Slashdot Mirror


Coming Soon — Cyborg Farmers

palegray.net writes Robots.net covers an article about robotic exoskeletons for Japanese farmers. These exoskeletons would provide increased strength and support for manual labor intensive tasks. More information can also be found at robots-dreams.com. 'The robotic suit relies on ultrasonic motors along with various sensors and wireless networking gear. [...] The mass-produced version of the suit is expected to weigh in at 8 kilograms and cost about 200,000 yen.'"

172 comments

  1. Before anyone else can say it... by AbsoluteXyro · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one welcome our new cyborg farming overlords.

    1. Re:Before anyone else can say it... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Will they be equipped with tentacles? Will Japanese schoolgirls flee in terror?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Before anyone else can say it... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I'm no farmer, although I garden every once in a while. But as a cyborg I thank you for the overlordship you have bestowed on me.

      Oh yeah - resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Before anyone else can say it... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      As I am a cyborg I think I can answer for you. No tentacles (although here in in Springfiels where the cartoons all live, who knows?). From my perspective the schoolgirls are safe (for now) but the middle aged women, well... since most of us cyborgs are geezers, your mom needs to, er, well, say HI to her for me would you?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    4. Re:Before anyone else can say it... by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, they're equipped with testicles and yes Japanese schoolgirls will flee!

    5. Re:Before anyone else can say it... by janegirl · · Score: 1

      I think this has the potential to be helpful and profitable to the US with a growing elderly population. We need exoskeletions to help prevent all of those pesky broken bones and to augment those atrophied muscles. Imagine a world where instead of having those ugly motor-scooters the elderly were fitted with exoskeletons.

    6. Re:Before anyone else can say it... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Before anyone else can say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then those kids would REALLY get off your lawn.

    8. Re:Before anyone else can say it... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      In Korea only old people wear robotic exoskeletons....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  2. Where is mine by guruevi · · Score: 1

    200,000 Yen =~ $1800. Where is my exoskeleton. I would imagine something like the exoskeleton suit from the Aliens series would be quite useful.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Where is mine by somersault · · Score: 1

      It would also weigh a little more than 8 kilos. I'd prefer a normal body sized exo-skeleton to a 20 foot mecha style exo-skeleton for everyday usage ;)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Where is mine by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Now, take loose plates of armor and attach them with easy snap-on latches. You now have body armor that gives strength increase. All you need are weaponry slots for guns and such.

      --
    3. Re:Where is mine by Nullav · · Score: 1

      But who harvests crops with guns?

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    4. Re:Where is mine by somersault · · Score: 1

      I hope the easy snap-on latches aren't also easy snap-off latches :s

      --
      which is totally what she said
  3. Wait a second. by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture wasn't in charge of Gundam.

  4. WTF are "Ultrasonic Motors?" by StCredZero · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are they just motors we can't hear? Or was the article written by a science illiterate who includes words that he thinks sound scientific?

    1. Re:WTF are "Ultrasonic Motors?" by Arthur+B. · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    2. Re:WTF are "Ultrasonic Motors?" by jbeaupre · · Score: 3, Funny

      Check out this crazy concept: Type "Ultrasonic motor" into this new fangled search site called Google. It pointed me to this free, (seriously: it's free!) encyclopedia called Wikipedia. The link talked all about ultrasonic motors http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasonic_motor. Seems they are commonly used in cameras. I bet other links would give even more information.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    3. Re:WTF are "Ultrasonic Motors?" by AikonMGB · · Score: 1

      Without reading the article, I would guess that what they meant was "harmonic drive" transmissions.. that's the only relation to something that sounds like "sonic" that I can think of.

      Harmonic drives can provide incredible output torque and extreme precision (i.e. no backlash).

      Aikon-

    4. Re:WTF are "Ultrasonic Motors?" by pragma_x · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks for the info, but I found that article to be impenetrable. So I went surfing for a more remedial explaination:

      A decent explaination about how these things work.
      http://www.tky.3web.ne.jp/~usrmotor/English/html/principlesandStructure.html

      NASA JPL image of a robot arm assembly using a ultrasonic rotor (should help with visualizing what TFA is about)
      http://www-robotics.jpl.nasa.gov/tasks/taskImage.cfm?TaskID=140&tdaID=800006&Image=319

      NASA JPL article with a good illustration of the "travelling wave" phenomenon that makes these work.
      http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/technology/images_videos/iv_pages/Yosi_Ultrasonic_Motor1.html

    5. Re:WTF are "Ultrasonic Motors?" by photomonkey · · Score: 1

      They have been in use for years in professional-grade (and now even consumer-grade) autofocus camera lenses.

      See the Canon USM lenses and the Nikon Silent Wave (S) series lenses.

      --
      Message contains 1 attachment: spam.gif
    6. Re:WTF are "Ultrasonic Motors?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My God you're fucking stupid. With such a low ID, you'd think you'd have the wits to check before spouting, but it turns out someone misheard the parts list for your head and filled it with SHITS instead. God damn moron. These motors have been around since years, ever heard of oh I don't know, CAMERAS? Idiot.

    7. Re:WTF are "Ultrasonic Motors?" by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Robotic designs have been around for years; The problem is not the design, but the power source. If there exists a power supply that does the job, would a farmer wear it into a rice pond? Maybe an autonomous design might make more sense here.

  5. And they'll be sold by Jawas... by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    and sometimes speak Bocce...

