Slashdot Mirror


Voyager 2 Shows Solar System Is "Dented"

Selikoff writes "NASA's Voyager 2 spacecraft has found that our solar system is not round but is 'dented' by the local interstellar magnetic field, space experts said on Monday. The data were gathered by the craft on its 30-year journey when it crossed into a region called the 'termination shock.' The data showed that the southern hemisphere of the solar system's heliosphere is being pushed in. Voyager 2 is the second spacecraft to enter this region of the solar system, behind Voyager 1, which reached the northern region of the heliosheath in December 2004."

173 comments

  1. Shape? by TitusC3v5 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Could somebody explain how exactly the solar system has an innate 'shape'? I would think that that would be human-defined, not an actual, measureable feature.

    --
    And the masses cried out, "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0!"
    1. Re:Shape? by Kranfer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Its not the solar system that is dented but its far reaches where the solar wind suddenly slows down that is 'dented'. Figure a magnetic field or a sphere that is effected by its environment and causes it to lose its shape... The area where the solar wind slows down changes in shape due to interstellar influences... gasses, magnetic fields, etc... From a few articles I read on this the other day Voyager 2 passed through the terminal shock numerous times so far and will again in 2008 because it is constantly changing shape. Although I may be wrong, and I have been up all night sick and decided to go into work at 4 am... I dunno what the hell is wrong with me lol.

      --
      -- Josh
      "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    2. Re:Shape? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Could somebody explain how exactly the solar system has an innate 'shape'? I would think that that would be human-defined, not an actual, measureable feature.

      Well the Sun has an innate shape. It is mostly a sphere, flattened a little bit by rotation. Other factors such as magnetic fields will play a part.

      The solar wind is really the outer part of the sun, so in one sense we are embedded in the sun, and it flows around our planet. It has long been expected that the solar wind would meet the interstellar medium at some sort of bow shock on the upstream side with a tail of sorts on the downstream side.

      This article suggests that magnetic fields which exist between stars also affect the shape of the boundary between the solar wind and whatever is outside it. Instruments on the Voyager spacecraft tell us which medium it is in at any point in time.

    3. Re:Shape? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is human defined in a sense, however the humans in question aren't arbitrarily picking a point, they are basing the definition on a measurable physical property, ie the area where the Sun's magnetic field has a (dominating) effect.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    4. Re:Shape? by entrigant · · Score: 4, Informative

      See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliosphere

      Basically the suns solar winds push back interstellar matter. This can have a shape.

    5. Re:Shape? by rucs_hack · · Score: 3, Funny

      Basically the suns solar winds push back interstellar matter. This can have a shape.

      So what your saying is, out there in interstellar space is a giant space kitteh saying 'I has a shape, let me apply it to you'.

      If it drops some giant space kitteh kibble while doing this, we are so screwed..

    6. Re:Shape? by entrigant · · Score: 1

      So what your saying is, out there in interstellar space is a giant space kitteh saying 'I has a shape, let me apply it to you'.

      Precisely

    7. Re:Shape? by Gabrill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok how long apart are these 2 (count them 2) points of reference? V2 also crossed the boundary what, 5 times? It seams to me that this could be stronger evidence that the whole thing fluctuates in size, rather than having a hard, irregular boundary.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    8. Re:Shape? by shokk · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Going to go out on a limb here and guess that this has to do with our sun's solar cycles. But also which star systems have passed through these areas of the galaxy thousands of years before us, and of course, their solar cycles. Next year, or 20 years after, the other side could be squashed. I think it probably more resembles a flame.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    9. Re:Shape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is the common method of viewing what termination shock is on earth: go to a sink and turn it on, as you will see in the basin, when the water hits, its ejected out on all sides. On the outskirts of the basin, where the water is forced by gravity back down, the water will become regular, non-moving, etc. This is the interstellar medium, the ambient pressure from outside our solar system is pushing against the solar wind (the water thats rushing away from its impact location) creating a location thats called termination shock. This location, as you can clearly see, is moving, always fluctuating. It changes its shape in response to the outside pressure (which here on earth, is caused by gravity wanting to pull the water down in the basin). You can probably easily see how a object could pass this boundary several times, especially when you realize that our solar system is much, much bigger then this example. A dented shock boundary could occur when, for whatever reason, the rushing water is being pushed back sooner. Perhaps there is more pressure on that side, or, in the case of space, you have some magnetic influences acting against the solar wind. Granted there could be other reasons, but the smart minds of today say its probably magnetic influences.

    10. Re:Shape? by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Quick throw it a cheeseburger!!!

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    11. Re:Shape? by blastwave · · Score: 1

      It has paint primer, rust, no hub caps and dirt in most places too. No surprise there. Have you seen some of the low life beings that live in there?

