Slashdot Mirror


Survey Shows More Women Blogging Than Men

thefickler writes "The blogosphere has hit the mainstream, according to a new survey, which reveals that 80% of Americans know what a blog is, 50% regularly visit blogs, and 8% publish their own blog. The survey also reveals that more women than men are bloggers, with 20% of American women who have visited blogs having their own versus 14% of men."

181 comments

  1. This not surprising... by Cookie_Monster_Troll · · Score: 2, Funny

    they always talked more.

    --
    dum de dum de dum de dum de dum ...
  2. figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Chicks are all "yap yap yap" and dudes are like "why don't you go write in your blog, I'm trying to play Xbox".

    1. Re:figures by kc2keo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree. Women yap a lot and its real annoying. I'd rather do what I do which is... -Download and watch porno -Do other hobbies like play video games, work on web site, and other shit -read Slashdot. I love to read slashdot every day. I've become a regular since a few months ago. I do not really respond as much as read the replies and articles. -I read the newspaper almost every morning (Comics, Some sports, business, and more deaths on highways that are local here. I287, 684...) -Sleep and eat -Reality shit such as... School and job.

    2. Re:figures by eli+pabst · · Score: 1

      Better all of you, than me!

    3. Re:figures by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      crap... the formatting came out all wrong in the post. Should of used the preview button. The dashes were supposed to be at a start of a new line. Oh well... :P

    4. Re:figures by Raelus · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's much more wrong with your post than formatting.

      --
      "It is the stillest words which bring the storm. Thoughts that come with doves' footsteps guide the world."
    5. Re:figures by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      In my experience girls *do* surveys. Guys only do surveys if they're sent to them by girls.

      ~Jarik

    6. Re:figures by jotok · · Score: 1

      So...you "have a life" (consisting of such amazing feats as sleeping and eating) as an alternative to talking? And women don't because they talk a lot. Wow.

      I think the icing on the cake here is that you just became a slashdotter. My friend, I don't think you'll have to worry about encountering women anytime soon.

    7. Re:figures by WeeLad · · Score: 3, Funny
      I looked through one of those Cosmo quizzes. There was no Cowboy Neal option.


      --
      Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
    8. Re:figures by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      Your a slashdotter also. Once a slashdotter always a slashdotter... :-D

    9. Re:figures by sacrilicious · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  3. That's Really Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So one in ten people who knows what a blog is, HAS a blog.

    That's too many blogs.

    1. Re:That's Really Funny by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      But how many of them have blags?

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
  4. I'd belive the stats by BWJones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These stats seem to hold up with what i am seeing on the stats for Jonesblog in that the majority of readers seem to be women looking for recipes , pictures of animals and interestingly, travel while the majority of searches from males tend to be stuff like guns , airplanes , cars and an inordinate amount of traffic searching for hot women that somehow hit this page . Stereotypes are sad, but true I suppose in some areas. The interesting thing that really surprised me was that I had to include a notice in my FAQ on my "status" as I've had more than one unsolicited request for a date from visitors to the blog.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:I'd belive the stats by Skadet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think an interesting follow-up question is, "does more talking in real life equate to more blogging?". Sure there's correlation -- I think most of us will agree that women talk more than men -- but I wonder if the drive is similar between the two. . . In other words, does the mechanism that makes women blabber on also compel them to blog more? If so, what is that mechanism?

    2. Re:I'd belive the stats by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Stereotypes are arbitrarily decided; they have their roots in some truth somewhere.

    3. Re:I'd belive the stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! That has got to be one of the best (or worst) self promoting posts ever.

    4. Re:I'd belive the stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a recent study (I'm sure you can get a link from Google) shows that (American, IIRC) women do not, on average, talk more than men. (Furthermore, other studies have showed that in groups where both genders objectively have approximately equal speaking time, both men and women tend to report afterwards that the women spoke more than the men.)

    5. Re:I'd belive the stats by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      "while the majority of searches from males tend to be stuff like guns , airplanes , cars and an inordinate amount of traffic searching for hot women"

      Not especially in that order I guess?

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    6. Re:I'd belive the stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I just sucked 9.9 MB out of you. For nothing. And it isn't even my fault.

    7. Re:I'd belive the stats by Smight · · Score: 4, Informative

      That recent study was done on college students in Austin, Texas mostly majoring in psychology. I think if you were going to judge how verbose all men are you wouldn't pick future psychologists as a representative sample. http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/200707 06/men-dont-talk-less-than-women

      --
      IOU one (1) signature
    8. Re:I'd belive the stats by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Although I suppose there could be a skew of some sort, I wouldn't expect the gender differences-- as long as the group was otherwise similar-- to be much different.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    9. Re:I'd belive the stats by GuitarKat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, those stats are well done, but I guess I'm not the usual woman. I don't look for recipies and I don't look for animals. I suppose travel would be the remotely closest thing I could see myself looking for.

      I actually get feeds from /., Homestar Runner, Penny Arcade Comic feeds, Kawaii Not feeds, some poltical journals (mostly socialist/liberal) and stuff from my friends and ThinkGeek on their new products up on the store.

      You are right, BWJones, stereotypes are depressing. And no, sorry guys, I don't have a picture of myself posted in a bikini on my blog.

    10. Re:I'd belive the stats by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Judging by conversations with my girlfriend, women don't talk more. They just say things far less efficiently.

      For fucks sake, do I seriously need five peoples' life stories, complete with relationship diagram, for you to tell me two of your friends had a fist fight?!

    11. Re:I'd belive the stats by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Pics or GTFO!

      Kidding, kidding... put the mod points down.

    12. Re:I'd belive the stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Frankly, you post looked at from a slightly more abstract viewpoint indicates that you are "the usual " (i.e. stereotypical) woman. You have an explicitly feminine name "GuitarKat", you claim to be "socialist/liberal", you complain about stereotypes, and you have a belief that men want to see you "in a bikini". This suggests that you identify with your gender, you consider yourself kind-hearted (aka motherly), you have security issues regarding being placed in the very groups with which you identify yourself, and you attract attention to your sexual appeal without prompting.