  6. Nifty advances by jbeaupre · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not the first time Japanese agriculture spins out some interesting stuff. Check out their UAV helicopters: http://www.gizmag.com/go/2440/.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Nifty advances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what you are saying is that what is being mistranslated as "Ministry of Agriculture" is actually "Ministry of World Domination";-)

    2. Re:Nifty advances by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      I don't think the Japanese are up to anything nefarious, but Germans used civilian programs to hide military efforts prior to WWII. For instance, they encouraged lots of boys to make and fly gliders in clubs. When war broke out, they had thousands of partially trained pilots ready to go. I learned that story from a guy at my glider club in the US a few years ago. I was waiting to take a lesson when an old German guy next to me says to another guy (paraphrased) "Back when I learned to fly gliders in the Hitler Youth...." Cue doubletake! Sometimes its easy to forget they weren't just characters on the History Channel, but real people that are still alive. And if it happened once, it could happen again.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    3. Re:Nifty advances by antek9 · · Score: 1

      It already does, but actually it is the Bin Laden Youth nowadays, and they are giving out free copies of MS Flight Simulator. Much harder to spot than actual gliders, if you ask me.

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    4. Re:Nifty advances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that and part of the Versaille treaty results was that the Germans was severly restricted in development, building and training of motorized flight.

  7. ¥200,000 = $1834.55 by r_jensen11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Something about this sounds fishy.... I find it hard to believe that it would cost less than $2,000 to turn in to RoboCop.

    1. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by somersault · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, you sit there in your unbelief.. wheeeee!! *jumps onto the top of the empire state building*

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Funny

      I find it hard to believe that it would cost less than $2,000 to turn in to RoboCop You're leaving out the cost of weapons.
    3. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by colonslash · · Score: 1
      Maybe they are trying to get these to as many people as possible - it wouldn't be too hard to immobilize someone in one of these getups.

      Mmmm, soylent green farmer

    4. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe that it would cost less than $2,000 to turn in to RoboCop.

      I fond it hard to believe that an exoskeleton would cost as much as a car. The Indians are putting a CAR out for about that price.

      I want one like in The Matrix. Those exoskeletons would cost a bit more than $2k I think!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    5. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Batteries Not Included.

      Click here to add a Mr Fusion to your order.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    6. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by Sandbags · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, it's not really a robotic suit, it's a robotic "assist" suit. It doesn't do anything by itself, it's just a few servos with some quality sensors attached and calibtrated to the wearers movement. It helps prevent fatigue by helping the farmer balance, stand and squat, and remain bent over for long periods of time.

      the software behind it isn't anything radical, and since then motors don't apply force, just resistance, most of the work is done with very little power. (power is needed to turn on and off the motor, but not to actually move limbs, so it;s kind of like assisted breaking, or power steering, but for the body.)

      It's a lot more simple than people think to make it out. Many of the componenets are slight upgrades to common hobby gear... the sensors are where the real magic is, allowing the suit to move fluidly with the wearer and sense when to support and when to assist. Other than that, it's not more than a fancy mechanical brace. $2000 USD is completely beievable.

      Also, misprint in the article states 8KG. It's 18KG (about 40 lbs).

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    7. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by CrashPoint · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe he means the British RoboCop?

    8. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by veganboyjosh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they are trying to get these to as many people as possible

      Coming soon: The OEPC project...?

    9. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Something about this sounds fishy.... I find it hard to believe that it would cost less than $2,000 to turn in to RoboCop. Turning into Robocop would cost you an arm and a leg...a pair of both, actually.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    10. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by Necreia · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean RoboCrop?

    11. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice to see a bit more substantive article. This looked to me like a weakly disguised attempt to get some heavy web traffic. But the exoskeleton idea is certainly valuable. I've got my credit card right here, and 2000USD or so seems inexpensive for the benefit.

      There are other uses than heavy manual labor for a minimalist exoskeleton. I have a friend with a spinal injury that requires her to wear a stiff plastic collar. She pretty much can't pick up anything heavier than a small plastic drinking glass of water. She spends a lot of time lying on her back with icepacks on her neck. She's already had one surgery and it's not clear whether more surgical intervention will make any difference.

      An exoskeleton might (or might not) be a little awkward out in public, but being able to do ordinary things at home, like lift a cooking pot or hang clothes on the clothesline, would be a huge quality of life enhancement for her.

      I'll refrain from bringing up the robot girlfriend fantasy angle...

    12. Re:¥200,000 = $1834.55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You never see Jack Bauer go to the bathroom. That's because nothing escapes Jack Bauer. Ohh please. Each episode of 24 is actually just 41.3 minutes or so. Yet the clocked has ticked a full hour. The remaining 18 minutes is used for tea and crumpets and the odd visit to the gents while you get to watch commercials for cheetos and viagra.
  8. how long before.... by zappepcs · · Score: 1

    these robotic suits are used to record all the data necessary to train robots to do the same work?

    1. Re:how long before.... by zentinal · · Score: 1

      If we run short of migrant workers as a side effect of immigration reform, imagine flocks / herds of robotic weeders / pickers roaming the fields. Heck, you could even have pest eating robots.

    2. Re:how long before.... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      You train organisms. You program robots. Quite a difference, even if you can program some robots "by example".

      There's way too much Anthropomorphism in robotics IMO, especially Japanese robotics.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:how long before.... by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Well said, I agree with you. My bad

    4. Re:how long before.... by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      Actually, the grandparent is correct in using the word training. If you have a self learning algorithm, you program it into a computer. After that is done you train it for a specific task by feeding it data.

      Programming is also often used when talking about living organisms. Specifically when dealing with brainwashing and conditioned responses. The main difference in meaning seems to be that training is used when the result is more fluid, while programming is more strict and focused. When they can be interchanged for each other, learning has a more positive tone, while programming sounds more negative.

