Slashdot Mirror


Inventor of GMR Bids To Shake Up Storage, Again

Nrbelex writes "Stuart S. P. Parkin, an I.B.M. research fellow largely unknown outside a small fraternity of physicists, thinks he is poised to bring about a breakthrough that could increase the amount of data stored on a chip or a hard drive by a factor of a hundred. This is the man who pioneered exploiting the giant magnetoresistance effect in the 90s, causing disk storage to jump ahead of the Moore's Law curve. If he proves successful in developing 'racetrack memory,' he will create a universal computer memory, one that can potentially replace DRAM and flash memory chips, and make a 'disk drive on a chip' possible. It could begin to replace flash memory in three to five years, scientists say."

220 comments

  1. I know he was evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is the man who pioneered exploiting the giant magnetoresistance... Is it me or does this sound like he's making use of a group of people who took X-Men WAY too seriously?!
  2. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Enough space for all the porn in the internet... at least for now.

    1. Re:Finally... by XenoPhage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Enough space for all the porn in the internet... at least for now. I disagree.. I don't think the Internet has enough space for porn, it seems to keep spilling over into my browser...
      --
      XenoPhage
      Technological Musings
    2. Re:Finally... by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 0

      "I disagree.. I don't think the Internet has enough space for porn, it seems to keep spilling over into my browser..."

      Just as that sock of yours doesn't have enough room for what you keep spil... ok, ok, I've gone too far.

      I apologize.

    3. Re:Finally... by XenoPhage · · Score: 1

      Just as that sock of yours doesn't have enough room for what you keep spil... ok, ok, I've gone too far.

      I apologize. Hey, get out of my sock draw... er.. I mean, what are you talking about?

      --
      XenoPhage
      Technological Musings
    4. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you build it, they will cum...

    5. Re:Finally... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      draw... er.. THANKYOU! Finally someone spells it right! :P
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    6. Re:Finally... by CaptDeuce · · Score: 1

      I don't think the Internet has enough space for porn, it seems to keep spilling over into my browser...

      Please... don't use the words porn, spill, and browser in the same sentence...

      --
      "Where's my other sock?" - A. Einstein
    7. Re:Finally... by ekimminau · · Score: 1

      If porn is spilling into your browser it sounds to me like you need to sit further back from your computer. Just a thought.

      --
      Armaments, 2-9-21 And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade' N
  3. Oh, no! Not the dreaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    three to five years again. Every revolutionary storage tech is always ready in "three to five years", and probably always will be :(

    1. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I agree. Especially on storage. It seems for years I've been hearing where Seagate or IBM or whomever has a new tech that is going to do XX GB per square centimeter and it will be on the market in three to five years... we're still having issues getting beyond blu-ray/hd-dvd. Does this technology take forever to filter down or are we being taken on a ride of fantasy yet again?

      And don't get me wrong, I'm not a naysayer. I was for this to happen. I want a PDA sized gadget with all my music and the library on congress on with the battery life of a nuclear submarine but I know that not a whole hell of a lot has changed on the shelves of Best Buy.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound dissatisfied, are you out of your HD again?
      Scratch some porn.

    3. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by solios · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does this technology take forever to filter down or are we being taken on a ride of fantasy yet again?

      The CD-ROM came out in the eighties. Yet it wasn't until the very late 90s that CD burners and blank media were widely available to consumers - at which point video DVDs were common, though it wasn't until the early 00s that DVD-Rs popped up on the market. While they became faster and more afforable much faster than CDs, they're still ultimately an evolution of the same technology and form factor. Anything significantly different is going to take longer to trickle down - flash memory has been around for just as long, but is just now hitting the price-to-capacity point where it's become consumer-friendly for a variety of devices.

      I had a 4x SCSI CD burner in 1998 and thought paying a couple of hundred for the burner and a buck a blank was AWESOME. Now I have 16x double-layer DVD burners in all of my home machines (total cost : much less than that crotchety old 4x burner), and am paying less than a buck a blank for more than seven times the storage capacity.

      Blu-Ray burners are currently retailing for 500$ and up; HD-DVD for 600$ and up, and the media is between 10$ and 25$ per disk. At those price points, I'd say we're still having issues getting to BR/HD-DVD, let alone beyond it. In five years these burners will be under 100$ and the media will be under 5$; at which point the technology in the article will hopefully be hitting the wild at a price point similar to where Blu Ray and HD-DVD are now - prohibitively expensive for consumers, but available for those who actually need it.

    4. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

      Not sure if this article is dated, but as I (poorly) understand it, Hitachi already developed a DVD that dwarfed HDDVD and BluRay.
      http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_zdpcm/is_200508/ai_n14908621
      Please tell me if there have been updates.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    5. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by Amouth · · Score: 1

      not always..

      http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/research/recording_head/pr/PerpendicularAnimation.html

      Perpendicualr Recording came out very very very fast after it's concept.. hell i want to say it was less than 3 months between release of idea to owning a drive with that tech.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    6. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah. Because there certainly has not been a leap from hard drives the size of a washing machine, to drives the size of a toaster, to drives of modern form factor. And there definitely has not been a progression from 1 megabyte to 20 megabyte to 200 megabyte to 1 gigabyte to 20 gigabyte to 150 gigabytes... No siree, it's all a big lie.

      Everyone knows that hard drives are vaporware. And the idea of computer performance increasing exponentially? I mean who the hell would believe that shit.

    7. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by mikael · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Just 20 years ago, a student was lucky to get a 1 Megabyte disk quota on a 200 Megabyte hard drive. Now the flash memory on a digital camera is 10 times that amount.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      That animation explains why the technology came out so fast. Apparently perpendicular recording is made possible by the application of a technology which has been mature for decades... disco. Very interesting.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    9. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the reason storage media is delayed over and over is that our dear friends lobbying Congress for ever more restrictive copyright laws have to have the proper DRM for any storage medium that comes out before it is released. From CPRM to AACS.

    10. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, that's a hard disk DVR that also burns DVDs. The terabyte is just a hard drive.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    11. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

      I agree that the article I posted relates to a DVR (should have RTFA a little closer), but I swear that I read that Hitachi had developed a 160GB DVD format. Perhaps I didn't read that FA closer too, but the line item was clear that they thought Blu Ray and HD DVD could be in trouble.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    12. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      That animation explains why the technology came out so fast. Apparently perpendicular recording is made possible by the application of a technology which has been mature for decades... disco. Very interesting.

      So that explains the dancing clean suit men in the Intel commercials...

    13. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by jcr · · Score: 1

      This guy has a track record. He's already been responsible for a massive jump in disk capacities.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    14. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      The power of boogie, is there anything it can't do?

    15. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      My father worked for ICL in South Africa when they got an additional 8MB of RAM for their mainframe server. It was the size of a small garage, and he was responsible for debugging it, which at that point still meant climbing inside and flicking cockroaches off the solenoids.

    16. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Blu-Ray burners are currently retailing for 500$ and up; HD-DVD for 600$ and up, and the media is between 10$ and 25$ per disk. At those price points, I'd say we're still having issues getting to BR/HD-DVD, let alone beyond it. In five years these burners will be under 100$ and the media will be under 5$; at which point the technology in the article will hopefully be hitting the wild at a price point similar to where Blu Ray and HD-DVD are now - prohibitively expensive for consumers, but available for those who actually need it.

      I'll wager with you that it will be less than 3 years, and that the media will be less than $3 a blank.

      What is also different now is that people have backup hard drives - in the 90s almost no one had a spare hard drive, perhaps an extra one in the machine. But just a spare hanging around for backups? No. Now, they are in every store.

      The humble CD-R,DVD-R has competition - those harddrives and flash drives it did not have 7 years back. And those devices are faster and more competitive in key areas. Especially cost - a 500 GB harddrives cost less than $90 on Pricewatch. That is about 106 4.7GB DVDs in capacity at only twice the cost. Figuring time involved burning - that is less expensive.

      I don't even think Blu-ray or HD-DVD is that exciting from a capacity standpoint for back-ups. DVD-Rs are only convenient for me right now when I give data to friends - that's it.

      Perhaps HVD will come out soon and that is the only thing I am looking forward to in the area of backing up on optical disks.
    17. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by 2.7182 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nuclear submarines don't run on batteries.

    18. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Nuclear submarines don't run on batteries. They don't ? So you're saying they don't have "Energetic Bunnies" in them either like in "The Hunt For Naked Red October" ?

