Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Sued by a Beijing Student Over 'Privacy Violation'

freakxx writes "Xinhua report that a Beijing University student has sued Microsoft for allegedly gathering personal information via Windows Genuine Advantage. He has demanded a compensation of 1,350 RMB (around US$ 180) and an open apology printed in a national newspaper. The student has accused Microsoft of using WGA to gather information about his computer and himself, rather than solely checking whether or not the installed Windows XP system was genuine. A Microsoft spokesman has declined to speak on this issue and said that the matter is under investigation."

157 comments

  1. Priceless by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Copy of Windows in China: $10

    Settlement of legal dispute: $150

    Suing Microsoft for collecting your personal info when you live in the People's Republic of China: Priceless.

    There are some things you can blame on the government. For everything else, there's Microsoft.

    1. Re:Priceless by necro2607 · · Score: 2, Funny

      /me watches as Mastercard sends a takedown notice to /. regarding the parent post ;)

    2. Re:Priceless by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "A Microsoft spokesman has declined to speak on this issue and said that the matter is under investigation"

      In a press release, MS claims:

      We have NO idea what information is gathered as part of WGA. We promise to investigate what information is gathered, and then blame the collection of personal information on a rogue programmer who did it without the permission or knowledge of management. In the future, we promise to encrypt all the personal information we collect so you can't tell that we are doing this anymore.

      No more than 2 puppies were killed to produce this press release.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Priceless by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      also, at least one of the puppies was really ugly.

  2. Quote of the Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What we can say is that Microsoft is fully committed to letting customers control their personal information."

  3. Oh please, this is FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spread by the Chinese. I hate Microsoft as much as the next guy, but this is just the Chinese government trying to make Microsoft look bad as a bargaining tactic.

    1. Re:Oh please, this is FUD by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Spread by the Chinese. I hate Microsoft as much as the next guy, but this is just the Chinese government trying to make Microsoft look bad as a bargaining tactic.

      Perhaps ... but then again, to be completely fair, you really don't have to work that hard to make Microsoft look bad.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  4. Self worth by athdemo · · Score: 5, Funny

    $180? Where's the self-esteem, guy? They violated you!

    1. Re:Self worth by HappySmileMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      $180? Where's the self-esteem, guy? They violated you! I know... I've never paid more than 75 to be violated...

      Wait, what are we talking about?
    2. Re:Self worth by ILikeRed · · Score: 5, Funny

      But just think - there goes 25% of Microsoft's Vista sales in China.

      --
      I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
    3. Re:Self worth by Mr+Europe · · Score: 1

      It's just the beginning. Wait until the rest of the Chinese do the same....

    4. Re:Self worth by athdemo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know, my definition of prostitution is getting really blurred. You pay? She pays? I just don't know anymore...

    5. Re:Self worth by modecx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who said anything about a "she"?

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    6. Re:Self worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $180? Where's the self-esteem, guy? They violated you!

      It may sound like a tiny sum, but Here In the Rest of the World, you don't sue people for ONE BAJILLION DOLLARS without batting an eye. In certain countries, you can get the damage's worth (what a novel concept), but not what you think in your wildest fantasies the damage is worth.

    7. Re:Self worth by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good ballpark figure to me - unless you're used to receiving millions after having your toe trodden on.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    8. Re:Self worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill probably has more than that sitting in the cushions of his couch. Hell Microsoft probably already wasted $180 by just opening the envelope and communicating the contents up the food chain to their lawyers.

  5. If only... by Starteck81 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...He could do the same to his own government.

    --
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
  6. I'd rather Microsoft have my info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I'd rather Microsoft have my personal info than the government. Any government.

    1. Re:I'd rather Microsoft have my info by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd rather Microsoft have my personal info than the government. Any government.

      If Microsoft had it they'd just sell it to the governent. Any government.

    2. Re:I'd rather Microsoft have my info by athdemo · · Score: 2, Funny

      You trust Microsoft, but not /.? Coward!

    3. Re:I'd rather Microsoft have my info by IdleTime · · Score: 0, Troll

      That explains why you posted as AC... Plush Balls and scared shitless!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    4. Re:I'd rather Microsoft have my info by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I'd rather Microsoft have my personal info than the government. Any government.

      How do you know Microsoft won't give the government your info? Wasn't MS one of those cited for giving the Chinese government data on people? Wasn't MS cited for sharing data with the US government, along with Yahoo while Google refused?

      Falcon
    5. Re:I'd rather Microsoft have my info by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      They all do. Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Cisco are enemies of liberty. They are filthy collaborators.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:I'd rather Microsoft have my info by jandersen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, because as we all know, private companies are accountable to The People, whereas governments are only accountable to their shareholders.

      Come on, do you really think that a private company like Microsoft will hesitate as much as one second abusing the information they hold about you if it could earn them money? At least a government - any government - is ultimately accountable by the people. Even the Chinese government has to take the population into account when they make their decisions if they don't want to end up having an uprising on their hands, but Microsoft, and most other multinationals have repeatedly demonstrated a complete disregard for the rule of law, as you well know. Multinational companies can just move to another country, but a government can't, you see.

  7. M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to..... by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    M$ should be able to force you to sing extra contract like Eula's on top of the ones at time you payed for XP for things like updates at are part of first contract / terms of sale.

  8. Oblig. Simpsons quote by Mortiss · · Score: 1

    Mr. Burns: "Yes. But I have ten high-priced lawyers."