    5. Re:how long before.... by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, don't anthropomorphize robots. They hate that.

  9. 48 years early by p3d0 · · Score: 1
    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  10. Get away from her... by show+me+altoids · · Score: 3, Funny

    you Bitch!!

    --
    I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
    1. Re:Get away from her... by show+me+altoids · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on, hasn't anyone ever seen the end of Aliens?

      --
      I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
    2. Re:Get away from her... by Punko · · Score: 1

      Compare with shout by Mrs. Weasley at end of last Potter book . . .

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    3. Re:Get away from her... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Compare with shout by Mrs. Weasley at end of last Potter book . . . Haven't read it but it's probably along the lines of "get away from her you naughty person, pout !"
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  11. BS by holmedog · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I call bullshit on the entire thing. For starters, your going to see exoskeletons in military long before you will out in the Japanese fields. We have these things already, they are called tractors.

    Also, at $1800 per, your not going to see people investing in these when they can just hire some cheap child labor.

    1. Re:BS by altinos.com · · Score: 1

      They're probably not military grade yet, so they could be more of a hindrance in the field. Usually on a farm you don't have to worry about people shooting at you, so the exoskeleton won't need to be bullet and fragment resistant.

    2. Re:BS by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Chinese were using rockets for celebrations long before they thought to fire them at each other in wartime.

    3. Re:BS by asuffield · · Score: 5, Informative

      Also, at $1800 per, your not going to see people investing in these when they can just hire some cheap child labor.


      What country do you think Japan is in?

      This is not China or India. They do not have "cheap child labour". This is the country with the highest per-capita wages in the world. This is where labour is at its most expensive. This is also the country where children go to school 10 hours a day, 6 or 7 days a week, from the age when they can hold a pencil until they go to university. There's no child labour at all, let alone cheap.
    4. Re:BS by holmedog · · Score: 1

      I give you that. I shouldn't have said Child labor, but instead just "Cheap Labor". The point was more that you could easily pay a few months wages (even here in the states) to cheap labor instead of paying the ~$2000 to buy the suit.

    5. Re:BS by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 1

      And that has what bearing on the availability of child labor?

    6. Re:BS by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 1
      If that was true then the tractor wouldn't exist.

      A $2000 one-time capital investment is not very much. It wouldn't take long even for 'cheap' labor to eat up that much in wages. Also I bet that Japan is like the USA and there are regulations, paperwork, insurance, and various other hidden costs when it comes to hiring workers. 'Cheap' labor is never cheap in 1st world countries unless you cheat and pay undocumented workers under the table. Also, FYI, the Japanese version of the IRS is famous for being effecient and very ruthless. You don't want to get caught in tax-evasion in Japan.

    7. Re:BS by Afecks · · Score: 1

      Who says that's a bad thing?

      I'd rather you kill yourself than someone else.

    8. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good point. With the lowest birthrate in the industrialized world and an obsession with maintaining racial purity expect to see the development of more and more robots designed to perform "menial" functions.

    9. Re:BS by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Japanese minimum wage is ¥4,712-5,465 per day. If you are able to pay the cheapest wage then the exoskeleton costs the same amount as a labourer for 42 days. At the most expensive (minimum) rate it works out as 37 days. Either way, you get under two months of human for the cost of the suit. If the suit makes one person 20% more efficient, it will pay for itself in under a year.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:BS by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      What country do you think Japan is in? Uh... is it in Japan?

      *gets a recursive atlas*
      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    11. Re:BS by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Also, FYI, the Japanese version of the IRS is famous for being effecient and very ruthless.
      They employ ninjas. Nuff said.
    12. Re:BS by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      The point was more that you could easily pay a few months wages (even here in the states) to cheap labor instead of paying the ~$2000 to buy the suit.

      Two thousand dollars would get you about one month's wages for cheap labour in England. Maybe six weeks. You'd have to hire illegals to get much cheaper. Japan's even more expensive than that.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    13. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, that's bullshit. The WHO's numbers (better presentation at Wikipedia) put it at 9th, and even were it at its recorded peak in the past 50 years it wouldn't break into the current top 7.

      Japan has a relatively high suicide rate, absolutely, but they're not even in contention for the top spot.

    14. Re:BS by antek9 · · Score: 1

      Usually on a farm you don't have to worry about people shooting at you
      You have never been to the US, or watched any movies, I reckon? [insert random quote here, e.g. "I said, step away from my LAWN, you assclown incarnation of a Dr. Octopus, yes you!", "I'm not gonna say this twice, Sonny, I'm gonna ask you to leave. NOW! And take your motherf*nkin exoskeleton with you, now will ya?"]
      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    15. Re:BS by celle · · Score: 1

      Yes there is child labor, In japan its called an getting an education, since it can ruin your life via burnouts and abuse just like a real job, call it what it is. Let's not forget how you go through it can affect the rest of your life then in some ways its worse than a job. And the japanese children have to work hard at it.

    16. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is also the country where children go to school 10 hours a day, 6 or 7 days a week,

      School days are the same length as in the US - supplementary cram schools exist, but most Japanese only use them the year of key entrance exams.

      Half-days of school on Saturday have been phased out.

    17. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 hours a day, 6 or 7 days a week - sure sounds like child labour to me.

    18. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also minimal immigration, even less for "unskilled" workers.
      Robots are the only choice they have, since almost no "young" people (less than 80 years old) are sticking around rural communities anymore.