      Ah, wait, sorry, wrong film, must've had my sections mixed up in the rental store
      *blush*
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    19. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Because there certainly has not been a leap from hard drives the size of a washing machine, to drives the size of a toaster, to drives of modern form factor. And there definitely has not been a progression from 1 megabyte to 20 megabyte to 200 megabyte to 1 gigabyte to 20 gigabyte to 150 gigabytes... No siree, it's all a big lie.

      There hasn't been that much progression in every area, try racing modern disk drives and you'll find they're sorely lacking in that department. :(

      And *my* first hard drive was 5 megs (divided in I can't remember how many floppies because that's all the CP/M related OS knew how to handle), so there.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    20. Re:Oh, no! Not the dreaded by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Maybe you meant this.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  4. Racetrack memory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already lose enough money at the racetrack, now I will be losing it on my computer too. =(

    cac

  5. Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 years? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What? All of you? You're all using this man's technology right now. Accusations of this product being vaporware do not account for the man's track record (no pun intended). You should all give this man a little credit, okay?

  6. Interesting Concept by JordanL · · Score: 1

    I made the mistake of RTFA, ensuring this wasn't the Frost Pist (tm), but what the article describes sounds like an interesting technology. The medium involves coiled wire on a silicon chip and "sliding" magnetic ones and zeros down "notches" in the wire.

    1. Re:Interesting Concept by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      The medium involves coiled wire on a silicon chip and "sliding" magnetic ones and zeros down "notches" in the wire.
      From the article's description, it sounds like it isn't "sliding" magnetic data in a metaphorical sense, but actually physically sliding magnets around. This sounds kinda like the nanomechanical computers the hard-code nanotech people (Drexler, etc.) talk about, although I'm not clear if it's quite down to that scale, yet.

      It could be very cool, but I do wonder about the shock resistance of such a device.

    2. Re:Interesting Concept by harrkev · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the article's description, it sounds like it isn't "sliding" magnetic data in a metaphorical sense, but actually physically sliding magnets around.
      TFA is far from clear on this point. If it IS mechanical, I would have serious doubts about its reliability. If there are no moving parts, then he has just re-invented Bubble Memory
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    3. Re:Interesting Concept by Climate+Shill · · Score: 3, Informative

      This New Scientist article from centuries ago is slightly clearer.

    4. Re:Interesting Concept by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      It sounds for all the world like some kind of tiny electromagnetic abacus.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    5. Re:Interesting Concept by MBCook · · Score: 1

      You're right, that is better, but I'm a bit unclear still. This really sounds like a microscopic and magnetic version of delay line memory. Is that really what this is?

      I'm still amazed that delay line memories were ever used in consumer products (like calculators).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:Interesting Concept by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's very similar to bubble memory, only the loops the magnetic domains travel on are now vertical, giving much higher density and speed.

    7. Re:Interesting Concept by fractoid · · Score: 1

      The medium involves coiled wire on a silicon chip and "sliding" magnetic ones and zeros down "notches" in the wire. Yep. It sounds like a nanotech abacus, with one bead on each wire. Relevant quote (for people who haven't R'd TFA):

      His research group is able to slide the tiny magnets along notched nanowires at speeds greater than 100 meters a second. Since the tiny magnetic domains have to travel only submolecular distances, it is possible to read and write magnetic regions with different polarization as quickly as a single nanosecond -- far faster than existing storage technologies. One poster mentioned wear problems with nanomachines. I'm fairly sure that well-designed nanotech can work without friction damage. Take DMD displays for example. DLP projector bulbs wear out as normal, but I've never heard of the DMD chips themselves failing.
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    8. Re:Interesting Concept by TheLink · · Score: 1

      If it's a delay line what happens when the power is switched off?

      With a normal hard drive, the data on the platter persists, and if you switch it back on the platter respins again and the data can be read again.

      --
  7. Racetrack Memory & The New Tron Moview by tulsaoc3guy · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, racetrack memory... just in time for the parimutuel betting scene in the new Tron movie. See: http://movies.ign.com/articles/819/819271p1.html/

    1. Re:Racetrack Memory & The New Tron Moview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your link is brok-ed :(

      Try this: Tron is On.

  8. Awesome! by illegibledotorg · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it means my computer gets to look like that thing from TFA, then I'm SO in!

    1. Re:Awesome! by SC-James · · Score: 1, Funny

      But where is the cup holder?

    2. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I also like that they managed to get a picture of a chick in there as well!

    3. Re:Awesome! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I always wanted a computer designed by Willy Wonka.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    4. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want one of those in my iPod.

    5. Re:Awesome! by Climate+Shill · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it's ever said "Death to the fleshy ones !", but you can tell it's thinking it.

    6. Re:Awesome! by EdBear69 · · Score: 1

      -- Insert Obligatory Beowulf Cluster Comment here. --

      --
      I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV...
    7. Re:Awesome! by hey! · · Score: 1

      On one hand, yes, your computer will look like the avatar of the pipes screensaver. On the other hand, the bad news is that the picture was taken with a scanning electron micrograph. You'll be able to fit a thousand of 'em on the head of a pin. On the other other hand, the good news is that that will explain your hygiene: "I can't take a shower because I'm afraid I'll lose the company's server farm."

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  9. Three to five years is OK... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    to make a working lab prototype with limited functionality. It will take a lot longer to drive out cost and increase reliability sufficiently for this to be used in mass consumer applications.

    Update of electronic devices typically takes quite a while. NAND flash was invented in the 1980s yet only really caught on in approx 2002.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  10. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No. All peoples claims should be approached with a skeptic eye. What I will do is not discard this man as a crackpot immediately. Many men that have created great things also had crackpot ideas.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Re:Potential.. by east+coast · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine, 10,000GB of RAM.

    I have that in my laptop. Unfortunately I only have a 2 gig harddrive but I do have 56k on my video card.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  12. But look at how big drives ARE getting? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    A decade ago, terabytes were a lot more than a thousand bucks, for sure! So, drives have been getting bigger, it's just that, there's been a few releases of Windows along the way!

    --
    This is my sig.
  13. Library conversion by Per+Wigren · · Score: 5, Funny

    allow every consumer to carry data equivalent to a college library on small portable devices Now, I'm confused. How many College Libraries are there in a Library of Congress?
    --
    My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    1. Re:Library conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many College Libraries are there in a Library of Congress? That depends - are you talking troy or fluid?
    2. Re:Library conversion by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

      That depends - are you talking troy or fluid?

      Metric.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    3. Re:Library conversion by Climate+Shill · · Score: 1

      How many College Libraries are there in a Library of Congress? That depends - are you talking troy or fluid?

      Don't be rediculous - the Library of Troy burnt down in 1187 BC.

    4. Re:Library conversion by Climate+Shill · · Score: 1

      ...and it was small enough to be lost in a sack.

    5. Re:Library conversion by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      A better way of measuring vast amounts of storage in manner relevant to the iPod generation would be the "RIAA". The actual value of this unit would continuously increase depending upon the total number of musical tracks in existence at any given point in time. This would allow it to scale nicely with advances in storage technology. For example, "My MP3 player has one RIAA of storage". That's all you would ever need.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:Library conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont get this joke
      what am i missing?

    7. Re:Library conversion by fractoid · · Score: 1

      If only we could find that sack, we'd be rich! Or even better...

      ...we could get Helen of Troy in the sack? ;)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    8. Re:Library conversion by mspohr · · Score: 1
      Library of Congress 30 million books

      Good university library 5-10 million books

      Standard university library 1 million books

      Generic college library 0.5 million books

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    9. Re:Library conversion by Keybounce · · Score: 1

      Library of Congress 30 million books
      Good university library 5-10 million books

      "Oh, three or four"
  14. 3rd dimension and cooling by snooo53 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I skimmed TFA, it states that this development will take microelectronics into the 3rd dimension, but doesn't really state how these magnetic loops translate into 3 dimensions... does anyone have a better reference for the technology? Also what kind of heat issues will arise (since packing they will be packing more transistors which presumably means more heat) and how can those be dealt with beyond the current ways of using massive cooling systems and shrinking the wire size?