    12. Re:Shape? by GreenLED · · Score: 1

      Could somebody explain how exactly the solar system has an innate 'shape'? A fish swimming in a round bowl would say "my universe is boxed," after all, it only sees 4 walls, a ceiling and the floor. It's impossible to judge what shape the universe is unless you are able to reach it. No mater how hard you try to guess, you'll always have that unknown variable that will haunt you. We just don't like that word "impossible" because it's foreign to American's.

      Logically speaking, if this galaxy, and many others are round, or in a globe like form, it would make sense that our universe is round.
    13. Re:Shape? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The solar wind is really the outer part of the sun, so in one sense we are embedded in the sun

      And you blame global warming on my Hummer, phooey!

  2. I don't get it by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

    Voyager 2's data is scientifically exciting for a number of reasons, NASA said. The spacecraft has a working plasma instrument that can directly measure the velocity, density and temperature of the solar wind. A similar instrument on Voyager 1 stopped functioning long ago.

    Voyager scientists had expected the temperatures within the termination shock to be about 1,000,000 degrees Fahrenheit (555,500 C) as material normally slows down and is heated up when it encounters an obstacle in a normal shock wave.

    But according to Edward Stone of California Institute of technology, the temperatures registered were much lower, at around 200,000 degrees F (111,100 C). Also, Voyager 1 made only one crossing into the termination shock while Voyager 2 has made at least five shock crossings over several days which allowed

    how does the spacecraft survive in those temperatures?

    1. Re:I don't get it by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Informative

      how does the spacecraft survive in those temperatures?

      The density is very low. The body of the spacecraft might get hit by individual molecules which have that temperature, but what are a few thousand molecules going to do to it?

    2. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably simple physics ... remember, the density of the gas in space is very low (almost non existant); this implies that there are very few particles hitting the craft at that temperature. Meaning that the craft only needs to have roughly 10000 times the density of space to operate at a "normal" temperature. Given the craft is made out of solid things like metal, that shouldn't be too hard...

    3. Re:I don't get it by SquirrelsUnite · · Score: 1

      Despite the high temperatures an astronaut would actually freeze to death out there without thermal insulation. His body would still radiate heat and the low density matter would not be able to make up for the lost energy.

    4. Re:I don't get it by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I'll venture, given the fractal nature of reality, that this is just the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Atlantic_Anomaly writ large.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    5. Re:I don't get it by sqldr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As an analogy, it's like smoking. You're breathing particles at up to 6000 degrees C, but it doesn't do (much) damage.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    6. Re:I don't get it by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

      My hat is off to you. You, sir, are a master of irony.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:I don't get it by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      how does the spacecraft survive in those temperatures?

      Look up the difference between "heat" and "temperature".
      The ultra-low density gas that contacts the spacecraft can not conduct much heat. What matters is not the temperature of the gas but the temperatur of the spacecraft.

  3. I, for one... by sammydee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually think it's awesome that even twenty YEARS after it's launch, voyager 2 is STILL doing useful science. Another thing that astounds me is how the engineers managed to ensure that even after all these years in the hostile environment of space, this machine is still perfectly functional.

    1. Re:I, for one... by Kranfer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I find it amazing as well. However, I know that someday Voyager will stop functioning and will shut down from lack of nuclear fuel... or be destroyed by Klingons... or even return to Earth is a horrible epic adventure involving the Enterprise....

      --
      -- Josh
      "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    2. Re:I, for one... by Eternauta3k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, voyager 1 and 2 stopped working after a few months, current "findings" are just invented by NASA.

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    3. Re:I, for one... by SquirrelsUnite · · Score: 1

      Just wait til the writers' strike hits them.

    4. Re:I, for one... by Tailsfan · · Score: 1

      Are you sure they are not working anymore?

    5. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA took extended warranty from Circuit City.

    6. Re:I, for one... by Briareos · · Score: 1

      Or it'll get destroyed crashing into a Krenim time warship, followed by the timeline changing so it'll never have happened and everyone living happily ever after...

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    7. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in another twenty years, maybe you'll have learned the difference between its and it's. You think?

    8. Re:I, for one... by promixr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and how come my iPod broke after a few months?

    9. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually think it's awesome that even twenty YEARS after it's launch, voyager 2 is STILL doing useful science

      And what's more impressive is it's still doing useful science thirty years after launch. ;P

    10. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plutonium is good for something it seems.

    11. Re:I, for one... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      STOP! Geek time-

      or be destroyed by Klingons...

      That was a Pioneer, not Voyager. You can tell by the plaque; I think non-canon lit rules it Pioneer 11.

      or even return to Earth is a horrible epic adventure involving the Enterprise....

      Did you ever see the director's cut DVD that came out a few years ago? It's a much better film, still a bit slow, but the visual effects are much better -- and were restored in a manner in keeping with the original concepts -- and now I think it's the best of the odd-numbered Treks. The cuts they made, the proper sound mix and the good visuals let you focus a lot more on the story which is really compelling in a 70s hard scifi way.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    12. Re:I, for one... by newgalactic · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know who were the Project/Program Managers for the Voyager space programs? They deserve some real props.

