Slashdot Mirror


OOXML Critic Fired From Finnish Standards Board

Shirke writes "A Finnish computer magazine reports that Finnish Standards Association has fired Mr. Lassi Nirhamo (article in Finnish). Some excerpts: Mr. Nirhamo was chairing the OOXML standard proposal meeting. During the meeting Mr. Nirhamo asked other board members to be excused of his duties and voice his opinion as a private citizen. After this was granted he criticized the standard proposal and resumed his duties as chairman. Mr. Nirhamo has now been let go due to a 'lack of trust.' Independent observers have assessed his chairmanship as 'excellent' and 'one of a kind.' The Association is accepting applications for the position. Anyone interested?"

47 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. So... by Romancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Getting fired for something that's on record that you not only asked permission to do, but got that granted permission documented.

    That's a new one to me.

    Are these people elected and when's the next open forum meeting?

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    1. Re:So... by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Getting fired for something that's on record that you not only asked permission to do, but got that granted permission documented.

      You speak Finnish then? I don't, so I can't tell what exactly he was fired for. However, it seems unlikely that he was fired for speaking as a private citizen, so much as for the content of what he said.

      Look at it this way - if I asked my company for permission to speak candidly, and it was granted, and then I told them that I'd been stealing stuff from them, or selling secrets to the competition, I'd be fired. Not because I spoke candidly, but because of what I said.

      Until we know exactly what he said, we can't really tell why he was removed.

    2. Re:So... by hazem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Getting fired for something that's on record that you not only asked permission to do, but got that granted permission documented.

      The key here is that as the chairman of the committee he's supposed to work from a neutral point of view. Sure he has his own personal opinion but he's not supposed to let that influence his job as chairman. By taking the role of chairman you are pretty much agreeing to be bound by that.

      When he then openly expressed his opinions about the matter his further judgment will be called into question, especially if his decisions as chairman align with this publicly stated opinions. He gave up his objectivity and by keeping him as chairman, anything that comes out of that committee would be called into question.

      Depending on the rules of order in place, the committee probably did not even have the authority to let him "step down" from the chairmanship and back up again.

    3. Re:So... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Look at it this way - if I asked my company for permission to speak candidly, and it was granted, and then I told them that I'd been stealing stuff from them, or selling secrets to the competition, I'd be fired. Not because I spoke candidly, but because of what I said.

      No you wouldn't, you'd be fired for what you did. Big difference there.

      If you asked to speak candidly at a meeting, were given permission and you stood up and said "Our products suck, no one I know likes them and we're a laughing stock", a good company would maybe want to hear more details as part of an improvement process.

      Then again, maybe if you work for a company that's a laughing stock, inability to take criticism is probably a respect aspect of the corporate culture and being fired might look good on the CV.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    4. Re:So... by laa · · Score: 5, Informative

      You speak Finnish then? I don't, so I can't tell what exactly he was fired for. I do. The problem is that he got no reason, we was fired during his four months "trial period" so the employer is not obliged to give a reason. The article certainly tries to hint that the reason was his open speak, but then again, it's pure guesswork as no reason was given.

      A chairman is supposed to be objective but I am still stunned. Finland is a place where you're almost always permitted to speak your mind freely. Interesting...
      --
      Why does the kernel go through stable and then unstable forks? Can't it always be a stable build, like with Windows?
    5. Re:So... by Mr+Europe · · Score: 4, Informative

      A guick translation (of the story and one comment presumably from a board member present the meeting):

      "Lassi Nirhamo was the chair leader of the OOXML-meeting in Finland, where the Finland's opinion should be agreed. During the meeting Nirhamo surprized all and asked other board members to be excused of his duties and voice his opinion as a private citizen. After getting the permission he told as his personal opinion that he was against the acceptance of Microsoft's standard. He also listed the grounds for his opinion, which Microsoft members could not deny. In the end of the meeting he proposed as the meeting would abstain from giving a opinion."