    The article talks about how great and fast this is going to be, but doesn't go into how one fabricates wire loops on a semiconductor die, or how one would stack them in 3 dimensions

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    1. Re:3rd dimension and cooling by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's the concept, with a nice animated gif: http://www.almaden.ibm.com/spinaps/research/sd/?racetrack

      The genius of the design is that the bits can be moved along the nanowires, allowing tens to hundreds of bits or maybe more to be accessed by only one reader. The readers can be fabricated in an array on a chip, and the wires can be hung from above, storing the data vertically. AFAIK they haven't yet gotten to the point of figuring out fabrication issues for the nanowire parts, like making a vertically oriented array and aligning them to readers. So far they have been working on getting the racetrack part working. That is, they have been working on using an electric current to shift magnetic domains longitudinally along a nanowire, and reading/writing the domains. And actually, the article seems to suggest that they are ignoring the 3-dimensional nanowire fabrication issues for now, and are going to make prototypes with the wires fabricated traditionally, 2-dimensionally, on a chip surface, which may still be competitive with Flash.

      As for heat issues, Hopefully the amount of current necessary will be small and thus the wires themselves will generate little heat. I would imagine that this design would have fewer transistors than, say, a DRAM, since the transistors will not be storing the data themselves. The transistors remain 2-dimensional, only on the chip surface. The wires are the only 3-dimensional part.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    2. Re:3rd dimension and cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but doesn't go into how one fabricates wire loops on a semiconductor die, or how one would stack them in 3 dimensions...

      Presumably in much the same way it's done currently (vacuum ion-plasma deposition, chemical etch, mask, lather, rinse, repeat). The bitch of it would likely be fabricating the nano-magnets on the wires.

      since packing they will be packing more transistors which presumably means more heat

      The point of storing the bits by encoding them on magnetic domains on wires means that you're not using transistors to store the bits by encoding them as voltage potential domains on semiconductor junctions.

    3. Re:3rd dimension and cooling by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me like they're not storing small magnets, but small areas of magnetism on the wire (sorry, that made sense in my mind).

      In other words, different parts of the wire are positive and others are negative, and they can get those polarities to move along the wire.

    4. Re:3rd dimension and cooling by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1

      Sooooo,it is analagous to a tiny mercury transmission line?

    5. Re:3rd dimension and cooling by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Sooooo,it is analagous to a tiny mercury transmission line?

      That's exactly what I was thinking. This sounds very much like delay line memory, except at the MEMS scale. Everything that is old is new again.

      Delay line memory actually makes sense because you can pack so many more bits into it than a normal SRAM or Flash cell. Normal cells require interface logic for every bit (or every 2-4 bits on the most advanced Flash processes, thanks to multi-level cells). With this loop-based technology, you can place several times more bits at a time on the loop, and build only one controller to manipulate all those bits as they pass through.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  15. Whats the point... by damburger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If every 4mb of music you buy have costs $2, then your 16 Terrabyte Ipod would cost $4 million to fill up.

    Extra capacity is useless if the cost of data is artificially inflated

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:Whats the point... by athdemo · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the porn I fill it up with is free.

    2. Re:Whats the point... by damburger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, until somebody thinks to form the PIAA, then itll be $3 per titty, and the phrase 'money shot' will take on a whole new meaning.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    3. Re:Whats the point... by athdemo · · Score: 0

      $3 a titty?! Jesus, what am I paying for, their implants?

    4. Re:Whats the point... by merreborn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bah, you can get 30 GB of blu-ray/HD-DVD for $15. It'd only cost $8,200 to fill a 16 TB iPod with full-quality movies at that price.

      As storage grows, so does the bit rate and fidelity of file formats, and the way we use storage itself. I don't know about you, but back in 1994, I had maybe 20 meg of low-bitrate WAV files on my 250 megabyte harddrive. 10 years later, I had 20 gigabytes of MP3 files on my 250 gigabyte harddrive. In another 10 years, I fully expect to have 20 terrabytes of audio/video on my 250 terrabyte drive.

    5. Re:Whats the point... by merreborn · · Score: 1

      And hell, if you hit the HD-DVD bargain bin at wal-mart in 5 years, you could probably load your 16 TB iPod up with B-movies for $2k...

    6. Re:Whats the point... by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Extra capacity is useless if the cost of data is artificially inflated

      If your measure of data cost is size, then I have an uncompressed bridge to sell you.

    7. Re:Whats the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your math is kind of wrong:

      1st. You are saying that you're paying $2 for 4MB. Which is not true, clearly uncompressed CD quality goes around 10MB per minute. So you are paying $2 for around 40MB, if you want to compress the song and lost the quality (and money) it's your problem.

      2nd. Why is that someone talks about a big hard drive you have to fill it with copyrighted multimedia? New video cameras with HD have also the capability of filling your hard drive pretty quick with your own recorded media. Furthermore, allows to new media formats to become more realistic reducing the compression or increasing the resolution. You choose.

      3rd. Larger memory with larger speed provides great improvements to your computer performance. Not everything depends on your processor.

      4rd. Why.. whyyy is that slashdot people use the term iPod as a reference measurement? Is that approved by the metric system? That's more like an archaic English System. "The royal iPod would hold 4000 songs, therefore the capacity measure is now Royal iPods"

      Geez! and you were modded insightful?

    8. Re:Whats the point... by Dewin · · Score: 1

      Bah, you can get 30 GB of blu-ray/HD-DVD for $15. It'd only cost $8,200 to fill a 16 TB iPod with full-quality movies at that price.
      They still make quality movies? Where can I find some?
      --
      Of course nobody reads the FAQ! If people read the FAQ, the Questions wouldn't be so Frequently Asked.
    9. Re:Whats the point... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Extra capacity is useless if the cost of data is artificially inflated

      If you'd prefer, you can pay $18 per 700MB for your music data...

      The value of a music file is not measured by the number of sectors it occupies on disk, but by the quality of the music contained therein.

  16. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

    No matter how famous and credible someone is if they invent something and sell the patent rights to a company that will just sit on it like most vaporware ends up, we'll never see it. Hopefully he's smarter than that (and not that much of a greedy jackass)

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  17. bubble memory reborn? by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the early 1960's Bell labs was researching bubble memory. By the early 80's, TI or Bell commercialized it but it was too slow and bulky except for limited use, like static telephone messages. Guess shrinking the wires/tube and magnetic domains sped it up quite a bit.

  18. Hopefully, you do not get modded up by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    The truth is that most of the items are in RESEARCH. the 3-5 years is development time. And most of the items mentioned here for improvements HAVE lead to being in the field. Since this is from IBM, I am guessing that we will see it in 3-4 years. Hopefully, they do not lose control of it.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  19. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    What? All of you? You're all using this man's technology right now. Accusations of this product being vaporware do not account for the man's track record (no pun intended). You should all give this man a little credit, okay?

    Yea, ok. It's funny you posted this although no any previous comment even attempted to doubt his credibility, you karma whore.

  20. Thus again proving by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even evolution happens in jumps, not gradually.

    1. Re:Thus again proving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, a jump with the average hang time of 10 years (if you're lucky).

    2. Re:Thus again proving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evolution happens in jumps because its been intelligently designed that way.

    3. Re:Thus again proving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are two kinds of scientific progress: the methodical experimentation and categorization which gradually extend the boundaries of knowledge, and the revolutionary leap of genius which redefines and transcends those boundaries. Acknowledging our debt to the former, we yearn nonetheless for the latter."

      Academician Prokhor Zakharov
      -Alpha Centauri

  21. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by doombringerltx · · Score: 1

    Example #1: Henry Ford. On one hand you have the assembly line, and on the other had you have that great piece of literature "The International Jew"

  22. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1
  23. Five Years. It's always Five Years. by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    begin to replace flash memory in three to five years

    Five years! It's always Five Years!

    By 2012 I expect to have, this super memory technology, solar cells with efficiency above 70% for pennies per watt, flying cars, paper thin televisions the size of my wall, fuel cell powered hybrid cars, batteries replaced by power cells that store more power, cost less, are infinitely rechargeable, and charge/discharge like capacitors -- plus several other things from the last few months of Slashdot.

    Also the Mayan calendar will have expired, and the entire West Coast in to the Sierra Nevada mountains will be flooded, so I don't know how useful this all will be to me.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  24. Re:Potential.. by zig007 · · Score: 1

    I have that in my laptop. Unfortunately I only have a 2 gig harddrive but I do have 56k on my video card. 56K? Christ! I can't see how anybody could ever need more.

    Me, I have to make do with a measly 64 bits! //Nicklas
    --
    Baboons are cute.
  25. Storage leaps by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Imagine the social implications of the $50 5TB thumb drive...

