Slashdot Mirror


Australian Army Invests in Electrical Shirts

Stony Stevenson writes "The Australian Defence Department has injected $4.4 million worth of funding to further Australia's national science agency's (the CSIRO) research into designing clothing which can be used as a self-recharging electrical source on the battlefield. The Defence Department is hoping the technology can be used to replace cumbersome disposable batteries that soldiers must carry on the battlefield. The Flexible Integrated Energy Device (FIED) will be used to store and provide energy over a continuous period of time. It can be charged by either vibration energy harvesting or through plugging into an electrical power point."

124 comments

  1. Cold ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    As long as it can keep beer cold.

    1. Re:Cold ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have a better idea, involving kangaroos and treadmill-powered refrigerators.

  2. Cant wait till I can get one of these! by psychicsword · · Score: 1

    Then I could have constant battery charging.
    Unfortunately I don't think these will be able to make enough power to fully power a decent computer but it would be able to do small thing like civilian uses such as cell phones/PDAs or a more military application of radios which would be great in combat away from power outlets, but I really want the civilian use so I can enjoy this too! Must be expensive to produce though.

    1. Re:Cant wait till I can get one of these! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup.. talk about getting a buzz for free!! Dont need no visits to the pub on the way to the battlefield ;)

    2. Re:Cant wait till I can get one of these! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Having spent some time in the field wearing various uniforms, I have to say, the idea of wearing a bunch of plastic and metal fibers in the field doesn't sound very appealing. It sounds like a recipe for heat exhaustion.

      Are other energy sources really so inconvenient that this is justifiable?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    3. Re:Cant wait till I can get one of these! by psychicsword · · Score: 1

      Are other energy sources really so inconvenient that this is justifiable? It is the same reason someone venturing into the jungle alone might want one of these, you wouldn't need it in any normal circumstanced but it would be a great safety tool and just like the USA want to get rid of foreign oil dependencies I think the military would like to have alternative sources of power in case their power source is shut down or blown up. It might even be able to double as armor and even if it is never used it will have many other civilian applications.

      Plus it is one step closer to a self powered HEV suit.
      It is justifiable when the eco-loving anti-war people protest the war you can say at least it is eco-friendly :P
    4. Re:Cant wait till I can get one of these! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Must be expensive to produce though.
      It can't be too expensive if they're handing them out among any significant portion of the troops.
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  3. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time I button-up incorrectly, will be the last time.

    Or worse, I will be out of electricity because all clothes got burnt in the previous bombing.

  4. heh. by apodyopsis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thats great, now they just need to give out a load of free pin ups pics so they can all get to work cranking up a good charge to power their gear.

  5. Killswitch 0.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Please plug yourself into a wall outlet for termination if you are ever captured by hostile forces."

  6. Now say after me by bakuun · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The first law of thermodynamics states: "The increase in the internal energy of a system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings".

    This means that while it is perfectly possible in theory for soldiers to charge batteries by running around, they will have to exert that extra energy themselves. I doubt that any soldiers (already heavily laden with weapons, body-armour and other gear) will want to wear suit that requires more energy from you for movements than normal suits.

    1. Re:Now say after me by bestiarosa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      True, but I guess those shirt will harvest energy from body heat the soldiers would have lost anyway and from movements the soldiers would have done anyway. This way, the shirt would only be recycling energy which would've been otherwise lost.

      On the other hand, imagine if the battery somehow breaks starting to leak acid all over the guy's skin.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:Now say after me by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      but what about the weight of the batteries you carry?

      As a signalman you'll carry a fair few, now which is a better use of energy, using it to haul around 15 kilo of batteries, or being lighter but using a little extra energy for charging batteries?

    3. Re:Now say after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why the CSIRO is the CSIRO and you are just another Slashdot armchair scientist.

    4. Re:Now say after me by das_magpie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt that any soldiers (already heavily laden with weapons, body-armour and other gear)

      Yes but this is a start in the reduction of heavily laden gear.

      The increase in the internal energy of a system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings".

      Whats this really matter its still a plus for the soldiers system must do the work regardless and the expended energy is going into a system which has a positive effect on the soldier as it is lighter then previous disposable solution?

    5. Re:Now say after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hup, Two, Three, Four,
      What Are We Charging For?
      Five, Six, Seven, Eight,
      To Heat The Meals We Hate.

      Hup, Two, Three, Four,
      I Am Hungry For More.
      Five, Six, Seven, Eight,
      Starving Shall Be Our Fate?

    6. Re:Now say after me by psxman · · Score: 5, Funny

      imagine if the battery somehow breaks starting to leak acid all over the guy's skin. ... He'd become a superhero?
    7. Re:Now say after me by bestiarosa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hadn't thought about this possibility.

      Super Battery Acid Man fighting for the freedom of Iraq!

