Slashdot Mirror


FBI May Have Datamined Grocery Stores With Help From Credit Companies

An anonymous reader writes "Recent media reports indicate that in 2005-06, the FBI went trawling through grocery store records in order to track down Iranian terror cells. They hoped to locate 'Middle-Eastern terrorists' through the purchase of specific food items. Many of these items, though, are not sold through big-box supermarket chains, and the majority of mom and pop ethnic markets do not have the detailed computer purchase histories that Safeway or Whole Foods have. What the FBI seems to have done is instead put together a list of everyone who shopped at a Middle Eastern food market. All signs point to the credit card companies providing this data, and not the individual stores. If so, this could be the tip of a (potentially illegal) data-mining iceberg."

25 of 442 comments (clear)

  1. In Other News... by Mr_Perl · · Score: 4, Funny

    Falafil Inc. sues the FBI for defamation of character and loss of business.

    --

    My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
    1. Re:In Other News... by show+me+altoids · · Score: 5, Funny

      Falafil Inc. sues the FBI for defamation of character and loss of business.

      I really falafel about this.
      --
      I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
  2. Alienation by explosivejared · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just say anyone of middle-eastern descent is automatically a threat? That's basically what it's come down to. How in the world is food purchasing data related to terror suspects. Alienation only leads to more strife. This doesn't do anything but make relations worse.

    --
    I got a catholic block.
    1. Re:Alienation by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Funny

      because, non-middle easterners might like the food.

      And thus, even though not ME, they must be terrorists too!

      *sigh* I didn't realize I was a terrorist :-( It's just that the food is so yummy.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:Alienation by djasbestos · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seriously. Shawarma with saffron rice FTW.

      I guess I am a bad American for liking terrorist food...hummus...Hamas...same thing, right?

    3. Re:Alienation by MBCook · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ketchup. They're seeing who isn't buying enough.

      Ketchup has natural mellowing agents that help to keep you satisfied with our government and able to accept what happens to you.

      -- A message from the Ketchup Advisory Board

      (This is well documented. See here and here, for example.)

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:Alienation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Will I be subject to arrest for having a copy of Disney's Aladdin in my home? No, but you will be subject to arrest if you have the sequels. The bad taste police will be by shortly to confiscate those DVDs as well as the parachute pants you still have in your closet. Thank you, and good day.
    5. Re:Alienation by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I bought some halva, baba ganoush, and pita bread recently. I guess I should expect a knock on the door soon.

      The whole FBI story sounds like they are trying to generate a boogey man where there is none (gotta keep that budget fat!). Iran and Hezbollah's focus isn't global but regional. If they have agents in the US it would most likely be for political or for fund raising reasons, not terrorism. They might carry out an attack if we attacked Iran but that wouldn't exactly come as a surprise.

      I hope our relations with Italy never sour. I'd hate to be put on the no fly list for buying olive oil and prosciutto.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Alienation by n+dot+l · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is absurd. Next thing you know they'll be going after people that like Chinese cooking on the grounds that they're probably Communists. Oh, that's right, most people that leave China (you know, the ones that open up Chinese ethnic food shops/restaurants) do so to get away from the communists. Has it dawned on these people that a large number of Middle-Easterners might have the same sentiments regarding the religeous extremeism, tyrranical regimes and terrorist groups that are common in their home lands?

      Next month's headlines:
      • People who eat French cuisine profiled as likely supporters of socialized medicine. Names posted, extreme-right-wingers encouraged to kill them on sight.
      • People eating Mexican food deemed lazy. Fired en mass.
      • FBI struggles to find uniquely Canadian food: "How else will we know where they all are?" Says spokesperson.
    7. Re:Alienation by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Has it dawned on these people that a large number of Middle-Easterners might have the same sentiments regarding the religeous extremeism, tyrranical regimes and terrorist groups that are common in their home lands?

      I don't know about the U.S., but at least in the UK polls regularly show a disturbing level of support for Islamist values among the immigrant community. Many aren't trying to get away from strict Islam at all, they just want to bring it with them when they emigrate for better economic opportunities.

    8. Re:Alienation by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 4, Informative

      FBI struggles to find uniquely Canadian food

      That would be Poutine.

    9. Re:Alienation by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why is that disturbing or surprising at all? When american expats go to teach english in china, don't you think they bring their western ideologies with them?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  3. Just another reason I pay cash when possible. by RandoX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buying hunting ammunition? Pay cash. Buying food? Cash. Fireworks? Cash. Whether I have a reason to or not. And don't get me started on those "in-store discount cards".

  4. Wow! by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If that's not racial profiling, I don't know what is?

    Getting the information on anyone who purchased food at a Middle Eastern market? That's just crazy, and scarily over-broad.

    Hell, I shop at Middle Eastern markets, and I'm about as pasty white as you get. I mean, where else am I gonna get some of those things? You can't buy them elsewhere, and they're just so damned yummy. Come to think of it, I shop at Latin Markets, Asian Markets, and Caribbean Markets -- does that make me a terrorist? Or merely someone who eats a lot of ethnic food?

    This is like that now eerie joke about being arrested at an airport for "traveling while brown". Surely it's still legal and un-suspicious to buy ethnic food for crying out loud -- they're the only ones who have food worth eating. :-P

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  5. Sources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I like how the article linked as a source ("All signs point to...") contains the phrase: I have no sources at all for my argument today. I have nothing to back it up other than a gut feeling.

    If you read the CQ article, which is the only source of information here (the other two rely on it totally), it is not clear that this idiotic program was ever implemented to any extent whatever. It may have just been some words written on a napkin after a late night of drunken FBI 'brain'-storming.