  9. Customers. by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
    > "What we can say is that Microsoft is fully committed to letting customers control their personal information."

    "Customers." They keep using that word. I do not think that word means what most of us think it means.

    OEMs are the customer. The end user who purchases a PC from an OEM and finds himself dependent on Microsoft is not the customer, he is the product.

    1. Re:Customers. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Customer:
      1) Person who potentially buys things. The one they buy from is known as a vendor.
      2) (Microsoft dfn). Ugly bags of mostly water+some money. The idea is to get the money out of the bags and then be able to keep it. For some reason, the bags sort of hold on to it when it's being taken.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    2. Re:Customers. by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      "Customers." They keep using that word. I do not think that word means what most of us think it means.

      OEMs are the customer. The end user who purchases a PC from an OEM and finds himself dependent on Microsoft is not the customer, he is the product.


      Oh, really. I really don't like when a Slashdotter pulls a one-bit logic on a painful issue.

      How about a more realistic look: OEMs are the customer who buys the Windows licenses. And end-users are the customers of the hardware vendors who preinstall Windows on their machines to make them usable for the masses.

      But wait, that doesn't sound shocking now, it sounds like the normal business it is.

    3. Re:Customers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > How about a more realistic look: OEMs are the customer who buys the Windows licenses. And end-users are the customers of the hardware vendors who preinstall Windows on their machines to make them usable for the masses.

      The problem with Microsoft is they're no longer working this way. Their business model is much more like that of RIAA/MPAA.

      The guy watching Battlestar Galactica isn't the customer of the Sci-Fi Channel. He's the product. Sci-Fi's customer is the advertiser, who purchases the product (us). BSG is merely the means by which Sci-Fi delivers the product (us) to the customer (advertiser).

      Similarly, Microsoft's installed base is the product. OEMs are the customer, users are the product, and the operating system is the means by which Dell gets to monetize its investment in Microsoft OEM licenses.

    4. Re:Customers. by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Sci-Fi's business model and Microsoft's have nothing in common.

      Microsoft doesn't hand out free copies of Windows with embedded ads in them. But I enjoy your circular logical nonsense nonetheless. Enjoy.

    5. Re:Customers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Microsoft doesn't hand out free copies of Windows with embedded ads in them.

      Score (+5, Funny). If we can't be bothered to RTFA, what makes CmdrTaco think we can be bothered to RTFSlashdot

    6. Re:Customers. by LordP · · Score: 1

      Ob Joke Reference - "They're made out of meat"

      http://baetzler.de/humor/meat_beings.html

      --
      Nothing is so smiple that it can't be screwed up.
    7. Re:Customers. by oever · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't hand out free copies of Windows with embedded ads in them.

      Not yet, but they might.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    8. Re:Customers. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      ""Customers." They keep using that word. I do not think that word means what most of us think it means."

      I think you're being too narrow minded. If you're male, gay, and a big fan of 'receiving' .... then you're pretty much spot-on.

      --
      -Styopa
  10. He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by JamesRose · · Score: 1, Troll

    Hear me out. If he truly didn't want to be spied on, have his details collected, he should be getting the hell out of china, not using it's legal system to sue a company for doing what the government does to everybody everyday.

    1. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If he lives in China, where the government censors a hella lot of information, how do you expect him to know that the government is spying on him?

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    2. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by Rycross · · Score: 1

      I doubt its that easy to just "get the hell out of China." Living and working in foreign countries can be quite difficult, even (especially) if you're a skilled laborer.

    3. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1

      So basically, if I catch M$ spying on me, I should get the hell out of the US?

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    4. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by deets · · Score: 1

      The difference here is that Microsoft won't kill you if you try to stop them from spying on you.

    5. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by Petrushka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And, er, which country would you suggest he move to? Are you under the impression that there are any countries that don't collect personal data on their inhabitants and conduct surveillance on them? (I omit wiretaps, of course, as there are lots of countries that don't do that.)

    6. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by kennygraham · · Score: 1

      $ure you $hould.

    7. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I doubt its that easy to just "get the hell out of China." Living and working in foreign countries can be quite difficult, even (especially) if you're a skilled laborer.

      ...and that's before you even take into consideration the lengths to which most communist countries go to keep people from escaping.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by revengebomber · · Score: 3, Funny

      And, er, which country would you suggest he move to? Are you under the impression that there are any countries that don't collect personal data on their inhabitants and conduct surveillance on them? (I omit wiretaps, of course, as there are lots of countries that don't do that.) Sealand!
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    9. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by rts008 · · Score: 2, Insightful


      So basically, if I catch M$ spying on me, I should get the hell out of the U$?

      There, fixed that for you.

      But, yeah...I understand your sarcasm, but for the clueless wonder you replied to, here are some Educational links (heh!heh!):

      Maybe you missed these earlier: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/13/1259202, http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/11/1615211,
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/11/1228241, http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/22/1712252, http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/02/139251, http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/22/2223236, or this...their version of the future: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/13/1447235.

      And let's not forget all of TFA's about the NSA, FBI, and who only knows who (or should it be whom?) else is tapping into our tubes in the War Against Terrorism! (tm) here in the good old USA.

      I could go on and on here, but I think this should suffice for now.

      Yes, he probably has not crawled out of mom's basement yet. Let's have a good laugh at his expense just thinking what a shock to his world it will be when he finally does!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    10. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by Howzer · · Score: 1

      take into consideration the lengths to which most communist countries go to keep people from escaping.

