Slashdot Mirror


Three MythTV Linux Distros Compared

An anonymous reader writes "Linux.com has a comparison article up looking at three MythTV-focused Linux distributions. The piece looks at Mythdora, Mythbuntu, and KnoppMyth, with an eye towards ease of installation and the actual utility of the install. From the article: 'For regular system maintenance, KnoppMyth simply isn't in the same ballpark as MythBuntu and MythDora. The live CD heritage of Knoppix means you cannot update individual packages, which is fine if you like that, but for an always-on system like a MythTV back end, I'd prefer flexibility and configurability of a mainline distro. When all is said and done, if I were building my TiVo replacement today, I would do it with MythDora. MythBuntu shows a lot of promise, and I will give the final 7.10 release another look (in part because I run Ubuntu on my desktop machines), but it isn't ready yet.'" Linux.com and Slashdot are both owned by SourceForge.

176 comments

  1. MythDora? by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Funny

    MythSwiper, no MythSwiping!

    Oh man...

    1. Re:MythDora? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      some while back a totally different aproach then Tivo or the newer DVRS came out and as far as I can see. died. All the systems used a software based on a package called MyIHome. Brands included Neuston, Mumistu, IODATA/AVEL, and, on the Macintosh side Elgato's iHome. All of these are no longer on the market. Some had built in DVD drives, some USB for addition of external hard drives... a few had wireless.
      These boxes connect to your local network,and stream various media files to your TV. You are limited to the codecs supported (meaning yes to DivX, no to WMV 9) but for standard televison they are absolutely wonderful. Instead of limiting you to the drive on your DVR, you can now stream from any box in the house. Music and photos can also be streamed. Some offer internet connectivity so streamed Video Blogs (Cranky Geeks, DLTV) can also be watched on TV. MythTV is capturing this capability these days but back when, it was already available. I have 2 of these boxes and love the system. I never could figure out why it didn't catch on. The boxes can talk to a streaming server on any platform (including MythTV). Highly recomended.
      -

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    2. Re:MythDora? by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      "MythSwiper, no MythSwiping!

      Oh man..."

      Awsome!

      Too bad nerds don't usually breed so nobody here will get it.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    3. Re:MythDora? by vizek · · Score: 1

      Oh well, as a result of having a 3 year old AND a PVR (windows box for now) I do get it

    4. Re:MythDora? by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I have a three year old AND a mythdora system. I got it, and it caused an involuntary twitch.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    5. Re:MythDora? by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      Can't grown ups watch Nick Jr? I find Dora The Explorer funny as :D

    6. Re:MythDora? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      MythSwiper, no MythSwiping!

      Oh man...

      Aaaarrrggghhh!!! I come to work specifically to read slashdot in peace and escape from Dora the Fucking Explorer and now look what happens...
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:MythDora? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Can't grown ups watch Nick Jr?
      Only if they're forced to by their kids, otherwise there is really no excuse.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. MythTV for PS3 by DrXym · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The PS3 can run Linux but so far it's been regular Linux distributions. MythTV sounds like a natural fit for a device which has practically everything in place to be a kickass multimedia console. It would be cool to see a MythTV dist for the PS3 that boots straight into the UI and also works with any plugged in USB devices like TV tuners.

    1. Re:MythTV for PS3 by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      any tuner device supported by linux should be usable with mythtv so if you find a USB tuner with linux support you can use it

      (Watching HDTV on mythtv trunk on fc7 right now)

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    2. Re:MythTV for PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is I don't think there are any USB TV capture devices that work in MythTV.

      I have been using MythTV for something like 4 years now just because there isn't anything as good but I really hate it. It's so freaking slow and buggy. I mean once you have hundreds of recorded shows the thing just slows to a crawl. It takes forever just to delete a program. This all seems totally ridiculous considering the relatively tiny amount of data it is managing. Then there are the bugs like when it gets into some sort of bad state and the menus don't work (you can open the menu but can't select anything). Very poorly written piece of software if you ask me.

      I have been wanting to write a better MythTV ever since I tried the first version but I just haven't had time so I keep using the piece 'o crap.

    3. Re:MythTV for PS3 by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      I think the PS3 locks down most of the processing power when you boot it into something other than the PS3 OS. Trying to watch a video on my friends ubuntu install on his ps3 was terrible, like 3 or 4 fps.

    4. Re:MythTV for PS3 by EvilRyry · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is mostly because there are no accelerated video drivers for Linux on PS3. CPU power should be mostly there I'd imagine though...

    5. Re:MythTV for PS3 by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I've installed VideoLan on a PS3 and the framerate is acceptable.

    6. Re:MythTV for PS3 by FunkyELF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not true. Most of the processing power is still there. Just no accelerated graphics. The CELL should be enough to process it, the code hasn't been written yet. If you're watching a video on there you're just using the 3.2GHz PPC with a frame buffer. You're not using any of the SPU/SPE's. I think work is being done for this but it will take time.

    7. Re:MythTV for PS3 by tji · · Score: 3, Informative

      > The problem is I don't think there are any USB TV capture devices that work in MythTV.

      The PS3 would make a good MythTV frontend (display) system. You're better off using a Linux box as the backend. That way you can still use the PS3 as a game system or Blue-Ray DVD player -- rather than leaving it in Linux mode all the time to record programs. As for tuners. the HDHomeRun is a good network-based HD tuner option.

      > I have been using MythTV for something like 4 years now just because there isn't anything as good but I really hate it. It's so freaking slow and buggy. I mean once you have hundreds of recorded shows the thing just slows to a crawl. It takes forever just to delete a program. This all seems totally ridiculous considering the relatively tiny amount of data it is managing. Then there are the bugs like when it gets into some sort of bad state and the menus don't work (you can open the menu but can't select anything). Very poorly written piece of software if you ask me.

      It's hard to say what the issue is from that description.

      - Slow performance: All the standard Linux tuning applies. MythTV uses MySQL extensively, so tuning that performance is important.
      - Slow Delete: File system choice is important. ext* is very slow in deleting files. I use JFS because it deletes almost instantly. In newer MythTV versions, there is an option to do deletes in smaller chunks to avoid this problem on ext* systems.
      - I haven't seen bugs like those you described. I use 0.20.1, and it works well. MythTV is not ideal.. setup is difficult, as is configuration.. The menu systems could use some major improvements and configurability. It's definitely the worst DVR going, except for everything else.

    8. Re:MythTV for PS3 by tji · · Score: 4, Informative

      > any tuner device supported by linux should be usable with mythtv so if you find a USB tuner with linux support you can use it

      MythTV is modular. You do the tuning/recording/processing on the backend, which talks to the frontend (display) via the network. These functions can be on the same box, but with the PS3 as a frontend, you would want a separate backend.

      http://linuxtv.org/ has info on supported devices. My tuner of choice is the HDHomeRun, a network based dual HD tuner.

    9. Re:MythTV for PS3 by halfelven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      HDHomeRun looks very promising. I'm having one delivered to my door today, can't wait to play with it.

    10. Re:MythTV for PS3 by Skater · · Score: 1

      Not true. Hauppage Win TV DVR USB 2 (don't quote me on the name of it - but it's something like that, and it has to have ALL of those parts - DVR, USB, and 2 - or it's not the right one).

      I have one, works great. I use it with my laptop in the RV when I want to watch TV (quite rare - I think the only time I've actually used it that way was when I was actually living out of the camper for a time), and the rest of the time it's at home serving as a second tuner for the MythTV setup.

      Only downside: MythTV goes a little nuts if it looks for the tuner and it's not there. I suspect it would be okay if I had the tuner plugged into to a different backend and took that backend down when I wanted to use the tuner in the camper, however. Still, it'd be nice if it understood that a USB tuner may not be present and handled that more gracefully. (Or it may be something in the drivers for the tuner causing it, and not MythTV at all - I haven't really looked into the issue.)

    11. Re:MythTV for PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The slow performance it not from deleting the file. I use XFS and deletion is instantaneous. It's the stupid MythTV software (or by proxy MythTV's poor use of MySQL).

      It's not just deleting. The whole thing just gets incredibly, slow to open menus, slow to delete, slow to start playing, etc. It's just slow. It's snappy at first but like I said once you have several hundreds of recorded programs it becomes painful.

    12. Re:MythTV for PS3 by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      As far as the GPU is concerned yes. But you have the full power of the CPU available. The problem is that the CPU isn't that great if you don't use the SPEs. Now if they ever port the codecs to use the SPEs then the PS3 should be a transcoding monster.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:MythTV for PS3 by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a minor tuning issue. Admittedly it's one that end users should not ever be exposed to. However it is still pretty simple to fix. You just need to let mysql be more greedy with memory.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    14. Re:MythTV for PS3 by Adam+Hazzlebank · · Score: 1

      The problem is I don't think there are any USB TV capture devices that work in MythTV. There are a bunch. I'm using a Twinham 7041 DVB-T capture device and a Twinham 702x DVB-S (SkyStar 2) at the moment. In general if you can get the device to work on Linux you should be able to get it to work with Myth.

      I have been using MythTV for something like 4 years now just because there isn't anything as good but I really hate it. It's so freaking slow and buggy.... I have been wanting to write a better MythTV ever since I tried the first version but I just haven't had time so I keep using the piece 'o crap. I think it's a bad design decision of their part. Basically they seem to have taken the very un-UNIXy approach of adding everything in to one code base rather than reusing and improving other programs. Video playback for example, could have used mplayer. They've written their own DVD playing code rather than improving the other software that's available. You might want to check out Freevo it looks nice and IIRC is writen in Python, it glues mplayer and a bunch of other stuff together to create a PVR. It looks nice, but obviously doesn't have the support Myth does.
    15. Re:MythTV for PS3 by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Don't kid yourself.

      You are no champion for those that "just want to make it work".

      You want to whine about something. This happens to be it. Something else would do equally well.

      When it comes to "just want to make it work", a poorly tuned mysql db is just an annoyance and is no show stopper.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:MythTV for PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People take time to suggest solutions to an AC, and that's how you respond?

