Slashdot Mirror


UC Berkeley Posts Full Lectures to YouTube

mytrip writes to tell us that Berkeley is now using YouTube as an important teaching tool. Today marks the first time a university has made full course lecture available via the popular video sharing site. Featuring over 300 hours of videotaped courses initially, officials hope to continue to expand this program.

204 comments

  1. Awesome! by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 5, Funny

    By watching these, it will have the same effect on me as getting UC Berkeley degree!

    (Except for the job offers and stuff.)

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm surprised the internet hasn't made us reexamine the entire nature of our higher education system. Is congregating people in one spot for four years to learn something really the best way to do it? Of course there are physical things that you need access to for a lot of classes, but we could be looking at a future where education is a lot more accessible, transparent, and open. If you could sit in on lectures and classes just because they interest you, there may be a lot more people learning things and getting exposed to knowledge they otherwise wouldn't have. You're right that there would need to be some way to certify and verify things, and that's really the main strength of the current system. I can't help but thinking there's got to be a better way. But we're definitely not there yet, and old institutions die hard. In some ways we're actually moving away from this ideal, college is getting more and more expensive and the State is helping out less and less.

      Whenever you make education more widely available you improve all aspects of society, so it's in everyone's interest to be able to do something like this. Is progress being held back simply because of technological hurdles or is there elitism and old-thinking that's keeping the system from evolving?

    2. Re:Awesome! by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm all for making this kind of material publicly accessible. If someobdy wants to watch these lectures, it's great that they'll be able to do that from the comfort of anywhere there's a computer and network connection.

      As a Berkeley grad though, I generally wouldn't attribute very much of the value of my education there to lectures I sat (or slept) through. Especially in Computer Science, most of the lectures probably didn't differ a whole lot in content or form from those taught at other less prestigious institutions. Most of what I learned came from being surrounded by other driven students in a unique environment and completing challenging assignments. In particular, the first of those is all but impossible to capture in an online manner.

    3. Re:Awesome! by lymond01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These will serve multiple purposes, the most common one likely being a bunch of kids sitting around a table working on homework late at night and they get to a problem or analysis and one asks, "What did the prof say about this?", they bop online, fast-forward through the lecture, and listen again to the professor's wise words.

      If you miss a class, you can view the lecture online.

      Attending a centralized campus doesn't work for everyone, and online lectures are a good thing for full-timers. But I wouldn't TRADE one for the other -- attending college is like being hand-held into the real world in terms of responsibility (doing your own laundry), being social (interacting with peers), and building relationships (both friendly and business).

    4. Re:Awesome! by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Is congregating people in one spot for four years to learn something really the best way to do it?

      Yes. If by "learn something" you mean "get a college education", that is; if you mean "learn some specific, limited, subject" then no.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    5. Re:Awesome! by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That's a really narrow view on your part. There are a lot of people who would love to get an education. But they can't afford it. Or they can't fit it into a schedule because they need to work strange hours to feed thier kids. Or they live somewhere where a college isn't handy. Or, or, or...

      This is the start of education for the masses. Books are nice, but they don't convey enough information of certain types. The lectures will help go beyond that. Even barely literate people will be able to use these to learn. It will also be a huge boon to people with dyslexia and other issues. Even more important is the time-shifting aspect. Learn when you have time. Thanks to this trend a lot of people who might not have otherwise been able to get access to this type of education will now be able to do so. In time they'll probably be able to take tests as well and for very little money get a degree at their own pace and within the needs of their own life.

      The exciting thing about this is that it will actually allow the internet to do something really great. Provide effective, free, and high quality education to ANYONE who can get a computer and an internet connection. Which is rapidly becoming almost everybody in the world.

    6. Re:Awesome! by elysiuan · · Score: 1

      They said all the same things about television and we see how that's worked out.

      Sadly for much of the "masses", they do not value education and do not want anything to do with it.

    7. Re:Awesome! by AndersOSU · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but I really don't see how anyone is going to learn something from a non-interactive lecture on the internet that they couldn't learn from a book in a library.

      Anything that can be said in a lecture can be written in a book. Anything that can be drawn on the board or presented on an overhead projector can be presented in a book.

      Education doesn't come from sitting for lectures. At best the lectures provide the very most basic information to start the learning process. The real learning happens from interaction, assignments, and studying for tests. The value of a university isn't the lectures, it's the resources available to someone when they don't understand something they're studying. Whether that's classmates learning the same things at the same time, or expert professors and grad students (TAs) available through recitations or office hours, it's not recorded lectures and textbooks.

    8. Re:Awesome! by deesine · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is awesome. I plan on getting a couple degrees from MIT, and now Berkley, but I'm busy downloading the Transformers. I need another connection.

      --
      damaged by dogma
    9. Re:Awesome! by mikael · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you not heard of the Open University that is run by the BBC? . You an cregister for the course, get the course materials sent to you by post, and the lectures would be broadcast on TV at the odd hours that no-one else would be watching. In those days, the main channels only started at 9.00am for school programming, and closed down at 12.00pm . Between those hours , Open University lectures would be broadcast, and repeated on the weekends. That allowed people to work their day jobs and study part-time, even more so if they had VCR.

      But now, the matierals are easier to distribute. From their website:

      The course materials

      We use a variety of media to help you learn. Your course may use any of the following different media that you will use from home (or wherever you choose to study):

              * printed course materials,
              * set books,
              * audio cassettes,
              * video cassettes,
              * TV programmes,
              * cd-rom/software,
              * web site,
              * home experiment kit.


      When Saturday morning kid's TV was boring, you could just change channels and watch presentation on mobius strips, fitting cubes into spheres, coastal erosion, the dangers of matching the harmonics of airplane engines/wings, bridges and wind speed, lasers and travel at relativistic light speeds.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:Awesome! by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The fact that a handful of people said that about TV has what to say about this argument? The technologies aren't even remotely similar. Also, unlike with TV, we are already seeing that the educational possibilities are beginning to emerge on their own. It's not ivory tower speak. It's happening.

      Posting content to the internet is basically free and mostly unregulated. The content is available on demand. The internet also provides a means for feedback, chatting, and community discussions about the content to instantly spring up.

      Broadcasting on the airwaves is regulated by governmental monopolies and is a scarce commodity. It is regulated, censored, and horribly expensive. No ability for feedback loops or interaction.

      The internet reduces the cost of transmitting, storing, and replicating all forms of information to almost zero. Education is mainly a form of information. That is why it will become a tool of education. Even if only 0.1% are interested in using it that way, it will provide that function.

    11. Re:Awesome! by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      MIT has a similar program and if I remember correctly Berkely already had this setup going, just running off of their own servers. This is just a cheaper(for them) version of the same thing.

    12. Re:Awesome! by Seumas · · Score: 1

      By watching these, you will get all of the lecture without any of the stinky Berkley body oder!

    13. Re:Awesome! by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm sorry, but I really don't see how anyone is going to learn something from a non-interactive lecture on the internet that they couldn't learn from a book in a library....The value of a university isn't the lectures, it's the resources available to someone when they don't understand something they're studying.

      First, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests different people learn better with different approaches. Not all people learn well from reading the written word. Hearing it or seeing it will provide a great benefit for speed, retention, and comprehension for many people. Just because you do well with books does not mean everyone does.

      Second, a book is no more interactive than the lecture series will be. The lecture series + book is a much better combination.

      Third, with the internet you will soon have blogs or interactive discussion boards around these lectures. It's just the way the internet tend to be. So it will become interactive to a lessor or greater extent. Even if you miss most of the interactive action, if the discussions are retained it is likely the bulk of your questions that arose will be answered, making it far superior to reading a book in isolation. At minimum you'll get the added benefit of a FAQ, and if you're lucky you'll have an active forum and possibly even the ability to communicate with an authority.

      Fourth, this is just the start. Soon these educational videos will include dynamic information. You can't show a heart pumping in a book. You can't show a sterling engine in operation in a book. It's static. With video you can show, well, video. These lectures won't stay just being a video of some professor. Eventually someone will start putting out educational video that is much richer in content and leverages what you can do with video. There are tons of things you can do with video that you can't do with a printed page.

      Fifth, thanks to the feedback loops of the internet and network effects, the best videos will be found, rated highly, and rise to the top. So the best sources of information will soon be easy to find.

      The current crop of videos aren't all that important. It's what they probably portend for the future that is important. Fully dynamic, multiple approach (written, visual, auditory), interactive, free, at will education.

    14. Re:Awesome! by ArikTheRed · · Score: 1

      By watching these, it will have the same effect on me as getting UC Berkeley degree! It'll turn me into a pretentious ass?
    15. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forbidden You don't have permission to access /img/articles/spinoff/milton.jpg on this server.

    16. Re:Awesome! by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      If by "learn something" you mean "get a college education"

      I think the non-class experiences are at least 50% of the value of a college education. The ridiculous games played in the halls of the freshman dorm, living off of dining hall food, being hugely codependent with an entire community that is out of their parents home for the first time. It is a cultural common grounds that is as close to a coming-of-age ritual as we have here in the USA. It's also about the most fun you can hope to have in four years. Online courses may convey the information, but they will not convey the experience.

      --
      We are all just people.
    17. Re:Awesome! by brjndr · · Score: 1

      As a Berkeley Grad I'm pissed this wasn't around when I was there.

      What a sucker I was, actually sitting in a lecture hall.

      Seriously though, I knew a couple EECS majors in my dorm who barely had any human interaction already. If they had the option to play Warcraft II (or Marathon) and watch a lecture at the same time, I may never have known someone lived in their room.

    18. Re:Awesome! by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      This is only the lectures, the most boring stuff it will help the students that missed (or slept through) that lecture. Most important part of learning occurs in the lab. Also having contact with other people in lecture hall that may help understand what professor or teaching aid said. Now I work for with these professors so understand why is it so confusing to all of the students.

    19. Re:Awesome! by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Remember the lecture hall full of tape recorders recording what the lecturer's tape recorder dictated?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    20. Re:Awesome! by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      This does happen, and has been the case for a while now. The campus has had a Real Media-based webcast system for enrolled students for several years. And yeah, a significant number of EECS majors just sit in their rooms and rot until it's time to take an exam or hand in a project (sometimes not even then, if it can be submitted electronically).
      What Berkeley IST should be working on is the damn enrollment system. Tele-BEARS on the Web sucks, plain and simple.

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
    21. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Did you really mean this to be funny?

