Slashdot Mirror


Crew Ends 100 Day Mars Simulation in Arctic

Paul server guy writes "According to Wired Science the seven person F-XI LDM crew that has been stationed at the Mars Society's FMARS station has completed their unprecedented 100 day simulation. (Actually 101 days, because for 37 they lived on 'Mars time' adding 39 minutes to each day) According to the mission's remote science principal investigator Chris McKay, of NASA Ames. 'Their pioneering simulation of crew operations on Mars time is by far the best work on this topic ever done. It sets the standard for future Mars mission simulations.'"

147 comments

  1. OK... by cp.tar · · Score: 4, Funny

    So when do we send people to Mars?

    And do we send politicians first?

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
    1. Re:OK... by psychicsword · · Score: 3, Funny

      And do we send politicians first? Only if they don't have a spacesuit on.
    2. Re:OK... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Funny

      So when do we send people to Mars?

      And do we send politicians first? Only of they know how to sanitize telephones.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    3. Re:OK... by tazbert · · Score: 5, Funny

      The politicians will be on the second ship, along with the telephone sanitizers, hairdressers, advertising account executives, and other 'essential' personel.

    4. Re:OK... by lottameez · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hey, we've already been there.

      --
      Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
    5. Re:OK... by Rasputin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Homer: All that counts is that we're alive and rubbing elbows with the greats. [gasps] Ooh, there's Ross Perot, Dr. Laura, Spike Lee.

      Bart: Wait a minute, they're not so great.

      Homer: Okay but there's Dan Quayle, Courtney Love, [increasing panic], Tonya Harding, Al Sharpton, Ah! Tom Arnold! What the hell's going on?

      --
      "I once preached peaceful coexistence with Windows. You may laugh at my expense - I deserve it." Be's Jean-Louis Gass
    6. Re:OK... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      ...which will "inexplicably" explode shortly after launch. The launch director will be overheard shortly after saying "red button? I didn't punch any red buttons". The reporter will note that the destruct button is indeed not red; it is black.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    7. Re:OK... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      The politicians will be on the second ship, along with the telephone sanitizers, hairdressers, advertising account executives, and other 'essential' personel.
      . Don't forget all the middle managers...and the fact that we're building the second ship first, prepping it first, and ships one and three will be a few light years behind it...
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    8. Re:OK... by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Funny

      hairdressers?

      I hate to see what your hair/personal hygiene is like? Are you Alan Cox?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Cox

    9. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about volunteers? Would anyone here go to mars to live for a year even though there was an almost sure chance of dying?

    10. Re:OK... by JonXP · · Score: 1

      Hairdressers, not barbers. :D

    11. Re:OK... by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      You are obviosly missing the point of sending politicians.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    12. Re:OK... by Amouth · · Score: 0, Redundant

      sure i would go... jsut not on the second ship...

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    13. Re:OK... by Propaganda13 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Forget the destruct button, we booked them on Carmack's Armadillo.

  2. Averting disaster by Verteiron · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Did someone club Anne and Sax and lock them in a room together until they figured out their feelings? 'cause that's gonna save a LOT of trouble. Trust me.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:Averting disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hilariously, real-life is imitating Kim Stanley Robinson's Hugo and Nebula winning Red/Green/Blue Mars Series.

      I hope the real astronauts don't have an equivalent of Maya along with them...

      (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_trilogy)

    2. Re:Averting disaster by syrinx · · Score: 1

      haha, thank you.

      Or really, just club Ann and leave it at that, it'd make parts of the subsequent mission less tedious. :P

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    3. Re:Averting disaster by sconeu · · Score: 1

      They should have clubbed Phyllis and pushed her out the airlock.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:Averting disaster by lysdexia · · Score: 2, Funny

      She can stay in my habitat.

  3. Well then by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get your ass to mars.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Well then by Kemanorel · · Score: 1

      Quaid! Start the reactor!

      --
      Mess not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup.
  4. Its not a simulation by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Its a bunch of space nerds wasting their time.

    Why?

    The gravity is wrong.
    The solar radiation is wrong.
    The atmospheric pressure is wrong.
    The soil chemistry is all wrong.

    So what have they proved other than they can sit in a phoney "space base" for 100 days and run around in mickey mouse home made space suits? Nothing.

    1. Re:Its not a simulation by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Think of it more as a psychology experiment than a real space experiment. Maybe you won't be so testy then.

      Of course, if it were a real psychology experiment, they should have at least lived on Mars time the whole time, and not just for a third of it. Makes you wonder why they stopped using Mars time...

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:Its not a simulation by Viol8 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "Think of it more as a psychology experiment than a real space experiment. Maybe you won't be so testy then."

      The Big Brother TV franchise has been throwing people together in a confined space for years but they didn't dress it up as any kind of space related simulation.

    3. Re:Its not a simulation by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So what have they proved other than they can sit in a phoney "space base" for 100 days and run around in mickey mouse home made space suits? Nothing.

      The true test would be a closed system here on Earth, with only energy input (from the sun or from a nuclear reactor). See if it can function for two years or whatever the required duration of a mission to Mars is without running out of air, water, or nutrient. It doesn't have to be absolutely sealed like Biosphere 2 -- it could exhaust, just not take in, and it doesn't have to be in the same state at the beginning as the end; resources can be depleted. But THAT's the kind of experiment that we should be running.

      -b.

    4. Re:Its not a simulation by ookabooka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TFA said they used Mars time during the 24-hour sunlight, they simply covered their windows from 8am to 8pm. If they used Mars time continuously sunset/sunrise would slowly shift around and would probably really mess up their circadian rhythm.

      On a side not you are correct that it was more of a psychology experiment, though that wasn't the extent of their goals. They did things like try to figure out ways to minimize their water usage, etc. Basically anything they could simulate and figure out here on earth they did. Now when NASA says "Ok, how are we going to decrease water usage by 10%" they actually have a very well documented simulation to review through and see what works and what doesn't. Basically before this everything was open to conjecture, now we have tangible information to work with, though not 100% accurate to a real mars mission it is better than nothing.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    5. Re:Its not a simulation by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're completely missing the point. It's not about whittling down a pile of celebrities or game show contestants, it's about making sure a group of intelligent people with a common goal of research can exist in the psychological environment they would need to on Mars. Once you've got that major factor nailed down as much as possible, then you can go to the trouble and expense of simulating the other physical variables.

    6. Re:Its not a simulation by tknd · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the case, when is this reality TV series going to air? What will be the title of the show? Survivor: Mars? The Mars Bachelors?

    7. Re:Its not a simulation by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder why they stopped using Mars time...