      Go buy a Tivo, asshole. You're clearly not bright enough to use a Linux homebrew PVR.
      Or, if you want to stick with MythTV, get off your ass, do a little homework, and solve your own fucking problems. The things you describe are not common problems.

      Or, sit there and keep bitching that other people aren't solving your problems fast enough. You seem to enjoy that.

    17. Re:MythTV for PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Video playback for example, could have used mplayer. They've written their own DVD playing code rather than improving the other software that's available"

      Nonsense. Myth lets you use whatever player suits you. Want to use mplayer/vlc/xine? Go right ahead. It even lets you choose different player commands depending on file types.

      The reasoning for the creation of the internal player had more to do with keymappings and controls. The internal player uses the same controls as the 'live tv' player. This makes it easier to remember which keys to press to fast forward, or change the volume, etc.

      It is possible to set up key mappings for individual applications, but it is a pain.

    18. Re:MythTV for PS3 by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I don't like streaming because I see no reason that I should need two machines in order to provide what should be capable through one. Streaming is a geek solution, not a general purpose solution.

      Instead I see something akin to the XBox Media Center project. The PS3 hardware is well defined apart from USB devices so it should be possible to optimize the performance and indeed the code (6 free SPUs are there to be commanded), to make a superb no-brain media center for the PS3. It could local content (MP3, AAC, OGG, H264, MP3, MPG-2 etc.), streaming content, TV tuners, TV listings, web browers, weather and more out of the box. It could also support the PS3's SIXAXIS, remote and other Bluetooth devices. All of this without any user configuration at all. It could even default to DHCP to spare the user configuring the network connectivity. The goal at every stage would be simplicity. Naturally it could offer advanced configuration features, and even allow an expert to add modules (e.g. MAME) but the default should be simple and ready to run out of the box.

  3. hmm by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    From TFA, it sounds like "Gutsy Gibbon" is more like "Glitchy Goat" as an alpha. I'm kinda curious how it will turn-out after the beta testing is done. I mean, with all the hype and good reviews surrounding Ubuntu, I can see this as dominating the other MythTV-infused distros out there.

    As for TFA, bench testing an alpha versus go-live products is hardly fair.

    Just my $0.02.

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:hmm by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Gutsy Gibbon is more than adequate as a MythTV plaform. The problem from the article is an edge case that may or may not get seen much in actual use. In general who gets highly integrated systems just to slap in an aftermarket video card?

      The article didn't really address anything substantive. The really tricky parts like ivtv and lirc weren't even addressed. It's really impossible to judge competing distributions if you don't mention that sort of stuff. This article was too superficial to be useful.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  4. And People Complain About The Many Version Of Vist by T-Bone-T · · Score: 0, Troll

    I honestly thought that when one said,"Get MythTV." it would be that simple. Why does it surprise me that there is more than one distro, just like the rest of Linux?

  5. WARNING: Critical problem with out of date distros by LordKazan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Recently the free listings provider for north america (TMS' Zap2it) annouced they will be going offline on Sept 1 - a replacement ($5/month for now, hopefully reducing to $20/year in the future - schedulesdirect.org) is available but only the latest release .20.2 of stable (And -fixes and trunk in snv naturally) support using it.

    If you download one of these distros make sure they have updated it with a .20.2 (post mythfilldatabase scheduling fix) otherwise you will not be able to get north american listings.

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  6. Anyone have an alternate link? by Isca · · Score: 1

    The hamsters are having trouble keeping up.

    1. Re:Anyone have an alternate link? by dantal · · Score: 1
  7. Re:And People Complain About The Many Version Of V by LordKazan · · Score: 4, Informative

    mythtv is just linux softwre - those distros are just rolls of their parent distros with mythtv bundled and tuned as it doesn't normally come bundled.

    if you're going to watch HD it's best to compile it yourself so it can do the most cpu optimizations (make sure to enable them via the appropriate configure flag)

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  8. Security of Mythdora by Jerm · · Score: 1

    I agree with the basic assumption that in terms of "just working," Mythdora is pretty good. My problem with it is a sudo-enabled user with identical login and password. On a fire-walled home setup, I suppose this is less of an issue, but as I had no idea if changing the default password would break functionally, I had to ditch it.

    --
    Jerm
    Oh, you're not a real doctor, are you?
    1. Re:Security of Mythdora by jerkychew · · Score: 1

      Mythdora gives you the option of enabling SELinux and the firewall during the install interview. Granted this isn't a perfect solution but a) It's better than nothing and b) It's meant to be an appliance, not a server. I'd hope that it would be on your local network behind a firewall and not wide open to the internet.

      My issue, though is your statement, "...but as I had no idea if changing the default password would break functionally, I had to ditch it."

      - So, what you're saying is you did zero research, and didn't bother even trying it before you gave up on the idea?

    2. Re:Security of Mythdora by idcard_1 · · Score: 1

      Are you that incompetent of a Linux user that you cannot type: su passwd mythtv I mean even man passwd could have done you good.

  9. Upside by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The good thing about being forced to get a TV is that a condition of me doing so was that I get to install a Myth TV setup. I'm thinking satellite + cable + OTA inputs to a small cluster in the basement, new fibre runs all over the house, speakers in every wall, projectors in hidden drop down ceiling mounts, touch screen controls in every room, integration of every form of entertainment known to man and a user interface that delights and astounds.

    By the time I'm finished, of course, it'll be obsolete and I shall have to start over, just like the fourth bridge paint job. Perpetual geeking if you like.

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Upside by edmicman · · Score: 2, Funny

      user interface that delights and astounds
      And you're going to use MythTV?
    2. Re:Upside by james_orr · · Score: 1

      I think you mean the Forth bridge. How are you being forced to get a TV?

    3. Re:Upside by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you've never used a Tivo. Nor a Cableco provided DVR for that matter.

      Just the avoidance of easter eggs and little hacks to re-enable critical features is a nice improvement.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Upside by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      You say this like it's a bad thing...

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
  10. Re:WARNING: Critical problem with out of date dist by krbvroc1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your facts are kinda misleading. True, the latest 20.2 release incorporates direct support for the new schedulesdirect.org program listing. However, older versions can be 'retrofitted' by using/updating just the xmltv application. The latest xmltv 0.5.48 will work with the new schedulesdirect site. You can then feed that into your existing mythfilldatabase. This solution might work for those unable/unwilling to upgrade their mythtv version. Personally, I've gone to 20.2 and the upgrade was pretty seamless.

  11. In other news by chuckymonkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The Slashdot Botnet has struck down linux.com. According to our sources this botnet is commanded by a cmdrtaco. In a recent interview with "cmdrtaco" he stated "We like to take down sites for fun, it's not so much malicous as just a side effect." We'll keep you updated on new developments as they happen.

    --
    "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
  12. A possible source for guide data by Mike+Gleason · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's been some talk about getting a subscription service running for MythTV users; if I recall, the goal was to get it going for $5/month.

    Here's an option that could be considered: buy a BeyondTV license from Snapstream, then use your username and password along with a little reverse engineering to login legally to their guide service. BeyondTV's guide data is included with your purchase -- no monthly fees. Currently it costs $70, so after a year it would have paid for itself at the proposed $5/month.

    That said, I should say I'm pretty pleased with the actual BeyondTV software, even though it is Windows-based. I spent about 2 weeks trying to get Myth (MythDora) and Freevo to work at all on a pretty vanilla new Dell PC with new hardware reported to be compatible. I downloaded BTV just to see if the hardware was to blame, and after a grand total of 15 minutes, I had a working PVR with multiple tuners. The software is customizable as well, so I can do nightly batch processing like I was planning to do with the Linux box, although the included Xvid transcoding works automatically if you want to do that.

    1. Re:A possible source for guide data by Mike+Gleason · · Score: 1

      Or, to be pedantic, after a year and 2 months it would pay for itself.

    2. Re:A possible source for guide data by LordKazan · · Score: 3, Informative

      you're pretty out of date - schedulesdirect is up... and they hope to be able to reduce to $20/year eventually. try reading the thread before replying i posted about SD before you posted

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    3. Re:A possible source for guide data by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Here's an option that could be considered: buy a BeyondTV license from Snapstream, then use your username and password along with a little reverse engineering to login legally to their guide service. BeyondTV's guide data is included with your purchase -- no monthly fees. Currently it costs $70, so after a year it would have paid for itself at the proposed $5/month. I've got an old ReplayTV (the kind that could automagically skip commercials and came with a lifetime schedule subscription) sitting on a shelf. I would love to make use of that lifetime subscript for my myth setup.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:A possible source for guide data by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Here's an option that could be considered: buy a BeyondTV license from Snapstream, then use your username and password along with a little reverse engineering to login legally to their guide service. BeyondTV's guide data is included with your purchase -- no monthly fees. Currently it costs $70, so after a year it would have paid for itself at the proposed $5/month.


      While that is a technical possibility, it cannot be done legally since BeyondTV's license agreement specifically prohibits it. You can do it, but you can't do it legally.
      --

      Enigma

    5. Re:A possible source for guide data by Tack · · Score: 1

      I spent about 2 weeks trying to get Myth (MythDora) and Freevo to work at all on a pretty vanilla new Dell PC with new hardware reported to be compatible.
      Speaking on behalf of Freevo, I can say we know it sucks, and we're not happy with the suckage either. Freevo 2 (whose vaporwareness admittedly approaches that of Duke Nukem Forever) will suck less in that respect, and our partnership with GeeXbox will make the distribution aspect of it much simpler.
    6. Re:A possible source for guide data by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I spent 2 hours getting Myth working on my Mac Mini.

      Most of that time was just waiting for the Ubuntu installer to do it's thing while I jumped in and out of the home office doing other things.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  13. MythTV distros over-rated by halfelven · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't see what's the point of building a dedicated distro for MythTV. Why reinvent the wheel? Why not use a well-known, established distribution, and just create a software repository with MythTV?
    A dedicated distro may be here today, gone tomorrow, if it doesn't build a large enough community. That's not what I expect from the operating system that I'm gonna use on the MythTV server that I will build next month.

