Slashdot Mirror


1300 Unopened Fry's Rebate Forms Found In Dumpster

blackmonday writes "The Consumerist is reporting a find of 1,300 unopened rebate submissions in a dumpster belonging to Vastech, a rebate processor hired by Fry's Electronics. Vastech's management blames it on a bad employee."

89 of 433 comments (clear)

  1. Fry's Merely Chose the Wrong Company by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Funny
    Excerpt from the enclosed rebates:

    Congratulations on the purchase of your new Intel Core 2 Duo! To apply to recieve your $100.00 rebate in 6 to 8 weeks, please enclose your original reciept, this completed form & the original UPC from the product in a self addressed stamped envelope and send it to:

    INTEL CORE 2 DUO REBATE OFFER LONG NAMED CLEARINGHOUSE PLACE
    c/o Vastech
    888 Bestgate Road
    Suite # The Dumpster Behind Denny's
    Annapolis, MD 21401 Yeah, be sure to check the address on those things. Also, I believe the Vatican uses Vastech to handle all their "Children's Letters to God" mail.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Fry's Merely Chose the Wrong Company by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Excerpt from the enclosed rebates:

      Congratulations on the purchase of your new Intel Core 2 Duo! To apply to recieve your $100.00 rebate in 6 to 8 weeks, please enclose your original reciept, this completed form & the original UPC from the product in a self addressed stamped envelope and send it to:

      INTEL CORE 2 DUO REBATE OFFER LONG NAMED CLEARINGHOUSE PLACE
      c/o Vastech
      888 Bestgate Road
      Suite # The Dumpster Behind Denny's
      Annapolis, MD 21401
      Yeah, be sure to check the address on those things. Also, I believe the Vatican uses Vastech to handle all their "Children's Letters to God" mail.

      Actually it was a bad employee. The employee was supposed to shread them first.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Fry's Merely Chose the Wrong Company by hpotterjr · · Score: 2, Funny

      WOW! I guess the dumpster was full of frys.

    3. Re:Fry's Merely Chose the Wrong Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      To shreds you say?

    4. Re:Fry's Merely Chose the Wrong Company by maybenot · · Score: 5, Informative

      I once had a boss that said dont pay the rebates unless they write or call to complain. Nice ehh? I did what I was told, I needed the paycheck.

    5. Re:Fry's Merely Chose the Wrong Company by purduephotog · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've learned: This time I took PHOTOS of all my rebates before they were stuffed in the letter. I like hearing that they didn't receive what they needed because now I can fax them a photo with all the material in it...

    6. Re:Fry's Merely Chose the Wrong Company by slashbob22 · · Score: 2, Funny

      To shreds you say? Well, how is Vastech holding up?

      To Shreds you say?
      --
      Proof by very large bribes. QED.
    7. Re:Fry's Merely Chose the Wrong Company by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've learned even better: Stop dicking with mail-in rebate bullshit, and buy my stuff online. I'm not an animal to be trained to jump through hoops, thank you very little.

    8. Re:Fry's Merely Chose the Wrong Company by wizzahd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because no online store offers mail-in rebates.

    9. Re:Fry's Merely Chose the Wrong Company by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not an animal to be trained to jump through hoops, thank you very little. Not yet married, eh?
      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  2. a bad employee... by SC-James · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does someone not notice when you walk out to the dumpster with 1300 envelopes?

  3. So that's why by thrashee · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that's why it takes so long to get rebates back! And here I was blaming the post office.

    1. Re:So that's why by Joebert · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if they'd have kept their mouth shut it could have been assumed that a new postal employee just wasn't familiar with what a mailbox looks like, or a genius.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  4. Re:Maybe you should have done a fucking search of by you-nix-boy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh good! A member of the Fry's customer service team has joined the discussion!

    --
    --- Pork is not a verb.
  5. Re:Bad employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There was SUCH a long line at the shredder that day. I really needed to get down to the pub for a few pints.

  6. That's the reason by Judg3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..that I don't send in rebates any more unless they are $50 or higher. Seems like 9 times out of 10 I never hear from the company again if the rebate is a smallish amount - now I know why.

    It truly is brilliant though, how hard would you try to get a small $3.50 rebate back, but it was the reason you picked that product over a competitor. So they win twice, once on getting your business and again when they don't send you the check and you don't really care.

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    1. Re:That's the reason by Mattintosh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't buy things with mail-in rebates. If retailers want to play games, they can find someone else. If they want me to buy stuff, they can put the real price on the shelf instead of the after-rebate price. Instant rebates are a different matter...

    2. Re:That's the reason by gravos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When a manufacturer decides they want to offer a rebate, they almost always come to some agreement with a third party (like Rebate-zone) who prints up forms, handles submissions, and mails out checks. Typically I think this agreement involves a lump-sum payment based on the number of rebates that could potentially be redeemed (but less than [number of rebates] * [rebate value] because a significant number will never be mailed in).

      Surely you see the conflict of interest here. The rebate operation has no business with you, the customer, except that they have to mail you part of their lump sum if you mail in your goodies. They don't really care if they make you angry, because you are not their customer. They are "Rebate Operation Inc.", and "Sony" or "Toshiba" or whoever the heck you actually bought your product from is who gives them their dough. Since they couldn't care less if they inconvenience you, the guy who is trying to steal a chunk of their change, it is exceedingly common that you will get a rebate denial with some bogus explanation like "No UPC included" or "Receipt illegible" or the world-famous "Postmark date incorrect" even if you've followed the directions perfectly and submitted well before the deadline.