      Probably because they were getting too far off of the circadian rhythm. After 37 days of adding an extra 39 minutes to the day you're a whole 24 hours behind. I imagine on Mars the human body would adjust to the extra 39 minutes because it will actually be bright outside, just like you adjust to a different time zone after a couple days.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    8. Re:Its not a simulation by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I think of it as a psychology experiment, I'd get even more testy. Long duration isolation experiments are old hat. Then there is real world experience like crews wintering over in the Antarctic. (Or head over to the US Sub Vets national convention - you'll find guys who have done 100 days submerged by the gross lot.) You have the 'closed loop enviroment/isolation' studies done a decade back by NASA, and you have Biosphere II as an example of how not to do it.
       
      Then there are stunts like 'living on Mars time' - which has already been done (by the Spirit and Opportunity control teams). Why would you do that? Why would you want to force your mission clock 'out of sync' with the local solar clock, except as a stunt?
       
      The simple fact is, the Devon Island station is nothing more than a PR stunt. Driven by Robert Zubrin's ego it has been a multiyear exercise in re-inventing the wheel. TFA is correct when it says 'Their pioneering simulation of crew operations on Mars time is by far the best work on this topic ever done. It sets the standard for future Mars mission simulations.', but what it doesn't tell you is how abysmally *low* that standard is.

    9. Re:Its not a simulation by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      A reality TV show on a manned mission to Mars might be a profitable venture.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    10. Re:Its not a simulation by TED+Vinson · · Score: 1
      Before you scoff, ask your self what you did to further space exploration this summer.

      This experiment is a step toward doing more long-term, closed-cycle experiments as you describe. A program of research usually starts with smaller experiments and uses the results to guide the more elaborate full-scale experiments later.

      A full-scale test before going to Mars is certainly needed. However, they have not started constructing the Mars ship in the orbital dockyards yet, we have some time to work incrementally on this problem.

      A two-year-long, closed-cycle experiment would:

      -Cost much, much more.

      -Require a 'crew' that is doing this for a living. If you look at the bios, these people all have other jobs and are taking their own time (without pay) to contribute.

      -Be a waste of time and money if it failed in the first month because the work cycle was wrong or nobody knew how much water would be consumed or how many packages of Tang to pack. This is the sort of thing they are investigating.

    11. Re:Its not a simulation by RockyPersaud · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The value of the experiment is the fact that these seven scientists and engineers DID NOT just sit in a chamber for 100+ days. They conducted real exploration of Devon Island and the Haughton impact crater, under constraints similar to what a crew would have to do on Mars. The gravity is wrong. But they weren't doing physiology experiment on the effect of gravity. The solar radiation is wrong. But they weren't doing solar radiation experiments. The atmospheric pressure is wrong. But they weren't doing atmospheric experiments. The soil chemistry is all wrong. But they weren't doing soil chemistry experiments. They were doing astrobiological, geological, operational, and psychological experiments, as this page lists 22 such experiments. http://www.fmars2007.org/arctic/science-projects.a sp So what has your indignation proved other than they can sit on your ass in front your computer and run mouth off on topics you know nothing about? Nothing.

    12. Re:Its not a simulation by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      TFA said they used Mars time during the 24-hour sunlight, they simply covered their windows from 8am to 8pm. If they used Mars time continuously sunset/sunrise would slowly shift around and would probably really mess up their circadian rhythm.

      So they could cover the windows to simulate nighttime, despite the sun shining, why couldn't they blast lights at the windows to simulate the day, even if it's dark outside. This seems like a rather trivial exercise to simulate the Mars day/night cycle. Am I missing something?

    13. Re:Its not a simulation by hax0r_this · · Score: 1

      People have been minimizing water usage for thousands of years. When NASA wants to know hot to minimize water usage on Mars they could either ask anyone who has lived in the desert, or they could ask one of these 9 "scientists". Of course that won't tell them anything about water conservation on Mars, just water conservation while playing hermit at the north pole.

      I find it interesting that they didn't even bother to do things that they could do relatively easily, like force all communications to go through a buffer with a built in delay to simulate the distance, etc.

    14. Re:Its not a simulation by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      I imagine on Mars the human body would adjust to the extra 39 minutes because it will actually be bright outside, just like you adjust to a different time zone after a couple days.
      Agreed, though it can take than two days at times. When we PCSed to Germany, it took the family about two weeks to feel really comfortable. As I've gotten older, however, I've noticed an odd pattern in my own rhythm: Left to itself {free of time-critical concerns} my body likes a *36* hour day. That's 24 hours awake, with 12 asleep. I'm betting that a slightly longer day won't impact the astronauts' body clocks too much...
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    15. Re:Its not a simulation by da'+WINS+pimp · · Score: 1

      This is exactly right Paul. I'm one of them (the chief engineer).

      --

      "I'm just here to regulate funkyness." - James Gandolfini, as Winston in The Mexican
    16. Re:Its not a simulation by da'+WINS+pimp · · Score: 3, Informative

      Er, sorry I hit send too quick... We stopped the Mars Time experiment when we were one day off of Earth time so that we would not be too far off when the simulation was over.

      --

      "I'm just here to regulate funkyness." - James Gandolfini, as Winston in The Mexican
    17. Re:Its not a simulation by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Frankly, then, that seems awfully short sighted.

      Are the Mars explorers going to be allowed to use the Mars circadian rhythms or be forced to use Earth's? Why would the experiment try to do it half and half?

      So what if you're off of earth time? Both astronauts and ground crew will have to live with that on the real trip.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    18. Re:Its not a simulation by veganboyjosh · · Score: 2, Funny

      From "To catch a predator: Mars edition", to air sometime in the next 15 years:

      Chris Hansen:Who are you here to see?
      Astronaut:Um...Stephanie?
      Chris Hansen:And how old is Stephanie?
      Astronaut:She told me she was 18.
      Chris Hansen:I've got the chat transcripts; wanna try again?
      Astronaut:Oh, you do. She said she was 12.
      Chris Hansen:And how far did you come to meet "Stephanie" this evening?
      Astronaut:Somewhere between 36 million and 250 million miles.
      Chris Hansen:...

    19. Re:Its not a simulation by FatMacDaddy · · Score: 1

      I would think the biggest part of the psychological impact of actually being on Mars would be the concept of total isolation on a scale that can't be duplicated. Yes, the artic is remote, but if things get bad you know a support team could hopefully arrive within hours. On Mars, you have the always-present knowledge of the vast gulf of space that separates you from any help. If some strange illness starts dropping your colleagues or cracks begin forming in your habitat/shelter, that sense of isolation would be the thing that eats away at me.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    20. Re:Its not a simulation by ookabooka · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes, they would do routine simulated EVA's. So walking outside shortly after getting out of bed and seeing the sunset would probably be bad for the circadian rhythm :)

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    21. Re:Its not a simulation by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Big Water Brother.

    22. Re:Its not a simulation by lysdexia · · Score: 1

      I have never felt more humble. Wow.

    23. Re:Its not a simulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by Viol8 (599362) on Wednesday August 22, @01:45PM (#20320485) "So what have they proved other than they can sit in a phoney "space base" for 100 days and run around in mickey mouse home made space suits? Nothing."