    13. Re:I, for one... by my_left_nut · · Score: 1

      I always think that too... for a few seconds.

      Then I realize it still doesn't run Linux, and get depressed.

    14. Re:I, for one... by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      You've made a conscious comparison of odd-numbered Star Trek films...

      Please hand in your old geek card and accept this jewel-encrusted platinum VIP pass. Your lifetime achievement award is in the mail.

    15. Re:I, for one... by Kranfer · · Score: 1

      ZOMG You ruined my joke :( I get emo on you now! ::whines::

      --
      -- Josh
      "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
  4. Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously, the reason the solar system is dented is because God dropped it.

    1. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oops, sorry.

      -God

    2. Re:Obviously by nawcom · · Score: 1

      Proves to you that the bible has answers to everything!

    3. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Chuck Norris side kicked it.

    4. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's dented in the south. Which means our solar system has an ass... or maybe is shaped like one.

  5. Dented? by Centurix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good job we have third party insurance on this sucker, I'd hate to see what we hit...

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:Dented? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I'd hate to see the slide hammer and the massive bucket of Bondo that will be used to fix it imo...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:Dented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, the policy is six billion years old.

      Honey, are we still paying the premiums for this?

  6. Its not really hostile by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Interesting
    • Temperatures are extremely stable, so there is no expansion or contraction
    • Your electronics can't get rained on or filled with dust
    • There are no rats to eat your wires (yet)
    • There are no engineers around to fiddle with it and improve it (yes I know this does happen to software)
    • Cold is generally good for equipment, but not too much of course.
    • Your chance of being hit by a meteor is probably less than on Earth
    • etc

    If I ever do the transhuman thing and get turned into software, The Oort cloud is where I would want to be for serious durability.

    1. Re:Its not really hostile by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Although its only a matter of time before Mynocks get to it. :)

    2. Re:Its not really hostile by coinreturn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cold is generally good for equipment, but not too much of course.

      Actually, the "cold" of space doesn't help at all. Because the density of particles is so low, spacecraft can't cool down by convection. Cooling spacecraft (eg shedding internally generated heat) is a big problem. Also, the main "harsh" ingredient of space is radiation. The technology used in spacecraft is usually way behind commercial technology because it also has to be "rad-hardened."

    3. Re:Its not really hostile by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Your chance of being hit by a meteor is less than the chance of the Earth being hit by a meteor. But the chance of you being hit by a meteor if you are outside the earths atmosphere is actually greater because most small meteorites burn up in the Earths atmosphere before reaching sea level.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    4. Re:Its not really hostile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      RCA did a damn fine job with its rad-hardened version of the CDP1802. That and the fact that, at the time, it was about the only low power CMOS microprocessor out there made it a popular choice for space applications. I've read that the engineers had some qualms about the chip's rather unconventional, simple instruction set, but it seems they made the most of it despite their misgivings.

      More about the 1802 here for your daily dose of geek history.

    5. Re:Its not really hostile by phillipsfamily_01969 · · Score: 1

      Except for maybe that 200,000 degree F at the termination shock. What a bitch! I really do wonder how that isn't a problem for Voyager 2.

    6. Re:Its not really hostile by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yes but what is the meteor flux out around Pluto? Pretty low, I suspect.

    7. Re:Its not really hostile by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
    8. Re:Its not really hostile by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Why do you call something that does its job well "behind"?

      Spoken like a PC salesman...

      Rad-Hardened CPU's and what-not are time-tested, and just work. A lot of the reason that they are "behind" isn't because new rad-hardened components can't be made (in fact they have), it's because satellite engineers have higher discipline levels when it comes to code-reuse and risk-management of software.

      Using an old chip (if it's fast enough and meets other requirements) with code that has not caused a failure of any multi-million dollar pieces of on-orbit hardware (and thus, lost if it dies) -- is good engineering.

      More Terrestrial engineers could learn from those guys, really. Optimization and solid code are critical on board satellites. Crap bloatware that requires the latest and greatest bloatware engines (new CPUs) isn't welcome. Huzzah!

      --
      +++OK ATH
    9. Re:Its not really hostile by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Why do you call something that does its job well "behind"? Spoken like a PC salesman...

      Hey, there's no reason to start name-calling! If you re-read my post, you'll see the thrust of my message was about cooling, not modern hardware. I mentioned "behind" because it takes years for new technology to be in enough demand for manufacturers to "bother" with rad-hard stuff. Yes, "behind" hardware can often do a great job, but often the new tech is much lower power (very important in space) due to shrunken geometries. I am the LAST to promote bloatware. I am a digital designer myself and when the software guys want to put an operating system inside one of our embedded projects, the first question I ask is "Why do we need a full-blown operating system?"

  7. It seems logical by laejoh · · Score: 2, Funny

    that the birthplace of Arthur, Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha, contains something that appears Dent(ed).