    I think I'm just going to use CentOS or Ubuntu (the LTS edition - long-term support) and pull MythTV from one of the popular repositories.

    1. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by jma05 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > I think I'm just going to use CentOS or Ubuntu (the LTS edition - long-term support) and pull MythTV from one of the popular repositories.

      Because many of us already tried that and couldn't get it to work. MythTV is one of the worst software I had to set up. It is just wrong to expect an end user for a PVR to even know what a database is, let alone having to set it up and deal with the error messages, even if it something popular such as MySQL. MythTV just needs to be as easy as the commercial packages to setup.

    2. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I haven't tried MythBuntu yet but it's not much more than a fancy Ubuntu+mythtv installer. All the packages come from the official Ubuntu repositories. The new mythtv control centre created for Mythbuntu will be in the official Ubuntu 7.10 (gutsy) repositories. So installing Ubuntu + mythtv + mythtv control centre will give the exact result as Mythbuntu + desktop option. Nothing will come from unofficial repositories AFAIK.

      Ubuntu LTS (dapper)'s kernel didn't have ivtv included yet.
      Ubuntu 7.04 (feisty)'s kernel doesn't have the lirc modules.
      Ubuntu 7.10 and Mythbuntu will have everything I need for absolutely painless installation in my case.

      I have 2 hauppauge pvr-150 tuners and a nvidia card.

      The same people working on mythbuntu have added improved the Ubuntu Mythtv packages very much. Things like automatic mysql setup, automatic backups of the mythconverge database. There are meta-packages for mythtv-backend and mythtv-frontend. These things make setting up mythtv a breeze compared to before.

    3. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by halfelven · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see.

      Well, I agree that MythTV per se is a bit dorky, and it might be a chore for the non-technical user (or at least the user not too familiar with Linux) to install and configure. Yes, they do need to make the install / config process easier. And yes, I think I see now the point of using a dedicated distro.

      I had no problems with the setup - but then I'm fairly familiar with the OS.

      Hm, still, the average enthusiast should not find it too difficult. Sometimes the hardware might get tricky, but that's about it, is my guess.

    4. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by jma05 · · Score: 1

      > it might be a chore for the non-technical user
      > still, the average enthusiast should not find it too difficult.

      It can be a chore for anybody. A non-technical should not even touch it. I have been using Linux for at least 6 years now (both desktop and servers). Not exactly a newbie. Although most of my problems were related to poor compatibility of my tuner card at the time. But I was annoyed with other aspects of the install as well. People have varying luck with MythTV. For some, it just works and they never go back.

    5. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Styrmis · · Score: 1

      I don't see what's the point of building a dedicated distro for MythTV. Why reinvent the wheel? Why not use a well-known, established distribution, and just create a software repository with MythTV?

      Even the best efforts of package maintainers (like cardoe for the Gentoo ebuilds) cannot make the process of setting up a Myth system as simple as a dedicated distro.

      The reason for this is that there is so much more to setting up a Myth system then just installing and configuring Myth. Even compiling from source is very simple.

      The hours of toil come from:
      - getting your TV tuner(s) working correctly (ivtv, firmware)
      - setting up your storage (LVM?)
      - defining and automating maintenance tasks (backup, channel data updates)
      - getting Lirc working
      - Working out the quirks of your particular setup (unavoidable)
      - etc. etc.

      There are many small tasks which cumulatively take a lot of time to complete which have been taken care of for you in, for example, MythDora. Many people will just follow Jarod Wilson's guide http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/fcmyth.php anyway; why not take advantage of all that hard work in an automated installer?

      The flip side is that building it yourself from scratch will allow you to diagnose and fix many more problems while also providing an interesting project which will not only record TV but give you a taste of what it takes to keep a heavily-loaded system running for weeks or (hopefully) months at a time.

    6. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by halfelven · · Score: 1

      Oddly, after investigating Mythbuntu I'm changing my mind. It's based on Gutsy, which will receive package updates for 18 months. After that it's either no updates, or upgrade the OS.
      18 months is not too bad. The Ubuntu OS upgrade is not too bad either, from what I've heard.

      Maybe I'll give it a try.

    7. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu, Xubuntu and Kubuntu are all really the same distro with different meta-packages installed (ubuntu-desktop, xubuntu-desktop and kubuntu-desktop respectively). From a quick perusal of Mythbuntu's website it would appear that they operate on much the same principle, aside from being in a separate repository.

      It sure would be nice to be able to do

      apt-get install mythbuntu-frontend
      on a vanilla Ubuntu Server install (Ubuntu Server is really just Ubuntu without any of the aforementioned desktop packages installed) and get a nice, friendly media center UI right out of the box, while still benefiting from the latest updates from the main Ubuntu repositories. It looks like that is what Mythbuntu is working towards, and if they can make it work it might persuade me to have another look at MythTV.
    8. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by siwelwerd · · Score: 1

      I don't see what's the point of building a dedicated distro for MythTV. Why reinvent the wheel? Why not use a well-known, established distribution, and just create a software repository with MythTV?

      Because MythTV isntallation is a pain in the ass. Even with all the packages in a repository. After messing around with your proposed method for a weekend, I downloaded MythDora on a whim, popped in the disk, and was off and running in an hour. Not that I particularly like Fedora, but automated installation of the trickier bits is what did it for me.

    9. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Burz · · Score: 1

      That is what LinuxMCE does. First you install Ubuntu, then you run a program that installs and configures a whole suite of programs including MythTV.

      The demo video on their site is impressive.

    10. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by dashslotter · · Score: 1

      I've set up my share of myth boxen, and I think it can be done by a newb (after all, this is what got me into linux). Sure, problems can arise, but if you go with a popular distro like ubuntu, then odds are the wiki docs will cover the majority, if not all of them.

      --
      I was flipping bits on an abacus, newb.
    11. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, MythDora is based on Fedora. All I could think of was Dora the Explorer.... Thanks for mentioning Fedora.

    12. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by halfelven · · Score: 1

      I agree. The amount of online documentation that Ubuntu has amassed is amazing. If you stumble upon an issue, chances are it's already solved somewhere in the Wiki, the forums, or the mailing list archives.

    13. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can do this right now with vanilla ubuntu, it's how I set up my last mythbox. Follow the guides here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MythTV_Feisty.

      You basically apt-get install mythtv-backend-master and/or ubuntu-mythtv-frontend.

      Being a normal Ubuntu install it makes it very easy to install things like Xine or K3B or whatever else you decide you need at a later date.

    14. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      It is just wrong to expect an end user for a PVR to even know what a database is

      No offense, but that's fucking idiotic. If you're building a DIY PVR, and you decide to build it on top of Linux, it behooves you to understand the basics of system administration. This includes how to run a mysql database, among other things. Or were you just expecting the system to magically auto-maintain itself?

    15. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Harin_Teb · · Score: 1

      I agree. I used (note past tense) KnoppMyth for about 6 months. In the end it just (seemingly randomly) crapped out on me, and now I have an expensive paperweight sitting next to my TV. I suck at Linux, and quite frankly I don't have the time to learn it right now. I'd love to do the OS thing, and use all free (in every sense) software but it just isn't gonna happen until it "just works." I'm considering buying a windows licence (XP) and one of the non-free software suites to have essentially TiVo. Either that or one of the pre-built, garunteed to work, MythTV computers where all I (as the end user) need to do is plug my cable into the back, and the output into my TV. unfortunately those run about $1000 -- I could just get TiVo for that...

    16. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I built my first ever MythTV setup this weekend, as a test. (I can receive HD from all the local networks - yay!) I chose Ubuntu because I am a hardware engineer, not a software engineer, and packages (specifically Debian based as that is all I've ever used) allow me to use Linux.

      My biggest problem is that the MythTV distribution for Ubuntu is not built with XvMC support. My computer (Athlon 64 3000+, 1 GB, GeForce FX 5200) is perfectly suited to run as a dual back/front-end box if XvMC is enabled (according to many guides I've read). If it isn't enabled, the CPU is pegged at 100% and the signal skips - exactly what I see.

      I followed online guides to get things set up as they are now, with everything working fine except the prebuffering errors. I haven't found a guide that adequately walks me through building MythTV from source, and I cannot do it on my own. Even if I could, I would be giving up the ability to upgrade with any level of ease, such as what I would need to do quickly to support SchedulesDirect.

      So, I guess I can be in the category of "I tried that and couldn't get it to work". Perhaps there are other tweaks besides XvMC that these dedicated distros have done to alleviate the need. Or, perhaps one of these does actually enable this.

      Anyone know if one of these dedicated distros enables XvMC in their prebuilt distribution?

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    17. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...a dedicated distro isn't going to change any of that.

      If there is an automated build for lirc, that can be assimilated into a normal distro just as well.

      apt-get install mythtv works pretty much the same way either way.

      Automagic setup of mysql with mythtv is going to work the same exact way even with some crusty edition of Debian.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    18. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      if you do your research and get well supported cards (Hauppauge PVR-150s, PVR-500s for analog, DVB cards for digital (the Kworld ATSC 110 is a DVB card that does US ATSC and QAM)) setup is a snap. It's not mythtv's fault if you fail to check your cards compatability.

      that being said setup could certainly be made easier

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    19. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Dedicated distro easier?

      pppppffffft. Bull puckey.

      They're actually harder to use. That's not even counting if you want something other than what in the can.

      Any dedicated MythTV distro I've ever tried has made me want to throw the install CD across the room.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    20. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The setup is just awful though. I tried setting up MythTV a year or so ago. I've maintained Gentoo, Debian, and FreeBSD boxes. I can program. I know databases. But IIRC, the very first page of the setup--not sure if it was MythTV or KnoppMyth's fault--was asking about which sockets I wanted to use, or some such nonsense. I mean, WTF, pick the default for client/server on the same machine, and don't make it part of the initial setup. Then allow configuring that later, once it is up and running. That kind of thing turns off even experienced, knowledgeable users.

      Meanwhile the commercial SageTV application asks you to select your tuner card, choose a cable listings lineup, scan the channels, and you're done. When you want to add client/server, you add the client app on another PC and go. It's not hard to design a reasonable setup procedure. The MythTV designers just don't have a clue what is reasonable.