      Yeah, right.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    8. Re:Now say after me by somersault · · Score: 3, Funny

      SBAM Man! Fighting injustice by clogging up enemy inboxes!

      I somehow doubt they'd be using lead acid batteries.. heavy and nasty.. lithium polymer would be better.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:Now say after me by nicklott · · Score: 1

      They will already be doing work to bend and flex their existing suits, it's just being lost as there is no mechanism to catch it

    10. Re:Now say after me by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      It all depends on whether the extra force is more than carrying batteries around or not.

    11. Re:Now say after me by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      The main thrust of the technology is to both distribute the battery weight around and harvest some energy to charge them, looks like possibly up and down movement of a walking/running person. since they have to lift the battery anyway (stated as weighing several kilos in the article) as long as the charging mechanism does not weigh too much it would be quite useful. just off the top of my head the cells up and down movement in the jacket could pull directly on a cable hooked up to a geared flywheel to drive a small generator. obviously that example would not work in real life but i'm sure you could see from that how it could actually work with a couple of smarter brains than mine.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    12. Re:Now say after me by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Cool, with the explosive capabilities of lipo batteries our superhero could fly as well.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    13. Re:Now say after me by casals · · Score: 1

      == laboral gymnastics?

      --
      AT &F1DT0,T0800665544 - Real men, real help desk support.
    14. Re:Now say after me by MotorBheaded · · Score: 1

      > On the other hand, imagine if the battery somehow breaks starting to leak acid all over the guy's skin

      Good point. The "somehow breaking" should indeed be taken into consideration when conceiving a device to be worn be someone who's supposed to be shot at sooner or later...

    15. Re:Now say after me by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      This means that while it is perfectly possible in theory for soldiers to charge batteries by running around, they will have to exert that extra energy themselves. Not true! All you gotta do is, give the troops the kind of shoes I'm wearing to work today, and then carpet bomb (heh heh) the entire battle zone with bits of the same carpet we have here at the office. I tell you, I have plenty of power at my fingertips (zapouch), and I don't feel one bit tired. It even keeps me on my toes, one might say.
    16. Re:Now say after me by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "imagine if the battery somehow breaks starting to leak acid all over the guy's skin."

      Or worse yet, imagine if the batteries were made by Sony and the battery bursts into flame during combat. Bad news...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    17. Re:Now say after me by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      How about option number 3, a portable power source that generates energy by being moved around, clips onto your web harness with a carabiner, but doesn't trap heat or sweat and won't be ruined when you rip your clothing climbing through trees, rubble, barbed wire, razor wire, etc.

      As for your example, if this were issued to signalmen as a replacement for batteries and not a replacement for standard issue gear, what happens when the signalman gets shot? Are you going to trade uniforms with them on the battlefield?

      Sounds like a big waste of time, money, effort and eventually lives to me.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    18. Re:Now say after me by mstahl · · Score: 1

      The first law of thermodynamics states

      Now just stop it right there. I understand you're super hyped about quoting something from your physics textbook to try to make TFA seem ridiculous, but just simmah down a second. Soldiers already have to run/march all over the place and they do a lot of moving around. Provided this shirt (read "shirt" not "cumbersome bodysuit") doesn't impair their movement any more than the rest of their equipment (or if it impairs them negligibly) then yes this is basically while not necessarily "free" energy it's "ridiculously damn cheap energy".

      Basically, while you're right that the energy has to come from somewhere, there's no need to be pedantic about it, and the fact of the matter is that this is a pretty cool idea. You should just sit back and admire it, knowing that everybody else on this site knows all about the laws of thermodynamics—some of them probably much more intimately than you do.

    19. Re:Now say after me by lhorn · · Score: 1

      ...or the shirt batteries are made by Sony...

      --
      accept no limits but time
    20. Re:Now say after me by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      No, you are wrong, the parent is right. This energy needs to come from somewhere.

      First, let's talk about movement.

      Yes, he would have made the same movements without the harvesting shirt. But wearing it will increase the difficulty of movements. The same gesture will require more energy. This energy will be transformed into electric (with some losses of course).

      The amount of electricity that we will harvest is analogous to the effort that the soldier makes.

      Perhaps if the shirt is "genle" enough the soldier will not notice. But don't expect to power anything more than a watch.

      And now, about the heat.

      If the shirt harvests heat, then that heat must be taken away from the human body. Lack of heat means cold, or just colder. Now, if the shirt harvests just the exceeding heat (e.g. the amount of heat that makes you sweat), then I suppose everything is fine. So you would have a shirt that turns on the harvesting after the heat reach a given temperature. But then again you would need to have a small computer in the shirt or some analogue mechanism to check that. And that would be mean more energy spending and loses. Generaly complex structures have more energy loses. So the benefit from this would be small, if not zero.

