. Carry on.

  27. Re:Dear hey!: that wasn't funny or original by hey! · · Score: 1

    Actually, enhanced reality is considerably more interesting than virtual reality.

    Example: the copy machine is jammed. The goggles give you a kind of x-ray vision showing exactly where the jam is, and a line drawing superimposed on the copier animates the next step in removing the jam.

    Example: Take the cell phone company idea of location based services, but instead of sticking it on the phone, overlay the information on the user's perception.

    If you imagine a generalized service of this sort, Google is better positioned than anybody with its technological infrastructure. Not that I think that's what they are doing.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  28. Clueless email admins untie! by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    This will be greeted with cheers by countless Exchange-Server-In-A-Box admins, who can't configure any sort of spam or content filtering on their side, or by those too frightened by Unix to implement their own relays. "If it has Google goodness, it must be ok - lets just use Postini! (while I make myself less and less relevant)".

    Sorry, bitter today, mopped up after too many bad mail admins.

    PS Find the joke and win the prize!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Clueless email admins untie! by dave562 · · Score: 1

      As an Exchange-Server-In-A-Box admin, I will take your flamebait and politely tell you to go shove it. It's a lot easier to let a company like Postini take first crack at the incoming emails than to devote resources on my end to dealing with the problem. The issue isn't that I can't configure spam and content filtering, because I can. The issue is that it's more cost effective for my organization (non-profit, ~300 users) to farm it out to a company that does nothing but spam and content filtering. Let Postini take the bandwidth hit, and the CPU hit to deal with the spam.

  29. Re:Name change for Postini by Hanners1979 · · Score: 1

    Anybody wanna Poogle?

    Maybe when I'm done with my Wii.

  30. Email Down by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 1

    Oh the irony! My company's email service is hosted by Postini and is down this morning.

    --
    - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
  31. I had my previous firm using Postini by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Informative

    I started off with Spamassassin+CLAMAV and something else and some Exchange server-based rules but the upkeep was time-intensive and the spam were still coming down our wire.

    Then I got Postini and the world changed. Upkeep was mindless, the product was really cheap per mailbox and a huge portion of the spam was stopped at Postini's servers hugely reducing the load on our Spamwall and Exchange servers. In addition, it also gave us mail spooling for when we had to take the Exchange server down or if our Internet connection went out. Nothing was ever lost.

    This is another case of Google finding an excellent product that fits in with their business direction and will enhance their products, not just a Microsoft-type acquisition intended to stifle competition.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:I had my previous firm using Postini by dloseke · · Score: 1

      We tried out Postini recently at my business but we didn't like it because of limited reporting and tracking capabilities I believe. We just signed a 2 1/2 year contract with TrendMicro for hosted spam and virus scanning, and, as a couple others have mentioned, it queues up the messages for us if we have to take our exchange server down. There were certainly thing we didn't like, such as no outbound message tracking, the reporting can take up to 2 hours to update, and we can only go back 5 days in tracking incoming messages. However, they say they're working on the first two, so all in all, it's not a bad service. I was really surprised we didn't go with Postini but I wasn't involved in that decision.

  32. Re:Name change for Postini by mrbooze · · Score: 1

    The vessle with the Postle holds the brew that is true!

  33. Re: Google Enhanced Reality, Sinicized. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    It also informs the Chinese government of the exact location of those who search for forbidden terms/subjects or put them on blogs- then it provides options on how to best allocate resources to "plug the leak".

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  34. Re:Name change for Postini by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 1

    I think it's what the Jawas yell it out several times in Star Wars. "Postini!"

  35. Microsoft better positioned for enhanced reality? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    I would lean towards saying that Microsoft might be better positioned to do that kind of reality, because they have better relationships with all of the hardware vendors. I could see them building something into Windows that has a standard way of obtaining .x files from attached devices on the network, indicating various repair states and problems, and Microsoft would then work with other hardware vendors to come up with a closed spec for making the goggles and wireless actually work.