    21. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by jma05 · · Score: 1

      >> It is just wrong to expect an end user for a PVR to even know what a database is
      > No offense, but that's fucking idiotic. If you're building a DIY PVR, and you decide to build it on top of Linux, it behooves you to understand the basics of system administration.

      That bigotic "Those dumb users" mindset especially when basic usability testing is lacking is actually offensive. Don't know about you or what a majority of MythTV users do, but I DON'T build dedicated PVRs. I installed a PVR software on my desktop, let it run while I left for work and watched after I got back. I DO know how to administer databases. I just don't think it should come down to that for an entertainment app. Especially when that part can be automated and abstracted away.

      > This includes how to run a mysql database, among other things. Or were you just expecting the system to magically auto-maintain itself?

      Actually, yes. What do you think EVERY other PVR software expects you to do?

    22. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by egypt_jimbob · · Score: 1

      I've set up my share of myth boxen, and I think it can be done by a newb (after all, this is what got me into linux). Sure, problems can arise, but if you go with a popular distro like ubuntu, then odds are the wiki docs will cover the majority, if not all of them. That assumes a newb with quite a large amount of dedication. Many people who are not regular Linux users seem to install software like this:
      • download installer
      • run installer
        • if it doesn't work, author an informationless post in an unrelated forum then give up and complain to all their friends that Linux sucks
        • if it does work, complain about how hard it was to install and Linux sucks
      I would like to have faith. I would like to believe that newbs read forums and ask useful questions. I just don't see the evidence for it.
      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    23. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      To follow up on my own comment, I (having nothing better to do) decided to try and build MythTV from source tonight.

      I'm following the "Install MythTV" section of this page:
      www.pchdtv.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1938

      Note that I'm using Ubuntu Feisty Fawn instead of SuSe. I have also already installed some development tools to compile the utilities that came with my pchdtv 5500.

      Problems:
      1. Path to frontend.h is wrong. Quick file search is easy to fix.
      2. Configure complains about lack of LAME MP3 library. Installing liblame...
      3. Configure complains about lack of qmake. Installing libqt4...
      4. Make errors out regarding lack of XvMClib.h (as the first of many errors). Installing libxvmc, then using "make distclean" and starting over...
      5. Make errors out regarding lack of qdom.h (as the first of many errors). It should have been installed as part of libqt4-dev - I even see it on the list of installed files on that package in Synaptic - but even searching doesn't pull it up. I browse to where it's supposed to be... and it's there! If I search in the usr folder or deeper I find it, but searching from root and it's gone. Ok, from reading a web page, perhaps I need to set an environment variable? "export QTDIR=/usr/include/qt4", run "make distclean" and start over. Note this step took 45 minutes...
      6. Hey, guess what, that didn't work. Make still can't find a stupid file installed on my computer. Genius. Let's try "export QTDIR=/usr/include/qt4/Qt" since I see qdom in both that folder and in the QtXml folder. Maybe it's not complaining that it can't find the file, but instead that it finds two copies of the file...
      7. Nope, didn't work. Ok, that's two hours, all I can take of this tonight.

      If anyone who actually reads this has a suggestion, I'm more than happy to hear it. In the mean time, I better understand those who say compiling in Linux is too difficult.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    24. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      That bigotic "Those dumb users" mindset

      Hey, did I say that? No! I said the users should be expected to *learn* something. God forbid...

      Don't know about you or what a majority of MythTV users do, but I DON'T build dedicated PVRs

      Then you're most certainly in the minority, and your needs may not be well served by Myth.

      I just don't think it should come down to that for an entertainment app.

      If that's all your Myth install is to you, then you're definitely in the minority. Myth isn't an "app". It's a software system, with a full client-server architecture. My own system is composed of a dedicated backend server, along with an HTPC in my livingroom, communicating over a 100mbps switched network. It's an entertainment center, and very much an appliance. But like any complex system, it requires knowledge to build and maintain. If you don't like that, tough shit, go find another product that fits your needs.

      Actually, yes. What do you think EVERY other PVR software expects you to do?

      Suffer with half the features, for a price.

      The fact is, Myth gives a person who wants a powerful, customizable PVR a system which will do basically anything they could ever want. But it comes at the price of complexity. Is that a fault? Personally, I don't think so. It's simply the case that Myth isn't targeted at users who aren't willing to get their hands a little dirty.

    25. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      I tried setting up MythTV a year or so ago. I've maintained Gentoo, Debian, and FreeBSD boxes. I can program. I know databases. But IIRC, the very first page of the setup--not sure if it was MythTV or KnoppMyth's fault--was asking about which sockets I wanted to use, or some such nonsense.

      Yeah, and it picks a default. So if you don't care, why didn't you just ignore it? Honestly, if that's the extent of your complaints, you obviously gave up too easily.

      Incidentally, if what you say of your experience is true, you should've been able to have a Myth system set up in an afternoon. My own backend install took more time to install the OS than the actual Myth setup, and that includes configuring lirc to drive a DSTB, too. That's from zero to full recording capability in a matter of hours, having never installed Myth before. Anyone with a decent HOWTO and the kind of experience you claim to have should be able to do the same. But, of course, if you freak out at the first sign of a port number, I can see how you wouldn't get very far (and also makes me question the experience you claim to have).

    26. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Ok, I think I found it in the MythTV.org howto. My google searches failed me, but I found it while looking for MythTV forums to post the question...

      The sections on Shared-Library Requirements for MythTV and Environment Variables for MythTV seem to be what I was looking for, except that the instructions don't match what I see in Ubuntu, and it doesn't say at all how to permanently change these variables. At least I know from previous research that "export" will set them temporarily during a console session. I use QTDIR=/usr/share/qt4, and add /usr/include/qt4/Qt to the path along with anything else different between mine and what the page says, substituting /usr/share for /usr/lib...

      8. Ok, I take that back. It still can't find qdom.h, even though the directory it's in is in my path... Maybe I should have qt3 installed, not qt4? The second file it can't find, qptrlist.h, is only in libqt3-headers according to packages.ubuntu.com. I switch from qt4 to qt3 using Synaptic, and redo all the PATH and QTDIR stuff to point to qt3 instead...

      9. It's complaining about "No rule to make target" with something in a qt4 folder. I've run make distclean. I dunno. Let's just try starting over in a new version of the MythTV source extracted to a new location, to clear up the qt4 leftovers. That seems to have worked...

      10. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXxf86vm. This is in the MythTV howto - says I need xfree86-devel. Didn't everyone move to X.org a few years ago, if I recall from slashdot? There's no package by that name anyway, so the howto isn't useful and it's back to google again. Installing libxxf86vm-dev...

      11. It compiled! Ok... time to run mythtv-setup, as the instructions state... and all I get is "command not found".

      That's it. I give up. I can spend all day reading the PCI Express specification and implement a beautiful product that meets every line, but I can't follow the tangled mess of crap that is compiling on Linux.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    27. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I don't see what's the point of building a dedicated distro for MythTV. Why reinvent the wheel? Why not use a well-known, established distribution, and just create a software repository with MythTV?

      tomato - tomahto

    28. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      After it compiled, you did a 'make install', right? And made sure to have /usr/local/bin in your path? And also made sure /usr/local was in your /etc/ld.so.conf or the distro equivalent?

    29. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the reply! It is appreciated.

      I ran "make && make install" as the command, following the instructions of the guide I followed. That looked like it would execute both for me. I can try running "make install" by itself tonight.

      I had to change the path variable a few times as noted in my saga. It's possible I left one out. I'll verify.

      The format of ld.so.conf was a bit confusing when I looked at it last night. There was only one line, which said "include /.../*.conf". I added a second line per the MythTV.org howto, but my line just has the path "/usr/local/lib". Should I have added the "include" at the start of the line? ldconfig didn't return any errors, so I assumed I'd done it correctly.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    30. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      "include /.../*.conf"

      That was supposed to read "include /...something/*.conf". My fault for not previewing.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    31. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the reply! It is appreciated.

      My pleasure. :)

      I ran "make && make install" as the command, following the instructions of the guide I followed. That looked like it would execute both for me. I can try running "make install" by itself tonight.

      Well, the question is, *what* did it install? Check /usr/local/bin. Look for a file called 'mythtv-setup' or 'mythtvsetup' (yeah, without the hyphen). One of those should be present, in addition to 'mythbackend' and 'mythfrontend'.

      The format of ld.so.conf was a bit confusing when I looked at it last night. There was only one line, which said "include /.../*.conf". I added a second line per the MythTV.org howto, but my line just has the path "/usr/local/lib". Should I have added the "include" at the start of the line?

      Well, if you want to do it the "right" way, you should create a new file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ (assuming that's what followed the include line in ld.so.conf) called, I dunno, local.conf, which would contain the single line "/usr/local/lib". But I believe either way will work.

      To check, run 'ldconfig -v', pipe that to a pager, and see if any of the libraries in /usr/local/lib appear (eg, libmyth, libmythui, etc)..

    32. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Continuing my work...

      I do see the myth libraries in the output of ldconfig -v, so that looks good.

      I have to recreate the QTDIR and PATH changes in my console window tonight. If I'm successful with the build, I'll figure out how to make these changes permanent later - I'm sure there's some .conf file somewhere that defines these on startup.

      syd@test:~/Desktop/mythsource/mythtv-0.20.2$ sudo make install

      It worked! My problem last night? I just ran "make && make install". Make works fine with just that, because it's all in my home directory, but "make install" needs sudo because it's copying stuff into places I don't own. I think that's what I did wrong.

      12. Because this machine had previously run MythTV from the Ubuntu distribution, I thought that MySQL was already set up correctly. I must be mistaken, because mythtv-setup dumps a bunch of errors to the console window, then the GUI that appears (yes, it appears!) says that MythTV can't connect to its database. Ok, I need to set that up too, apparently.