  7. Styling by Edgyboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they going to look like Dynamo from the movie ''Running man''?
    If not, I'm not interested.

    --
    Magazine 13 - We like to think its funny... sort of
    1. Re:Styling by Kozz · · Score: 1

      For those who haven't seen the movie in a while... Dynamo ain't exactly sexy.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  8. Yeah, but... by amake · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...if [the extra exertion required to charge this shirt] is less than or equal to [the energy needed to haul around those batteries the shirt will be replacing], then it's a net win. In fact, even if the shirt requires more exertion, it might still be worth it not to have to worry, "Do I have my batteries with me today?" "Are my batteries charged?"

    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      ...if [the extra exertion required to charge this shirt] is less than or equal to [the energy needed to haul around those batteries the shirt will be replacing], then it's a net win. Y'know... I think you just invented perpetual motion! Who'd have thought the missing factor would be human effort. All those idiots messing round with magnets.

      --
      Deleted
    2. Re:Yeah, but... by jank1887 · · Score: 3, Informative
      that's not what he said. Let me translate:

      Current method is inefficient. New method is also inefficient, but not as bad as first method. Thus, even though the total system energy will be depleted eventually, less is being wasted rather than being converted to useful work in the new method. SO IFF the new method is 'less bad', the overall system will see an improvement in function. No perpetual motion required. The guy still has to 'plug in' at some point.

    3. Re:Yeah, but... by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Y'know... I think you just invented perpetual motion!
      Bull. You almost have to wonder if people should even be taught the laws of thermodynamics, they're so eager to run off and leap to unsupported conclusions. Every single story in any way related to power, somebody refers to the laws of thermodynamics to "prove" it's not a good idea because "the power still has to come from somewhere." I got news for you kids, that doesn't mean all power sources are equally useful, economic, reliable, efficient, or anything else.
  9. Misplaced Investment? by SJ2000 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should be investing in armor which give a soldier a "high degree of agility, stealth and physical endurance" instead.

    1. Re:Misplaced Investment? by minorproblem · · Score: 1

      He was SAS, so when they say he died "on patrol" that isn't what he was actually doing...

    2. Re:Misplaced Investment? by SJ2000 · · Score: 1

      Obviously, but the comment made in defense of the lack of body armor is still valid if you imagine what environment he was working in

    3. Re:Misplaced Investment? by mrjb · · Score: 1

      Then again, maybe they should not be investing in the army at all. Although I must admit that the idea is novel and cool. Perhaps integrate it with smart fabrics that allow changing the print/color of a t-shirt? Would be cool to wear in the disco (which I avoid like the plague, by the way). Welcome back eighties!

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  10. Ask any Grunt... by NewToNix · · Score: 3, Funny
    And he'll tell you all that's needed is a fuel cell powered by sweat. Then he could pack even highly inefficient energy weapons into battle & still have power to spare.

    Just for those of you that may not be familiar with the term: Grunt

    1. Re:Ask any Grunt... by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      That isn't actually as insane an idea as it may sound. In climates where the outdoor temperature is lower than the body temperature you could theoretically convert a fraction of the thermal energy that flows out of the body into electricity. Of course, the second law of thermodynamics limit the efficiency of the conversion, so you wouldn't get a whole lot of energy out of it unless it was REALLY cold outside, so a battery or flexible solar cells in the fabric would probably be preferable.

      Then of course we have my favourite. Nuclear! Will have to work out a good way to incorporate it into equipment. A miniature RTG could be feasible I guess. You would need a good insulator to get a high conversion efficiency thou. Bremsstrahlung and/or gamma emission may be an issue too...

  11. So we're buying NEW stuff now? by vandan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought our politicians only saw it fit to buy decommissioned US junk, such as 30 year-old helicopters, and the odd fleet of dud tanks and fighter jets. Perhaps this is Howard's idea of renewable resources. Personally, I'd rather just put the grunts put to work in a more economic - imagine how much clean energy we could produce if we took our soldiers from the bloodbaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, and lined them up in a big grid of treadmill generators. We could put a picture of Kylie Minogue in front of them, and maybe a picture of Bin Laden behind her. This would pretty much motivate the lot of them.

    1. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by SJ2000 · · Score: 1

      'Rumour' has it that the F-111G have already been decommissioned quietly http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=295292

    2. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by moosesocks · · Score: 1, Interesting

      To be perfectly fair, don't you see it as a 'very good thing' that Australia has no *need* for a massive high-tech army?

