Slashdot Mirror


CES 2008 Hall of Shame

Romana Reynolds writes "The CES 2008 Innovations Design and Engineering Awards Showcase honored the Atom Chip Corporation, which was exhibiting the same 100GB, 500GB, and 1TB 'quantum optical' memory chips back in 2006. We actually wandered by, but long gone are the 'SolarMemory' chips, and he didn't know anything about Duke Nuk'em Forever. A little easy digging shows that they'd been making the same extraordinary claims and exhibiting prototypes at CES during the past three years, long enough to make 'atom chip hoax' the fourth suggestion on typing 'atom chip' into Google. I'm amused that the 'preeminent' panel of judges failed their vetting and gatekeeping functions. But I fear that Atom Chip will gather investors based on their recognition at CES, and continue in the game for many years to come, while honors at CES become a Hall of Shame."

179 comments

  1. The "atom chip" Huh? by AltGrendel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aren't they going to use that in the Phantom console?

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:The "atom chip" Huh? by Ryukotsusei · · Score: 1

      I guess the atom chip and phantom console are both aptly named- you can't (and never will) see either of them!

    2. Re:The "atom chip" Huh? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but I hope they include a Bitboys Glaze3D to get the best performance.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:The "atom chip" Huh? by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      How many minutes was spent producing this report? It looks like maybe 5 at the most. Links to articles written years ago should have been updated. The article states they even walked to the booth but nothing was written about the visit. I would think that it would be the easiest thing to disprove. Just bring a external hard drive with movies on it and ask whoever is at the booth to transfer those movies onto the memory chips. After the hard drive is removed than just ask whoever to play those movies. If the movies play than they have something but I doubt that they would even attempt to transfer the movies and prove once again that they do not have a working product. I would think that any claim of a product that in so amazing would require at least a demonstration of that product. It seems to me that CES only concern is the revenue it gets. I will have a lot less interest in the reports that will come out of CES 2009 unless something is done about who they allow to have booths and who they give their honoree awards to.

    4. Re:The "atom chip" Huh? by TOI_0x00 · · Score: 1

      you will never know until you open the box!

  2. 'Quantum optical'??? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quantum optical? C'mon, is it just me or doesn't that just sound like they made that up after watching a Star Trek: The Next Generation marathon on Spike?

    1. Re:'Quantum optical'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends, does it function by reversing it's polarity?

    2. Re:'Quantum optical'??? by operagost · · Score: 3, Funny

      This company is clearly a hoax. Everyone knows you have to divert your quantum interconnects through the main deflector to avoid overloading the holographic matrix.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:'Quantum optical'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't know, but it looks like it can add an extraneous apostrophe into the possessive "its". "it is polarity"?

    4. Re:'Quantum optical'??? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      and don't forget to reverse the polarity!

    5. Re:'Quantum optical'??? by jaxtherat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely an Oscar being one of the awards won in Europe would indicate that this is a very clever hoax:

      page: http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page7.html
      image: http://atomchip.com/db4/00366/atomchip.com/_uimages/IMAGE043.jpg

      Gentlemen, I think we've found the Borat of CES :)

      --
      http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    6. Re:'Quantum optical'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lecturer: Okay, so what you want to do is this: You want to attack at the most vulnerable spot. Come at it from this angle and locate the automatic flip-flop override device here, which in turn will defuse the antigyroscopic preinterface thruster chamber, and the pneumatic centripetal antigravity shield deflectors, then you simply deactivate the axial gyro-presubinertia-photomegatronic oscillator that you see here.
      Fluke Starbucker: Huh?
      Lecturer: You pull the plug!

    7. Re:'Quantum optical'??? by StargateSteve · · Score: 1

      otherwise the control interface will cease to modulate, creating a paradox. You cannot change the laws of physics!