      I have been watching these for several months, using them to attempt to update my knowledge. I received my formal computer education a couple of decades ago, and I've neglected it. I chose a specialisation that died (SGI graphics). Most of my work training was as a 'software engineer' in a defense company, but I've discovered that some companies (eg Google) seem to thing that a 'software engineer' is what I think of as a 'computer scientist'. So, I've had to do some training and my location is such that these Berkley courses have been very useful. ...but no, no job offers yet.

    22. Re:Awesome! by loganrapp · · Score: 1
      How will a non-interactive higher education system help me as a media production major? Each production I work on, even the most basic, one-camera, one-microphone deal, requires three people.


      Editing class - we're sitting at computers editing video. Can we do this at home? Some of us, maybe. I don't understand something and perhaps all I have to do is lean over and ask someone for help, or raise my hand and note that I don't get something.

      How about the number of people who meet their future husbands and wives in class? My parents, brothers and sisters all met their spouses in class, in the midst of doing something that inherently brought them together.

      How funny is it that the smaller the world supposedly gets, the further away we are from each other.

    23. Re:Awesome! by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry, but I really don't see how anyone is going to learn something from a non-interactive lecture on the internet that they couldn't learn from a book in a library.

      I'm an auditory learner. I do much better by sitting in a lecture (even when I'm not fully paying attention) than I do from reading a book myself. I also have an uncanny ability to remember, nearly down to the word, conversations that happened years ago -- this infuriates my wife but my friends find it to be crazy.

      So, while I could learn this material from a book, and have, it's much easier for me to do it by listening. I guess textbooks on CD would be a godsend for me -- although extremely boring ;)

      Just because YOU don't learn in one particular way doesn't mean that others won't.

    24. Re:Awesome! by JoshWurzel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I generally wouldn't attribute very much of the value of my education there to lectures I sat (or slept) through

      You obviously never took Chem 1A with Professor Pines. The man blew something up or set something on fire during every lecture (on purpose). If I hadn't already known I wanted to be a structural engineer, he'd have convinced me to major in chemistry. A brilliant man. Makes me sad when I hear about everyone out there who struggles with freshman chem because it doesn't engage them correctly.

    25. Re:Awesome! by giarcgood · · Score: 1

      Or, or, or...
      I think you are completely right for the first few years of college. Very few academics really want to teach first or second year courses. Let the one who are good at that do videos for everyone. Eg, my first year economics course had multiple overflow rooms, how useful was that? MIT are taking good steps with this. Eventually you will be able to get some certification from public projects like this.

    26. Re:Awesome! by jumpingfred · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You obviously never took Chem 1A with Professor Pines. The man blew something up or set something on fire during every lecture (on purpose). If I hadn't already known I wanted to be a structural engineer, he'd have convinced me to major in chemistry. A brilliant man. Makes me sad when I hear about everyone out there who struggles with freshman chem because it doesn't engage them correctly.
      Is he still teaching that course? I took that course 20 years ago.

    27. Re:Awesome! by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I really don't see how anyone is going to learn something from a non-interactive lecture on the internet that they couldn't learn from a book in a library....The value of a university isn't the lectures, it's the resources available to someone when they don't understand something they're studying.

      First, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests different people learn better with different approaches.

      Is there a growing body of evidence favoring a "dominant sensory system"? 'cause when I checked up this about a year and a half ago, there was a strong body of evidence showing that there was no such thing as a dominant sensory system, and it seemed fairly clear this particular aspect of NLP was plain wrong. If there has come in evidence pointing to the contrary, I'm very interested - anything that can convince me that I was wrong about something means I've learned something new :)

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    28. Re:Awesome! by mike27112 · · Score: 1

      Yes, all of that, plus it's much better checking out the ladies in person ;-)

    29. Re:Awesome! by umghhh · · Score: 1
      Being anengineer in completly different industry I know nothing about building houses. I bought one recetly however and then I had to do number of things myself (the budget was limited so I had to). I found a lot of information on the internet and book store but its quality was bad: the info was either incomplete, not accurate or so scattered that it was really questionable whether one could learn usefull things this way. At the end I succeeded but I had to learn the hard way (is there any other?) and it took me more time than I predicted. I can imagine that it would have taken me much less time if I had had a guidance. That is exactly where univesities excell - they provide you concetrated source of information and guidance. Information you can find in internet but guidance is much more difficult to find.

      Once you aquire your degree however, you will notice that it is not a degree that makes an engineer. It is a hard heart and hard work that do.

      This said I agree one can use modern technology to open education to more people. Everybody profits this way. Recent study of OECD seems to confirm that more educated people make life better for all - see this link: http://www.oecd.org/document/57/0,3343,en_2649_201185_39315897_1_1_1_1,00.html or look into this discussion: http://www.oecd.org/document/21/0,3343,en_2649_201185_39414933_1_1_1_1,00.html

    30. Re:Awesome! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Does your country not have an equivalent of the Open University? It's been around here since 1969, so learning without a physical university is hardly a new concept. There are a few problems with the approach:

      • There is no assessment along the way.
      • There is (or was) no good way of asking questions and getting an answer.
      • You miss out on a lot of the social components of the university experience.

      The first point really boils down to self-discipline. If you are the kind of person who can motivate themselves enough to study without any feedback on your progress then it isn't a problem, but very few people of university age are.

      The second is a much bigger problem. I skipped a lot of lectures when I was at university, because I didn't feel I got anything more from being lectured to than I got from reading the notes. The one exception was when I didn't understand something in the notes. If a lecturer explains something badly, you can ask him for a clarification. If a video (or a book) explains something badly, you have a problem. My course (Computer Science) also had programming labs, which helped the weaker students a lot since they could ask questions while completing assignments. Arts subjects tend to have seminars, which are a lot more interactive and couldn't be replaced by something passive easily. You could maybe replace them with videoconferencing, but I don't see that this would gain you anything.

      The final point is perhaps the most important. There is a lot more to university than just getting a degree (my mother, by the way, got an OU degree, but it was her second degree and I would definitely recommend them for people who have already been through a university once). Part of the experience is being surrounded by intelligent people from very different backgrounds, which you don't really get to anything like the same degree elsewhere (in my first year I was living with three Americans, a Nepalese guy and two Germans). Student organisations are also a large part of the experience; in my second year I was on the executive committees of the computer society, the choral society, the dark ages reenactment society and the drinking wine society. I was also a member of the student union's finance committee. In addition to these, I took up badminton, squash, yoga, and salsa dancing in my time at university. I can't imagine getting anything like the same depth of experience from a distance learning course.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    31. Re:Awesome! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When Saturday morning kid's TV was boring, you could just change channels and watch presentation on mobius strips, fitting cubes into spheres, coastal erosion, the dangers of matching the harmonics of airplane engines/wings, bridges and wind speed, lasers and travel at relativistic light speeds I think you know you're a geek when, as a child, you get up early on Saturday mornings and quickly get bored with cartoons and start watching whatever the OU are showing.

      Yes, I did it too.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    32. Re:Awesome! by rben · · Score: 1

      I think we need a University of the Internet, that would provide free education K-Bachelor for anyone who is willing to do the necessary work. One Laptop Per Child is one step towards that, Free Wi-Fi in communities is another, this step by Berkly is one, as well. But it would be good to have some open organization pulling everything together.

      Think about it. If every university donated content and some small amount of instructor time, this would be doable. It would give professionals a chance to donate time as an instructor or tutor, as well.

      The best way to deal with the host of problems facing us is to make sure that we educate everyone we can as well as we can. It's not military might that's going to help us solve the problems ahead, it will be brain power. We need to cultivate that throughout the world.

      --

      -All that is gold does not glitter - Tolkien
      www.ra

    33. Re:Awesome! by umghhh · · Score: 1

      there is no such a thing as a computer scientist. Neither a software engineer exists. If they are any different from unicorn then they are extinct or almost extinct creatures and probably live in China (in Schanghai's Zoo ???).
      Of course it is not a big wonder that this is the case as if youlook around you will notice that for instance these days it is widely believed that to write good quality software one needs a bit of glass pearls to pay for work in some underdeveloped country, some fluffy idea of what needs to be done and few days of time. Possibly internet access for your slaves so that they can google the solution out of the web but I guess that may be a luxury already. Starting with a huge staff in the west and laying them off brings the share price sky high and a nice bonus to the manager too.

      You see there is a reason why young people in the west of Europe do not want to do technical studies. It is difficult, you can make your hands dirty, your brain could overheat and it allows you to enjoy blackmailing (designers in Somalia are much cheaper than you) every time your manager needs a bonus for saving 1k rupia. That their in years time acuried knowledge is not worth a thing because you do not know the new buzz words or newest abbreviation is another motivation of course.

      Maybe you should have become lowyer or mercenary??? I personally like the idea of mercenary - if my boss went on a path of apparent self destruction (by offering me career change possibility for instance) I could have shoot him in the head and sell his kidneys (there is no market value in oposit handling).

    34. Re:Awesome! by oblonski · · Score: 1

      Amen to that!

      And with stuff like http://freetechbooks.com/freetechbooks for instance and the http://ocw.mit.edu/MIT openCourseware it really is beside the point whether you get credit or a "real-life" experience, whoever derives whatever value from this resource do so for their specific reasons and their specific conditions and circumstances and therefore this sharing of valuable life tools need to be commended

      --
      Move along now, nothing to see here! Go on!
    35. Re:Awesome! by dashslotter · · Score: 1

      Dude, didn't they have the black lightning notes when you were there? Paid note takers took notes and sold them as a service through the school, but only if the prof. agreed. Like custom Cliff's notes.

      --
      I was flipping bits on an abacus, newb.
    36. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, Real Genius. Probably my favorite movie.

    37. Re:Awesome! by mikael · · Score: 1

      Very true. There was only so much Tarzan, Tiswas, Swap Shop and No. 73 that I could watch. Bring back Metal Mickey, Joe 90, Thunderbirds, The Banana Splits and Electrawoman.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    38. Re:Awesome! by mikael · · Score: 1

      You can't show a heart pumping in a book. You can't show a sterling engine in operation in a book

      The geeky/arty guy in my science class use to draw these little flip-book animations on the corner of hit notebook pages.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    39. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that another reason for reexamining the higher education system is the fact that information systems make some memorization obsolete. Why spend time drilling certain facts into your head when you can find the answer on Google in under 15 seconds? Yes, some information you find through a search engine may be inaccurate, but it could also be more accurate than what you learned if there have been developments in that area since you went to school. Ensuring accuracy of information is just a matter of improving the information systems.