      13. Hmm. I get Incorrect database name '/home/syd/Desktop/mythsource/mythtv-0.20.2/databa se/mc.sql'. I see that file at that location. I'm not sure what's incorrect about it. Ahh ok, from reading on the internet here:
      http://www.astahost.com/cant-import-backup-sql-fil e-localhost-t15040.html
      it seems that the mc.sql isn't the database. That's just a script that probably points to a different database, and that one has a problem with its name. Let's look inside mc.sql... Nothing looks too weird there. So the name of the database is mythconverg, it's supposed to create it if it's missing, and yet it complains that the name is wrong... Adding the -v verbose tag to the command doesn't help; nothing new is printed. Ok, from the mythtv.org howto, I try:
      syd@test:~/Desktop/mythsource/mythtv-0.20.2/databa se$ mysql -u root -p mythconverg
      This seems to work, giving me a mysql> prompt. I'll try manually executing all of the commands in the script and see what happens.
      Ok I don't know. Every line executes on its own without problem, except the first one which I skipped because mysql seemed to indicate that the database did in fact exist. Is it done now?

      It worked! mythtv-setup executes. Actually, there's nothing to set up; it still remembers all my setup and channels from when I had the package version installed.

      14. /var/lib/mythtv/recordings/nfslockfile.lock: Permission denied
      Unable to open lockfile!
      Be sure that '/var/lib/mythtv/recordings' exists and that both
      the directory and that file are writeable by this user.
      Ok, fair enough. I'm in group mythtv, but the group has read-only access, not write access, to the two files already in that folder. Let me fix that... (I wish I could figure out how to sudo in the GUI to use the right-click "Properties" to fix this.) I think chmod is the file, but it's --help is less than useful. There are some options, then:
      Each MODE is of the form `[ugoa]*([-+=]([rwxXst]*|[ugo]))+'.
      Gee, that tells me nothing. Google search saves me.
      syd@test:/var/lib/mythtv/recordings$ sudo chmod g+w *
      That did it.

      15. Well, we're almost there. I have video, but no sound. I had sound with the pre-built version, and I have sound on the system now, so it must be my mythtv configuration. Audio output device is set to ALSA: default. Aha! From the console output:
      2007-08-29 19:32:10.156 Audio output device is set to an ALSA device but ALSA support is not compiled in!
      2007-08-29 19:32:10.156 NVP: Disabling Audio, reason is: Unable to create AudioOutput.
      It looks like my guide served me wrong with regard to what options to use. My only other options are dsp and dsp2. Let's see if they work.
      dsp worked!

      Ok, I'm already getting fewer prebuffering pauses than with the prebuilt setup, b

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    33. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The addition to xorg.conf doesn't work. Xorg.0.log even says it's ignored, right below the line that says my "UseEvents" is ignored.

      I see these around line 245 in Xorg.0.log:
      (II) Module extmod: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
              compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.0.0
              Module class: X.Org Server Extension
              ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 ...
      (II) Loading extension XVideo
      (II) Loading extension XVideo-MotionCompensation

      But later in the same file I see this:
      (WW) NV(0): Option "UseEvents" is not used
      (WW) NV(0): Option "XvMCSurfaces" is not used
      (==) RandR enabled
      (II) Initializing built-in extension (a long list of extensions excluding the XVideo and XvMC extensions).

      From:
      https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MythTV/Install/W hatNext/Fesity_D
      It seems I need to replace the contents of /etc/X11/XvMCConfig with "libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1". Let's try that.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    34. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      No, it didn't work:

      2007-08-29 21:10:39.789 VideoOutputXv Error: XvMC output requested, but is not supported by display.
      Xlib: extension "XVideo-MotionCompensation" missing on display ":0.0".

      So that's it. I give up again. Three hours of work tonight, a lot of progress, but I have no ideas or suggestions to make this happen.

      This was all done as a test on my desktop machine. Sadly, since the test failed, I don't think I'll risk buying the rest of my MythTV system. We'll probably end up with a DishNetwork HD receiver. =( That's not what I wanted, but sadly that's where I'm heading.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    35. Re:MythTV distros over-rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm considering buying a windows licence (XP) and one of the non-free software suites to have essentially TiVo. Either that or one of the pre-built, garunteed to work, MythTV computers where all I (as the end user) need to do is plug my cable into the back, and the output into my TV. unfortunately those run about $1000 -- I could just get TiVo for that..."

      You still don't seem to understand. A prebuilt system might be easier to turn ON after taking it out of the box but you are going to be confronted with the same myriad of configuration options every other MythTV user NEEDS to learn and understand in order to enjoy the benefits of Myth.

      Someone else mentioned that Myth is not an application such as Windows MCE or Snapstream. Myth is a client server application, even capable of distributed computing across various backends for recording, transcoding, and commercial flagging jobs. I could go on for hours here about features and bells and whistles that have been committed to the codebase over the years. But I won't. Because it will fall on deaf ears (or rather, ears with fingers in them while their owners chant "it's too hard, I don't wanna read a man page."

      You say you can get a Tivo for $1000. Actually, it much less than that now. But you will have a fraction of the features, be locked into a platform that is not scalable and cost you over $250 a year to use. And it will deliver even MORE advertising than just plain old TV. Remember that part I mentioned about commercial flagging? Myth finds the commercial breaks, flags them and even skips them for you as you watch or better yet, disposes of them during transcoding or archiving to DVD. Try getting a Tivo or any other PVR to do that.

      Isaac and the other developers that work on Myth do so in their spare time. It is a hobby for them. There is no commercial support. They don't make a penny from it and don't even think about bringing up Schedules Direct. ALL membership fees that exceed the operating expenses are to be donated to the FSF and EFF as of the time of this writing. Bottom line, the price of admission to MythTV is learning to administer a linux OS, some MySQL (not a lot), Apache (optional), twenty dollars a year (if you live in North America, elsewhere costs you a little config time with XMLTV at zero dollars) and a willingness to to do lots of research.

      I've tried Knoppmyth in the past and went right back to Fedora because of Knopp's live CD limitations. Now, my master backend is an Ubuntu LTS server, the frontends are a mix of Fedora, MythDora, an XBox, and my shiny new MacBook Pro. And I am eternally indebted to Isaac and the other developers for the inspiration I needed in order to learn Linux.

      If you are unable or unwilling to roll up your sleeves, please don't even think of trying a pre-rolled Myth distro. If you ARE willing to give it a go, I heartily recommend Mythdora as it is mature, stable and leaves you with a perfectly working Fedora Core installation in which to learn and explore linux.

      My .02 (which wasn't meant to target just the OP)

  14. Re:WARNING: Critical problem with out of date dist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Have you actually TRIED to update a pre-existing Knoppmyth to use the new xmltv? You might as well try and pull your teeth out with rusty pliers. And there is NO Knoppmyth release at the moment that incorporates the 0.20.2 SD support. Sept 1st is what, THREE DAYS AWAY? This is gonna go over real bad.

  15. Configure? Yeah. Update? Not so much. by dfdashh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been using my MythTV box as my primary media center for over a year and a half now. While I love to make the occasional configuration changes to meet the ever-changing needs of my family, I NEVER update unless I have a very, very good reason. Why? Because at this point I don't want a weekend troubleshooting session because I triggered incompatibilities. I guess that is just me being paranoid, though. I've never had drastic problems with Myth, but I can also attribute that to the fact that I wrote up my requirements, built the machine to them, and left it that way. No surprises! So there are some tradeoffs when using a media distribution like KnoppMyth to build out your MythTV, but sometimes they are really blessings in disguise.

    --
    df -h /my/head
    1. Re:Configure? Yeah. Update? Not so much. by halfelven · · Score: 1

      Fully agree. That's the best way. Build a dedicated machine, upgrade MythTV only when absolutely necessary. Like a DIY appliance.

  16. ABI change? by pavon · · Score: 1

    According to this ubuntu bug report the ABI changed along with the schedules direct change, so you do need to update everything, not just one module. At least that's how I read it - I may be wrong.

    1. Re:ABI change? by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      you read that right

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    2. Re:ABI change? by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      The ABI change is because the plugins always to be recomplied to match a new version. My point is that for those unable/unwilling to upgrade to the latest, some sort of 'yum update xmltv' or 'apt-get update xmltv' or manual tar ball installation from xmltv.org should be a temporary solution without having to update/upgrade the rest of the system.

  17. Re:WARNING: Critical problem with out of date dist by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

    I haven't. However, the article mentions two other distros which may be much easier than the live distro. The problem with xmltv is that it is Perl and its Perl dependency hell. I haven't had to use it in years, but its an option for some. Even as a stop gap - you could run it on another machine (windows box too) to produce the daily xml file, copy that over to your myth box, and run mythfilldatabase. Its a stop gap. Also, remember you that you get about 14 days of schedule information. So on Sep 1, you should have a few more weeks data.

  18. Knoppmyth and updates... by stoneymonster · · Score: 1
    The live CD heritage of Knoppix means you cannot update individual packages, which is fine if you like that, but for an always-on system like a MythTV back end, I'd prefer flexibility and configurability of a mainline distro.

    Not sure I understand what he's trying to say here. I run Knoppmyth, and I've never had any trouble upgrading packages (Apache, PHP, mysql, etc.) and installing new ones using apt. It's basically Debian, so anything you can do with Debian you can do with Knoppmyth. Plus the nice thing is it runs well out of the box, so you can do your tweaking and updates later without having a large downtime if you are doing a fresh install.

  19. Re:WARNING: Critical problem with out of date dist by brunascle · · Score: 1
    save yourself a few days/weeks with:

    mythfilldatabase --max-days 14
    that'll give you 14 days until you have to update. pick your own number, but the further you go into the future the more info is going to be missing.
  20. Re:MythDora? (XBMC on its way) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With the Linux port of XBMC underway, and very usable at this stage, Myth will have serious competition soon for (currently) its non-PVR functionality. The linux port of XBMC is completely OpenGL 2.0 optimized. Currently, in terms of UI and user friendliness, there's very little that compares to XBMC.