    1. Re:It seems logical by Mikachu · · Score: 1

      What does the Z mean?

      Which Z?

      All of them.

  8. Wow... by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 1

    They sure don't make 'em like they used to. Of course, this isn't the first time I've heard of the Voyager probes, but I am amazed every time I read a story about them. Thirty years old and still flying through space taking measurements. Absolutely amazing.

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uuh, ever heard of Spirit and Opportunity? And they are in a much more hostile environment, too.

  9. Is this any better than conjecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    AFAICT, they have one data point on the surface of the 'sphere'. Using that one data point they decide that the sphere isn't spherical. If they had a hundred Voyagers all leaving the solar system in different directions at the same time, I would be more convinced.

    1. Re:Is this any better than conjecture? by andphi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, they seem to base their conclusion on the fact that Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 don't seem to have entered the termination shock at the same distance from the earth.

      FTA:

      "Voyager 2 entered the termination shock almost 1 billion miles closer within the southern hemisphere of the heliosphere of the solar system than Voyager 1 previously had," said Voyager Project scientist Edward Stone of the California Institute of Technology.

    2. Re:Is this any better than conjecture? by MikeyVB · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, they seem to base their conclusion on the fact that Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 don't seem to have entered the termination shock at the same distance from the earth.

      Actually, they seem to base their conclusion not only on that fact, but also because they had theorized that it might be that way from computer models that predicted when Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 reached the termination. So far Voyager 1 (actually, not sure on V1) and Voyager 2 reached the termination shock around where they thought they would according to the model that the Solar System is asymmetrical as described in TFA. (Thisarcicle briefly mentions the computer model)

    3. Re:Is this any better than conjecture? by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      Two data points, surely? And if they're right, they expect more in the future...

      --

      jh

    4. Re:Is this any better than conjecture? by ISMist · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is much better than conjecture. The article does a poor job of describing the evidence and theory involved. The theory is based on a wide range of data and modeling of the solar wind and the interstellar medium. If you really want to learn more about it I suggest you search astro-ph on heliosphere (http://xxx.lanl.gov/find/astro-ph) -- here's one good paper to read: http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/astro-ph/0606324. Or at least read the wikipedia article on the heliosphere. In fact the heliosphere is bow-shaped as has been understood for some time. The "dent" mentioned is a departure from the roundish shape of the bow shock in the upwind direction -- really asymmetry is a better description. And its based partly on when the two Voyagers crossed the solar wind termination shock and partly on the direction from which particles were detected as Voyager 2 approached the shock.

    5. Re:Is this any better than conjecture? by director_mr · · Score: 1

      "Actually, they seem to base their conclusion on the fact that Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 don't seem to have entered the termination shock at the same distance from the earth." Distance from earth is irrelevant and would vary based on what part of the orbit of the sun we were in at this point. Voyager 1 and 2 are no longer significantly affected by the earth, neither is the environment they are in. You would want to say they dont seem to be the same distance from the SUN.

      Some may think I'm being overly picky here, but we have to constantly remind ourselves the universe and solar system does not revolve around us. Actually it is not surprising that the termination shock varies, because the radiation from the sun varies as well. Regions of space that correspond with areas of the sun that had more activity would expect to have a more flared out termination shock area. It is interesting that they appear to be detecting interference from inter-stellar space now. I am curious how conditions differ in this area.

  10. human defined? by someone1234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmm? Is there anything known to us humans, that isn't human-defined?

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    1. Re:human defined? by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      McDonalds?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:human defined? by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pi? I've certainly never seen a complete definition of it, only approximations.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    3. Re:human defined? by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      Complete definition of pi:

      4 * sum(i=1 to infinity) { (-1)^(i-1) (1/i) }

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    4. Re:human defined? by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Nice. Although I would counter that that's the definition of the formula to calculate Pi, and not Pi itself. Of course at this point we've basically descended into semantic bickering and since I was only half serious in my original post I'm going to leave it at this.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    5. Re:human defined? by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      Pi? I've certainly never seen a complete definition of it, only approximations. What about "the ratio of any circle's circumference to its diameter in Euclidean geometry" (from Wikipedia)?
    6. Re:human defined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, McDonalds falls under Things Man Really Doesn't Want To Know, Especially While Eating.

    7. Re:human defined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:human defined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have. Pi is defined as the ratio of the circumference of a circle and its radius. Nothing approximate/incomplete about that. :)

    9. Re:human defined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have. Pi is defined as the ratio of the circumference of a circle and its radius. Nothing approximate/incomplete about that. :)

      Nope, nothing approximate or incomplete. Something wrong, though. Pi is a circle's circumference divided by its diameter (not radius).

    10. Re:human defined? by direwulf · · Score: 1

      I'd be wary about the use of "defined" here. Pi is defined as the ratio between the circumference of a circle and its diameter.