      These headaches, combined with the possibility of the postal service losing your check, make it largely worthwhile to ignore any product with a mail-in rebate unless you are willing to pay the full price.

    3. Re:That's the reason by dougmc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I should start paying attention to whether I get them back. Yes, you should. I've had a number of cases where I didn't get my rebates, and so I called them, and either 1) they magically found it, or 2) they wanted me to send in copies of my copies, and I got my rebate. I've only had a handful of cases where I didn't get my rebates, and it couldn't be blamed on me (like sending it in too late.)


      Personally, I keep an Excel (well, oocalc) spreadsheet of all my rebates, what, where, how much, when sent in, when to check, when received, etc. It's quite helpful. (Wow! I just added up my `how much' field -- $1723.)

    4. Re:That's the reason by Gospodin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They don't really care if they make you angry, because you are not their customer.

      Well, they should care, because if they make me angry at the company that hired them, it's less likely that company will hire them again. The company I am doing business with usually has some interest in good PR.

      Incidentally, I bought a printer in May that came with a $100 mail-in rebate. I just received the check this week. I had written that one off a month ago!

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    5. Re:That's the reason by NotPeteMcCabe · · Score: 5, Funny

      No offense, but if you have to add up your "how much" field, you may want to get a new spreadsheet.

    6. Re:That's the reason by ShakaUVM · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, I handle all the rebates for our company, and even with all the correct documentation, the return rate on rebates is around 50%. When you call, they magically start processing it.

      I think the entire industry is a scam, though I have a friend that works in it, and says that they, like casinos, don't need to cheat to make money.

    7. Re:That's the reason by InvalidError · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mail sometimes gets legitimately lost.

      Given the expenses incurred when applying for rebates, I have made it my policy not to buy into rebated items unless the list price matches the normal list prices of no-rebate stores. Another reason I rarely bother hunting for rebates is that they are often precursors to price reductions and new product introductions. For technology products, I generally consider them as blinking and screaming "End-Of-Life / Discontinued" tags, indicators that I should avoid buying the stuff or at least be particularly wary.

      I have applied for rebates only twice ($15 on a $40 DI-524 and $45 on a $100 Audigy 2ZS) and got both back 2-3 months later. In both cases, the counter prices were already lower than other stores and in line with what I considered to be a fair price so I did not care too much whether or not the rebates came back... but I certainly would have made it a point to make it known to as many potential customers as possible if they did not.

    8. Re:That's the reason by vondo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, they should care, because if they make me angry at the company that hired them, it's less likely that company will hire them again.

      These rebate companies bid for the original company's business by emphasizing their low payout rates. If the finances work the way the OP suggests, then the company that rejects the most can underbid the competition. If the manufacture pays the rebate plus processing fee, it's also less expensive for the manufacturer.

      I buy things with rebates, notably Canon camera gear where the rebate can be hundreds of dollars. But, I always make sure I'll be happy with my purchase if I get bupkis. And, for these large rebates save all the documentation and fight like hell if they try to deny you. You will get it eventually.

    9. Re:That's the reason by griffjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a better strategy, nonetheless, if the mail-in is high enough, I'll go through with it. Filing Better Business Bureau complaints is a great way to get service.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    10. Re:That's the reason by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they, like casinos, don't need to cheat to make money.


      It took a LOOOONG time for casinos to learn that there was more money to be made over the long term from unquestionable integrity than there was from rigging games. I don't believe the rebate industry has learned this yet, because it's too tempting to just sit on a few percent more of the rebates and add them to profit. If someone calls to complain, process theirs, but most people will never call.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  7. Of Course They Do.... by asphaltjesus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bottom of the barrel wage earners working an admittedly unglamorous job tosses a few out. Where's the crime? Who's going to prosecute? Which State regs apply?

    Rebates are a racket, always have been. I know from experience because I admin'd them years ago for a peripherals manufacturer.

    Back to work!

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
    1. Re:Of Course They Do.... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bottom of the barrel wage earners working an admittedly unglamorous job tosses a few out.

      And as we all know, the best way to get a better job is to royally fuck up at your current one. I'm sorry, throwing out rebates in indefensible.

  8. Not surprising by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've gotten into the habit of completely ignoring mail-in rebates because I've never once received one. Over the years, I've sent in maybe as many as 10 rebates, and never gotten any kind of a response.

    Of course, in the fine print of every rebate is something along the lines of, "We have no legal obligation to actually send you a rebate, even if you send this in. If we believe any piece of information is wrong for any reason, we reserve the right to trash your rebate application."

    It's a scam. If they really intended to give you the discount, they'd have an "instant rebate", meaning a price-cut in the store. The whole point of a mail-in rebate is to trick people into thinking things are cheaper than they are. They advertise "$199 w/ mail-in rebate (normally $299)". So you start thinking the product is $199 even though you'll give the store $299 when you buy it. Then, either you forget to send the mail in rebate, or they find some excuse not to honor it. You've just bought the item for $299.

    1. Re:Not surprising by multisync · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a scam. If they really intended to give you the discount, they'd have an "instant rebate", meaning a price-cut in the store. The whole point of a mail-in rebate is to trick people into thinking things are cheaper than they are.


      I'm of the opinion that the whole point of these "rebates" is to harvest the customer's name, address and whatever other information is typically requested.