    "I was over at Jimmy's house yesterday and asked him to put some good stuff on my thumb drive. He gave me HD copies of the top 80 movies released in the past two years, plus 2000 of his favorite albums.

    Meanwhile, a second thumb drive I keep clipped to my belt has been keeping an audio/video recording of the last 17 months of my life, nonstop."

    1. Re:Storage leaps by geedra · · Score: 1

      He copied all that data over USB in less than a day? Color me impressed.

    2. Re:Storage leaps by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

      USB 2.0 has a maximum transfer rate of 480Mbps.

      Which is 60MB/s.

      5TB is 5120MB.

      5120 / 60 = 85.333 seconds.

      Your intuitive understanding of the speed of USB is wrong because the thumb drives you have used are most likely USB 1.1, and they're most likely flash based.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Storage leaps by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping some interface tech comes about to make use of such large external drives. Like, oh, 40Gb Ethernet (or even 10), Infiniband, Myrinet, etc.

    4. Re:Storage leaps by greywire · · Score: 1

      USB 2.0 has a maximum transfer rate of 480Mbps.

      Which is 60MB/s.

      5TB is 5120MB.


      Oops! 5120MB is not a TB, its a GB. a little more than one layer of a DVD.

      A Terabyte would be 1000 times more than that..

      85333 seconds, which is almost 24 hours.
      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    5. Re:Storage leaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5TB is 5120GB.

      5120 / 0.060 = 85333 seconds = 23.7 hours

    6. Re:Storage leaps by rhakka · · Score: 1

      I think the ramifications and implications of the "I can record my entire life on a wearable device" alone makes for a major revolution. You never have to forget ANYTHING, EVER AGAIN.

      Combined with wireless internet, and you are also a one person, non stop, possible reporter, eye on the scene.

      How far from there to Hive Mind?

    7. Re:Storage leaps by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. By then, actual FireWire 3200 silicon will be available. and will knock that down to under four hours.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:Storage leaps by |Cozmo| · · Score: 1

      Actually that is not true. 480mbits is the maximum speed of the bus. A single storage (bulk) endpoint can't use that much bandwidth as the maximum packet size is far too small to max out the bus. High Speed bulk transfers use 512 byte packets, whereas a transfer somewhere in the range of 2 or 3k bytes (I'm too lazy to look it up) is what it'd take to use all the bandwidth.

      The "480 mbit!" stuff tattood on all of the USB storage devices out there is misleading at best, since those devices can't get anywhere near a 480 mbit transfer speed and never will.

    9. Re:Storage leaps by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      You never have to forget ANYTHING, EVER AGAIN.

      As long as you remember the timestamp.

    10. Re:Storage leaps by maelstrom · · Score: 1

      teh g00gle ftw

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
    11. Re:Storage leaps by ExternalDingus · · Score: 1

      The problem you would ahve then is the problem maybe we have with our own brains. The information is there we just can't find it. Which also explains why when hypnotized people can remember details they couldn't when conscious(as shown on Mythbusters recently).

    12. Re:Storage leaps by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > I think the ramifications and implications of the "I can record my entire life on a wearable device" alone makes for a major revolution.

      You can do that now, for at least several years worth of your life at a time. The rest is a matter of getting the video connection back to wherever you've stashed your archives. Or hell, you could just stream it there directly.

      Thing is, most people don't want to do that, and they don't want you to do so either, at least when they're involved. Revolutions happen when people change attitudes. Technology may enable the attitude change, but it certainly doesn't always drive it.

      When we can access directly via our brains, then we might be closer to the hive. Til then, it's just information, and 99% of it is useless.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    13. Re:Storage leaps by rhakka · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. That's just a UI problem though, which puts us in the position of basically engineering our own functional evolution...

      the issue is our current "hardware" is "fuzzy". it's not solid, binary, like silicon.

      What if we make our memory solid.. no misremembering. No forgotten detail unless it's just not important enough to recollect (with the barrier to that dropping as UIs improve, making it easier and easier to recollect anything). What impact would *just that* have? How many times have you been really invested in an idea that ended up being based on something you remembered wrong?

    14. Re:Storage leaps by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > I think the ramifications and implications of the "I can record my entire life on a wearable device" alone makes for a major revolution. You never have to forget ANYTHING, EVER AGAIN.

      Wonderful. It will take approximately ONE LIFETIME to review the recording.
      Maybe 50% of a lifetime with compression and high speed review.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    15. Re:Storage leaps by ExternalDingus · · Score: 1

      If you could search the information better, like you can search for text on the internet with google, then it would be worthwhile to record everything you say or that is said to you. Voice recognition is so poor that it might be worthwhile to create a new spoken language that can be recognized more clearly. Basically we would speak a computer language. Then this language could be more eaisly searched allowing us to find the info we need. It would be nice to record all the information you read on computer as you are reading it as well.. maybe by sweeping over it with a mouse pointer or soemthing ot that effect. Then we could access every word we have ever read, too. Or every image we have seen on screen.

    16. Re:Storage leaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flashback to 1992...

      Imagine the social implications of the $50 5GB thumb drive...

      "I was over at Jimmy's house yesterday and asked him to put some good stuff on my thumb drive. He gave me VHS-quality copies of the top 8 commercials released in the past two years, plus 2 of his favorite albums (in VOC format).

      Meanwhile, a second thumb drive I keep in my KangaROOS has been keeping an audio/video recording of the last 12 hours of my life, nonstop (in EGA)."

    17. Re:Storage leaps by zdzichu · · Score: 1

      5TB is 5120GB.
      Makes that roughly 85333 seconds -- 24 hours of copying.

      --
      :wq
    18. Re:Storage leaps by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    19. Re:Storage leaps by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Yeah... except trying to remember where to find what you've already forgotten.
      Geez! I lose files now that I can't find on any search method, only to come across them 6 months later on a drive I didn't know I had.
      Imagine trying to find a ph number across terabytes of mundane personal history...

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    20. Re:Storage leaps by daenris · · Score: 1

      Plus there's the fact that the 480Mbps that's advertised for USB 2.0 is really a burst-speed possibility, not a sustained transfer rate. So transferring large video files won't go anywhere near 480Mbps. So it's certainly going to take you over a day to copy that amount of data.

    21. Re:Storage leaps by thosf · · Score: 1

      Regarding the USB/Thumb drive: I see a lucrative market need that no one is currently addressing. Why isn't someone creating a small dedicated "cube" that you can plug two thumb drives into. The "cube" would be used to transfer files from one thumb drive to another. It would be much easier to share files with someone without needing a computer to do so. How it would work: Each thumb drive has a required folder named "Transfer" (or whatever). You plug in two thumb drives into the "cube", one thumb drive into the "A" slot, the other goes into the "B" slot. The cube has two push button switches: one transfers all files from the "Transfer" folder of the thumb drive in the "A" slot to the "Transfer" folder of the thumb drive in the "B" slot. The other push button switch does it in reverse (i.e., from "B" to "A"). If you design and sell them, at least give me credit for making you a fortune.

    22. Re:Storage leaps by mink · · Score: 1

      "You never have to forget ANYTHING, EVER AGAIN."

      This is not always a good thing. As one of the married men on /. I need to tell you that there is a biological recording unit that is 100% independent from you called a Wife.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  26. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    All peoples claims should be approached with a skeptic eye.

    Yeah, right.

  27. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Exactly. That assembly line shit was just completely out there. Several people each building a car is much better than one car being made by several people.

  28. "Inventor" of GMR a little misleading by Badge+17 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Read what the article actually says - "Mr. Parkin puttered for two years in a lab in the early 1990s, trying to find a way to commercialize an odd magnetic effect of quantum mechanics he had observed at supercold temperatures." Though he may have been absolutely critical to making GMR hard drives (I don't know the history) credit for discovery of GMR goes to Peter Grunberg and Albert Fert. You might be able to call Parkin the inventor of GMR hard drives, though.

  29. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hopefully he's smarter than that (and not that much of a greedy jackass)"

    If he is working for IBM, then the patent won't even be his. Nor will he even have a say how and when it is used.