      The formal reason was that his four month trial period was ending.

    6. Re:So... by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The key here is that as the chairman of the committee he's supposed to work from a neutral point of view. Sure he has his own personal opinion but he's not supposed to let that influence his job as chairman. By taking the role of chairman you are pretty much agreeing to be bound by that.


      According to the people who were present during the meeting, he handled the meeting really, really well. He was balanced, and kept the meeting in a tight rein. He also repeatedly underlined the fact that SFS's official stand on the issue will be decided by a vote in that meeting, regardless what the individual members might feel about the issue.

      So it was not like the meeting was anti-OOXML. It was fair and balanced. He apparently asked to voice his opinion as a private citizen (a request that was granted) due to pressure from Microsoft. And his opinion was based on facts that Microsoft could not refute.

      the committee probably did not even have the authority to let him "step down" from the chairmanship and back up again.


      Apparently it did. He asked for a permission, and the permission was granted. If the committee didn't have that authority, why should he be punished for a mistake that others in the committee made?
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    7. Re:So... by tiananmen+tank+man · · Score: 2

      So ... the real reason he was let go was he was too knowledgable. Mr. Nirhamo spoke his opinion and backed it up with a list of reasons for that opinion. These same reasons were also not contested by 'Microsoft members'.

    8. Re:So... by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are talking about the general case for a meeting chair, keep in mind that the chair may ALSO have other duties, and may need to report on those duties (thus speaking...) But you are right, generally the chair doesn't use his position as a pulpit. A chair is not a dictator, a chair is a moderator / facilitator. That said, while unorthodox, what he did (stepping down, speaking, and resuming his chairmanship) is exactly the way it needed to be done to be legit.

      Apparently, Microsoft now has the power (through its "paid" minions) to shape the makeup of not only the membership, but the standards board. This is a very bad situation. It destroys the legitimacy of ISO. Apparently the ISO doesn't have an ethics committee or ethics rules. If they do, they were swept under the carpet for the entire OOXML issue.

    9. Re:So... by CortoMaltese · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look at it this way: It's his job to say the things he said, right? He chose to say them off the record so that instead of genuinely trying to help, he was just having a bitch session. He then went right back to failing to oppose something he didn't believe in. He was not supposed to say those things on or off the record as a chairman of that meeting, or as a representative of the Finnish Standards Board, which was present as an independent, unbiased observer. What he did have was enough technical competence to understand what was wrong with the proposed standard, and asked if he could present his opinion as a private citizen. He was allowed to do that, and he also repeated that the opinion of the Finnish Standards Board would be the result of the meeting, regardless of his own opinions. In my opinion, he did the Right Thing.
    10. Re:So... by macshit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Try a relevant analogy: You're a project leader at a company, ask to speak candidly, say, "I hate this project and I wish it would just die", are you really expecting to be allowed to continue leading that project?

      Er, no, that isn't a relevant analogy. The committee's job wasn't to promote MS's standard, it was to judge it. If a company was evaluating a potential expensive purchase, and the team leader candidly said "well let's be frank, this product sucks" before the "official" evaluation was over, people would either laud him for his frankness, or argue with his premise, but they sure as hell wouldn't fire him!

      Of course, if the Finnish committee sees its job as promoting Microsoft products, then of course your analogy would be correct -- and the committee should be charged en-masse with corruption.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  2. Where can we find.. by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

    another Finn that no-one trusts.. Good grief.. I can't think of any.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  3. Sorry I can't RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    But it sounds like, again, OOXML is a shit standard, and it's going to be pushed through by pressure from MS and its political lackeys (I mean allies), and anyone who takes a stand is going to be crushed.

    Do I have it?

  4. Error. Help! by Prysorra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What you do mod an "informative troll"?

  5. Re:No, I'm not interested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it is an interesting post, even though I am not capable of reading Finnish. Typical anglo-centric thinking: Since I cannot read this, it has no merit for this website.