      Wow. I didn't think folks who followed Slashdor could be this ignorant.

    24. Re:Its not a simulation by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> The gravity is wrong.
      >> The solar radiation is wrong.
      >> The atmospheric pressure is wrong.
      >> The soil chemistry is all wrong.

      You're right. Clearly we should try colonizing the sun first.

    25. Re:Its not a simulation by ArcSecond · · Score: 1

      "Why would you do that? Why would you want to force your mission clock 'out of sync' with the local solar clock, except as a stunt?"

      The simple fact is you didn't read the (very short) article past the first paragraph, or you would have seen this:

      "Next to studying global warming, the coolest thing the crew did was take advantage of the 24 hours of summer sunlight in the Arctic to shift all their operations to Martian Time (a day on Mars is 24 hours and 39 minutes). The crew would simply cover the hab windows from 8pm to 8am "local" Mars time every night."

      Any more questions?

      --

      I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

    26. Re:Its not a simulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I think we already have a pretty good idea of what will happen on the first mission to Mars. One of the chicks is going to get it on with someone that's not her husband. She'll give birth to a lovechild who will be the lone survivor of the mission. He will be raised by Martians and eventually come home to earth. He'll use his Martian superpowers to impress people and start a new religion.

    27. Re:Its not a simulation by khallow · · Score: 1

      If I think of it as a psychology experiment, I'd get even more testy. Long duration isolation experiments are old hat. Then there is real world experience like crews wintering over in the Antarctic. (Or head over to the US Sub Vets national convention - you'll find guys who have done 100 days submerged by the gross lot.) You have the 'closed loop enviroment/isolation' studies done a decade back by NASA, and you have Biosphere II as an example of how not to do it.

      As I understand it, NASA hasn't done any credible work on this subject aside from the space stations and some microenvironment experiments (eg, glass balls containing small self-sustaining ecosystems). Biosphere II with its many flaws is better than anything NASA has done. Russians have done probably the best work here.

    28. Re:Its not a simulation by deboli · · Score: 1

      Some out of time experiments have been done in the 60s and 70s. In 1962 Michel Siffre, a French Geologist and caver spent 2 months alone in a cave without time reference He surfaced September 17 believing it was August 20, stretching his subject time by 85% or averaging a 44.5 hour day. On a second experiment in 1972 he spent over 200 days in a cave in Texas, sponsored by NASA. Again no time reference but but this time regular communications with the outside world. Even while knowing the problem and trying to actively counter balance it he stretched time by 17%.

      A cave is a much better testing ground than a boat or an arctic region since it does not give you a clue of daytime time and season. Even during the long summer days in the arctic you can estimate time from the position of the sun and if the experiment is long enough the passing of the seasons. Such experiments are important to see how people cape with the time needed to fly to mars.

      There was an article in National Geographic, "Six months alone in a cave", National Geographic, v.147, no.3, March 1975, pp.426-435.

    29. Re:Its not a simulation by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I told my friend to call it "Voted off the planet" or "Vote them off the planet".

      The voting options: keep, return and one-way.

      We can start with orbital missions first.

      --
    30. Re:Its not a simulation by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Whats Slashdor? Somewhere that cowards can post endless rubbish?

    31. Re:Its not a simulation by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      The true test would be a closed system here on Earth, with only energy input (from the sun or from a nuclear reactor). See if it can function for two years or whatever the required duration of a mission to Mars is without running out of air, water, or nutrient.



      Sorry, but that would be a fairly useless test. Getting the amount of consumables right is a matter of doing some math and adding appropriate safety margins. Plus, we have plenty of experience in outfitting space missions already. At least if we stick with working technology and don't try something completely untested (in-situ resource utilization, growing their own food in space or whatever).


    32. Re:Its not a simulation by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      The astronauts will have their circadian rhythms reinforced by the Martian day. I don't see why the ground crews can't stay on Earth time with shift changes like they did with Apollo.

      Besides, with a 40 minute round-trip for communications, the reliance on the ground crew will be minimal. It will be like trying to get real-time tech support via email.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    33. Re:Its not a simulation by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      I'm one of them (the chief engineer).

      That is so freaking cool. If you guys ever need a networking guy/PC support/code monkey/wrench turner, look me up. I've been a Mars exploration enthusiast since I read Zubrin's book "The Case for Mars."

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    34. Re:Its not a simulation by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, NASA hasn't done any credible work on this subject aside from the space stations and some microenvironment experiments (eg, glass balls containing small self-sustaining ecosystems). Biosphere II with its many flaws is better than anything NASA has done. Russians have done probably the best work here.

      Biosphere II, with zero sucessful runs is better than the NASA experiments with three different (manned!) configurations, four sucessful runs, and over a year of total 'lock-in' time?
       
      Let's just say your understanding is a wee bit flawed.
  5. Still very far away by JakeD409 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "It sets the standard for future Mars mission simulations." The fact that it says "for future Mars mission simulations" instead of just "for Mars missions" shows how far away we really are.

    1. Re:Still very far away by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      "It sets the standard for future Mars mission simulations." The fact that it says "for future Mars mission simulations" instead of just "for Mars missions" shows how far away we really are.

      Which doesn't surprise anyone actually familiar with the technology and the process. Contrary to the beliefs of many in the space fanboy community we are far from ready - but the problem isn't the technology, but because while much of the research has been done, almost none of the development has. Or, as I've pointed out before - if we, back in November 1998, could have waved a magic wand and created a completed ISS - and put it on a trajectory for Mars... Odds are the crew would be dead from system [equipment] failure.
  6. And now that I've read TFA... by cp.tar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Melissa adds that the extra 39 minutes does make a difference, "[you] feel like [you're] getting more work done."

    Wasn't it that the optimal duration of a day for humans is somewhere around 25 or 26 hours?

    I always try to maximize my awake time; as Pitr would say, Sleep, she is for the weak.

    And now for one truly scary detail:

    "We've all become acutely aware of the importance of water conservation, minimizing our garbage output, and generally behaving in a way to minimize our environmental impact."

    Why is this scary? Well, consider this:

    The crew bakes bread, makes a batch of cheese or yogurt, waters the "crops" (spouts and lettuce they are growing), re-fuels the generator, washes a bit of laundry by hand and prepares home cooked meals to add some spice to the day and the meals.

    They're training Fremen!

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
    1. Re:And now that I've read TFA... by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      Mau-di! Mau-di! Mau-di! Mau-di! Mau-di! Mau-di! Long live the fighters of Muad'dib!

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    2. Re:And now that I've read TFA... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Well, that's okay, because I hear ESA is training one young 'Paul Atreides'.

    3. Re:And now that I've read TFA... by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

      Why is it scary that they are training hardy survivors who can overrun even the greatest forces of the Imperial army and can hitch a ride on Shai'Hulud? I mean, that sounds pretty damn cool, where can I sign up?