      I never mail them in. I base my purchasing decisions on the price I pay at the till.
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    2. Re:Not surprising by Surt · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm always shocked by the number of people who report this. I mean, surely if you're not a rebate mailer, you learn at some point not to factor the rebate into the purchase price?
      I've also never had a problem with a rebate. Maybe because I have easy access to a photocopier, and always include a note that indicates that I kept a photocopy of everything in the event that there is a problem with the rebate. I've done about 20 rebates of $10 or more over the last 5 years with zero failures.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Not surprising by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a scam. If they really intended to give you the discount, they'd have an "instant rebate", meaning a price-cut in the store.

      People always say this, but I'm not convinced. I've sent in and received a whole bunch of rebates over time, and I don't immediately recall sending one in and never getting it back. I'm also very careful to follow the instructions to the letter.

      However, it still is better for them because people forget about or don't bother with the rebates. When I got my monitor, it was $300 with a $50 rebate. However, I didn't send in the rebate immediately, it got buried and forgotten about until I unearthed it a few months later, and they kept their $50.

      I think this is probably the biggest reason that they offer rebates instead of in-store discounts. I also wouldn't be surprised that they have people looking out for any procedural issues that would give them an excuse to deny the rebates, but I've never heard any evidence that there's an active conspiracy to defraud or anything.

      (Rebates also means that, if you cut the UPC out, you are probably going to have a hard time returning it to the store.)

    4. Re:Not surprising by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are other reasons. Can't return the product after cutting out the original UPC. Sometimes products break down after a few days, or are not as advertised. And time is money, so the longer they can use your money, the better for them.

      If the rebate system can't be tightened up, it should be outlawed. Bad for the honest merchants, but the system is just too easy to abuse. All this nonsense of sending "proof" of purchase is, as you said, a cover for getting your info, and also a hope that the hassle will discourage some, and generation of excuses for not honoring the rebate. Plus, the inordinate delay is just that much longer they get the use of your money. It's so easy to have much more efficient ways to verify and honor rebates. Like, why not have a nice credit card service that handles the proof of purchase and the rebate, posting the rebate amount to your account the instant you've had the product for 30 days?

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  9. Rebates are a scam by mcelrath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rebates are a scam that allows a company to pad their ledger with artificial profits that get refunded some time later. It's an accounting scam. They make money by having more money in the bank, earning interest, while you don't. They also count on a good fraction of people simply not filling out the rebate form. So it's a form of false advertising that allows them to advertise one price when in fact you have to give them a different amount of money.

    Don't do business with companies that offer rebates. Pay for what things are worth and screw this stupid shell game. I've not gotten my rebate many times, without explanation.

    This crap should be illegal.

    --
    1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    1. Re:Rebates are a scam by thue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This crap should be illegal.

      In my country, Denmark, it is indeed illegal. From what I understand, I am glad it is so.

      Did I mention that we have never had your problem with telemarketing either? Or that email and SMS spam is strictly illegal and swiftly and harshly prosecuted?

      Or that we actually have an efficient and respected state department which looks after consumer rights in cases like deceptive marketing and defective products? For example they recently went after Apple when Apple refused to repair faulty macBooks.

      Sometimes, more and more frequently lately, I am glad I don't live in the US.

    2. Re:Rebates are a scam by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Funny

      In my country, Denmark, it is indeed illegal. From what I understand, I am glad it is so.

      Did I mention that we have never had your problem with telemarketing either? Or that email and SMS spam is strictly illegal and swiftly and harshly prosecuted?

      Or that we actually have an efficient and respected state department which looks after consumer rights in cases like deceptive marketing and defective products?


      Also, due to clever science, the weather is never bad in Denmark, and delicious apples grow from lampposts. (Needless to say, the lamps never burn out as well!) And robots rise from the ground every thursday and wash our cars for free!

      (Christ, get over yourself, Denmarkians.)

    3. Re:Rebates are a scam by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please show me any any such comparisons. I would be very interested in a formal study comparing private/government efficiency. All anecdotal evidence I've heard, and my personal experience, is that government tends to be much less efficient than private industry. Health care is the one that comes to mind. Most western countries with national health care systems spend less of their GDP on health care, yet they cover more people, have lower infant mortality and longer lifespans, and overall, get a lot more for their money than we do. Even in the US, Medicare has much lower overhead than private insurers: something like 6% vs. 30%.

      (I don't have citations off the top of my head. I suppose I could look them up if you want them, but they shouldn't be too hard to find.)

      I see that you mentioned health care later in your post, but I don't think the factors you mentioned are enough to explain the sorry state of our system compared to others. We're hardly the only country that regulates doctors or allows malpractice suits.

      Telecomm/utilities are a natural monopoly, so you do need some type of regulation to keep the customers from getting screwed by the local monopoly. It's not just about monopolies, it's about providing services even when there's no profit incentive. The problem with small communities that couldn't get phone service wasn't that it'd be too expensive to run multiple sets of wires for competing phone companies... it was too expensive to run even one set. Phone service could not be provided there at a price that would allow the phone company to turn a profit. Without government intervention, it simply wouldn't have been available there, but we the people decided telecom was important enough to subsidize.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    4. Re:Rebates are a scam by thue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nice out of context quoting.

      And I don't see what connection there is between the quality of the consumer laws and the tax bracket. You could have the same laws, while retaining your current tax rate, if you just were better at electing your politicians.