  6. Any more details? by Skrapion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I searched around Google a bit, but I couldn't find anything. Anybody have any more details? Some things I'd be interested to know are:
    • What did he say?
    • What is the structure of the Finish Standards Association? Who fired him?
    • Who claimed he was 'excellent' and 'one of a kind'?
    • Who else is part of this association?
    • What does this association standardize, and for whom? In other words, what is the impact of this association's decision?
    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
    1. Re:Any more details? by PrayingWolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      In this case, the Finnish Standards Association is the body that decides Finland's stand in the debate over OOXML becoming an ISO standard. Finland's vote at ISO is now going to an "abstension"...

    2. Re:Any more details? by rasjani · · Score: 5, Informative

      • What did he say?
      • What is the structure of the Finish Standards Association? Who fired him?
      • Who claimed he was 'excellent' and 'one of a kind'?
      • Who else is part of this association?
      • What does this association standardize, and for whom? In other words, what is the impact of this association's decision?

      Some answers:

      • During the meeting, he asked permission to speak as private person and was granted to do so. The article is abit brief on the matter but comments on the article says that he mentioned errors/problems in ooxml and even the microsoft representative on the crowd wasnt able to deny those facts. I should also mention that the same comment mentions that he explicitly pointed out that this was his personal view and SFS should should have only the view that this meeting will decide, twice.
      • He was fired by Pekka Järvinen, who's basicly CEO of SFS. According the article, Nirhamo was still on his 4week trying period and Järvinen said to the press that the contract is cancelled due to issues that have appeared are causing a lack of trust and he cannot talk more about the details.
      • Comments in the article mentions that he was keeping the meeting well in course, not allowing people to wonder to offtopic discussion.
      • Member list of the association is here: http://www.sfs.fi/sfs_lyhyesti/jasenet/jasenluettelo/ . Briefly said, its an organization that has members from wide range of finnish industrial and commercial associations and finnish government/minister offices.
      • SFS Covers alot of standardizing in various fields. Im not so aware of all the things they work with but seeing the memberlist has basicly all the major industrial and commercial associates and all major government offices, i would assume that their work is atleast "relevant" =)

      Addition to the last answer, i read the linked article which covered the actual meeting. In the end notes of that article, journalist mentions following:

      Freely translated: Finland is one of ISO JTC1-group's so called 36 P members, who's votes 75% are required to accept the standard. And due to outcome of this meeting, Finland's decision wasnt declared due to results of this meeting.
      --
      yush
    3. Re:Any more details? by hakola · · Score: 3, Informative

      About not being told a reason to...

      It is quite difficult to fire somebody with a permanent contract in Finland,
      i.e. one can always sue the company for being wrongly dismissed. Because
      termination of contract due trial period is one of the rare cases, which
      really cannot taken into court of law, it is advisable not to give any
      explanations in such cases. Advisable for a company doing the termination,
      that is.

      Thus, when people are laid off during the test period, they rarely get
      anything other than "on the grounds of test period".

    4. Re:Any more details? by vinsci · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Reporters may want to talk to Mr Jaakko Lehtinen who participated in the OOXML-meeting at the SFS and wrote this insightful comment (in finnish) regarding the decision to fire Mr Nirhamo:

      Translation of the original comment in finnish*:

      October 1st, 2007, 22:03 by Jaakko Lehtinen
      Re: Wrong opinions

      Can it really be, that Microsoft would be involved in this decision as well.

      I question what caused this lack of trust. We don't know that, as we're not told. This however causes suspicion regarding the SFS.

      You see, I was there at the SFS's ooxml decision meeting, which ended in very even votes for and against and where the state's votes also were 2-2 — first even 3-1 against ooxml.

      Mr Nirhamo handled his role as chairman in a very professional manner. He kept the discussion tightly within the agreed 'frame', to use contemporary wording. Some [attendees] tried to start for example comparing the existing standard and the suggested standard against each other, but that was ended immediately, as it was not on the agenda for the meeting. No kind of deviations to other subjects were allowed. Not even from Microsoft.