      There was an interesting little bit about this topic in the transcript of the conversation when Nixon met Mao.

      Nixon: We're concerned that people in your country don't have freedom of movement, Mr Chairman.

      Mao: (thinks for a moment) Tell me how many million you want, Mr President.

      Needless to say, the topic was dropped, and has never been raised again. How many tens of millions do you want?

    11. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by w000t · · Score: 1

      ...and that's before you even take into consideration the lengths to which most communist countries go to keep people from escaping. ...and the lengths developed countries go to keep people from entering.
  11. Re:M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to.. by initdeep · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only if they can also force people who can barely construct sentences to go back to school before posting on public forums as well........

  12. Re:M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I completely agree with whatever you just said

  13. solidarity begins at home. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to those living in United States. before you start making fun of China, think of the situation with privacy in your homeland. Love, PPJ.

    1. Re:solidarity begins at home. by Leiterfluid · · Score: 1

      At least I, as an American, am allowed to think of such things.

    2. Re:solidarity begins at home. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

      Yes, to think freely and even to post freely on Internet. Let us all make sure that won't disappear one day.

    3. Re:solidarity begins at home. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At least I, as an American, am allowed to think of such things.
      So are the Chinese. The problem is, how much are you practically able to express these things publicly? Recent events have shown that to be rapidly eroding in America.
    4. Re:solidarity begins at home. by E++99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is, how much are you practically able to express these things publicly? Recent events have shown that to be rapidly eroding in America.

      Such as what? What are you not able to express publicly in America?

      A guarantee you that somewhere in America right now someone is standing on some street corner with a megaphone (covered in and-written cardboard signs probably) shouting that Bush did 9/11, that he's a war criminal, and should be tried and found guilty of treason. And if the police are doing anything, they're protecting him from the more sensible people who would like to smack him around.

      Hyperbole is one thing, but when it becomes a paranoid fantasy-land where all statements are absurdities, it just takes us that much further from having rational debate and therefore rational policy.
    5. Re:solidarity begins at home. by E++99 · · Score: 1

      Okay, thought about it. Yes, it is pretty laughable that the US Military has to now go to a judge before spying on a suspected member of a foreign terrorist organization. As goofy an inept as that makes us look, I still want to make fun of China. China's problem isn't exactly goofiness.

    6. Re:solidarity begins at home. by tftp · · Score: 2, Informative
      And if the police are doing anything, they're protecting him from the more sensible people who would like to smack him around.

      Keep dreaming ...

    7. Re:solidarity begins at home. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Such as what? What are you not able to express publicly in America?
      How about peaceful protests in New York at the Republican National Convention of 2004? That's just off the top of my head. There are plenty more examples both overt and covert.
    8. Re:solidarity begins at home. by darthflo · · Score: 1

      What are you not able to express publicly in America?
      "Bong Hits 4 Jesus".
    9. Re:solidarity begins at home. by Supergood-ape · · Score: 1

      "to those living in United States. before you start making fun of China, think of the situation with privacy in your homeland."

      Ok I did and I'm still several orders of magnitude more free here than in China. Happy now?

      Also, why do I have to consider the freedom here to criticize China? I can't criticize them both at appropriate times?

      Of course I can, which makes me wonder why anyone thought your comment was insightful at all.

    10. Re:solidarity begins at home. by TheClam · · Score: 1

      From reading that article you linked to (gasp!), it seems like they were trying to publicize their march in DC tomorrow. By having "mounted police charge" them, the cops have just helped them publicize more. Sort of a win-win for the protesters.

      In China, this would likely be a lose-lose. > bless the USA!

    11. Re:solidarity begins at home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By specifically mentioning America, you seem to be implying that this isn't happening all over the western world. You're a tool.

    12. Re:solidarity begins at home. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      By specifically mentioning America, you seem to be implying that this isn't happening all over the western world. You're a tool.
      You're not very good at this whole "reading" thing, are you Mr. Coward. I'll give you an example that even your obviously feeble mind should be able to understand.


      You are an idiot. Now, by my saying that you are an idiot, that does not in any way imply that I believe everyone else is a genius. As to the specific topic at hand, yes I do believe that erosions of rights are occuring throughout much of the Western world right now. But, America and Britain are leading the pack. In fact, it looks like they are trying to out do each other in some sort of sick fascism race.

  14. At that price... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

    I'd imagine MS has a tough decision to make... just pay up as going to court would be a lot more expensive (but perhaps set a precedent allowing others to sue them or threaten suit), or go to court and spend a lot more to hopefully prevent a precedent (assuming the guy wins).

    1. Re:At that price... by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      They cannot settle. $180.00 times 1 Billion people...

    2. Re:At that price... by l3mr · · Score: 1

      Oh, but they can. As a rough guess, there may be as many as 5000 legal windows copies in China. What's the problem? :)

      --
      The world always seems brighter when you've just made something that wasn't there before. - Neil Gaiman
  15. Free Software? by sweetandy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's like Catholicism! Why have your computer controlled by some remote, powerful entity rather than by yourself?

    1. Re:Free Software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like Catholicism! Why have your computer controlled by some remote, powerful entity rather than by yourself? A PC + Holy Water = Holy Smoke

    2. Re:Free Software? by killdozer3k · · Score: 1
      No. In Catholicism they reveal that your computer has already been controlled by an evil entity that hates you but that a good entity loves you and wants to install beneficial software that will help you.