  10. arrest warrant for key managers by EMB+Numbers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is so clearly fraud that the MD attorney general should have completed the arrest warrant for key members of Vastech's management by tomorrow morning. With arraignment hopefully postponed until Monday morning, the managers will be well motivated to correct the situation after they post bail.

    In all seriousness, rebate letters that contain irreplaceable original receipts should be handled with the same care as bank deposits, and the same penalty should apply as would apply if a Bank manager discarded all of the night deposits for a bank branch.

    I call this fraud and criminal negligence, and if nobody is prosecuted, it will be a travesty of justice.

    1. Re:arrest warrant for key managers by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everybody here hates CEOs and likes to hold them liable for everything. I want to hold the individuals responsible. A CEO can't track every little thing every employee does. If I have a company with 10k employees and an employee trashes somebody's rebate form, you can't hold the CEO responsible. Hold the employee responsible.

      This is especially true when I hear of engineers writing rootkits or spyware for a company. I want the balls of the engineer who wrote that code. Likewise, if somebody trashes rebate forms, take it out of their pay checks. These are cases of malicious, intentional damage to a customer and the individual should be held responsible for their actions.

    2. Re:arrest warrant for key managers by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CEO is RESPONSIBLE for all his companies actions. if the CEO is such a tool that he does not know what is going on and does not have a competent management team underneath him to make sure things are done right then the pampered ass needs to be fried.

      That is what they get those huge incomes for, it's not for their witty banter or great story telling.

      Fry a CEO or two really hard and you will see the corporate world straighten up overnight. nothing put in line an overpaid prima donna like a real threat of being jailed with icky poor people.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:arrest warrant for key managers by phliar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would the CEO not be responsible for the actions of his company? I didn't send the rebate form to that disgruntled employee, and it's no concern of mine why my rebate ended up in a dumpster. And not the CEO of that outsourced firm, but the one that sold the original item to the consumer. (Just like that rootkit writer -- if he did it for a company, the company is responsible. Sure, the writer needs lessons in ethics, but the company that paid him is the true villain.)

      But taking responsibility is so out of style! Just hire a PR firm to fix up the bad publicity, grease a few politicians' palms, and give that CEO another bonus!

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    4. Re:arrest warrant for key managers by number11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everybody here hates CEOs and likes to hold them liable for everything. I want to hold the individuals responsible. A CEO can't track every little thing every employee does. If I have a company with 10k employees and an employee trashes somebody's rebate form, you can't hold the CEO responsible. Hold the employee responsible.

      The company is the one that pockets the profit. I say, hold the company responsible. Don't be any harsher on them than on an individual. If stealing that amount would put an individual in jail for 30 days, incarcerate the company for 30 days. Send the marshals around to freeze their bank accounts and padlock their doors for 30 days. First time that happens to a Fortune 500 company, that will make people sit up and pay attention.

  11. No surpise... by jak10900 · · Score: 3, Informative

    To my knowledge most rebate handling companies are given x amount of dollars to in turn give out y dollars to the customers. Whatever is leftover is theirs to keep.

    x - y = profit

    So they're not really inclined to process every single rebate form that comes through there.

  12. I always treat rebates as chance to win. by netsavior · · Score: 4, Funny

    Buy this RAM and you have a chance to win 50 dollars by mail!

    Price comparison should always be done while ignoring rebates.

  13. Toothpaste for dinner.... by dashslotter · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    I was flipping bits on an abacus, newb.
  14. Whereas I disagree by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems like half the equipment sitting on my desk right now I bought with the aid of a rebate. I got two rebates on my desktop CPU, I got a rebate on my laptop, a rebate on my wireless router, one on my Wacom tablet, another on my monitor ... all of them have been honored.

    In fact, if you want to go into details, the manufacturer of my laptop actually offered a rebate on it about two months after I bought mine. That pissed me off, so I doctored up a copy of the store receipt with a later date. It was honored, and I'm not sorry.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Whereas I disagree by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      3.5 Float the extra $100 x 20,000 buyers x 2 months and collect the interest.

  15. 1300 * $X is no longer a misdemeanor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's getting into grand theft range if not already there.

    BC

    1. Re:1300 * $X is no longer a misdemeanor by asphaltjesus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll go with your assumption that there is somewhere a statute that is violated. What's the penalty for this crime? Probably a slap on the wrist.

      I'll go with you one further and assume there is a serious crime, with lots of precedence that some prosecutor can win:

      Let's say the rebates are for $20: $26,000 is the amount of the crime. Let's say the rebates are for $50: $65,000 is the amount of the crime. What's the cost to prosecute? Way more than $65,000 after judges, courtrooms and prosecutor costs are estimated. That's not even considering what happens when the rebate processor lawyers-up and drags this thing down and out.

      The company gets a day of bad press and that's about it. HP's CEO/board members got away with far, far worse with practically no penalty whatsoever. Certainly nothing that won't be forgotten in a couple of years.

      Laws are to prosecute the individuals and corporations without enough money to lawyer-up.

      --
      Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
  16. Can't be. by rk · · Score: 4, Funny

    He was far too polite for that.

    1. Re:Can't be. by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  17. Related to Fatwallet's crazy rebate scheme? by Organic+User · · Score: 2, Insightful

    About a month ago the fatwallet community produced a crazy rebate scheme where you profit off bundled software. The scheme originated in this thread. The scheme has since been used for many more deals. I am just wondering if it is related? The rebate T&C say the rebate can not be for more than the cost of the product. The scheme worked by claiming rebates from the retailer (by buying a hardware and software bundle) and the software distributor at the same time and assuming they don't realize your the same person (i.e. lack of communication from the retailer and distributor). To sweeten the scheme you could buy competing software packages and use them for the upgrade rebate. If this is related then Frys must of caught onto the scheme.