      And it was a very well handled decision meeting, I dare say as someone who has been in meetings with hundreds of pretty big decision makers.

      Rarely — hardly ever — have I seen and experienced such a great performance by the chair.

      Further about speaking one's mind, he made it clear at least twice, that the SFS doesn't have and can't have any other opinion that the decision of that meeting.

      Due to Microsoft's pressure he separately inquired if he can put forward his own opinion of the matter. The representatives of the SFS who were present gave him permission to temporarily diverge from his position as chair and to state his own opinion.

      He then showed the facts, that he based his opinion on. These arguments could not be denied by Microsoft either. There are errors and contradictions in the ooxml-suggestion.

      I am very sorry about how Mr Nirhamo has been treated and disappointed at the SFS's way of handling the matter, if the alleged lack of trust was due to that meeting.

      In that case, the SFS does not deserve my trust.

      This looks like a full-blown scandal at the SFS to me. Certainly, the SFS under managing director Pekka Järvinen, can not be trusted to create standards according to the SFS's charter (link in Finnish), which among other things says that the SFS is an independent organisation and that it should represent the interest of Finland.

      ____________
      *) Although I believe this translation to be very good, I'm not a translator by trade.

      --

      Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
    5. Re:Any more details? by CortoMaltese · · Score: 4, Informative
      Assemblix wiki has some more details:

      The goal was to reach consensus between all parties while SFS acts as an independent observer. There was no vote, but all parties were given the chance to voice their opinion. If no consensus could be reached, Finland's vote would be "abstension".

      Gathered from the above source and others, the opinions were (non-exhaustive list):

      Approval:

      • Microsoft
      • Novell
      • Sysopen Digia
      • Tietoenator
      • WM-Data
      • Ministry of Trade and Industry
      • Ministry of Finance
      • Customs
      • City of Helsinki
      Disapproval:
      • Nokia
      • Sun Microsystems
      • IBM
      • Ministry of Education
      • Ministry of Justice
      • National Archives Service
      • National Library
      • Electronic Frontier Finland
      • Confederation of Finish Industries
      • The Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities
      • Centre for Open Source Solutions
      Abstension:
      • F-Secure
      • Nordea
      • Tax Administration
      After the comments Microsoft representative wanted to know why it was not possible to accept the "approval with comments" option. It was at this point that chairman Lassi Nirhamo of SFS responded "as a private citizen" that the proposal does not fulfill a single requirement set for ISO standards.

      At the end, the chairman had stated that it was evident that the corporations disagreed, and that it would've been enough if the state had been unanimous, but as this was not the case, Finland's vote would be "abstension".

  7. Re:No, I'm not interested by Iskender · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're flamebait/troll, but I'll bite for future reference.

    This place won't post stuff without links (there are exceptions, but you can't count on them). If a submission doesn't have a link, the story won't be posted. If a story isn't posted, you won't find out about it.

    In other words, if this story in Finnish hadn't been posted, you would have been more ignorant about the OOXML ISO process, story in Finnish or not. A longer summary or complete translation will no doubt appear soon, too (I speak Finnish myself, but am too busy at the moment unfortunately).

  8. Re:My suggestion by ByteSlicer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm afraid that Steve wouldn't keep the chair very long...

  9. Correct me when I'm wrong by jsse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mr. Nirhamo has now been let go due to a 'lack of trust.' ... The Association is accepting applications for the position. Anyone interested?" Apparently they can only trust someone who wouldn't speak up for the truth...

    I'm in!
  10. Re:Error. Help! by deek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What you do mod an "informative troll"?

    ± 1 Freakish

    Back on topic, personally I've got no issues with someone posting a foreign language link, and providing the interesting bits in English. I'm certainly interested in viewing the opinions of other countries.
  11. Re:My suggestion by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm afraid that Steve wouldn't keep the chair very long...

    coffee+keyboard == you are a git....