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    4. Re:And now that I've read TFA... by stormi · · Score: 1

      What's scary to me is all of the things that were really done on this simulation are skills that in my opinion the people should have had already. Is society really so far gone that people lack basic skills like cooking?

      "We've all become acutely aware of the importance of water conservation"

      Same goes for people who live through drouts, are environmentally conscious, live in parts of the world without much water, or even have a well at their house with finite water.

      "minimizing our garbage output"

      Same for people who are environmentally conscious... remember "reduce, reuse, recycle"? Same with composting...

      "The crew bakes bread"

      LOTS of people bake bread. I'm sure a large percentage of families have at one point or another attempted baking bread.

      "waters the "crops" (spouts and lettuce they are growing)"

      Some people water gardens. I water house plants...

      "re-fuels the generator"

      You re-fuel everything that uses fuel. It doesn't fill itself.

      "washes a bit of laundry by hand "

      So do I when it says "handwash only"

      "prepares home cooked meals"

      So can most people I know, if they have to.

      --
      "if only i had known i would have been a locksmith." -albert einstein
    5. Re:And now that I've read TFA... by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      LOTS of people bake bread. I'm sure a large percentage of families have at one point or another attempted baking bread.

      I'm an amateur chef. I'm thinking about attending some form of culinary school and doing it professionally. While I was reading TFA I couldn't help but think how appealing the idea of being a cook on such a mission would be.

      Yesterday I baked a loaf of bread (sans bread machine) from scratch for the first time. Nothing difficult or special about it at all, only that it was my first time. It was the tastiest bread I've ever had in my life. Not only that but there's something very social and time-honoured about bread. After all, it is possibly *the* oldest prepared food. There's something special and extremely social about baking a loaf of bread from scratch and sharing it at the dinner table. I'm not a conservative or an idealist at all. I'm a programmer and run web sites for a living. So I love my technology as much as the next person. But technology really has, at the very least, hidden some of the behaviours that have made us human for thousands of years. I don't see anything wrong with that, but I find that cooking, especially when you make as much from scratch as possible, is an excellent way to explore that part of who we are.

      So colonizing another planet (or even a part of un-inhabited land here on earth) definitely makes an interesting social experiment. We'd bring technology with us but we'd also have to get back to basics on some things like making food from scratch and really conserving resources. It provides a small hint of what human life was like not all that long ago.

      Sorry for the slightly OT blurb, but your post inspired me to bring up what I would, personally, find of value in such experiments.

    6. Re:And now that I've read TFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water Conservation? check
      Sleep? Only when physically required
      Minimize garbage output? check
      Minimize environmental impact? check
      Bakes bread? not yet
      Makes cheese/yogurt? nope
      Waters crops? no crops
      Re-fuels generator? pays electrical bill(?)
      Washes laundry? Only when smell > appearance
      Adds spice to meals? check

      Can I sign up for future expeditions? I'm pretty close on this one.

    7. Re:And now that I've read TFA... by khallow · · Score: 1

      What's scary to me is all of the things that were really done on this simulation are skills that in my opinion the people should have had already. Is society really so far gone that people lack basic skills like cooking?

      I find it interesting that you then spend more time discussing water conservation and garbage reduction than cooking. In most of the developed world, there isn't a problem with water supply or garbage services. So discussion of such concepts is novel especially to the degree that this experiment has had to do them. It's certainly not something pretty well known like cooking bread.
  7. Self Reliant? by cez · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    From TFA:

    It harks back to the post last week from WorldChanging.com about how extreme space exploration can help make living sustainably sexy. As Commander Battler says it, "we've all become incredibly self-reliant, and developed many other interesting, useful skills and attitudes, thanks to our isolated home in the Arctic!"
    How does living entirely in a prefabbed environment make anyone self-reliant? Is she saying... "ohhh I can work out my problems now with meditation instead of crying over drinks with the ladies!"


    I would think this experience would lend itself more towards group initiative and synergy to get by than "self-reliant". I mean come on, they are probably told when to eat, sleep and fart by a NASA computer.

    --
    Walk with Music;
    1. Re:Self Reliant? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      I would think this experience would lend itself more towards group initiative and synergy to get by than "self-reliant". I mean come on, they are probably told when to eat, sleep and fart by a NASA computer.

      Actually, absolute control from Earth would be impossible on a real Mars mission -- there's a lag time of about 3 min (one way) for radio communications, because of the speed of light. It's not going to be like one of the low earth orbit Shuttle missions.

      -b.

    2. Re:Self Reliant? by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      You aren't questioning the computer are you?

      Trust The Computer. The Computer is Your Friend.

    3. Re:Self Reliant? by cez · · Score: 1

      true...but there is going to be a lot of microwave popcorn, pop it in and press a button and PRESTO~! Self reliant food source. Watering their crops that came in a nice pre-packaged hydro-garden or what have you, or having everything spelled out for you in a cookie-cutter instance is not self-reliant in my book...I don't know, maybe I'm being too much of a grammar / meaning nazi on this one.

      --
      Walk with Music;
    4. Re:Self Reliant? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      3 minutes when Mars and Earth are at their closest point. 20 minutes or so when they are further apart :)

    5. Re:Self Reliant? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      "Computer, I'd like to register my mutation... It's Machine Empathy."

      -- Entry 388 of Famous Last Words in Role Playing

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    6. Re:Self Reliant? by cez · · Score: 1
      on a side note... what if that lag was compensated by an advanced quantum simulation of what would happen next, of course making all the pre-simulated / analyzed sensor readings.


      Anyways, didn't mean to flame. Was just saying, she spent 100 days and what she learned was how to stay there by her self, or be self-reliant there. I would hope a Mars mission isn't half spent on learning how to flush your toilet by yourself. Maybe I was looking for something a little more introspective or tangible of an experience.

      --
      Walk with Music;
  8. Worse than that. by twitter · · Score: 1

    The thing that really scared me was this:

    extreme space exploration can help make living sustainably sexy

    I think they meant that sustainable living would look sexy, not that space exploration gives you Priapism.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Worse than that. by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      I think they meant that sustainable living would look sexy, not that space exploration gives you Priapism.
      Speaking {out of my tailside} for the male space geeks, I'm pretty sure most of us would have a chubby upon reaching space that wouldn't die 'til we got back to Earth.
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  9. Finally they can get back to mom's basement by netsavior · · Score: 4, Funny

    It must have been hard living in a pre-fab environment never seeing the sun and wearing the same clothes for days. Now they can go back to their mom's basement where the conditions will be at least slightly different from a mars mission.