    40. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, what happens to higher education when human life spans increase to hundreds of years? When I studied physics in London in 1821, I had no clue of the developments that have happened since then.

    41. Re:Awesome! by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 1
      No, I'll have to give this point to you. The theories have not yet really been tested yet. I thought there was more evidence on it, but it's still more intuition than science. On the other hand I know what works for me, and not all styles of trying to learn work the same.

      Anyway, I don't think there is much controversy in saying that using multiple styles to learn isn't helpful. If you read it, say it, and then write it down then those seperate types of actions will help cement the knowledge. Reading the material and hearing the same material paraphrased differently has to improve the learning process.

    42. Re:Awesome! by brjndr · · Score: 1

      Tele-BEARS on the Web sucks, plain and simple.

      The web!? The WEB?!!? We had to do Tele-bears on the PHONE. And you could never actually get through when it was your turn, you had to keep calling until you actually got a voice instead of a busy signal

      I did get to use the beta of Tele-Bears on the web before I graduated. It was glorious.

      Cal 1996-2000

    43. Re:Awesome! by h3 · · Score: 1

      PHONE?!? Luxury! We filled in bubbles with a number 2 pencil then waited in line at Sproul.

    44. Re:Awesome! by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1
      I think we can all agree on that :)

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    45. Re:Awesome! by dedalus2000 · · Score: 1

      an additional benefit to video is pause, rewind and fast forward it's then possible to work the problem out ahead of the instructor and check your steps even at the very beginnings of learning a new subject skip past the repetitive bits go back to relearn something that's unclear and and generally have the benifits of instruction as one of multiple learning methods while gaining the reference ability of a book.

      --
      My keyboads not woking popely.
    46. Re:Awesome! by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1

      I started out as a Chemical Engineer and thus took Chem 4A (Chemistry for students in the College of Chemistry), although I know all about Pines' fame :)

      I had some good lectures, but they were far and few between. At some point during Math 1B, I figured out that the prof was just doing the examples out of the book. From that point on, I just started sleeping in instead of sleeping through the 8am lecture.

    47. Re:Awesome! by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't go to UC Berkeley. We're known for many things, but not exactly for beautiful people of either sex.

  2. How long will that be free? by asklepius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You would think that YouTube would balk at being the distributor for a university. Will they try and make money with this?

    1. Re:How long will that be free? by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Why on Earth would they balk at that? YouTube is trying to make money out of people watching videos for free, via advertising. This is their business plan.

      --
      Azural - instrumentals
    2. Re:How long will that be free? by kebes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You would think that YouTube would balk at being the distributor for a university.
      Why? They don't mind being the distributor for thousands of independent creators... nor do they mind being the distributor for the numerous "web TV shows" that have official YouTube channels.

      Will they try and make money with this?
      Of course they will. They'll apply the same business model that they are applying to all content uploaded to YouTube... Which is, apparently, to generate a huge community of video-posters and video-watchers, and then to make money off of promoted videos and selective advertisements.

      I fail to see how a university uploading videos that people want to watch is any different from anyone else uploading videos that people want to watch.
    3. Re:How long will that be free? by SlashV · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how a university uploading videos that people want to watch is any different from anyone else uploading videos that people want to watch. I fail to see why a university wants to upload their material to YouTube. That way they no longer have any control over the material. Surely they could have hosted it on their own network.
    4. Re:How long will that be free? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      This is the internet- as soon as you post it anywhere you no longer have control. Hell, I still have lecture notes from every ECE class at UIUC that was posted on the school intranet before they started password protecting classes to "control their IP".

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    5. Re:How long will that be free? by mangu · · Score: 1
      I fail to see why a university wants to upload their material to YouTube.


      Maybe they want to use their servers?


      they no longer have any control over the material. Surely they could have hosted it on their own network.


      Never mind that, if it is in a digital form, in no time at all someone will put it into a P2P system somewhere.

    6. Re:How long will that be free? by SlashV · · Score: 1

      Never mind that, if it is in a digital form, in no time at all someone will put it into a P2P system somewhere. That is not the same ! When I download it through P2P, I know the information is 'third hand', meaning it could be anything. When I read that a university put it on YouTube, I have some expectation that the content has a certain quality. Suppose someone wants to have a little fun and puts lectures of his won on YouTube pretending to be from UC Berkeley. If I were a university director I would want to stay away from any of that. Actually I wouldn't want to be associated with YouTube at all, being a respected university, but maybe the general image of YouTube is different than mine. To me it's mostly a fun place for soccer replays, surfers and teenage popstars.
  3. Good for them by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Free sharing of knowledge will only help create more and better engineers and scientists. MIT does something similar as well- at least outlines, and sometimes full lecture notes and videos are available at http://ocw.mit.edu/ for almost all their courses.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:Good for them by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, that's what universities are about. Or were, rather. Free flow of information and research based on the findings of those before you. Standing on the shoulders of giants and such.

      Today, few universities can really afford sharing and distributing their research. It usually belongs to someone else.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Good for them by neapolitan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yes, good point. I've used the MIT course syllabi for for teaching myself a few topics needed for programming, and they have, on occasion, been very helpful. Harvard streams all its lectures so we could watch them in our dorm rooms, but they were not released outside of the firewall.

      Much as I would like to think that releasing video lectures will make people tune in on their Saturday night and become wonderfully educated citizens, I think this will be an evolutionary tool for a (relatively) niche market. Keep in mind that a vast repository of knowledge is already locally available for free for modest effort at your local library, in book and video forms, and look how masses of people are beating down doors to get in there.

      Nevertheless, I do feel the possibilities are large, and a few immediate points come to mind:

      - A complete (spoken) language course on Youtube / web for free would be very valuable. I could easily imagine sitting down for many hours watching a series of these and emerging with conversational language. This would be very useful prior to a planned trip so you could hit the ground running.

      - Courses are very good at integrating study tools for a topic. If you try to learn calculus by picking up a book, you can probably do it. However more complex / scattered topics (Renaissance painting in Italy, Advanced concepts in cryptography, etc.) are very easily done using lectures plus book supplementation to guide one so you don't get lost / swamped in the topic.

      Personally, I can't wait for video lectures to become freely available. I watched Andrew Morton at Google on Google Video as part of the speaker series, and found it quite interesting. However, I'm a geek, and you probably are too.

      --
      Slashdotter, ID #101. UIDs are in binary, right?
    3. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the rural environment I find myself in the local library is ten miles away and doesn't include any textbooks. As I am able to scrape together the money I purchase textbooks for the subjects that I seek to study (mathematics, physics, chemistry, computer science) when I cannot find suitable texts under free licenses online, but I certainly would appreciate free lectures, especially for subjects I might not otherwise study due to financial constraints. Of course videos take a lot of time to transfer via dial-up, but beggars cannot afford to be choosers.

      I don't know how common my position is, though, so I don't mean to imply that it would be the most popular venue in the world. I would find it very useful, though.

    4. Re:Good for them by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Informative

      Keep in mind that a vast repository of knowledge is already locally available for free for modest effort at your local library

      Have you been to a public library recently? The largest in my state doesn't even have any journal subscriptions. I know the quality varies from place to place, but a fairly high percentage of them are struggling along with almost no budget at this point.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    5. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm a geek, and you probably are too.

      I'm not a geek, you insensitive clod!

    6. Re:Good for them by nick5000 · · Score: 1

      MIT World already does this for many important events at MIT (including, but not limited to, course lectures). Plus, the quality is better than Youtube videos.

    7. Re:Good for them by illaqueate · · Score: 1

      webcast.berkeley.edu has had video lectures since at least 2001; and before that bmrc.berkeley.edu in 1999. The MIT offering has had barely any video or audio until recently. Syllabus and notes are everywhere - there's nothing special about them except the hype in association with MIT.

    8. Re:Good for them by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      How is a slew of Berkley lectures on subjects like "Female Gender Roles and Patriarchy in the Postmodern World: A Feminist Perspective" going to lead to better engineers?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. videotaped intercourses by mynickwastaken · · Score: 2, Funny

    Over 300 hours of videotaped intercourses?
    Did they mean Porntube, isn't it?

  5. Wardrobe! by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is really great of them (even the podcasts they used to have were terrific) but they really need to get a fashion consultant to work on some of those professors...

    Clicking around randomly, I had to laugh at the attendance for Chemistry 3B, lecture 21. Yeah, that's about par for the course for Orgo that late in the term.

    1. Re:Wardrobe! by calcapt · · Score: 1

      I think a friend of mine took that class last spring. Vollhardt, the professor teaching the course, wrote the book and pretty much expected everyone to know everything he had included in the text. If you watch a little into the video, you see that the average of the midterm they just took was around 100 out of 250 points. Based on how the class did, I wouldn't blame them for not going to class =P. The capacity of that room they're in (Pimentel) is around 500, too. Around 300 were probably enrolled, and, hah, it looks like less than 1/10 of that number showed up.

      I'd also like to point out that this isn't the norm for attendance; I took the course with Professor Ellman, and his classes were ALWAYS filled to the brim.

    2. Re:Wardrobe! by kimble3 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Podcasts... why don't they just release them as a video podcast? That would be much more useful...

    3. Re:Wardrobe! by theskipper · · Score: 1

      They could adopt this idea.

      Replacing the profs with hot naked swimsuit models solves the attrition rate, too.

      Bob's your uncle.

  6. Has anyone here actually tried by MeditationSensation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    educating themselves with all this online courseware stuff? Seems to me like most people would still need the oversight of having papers due, the classrooms discussions, and the 1-on-1 talks with professors to get the most out of a subject. But I could be wrong.

    1. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have. In the end, you have to buy the course books- the lecture notes just aren't detailed enough. They're an aid more than a main source, and they were written with that purpose in mind. Other than that, its no more difficult than any other way of learning from books. The ability to talk to fellow students and figure stuff out is missed (although replacable with web forums as underused as that idea is), but definitely doable. As for talking with professors- I don't think I ever did that in my undergrad, so for me its not missed.

      I'm reading the course book for MIT's signal analysis course now. I'm actually understanding the concept of Fourier transforms better now than I did in college with a professor teaching it- the book actually explains the math, something my prof never did.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by kebes · · Score: 1

      educating themselves with all this online courseware stuff? Seems to me like most people would still need the oversight of having papers due, the classrooms discussions, and the 1-on-1 talks with professors to get the most out of a subject.
      I agree... and I don't think anyone is claiming otherwise.