    11. Re:human defined? by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Yes, after seeing the responses I should have been more specific. I should have said the numeric definition of Pi. As it is several people have given the formula to calculate Pi as well as a verbal definition of the formula such as the one you gave.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    12. Re:human defined? by AeroIllini · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except those approximations of pi are expressed in (usually) base-10 notation, which is a human-created construction.

      Asking if there is something that exists that is not defined by humans is a tricky question. All of these things "exist", but all the tools we have for sensing them and measuring them are largely based on human-defined systems of measurements. We can't talk about these things without resorting to standards of measurement, which are wholly arbitrary and based on human experience.

      So, yes, there are lots of things that exist that are not human defined. However, once we name it or measure it or look at it or smell it or hear it or touch it, we are ascribing human-created standards to it so we can describe it to other people. It is these standards of measurement which are defined by humans, not the things themselves.

      </philosophy>

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    13. Re:human defined? by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Excellent post. Now, how about this, is Pi something that is measured, or is itself a form of measurement and thus wholly human defined? Does it exist independent of humanity or is it simply a human construct used to convey information about the shape of a thing to other humans? Of course at this point we're entirely into philosophical territory and this has really ceased to be relevant to much of anything.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    14. Re:human defined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a circle has radius r and circumference c, then pi is exactly one-half of c/r.

      You're welcome.

    15. Re:human defined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, any measurement of pi is an approximation. Its quite possible to provide a perfect definition. I'll put it in ratio terms, because I love Euclid.

      1:pi::any given circle's diameter: that circle's circumference

    16. Re:human defined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are actually saying it is NOT known. Makes the whole point kind of moot.

    17. Re:human defined? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Actually, you shouldn't have said "numeric definition". What you appear to be trying to say is something along the lines of the "decimal representation" of pi, which is, of course, not a "definition" by any stretch of the word.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    18. Re:human defined? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Of course for that to be a perfect definition, you first have to perfectly define "ratio", "1", "circle", "diameter" and "circumference".

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    19. Re:human defined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are a GOD!!!

      (In other news, I'm tying this on a spare keyboard)

    20. Re:human defined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh?
      Even gradeschool students know the complete definition of PI:
        pi=c/d (at least for Euclidean geometry)

      The exact numerical value and ways to calculate it is another thing (since it's impossible per definition)...

      - Peder

    21. Re:human defined? by somersault · · Score: 1

      You sir, are a GOD!!! Meh. I try my best, but the people they still complain.
      --
      which is totally what she said
    22. Re:human defined? by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Pi exists. It is a real number, between 3 and 4. However, the *significance* of pi is based on our human-defined methods of geometric measurement to an accuracy not found in nature. In the real world, there is no such thing as a perfect circle, and therefore there would be some error when dividing the circumference by the diameter. The accuracy of a specific irrational decimal to an infinite number of decimal places is a construction of our abstract geometric purity.

      However, in geometry, pi has the same significance as other specific measurements. For example, the number 4 is significant in the same way as pi because it is the circumference of a square divided by its width (which again, in reality, would be an approximation due to the lack of perfectly square objects). We have named pi (and not 4) because it appears in our calculations quite often (especially in trigonometry, which is based on circular geometry), and it is semantically awkward to refer to a very specific irrational decimal if it doesn't have a catchy name. We also named "e" for this reason. The fact that pi appears in so many calculations makes it appear more significant than other numbers, but this is really just a function of the human brain's tendency to find patterns even if there are none to be found. The number 4 shows up a lot, too.

      However, using pi in our measurement of radians is just as arbitrary as choosing 360 to measure the circle in degrees. We used it because it was convenient in our calculations, and made the answers come out to nice neat multiples of pi, which were easy to write down.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  11. My bad by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry folks, this was my fault. The folks were out of town and I figured I'd take the solar system out for a spin. I took a hard right to dodge a black hole and one thing led to another... Anyway, sorry about the dent; I'll pay for the damage.

    1. Re:My bad by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Oh, you would be the Son of God, then?

      Teenagers...

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  12. Dent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy, it's the most... it just leaves the frogs standing!

  13. Halp! by Fizzl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    southern hemisphere of the solar system's heliosphere

    Could someone remind me how to orientate myself in the universe?
    1. Re:Halp! by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      Up is the shortest distance out of your head. In most cases, its best if "up" is not in the same direction as the dominant gravity source.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Halp! by andphi · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Enemy's Gate is Down.

    3. Re:Halp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the dent in the solor system's heliosphere, duh.

      Seriously though, most planets orbit the sun in a rough plane. Now the earth's rotational axis is roughly perpendicular to this plane. Not quite, otherwise we wouldn't have summers and winters, but close. The direction perpendicular to the plane that roughly coincides with the way the north end of the earth's rotational axis points is often called north, the other direction south. I imagine you could do the same for the galaxy, but farther outwards things become trickier.

    4. Re:Halp! by Gabrill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right hand rule. Fist your right hand, and the fingers indicate direction of spin. The thumb indicates North. Most of the Milky Way galaxy follows this rule, in conjunction with Earth (excepting Uranus, not a team player).