      (At least in my eyes) Australia is fairly well-respected in the international community, and doesn't have any highly lucrative natural resources -- it's also completely surrounded by water. In fact, I'd peg a stable government and an educated populace as being its two greatest assets. You'd be absolutely daft to seriously consider going to war with Australia. You'd have very little to gain, and would provoke a massive international retaliation. (Canada comes to mind as being in a similar boat)

      Yes, having a well-trained defensive force is a good idea, considering the corner of the world where Australia's located, but the odds of a land war down under seem extremely remote. (Of course, it does make sense to invest in technologies that allow the military to be smaller but more efficient).

      Then again, absurd invasions aren't completely unheard of; Germany did attack Svalbard during WWII. I'm still not sure what they were trying to accomplish with that one....

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    3. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by Onetus · · Score: 2, Informative

      and doesn't have any highly lucrative natural resources Actually we do. Our economy is based on exporting numerous resources to the world.
      Most of the exportable metals, plus coal, coal and more coal.
      We've also got the oil and natural gas reserves in Bass Strait.

      Oh and strangely enough Fosters beer. Why you overseas people drink it, we'll never understand.

    4. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by z0idberg · · Score: 2, Informative

      As well as 40% of the worlds uranium deposits.

    5. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by tony1343 · · Score: 1

      The stranger thing about Fosters beer is, in my experience, everytime somebody in America is drinking it, they talk about how bad it is. Then someone else chimes in that he's been to Australia and Australians don't drink it. Yet, people keep drinking it and the cycle repeats itself. Americans have an affinity for drinking nasty beer (e.g., Natural Light, Miller High Life, most everything made by Budweiser, Miller and Coors, etc).

    6. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by slashbob22 · · Score: 1

      Canada is more in this boat than the one described earlier.

      Alberta Oilsands (and many other oil projects), Potable Water, precious metals, etc. Seems like oil is popular these days and there are predictions that water will become more popular than oil in the future. Besides we need water to produce cold, crisp, canadian beer.

      --
      Proof by very large bribes. QED.
    7. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by Namors · · Score: 3, Informative

      doesn't have any highly lucrative natural resources
      Well I wouldn't say that exactly
      http://www.australianminesatlas.gov.au/info/info.jsp

      Australia has about 5% of the world's EDR of magnesite
      Australia has 10% of the worlds EDR of Iron ore
      Australia's EDR of industrial diamond 19% of the current World total
      Australia's 37% of of worlds EDR of Nickel

      The USGS estimate of World gold reserves of 42 000 t was similar to 2005 According to the USGS, South Africa still has the World's largest reserve of gold at 6000 t (14.3% a similar level as in 2005. According to the USGS Australia has the second largest reserve with approximately 12% of the World's holdings.)

      Australia has the World's largest resources of uranium in RAR recoverable at less than US$80/kg U (equates to EDR), with 27% of World resources in this category (at December 2006). Other countries with large resources include Kazakhstan (14%), Canada (13%), Niger (7%) and South Africa (7%) (Source: OECD/NEA & IAEA.)

      Based on USGS data for other countries, Australia's demonstrated bauxite resources of 7.8 Gt rank second in the world after Guinea with 8.6 Gt and ahead of Brazil with 2.5 Gt, Jamaica with 2.5 Gt and China with 2.3 Gt.

      Australia is the world's largest iron ore exporter and, as a producer, ranks third (with 16%) after China (31%) and Brazil (18%).

      Produces about 40% of world bauxite and over 30% of world alumina, making it the largest producer of bauxite and alumina.

      Based on USGS data for other countries, Australia has the World's largest EDR of both zinc (18% of the World) and lead (32%). Australia has the World's second largest EDR of silver (16%) behind Poland (18%).

      I'd peg a stable government and an educated populace
      Most the Time it feels the other way around. :P
      now to stay on topic
      We need this type of forward thinking as we have a massive country and a tiny population.
      The old work smarter not harder.
      Regards,
      Namor
      --
      Dual Century Programming: Yeah I know ... But it sounds Good
    8. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* uranium. yep. we got sh!t loads of it. sorry for the rude wake up call.

    9. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot really needs a "-1 misinformation" modifier

      From "Australia is the world's largest exporter of coal (35% of international trade), iron ore, lead, diamonds, rutile, zinc and zirconium, second largest of gold and uranium, and third largest of aluminium."
      Also see wikipedia as to why the Germans attacked Svalbard.

      Next time think before you post.

    10. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by EnigmaPenguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I only really would point out two things.

      "and doesn't have any highly lucrative natural resources"
      Who would ever want all that oil, gas, coal, bauxite, various other heavy metals, gold, uranium ( of which we have a lot of), diamonds, pearls right? Some people postulate that war will be waged over the worlds resources one day, why not consider that a point when you have all those people screaming about peak oil. Whether you believe it or not, it only takes for the enemy to believe it.

      "it's also completely surrounded by water"
      Not the best defensible position is it.