      "Getting a degree" is so much more than just sitting in on lectures. Labwork, discussions with professors (and other students), libraries, and many other things act together to shape a person's education.

      The posting of these lectures is important, however, in other ways. First of all it's a nice convenience for the students taking those courses: they can review lectures without worrying about making a personal audio recording. But it's also a great resource for interested hobbyists, professionals who need to refresh their memory, specialists in a particular fields who want to learn some of the basics of some other field, and so on. I can even imagine young interested students using such lectures to get a "head start" on subjects they are passionate about (e.g. if they find the curriculum in their high school lacking), or students who cannot afford a conventional education using those videos (along with some other resources and lots of hard work) to get up to speed on a subject matter.
    3. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I've watched the videos that go with the SICP book, and learned quite a bit from them.

      I'm sure I would have gotten more out of actually taking the class, but the videos alone were still helpful.

    4. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by zeromorph · · Score: 1

      It won't supersede "classical style" education, but it can broaden the horizon of students (and lecturers/professors).

      Now, I have the opportunity to (kind of) attend a talk of Sergey Brin (as in TFA) irrespective time and place. I mean, I could even point one of this talks/lectures out to my professor/supervisor and discuss it with him and thus combine the benefits of both kinds of knowledge transfer.

      Science without access to knowledge is impossible. So this is a good development.

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    5. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      this is why there is no real threat for a university to do this... this is only part of a proper education.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    6. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by ericrost · · Score: 1

      We had a really good workbook of all things when we did Fourier in my controls class. Going back to third grade on it did well for my comprehension.

    7. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I can see that. My aha moment was when the book introduced the transform in terms of Fourier series (which I can't prove, but understand) and showed step by step how X(jw) was a curve on which all a_k were related, and that as w got smaller, a_k became more frequent samples of the curve (with the extreme case being w being infinitely small and the result of that being an integral over X(jw)). Back in college I got the end formula and no real explanation about this vague "frequency domain" that we suddenly needed to start calculating (in the last 4 weeks of the course, actually using that domain and learning its useful properties was the next course, and not required for compEs (I stayed the hell away from it).

      I think a lot of concepts in engineering might be better taught by that approach- we learn derivatives by starting with taking shrinking dx's and calculating slopes, then learn (h(x+dx)-h(x))/dx, then learn all the quickie ways. We learn integrals by starting with Riemann sums and later learning quickie methods. So why do so many engineering textbooks and classes decide to just dump formulas on you instead?

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    8. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by disckitty · · Score: 1

      Having classroom discussions and 1-on-1 talks is not conducive to getting undergrads (and their money) in and out of university as quickly as possible. These have long since gone the way of the dodo, unless you're that 1% that goes to talk to the prof or you're in an arts program. Its pitiful how little question time and exploration actually seems to occur in universities. The instructors can't be bothered as it wastes time they'd rather spend doing something else, and the students can't be bothered as they just want their piece of paper.


      Papers due is still a requirement, but that can be done and submitted online. Heck, discussions (har har, should they actually occur) could also be done via web conferencing, web cams, forums, etc.


      Thinking about it further, this is fantastic for Berkley. Not only can they increase enrollment by a huge amount (don't need to worry about class size, if they're all watching it from their own home), but the instructors can spend either more time doing their research (less likely) or spend more time marking all the assignments for the increased number of students (more likely). Ah, the commercialization of education at its best. (#$!?!?!%) Best to suppress inquisitive natures. Perhaps its also part-political motivation in that case?

    9. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by eh2o · · Score: 1

      It works if you really want to learn the subject, and it helps if the professor has a good lecture style. Also, the webcast course materials are almost always entry-level material so you could take a few survey courses in different areas but don't expect to get anywhere near the depth that an actual degree would entail. In other words, if you don't understand something in the material its probably just because you were not paying attention--its just not that complicated.

      Oh and UCB has had public webcast courses for years, just not through YouTube.

    10. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by Russell+Coker · · Score: 1

      A small portion of what I learned during my B.Sc degree (majoring in Computer Science and Software Engineering) came from the actual course work. Most of what I learned came from being in an environment with many intelligent people who wanted to learn (which comprised a minority of staff and students), having access to a well-stocked library, and having access to good hardware resources (lots of expensive Unix systems with man pages online).

      Now I have a choice of Linux distributions, three different BSD distributions, and OpenSolaris that run on hardware that I can find in a dumpster.

      If you want to read in the library (not borrow books) then anyone can use a university library (they don't check ID when you enter).

      So in regard to actually learning Computer Science the main thing that universities offer is an environment where the intelligent people who want to learn are in less of a minority than the general population.

      I'm sure that CS is not the only area of study that could be completed without a university.

      Of course if you want to get a job with high pay then university degrees still have something to offer. ;)

      --
      See http://etbe.coker.com.au/ for my blog.
    11. Re:Has anyone here actually tried by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

      May I recommend... ...Who is Fourier?

      (It's a math book, not a biography.)

      I got a *lot* out of this book. (Read the reviews on Amazon, as well.)

      If I see you at the Seattle party, I can lend it to you.

  7. mashups? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    the possibilities are endless.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  8. I'll be taking... by vjmurphy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sleeping Kittens 101
    Girls Fighting Girls 273: Advanced Techniques
    I Love Turtles Symposium

    The future looks bright!

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
    1. Re:I'll be taking... by zeromorph · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot: "Advanced particle physics 3B, lecture 21: Will it Blend?"

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
  9. Hey! What do you think you're doing? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    The internet wasn't created to distribute information, dammit!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Hey! What do you think you're doing? by __aahmnf219 · · Score: 1

      The internet wasn't created to distribute information, dammit! Hey, this is Slashdot, most posters got their sex education from the internet, at the very least...
  10. Attendance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So why attend class?

    1. Re:Attendance by c_sd_m · · Score: 1
      So why attend class?

      Why videotape lectures, all of the information is in the books (and journal articles) in the library waiting for you? Why have tutorials (that students do surprisingly attend) when all the material was covered in the lectures and is in the textbook?

    2. Re:Attendance by faloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because, depending on the professor, attendance might still be mandatory to get the coveted piece of paper at the end.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Attendance by bronney · · Score: 1

      I attended classes because looking back up at Heather(TM) from the front row is a view too grand to pass up.

    4. Re:Attendance by Minwee · · Score: 1

      That's okay. I posted a video of myself sleeping to YouTube so all of my professors can watch it instead of having me come out to class.

  11. iTunes U by the_brobdingnagian · · Score: 1

    I've been enjoying iTunes U for a while. It's good to see more universities publishing their courses for free online.

  12. Rewind button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I had this back at MIT so I could figure out what Prof. Bekefi was saying.

    1. Re:Rewind button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iirc, he kept saying "You there, in the back! For the last time, get out of my lecture! You didn't get into MIT, so stop telling people that you did."

    2. Re:Rewind button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He died about 8 years ago. Too bad, I really liked that guy.

  13. awesome idea by trybywrench · · Score: 1

    i'd love to see a lecture or 2 on a subject i'm curious about. I'm out of college but watching a lecture on psychology or history or whatever strikes my interest would be great.

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
  14. Also positive for good lecturers... by KokorHekkus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...since this will allow students to evaluate their lecturing style in addition to the other aspects that they consider when choosing a course. Personally I would have taken a harder calculus class if could have had another better lecturer. And conversely there are a few non-core courses that I would have dropped if I'd seen the way they were taught.

    And hopefully in the end it will lead to a somewhat higher standard in lectures all over in the long run even if there are some that will never change.

  15. Last gasp before the masses realize... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Berkeley is now using YouTube as an important teaching tool.


    I wonder if this is the last gasp before the masses realize...

    If you need to pay your own way though college (like I did), you're much better off buying 100- and 200-level credits at the local junior college and saving your money for the 300+ level stuff universities specialize in. (The teaching quality of 100/200's in the junior colleges is usually better than that at universities too - you get an actual teacher with a masters who came up through the high school ranks instead of some useless grad student who's stuck with you because he/she can't get a job.)

    1. Re:Last gasp before the masses realize... by AuMatar · · Score: 0

      In some subject, and some schools, yes. But the top colleges do teach even the low level courses in a different way. Look at MIT's calculus course- far more about the theoretical underpinings of calculus than just endless differentiations. While you do get the credits far cheaper the junior college way, you don't learn as much.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Last gasp before the masses realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The teaching quality of 100/200's in the junior colleges is usually better than that at universities too - you get an actual teacher with a masters who came up through the high school ranks instead of some useless grad student who's stuck with you because he/she can't get a job.
      I disagree, I've done both with mixed results. I went to one state university with universally good lecturers and half/half good/bad TA's. I ran out of money and went to a small college with great results, small classes. Now I have to go to a bigger community college for class variety and the lecturer quality is terrible. I suspect their pay is terrible, most of them have real jobs and do this on the side for reasons I can't figure out because most of them seem to not like it so much.
    3. Re:Last gasp before the masses realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there are class-based constraints on transfer from a junior to a regular university, at least in California. You can only transfer upon completion of a very specific set of classes, and that means taking _anything_ elective will hold back transfer. I was trying to help a friend attend my university and the manager basically said she could not transfer because she did not have enough correct credits. period. It _may_ have been possible for her to apply with just an SAT score and high school transcript (but thats the problem, she was a young dyke from FL that dropped out of school). Her crime? Taking two art classes. She wanted to get an art degree...and she may have even needed a portfolio for admission to the university's art dept.

      Anyways, considering that most people do not know what they really want to do and/or take work related electives at a junior college, they are held back for quite some time before they can transfer to a full university--because only general requirements count toward the transfer. In addition, they transfer in to all the 3rd and 4th "year" classes with no experience with university level work. Can you imagine taking 2+ years of core coursework without anything in your possible degree? I can't...course i did two degrees in three years.

      Anyway, at least in california, there are clear effects of the junior college on preparedness for those later courses and there are clearly classist controls that limit transfers.

    4. Re:Last gasp before the masses realize... by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      That's weird. What you described is almost the opposite of what I know. There may be some special circumstances to your friends case, maybe something about the particular schools that she's transferring from and to, but in general, I find the whole transfer process from Community College to State University in California to be fairly open.

      What they were probably trying to convey was that she couldn't transfer in as a Junior with the specific credits she had or the amount of credits she had, and would have to apply as a Freshman instead, or take more classes at the Community College to fulfill the requirements. In order to transfer as a Junior, you have to have about 60 credits total completed, and have to fulfill certain mostly very general subject area requirements, but they certainly wouldn't block anyone because they took some art classes.

