Slashdot Mirror


British Scientists Reverse Casimir Effect

An anonymous reader writes "The Telegraph reports that Scientists at the University of St. Andrews have developed a technique to cause the Casimir effect to repel instead of attract. This discovery could lead to near frictionless machines or in theory even levitation."

97 of 347 comments (clear)

  1. wait... by flanker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't it "repel" rather than "repeal"?

    --
    Left shift 1 for e-mail...
    1. Re:wait... by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are suggesting that they repel repeal in order to repeal the misunderstanding of repel.

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    2. Re:wait... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wouldn't that be repugnant, then?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:wait... by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the OP was right. They're repealing attraction. Don't know why they took so long, Slashdotters repealed attraction years ago.

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:wait... by russ1337 · · Score: 5, Funny

      >>> the whole world is not American you know

      That depends on who is defining "world".

  2. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gasp, that means we will have to repel one of the laws of seance.

  3. uplifting by bobby1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

    How says science cannot be uplifting.... literally.

    1. Re:uplifting by IBBoard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Depends how you look at it - pessimists will see the lower atom being depressed ;)

    2. Re:uplifting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I've got a chimpanzee here who says uplifiting is total bunk.

    3. Re:uplifting by mhall119 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because not many people will understand the reference:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uplift_Universe

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
  4. Repeal instead of attract. by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 4, Funny

    This could be put to immediate use in the USA, where much bad legislation needs to be repealed and they need to attract fewer blockheads to a career in politics.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:Repeal instead of attract. by gb506 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This could be put to immediate use in the USA, where much bad legislation needs to be repealed and they need to attract fewer blockheads to a career in politics.

      You're so right on, DR! I'm packing my shit up and moving someplace where the laws are all just and the politicos are uniformly uncorrupt and capable. (looks at map, scratches head)

  5. casmir by edittard · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not a big fan of knitwear at the best of times.

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    1. Re:casmir by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

      So you're already repelled. When they reverse the effect, maybe you'll be attracted. It will be sweaters every day for you.

  6. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a feeling that this breakthrough will eventually lead to the development of giant flying mecha.
    You heard it hear first, on slashdot.

  7. Finally... by rootus-rootus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Soon we can do away with stupid things like elevators..

    --
    The moral of the story is: "Always remember to mount a scratch monkey."
    1. Re:Finally... by fthomas · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a "lift" you insensitive clod...

  8. repeal vs. repel by Laebshade · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's "repel" as in "the body odor of submitter repels women worldwide", as opposed (heh) to repeal, which means, "to remove or reverse a law".

  9. They'd better be careful by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or they'll vaporize the universe with this contraption. I suppose somebody's out there looking to make a weapon out of the thing.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:They'd better be careful by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or they'll vaporize the universe with this contraption. I suppose somebody's out there looking to make a weapon out of the thing.


      Probably. Many major scientific breakthroughs have come from researchers working on weapons technology. And vice-versa -- many new weapons technologies have come from researchers working on scientific breakthroughs.

      Imagine causing all of the atoms in a tank to repel each other. Messy.
    2. Re:They'd better be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have a masters in physics, and although im not an expert in these things, i believe i have a better working knowledge than parent.

      In the quantum description of the electromagnetic field, there is no such thing as uniformly zero field - even in completely empty space, there are oscilations in the field spread over all modes (ie. wavelengths). It can be compared to an ocean or pond in stormy weather where there will allways be *some* waves.
      Now, if we have a geometry consisting of two flat opposing plates, only certain wavelengths corresponding to the distance between the plates will be allowed. Thus by increasing or decreasing the distance between the plates, we can deside which zero-point wavelengths will be allowed, and it is such that the situation where the plates are very close are energetically favorable, hence we will see the two plates attract each other and this is known as the casimir force which has been measured many times in the experiment. Its important to realize that its not charges on the plates which are doing the work - everything is kept charge neutral. Its vacuum doing work :-) .

      (by manipulating the geometry of the plates, inserting lences, etc. its then theoretically possible to make the plates repel instead, which is what the article is about)

      Anyway. My point is. This is not like nuclear chain reactions. The experimental conditions under which you see these effects are extreme (as in: the truck on the street or the cellphone in the assistants pocket will ruin it). Its a neat discovery, but the doom and gloom is completely uncalled for.