      Other than that you'd be right, we have an okay standing minus the war in Iraq and it really wouldn't do well for the invader on the world stage. I'll also concede that considering the Indonesian's purchase of military hardware from Russia for the coming decade (This includes a whole range of weaponry that could cause a lot of damage) we could have issues. After the F111 retires our long range bombing is reduced until the joint strike fighter program finishes up. This obviously limits our actions in regards to strategic options and its not as if they wont hear a collins class coming.

      It just might be wise to improve our own technology in regards to ground forces, be it for the regular peace keeping or out right war.

    11. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      Maybe as a base of operations against the Arctic Convoys?

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    12. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by sqldr · · Score: 1

      Oh and strangely enough Fosters beer. Why you overseas people drink it, we'll never understand.

      Because it's a different beer. Up until the 70s, fosters was available imported (and mainly drunk by Australian ex-pats, before the brand became rejected in Australia), but later on, Courage decided to use the brand to make the beer in the UK. Alas, they didn't follow the recipe to the letter and made something quite different.

      I'd still call it "cooking lager" (you'd hardly use your best lager for cooking), but I hear reports that the Australian version tastes worse.

      You can also get "Fosters Export" over here, but I have absolutely no idea what that is (except stronger, and a bit disgusting), as it's also brewed in the UK.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    13. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by Bede+EW · · Score: 1
      From Wikipedia:

      Australia is the world's largest exporter of coal (35% of international trade), iron ore, lead, diamonds, rutile, zinc and zirconium, second largest of gold and uranium, and third largest of aluminium. Infact, although Australia is currently the second largest exporter of uranium it has the worlds largest known reserves, weighing in at about 30%.

      At the moment the chances of Australia being invaded are about the same as America or the UK being invaded - next to nothing.

      The truth is that the primary role of our armed services has never been defense of the home soil, it has been to take part in overseas wars or peacekeeping missions.
    14. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by modecx · · Score: 1

      I thought our politicians only saw it fit to buy decommissioned US junk, such as 30 year-old helicopters

      To be fair, there's plenty of late twenty, 30-40 and even 50 year old aircraft in the US military inventory. Sure, most have had their share of upgrades, but they're still doing their job.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    15. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this informative and not redundant? He already mentioned metals.

    16. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Canada (access to the US market, multicultural) + Australia (proximity to China, relative isolation from outside influences) is going to be a big challenge. It's happening already.

    17. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Canada can spare three tanks (Leopard 2), 3 CF-18s and a bunch of Boy Scouts trained in the use of knives. You got transport?

      JTF2 will go in first.

    18. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by vandan · · Score: 1

      Australia is fairly well-respected in the international community,

      Hardly. We're in the Axis of Evil that invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. The US, UK and Australia consistently provoke international condemnation by supporting Israel, refusing to ratify Kyoto ( UK is off the hook here ), and 'leading' the war on terror. We're the world's hypocrites. Maybe you feel that other Westerners think highly of Australians, and that might be so, but if you ask people what they think of our foreign policy, it's a radically different story - particularly outside the Western world ( and lets be clear, most people in the world are not Westerners ).

      and doesn't have any highly lucrative natural resources

      As others have already pointed out, we have 40% of the world's uranium. The bloody oil wars that we're seeing in the Middle East are a walk in the park compared to the coming uranium wars ... after we hit peak uranium production, there is no magic solution left. There'll be no time ( or money ) left for renewable research. The whole of the South Pacific will be turned into a radioactive hell-hole, and the usual suspects - the US, China, Russia, will all be here fighting for their share. And whose side will we be on? Not the US's side! By that point, we'll be a an economic satellite of China.
      and would provoke a massive international retaliation.

      Bullshit. Every single time Australia has asked for US military assistance, it's been denied. Admittedly, none of these requests have been for defence. But then keep in mind the US entered WWII incredibly late ... late enough that everyone else's economy was in ruins. And then they were hedging their bets both ways on the UK and Germany. The big US banks, in particular, were backing Germany. The thing about international relations is that they're all as transitory as money is liquid. When business circumstances change, alliances change instantly. They have to - it makes business sense, and that's what decides foreign policy. If you want an example of this, think about Iraq.
    19. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infact, although Australia is currently the second largest exporter of uranium it has the worlds largest known reserves, weighing in at about 30%.

      After BHP's recent exploration update, Olympic Dam now contains 42% of known economic reserves. They still haven't found the limits of the deposit either.

  12. Sounds like a great idea, perhaps. by backbyter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The extra weight of the clothing is offset by not having to carry the extra batteries. So it shouldn't place anymore weight on the troop. I know it's much more convenient for me to wear a loaded photographers vest than it is to carry the bag. Same weight, but the distribution of that weight on your shoulders feels much better at the end of the day.

    My concerns are these.

    What's this vest made of? If a trooper takes a bullet through the vest, what type of stuff from the vest is going to follow the bullet into the body?