  12. Dance-Dance Revolution upgrade by dingleberrie · · Score: 1

    I want to be able to upload mine with dance moves developed after my latest self-education in 1985 and have it teach them to me (motors on) then grade my progress (motors off).

  13. Wow, bad misread. by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    This is the worst I've misread a summary yet... And oddly, probably the most accurate misread also.

    I read it: "The mass-produced version of the weapon is expected"

    Scary.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:Wow, bad misread. by Mantaar · · Score: 1

      I'll wait for them things to get produced on a larger scale. I wonder when the first incident will be reported where a drunken farmer abuses his newly-grown exo-super powers...

      Would be fun to have a fight in those things, too, I think. Just one blow that's not blocked properly and you're dead meat, ready for consumption.

      --
      I'm an infovore...
    2. Re:Wow, bad misread. by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      That's okay I misread the title as "Coming Soon - Cyborg Farms"

      In my defense, I did just watch the first 2 episodes of "Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" and the last episode of "Stargate Atlantis" last night.

  14. Tractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In America these are called tractors. http://www.deere.com/servlet/ProdCatProduct?tM=FR&pNbr=9630_RW
    If you are going to use a machine to help you don't use a small thing you put on like a coat use a BIG machine the size of a house and get more work done faster.
    The point of a machine is to reduce the need for manual labor.
    When walking won't get you there fast enough you don't use a 200,000 yen exoskeleton suit to help you run faster, you ride a bike which can be had for under $300 new.
    It is like they intentionally tried to find the most complicated solution. I do not down play the accomplishment or the coolness of it but must admit that I don't get it.
    What is it with the Japanese and the giant fighting robots?

    1. Re:Tractors by asuffield · · Score: 3, Informative

      In America these are called tractors.


      In America they grow mostly maize and wheat, which can be easily automated by dragging heavy machinery across the top of the soil. In Japan they grow mostly fruit and vegetables, which have to be carefully picked from the plants. Tractors are just not that useful to them, which is why they don't really use them. Harvesting is mostly done by hand because the land of genius automation has not been able to find a way to automate it - until now (maybe).

      Here's a hint at the problems they have to deal with: the Japanese radish (one of their staple vegetables) is a foot long and about three inches wide. It takes a lot of careful pulling to get something that size out of the ground without damaging it.
    2. Re:Tractors by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      The point of a machine is to reduce the need for manual labor

      Tell that to the Japanese. They have this ultranerd complex that makes them want robots where robots aren't needed. The Sirius Cybernetics Corporation is surely a Japanese company. "the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation defines a robot as 'your plastic pal who's fun to be with'."

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Tractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a foot long, three inches wide, and takes a lot of careful pulling by the Japanese to get it out?

      Hint: It's not a tentacle for a change.

    4. Re:Tractors by angus_rg · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the Japanese. They have this ultranerd complex that makes them want robots where robots aren't needed. The Sirius Cybernetics Corporation is surely a Japanese company. "the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation defines a robot as 'your plastic pal who's fun to be with'."

      Complex like making a cup of tea?

    5. Re:Tractors by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Try picking strawberries with a tractor. There's a lot of hand-picked produce out there still, and that's quite literally back breaking labor. Some sort of mechanical support could make farming a whole lot more humane. Of course in our economy, we have illegal immigrants to pick our fruit and nobody cares about their knees anyway.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Tractors by teebob21 · · Score: 1

      The Sirius Cybernetics Corporation is surely a Japanese company. "the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation defines a robot as 'your plastic pal who's fun to be with'." That's funny, the RealDoll Corporation has the same slogan.
      --
      khasim (12/9/06): In a blind taste test, more people preferred Coke over the Pepsi that I had previously pissed in.
    7. Re:Tractors by ChainedFei · · Score: 1

      That's odd, Mario always made it seem so easy. It must have been because he was dreaming at the time.

  15. meklars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The japanese farmers would be much better off with Sakkra with their +1 food production bonus, the subterranean bonus would be perfect for crowded japan, and as another bonus, they'd make a good militia whenever Godzilla comes to town.

  16. Next: Script kiddies play with humans too? by olden · · Score: 1

    I can't help but think (sorry, I work in the field): powerful motors strapped to a person's body, combined with "wireless network gear" (although this last bit is not in TFA)... hmmm, they better make sure this "suit" is intrinsically secure, ie it cannot possibly make motions exceeding the wearer's physical limits, not matter how badly the software malfunctions or is compromised.
    Otherwise we could very well have someone eventually end up in intensive care because of a computer virus infection. :/
    That said, in a very geeky sense (hey, this is /.), this looks cool indeed...

    1. Re:Next: Script kiddies play with humans too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have missed the other comment about how this has no servo capabilities, only controlled resistance.

  17. 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Countdown to totally bizarre robotically-assisted Japanese porn animation in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...

  18. I hope... by tgd · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope I wasn't really the ONLY one whose first thought was "well that pretty much decides the whole illegal immigrant discussion once the migrant workers get cybernetic exoskeletons"...

    I, for one, welcome our cybernetic illegal immigrant overlords.

    um... I mean... I, para uno, dan la bienvenida a nuestros overlords inmigrantes ilegales cibernéticos.

    (thanks babelfish)

    1. Re:I hope... by funk1337 · · Score: 1

      Haha...get out of my head.

    2. Re:I hope... by Fx.Dr · · Score: 4, Funny

      um... I mean... I, para uno, dan la bienvenida a nuestros overlords inmigrantes ilegales cibernéticos. (thanks babelfish)

      The last time I heard someone used Babelfish, it was in reference to some manner of diplomatic incident.

