Slashdot Mirror


Japan Moon Probe Snaps First Photos

mrcgran writes "Space.com reports, "Almost one month after Japan's successful launch of the Kaguya lunar probe, the unmanned observatory has begun its first major activities in orbit around the moon. In addition to snapping its first lunar images, the probe jettisoned one of two 110-pound (50-kilogram) "baby" satellites that will help create a detailed gravity map of the moon." The major objectives of the "KAGUYA" mission are to obtain scientific data of the lunar origin and evolution and to develop the technology for the future lunar exploration. "KAGUYA" consists of a main orbiting satellite at about 100km altitude and two small satellites (Relay Satellite and VRAD Satellite) in polar orbit."

184 comments

  1. Not me. by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, am sick to death of welcoming 50 kilogram robotic overlord after 50 kilogram robotic overlord, only to have them fly off to the moon after a month or so, leaving us high, dry, and overlordless back here on Earth!

    --
    John
    1. Re:Not me. by Sentri · · Score: 1, Funny

      With that welcoming attitude its a wonder they ever turn up at all!

      haha, now I have an image in my head of those people on the roofs of skyscrapers in Independance Day, except they are all japanese and asking for their moon-probe-robotic-overlord back

      --
      Can't we all just get along
    2. Re:Not me. by cookieinc · · Score: 2, Funny

      From all the Japanese videos I've seen on the net, I can be 100% sure that they have sent this probe solely to hunt for more tentacled space aliens. I guess the aliens just do it for the money

    3. Re:Not me. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1
      --
      How ya like dat?
  2. Prettier webpage by Sentri · · Score: 4, Informative

    More user friendly version here: http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.htm

    --
    Can't we all just get along
    1. Re:Prettier webpage by cookieinc · · Score: 1

      Can anyone explain why the photos are extremely low resolution? Here's the largest I could find: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img/20071009_kaguya_07l.jpg

      Judging from the lack of detail even at this relatively small size, it looks like these photos are the original resolution it was captured at.

      Why not install a higher resolution camera? Are space cameras much different from Earth cameras?

    2. Re:Prettier webpage by Karthikkito · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a high res camera -- this one is just meant to observe the antenna that's right in the middle of every shot (make sure it's oriented fine, etc, in the event of communications troubles). Just happens that the moon is in the FOV.

    3. Re:Prettier webpage by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      I guess they could only afford to send up one of their fancy 3G dual camera phones - Probably forgot to tape it on the right way around and ended up with the vga cam all arse about instead of the 5mega-pixel jibber at the back.

    4. Re:Prettier webpage by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So they sent up a moon satellite with a B&W camera?
      That's pretty dumb... but at least they put a blue filter on it to make it like a movie.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    5. Re:Prettier webpage by fbjon · · Score: 2, Informative

      More than that, there's an HDTV camera, apparently shooting at 1920 x 1080 pixels. Lunar observation is scheduled at 19th of October.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    6. Re:Prettier webpage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not install a higher resolution camera? By international treaty the US won't allow pictures above a certain resolution near where the "moon landings" supposedly occurred.

      It would be difficult to explain the lack of evidence;-)

    7. Re:Prettier webpage by fbjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What do you mean B&W? It's a satellite for science, not for human comfort. Besides, it's not B&W anyway.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    8. Re:Prettier webpage by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The cameras on the Mars Rovers are "B&W" as well. They just image in three different wavelengths and combine them to get the color images.

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    9. Re:Prettier webpage by DreamingReal · · Score: 2, Funny
      Besides, it's not B&W anyway.



      Then it's obviously a fraud perpetrated by the Japanese. As a user of Google Moon, I am well aware of the fact that the Moon is yellow at high resolutions.

      --
      We want some answers and all that we get
      Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

      - Ministry
    10. Re:Prettier webpage by nickyj · · Score: 1

      Great I can watch the video on my new ASHDTV

      --
      Causing Chaos Everywhere,
      Nik J.
      The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
    11. Re:Prettier webpage by v1 · · Score: 1

      which of course will be automatically downsampled to 640x480 if any attempt to capture the video is detected

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  3. Hey! Down in front! by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing like a freaking high gain antenna smack-dab in the middle of every freaking shot.

    1. Re:Hey! Down in front! by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nothing like a freaking high gain antenna smack-dab in the middle of every freaking shot.

      The capricious manager who proposed moving the antenna at the last minute before launch must feel pretty stupid right now.

    2. Re:Hey! Down in front! by sykopomp · · Score: 1

      Even rocket scientists do stupid shit sometimes.

    3. Re:Hey! Down in front! by phantomcircuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      The camera is to observe the high gain antenna, not to take pictures of the moon.

    4. Re:Hey! Down in front! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As it says the camera is for monitoring the high-gain antenna, I think it might not be such a stupid idea to actually have it in the photos.

    5. Re:Hey! Down in front! by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      At first I thought he was joking but then I read the article. How curious.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    6. Re:Hey! Down in front! by achurch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't worry; Kaguya has a better camera, too.

    7. Re:Hey! Down in front! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really... if you want pictures just stick your camera on the end of a telescope. There are many more things we don't know about the moon that can't be seen by a camera. Like, for example, getting a detailed gravity map.

    8. Re:Hey! Down in front! by pizzach · · Score: 1

      Well actually, the original plan was to remove the antenna using SGI effects before going public with the pictures. What a management bungle this was!

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    9. Re:Hey! Down in front! by CoreDump01 · · Score: 1

      Very nice shot, thank you!

    10. Re:Hey! Down in front! by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      Whoever labeled the pictures on the jaxa.jp website isn't much better, they say "upper right" when they mean lower right and "lower left" when they mean upper right!

    11. Re:Hey! Down in front! by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      It's a cultural thing I'm sure. Arabic, Hebrew, and Japanese are all read right to left rather than left to right like most modern languages.

    12. Re:Hey! Down in front! by maltwhiskman · · Score: 1

      No ordinary moon photo faker would ever think of that. The fake "we screwed up" trick, makes your dull fakes come to life.

  4. That's no High Gain Antenna by RuBLed · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's supposed to be the tripod, I believe someone got fired...