      You can keep using the evil software for free and keep paying hidden fees or you can get a new install of the good software that someone else has already paid for.

    3. Re:Free Software? by killdozer3k · · Score: 1

      In case you don't get the parallels: bad software=M$/Devil and the good software =God/Jesus/Linux/Unix/*nix all of which run on the AnthropOS

    4. Re:Free Software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but then some idiot comes along and runs over your computer in a Buick. He notices a little later that his left front tire is flat, and he fills up the tire but it just goes flat again over the next few days. Meanwhile, you're pissed at him, so you start putting sugar in his gas tank, so he's got that problem too. Plus his girlfriend is angry and keys the car a few weeks later, so he just decides to forget about the whole thing and trades it off for a Chevrolet. It's really your own fault though, because you shouldn't have left your computer in the road in the first place.

  16. Just fighting against spyware by Creamsickle · · Score: 1

    I applaud this person for taking a principled stand against spyware that has been forced upon him.

    The fact it's made by Microsoft should be irrelevant, just analyze the behavior of the application and judge it on that.

    WGA communicates unique information at any time to an American based advertising company (msn anybody?) with you the user having no idea of what data and what the implications are of giving this company that data.

    Can your business really risk an application like this on your systems? Are you prepared for the consequences of letting this program run unchallenged inside your companies infrastructure?

    --
    On the 0th day, God created C
    1. Re:Just fighting against spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up retard. It notifies you that it's collecting this information when it does its thing. It doesn't tell you what it is, presumably if it is that important to you you can switch to Red Flag Linux or the like. More over the information cannot be used to identify the user, so unlike every other transaction or interaction in China, the user in question has a guarantee of complete annonymity.

    2. Re:Just fighting against spyware by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      presumably if it is that important to you you can switch to Red Flag Linux or the like.

            I already have.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Just fighting against spyware by darthflo · · Score: 1

      [...] been forced upon him.
      Been forced upon him like listening to the default radio station is forced upon you whenever in your car? MS Windows is an Operating fucking System, developed and sold by a private entity. It's like those disgusting olives that are put on some pizzas. If your taste's bad enough or you don't want to be bothered with removing them, you eat 'em; if you don't like them, replacing them with ham (linux), pieces of ananas (bsd) or anything else is done within minutes.
  17. Re:Let him sue his government first by cromar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Same could be said about us USians.

  18. Why Doesn't Someone Do It In the U.S.? by asphaltjesus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WGA works the same here as it does in China. The notion that they collect "no personal information" is very clever, but untrue.

    Microsoft can easily associate your pc with a record in their backend because each pc generates a unique signature. They don't have your name at the moment, but that doesn't mean they don't know who's using their OS when and where. Given the number of times a windows box phones home when it goes online, I'd say there's plenty they know about you.

    This is exactly like the story some months ago where AOL gave out search data that was supposedly private. Same situation, bigger fish.

    BTW, if you are still married to a microsoft OS, your software firewall should be good enough to alert you when it attempts these connections. My Kerio firewall at work does it. And marriage is the right word for it because sometimes you wonder what the hell you got yourself into.

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
    1. Re:Why Doesn't Someone Do It In the U.S.? by sweetandy · · Score: 1

      I think nobody does it in the US because here in the US we're all talk and no action. That, and we're also much more afraid of the corporations and their power than we say we are - in major part because we buy everything they feed us and we're afraid of what will happen if that hand suddenly doesn't come out for lunch. I may live hand-to-mouth with my computers, but at least it's my hand.

  19. Re:M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to.. by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    M$ should be able to force you to sing extra contract like Eula's on top of the ones at time you payed for XP for things like updates at are part of first contract / terms of sale. Yeah, but do you really think anyone would buy the recording?

    - RG>
    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  20. Re:M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to.. by aevan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know...forcing people to sing contracts when they agree, might severely cut back on their [EULA]length. I know my voice would.

  21. So much for the... by Skiron · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... great firewall of China.

  22. Re:M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to.. by EvanED · · Score: 1

    I don't know...forcing people to sing contracts when they agree, might severely cut back on their [EULA]length. I know my voice would.

    You know, having only read the first half of this post, I was sure that you had transposed the "ng" in "sing."

  23. situation of privacy in the usa: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    bad

    getting worse

    still a couple of orders of magnitude better than it is in china

    this stunt is more of a nationalistic chest thumping exercise. were microsoft a chinese company and this guy had done what he did, he would be ignored, reprimanded, harasssed, or arrested. but being an american company, the authorities probably approve of it

    and who said i found the situaiton in china, or the usa, funny?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  24. Re:M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to.. by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...and, now I see that the OP is where the "sing" came from.

    Me == idiot.

  25. Re:M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to.. by hostyle · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he was using the Internet Explorer kelsey grammer and spull chigger ...

    --
    Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  26. under investigation? by varkman · · Score: 1

    A Microsoft spokesman has declined to speak on this issue and said that the matter is under investigation. What I mean is, when you install the "WGA" it says personal information is _not_ sent to microsoft, so why is there any need to investigate, as they are NOT doing it?

    On a more funny note : the spell checker (of course) thinks i should write microsoft with a capital; wasn't really expecting that :)

    1. Re:under investigation? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      when you install the "WGA" it says personal information is _not_ sent to microsoft, so why is there any need to investigate, as they are NOT doing it?

