Slashdot Mirror


Explosion at Scaled Composites Kills 2, Injures 4

Animats writes "Details are scant at this time, but a explosion at the Scaled Composites rocket test facility has killed two people and seriously injured four more. The Los Angeles Times reports that the explosion was 'ignited by a tank of nitrous oxide.' This is Burt Rutan's facility, and the home of SpaceShip One and Virgin Galactic spacecraft development."

239 comments

  1. what the shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    then we got NASA people sabotaging computer parts, and astronaughts getting piss drunk before they go to space.. Whats next for space news? a new discovery? or more paris hilton type shit?

    1. Re:what the shit... by Kenshin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whats next for space news? a new discovery? or more paris hilton type shit?

      Ah, just wait till the Russians show off their Lindsay Lohan type shit...

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  2. De Ja Vu by slacktheplanet · · Score: 0, Funny

    Here in Dallas, we just had a massive gas explosion yesterday at an propane/acetylene company.

    1. Re:De Ja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why this was modded funny. I live in Dallas. Was kind of a big deal around here.

  3. First and foremost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Condolences to their families and loved ones...

    1. Re:First and foremost by Interl0per · · Score: 1

      Words fail, I can only echo my heartfelt sympathy for all who have suffered loss in this tragedy.

    2. Re:First and foremost by Malekin · · Score: 1

      Respectfully, I think first and foremost important is figuring out what happened and ensuring that nobody else is in immediate danger. It is better that mourning is delayed than compounded by more deaths. Maybe it's sympathetic, but I think it's glib to say "first and foremost" are our condolences.

    3. Re:First and foremost by Riverman5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      When I saw the headline, I thought "OH NO! Not John Carmack! What will I do without my armadillo updates!"

      Then I found out it was just Scaled. Whew.

    4. Re:First and foremost by crabpeople · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I find it hard to believe that anyone can really care for some random anonymous people. The only reason people make the parents statement is because its "the thing to do". I personally think it cheapens the accident by pretending to care.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    5. Re:First and foremost by Paperweight · · Score: 1

      ...and even more condolences to those injured and lost in the dangerous pursuit of man's spacefaring future.

    6. Re:First and foremost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you saw AC got +5, Insightful and decided to whore yourself out for some mod points, huh? I guess I shouldn't really blame you, it looks like everyone is doing it today.

    7. Re:First and foremost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3000 dead troops - rest in peace.

      200,000 terrorists and terrorist supporters, enjoy your eternal burning in Hell!

      Ha ha ha!

      (and no, I don't like Bush - that doesn't mean I like terrorists - cause one destroy New Orleans doesn't make the others destroying the WTC and countless other attacks right).

  4. New planet definition.... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Funny

    an asteroid with botox treatment.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:New planet definition.... by AoT · · Score: 1

      Whatever.

      I blame the Luddites.

      It was sabotage, look for the wooden shoe.

  5. CNN by Lithgon · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:CNN by fractalVisionz · · Score: 2, Informative

      ABC is also providing a more in-depth article.

      http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=3419315

  6. Oh, damn! by JimDaGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My prayers are with the lost and their loved ones. What a shame. There are two gone, but 4 are still with us, though in really bad shape. So... send your prayers, positive vibes, your "mojo", or your voodoo. It doesn't matter now. These people are working hard to help push our knowledge as humans further. So we should stand by them and do what little we can.

    --
    General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
    1. Re:Oh, damn! by pixel.jonah · · Score: 1

      May the two that died rest in peace and a speedy and complete recovery for the five injured.

      To all of them and the rest of the Scaled crew: Thank you for continually innovating and pushing the envelope of our human capabilities.

    2. Re:Oh, damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      whenever I hear of someone dying I try to look at the bright side and think:
       
      "well, maybe they deserved it"

    3. Re:Oh, damn! by tobias.sargeant · · Score: 1

      I don't want to belittle the suffering of the individuals or their families in any way... but... can't... resist...

      > So... send your prayers, positive vibes, your "mojo", or your voodoo. It doesn't matter now.

      It does matter... Don't send your voodoo. We all know voodoo creates zombies, and if there's one thing that Scaled Composites doesn't need at this time, it's zombies.

    4. Re:Oh, damn! by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Unless you see a good reason to think so, how dare you! Particularly in cases like this, it was probably someone elses fault (If you know otherwise, please inform the rest of us).

      I know I shouldn't respont to an AC, but who modded the troll funny?

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    5. Re:Oh, damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I shouldn't respont to an AC, but who modded the troll funny? somebody with a functioning sense of humor.

    6. Re:Oh, damn! by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Nah, more a George Carlin type of humor.
      I know I read it with his voice in mind :)

      Seriously, RIP for the ppl, but this was more comedy noir.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    7. Re:Oh, damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Are you fucking kidding me? You call that shit "standing by them"? Here's a handy hint for you: unless you're a medical researcher with some breakthrough new treatment for burns or explosion-related injuries, then you can't help. Any tricks you pull inside your own mind that you think are helpful are actually just a way of calming yourself down and making yourself feel better about your own impotence in this situation. It's actually a highly selfish thing to do. If you really are so desperate to "do what little you can", then you get on a plane, fly over there, and fucking well tell them what a big fan you are and how much their work means to you. Something like that just might have enough positive mental effect on them to actually affect their progress in some way.

    8. Re:Oh, damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that. There are too many people out there who fall back on religion or pointless exercises of supernatural or superstitious rituals when they face something out of their control - it also annoys me whenever I see someone saying they are praying for the victims. A $20 donation to a worthy cause (hospital, family trust etc.) does a hell of a lot more than any prayer.

    9. Re:Oh, damn! by Lord+Ender · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      send your prayers, positive vibes, your "mojo", or your voodoo.
      Since study after study has shown that wishful thinking has no effect on the physical world, your suggestion doesn't help at all. It just makes you, personally, feel better about yourself.

      Actually useful advice would be: study the incident report so that if you are ever in a similar situation, you don't make the same mistake. Additionally, help educate the public by stressing the importance of private space travel if it ever comes up in conversation.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    10. Re:Oh, damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a shit load more than jumping on someones beliefes on slashdot you fing tool...

    11. Re:Oh, damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we should stand by them and do what little we can.

      Stand by them by doing what?!? Posting on /.?!? Boy, you sure live up to your word. That's about the very least you possibly could do. Score:5, Insightful my ass!!
  7. Strange for a hybrid motor by sokoban · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article's a little light on details, but explosive failure is pretty rare for hybrid rocket motors such as this, isn't it?

    Usually mis-ignition will just cause rapid release of the N2O oxidizer, and designs are such that a clogged nozzle which would actually cause an explosion generally causes a safety valve to open and vent the excess pressure.

    Yeah, everything I've seen on hybrid motors says they are non-explosive with a near zero TNT rating.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:Strange for a hybrid motor by evanbd · · Score: 4, Informative

      They weren't firing the motor; apparently this was some sort of handling accident. Which also explains why people were close enough to be hurt. Why the fireball, I don't know. Also, nothing actually *detonated* here -- just a big fireball and modest overpressure. (At least, that's what informed commentary on the pictures I've seen says.)

      It's also worth noting that given sufficient provocation, it is entirely possible for N2O to detonate by itself -- it's an energetic compound. It's just fairly non-reactive under most conditions, and even if it does start decomposing in a self-sustaining fashion it doesn't normally detonate. But it can, and if you have enough of it you don't even need a detonation to kill people.

    2. Re:Strange for a hybrid motor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I read this, yours is the FORTH comment. Bookmark this now, because I guarantee you will never find a comment with half as much insight, thoughtfulness, understanding, and education on Digg. Ever.

    3. Re:Strange for a hybrid motor by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      It's just fairly non-reactive under most conditions, and even if it does start decomposing in a self-sustaining fashion it doesn't normally detonate.

      Yep, It's an oxidiser and needs a fuel to ignite, but when there's fuel there, it'll be a very energetic fire. I'm guessing there was some fuel vapour release, probably from the semi trailer in the photo here. http://africa.reuters.com/world/news/usnN26257938. html

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    4. Re:Strange for a hybrid motor by evanbd · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it most certainly does *not* need a fuel. It is an energetic chemical. In other words, 2N2O -> 2N2 + O2 + energy. Not TNT levels of energy, but not small amounts either. I don't have the numbers off hand, but the decomposition temperature is over 1000 Celsius. That reaction *can* happen in a detonation. However, the chemical is quite stable and relatively inert at normal temps (thermal decomposition starts a bit over 500C, iirc) -- at room temp it's far less reactive than oxygen. This accident may or may not have been that -- my understanding is it looks more like a pressure vessel burst and a fire from fuel + oxidizer, but we don't have enough details to know that. The trailer and tank you see overturned in that photo hold nitrous normally (I don't know what was full, or where the nitrous was at the time).

      I've worked on that airport and seen these guys out testing. My condolences to the families.

    5. Re:Strange for a hybrid motor by sokoban · · Score: 4, Informative

      2N2O -> 2N2 + O2 + energy. 104.20 kJ/mol of N2O at 298K to be exact.

      The activation energy is high, but it can be lowered by use of a catalyst.
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    6. Re:Strange for a hybrid motor by afidel · · Score: 1

      I don't know, modest overpressure isn't going to crumple a shipping container like the one that was near the explosion.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Strange for a hybrid motor by DesserttRatt · · Score: 3, Informative

      I didn't see any fireball. Just a large explosion... A black cloud with lots of brown dust mixed in, shooting 3-400 feet into the air... Mostly straight up with one very large piece flying off to the south-southwest followed quickly by a loud BOOM (I was about 1/2 mile away at the time so the sound and pressure wave were a bit delayed) but it most certainly was a "detonation".

      --
      . . Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done and why. Then do it. Robert Heinlein
    8. Re:Strange for a hybrid motor by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      Usually mis-ignition will just cause rapid release of the N2O oxidizer,

      Actually... toward the end of the burn and sometimes before the pressure in the tank goes down and combustion instabilities can set in; causing a buzzing- the flames are oscillating at the injectors.

      But if the flames go back into the tank, then the tank can explode.

      The scary thing is that manufacturers often induce these instabilities deliberately because it makes a crowd-pleasing buzzing noise, and doesn't usually explode. ;-)

      and designs are such that a clogged nozzle which would actually cause an explosion generally causes a safety valve to open and vent the excess pressure.

      No, clogged nozzle is an all-she-wrote.

      The only reason that hybrids often survive that kind of failure is that they deliberately use rubberised fuel- that kind of fuel just deforms its way through the nozzle and can't really block it. But if something does seriously block the nozzle (and it has happened)- the chamber is going to explode in a shrapnel-shedding way, and no safety valve is going to realistically stop it.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  8. Whats with Explosions this week? by WarlockD · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dallas explosion injures 3, snarls traffic
    (Sorry about the link, Dallas News is just WAY to heavy in adds)

    Saw that one when working. Gezz, you could see those Acetylene canisters fly. People stopped, ran from their cars just amazing. All started with a faulting line filling the smaller tanks too.

    1. Re:Whats with Explosions this week? by doombringerltx · · Score: 0, Troll

      Snarls traffic is right. Hearts go out to the families, blah blah blah, but 635 was an abortion on the way home that day. When people start having industrial disasters, then need to think ahead of how they will effect *me*

  9. A couple more details by evanbd · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been chasing news articles for a little while now.