  10. It was a simulation by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A simultation is doing something as close as possible. NASA went through very similar things about going to the moon, and IIRC, it was done in Texas. Even now, every mission to the ISS, is done in water to simulate low gravity. However, if they really WANTED to simulate, they would change a few parameters.
    1. It should last 1-3 years. No way will the first mission to mars be 100 days. It will be several years.
    2. They should be working with biosphere 2 folks to do it again, as a closed experiment. For several years, the system WILL be closed and almost certainly self-reliant.
    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:It was a simulation by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that a preliminary Mars mission profile says that one possible mission is a short stay, 30 to 90 days. Now, you might ask why you'd go all that way and not stay longer, but realize that we'll be landing on a world we've never been to (not counting robotic probes) and while we are confident we understand the environment, we don't know how much conditions on Mars will differ from simulations. It will important for the first mission to be long enough to justify the expense while at the same time short enough that the astronauts can return and impart what they've learned to the colleagues, to allow for better mission planning, simulation, and training.

      The same thing occured with the Moon landings. Neil and Buzz were only on the surface a little over two hours, for the reason that the information they needed to gather in that time was more important than exploration of the Moon's surface and they wanted to ensure that there were sufficient resources available in case of trouble. The first landing on the Moon was a test to ensure that the training and procedures would allow a crew to get down and back up successfully. Mars will be a bigger risk, so landing and then leaving immediately would be expensive and counter-productive, but NASA managers won't want to stay any longer than necessary to minimize the potential risks.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    2. Re:It was a simulation by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      NASA says that it will be short. But that has more to do with costs to go there. In particular, they are worried about losing a crew there (which politically could hurt NASA). More likely, whoever goes there first, will build a forward base using robots. I would expect that it would be several bigelow stations that were proved on the moon, as well as the beginning of a in-ground station. In addition, the base will be active for at least 1 year. Then and only then, will we send a crew for no less than 2 years (or whatever will give us the shortest travel time from mars to earth; the real threat is the travel, not the stay). I am not sure that the first crew will be NASA only. In fact, I believe that it will be NASA combined with either business interest, EU, and/or Russia who will want to stay for a LONG time.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:It was a simulation by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Erm, ok I'm going to try and not sound trollish for once. Did you understand the post you replied to, and did you read the article that you linked to? The round-trip time for the 30-60 day mission profile is estimated at 400-650 days. Which is exactly in the range that the GP proposed such an experiment should last. Because the crew are going to be just as confined and isolated on the trip as they will be on the surface.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    4. Re:It was a simulation by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Billasour is correct in what he thinks I was saying (weird to put it that way). I simply do not believe that NASA is not going to do the short stay version. The stress on the crew will be MUCH higher then if they spend a couple of years on Mars. This is more probable since we doing the moon first rather than Mars. We will no doubt build the lunar base via robotics in the same manner that I mention for Mars (bigelows units down first; connect them; then dig and create a subterrain base). The lunar base will almost certainly not be self-sufficient, but it will be useful. OTH, Mars will need to be made to be self-sufficient (energy and food come to mind).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:It was a simulation by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Aha, in that case it was I that misunderstood you (and apologies to Billasour). Although what I thought you were saying still makes sense. No matter which profile they go for, the length of time away from Earth is substantial. Simulations into the effects of long-term spaceflight should take that into account. Also, the closed system environment is still an interesting challenge, and I'd like to see anyone who could maintain a local ecosystem for the entire duration of a mission.

      As far as what you were actually saying goes :) you both make a good point that the psychological impact is going to be affected by the ratio of flight-time to surface-time. Even if the flight-time is relatively shorter, the return journey may have the largest impact because the climax of the mission has already been and gone, and in some sense the astronauts are killing time until they can get home.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    6. Re:It was a simulation by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, being in close quarters on the space ship will get old after a month. It will be 7 month journey. These folks will be eating at each other. Even on the outbound trip, they will likely be at each other. I suspect that if we start the base first (with lessons learned from the moon), we will see our first trip last the 2 years, and then after that, we will probably see a 10 year or even a lifetime crew. I know that ppl here think that nobody will go there for a lifetime, but that is silly. We have 6 billion+ on this planet. Even assuming that only 1% are willing to go, that is a LOT of ppl (personally, I would, but my wife would not; besides I am too old). It is actually cheaper and better to use the bulk of the trips for cargo. At first, they are going to need lots of robots for construction, exploration, and survival.

      In fact, I was thinking that if we really wanted to colonize anther planet, we might be better off sending lots of women there, and then send up a BUNCH of embryos. Kind of a weird idea, but it would work.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:It was a simulation by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Oh there can be a lifetime crew alright... Just for smaller values of lifetime.

      As for colonization, why would you colonize a planet like Mars once you've figured out how to keep humans alive in space for a long time? It's not like Mars is very much better. Might as well stay in space and just send a few people down when necessary.

      Embryos are a weird idea. Why not sperm instead?

      Anyway this sort of simulation stuff is a silly waste of time, NASA et all should just stick to picking candidates from nuclear submarine crew instead of the Air Force type people they appear to be so fond of. Or at least use the same criteria as in picking sub crew.

      --
    8. Re:It was a simulation by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Why Mars? Gravity, space, protection, independence from earth, and easy access to resources come to mind.

      Embryos allow for needed genetic diversity. If you do sperm only, then you are limited to just the number of women there.
       

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  11. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    not that space exploration gives you Priapism

    It will, if they use M$ Winblozes and big dumb company products and services on the mission which takes aways their freedoms. Am I right or am I right?

  12. Oblg Reply by powerlord · · Score: 1

    The Spice Must Flow

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    1. Re:Oblg Reply by cp.tar · · Score: 4, Funny
      The Spice Must Flow.

      Here, fixed it for you.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    2. Re:Oblg Reply by andrewd18 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points. +1 hilarious.

    3. Re:Oblg Reply by powerlord · · Score: 1

      LOL! That's just wrong on so many levels. :)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    4. Re:Oblg Reply by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait. I found another one (same cat, different text).

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  13. pics by ngt · · Score: 1

    And no pictures from the Titanic movie were used in this Arctic simulation environment... ;-)

  14. More theory than reality by Joseph1337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The test probarly produced results known decades ago. The main problem - effects of long human exposure to microgravity are still barley known. It resembles some similiar tests that were conducted , that as it was revealed were fraudy and had little scientific results

    1. Re:More theory than reality by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Funny

      The main problem - effects of long human exposure to microgravity are still barley known. On the other hand, the effects of barley (along with hops) on me are well known, and I like 'em.
    2. Re:More theory than reality by da'+WINS+pimp · · Score: 1

      Then you'll be happy to know we made our own and drank it. Cheers!

      --

      "I'm just here to regulate funkyness." - James Gandolfini, as Winston in The Mexican
  15. Why 37 days? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $ expr \( 37 \* 39 \) / 60
    24
    That's how long it took to lose a day. So when do they get that day back?

    Ha.
    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Why 37 days? by DanQuixote · · Score: 1


      Oh yea, like /. readers are worried about losing a day...