    1. Re:That's no High Gain Antenna by fbjon · · Score: 1
      No, it's the microphone on the set. The boom operator responsible for this mistake has been sacked.


      Seriously though, it's supposed to be right in the middle of the view, because that's exactly what the camera is for.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  5. Re:Weapons by RuBLed · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah I don't trust them too, considering that we are not in charge of Gundam.

  6. Re:Weapons by Sentri · · Score: 1

    For a well measured and written comment, that certainly harbours alot of fear and mistrust. Do you have a basis for those fears or are they more of a phobia? Im wondering because when a country is destroyed and then left to moulder I can see why it would harbour resentment, but I was under the impression the US helped with Japan's rebuilding efforts.

    --
    Can't we all just get along
  7. Got a snap of the American flag they left behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the buggy thingamees that they left up there? And the coke can. I jest, but seriously folks, I want to see if these conspiracy theories can be put to rest for good. Can they photograph the equipment left behind?

  8. Re:Weapons by adona1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I call paranoia. With a strong economy, a military isn't really needed. They can rule you wholesale instead.

    Let others boast of martial dash
    For we have boldly fought with cash

    --
    Between the falling angel and the rising ape
  9. Re:Weapons by akasch · · Score: 0

    so Japan got to the moon finally with an unmanned vehicle - good for them

    --
    Mo
  10. Re:Weapons by ArcherB · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For a well measured and written comment, that certainly harbours alot of fear and mistrust. Do you have a basis for those fears or are they more of a phobia? Im wondering because when a country is destroyed and then left to moulder I can see why it would harbour resentment, but I was under the impression the US helped with Japan's rebuilding efforts.

    And that is the key. Defeated enemies tend to become the strongest allies when you take the time to stick around and rebuild the country so that it is nicer than it was when you first showed up. Japan is an ally because we were allowed to finish the job and did not "cut and run". Hell, we are still there!

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  11. So the big question is.... by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 3, Funny

    ....did they find our fake moon landing set yet?

    --
    What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
    1. Re:So the big question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't be hard to find, it's right next to the alien base.

    2. Re:So the big question is.... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      did they find our fake moon landing set yet?

      Their probe is using the same studio, so of course they'll find it all right there as expected.

    3. Re:So the big question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how you expect them to find it in all that cheese.

    4. Re:So the big question is.... by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      A fake moon landing set ... on the moon?

  12. Proof of the moon landing maybe? by The+Tonester · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps the Japanese can provide some unbiased evidence of the (alleged?) moon landing site. Put those pesky theories to rest...

    1. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by RuBLed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Conspiracy theories are designed to persist even against overwhelming evidence against it.

    2. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by pv2b · · Score: 1

      There isn't really any controversy over whether the Americans went to the moon. Pretty much every single claim that they didn't has been convincingly debunked. And if the conspiracy theorists don't believe those debunkings -- do you really think they are going to believe some images from an unmanned Japanese space probe?

    3. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by davmoo · · Score: 1

      Nah, won't change a thing. The "it was faked" whack-jobs will just swear up and down that the American government bought off the Japanese to doctor the photos, the American government doctored the photos themselves, or that the Japanese lunar mission itself is fake.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    4. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      watch the penn and teller bullshit ep. on conspiracy theories. fucking funny.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    5. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by evanbd · · Score: 1

      XKCD put it quite eloquently. These are not theories that any amount of rational evidence or logic will refute.

    6. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by niklash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There already is.

      Why don't people think of the soviets?
      The one country on earth that desperatly wanted usa to fail.
      The one country that had the technology to check if there really was a spaceship flying to the moon.

      If there was anything even remotely fishy about the moon landing they would complain to no end.

      And still they said nothing. They diden't even *try* to discredit the moon landing.

    7. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      If a reliable source can verify the landing-sites, it's obvious proof that the US government secretly has launched unmanned probes to set up faked landing-sites on the moon. =)
      Complete with fake moon-boot print makers and all.

      For real. No lie.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    8. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by Xiaran · · Score: 2, Funny

      They diden't even *try* to discredit the moon landing.

      And *thats* what makes the whole thing so suspicious! :)

    9. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      And *thats* what makes the whole thing so suspicious! :)
      I heard something in my brain pop and now I smell burning hair. I think you gave me a stroke.
      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    10. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by Big+Homestead · · Score: 1

      I am gonna laugh my ass off if it is the Japanese who show the world that landing was a hoax,....which it was. I believe.

      --
      My wife likes quotes, so here's mine.
    11. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It was no hoax. The Soviets would have been all over it if it were... after all, they've been there too... and do you think for one second they would have let the USA live it down if after one of their own lunar missions they came back with proof that the USA had never been there? Or do you think that the 20 or so successful Soviet lunar missions were faked too?

    12. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I wish I hadn't commented on this story yet. I definitely would have dropped a mod point on that post... :)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    13. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by BiOFH · · Score: 1

      "I am gonna laugh my ass off if it is the Japanese who show the world that landing was a hoax,....which it was. I believe."

      But... we can laugh our assess off at you if they confirm the landing(s), right?

      --
      - I am made of meat.
    14. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by Big+Homestead · · Score: 1

      We simply don't have the technology to see the lunar lander, lunar rover, flags or any evidence of a landing. Look it up. Thats why us skeptics are so happy that Japan has something over the moon, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. But the belt of radiation surrounding the Earth would fry a humanm hence not thinking a 50's 60's NASA could keep men alive through it at that time. Cheers

      --
      My wife likes quotes, so here's mine.
    15. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by mark-t · · Score: 1
      The belt of radiation surrounding earth is dangerous, to be sure... but the astronauts weren't exactly dawdling while in it. They were moving at a fast enoogh clip that their total time spent in that dangerous zone was less than 4 hours. Even at the belts highest energy densities, that still would not have been significantly different from what one would get from a common X-ray. Measurable, to be sure... but hardly fatal.

      If they had stayed there for days on end, yeah... that could have been problematic.

    16. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      But how would fake photos from a make-believe moon probe prove anything? :)

    17. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that's because in Soviet Russia, the moon landing discredits you.