    Details are very scarce, but apparently this was a cold-flow test -- they weren't intending to light the motor, just flow nitrous through it. Tank ruptured, and a big fireball. Evidence visible from pictures etc suggests nothing detonated. Apparently people a couple miles away at the airport proper didn't hear an explosion -- they just saw clouds of dust and smoke, not abnormal for a motor test. I haven't seen anything about causes etc.

    My condolences to the families.

    1. Re:A couple more details by Thagg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My condolences as well. I know that Rutan has done everything he could think of in the design to prevent any kind of explosion, and the purposely doesn't light the rocket until they're 10 miles away from almost everybody, just in case something unexpected does happen.

      Among the safety innovations of this rocket is that a single fiber optic cable is wound around and around the tank, so that if it ruptures anyplace it will cut the cable, and the rocket will be shut down immediately.

      That said, in a cold-flow test, there shouldn't be anything burning.

      I am sure that Burt and Richard Branson are terribly distressed by this. My deepest sympathies go out to the families of the killed and injured.

      Thad Beier

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    2. Re:A couple more details by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Details are very scarce, but apparently this was a cold-flow test -- they weren't intending to light the motor, just flow nitrous through it. Tank ruptured, and a big fireball. Evidence visible from pictures etc suggests nothing detonated.

      I did well in high school physics, but there is one thing I think I read/learned awhile back, and wonder if someone can confirm it, and its relevance to this event (if the parent poster quoted above is correct).

      The thing is this: that things can explode simply through rapid expansion, which generates heat and a shock wave and all the other nasties one would associate with a detonation, but without there being something detonating.

      I seem to recall that nitroglycerine doesn't ignite when it's jostled, but it just so rapidly expands to a ridiculous amount of its original volume, that it wreaks havok. Just like the ruptured tank in this case released expanding material so quickly that it caused a lot of damange (and sadly, deaths and injuries).

      Sorry if this is an ignorant question, but some people may want to know the distinction in this case, if the parent post is indeed correct.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    3. Re:A couple more details by evanbd · · Score: 4, Informative

      In non-technical usage, explosion can refer to a detonation or a deflagration. The distinguishing feature is a detonation has a supersonic reaction front, a deflagration is subsonic.

      A pressure vessel rupture is an explosion for most purposes in terms of the results; ditto a deflagration. This appears to have been a deflagration -- damage is too light for a mass detonation on that scale.

      Damage from explosions can come both from the overpressure, heat, flame, etc caused by the combustion, and also from the shock wave of a detonation. The shock wave will shatter hardened structures, the overpressure "just" moves things around. Also, with a detonation, the pressure rise time is *much* faster, and the overpressure can be *much* higher, so a comparable mass of substance will do much more damage if it detonates rather than deflagrates.

      Nitroglycerin doesn't "ignite" in that there isn't a "flame", but the reaction that occurs is a combustion reaction -- the complex molecule ends up as a mix of N2, H2O, CO2, CO, etc. That reaction propagates at supersonic speeds. Interestingly, it will burn quietly if lit -- there's no pressure wave, just thermally-induced decomposition, and it won't transition on its own.

    4. Re:A couple more details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I seem to recall that nitroglycerine doesn't ignite when it's jostled, but it just so rapidly expands to a ridiculous amount of its original volume, that it wreaks havok. Just like the ruptured tank in this case released expanding material so quickly that it caused a lot of damange (and sadly, deaths and injuries)."

      Like many low order explosives, it rapidly decomposes generating large amounts of expanding gases and heat. For all intents and purposes an explosion, the chemical means is rather irrelevant if you are standing next to it at the time.

      In this case they likely had a massive oxidiser leak, this is just as dangerous as a large fuel leak, if not more so as the level of energy required initiate combustion is much lower than a large fuel leak. If you had a large oxygen leak in a normal lounge room, you'd have a serious fire, as the furniture in the room would be plenty of fuel, and the heat from a random plug pack / TV, etc would be all that was required for ignition.

      But again, from the point of view of someone within range, the reason for the explosion is largely pointless.

    5. Re:A couple more details by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      A chem class would be more illustrative. Your nitroglycerin does undergo a chemical reaction. Specifically, it decomposes, forming gases. Barring an opposing force, a gas will always expand. Nitroglycerin gets its oomph from how quickly it decomposes into gaseous chemicals. (I'm too lazy to look up the actual decomposition.)

    6. Re:A couple more details by Strider- · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Among the safety innovations of this rocket is that a single fiber optic cable is wound around and around the tank, so that if it ruptures anyplace it will cut the cable, and the rocket will be shut down immediately.

      Actually, this is standard in a lot of rocketry situations. On the space shuttle, the electrical wire that controls the hydrazine valve to the thruster is wrapped around the thruster bell. If something goes wrong, and the bell fails, it will cut power to the control valve, causing it to close, and thus shutting down the thruster.

      This is the basic principle of "Fail Safe" design. To me, the problem with the fiber optic cable is that the fiber cable is just a data control. It would be better if they wrapped the power line around it, so that a failure would cut the power, and thus cause it to go safe.
      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    7. Re:A couple more details by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I started an accident reconstruction as soon as pictures started to come out... I'm in the industry and I want to figure out what went wrong. As far as I can tell, a pressure vessel rupture explains all of what we see here.

      It just looks like that one tank trailer fell over, but in fact it has to have rolled over 270 degrees to be where it's lying now. Also, the container just past it was both hit really hard in the side by expanding gas, and knocked over.

      But there's no massive fragmentation damage or burn mark anywhere to be seen.

      What is instructive however, is that there's something missing, and something else tipped over. The other thing tipped over is the test stand itself, which is a large blue steel truss structure, which is now about 10 feet away from where it started and lying on its side.

      What's missing, is a large (roughly 7 foot diameter and 10 foot long) composite "flight tank" which would hold the nitrous oxide for the motor during a test or flight, and any sign of the injector or a chamber assembly. They're just out and out gone.

      The missing tank, test stand knocked over, lack of fire or fragmentation damage seems to indicate that nothing burned much if at all, and nothing detonated. This has all the hallmarks of a large pressure vessel explosion.

      I for one am going to try to attend the memorial service.

    8. Re:A couple more details by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Many rockets have a break-wire that runs the length of the rocket. Its used to detect structural failure and to trigger the thrust termination system.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    9. Re:A couple more details by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Hey, nice to see you out and about. Just wanted to say I enjoyed your and others' Usenet posts on sst.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    10. Re:A couple more details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you wrap a power cable around the tank. The tank ruptures, breaks the power cable, which then makes contact with the metal of the tank, creating sparks and igniting the whole damn thing. Doesn't sound like a very good idea to me.

    11. Re:A couple more details by SCWK2 · · Score: 1

      The test stand was the twisted blue mass on the forklift that tank and housing was in, it was the size of a Chevy suburban and now there is nothing left, and some say that it wasn't loud I was 2 miles away in a hanger and it shook the building. I pray for the families of my coworkers, and friends....

  10. Re:Not surprised... by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is what you would expect when the private sector tries its hand at space travel -- deaths due to carelessness. That's why space colonization is properly a government function. Right, cuz we've never lost a government astronaut do to carelessness and general fuck-ups. Not sure if you're a troll or some sort of weird dark libertarian.

    All I have to say on the matter is that rocket science is dangerous business, the same goes for any kind of challenging engineering. Sometimes people die because other people fuck up, sometimes people die in spite of every sane precaution that could possibly be taken. I just hope this is the latter and not the former. I just hope it isn't symptomatic of a corporate mentality takeover after the buyout.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  11. Re:sorry by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if it sounds heartless... first thing that came into my head after reading this article..

    "Where's the kaboom?.. There was supposed to be an earth shattering kaboom" It was earth-shattering for their families, earth-shattering for the injured. For the dead, they're not feeling anything.

    Man, I can usually appreciate sympathetic dark humor but that joke just comes across as so dickish and it isn't even funny in an inappropriate "NASA=need another seven astronauts" kind of way.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  12. Not a launch by flawedconceptions · · Score: 1

    From the image, it looks like a truckbed fell over during the course of unloading something (presumably a tank of nox). A forklift is still upright, so the explosion couldn't have been huge, deathly though it was. Hopefully this is just a relatively minor accident at a relatively popular company.

    1. Re:Not a launch by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      It was large enough to knock over a nearby test stand and blow out the windshields of nearby cars. See the CNN video:

      http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/26/spaceport.blast/i ndex.html#cnnSTCVideo

      It was obviously a very powerful explosion, even if the fuel didn't detonate.

  13. shame by gadzook33 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Besides the obvious tragedy of human loss, I hope this doesn't also sway them from continuing. With NASA spending money on colonizing the moon, guys like this may be our only chance for the future of interesting and pioneering science.

    1. Re:shame by Riverman5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, space tourism is pretty much all they got. Count on NASA, or maybe ESA.

    2. Re:shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tragedy aside, I think that what Scaled Composites does is engineering, not science. Manned space flight for the purpose of space tourism must not be confused with real science.

    3. Re:shame by gadzook33 · · Score: 1

      Well, Virgin is looking at space tourism but really the technology these companies are pioneering is the key. The whole point of scaled composites is that they craft an entire aircraft on a CNC machine. Pretty impressive stuff if you ask me. This, along with other cheep launch vehicles, etc could help reinvigorate space travel. What's NASA working on? - A moon base - Building a space station - Supporting the space shuttle with pointless missions - Taking pictures of deep space With the possible exception of the last one, what is the point of any of this? Anyone?

    4. Re:shame by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

      Cassinni, New Horizons, pretty much everything the space tourists won't do. Yeah, scaled built basically an "airplane" and the true innovation is his reentry wing, everything else is just off the shelf components. SpaceX is doing a lot better job of going further, by making the cost to orbit cheaper. That's not even in virgin galactic's game plan.

    5. Re:shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "This, along with other cheep [sp] launch vehicles..."

      SpaceShipN series vehicles are NOT launch vehicles by any means. Launch vehicles, by definition, propel a craft to orbital or escape velocities. Virgin Galactic's plan, on the other hand, is to get to 0km/h vertical at some point above the internationally defined 100km space/earth boundary and then come back down in a parabolic path, simulating weightlessness. Think "Vomit Comet" with a longer flight.

      The shuttle is important because it's the only launch vehicle able to carry parts of the ISS up. You said the ISS has no point? Well, without the ISS, SpaceX -- and virtually every other orbital space startup -- has no real market for the human rated launch vehicles. You can point at the money NASA spends on a project, then the "successes" of similar-sounding ventures (which may or may not really be all that similar) of private companies, and then conclude that private enterprise is doing much better. Trouble is, they're either doing things that have been done decades before (parabolic flight) or are based off the results of the huge research budgets that NASA entertained years ago (launch capsules). And even though NASA has had failures in the past, these newer companies also have problems just as often. SpaceX hasn't had a 100% successful launch yet, SpaceShipOne had controls issues on its first flight, etc etc etc. There's a reason these projects take hundreds of engineers close to a decade to complete - these systems are far more complex than the Web 2.0 products built by a pair of recent college grads in an apartment near campus over a summer. Nothing against the people building the apps, but a lot of people seriously underestimate the complexity of launch systems, especially those rated for human flight.

  14. Re:Not surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because there's never been any deaths due to carelessness at NASA.

  15. Obvious Cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Los Angeles Times reports that the explosion was 'ignited by a tank of nitrous oxide.' This is the home of SpaceShip One and Virgin Galactic spacecraft development."