  12. Re:I Will Do It by Aranykai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, Im pretty sure that being bought off is a requirement to hold chair on a committee. So, get millions from Microsoft, then they'll consider you.

    --
    If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
  13. FTA by PrayingWolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article says (I can read finnish) that mr. Hirkamo was still on his trial period of 4 months, during which his boss could legally fire him without providing a reason.

    The CEO of the organization in question, Pekka Järvinen, stated that "Unfortunately issues came up during the trial period, after which trust is no longer possible". And "I cannot comment on the reasons any further".

    I guess his anti-Microsoft ideas were not appreciated :-P

  14. How do you say by slickwillie · · Score: 3, Funny

    "throwing chairs" in Finnish?

    1. Re:How do you say by Fizzl · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quite easy actually.
      First, let us tackle the verb and the subject.

      Throw = Heittää
      Chair = Tuoli

      Now, the interesting thing is that the basic form of this verb is only used when speaking of 3rd person perspective. F.ex. "Ballmer heittää tuolin".
      Also note, that in this case the basic form of "Tuoli" is not used. The 'n' suffix indicates a possessive form. Which makes no sense so it must mean some other form. Which, I have no idea. No one but the men of language sciences know all of Finnish forms of words.
      Then, let's have a look for first person action. "I throw a chair" -- "Heitän tuolin".
      Again, have a look at the suffixes. Lord only knows why, but now we threw out one T and added an N to the verb. The subject has the N suffix again. the subject is actually useless without a form. Basically only thing you can do with a subject without form would be edumacation like "This is a chair" -- "Tämä on tuoli".

      To give something to chew. Let's list the normal presens form:
      Heitän tuolin (I throw a chair)
      Heität tuolin (You...)
      Heittää tuolin (He/She...)
      Heitämme tuolin (We...)
      Heitätte tuolin (You (in plural))
      Heittävät tuolin (They...)

      And to indicate the possessive:
      Tuolini (My chair)
      Tuolisi (your...)
      Tuolimme (Our...)
      Tuolinsa (His...)

      Any combination of these is valid.
      More interesting things to do with 1st person declensions.

      And here's the 15 basic cases to finnish language:
      nominative, genitive, accusative, partitive, essive, translative, inessive, elative, illative, adessive, ablative, allative, abessive, comitative, and instructive.

      And 12 adverbial cases:
      superessive, delative, sublative, lative, temporal, causative, multiplicative, distributive, temporal distributive, prolative, situative, and oppositive.

      You don't just throw chairs in Finnish! Prepare for lifetime of torture with the grammar before you can simple things correctly!
      From http://www.helsinki.fi/~jshermun/language.htm:
      "It is an essentially logical language. The rules are absolute and reliable in all situations, except exceptions."

  15. To be fair... by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Funny

    In their defense, the board just said they'd excuse him of his duties. They didn't say they'd give them back.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  16. Translation of the article by kalpaha · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a quick translation of the article.

    The finnish standards association has suddenly terminated the contract of Lassi Nirhamo, the new expert of the IT standardization team. As late as last week, Nirhamo participated in the SFS press conference and was part in making the finnish stand on OOXML known at the ISO organization. Lassi Nirhamo tells to the Computer- magazine that he only got the information about the severance of his contract last thursday, after his four months probation was coming to an end. At this point the employer can legally terminate the contract without any cause.

    Lassi Nirhamo himself wonders, that no reasons were given. "It's quite hard to say anything about reasons, when they haven't told me", says Nirhamo.

    Lassi Nirhamo lead the OOXML- meeting in Finland, in which the finnish stand on the standard was decided upon. During the meeting, Nirhamo surprised the participants by announcing that he would speak as a private person for a moment, instead of being the chairman of the meeting. At that point he announced that he was against accepting the Microsoft standard. At the end of the meeting, Nirhamo put forward the opinion that Finland should abstain from voting.