      Note that I'm not objecting to any of these qualities, merely illustrating that stereotypical male/female characters are less about particular choice of activities and more about motivation, approach, outlook, etc. I'm not even saying that the stereotypes are accurate - when it came to the voting booths, for example, we have Conservative-leaning ladies to hiss at for tipping elections in Thatcher's favour. What I am saying is:
      • It's reasonable to assert "I'm not X just because I'm a woman", but to imply "I'm X despite being a woman" (where "X" is liking videogames, or whatever) is tacitly giving succour to a stereotype - like saying "I got into University despite being black".
         
      • Nature did predispose you to certain traits for being a woman; of course, any intelligent human can override the instinct with reason, which is why it's not necessary for a human to act according to a gender stereotype. But there's no reason not to be proud of the positive qualities nature might supply to you as a result of your gender - for example, testosterone in males is often associated with uncontrolled anger, when it can be applied to intense focus and willpower in "getting a job done".
         
      • The incidentals surrounding any expression usually say as much about an idea someone is trying to convey as the conscious choices they make in conveying it.

      Just some thoughts and a little Devil's advocacy to start the morning ;-).
    13. Re:I'd belive the stats by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      and an inordinate amount of traffic searching for hot women that somehow hit this page.

      Not so surprising; it has the words "squeeze" and "tube" in the very first paragraph!

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    14. Re:I'd belive the stats by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you'll find that more women keep "diaries" than men, which would be a better correlation. Most of the women I know that "blog" are actually treating it as an online diary that happens to get feedback from other people occasionally. Society has taught women to write down their secrets and feelings for a long time. Now that sites like myspace, facebook, livejournal, etc. have become popular it's no surprise that women are transitioning from private hard-copy diaries to semi-private online diaries.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    15. Re:I'd belive the stats by GuitarKat · · Score: 1

      Ah ha! You caught me. ;) I was trying to be funny... didn't quite work, did it? As for the username, I've had it since around 5 years. I play guitar and my first name starts with Kat. Seemed logical and something I would remember.

      Of course, your points are indeed valid.

      Nature did predispose you to certain traits for being a woman; of course, any intelligent human can override the instinct with reason, which is why it's not necessary for a human to act according to a gender stereotype. But there's no reason not to be proud of the positive qualities nature might supply to you as a result of your gender - for example, testosterone in males is often associated with uncontrolled anger, when it can be applied to intense focus and willpower in "getting a job done".

      This is one point that is vaild and also very true. Although, this trait has been evolved and primitve for the longest time and is biological. Another example could be that most women are "motherly" because of the traits to be childbearers and more nuturing.

    16. Re:I'd belive the stats by dynamik · · Score: 1

      "...I've had more than one unsolicited request for a date..."

      Aren't all requests for a date unsolicited? Oh it's hard to be humble.

    17. Re:I'd belive the stats by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Estrogen.

  5. Survey also shows... by thedogcow · · Score: 1

    that any article summary mentioning the word "blogosphere" resultants in your average slashdot reader to be 79.993093 more likely not to RTFA because the term "blogosphere" was mentioned. Seriously. Kill it with fire. I hate the word.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:Survey also shows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Everyone knows that the proper term is "blagotubes"

    2. Re:Survey also shows... by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      "79.993093 more likely"

      Like in, almost eighty more people?

      Or eighty times as many people?

      Or eighty percent more?

      Or eighty million times more?

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    3. Re:Survey also shows... by arth1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      that any article summary mentioning the word "blogosphere" resultants in your average slashdot reader to be 79.993093 more likely not to RTFA because the term "blogosphere" was mentioned. Seriously. Kill it with fire. I hate the word.

      Yes, let the word "blogoshphere" become a roadkill on the information superhighway, for the synergetic well-being of all netizens!

      Regards,
      --
      *Art
    4. Re:Survey also shows... by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that make it so that there are a negative number of people who RTFA?

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    5. Re:Survey also shows... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Seriously. Kill it with fire. I hate the word. That won't work. You have to nuke it from orbit. It's the only way you can really be sure.
    6. Re:Survey also shows... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Yes, let the word "blogoshphere" become a roadkill on the information superhighway, for the synergetic well-being of all netizens!

      That is soooooooooo Web 1.0.

    7. Re:Survey also shows... by andphi · · Score: 1

      Bingo!

  6. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone actually give a flying fuck as to what bullshit advertising is being spouted from these blogs? And who the fuck even reads blogs anymore, it's like masterbating into someone's language. You self-absorbed fuckers.

    1. Re:So what? by FoolsGold · · Score: 0

      Does anyone actually give a flying fuck as to what bullshit advertising is being spouted from these blogs? And who the fuck even reads blogs anymore, it's like masterbating into someone's language. You self-absorbed fuckers.

      Slashdot is, by definition, a blog as well, which means you're reading one too, you self-absorbed fucker. :)
    2. Re:So what? by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that a blog is where one dipshit babbles endlessly, and sometimes others respond to it. On the other hand, slashdot is a forum -- anybody can submit a post to begin a discussion (despite the fact that there are restrictions and reviews, however incompetently performed), and the discussion following the original post (the article) is the point of the site. There isn't much ambiguity about what a forum is, and they predate blogs by several decades.

      Certainly the numbnuts who live and breathe blogs seem to have decided that any form of online discussion is a blog, but that just further confirms that on the whole, they tend towards cluelessness.

      Yes, there are usages and situations that blur the lines, but that's like arguing that there isn't any point in differentiating between a truck and a car because they have so much in common.

      (As an aside, we need a new moderation option: +1 Car Analogy)

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  7. Good... by sgant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Then hopefully it will STOP THEIR YAPPING all the time! Damn broads....

    Hang on, my wife is having me go wash the dishes....