    James Bond was seen running from the facility.

  16. Re:NASA Cutbacks Due To Bush's Push To Mars by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Lots of articles on this. Seems that the cut budgets ebing realigned for Mars manned flight is causing big cutbacks in other areas. Not like this led to astronauts in diapers, drinking before launch, or sabotage, but it does just hurt the whole NASA organization and probably does make the sensational crap more possible. Look, I like bashing Bush and the idiot zampolits running NASA as much as the next geek but Scaled Composites isn't a government contractor.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  17. Re:NASA Cutbacks Due To Bush's Push To Mars by terrymr · · Score: 1

    Seriously - long waits on the launch pad led to astronauts in diapers.

  18. Re:Not surprised... by MouseR · · Score: 2, Informative

    *cough* apollo 1 *cough*

  19. This has NOTHING to do with NASA by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    NASA has NOTHING to do with this project. This is most likely scaled composite's facility (though details are missing). In fact, it is possible that 1 of the 2 was burt rutan. If he dies, then Scaled will fold up in the same fashion that cray research did. Rutan IS Scaled.

    My condolences to the families.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:This has NOTHING to do with NASA by kimvette · · Score: 3, Informative
      http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070727/ap_on_re_us/ai rport_explosion;_ylt=Atw8pinyLC7AW3ayUC4B.Eis0NUE

      Aerospace designer Burt Rutan, who heads Scaled, was away at the time. He sounded distraught in a phone call with The Associated Press as he was en route to the scene.

      "We've lost a couple of our employees. It's a very big deal," Rutan said.


      Rutan is fine.
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:This has NOTHING to do with NASA by evanbd · · Score: 1

      It was Scaled's facility; that much is obvious looking at the pictures (until recently I worked at the airport).

      Burt wasn't at the site at the time.

  20. How dense are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was sarcasm! You can't think of the shuttle program without thinking of columbia. Obviously he was referring to that!

    Crap!

    1. Re:How dense are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't look like sarcasm to me. You'd have to try really hard to say what he wrote with a sarcastic tone. If it was sarcastic maybe he should have tried harder.

  21. Re:sorry by Spikeles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Different people take humour in different ways. I like the NASA one, hadn't heard that before. Seriously though, you are saying earth shattering for injured and families.. Oh no. 6 or 7 people hurt/killed. How many are murdered each day in America? How many murdered killed, die of famine each day, killed in Iraq from bombs, blown up by landmines, crushed to death? Really, i'm sick of the double standards we humans have. Certainly condolences to the families, but I'll be damned if I'm going to make these deaths any more or less special than any other.

    --
    I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
  22. Complacentcy by Sorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I work with munitions both guided and unguided with the AF, General Purpose Bombs and Guided Missiles, More then likely just complacentcy was the factor, hardly ever is there an accident with explosives that takes place that doesn't involve that factor. This day and age explosives are not as fragile as Nitro once was, it takes a hell of alot to set them off. Even with the solid rocket motors of the missiles the tech data states that a spark of static electricity could set them off however after working with them long enough you learn to respect the potential there but also know what you can and can not do with them. But in the end they will find a scapegoat and blame it on someone or a group of people to help keep the heat off themselves.

    1. Re:Complacentcy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. There were no explosives or solid rockets involved. To assume complacency when you don't know the system or any of its basic components is to be an ass.

    2. Re:Complacentcy by nietsch · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Thank you for your confirmation that all/most people in the military are idiots. No wonder, how else could they think that signing up is a good idea.
      Did you notice that this was a cold-flow test with no munitions, rockets etc. involved? Like the previous poster said: you're an ass. No go look for you haversack.

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    3. Re:Complacentcy by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Anyone who does not recognize the danger inherent in working with pressure vessels is an idiot. There's little practical difference between the rupture of a pressure vessel and the detonation of a bomb. Thousands of people used to be killed every year in boiler explosions.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:Complacentcy by CKW · · Score: 1

      No, you and nietsch are the knee jerk idiots.

      All he is doing is pointing out (with personal examples) that in any environment it's human nature for complacency to set in and to lead to accidents.

      He's not blaming anyone.

  23. Re:NASA Cutbacks Due To Bush's Push To Mars by deprecated · · Score: 1

    You know this wasn't at NASA, right? I blame Bush for everything too, but this one might actually not be his fault.

  24. Re:NASA Cutbacks Due To Bush's Push To Mars by wildsurf · · Score: 1

    ...Scaled Composites isn't a government contractor.

    Well, no, but it was just acquired by one.

    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  25. Rutan was not killed by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

    Burt Rutan is not one of the casualties. He's spoken to the press since the accident. All six casualties were Scaled Composites employees.

  26. Re:NASA Cutbacks Due To Bush's Push To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought enraged jealousy led to astronauts in diapers.

  27. Moment of Silence by Effugas · · Score: 1

    A moment of silence for these lost explorers, and deepest hopes that the survivors of this accident recover to see space!

  28. Quick Turnaround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Scaled Composites website says they are "NOW HIRING!"

    http://www.scaled.com/

    1. Re:Quick Turnaround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're a piece of crap for posting that. Sorry for the weak insult, but thats just disgraceful.

    2. Re:Quick Turnaround by CdXiminez · · Score: 1

      I'd rather expect Scaled Composites to put up a notice of mourning on their site in stead of the 'hiring' advertisement.
      The most recent news item is of February 2 2006...

    3. Re:Quick Turnaround by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Well, they did that by now. Maybe their website was not the first of their concerns. Anyway it shouldn't be, and I think the first poster was distasteful as hell.

  29. Re:"Pull out of space flight"? by kimvette · · Score: 1

    If someone willingly chooses a risky career, what business is it of yours to say it's not worth it? By that logic, we should all be living by the Amish, because driving to work, particpating in practically any sport, and even crossing the street all entail risk. If your logic is implemented I hope that football is banned because it is a high-risk sport, and the people who participate in football should have that choice eliminated.

    If people who worked in aerospace were forced to choose that profession I might agree with you, but they didn't; they chose to work there and knew the risks. Besides, this incident was likely a freak accident that could more easily happen at any hardware store where some under-trained careless employee is refilling a LPG or LNG tank.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  30. Sabot is French, Luddites were English by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Informative
    As Wikipedia notes, the entymology that sabotage comes from Luddites throwing Frech shoes into English looms seems highly suspect.

    The entymology I am more familiar with, and would seem more believable, is rooted in the Fench revolution. The French peasants trampled the landlords' crops by stamping on them with their sabots. Much more believable!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Sabot is French, Luddites were English by aichpvee · · Score: 1
      The word you are looking for is etymology, and I don't think that it means what you think it means.

      Etymology is the study of the history of words - when they entered a language, from what source, and how their form and meaning have changed over time.
      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    2. Re:Sabot is French, Luddites were English by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your use of the word 'entymology' really bugs me...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:Sabot is French, Luddites were English by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that Star Trek has lied to us?

    4. Re:Sabot is French, Luddites were English by AlecC · · Score: 1

      The Oxford English Dictionary puts the etymology later - about 1910. They claim it was first used in musical performances, when people would express their displeasure by stamping their feet so they would "saboter" the piece (actually probably just heavy boots rather than sabots). The word "sabotage" spread from this to mean the destruction of anything, not just a musical performance, by malignant non-participants. Frankly, this sounds more credible to me than throwing your (valuable) footwear into the machinery. Are you going to hop home?

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  31. Re:Not surprised... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If anything, I would say this is a sign of progress (although, the loss of life is terrible). When you're at the edge of the frontier and pushing forward, lives will be lost. For historical significance, please reference the last 6000 years of civilization.

  32. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure it's tragic and all, but honestly.. stuff exploding on the ground is like a rite of passage for the space race.

    First thing into my head on seeing the headline was "Is Burt okay??".
    Marvin's Kaboom quote was the second though, I'll admit.

  33. Re:sorry by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Different people take humour in different ways. I like the NASA one, hadn't heard that before. Seriously though, you are saying earth shattering for injured and families.. Oh no. 6 or 7 people hurt/killed. How many are murdered each day in America? How many murdered killed, die of famine each day, killed in Iraq from bombs, blown up by landmines, crushed to death? Really, i'm sick of the double standards we humans have. Certainly condolences to the families, but I'll be damned if I'm going to make these deaths any more or less special than any other. Look, I don't know these guys from Adam. But of all the people who died yesterday, these are the ones I'm reading about right now, here on Slashdot. They died working on something that I think is cool and I'm sorry they lost their lives. Just today I'm talking with a guy who came off jury duty. The case involved the death of a young girl involved in a horrific rollover accident and the parents were suing the auto-maker for negligent design. I didn't know of her when she died but just hearing of the parents' grief in that court-room second-hand was enough to make me feel sympathy. A single death is a tragedy, a million a statistic. But it's still human to feel for the people when you hear about the deaths in detail, just as it's human to grow numb when all you hear are the numbers.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  34. Re:sorry by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The Los Angeles Times reports that the explosion was 'ignited by a tank of nitrous oxide.'" Just goes to show that nitrous oxide is no laughing matter.

    --
    We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
  35. Re:NASA Cutbacks Due To Bush's Push To Mars by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Well, no, but it was just acquired by one [slashdot.org]. This is true but I don't know if that means the parent company is farming out work to them yet. As far as I am aware, their meal ticket is still Virgin Galactic.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  36. Re:sorry by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many are murdered each day in America? How many murdered killed, die of famine each day

    This is a non-convincing argument. Pro-war people say the same thing "Oh how many people get murdered each year?" Rapists say "at least I didnt kill anyone." Murders say "at least I'm not a pedophile." This is moral relativism and a slippery slope. If you cant defend private enterprise launching millionares into space as something to die for then that should tell you about how weak your position is.

    Well, first of all this rocket business is just that: a business. Its someones fucking job and they got killed at the workplace. You CAN prevent that. You CANT prevent sensless street murder. You CANT stop famine and overpopulation. People should expect a safe work environment. At the end of the day these people died so Burt can launch millionaires into near orbit for 250k a pop. Not exactly a noble calling.

    Now, I fully expect the government to come in and regulate these guys. At least put in some real NASA-level safety precautions. NASA isnt perfect but their safety record and procedures are pretty good. I think this is the beginning of the end for the "wild west" approach to space exploration. Now the responsible adults need to step in and protect the worker and protect the customers. We've seen a milliom times in america. From little children working at the looms losing fingers to men losing their hands in meat packing. Some new industry comes up and safety is the last concern. No more, thanks.

    My condolences to the families.

  37. Re:Not surprised... by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If anything, I would say this is a sign of progress (although, the loss of life is terrible). When you're at the edge of the frontier and pushing forward, lives will be lost. For historical significance, please reference the last 6000 years of civilization. The pilots in the Air Force Thunderbirds are living on the edge and pushing the boundaries but none of them would consider lives lost a measure of progress, they would see it as a sign that the training is deficient. The danger is always there and sometimes shit happens but I wouldn't call it progress. Did Challenger show we were making process in space exploration or did it show that when in doubt, management should Listen to the Fucking Engineers(tm).
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  38. Re:sorry by Genda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Context is everything...

    Why does the needless death of a beautiful baby in a war torn nation touch us or tug harder at our heart strings than the equally tragic death of an old man in a traffic accident? Part of it is the loss of possibility, a life unfulfilled. Part of it is the sadness of losing something innocent to something so depraved and heartless as a snipers rifle or terrorists bomb.