    8. Re:'Quantum optical'??? by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

      But Don't Cross The STREAMS! That would be 'bad'

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    9. Re:'Quantum optical'??? by Poltras · · Score: 1

      Hey! They have a "PATENT PANDING!" (see bottom... the pictures are horrible - the shadows are all wrong). Everybody loves a panda...

  3. Wow... by BvF7734 · · Score: 1

    One would think that after three years of showing mostly the same thing with little to no improvements that the organizers would have caught on and prevented them from coming. Smells like vaporware to me...

    1. Re:Wow... by Quarters · · Score: 1

      You talk as if you think there is some sort of vetting process involved. Other than asking "Do you have enough money to rent space?" I doubt convention organizers care one way or the other what people are trying to show.

    2. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That being the case, I have a new and improved TV-B-Gone I've been itching to debut!

    3. Re:Wow... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Interesting
      For around $25K, you too can have your own CES Innovations award! Having exhibited my own products at CES for many years, I can tell you that you:

      1. Pony up around $2,500 to "submit" your product for evaluation
      2. Pony up another $5,000 when your product is chosen to be a "semi-finalist"
      3. Pony up another $7,500 when your product is chosen to be a "finalist"
      4. Pony up another $10,000 when you are chosen a winner, to cover "marketing expenses"
      5. Profit (for CES and, presumably, you via marketing)

      Inside most of the CE industries, CES Innovations awards are ignored - they mean nothing because everyone knows you can buy one. Just if you want the press or marketing exposure (so the BB/CC sales drone can move your product - it's an Award Winner!) it's worth the $$$. If you don't need it, don't pay.

      That said, traffic at CES was noticeably down this year. LV wasn't as crowded, the floors were more open, and many areas - like the Venetian and Hilton - had a LOT of empty space. Lots of companies are dropping out of attending CES simply because it's gotten way too expensive to show at, and it simply has lost focus on what made it big back in the day - entertainment CE products.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  4. No! I won't belive it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I well expect to get that $10k I invested into atom chip back, with excellent interest.

    Yes, I know that my $10k investment is only worth $5 now, but that's just the cost of R&D, it'll come back! ...
    It's not coming back, is it?

    1. Re:No! I won't belive it! by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      It depends on how many free pens they brought with them to CES....

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
  5. Corporate Image by FalconZero · · Score: 5, Informative
    Wow, with a website as slick as theirs, I wonder if they made their show posters with crayons?

    Seriously though, if their intention is to promote snake oil in the hopes of attracting investors then the least they could do is put more than an hour of effort into what is pretty much (at least in this industry) the primary corporate representation.

    At least they didn't create it in Word. Now that would have really irked me....

    Incidentally, I did a little digging on this, and it seems its owned by a Russin Scientist called Shimon Gendlin (based out of Long Island), who as per information here in 1997 owned two companies both pitching along a simmilar theme :
    • SVG Israel New Technology, Ltd. (President)
    • Compu-Technics (Chairman of the board)
    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:Corporate Image by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 0, Redundant

      In Soviet Russia, crayons and show posters make YOU!!!

      -- Shimon Grendlin

    2. Re:Corporate Image by yakumo.unr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I particularly like the way they've photographed an SD card and GIMPed it into their 'product' but not mentioned anything about it being concept art or anything too.

    3. Re:Corporate Image by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems they've removed the following line from their page source

      <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0">

      Only more laughable is their "Stationary adapter, which is connected to the optical fiber and electrical cables" shown here

      http://atomchip.com/db4/00366/atomchip.com/_uimages/256Mx61.jpg

      which looks deceptively like an 1/8" stereo connector.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    4. Re:Corporate Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Patent links from one of the flickr links in TOA: 5841689 5718983 ...

      If it's patented, it's real, right?

    5. Re:Corporate Image by FalconZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just found my favourite part. This page has details of their "NvIOpRAM 24GB-128GB" (whatever that is), however the key to the diagram states that part 2 (as indicated several times on the diagram) is an 'optical lens' when it is quite clearly the end (and third contact) of a 3.5mm audio jack (as should be obvious to anyone who has ever used any form of personal audio).