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:Good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe watching this will help you in your situation.

    2. Re:Good... by sgant · · Score: 1

      Maybe watching this will help you in your situation.

      Ah, I see what you did there...

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    3. Re:Good... by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Keep your personal frustrations for yourself; or start a blog.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    4. Re:Good... by sgant · · Score: 1

      Lol, it was a JOKE. Ok, not the best joke in the world, but I thought it was pretty obvious I was kidding. I see now it wasn't.

      Lighten up peeps.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    5. Re:Good... by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      OMG this is funny :-)

      My reply was meant as a joke upon your joke.

      And because your post had a daring tone, I'd figured I could go with that.

      And looking back, it looks like I was the initiator of your post being interpreted as a troll.

      ASCII; the source misinterpretation.

      We have to fall back on our smileys. :-p

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    6. Re:Good... by prionic6 · · Score: 1

      I think his reply was meant as a joke, too. You just don't get it. Give up!

  8. in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news the sun emits light, more at 11

  9. STBU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why are blogs irrelevant?

    When asked about the types of information they get from blogs, 65% said they get opinions, while 39% get news and 38% get entertainment. Eight paragraphs later:

    Almost half of those surveyed say it's because they find blogs entertaining, and another 26% read them to learn about specific hobbies or other areas they're interested in. Only 15% of blog readers say they do so for news, indicating that the more traditional forms of news consumption still have a stronghold. Looks like two women wrote this one (sorry John).
    1. Re:STBU! by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I'm confused, what do you think the issue is? The first question is what do they get out of blogs, the second question is their main reason for reading blogs. The two don't have to result in the same numbers, in fact since one person can have multiple answers to the first question but should theoretically have only one to the second means that the results should be very different.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  10. survey by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    100% of people who took this survey are likely to answer surveys, but how many people who don't answer surveys are likely to have blogs hmm?

    --
    I like muppets.
  11. mindless gab by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    OMG women like mindless gab and talking about their thoughts and feelings more than men?! That has thrown my entire perception of reality into chaos.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  12. Does myspace count as blogging? by catbutt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just curious.

    1. Re:Does myspace count as blogging? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      Only if you're 14.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    2. Re:Does myspace count as blogging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      >Does myspace count as blogging?

      All jokes aside, this is a good question. When I heard 50% of all Americans read blogs, I thought.. that's got to be bullshit. I know for a fact that most of the adults I know might know what a blog is, but sure as heck don't "regularly visit blogs". But, to your point, if you factor in things like livejournal, myspace, hell even facebook, which have "blogging" elements, then perhaps we approach this 50% mark when you consider all the youth today having their social sites.

      The thing I am curious about is WHO exactally they surveyed, WHAT the questions were, and HOW they arrived at their conclusions.

    3. Re:Does myspace count as blogging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually a fair question, as Myspace, Facebook etc. pages have blogs/journals that may or may not be used by the owner. For that matter is Livejournal a blog? If not, what's the difference? How about "blogs" by owners or content contributers of sites that are a features but not the main attraction? (e.g. and purely off the top of my head, Nathan Rubin at the Onion A.V. club.) Then there's a half million Blogger.com pages with two or three entries, or that get updated so infrequently it's hard to tell if they're forgotten or not. How can you possibly get an accurate count of blogs?

      Of course the fact that women equal or outnumber men doing ANYTHING online in 2007 is pretty much a nonissue anyway. Are we still supposed to think of this ubiquitous mainstream communications tool as the domain of geeky male basement dwellers? Is it news that more women have cell phones than men now too?

    4. Re:Does myspace count as blogging? by catbutt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course the fact that women equal or outnumber men doing ANYTHING online in 2007 is pretty much a nonissue anyway. Well I just read about a different survey that concluded that over 50% of people on slashdot are women. I don't know about you, but I found that number rather surprising.

      Ok, I made that up.
    5. Re:Does myspace count as blogging? by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well I just read about a different survey that concluded that over 50% of people on slashdot are women. I don't know about you, but I found that number rather surprising.

      I'd believe it if the sample size was 2.

    6. Re:Does myspace count as blogging? by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      So the mail with man-boobs in your sample set contributes his frontal appendages to the >50% stats?

    7. Re:Does myspace count as blogging? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno what I'd do if I ever received mail with man-boobs.

    8. Re:Does myspace count as blogging? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I didn't find it surprising either - most of the communities I"m on on LJ are almost entirely female. The most male-dominated one is like 10-15% male. Of course, I'm probably on comms that appeal more to women, but most of them aren't topics that are obviously feminine. My husband reads political blogs but doesn't have one himself; I have like three.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    9. Re:Does myspace count as blogging? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      A result over 50% from a sample size of two would require the presence of women, plural.

  13. What? by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The survey also revealed that more women than men are bloggers, with 20% of American women who have visited blogs having their own versus 14% of men.
    That does not prove what they're trying to indicate at all. That indicates "women who read blogs are more likely to have one of their own". It doesn't say squat about how many women actually have blogs - if there's five women out there who read blogs, and 100 men, then that's one female-run blog and 14 male-run blogs.

    Come on, guys. Get your facts straight.
    --
    Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    1. Re:What? by chubs730 · · Score: 1

      Come on, guys. Get your facts straight. Maybe it's girls, they are a dominating blogging force after all...sheesh didn't you read the article?
    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, guys. Get your facts straight.

      We're talking about blogs here. Facts have nothing to do with it!

  14. I am SO blogging this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re:I am SO blogging this! by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      Go blog yourself you pervert!

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  15. Now for some more stats please. by Uno+Due+Tre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What percentage of blogs are actually READ with a break-down of male/female? I think blogs by women who post a hot picture of themselves would possibly be a bit overrepresented. I know a few nerds who read a chick's blog just because she also happens to be a swimsuit model. Personally, I would prefer to read a blog that was actually interesting.