    18. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by Big+Homestead · · Score: 1

      And that is a very textbook conclusion concerning the belt, however, the Russians refused to send a single human through it because they could not account on how to deal with how strong that radiation really is. If Russia could send someone somewhere, they would. I believe that belt may be stronger then assumed, and I believe the Russians may have been onto something. But like I said, if the Japanese satellite can see the lander and so forth, then I eat crow. Thanks alot for the conversation. :) Cheers!

      --
      My wife likes quotes, so here's mine.
    19. Re:Proof of the moon landing maybe? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with the hoax theory is that it is not substantiatable by references which do not themselves subscribe to the theory that the US lunar landing was a hoax. This is called begging the question, and is ultimately a logical fallacy. Whereas one can independently verify the dosage of radiation that the astronauts would have received travelling through the Van Allen belt at a speed of over 5km/second, and ascertain for oneself that the dosage, while admittedly not below a truly negligible threshold, is not significantly harmful. And although certainly the radiation exposure is cumulative, in the case of the Apollo astronauts, their trips were few and far enough apart that the cumulative effects of the radiation doses they received would ultimately result in nothing more serious than some of them developing cataracts as they got older, a disorder with many possible causes, but quite easily attributable to atypical radiation doses when they were younger (and fortunately, a condition that was fairly easily treatable by the time such symptoms showed up).

  13. Then quit whining.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...SPAWN MORE OVERLORDS!

    1. Re:Then quit whining.... by arktemplar · · Score: 1

      for (;;)
      system("./overlords");
      --
      blog plug -> The Darker Side of Light
    2. Re:Then quit whining.... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "# emerge OVERLORDS"?

    3. Re:Then quit whining.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      emerging takes too long.
      much easier to apt-get install OVERLOARDS

  14. Re:Weapons by wanderingknight · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Yay! Let's do the preemptive war on them, too!

    </sarcasm>

  15. Re:I for one... by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    welcome our Japanese mooninite overlords.

    [insert Asian version of goatse link]

  16. Re:Weapons by cong06 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't even start using that as an excuse to stay inside of Iraq. What are we accomplishing? Maybe we should drop nukes on Iraq as well? I'm sure that would overall increase our reputation. That way instead of not only creating more hostility between America and the Middle Eastern Nations, or even simply creating a general anger towards America's ignorance and atrociousness, we would be showing off to the whole world that indeed, America is just as evil an empire as all the Radical Muslims are attempting to fight against.

    Maybe then you'll have given the whole war to these Radicals. This war needs to be fought person by person. Through Discussions between people, and by understanding the "enemy" to the point of reasoning with them.

    Back to Japan though, I wonder how much of the "peaceful relations" that we have with them aren't so much because we helped rebuild (we had better help rebuild...after blowing a big crater in a densely populated area) but because we are the current world power. I'm sure most countries just "play along" with all the things we do simply so that they don't get lost in the shuffle.

  17. Re:Weapons by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "and are physically and culturally linked to China, one of our gravest threats."

    umm i hate to rain on your parade there kiddo but china and japan hate each other. there's a few centuries of mistrust and ill will between them - they love america far far more.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  18. Is it me or... by BTWR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there also an air of nerdy excitement about this new-sorta "Space Race II" (new character... Asia!) in the rest of you guys too?

    1. Re:Is it me or... by mstahl · · Score: 1, Funny

      On the moon, nerds are spanked with moon-rocks!

    2. Re:Is it me or... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Nah. I don't generally get excited about internet memes.

    3. Re:Is it me or... by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      The highly competitive sport of Space Race is always exiting.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    4. Re:Is it me or... by raduf · · Score: 1


      If Asia's one contender in the race, who's the other?

    5. Re:Is it me or... by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would love to see a space race in my lifetime just without the threat of nuclear annihilation.

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  19. Re:Got a snap of the American flag they left behin by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

    What about the buggy thingamees that they left up there?

    Everything left on the moon worked perfectly! (That slapping sound you hear is a horde of retired NASA engineers throwing down gauntlets)

    I want to see if these conspiracy theories can be put to rest for good. Can they photograph the equipment left behind?

    These are people who don't accept the existing film, photographs, hunks of moon rock, etc, as evidence; more photos won't make a scrap of difference. The only way to refute conspiracy theorists is to take them to the moon and push them out an airlock without a space suit so they can experience the low gravity and hard vaccuum first hand (and even then they'd probably use their last breath attempting to argue that it couldn't have been done in the 1960's...).

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  20. Re:I for one... by Paktu · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    welcome our Japanese mooninite overlords.

    [insert Asian version of goatse link]

    I'm pretty sure you're talking about www.lemonparty.org

  21. troll food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was somebody arguing otherwise?

  22. Kaguya Hime by Bonker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Princess Kaguya is the traditional main character in The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter. She's something of a Japanese 'Tom Thumb'.

    Kaguya is a golden-haired princess sent to the Earth from her Moon kingdom to learn about the joys and sadness of life. In various versions of the tale, she's required to return to the moon once she reaches adulthood.

    Anime fans will note that the 'Moon Princess' motif is used repeatedly in modern stories, such as 'Sailor Moon', 'Mammotte Syugogetten' and more recently, 'Oh, Edo Rocket!'.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Kaguya Hime by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      And don't forget Shingetsutan Tsukihime, even though it had some kind of fallen angel connotation as well.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    2. Re:Kaguya Hime by mconners · · Score: 1

      Is Princess Kayuga one of the Cosmos from "Godzilla vs. Mothra"?

    3. Re:Kaguya Hime by afedaken · · Score: 1

      [otaku purist]
      Lies! There is no Tsukihime anime!
      [/otaku purist]

      --
      If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
    4. Re:Kaguya Hime by Bonker · · Score: 1

      [otaku purist]
      Lies! There is no Tsukihime anime!
      [/otaku purist]


      For those unfamiliar with it, 'Lunar Legend Tsukihime' is an anime based on what was originally a well-written 'visual novel' by a certain Mr. Nasu. The software was an amateur production (a 'Doujin' work) and ties in VERY loosely with other works by Nasu, such as 'Fate/Stay Night'. Like most 'ero-games', the novel features multiple story paths, and explicit sex.