  18. Annoying, but they usually work for me.... by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I hate mail-in rebates as much as the next guy, and try to purchase things from vendors that don't use them whenever I can, but I have to say that I don't think I've ever had one *not* work. I totally agree that it is just some accounting trick that should be banished, but none-the-less, they've always worked for me.

    Over the years I've mailed in probably two dozen rebates for various products at brick-and-mortar places like Best Buy, Circuit City, Office Depot, Staples, AT&T/Cingular, etc. I'm referring to $25-$200+ back on things like laptops, TV's, Tivos, software, cell phones, etc. I had a Cingular rebate once that was 4 weeks overdue. One 10 minute phone call and the rebate was re-issued and arrived 3 days later. I've even done a couple of the 'come test drive the new Mazda Whatever and get a $25 gift card' rebates, and those have always arrived as well.

    OTOH, I've never bothered with the '$3.50 rebate on a $5 pack of CD-R' type things, as it's just not worth my time.

    FWIW, I've always carefully followed the directions and have received the rebates within roughly the correct time period as stated. I keep a copy of everything I sent and make a note in my calendar for 6,8,12,whatever weeks away that I should have received it and then just forget about it until then. My point is, rebates suck, but they aren't *always* a scam....

  19. My 2 cents (after $2 rebate) by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I've stopped buying products advertised at a price after rebate. It simply isn't worth the hassle to assemble the appropriate documentation, photocopy it, file the photocopy, and then send it in. Then, 6 to 8 weeks later, start phoning the company asking where my rebate is. All that to save a few bucks on some cheap piece of Chinese-made crap simply isn't worth my time. I'll continue to review the ads and buy something I want when it is truly on sale. As a result, I've pretty much stopped going in to Fry's since nearly everything has some sort of rebate attached to it. I never go to Best Buy either, partly for the same reason, but mainly because their prices are always high and their service sucks so bad.

    Does this matter to a place like Fry's. Admittedly, no it doesn't, but I feel better about it.

  20. And this is why..... by Roskolnikov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When shopping for tech toys I always treat the rebate as secondary, the price has to be the lowest before the rebate, if the rebate is instant even better but you just can rely on the companies servicing these things
    to come through; read the fine print on most of the rebates and you will find that you are responsible for making sure the company has received and processed your rebate, once its sent you've more than likely sent the only copy you have along with the original qualifying UPC/product label, once that's lost your chances at getting the rebate fulfilled are next to nil.

    This kind of news just amuses me, it is obvious though that the company didn't do this intentionally, that kind of move would have involved shredding.

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  21. Grammar Nazi in the House by The+Monster · · Score: 5, Funny

    If this is related then Frys must of caught onto the scheme.
    Please stop killing English.
    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  22. Let's Play "Rumor"! by fm6 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, Fry's is the worst retailer on the planet, and rebates are an evil scam. But...

    I read the original Mercury-News story earlier today. It's version is that Vastech is a computer accessories company that distributes through Fry's (among other retailers) and that processes its own rebates (hey, throwing them out is "processing" isn't it?). The dumped envelopes were discovered by an employee at a neighboring company, who gave them to his boss, who gave them to Dean Takahashi, who wrote the Mercury-News story.

    The story was quoted in an article on Consumerist, which in turn is quoted in this article. By the time Slashdot had posted it, the envelope's had been retrieved by the reporter, and Vastech had morphed from a flaky hardware reseller to a Fry's rebate processing contractor!

    Ok, it's natural that a story should change a little as it passes from ear to ear. But to get so many facts wrong after just two iterations? Come on, people!

    Another thing that bothers me is Takahashi's outrage over those 1300 envelopes. Not that I don't share his hatred of rebates. But the big offenders are not little companies like Vastech (which would probably have gone out of business soon anyway, even if Fry's hadn't just cancelled all their orders). It's big companies that go through the motions of honoring rebates, but almost always have an excuse for not paying or an indefinite "processing delay". If we're going to be pissed off, let's be pissed off at the right people!

  23. Re:I'll bet... by sricetx · · Score: 2, Funny

    "1300 Unopened Liberty Mutual Insurance Payments Found In Dumpster." It would be from 1300 people who had filed big insurance claims, of course, so the company could get out of paying the claims by arguing the customers hadn't paid their premiums. Never trust an insurance company, all of them are crooks.

  24. Re:Scam? by The+Salamander · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You could try contesting the charge on your credit card... (If you used one..)

    I got the run-around on a $100 rebate on a $2000 fujitsu laptop, and my CC company happily took back the entire $2k until I finally got it.

    Strangely enough, just days after the chargeback they seemed very interested in fulfilling the rebate.

  25. Especially when you have a PO Box by quanta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where I live, the US Post Office doesn't send a uniformed employee to my house with the mail. I have to drive down 2 miles of dirt road and dial into my box at the local Post Office.

    Needless to say, this cuts out a LOT of rebates, which demand sending the check by US Mail to your street address. Which in my case will just get bounced.

    Occasionally, the form will accept the 9 digit zip code, so I can sneak that in and hope for the best.