    The CEO of the Finnish Standrds Association, Pekka Järvinen says that the reason for ending the contract is lack of trust. "Unfortunately, during the probation period, issues came up, after which trust is not possible. I cannot comment further than this." Järvinen says over the phone.

    SFS is now searching for a new expert who would be responsible for the many IT standardization related jobs, like continuing the OOXML- issue in the ISO organization next spring.

    1. Re:Translation of the article by Flambergius · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Lassi Nirhamo tells to the Computer- magazine that he only got the information about the severance of his contract last thursday, after his four months probation was coming to an end."

      For those not familiar with Finnish labour law: almost all employment contracts being with a four month trial period (koeaika). That's what the article is refering to. I think "probabtion" isn't the best translation, as it could imply that Mr. Nirhamo was on probabtion for some other reason. Anyways, during that four month period his employment can be severed for without the employer having to provide a justification (or indeed to have one).

      Finnish Standards Association is perfectly within their rights to fire him, this is not in question. Whether or not it had something to do with Mr. Nirhamo's actions relating to OOXML is basically unverifiable. Pushing FSA on that point might well compromise Mr. Nirhamo's right for privacy.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers - Pablo Picasso
  17. Translation of the article by Jagetwo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Preview is your friend... :)

    Microsoft standard critic got fired

    Picture text: Lassi Nirhamo participated SFS (Finnish Standards Association) press conference just last week, where he said he'll take OOXML subject to ISO workgroup. Finland's vote may change in the spring.

    SFS has surprisingly ended work contract of information technology standards team's new expert Lassi Nirhamo. Just last week Nirhamo participated SFS's press conference and was going to take Finland's views about OOXML to the ISO.

    Lassi Nirhamo tells Tietokone magazine, that he was informed losing his job last thursday, when four month test period was about to be finished. At that point employer can legally give notice to end the contract without giving any reason why.

    What Lassi Nirhamo wonders is the fact there was absolutely no reason given. "It's rather difficult to say anything about the reasons, because they never told me", says Nirhamo.

    Lassi Nirhamo was leading Finland's OOXML-meeting, in which Finland's vote was decided. In the middle of the meeting Nirhamo surprised the participants by telling he won't be the chairman, but a private person. At that point he declared to be against accepting Microsoft's standard. In the end of the meeting Nirhamo suggested to vote void.

    The CEO of SFS Pekka Järvinen tells the reason for ending the contract was lack of trust. "Unfortunately certain things came in to daylight during the test period that prevent trust. I can't elaborate any further than this", says Järvinen on the phone.

    SFS is looking for a new expert, whose responsibilities will include many information technology projects, such as continuing on OOXML in ISO in the spring.

  18. Re:My suggestion by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2
    yes, this needs a good candidate.

    Oh come on, it's obvious.

    If Lassi's gone, we'll need Rin Tin Tin.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  19. That means... by rxmd · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that his career is finnished, I guess.

    (Thanks, thanks, I'll be here all week.)

    --
    As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
  20. Translation of the news by raatti · · Score: 2, Informative

    (Note: this is a very quick word-to-word almost translation, I am not an expert in this just wrote for people to get a view of the issue)

    The news is:

    --
    Expert who criticised the Microsoft's standard was fired.

    Finnish Standards Association SFS has suddenly let go of IT standardation team's fresh expert, Lassi Nirhamo. Yet in the last week, mr. Nirhamo participated in SFS press conference and was taking the Finnish stand about the OOXML standardiation issue into ISO.

    Lassi Nirhamo told the magazine (Tietokone) that he was told last weeks thursday that hes trial period of four months was coming to an end. In the trial period, its possible for employer to legally fire you for any cause.

    Lassi Nirhamo wonders however why no cause has been given. "Kinda bad to say anything about reasons, when they didn't tell me why", says Nirhamo.