      The anime is considered VASTLY inferior to the original visual novel. Like the second 'Highlander' movie, many fans have tried to block it entirely and pretend that it never happened.
      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  23. Re:Weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You're a fucking idiot.

  24. "KAGUYA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is savage word? Why must we always have stories about what some barbaric race is doing?

    Meanwhile, the Linux server marketshare has dropped 20% in the last quarter and no stories on that...

  25. HD by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These pictures are fairly low quality, probably from an engineering camera rather than a scientific one.
    One thing I noticed on the website is that they also carry an HDTV camera! Can't wait to see some nice HD video from lunar orbit.

    1. Re:HD by MikeyVB · · Score: 1

      You are correct, it is an engineering camera. The article states (http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071009_kaguya_e.html#at01) that the images are from a camera specifically there to monitor the high gain antenna. I can't wait for the HD camera photos, those ones will probably be really nice!

    2. Re:HD by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1
      These pictures are fairly low quality, probably from an engineering camera rather than a scientific one.

      Indeed, the fact the antenna is right in the middle, and the linked web site refers to a "on board camera for monitoring the high gain antenna", I would say this is pretty much confirmed. I look forward to the high def shots.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  26. WOW slashot got way less hard to reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    two 110-pound (50-kilogram) "baby" satellites that will help create a detailed gravity map of the moon

    This is when we find the monolith.

    *This post brought to you buy me FINALY finding the stupid javaascript shit with the reply button.
    1. Re:WOW slashot got way less hard to reply by TarZ · · Score: 1

      Regrettably, "baby" satellites doesn't have the ability to find the Magnetic Anomaly.

      The main satellite has the ability. Lunar Magnetometer

    2. Re:WOW slashot got way less hard to reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regrettably, "baby" satellites doesn't have the ability to find the Magnetic Anomaly. Is that where the Monolith is buried?
    3. Re:WOW slashot got way less hard to reply by TarZ · · Score: 1
      Tycho Magnetic Anomaly-1

      Tycho Magnetic Anomaly-1 (also known as TMA-1) refers to the apparent magnetic irregularity found at the Tycho crater on the Moon's surface by American astronauts. ...
  27. Anyone for Engrish? by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 4, Funny
    All I want to say is hopefully their science is better than their english and/or translators.

    At the CCD device, pixel defects (white blemishes) generate by space lay, so, it is expected the cyclic observation makes clear the effect of the space lay around the moon orbit. It is difficult to protect the CCD from the space lay. So we have been developed the grand system be able to compensate the white blemishes of max 20 thousands from the pick-up image.
    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    1. Re:Anyone for Engrish? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I had similar issues with the asteroid mission which is still running. Their press releases can be a bit hard to understand, but it is pretty clear that the Japanese have a lot of engineers working on these programs who really know their stuff.

      But they do it all in Japanese, the way Australians like me do everything in English.

    2. Re:Anyone for Engrish? by ignoramus · · Score: 1

      All I want to say is hopefully their science is better than their english and/or translators.

      Wow.

      You seem to be under the impression that we native English speakers are and will continue to be the center of the world.

      We'll be lucky if the countries that are actually interested and doing real science and exploration keep bothering to tell us what's going on, even if the english is bad. We're too busy catering to the lowest common denominator by pouring all our collective energy into making every single part of life drool proof and safe, encouraging the impression that anything that's difficult or complex should be avoided.

    3. Re:Anyone for Engrish? by orcrist · · Score: 2

      You seem to be under the impression that we native English speakers are and will continue to be the center of the world.


      Oh cut the politically correct crap. Translating to English isn't generally for the benefit of the native speakers, it's to allow for as broad of an audience as possible. Why the fuck do you think we're typing this in English? Hint: it's not just because Slashdot is from the U.S. And now, think about who will have the most problems reading poorly translated English? Hint: it's not native speakers.

      I've travelled around quite a bit -- and lived abroad for at least a third of my life -- and I've heard many more complaints about poor English from non-native speakers than from native speakers because the non-native speakers are the ones who have more problems with it.

      Incidentally, I would agree with you if the GP had been criticizing, e.g. a Slashdot post or spoken English (anyone can make a mistake), but this is from their space agency and is presumably meant for international consumption. There must be plenty of Japanese/English translators who can manage better than that. Why don't they hire one?
      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    4. Re:Anyone for Engrish? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Wow, what an appropriate username for your comment.

      Actually, I don't care what language you do your science in, but if you're going to release a press release about it in another language you should have at least one native speaker proof your work. Even the best product in the world is bound to fail if you have lousy marketing.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:Anyone for Engrish? by starless · · Score: 1

      A common problem with Japanese to English translations is that they often aren't done by native English speakers. It's usually considered best to have a translation done by someone is who a native speaker of the target language, but for some reason the Japanese often don't do this. Although in this case the web page may have been put together quickly by Japanese scientists, who could be excused for this, I can see lots of translation problems just by looking at the manuals for my car or my television.

    6. Re:Anyone for Engrish? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1
      The whole Communication - Information page is a hoot!

      March 26, 2007 It carries out from Tsukuba Space Center

      SELENE, obtaining the job at Tsukuba Space Center, being placed by large-sized trailer 5 containers in nighttime, was carried out in order to face to Tanegashima. SELENE was waived from the project manager and the authorized personnel in nighttime .

      While the large-sized trailer, counterattacking the wide Tsukuba road, observing at that it keeps being carried out, while asking safety, we in the driver continued to shake the hand.

      On the other hand, there are some cool cultural references on the page. For example, it was fun playing the Katamari Damacy level where you pick up the paper cranes. But I had no idea that the crane and the tortoise are traditional Japanese symbols of longevity -- this was explained in a posting about a 2,000-long crane chain given to the project for good luck.

      Besides, it's not like English speakers fare any better when communicating outside their native tongue... like translating a soft drink slogan into "Pepsi brings your ancestors back from the grave".
      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    7. Re:Anyone for Engrish? by tknd · · Score: 1

      There must be plenty of Japanese/English translators who can manage better than that. Why don't they hire one?