    I've offered to write a small database to match the PO boxes with the actual street addresses, but they (the PO), couldn't care less.

    Always wondered if it's legal to force US mail to a non-deliverable address, but I haven't found out anything which describes this situation.

  26. Often not the retail that plays the game by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You'll find items on Newegg or Zipzoomfly often have rebates. However you'll notice it's never a rebate from them, it's from the manufacturer. Manufacturers like to run promos sometimes to try and get people to buy their brand. Well, you can't fault the providers for helping you know about this and how to take advantage of it. You'll also notice, at least in the case of Newegg, they list the primary price as the actual price you pay.

    Just don't go getting mad at the wrong party.

    1. Re:Often not the retail that plays the game by RobFlynn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's something I really like about NewEgg. Oh, this Hard Drive is only $70.00. Oh, neat, it also comes with a $30.00 rebate! I don't buy for the rebate, if I like the $70.00 price then I knew right up front that's what I'll be paying. If the manufacturer actually pays out the $30.00, then that's a bonus.

      --

      ---
      Rob Flynn
      Pidgin
  27. Small claims court. by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've posted this story before so I won't go into a lot of detail, but my brother (the anal retentive one in the family) against my advice bought one of those too good to be true CD-R spindle deals where the rebate is just about as much as the purchase price of the spindle pack.

    Months later and after much friendly teasing from me without even the hint of a rebate, my brother got angry and filed a small claims suit against them that was ultimately successful. After maybe an hour or two of research and an afternoon at the courthouse he received his rebate along with all of the expenses incurred in pursuing his claim. I was actually surprised at how simple the process was and effective the outcome.

    My point is, there are ways you can get that rebate without incurring any cost to you.

    1. Re:Small claims court. by glwtta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My point is, there are ways you can get that rebate without incurring any cost to you.

      Unless you count time and dignity.

      (Oddly enough, I place both of those above a nigh-free CDR spindle)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  28. No surprise! by markwelch · · Score: 5, Informative
    There is NO VALID BUSINESS REASON for rebates in the 21st century. Given the high cost to process and issue small-value rebates, and the damage to reputatin, the ONLY real business reason is the expectation that a substantial number of the rebates will not be paid. A rebate offer is a way of denying some consumers the advertised price. After the many disclaimers and contradictory terms in the rebate language, and the nit-picking and deliberate indifference of rebate processors, deliberate misconduct or gross negligence (1,300 unopened rebate envelopes in a trash can) is just the "icing on the cake."

    I can't understand why some enterprising state legislators don't introduce a bill to prohibit the use of mail-in rebates entirely, or to create a "rebate death penalty" whereby no retailer or manufacturer could advertise rebates after proof that valid rebate requests were rejected. Of course, one issue is that states collect sales tax on the rebate amount (since the consumer pays the full price, and gets a rebate for the purchase price but not for the extra sales tax).

    I recently returned a laptop computer ("$549 minus $200 rebates = $349") to Circuit City (this was really a $400 laptop marked up to $549 so they could boast a price of $349 "after rebates"). It was a "sham" offer. First, the two rebates ($50 and $150) were BOTH to be sent to Circuit City (at two different addresses in two different states), but although both were advertised together, each form clearly stated that only ONE rebate would be paid "at most." Then I read on, and found a complete and total disclaimer of ANY duty by Circuit City or any other entity to process or pay any rebate; there was even a provision requiring that I wait 120 days for the rebate to be issued, along with another provision provided that any claims regarding unpaid rebates would not be considered unless they were be presented to Circuit City within 90 days after purchase. When I called for clarification, I was given many reassurances that contradicted the paperwork, but a flat refusal to put anything in writing; when I returned the computer to the store, they insisted that my concerns were unfounded, but again would not put any of their reassurances in writing. Of course, Circuit City took $80 out of my refund as a "restocking fee," despite the fact that their fraud and their refusal to honor their promise was the sole basis for my return.

    Fry's is certainly a "bad actor" in the rebate space; over the past 20 years, I've caught them many times advertising rebates that have expired or combining mutually-exclusive rebates together. But in fairness, Fry's Electronics seems to offer FEWER "deals" that include rebates than the larger chains like Best Buy, Circuit City, and CompUSA. I have lots of reasons to dislike Fry's, but I can only think of ONE product that I purchased at Fry's that had a rebate -- and I bought it because the price before rebate was still lower than the competing products. (I probably wouldn't have spent the postage to mail the rebate form if the purchase weren't on behalf of our 12-year-old child; getting the crumpled-postcard $5 check four months later was a nice, unexpected bonus.)

    In terms of fairness and honesty, one of the new "scams" is the use of "debit cards" to fulfill rebate promises; these are a huge hassle and are intended to create additional profit, and I was outraged to receive one of these instead of a check (as promised) from Symantec a couple years ago; I won't buy another Symantec product.

    I now mentally edit out rebates whenever I look at any offer. In the cell-phone store, I ignore the large bold price because I know it reflects the application of one or more rebates which might or might not be paid.

    --
    -- http://www.MarkWelch.com/ Pleasanton California
  29. Re:It was done on purpose by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    D'oh! Preview button, gotta remember that. Such clauses are usually considered unenforceable by the courts, and the rebate company would have to honor it regardless.

    --
    Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  30. Re:Gullible is no longer in the dictionary by Original+Replica · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what really amazes me are people like yourself who actually believe that the CEO didn't do this himself.