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    5. Re:Halp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The closest thing to a universal frame of reference is the cosmic microwave background. The Solar System is moving, with respect to that, at about 370 km/s (1,332,000 kmh) in the direction of Leo.

      http://mrsquid.blogspot.com/

    6. Re:Halp! by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      Perhaps towards Polaris. Or you could use the celestial pole.

      Or you could use the plane of the solar system which contains planetary orbits as the "equator" and then decide to orient one as "north" to either the celestial pole or the pole star.

      Really, it's not that hard.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    7. Re:Halp! by fbjon · · Score: 1

      It's even simpler: Google is always up, TFA is always down.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    8. Re:Halp! by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      An xkcd for any occasion, http://xkcd.com/241/.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    9. Re:Halp! by rb4havoc · · Score: 3, Funny

      So basically, Uranus is the Dennis Rodman of Planets?

      --
      "There are 10 types of people in this world--Those that understand binary, and those that do not..."
    10. Re:Halp! by TimeTraveler1884 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most of the Milky Way galaxy follows this rule, in conjunction with Earth (excepting Uranus, not a team player).
      No kidding, that guy is a real ass.
    11. Re:Halp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't Venus rotate in the opposite direction?

    12. Re:Halp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, Ur-mom's-anus is a team player, and will accept that fist you just made.

    13. Re:Halp! by baKanale · · Score: 1

      I'm left handed, you insensitive clod!

    14. Re:Halp! by bigoil · · Score: 1

      The enemy is always down.

    15. Re:Halp! by darken9999 · · Score: 1

      Orientate is not a word.

    16. Re:Halp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could someone remind me how to orientate myself in the universe?

      Christalmighty!!

      The same way you orient yourself on Earth:

      1) You pick one of two fucking directions relative to the rotational axis
      2) Call one North
      3) Call the other South
      4) ???
      5) Profit!!
    17. Re:Halp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding not a team player. I am always either plugged up or flowing to freely. Wish it would just get with the program.

    18. Re:Halp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uranus doesn't like to be fisted with any hand.

    19. Re:Halp! by stonefry · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot fart-eater.

    20. Re:Halp! by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      Geeze, your just about as bad as anyone! Think of the one-armed man!

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
  14. Still a very good Solar System. by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    "Very Good - Looks fine at arm's length, but looking closer reveals soft corners and other imperfections."

    There goes our hopes for a near mint Solar System.

    Someday we'll finally end destroying the Earth and start with the rest. This gives us a head start.

  15. another ding in the solar system by yagu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Should have parked farther out, not close to any other solar systems. Probably won't even meet the deductible.

  16. That's a relief by Steeltalon · · Score: 1

    It's good to know that the grocery store won't charge full price for our solar system.

    --
    Regards, Ian
  17. Thats just because of the black hole in Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just because of the black hole eating away at the center of Mars, where all the water went...

    Remember that giant supercollider project that was cancelled? That's probably as far as the Martians got.

    1. Re:Thats just because of the black hole in Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for elucidating this. I was thinking it was because of the black hole in Uranus...

  18. Last Time I Let Him Borrow the Car! by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The Solar System is Dented! God damn it! That's the last time I let Voyager 2 borrow the Solar System. This is going to have to come out of Voyager 2's allowance!

    1. Re:Last Time I Let Him Borrow the Car! by SkimTony · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a shame he can't be better behaved, like his older brother, Voyager 1.

  19. I could have... by inode_buddha · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dented?!?!

    I could have saved 15% or more on my solar system insurance...

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:I could have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GALACTICO.com, so easy an Earthman can do it.

  20. I have updated Wikipedia to reflect this by thomasdz · · Score: 2, Funny

    RE: "Voyager 2 Shows Solar System Is "Dented", and "our solar system is not round"
    The Wikipedia entry for "Solar System" has a bunch of silly stuff about planets and moons and asteroids and other useless stuff, so I've deleted it all and replaced it with the much more informative: "not round, but Round-ish" ...update: Grrr... some wiki-fanboi perfectionist editor has corrected it to read "sphere-ish" ... oh well, at least my edit has a reference source so I guess I'll just take it up with Jimmy Wales

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
  21. How does it stand the thermal shock? by Tzinger · · Score: 1

    My question is how Voyager 2 can stand the thermal shock. The article reports that the temperature is something around 200,000 degrees. They are actually talking about the temperature of the "ions" but I would think that would damage the probe?

    I know we are not talking ambient temperature which would vaporize the probe. How dense is the matter and how do you measure this kind of energy?

    --
    "If all the American people want is security, let them live in prisons." Eisenhower
    1. Re:How does it stand the thermal shock? by fbjon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How dense is the matter and how do you measure this kind of energy? Very sparse. With a thermometer.
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  22. It's like.... by argStyopa · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...millions of personal-injury lawyers cried out in pleasure at the idea of the galaxy's largest class-action damages lawsuit, and were suddenly silenced - by realizing that simply serving the summons on that bastard Fomalhaut (we know it was him, he's always been a troublemaker) would take longer than their lifespans.