      They're all busy translating the latest manga and anime for free.

    8. Re:Anyone for Engrish? by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      It's usually considered best to have a translation done by someone is who a native speaker

      How true!

    9. Re:Anyone for Engrish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In general the Japanese suck at English because of their school system. The standard methods for teaching English in Japan are crap focusing more on passing specific government regulated English tests, and everyone spends enough time (like years and years, plenty of time to actually learn English) not-learning-English, making them think that they are really good at English, when in fact they couldn't English their way out of a wet paper bag. So you get a population who incorrectly thinks they speak English well, which leads, I imagine, to a reluctance to hiring professional translators.

      Or at least the impression I get from J-list's Japanese culture email subscription.

  28. Gravity map? by Slurpee · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it will take them to find TMA1

    1. Re:Gravity map? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder how long it will take them to find TMA1

      Time to read the book again. It was the magnetic field which made it stand out, possibly maintained by current in a loop of superconductor.

      There is a pretty good chance we would have found it by now.

    2. Re:Gravity map? by Slurpee · · Score: 1

      or at least let the difference between gravitic force and magnetic force

    3. Re:Gravity map? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly. "These contour maps cover a relatively small band on the lunar surface" would seem to imply that not much of the surface was scanned....

  29. Re:Got a snap of the American flag they left behin by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

    Yes but if you took them all you could end the argument. I vote ship two we load up with middle management types and phone sanitizers.

  30. Too much psycho-AI on the mind by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    At first I read that as "Japanese moon probe snaps: first photos"

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  31. Re:Weapons by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And that is the key. Defeated enemies tend to become the strongest allies when you take the time to stick around and rebuild the country so that it is nicer than it was when you first showed up. Japan is an ally because we were allowed to finish the job and did not "cut and run".

    Oh for crying out loud, the thinly veiled reference to Iraq is ludicrous.

    We didn't unilaterally invade Japan. They were at war prior to our involvement with them.

    Japan wasn't harboring long term resentment over American oppression and manipulation at the individual level the way many Iraqi's 'hate america'.

    Japan wasn't already on the point of a civil war due to multiple mutually hostile internal factions that were barely being contained by the brutal dictator we installed and propped up.

    So it was largely the government that was at war with the US, not the 'people'.

    So when Japan surrendered after the nuclear weapons attacks, and the government was dissolved and reformed they really did surrender, and the whole country especially the average civilians were pretty unified in their desire to get on with the rebuilding. Iraq has gone a completely different direction; with multiple competing hostile factions that were there all along going at each other with America caught in the middle of it.

    Even if the US manages to ultimately succeed, it will be by siding with one of the factions and helping them become dominant and rebuilding with them... this will only alienate the other factions who will just become even more hostile to the US, and they will gather with allies in Afghanistan, Iran, etc.

    At -best- its going to be Israel all over again. Sure we have a great ally in the faction we helped dominate and claim and rebuild the space, but at what cost? perpetual war and festering anti-american sentiment from the displaced/neighboring factions.

  32. Protoss?? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    In addition to snapping its first lunar images, the probe jettisoned one of two 110-pound (50-kilogram) "baby" satellites that will help create a detailed gravity map of the moon. This is the precursor to a Protoss-like Carrier in World War IV. I'm just saying.
    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  33. Re:Weapons by rucs_hack · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe we should drop nukes on Iraq as well?

    No way, we don't want an Iraqi Ishiro Honda Creating more Godzilla, and an endless stream of city destruction analogue cartoons that all seem to require the technical expertise of schoolgirls.

    'Ah yes, we need the schoolgirls because their purdah wearing panty flashing abilities, um, well, we just need them, ok?'

  34. Apollo 20..? by xx01dk · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they are planning on taking a closer look at the backside. Look it up, seriously.

    --
    There is simply too much glass..
    1. Re:Apollo 20..? by oni · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking. Somebody made a fake video and claimed it was footage from an apollo 20 mission, so I know you must be joking, because nobody is dumb enough to fall for such an obvious fake.

    2. Re:Apollo 20..? by xx01dk · · Score: 1

      Just sayin'.

      --
      There is simply too much glass..
  35. When do the giant alien monsters attack Tokyo? by gbulmash · · Score: 1

    Don't a handful of the Toho rubber-suit-monster movies start with a Japanese space launch getting the attention of unfriendly aliens?

  36. Re:Weapons by dltaylor · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "to the point of reasoning with them" makes the erroneous assumption that humans (other than a rare few) are consistently capable of reason. On any subject where "belief" is involved (religion, political and economic theory, child-rearing, ...), reason is literally not possible by the believer. You can no more reason with an Islamic fundamentalist or George W. Bush regarding their respective delusions, than a significantly afflicted schizophrenic off his medication, and probably less.

    "Peaceful relations" with Japan are a product of the advantages that they perceive and American delusions. When either of those factors changes, then the Japanese would quite willingly return to their Imperial behavior, or the US will go back to the arrogant pre-war behavior that made the war with Japan inevitable.

  37. Moon landing set? Yeah what ever you say. by asm2750 · · Score: 2, Funny

    President Truman: Get this saucer to Area 51.
    General: But that's where we're building the set for the fake moon landing.
    President Truman: Then we'll have to really land on the moon. Invent NASA and tell them to get off their fannies.

  38. On a *gravity* map? Never! by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

    A very, very long time on a gravity map - they'd need a MAGNETIC plot. Remember, TMA1 stands for "Tycho Magnetic Anomaly - One" thats how they found it.

    Of course the gravity map *might* find the buried Atlantean spaceship because of its mini-blackhole power source, but I doubt it....

    1. Re:On a *gravity* map? Never! by Slurpee · · Score: 1

      damn - stand back while the penny drops.

      I read your comment - and it clicked - stupid.

      and you know what? I even reminded myself what TMA stood for before posting....

      Magnetic force - gravitic force....same thing right? ;-)

    2. Re:On a *gravity* map? Never! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magnetic force - gravitic force....same thing right? ;-)
      Particle scientists have been hoping for that for a long time...