    If this shirt is meant to be worn under armor then what impact does the constraint of being sandwiched between the body and the armor have on the overall effectiveness of the shirt?

    If the shirt is meant to be worn over the armor, is there any redundancy to the power generation when the shirt takes a hit? With batteries, the trooper could always ask a buddy for a spare battery. Asking for the shirt from your buddies back, in combat, would probably be looked on negatively.

    1. Re:Sounds like a great idea, perhaps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The shirt probably has a wire coming out of it somewhere, so if they desperately needed the power under fire then they could borrow their buddys' shirt's power, otherwise they'd get a replacement (probably following the same procedure as if a regular battery had conked out).

    2. Re:Sounds like a great idea, perhaps. by IchBinEinPenguin · · Score: 1

      is there any redundancy to the power generation when the shirt takes a hit?

      Darn, no power. If only I could play some soothing tunes on my iPod to take my mind off my sucking chest wound......

    3. Re:Sounds like a great idea, perhaps. by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Shite, where'd the wireless link to the medic go.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
  13. Just a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...hoping the technology can be used to replace cumbersome disposable batteries that soldiers must carry on the battlefield. The Flexible Integrated Energy Device (FIED) will be used to store and provide energy over a continuous period of time. It can be charged by either vibration energy harvesting or through plugging into an electrical power point." Just curious .. if the vibration energy is derived from a battery powered device, does this mean that our female soldiers on solo assignments can safely assume they will never run out of batteries?
    1. Re:Just a question... by somersault · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of one of them perpetual motion devices again!

      --
      which is totally what she said
  14. Women soldiers by mrbluze · · Score: 1

    Thats great, now they just need to give out a load of free pin ups pics so they can all get to work cranking up a good charge to power their gear. Heyyy.. I think I just came up with an idea for a perpetual motion .. er.. vibration device.
    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    1. Re:Women soldiers by biocute · · Score: 1

      Why women soldiers? I'm sure if male soldiers are left out there long enough, they would appreciate a vibration device just as well as their female counterparts.

    2. Re:Women soldiers by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      Why women soldiers? I'm sure if male soldiers are left out there long enough, they would appreciate a vibration device just as well as their female counterparts. Indeed, why stop there? They should spend another 4 million and develop the Nude Bomb and shower the enemy skies with toys. Then it's just a matter of waiting before the enemy nation becomes a tourist haven for obese elderly nudists. Even the thought of that would be enough to cause widespread peace, I'd have thought.
      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    3. Re:Women soldiers by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he was talking about their boobs jiggling or bouncing up and down without a bra rather than an actual vibrator used for vaginal stimulation. That would just consume precious power rather than generate it like the boob vibrator would.

    4. Re:Women soldiers by Eivind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That problem lessens itself if you've got both types of soldiers.

    5. Re:Women soldiers by instarx · · Score: 1

      Indeed, why stop there? They should spend another 4 million and develop the Nude Bomb and shower the enemy skies with toys.

      You jest, but we've been there already. Heard about the proposed [and cancelled] "gay bomb" to turn enemy soldiers gay? Or the unexploded cluster bomblets that were shaped and colored like childrens toys? That's one I'd like to think was unintentional. Taking it further, how about food bombs? In the Balkans war the US dropped pallets of relief supplies on top of people, killing many.

  15. Just try to taze me, bro! by martensitic · · Score: 1

    This may require some extra care in using today's less-lethal weapons.... lest the tazer become the tazee!

    --
    Ut Tensio, Sic Vis
  16. Surely FRIED... by casley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on... Flexible Rechargeable Integrated Energy Device is much better. I'd wear a fried shirt - wouldn't you?

    1. Re:Surely FRIED... by bint · · Score: 1

      Not a Flexible Rechargeable Integrated Energy Shirt then? As in "You want FRIES with that?"

  17. Much better idea by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Build some solar cells into their helmets.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Much better idea by notenslaved · · Score: 1

      Solar cells would need to charge a battery, otherwise the soldier's gear wouldn't work in certain weather conditions, underground, under water, etc.

    2. Re:Much better idea by stor · · Score: 1

      Build some solar cells into their helmets.

      Ouch! That would be uncomfortable. Also you won't get much light in your pants even if you think the sun shines out of your arse.

      Oh... you mean the helmets on their heads? Never mind.

      -Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  18. fremen by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sooner or later this kind of tech is going to result in a stilsuit. Hope so anyway, those things are just too cool not to be instantiated.

    Seriously though, if we colonise mars, they will be more then interesting, they may well be essential.

    Frank Herbert had way more right than people realise. Except for the spice thing, but if I have this right, in his original musings on the story, spice wasn't as important, and it was Stilgar, not Paul Atraides who was to be the major character.