  30. I'm skepitcal of your claim... by FatSean · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...that all peoples' claims be approached with a skeptic eye.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:I'm skepitcal of your claim... by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      ...that all peoples' claims be approached with a skeptic eye.
      Why? I'm skepitcal of your motives for questioning the poster on this issue!
    2. Re:I'm skepitcal of your claim... by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Why? I'm skepitcal of your motives for questioning the poster on this issue! I don't think you are!
      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
  31. Feasability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now, most silicon industry executives and many, many silicon engineers are at an Expo in Santa Clara, CA. I just made sure that this story got passed to pretty much all of them, and it's probably going to be their dinner conversation for the next week. Given the state of the silicon industry, this is going to be IBM's skyrocket - anyone can make a Beowulf cluster (storm worm, anyone?); Many can make an MP3 player, OS, or word processor; Fewer still (yet still thousands worldwide) can design a processor, module, or ASIC; An elite few can develop "killer-application" "have-to-have-it" disruptive physical technologies. And one of the implications of Moore's Law regards what consumers demand - they demand higher and higher processing and information densities.

  32. Now here comes the MPAA and RIAA by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now comes the MPAA and RIAA asking for damages and injunctive relief.

    This speed and storage capacity and can only be used for downloading and pirating illegal copies of movies and music.

    Therefore this must not be permitted to happen.

  33. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The moral zeitgeist of the pre-WWII world was much more accepting for anti-semitism than it is today. Just read the works of otherwise well respected and much revered people that lived in the 19th/early 20th century and you can find examples of anti-semitism that was apparently common. Starting from Boleslaw Prus to the catholic church. Henry For was merely more vocal about it than others I guess.

    Everyone should be judged according to the time they lived in. Darwin isn't judged negatively because he believed in the superiority of white men either, because that was the commonly accepted view of his age.

    When someone thinks about the founding fathers of the USA, they have held a lot of ideas that seem barbaric to us, but they are judged by the moral zeitgeist of their time. There shouldn't be an exception done about anti-semitism in this matter.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  34. that's a sweet case mod by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    kind of hard to lug to the LAN party tho

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:that's a sweet case mod by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. You got hardware that sweet, the party comes to YOU.

  35. At Long Last! by BlackGriffen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They have finally perfected the abacus!

    FTFA:
    "His idea is to stand billions of ultrafine wire loops around the edge of a silicon chip -- hence the name racetrack -- and use electric current to slide infinitesimally small magnets up and down along each of the wires to be read and written as digital ones and zeros.

    His research group is able to slide the tiny magnets along notched nanowires at speeds greater than 100 meters a second. Since the tiny magnetic domains have to travel only submolecular distances, it is possible to read and write magnetic regions with different polarization as quickly as a single nanosecond -- far faster than existing storage technologies."

    What is really really old is new again, eh?

    I can see it now - to erase your iPod, turn it on its side and shake - just like an Etch-a-Sketch!

    1. Re:At Long Last! by Splab · · Score: 1

      I can see it now - to erase your iPod, turn it on its side and shake - just like an Etch-a-Sketch!


      Thats just great, so every time I go running (It could happen!!!) I'm going to erase my iPod?
    2. Re:At Long Last! by mentaldrano · · Score: 1

      Ah, everything old is new again! This is basically core memory scaled way down to nanometer size. The operating principle is a bit different (the magnet moves instead of flipping orientation), but conceptually this is the same. Still, it's a great idea. Physicists have been working with tiny magnets and magnetic domains in wires for a while now, so it's nice to see an actual application of this.

      Guess I'll have to upgrade my porn collection to fill a 100TB drive...

    3. Re:At Long Last! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      More like the magenetic wire recorder, which used wire instead of tape.

  36. It's not up to the scientist by RingDev · · Score: 1

    It could begin to replace flash memory in three to five years, scientists say Who cares what the scientists say? What does accounting, marketing and production say?!?!

    -Rick
    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:It's not up to the scientist by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Who cares what the scientists say? What does accounting, marketing and production say?!?! Marketing says 2 and half years if your pre-order.
      Production says 10 years if don't screw up the prototypes again.
      And accounting says in 1 year it won't matter because you're all being laid off.
      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  37. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by provigilman · · Score: 1

    The whole article was tagged as "vaporware", that's what he was responding to. Please read the page before you go throwing around insults.

    --
    "Life's short and hard, like a body building elf." -- The Bloodhound Gang
  38. Obligatory Star Trek Reference by nohup · · Score: 1

    "make a 'disk drive on a chip' possible"

    Isolinear chips here we come!

  39. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by doombringerltx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Singling him out does take in account the attitude of the times. Anti-antisemitism was much more common then, but even in those days The International Jew was a step beyond. They earned him the title of the only American mentioned in Mien Kampf.

  40. Sounds like bubble memory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As I was reading it, it sounded very much like Bubble Memory of the 80s. Magnetic domains were created on a solid-state substrate and run around little tracks on the chip by using little T-shaped control circuits (sort of like his little racetrack coils). Bubble memory was one of those things that finally became practical about the time that it became obsolete. Since the bubbles could only be written/read semi-serially, it was pretty slow.

    On the plus side, it was non-volatile and very sturdy. I can't remember, but I believe that it was pretty radiation hard, also.

    Anon

    1. Re:Sounds like bubble memory... by JoelKatz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He should be able to move his magnetic domains about once per nanosecond. If you put 128 bits on a ring, that would mean a single ring could clock out 128 bits in as many nanoseconds. There's a bit of write overhead involved in bringing the correct domain underneath the write head, kind of like seek time. Again, for 128 bits per ring, assuming random access, average seek delay would in the neighborhood of 64 nanoseconds.

      You would likely rig things so that writes are buffered and sequential addresses take sequential magnetic domains. So write speed would be quite high unless you had out-of-order writes to the same domain, in which case you'd stall an average of 64nS.

      You can imagine a pathological write pattern, kind of like trying to alternately write to disk sectors on complete opposite sides of the disk. Even with such a pathological write pattern, you could still do one write every 200nS or so.

      Guesstimated throughput would be, assuming 128-bit operations, 1nS rotation time, 128 bits per racetrack, and reasonable buffering and multiplexing:

      Random read: 250MB/s
      Sequential read: 5GB/s
      Random write: 500MB/s
      Sequential write: 5GB/s

  41. Quite old. by Climate+Shill · · Score: 2, Informative

    New Scientist covered this a lifetime ago.

  42. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by mdielmann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many men that have created great things also had crackpot ideas. And many men that created great things went on to do it again. And this guy has all the earmarks of a man who can shake things up. He's a respected researcher of a major corporation that is known for innovative products, working in his field of expertise, engaging in research that in some way builds on his previous research, using technology that is either already in place today or is feasible with today's technology. Now, questions of scalability, reliability and such will have to be addressed, but this is by no means a black box or snake oil.
    If I were to place bets, I would be expecting the next innovative storage technology to be coming from a guy like him, and not some dark horse who stumbled onto something in his spare time.
    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  43. One word... Segway by jred · · Score: 1

    Soooo, what do you think about THAT?

    --

    jred
    I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    1. Re:One word... Segway by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      "I'm the bum of the future."

  44. Holy inappropriate reference Batman! by 3ryon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the man who pioneered exploiting the giant magnetoresistance effect in the 90s, causing disk storage to jump ahead of the Moore's Law curve.

    I didn't realize that the amount of data stored on a disk was related to the number of transistors on an integrated circuit. This sentence doesn't even make sense if you misinterpret Moore's law the way it's usually misinterpreted...doubling of speed of CPUs.

    Moore's Law

    1. Re:Holy inappropriate reference Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      I didn't realize that the amount of data stored on a disk was related to the number of transistors on an integrated circuit.

      The ability to store data grows at a faster rate than the ability to process that data.

    2. Re:Holy inappropriate reference Batman! by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      Just being pedantic, but you said that as if it were a fact. There is nothing that keeps us from being able to increase the data processing rate faster than our storage growth rate. The statement should have been something like this.
      Trends show that our ability to store data has grown at a faster rate than the ability to process that data.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
  45. Fermat Jr.'s Last Theorem by sehlat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a truly marvelous proof of this proposition which this 50TB hard drive is too small to contain.

    1. Re:Fermat Jr.'s Last Theorem by Mode_Locrian · · Score: 1

      Nice joke--that got a good chuckle out of me. I'd mod you up if I had any points...

  46. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Splab · · Score: 1

    This is probably the most insightful comment I've seen in a long time - yeah its funny, but most comedy truly is insightful.

  47. *Inventor* of GMR? by exley · · Score: 1

    Damn, I wish I were smart enough to invent my own effects in the realm of physics... It sure woulda made physics classes a lot more fun and easy!