  39. Remember... by apodyopsis · · Score: 3, Funny

    When they snap the Apollo landing sites and see two sets of footprints leaving the capsule..

    ..and three returning that you need to start worrying.

    Nah, I'm no so amused about the landing site, it's the enormous "Kilroy was here" on the darkside of the moon I'm wait for....

    1. Re:Remember... by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      "Nah, I'm no so amused about the landing site, it's the enormous "Kilroy was here" on the darkside of the moon I'm wait for..."

      You mean the Far side of the moon. The "dark side" is just the side that is facing away from the Sun at that time. Every part of the moon will see darkness at some point. If "Kilroy" was on the "dark side of the moon" right now, and it wasn't in the "far side", you would see it in just a few hours.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    2. Re:Remember... by ImpShial · · Score: 1
      I'm actually looking forward to seeing C-H-A carved into the visible side of the moon sometime in the near future.

      Link for the Tick-challenged - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chairface_Chippendale

      --
      I gave up religion for Lent.
  40. Re:Got a snap of the American flag they left behin by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    What! You want us to die from a virulent disease from a dirty telephone????
    Geez the nerve of some people!

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  41. Hiya, I live in Japan... by patio11 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There are very few countries I would trust in a foxhole, and only one of them doesn't speak English as the national language. That one is Japan. Japan is so intimately tied with the United States politically, economically, and culturally that to suggest that Japanese rearmament (a frog that has LONG since boiled -- they now have something like the world's 5th largest military) leads to military conflict with the United States is like suggesting that Canada is planning to continue the War of 1812 grudge match at the first provocation.

    In some bizzaro world where Japan and the United States had economic hostilities (as opposed to the odd disagreement among friends over import levels, tariffs, and the like), Japan cutting off trade with the US would ruin the nation in a matter of months. (And that is assuming we didn't respond by having the Navy cut off their oil supply, in which case she would quite literally cease to have a modern economy in a matter of weeks.) That is the flipside of them being economically dependent on exports to America and their other overseas markets.

    Additionally, debt is a weapon that goes both ways. There is a nice expression -- "When you owe the bank $100,000, the bank owns you. When you owe the bank $100 million, you own the bank." The economic nuclear option for the United States is having a midlevel Treasury functionary say one catastrophically important sentence: "We will not pay interest on the T-bills held by the Japanese government, or anyone they should sell them to, for the duration of the hostilities." Oh, we owed you a trillion dollars? Sorry, our mistake -- the accountant has been fired.

    That is a heck of a lot more important with regards to China than it is to Japan, by the way. I really don't mind China investing their profits in the US debt (*somebody* is going to own it, who cares who) -- should they decide to have an attack of stupid and talk about nuking Los Angeles again, we can just threaten them with causing a financial panic on a scale unheard of in history. All of the devastation with many less bodies than threatening to match them in megadeaths.

    I call this the economic nuclear option because it would NOT be consequence free -- it would pretty much guarantee a worldwide financial panic. But, hey, if you're talking about a major conflict between two of the richest nations in the world the worldwide financial panic is a given.

  42. Re:Got a snap of the American flag they left behin by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

    To be fair to the plan, death by dirty telephone is only a possibility, while ridding ourselves of middle management is guaranteed.

    Worth the risk, IMO.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  43. Google by AkumaReloaded · · Score: 0

    Why do we need these pictures anyway. Everyone knows that when you get close enough, you will find out the moon is made of cheese.

  44. What a vain probe! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny

    Geez, nothing but pictures of itself! Should have named it PRINCESS.

  45. Rapid approach by janap · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the speed of that little thing is. I noticed that the moon just about doubled in apparent size in the space of twenty minutes, according to the comments under the photos.

    --

  46. In Soviet Russia by mrbluze · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    On the moon, nerds are spanked with moon-rocks! The rock moons you!
    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  47. Re:Weapons by vtcodger · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    ***Japan is an ally because we were allowed to finish the job and did not "cut and run". Hell, we are still there!***

    If the US had mismanaged the occupation of Japan and Germany to the extent that it has bungled things in Iraq, we'd have ended up fighting and losing 20 year long guerilla wars in both places. And we'd be looking at two important rearmed and hostile enemies.

    Like Kenney Rogers says "You gotta know when to hold em and know when to fold em." In the case of Iraq we should have stayed out of the game and it's long past time to fold our hand just walk away. Stay a few more years and it'll be time to run.

    BTW, I don't have any problem with sending the Iraqi's a bunch more money eventually to fix up their country. We broke it. We should pay for the damage. But they probably need to have (a) real functioning government(s) before air-dropping money will do any good. In the meantime, how about we focus on what went wrong in the US, and why, and how do we keep the clowns who are responsible from ever doing any decision making again?

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  48. Yes but also... by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    >Is there also an air of nerdy excitement about this new-sorta "Space Race II"
    >(new character... Asia!) in the rest of you guys too?

    Yes, but also I have this nagging fear that we won't be able to dominate like we used to. We're lazier and more expensive than we used to be.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:Yes but also... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      More to the point, though, do we even want to dominate this particular race? Getting to the moon [again] is a big deal, but is it worth the effort? Unless we're going to develop a lunar base, what would be the point of racing to the moon again? We've already proven we could do it with technology from 40 years ago, why would doing it again really prove anything?

      Certainly it would generate some new technologies and possibly even support for the space program, but our current space program is so wrapped up in its own importance that I doubt that would happen.

      "Space-worthy" equipment is ridiculously expensive these days and NASA won't send anything up that isn't hardened to ridiculous standards. People would focus too much on the failures and the cost to recognize any true benefits, and thus, there would be no real benefit because the program simply wouldn't get off the ground.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  49. That was nice BBS software by the way by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    WWIV. Ah, the good old days. :)

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  50. Oblig. by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

    "That's no moon..."

    --
    Meta will eat itself
  51. Welcome home, baby... by wezeldog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I say this to all your things, for this is a robbery.

  52. So I am guessing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That *this* is the ministry in charge of Gundam.