  10. Re:ummmm? by IBBoard · · Score: 5, Informative

    The BBC are slightly more useful at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_ east/6932283.stm - they say it's a "friction reducing lens". Still doesn't give us a lot to go on, but it's a start!

  11. Using the force? by therufus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Micro or nano machines could run smoother and with less or no friction at all if one can manipulate the force. Obi-Wan was right after all! I can become a Jedi!

    So was it only me that heard Sir Alec Guinness read that line out?
    --
    You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    1. Re:Using the force? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sir Guiness


      In actual fact it's Sir Alec, if he was a Lord it would be Lord Guiness and if he was a King it would be King Alec.
  12. Not a high point in science journalism by Mathinker · · Score: 4, Informative

    The discovery is not to be belittled, but both the article and the poster somehow forget to mention that the "levitation" which is talked about is on the order of nanometers (check the Wikipedia article on the Casimir effect). Far from the kinds of stuff you see stage magicians do.

    1. Re:Not a high point in science journalism by TALlama · · Score: 5, Funny

      Far from the kinds of stuff you see stage magicians do.

      I assure you, Ladies and Gentlemen of the audience, this gigantic crate is levitating! Between it and the stage are entire nanometers of magic.

      --

      - The Amazina Llama

  13. And the Casimir effect is... by Mike1024 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Wikipedia:

    In physics, the Casimir effect or Casimir-Polder force is a physical force exerted between separate objects, which is due to neither charge, gravity, nor the exchange of particles, but instead is due to resonance of all-pervasive energy fields in the intervening space between the objects. [...] Since the strength of the force falls off rapidly with distance it is only measurable when the distance between the objects is extremely small. On a submicron scale, this force becomes so strong that it becomes the dominant force between uncharged conductors. Indeed at separations of 10 nm -- about a hundred times the typical size of an atom -- the Casimir effect produces the equivalent of 1 atmosphere of pressure (101.3 kPa).
    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    1. Re:And the Casimir effect is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was disappointed with the Wikipedia entry. Not because it is inaccurate— I don't have the background to judge that. But because I was once shown a much better way to visualize what is going on with the Casimir effect, and this wasn't mentioned.

      The following is NOT TRUE, in the same way that centrifugal force is not true. However both of these fictions are very convenient, and often useful enough in practice that their theoretical shortcomings are ignored.

      Qunatum foam is the constant creation and disintegration of pairs of virtual particles that is an inherent property of empty space. The Heisenberg principle is at work and causes empty space to continually create pairs of virtual particles such that simple low energy, high probability pairs happen more frequently than high energy or complex pairs that have much lower probabilities. That is the essence of quantum foam.

      Now put a couple of neutral, very flat, parallel plates within this space and move them toward each other. At some point the plates are too close for some long wavelength particles to fit between them: the quantum foam is constrained from creating virtual particles of these wavelengths in the direction perpendicular to the face of the plates. But there is no such constraint on the other side of either plate, and a radiation pressure gradient has been formed. The plates will start to move closer to each other, which constrains shorter wavelengths, and so there is a positive feedback in play: the closer they get to each other, the greater the forces pushing them at each other. It isn't so much that the space between plates somehow sucks them toward each other; it is more a case of the rest of the universe pushing them at each other.

  14. Requires a perfect lens by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Informative
    From this article:

    Now, Leonhardt and Philbin have calculated that the Casimir force between two conducting plates can turn from being attractive to repulsive if a "perfect" lens is sandwiched between them. A perfect lens can focus an image with a resolution that is not restricted by the wavelength of light. Such a lens could be made from a metamaterial made of artificial structures that are engineered to have negative index of refraction -- which means that the metamaterial bends light in the opposite direction to an ordinary material.

    According to the researchers, the negative-index metamaterial is able to modify the zero-point oscillations in the gap between the surfaces, reversing the direction of the Casimir force. Indeed, the researchers believe that this repulsive force is strong enough to levitate an aluminium mirror that is 500nm thick, causing it to hover above a perfect lens placed over a conducting plate. Since the Casimir force acts on the length scale of nanomachines, manipulating it could be important for future applications of nanotechnology. To summarize, nothing has been built yet. It's possible that it could be built, though you'd have to make a "perfect" lens in the tiny space between the two plates. Unfortunately, every "perfect" lens I've heard of tends to be wavelength-specific and relatively large (compared to the gap the Casimir effect requires). It may be that these are just engineering hurdles, but it may also be physically impossible to pull off.
    1. Re:Requires a perfect lens by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, well, then I guess we're not going to leave it up the guys who made the original lenses on the Hubble, now are we?