            Because "we will investigate" is the standard, canned answer for ANY corporation. It sounds real pro-active and nice and all that.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:under investigation? by qzulla · · Score: 1

      Which begs the question what is personal information?

      qz

    3. Re:under investigation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sent to Microsoft != Not sent anywhere.

  27. Can you say, "settle out of court?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drop a couple thousand to avoid the bad PR of the newspaper apology and we never hear from him again.

    Or just ask the government for a favor and _nobody_ hears from him again.

  28. Re:Let him sue his government first by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

    He can not possibly claim that his privacy has been violated in any way which is meaningful in China.
    Or, you could look at it this way: A guy in China is claiming that his privacy has been violated by Microsoft. It sounds much more severe that way, doesn't it?
  29. We're doomed by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are gaining in space, have cheaper manufacturing, out-hacked us (pentagon penetration last week), and finally they are taking our last remaining comparative advantage away: law-suits.

    1. Re:We're doomed by mathfeel · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? The Chinese are not catching up at all!! A weesy beesy $180?? What about punitive damages?? On a serious note, asking for a reasonable amount of money and a public apology does make people think that he's doing this out of principle and conviction, not motivated by greed. If the Chinese civic legal system continue to evolute this way, who knows? Maybe in 50 years, it won't be so bad after all.

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
  30. Probably the most important lawsuit this year by SpeedDevil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I truly hope he wins. And I am glad that he is not asking for much. I'm pretty sure Microsoft will try to settle out of court but I am also pretty sure this guy is not really doing this for the money. The Chinese government has been trying to reinforce the people's trust in their legal system so I don't think they will just push the case aside, especially after it being covered on Slashdot. I really hope this case gets the attention it needs because this case could be the answer to protecting the privacy of all of us. Setting the precedent in China will make way for more precedents elsewhere. Lu Feng ... we are with you!!! K PS: I'm pretty sure somebody in Microsoft is going nuts right now ... hehe

    --
    "The User is a dangerous animal so handle it with extreme caution." Krassi (me)
    1. Re:Probably the most important lawsuit this year by SpeedDevil · · Score: 1

      I might have got the guy's name wrong ... Sorry

      --
      "The User is a dangerous animal so handle it with extreme caution." Krassi (me)
    2. Re:Probably the most important lawsuit this year by mathfeel · · Score: 1

      I am sure all Chinese high level legal officials are faithful /.er's.
      After all, there are many US bashers here.

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    3. Re:Probably the most important lawsuit this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with almost everything you say except, I don't think the Chinese government really cares or not what appears on Slashdot. I think if you compare the Slashdot reader demographic with the Chinese population demographic you might notice some differences. Remember Lei Feng!

    4. Re:Probably the most important lawsuit this year by SoulRider · · Score: 1

      There has to be some stigma attached to having the Chinese government tell you, you are being too intrusive on peoples privacy.

    5. Re:Probably the most important lawsuit this year by weenie510 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure somebody in Microsoft is going nuts right now

      My God, those poor chairs!

  31. Why so stingy by Nonillion · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude, it's Microsoft. You need to move that decimal place at least six more places to the right.

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:Why so stingy by belmolis · · Score: 3, Funny

      You need to move that decimal place at least six more places to the right.

      Not a problem. If he wins, millions of other Chinese will follow suit. I don't think that China has class actions, so Microsoft will have the fun and expense of defending each suit separately if they don't settle.

    2. Re:Why so stingy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is perfect, Microsoft will have to pay many times that to defend themselves or settle. This is less than chump change, it's quite brilliant and in China I bet it goes a long way for a student. Maybe they'll settle.

    3. Re:Why so stingy by SpeedDevil · · Score: 1

      "Your Honor, are you saying I have less right to privacy than somebody in China!!!"

      --
      "The User is a dangerous animal so handle it with extreme caution." Krassi (me)
    4. Re:Why so stingy by zen-theorist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i'd say its a bit of a gamble. maybe if MS fess up to this one and pay it instead of contesting (why not?) it could set legal precedent, and then the amounts could be much higher..

  32. Tin Foil Hat #132 by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd rather Microsoft have my personal info than the government. Any government.

    You are assuming they are mutually exclusive...

  33. Re:M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to.. by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Look at some of the parent's other posts here. English sucks as a second language.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  34. Re:Let him sue his government first by SpeedDevil · · Score: 1

    PATRIOT Act ..... It will probably be extended again. 'nuff said

    --
    "The User is a dangerous animal so handle it with extreme caution." Krassi (me)
  35. Treshold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Microsoft is getting really close to the threshold both at personal and corporate level where consumers will simply refuse their products, because of the continuous, repeated bad taste Windows leaves behind.

    1. Re:Treshold by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      I think Microsoft is getting really close to the threshold both at personal and corporate level where consumers will simply refuse their products, because of the continuous, repeated bad taste Windows leaves behind. Or just as bad from Microsoft's point of view.. People start to not be afraid of low flying chairs..
      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  36. Can not mix person and non-personal info ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 3, Informative

    The notion that they collect "no personal information" is very clever, but untrue. Microsoft can easily associate your pc with a record in their backend because each pc generates a unique signature.

    I have some experience in this area. According to our attorneys, but being informally paraphrased by myself, it was important to never mix personally identifiable information (PII) and non-personal information. Any mixing or linking would cause the non-personal to become PII and therefore under the jurisdiction of US and international legislation, with more legislation on the way given the new found importance of this topic. So to make life simple, I may collect the operating system version for demographic reasons but I can not record an account name, IP number, or other PII with that information, nor could I have some common key to associate records in PII and non-personal databases.