    1. Re:fremen by Silicon+Rover · · Score: 1

      You have it wrong. Spice is integral to Dune. Without it the spacing guild cannot "see" safe routes between the stars. Therefore interstellar travel/commerce/war are not possible. The planet Dune's monopoly on spice production is its primary means of income. Stilgar is a surrogate father to Paul but by no means the main character.

    2. Re:fremen by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      I meant Liet Keins, not Stilgar, and I corrected that in a reply above yours...

      In fact a great deal of the Dune story takes place without mentioning spice at all. In later books it it little more then a luxury item, only used by the spacing guild for anything serious. It's only of primary importance in book one.

    3. Re:fremen by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Sooner or later this kind of tech is going to result in a stilsuit. Hope so anyway, those things are just too cool not to be instantiated.
      Afaict the main ways in which the body loses water are breathing and sweating,

      I would imagine if you could keep the body cool enough to avoid sweating and condensed the moisture from breathing out you would probablly gain not lose water (remember respiration converts carbohydrates and oxygen into water and CO2 from your system).

      the real problem as I see it is how to get rid of excess body heat in a hot climate other than through the vaporisation and release of water. Maybe an ice pack that you left out to refreeze at night (deserts are often very cold at night) would do it.

      You would also still need food of course.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  19. Just finish high school physics? by briancnorton · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The laws of thermodynamics hold perfectly true, but it's not a simple closed system. This system sounds as if it is harvesting waste energy. (the running that the soldier is already doing) The extra effort exists in the weight of the unit, but since it replaces another, chemical battery system, the tradeoff will likely be negligible.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    1. Re:Just finish high school physics? by bakuun · · Score: 2, Informative

      This system sounds as if it is harvesting waste energy. (the running that the soldier is already doing) The running is not waste energy - the energy used for running is spent up doing just that - running. Granted, the muscles will produce heat, which can be used - but the article seems to suggest that it is not heat which will charge the batteries, but rather the actual motion.
    2. Re:Just finish high school physics? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Informative

      But they have to run regardless of which system they have used. They are actually replacing heavy non-rechargable batteries, which may run out, with this new system, which probably weighs about the same, but provides much more reliable power.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Just finish high school physics? by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      I agree except replace "probably" with hopefully. I agree the concern is the weight change (if any), the rest just sounds like efficiency, although I do wonder how powerful of a charge they are talking about here.

  20. whoops, mistake in post by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

    I meant Liet Kiens, not Stilgar

  21. It's just a vibrator in reverse by giafly · · Score: 1

    ... so they can shove it.

    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  22. Let me guess... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Let me guess... Nylon?

  23. Re:Yeah, but, but yeah by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 2, Funny

    now the question will be "did my shirt get mixed in with the non-electrical laundry?"
    and "will this thing shock me everytime it rains?"

  24. oh, this is brill by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    I know soldiers are going to be eager to strap F-IED's to their bodies.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  25. Hugging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Furthermore, energy can be shared on the battlefield by hugging."

  26. Clap if you love Dynamo! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    I must say that both me and Maria Conchita Alonso find that there's nothing funny about a dickless moron with a battery up his ass. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093894/quotes

    Particularly when they don't make him waterproof.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  27. Obligatory Mention of Goons Show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tales of Dead Men's Shirts.

    In which the British Army is discomoded by explosions on the tails of military shirts. Is it sabotage? Is it a dastardly plot to sell more underpants? Read on.....

  28. You may laugh but... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Used on soldiers today, tomorrow entire continents may be powered by small children on sugar dressed in overalls made this way.

    Just don't let them go swimming wearing that.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  29. Powered Combat Vest by xarragon · · Score: 1

    Remember the Half-Life expansion pack, Opposing Force? Remember what our friend Adrian Shephard was wearing during the Black Mesa incident? A "powered combat vest". I wonder if they'll start issuing a heavy pipe-wrench with those PCV's anytime soon. Maybe they've got crabs in the deserts down there, headcrabs!

  30. They should talk to these guys by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1
    --
    Deleted
  31. What happens... by Nameisyoung007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If a soldier gets shot? What would typically be a bad flesh wound now has an electric battery system thrown in there as well...

    1. Re:What happens... by lardbottom · · Score: 1

      Imagine if he were wearing something lithium polymer related. Maybe we could instruct them to shoot themselves to take out more of the enemy. All that's lacking now is to teach them to be soldiers while they are still children. Ah.. but I take things too far again.. shame on me.

      --
      Give me a fish, I shall eat well for a day. Teach me to fish, and I will eat well until some idiot patents it.
  32. Another feature by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Shock shirts: soldiers will _always_ obey their orders without any hesitation.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  33. Office use? by owlnation · · Score: 1

    Now if we could only apply this principle in the office - imagine the potential power wasted by not harvesting all the hot air generated in meetings.