    2. Re:Requires a perfect lens by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Negative refractive index materials, called "lefthanded metamaterials" are already in use.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  15. huh? by apodyopsis · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is this? a spelling contest or a discussion about a new scientific discovery?

    Sheesh. Anybody would think /. is populated purely by obsessive pedants with nothing better to do.

    oh..

    1. Re:huh? by Ciarang · · Score: 5, Funny

      You need a capital A to start a new sentence.

    2. Re:huh? by Duhavid · · Score: 5, Funny

      AI want to start a new sentence. Aso, I need a capital A.
      AI did not know that. AI'm glad you were here to point that out!

      Abye.

      APS:, AWhy didn't your sentence start with a capital A?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:huh? by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, ha ha. But just so people don't get the wrong idea, apodyopsis wasn't starting a new sentence, but rather was using a question mark mid-sentence, which is perfectly allowed.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Question_mark

      It can also be used mid-sentence to mark a merely interrogative phrase, where it functions similarly to a comma, such as in the single sentence "Where shall we go? and what shall we do?", but this usage is increasingly rare.
  16. Re:Disintegrators by asliarun · · Score: 2, Funny

    What happens if all the molecules in your body suddenly repels eachother? You will be rudely repealed.
  17. Dry glue? Are you thinking what I'm thinking? by objekt · · Score: 4, Funny

    "dry glue" effect that enables a gecko to walk across a ceiling.

    "Spider-pig, Spider-pig,
    Does whatever a Spider-pig does."

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:Dry glue? Are you thinking what I'm thinking? by Carewolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Spider-pig, Spider-pig,
      Does whatever a Spider-pig does."

      "Can he fly from a web?
        No he can't 'cause he's a pig"
    2. Re:Dry glue? Are you thinking what I'm thinking? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Spider-pig, Spider-pig,
              Does whatever a Spider-pig does."

      "Can he fly from a web?
          No he can't 'cause he's a pig"


      "Look out! He isn't paper trained....."

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  18. Re:ummmm? by ROMRIX · · Score: 2, Funny

    i RTFA, but didn't see any explanation or examples. im baffled how this works.. any insight?
    It works on the same principle as zits on your prom date.
  19. *applause* by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nicola Tesla would be proud. This sounds like all the electrical field tuning he did back in the 1800's only on a smaller scale and for different purposes.

    Modulating fields like this seems to me to be some sort of thrusting action although they don't come out and say it.

    --
    The game.
  20. Re:ummmm? by DJ+Paradox · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try checking out the University website - it had much more information about the science of the discovery:

    http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~ulf/levitation.html

    Pity they have a photo of Syndrome and his Zero-Point Energy device as an example at the top. Doesn't help anyone to take them seriously surely.

  21. Well, it's _scheduled_ for publication by tenco · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://www.iop.org/EJ/journal/-page=forthart/1367- 2630#Papers

    Quantum levitation by left-handed metamaterials
    Ulf Leonhardt and Thomas Philbin
    Provisionally scheduled for August 2007

  22. Re:ummmm? by catman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Thanks for the link - the Wikipedia article explains the effect and says that for materials with certain electromagnetic properties and configurations, the Casimir effect might result in a repulsive force instead of an attractive. Looks like somebody demonstrated that. Still, there's a long way from this to a macroscopic levitation system...

  23. Woohoo by zonestalker · · Score: 2, Funny

    now where is my hover skateboard?

    --
    Electronic Liberties must be defended at all costs!
  24. Casimir Scientists' Own Page by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Informative

    A humorous page about these British scientists' work by St Andrews physics Professor Leonhardt explains their work on Casimir "levitation".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  25. Being British... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Invent/discover something cool
    2. Tell everyone about it
    3. ???? 4. NO Profit

    It's sad to say that here in the UK we never learn and have a long and distinguished history of brilliant research followed by total fumbling of the ball and making no money out of the discoveries whatsoever.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Being British... by Pecisk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And this is bad because...?