  48. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by brarrr · · Score: 3, Informative

    So true. I'm one of the people in the small community of physics.... and he didn't invent GMR. First publication was in 88 by Baibich. Not to discount the contributions that Parkin has made, but he was not the inventor nor would making the claim that he is the single most important person in the field be correct...

    --
    to email me: take my /. handle and append .net preceded by charter.
  49. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if you're saying bad things about jews that are true is that antisemitic?

    For example, if you're saying that jews are fuckers because they believe they are God's chosen people and everyone else will burn in hell, is that antisemitic?

  50. This is a case of.. by Peaker · · Score: 1

    intelligent design :-)

    Not evolution...

  51. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    >For example, if you're saying that jews are fuckers because they believe they are God's chosen people and everyone else will burn in hell, is that antisemitic?

    Well, it's inaccurate... but hey, that's never stopped people from making ludicrous claims.

  52. Re:Five Years. It's always Five Years. by IronChef · · Score: 1

    By 2012 I expect to have, this super memory technology, solar cells with efficiency above 70% for pennies per watt, flying cars, paper thin televisions the size of my wall, fuel cell powered hybrid cars, batteries replaced by power cells that store more power, cost less, are infinitely rechargeable, and charge/discharge like capacitors -- plus several other things from the last few months of Slashdot.

    I like your future better than mine, where I am running from grey goo, hiding from flesh-eating robots, all of my software is delivered by Google, and I have to pee into my fuel cells. On the plus side, my $100 laptop will be pretty sweet.

  53. Whats really interesting.. by greywire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What makes this, and some other potential memory technologies, so interesting is that it would have the mass storage and non volatility of harddrives, the solid state of flash, and the speed of DRAM, or even exceeding that of current techs.

    This is interesting not because its "more, better, faster" but because it can completely change the way computers work. Imagine simply not needing all the storage tiers we currently have... disks, harddrive, flash, DRAM, cache... imagine something big enough and fast enough to cover it all. A CPU and this memory, and nothing else. It could mean big changes to your operating system. Imagine just not needing to load and save things anymore. Imagine not needing elaborate schemes like virtual memory paging, harddrive caching, file systems, or even needing to compress things as often. There's all kinds of overhead and mechanisms in our OS's that are currently needed to deal with all the different storage hardware and their limitations.

    If this memory can work fast enough, it could even change the way CPU's are designed. It could change almost everything.

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    1. Re:Whats really interesting.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow,

      That is a very lucid and likely commentary on this article. I suspect that you are correct. It all depends on proven viability, but given that, we could be on to something relatively novel here. Thanks for sparking my imagination.

      Promet

    2. Re:Whats really interesting.. by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Now you're thinking!

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    3. Re:Whats really interesting.. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Imagine not needing elaborate schemes like virtual memory paging, harddrive caching, file systems, or even needing to compress things as often.

      Virtual memory is A Good Thing (tm), and once you have a working VM system, paging can be a relatively easy add-on. Stripping out paging but keeping VM won't be all that much simpler, I don't think.

      HD caching, I'll give you.

      File systems? You'll still need to find all that data and mete out access to it. Since I don't know what latencies would be like in this storage, it's possible that current filesystems that are optimized for high latency and high throughput might still be reasonable.

      Finally, at some point you're going to want to transfer that data from storage to the CPU or to another machine. As busses and network links have finite bandwidth, compression will still rule the day.

      Having said that, I still welcome our terabyte-thumbdrive overlords.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:Whats really interesting.. by the_ed_dawg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Imagine not needing elaborate schemes like virtual memory paging

      The ability to use a full 4GB virtual address space (i386) is only one of the major features of virtual memory. An equally important goal of virtual memory is process isolation. That is, the illusion that a process has exclusive access to the full memory. Prior to virtual memory, programs had to know what other programs were running and stay out of their physical address spaces. Virtual memory drastically simplifies the lives of millions of programmers everywhere because you don't need to know the memory locations needed by other programs.

      Virtual memory isn't going away due to increasing the size of memory.

      --
      There are two types of people: those prepared for the zombie apocalypse and those who will be eaten.
    5. Re:Whats really interesting.. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Won't happen. There will always be some kind of inherent tradeoff between memory speed and characteristics desirable for mass storage. You can affort a few MB of really fast cache, whereas making this tradeoff for all of your storage would be a waste. It will be nice if/when we can at least merge the mass storage/main memory split and just have mass memory and the processor and its cache.

    6. Re:Whats really interesting.. by greywire · · Score: 1


      The ability to use a full 4GB virtual address space (i386) is only one of the major features of virtual memory. An equally important goal of virtual memory is process isolation. That is, the illusion that a process has exclusive access to the full memory. Prior to virtual memory, programs had to know what other programs were running and stay out of their physical address spaces. Virtual memory drastically simplifies


      You're confusing VM with memory protection and memory mapping, things handled by the MMU's in a CPU. Also taken care of by making loadable executables in a format where the addresses can be fixed when loaded into memory (another mechanism that would be changed, since this would only need to be done when the code is installed the first time, and not every time it is run). Computers had this ability before virtual memory was introduced.

      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    7. Re:Whats really interesting.. by greywire · · Score: 1

      Virtual memory is A Good Thing (tm), and once you have a working VM system, paging can be a relatively easy add-on. Stripping out paging but keeping VM won't be all that much simpler, I don't think. Point being that you simply wont need it. Stripping it out is probably more work than needed, but what I am thinking of is that a totally new kind of OS will be created to take advantage of these new types of memory.

      File systems? You'll still need to find all that data and mete out access to it. Since I don't know what latencies would be like in this storage, it's possible that current filesystems that are optimized for high latency and high throughput might still be reasonable. There would be a need for some kind of organizational structure, but it wont be a file system in the current sense. There is no need in memory for all the nonsense you need on a disk based, orders-of-magnitude slower medium like harddrives. We would have something more akin to an in-memory optimized database system. yes, compression would still be used I am sure. It just may be less needed than before, and like you said maybe mostly used at the transport layer when moving things over the net. We would still I am sure have at least three tiers though: memory, removable memory (thumbdrives) and the network. So the concept of uploading/downloading probably isnt going away, unless network links become a whole lot faster too...
      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    8. Re:Whats really interesting.. by rdebath · · Score: 1

      No fixups were invented so that microprocessors could simulate the big iron.

      In the grown up computer world the CPU just had a base+range pair to say where the current program's memory was and every program ran as if it were at address zero; like the OS itself.

      This way a program that was waiting for a screen to come back from a block mode terminal could relocated to free up the fast memory.

      The simple fact is this need to relocate data isn't going to go away because closer data will always be faster to access. ie: Register >> onchip >> oncpucard >> onmotheboard >> oninterfacecard >> ... >> removable >> compressedremovable >> ... ... >> theothersizeoftheowrld >> therestoftheuniverse.

      There are only so many atoms within a picosecond of the cpu.

  54. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

    No, comedy is funny. If it's insightful, smart people will think about it after the show. Also, insightful comedians are called humorists.

    --
    No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
  55. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    It would have been nice if the summary had explained what the hell "GMR" is or why anybody should care. I presume it's this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_magnetoresistive_effect except that the patent for that is held by Peter Grünberg and Albert Fert, so I really have no clue if that's what they're talking about or not. Seems applicable to hard drives, at least.

  56. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by jcr · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    It may surprise you to know that the "burn in hell" mythology isn't a Jewish idea. That was a christian innovation.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  57. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Albert Einstein for one.

  58. Great stuff.. by clayne · · Score: 0

    But being that we've sat through more than enough "believe it when I see it situations" we'll just have to wait and see..

    Also, when will people stop referring to "Moore's Law" as a law? It's a hypothesis at best.

  59. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was Prus supposed to have said that was anti-semitic?

  60. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by irenaeous · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    It may surprise you to know that the "burn in hell" mythology isn't a Jewish idea. That was a christian innovation.

    Not correct. The whole hell of fire concept also known as Ghenna is of Jewish Origin. See The article on this in the Jewish Encyclopedia.

  61. Re:Five Years. It's always Five Years. by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    In five years, you will have:

    16 cores
    10GB Ram
    300 GB HVDs, burnable
    5-10 TB disks
    Aforementioned disks will be 90% full or pron
    Carpal tunnel syndrome

    Be happy with that.

  62. Re:kdawson tell me... by megaditto · · Score: 0, Troll

    Stuart S. P. Parkin is a foreigner stealing American jobs.