    --
    This is my sig.
  36. Re:Dear hey!: that wasn't funny or original by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

    We truly are becoming The Borg. Just add in RFID implants, cell phones in our teeth, a laser range-finder/scanner, and an exoskeleton, and the transformation will be complete. It's all current or near-future tech.

    By the way, I think this is called augmented reality .

  37. Re:what does Google want with a male stripper? by cymen · · Score: 1

    I remember Postum fondly from my youth. No, I don't want a cup right now. Lets just keep it as a fond memory.

  38. Market Share: Postini Dominant in Fortune 1000 by nickh01uk · · Score: 1

    A blog entry over at the BackChanne breaks down just how many customers Postini had in the enterprise market, the only surprise for me was that Microsoft chose to take-out Frontbridge and not Postini. Whats next? Yahoo buys Messagelabs for 300M? Half the market share of Postini.
    For those of you with click fatigue, the market rankings look like this:
    Postini 49%
    Messagelabs 22%
    Frontbridge 21%
    MXlogic 5%
    Blackspider 0.4%


    Nick

  39. Re:Hmmm... by A+non-mouse+Coward · · Score: 1

    If I had to guess why it's worth $millions, I'd say it's because of Google Apps for the Enterprise.

    Imagine you're wanting to make a service offering to host corporate America's email, which includes all of the private juicy tidbits of data that are in it as well. It makes a lot more sense, from the corporate entity's standpoint to have that interaction be with one outsourced company, not two like it is today (READ: Gmail for your domain currently uses Postini for anti-SPAM). Add onto that the compliance aspects of outsourced email (think: lawyers needing copies of email for lawsuits), which Postini is selling as an add-on feature for Enterprise Gmail, and you can see why they might want to tap that datastream for an administrator's "google for everyone's email with search terms X" for some lawsuit.

    Apologies ... I typed the above on speculation before reading the linked article. Turns out my hunches are dead-on.

    -Tim

    --
    libertarian: (n) socially liberal, financially conservative; neither left, nor right.
  40. Re:Name change for Postini by Hey+Apples · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a Postini-Google merger actually be... Postle? I know when I get enough spam, I sure as hell want to go postal.

  41. Re:Microsoft better positioned for enhanced realit by Eristone · · Score: 1

    Actually, Google would be well placed to do this -- at least from a test standpoint. They (working with Earthlink) are looking to provide wireless to all of San Francisco. Once that infrastructure is in place, they have a full network that can do geospatially based maps, ads, etc. Imagine walking around San Francisco wearing the Google Googgles (TM) - information pops up based on which building you look at (they've already done the street level mapping) - including businesses that are located there. Or if you are walking (or driving) and pre-program in a map to display with arrows and the like.. I'm certain others will add to this...

  42. Now Postini will get access to the Googlebrain! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Interesting
    First of all, as many have noted, the point of this is not to adapt Postini tools to Gmail. That may happen eventually, but it's not the point. The point is that Postini offers enterprise services that Google never did, and already has a prominent userbase. And if you ask why enterprises don't just switch to Gmail and get the same spam-filtering for free, you don't understand how enterprises work.

    I don't doubt that some of the spam filtering procedure developed by Postini will eventually help filter Gmail. Indeed, it wouldn't make sense in the long run for Google to keep two separate spam filtering platforms. But here's the point: the primary beneficiary of the buyout will be the Postini spam filter itself, the thing that will be sold for subscription fees to enterprises. That product will improve for one simple reason: Access to the incredible amount of data that Google has access to. We all help Google when we're kind enough to press the "mark as spam" button in Gmail. And I'm sure they remember, and our entry sharpens up whatever Bayesian algorithm Google uses to detect future spam. When Google's data merges with Postini's data, it will be very hard for other enterprise spam filtering providers to offer a product of similar effectiveness. To do so, they would need to store their own databases on a scale large enough to compete with Google - which isn't cheap. It is cheap for Google to supply Postini filters with raw data, since Google collect that data anyway. So Postini the pay service gets an incredible competitive advantage though it's intergration with the Googlebrain. That's not to mention the extra mindshare that the Google brand brings with it.