      Seeing as how Japanese cyborgs are involved, I feel you just opened up a whole can of worms. Good going, man. Good going.

    3. Re:I hope... by thebdj · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    4. Re:I hope... by greeze · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, para uno, dan la bienvenida a nuestros overlords inmigrantes ilegales cibernéticos. I, for one, cybernetic illegal immigrants give to the welcome to ours overlords.

      (thanks, babelfish)
    5. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, == Yo , por mi parte,

        Yo , por mi parte, doy la bienvenida a nuestros Supremos Gobernantes inmigrantes ilegales ciberneticos.

    6. Re:I hope... by afedaken · · Score: 1

      Seeing as how Japanese cyborgs are involved, I feel you just opened up a whole can of worms. Atarashii cyborg no dai-ou-sama ni, youkoso!
      --
      If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
    7. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo, por mí, doy la bienvenida a nuestros amos inmigrantes ilegales cibernéticos.

  19. Robot *what*? by jesdynf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Japanese farmers driving exoskeletons?

    Don't I seem to recall something else Japanese farmers are famous for?

    Oh, that's right. Ninjas.

    Nothing but awesome can come from this.

    --
    Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    1. Re:Robot *what*? by Unkemptwolf · · Score: 1

      Robot Ninjas? My god, someone warn the pirates!

      --
      The more you know, the more you realize how much you don't know.
    2. Re:Robot *what*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Samurai was way more awesome than any Ninja.

    3. Re:Robot *what*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese farmers driving exoskeletons?

      Don't I seem to recall something else Japanese farmers are famous for?

      Oh, that's right. Ninjas.

      Nothing but awesome can come from this.

      Wow...The pirates are so screwed.
    4. Re:Robot *what*? by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      "Robot Ninjas? My god, someone warn the pirates!"

      There is only one possible response to this development. Genetically engineered monkey-pirates. If that's not enough they've always got zombie-monkey-pirates in reserve.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    5. Re:Robot *what*? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Genetically engineered monkey-pirates. If that's not enough they've always got zombie-monkey-pirates in reserve.

      LeChuck, is that you?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  20. 8kg? Might be a misprint by damburger · · Score: 1

    8kg is ridulously light for an exoskeleton that can increase the strength of its wearer significantly. The power source alone would have to be much heavier (its designed to work outdoors, so no wired power). For comparison, the Apollo space suits weighed about 80kg.



    Or it could be an indication this is BS...

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:8kg? Might be a misprint by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      The Apollo spacesuits were designed over forty years ago for a completely different purpose. Unless something's terribly different about Japanese farming methods, I don't think that they need to carry around an air supply with them nor do they need to be protected from the vacuum of space.

    2. Re:8kg? Might be a misprint by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      A crowbar can't be more than a kilo or two, and look how the power of leverage works for it.

      Bonus: it can even be used to ward off alien invaders from another dimension, or smash crates.

    3. Re:8kg? Might be a misprint by pragma_x · · Score: 1

      There's a few things to consdier. For starters, the article is a form of product PR so there's probably some details left out here.

      My guess is that they're estimating based on a carbon-composite frame (cheap and light), soon-to-be-developed lightweight motors and no batteries. Manufacturers do this crap all the time, especially in the auto industry. It seems that MPG estimates always move after those darn EPA regulations are taken into consideration.

      As far as the batteries go, you could have an autonomous support vehicle, like a small four-wheeled robot that carries your power supply for you (A "gonk droid" of sorts). Such a vehicle could also be your farm tractor; you'd just have a limited operating radius rather than full freedom. In either case you'd be tethered, but the exoskeleton itself would stay lightweight.

    4. Re:8kg? Might be a misprint by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      Misprint, indeed. TFA says 18 kg. It also says 8 motors. Perhaps that's where palegrey.net made the mistake.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    5. Re:8kg? Might be a misprint by damburger · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if its that common, and it doesn't bode well for such an adventurous technology. Remember the Ford Nucleon - ford designed a nuclear powered car based on certain promising developments in lightweight shielding materials and miniaturised reactors that never actually materialised. I can see how you might be able to get away with it when you are tweaking a well understood design (a standard, petrol driven car) but surely for something completely new you've got to be a bit more honest about the specs?

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  21. Dunno about that by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I thought they were celebrating BECAUSE they drove off invaders with them.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Dunno about that by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I thought they were celebrating BECAUSE they drove off invaders with them. Yes, it would seem our round eyed friend has a short memory...
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  22. Boon for the disabled, and astronauts by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    The greatest life-changing benefit I can see for these are for the disabled - quadriplegics, paraplegics, stroke victims, those weakened by various conditions. They don't need super-strength, but being able to get around town without a walker or wheel-chair would be massively life-enhancing for millions. For astronauts on Fred, or future Mars explorers, these devices would help tremendously in extending their capabilities for assembly, and for exploration. Then of course, there are construction workers.

  23. HAL by wizardforce · · Score: 1

    didn't they call it "HAL" or was that another robot assistant? What do you think you're doing Dave?

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  24. Rice-planters Better Than Rice Lifters by writerjosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While this suit is totally cool, I think bigger, mass-production robots like this rice-planting robot are far more practical. The robot suit is indeed a technological breakthrough, but I think robots that can help more than one person at a time are far more valuable. Or, check out these weed-killers.

    1. Re:Rice-planters Better Than Rice Lifters by BotnetZombie · · Score: 1

      Weed-killers? If these become too common, then, goodbye cruel world :(

  25. Robots aren't strong by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

    Maybe it's just me, but most robots I've seen aren't that strong. Most can be outdone pretty easily by a human the is in good shape. There are some strong robots, but they are extremely large, and not the kind that could be worked into a suit that would be worn by a human. Also, what advantage does this offer over typical farm machinery that isn't in a human exoskeleton form factor?