  53. Re:Got a snap of the American flag they left behin by Nigel_Powers · · Score: 1

    I, for one, would like to see third-party pictures of the landing site.

    I trust the Japanese to supply me with all my high-tech components -- my auto, cameras, etc. Frankly, I trust them more than I do my own government.

  54. Re:FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please explain how America is acting "imperialist."

  55. Tsuki he kita! by afedaken · · Score: 1

    JAXA to Kaguya ni omedetou gozaimasu!

    --
    If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
  56. The don't have the resolution by oni · · Score: 2, Informative

    The resolution will be 10 meters per pixel. That's not good enough to see the lander bases from apollo, let alone any footprints.

    wiki article (look for the data on the Terrain Camera)

    1. Re:The don't have the resolution by apodyopsis · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...darn.

      ...but it can pick up the giant Killroy okay, right?

  57. Re:Weapons by Choad+Namath · · Score: 1

    Japan's close proximity to China is exactly why we should be in favor of Japan having a stronger military. China has been building theirs up for years, and with Kim Jong Il in the neighborhood, it's important for us to have strong allies in the region for the balance of power. South Korea and Taiwan can't exactly provide that by themselves.

  58. Re:Weapons by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    So it was largely the government that was at war with the US, not the 'people'.

    Sorry but that is simply not true. Way to rewrite history. The majority of Japanese citizens believed in what their government was doing. That was one of the reasons in fact that the bombs were dropped despite the fact that the US was already on the point of winning the war by conventional means. US generals believed that there would essentially be no way to really 'win' in any conventional sense because there would be so many civilians rising up to fight in the streets. They believed any attempt to take Japan would be met with *very* high losses to both sides because the resistance from the civilians would be so strong. The belief was that many would prefer to die fighting in the streets than surrender. Ironically in Iraq it seems to be just the opposite. If there has been a mass organizing of Iraqis to overthrow the US occupation I have certainly not heard anything about it. These sneaky little bombs here and there are just not going to do it. Sorry. So they may be pissed about being occupied by a foreign power, but I guess they are not pissed enough to try to really fight.
    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  59. Re:Weapons by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    Well there's no doubt that many Chinese *still* hold grudges against Japan due to its actions in WWII. However I'm not sure that the Japanese hold any deep seated resentment against China. And I certainly think it's an exaggeration to say that either country 'loves' America. Certainly I have met some Chinese who don't have too many nice things to say about Americans in general. And I'm talking about the American people, not the US government.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  60. I would but... by jjohn · · Score: 1

    I REQUIRE MORE MINERALS.

    However, my VESPIAN GAS stores are UNSTOPPABLE.

  61. Moon Structures by synonymous · · Score: 1

    Lets see if they announce or show images of the moon structures that NASA found long time ago.

    1. Re:Moon Structures by BiOFH · · Score: 1

      They already did. They're called rocks.

      --
      - I am made of meat.
    2. Re:Moon Structures by synonymous · · Score: 1

      What is your opinion on Ogg Vorbis? What -q you use?

    3. Re:Moon Structures by synonymous · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would bet that the reason that all these other countries have decided to go there is just because of what is on the blind side. To see for themselves.

      http://www.ufocasebook.com/moonstructures.html

  62. Incentive by s31523 · · Score: 1

    The Japanese have a lot more incentive to colonize the moon.. They have a serious overcrowding thing going on in their cities. Creating Lunar colonies might be a good way to free up some space by shipping people to the moon for extended work programs or even living. Of course, I imagine the prolonged exposure to less gravity might be an issue for a return, but put that in the fine print! I can't wait to vacation at Disney's Moon Adventure!

    1. Re:Incentive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to colonize the moon strictly so they can set up "Japanese Only" signs everywhere. They ain't gonna share their moon real estate with anybody.

  63. Re:Weapons by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    what crack are you smoking? the japs are fucking insane for anything american. look at how crazy they are over baseball and mcdonalds.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  64. At least someone thinks the moon is a good idea... by harshmanrob · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...to bad the Americans only care about conquest of the middle east and ethnic cleansing of Muslims so their god will be happy.

  65. Re:Weapons by AlecC · · Score: 1

    I agree with this. Japan and China are as "physically and culturally linked" as the US and Latin America. Lots of cultural exchange, and not a few invasions, but that has not made the two merge together at all.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  66. Conspiracy theories = by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1
    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
  67. Actually they did. by Atroxodisse · · Score: 1

    The name is a mythological Moon Princess. Or something like that.

    --
    Read my short stories - You won't regret it.
    1. Re:Actually they did. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      You know, I think you're right! Good idea, though. :)

  68. Re:Weapons by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Sorry but that is simply not true. Way to rewrite history. The majority of Japanese citizens believed in what their government was doing.

    You misunderstood what I was trying to say. Yes the Japanese believed in what their government was doing, but it was faith in their own government and patriotism not years of ground in hatred of America that would have driven them to fight.

    These sneaky little bombs here and there are just not going to do it. Sorry. So they may be pissed about being occupied by a foreign power, but I guess they are not pissed enough to try to really fight.

    First any attempt to organize, even if it was in the cards, would be exactly what the US would want. A nice conventional enemy to fight. If one wanted to fight the US, guerilla/terrorist tactics would be one's best bet. You aren't going to go toe to toe with them and win.

    Second, they don't have the will to organize and fight collectively because they hate each other just as much. The various factions are more interested in securing their own dominance in Iraq over the other factions than they are interested in driving the American's out. The real coup is getting the American's to take sides. The faction doing that wins control of Iraq.

  69. The "Moon": by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny

    A Ridiculous Liberal Myth!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  70. Re:Weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We didn't unilaterally invade Japan.
    The U.S. didn't invade Iraq unilaterally, either.

    U.K., Australia, Canada, Poland, and many other countries sent troops.

    Unilateral would mean ONLY U.S. troops.

    But don't let the facts interfere with your religion of liberalism.

  71. My dyslexia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read it as "So, Pope John's tampon sops brainfart"

  72. Re:Weapons by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

    "they love america far far more."

    You mean, they hate America far far less...