    1. Re:Now for some more stats please. by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know a few nerds who read a chick's blog just because she also happens to be a swimsuit model.
      Yeah, right. And I'm guessing that would also be the same percentage who subscribe to Playboy "for the articles." (rolls eyes)
    2. Re:Now for some more stats please. by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, or coach the girls-team because of social involvement...

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  16. Summary says most women are men? by Nymz · · Score: 4, Funny

    What an insensitive summary, but I guess that's to be expected from the patriarchal and male-dominated Slashdot blog. So for the last time you unenlightend masoginists, Bloggers are male, and Bloghers are female. Sheesh.

    1. Re:Summary says most women are men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right in a sense. Here's the extended summary:
      The survey also reveals that more women than men are bloggers, with 20% of American women who have visited blogs having their own versus 14% of men. A follow up survey revealed that 90% of the 100% of women who were surveyed proved to be men in actuality.

      And no, "extended summary" isn't the joke people.

    2. Re:Summary says most women are men? by d12v10 · · Score: 1

      misogynist.

    3. Re:Summary says most women are men? by Nymz · · Score: 1

      misogynist.
      Thanks. I wish Slashdot would let me edit my poor spellyng.
    4. Re:Summary says most women are men? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      At first I thought you were kidding, but your sig really does link to a misandry site. If you were kidding, then you got me. If not, then I can hope that kind will be called out for being the bigots you are, just as other bigots have been in the past.

    5. Re:Summary says most women are men? by caluml · · Score: 1

      masoginists - wow, it's so wrong it hurts. Did you hear a new word yesterday? It's from Miso- hatred/dislike of, gyno- relating to women. Misogynist.

  17. Wrong conclusion by panaceaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The body of the article states:

    "The survey also revealed that more women than men are bloggers, with 20% of American women who have visited blogs having their own versus 14 % of men."

    This does not equate to more blogger being women. If there are twice the number of males reading blogs than females, then given the above ratio, 40% more men would be blogging than women. Unfortunately this article doesn't tell us the number of males reading blogs versus females, so we can't draw any conclusion either way. And I'd guess that there's more men reading blogs based on my use of Slashdot and Digg, but I really have no broad data to back me up.

    The only thing this survey shows is that of blog readers who fill out surveys, females tend to blog more than males. And even then, the margin of error on a population size of 10,000,000 bloggers with their 1,000 user sample size is 3.1%. So the statistic is nearly meaningless ...

    1. Re:Wrong conclusion by glavenoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      nice sig...

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    2. Re:Wrong conclusion by garcia · · Score: 1

      So the statistic is nearly meaningless ...

      Just like any.

    3. Re:Wrong conclusion by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The thing to bear in mind is some people consider a mypace page to be a blog, so it really depends on what they interpret as being a blog.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:Wrong conclusion by VirusEqualsVeryYes · · Score: 1

      The only thing this survey shows is that of blog readers who fill out surveys, females tend to blog more than males.
      This is further skewed by the fairly well known fact that females, especially underage girls, have a higher rate of filling out surveys and taking quizzes and posting the pretty graphic of the results on their blogs. Females are far more talkative in real life, so it's small wonder why they act and interact on the Internet more, whether the medium is IMing, blogging, posting in forums, or whatever.

      Relatedly, since this was an online survey, if there really is an imbalance in the blogosphere, it would be magnified due to the nature of blog interaction: friends with blogs frequently exchange links to surveys and other interactive websites, so those who do have blogs would be in a better position to learn about the survey and take it.

      Personally, I think any overall gender imbalance is irrelevant. Blogs within categories of subject content are far more polarized by gender, with men going for tech, sports, and science, and women for entertainment, fashion/shopping, and health -- and besides, having a blog is useless if no one reads it. I'd be more interested in the different gender imbalances of figures considered powerful or influential in the blogosphere versus reality. Are women in positions of influence in higher proportions on the Internet than in real life? That would be eye-opening, I think.
  18. Re:You're Embarassing Us in Front of the Other Sex by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

    You misread that, is says that 20% of women who have visited blogs have one of their own.

  19. Well, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's because women believe people care about all the funky crap rattling around in their heads; haven't you spent time with any of them?

    Oh wait......nevermind.

    Maybe this means if I teach my wife how to blog, I'll get to play some BF2142 when I get home instead of hearing her describe the day's office politics in excruciating detail.

  20. Words that must die: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blog
    Blogger
    Blogosphere
    Podcast
    and anything blog- or pod-
    Need to die.

    We had fine words for ALL of these concepts before these verbal-STDs began infecting the series of tubes that is the internet. The Slashdot summery was like gonorrhea in the eye

    1. Re:Words that must die: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blag. You forgot blag.

    2. Re:Words that must die: by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      Also the word blogophobia?

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  21. That makes Wil Wheaton... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...gay

    1. Re:That makes Wil Wheaton... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They talk more too.

  22. Bogus statistic that ignores internet reality by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny

    " Survey Shows More Women Blogging Than Men"

    On the intenet, men are men, women are men, and little kids are fbi agents.

    ... or dogs.

    1. Re:Bogus statistic that ignores internet reality by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows that feeling of betrayal; you are browsing porn and find pictures of a very hot girl, and the last three pictures show that the girl was actually a shemale.

      When you are a teenager, it takes a lot of confidence in your sexuality to not panic in silence.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  23. So what is the percentage of blogs about cats? by 7String · · Score: 1

    Inquiring minds want to know.

    --

    It isn't a memory leak. It's an object life-span issue.
  24. Must... kill... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    ... people who say "blogosphere".

    Damn hippies.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Must... kill... by cortesoft · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't understand what makes the blogosphere a sphere..... why not the blogosquare?

    2. Re:Must... kill... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Same reason we don't have an atmosquare.

  25. New buzz for old words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blog : A web page updated by a person on a regular basis. Before 2004 this was known simply as a "home page" but was changed because the original term did not sound good enough when used on fox news.