  37. Common key? by asphaltjesus · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute.

    I may collect the operating system version for demographic reasons but I can not record an account name, IP number, or other PII with that information

    I still don't see how that should make Windows users feel secure.

    History has repeatedly shown it's quite easy for Microsoft to argue in court they don't "collect" PII despite the fact they most likely do. Anecdotes abound of Judges and cases where technical fiction often passes as fact.

    Judging by the number of times my windows box phoned home on a daily basis, I'd say they have an excellent idea who I am and what I'm doing. The rest is arbitrary legal fiction.

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
    1. Re:Common key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at Microsoft and was involved with a feature that calls home a while back. If there's one message I got loud and clear, it was that I was not to send anything that I could ever map to a human being. I couldn't identify my own test machines from the other testers and self-hosters. I had a lot of useful technical information, but nothing more.

  38. Microsoft...what absolute & complete CRAP! by MS+Bleauxs · · Score: 0, Troll

    Having used Apple computers for the past 5 years, I thought it might be interesting to try a new MS-based laptop to run MS Flight Simulator. What a MISTAKE! I cannot believe the people put up with such idosyncracies & illogical operating environments such as Vista Home Premium. This is the WORST computer system I have used since the first 386sx hit the market over 10 years ago. I will return this computer to Dell this week. Nothing particularly wrong with the hardware, it's just that Microsoft has this machine choked with ridiculous interactions that are beyond my tolerance. When people first use an Apple computer, they are pleasantly surprised. It just works! And Apple computer's software makes sense. On the other hand, as "pretty" as the shell is for Vista, I cannot honestly believe that a team decided to field this poor software to the public. Microsoft Vista is like a machine with adjustable knobs hanging off its sides, but get in the way all the time, and interfere with the use and function of the actual software. It's sad that Microsoft apparently only focused on the external appearance of Vista, rather than getting "inside" the software and actually making it user-friendly. But with Microsoft, that will (apparently) never happen. Viva Apple Computer.

    1. Re:Microsoft...what absolute & complete CRAP! by SpeedDevil · · Score: 1

      If the dude wins the case I might reconsider dual booting Windows again. Well, I said I might reconsider, I'm too lazy to reboot Lenny so I can't really see myself going through the trouble. :D

      --
      "The User is a dangerous animal so handle it with extreme caution." Krassi (me)
    2. Re:Microsoft...what absolute & complete CRAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a homosexual with shit stains on your glans.

    3. Re:Microsoft...what absolute & complete CRAP! by MS+Bleauxs · · Score: 0

      Well spoken by a Koolaid Vista drinker. And a typical response from an idiot without a clue. Party-on dumbass. 10:1 odds you've never even tried Apple OSX, you worthless sack of crap.

    4. Re:Microsoft...what absolute & complete CRAP! by luther349 · · Score: 0

      taking the laptop back couse it runs vista is stupid lol. install ubuntu and cedega runs ms flight simlator. no windows and you have your game.

  39. Sneaky :) by headkase · · Score: 1

    Yup, once the Chinese legal system settles in this guys favor, the Chinese government will no doubt use a ruse such as this to ban WGA checks within their borders. For Privacy... Yeah. Not to get free access to all those patches on Windows Update without the check... Oh no, they would never do that... :)

    --
    Shh.
  40. Outsource. This is not really funny. by Erris · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    There are some things you can blame on the government. For everything else, there's Microsoft.

    How do you tell the difference? The severity of punishment for thought-crime in China makes privacy a very serious matter.

    I'd like to make a joke about in how Communist China, you sue the BSA, but it's just not funny. People who look at the wrong web page are put in jail and executed for their organs. Technicians have testified before the US congress that prisoners were skinned alive to better preserve the skin. It should be a crime to do business with China.

    I'm sure this is just PR and an attempt to shift blame to M$, but that's the kind of thing you expose yourself when you do business in a country like that.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  41. I wonder if Canadians can do the same thing? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Unlike the US, Canada has strong privacy rights, as Google is finding out, and which belong to all their citizens ... hmmm.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I wonder if Canadians can do the same thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Canada has strong privacy rights"

      It doesn't matter though since private companies have more quite a lot of clout in government via lobbying, etc. I mean really short of doing a full on thorough investigating microsoft buildings and personel with the right people, how is the government going to know what they are doing?

    2. Re:I wonder if Canadians can do the same thing? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Well, in a recent lawsuit, Google found out that Canadian privacy rights trump their ability to sell Google Streetview images of their houses and faces.

      Not everyone has the exact same legal system as the USA.

      [caveat - IANAL but I did take legal courses in high school and college in B.C. and most of my friends in Seattle are lawyers, including my brother and uncle and some ex-gfs]

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  42. Why We're The Only Superpower by E++99 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    $180? Dude, YOU'RE NOT DOING IT RIGHT. Until other countries get some lawyers who know how to properly sue multinational corporations, America's supremacy in the world will never be challenged.

  43. In communist China.... by ihatewinXP · · Score: 1

    1,350 RMB?

    Seriously will buy you six hundred and seventy five 22oz beers here!

    I think you guys are selling him short - he has this totally figured out......

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
  44. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would be careful about relying on the testimony of technicians. The United States was lulled into the first Gulf War partially on the testimony of a woman saying Iraqi troops were breaking into Kuwaiti hospitals and stomping infants in incubators to death. It later turned out the woman was a member of the Kuwaiti royal family, and made the whole thing up as part of a systematic Kuwaiti campaign to get America to attack their invaders.