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Robots aren't strong by Invidious · · Score: 1

      A human exoskeleton form factor. Not to mention, in some places, due to terrain, a bipedal vehicle could be very handy.

  26. Cyborg Farmers? by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

    Yes but, how will they fare against the Pirate-Monkey hybrid Farmers?

    1. Re:Cyborg Farmers? by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new poop-flinging cyborg overlords.

  27. Oh my! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    Pity the farmer's dogs.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:Oh my! by gbelteshazzar · · Score: 1

      japanese farmers don't have dogs, they were all eaten in the great puppy eating frenzy instigated by Minamoto no Yoritomo in 1196 as part of his campaign to reduce the influence of the Kamakura shoguns. sounds crazy, but heres the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamakura_shogunate

  28. ER/EI by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1, Interesting
    So, how much energy does a cyber farm hand embody in its mining, construction, operation and maintenance, as opposed to a human and how many calories of food can it generate?

    Given the average farm hand needs 2000 calories to maintain homeostasis and at least that much for accoutrement (clothing, etc.), the machine has to run on less than 4000 calories a day of energy, including its energy investment as an object.

    I'm not saying one way or the other, but the analysis needs to be made before we can welcome such cyborg farmworker overlords.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:ER/EI by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      So, how much energy does a cyber farm hand embody in its mining, construction, operation and maintenance, as opposed to a human and how many calories of food can it generate? Well, this can't be too hard. Rather than calories, let's use something that we already do universal conversions between (time, calories, effort, etc.). We'll call it money. Apparently, $2000 is enough to cover the cost of extracting, refining, and forming the exoskeleton, setting up the framework for powering it, building the sensors that help control it, and designing the software to help control it. This assumes that number isn't subsidised one way or another. (In other words, no one really needs to know what the energy investment is, outside of the long-term viability of using it, in the order of decades or centuries. The dollar costs tell us that in a fairly simple way.)

      Now for the unknowns. What is the cost of the infrastructure to be able to use this (sounds like a lot of cabling to run into a field). What is the maintenance cost? How much does it improve productivity (in tasks where speed or finesse are required)? How much does it reduce time off from work due to repetitive strain injuries? How much does the reduction in injuries reduce the cost of medical care? Analyse all those costs and benefits, amortise it over 2 to 5 years, and if the numbers point to a positive, widespread adoption could occur (businesses are in it for the money, after all). What this means right now is some limited testing in order to answer those questions.
      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    2. Re:ER/EI by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      economics is of no value in a decreasing situation.

      Example: let's say you have a car that gets 30 mpg. You are out in the desert and have 1 gallon of gas. The next gas station is 100 miles away. All The Money In The World isn't going to buy you a gallon of gas when you run out. You're going to have to push the car. If you push it 3 miles a day, you might get there in a month. So, now you know the Energy Value of one gallon of gas: one month of hard labour pushing a car 100 miles.

      Another example: carting Grain by horse is limited, as the energy in a cartload of grain is eventually exceeded by the food demands of the horse and driver. All The Money In The World won't change that. As a consequence, in solar economies, (i.e. pre-industrial) most grain was grown and harvested within a week's time of a horse's efforts. 10 miles a day? So, about 70 miles. Maybe 100 if you're lucky.

      Food is energy. Pure and simple. Right now we use about 10 calories of petroleum based energy for every calorie we eat. As petroleum depletes, that ratio will, NECESSARILY, decrease, and all the money in the world won't change that. It's called Thermodynamics.

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    3. Re:ER/EI by acid06 · · Score: 1

      I'm actually a bit hungry right now and these batteries here on my desk are not being able to keep me well fed.

      Oh wait, I just realized what's wrong! Humans can't be fed using electricity... bummer!

  29. Sounds familiar by bograt · · Score: 5, Funny

    I watched a movie about this recently. "RoboCrop", I think it was called.

    1. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please move away from the vegetables. You have 30 seconds to comply.

  30. The summary is stupidly misleading by ueltradiscount · · Score: 1

    Its a motor assisted weight lifting harness ("exoskeleton"? come on...) for aging farmers who struggle with manual farming tasks due to decreased muscle strength. Given the average height of the generation its aimed at and the tasks its designed for (pulling radishes out of the ground, lifting 10Kg sacks of rice) it hardly amounts to Robocop or Gundam. Nevertheless I hope it doesn't run Windows as its OS, if it has an OS. I would hate to see elderly farmers brought into hospitals with their limbs rotated at strange angles.

  31. Its Farmer Joe!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. A sad testiment to Japan's birth rate. by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a sure sign things are getting bad in Japan. Back in the day farmers would just have a bunch of children and they'd help out on the farm. So now instead of rutting their wives and getting some help the old fashioned way Farmers have to turn to cyborg technology.

    It's all well and good for the current generation but who'll tend the fields when the Cyborg's dead and buried?

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
  33. Exoskeleton != Cyborg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having an exoskeleton does not mean you are a cybernetic organism. Just ask a turtle.

    1. Re:Exoskeleton != Cyborg by IdeaMan · · Score: 1

      A turtles shell does not have muscles in it.
      In an indirect fashion, this exoskeleton does have "muscles" and is indirectly tied into the wearers CNS.

      --
      They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
  34. Your sig: oh, the irony! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    8kg is ridulously light for an exoskeleton that can increase the strength of its wearer significantly. The power source alone would have to be much heavier (its designed to work outdoors, so no wired power). For comparison, the Apollo space suits weighed about 80kg.