    Blogosphere : All the web pages updated by people on a regular basis. Before 2004 this was known as "the internet" or "a series of tubes". Now the term is used to organize the internet. All blogs fall into the blogoshere category, the rest fall under the porn category.

    SOA : A new approach to feeding monkeys that involves a banana as opposed to the more conventional "banana"

  26. Livejournal? by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    Where does one draw a line between blog and "online diary"? I didn't notice a definition when I skimmed TFA. I would think that things like LJ skew the results quite a bit, since lots of teens are liable to hit up these sites and the post to them every once in a blue moon.

    1. Re:Livejournal? by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      I would think one criterion would be subject matter, being personal or not. I write about hockey online, and would definitely call that a blog, not an online diary...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:Livejournal? by Minarin · · Score: 1

      Main Entry: blog
      Part of Speech: n
      Definition: an online diary; a personal chronological log of thoughts published on a Web page; also called Weblog, Web log

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/blog

      So uh...what do you mean where does one draw the line between two synonymous words?

  27. I don't believe the stats, at all by JonTurner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I call total bullshit on these statistics.
    8% write their own blogs? Twenty million people?!? Impossible. No way, no how. Now maybe, just maybe 8% of some select subclass of internet users (e.g. 8% of people who spend more than 4 hours/day on the internet, have a college education, a median income greater than $####, own at least one foreign-made car, read WIred magazine, etc.) write blogs, but to think that many ordinary Americans are writing their own blogs... nope. I don't buy it.

    And if you doubt this for one moment, just try to remember the last time you stood in line at the Department of Motor Vehicles. See how silly it seems thinking 4/5 of them could explain what a blog is? And to think nearly 1/10 writes their own? Nyet.

    1. Re:I don't believe the stats, at all by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... a median income greater than $####, ... Could you repost that, but this time expand the column so we can see the entire number?
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:I don't believe the stats, at all by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends on what you count as a blog. I could easily believe nearly 1/10 people have used the "blog" feature on MySpace.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    3. Re:I don't believe the stats, at all by fymidos · · Score: 1

      > but to think that many ordinary Americans are writing their own blogs... nope. I don't buy it

      It is true, many many ordinary people around the world have a personal blog. This was an online survey, so the article is a little misleading: it is actually the 80% of internet users that "know what a blog is".

        The numbers of bloggers are definetely high though: According to www.technorati.com there are more than 100 million blogs around the world. Even if many of them are dead, we are talking tens of millions active blogs -there is no question about it- and a large percentage of them has to be from US.

      --
      Washington bullets will simply be known as the "Bulle
    4. Re:I don't believe the stats, at all by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I call total bullshit on these statistics.
      8% write their own blogs? Twenty million people?!? Impossible. No way, no how.


      How many million people are on MySpace these days?

      I think it's easily believable. "Blog" doesn't just mean a standalone website you maintain yourself and write about political stuff, it's any journalling site, which people usually use for personal stuff.

    5. Re:I don't believe the stats, at all by slashbob22 · · Score: 1

      Could you repost that, but this time expand the column so we can see the entire number? He can't - the field's locked.

      Quick, someone open up the OOXML document in an application with poor implementation.
      --
      Proof by very large bribes. QED.
    6. Re:I don't believe the stats, at all by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Nothing on myspace should ever count for anything... ever. MySpace is the most disgusting collection of crappy webpages made by bored middle school / high school / college students ever. does "ZOMG STACY JUST PICKED HER NOSE IN CLASS TODAY" really count as a blog? ugh, I hope not.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    7. Re:I don't believe the stats, at all by porcupine8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Remember that "a blog" does not mean "a well-known blog" or "a blog that gets a lot of hits" or "a blog anyone but my three friends reads" or even "a blog that ANYONE reads." It just means any blog you write in - which includes everyone on LiveJournal and its children, plus the millions more on MySpace who use the blog function on there, plus blogger, wordpress, etc... 8% doesn't seem off at all to me. Hell, my MOM, who knows very little about computers, has a blog on 360.yahoo.com that she writes in once a month. My aunt and uncle, who are about as computer-savvy as she is, both have MySpace accounts and write in those blogs now and then.

      Regular people blogging: It's more likely than you think!

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    8. Re:I don't believe the stats, at all by porcupine8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why wouldn't that count as a blog? Since when does "blog" mean anything other than "web log," or "online log of your daily thoughts and activities?" Who decided that an online journal must meet some minimum requirement of eliteness to qualify as a "blog"??

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    9. Re:I don't believe the stats, at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn, you talk alot.... :)

    10. Re:I don't believe the stats, at all by nthwaver · · Score: 1

      Livejournal alone has 3.4 million users [livejournal.com]. This and many other social networks can be called blogs.

  28. Behind the counter by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Very nice reading; a girl who in an entertaining way writes about her frustrations at Walmart.

    http://www.behindthecounter.com/

    Just stumbled across it and like to share it.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    1. Re:Behind the counter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does she have nice tits?

    2. Re:Behind the counter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, that is one WHINY SELF-CENTERED BITCH writing that blog.

      Seriously, in the first post I read, she basically got pissed off because an angry customer wanted a $10 upgrade. So what? What's $10 to retain a customer? And it was full of personal attacks. Wonderful. Next article, more personal attacks: "Stupid cow. She probably waddled over to the McDonald's and spend the $6.42 on three Big Macs, two large fries and a large Diet Coke, because, you know, she's got to cut back somewhere!"

      Nice to know that when I go to Wal-Mart, I have to deal with wage slaves who can't deal with their own "anger issues". Then again, what kind of emotionally balanced, people-oriented person chooses to man the registers at Wal-Mart?

      (Actually it might not be a girl. Replace "BITCH" with whatever is appropriate. Doesn't matter.)

    3. Re:Behind the counter by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Customer returns bed; wants a bigger one. The blogger sais that this is no problem.
      Customer does not want to pay the extra amount. The blogger sais that this is a problem.
      I don't see how you can not agree with her.