    That's not to say the charges against China are without basis. I'm just advocating some skepticism about people who may have a grudge against China, or have a good reason to lie about torture back home (so they can get asylum and citizenship here in the United States).

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  45. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by miffo.swe · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The US greatly surpass both Communist Soviet and WW2 Germany when it comes to propaganda. If you blindly believe things said by US authorities i have a bridge to sell you cheaply. Havent you asked yourself lately where all the WMD from Iraq is? China is does terrible things to its people but damn, how many people havent died in Gaza, Afganistan, Iran and Iraq because of direct involvment from the US? Atleast China maims and kills inside its own borders.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  46. Cool sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    People who look at the wrong web page are put in jail and executed for their organs. Technicians have testified before the US congress that prisoners were skinned alive to better preserve the skin.

    M$, organ harvesting, chinese technicians and the US Congress. What might have sounded like paranoia before, starts to look like common sense.

    ... if you repeat it enough times.

  47. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by dedazo · · Score: 1

    Atleast China maims and kills inside its own borders.

    Yeah, we should all be grateful for that. Most especially the people of Tibet.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  48. Lacking details? What information? by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 1

    Nowhere in TFA does it mention what information he claims it collects, or how it collects it. Until I see some details, I'm calling BS on this.

  49. He obvously forgot... by grilled-cheese · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He obviously forgot to wear his tinfoil hat.

  50. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    People who look at the wrong web page are put in jail and executed for their organs.

    BWAHAHAHAHAH!!! You've been reading too much xenophobic propaganda my man.

  51. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Please point to a single case of people looking at the wrong web site, and then being killed, with their organs harvested. China has its major political problems but just the idea of what you're saying is totally ridiculous.

  52. MOD parent up by beav007 · · Score: 1

    Me == idiot.
    Mod Parent +5 Insightful
  53. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by Erris · · Score: 1

    I'm just advocating some skepticism about people who may have a grudge against China, or have a good reason to lie about torture back home (so they can get asylum and citizenship here in the United States).

    You must realize that the desperation people feel, which you think makes them less than honest, is also an indictment of China. Technicians are comparatively privileged people without economic reasons to immigrate. What grudge can they have that's great enough to make them leave their friends and family forever? What do they fear about going home? Imprisonment, torture and worse? I'll believe news to the contrary when people in China are free to report it without fear or reprisals.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  54. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by enrevanche · · Score: 0, Troll

    The "lulling" of the US into the first Gulf War was done an administration who knew that that the was a bogus performance. That is a fraud, by elected officials for which they should be in jail. The Bush administration spent months on with great expense to sell this to America.

  55. He has already lost. by realdodgeman · · Score: 1

    What he just did? He sued them because they did what he previously told them was okay. He accepted the EULA, now they own his PC and his data...

    1. Re:He has already lost. by scoot80 · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe its time EULAs have to change, and we don't have to blindly agree to companies stealing our private information. I know you have the option of not installing it if you don't accept the EULA, but certain things should be illegal.

    2. Re:He has already lost. by Bloodoflethe · · Score: 2, Informative

      The EULA doesn't claim personal data as their property. In fact, they go to great lengths in their documentation to say that they are not collecting personal information!

      --
      "Little is much when little you need."
  56. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Huh, really?

    One of my roommates in college was a Palestinian guy who grew up in Kuwait. His family was in vacation (thank heavens) in America when Saddam invaded. They broke into his house, pissed on the carpet, stole his TV and anything else valuable, and lived in it for the duration of the occuptation. His family's bank accounts got frozen, which he never got back. Fortunately, his father was a big believer in cash when going on vacation and had two hundred thousand dollars *on hand* in LA, with which they bought a 7-11, a car, and a down payment on a house. Unfortunately the 7-11 was in Northridge, but everything eventually worked out all right for him. No thanks to Saddam.

    The piracy charges against China are true. When I was in Shanghai I could have picked up copies of any Microsoft product for $10 or so. They have kids hustling CDs on the streets, containing everything from movies to software to porn. Of course, whenever the 8 year old kids saw a big white dude, they always offered the porn first. We must have a great reputation for being lechers over there.

  57. I'm from China so lemme have some say ... by gzipped_tar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm from Beijing. I understand the situation Mr. Lu Feng is faced with: a monopoly power M$, a considerably corrupted legal system, and the suspected alliance of the two. In Chinese gov't (and persumably court) offices they run the M$ Windiz + Office. M$ is an 'official' choice. If Lu wins, an implication would be that M$ not only voilates out privacy & property rights, but also severely threatens the public security of the country. However the gov't are not fools, neither are M$ men. Gov't clearly knows what M$ is always doing to its costumers. Ergo, PRC Gov't --- M$ is not the same as you --- your software producer. That's why I suspect the two are in alliance with each other --- alliance based on the crime of betrayal and spying. The county is doomed. The PRC collapses and you Amiricans are happy... However that's only some hot air. In reality the lawsuit probably would end in a reconcilation with M$ paying a sum of $ to Lu for his silence. That would be the easiest way for both the court and M$. Even if Lu wins, only a few could benefit from the case --- Lu himself and those private users of authenticated Windiz. The Mass use pirate copies, remember! In my university (Beijing Normal Univ.) there are about 2000 university-owned boxes running pirate Windiz and PowerPoint things, from the library to every classroom ( why do they think every classroom needs a computer??) --- mass violation of the law!! Perhaps the media coverage of this case would encourage more Chinese switching to Linux / (GNU/Linux). Just a wish. Personally, I don't care about it. I'm using Fedora GNU/Linux, remaining quiet over the matter, and I'll be relatively safe. One thing interesting: you guys at /. are much more active on the topic than native Chinese men. You know M$ is just M$. But for many Chinese, M$ means either a large, shadowing power who can sue you against using pirate copies of its products at any time it wishes, or the only OS/office/othersillystuff solution. They don't even know Linux or /. exists.