    In the same way, we are especially touched by the loss of heroes. Heroes of the mind who force back the darkness, heroes of the will who challenge what's possible for people, and heroes of the heart who throw themselves fiercely at life's dare. Along the way we lose some of these heroes and a little piece of us dies with them, and that's why we mourn, that's why their passing is something special.

    It doesn't diminish the humanity or worth of others, it doesn't diminish the depth or breadth of the trajedy of losing others. It is however a special loss, and these men and women deserve our acknowlegement, our respect, and our tears at their passing. It will always be hardest when we lose that which is the best of ourselves.

    Who we make heroes... and how we mourn there passing more than anything else says something about who we are.

  39. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A rabbit stole my Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator, you insensitive clod!

  40. Pull out of forklift-aided transportation by markov_chain · · Score: 5, Funny

    The increased U.S. efficiency in handling goods is not worth the price in human lives.

    While corporations are profiting from increased handling capacity, our brave young men and women are dying unnecessarily.

    Ban forklifts!

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  41. Re:Not surprised... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Exploring space is dangerous. Getting there uses lots dangerous fuels, and once there, it's not that hospitable of a place for the human body. We live in fantastic times. People in their 20s and 30s will live longer then any earlier humans. There is much less danger on a daily basis then in any other time in human history. Space is dangerous. Getting there is dangerous. You can mitigate the risk as much as possible. At the end of the day, there's still a hell of a lot of risk.

  42. Re:sorry by Spikeles · · Score: 1

    It is however a special loss, and these men and women deserve our acknowlegement, our respect, and our tears at their passing.
    So you are saying that these deaths are more important than say.. when *my* father died? What makes them more or less "special"? Or this one of those nasty "context" things?
    --
    I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
  43. Re:sorry by Spikeles · · Score: 1

    I don't understand what your point is with the first two paragraphs but i agree wholeheartedly with your third.

    --
    I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
  44. Re:"Pull out of space flight"? by fractoid · · Score: 1

    The US occupation of highways, industrial workplaces, Iraq, beaches, hell even five-star resorts is higher priced in terms of human lives than the US occupation of space. 10 out of 10 for sensationalism, but more people are killed each year by bees than by the space program.

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  45. Dear editors: This article is not about science! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please create an obituary section, and place death-related articles in it.

  46. Good. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Certainly condolences to the families, but I'll be damned if I'm going to make these deaths any more or less special than any other.

    That sounds heartless and cruel, but it would be the best thing for the company and everyone else who works there. This is an industrial accident. It's terrible and deserves an investigation like any other. People are not supposed to die at work and all safeguards should be in place. Anything else is taking chances with other people's lives for money, the moral equivalent of murder. At the same time, society should not blow it out of proportion. Immoral people take advantage of that kind of emotional response to pass laws to their advantage. It already takes billions of dollars to break into the space business, an accident like this can be used to make even that impossible. This accident strikes most of us because these people are the lucky few who are living a science fiction fantasy. Keeping a cool head is the best way to make sure there's more of this work to go around.

    Awww, who am I kidding? Scaled Composites is bought. The parent company is going to fire them all anyway.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > People are not supposed to die at work and all safeguards should be in place. Anything else is taking chances with other people's lives for money, the moral equivalent of murder.

      Or warfare. Someone's gotta have the brains and the balls to get us off this rock. (I've got the balls to gladly eat the blast wave on behalf of those with the brains... except that I didn't have the brains to get the job :)

      > Awww, who am I kidding? Scaled Composites is bought. The parent company is going to fire them all anyway.

      To pick one nit with your post: the employees won't be fired. They'll be kept on, but under strict NDAs and non-compete clauses, to ensure that their knowledge never sees the civilian world in our lifetimes. If there's one thing post-Apollo NASA hates these days, it's competition.

      Otherwise, you're sadly right. I really thought Scaled was gonna make civilian access to space a reality. Great for the shareholders, and I don't begrudge them the money they've rightfully earned.

      Doesn't make it any better for the rest of us, stuck on this shithole rock, realizing after the NOC takeover that we've gotta wait another 20 years for the next guy to try the experiment.

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. It Happens by DynaSoar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those people were professionals. They knew what they were doing and they knew the risks. That's not to be cold hearted, but the opposite. They did their jobs despite the risks and suffered for it. That's the price of pioneering. They're not heroes for suffering, they were heroes before, for living and working on the edge. Heroes will replace them. Some of those will get hurt, and so on.

    The first thing that occurred to me was whether Rutan was there. He wasn't, but he could have been. It's his way to keep his hands in things. That would have been an enormous loss to aero- and space development. He's one of the all time geniuses of all things flyable. Any really good aerospace engineer could write a definitive book on composite construction. It took genius to do so in 28 pages. It'd be damn hard for Scaled to go on without him, even with Northrup buying them out.

    The second that occurred to me was that it'll put a damper on hybrid motor development and use. The motors are much safer than solid or liquid, but the handling equipment isn't safe by any stretch. Amateur rocketry has been using them for years, but nobody is willing to break the high-power certification barrier and make them available to low and mid-power rockters due to the liability factor from the ground equipment. It may come to nothing more than headlines for the media and PR for some politicians, but I expect a call for the FAA's Office of Space Transportation to rethink certifying of hybrid powered human rated craft.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:It Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > The second that occurred to me was that it'll put a damper on hybrid motor development and use.

      What better way to make sure Scaled's new owners can keep their new technologies under wraps.

      Upside: Next round of warfare, we win. Enemy doesn't even have a clue why.
      Downside: I don't get to spend my kids' retirement on a holiday in low earth orbit.

      And yet, I'm more saddened by the downside than I'm intrigued by the upside.

      Maybe it's because we woulda wasted the enemy no matter how few of my tax dollars the government took from me, but spending a weekend in low earth orbit (never mind the fucking moon) has been on my "List Of Things To Do Before I Die" since well before puberty.

      My condolences to the families of the dead and injured. To the living: If NOC fucks you over, quit and wait for your non-compete contracts to expire. Then rebuild. If NOC doesn't fuck you over, keep building.

      Whether NOC fucks you over or not, please, please, please, for the love of Dobbs, get us off this fucking rock.

      Even if only for a weekend.

    2. Re:It Happens by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or does anyone else notice that whenever an AC posts on Slashdot they're a fuckin' moron?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:It Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Those people were professionals. They knew what they were doing and they knew the risks. That's not to be cold hearted, but the opposite. They did their jobs despite the risks and suffered for it. That's the price of pioneering. They're not heroes for suffering, they were heroes before, for living and working on the edge. Heroes will replace them. Some of those will get hurt, and so on.

      Thank you for these words. Someone in a different thread was going on about how this happened at a workplace, so it should have been prevented. I was so incensed that I couldn't find a way to respond in any clear or coherent manner. I'm glad I continued reading, because as it turns out, you said precisely what I had hoped to and it has calmed me down.

      One doesn't come to work at a company like Scaled Composites by accident, or because there's just no better job available. These individuals were incredibly passionate about their jobs, they were more qualified than anyone else to be doing the work that's being done there, and - yes - they knew that there were risks. We must respect them for that, and we should accept the fact that whatever comes of this tragedy will be knowledge for future improvements. We must acknowledge that the loss of these two lives, and the critical injury to four others, can only result in better designs of future tests and deployments.

      There are no words that any of us can put forth right now that will console the families and friends of those lost. But I think they'll know and understand - more than the rest of us ever will - the sacrifice of their loved ones. You don't conquer a new frontier without losing many amazing people along the journey. This has always been true of space exploration, and is a fact that even NASA cannot deny during its many expeditions into unfamiliar territory. What works one day will not always work the next, and as previous tragedies have shown, even with the weight of the government behind you, you cannot guarantee success.

      To all those who have been lost in the pursuit of space exploration, godspeed. I wish I had the gumption and the sheer knowledge to join you.
    4. Re:It Happens by fermion · · Score: 1
      I hope they knew what they were doing, and I hope that all precautions had been taken. In any case we are going to see more of this as rocketry moves into the commercial sector and more people gain experience with the materials.

      But even with experience, and until we get more I think it will get worse before it gets better, there will still be accidents. It is important to have perspective. There were three people injured in Dallas just yesterday in gas explosion. Last year several people were injured at the BP plant. In that case they were contractors and BP did not even want to count them. It is heartless, and I know some people out there are hurting really bad, and one persons death is no less a loss than another, but what happened is just part of the business. I hope that the event is studied and used to protect people in the future. That is how we can show respect for the fallen.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:It Happens by khallow · · Score: 1

      It's just you. These guys drip pure genius. I harvest and bottle it to sell on Ebay.

    6. Re:It Happens by khallow · · Score: 1

      Thank you for these words. Someone in a different thread was going on about how this happened at a workplace, so it should have been prevented. I was so incensed that I couldn't find a way to respond in any clear or coherent manner. I'm glad I continued reading, because as it turns out, you said precisely what I had hoped to and it has calmed me down.

      No offense but those other posters are probably correct. Usually when an accident like this happens, it's a preventable cause. Keep in mind that people have handled N2O for a long time (someone here said about a century), and the Scaled Composites crew had done this before (numerous times with Spaceship One). It's not like sitting in an experimental craft that has flown maybe a few times. You can do this pretty safely.
    7. Re:It Happens by jaxom_01 · · Score: 1

      Hybrid motors are available to those without a high power rocketry certification. Look at SkyRipper Ssytems and their 29mm motors that have 2 loads for them in the G motor range.

      http://www.skyrippersystems.com/documents/performa nceinfo.htm

      Only requirement is that you be 16 (18 in some states) to purchase the nitrous oxide. I don't think the explosion that happened was due to a hybrid as much as it was that they were loading liquid nitrous in 99 degree F from a large (3000 pound) tank to the smaller, flight tank. If they were not careful and kept the tanks cooled to below 97 degrees F (critical temp for nitrous) then they would never have transferred any liquid nitrous, only gaseous nitrous. If they were measuring the fill rate by weight and not pressure in that situation, they could have over-pressurized the flight tank which would rupture and send shrapnel for 100's of feet in all directions.

      My thoughts go out to all those involved.

      -Aaron
      --
      The post made with 100% recycled electrons
    8. Re:It Happens by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

      > No offense but those other posters are probably correct. Usually when an accident like this happens, it's a preventable cause. Keep in mind that people have handled N2O for a long time (someone here said about a century), and the Scaled Composites crew had done this before (numerous times with Spaceship One). It's not like sitting in an experimental craft that has flown maybe a few times. You can do this pretty safely.

      1. It's always preventable in retrospect, and many times that's the only way it's found. It's definitely the only way it's found the first time for a given set of circumstances.

      2. You cannot handle the amount of NO2 at the pressures they were safely. Those amounts and those pressures are dangerous. You can handle it successfully, without mishap, but there's nothing safe about it. I handled LOX, ammonia, RFNA and other fuels for the Air Force. I was never safe when I was doing so, and wouldn't be so flippant as to think I was, because that can cause accidents. I've got a high powered rocketry certification so I can legally fly hybrid rocket motors. The motors are relatively safe, but the ground equipment isn't. That's why it takes certification to use them. That certification process is either reviewed and approved by the FAA, ATFE, and NFPA, or built around their regulations to start with. If it were safe, it wouldn't need to have them involved. And, if it were safe, a large part of my annual recertification fees wouldn't be going to a million dollars worth of liability insurance.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    9. Re:It Happens by khallow · · Score: 1

      1. It's always preventable in retrospect, and many times that's the only way it's found. It's definitely the only way it's found the first time for a given set of circumstances.