    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?


    Don't shoot yourself, suicide is still illegal.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:Your sig: oh, the irony! by damburger · · Score: 1

      It isn't a non sequitur; An exoskeleton and a space suit actually have some similarities.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    2. Re:Your sig: oh, the irony! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      So does my shirt. If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we make a shirt that fits?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  35. Re:Japan's not the highest GDP per capita by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

    Japan GDP per capita is $33000 (2006 est.)
    Japan's GINI index is 38.1 .
    GINI is a measure of inequality of income distribution or inequality of wealth distribution. The lower, the more equally GDP is distributed.

    In Japan 127,433,494 people are packed in 374,744 sq km. Compare that to the US, in which 301,139,947 people are spread over 9,161,923 sq km.
    Housing in Japan costs 3-5 times more than it costs in US. Japanese compensate by living in tiny apartments.

    US's GDP per capita is GDP $43,800 (2006 est.)
    US's GINI is 45, which is not that bad when compared to Japan's, especially if one considers Norway's or Sweden's GINI (25-26).

    I would not call the Japanese the wealthiest people in the world.
    Wanna find out which nation has the wealthiest population? Start looking towards the direction of UAE and Norway.

    References:
    https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ja.html
    https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html

  36. Just great! by slashname3 · · Score: 1

    This is just what we need. A cheap exo-skeleton that anyone can buy and wear all the time. Once it becomes popular people will think they are the six million dollar man, lifting things over their heads.

    Of course over the next couple of hundred years we will evolve into nothing more than a brain and some nerve endings that will activate the exo-skeleton's. Wonder when they will start making them look like Daleks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalek

    1. Re:Just great! by pragma_x · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wonder when they will start making them look like Daleks.
      Good point. With handicap ramps now the norm in building construction, they'll be quite practical too.

      ...

      Wanted: apartment in multi-story building with no elevator. Close proximity to gun store preferred.
    2. Re:Just great! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Good point. With handicap ramps now the norm in building construction, they'll be quite practical too. Wanted: apartment in multi-story building with no elevator. Close proximity to gun store preferred.

      Everyone knows Daleks have this ridiculous useless sink plunger on the front. Dalek rayguns only point forward so you're safe if you keep behind them because they can't turn fast. And above all, Daleks can't climb the stairs.

      Yeah. Everyone knows that.

      (Some of them _prefer_ not to climb the stairs, finding an alternative approach more aesthetically satisfying, but that's another matter ;-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  37. I can see this as useful by thorkyl · · Score: 1

    If a corporation can get 3 time the work out of an employee
    they can terminate 2/3 of the work force

    so lets say each employee makes 30k per year and you have 100

    over 3 years that's 1,980,000 in payroll you don't have to pay

    --
    -- I am the NRA, enough said...
    1. Re:I can see this as useful by Badgam · · Score: 1

      You can also grow your business threefold without additional labor. Really, this kind of productivity enhancement is optimal for labor intensive industries, especially in countries with low unemployment rates; $2000 for such a huge boost in productivity is a stunningly good investment no matter what way you look at it. I have no doubt this technology will be used not just in agriculture but in other labor intensive industries where the workers could benefit from these enhancements. It will be interesting to see how much this reduces job-related injuries, especially with the aforementioned aging workforce. This would cut down on healthcare costs and lost working days due to injury as well as enhance quality of life for the employees.

  38. The future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many times I see people predicting the future wrong for one reason: they consider what is possible instead of what is economic. The only way there will ever be farmers in robotic exoskeletons is if the increased yield from their fields due to the robot suit is enough to offset the cost.

    Never gonna happen. Not even worth talking about.

  39. Spec typo by rubydooby · · Score: 1

    The source article says 18 kg, not 8 kg. 8 kilo might get you a wheelbarrow.

    "weighs 18 kg (just under 40 pounds)"
    - http://www.robots-dreams.com/2008/01/new-robot-suit.html

  40. I've been saying this for years.. by Layth · · Score: 1

    Once the machines do all of our farming, transportation of goods, preservation of goods, and reparation of other machines.. There is nobody left to pay for food.. One giant, self filling, solar powered vending machine. Eventually they'll build our houses, and basic citizenship will include food and shelter.

  41. Better Check My Policy. by hotwatermusic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Must make sure my Old Glory Insurance is current.

  42. Moisture Vaporators? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    "Vaporators! Sir - My first job was programming binary load lifters... very similar to your vaporators in most respects."

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  43. As Ripley would say by Greg01851 · · Score: 1

    Get away from her, you B*tch !!

  44. And in other currencies... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2, Informative

    In other major currencies 200 000 yen is approximately

    950 UK Pounds
    1250 Euros
    44850 Rubles
    72300 Rupees
    13400 Yuan
    20150 Mexican Pesos

    HAL.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    1. Re:And in other currencies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also:
      200 000 ¥ is 55,723,617.53 ZWD (Zimbabwe Dollars)
      Oops wait, it's now 55,725,069.03. No 55,733,642.24. err 55,735,357.20.

  45. Subject header is wrong. by GHynson · · Score: 1

    The definition of a cyborg is someone with embedded or implanted
    technolgy.
    They are not cyborgs, but robotic assisted workers.
    Just because I use a car to drive to work does not make me a cyborg.
    But,..If I had my legs permently intergrated into a go-cart, that might
    make me a cyborg.