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  73. Re:Weapons by Boronx · · Score: 1

    It's amazing what can happen in a country after they attack us, we beat them into submission costing tens of thousands of our people and millions of theirs, then they formally surrender under threat of nuclear annihilation and/or soviet invasion followed by a well-run occupation sufficiently manned.

    I think it's heartening that history is showing a trend that the aggressor in a war takes more and more blame for it and suffers accordingly in the long term. It's not 100% true, but it's more true than it used to be, and it shows that we humans may be growing a bit wiser.

  74. demographics by JavaLord · · Score: 1

    They have a serious overcrowding thing going on in their cities

    It wont be as bad in a generation or two.

  75. Re:Weapons by slackoon · · Score: 1

    Personally I'm seeing a striking similarity between that comment and Taliban mentality. Hate being brought down through the generations, that's exactly what that comment represents. Yes, our fathers fought their fathers but that was then and this is now. The people who made the decisions that lead to, amongst other things, the attack on Pearl Harbor are no longer in charge. Guess what, they haven't been for a LONG TIME! Are you the type of person who is still mad at that bully that beat you up in grade 2?

  76. Re:At least someone thinks the moon is a good idea by susano_otter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...to bad the Americans only care about conquest of the middle east and ethnic cleansing of Muslims so their god will be happy.

    Well, that and Mars (MER), Jupiter and its moons (New Horizons), Pluto (New Horizons), Saturn (Cassini), the Heliopause (Voyager), and incidentally the Moon (Orion), right?
    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  77. Re:Weapons by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

    China, one of our gravest threats.


    China is nowhere close to being a threat. Stop getting brainwashed by the media. Our greatest threat is ourselves.
  78. Re:Weapons by ArcherB · · Score: 1

    I didn't see that analogy, but thanx for pointing it out. It makes perfect sense that you don't abandon a country in their time of need. That explains why Japan and Germany prospered and became allies and Afghanistan failed miserably after the Soviets left and we abandoned them.

    But, since you brought up Iraq, it really doesn't matter what you think about about the war or why we went in. The reality of the situation is that we are there now. Trying to change the subject is denying reality! Explaining why we should not have gone in is a complete waste of time and breath. All that really matters at this point is where we go from here. Do we simply pull out as Code Pink wants (Out of Iraq, NOW! (impatient little bitches)) or do we stick around until Iraq is able to stand on their own two feet? History shows that it is better to stay, stand, fight and rebuild (Japan and Germany) than it is to simply abandon (Afghanistan, Vietnam).

    From the way things look now, the BEST we could hope for an abandoned Iraq is for them to turn into a 1990's Afghanistan, only with unlimited funding from oil. I think that is exactly what Code Pink wants so it will make Bush look bad and they and people like you can say, "see, told you so!"

    If you are concerned about the US's image on the world's stage, do you think leaving Iraq in a state of civil war will make the US look good? Do you think that turning Iraq into a puppet of Iran and/or Al Qaeda is good for American interests and security.

    Stop trying to place blame and start trying to find solutions. The debate on going into Iraq is over and your side lost. History will show if it was for better or worse. Let's try to make it for the better instead of throwing a temper tantrum and hoping for the worst just so you look like you were right.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  79. Re:Weapons by cong06 · · Score: 0

    I think I pointed out a decent solution. I may have leaned too much on the side of Troop withdrawal, but I was trying to point out that conversation is the key. See my post that was marked (-1 Off topic). In there I had an example of how Conversation between the Iranian President and George Bush was terminated. If knowledgeable, peace seeking Americans engage on a Religious/Spiritual level with Muslims across the world, then we can start waging peace with our enemy instead of war.

  80. MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

    I thought that's because in Soviet Russia, the moon landing discredits you.
    heh! I think that's the first IN SOVIET RUSSIA joke that actually means something. The USA landing on the Moon first pretty much won the space race. The Soviet Union had a decent (if careless and hasty) space program, but failing to reach the Moon before the Americans was a big blow to their image.
    --
    sudo eat my shorts
  81. Re:Apollo 20..? the backside? by aqk · · Score: 1

    >>I wonder if they are planning on taking a closer look at the backside.

    Don't you read /. ?
    This was extensively covered in last week's discussion on the mission to Uranus.

  82. Re:Weapons by aqk · · Score: 1

    I don't know about those other US puppets you mentioned, but Canada did NOT send troops to Iraq.
      Take a look- NO Canadian soldiers in Iraq.
    1.
    2.
    3.

  83. Telescopic Camera at all? by Safiire+Arrowny · · Score: 1

    Odd, I thought you could see various human light sources over the face of the earth at night, but this shot seems totally dark.
    Perhaps that is only when up closer as this shot is pretty far from earth. I can't remember where I saw images showing all the night time light, but it was neat looking, and so is this image.
    Speaking of this distance to resolution problem, and no I'm not trying to pull a moon landing hoax, but it would be nice to see some shots of the landing site from this probe if possible, specifically because it is non-US.

  84. Re:Weapons by vux984 · · Score: 1

    U.K., Australia, Canada, Poland, and many other countries sent troops.

    Canada was and is in Afghanistan. They declined to participate in Iraq, and were against it.

    The US sent 250,000
    As for the 'many other countries' sent troops, you are referring to:

    Of the 41 countries involved: 39 of them sent 2000 or less. (Of that 39, 33 sent less than 500, and of that 33, 12 sent less than 100.) A few sent less than 10.

    But ok, it was still a US led coaltion. No real argument there.

    The U.S. didn't invade Iraq unilaterally, either.
    Unilateral would mean ONLY U.S. troops.


    Uni = one, Lateral = side.

    The US war on Iraq was "unilateral" or "one sided" because the other side (the Iraq side) never attacked America either before or after the US attacked them.

    In the US/Japan conflict both sides struck each other in a number of conflicts during the war, and Japan struck America first, making American retaliation completely justifiable and uncontroversial.

    But don't let the facts interfere with your religion of liberalism.

    I'm not the one who has issues with 'facts' Mr "Canada was there too". But hey, don't let actual facts interfere with your narrow minded grandstanding.