      I'm not an expert in this area, but I would be surprised if the type of accident you describe is more than a third of all industrial accidents. Having said that, I'm not going to push the issue since they did have an experimental setup and it was probably operating under circumstances well outside normal industrial applications. Plenty of opportunity for first time accidents to occur.

  49. nitrus oxide explosion is no laughing matter by Salgamma · · Score: 1, Funny

    'nuff said

    --

    Plus ca changes, plus c'est les meme choses.

  50. Re:sorry by Mistlefoot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And people die each week so you have the convenience of buying a pepsi at 3:00am.

    The grandparents point is simply that a death is a death, although when their is something unique or spectacular about it we make it a bigger deal than if it's simply a "routine" death. Now I don't mean routine to the family, but routine in a page 26 kind of way, as opposed to something that makes the front few pages.

    And I would expect that sending someone to orbit is a very noble calling to many. How many non-goverment employees have ever sent someone to orbit? I'm guessing not very many.

    Pretty quick of you to assume that safety wasn't a concern. It was actually a cold test run when it happened. There were bunkers onsite to ensure safety. That's just the from the story we know now. When it's been determined that safety wasn't a high priority then I'll be on your side but for now you are just assuming....

  51. Re:Not surprised... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's a big difference between accepting death as a natural result of an activity, and measuring the progress of that activity in terms of death. When one goes to war, one expects to lose soldiers. That doesn't mean that whoever lost the most soldiers has necessarily won.

    Hindsight is 20/20. From this initial report, it sounds like this particular incident was a result of known factors, and thus avoidable. The Challenger and Columbia incidents were the result of factors which, while known, were under-appreciated. The Challenger factors were managerial, while the Columbia factors were the result of engineering.

    There's also the matter of economics. It's simply not economically possible to guard against every threat. If it were, then someone on this planet would be nigh-immortal.

  52. Re:nitrous oxide explosion is no laughing matter by Salgamma · · Score: 1

    is it funnier with or without the typo? It's past my bedtime.

    Seems like an honorable way to go. Condolences to all involved.

    --

    Plus ca changes, plus c'est les meme choses.

  53. Re:sorry by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a non-convincing argument. Pro-war people say the same thing "Oh how many people get murdered each year?" Rapists say "at least I didnt kill anyone." Murders say "at least I'm not a pedophile." This is moral relativism and a slippery slope. Oh grow up. You are comparing someone making a morbid joke with murders and rapists.
    Get off your high horse. Moral relativism, my ass.

    And I'm someone who's first action on reading the headlines (before slashdot even noticed them) was to call a friend who has been closely involved with the x-prize and scaled composites to make sure she wasn't one of the ones hurt.
    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  54. Re:sorry by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Its someones fucking job and they got killed at the workplace. You CAN prevent that. You can't prevent an individual incident unless you counter the factors that will cause that incident.

    You can't prevent a class of incidents from occurring. You can make them rare, compared to previous statistics, but you can't prevent them outright. And at some point, you have to realize that there is a balance between risk and reward, and that human nature is to always treat the current level of risk as unacceptable.

    I wish more people would realize that.
  55. Re:sorry by Lawn+Jocke · · Score: 1

    Double standards, yes, but you have to understand that they are an inherent part of human existence. You make a poignant statement, but I don't see how anyone can claim complete objectivity. Yes, your are right about the fact that these contradictions do exist, I cannot believe your contempt towards the simple acts of honoring the dead. Everybody has the right to be honored in death, every survivor has the right to comfort. The murdered, starved, bombed, and everyone else who died deserve this. If your view of fairness is that every death is the same, so be it. But to feel contempt toward those who feel that those dead should be honored is wrong.

    Maybe your logic and observations are true, but your contempt for those who would only wish to grieve is inexcusable. So what if they wish to honor those who died more than the next person? So what if they even were to erect statues of them that they didn't deserve? I see no crime in that. And even if the honor we give to their memory is unequal to that we give to others, that does not make it wrong to grieve. Fair, maybe not. But I too give my condolences to all those involved, and unashamedly at that.

    --
    Maybe if this sig is witty or clever enough, someone will love me...
  56. Re:sorry by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    "Really, i'm sick of the double standards we humans have. "

    So... if your father died, would you just shrug and say "Welp, just another death today?"

    I already know what the answer to that is. It's related to the reason why these deaths are important. When you feel personally involved (i.e. people working to further advance our journies into space), you care more. It's not a matter of double-standards. When somebody dies, invariably your thoughts drift towards how that will affect you. It's just the way the mind works.

    You could get all Vulcan about it and try to brush it off with rationale like you just used, but sooner or later, somebody will die, and your reaction will violate your rationale. Humans aren't as illogical as you're making them out to be. It's not worth getting 'sick' over.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  57. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    > At the end of the day these people died so Burt can launch millionaires into near orbit for 250k a pop. Not exactly a noble calling.

    Chuck you, Farley.

    At the end of the day, these people died so Burt could launch millionaires (instead of billionaires) into near orbit for $250K a pop (instead of $30M a pop).

    Given the situation in Unistat, and the likelihood of "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" (TANSTAAFL is something Heinlein derived as a likely result of living in a hostile environment) coming true after a critical mass of humans is achieved outside of earth orbit, I'm willing to bet that the people working at Scaled Composites were on their way towards doing more for human freedom than NASA did in the past 40 years.

    Until NOC bought them out, of course, ending all hope of cheap civilian access to space.

    > Now, I fully expect the government to come in and regulate these guys. At least put in some real NASA-level safety precautions.

    Chuck you again, and the horse you rode in on, Farley.

    Columbus and those who followed him didn't cross the Atlantic because they thought it was safe. They did so because he thought he could make a fuckload of money by doing so.

    NASA safety precautions are appropriate for people who will sue you if your spaceship blows up.

    The meek (and that's you, Farley) can have the earth. The rest of us only want the right to sign a waiver that we may take our chances with the stars.

  58. Sad Accident by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    High-pressure gas cylinders are to be respected.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_cylinder

  59. Re:NASA Cutbacks Due To Bush's Push To Mars by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

    Dude, you post way to much on the boards. I post maybe once a week, but you are always there. You're a god damn karma whore. Read the fuckin' article next time.

  60. Please, Burt by freeweed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't stop.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Please, Burt by ruprechtjones · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this insightful. Please Burt, despite the loss of some valuable employees, despite the buyout, no matter what, don't stop. Some of us are counting on you. This needs to continue. At all costs, with blessings to those that have suffered those costs.

      --
      Kip Hawley is an idiot.
    2. Re:Please, Burt by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Burt bailed. Please petition to Northrop Grumman.

  61. Not unexpected by macemoneta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is very sad, but not unexpected. Every major construction project will have an estimated number deaths associated with it before it starts. Every skyscraper, every bridge, every tunnel, every road through bad terrain, and yes, every space mission.

    Most people (other than the safety engineers and insurance folks) rarely stop and think about what it costs in human lives to move forward. But there is a cost.

    In a perfect world it would never happen, but we are imperfect and it will always happen. People make mistakes. Equipment malfunctions. Bad weather. Mislabeled products. Acts of nature.

    The people that do this work benefit their species; a true higher calling. Take a moment to think about their sacrifice and thank them.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  62. Wasn't an engine test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were testing one of the fuel tanks.
    It was an explosion, the cause isn't known yet but the majority of the injuries were shrapnel related.

  63. Photos of NOX Tank by Techknowledgie · · Score: 1

    I found a couple of pictures of the tank that exploded, or one very much like it. The tank and the trailer it is on appear very similar to the blasted one in today's news pics. I found this at http://www.desertturtle.com/SpaceShipOne-Flights.h tml. You have to scroll down to the 9th and 10th thumbnails and click on them. Notice the sign on the tank says, "NONFLAMMABLE GAS, OXIDIZER".

  64. Uhh, they might want to update their website... by The+Media+Mechanic · · Score: 1

    Right now it says, prominently, "Scaled Composites is NOW HIRING!"... If you know about this tragedy you might interpret that banner ad the wrong way. Just pointing out they might want to update their website to say, our hearts go out to the loved ones.

    --
    I can throw as many stones as I wish; my house is made of transparent aluminum.
    1. Re:Uhh, they might want to update their website... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      our hearts go out to the loved ones I think they would rather you keep it in your chest cavity.


      Also, non-kidding: third person dies. It doesn't look good...

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  65. Re:Not surprised... by gregorio · · Score: 1

    When you're at the edge of the frontier and pushing forward
    They were NOT in the edge of the frontier. They were, in fact, very far from it.
  66. my money's on SpaceX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SpaceX was more likely to succeed anyway.

  67. Re:Not surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offense to the thunderbirds o any other acro team, but what they do is not progress, or advancing technology.

    Sport? Sure. Art? Maybe. Pushing the boundaries? No way!

    If all that necessary to get there is training, then you're not pushing the boundaries of anything. By definition, you're "just" doing it right.

    Now if they invented a new figure, it would be, but when's the last time that happened?

  68. Re:Not surprised... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

    I'm using the term in a metaphorical sense, not a literal one. If we're preparing a mission to Mars to deploy from an orbiting fueling station around Earth, and a fueling goes bad, it would be the same situation.

  69. No, they NEED zombies! by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

    I disagree. A zombie army will come in handy when fighting patent battles. Lawyers can't suck the lifeblood from a zombie, because it doesn't have any.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:No, they NEED zombies! by spun · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, zombies can't use their main attack, as lawyer brains are toxic. So it's kind of a stalemate.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  70. Nitrous Oxide Is Non-Flammable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SUBSTANCE IDENTIFICATION

    * Formula

    N(2)O

    * Structure

    (For Structure, see paper copy)

    * Synonyms

    Dinitrogen monoxide, factitious air, hyponitrous acid anhydride, laughing gas, nitrogen oxide

    * Identifiers

    1. CAS No.: 10024-97-2

    2. RTECS No.: QX1350000

    3. DOT UN: 1070 14 (compressed); 2201 23 (refrigerated liquid)

    4. DOT label: Nonflammable gas, oxidizer (nitrous oxide, compressed); nonflammable gas (nitrous oxide, refrigerated liquid)

    http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/healthguidelines/nitrouso xide/recognition.html

  71. Not at all by tjstork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If this is were NASA, they would ground the shuttle for two years as Congress and a bunch of jackass administrators poured over every detail in the name of safety. But, this is the private sector, and they will say that playing with explosives sometimes get you killed, and order the people back to work within the next day or so. By the time even NASA were to appoint a committee to form committees, the company will have cleaned the place and started building again.

    Look, this sort of thing happens every day in the private sector. Fisherman drown, taxi drivers get shot, construction workers die in falls, and life goes on, with hardly missing a beat. If you want space to be really privatized, the right way to look at this whole accident is to say, yeah, it sucks that they died, but, back to work people.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Not at all by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      They seemed to do it right though. I'm surprised they can figure out the original failure point whenever something like this happens. It's definitely worth it to ground the Shuttle after a disaster. Nice negative use of the word 'administrators'. I don't think administrators pieced back the puzzle of the 2 shuttle failures. They figure out the problem and fix it as best as they can. As others said, NASA does MUCH MORE than just Shuttle flights.