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    6. Re:Corporate Image by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      And they have the Photoshopping skills of a Nigerian scammer.

      My favorite is the picture on the very bottom of the page you linked, showing the "small display on the physical hardware itself".

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    7. Re:Corporate Image by Abeydoun · · Score: 1
      Here's their description of the "SOLAR MEDIA CHIPS FOR SPACE APPLICATIONS"

      The Solar Chip is a Quantum-Optical non-volatile RAM, which uses electricity from a special Solar battery to record and read information. The electricity output, which the Memory chip uses from a Solar battery, is very small. For instance, exposing the Solar battery to sunlight for five minutes allows the chip to work for twenty-four hours. Signals for recording and reading of information are send to the chip by a laser beam and can control the chip from a very big distance. The Solar chip is intended for memorization of an image, which is projected directly onto the chip surface at a distance of up to four inches or through an independent optical system at large distances. The information can be read using digital electric signals from pinouts or directly from the chip surface. The Solar Chip has four designs: 4GB; 8GB; 16GB and 32GB. The selling price for a Solar Chip is $60 per 1GB.

      Now IANAEE (electrical engineer) but that sounds pretty useless. A memory chip with it's own solar array, battery, laser based communication unit, and (crappy) imaging sensor? Are they planning on just putting a bunch of these in orbit as singular chip satellites? If someone has an idea how such a thing can be even remotely useful please correct me cause right now -- the entire unprofessionalness of their booth/website aside -- this looks like fud.

      --
      The only consistency in life is the lack thereof
    8. Re:Corporate Image by ichthyoboy · · Score: 0

      Their MicroSD card and adapter at the bottom of page 3 is even better... Welcome to the world of Nanomicrons and Beyond!!

    9. Re:Corporate Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they have the Photoshopping skills of a Nigerian scammer.

      Funniest quote ever!

    10. Re:Corporate Image by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      It looks like a fiber lens inside the tip connection. Like some kinda combo connector with the form of a normal 1/8" audio plug with electrical connections (for power supply?), plus a fiber inside of that (for the data transfer?)

    11. Re:Corporate Image by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Particularly interesting is the number of awards they've won. Considering they don't appear to have a product, it just shows how easy it is to fool the people who make these awards.

    12. Re:Corporate Image by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      I love the way it says 'PATENT PANDING' under each picture. Good job the website developers have a good grasp of Engrish.

    13. Re:Corporate Image by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      It's much easier to see if you look at the full size photo rather than the reduced webpage embed. It's still not clear to me that that's an "optical lens" but there's definitely more going on there than a plain old audio jack.

    14. Re:Corporate Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful talking about that. It's "Patent Panding" (sic!)

    15. Re:Corporate Image by king-manic · · Score: 4, Funny

      PATENT PANDING, it's nto a typo. They are pandering for a patent.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    16. Re:Corporate Image by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Their "gold-plated audio connector" form factor for RAM is very nice, too. And the storage devices with built-in LCD display that shows how much space they have left. I sure hope that display can interpret file systems besides FAR32 and NTFS... I also very much like the USB card reader that has a similar display and doesn't look badly photoshopped at all. Nooo, sir, it looks entirely real!

      Truly one of the most outstanding companies ever! I mean, it certainly does stand out...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    17. Re:Corporate Image by pete-classic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole site is a lot of bullshit, but that connector isn't the best example. There is a Toslink connector that is socket-compatible with the old 3.5mm headphone jack (images).

      Hybrid female connectors are common on Apple products that support both Toslink and analog audio. I've never seen a hybrid male, but it only stands to reason that someone would make one.

      -Peter

    18. Re:Corporate Image by KURAAKU+Deibiddo · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you look at the source, this line:

      <link href="/wsn/images/js/FCKeditor/editor/css/fck_editorarea.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">

      It would appear that they are using WSN Links with FCKeditor.