  6. Patiently waiting... by NetDanzr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm patiently waiting for the FBI to knock on my door and arrest me for all the ingredients I used (digested) in my attempts to create the perfect stink bomb.

  7. OMG! Imaginary Terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    I can't believe the FBI didn't figure out what a stupid idea this was! It's unbelievable. Oh, wait...

    The program, however, was short lived and was quickly "torpedoed by the head of the FBI's criminal investigations division, Michael A. Mason, who argued that putting somebody on a terrorist list for what they ate was ridiculous -- and possibly illegal."

  8. Re:Reality by jeffasselin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How is it more dangerous than the inside threat of Christian Fundamentalists that threaten the very nature of the US?

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  9. Quick reality check by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I know posting after the first five minutes on any YRO story is pointless, especially on something as inflammatory as this, but since no one will RTFA:

    1) "The brainchild of top FBI counterterrorism officials Phil Mudd and Willie T. Hulon, according to well-informed sources, the project didn't last long. It was torpedoed by the head of the FBI's criminal investigations division, Michael A. Mason, who argued that putting somebody on a terrorist list for what they ate was ridiculous -- and possibly illegal."

    2) "All signs point to the credit card companies providing this data" is a rather generous spin on a theory that the author simply made up.

    3) Do Iranians eat falafel at all? I've never seen it in Persian restaurants. Or do none of you people know the difference between them and Arabs?

  10. Re:Because by megaditto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't understand how datamining works. Records of you shopping for Islamic food by and in itself is irrelevant. Nobody is going to throw you in jail because you love a falaffel now and then
    However, once FBI computers have access to hundreds of unrelated databases, they can do things like

    RETURN PERSON ID where gender is a male AND between 17-35 AND shops at Islamic stores AND has expired visa AND received large cash transfers from an Islamic country AND bought a one-way ticket on an airplane AND is on the same flight as others of that class.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  11. Persecution of differences by TheMeuge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that it's even more insidious than what you describe. It's not even being Middle Eastern that attracts the attention of authorities in this matter, but rather what food you purchase.

    This isn't even targeted ethnic discrimination, but rather a blatant foray into the realm of persecuting any deviation from the "american norm". To me, this says: "What, you don't purchase apple pies, soda, and hamburger? Instead you buy pita, chickpeas, and lamb? You're not like us... thus you are an enemy"

    This is not just ethnic profiling run amock, but rather the beginnings of persecuting any differences from the average. The logical continuation of this policy would be to data mine television watching habits, and blacklist those who do not watch reality TV... or better yet, flag anyone whose TV is turned on for less than 2 hours per day.

  12. Re:Because by joranbelar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    RETURN PERSON ID where gender is a male AND between 17-35 AND shops at Islamic stores AND has expired visa AND received large cash transfers from an Islamic country AND bought a one-way ticket on an airplane AND is on the same flight as others of that class.

    (2 row(s) returned)

    RETURN PERSON ID where gender is a male AND between 17-35 AND has expired visa AND received large cash transfers from an Islamic country AND bought a one-way ticket on an airplane AND is on the same flight as others of that class.

    (2 row(s) returned)

    Thank God for the grocery store data! ;)

  13. Re:Because by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They can also do stuff like: RETURN PERSON ID where party != party in control of government AND buys anti-Administration magazines AND owns a gun AND actively participates in political protests.

    Why do pro-government apologists always sound like they're about to piss their pants in fear of terrorists? Who is more likely to destroy your life, a terrorist or the government?

  14. Re:Because by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful


    RETURN PERSON ID where gender is a male AND between 17-35 AND shops at Islamic stores AND has expired visa AND received large cash transfers from an Islamic country AND bought a one-way ticket on an airplane AND is on the same flight as others of that class.

    0 rows returned

    FBI Agent: "Damn! Now what? ....."

    RETURN PERSON ID where RELIGION='Islam'
    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  15. Re:Reality by qazwart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, that whole thing in Ireland was just a little misunderstanding?

    It doesn't matter if you're Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu, or Atheist. What matters is how you treat your fellow human being, and how do you look at yourself. If you think you're perfect, all those "imperfect" beings around you are in trouble. If you think you're 100% right, all those "incorrect" beings around you are in trouble.

    Christian fundamentalism is a 19th century phenomenon, so it wasn't around back in the 1600's. Yes, there were religious Christians, but they weren't following Christian fundamentalist philosophy.

    Like all other groups religious Christians have been both on the side of good and evil. It was the Quakers back in the 18th century who first spoke against slavery for religious reasons. At that time, all 12 colonies had slavery (Delaware was part of Pennsylvania, and didn't split off from Pennsylvania until 1770s). The Unitarians (Adams were Unitarians) later forced the Northern colonies and states to ban slavery. The Baptists (the first true fundamentalist group) spoke against slavery causing the Southern Baptists to break off. In the 20th century, Catholics and Jews spoke against the treatment of Blacks in the South.

    Then again, slavery in the South became a prime Christian doctrine. Many Southern preachers were leaders in lynchings and the Klan. Supremest Christian doctrine in the mid-20th century supported the Nazis in Germany and were involved in the America First movement. In the 19th century, the protestant Know Nothings went on anti-Catholic rampages.

    Then there were the anti-Mormon wars in Missouri lead by various religious leaders -- many from Christian fundamentalist churches -- in the mid-1830s. Of course, there was also the Mormon lead 1857 Mountain Meadows massacre.

    It isn't Christian vs. Muslim. It is intolerance vs. everybody else. The fact that you so proudly wave the Christian banner and so readily denounce those who you don't agree with your religious views shows which side of the divide you're on.