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
    2. Re:Not at all by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

      > Look, this sort of thing happens every day in the private sector. Fisherman drown, taxi drivers get shot, construction workers die in falls, and life goes on, with hardly missing a beat. If you want space to be really privatized, the right way to look at this whole accident is to say, yeah, it sucks that they died, but, back to work people.

      I got some nice comments for saying much the same thing in more polite terms.

      You had the balls to say more directly what I sugar coated. Good for you.

      Burt was crying when he saw the accident scene. When he gets over it, he'll probably say pretty much what I did in public, but pretty much what you did to his employees, and they're the ones who'll need to heed his words and carry on. And I have no doubt they will.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  72. Re:sorry by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now, I fully expect the government to come in and regulate these guys. At least put in some real NASA-level safety precautions. NASA isnt perfect but their safety record and procedures are pretty good. I think this is the beginning of the end for the "wild west" approach to space exploration. Now the responsible adults need to step in and protect the worker and protect the customers. We've seen a milliom times in america. From little children working at the looms losing fingers to men losing their hands in meat packing. Some new industry comes up and safety is the last concern. No more, thanks.

    They're pretty well-regulated already today, you want more regulation?

    If you want to shoot off anything bigger than a bottle rocket these days, you can bet your anatomy that you'll be hip-deep in Feds and the weight of the paperwork will exceed the weight of the bird. After all, they don't want anybody other than government contractors building WMDs, now, do they? Even indulging in high-powered rocketry on an amatuer basis takes a license. They don't just put them in Cracker Jack boxes. You need to be TRA AND NAR Level One certified to light off a big one. And bonded. Don't show up for your certification run with a six-pack of anything other than soda, they'll never even let you set up.

    As far as man-rated vehicles go, you couldn't afford the paperwork for them on an amatuer basis. And that's just to build one. To launch it is a whole 'nuther set of paperwork. "Wild wild West" approach to space exploration? Only in Hollyweird.

    Here's what the FAA says about model rockets: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ec fr&sid=a327e61307f208ad26c413bc89920ba6&rgn=div5&v iew=text&node=14:2.0.1.3.15&idno=14#14:2.0.1.3.15. 3. Finding the sections on man-rated rockets is left as an exercise for the curious, as those who just want to shrug off private-sector space travel as 'unlicensed and unregulated, send in the Feds' won't bother to look, they'll just post here demanding 'Something Be Done'.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  73. Is this the "Glenn May" who was killed? by cshay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some of the articles say that one Glenn May was killed. I wonder if this was him? http://bikerodnkustom3.homestead.com/danger.html

    1. Re:Is this the "Glenn May" who was killed? by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Charles May. Not Glenn May. That was a misreport.

    2. Re:Is this the "Glenn May" who was killed? by everphilski · · Score: 1

      actually, I think I had it backwards... there was some confusion with the person I had gotten the clarification from. Looks like it was Glenn. My bad.

  74. Re:sorry by fbjon · · Score: 1

    The importance of a death is proportional to your relation to it. It's not an absolute, it depends on who you ask, and there are no right answers.

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  75. the spy movie plot. tinfoil hat territory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This news combined with the NASA sabotage event may be correlated. Is someone trying to make US space activities look bad?

  76. Is it just me... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Or does anyone else find it suspicious that this happened less than two weeks after Northrop Grumman bought them out?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Is it just me... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The reason I ask, is that for well, since NASA, et al, were entering the aerospace industry, they've been saying "Civilians have no place in outer space.". Now, a major aerospace company has proposed to have taken over a civilian space company. Then, suddenly, said civilian space company has a major explosion costing human lives. Now then, expect the obvious "This is why we said civilians have no place in outer space, against us experts!" comments.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    2. Re:Is it just me... by twostar · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it's suspicious but you can be damn sure NG is going to go back and put some procedures in place. This is after they said they weren't going to change anything at scaled. They're going to use this as an excuse to implement their processes and procedures in the name of "safety" and start bringing down scaled.

      I just hope Rutan has the will to prevent this but I don't know if he's had to deal with anything like this before.

    3. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or perhaps you just need to put away the tin foil hat and understand that NASA has also lost many many people to accidents, which are still quite common in this risky field of endevour. It's still a part of space travel. Heck it's even still part of air and car travel.


      It is too bad that instead of just mourning them and redoubling efforts, people like you want to turn this tragedy into yet another political anti-NASA/anti-government conspiracy theory. Here's a hint for you, just like the 911 conspiracy nuts, you do "your side" a great disservice by trying to use a tragedy to attack your political or ideological adversaries.

    4. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. NASA has lost several civilians.

    5. Re:Is it just me... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Hello, are you retarded, or just dense?
      Does the phrase "Industrial sabotage" mean anything to you? Come on!
      There was just an article on /. earlier about how someone snipped some wires in a NASA computer (FNAR). The fact of the matter remains that a MAJOR AEROSPACE CORPORATION bought out a MINOR AEROSPACE CORPORATION, which everyone with two brain cells to rub together knew said minor aerospace corporation would give the public a chance to reach near orbit. NASA, from the very beginning, has been vocally outspoken against space tourism. NASA, the very same organization that is a primary outsourcer to companies such as Northrop Grumman, the company that built a goodly sized chunk of every space shuttle in orbit.
      The explosion came as part of a "routine test", and, as I may add after two days, now is exhibiting the exact same results as I predicted:
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/27/scaled_com posites_mojave_spaceship_two_explosion/
      http://news.com.com/8301-13574_3-9751315-40.html
      http://www.kget.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_ id=530d01a7-2215-4ee1-9568-6edcc3904343
      http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article? AID=/20070728/NEWS02/707280333/1006

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    6. Re:Is it just me... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Here's some more, oh grand poobah:
      http://news.com.com/8301-13574_3-9751315-40.html

      And even NASA is advising, LOL:
      http://www.bizjournals.com/albuquerque/stories/200 7/07/02/daily25.html

      I'll take off the tinfoil hat, when you take out the earplugs.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    7. Re:Is it just me... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Oh, and last but not least:
      http://www.contracostatimes.com/nationandworld/ci_ 6487976

      So please, don't pretend to be an expert, if you cannot bother to use google news.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  77. Re:sorry by Rei · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "(i.e. people working to further advance our journies into space)"

    For the Nth time (where N approaches infinity), as gets mentioned several times every time an article about Scaled comes up, they were doing no such thing. They're working on a pricey joyride which does very little to advance the state of the art of spaceflight, whose operating envelope is more akin to a supersonic aircraft than that of a spacecraft, which gets to skip out on all of the *real* challenges of spaceflight (ISP to mass ratios, thermal protection, etc) and take the much, much easier routes. It'd be like me claiming that I'm advancing the state of the art on ocean crossing because I built a powered dinghy that can only survive 5' waves but has a really neat wiring system.

    This all doesn't make any of these people's deaths less tragic (and my heart goes out to their families), but let's not use their deaths as a chance to portray them as some sort of heroic visionaries leading the way into the future. They were working on a job and died in an industrial accident.

    If anything, perhaps this accident will put lie to the concept that hybrid rockets are somehow inherently safe.

    --
    Present day. Present time.
  78. Mod parent up. by Karellen · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up.

    --
    Why doesn't the gene pool have a life guard?
  79. Interesting coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burt Rutan has just sold the company to Grumman. Is it possible that he didn't like the way things were going and bailed?

    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/2 1/2114226&from=rss

  80. Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, three more people gained super powers.

  81. Re:Not surprised... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Airforce Thunderbirds pilots should never be at the edge or pushing any boundaries - they are airshow display pilots with specific artificial boundaries that protect the crowds, and they are nowhere near the performance envelopes of the aircraft.

  82. C.S.I. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 & 4 != 3 & 3

    Was anyone smoker?

    No smoker! => no explosion!

    Rocket != car's motor

    Security of the rocket != security of car's motor

    Or was not there security in the rocket test facility?

    1. Re:C.S.I. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found a Marlboro cigarette of "Philip Morris USA" there!!!

      In the facility,
      was not there 2 deposits (fuel and oxidizer) for the rocket?

      Else, the rocket doesn't work!

  83. Right after the announced acquisition? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
    I guarantee that there is foul play somewhere in here.


    The motivation, I am not yet informed about for reasonable speculation.

    Branson is involved as a partner, and has, himself been talking about the sale of Virgin holdings to The Carlyle Group.



    Three feet deep, and rising...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Right after the announced acquisition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i bet one of those "space elevator" crazies is behind all of this.

  84. Re:sorry by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Why? Because:

    1) It's highlighted for special attention.

    Photos help a lot. Background story so that you know more about the person or even the animal who died help too.

    Most people won't think about the millions of pigs being slaughtered to produce food, but they'd care about some little pig if it's highlighted in the media.

    2) You have only just so much "bandwidth" for sadness.

    One baby dies, you feel sad. One thousand babies die, you don't feel 1000 times sadder.

    Lots of people die every day who shouldn't die. But fact is, it's not very helpful to go about constantly crying over that.

    Be sad sure. Try and help fix it if possible = even better.

    3) Everyone has favourites, we have to have favourites, being finite in this finite world. Seems even God has favourites.

    I hear in some farms there are animals that are pets, and animals that are going to be food/"produce". But it's not like Daisy the cow was really different from cow #15534.

    --
  85. Re:Not surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space is dangerous. Getting there is dangerous. You can mitigate the risk as much as possible. At the end of the day, there's still a hell of a lot of risk. There is risk in everything, but we try to understand it and minimize it where practical. There is no obvious reason why this test procedure needs to be dangerous. It was designed to be safe. Something went very wrong here, and I'm sure that Scaled Composites will spend significant effort understanding what happened, and what changes or additional controls need to be put in place to minimize the danger. This in addition to everything else that has to be done when 3 people (perhaps 4, 5 or 6) out of a 200 person outfit die in an accident on the job. When 3 of your co-workers die, a delay to the schedule is not the only thing you're concerned about.

    Anyway, it's no help saying "accidents will happen" or, as you have it, 'space is dangerous'. This is surely a very difficult time for Scaled Composites and I give them my prayers and condolences.
  86. GREED KILLING by sixtuslab · · Score: 1

    FTA "Gary May also cited the excitement of working for a company whose projects were financed by famous entrepreneurs such as Richard Branson of Virgin Atlantic and Paul Allen, a co-founder of Microsoft."

    Let me suggest a musical offering: "GREED KILLING" by Napalm Death =)

  87. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just today I'm talking with a guy who came off jury duty. The case involved the death of a young girl involved in a horrific rollover accident and the parents were suing the auto-maker for negligent design. I didn't know of her when she died but just hearing of the parents' grief in that court-room second-hand was enough to make me feel sympathy.

    With all due respect to the parents, the cynic in me says this is exactly how their lawyers want the jury to feel. Abandon all common sense and award the parents $100 million for their suffering, of which the lawyer will get $30 million, not that it will help the dead girl in any way. The parents will never have to work again for the rest of their lives and can focus all of their attention grieving for their daughter, until they die from idleness and rich food. And the bad, bad auto makers will be punished. Never mind the drunk who was the true cause of the accident, since he has no money. In the meantime, the rest of us will pay for it with higher auto sticker prices.