      Woah, you want to tell me that there are scientists who actually do science for...err...sake of science, not money? What a surprise!

      Without irony, I personally don't believe in profiting from BIG discoveries. If you get some applications going from that discovery, then it is understandable that you can and you will profit from them, but not from discovery itself.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    2. Re:Being British... by vigmeister · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've always wondered about what would happen if/when a time machine is discovered. You can patent it only for so many years, but with free travel possible in the temporal dimension, just thinking about a profitable business model makes my head hurt.

      Cheers!

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    3. Re:Being British... by Chief+Camel+Breeder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From the researcher's point of view:

      1. Discover something cool.
      2. Publish results in peer-reviewed journal and get famous.
      3. Get better research job (or more money, security in current one).
      4. Profit!

      Step 3 doesn't have to involve selling technology.

    4. Re:Being British... by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny

      That should be pretty obvious. The moment that you start to make progress on a working Time Machine, something unfortunate and completely unforseen will happen to stop you from finishing it. Maybe you will just decide to paint bubble wrap red and paint the words 'TENSION SHEET' on it instead.

      Because somewhere in the future, somebody has got to really hate having his history messed with.

    5. Re:Being British... by ssorc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe the answer is U.S. Patent Number 1 by Cheapass Games.

      --
      /-\-/
    6. Re:Being British... by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Contrary to popular belief, the world does in fact not revolve around money.

      That is all.

  26. an almost content-free article by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Apart from saying it uses a "special lens" there's no information about how the team managed to reverse this effect. In fact there's more space given to the hocus-pocus aspects (that every straight thinking /.'er dismissed in an instant) than of any actual science.

    The thelegraph is supposed to be one of the more serious british dailies. So heaven help us all if this is what they pass off as a science story.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  27. Casimir... by Rhaban · · Score: 3, Funny

    I did not know this guy => http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_(dinosaur) had a physics degree.

  28. Re:ummmm? by itsdapead · · Score: 5, Funny

    im baffled how this works.. any insight?

    I assume it involves a cat with a piece of buttered toast strapped to its back...

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  29. Re:Disintegrators by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or even worse: what if all your *electrons* repelled each other?????

  30. Slam Dunk Reporting, Guys by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 5, Informative
    You can tell the journalistic standards at the Telegraph are through the roof. From the article:

    The force is due to neither electrical charge or gravity, for example, but the fluctuations in all-pervasive energy fields in the intervening empty space between the objects and is one reason atoms stick together, also explaining a dry glue effect that enables a gecko to walk across a ceiling.

    This wasn't enough for me, so I wandered over to Wikipedia:

    In physics, the Casimir effect or Casimir-Polder force is a physical force exerted between separate objects, which is due to neither charge, gravity, nor the exchange of particles, but instead is due to resonance of all-pervasive energy fields in the intervening space between the objects.

    The only changes to the Wikipedia article lately have been a link to this article, which is sort of meta. Wikipedia linking to an article plagiarizing from, of all places, Wikipedia. Cute, but also a little sad.
    --
    Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  31. When I hear 'Casimir', I think 'Zero Point'... by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am a physicist, but these subjects are often beyond me. Still, let me try a short explanation. This seems, to me, rather an important discovery.

    The Casimir effect happens when you get two surfaces very nearly touching. Virtual particles emerge on the other side of the surfaces and force them together. Virtual particles being, well, virtual -- very short-lived and low-energy -- this effect only occurs when the surfaces are very, very close to one another.

    What's intriguing about the Casimir effect is that it is extracting work from the zero point energy of the universe, the base energy field of empty space. (Yes, even a total vacuum contains virtual particles, and thus some energy.) It is not immediately obvious how to make this useful, however, if the only way to tap into the zero point energy is to destructively sandwich two expensive materials together.

    Reversing the Casimir effect is brilliant. By placing a perfect lens between the two materials, the virtual particles create a repulsive force. This could, as stated, create a levitation effect by preventing the surfaces from ever touching. 'Levitation' is a strong word, though. It'll 'levitate' a nanometer or so above the other surface, which is only good for reducing the friction between them to zero. So 'frictionless surfaces' is probably the keyword we should be using here.

    I'm intrigued because it would seem to be easier to generate power from the zero point energy with a repulsive effect than an attractive one. So this could also be the first step toward a zero point energy generator -- free energy. What will they think of next...