      If this happened recently, have your friend read the community college catalog sections regarding "IGETC" or the California State "Breadth" transfer tracks (or search the web for those, although usually it's specific to the particular community college). That should pretty much have all the requirements spelled out in detail.

    5. Re:Last gasp before the masses realize... by darklordyoda · · Score: 1

      (Disclaimer: I am a current Berkeley MechE undergrad, but no, I'm not in any of the classes from those videos.)

      I think it would be better characterized as "Berkeley is now using YouTube as an additional teaching tool." I highly doubt they're subtracting anything.

      The professor's lectures, the book, the GSI's discussion section. Any one of these, if well-taught or well-written, is enough to help you completely understand the material. The best students use a combination of these to ensure they learn what they need to, covering up any shortcomings in one of the methods of delivery. There's really no harm in an extra avenue of information (extra, not substituted) Some professors have been posting their lectures online for years now, but the only difference here is the ease of use and popularity of youtube.

      Some may complain about people using this to argue for not going to class, but there are two issues here: Most of those classes that are setup for web-casting are either extremely large, so you're not missing out on any significant warm-and-fuzzy professor interaction, and more importantly, most people who argue this wouldn't go anyway.

      As for your comments about junior college, I have to say, it's a perfectly legitimate and common way to do it. There are a lot of people I know in engineering who transferred in as a junior for that reason. (By the way, for us 100 and 200-level classes are upper-div and graduate-level, respectively) I can't agree too much with the "better teachers" sentiment, though. You're just as likely to get a poor teacher at a good J.C. as you are to get a useless grad student, at least at a school like Berkeley where the average grad student is somewhat more knowledgable. (Anyways here just about every class is taught by a professor or a lecturer with a Ph.D., and a GSI for an extra discussion/lab section)

      Still, if there are any slashdot-reading prospective top-tier-college-goers out there worried about cost, Berkeley's financial aid is pretty good, and it's ~8k a year for tuition, if you live in California. Come to the north-east corner of campus where the engineers and CS majors are, and join us in ignoring the hippies, who are mostly humanities majors with not enough to do anyways.

    6. Re:Last gasp before the masses realize... by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1

      Yikes, it's $8K/year now? When I graduated 5 years ago it was around $4K/year and it had gone down every year I was there.

      At least when I was there, there technically wasn't any tuition for in-state students, just several thousand dollars in "fees".

    7. Re:Last gasp before the masses realize... by darklordyoda · · Score: 1

      Er, yeah, I meant fees. It's their workarund for not being allowed to charge tuition, I figured it was close enough to the same thing. Looking it up now, it's 8.3k per year for undergrads from CA, 14k for non-state. Yeah, it has gone up, but it's still far below private schools with comparable offerings.

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. Free Lectures on iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a while, there have been free video and audio podcasts available on iTunes from several universities, including MIT. The quality is better than Youtube and you can easily download it and take it places.

  18. Man... by thepartyanimal · · Score: 0

    When you guys say 'news for nerds' you're not kidding.

    1. Re:Man... by zeromorph · · Score: 1

      You must... /*Oh wait, thepartyanimal (1149043)*/ ...you are new here!

      /*Ducks to hide his own id number*/

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
  19. Streaming (!= Copy protection) by wowbagger · · Score: 1
    I really wish that Youtube would do as Google video has done, and provide a direct download link for the FLV in addition to streaming it, for several reasons:
    1. On "thin" connections, streaming simply doesn't work, but downloading does. Sure, it may take longer to download than it takes to watch - that's what background downloads are for.
    2. For something like a lecture, I want to be able to watch them multiple times, in case I miss something.
    3. I want the option of watching when I am not connected - if I can download it I can put it on my N800 or my phone.

    Folks: streaming is NOT a form of copy protection. Nor is using Javascript to compose the video URL so that things like VideoDownloader can't parse it. You aren't making saving the video impossible - just difficult.
    1. Re:Streaming (!= Copy protection) by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      it's not like it is hard to get the flv.

      They want you to come back to their site to see the advertisements. Why should they make it easy for you to not?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Streaming (!= Copy protection) by Metaphorically · · Score: 1

      I agree with your sentiment but to work around the slow connection issues I just pause after a second and let the whole thing come down before I hit play.

      --
      more of the same on Twitter.
    3. Re:Streaming (!= Copy protection) by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      The video files should be availible in flv format in your browser cache. Also, if you want to avoid having to look into cache, you can use a user javascript to insert a download link directly into the page, using opera (Set the javascript under site preferences/scripting) or firefox (using the greasemonkey extension). A very simple working youtube userscript can be found at http://www.openjs.com/scripts/greasemonkey/download_youtube_videos/

      The only problem is if your mobile doesn't support the flv format. In that case you would have to reencode the video before loading it onto the mobile phone. That is beyond this post though.

    4. Re:Streaming (!= Copy protection) by nevali · · Score: 1

      It's not quite the same as a direct download from YouTube, but UCB (and many others) have been making their material freely available via iTunes U for some time, which is handily also a standard format (MPEG-4 video, as opposed to FLV).

      Mind you, YouTube have reportedly been encoding everything uploaded recently as H.264 as well as FLV, though I think that's more to do with the iPod/iPhone/Apple TV support than direct downloads (sadly).

    5. Re:Streaming (!= Copy protection) by Fallingcow · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Streaming (!= Copy protection) by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      You've missed the entire point of streaming media.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    7. Re:Streaming (!= Copy protection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only are there video extraction add-ons for firefox (and I'm sure IE), but if you use Miro (nee Democracy Player) you can subscribe to tag searches (formed into channels) at all the major video sites that are automatically populated as new videos appear in the system with matching tags. These are tagged with "webcast.berkeley" (amongst many other, more specific tags). I've been using Miro (and DP) to download and play Berkeley lecture audio podcasts for years. I'm not so sure I'm happy to see the prof, now :) How about turning that camera around??? ;-) "biodiesel" and "phev" are two of my self-populating channels, for instance. And some ham radio stuff. Miro really is king. Even does torrent RSS natively -- no helpers.

  20. What about Google Video? by jjh37997 · · Score: 1

    I'd think that would be a better choice..... YouTube is nice but I want to be able to download the lectures and watch them on my own time. Not everyone has 24/7 high-speed internet access. I'd love to have high quality videos that I can watch offline.... converting YouTube flash videos to another format for offline storage is going to be annoying.

    1. Re:What about Google Video? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      VLC, MPlayer, xine, RealPlayer, and WMP (via ffdshow) can handle .FLV natively.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:What about Google Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but you have to use a trick to get the file, while on Google video there's a "Download" button.

  21. Berkeley Webcasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    UC Berkeley has been webcasting their classes for several years now. http://webcast.berkeley.edu/ It looks like they're just offloading the storage and network to youtube now.

    1. Re:Berkeley Webcasts by Taxman415a · · Score: 1

      If I hadn't commented already, I'd have given you some modpoints. Nice link, especially since there are more courses on the link you gave. The youtube link so far doesn't have many classes, and the lectures are horribly organized with some missing. Hopefully that will improve as the effort moves along. But either way I found a number of courses in the links you gave that I wouldn't mind at all going back to review a bit. In fact the link goes back several years, so you even have the choice of professors in some cases.

  22. Depends by iknownuttin · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Seems to me like most people would still need the oversight of having papers due, the classrooms discussions, and the 1-on-1 talks with professors to get the most out of a subject.

    For a course that I have to take - yes. For something that I'm really interested in - No.

    I wish I can remember the term, but there's this style of teaching/learning that's called something like Discovery Learning - I think. Anyway, here's an example of how it works and this is how I learn(ed) computer science (I'm 42 and always learning) in a nutshell:

    I see something, an algorithm, a piece of code in a language I've never seen before, whatever. I then say to myself, "WTF is that! I have to find out!" I then Google for it and start reading up on it. When I was a kid and learning how to program graphics, I started teaching myself geometry and trigonometry so I could eventually get the Apple II to draw graphics. The information has stuck with me until this day. Now, the grammar that I had to learn hasn't - as if you couldn't tell.

    I really think if our education system got away from the rote learning and drills and allowed kids to learn and have fun at it - it can be fun when you are personally discovering something - our education would greatly improve.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:Depends by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1

      For that to work, we need to figure out how to end anti-intellectualism. If children are forced to choose between learning and being popular, many will choose to be popular, and their education will suffer; they will not take the time to learn and discover things on their own because it will be seen as "uncool". Without motivation for self-directed learning, rote learning is pretty much the only option left.

      I was lucky. My parents provided an environment that was conducive to what you describe as Discovery Learning, at home where it would have little impact on my social standing; as a result I generally didn't have to make that choice. For example, my dad showed me the basics of an early version of Lotus 1-2-3 when I was 5 years old. He then provided the reference materials and encouragement I needed to teach myself how to do things with Lotus 1-2-3 that even he didn't know at the time. (And because my parents had taught me to read at age 3, I was able to use those references without much help.)

      The question of how to create such an environment in a school is difficult to answer, though. (And I'm not convinced that home-schooling is the answer either, or at least the entire answer. What happens with children of parents that are not well educated?) Smaller classes certainly help, but that means hiring more teachers and attracting more people to the teaching profession. That in turn requires spending more money, both on existing teachers and new ones, and where is that money going to come from?

    2. Re:Depends by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      I see something, an algorithm, a piece of code in a language I've never seen before, whatever. I then say to myself, "WTF is that! I have to find out!" I then Google for it

      Actually, as much as I like Google I'm finding that I prefer Wikipedia more and more when I have specific concepts to look up. The number of branching references from there can take me on a long journey, sometimes heading directly toward the thing I'm interested in and sometimes exposing gaps in knowledge that need to be filled. For pure raw search, I prefer Google (tames my misspelling demon) but for pure research, I start with Wiki. Take a look at Wiki on "Caffiene" for example. Didn't know it had links to asthma therapeutics (theophylline, not used much any more (which is good, the stuff made me ill)) but a few quick related clicks uncovered what I wanted to know. So now I generally go there first.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re:Depends by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, should have mentioned that the caffiene-theophylline link was actually via "guarana"

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  23. American Universities by youthoftoday · · Score: 0

    Berkley students are lucky to go to an American university.

    In Soviet Russia, Full lectures post YOU on youtube.