      And if you can't identify with her frustrations then you have not worked in horeca, gasstations, do-it-yourself stores or anything similar where you have to serve customers in all their variaty. They are ordinary frustrations that you can not show in your profession, but talk about with your friends and colleagues.

      The recognition is what makes her blog good.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    4. Re:Behind the counter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From here:

      Those who enter the widest window of available hours tend to get the best shifts. Michael works weekends at a Wal-Mart in Florida. He has a blog called "behind the counter". He doesn't use his real name, fearing dismissal. He says at his store, the new scheduling system isn't working well for part-timers like him who hold more than one job, and so have more limited availability


      Doesn't sound like a girl to me.
    5. Re:Behind the counter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an excellent question - however, I didn't see a single tit on that site!

  29. Statistics by Tribbin · · Score: 4, Informative

    73.3 percent of all statistics are made up.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    1. Re:Statistics by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Informative

      On top of being made up, a full 23.34432% of them pretend to be more accurate than they really are.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:Statistics by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Informative

      And 112% of them don't apply to logic.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    3. Re:Statistics by simonv · · Score: 1

      but 100% want karma points

  30. In other news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Women have been found to whine more than men.

    1. Re:In other news: by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      And that makes you ...

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  31. Surprising! by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Surprising how many men have blogs, considering that the ratio of men/women keeping diaries is, say 1/9.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  32. This sure took me by surprise. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

    More women are attention whores online than men! Who'd a thunk it?

    --
    How ya like dat?
  33. "The Internet"...where men are men, and women... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The Internet":
    Where men are men,
    Women are men,
    And all the children are undercover FBI agents.

  34. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gay people indeed talk a lot. Wil actually alluded to homosexuality in an interview after he starred in the movie Python.

  35. librarians by sh3l1 · · Score: 1

    a lot of librarians blog and there are tons of female librarians.

    --
    Help Me! I'm trapped in the tubes! Oh noes! Here comes a internet!
  36. Reading a blog doesn't make you a blogger by Andrew+Tanenbaum · · Score: 1

    "The survey also reveals that more women than men are bloggers, with 20% of American women who have visited blogs having their own versus 14% of men.""

    Sorry, visiting blogs doesn't make you a blogger. I'm a blogger. I write blogs that are read by over ten thousand people a day - EACH. I make my living writing blogs. And if you don't, you're not a blogger - you're just a wannabe.

    1. Re:Reading a blog doesn't make you a blogger by hjo3 · · Score: 1

      You go around yelling "Don't you know who I am?!" a lot, don't you?

    2. Re:Reading a blog doesn't make you a blogger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You go around yelling "Don't you know who I am?!" a lot, don't you?
      I'm the juggernaut, bitch!
  37. I see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well I personally would rather read articles than blogs; because I like news not gossip; and I like facts not opinions. Almost no blog is written or even pretends to have any sorta of investigation work or journalistic integrity in them; thus they are as worthless words from some random person that doesn't really even know what they are talking about, sitting somewhere behind a computer spewing whatever dribble comes into their feeble minds. I mean, just look at what "news sites" are trying to pass off as news in their feeds..

  38. Another survey confirms by theendlessnow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Men are less likely to become pregnant than women.

    You heard it here first!

    Come on! Did somebody really have to do a survey to figure this one out?

  39. Look at the bright side... by Greg_D · · Score: 1

    ... blogs are the new attentive boyfriend who she can cheat with while she's with you. When YOU won't talk to them about their feelings because you really don't care about how horrible it was that her co-worker bought a pair of shoes just like hers after she had already shown hers off at work, she can go yap to a bunch of other estrogen driven goofballs who take that type of shit very seriously. Most of them will invariably be effeminate gay men who will pour their own pathetically wounded hearts into comments about fashion issues, and/or horny virgins who will feign sympathy in an attempt to garner long distance wank fests.

    So after she blows off her steam and has her fill of stuff you don't care about, she'll need someone who smells of sweat and cheetoes and football and cars and even Xboxes, just to wash all the stink off after spending an hour or two gushing to that perfume laden fantasy world.

    Of course, all you geeks will never have to worry about this. Level 65 Death Knights don't really let women near their PCs, after all. Or is it that women don't want to be near the PCs of level 65 Death Knights?

    I forget.

  40. minor details by V_Pundit · · Score: 1

    No, I didn't go read the article
    "20% of women WHO HAVE VISITED BLOGS have their own blog versus 14% of men."

    Even if I assume that it is "14% of men who have visited blogs," that statement is meaningless unless we know whether more men have visited blogs or not. If 14% of 2 Million men have blogs that's 280,000 men with blogs which would be more than 20% of 1 Million women who have visited blogs.

    I made up the numbers, but the point is that we have to have the full story. The numbers we were given does not prove that more women blog than men.

    --
    that's how I see it anyway . . .
    1. Re:minor details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about all those people who don't visit blogs but don't visit any? Huh? I believe the author needs a little modus ponens on their hiney

  41. Does it say... by drew · · Score: 1

    ...what percentage of either gender feels the overwhelming urge to vomit every time they hear the word "blogosphere"?

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  42. More women? by hnoon · · Score: 1

    More women the same way there seem to be more "women" on irc trying to chat with you?

  43. mayhaps.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this has some merit. I know I only write blogs when I'm pretending to be a woman....

  44. So Easy by pgn674 · · Score: 1

    Blogging is so easy, even women can do it!


    (Or are we done with that joke now?)

    1. Re:So Easy by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      i'm not done with it ;p

      --
      Balderdash!
    2. Re:So Easy by hjo3 · · Score: 1

      Boy, if they ever figure out how to post on Slashdot you're going to get a real earful...

  45. Dear thefickler by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    The survey also reveals that more women than men are bloggers, with 20% of American women who have visited blogs having their own versus 14% of men."