    Regardless of if the CEO actually did the physical work,the CEO should be held responsible. Here's how I see it, if an employee does something good and the company makes $$$, what share of that does the employee get and what share does the CEO and other upper management get? Why should the distribution of criminal guilt be any different? All of the rewards and none of the responsibility just doesn't ring true to me.

    --
    We are all just people.
  31. My only fry's rebate experience... by merreborn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought an HP laptop from Fry's a bit over a year ago for $900, and was told there was a $100 rebate.

    At the register, I was told that they didn't have the rebate form, and that I'd receive one in the mail.

    3 copies in separate envelopes showed up in my mail several *weeks* later. Weeks after the rebate period had expired.

  32. Re:Gullible is no longer in the dictionary by virgil_disgr4ce · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think words like "CEO" and "employee" are pretty out of context here for good old Vastech. I think the words we want are "hey you" and "that guy that's that other guy's cousin."

    OT: Vastech? Did they used to sell Vaseline or do vasectomies or something? Did someone tell them, "hey, rebates man, that's where the REAL money is!"

  33. Stop Shopping at Fry's by FuzzyL0g1c · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, I bought a computer for my wife from Fry's in Fremont, but then she got one from her Dad for her bday. So we called and they said we could return the computer to the Fry's in Menlo Park. After waiting for a long time, we were given a refund for all but 6$. They said that this was due to the fact the tax in Fremont and Menlo Park is different. I questioned this, as it doesn't make sense. I can buy a shirt at Gap in CA and return it to Gap in UT and get the same refund. Anyway, the manager there, was very rude to my wife and I. My wife was shaken up, so I took her to the car, then came back and went to go talk to the Manager again. He blew up and threatened me the moment he saw me; he kept asking if I wanted to fight. It was like somebody in Jr. High, he did the whole head bob thing and kept saying: wanna fight? wanna fight? I said no,(and he said "sure you do!") and left discouraged while he egged me on. I was unable to beleive what I just endured. He then followed me out of the store and said his name and said not to forget it; which just added to my disbeleif. The manager followed me out of the store and called me out in the parking lot? Anyway, I discovered tigerdirect.com and microcenter and all sorts of other online shops and haven't shopped at a Fry's in 2 years. I suggest the same to everyone else. Oh, the manager's name was Joel Byers; he's the fighter from the Menlo Park Fry's. ("Joel Byers, don't forget the name" he said out front) I wrote a complaint (the first time I ever did to anyone) to Fry's corporate and never received a reply. That's just how they are.

  34. a bad employer by the_fat_kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    no one notices it because they saw you do the same thing last month, and the month before that, and every month since they were hired.

    rebates are a BS way of advertising. If they want to lower the price of some thing, great! I'm all for that.
    Just don't tell me that if I pay full price now you will give me some money back in 6 to 8 weeks.

    I try to ignore the false price they like to post on the shelf, that includes the rebate, and look closely to see how much I'm realy paying.

    --
    -- Sig under construction...
    1. Re:a bad employer by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've only sent in for a few rebates, and I received every single one. Usually I don't figure it into any buying decision because I'm always suspicious, but those on things I happened to be buying anyway, I've always received them.

      In fact in one case they screwed up and gave me the money twice.

    2. Re:a bad employer by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My biggest pet peeve with rebates (other than not receiving them) is that in Ontario, we have 14% sales tax. And we have to pay sales tax, and don't get it refunded on the amount of the rebate. This can add up to quite a bit ($14 on a $100 rebate for those who can't do math). Whereas if they just take the rebate amount off the extra purchase price, then you don't have to pay the tax.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  35. send as registered mail. by 0xC2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are either lucky or a rebate mole. Keeping track is not always enough. I followed the t-mobile sidekick II rebate to the letter, and even took precaution to photocopy everything. Waited requisite 8 weeks for official response that never came. The SOBs gave me the royal runaround. Rebaters claim they never received the forms. T-mobile said I would have to resubmit (with photocopy bar code), so the rebaters could deny, before t-mobile could acknowledge my complaint. Weeks later I'm officially denied due to missing the original bar code. Now t-mobile can officially act on my complaint, which was basically "f--- you". Moral: photocopy everything AND SEND BY REGISTERED MAIL!

    --
    Be heard || Be herd
  36. Re:Me too! by Tiny+Fist · · Score: 5, Funny
    (shakes tiny fist)

    Cut it out.

  37. Re:Smackdown by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh Cool! BAD Employee, NO SOUP for YOU!!!

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  38. Wow... all the horror stories by NitroWolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, I'm surprised at all the horror stories about the rebates. I'm sure some of them, maybe a lot of them are true to an extent.

    However, I've sent in hundreds (Close to 300) of rebates over the past 3 or 4 years, and I've had exactly 6 come up with problems, which were resolved with a call to the company or to send in copies of my rebate submission.

    One company in particular, which I'm not sure what name they use, though, so they might actually be part of the retailer itself, as opposed to a rebate company proper, has been the lions share of problems. They claim part of my submission was not included... Well, I always keep copies, so I know what is included and what isn't, but on more than on occasion, they claim they got the receipt, but not the UPC or something... the funny thing is, the submission has the UPC and receipt on the SAME PHOTOCOPIED PAGE... so it's physically impossible not to receive one without the other... yet they claim it is so. Obviously they try to scam some people... Either way, once I send them in another copy of the SAME page, they send me my rebate.