    --
    -1 not first post
  24. w00t! by Cleon · · Score: 1

    Of course, it's not the equivalent of a Berkeley education or anything remotely close to it. But i

    This seems to be part of a trend; I know some scientific journals are considering putting their articles online for all to read, instead of charging exorbitant subscription fees like they do now.

    I'd like to see old lectures online, too--watching Richard Feynman lecture on physics would be too cool for words.

    --
    Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
    1. Re:w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOH! Typo. My bad.

    2. Re:w00t! by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      These were quite good. The sound isn't the greatest in the first one but he is brilliant to watch and the subject matter is very well explained.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
  25. The next step ... by GBuddha · · Score: 1

    They already had a website for that - http://webcast.berkeley.edu/ I guess this moving those videos to YouTube was the next logical step.

  26. The Berkeley Advantage by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a Berkeley grad though, I generally wouldn't attribute very much of the value of my education there to lectures I sat (or slept) through. Especially in Computer Science, most of the lectures probably didn't differ a whole lot in content or form from those taught at other less prestigious institutions. Most of what I learned came from being surrounded by other driven students in a unique environment and completing challenging assignments. In particular, the first of those is all but impossible to capture in an online manner.

    Blah blah blah, all code for: "You can't take LSD over the Internet."

    ;)

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:The Berkeley Advantage by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      As a Berkeley grad though, I generally wouldn't attribute very much of the value of my education there to lectures I sat (or slept) through. Especially in Computer Science, most of the lectures probably didn't differ a whole lot in content or form from those taught at other less prestigious institutions. Most of what I learned came from being surrounded by other driven students in a unique environment and completing challenging assignments. In particular, the first of those is all but impossible to capture in an online manner.
      Blah blah blah, all code for: "You can't make business contacts over the Internet."
      There, FTFY. Often it's not what you know, but who you know (or it's what you know if you know someone).
    2. Re:The Berkeley Advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Blah blah blah, all code for: "You can't take LSD over the Internet." Clearly you're visiting the wrong websites.
    3. Re:The Berkeley Advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm only a college professor, so what do I know, but I would have said that the main difference between reading the book/watching the film and actually taking the class would be that the professor grades your paper and gives you feedback on it. Maybe that's not true in engineering classes, but in history classes most of my time goes into reading student writing and commenting on it. In this way, students learn to construct and defend logical arguments.

    4. Re:The Berkeley Advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprise surprise surprise. The college history professor can't figure out how a comment thread works.

    5. Re:The Berkeley Advantage by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Actually the main difference is providing a disciplined learning environment. A formal regulated learning experience, that also prepares the student for the formal regulated working experience. In terms of feedback, it actually provides feedback in both direction to ensure, what is being taught can effectively be learnt, and whether the learning load can be increased or whether it should be decreased, hopefully in a more interactive continually adjusted manner, rather than a once per year review, of the previous year for the following year (a 3 year cycle for poor learning experiences). Social interaction, social experience are also a very important part educational experience, not to be ignored.

      So the formal learning environment provides a lot more than simple electronic tutorial (net or cd much the same). Except perhaps for live broadband interactive experience but then of course you are just exchanging a live physical meeting for a live electronic meeting, whilst of course that would be very workable, the technology is jut no quite broadly available enough yet (lots and lots of bandwidth, big screen high resolution displays).

      So what Berkeley is doing is just being really smart about shifting data transmission costs from itself to google, a pretty smart thing to do. Now of course, other universities need to be just as cunning and arrange to have their adds stuck in front of Berkeley's lectures to make it look like their work ;).

      Of course for my self I always found the lecture to be pretty poor learning environment and prefer the prac or tutorial, perhaps this will allow for a complete shift in focus, with an emphasis on tutorial and practical work, with professionally produced, view in your own time lectures/documentaries.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  27. An excellent use of available resources by DaveRexel · · Score: 1

    1- For the uni, just shoot the vid and upload it 2- For the student, just fire up the browser to watch x- benefits för all concerned y- profit! if x then y endif

    --
    # ~: no sigs today
  28. stanford? by mrmrmr50 · · Score: 1

    thanks to berkeley! I'm still miffed at Stanford, Stanford has decided to go I-pod despite 20% unix pc on campus ( princeton college review 2007). MIT 98% unix.

    1. Re:stanford? by mrmrmr50 · · Score: 1

      http://www.news.com/2100-1041_3-5931232.html maybe I'm wrong, things do change quickly. But, they, Stanford, have a lot of content that is in a proprietary format.

  29. Has anyone watched by XMcGyver · · Score: 1

    the sample Youtube video? I now remember why I got so much sleep in my university years... zzzzzz

  30. Still a better value for the dollar... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But the top colleges do teach even the low level courses in a different way.


    Not sure about that - I picked up my bad attitude at Duke U, and they like to think of themselves as a "top" school. (Maybe I should have accepted MIT's invitation instead.)

    Look at MIT's calculus course- far more about the theoretical underpinings of calculus than just endless differentiations. While you do get the credits far cheaper the junior college way, you don't learn as much.


    I suppose that might be marginally useful if you're going to get a doctorate in math someday, but I was just a lowly engineering major trying to get on with life without picking up student loan debt. If I was interested in the bells and whistles, I could have gone to the local bookstore and picked up a book on the history of math, mathematicians, etc.

    Instead, I was self-funded and debt-free a year out of college: the kind of accomplishment that gets employers' attention when competing with lightweights who coasted through college on their parents' dollar.
    1. Re:Still a better value for the dollar... by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am an engineer, and utterly uninterested in a doctorate in math. I also paid my own way, and thanks to doing 2 years of college concurrent with high school debt free the moment I left campus (albeit flat broke and with no car). I wish my courses did more of the theoretical underpinings. You can have a 50 dollar calculator solve a derivative for you. The understanding of how those formulas are derived, why they work, and the ability to think that way and apply them to things you learn later is priceless. That kind of problem solving ability and way of looking at things that I've found with study post college is worth more than all my college classes combined.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Still a better value for the dollar... by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      I dare say, if your undergraduate course doesn't teach you how the Power rule is derived, you deserve your money back. These are things I was taught in a public high school; I would hope your community college could at least keep pace with that.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    3. Re:Still a better value for the dollar... by ResidntGeek · · Score: 0, Troll

      You honestly have no curiosity about the theoretical underpinnings of the mathematics you learn?

      --
      ResidntGeek
  31. UNIX PC? by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    Uh... Macintosh computers *are* UNiX.

    * ducks *

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  32. We need good business courses by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    Looking for free business, marketing and so on courses on YouTube (or the entire Internet) just turns up "work from home" scams and dubious paid courses by various "gurus". Not cool.

    If you know any good courses in this range of study, please share links.

  33. Re: Oversight less necessary by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    I respectfully disagree.

    The big bucks used to pay for the Professor's authenticity to prevent slick talkers from deluding themselves or others about their subject knowledge.

    I have thought that education is a dormant bubble that will shake the world when it pops. All you need is attestation services to prove you have learned the subject.

    I know that *some* students thrive on the pressure of a deadline, but that would be a service to that student, not a core necessity. I had one great professor who used a brilliant form of inverse psychology on one of our early classes. Something to the effect of:

    "Our Registrar has deposited your check, so I have all the leverage I need. While I care about each of you, I could care less about rules, because rules do not equal learning. For the minimalists of you out there, here is : The book, my syllabus outline, the four test dates, the three paper spec lists, and $10 in supplies. Place those objects on my desk on the dates listed. Find me after the final so we can have lunch.

    I can answer a few questions in class. For those who need extensive answers, these are my office hours. Now go home. Since we all know the first day of class is a joke, I won't waste my time. See you on Thursday with chapters 1-3 read because they are also a joke. The best cafeteria Pizza is between 4:45 and 5:00 before the seniors get out of seminar. Bye."

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  34. Glass half empty posts by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 1
    I see a lot of posts that basically point out that:

    1: This won't take the place of real fact to face interaction.

    2: You still won't get the benefit of having a degree.

    3: The lectures really aren't complete without the notes.

    4: This will probably mainly benefit people taking the class.

    All those points are true for now. But they miss the real point. This is the start of a new, disruptive technology. In time there will be massess of these courses available and their will be much more comprehensive infrastructures around providing them than we have now. This is just a hint of what is to come.

    For those who claim that books do just fine, my answer is no they don't. They are static, they do not convey certain types of information well, and people are geared to learn from people. While not truly the same as true face to face instruction, this approach is much closer, and complements reading very well.

    In other words, education is on a path to becoming mostly or wholly free, of high quality, and disconnected from time, place, circumstances, and social class. This is part of a larger process of the internet becoming not just an engine for entertainment and commercial sales. It is starting to becoming an engine for moving high density, high quality information around, namely knowledge.

  35. Today? time a little off. by Technician · · Score: 1

    Today marks the first time a university has made full course lecture available via the popular video sharing site.

    Maybe they call today new simply because they transfered the videos from Google Video to You Tube, another popular sharing site. I have already watched the entire Physics for Future Presidents series about 6 months ago.

    http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Physics+for+future

    Why is a move from Google Video to You Tube such a big deal?

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
    1. Re:Today? time a little off. by Beolach · · Score: 1

      > Why is a move from Google Video to You Tube such a big deal?

      IMO the good news is that "Berkeley said it will continue to expand the offering." I agree that YouTube vs. Google Video is pretty pointless, but if UC Berkeley has decided that their general policy should be to make ALL, not just a few selected, of their course lectures freely & easily available online, then I definitely think it newsworthy. Of course, TFA doesn't say they're going that far, but "continue to expand" is good.

      --
      Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
  36. Free! Free! FREEEEE! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Since when has YouTube been about making money? Originally, they were about come up with technology that was so ridiculously kewl that Google couldn't stop themselves from buying them out. Now, like most of Google, YouTube is just about coming up with technology that's ridiculously kewl. Google gets huge profits from its keyword advertising, which subsidizes all the other money-losing operations. Sometimes they go through the motions of trying to make the other business profitable, but they don't really have any incentive to do this: Page, Brin, and Schmidt have a voting majority of shares, and don't really answer to the other stockholders.