    1. Re:Subject header is wrong. by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      Good point. The popular press have taken terms such as "cyborg" and "robot", and applied them to anything that has some form of machinery operated by a human via some form of computer. If a human is required to operate it in real-time, either directly or via some form of remote control system, and the link between man and machine isn't permanent, then it's a waldo, not a cyborg or robot.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  46. Remote Control by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they will ever make a remote control for this thing?

    Worker not picking potatoes fast enough ... speed him up.
    Worker getting too close to your daughter, make him kiss the ground.

    All without leaving the comfort of your front window!

  47. much needed by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm not an expert in the region and growing of asian produce, however, when I was in Japan visiting a friend I was amazed at how low tech the farming is there something ca 1920 US. They were planting rice by hand. We were biking through rural areas and I noticed a lot of older people that were bent over at a near 90% angle on the side walks. I asked my friend what was wrong with them, and he said they were farmers who's backs have become deformed from bending over all the time.

    The reason for this stupidity according to my friend: Japan (as admittedly a lot of countries do) has protectionist policies in place forcing rice and other crops to have to be produced in Japan. The cost of japanese rice versus the average is 7 times, but they have to produce it. Apparently it is cheaper to ruin the backs of people in a first world country then to risk not having control of your food supply - because you buy it from the close third world countries - in the advent of a war. Admittedly if I was like Japan and had crazies for neighbours (North Korea/China, government not the people) whom I recently pissed off by invading I might be worried about war preparedness as well.

  48. Ob quote by John+Whorfin · · Score: 1

    Rutabagas coming in nicely... BOOYAH!

  49. One major hurdle by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    Is where is it going to be ABLE to work at? According to my guesstimates, the weight per square inch that will be applied with even 50% of the nominal working load would be roughly triple the amount a 4 wheel cart. We're talking two footpads, roughly 250% larger than the human foot. You know that we exert a lot of pounds/square inch on our feet so that is why they are so articulate. The feet on this monster would probably be semi flexible pads that would not be as flexible, therefore be rougher than hell on any terrain.
    If you put one of those units onto unprepared ground (a field, dry or wet soil) it'll churn up the grasses and make bare ground. When it becomes wet, you get mud. Finally the lifter would sink up to it's knees because of its high load footprint. Take a Mule or a similarly tracked vehicle and it'll just dance across the terrain on either tracks of balloon tires.
    I can see lifters at work on concrete or similarly prepared ground, but not out the boondocks where it'll get hung in the mud or swamp.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  50. today's cane by redlynx · · Score: 1

    Someone made a good point. This suit will come in handy for older folks. Japan has a low birth rate, long life expectancy and the government is encourage people to work after retirement.

  51. This won't end well by evildarkdeathclicheo · · Score: 1

    Don't they watch their own movies in Japan? They know how this is going to end! Egad.

  52. This will be of very limited usefullness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...unless and until a portable power source can be devised to work with it. This is currently the biggest limitation of this kind of technology, in terms of distance and complexity of maneuvers. if your exo-suit has to be plugged in to a stationary power source (power outlet), then you are limited by the range of the power cord, and the cord will restrict movements to some degree as well. Becoming accidentally unplugged (or otherwise having your power connection severed) in the middle of hoisting hundreds of pounds could be a very bad thing.

    Someone invent a portable, relatively quiet and dependable power source, and THEN we'll start to see some really cool possibilities.

  53. Crysis by Ryukotsusei · · Score: 1

    At least we'll know what to do when ice-beam wielding aliens invade the farmlands.

  54. Common in SLR lenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a (d)SLR lying about, it most likely has one of those little buggers driving the focus mechanism. It might even say USM or something on the lens, short for UltraSonic Motor.

  55. Well, by sltd · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our cyborg farmer overlords!

  56. Labor Macros by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    If you were going to go this far for manual labor, why not take it a step further and motion capture it for use with an AI driven control system later on. As long as the system knows the proper motions and when/where to apply them, the exoskeleton should be able to do the work itself as a playable macro.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  57. How many Cyborgs you got on your spread? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, on my spread I got a heard of about 150 cyborgs on the south forty, and I'm thinkin about rentin some more acreage from Clem and adding another hundred or so next year. I think I'll do them organic cyborgs and sell them at the farmer's market, cause I heard that you can make a lot more profit by going the organic route.

  58. But.. by digitalbountyhunter · · Score: 1

    "I am an essential worker"

  59. Re:Tractors and your dentist by Keith+Duhaime · · Score: 1

    Next time your dentist needs to drill a cavity in your mouth, can I suggest he use this little puppy to do the job: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Tete-de-foreuse-p1010268.jpg. It's right in keeping with your suggest for a 30 series John Deere in a Japanese hort crop.

  60. Harvest Moon by skeeto · · Score: 1

    So, will this be a tool that you can buy in the upcoming Wii version of Harvest Moon? So that your lazy little guy will stop pooping out after roughly 2 minutes of labor?

  61. Oblig. pirate joke by BungaDunga · · Score: 1

    Pirate 1: Arr, those be a nice pegleg and hook ye got thar.
    Pirate 2:Yarr, they cost me an arm and a leg.

  62. Aging farmers by mattr · · Score: 1

    There are less young people going into farming these days. These suits will be good for aging farmers as well as maybe making it less backbreaking or more interesting to young people I'd think too.

    Of course the real robotic farmer that can plant rice by himself? I dunno, the Emperor does that himself you know, can the robot really plant delicious rice? Rice has a spiritual place in Japanese religion too.

    But my guess is this would be an excellent way to really test robots in the field especially when you aren't supposed to be military really.

  63. Vision for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Japenese will get +2 research and be Creative. They will also suck at ground combat. Unless they put lasers on their exoskeletons.