    See his biography here: http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/pr.nsf/pages/bio.parkin.html

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  63. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by nunyabid · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, I always thought Godwin's Law was a little tongue-in-cheek until today.

  64. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by hoggoth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    > You know, I always thought Godwin's Law was a little tongue-in-cheek until today.

    Godwin's law is usually applied to conversations that turn to Hitler that should have no relation to Hitler.
    In this case Henry Ford's anti-semetic writings and remarks happened at the same time in history as WWII. Hitler certainly knew about Ford and his writings, and Ford claimed to know all about the 'hidden masterminds' behind starting the war.

    I'd say it is appropriate to bring up Hitler in this discussion of Henry Ford, and in no way invokes Godwin's law.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  65. mod down as Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful?! More like pathologically unable to understand sarcasm, I mean how bleeding obvious does it have to be?

  66. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by nunyabid · · Score: 0
    You are a humorless pedant. You are also wrong.

    Wikipedia:

    "Godwin's Law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies)[1] is an adage formulated by Mike Godwin in 1990. The law states:[2] As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one. Godwin's law is often cited in online discussions as a caution against the use of inflammatory rhetoric or exaggerated comparisons. The rule does not make any statement as to whether any particular reference or comparison to Hitler or the Nazis might be appropriate, but only asserts that one arising is increasingly probable. It is precisely because such a comparison or reference may sometimes be appropriate, Godwin has argued,[3] that overuse of Nazi and Hitler comparisons should be avoided, because it robs the valid comparisons of their impact."

    Lighten up man.

  67. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by jhw539 · · Score: 1

    Credit should be given for past accomplishments. After all, this may be even better than It/Ginger/Segway/A-#@$$#^@-Self-Balancing-Scooter.

  68. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by jcr · · Score: 1

    I stand corrected. How disappointing. I had thought that Jewish mythology was a tad more, shall we say, benign than that of their neighbors.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  69. the question is... by Novaseer · · Score: 1

    ah yes, but will it run with Linux?

    1. Re:the question is... by Maple+Syrup · · Score: 1

      Given the number of architectures that Linux has been ported to, and the number of architectures that Windows has been ported to, it's a fair bet that it will run Linux long before it runs Windows.

    2. Re:the question is... by FunkyRider · · Score: 1

      I guess your question would have been "will it big enough to fit Windows?"

      --
      just wonder why there are so many anonymous cowards in this world....
  70. Re:Five Years. It's always Five Years. by jhol13 · · Score: 1

    Weve got five years, stuck on my eyes
    Five years, what a surprise
    Weve got five years, my brain hurts a lot
    Five years, thats all weve got

  71. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In addition I thought we were talking about new tech. Not Henry Ford being an anti semite. In any thread the comment immediately preceding Godwins law being invoked is most likely going to have something to do with it. But Hitler and the Nazis is a long way away from the new storage technoledgy that was being discussed.

  72. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by bane2571 · · Score: 1

    All well and true, except that the discussion was about hard drives and now it is about Nazis so there we go with how Godwin's eventually works.

  73. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by logicnazi · · Score: 1

    Obviously it's stupid to dismiss this guy as a crackpot.

    However, I think people have a reasonable point in that even the most promising technologies only have a small chance of making it to market. There are just so many different possible ways that we might choose to improve on current storage requirements that any particular option is low likelihood. This is how Moore's law and the like continue to work even while individual projects have failures or bumps.

    This having been said I don't see the motivation for the hate on this as being vaporware. It's just another possible way we might develop disk drives in the future being pursued by a clever researcher. *I* happen to find this interesting even though it will likely not be the way we do storage in the future.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

  74. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Albert Einstein for one.

    Shockley for another. Outside of his field ... he was out in left field.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  75. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by kf6auf · · Score: 1

    Look at the title bar of your browser. See how it says "Inventor of GMR Bids To Shake Up Storage, Again" . . . yeah.

  76. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    What the hell is a zeitgeist? Does repeating it make you smarter?

    We need to establish some kind of rubric for evaluating the efficacy of nomenclature repetition in craniophallic compensation.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  77. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the "Abrahamic religions" are rip-offs of other religions anyway: heaven, hell, gods, monotheism, etc., they were all invented before.

  78. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 2, Funny

    Craniophallic, is that like fucked in the head??

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  79. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was looking at the Wikipedia article and noticed his name wasn't there, but did not know enough about the issue to start messing about. Perhaps a blurb about him could be added that he helped commercialize the discovery by Peter Grunberg and Albert Fert in the GMR article.

  80. Re:Potential.. by cuzco · · Score: 1
    I have that in my laptop. Unfortunately I only have a 2 gig harddrive but I do have 56k on my video card.

    10 terabytes of ram? You must be able to fire ceramics with the heat that puppy puts out!

  81. What I want to know by LuminaireX · · Score: 1

    What happens when that coiled wire breaks? Is the break a broken circuit or just a bad bit? Is the entire 16TB screwed because one tiny notch in the beginning of the wire got poked by a paperclip? Dr. Parkins has a nice idea, but I wouldn't trust such a massive amount of data so tenuously stored.

  82. Re:Five Years. It's always Five Years. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and that was written over 30 years ago.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  83. It's just not going to work. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    I can't see any amount of monkeys trying to solder billions of bits of short wire onto the edge of a silicon chip happening at all. Just too fiddly!

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  84. Ah Yes, but... by Algorithmnast · · Score: 1

    begin to replace flash memory in three to five years Five years! It's always Five Years! By 2012 I expect to have, this super memory technology, solar cells with efficiency above 70% for pennies per watt, flying cars, paper thin televisions the size of my wall, fuel cell powered hybrid cars, batteries replaced by power cells that store more power, cost less, are infinitely rechargeable, and charge/discharge like capacitors -- plus several other things from the last few months of Slashdot. Also the Mayan calendar will have expired, and the entire West Coast in to the Sierra Nevada mountains will be flooded, so I don't know how useful this all will be to me.
    ... but will you have a girlfriend?
  85. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    > You are a humorless pedant.
    Bite me.

    > You are also wrong.
    > "The rule does not make any statement as to whether any particular reference or comparison to Hitler or the Nazis might be appropriate"

    Well played, sir.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  86. I predicted this by predicttechnology · · Score: 1

    I posted my prediction in a China IT discussion forum. If you want proof, I can show you. I can't pinpoint the exact technology, I only give the big picture, that the next generation harddisk will be so fast that it can act as DRAM as well as being physical storage. I posted my next generation hard disk prediction around the time news of Nintendo WII comes out, at that time Nintendo WII isn't officially named WII yet. The news article just mention a revolution in gaming hardware from Nintendo. Dear top 100 technology companies, I need a good job. If you think I am a good techologist to have make such predictions before time and want to hire me, please contact me.

    1. Re:I predicted this by predicttechnology · · Score: 1

      Other than next generation harddisk, I have some other predictions. If you are interested please contact me.

  87. Looks like the hardware vendors... by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    ...will need to get serious about their 64-bit Windows drivers. That much memory won't work on a 32-bit OS. ;-)

    Actually, it sounds like the kernel developers will need to get started on code to make RAM and disk space interchangeable. For instance, you may not need extra memory to load executables or shared libraries if you could just point to where they're stored on the "hard drive". Although issues like self-modifying code and "running out of disk space" seem much more ominous from that perspective. ;-)

    1. Re:Looks like the hardware vendors... by dwye · · Score: 1
      > it sounds like the kernel developers will need to get started on code to make RAM and disk space interchangeable.

      Ram disk

      Also /dev/mem, I think.

    2. Re:Looks like the hardware vendors... by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      I was talking about tighter integration than that. If you dedicate most of the memory to a ram disk, you won't be able to use 100GB of memory when you need it.

      And don't tell me that no one needs 100GB of memory. I'm a developer, and I play around with personal programs that would love to have 100GB of memory to play with from time to time (usually math-heavy algorithms). ;-)

    3. Re:Looks like the hardware vendors... by Anaerin · · Score: 1
      Then what about the RAM Drive that the Amiga had. It was forever 100% full as it always expanded to fit the data on it, leaving the rest of the RAM for the system. It made installing very simple:

      lha x archive.lha RAM:Installer/
      Installer RAM:Installer/Install
      del RAM:Installer
    4. Re:Looks like the hardware vendors... by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      So what do the installers do when they want to check to see if there's enough disk space to install an app? It always looks like there's no space. ;-)

    5. Re:Looks like the hardware vendors... by Anaerin · · Score: 1

      You don't install apps into RAM:. The contents of RAM: are lost on reboot. But when checking for available space, the system functions calculate the potential space in the RAM drive.