    1. Re:Free! Free! FREEEEE! by eihab · · Score: 1

      Google gets huge profits from its keyword advertising, which subsidizes all the other money-losing operations. Sometimes they go through the motions of trying to make the other business profitable, but they don't really have any incentive to do this: Page, Brin, and Schmidt (my emphasis) have a voting majority of shares, and don't really answer to the other stockholders. I thought I heard or read somewhere that VC (Venture Capitalists) pressured Larry and Sergey to hire him (Eric Schmidt, Google's CEO). And it looks like Wikipedia agrees with me:

      Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin (with the assistance of executive search firm Heidrick & Struggles, Inc.) recruited Eric Schmidt to run their company in 2001 under the influence of venture capitalists John Doerr and Michael Moritz. I don't own or run a billion dollars business, but I don't think having the majority of voting stocks make you omnipotent. The business world is just like politics (and they do complement each other), pressure and dirty tricks can be applied to make anyone do anything.

      Just my 2 cents.
      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
    2. Re:Free! Free! FREEEEE! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      This was back when Google was privately held. I don't know anything about their ownership structure back then, but I'd guess that the VCs who had put up the money had a lot of say in how the company was run. Certainly more than the all the current Class A shareholders who have two thirds of the company's equity, but only one third of the votes.

      As for Eric Schmidt: Page and Brin might have preferred not to hire an outsider, but they managed to get one who wouldn't interfere with their way of doing things.

  37. Continuing slashdot tradition... by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

    I will now proceed to complain about how these videos were actually posted a month ago. Typical /., posting stories a month later. How dare they bring something cool and interesting to my attention!?

    --
    All your base are belong to Wii.
  38. As a Berkeley Student... by PAKnightPA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a Berkeley Student, the first thing I thought was YES! Now I don't have to go to class. But seriously, this is why I really like UC Berkeley. They are a public school and seem to really take that to heart. While they wont give any schmuck a degree, they are funded in large part by the taxpayers so why shouldnt anyone be able to take advantage of what they have to offer?

    1. Re:As a Berkeley Student... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a rather uninformed Berkeley student. It figures, since most students just don't read signs anyway.

      Webcasts have been going on at Berkeley for several (at least 4) years now.

  39. Open Education Rules! by crf00 · · Score: 1
    I love the open minded thinking of these top universities that actually makes Open Education works. It really is a great source of knowledge to people like me who don't have good enough results and don't have enough money to enter a good university.

    I live in Malaysia, and I can never stop appreciating how the Internet and Information Technology led to the me today. During high school I bought alot of pirated CDs that contains ebook for computing. Those CD actually costed alot of money but relatively still hundred times cheaper than just one original book. That was how I started to learn programming, and in my region there was no library or even book shops that had these intermediate programming books. Today I rely heavily on bittorrent and other sources to download pirated ebooks from broadband, and I know much more than what has been teaching in my university.

    I realise how powerful knowledge is, and how sux the current education is that produces graduates with good results but little knowledge. Why do we have to get a good result to enter a good university? Why do we have to memorize rubbish and attend specialized tution just to get good grade in examination? Why do we have to spend so much money to get a good education? Why can't we learn the thing we want just because we don't get good results? Why do we need to spend so much money to learn what we want?

    If it wasn't these ebooks that educated me, I would be just started learning "what is a loop?" as my other friends do in their first year of university, I wouldn't know the philosophy of Open Source, I wouldn't know how much things is out there waiting for me to learn, and I wouldn't know much enough to care of reading in slashdot.

    If Open Education really reached the level of Open Source, then anyone can benifit much more than what I benifited. Education DO need to have the same openess as Open Source.

    Of course universities is more than just learning stuff, and it's more of an exposure, but we shouldn't limit the opportunity of learning. And there is some courses that can only be learned through university, such as engineering, doctor and language. But for courses like science and computing we do can gain 90% of the knowledge through Open Education.

  40. I have done something similar. by baileydau · · Score: 1

    I did part of my first degree (Science - Chemistry) as an internal student and part as an external student. I did my entire Graduate Diploma of IT as an external student.

    As an external student (at least with the university I studied through), you receive the lecture notes at the start of semester, which are essentially what the lecturer is presenting to the internal students. You also need the same textbooks etc as the internal students.

    In reality, even when you attend the actual lecture, the lecturer is rehashing the text books anyway. When I was an internal student, you tended to purchase the lecture notes anyway, as it was a great way to ensure you didn't miss anything. I see these videos as something similar.

    BTW isn't the definition of a lecture "a method of transferring the notes of the lecturer to the notes of the student, without passing through the minds of either"
    If you aren't so busy scribbling down stuff during the lecture, you may actually learn something...

    There were still tutorials (online / teleconferences etc). They also encouraged students in the same areas to form study groups to help each other along.

    Some subjects also had "residential schools", which were a week or so each semester on campus where you would do practicals (labs), have tutorials etc.

    It's definitely not a learning style that suits everyone, but if it works for you, it's a great way to do it.

    --
    Ever stop to think ... and forget to start again?
    1. Re:I have done something similar. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If you aren't so busy scribbling down stuff during the lecture, you may actually learn something... This is why all of the lecturers in my department hand out printed notes at the start of each course; so you don't need to write anything down, and can actually pay attention during lectures.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  41. Grade inflation! by megaditto · · Score: 1

    Notice how the exam average is 98/240, yet I guarantee that about 90% of the students got an A/A- on their transcript.

    This is part of the reason that a science degree from a "top" school means shit these days. That, and the fact that you could get a Biochem degree from a place like that with just three mandatory wet-lab courses.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    1. Re:Grade inflation! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Or could those low grades get inflated to As because the professor has no idea how to teach a graduate course, let alone an undergraduate one?

      Remember, professors get hired for their research, so many of them can't teach or find it too much a burden to do it well.

    2. Re:Grade inflation! by Taxman415a · · Score: 1

      Notice how the exam average is 98/240, yet I guarantee that about 90% of the students got an A/A- on their transcript.

      This is part of the reason that a science degree from a "top" school means shit these days.


      Or that could mean nothing that the average is that low. It's fairly basic testing theory that the harder the test to a point, you get greater dispersion in scores. Then you grade on a curve and can tell who got the A's etc. The difficulty of the test can simply be way more than you really need all the students to know. In other words the average score on the test means nothing without considering how difficult it was. That score could actually mean the students have achieved a good deal of mastery of the material, just not the final 5% or so that doesn't matter so much anyway.

      Or the questions on the test if they are very well written, can require a high level of mastery of the course material just to be able to approach them, and instead of testing if you recalled all the facts on page 32 (they basically presuppose that you know all the material), but also ask you to apply and extend it. That's pretty much how my organic chemistry class was. And yes, I can tell you confidently it was much more demanding than those at less prestigious universities. It doesn't mean grading on a curve is the right way to do it, but well, you get the point. The raw number means nothing.

    3. Re:Grade inflation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you are saying, but curving kind of loses its purpose if (almost) everybody gets bumped up to A. I'd rather that guy honestly work for a solid C- then get an automatic A.

      You said you took some advanced chemistry courses, so I think you might appreciate this little anecdote:

      I have interviewed two Ivy League chemistry grads for an analytical chemistry position at a top-3 pharma company: both claimed to have worked with HPLC and GC/MS equipment, yet when I asked adout it then knew NOTHING, quite literally. First they were asked to predict the peak times of several compounds (given the structures, mobile phase composition, column parameters, etc.), but they hit a brick wall... Soon we figured out that they had no clue about even the basics: neither could tell us how the elution time changes with temperature, what 'reverse phase' refers to or even what a 'phase' is, why the flow rate has to be relatively constant, how a mass spec works, what a mass spec printout would look like (I am not kidding!), etc.

      When we asked them to sketch an IR spectrum of HCl, we got a deer-in-the-lights stare back, from both of them. They could propose a synthetic pathway for an organic compund, yet that seemed to be learned by rote (e.g. one had no clue how an entropy would change for any given step, the other had no clue what a heat capacitance was). Both were plugging temperature in Celsius into the Nernst equation (at least it wasn't in Fahernheit, heh).

      Applying basic equations was also a big problem: both made mistakes in buffer calculation for a given pH. Neither had a clue about ion activity impact on osmolarity. Even when given all equations, they still could not apply them!

      I know this could be a rant of an old person bitching about the yonger generation, but todays top school grads are absolutely useless for anything but 'do you want fries with that' kind of a job. We do get guys that know their stuff, but very rarely. And even if it is the current policy to re-train ALL the new hires which can take months if not years, it just did not used to be this way.

      As such, I am very alarmed at the adequacy of our elite college graduates and worried about the future of America...

  42. already available on UC Berkeley website by Komi · · Score: 5, Informative

    These are already available on the UCB site. I do like the YouTube format better, but the selection from the Berkeley site is currently larger. They have some great analog transistor design classes there.

    --
    The ultimate goal of science is to unify all forces of nature to a single law that can be silk-screened onto a T-shirt.
  43. Don't Just Crow, Eat Crow by stabbycabby · · Score: 1

    "Today marks the first time," blah blah blah. While not offering as large a percentage of their lectures as Berkeley, Columbia University has already been doing that with lectures at their School of International and Public Affairs, also since the beginning of the school year: http://youtube.com/user/ccnmtl I wouldn't be surprised if many other universities were already doing this as well, and that simply evaded Slashdot's notice -- is there any proof that Berkeley actually is the first?

  44. Wish my uni did that by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

    Our lecture halls are so small, they have to use video broadcasts to reach all the students in the class for many of the lectures. The way this works is they put all the students who could possibly fit into one hall with the lecturer, then film the thing and transmit realtime video to the overflow halls. While this may seem like a nice idea, it would actually be much better if students could watch the lectures on their own time.

    Med school is packed with many different classes and has a very tight time table here, plus for some lectures students have to travel to halls that are literally in different parts of the city. It would save a lot of time for everyone if the lectures were just recorded and could be played back later whenever the timing is right. That way, they could also be used for exam preparation.

    Somehow I doubt my university would ever go for that...

    1. Re:Wish my uni did that by julesh · · Score: 1



      Queue 500 students trying to watch 30 hours of lectures for "revision" (i.e., for the first time because they couldn't be bothered to do so beforehand) in the last 48 hours before the exam.

      I know it's what I'd have done.

  45. Agreed by iknownuttin · · Score: 1
    The question of how to create such an environment in a school is difficult to answer, though

    Vouchers? Allow parents to send their children to schools that they want them. Destroy inner city schools, eliminate mainstreaming, or ... whatever - so be it! Being PC or stylish is destroying our children.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
  46. MITs: reply "collaborative learning" by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I went to an MIT admissions orientation this week and the officer spent a far amount of time talking about collaboration and interaction. When I was a MIT student, it was the buzz of being surround by peole with IQs 140 and higher that really pushed you. A few extreemly motivated people can do this alone, but lots of us need the cahalanging environment.