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    1. Re:When I hear 'Casimir', I think 'Zero Point'... by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm intrigued because it would seem to be easier to generate power from the zero point energy with a repulsive effect than an attractive one. So this could also be the first step toward a zero point energy generator -- free energy. What will they think of next...

      My thoughts exactly, although I found myself unable to word them thusly, which brings us to this inevitable question : Wouldn't it violate the second law of thermodynamics?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:When I hear 'Casimir', I think 'Zero Point'... by vigmeister · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't it violate the second law of thermodynamics? I'd assume there's no violation unless the surfaces move closer to each other as a result of the force since no work gets done. But the validity of that statement lies with my rephrased question: "Does any potential energy get 'created' in the process of increased attraction?"

      Cheers!
      --
      Vig

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    3. Re:When I hear 'Casimir', I think 'Zero Point'... by Vulva+R.+Thompson,+P · · Score: 3, Funny

      I am a physicist, but these subjects are often beyond me. Still, let me try a short explanation.

      That's fine. The non-physicists here will gleefully take up the slack.

    4. Re:When I hear 'Casimir', I think 'Zero Point'... by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 5, Informative

      The energy isn't created really, is kept from moving into the area between the plates.

      Let me explain further:

      Heisenberg's uncertainty principle says you can't know where a particle is, or it's momentum, at the same time. That applies to space too. For any point in space, you can't know if there's a particle there or not.

      Therefore, the reality is that the vacuum is boiling all the time with particles popping into and out of existence all the time. Particle soup. For another interesting effect of this, check out Hawking radiation.

      Anyway, if the plates are close enough together, no particles can be popping into existence in that space, because it's too small. It's literally small enough that if there were a particle there, you'd know it's position and momentum, and that is NOT allowed.

      So, the situation you've set up is that you have two plates very close together, with particles appearing and disappearing on one side of the plates (the outside surfaces) but not on the inside surfaces. That means that there's a pressure created which forces the plates together.

      No energy is created because what you're doing is preventing particles (energy) from appearing inside the plates. The energy of a vacuum is not zero because of those particles. The energy inside the plates is zero (zero point energy).

      The problem is that once the plates have moved together which is work, you don't get any more work out of the system unless you move the plates back apart.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
  32. Doesn't sound useful on a large scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Given the distance over which the force operates, it doesn't sound like you can use this to levitate large items. Surface roughness is measured in micro-meters and the force operates over nano-meters. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roughness

    A standard solution for a 'frictionless bearing' is an air bearing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_bearing

    The utility of this work seems limited to very small things.

  33. From the article by VitrosChemistryAnaly · · Score: 3, Funny

    Their discovery could ultimately lead to frictionless micro-machines with moving parts that levitate.
    Finally that fast talking dude will have a job again!
    --
    "It's a tarp!" -- Dyslexic Admiral Ackbar
  34. miniature giant space hamsters by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a feeling that this breakthrough will eventually lead to the development of giant flying mecha.


    Given that the Casimir effect actually produces enough force (well, pressure) at tens of nanometres distances between the two plates, that'll be some really tiny giant mecha ;)
    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  35. Re:I, for one by somersault · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've already patented using this technology on skateboard decks, and no, Back to the Future doesn't count as prior art! I didn't get the idea from there at all!

    --
    which is totally what she said
  36. In Theory by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hereby theorize that cramming peanuts into your arsehole will cause levitation.

    There, now that I've officially theorized this, I can say, "In theory, cramming peanuts into your arsehole will cause levitation." and it's perfectly true.

    1. Re:In Theory by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hereby theorize that cramming peanuts into your arsehole will cause levitation.

      Well, I tested your theory, three times.

      And I've documented the effects, three times.

      I got the same results every time.

      No levitation, but I won't be able to sit down for a week.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    2. Re:In Theory by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well duh, obviously you didn't use enough peanuts.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  37. Re:Repeal? by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, it appears it's in the process of trying to revoke the law of gravity

    --
    which is totally what she said
  38. Casimir effect allows geckos to walk on ceiling by mrjb · · Score: 5, Funny

    FTA: "The force is due to neither electrical charge or gravity, for example, but the fluctuations in all-pervasive energy fields in the intervening empty space between the objects and is one reason atoms stick together, also explaining a "dry glue" effect that enables a gecko to walk across a ceiling." ... and now that scientists have figured out how to reverse the Casimir effect, this will soon enable geckos to walk on the floor.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  39. Re:ummmm? by IBBoard · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would repel from the floor, but not from another cat with another slice of buttered toast strapped to its back (which is what this can potentially do).