  88. Re:Not surprised... by suzerain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not only that -- when the leader of the Thunderbirds was on the Daily Show, he said something I found kind of surprising. He's been the leader now for (I think) 3 years or so, and he has not changed the routine from what it was before he was there. They most definitely do not push boundaries of any kind; they perform a very calculated show to wow people, kind of like circus acrobats. Is it dangerous? sure. Pushing the limits? Not so much.

    --
    gameDB
  89. Re:Not surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nonsense!! They are AMERICAN HEROS!! They are THE BEST IN THE WORLD!!

    Anyone who doesn't think so is a PINKO COMMIE!!!!!

    So they must be pushing boundaries all the time, mustn't they??

    P.S. - if you want a lesson in how to push boundaries safely, look up Ron Ayres work on Thrust SSC.

  90. THREE killed by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    According to the article, two were killed on-site, and a further died in hospital, post-surgery.

    I tend to think these guys are heroes -- much more so, as people trying to innovate and expand our potential, than, say, those who go to iraq to fight other human beings, and find themselves strangely fought back against in the process. However, the article also says that Scaled Composites undertakes projects for the military, which muddies their heroism somewhat.

  91. Certain setback by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Three people dead, others injured, out of a small team. A proper test (testFLIGHT?) was due in a few days. Seems to me that this will definitely set things back, even if they don't take time to grieve, which I'm sure they will.

    What I'd love to know is... what are the other competing projects right now, and how ruthless are they?

  92. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "..(Columbus) did so because he thought he could make a fuckload of money by doing so..."

    Um, Yes! That's the most accurate view of American history I've ever heard from an American. It's so right, it hurts.

    Just for the record, most immigrants don't come to the US because they 'yearn to breath free' either. They come because they can make a fuckload of money.

    What that produces is an entrepreneurial spirit, all right. But it also produces crushing inhumanity. Columbus's attitude to the American natives of his day was that some would make 'good slaves'. And now we see the results of this selection process in America's dealings with the rest of the world.

  93. Re:Not surprised... by Hubbell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No libertarian would ever suggest anything being a government job beyond preserving individual freedoms and rights, beyond that govenment has no place.

  94. Re:sorry by Hubbell · · Score: 1

    No one forced them to take those jobs, why does the government need to once more be involved in the affairs of private citizens?

  95. Re:Not surprised... by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

    Both the Challenger and Columbia disasters had plenty of blame to cover both management and engineering.

    As Feynman demonstrated in the hearings over Challenger, the o-rings were not designed for use at the ambient temperature at launch time. That could have been known, and the launch stopped, if there had not been a stacking up of mistakes by NASA managers and engineers as well as those same groups at Morton Thoikol. All of those people spent time looking at what amounted to a handful of Powerpoint slides but none of them saw the relationship between temperature and rocket motor problems.

    Same thing with Columbia. Steps were taken to keep insulation from falling off, it was a known problem. They even had reasonable video of the actual piece that did the damage, doing the damage. While the thing was up in space they knew the steps the Lockheed engineers took didn't work. That problem was again compounded by the poor use of what information they had to determine what they should do in response.

    I'm picking nits here, but it illustrates the complexity of doing something like this. A whole bunch of intelligent people at NASA and Lockheed and Morton had a whole bunch of information to work with but they couldn't (or wouldn't) makes sense of it.

    --
    "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
  96. OSHA and ATF could delay reopening by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Other agencies will replace "NASA" and investigate this tragedy. This is dangerous work.

  97. My prayers go out to their families. by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    In respect to those who lost their lives, I'm going to watch The Right Stuff this weekend along with the SpaceShipOne DVD from The Discovery Channel.

    1. Re:My prayers go out to their families. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      n respect to those who lost their lives, I'm going to watch The Right Stuff this weekend along with the SpaceShipOne DVD from The Discovery Channel.
      While you're watching the SS1 video, please take note of the scene where Burt sends a guy to the junkyard to look for an old automotive switch. Then notice when the display goes blank when Mike is up there at Mach 3. That's because they picked up a brightness control at Radio Shack and it didn't like either the G's or the vibration (not sure which). They don't mention Radio Shack, I picked up that tidbit elsewhere. Also notable in the video is that they mention a lead guy on SS1 died on his first flight of an aircraft he built (I think it was the first flight). Not a Scaled project, but built by one of their people. That's not to say he was careless, just that as a group their track record isn't as perfect as they like to think. I have great respect for those that build their own, and more for those that design their own.

      That said, I think they honestly know when it's OK to be cheap and when things matter. I just hope they don't find this accident was caused by failure of a part they picked up at Home Depot.

  98. Re:Not surprised... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    No libertarian would ever suggest anything being a government job beyond preserving individual freedoms and rights, beyond that govenment has no place.
      I said "dark libertarian", implying someone working at odds with the typical libertarian credo. They also wear black and get a cool red lightsaber.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  99. Re:Not surprised... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    The Airforce Thunderbirds pilots should never be at the edge or pushing any boundaries - they are airshow display pilots with specific artificial boundaries that protect the crowds, and they are nowhere near the performance envelopes of the aircraft. That gets back to what I said, they try to do insane things as safely as possible. But you're still talking about expensive, fast, and dangerous aircraft flying inches away from each other. Trapeze artists don't have a deathwish, highwire artists will sometimes ham it up for the audience, just to make it look more dangerous, but it's a controlled level of risk. It has to be, otherwise the circus owners would have to find a new act every other week. At the same time, what they're doing IS dangerous and they CAN be killed if they fuck up.

    I haven't done much flying but one of the primary safety rules constantly repeated is "don't go dicking around close to the ground." Altitude gives you options. Another important rule is to keep proper separation from other aircraft. That distance should properly be measured in miles, not feet.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  100. About Burt Rutan by EvilNight · · Score: 1

    I see that some people don't know much about Burt Rutan and his goals and how he hopes to accomplish them. This talk should clear that up. If you think a government space program has any chance of accomplishing anything, then you should watch this video and get a bit wiser.

    http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/4

    This accident is a miserable development. Rutan is working very hard to provide us with that slice of 'west' the world hasn't had since California was settled. I hope this doesn't set back that dream.

    --
    Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
    1. Re:About Burt Rutan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not have heard the news but Northrop now OWNS Scaled. The dream is dead. Deal with it.

  101. So is hanging powerlines and oil refining by tjstork · · Score: 1

    There's plenty of dangerous industries in the USA. Consider, for example, all the natural gas pipelines. There's investigations when accidents take place, but it doesn't stop a company from delivering energy. Or, look at electricity. I'll say that any lineman has cahoneys as big any guy working on a spaceship. The lineman has a thousand people bitching at him to get the lights on when he's working thousands of volts in the rain. I think that often times we get so caught up in the glamor of the new that we forget the lives people lay on the line every day to bring us the electricity, gas, and food that we take for granted.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:So is hanging powerlines and oil refining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like NASA closed up shop for 2 years, they were still working and researching as well as investigating the problems. Would you have wanted them to send up another shuttle without knowing what went wrong with the first one? I don't think any private company would do that either, even if only because they fear another loss of assets on the scale of a whole shuttle.

  102. Re:Not surprised... by noSignal · · Score: 1

    some sort of weird dark libertarian. You're right: You'd have to be a weird libertarian to want your government paying for space colonization.
  103. Founder Burt Sugarman among the dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Founder Burt Sugarman, and a wolfman according to reports, among the dead. The target, Rapcrap, still alive.

  104. Re:sorry by DkY · · Score: 1

    If nothing else they're showing that a market exists for space flight at that price point, which is important in itself to attract investment in the harder problems of going into space.

  105. Particle Impingement by DivemasterJoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given this incident occurred during a oxidizer flow rate test I am left wondering if particle impingement somewhere in the NO2 system may have been the culprit.

    I blend a great deal of "exotic" breathing gases used for technical scuba operations and one of my primary concerns is having O2 "clean" equipment. The goal is to avoid any particles of material (dust, lubricant, etc) in the valves, lines, regulators, and cylinders that may be forced through very tiny orifices at high speed. The resulting friction inside a high pressure line, valve, or regulator can be enough to cause ignition of the particle. Of course, in the presence of an oxidizer, even a tiny bit of ignited material can cause other components in the system to fail. Valves and regulators are made of brass and have internal components made of nylon and rubber. The resulting cascade of failures can be quite devastating, especially if the pressure vessel is compromised.

    Just a thought...

  106. 3 dead, 3 injured now by Phleg · · Score: 1

    Update in Washington Post. One of the critically injured people died after surgery.

    --
    No comment.
  107. Its not just you by unity100 · · Score: 1

    too fishy

  108. Re:Not surprised... by pv2b · · Score: 1

    There's also the matter of economics. It's simply not economically possible to guard against every threat. If it were, then someone on this planet would be nigh-immortal.
    Tell that to Fidel Castro. :-) Then again, look at Cuba's economy...
  109. Death count risen to 3 by musicon · · Score: 1
    According to the AP, the death count has risen to three:

    A Kern County Medical Center official said two people died at the scene and one later died at the hospital after surgery. The three injured suffered numerous shrapnel wounds. Two were in critical condition and one was in serious condition early Friday, the official said.
    1. Re:Death count risen to 3 by dsmall · · Score: 1

      "Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of earth
      and danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings;
      Sunward I've climbed and joined the tumbling mirth
      of sun-split clouds - and done a hundred things
      you have not dreamed of - wheeled and soared and swung
      high in the sunlit silence. Hov'ring there,
      I've chased the shouting wind along and flung
      my eager craft through footless halls of air.
      Up, up, into the long delirious burning blue
      I've topped the wind-swept heights with easy grace,
      where never lark, nor even eagle, flew;
      and, while with silent, lifting mind I've trod
      the high untrespassed sanctity of space,
      put out my hand, and touched the face of God."


      "High Flight", by John Gillespie Magee, Jr.


      This was written by a 19 year old American volunteer with the Royal Canadian Air Force, who was killed in action, December 11, 1941.

      For those hurt, a speedy recovery, and for those killed, peace.

      David M. Small
      Denver, Colorado

  110. Burt's a great guy, but ... by everphilski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He gave nearly the same presentation at the AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference two years ago now. It was a good talk, over all. However, he is a bit of a dreamer. I'm not saying that is completely a bad thing. But if you believe for one second that SpaceShipOne can be scaled up to an orbital vehicle - something he implied in his presentation - I have oceanfront property in Arizona you might be interested in. Nice bridge, too ...

    He is right that the little guys have their chance at space - look at Armadillo Aerospace, XCOR, Masten Space Systems, etc. They are all realizing the dream, watching their budgets and doing their best to lower the cost of entry to space. And if they do, that will be something unique.

    A third and tangential point - NASA and the alternative space community have differing goals; so the 'If you think a government space program has any chance of accomplishing anything' really doesn't make much sense. 'Burt Rutan and his goals and how he hopes to accomplish them' ... Government funded space programs have sent probes from the sun, to past Pluto, to Mars, landed men on the moon, hosted men and women in earth orbit. What has Burt Rutan done again? Two suborbital space shots? I think NASA did that back in the 50's... (I'm an aerospace engineer. I also used to work for the Army designing missiles, I now work for NASA designing Ares. You might think I'm biased, but I do know people working in alt.space. I wish them all the best, and from my discussions with some of them, they know what their position is in history. What they are doing has been done before, their goal is to lower the cost of entry and raise the flight count per year. Achieving that will be a great success and open up space to the masses...)