  21. What about Yahoo? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Can't you just grab listings from tv.yahoo.com ?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:What about Yahoo? by LordKazan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      because it's potentially illegal, absolutely unrelaible, and there may not even exist a script to scape the information and transform it into a usable format

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    2. Re:What about Yahoo? by halfelven · · Score: 1

      http://www.schedulesdirect.org/faq

      Maybe, if you're doing it by yourself. It ain't gonna be pretty, nor reliable.

    3. Re:What about Yahoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Potentially illegal? How so? Not trying to be a smartass but I just can't see how getting info from a publicly viewable site is illegal.

  22. MythTV Box by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Does anyone sell a pre-built, pre-configured MythTV box? I personally have no interest in dealing with the quirks of setting one up, but I'd like to run one. Here's what I'd look for:
    • Packaged in the smallest possible, living-room friendly case
    • Runs quietly, with good power and heat management
    • Plays files off a USB drive and/or over ethernet
    • Online zero-effort software updates
    • Shouldn't cost a ton more than the cost of the required hardware

    If someone does this right I'd think they could have quite a hit on their hands.
    1. Re:MythTV Box by dfdashh · · Score: 1

      Probably doesn't meet all of your requirements, but it is close: http://www.monolithmc.com/features.php.

      --
      df -h /my/head
    2. Re:MythTV Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:MythTV Box by mrsmiggs · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're in the UK there's always these guys http://efficientpc.co.uk/desktops/isis/ Not sure about the zero effort upgrades, if they take the packages from a repository it can't be that hard.

      I often look at their website with the temptation to splurge some cash, not sure about their laptop packages though. I don't like the idea of buying a laptop and then not being able to use all the hardware that comes with it. Even if the hardware is spurious.
    4. Re:MythTV Box by Fratz · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/Commercial_My thTV_System is a comprehensive list of pre-built boxes that work well with MythTV

      --
      -- Fratz, human
  23. Distro? You Want Distro? You Can't Handle the... by WED+Fan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I honestly thought that when one said,"Get MythTV." it would be that simple. Why does it surprise me that there is more than one distro, just like the rest of Linux?

    New Slogans

    • Linux, its just too forking much.
    • Forked.com - It's not Porno!
    • If you need help, RTFM - Read the Forking Manual, you forking noob.
    • Linux Geeks, they couldn't get forked if their sisters were giving it away.

    Yes, I realize, a distro != fork, but now-a-days with the vast differences, it may almost amount to one.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  24. Re:And People Complain About The Many Version Of V by halfelven · · Score: 1

    How much does it really matter to use compiler optimizations for HD? Do you have any numbers, benchmarks, etc.?

    Just curious.

  25. Installing it the painful way... by monkeyboythom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm currently trying to do what the distro should be doing for me; installing layer and application at a time.

    Of course, I'm also trying to do this on a system put together from more recent hardware, the m-atx Gigabyte platform GA-MA69GM-S2H Socket which uses AM2 and the AMD 690G Northbridge. And a USB connected ATSC HDTV card.

    I'm finding it's a snap to install Ubuntu, LAMP, and MythTV but almost impossible to get any further than configuration. And that is the problem. I can install WinXP and SageTV and have all these components work right now. So it still is the main problem for Linux and any distro - hardware support.

    Yes, the larger question still is open versus restricted driver support. But at the end of the day, especially the present day like tonight, I'd rather have my hardware recognize a restricted driver and install it seamlessly than having the "freedom" of an open source driver. If move to open from a restricted, then shouldn't that be the incentive for hardware manufactures to provide these drivers?

    1. Re:Installing it the painful way... by hacker · · Score: 1

      So it still is the main problem for Linux and any distro - hardware support.

      You spelled "hardware vendors" wrong.

  26. Re:MythDora? (XBMC on its way) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't follow open source much compared to many people on slashdot, but in my opinion, XBMC is one of the best open source projects ever. I have bought XBOXs for family members, chipped them, installed XBMC, and created a great family entertainment center. I even own 3 XBOXs myself. A very easy to use yet powerful interface (My Dad is even able to use his with relative ease!). What makes them even more powerful is sharing files between the computer and XBOX. Share the "My Pictures" folder in Windows, and they can view family vacation or events in the comfort of their living room. Share the "My Music" folder and they can play their MP3s through their living room stereo. Share the "My Videos" folder... well you get the picture.

    If they somehow created PVR functionality within XBMC. Holy Crap. That's all I can say.

  27. Re:WARNING: Critical problem with out of date dist by asabjorn · · Score: 1

    For Ubuntu and MythBuntu packages for MythTV .20.2 has been released into the repositories for older releases.

    http://www.mythbuntu.org/node/30

    The packages are available for Feisty, Edgy and Gutsy (plus all their derivates).

  28. Reinvent what wheel? by cesman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    KnoppMyth has been around for four years http://www.mysettopbox.tv/CHANGELOG.txt/. A glance at the CentOS site shows it was first copywritten in 2004. When Ubuntu was launch in October of 2004, KnoppMyth was already a year old. The community is large and very active. I'll stop producing releases when my keyboard is pulled from my cold dead hands.

    Once I can actually read the article, I'll comment in full. But to state that one cannot upgrade software in KnoppMyth is dead wrong.

    Regards,

    Cecil

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    1. Re:Reinvent what wheel? by Phillup · · Score: 1

      But to state that one cannot upgrade software in KnoppMyth is dead wrong. I'll vouch for that!

      I just did a fresh install of knoppmyth yesterday (in preparation of your impending release of the next version), followed by an 'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade'.

      I had to hold the lirc stuff due to two packages wanting to replace the same file... but other than that, no problems at all.
      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    2. Re:Reinvent what wheel? by generica1 · · Score: 1

      Cheers to Cecil for his work maintaining this distribution.

      I can also attest to what he said -- I just this past weekend upgraded my Knoppmyth R5E50 to the new RFC1. There were very few problems -- mostly relating to my own custom lirc stuff having to be held back as well, and in addition there was a slight bug in the restore process (the process which takes you tar.gz backup file, and restores your database settings to match what you previously had configured). Despite the fact that it said the restoration failed, everything worked. It turned out to just be some Democracy Player cache files that didn't get restored correctly. So, like, whatever. It was a MUCH less painful experience than I was worried it was going to be -- I put off the upgrade for months before biting the bullet this past Sunday.

      Anyway, Knoppmyth has been solving my TV needs for months now. I actually found that as time goes on, it works better for me to just use KTorrent (http://www.ktorrent.org/) running in the background monitoring RSS feeds sure beats the crap out of using a TV Tuner to receive your shows. Gonna eBay that PVR-500 I bought a few months ago soon, and I just disconnected my analog cable service in favor of this method.

      Of course, I only watch public domain content using the aforementioned method.... i swear ;)

      --
      JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP IRRIGATE
  29. Re:Distro? You Want Distro? You Can't Handle the.. by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1, Interesting

    See? Not only are there different distros, there are even forks in the distros! How can you expect Linux to go mainstream if it is already this hard?

  30. mythtv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Like all software under the hippieware® movement expect no help setting it up and mass incompatiblities.

    also lets spend the next 50 hours tracking down lib.obscure.o only to end up compiling half the fucking software ever relased under the gpl.

    1. Re:mythtv by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 1

      Kudos to you. Funny, Insightful and Troll at the same time!

    2. Re:mythtv by amightywind · · Score: 1

      Yes, by all means lets use Enormoware (C,R,TM) where you have $50/hr call center 'help' and mass incompatibilities. And lets also spend the next 50 hours downloading 'obscure.dll' only to get the machine to 'lock up' every 10 minutes.

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
    3. Re:mythtv by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      pppffffft

      apt-get .*obscure.*dev

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:mythtv by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      obviously you've never installed mythTV via Gentoo

  31. Books on MythTV by louiebeth · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know a book just came out on MythTV: Practical MythTV (http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=1 0245) Is it any good? Anybody read it?

    1. Re:Books on MythTV by wicks0r · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try Hacking MythTV. It's from Jarod Wilson who wrote one of the most popular MythTV howto out there.

  32. Re:And People Complain About The Many Version Of V by LordKazan · · Score: 2, Funny

    it matters massively. HD is MPEG2 at 1920x1080. I am using an Athlon 2500+ and offloading some of the MPEG2 decode work to a geforce 6200 via XvMC (unfortunately ATI's drivers don't have XvMC) and i still use 50% CPU when watching HD. With CPU opts turned off i bet you i couldn't watch HD (no i'm not doing a recompile of mythtv and 10 recordsing tonight to find out)

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  33. Re:And People Complain About The Many Version Of V by gowen · · Score: 1

    it matters massively.
    Definitive answer...

    [Big Snip]

    With CPU opts turned off i bet you i couldn't watch HD (no i'm not doing a recompile of mythtv and 10 recordsing tonight to find out)
    Admission that you're actually just making this stuff up.

    The perfect slashdot post. Well played, sir.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  34. Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by QuijiboIsAWord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was a MythTV proponent for YEARS. I built my own box, and I've run with both Gentoo and Ubuntu based backends. When my video card blew out last month after 3+ years of constant running (including through some very bad power outages which were hard on the entire houses electrical system) I couldn't afford to replace the video card and motherboard which was also fried.

    I pulled the drive and stuck it in the computer in the other room, and decided to try XBox Media Center an my old xbox I had sitting around. To my surprise, XBMC completely blows MythTV out of the water. For about $30 in hardware (the equipment necessary to do the mod, which is entirely software based and done through a memory card and ftp) and 2 hours labor, I was up and running with a user interface that is one of the easiest to use I've ever seen.

    It outputs in 720p or 1080i (doesn't have the power to decode actual 720p content without some heavy hardware modding.) It streams all the content over my network, so all the storage is in the office right where I download it in the first place. It uses mplayer, so it can play anything mplayer can. It can do 5.1 sound, plus I can put a ton of emulators on there to play my old super-nes games with actual controllers, including multiplayer.

    For about $100 and a bit of searching online, a person could pick up a used XBox and be off and running, as long as they're just looking for a MEDIA CENTER and don't care about PVR capabilities that is.