    From what I remember of the buttered toast cat, doesn't it end up spinning just above the floor as the cat tries to land feet-first and the toast tries to land butter-side down? If so then why is no-one wrapping these cats in wire, putting them between magnets and throwing them off surfaces en-mass to generate electricity while they spin?

  40. Re:ummmm? by 49152 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Only works with live cats. The cost of feeding and care for the cats makes this uneconomical. ;-)

  41. Re:Disintegrators by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What happens if all the molecules in your body suddenly repels eachother?"

    Okay, that's a good safety tip. Don't cross the streams!

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  42. Casimir Effect Explained by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Casimir effect is very wierd indeed. If you take two metal plates and put them close together in a vacuum they will attract one another VERY weakly. The effect is caused by fluctuations in the electric charge of the vacuum. Think of it a little like sea level. On average if you measure sea level lots of times you wil get "0" for the height but if you measure it just once the height you get will depend on the tide and the size of any waves. The same is true for a vacuum. Look at a particular volume of space and measure the electric charge. On average you will get zero but for a particular moment in time it may be non-zero.

    Ok so far but how do we get an attractive force? Well it turns out that charge must be conserved so if one region of space has a small positive charge at one instant a neighbouring area must have a small negative charge (in quantum terms we say that we pair produce and virtual electron-positron pair) thuse we have a dipole. Now remember the two conductors? Well the one nearest the positive charge will have the electrons in the conductor attracted to it and being a conductor they will move towards it giving the conductor a net negative charge. The opposite will happen in the conductor nearest the negative charged area of space.

    So now we have, instantaneously, a conductor with a negative charge and one with a positive charge...so they attract one another. this is the Casimir effect. If you stop to think about it is is VERY strange because it means that two metal plates in vacuum, with no externally applied fields will attract...so you have to ask yourself what exactly is doing the work i.e. where is the energy coming from to move these plates?

    I'm not a condensed matter guy so I must admit I don't quite understand why this effect is so important to them. I understood that in molecules it was known as Van der Waal forces and due to periodic dipoles occuring in molecules in much the same way it does ina vacuum. Only, because there is a real electric field, the effect is much larger. So if there are any condensed matter people out there perhaps they would like to explain why it is Casimir and not Van der Waals that is important? or is it just because they have the same origin the name Van Der Waals has been dropped?

    1. Re:Casimir Effect Explained by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Informative

      I understand how you might think I got the two confused but no, this effect is completely distinct from gravity. It has a different strength, behaves differently and its fundamental mechanism is understood at the quantum level, unlike gravity.

      Also there is actually no evidence whatsoever that gravity and EM fields are interrelated. It is postulated that at around 10^16 GeV they are but there is no evidence for that yet....and just to show you how much faith you should put in theory without concrete evidence to back it up remember that at one time people thought that the Earth was flat!

  43. Same team unveiled invisibility cloak by Nezer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to TFA, the same team announced, last week, some breakthrough with an invisibility cloak. This week they make another spectacular claim regarding levitation (granted on a very small scale). Either this team is having an incredible run and some serious intellectual luck or they are totally full of shit. Given the history of such claims, my money is on the latter.

    Maybe next week they will announce they have discovered cold fusion.

    I hate to be such a skeptic but these claims seem to lack truthiness according to my gut. Your gut may differ. Either way, I'd take these claims with a very fine grain of salt.

    1. Re:Same team unveiled invisibility cloak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or maybe this discovery that works by means of 'a "perfect" lens with a negative index of refraction' is somehow related to their work on the invisibility cloak, which is based on metamaterials with a negative refraction index.

  44. At long last... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We will finally have Casimir sweaters that will repel lint and pet hair instead of attract it!

  45. I don't see how this is new news... by illumnatLA · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot readers have had the ability to repel instead of attract for years!

    --
    Web hosting that doesn't suck!Dreamhost
  46. Re:ummmm? by evanbd · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's all well and good until you have to take the cat down for maintenance. Have you ever seen a cat that's been wrapped in wire, strapped to a piece of buttered toast, and spun for 3 days? Let's just say it's not happy.