          Wrong. This just means that more American women who visit blogs have their own blogs. Please do not read more into the data than what is actually there.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  46. Sexism on Slashdot by postlude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the low intellectual tone of some of the comments in this thread are anything to go by, I would say that there are virtually no women using Slashdot, and to be honest, I can see why...

    1. Re:Sexism on Slashdot by pclminion · · Score: 1

      If the low intellectual tone of some of the comments in this thread are anything to go by, I would say that there are virtually no women using Slashdot, and to be honest, I can see why...

      Are you actually trying to argue that women are NOT more social than men? Yeah, the comments about yapping, gabbing, catty women are low-brow. That doesn't invalidate the basic point that women are more inclined to gossip. It's not sexist, it's truth. In other news, men have penises.

      That said, the survey is so completely flawed that I'd hesitate to draw any conclusions at all, except that the surveyors have no idea how to properly conduct a survey.

    2. Re:Sexism on Slashdot by kripkenstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the low intellectual tone of some of the comments in this thread are anything to go by, I would say that there are virtually no women using Slashdot, and to be honest, I can see why...
      I haven't seen any such comments, simply because I browse at +5. I recommend other try it as well :)
    3. Re:Sexism on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in soviet russia, virtual slashdot women use YOU!

    4. Re:Sexism on Slashdot by bjourne · · Score: 1

      If the low intellectual tone of some of the comments in this thread are anything to go by, I would say that there are virtually no women using Slashdot, and to be honest, I can see why... Are you actually trying to argue that women are NOT more social than men? Yeah, the comments about yapping, gabbing, catty women are low-brow. That doesn't invalidate the basic point that women are more inclined to gossip. It's not sexist, it's truth. In other news, men have penises.

      But what the fuck you literal dickhead. Slashdot is a blog which you are reading and from a quick glance at your userpage reveails, have written 3829 comments to. That makes you a pretty "chatty" person and, unless you are a female, does "invalidate the basic point." There are over a million other mostly male users on Slashdot wasting away their days reading and writing stupid comments, and if that doesn't prove that men are just as yapping, gabbing and chatty as women then I don't know what.

      But somehow, writing comments on Slashdot is considered equivalent to partaking in a high-brow, intellectual conversation so Slashdot is "good" while discussing pie recipes on some blog is considered yappy. Well, check this stupid article and the fucking morons posting their boring gender-stereotyping jokes that they probably learnt from a porno-mag.

      From the research that has been done in gender differences, very few conclusions can be drawn. Yes, men are in general better at chess and Sudoku while females are better in Scrabble and crossword solving, but the facts ends there. You cannot from the available evidence try and conclude that women are more chatty - the facts are just no there.

    5. Re:Sexism on Slashdot by postlude · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I'll try that.

    6. Re:Sexism on Slashdot by dwpro · · Score: 1

      Wow...I would like to respond to your comment, but trying to argue each of the flaws in your arguments would actually give credence to your men are just as gabby conjecture, so I'll just say, pics or GTFO.

      If, by chance, you decide to stick around, you really should have a sense of humor. Geeks on this site make fun of their own stereotypes constantly, and you should do the same. And while you're at it, move out of your mother's basement.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    7. Re:Sexism on Slashdot by pclminion · · Score: 1

      But somehow, writing comments on Slashdot is considered equivalent to partaking in a high-brow, intellectual conversation so Slashdot is "good" while discussing pie recipes on some blog is considered yappy. Well, check this stupid article and the fucking morons posting their boring gender-stereotyping jokes that they probably learnt from a porno-mag.

      You're a grizzled old hag, aren't you?

  47. Missed Opportunity by HairyNevus · · Score: 1

    Why wasn't this "from the chatty-cathy dept."?

    --
    You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
  48. 80% know what a blog is? by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I highly doubt it. Let me guess -- they conducted this survey ON THE INTERNET. So their sample is limited to exactly the same group of people who would probably know what a blog is. Somebody needs to re-take basic statistics...

    I could be wrong -- I can't RTFA because it's Slashdotted.

  49. New advertising slogan... by renegadesx · · Score: 1

    Blogging... now with more chicks!!!

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  50. Funny & Informative by Nymz · · Score: 1

    At first I thought you were kidding, but your sig really does link to a misandry site. If you were kidding, then you got me. If not, then I can hope that kind will be called out for being the bigots you are, just as other bigots have been in the past.
    "In the past quarter century, we exposed biases against other races and called it racism, and we exposed biases against women and called it sexism. Biases against men we call humor." - Warren Farrell
    1. Re:Funny & Informative by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Ok, You got me... I guess I've seen too many people that are dead serious and say the same exact same thing in the exact same way. I though I might of heard something whizzing right over my head. Good to know it was a joke, and not a rock.

  51. Doesn't really surprise me by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    OK, so the conclusions in the article may be a bit off, although I'm not really surprised if women are more common bloggers. If I go beyond the geeky tech blogs, based on what I'm seeing here on e.g. Swedish blog community sites, there's an ocean of blogs out there and a whole lot seem to be ran by women. It's not exactly the gender ratio you see on sites like this one. :-p

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  52. Lies by Amphetam1ne · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that "THERE IS NO GURLS ON TEH INTERWEBZ!!1!1"

    [padding]
    Ok, time for some message padding to let this get through the capfilter.
    [/padding]

    --
    I only buy pepper spray that's been tested on anti-vivisectionists.
  53. Statistics aren't the point by Almahtar · · Score: 1

    Everyone seems to be caught up on the statistics (there are plenty of statistical errors the article makes, for sure). I don't know about a lot of you but I know far more girls that blog than guys that do. Let's face it, girls tend to be chatty and want to share details about what's going on with them. It probably sounds pretty gay but I actually enjoy reading their blogs more than guys'.

    1. Re:Statistics aren't the point by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I don't know about a lot of you but I know far more girls that blog than guys that do.
      I know lots of guys who present themselves as females online who blog, I know far less actual female bloggers though.