    But, I digress. My point is that out of the nearly 300 rebates I've sent in, a very small percentage has ever given me a problem, and a large part of that very small percentage has been from one company in particular. Otherwise, I've always received my rebates without hassle, even if it takes 4 or 5 months for them to arrive.

    There's a program out there called "Rebate! Rebate!" that keeps track of your rebates. I don't have a link, but it works pretty well.

    I like rebates... kind of a pain to send in, but they do offer some really good/incredible deals now and then and are worth the effort, so long as you follow the requirements exactly, which usually isn't that hard.

  39. Misleading Summary by borderpatrol · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a Fry's employee (while no fanboy), I thought I would point something out.

    Vastech is NOT a "rebate processor hired by Fry's Electronics", it is the manufacturer who offered the rebate. They make small PC mods and accessories such as case fans and USB harddrive enclosures.
    You can see their webiste at http://www.vastechinc.com/

    Fry's Electronics does not offer any rebates themselves. All the rebates are though the manufacturer of the item you are purchasing. We even have a rebate department in each store to try and help you force though rebates or resubmit them.

    While everyone likes to poke fun at Fry's (the Walmart of electronics stores, I call them), they were not really in the wrong here, it really should be Vastech found at fault. I do hope Fry's sees this as an opportunity to put in some good will and issue their own refund checks to all affected customers.

    --
    Yeah I've been starving them, teasing them, singing off key. Me may mah mo, me mo ma me.
  40. Did not work with TigerDirect by walterbyrd · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to do the same thing, and it worked with CompUSA, and BestBuy.

    But, not TigerDirect. TigerDirect swore up and down that they would honor the gaureenty that they proudly display on their web-site, if I sent them all the receipts and photocopies of certificates via. certified mail.

    So I spent another $3.50, stood in line at the post office, etc. When I called back, they acted like they had no idea what I was talking about. Unless I wanted to take them to court over $80, I had no recourse.

    TigerDirect also require an insanely bothersome online process before you even mail in the receipts.

    That was the one-and-only time I ever did business with TigerDirect.

    Read rippoff-report about TigerDirect, I wish I had.

  41. Re:Class Action, anyone? by rts008 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, and they will taunt you again.

    Perhaps we could build a large wooden badger.....

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  42. Re:Gullible is no longer in the dictionary by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh man.. there's a vas deferens between rebates and surgery.

  43. If something I want has a mail-in rebate on it... by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I ask the sales person to take the amount of the rebate off the price. They are argue that they can't, and when I go to leave they just end up getting authorization from their manager. I get the rebate, instantly, and without the tax worries (I live in BC, so I know your pain).

    And if they try to call my bluff, I grab a flyer and go to one of the other stores in town to get a 'price match', in which I get them to factor in the rebate. So far I've been lucky and haven't lost yet!

  44. You accept this corruption? ! by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the manufacturer actually pays out the $30.00, then that's a bonus

    Heck that's shady business practice. You accept this kind of corrupt behaviour in your country? Hmm, your place is more messed up than I thought it was. Personally I'd be hassling my political representative to get the law changed so said companies get hauled over hot coals metaphorically speaking if they don't honour their promises.

    Actually, I don't really get the 'rebate' idea really - how does it work legally? Why don't they just get told by the law to sell the 70 dollar hard drive with a 30 dollar rebate for 40 dollars at point of sale? I understand how it works from their point of view - that not everybody will claim their rebate, so they win - but this seems very dodgy business practice. How is it structured? do you buy the drive for 70 dollars and inside the box is a slip you post off and they supposedly post back the rebate? Is this common practice?

    cheers

    1. Re:You accept this corruption? ! by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rebates have two purposes. One, they don't lose any money really on these (few really send them in on time, and correctly), and if someone is buying one of these rebate items they rip the UPC code off right away. Once you rip your UPC code off it's extremely hard to return it. Making sure customers can only exchange if defective seems like a pretty good reason unto itself to do a $10-$20 rebate for a $60 HD.

    2. Re:You accept this corruption? ! by bentcd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A mail-in rebate is one manifestation of the concept of market segmentation. The basic idea is that you have a product that costs you $10 to manufacture and distribute and figuring in your fixed costs and such you break even at $12, so you can sell it at, say, $15 and be profitable. What irks you, however, is that you /know/ that there are people out there that would buy it at $25 because it's so useful. If you set the price at that level, however, you lose all those customers that wouldn't pay more than $15 (because they're poor or whatever). So what you do is set the price at $25 and include a $10 mail-in rebate. The rich people will buy it at $25 and probably ignore the rebate (money isn't that valuable to them) while the poor people will find it opportune to spend the time to mail in the rebate request, spend some time on the phone to nag about not having received the money etc.

      It would have been more ideal to have two different formal markets, of course, one for poor people and one for rich people and then have different prices in those two markets. This is often not feasible in practice.

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    3. Re:You accept this corruption? ! by cnock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A third purpose: to gather names, phone numbers, email address, and physical addresses of people who buy their products. Then their spam and telemarketing are legal due to the "established business relationship".

  45. Re:If something I want has a mail-in rebate on it. by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most stores in the US will not honor a 'rebate' price. Sales prices are fine, but they often sell rebate items below cost figuring that the majority of people will not cash in the rebate.

  46. Re:Bad employee by SnapShot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A good employee would have opened the envelopes, copied all the personal information into the junk mail, telemarketing, and spam lists and THEN shredded the rebate forms.

    What do you think these rebates are for, anyway?

    --
    Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.