    Lassi Nirhamo led the Finnish OOXML-meeting where Finnish stand on the issue was decided. In middle of the meeting, Nirhamo suprised the participants as announcing that for a moment hes not the chairman of the speak but a private citizen. In that period he announced that he personally was against apporval of the Microsoft's standard. At the end of the meeting mr Nirhamo presented that the Finnish stand on the issue would be to give no answer.

    SFS's CEO Pekka Järvinen told that the reason of ending the employment was lack of trust. "Unfortunately during the trial period of employment, some issues came up after which trust is no longer possible. I cannot comment more on the specifics.", says Mr. Järvinen in a telephone conversation.

    SFS is now recruiting for new expert who's responsibility is many IT-standardation projects and continuing of the OOXML-issue in the ISO at spring.

    ---
    I hope this clears the subject a bit.

  21. Re:No, I'm not interested by pairo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I, personally, am also interested in the discussions on said topic, not only the news article. Well, sometimes. Depends on the story. But definitely in this case.

  22. Re:Error. Help! by bky1701 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "/0: Paradoxical"

  23. Re:No, I'm not interested by marcello_dl · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's more a case of "since ninety-nine percent of the people using this website cannot read this, it has no merit here.", which seems perfectly sensible.


    It seems perfectly sensible but for one crucial detail:

    "'Tis is Slashdot: we don't RTFA here!"

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  24. I can tell you've never been involved with ISO! by Flying+pig · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Anybody who has ever been involved in standards, whether ISO, IEC, or their national standards body, knows that this happens all the time. Chairing the meeting is not incompatible with holding strong views. What less ethical chairmen would have done is simply talk to people before the meeting, find people who agreed with their objections, and then make sure they got a chance to express them. If the opposition try and say too much, have a useful retired consultant who can be relied on to stand up and waffle the meeting out.

    ISO and IEC are often very political and feelings often run very high in working groups, though this rarely makes it way to the plenary sessions. People shout. Observers try to intervene and have to be shut up. This guy behaved perfectly properly. Your comment about "decisions as chairman" show a bottomless ignorance of procedure. I can only assume that either you have no experience whatsoever of standards work, or your employer is based in Redmond.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
  25. Depends... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone interested?

    Depends. How much does MS pay?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. Re:Stacking the committee by andy.ruddock · · Score: 2, Informative

    Quisling was Norwegian

    --
    God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
  27. Re:'es not fired... by phoenixwade · · Score: 3, Funny

    That was the Norwegian Blue. Keep your scandinavian countries straight, ok? It is so near to Russia,
    So far from Japan,
    Quite a long way from Cairo,
    Lots of miles from Vietnam.

    Finland has it all....
    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  28. Translation of Article by maroberts · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mr. Nirhamo is Finnished.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  29. Re:So... -- He said it ON the record by darkonc · · Score: 2, Informative
    What he said was said on the record, but he had to temporarily step down as Chairman so that people were clear that he was speaking as a private citizen not as the chairman of the committee.

    As the chairman of the committee, he was responsible for shepherding and implementing the decisions of the committee.
    As a private citizen he had a good deal of experience and an opinion about which way he would have liked the decision to go.

    It is actually standard practice, in this situation, to do precisely what he did.

    It is also standard practice, in any real democracy for someone to have an opinion that doesn't jive with that of the majority. The expression of that dissent is not (and should not be), per se, grounds for any sort of retaliation. Unless there was something in his speech that was completely inappropriate that was not mentioned or aluded to in the article, then I would be inclined to say that his firing was very, very bad news for the standards process in Finland.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  30. Re:Reminds me of Judge Jackson by nuzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember when Judge Jackson told a reporter what he thought of Microsoft coming into his court with blatant lies and fake demonstrations. His ruling was overturned because of his *bias*.

    Judge Jackson broke the three cardinal rules of being a judge:

    1. You do not talk to the press.
    2. You DO NOT talk to the press.
    3. YOU DO NOT TALK TO THE PRESS.

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.