    6. Re:Looks like the hardware vendors... by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      Either read TFA or pay closer attention. TFA says this could potentially replace both system RAM and solid-state (i.e. flash) drives, essentially replacing the two separate pieces of hardware with one. This wouldn't just make laptops faster and batteries last longer, it would be a paradigm-shifting change. The system memory IS the hard drive, and vice versa.

      All of a sudden, all that buffering code written for dealing with files does nothing but slow the system down. Just treat the file pointer like a normal memory pointer.

    7. Re:Looks like the hardware vendors... by dwye · · Score: 1

      Either read TFA or pay closer attention.

      Well, I did. First, I doubt that it would be replacing the memory buffers onboard the CPU chip, do you? Impedence mismatch would slow you down, if nothing else. Second, most systems aren't written for raw speed but more for reliability, simplicity, and/or security. If we wanted raw speed, we wouldn't waste time using files, we would do direct I/O to numbered sectors, ala the original FORTH disk I/O. Likewise, we would not waste our time with malloc(), but do direct calls to brk() and sbrk(), and handle smaller allocations ourselves (which I did, once, on an IBM-AT, just to see what it was like)(thereafter, back to malloc :-).

      All of a sudden, all that buffering code written for dealing with files does nothing but slow the system down. Just treat the file pointer like a normal memory pointer.

      On the main system where I work, IRIX64 and Solaris handled shared memory blocks as files on the ram disk (ie, /tmp), with zero length file buffers (well, from a outsider's view, sort of).

      I do not know how Linux handles shmem, never having had to run anything that uses it on my single processor workstation, vs. the 40-or-more processor main machines. I do know that the one researcher, here, always comes back from the Tachyon Conference really annoyed at the Linux people for NOT caring about speed when the user (well, mostly him, and a few hundred other fanatics around the world) needs it.

      It would force along the move to 64 bit or more OSs. It is already cheap enough to max out my home PC's 32 bit RAM address space, if I wanted, and we are far beyond that for partition c on our drives (assuming that the old convention that c covers the entire drive is still followed).

    8. Re:Looks like the hardware vendors... by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      I don't buy those arguments. Direct I/O to numbered sectors has its own mess of problems, and that argument doesn't take into account that disk access is still orders of magnitude slower than system memory access, or the fact that disk access is limited to sectors. This memory won't have those limitations (and I never implied that faster CPU memory caches would go away).

      Security will definitely still be a critical issue, but how does removing unnecessary code make it less simple or reliable? Let's say you're a SQL Server developer writing a B-tree algorithm for a database index. Instead of creating your own load/save functions, and instead of creating your own memory caching functions for dealing with which blocks should be kept in memory, you could simply write a version of malloc/free that takes a file pointer (and keep the address of the root node at the front of the file). It would be faster, simpler, more reliable, and use a lot less memory. The developer would still need transactional code for commit/rollback/recover, but a good chunk of code could (and all the bugs that come with it) could still be eliminated.

  88. Darwin against common belief by John+Bayko · · Score: 1

    Darwin isn't judged negatively because he believed in the superiority of white men either
    Actually, Darwin was one of the few people who didn't believe that. In "The Descent of Man", he wrote:

    There is good evidence that the art of shooting with bows and arrows has not been handed down from any common progenitor of mankind, yet as Westropp and Nilsson have remarked, the stone arrow-heads, brought from the most distant parts of the world, and manufactured at the most remote periods, are almost identical; and this fact can only be accounted for by the various races having similar inventive or mental powers.
    He was kind of a contrarian, you know, going against conventional wisdom of the time. Do you know he came up with the theory of evolution by natural selection?

    Here's an article on the topic: http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/darwin_nazism.htm

    Interesting bit from the article, Abraham Lincoln was a racist. He just thought that, while negros were inferior to whites, they weren't so inferior that they could be treated like property. A quote by Lincoln from a debate at the time:

    I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. [...] I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied every thing. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife.
    That might better support your point of judging people according to the age they lived in.
  89. Re:Whats really really interesting interesting.. by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

    Is that stories like these will no longer seem absurd:

    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/28/1912247
    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/14/180222

    and you will indeed be prohibited from erasing data from your computer:

    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/21/023235

    Scary thought, through one man's genius, the courts may fully achieve their stupidity.

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
  90. bwahahah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A visit to Mr. Parkin's crowded office reveals him to be a 51-year-old British-American scientist for whom the term hyperactive is a modest understatement at best. During interviews he is constantly in motion. When he speaks publicly at scientific gatherings, his longtime technology assistant, Kevin Roche, is careful to see that Mr. Parkin empties the change from his pockets, lest he distract his audience with the constant jingling of coins and keys."

    This is so true. In June I was down in Cali for the SpinAPS conference and, well, Parkin is like some crazy methed-up autistic genius. Emphasis on the genius, though.

    Racetrack memory looks really fantastic. I love this diagram (I think Kevin made it?):
    http://www.almaden.ibm.com/spinaps/research/sd/racetrack_anim.gif

    The major problem that they're facing is domain wall drift and annihilation. They have to keep the bits a certain length in the channel, as they will randomly shorten and disappear. You could start out with a pattern 101, and if the '0' bit shortens too much (domain walls get too close together), the domain walls will be attracted to each other and cancel out, leaving a bit pattern of 111.

    I think one strategy I saw for getting around this was introducing deliberate imperfections in the racetrack. These imperfections can 'trap' domain walls in place so that they will click into certain positions. When the current is applied, the domain walls shift over and click in again. Of course, now the problem is getting them to all start shifting at the same time, every time.

    This is massively complicated, and if successful it will be a feat of precision nanoengineering.

  91. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Invent" is probably the wrong term here. It is probably more appropriate to say that we didn't discover the GMR effect - that work was done by other physicists. However, as the article mentions, he was the one who took the basic scientific discovery and brought into the commercial market place - he made a new and practical use of the effect. This is akin to quantum computing - where the basic effects underlying a quantum computer have likely been well known for many years, but no one has overcome the practical hurdles needed for evryday use of such technology...

  92. Re:Anybody bought a hard drive in the last 10 year by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Could be, I guess. Since I just made it up right there as a placeholder for a term describing the equivalent inches of perceived IQ points.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  93. A Long Time Ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a quote from Wikipedia in an article about a long forgotten technology:

    "Bobeck's team soon had 1 cm square memories that stored 4,096 bits, the same as a then-standard plane of core memory. This sparked considerable interest in the industry. Not only could bubble memories replace core, but it seemed that they could replace tapes and disks as well."

    The way both technologies work is similar too. It's just now being done on a much much smaller scale and it scales up to another dimension.

  94. Re:Storage leaps .. but IO rates doesn't! by Terje+Mathisen · · Score: 1

    The trouble with your Jimmy scenario is this:

    Although your thumb drive can pack 5 TB, it doesn't have write rates much better than about 10 x today's 1-10 MB/s, let's call it 100 MB/sec, OK?

    This means that each GB 10 seconds, and a TB require 10K seconds or nearly 3 hours, if everything is working perfectly.

    For 5TB we're talking 13-15 hours, which means that you must have spent the entire day over at Jimmy's house.

    All this is assuming both Jimmy's (solid state?) disk array and your thumb drive can actually sustain a Gbit/s for a file copy operation, including all the file system overhead.

    Over the last 25 years both IO rates and storage densities have increased exponentially, but the storage exponent has been significantly larger than the IO exponent, which means that the time to totally fill/empty a new, state-of-the art
    drive has increased every year.

    Terje

    --
    "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
  95. Rebuttal to Technology by fedrive · · Score: 1

    IBM of late has made a move into spintronic atomic storage with IBM's Parkins new approach, referred to as "racetrack memory". Its interesting to note that pancake motors, electric field generators, etc. all use the concept of creating strong EMF fields by subatomic particles moving through serial wires. Not only will there be increased EMF, heat and energy needs of the device but when the wire develops an open in any wire there goes the memory device. High stray EMF magnetic fields could also pose a health problem to users as well as other electronics in the circuit. How does IBM propose handling the EMF crosstalk between wires possibly effecting neighboring wires data ? These and many other question need to be answered before this technology can be said to be reliable holding a customers data.

    http://colossalstorage.net/spintronics.htm