      --
      "We think people rightly feel that once they buy something, it stays bought," --Suw Charman, Open Rights Grp
  16. But they have a cool acronyms by wsanders · · Score: 1

    What space nerd would refuse to participate in an "F-XI LDM" crew at the "FMARS" station?

    Being cooped up as part of a large crew for an extended period seems important enough to not deserve your ridicule. The ISS crew is only three people. At least we have some data from the ISS about long term effects of (zero) gravity, (zero) atmosphere, and (plenty of) radiation, with Mars being somewhere between space and Earth in those respects.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  17. Soil chemistry? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not like they are supposed to get scientific results back the same as on Mars - part of what they are doing though is living in the same islotation, and working outside in realistic suits just as they would be on mars. They are seeing what works with transportation and tools that can be operated when you have to maintain a reasonable level of isolation from the environment around you. Working the Arctic helps because you are approximating the cold temperatures on Mars.

    As for gravity, it's not like the moon. No it's not as much as Earth but it's still a very solid level of gravity that is comparable.

    What you don't understand about the Mars people is that the end goal is a private mission to Mars - why wait around for the government? And, they have a reasonable plan for doing so with current technology.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Soil chemistry? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "part of what they are doing though is living in the same islotation,"

      Why didnt they just ask the Navy - they have these things called submarines.

      "and working outside in realistic suits "

      You're joking right?

      "very solid level of gravity that is comparable"

      Its one third G. If you were 1/3 your current height would you think it comparable to what it is now?

      "What you don't understand about the Mars people is that the end goal is a private mission to Mars - why wait around for the government? And, they have a reasonable plan for doing so with current technology."

      Only governments can afford to spend that sort of money on projects that won't even get close to returning financially on the investment. As for using current technology , it might be able to get humans to mars , but to keep them there alive AND get them back again? I don't think so. Not yet.

    2. Re:Soil chemistry? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Why didnt they just ask the Navy - they have these things called submarines.

      Which you can't work outside of on dry land. I guess that would explain though why your ideas were all wet.

      You're joking right?

      What's unrealstic about the suits they use. The design is based on real space suits, but tailored to the fact there is not an absolute vaccuum nor temperatures as near to absolute zero to contend with.

      Its one third G. If you were 1/3 your current height would you think it comparable to what it is now?

      Height, no, weight, yes. Do you often confuse height with weight? It's not like the moon where small steps can send you bounding, or like space where everything floats about. Adjusting to lighter gravity is one very small part of what a mars expedition would have to contend with, they are trying out the OTHER aspects of such a mission.

      Only governments can afford to spend that sort of money on projects that won't even get close to returning financially on the investment.

      If you can't see the monetary potential of forming a colony on Mars, you have an utter lack of vision. But a lot of the funds come from dontation. If commercial ventures can put up space hotels, why not martian colonies?

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Soil chemistry? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Which you can't work outside of on dry land. I guess that would explain though why your ideas were all wet."

      People who go outside a submerged submarine have to wear a protection suit in a hostile enviroment. I'd have though the analogy was obvious.he design is based on real space suits, but tailored to the fact there is not an absolute vaccuum nor temperatures as near to absolute zero to contend with.

      "What's unrealstic about the suits they use."

      They wouldn't last 2 seconds on mars, thats what.

      "The design is based on real space suits, but tailored to the fact there is not an absolute vaccuum nor temperatures as near to absolute zero to contend with."

      Mars pressure is about 1/100th that of earth. It might not be a vacuum but the pressure is so negligable that as far as the human body is concerned it might as well. Ergo they'd have to wear full pressure suits with all the issues that entails (such as joint manouverability).

      "Height, no, weight, yes. Do you often confuse height with weight? "

      In 1/3G equipment would not necessarily behave the same.

      "If you can't see the monetary potential of forming a colony on Mars, you have an utter lack of vision. But a lot of the funds come from dontation. If commercial ventures can put up space hotels, why not martian colonies?"

      Because the costs are so high (100s of billions of dollars) that theres no private organisation or even partnership in existence that could afford it. Once some sort of basic infrastructure is set up on Mars and the major costs have been paid then private organisations can move in but until then it won't happen. If you believe otherwise then I suggest you take time out from watching so many Sci Fi films and learn some simple economics.

    4. Re:Soil chemistry? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      People who go outside a submerged submarine have to wear a protection suit in a hostile enviroment.

      A completely different ind of environment. In case you hadn't noticed, water is a little thin on the ground on Mars. Mars is not short of cold, and with some atmosphere you don't have to have a whole pressure suit - easy to approximate here on earth.

      They wouldn't last 2 seconds on mars, thats what.

      You are just really unable to grasp the point of these tests, aren't you? You simply can't fathom that operating tools and machinery in a suit of approximately the same level of mobility and flexibility could have any value. Thank god you don't work for NASA or nothing would get done.

      Mars pressure is about 1/100th that of earth. It might not be a vacuum but the pressure is so negligable that as far as the human body is concerned it might as well. Ergo they'd have to wear full pressure suits with all the issues that entails (such as joint manouverability).

      Since you don't seem to grasp what they are using for suits, have a look at an earlier prototype here

      In 1/3G equipment would not necessarily behave the same.

      What does that even mean? It's not like weightlessness where you have to be anchored to use a wrench. Define the implications more clearly than a vague fear that tools will become worthless through some magical Martian effect.

      Because the costs are so high (100s of billions of dollars)

      I see your problem now, you are woefully ignorant of how little it actually costs to reach Mars if you don't spend like the government. Read "Mars Direct" and get back to us all with critiques of those costs.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:Soil chemistry? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "and with some atmosphere you don't have to have a whole pressure suit - easy to approximate here on earth.
      "

      Wrong and wrong. The presence of gas molecules around the suit or your body is utterly irrelevant - the only thing that matters is the pressure differential. At 10 millbars the mars atmosphere is to all intents and purpose a vacuum as far as the human body is concerned.

      "You simply can't fathom that operating tools and machinery in a suit of approximately the same level of mobility and flexibility could have any value."

      If you had a clue and understood anything I said you'd know the suits WERENT even close to being an approximate of what they'd need on mars.

      "Define the implications more clearly than a vague fear that tools will become worthless through some magical Martian effect."

      Different weights for tools and people means their whole balance is difference, some tools such as hammers with less weight but the same mass (or the same weight but 3x the mass as on earth) will behave differently because humans are used to a 1:1 ratio for mass:internal mass. Go read up.

      "Read "Mars Direct" and get back to us all with critiques of those costs."

      Even these fantasists come up with a total of $55 billion. Thats still way beyond anything any private company would cough up. Perhaps you should join this little group in their capsule, you seem to be as divorced from reality as they are.

  18. Why all the disappointment? by Natros · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't believe how many people seem to think this was a pointless waste of time. Sure, it's a very limited simulation, but it's a very good proof-of-concept study, and hopefully provided additional data on the psychological stresses that would be placed on a team of astronauts trying to establish an extraterrestrial base. By all means, they should incorporate more variables (true self-sufficiency, extended duration, etc) in future studies, but let's applaud an effort to study the human factors involved in space exploration.