  47. Re:Repeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gravity is a lot like your parents, break the law and you are grounded.

  48. Re:ummmm? by dmclap · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, the cat will freeze in midair suspended on its side, because in that case, the direction of spin that requires the least work to get the cat/toast to the correct position are in opposite directions with an equal magnitude. So, sadly, it will hit static equilibrium, so you'll just have a crazy floating cat, not a crazy floating power-generating cat.

  49. Re:ummmm? by hypnagogue · · Score: 4, Funny

    I assume it involves a cat with a piece of buttered toast strapped to its back...
    No, silly! That would be the cat-schmear effect.
    --
    Liberty you never use is liberty you lose.
  50. Re:ummmm? by Analogy+Man · · Score: 3, Funny

    Check out my e-bay auctions...I will sell you a pair of cat wiring gauntlets - guaranteed to protected you from the savage beasts.

    --
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  51. Re:ummmm? by Kohath · · Score: 2, Funny
  52. Re:Disintegrators by dapsychous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ummm... They do?

  53. Re:ummmm? by nwhitehorn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the paper, courtesy of arXiv:

    http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0608115

    It should be noted that this work is purely theoretical. What they have done is show that there is a much more physically realizable way to way a repulsive Casimir effect than the previous schemes, using a material with negative refraction over some range of important frequencies (this is a similar problem as making a cloaking device, but with a harder range of the spectrum). In practice, the effect would be small and the material hard to make, but the idea is interesting.

  54. Re:ummmm? by Genady · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now if only they'd try this with Edwin's cat. Bam! Superpossition of perpetual motion and non-perpetual motion... Ugh. Head hertz now.

    --


    What if it is just turtles all the way down?
  55. Mundi est omnis divisa in partes tres by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    The universe has three sections: the part between the plates, the part to the left of the left plate, and the part to the right of the right plate. All three parts of the universe are undergoing adiabatic expansion and are thus applying pressure to their boundaries. Generally they have more success at the edges of the universe (near where the CMB appears) than at the surfaces of the plates since it isn't clear that they have anything to push against near the CMB, but the boundary conditions at the surface of a plate are different because of the universe on the other side. The universe in the middle of the plates doesn't do a good job of expanding because even virtual particles have trouble fitting in there (the plates form a high pass filter that attenuates any long wavelength standing waves), so the other two parts of the universe make it contract. Soon the virtual particles in the middle universe have very high energy and apply an imaginary pressure on the plates that counters the imaginary pressure being applied from the two external portions of the universe, and this affects the position of the plates relative to one another. The force can either be attractive or repulsive depending on the electromagnetic characteristics of the plates and their effects on the wave functions of the charged virtual particles inside.

  56. Re:ummmm? by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Funny
    Ugh. Head hertz now.

    Don't worry, that's a cyclic effect that primarily appears when posting AC. In your case, it's probably just your sinuses. No need to go off on a tangent. Have a slice of pie and call me in the morning. I'm sure you're feel radiant by then.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  57. indeed by game+kid · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's a cyclic effect that primarily appears when posting AC.

    Indeed. The power of privacy that comes with being an Alternating Commenter can be electrifying but is sometimes a revolting experience. It's sometimes better to take charge and post directly as your user name instead.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  58. Re:I, for one by Doddman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why the hell did this get modded down? I think this is an insightful point.. he is right.

    I used to post AC when doing this, but it's just Slashdot. I don't give a shit about my karma anymore. Mod me down all you want.

    --
    If creativity is the field, copyright is the fence.
  59. Re:ummmm? by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't they mean Schrödinger's cat? It would simultaneously both produce electric current and not produce it until you touched the wire to find out.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  60. Finally some recognition! by Kazymyr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hallelujah. My username is finally getting the credit it deserves.

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  61. Re:ummmm? by RationalRoot · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is no net energy gain here.

    The cat, due to the spinning motion dies pretty quickly.

    It turns out that the lenght of time it will survive, and thue spin for, is a function of it's body fat.

    In short - you are simply using up the stored energy in the cat. No Net Gain.

    Simply chucking the cat into a furnace and generating electricity that way would be more efficient.

    --
    http://davesboat.blogspot.com/