    1. Re:MITs: reply "collaborative learning" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I'm glad I didn't try to go to MIT... they don't teach their students anything challenging.

  47. spoken language course by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    - A complete (spoken) language course on Youtube / web for free would be very valuable. I could easily imagine sitting down for many hours watching a series of these and emerging with conversational language.

        One way to pick up French or Spanish is to use the alternate audio and subtitles found on nearly all Hollywood DVD movies. Often there is both audio and subtitles in both French (for the Quebec audiences) and Spanish along with English second subtitles for the deaf.

        When paying close attention to the spoken dialog you will notice that it doesn't match the subtitles. That's because the films are actually translated twice by different teams. Once for the audio dubbed dialog and again for the subtitles.

        For French try and find modern French movies that have made it to the USA. The dialog and titles (for deaf French speakers) usually match exactly.

        For Spanish try paying close attention to the spoken language that is often used for public announcements. Our streetcars repeat every announcement like station stops and cross connections in Spanish. Also try using the auto checkout in grocery stores and ATMs in Spanish.

        You could actually try talking to people who are speaking the language that you are trying to learn. This has mixed results in real world contacts. Also try using the web translators like Systran or even the excreteable BabbleFish. Libraries have foreign language sections. Often popular titles are available translated into Spanish and sometimes French. Harry Potter and Steven King novels are often available in both English and Spanish, but in different sections of the library. There used to be books with French (and German) written on the left page and the parallel English text on the right page.

        The library may have language DVDs or CDs that can be ripped and copied quickly. If you can rip an entire CD of language dialog in a minute or less, then why not just grab five or six of them. Polish, Portugese, Thai, Japanese, Urdu... Why not?

        If you take public transportation, try the game of evesdropping (very discretely) on people speaking foreign languages and trying to determine what language they are actually speaking. I've quietly listened to people from Mexico and realized that they weren't speaking any language that remotely resembled Spanish. When I asked my Hispanic friend (soy estan gringo) about this, she said that they probably were speaking Mayan or some pre-Columbian Indian language that survived in the distant rural villages of Central Mexico. You will eventually be able to tell Spanish from Brazilian, Japanese from Chinese, Polish from Russian, and even if you become a bus-language master, the differences between the various SouthEast Asian languages like Lao and Vietnamese.

        Anyway, I'm rambling... ironically... lots of language..so little to say.

    1. Re:spoken language course by caluml · · Score: 1

      Greek always freaks me out. It sounds (from a distance) like Spanish. The sounds, the speaking pattern.

    2. Re:spoken language course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      soy estan gringo

      I am they are gringo?

      Brazilian

      Brazilian? You mean Portuguese.

  48. Like WYCC but on the tubes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure how many other places have the secondary PBS channels focused on providing some secondary level instruction, but the idea behind this isn't entirely new...

    Anyhow, with lectures and other instruction on publicly accessable internet video, it's better than similar TV offerings because now a broader slew of content can be found and you're not forced to wait until some odd hour to catch the show or figuring out how to get it to recorded...

    Now all we need are the free online quizzes to review the content by. (It's one thing to watch a lecture, but another to know that the stuff actually sunk in.) Not sure if flash or javascript would be the best way to go, but whatever works...

  49. Not cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If lectures were cool, they would have been featured on iPhone commercial instead of the skateboarding dog.

  50. Physics for Future Presidents... by owlnation · · Score: 1

    This is great. I see this as finally what universities should have been working towards as soon as the web was created.

    However can I draw everyone's attention to the course titled: "Physics for Future Presidents". Of course the lectures are interesting and useful, but the title is scary...

    "Physics", "Future" and "Presidents". Three words I'd never expect to be near each other.

    1. Re:Physics for Future Presidents... by EricJ2190 · · Score: 1

      I watch those videos every day that they are released (Tuesday and Thursday). I recommend the lectures to anyone that has any interest at all in the subject. They are really good videos. The title is weird, but Professor Richard A. Muller claims it is completely serious.

  51. Tempered success by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

    I will give preferential attention to any .edu domain results. This usually contains the links for lectures, power-point slides, PDFs, etc. from universities, and should thus be fairly reliable.

    After having received a degree in the field of Computer Engineering, I was able to successfully use online courseware (googled, no less) to learn an elective I wanted to take in college, but couldn't (specifically, DSP).

    I would dare say I was able to learn how to practically employ a variety of DSP techniques in about two weeks, no prof or classmates. This banks on having taken a Signals class in college...so I was already familiar with a lot of it.

    Still, I echo other posts which say that this is not a suitable substitute for a proper education.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  52. MIT Open Courseware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  53. Yes! by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

    I can sleep at home now!

    --
    +0 Meh
  54. iTunes U by takev · · Score: 1

    Has anyone noticed iTunes U on the iTunes music store? It shows quite a bit of universities and you can download lectures from a number of them, some are audio only, others are video. I have followed a couple of lectures about black holes from MIT on iTunes U.

  55. free as in beer, not free as in speech by erlehmann · · Score: 1

    freely would mean i could watch them in an open standard. very sad that they decided to use youtube.

  56. Non-news by guacamole · · Score: 1

    UC Berkeley's lectures, the ones that do get recorded, had been available online for years. Cool stuff, but for most part, the number of recorded lectures is very limited.

    http://webcast.berkeley.edu/courses.php

  57. Halo 3? Is my WOW degree no good now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Halo 3? Is my WOW degree no good now?

  58. online drive by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    the first of those is all but impossible to capture in an online manner

    Try working on an open source project if you want to be surrounded by other driven 'students', it's perfectly possible to copy that kind of driven / 'competitive' environment online.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  59. "You can't beat the live performance" by ArizonaJer · · Score: 1

    I had to laugh at the attendance for Chemistry 3B, lecture 21. Yeah, that's about par for the course for Orgo that late in the term. That vid is quite self-reflexive as the professor comments on the students' poor performance on an exam (average grade appears to be 40%!) and suggests that one problem may be that students are skipping lecture and relying on the podcast. As he comments: "You can't beat the live performance."

    Heh heh...
    --
    Jeremy Butler
    www.ScreenSite.org
    www.TVCrit.com
  60. Study material in 3rd world countries by Amitz+Sekali · · Score: 1

    I have tried learning some courses from MIT courseware. I even create a site to write down what I can learn: http://learningocw.blogspot.com/. I'm force to abandon such attempt because I can't access many study materials. I live in a third world country and there is no good library here. Buying the study materials is really out of the question since the book price is very expensive relative to average salary here.

    It's gonna be a great service for me (and people like me) if I can at least access all the lectures.

    --
    If you delay pleasure infinitely, the pleasure will be infinite. (YM)
  61. previous replies were just being nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're retarded

  62. I raised my hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but the professor in the video never called upon me!

  63. Berkley want to save bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://webcast.berkeley.edu/courses.php has been up for at least a half year, probably a lot more too. Why you would want to see the lectures in crappy youtube quality is beyond me...

  64. DMCA by kalirion · · Score: 1

    Wow, this makes it really easy to disrupt class.

  65. The Internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...now officially "serious business".

  66. Free? by sherriw · · Score: 1

    I feel sorry for students who paid big dollars in tuition money to go to this school and take those courses... because now I can get the same knowledge for free. Borrow the textbook from the library and bam, I'm now Berkeley-Educated. Ha.

    Good for us, bad idea for Berkeley. This should have been put in a secure area accessible to registered students only.

  67. Open University by QJimbo · · Score: 1

    http://www.open.ac.uk/

    They've been going for years, starting with TV programmes and courses done through the post, to today where they do a lot of internet based stuff.

  68. Speed Control by STFS · · Score: 1

    I hope this will result in YouTube adding speed control to their player. I hate watching lectures in 1.0x speed.
    Pitch control would be nice too... although sounding like Alvin the chipmunk can make dull lecturers more interesting.

    --
    You don't think enough... therefore you better not be!
  69. Don't individual faculty own their lectures? by fire5ign · · Score: 1

    I would be interested to know how UC Berkeley faculty view this. Have they sold the distribution rights (either in whole or in part) to the intellectual property of their lectures to UCB?

  70. It's a reaction by MikeTwo · · Score: 1

    The higher-ups in education took a look around, and what did they see?
    - A worthless administration that, if not elected outright twice in a row, at the very least garnished about half the country's vote.
    - A "museum" in Kansas that teaches a complete disrespect for reason and the scientific process
    - A world edging closer to a runaway greenhouse effect, with nonacceptance of this fact by an enormously technophobic populous
    - A society who's scientific literacy is on par with that of a very stupid 5-yr old


    They probably thought "we need to make this stuff more accessible." Knowledge has always been free, but so have reality-tv shows, and those get pumped into your living room every day. Compared to that convenience, the ominous stacks of non-interactive books at the library seem very far indeed, particularly for those who are not education-inclined to begin with.

    This is a good thing. A little late for a good thing. But a good thing nonetheless.

  71. Sounds like 'Nittany Notes' by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    They do this at a lot of schools. At Penn State I believe it's called "Nittany Notes." It's quite an operation; to get hired as a note-taker by them, you need to show your transcript (so that your GPA can be verified -- they don't want D students taking notes), and they have fairly strict requirements on not missing any classes, and the deadlines by which you have to have your notes transcribed and submitted.

    And I don't think they ask the professors' permission; in class you never have any idea who's just taking notes for themselves and who's taking for Nittany Notes. (They often have multiple note-takers in the same class to make sure there's good coverage, particularly on popular courses. When you buy the note pack you get all of them.)

    Not sure how long they've been around for but I think it's a while. I suspect there are probably similar operations at most larger university campuses.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  72. Beg to differ, but I'd rather have a campus! by fygment · · Score: 1

    I returned later in life to academics for a masters degree. I had to amass several credits through post grad level courses to meet the requirement. While I initially dreaded it, I ended up spending as much time on campus as possible. The reason was the infectious vitality of the student body. There are always slackers but most students (esp. at the PG level) want to learn and are generally enthusiastic about it. It was hard not to get swept up in the moment. It was at times a complete rush. Humans (even PG students) are social animals and a campus brings like-minded people together where they can motivate each other, exchange ideas, question professorial points of view, and cross-pollinate. OK, the last one isn't strictly academic but it is a perk you can't get sitting alone watching a lecture on YouTube.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  73. Miro, ex Democracy Player by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    You can use Miro to download streaming videos and watch them later; I have the same problem as you do, this tool is a good solution.