    --
    Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?
    1. Re:Why all the disappointment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Count on it...the same people who whine about these simulations being a "waste of time" are going to be the ones whining after the first fatal Mars accident, asking "why doesn't your incompetent space program test for these things in advance, any idiot would have done that!"

  19. Not much point if you can't get there -- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Not much point if you can't get there -- by khallow · · Score: 1

      I've heard this complaint before. The answer is that we do have some ideas. For example, retrorockets or using inflatable structures or parachutes to vastly increase the surface area of the landing vehicle so that we can decelerate through multiple passes in the Martian atmosphere.

    2. Re:Not much point if you can't get there -- by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Why not using an Orion-like technique? After all, it is known to be a very efficient technique, just non-practical in earth athmosphere because it would fry any non-protected electronics in several countries.

    3. Re:Not much point if you can't get there -- by khallow · · Score: 1

      I don't care how it's done, just that it's done. I do find questions about how to do something to be better than questions about whether it's possible.

  20. One way mars mission? by eniac42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sadly, its going to be a long long time before it happens for real. Zubrins "Mars Direct" plan http://www.cbqc.net/mars/docs/md_reno.txt is the best one using current tech - but it has so many possible ways it can fail that it will not be picked up by todays ultra risk-adverse space admins. The biggest mistake NASA ever made was to ditch the Saturn 5 and 1b systems that took Apollo to the moon - the Skylabs sent up with the later Apollos already did most of the usedful research being being replicated by the overpriced ISS, and they had designs in the pipeline for long term moon-bases, all using Sat5 boosters. Ironically, ditching Apollo never saved the money Nixon thought it would, and yet set manned exploration back 50 years (2019 is about "return to moon" time). Zubrins "Direct to Mars" plan uses two Sat 5 sized launchers for a 3 year round trip Mars mission.

    Because of the logistical problems of a manned mars round trip, someone actually preposed we should find volenteers for a one way trip!! Seriously, just find devoted (and perhaps older) individuals who would risk going to stay - maybe with the promise of a return vessel being sent a few years down the line (A.K.A. 2001).

    Any volenteers?

    --
    "A nation that forgets its past is doomed to repeat it." - Churchill
    1. Re:One way mars mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS. Yes I should spellcheck my posts..

    2. Re:One way mars mission? by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, a lot of the equipment still exists, but is long forgotten:

      http://www.ninjito.com/dump/2007-01-25/qx-door-3.j pg
      http://www.ninjito.com/dump/2007-01-25/qx-door-2.j pg

      You can google the ID on the side to see the role they played in Saturn V history...

    3. Re:One way mars mission? by MontyApollo · · Score: 1

      What was Zubrin's plan for landing? Another post mentions that no one has figured that out yet.

  21. Wait, they have McKay? by d0rp · · Score: 1

    ... what could possibly go wrong!?

    1. Re:Wait, they have McKay? by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

      Would anybody notice another solar system missing? ;)

      For those who don't understand, see Stargate Atlantis: Season 2, Episode 6 "Trinity".

      --
      This space is not for rent.
  22. Final Report by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    The final transmission from the facility indicated some kind of alien bacterial infection had gotten to the crew. Later entries were limited to screaming and gun shots.

    NASA declared the test a spectacular success.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  23. time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so here is my thing... if a "day" is 39 minutes longer, at what point is a day not a day? I mean, an earth minute is not a mars minute. I am probably simple but I find the the fundamental things like changes in time standards interesting when talking about living on another planet. Consider making a watch for use on Mars... Even an electronic watch is based on the earth standard time. Just makes me appreciate why I am not a rocket scientist.

  24. 1903 version of Slashdot... by TED+Vinson · · Score: 5, Funny
    Bunch of Slashdotters scoffing at the Wright Brothers' so-called 'manned flight' experiments.

    "Their [sic] waisting [sic] there [sic] time!"

    "Amusing, but you'll never be able to get across the Atlantic using wings. Airships are the future!"

    "We should be putting this effort into improving the proven technology of steam locomotives."

    "Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of those!"

    "I for one welcome welcome our new internal combustion powered, heavier than air overlords!"

    1. Re:1903 version of Slashdot... by Hanging+By+A+Thread · · Score: 1

      You forgot one....

      "In pre-Soviet Russia bicycle flies you!"

  25. obligatory... by whopub · · Score: 2, Funny

    The fact that it says "for future Mars mission simulations" instead of just "for Mars missions" shows how far away we really are. True. Especially if you consider they simulated the moon landings so thoroughly and then ended up not going there...

    *ducks for cover*
  26. ha ha. by twitter · · Score: 1

    My biggest fan, AC, jokes:

    Priapism - It will, if they use M$ Winblozes and big dumb company products and services on the mission which takes aways their freedoms.

    Digital restrictions and bugs are more like a cock block, but Micro Soft has always promised that.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:ha ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      cock block

      Tell me about it!

  27. Apparently when you say "weak"... by SIIHP · · Score: 1

    You mean "those who wish to stay healthy"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_deprivation#Eff ects_of_sleep_deprivation

    "Effects of sleep deprivation

    Generally, lack of sleep may result in[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]:

    * aching muscles;
    * blurred vision;
    * Cardiovascular disease;
    * clinical depression;
    * colorblindness;
    * daytime drowsiness and naps;
    * decreased mental activity and concentration;
    * weakened immune system;
    * dizziness;
    * dark circles under the eyes;
    * fainting;
    * general confusion;
    * hallucinations;
    * hand tremors;
    * headache;
    * hernia;
    * hyperactivity;
    * hypertension;
    * impatience;
    * irritability;
    * Lucid dreaming (once sleep resumes);
    * memory lapses or loss;
    * nausea;
    * nystagmus (rapid involuntary rhythmic eye movement);
    * psychosis;
    * pallor;
    * slowed reaction time;
    * slurred and/or nonsensical speech;
    * weight loss or gain;
    * yawning;
    * symptoms similar to:
    o Attention deficit Hyperactivity Disorder;
    o Alcoholic Intoxication.

    [edit] Diabetes

    A 1999 study by the University of Chicago Medical Center showed that sleep deprivation severely affects the human body's ability to metabolize glucose, which can lead to early-stage Diabetes Type 2.[10]

    [edit] Effects on the brain

    Sleep deprivation can adversely affect brain function.[9] A 2000 study, by the UCSD School of Medicine and the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System in San Diego, used functional magnetic resonance imaging technology to monitor activity in the brains of sleep-deprived subjects performing simple verbal learning tasks.[11] The study showed that regions of the brain's prefrontal cortex displayed more activity in sleepier subjects. Depending on the task at hand, the brain would sometimes attempt to compensate for the adverse effects caused by lack of sleep. The temporal lobe, which is a brain region involved in language processing, was activated during verbal learning in rested subjects but not in sleep deprived subjects. The parietal lobe, not activated in rested subjects during the verbal exercise, was more active when the subjects were deprived of sleep. Although memory performance was less efficient with sleep deprivation, greater activity in the parietal region was associated with better memory.