    For those of us who wondered how Google plans to profit from all this investment in a free email service, this is a part of the answer: There will be a for-pay enterprise version based on the same investment. The same goes for Search, btw. So pay attention: this is Google trying to become something more than an ad pusher. And it's not a dumb idea: the marginal cost for Google to develop a good for-pay spam filtering system is small compared to the money they could sell it for.

    And since you can already buy Google computers to search your enterprise for internal data, and those Google computers are heavily based on work Google developed for other goals (and for free access), we might ask the following question: What other things is Google good at, and would enterprises be interested in paying for products based on those skills? Google maps? For sure! But consider Google News, the human-free, smart organizer of articles by subject, relevance and prominence. Are there companies with a lot of data that could benefit from the sort of organization alorithms that run Google News? Damn right! Each year more enterprises are finding that the cheapness of data storage left them with attics of archival data that's a complete mess. I think we're starting to understand the "???" that separated Google's free services and Profit.

  43. in other ways... by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    Maybe to learn on how to better deploy SPAM ("cough": Ads) features from a ANTIspam company?

    Considering they are hitting the plateau for hiring extreme/smart developers (nope, I guess I didn't "cut it" after interview #3), and learning more about ads/spam and spam filtering, this is a good buy to compliment the double click purchase.

    But for 625M!? Makes me think not...

  44. Re:Good job regurgitating Snow Crash by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

    I'm hurt. An anomymous troll. Forget to take your medication today? Don't worry - just call upstairs for mommy and she'll bring it for you.

    Actually, I enjoyed Snow Crash. I found Stephenson through Cryptonomicon, read the Baroque Cycle, and then went on to his smaller books because I enjoyed his writing so much.

    Anyway, it wasn't Snow Crash I was thinking of, but I guess that's apt. As much as I enjoyed Stephenson, I was a trekkie for far longer, and the Borg are a much better-known analog.

    Damn. I fed the troll.

  45. Postine has a MUCH better filtering approach by cheros · · Score: 1

    When Postine doesn't need to store for compliace reasons the whole email filtering process never hits a disk - it stays in memory all the way through.

    That's also why the average time between receipt of mail by Postini and your incoming server receiving the header is in the region of 400ms or so, as opposed to, say Messagelabs which is (if I recall correctly) somewhere between 2 and 4 minutes.

    Postini is also the only one who also has a Swiss hosted setup, and it's thus the only one who can filter for Swiss banks.. Control of the lot is done from Zurich (it has to be legally limited to originating from a Swiss location only).

    I hope Google keeps it the way it's going, I like the company. And if I recall correctly ,Google Zurich HQ aren't that far removed from Postini's offices so that is at leats not too much effort :-)

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  46. Re:Good job regurgitating Snow Crash by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

    No, it was not an ad hominen attack. You shouldn't throw around words you don't understand. A personal attack? I suppose, a mild one. OTOH, anonymous trolls deserve them, so...

  47. Re:Dear hey!: that wasn't funny or original by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

    There's an anime running now about pretty much exactly that, called dennou coil. Highly recommended viewing, imo.

    --
    - These characters were randomly selected.
  48. Re:what does Google want with a male stripper? by Poohsticks · · Score: 1

    As a friend of mine at work said, "Do no evil. My ass!"

    --
    "The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been wide
  49. Credit by kylehase · · Score: 1

    Google keeps making these multi million dollar purchases. I hope they're using a credit card to earn miles.

    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
  50. This just in... by Diabolus+Advocatus · · Score: 1

    A revolt is sweeping the intergoogle as googledotters dismay at googlesofts purchase of diggoogle.

  51. Google Airline - windows by speardane · · Score: 1

    Did you know that the windows are actually the weakest part of the airplane... no actually not now they are round - they were when they had corners. This is the place where nerds hang out isn't it?

    I just thought maybe I should sell the idea to MS - change from using a rectangular screen to a rounded one and reduce the stress!

    --
    if "Faith" could be proved with facts - would it still be faith? So why does "Faith" try to present beliefs as fact? -
  52. I am also for sale... by realkiwi · · Score: 1

    ... for the same amount

    --
    realkiwi