  34. Damn I wanted a Lighting Shi(eld)rt by Lifyre · · Score: 1

    Being able to walk up to someone and say "Touch my shirt" and watching them fry like flies on a bug zapper would be priceless.

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  35. Halo by XavidX · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a Halo Situation

    perhaps Dr Freeman's suit in HL 2....

    Uhh.. a comment like this makes me think I gotta quit playing games for awhile.

  36. Reeediculous, if you do the math by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
    If you do just a teensy bit of the math, the idea of recharging by "vibration" or body motion is revealerd to be quite ridiculous.

    First let's estimate how much of your body motion you would not mind having drained off. Let's say you're walking, that takes about 0.05 horsepower. Let's assume you would not mind having some VERY STIFF pants that siphon off 10% of your walking power. That's 0.005 of a horsepower.

    Then let's assume that the motion sensors are 20% efficient, which is rather high for your typical piezo squeeze transducer. So we have a whole 0.001 of a horsepower. Convert to watts, and that's 750 milliwatts. Assume you're walking 30% of the day, that's 250 milliwatt-hours per day. A single AA lithium cell can put out 4 watt-hours, so this whole nasty stiff-pants thing can be replaced at a cost of ONE AA cell every SIXTEEN days.

    Doesn't sound like the stiff pants are a win-win for anybody, anywhere.

    1. Re:Reeediculous, if you do the math by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Something tells me that the army has number crunchers of their own, and have made similar computations (without numbers pulled from their ass) and decided it was more efficient than carrying batteries.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    2. Re:Reeediculous, if you do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing like a careful critique of the work of a country's top scientists by someone that uses the terms "let's say" and "let's assume".

  37. Ceasefire, ceasefire, ceasefire! by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    Time out while I recharge my shirt!

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  38. Better idea for which side? by Eevee · · Score: 1

    Nothing like putting a shiney target on yourself to make your enemy's day that much easier. There's a reason why combat uniforms don't have bright bits of metal for insignia like the dress uniforms.

  39. One acronym: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  40. Now say after me...you missed the point by johnnyheavens · · Score: 1
    Even notice that smart people still come off as stupid sometimes.

    The first law of thermodynamics states: "The increase in the internal energy of a system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings".


    Where does it say that the suits/shirts will require more movement? Most people move on a regular basis...just suppose for a moment that this includes those in the military. You see they already move and would already be generating some energy for the suit. Perhaps this is the whole idea?
  41. Colonel: Sargeant, your men are all bedraggled looking! I thought they were in tip top shape! A 40 mile march shouldn't have them this beaten.

    Sargeant: I don't know what could be wrong, sir. We just gave them these new shirts so they don't even have to carry their batteries anymore.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  42. Don't wear it to the airport... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make sure you never wear it to an airport! Something like that would get you shot as a "terrorist" for sure...

  43. Obligatory: depends on the manufacturer by noidentity · · Score: 1

    Hope it's not made by Sony, otherwise it doubles as a suicide bomber vest.

  44. More details by jagdish · · Score: 1

    The article is skimpy on details, I got this after a bit of digging around. There are 4 primary modes of the suit
    1. Strength
    2. Speed
    3. Armor
    4. Cloak

    Oh and you need $500 graphics card and Vista to run it. More details here.

  45. Re:Yeah, but, but yeah by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

    This just in!!! "Australian Army to only be deployed in dry locations"

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  46. Batteries + Weapons Penetration = Disaster? by RudeIota · · Score: 1

    I wonder how one of these 'shirts' would take a bullet? Would it gracefully handle the damage? Would it quit working all together? Would it become a liability and potentially leak, overheat, explode and/or poison the soldier?

    I didn't RTFA, but I doubt it addresses these issues anyway.

    Then again... whatever penetrated the 'shirt' would probably be priority in a moment like that. Taking the shirt off before it explodes 3 city blocks would be the second concern. ;)

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  47. What are you doing? Trying to kill us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez, why not just paint a bullseye on Uluru, and while you're at it put a big sign nearby saying "Invade now, while we've still got 40% of the worlds bauxite!"

  48. Night by algoa456 · · Score: 1

    Right, no more fighting at night. Let the buggers sleep or drink beer

  49. additional energy source by swell · · Score: 1

    I hope I'm not divulging military secrets when I mention the obvious (but no doubt patentable) allure of using piezoelectric material in the uniforms of field soldiers. This material would generate significant voltage upon the impact of larger bullets, shrapnel, dirty bombs, flying debris and blows from the enemies' rifle butts. An active warrior would be a veritable powerplant as he braves the front lines with his modern garb. Even the final impact of his body crashing to the ground would generate electricity.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  50. Washing by kramulous · · Score: 1

    As long as it is compatible with front loaders ... win!

    --
    .