    --
    -Hmm...I got a G+ invite, better remember to remove the request from my sig...-
    1. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For about $100 and a bit of searching online, a person could pick up a used XBox and be off and running, as long as they're just looking for a MEDIA CENTER and don't care about PVR capabilities that is.

      Wait, what? MythTV's PVR capabilities are its core functionality. I don't know why you would even consider setting up a MythTV box if you didn't intend to use it as a PVR.

      This is aside from the fact that my MythTV box can pretty easily do 1080p (let alone 720p).

    2. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by ommand · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Myth can also do all of the emulation the grandparent seems so excited about.

    3. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by RevHawk · · Score: 1

      Where can I find how to do a software mod with a memory card? I've always been under the impression one needed a mod chip... Any links to guides, etc?

    4. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mythtv is, as you say, a PVR. Simple as that. I love XBMC, and for ages ran XBMC as a media center with only a mythbackend server for recording programs. Then recorded stuff just showed up on a Samba share which XBMC could see.

      Recently I ditched XBMC since it can't decode 720p or better content and put together a real mythfrontend. An added advantage is being able to use feature like pausing live tv rather than just recording stuff. But I am keeping a very, very close eye on the Linux port of XBMC. I currently have it set up so that hitting a button on the remote launches it so that I can use it for music playback, since the mythtv music plugin is so utterly terrible, some small video bugs are stopping me from using it for video just yet. But it is very early days and already pretty damn good.

    5. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To my surprise, XBMC completely blows MythTV out of the water.

      Weird, I had no idea you could plug a video capture card into an XBox, let alone set up XBMC to use it to record TV. Got any links?

    6. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by Palshife · · Score: 1

      doesn't have the power to decode actual 720p content without some heavy hardware modding

      That's why.

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    7. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PVRs are all about their interface. Just recording should be a matter of an ioctl to change the channel, then streaming /dev/tuner to a file, and triggering it from cron. No, not literally, but simplicity along those lines. MythTV has always made the interface a complete afterthought, except of course for adding flare to their gimp-created penguin logos. I think the fact that it manages to work at all is what has most MythTV advocates so excited.

    8. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by stoneycoder · · Score: 0

      what fantasy land do you live in where your xbox outputs ANYTHING other than 480i? it might show up on your hi def tv, but just because the picture is on the screen doesn't mean its 'hi def'.

      its sad how many people run around thinking they have hi-def just because they purchased the equipment. Then they hook up thier set top boxes via composite (rca) cables and brag about the picture quality. hilarious.

    9. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by yanos · · Score: 2, Informative

      I dunno, but I was using xbmc for some years and its far from perfect, even just for a media center.

      - It doesnt allow you to decode hi def video.
      - Contrary to what you claim, it only outputs at 480i.
      - It's hard to update since it's illegal to distribute in binary form, so you're stuck to deal with l33t forums and such to get one, or find the MS compiler and compile the sources (on windows).
      - There is alot of formats it doesnt support, like ogg, matroska video, vob subtitles, quicktime, mp4..etc
      - For some reasons the ftp server suck incredibly. You *really* have to be careful of the name of the file you're sending, because otherwise most of the time it will be rejected, *after all the fricking data has been transfered*.

      What I would want is just a neat interface to an easily updatable mplayer, but never manage to find one.

    10. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by 68th+Overlord · · Score: 1

      I believe you answered your own question. MythTV is for people looking for a full featured PVR. XBMC is a media center, which looks like a great way to play content but not record it.

    11. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The parent is 100% correct on this one - nothing comes close to XBMC in the Media Centre stakes. Instant on/off, easy and fast menu system, plays just about anything you can throw at it, easy config, supports Windows network shares etc...

      Everything else just sucks by comparison. I tried various things for Windows, including Media Portal. All were rubbish. Media Portal, for example, has a really slow menu system. On XBMC, you move a highlight and it's instant. On MP, every time you move there is a scrolling effect with bounce, meaning it takes 10-15 seconds to navigate the entire main menu! Getting TV output to work well can be an issue on PCs as well, although DVI/HDMI does make it a lot easier unless you need to create custom resolutions first.

      If someone could only make a box that runs XBMC but has enough CPU power to decode 1080p H.264, it really would be the king of Media Centres. I suppose some people care about recording as well, but why bother when you can just get the torrent?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      - It doesnt allow you to decode hi def video.

      720p works okay with XVID/DIVX, but you are right that H.264 and 1080 are out of the question sadly.

      - Contrary to what you claim, it only outputs at 480i.

      No, the XBOX can do 1080i/p, and can upscale video to those resolutions better than many expensive TVs or DVD players. There are even a few games that support it, Dragons Lair HD being the only one that springs instantly to mind.

      - It's hard to update since it's illegal to distribute in binary form, so you're stuck to deal with l33t forums and such to get one, or find the MS compiler and compile the sources (on windows).

      Just got Mininova and download a clean build from CVS, or a l33t one with loads of scripts pre-installs. FTP over and you are updated. Having said that, my box has not been updated for ages because it just works.

      - There is alot of formats it doesnt support, like ogg, matroska video, vob subtitles, quicktime, mp4..etc

      It supports all those. Multiple angles, multiple audio streams and soft subtitles in obscure formats as well. I watch a lot of anime .mkv files with dual audio and subtitles embedded. Quicktime streaming from the Apple movie trailers site works very nicely.

      - For some reasons the ftp server suck incredibly. You *really* have to be careful of the name of the file you're sending, because otherwise most of the time it will be rejected, *after all the fricking data has been transfered*.

      The XBOX file system only supports up to 64 characters and a subset of ASCII, but why bother when you can just use Windows shares or NFS to read files directly from your main PC? I do keep some video stored on my XBOX, in which case I just rename it to fit the limitations, which are not actually that limiting anyway.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by lotsotech · · Score: 1

      I use a completely different system, but if you're not averse to downloading TV shows who cares about PVR functionality? Someone out there already trimmed the commercials for me and has better reception than I do.

    14. Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      but if you're not averse to downloading TV shows who cares about PVR functionality?

      Fuck, I hate it when people say this. Yeah, sure, if all you watch is mainstream, popular television, particularly if you track new series, downloading might just work for you. But for anyone who watches even slightly off-the-beaten-track stuff (say, re-runs of America's Test Kitchen), good luck finding a well seeded torrent, or be prepared to wait for weeks while your downloads trickle in.

  35. mythweb, mythflash by tamarin · · Score: 1

    Mythweb, mythflash serve me well. I watch recorded tv during lunch time at work.

  36. It IS slashdotted. by Kludge · · Score: 1
    And the funniest part is this

    Linux.com and Slashdot are both owned by SourceForge.


    Slashdot takes out other subsidiary's servers.
  37. Re:And People Complain About The Many Version Of V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut the fuck up, you stupid troll.

  38. Some comparision.... by cesman · · Score: 5, Informative

    I started KnoppMyth over 4 years ago, so I'm biased.

    The comparison seemed rather dull and uninformed. The installation, default theme and the "running" systems are compared. In the end, it comes to "convenience". This is where the author's lack of information really shines.

    To stated that one cannot install additional software on KnoppMyth is wrong. You can install a .deb or install from source. The problem comes in if you want to auto upgrade to the next release (BTW: Neither of the other options supports an auto upgrade functions. MythDora is working on it however.). Whatever additional packages you installed, you'll have to reinstall (R6 will address this). But what do you need to install (other than perhaps pineapple and some codecs ;)? And if you read tjc's guide to using the backup and restore, you'll only have to install those once.

    In addition to MythTV and it's official plugins KnoppMyth includes mplayer, xine, webmin (how is that for conveniences?), rrd (hit Apache and see how your system as been performing, seems pretty convenient to me), MythWebFlash, irblaster support and so much more.

    In addition to the official themes, we also include most if not all of "Juski's" http://juski.co.uk/themes are included as well. So while the author didn't like Titivillus, there is nothing stopping him or any user from using any theme. Got an ipod? What to take that show with you? Myth2ipod http://www.myth2ipod.com/is include in KnoppMyth. Or stream it with MythStreamTV.

    Both NFS and Samba are included and configured. All one has to do is start the daemons. Got an nvidia based video adapter? Guess what is automatically installed on first boot? Navigate with a keyboard? KnoppMyth includes out the box support for multiple remotes. Guess which distro was the first to officially support the popular Hauppauge PVR line of hardware MPEG tuners?

    The ideal behind KnoppMyth is to make it easy to get a Linux/MythTV powered PVR is a quick and easy manner. Some of you already get this... Think appliance. KnoppMyth is into it's fifth year and we'll continue to improve and develop it. Much thanks to member of the community for the improvements, ideals and support. I do wish MythDora and MythBuntu well, however as I see it... They are threading on ground already paved.

    Regards,

    Cecil

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    1. Re:Some comparision.... by Mammy-Nun · · Score: 1

      Cecil,

      Let me thank you publicly for the great work you do.

      I'm happier not knowing how many hours I spent trying to get Myth running on Gentoo before being encouraged to try KnoppMyth. You've done a fabulous job of creating a very appliance-like experience and creating a great base for tinkering. And when you mess things up while tinkering, it's one quick restore to get it back - before missing your wife's favorite show.

      Everyone should try KnoppMyth as their first MythTV installation. At the very least, at least you'll know how it's supposed to work after you've gone to all the trouble to set it all up. ;^)

    2. Re:Some comparision.... by cesman · · Score: 1

      You're welcome. I'd like to see people that try it, stick with. If something doesn't work, use the forum and report the problems. Several users have come back and reported what was now Tier 2 is Tier 1!

      Regards,

      --
      When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    3. Re:Some comparision.... by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      I have been playing with Knoppmyth for several years now. I am very impressed with the development it's taken especially in recent times. It has become a very stable platform and all of my Media entertainment is driven by Knoppmyth. I have a Combined Frontend/Backend and a frontend setup. All I need now is more HDD's and more tuners :-) I recommend people give it a go and also wish to thanks Cecil and the other guys who spend a large amount of time making this project a reality.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    4. Re:Some comparision.... by modemboy · · Score: 1

      Cecil, thanks for hopping in here and clearing up the confusion. I hadn't looked at MythDora in a while but knew there was no way it had surpassed KnoppMyth. I have been running KnoppMyth for 3 years now and it is perhaps my favorite software ever ;)
      Keep up the good work, can't say how much I appreciate it.