      Let's face it, girls tend to be chatty and want to share details about what's going on with them.
      The actual female bloggers I know of, talk about Anime stuff, they don't really share much about what's going on with them.

      That said, I don't really find the majority of blogs that interesting.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  54. Womens' yappin' by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't mind listening to them yap if they had something interesting to say... *ducks*

  55. Averages aren't necessarily stereotypes by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    I think averages aren't actually stereotypes, though. The point when it becomes a stereotype and possibly sexist or racist is when it's extrapolated to "all X are/do/like Y" or the equivalent "you're an X, therefore you are/do/like Y". A lot of people extrapolate from statistics and averages to that, but it's that extrapolation that's the fallacy, not the statistic or average itself.

    E.g., consider this "most insects have 6 legs, spiders are insects, therefore spiders have 6 legs." The fallacy there is the implied extrapolation from "most" (i.e., a variant of "some") to "all", not the "most insects have 6 legs" premise.

    Ditto, "women like pink" is a stereotype, especially if it's taken to the point of "you're a woman, therefore you like pink", but "more women than men like pink" is just a statistic. And yes, we have a statistic showing that, for westerners. (For Chinese it's much more of a close call, since it's a lucky colour in their culture, though.) I think the same applies to blogs, recipes, physical strength, or anything else. If you steer clear of the usual extrapolation from "some" to "all", it's IMHO not really a stereotype.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Averages aren't necessarily stereotypes by baadger · · Score: 1

      E.g., consider this "most insects have 6 legs, spiders are insects, therefore spiders have 6 legs." The fallacy there is the implied extrapolation from "most" (i.e., a variant of "some") to "all", not the "most insects have 6 legs" premise.

      Actually there is no fallacy there since spiders are not insects. Spiders belong to the biological class "Arachnida" not "Insecta" unlike, say, common flies you will find about the home.
    2. Re:Averages aren't necessarily stereotypes by Weedlekin · · Score: 2, Informative

      "E.g., consider this "most insects have 6 legs, spiders are insects, therefore spiders have 6 legs." The fallacy there is the implied extrapolation from "most" (i.e., a variant of "some") to "all", not the "most insects have 6 legs" premise."

      The fallacy is the statement about spiders being insects. They're chelicerates, which is a distinct arthropod sub-phylum that's much older, and genetically distinct from the hexapods (which includes insects and other six legged arthropods such as diplura). As the name "hexapod" suggests, _all_ normal (i.e. undamaged) adult insects have six legs, although their larvae can have anything ranging from none (e.g. maggots) to many (e.g. some caterpillars).

      NB: some zoologists used to use the term "insect" as a general catch-all for any arthropod, but it's now considered as obsolete as the sun being classed as one of the planets.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  56. Yup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever been down to Midtown Atlanta? Once they get a convo struck up, you just "*can't quit*"

  57. My problem is : I got nothing to write about! by zukinux · · Score: 1

    I mean.. I got a slashdot blog, and I will not write how I feel today or that stuff because honestly it's too gay.
    I write only neat stuff that comes up my mind when I'm in my own journal. If you want, you can check my journal out and let me know what to write about and if my journal is nice or not (if you like linux stuff you will like the basics of it, but there are not much articles).

    I'm feeling good today... thanks!

  58. Thank you Spock... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    ...mentioning the word "blogosphere" resultants in your average slashdot reader to be 79.993093 more likely not to RTFA...

    How about we just call it 80% for a "rough estimate"?

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  59. Not that surprising by notorious+ninja · · Score: 1

    I have a personal blog, and have had for many years. Most of the personal blogs I see are by women and all my "blog friends" are women (usually girls in their teens & 20's). A lot of it revolves around making layouts, talking about your life, girl-oriented topics, making new friends/penpals, etc. I just can't picture a lot of guys being into the same thing... *shock*!

  60. Tests Show it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just looking at our young families class at church, there are a ton of women bloggers but it's all about their kids and families to let others in their ever busy sphere know what's going on.

  61. Ever notice how many blogs are really bad sites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many load about 10,000 images and are all on a single page. Every once in while one will turn up for me on a Google search that I will look into. Many of these take forever to load and occasionally bog my browser down so much I have to kill it. Spread things across multiple pages or show things based on date will ya?!

  62. Let's treat this like GAMEZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's handle this the same way that women in games is being handled. Oh NOES! We've just GOT to get more men blogging and reading blogs! Maybe we should offer scholarships for men so they DO MORE BLOGGING! How can we ever get the males to catch up? Let's go find a clan of male bloggers and hold them up as an example so more males start doing it.
    (I'm trying to point out that there *are* differences between males and females in very large scale stereotypical ways, and that we are *not* the same as some would have us think. Nothing wrong with those differences, but they DO exist.)

  63. cat fight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please share

    1. Re:cat fight? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No, two drunk dudes.

  64. Conspicuous... by psychicninja · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, haven't seen a comment yet that started with "I'm a woman, and I think..."

  65. La estadística no tiene la culpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The survey also revealed that more women than men are bloggers, with 20% of American women who have visited blogs having their own versus 14 % of men.
    INCORRECT! yes, more women that visit blogs are bloggers, but more men visit blogs so the total number of men bloggers are bigger than women bloggers
    0,2y are women who have blogs
    0,14x are men who have blogs
    x= number of men who visit blogs
    y= number of women who visit blogs
    let 66,6...% of blog visitors be men
    let 33,3...% of blog visitors be women
    so 0,2y = 0,066...
    0,14x = 0,0933...
    0,0933... is bigger than 0,0666
    so more men are bloggers...

    the author must learn conditional probabilty!!
    Don't blame statisitics (it's only an instrument) blame the people.

    Greets, Andres from Argentina

  66. You need Internet Access to take the survey by op3nsource · · Score: 1

    The survey isn't of all Americans, it's all Americans with Internet access. So the gross numbers are skewed, analysis here: http://www.encoreopus.com/statistics/blogger-stati stics-lying-with-numbers.html