  111. Re:Not surprised... by everphilski · · Score: 1

    All I have to say on the matter is that rocket science is dangerous business, the same goes for any kind of challenging engineering.

    Agreed. There will be loss of life. However, if the accident occurred as I've heard it (the result of a cold flow through an igniter test), then these deaths are particularly sad. All they were doing was running laughing gas through an injector. There was no need for people to be exposed during the test. They should have been in a bunker. I just hope this wasn't a case of complacency. That's not what alt.space needs right now.

  112. Re:sorry by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    Indeed, these people were no more special, or less special, than many others killed every day. The difference is that these people died doing something generally considered "not dangerous", so the deaths are more unexpected.

    Still, I don't make jokes about individual soldiers in Iraq dying, I don't make jokes even about individual gang members dying. Making jokes about individual deaths is insensitivity in the extreme; even when shielded behind anonymous internet monikers. If you want to make jokes in general about death, or even about 'anonymous' deaths, that's one thing. But to take light the lives of the recently deceased is the height of cruelty. I do know one Scaled employee who I don't even need to worry was there, I know he's working on a different project, but I also know he reads Slashdot. I'm sure close friends or relatives of one or more of the deceased do as well.

    I don't ask for any specific death to be treated more specially, just equally humanely.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  113. N2O by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, whippet whips YOU!

  114. BBC reports three deaths by stormhair · · Score: 1

    According to the BBC, a third person has died. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6918540. stm

  115. Re:Not surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a big difference between accepting death as a natural result of an activity, and measuring the progress of that activity in terms of death. When one goes to war, one expects to lose soldiers. That doesn't mean that whoever lost the most soldiers has necessarily won.

    Shit, if that was the case, the we'd have to say that it was actually the Russians that won the space-race. =D
  116. Re:Not surprised... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Agreed. There will be loss of life. However, if the accident occurred as I've heard it (the result of a cold flow through an igniter test), then these deaths are particularly sad. All they were doing was running laughing gas through an injector. There was no need for people to be exposed during the test. They should have been in a bunker. I just hope this wasn't a case of complacency. That's not what alt.space needs right now. You can get some of the most tragic accidents when people who should know better make careless mistakes. There was a story a few years back about a veteran skydiver with 10,000 jumps making his last jump without having packed a parachute. Not a suicide attempt or anything, just a stupid mistake! Complacency is exactly the right word for these accidents. I haven't seen any statistics but I'd bet if you plotted the experience of accident victims here you'd see a cluster when they first start the activity, a big drop as they become comfortable, and the further along you get, you'll start seeing spikes and clumps as they get complacent and get maimed or die.

    And now they say a third person has died.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  117. Reinventing The Wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course people remember the old newsreel clips of rockets exploding on the launchpad, and test beds blowing up. We think they're funny and quaint. But the people who actually worked on those designs, and who learned from those failures learned a great deal that made it into NASA's procedures but never made it into the textbooks. Most have died of old age. Many of the new generation of enterpreneurial engineers think NASA if full of scared old women, no "real men" with the right stuff any more. Until those engineers accidentally kill somebody with their ignorance.

    I think that this is just the first of a series of deadly lessons that the new space engineers are going to have to relearn before they succeed, and one of the lessons will probably be why safe space travel is so expensive.

  118. Delays by heroine · · Score: 1

    When is it going to fly now. 2011? 2015?
    It's been 3 years since the last private space flight.

  119. Sorry to all those involved, but what went wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I mean its not exactly rocket science

  120. If you want to express your condolences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone of you here wants to express your condolences in a way which reaches the co-workers of the victims, you can use the contact form on. Even a small supportive word from a total stranger can really make wonders. Just remember to select the "Fan letters and well wishes for the SpaceShipOne program" radio button, that makes sure your message will be delivered to the right persons.

  121. tank failure? by Muhammar · · Score: 1

    I guess the big nitrous tank has ruptured, the fire was a secondary and happened after the tank failure. Stuff burns in nitrous oxide quite nicely, like in oxygen. I don't believe nitrous oxide has explosive properties (unless it is mixed with some flammable material). This would be consistent with the shrapnel injuries and burns of the victims. Also, if any explosive substance in a hundred kilo quantity had truly detonated, there would be nothing left of the trailer, there would be only a hole in the ground.

    Nitrous oxide tank has to be able to handle pressures about as high as tanks for acetylene welding gas (much higher than in the common household propane tanks). Building the Space Two nitrous tank must be quite a challenge - I think they are using composite materials to keep it reasonably light. During compression and release, there are high temperature fluctuation inside the tank (like in the fridge freon compressor) and it is possible that cold/heat shocked composite wall of the tank cracked under the pressure.

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  122. Anyone find it odd..... by belunar · · Score: 1

    ..that this took place soon after the announcement that Northrop Grumman was taking full control of Scaled Composites? I may be wrong, I may be paranoid and its just a big coincidence, I may be right on also. Just seems odd to me.

    Article on buyout http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/2 1/2114226&from=rss

    I am sorry to hear people were hurt, I hate seeing news items like this. I hope that everyone that lived is ok and that it turns out the problem was a mechanical failure or something simular as opposed to neglegence or sabatoge.

  123. Re:Not surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what you would expect when the private sector tries its hand at space travel -- deaths due to carelessness. That's why space colonization is properly a government function.
    Right, cuz we've never lost a government astronaut do to carelessness and general fuck-ups. Not sure if you're a troll or some sort of weird dark libertarian.
    Libertarians would want to get the government OUT of space exploration, and leave it to individuals and private companies. Only jobs such as law-enforcement, courts, and the military that must be impartial toward the citizens would be taken care of by the government.

    Actually, most Libertariens in the US just want to see us actually start following the constitution.

    I'm a left-leaning Libertarian. I believe that our society should feed, educate, and provide medical care to those who are less fortunate than myself -- but I'd be happier if I could give my money to a number of competing charities rather than have it appropriated by the government. But, what I really want is for our leaders to read the constitution, return habeus corpus, close the secret switch-rooms, stop regulating who I can marry, disallow government-bodies from taking my home so that they can build shopping malls, and so forth.

    Historically, Libertarians tended to lean Republican -- but the bushie's blatant disregard for the constitution has pretty-much changed this.

    Enough politics! Let's get back to discussing these brave, independent, and free pioneers who suffered a tragic loss -- but who, we hope, will go on and do even greater things. I'd love to work there, even after this tragedy.
  124. Words just don't cover it well. by Snowtide · · Score: 1
    Damn.

    But what these people are doing is important, if I had skills they needed I would be happy to work there, risk and all.

  125. Re:sorry by Rei · · Score: 1

    At the end of the day, these people died so Burt could launch millionaires (instead of billionaires) into near orbit for $250K a pop (instead of $30M a pop).

    Given the situation in Unistat, and the likelihood of "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" (TANSTAAFL is something Heinlein derived as a likely result of living in a hostile environment) coming true after a critical mass of humans is achieved outside of earth orbit, I'm willing to bet that the people working at Scaled
    Composites were on their way towards doing more for human freedom than NASA did in the past 40 years.


    "Near orbit"? Human freedom? Time for a reality check.

    --
    Present day. Present time.
  126. Re:Not surprised... by fjf33 · · Score: 1

    Exactly so their deaths did expose something, and a small step forward was taken. Was their deaths worth the step? Could we have spent enough resources to avoid their deaths? That is what engineers and program managers deal with every time. Maybe we just should not be going into space or doing any of the interesting things that some of us risk our lives doing, but it is just human nature to do them anyway.

  127. Re:sorry by Genda · · Score: 1

    Again, your loss is profound and appropriate. Losing my Father was a world altering trajedy for me. It was a terrible loss for friends and family, my Father was a much loved man. It however didn't make the evening news, and it was any different for me than the 10,000 other families around the world that lost their Fathers that day.

    Losing a leader, any leader, a president, a religious leader, an astronaut, an artist, a saint, a person of great compassion, intelligence, dignity, or humanity, losing any public figure like this impacts us all. It's different than the private loss of a loved one.

    It's the difference between having a Cesna lose power and crash into your house, VS 9/11. One is a private loss, the other is very public, and there's something fundamentally different about public loss. Not worse, not more important, just different. The world occurs differently. The hurt doesn't come from the inside going out but instead the other way.

    I want to make this clear. Your loss is your loss, and nothing can dimish that. To lose a public figure however, a public hero, someone you deeply respect for how they spent their one and only precious life, this loss touches all of us deeply, and it's that common loss that binds us and makes us human.

  128. Northrup Grumman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't it just announced that Scaled Composites was being purchased by Northrup Grumman, like yesterday? My condolences to those involved also.

  129. Re:Not surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just hope it isn't symptomatic of a corporate mentality takeover after the buyout. As mentioned in TFA, Northrop Grumman's agreement to buy the business in its entirety is pending regulatory approval. The current ownership of 40% has been unchanged since 2000, during which time a number of significant things have been accomplished. Even though many people believe Big Bad Corporations are to blame for whatever goes wrong, it just isn't so.
  130. Re:sorry by trout007 · · Score: 1

    Oxidizers are no joke. Liquid Oxygen is much worse then dealing with Liquid Hydrogen. Drop Liquid Oxygen on asphalt and you get yourself a bang and a hole. High pressure Liquid Oxygen likes to make all sorts of things fuel like titanium and even stainless steels. You have to go into the nickel alloys like Inconnel and Monel. I'm wondering if they didn't push Liquid Nitros Oxide too far for the materials they were using. I've seen just a little piece of debris travel in a Liquid Oxygen line and when it turns a corner or goes into a pump BLAM! no more pump. The oxygen oxidizes the whole thing.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  131. Re:Not surprised... by brucemcdon · · Score: 1

    corporate mentality takeover after the buyout Yeah, like "What can we do to make sure the Feds approve our buyout of that guy whatzisname's rocket factory? Hey I know, let's blow something up!"
  132. Re:Not surprised... by catprog · · Score: 1

    What about more iron in pure form then have ever been mined on earth.

    Cancer(the old age cancers and other old age diseases like Alzheimer) is because we are living longer.

    Exploring the oceans is dangerous(1800) so why do it?

    --
    My Transformation Website
    Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
    Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
  133. Can you imagine... by Sister+of+One · · Score: 1

    I am one of the sisters of Todd, the "third" that died in the Scaled Composite explosion. Thank you to all who are thinking of our family and the other families. We are devastated. Our mom and dad are in CA now after a long flight from Alaska. They have much to wrap up there before being able to arrange a memorial service for Todd, including identifying him at the coroner's office. Can imagine doing that? Can you imagine going through your son's things and packing them up? Can imagine how family would feel after reading several of the threads? Can you imagine that even though he was only one of thousands that died that day, that a family would grieve over this? Can you imagine that? Some of you, some of you not. I stubbled over this site while looking for an explanation of what happened. I am an engineer, and I really just wanted to understand what happened, not find blame, just the facts and understanding. There is very little known, but some of you gave me some much need knowledge about how these engines work, NO2, compressed gas cylinders, etc. I really didn't need to read all the threads about whether these deaths were significant or not. Please let every key stroke be well thought out of who might be reading it. Most of the threads were written within a 24 hour period, and lives go on, but your words are still out there. Thank you again to all the informative and condoling people.

  134. Re:Not surprised... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    *cough* Soyuz 1, Soyuz 11, Nedelin, Challenger, Columbia, Alcantara, Intelsat 708 *cough*