    A 2001 Study at Harvard's Medical Institute suggested that sleep deprivation may be linked to more serious diseases, such as heart disease.

    Animal studies suggest that sleep deprivation increases stress hormones, which may reduce new cell production in adult brains.[12]

    [edit] Effects on growth
    This short section requires expansion.

    A 1999 study[13] found that sleep deprivation resulted in reduced cortisol secretion the next day, driven by increased subsequent slow-wave sleep. Sleep deprivation was found to enh

    --
    I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
  28. Biosphere vs. Mars Mission by kuruptacus · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they invited that delightful Pauly Shore like they did for the Biosphere Documentary?

    --
    Shop as usual. Avoid panic buying.
  29. I wonder which crew member got voted out first. by timias1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder which one is the: Bitch, Naive Girl-Next-Door, Surfer Dude, Homosexual, Playa, Joe Schmoe, Drama Queen

    1. Re:I wonder which crew member got voted out first. by rholland356 · · Score: 1

      I wonder which one is the: Bitch, Naive Girl-Next-Door, Surfer Dude, Homosexual, Playa, Joe Schmoe, Drama Queen

      Bitch is Cissy Yost

      Naive Girl-next-Door is Kai

      Surfer Dude is Butchie Yost

      Homosexual is Steady Freddie Lopez

      Playa is John Monad

      Joe Schmoe is Meyer Dickstein

      Drama Queen is Linc Stark



      There, that was easy. Huh? It's cancelled?

      crap...

  30. Crew Ends 100 Day Mars Simulation in... by TheBlunderbuss · · Score: 1

    My RSS aggregator chopped the title off at "Crew Ends 100 Day Mars Simulation in..." and some twisted part of me chanted "... a ball of fire, a ball of fire" as I clicked the link. Does this speak ill of me, or would it be an expected NASA blunder?

  31. Some of their findings by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Just a sample of their recommendations for travelers to Mars based on their simulation:

    - Seals would be a valuable food source
    - Canadian TV is available
    - You'll need skis and a boat to get there
    - Igloos can be substituted for prefab shelters
    - If you need water don't worry, it'll rain/snow occasionally

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  32. 1000 days - Mars Ocean Odyssey by slashmojo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is a couple currently on a somewhat related venture.. they plan to spend 1000 days at sea in a yacht, completely self sufficient and never touching dry land for the duration.

    So far they are on day 121 and have had some 'fun' already - a collision with a freighter for example caused some significant damage which had to be repaired at sea.

    The idea obviously is to (kind of) simulate a very long space journey where the crew have only themselves and what they can carry to depend on.

    There are a few notable differences though such as the lack of fish to catch in space. ;)

    You can follow their journey here..

    http://1000days.net/home/

    Looks like a great adventure anyway.. wish I could take 1000 days off work!

    1. Re:1000 days - Mars Ocean Odyssey by crazyvas · · Score: 1

      http://1000days.net/home/
      Summary: this guy saw an opportunity to exclusively hump this chick for 1000 days in a row, and pounced on it.

    2. Re:1000 days - Mars Ocean Odyssey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The funny thing is that you are not even joking a little bit.

      Soanya came into contact with the 1000 Days Non-stop at Sea expedition at the beginning of her third year in college as she was photographing the piers of Manhattan. Having worked various office jobs through college, as she was graduating, she realized the well defined city grid and square cubicle was not for her. She preferred instead to follow her own expansive spirit in a less limiting environment and the sea was the perfect place to start. Three years after her first encounter with the project, she decided to become a part of it and accompany the noble and charming captain of the expedition, Reid Stowe, on his greatest and most challenging voyage yet.

      After being onboard the Schooner Anne for a year now, Soanya has come to play an integral role with all facets of the expedition including, photographing, videotaping, organizing, and inventorying as well as operating all of the computers and communications equipment She, uh, does "photographing, videotaping, organizing, and inventorying"... right... I think she does something else besides take pictures for the 'noble and charming captain' who has a good 20+ year age jump on her.
    3. Re:1000 days - Mars Ocean Odyssey by loki1978 · · Score: 0

      Waterworld

      really

      forgive me, but i actually like this movie

      --
      According to prophecy
  33. Why on Earth... by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...would they choose to simulate Mars in someone's attic. Most simulations of this kind are much better performed in the basement of one's parent's house.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  34. Problem Solved by mooterSkooter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "But while the Apollo lunar lander weighed approximately 10 metric tons, a human mission to Mars will require three to six times that mass, given the restraints of staying on the planet for a year. Landing a payload that heavy on Mars is currently impossible, using our existing capabilities" Well, I see a simple solution; Build a spacecraft that splits into several separate parts (of approximately "10 metric tons") before entry! Problem solved.

    1. Re:Problem Solved by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Or if we are sure we can guide landing of objects fairly well, why not just ship unmanned payloads to Mars ahead of time? It would require some long term planning, but as long as you were able to land the payloads reasonably close to each other, there's no reason you couldn't send them ahead of time. Then all you need is to send the astronauts at the end along with a "pick-up truck" to pick up the various payloads and bring them back to base camp.

      (On a side note, I wonder if any of the major automobile manufacturers have made any strides in creating a lower power, all electric pick-up truck. Can you imagine the advertising points that would give you? "Ford: so tough they use it on Mars!")

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  35. Mars Simulation in Attic by SoyChemist · · Score: 1

    When I first read this, I thought it said "Mars Simulation in Attic". I can certainly picture some of my friends having a 100 day sleepover party in their grandmother's attic while wearing star trek pajamas and plastic communicator badges.

  36. Has to be said: Chicks on Mars!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Melissa adds that the extra 39 minutes does make a difference, "[you] feel like [you're] getting more work done."

    OK, a real techie girl, but still....

  37. Doom by jlebrech · · Score: 0

    Weren't they just playing Doom 3 for 100 days, Arctic weather is pretty useful for when you want to overclock a pc.

    Come to think of it, that may explain some of the freakish weather due to global warming.

  38. Time delay by Kopretinka · · Score: 1

    hax0r_this already said that in an earlier comment, but it's worth repeating: they should make all communications go through a device that will delay them by a few minutes; I expect that it should also vary from 5 to 20 minutes to simulate Mars and Earth being in various parts of their orbits. This should add a lot to the emotional feeling of being far away from the rest of humanity.

    --
    Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
  39. Mars Simulation???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds more like the Big Brother TV series but set in the Arctic. Get the gormless inmates/guests to wear fancy dress and do space-like "tasks".
    So what did this exercise tell them then? Can we survive on Mars without resorting to canabilism? That's the million dollar question I want answering!