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    1. Re:I'm from China so lemme have some say ... by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      someone please mod parent up. This Lu Feng sounds like a real hero risking himself to stand against an oppressive corporation and corrupt bureaucracy for what ? Not for a huge cash settlement (face it $180 is nothing to microsoft) but for an apology and for an uninstall program. I didn't know /. was this international, but I say let /.ers help those who pursue justice in any country!

  58. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by chrish · · Score: 0, Troll

    Porn... the universal language of international diplomacy!

    --
    - chrish
  59. Re:M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to.. by jmac1492 · · Score: 1

    M$ should be able to force you to sing extra contract like Eula's on top of the ones at time you payed for XP for things like updates at are part of first contract / terms of sale. Yeah, but do you really think anyone would buy the recording?

    - RG> No. But they'd stea^W I mean infringe on the copyright by downloading it.
    --
    Jenny's got a new number! 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  60. Publically speaking... by Bloodoflethe · · Score: 1
    Don't forget this: White House Executive Order

    "...undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people."

    Pretty broad, that is.

    Undermine - I'm ok with using definition 3, but definition 4...?
    --
    "Little is much when little you need."
  61. Re:M$ should be abelto forceM$ should be able to.. by emilper · · Score: 1

    which English ? US, UK, NZ, Australian ? Serbians/Croatians and Rumanians/Moldavians are in the same situation, having their own native language as a second language ...

  62. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who, under the fuck up of a theocratic government Tibet had before, were routinely subjected to amputations, rape, and physical assault...

  63. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the first Gulf War, which was sold to the American people by the Bush administration (the first one, remember? Junior's Daddy?). It was a much better sell job (though arguably a much easier sell job). It was, I personally think, a much more justified war than the current one, but still had some significant spin involved in selling it.

    How fucking stupid are you?

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  64. How did that get modded up by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Would a delegate to the People's Congress have a reason to have a grudge against China? Because one stated last year that they executed a hair under 10,000 people, a rate which is over sixty times that of the US's on a population-weighted basis. (We're #2 on absolute and population-weighted counts among major nations.) Amnesty International, noted human rights organization, was skeptical -- based on Chinese newspaper reports, they think China merely killed at a multiplier of twenty, with an unknown additional number succumbing to torture and prison camps.

    It must be said that China has improved over the years, with either 3,400 or 10,000 being substantially less than the democides they used to perpetuate. The lowest possible bounds are in the millions.

    This is one of those times where the oh-so-sophisticated-evenhandedness-and-cynical-skepticism reminds me of... ahh, dang it, it reminds me of a Godwin's Law violation.

  65. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1, Troll

    Of course, whenever the 8 year old kids saw a big white dude, they always offered the porn first. We must have a great reputation for being lechers over there.

    And stupid too, apparently -- what idiot pays for porn?

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  66. Desperation? by hackingbear · · Score: 1
    As a legal immigrant from China in the 80's, I would say that people there in the 1970's were desperate to leave China for survival. Since mid-80's people desperate to go USA because they believed USA was heaven. Many people desperate to come to US nowaday either because they or their offsprings wanted to get US college degree or because they want to hide their wealth for which they collected in some less than legitimate methods.

    Do the later two consider true desperation? maybe.

  67. Class Action by stites · · Score: 1

    The guy is only suing for $180 but think of the potential if he turned it into a class action lawsuit.

    ------------------
    Steve Stites

  68. Re:Let him sue his government first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, what?

    And what the fuck is a "USian"? I keep seeing people post this and then invariably say something idiotic immediately afterward.

    Is it what stupid people call Americans? And why do the stupid not realize that it's wrong? And why do the stupid people not realize they're stupid?

  69. The US and China have so much in common! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We both have conservatives seeking to oppress the masses, we both have conservatives doing everything they can think of to take away access to information, and we both have conservatives suppressing free speech!

    And now, we both can appreciate the fact that we both have rabid, irrational anti-MS zealots, willing to complain how everything in the world is Microsoft's fault!

    Celebrate our similarities!

  70. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by Just+because+I'm+an · · Score: 1
    Hmm.. so they pissed on the carpet and then lived in the house? It's an amusing story but somehow it doesn't ring true. People will resort to exaggeration to make a point, and thereby dilute it instead. (geddit... dilute... piss... come on!)

    The story about the incubators was a total fabrication and while I've no doubt the Iraqi troops didn't say "please" and "thank you" suddenly all the other claims of what they supposedly did are thrown into a much more rigorous bullshit filter.

    As for taking things from people's houses... well that's part of the whole war thing isn't it? I wonder how much of the stuff in Saddam's palaces is still where he left it.

  71. Re:Outsource. This is not really funny. by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    This isn't a friend of a friend. This was my roommate's house that was thrashed by Saddam's army. If you knew anything, you'd know that such behavior was basically by the book for their army.