    Nevertheless, I'm sure a few are planning to file anyway this morning, "just in case".

    --
    -Styopa
  23. I just find it amazin by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 1

    that the thing has been functioning for 30 years, in such conditions.* All the star trek shows have made us immune to the amazement of such a feat. I mean this thing traveled to the edge of the solar system, we can't begin to comprehend that distance....that's gotta be at least some 30-40 light seconds away from the sun.
    It traveled a huge distance, over a rather large period of time, and it still function.
    if that doesn't desrve a 'WOW'** that i don't know what does.

    *No MS/Linux jokes please
    **No World of Warcraft jokes please.

    1. Re:I just find it amazin by Technopaladin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I ANAAP but Earth is 8 Light minutes from the sun...so I would suspect we are talking an hour or so.

    2. Re:I just find it amazin by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 1

      oh right...right...i thought it was 8 seconds

      still an hour....even more amazing
      you look at the sun, and that's a sun from an hour ago....if sun disappeared you would still see it for an hour. It's an old realization, that quite a few stars I see at night don't even exist anymore.

      This is not a new fact to me, but it never ceases to amaze me. Puts everything in perspective somehow. Just proves to you if you see something it doesn't really mean it's there or it even exists anymore. BTW Anyone got a clue how long does it take a signal, to travel from Voyager 2 to Earth?

    3. Re:I just find it amazin by TheOrquithVagrant · · Score: 1

      >that's gotta be at least some 30-40 light seconds away from the sun.

      I'm not sure if that was tongue-in-cheek, but the signal round-trip time to the voyagers are over 29 hours for V1 and closing on 24 hours for V2. Distance, in other words, is roughly 15 & 12 light _hours_. Heck even the sun itself is 8 light-minutes away. 30-40 light-seconds isn't very far, really.

  24. Awww... by Takichi · · Score: 1

    it's not dented, it just needed a hug.

  25. King of All Cosmos went on a bender again... by Genom · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like the Prince has some rolling to do.

  26. A Fire Upon the Deep by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

    It seams to me that this could be stronger evidence that the whole thing fluctuates in size, rather than having a hard, irregular boundary.

    Small weather-like fluctuations at the periphery of this Zone are normal, but it only fluctuates wildly when there is some kind of a malignant, evil force that needs to be neutralized. The only question is how deep Earth is within the Unthinking Deeps.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:A Fire Upon the Deep by mmdog · · Score: 1

      ...The only question is how deep Earth is within the Unthinking Deeps. I've often pondered that question and my gut always tells me we are pretty deep. Seems almost like we are sinking deeper every day...
      --
      Politicians are like diapers - they should be changed frequently and for the same reasons.
  27. Almost 12 light-hours, actually by yeremein · · Score: 4, Informative

    This article says it's 84 AU out, which is a little more than 11.6 light-hours.

    1. Re:Almost 12 light-hours, actually by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

      Good call.. I decided to look it up and low and behold my understanding of the solar system was very off. Really amazing how big the Solar system is.

  28. The Truth by ScotlynHatt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Okay folks, I have some bad news for you. Human space exploration is deforming the universe and stuff. You heard it here first. I declare this anomaly "Universal Warming." What's higher than the Nobel prize?

    1. Re:The Truth by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I'm not believing a word of what you say until Al Gore makes a movie full of sensationalist claims of impending disaster about it.

  29. Oh, good grief, you kids by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

    I go and give you a brand new solar system, and what do you do? You go and *dent* it! And that won't even buff out, I'm going to have to use some interstellar Bondo!

  30. What about... by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    What about space herpes?

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    1. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already told you, those are regular herpies.

      Now put on the cream and shut the fuck up. :-D

  31. Uh-oh! by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    Better get Maaco! http://www.maaco.com/

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  32. This makes me wonder... by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    When was the last time we launched something with an intended lifespan of 30+ years? I can't recall (not to say that there *aren't*) any projects in the past 10-20 years. Granted, Spirit may end up running for a total of 30 years, but it's been running unexpectedly for a while already, and had no intentions of running for 1 year, let alone 30.

    Is there any way to get the US public behind a long-term investment like the Voyagers again?

    1. Re:This makes me wonder... by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 1

      I don't think had an intended lifespan of 30 years - it had an intended lifespan of long enough to be able to photograph and take readings on the gas giants, as part of the original Grand Tour. Anything after that has been a bonus.

  33. Dented Solar System by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's a rental and came like this?

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  34. Not the dent... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    It is all the parasites in our solar system that gives it such a good discount.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  35. 1 atom per cubic centimeter by mbone · · Score: 1

    People should realize that this "dent" is in a heliopause with a density of maybe 1 atom per cubic centimeter - in other words, a much
    better vacuum than any on Earth. The solar wind blows up a huge "bubble" in galactic space, and Voyager is just getting to the edge of it.