    5. Re:Some comparision.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I absolutely and wholeheartedly agree. KnoppMyth is and always will be my MythTV distro of choice. I had my initial install of KM for two years before the hard drive on my box died. I replaced it, grabbed the latest ISO of KM and within 30 minutes of booting the media had my Myth box back up and running.

      I'm all for other distros centered around Myth though! The more the better!

      As for the article, I posted a correction concerning the ability of KM to be upgraded with apt-get. I was branded a troll. So much for the writer.

  39. Slightly OT... Lightweight MythTV Front-end by Hercynium · · Score: 1

    My preference is to just run the MythTV backend on an Ubuntu server in the basement and the frontend from an old laptop in the living room... for the laptop, using a LiveCD is ideal since I don't have to maintain anything, save for burning another CD for updates (when I feel like it).

    Lately, I've started looking at a device called the Neuros OSD... I don't know much about the state of development of the OSS add-ons but if someone gets either the MythTV front-end running on it, or writes a front-end that is compatible with the back-end I'd get one for each TV in the house.

    --
    I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
    1. Re:Slightly OT... Lightweight MythTV Front-end by cesman · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need a KnoppMyth CD. Boot the CD, provide basis data and as long as the backend is configured correctly... You have a functioning frontend completely running from the CD.

      --
      When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    2. Re:Slightly OT... Lightweight MythTV Front-end by Hercynium · · Score: 1

      That's actually what I'm doing right now. It works nicely, but I don't want to buy more laptops, remotes and sensors for the other rooms in my house.

      I guess what I was getting at (and hence why it's OT) is that I want a simple, affordable, turn-key, set-top device with no local storage that runs MythTV's front-end, or something like it that can communicate with the back-end.

      Using an old laptop is still not like using a set-top box, even though a LiveCD makes it closer. I've read that AppleTV can run Myth front end... but getting it on there looks like a nightmare... I shudder to think of upgrades and bugs, etc. I spend more than enough time wrestling with systems at work - I have neither the time nor the patience to deal with hacking at home. (not since having kids, at least)

      Of course... if someone's willing to pay me to build this... ;)

      --
      I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
  40. Re:And People Complain About The Many Version Of V by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your honour, I cite the precidents set in RUBBER v GLUE and POT v KETTLE, and request that the poster be beaten about the head and shoulders with a large, freshwater fish.

  41. Re:Distro? You Want Distro? You Can't Handle the.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Funny

    How can you expect people to wear clothes, when there's so much choice?-)

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  42. Re:WARNING: Critical problem with out of date dist by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Ok then don't use Knoppmyth.

    Rebuilding MythTV is trivial under Ubuntu.

    My backend is running 6.10, my frontend is running 7.10 and I built 0.20.2 on both without any trouble.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  43. LinuxMCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux MCW is where's at? It does more than most other distributions and it has the testing and quality assurance of a commercial company behind it while being a full GPL product.

    Download the high-definition demo video from their page and be amazed.

    http://linuxmce.com/

  44. Wussy by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    I built my mythTV box with GENTOO.

  45. Anyone have a VM of MythTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I really want is a VMWare version of the backend & frontend.

    I know it won't have a TV tuner setup (well maybe a USB version)
    But I left the OTA/Cable/Sat TV realm ~8 years ago.
    All I want is a DVD-ISO/Divx/MP3 jukebox.

    If Netflix & BitTorrent don't have it I don't need to see it. (Well YouTube.)

  46. Re:Distro? You Want Distro? You Can't Handle the.. by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

    That's pretty funny.

  47. Happy with MythDora 4.0 by smchris · · Score: 1

    Got around to blowing away my hand-rolled Fedora 4, Myth 2.0 rpm set last week with an "auto" MythDora install. Installation and hardware recognition were 100% uneventful on low-end current stuff. The beginner could find the Myth configuration a learning experience, as always, but I had screen shots of my previous installation and that was uneventful as well.

    I think it took me about as much time to angle the new SATA drive into the machine as it did to do the install and an equal amount of time (because I knew what I was doing) to get my first TV reception. Subsequent twiddling is still going on this week of course because I had extra stuff installed like avidemux ;)

  48. Re:And People Complain About The Many Version Of V by zenyu · · Score: 2, Funny

    How much does it really matter to use compiler optimizations for HD? Do you have any numbers, benchmarks, etc.?

    The big ones, but also enabled in many pre-compiled packages:
      * cmov, about 10% (supported by Pentium Pro and later, but not some VIA processors)
      * enabling MMX & SSE, about 10-15%

    Total you can add about 30-35% with full optimization on a P4, vs. compiling for a Pentium Pro, which is the default. These numbers are somewhat old, but there is no reason to think they have changed appreciably.

    If you search the MythTV mailing lists you will find these and even better numbers. Video is one of those things that is much better supported on modern instruction sets than the classic i386 ISA; hence the dramatic improvement. Using a compiler like icc might yield some good improvements over gcc too.

  49. How does LinuxMCE compare? by Argon · · Score: 1

    See http://linuxmce.com/. Disclaimer: I've never used any of these. I am however thinking of building a media center box and noticed the LinuxMCE freshmeat announcement a few days back.

  50. Not comparing apples to apples by elgordo123 · · Score: 1

    Knoppmyth is in a completely different league than the other two. If you would realize this and do your homework instead of posting a half-assed ridiculous article. Knoppmyth is made to be a set top box. Not an entire distribution that happens to run mythtv on top. Knoppmyth is extremely light weight and rock solid. Looks like you failed to do your homework and see how many posts on the mythtv mailing list there are about people that hose their system from installing and upgrading. This is on the case with knoppmyth. Next time do a little better research on your articles. Get your facts straight.

  51. Re:my favorite: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know what you are trying to do: sexualise children in some persons minds that are vulnerable to that. That's why I need to correct the ending of your story. ..as you left the place after raping the child and leaving her with life long trauma and bad injuries, you felt like committing a suicide again; after 30 seconds of chemical relief you realized that this circle of sickness needs to stop and hurrily jumped of the bridge. WOuld you have known that you survived it you probably would have taken castruation, but unfortunately you couldn't make that choice anymore as you were paralyzed.

  52. Re:Distro? You Want Distro? You Can't Handle the.. by Anpheus · · Score: 1

    If I wear one t-shirt versus another, it doesn't make it so I can't run, jump, swim, or whatever. If I choose one distro or another, or even different operating systems, I have to choose from large sets of activities that are almost entirely exclusive from each other, with overlap only in the most popular areas, and the usability varies wildly.

    If t-shirts were like distros or operating systems, I'd have to wear blue every time I wanted to play a game.

    So I ask you, is that you, BadAnalogyGuy?

  53. Re:Distro? You Want Distro? You Can't Handle the.. by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

    How can you expect people to wear clothes, when there's so much choice?-)

    It's not so bad. We're geeks... we only have to choose once every month or three.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  54. Neuros OSD is the way to go by msisamonopoly · · Score: 1

    I just bought a Linux-powered Neuros OSD. The organization behind this device are to be loudly applauded for creating a very low-cost awesome device.

    The product packaging is world-class. The documentation is first class. The product design is second-to-none.

    Quite frankly, unless you really really want to waste time, buy one of these tiny devices and begin enjoying a powerful open Linux-powered media system within minutes. The package also includes a remote control that can be easily programmed to work with most TV.

    1. Re:Neuros OSD is the way to go by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      Quite frankly, unless you really really want to waste time, buy one of these tiny devices and begin enjoying a powerful open Linux-powered media system within minutes. The package also includes a remote control that can be easily programmed to work with most TV.

      The Neuros OSD FAQ mentions that there is no tuner in the device, and portrays the workarounds for this omission as not working smoothly:

      Can I use the OSD to record live TV?

      Yes you can. All you need to do is connect your Neuros OSD to a video source (DVR, Cable or Satellite receiver box, VCR, etc...) using the RCA cables provided. Get your video source on the channel you want to record (the Neuros OSD does not have a built-in tuner), and you are all set. You can even use the IR blaster included in the accessories to schedule recordings on different channels at different times. The IR blaster will emulate the IR signal used by your remote to set the tuner of your video source to the channel of your choice at the time of the recording. (you can also use the serial cable which has the potential for interfacing with devices such as TiVo directly). None of these solutions (IR blaster and serial cable) are in 100% working order as of 3/20/07, but they are being actively pursued. Stay tuned for updates.

      Any clarification available?
      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  55. Re:WARNING: Critical problem with out of date dist by brunascle · · Score: 1

    mod parent up.

    i tried this last night, and it worked great for me in feisty. and schedules direct is finally accepting sign-ups, so all is well. you get a free trial period (1 week i think) before you have to pay.

  56. incorrect and ill thought out by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

    > The live CD heritage of Knoppix means you cannot update individual packages

    The package manager is installed just like on any other
    system. Upgrades are not a problem. This guy 'upgrades' because he's a technophile tinkerer,
    not because there's any valid reason for doing so.

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
  57. PS2 and mythfrontend by MrKaos · · Score: 1
    I know this is a bit old school, but Sony ps2's are linux friendly and cheap. Has anyone tried to use one as a mythfrontend with the network adapter and the linux kit.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  58. Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is right about the updates; apt-get works fine in KnoppMyth. I have not tried MythDora or MythUbuntu, but rather tried KnoppMyth recently mainly because of cesman's comment.

    I ran into a some problems due to my extremely low-end hardware, but eventually got a decent working system, even with the PVR-350 card which is admittedly kind of bizarre. My understanding is that KnoppMyth has the best support for this card. Record worked fine. Playback worked after an obscure configuration change. Remote control worked out of the box.

    There are plenty of problems and MythTV is definitely not for casual "installers", but once it's set up will work ok for casual users (that is, girlfriends). I like the default KnoppMyth theme a lot. Unfortunately the MythTV interface itself needs a lot of love from a user-interaction designer.

    2 cents.