    It is interesting but hardly surprising that so tenuous a gas so far from the Sun is buffeted by the even more tenuous gas flowing in the galaxy.

  36. Dent, paint primer, rust, and no hub caps by MindKata · · Score: 1

    Ok, so if the Solar System has a dent, paint primer, rust, and no hub caps, then maybe we can at least fill in the dent and then spray paint over it. It may take a while though, so its going to cost you. Would next Thursday be ok?

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
  37. Well that's just great. by El+Yanqui · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is why we can't have nice things.

    --
    Well, thanks to the Internet, I'm now bored with sex.
  38. Re:please go back to school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space is not a total vacuum, moron.

  39. Voyager... 2? by morari · · Score: 1

    I just glad that it didn't get lost in the Delta Quadrant as well!

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  40. I should have check.... by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Never buy a solar system without a starfax history report....

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  41. two data points, and that's enough. by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    They have two data points: where V1 and where V2 crossed into the heliopause.

    And that's enough. If the heliosphere were a sphere, then by definition every point on its surface would be equidistant from the Sun. Now that they know two points are not equidistant from the Sun, they know it's not a sphere.

    What they don't know is how big the "dent" is. It could be no bigger than the spacecraft, of course, although that is extraordinarily unlikely. Or it could be enormous. This is probably what you mean: they can't say exactly what shape the heliosphere is without lots of data points, outlining it.

    However, only a few -- in the case of a sphere, just two -- data points are enough to say what shape it isn't.

  42. isn't much by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Informative

    Matter is unbelievably thin out there. Roughly 1 atom every 10 cubic centimeters. By contrast the best vacuums we can produce on Earth (around a trillionth of an atmosphere) contain 250 million atoms in every 10 cubic centimeters.

    It doesn't damage the spacecraft because, as anyone who has put out a candle flame with his fingers can tell you, it's not temperature that is dangerous but heat. Things with very little heat to transfer -- in this case, some unbelievably tiny amount of matter -- but at very high temperature, are harmless.

    An analogous situation exists with respect to electricity: it isn't voltage per se that is dangerous to you but rather charge. Things that are at very high voltages (e.g. the static charge you built up when you scuff your shoes on a dry winter day) can be quite harmless if the amount of charge that can be transferred is very small, e.g. just a little spark.

    The confusion exists in part because usually things at high temperature (or high voltage) have plenty of heat (or charge) to transfer, and then they are more dangerous than equivalent reservoirs at lower temperature (or voltage), because they transfer the lethal dose of heat (or charge) much faster.

  43. A message to religious zealots by nih · · Score: 1

    Voyager 2 is the second spacecraft to enter this region of the solar system, behind Voyager 1, which reached the northern region of the heliosheath in December 2004

    see, even the solar system practices safe sex!
    --
    I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
  44. By looking at the dent we've made it worse!!!! by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    For shizzel: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/11/21/scicosmos121.xml&CMP=ILC-mostviewedbox

    (OK, I'm sorry for saying sizzel. I don't know what come over me. I'm gonna go sit down. My head is spinning.)

  45. measured temperature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone explain to me why the measure temperature was 200K F and the spacecraft didn't burn up? Was voyager built with enough shielding?

  46. North and South by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    The radio imparted commentary about this. However, they described the Voyager probes as going "North and South, respectively". I did a mental double take in my car, and wondered who in the hell got to decide which way is "North" in this 3D (or more) coordinate system. Can they even have that?

    --
    -
  47. Mod Parent "informative" by Falladir · · Score: 1

    This is a reasonable answer to a question that the summary raised for me.

  48. Women by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    If you figure out how to define them, you probably aren't human. Or seriously mistaken and about to be told so in detail.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  49. why hasn't another Voyager been sent up? by blingbing · · Score: 1

    It's been over 30 years since Voyager 2 was launched, and technology wise we've come a long way. It's long overdue that a new Voyager should be made and sent up.

    so my question is, why hasn't it happened already?

  50. Too cold by NotZed · · Score: 1

    So .. if the temperature is out by 5x, doesn't that mean their modeling is rubbish? Or are they just going to explain it away with a small tweak to make this 'new fact' fit?

    When's the last time an astronomer wasn't 'surprised' by some new discovery in space? Is this really science, or just expensive fantasy, barely better than astrology?

    --
    _ // `Thinking is an exercise to which all too few brains
    \\/ are accustomed' - First Lensman
  51. Tag by mijkal_mobile · · Score: 1

    Homer: itwaslikethatwhenigothere

  52. Dent or Ding? by counslr2002 · · Score: 1

    My Ronco Pop-a-Dent can make that sucker look good as new!

  53. That bastard by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    It must have been the same fucker who dented my car in the parking lot today and then took off.

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open