      My favorite thing about that site is still the "Patent Panding" (sic) SD card, which was quite obviously (and badly) Photoshopped.

    19. Re:Corporate Image by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      the key to the diagram states that part 2 (as indicated several times on the diagram) is an 'optical lens' when it is quite clearly the end (and third contact) of a 3.5mm audio jack

      Perhaps the ring and sleeve portions of the connector are based on the 3.5mm audio connector, but the copper 'tip' has been replaced with a TOSlink-type fiber optic coupler?

      Yeah, it's ALL shady vaporware garbage, but I'm not so sure they've been caught in a blatant and intentional lie there.

    20. Re:Corporate Image by Rogerborg · · Score: 0

      Talking of photographs - never mind these sleazy hucksters, here's the CES 2008 Booth Babes. +1 Insightful, thanks.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    21. Re:Corporate Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He never saw a Macbook ;).

    22. Re:Corporate Image by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Urgh, now that I've actually looked through them, I'd prefer a -1, Skankathon. I know there's a recession on, but damn it, you don't cut your Booth Babe budget, ever.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    23. Re:Corporate Image by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

      At least it's better than their old site.

    24. Re:Corporate Image by marcansoft · · Score: 2, Informative

      So it's a hybrid mini TOSLINK + audio jack. Those things exist.

    25. Re:Corporate Image by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      No, using word to write the website would require too much work, this guy used FCKeditor, a web based HTML editor.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    26. Re:Corporate Image by Flagran · · Score: 1

      it's nto a typo Was that intentional? In any case, I think it's awesome and I definitely want it printed on a T-shirt!
      --
      Make love, not sigs
    27. Re:Corporate Image by schon · · Score: 1

      Urgh, now that I've actually looked through them, I'd prefer a -1, Skankathon. I dunno - some of them are quite tasty.. this one is quite attractive.

      But man - the one on the left looks like Richard Kiel in drag!
    28. Re:Corporate Image by slamb · · Score: 1

      I particularly like the way they've photographed an SD card and GIMPed it into their 'product' but not mentioned anything about it being concept art or anything too.

      I attended CES 2005 and saw their booth. You're wrong; this is not a Photoshop/GIMP job. They actually took SD cards and physically stuck things (labels and optical things) on them. I was tempted to ask for a demonstration, but I was afraid to let them plug anything into my laptop.

    29. Re:Corporate Image by jandrese · · Score: 1

      These chips are causing you Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    30. Re:Corporate Image by CodyRazor · · Score: 0

      I like how the SD card they have says its 50GB x 2 and the lcd states it have over 52GB free on disk 1...

      --
      So Skulldilocks threw acid on the schoolchildrens' faces, cause somebody from the bible told her to do it!
    31. Re:Corporate Image by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of fugly ladyboys in there, for sure. However, I am starting to overrate Sharp for some reason.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    32. Re:Corporate Image by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

      Right, because under no circumstances would I ever, ever want to be knockin' boots with any of these girls. Really. I mean it. Don't even suggest it.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    33. Re:Corporate Image by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      Ok, they may well have produced a mock up, but the one pictured on the website is definitely a photochop (sic) job. look at the hard 1 pixel, anti-alias free lines, and inconsistent shadowing for an easy start.

    34. Re:Corporate Image by mightyQuin · · Score: 1

      I also get much more excited due to their use of an exclamation mark after each:
      PATENT PANDING!

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got some idea balls to remove from a manatee tank.
    35. Re:Corporate Image by slamb · · Score: 1
      Ooh, I see what you mean now. Yeah, some of those are clearly altered.

      (BTW, I misspoke; I was at CES 2006, not 2005.)

    36. Re:Corporate Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      props to think computers.org for being one of the first site to properly display on my wii. this thing rocks. i always liked the idea of webtv, but never enough to use it as a standalone. this is great. captchas have autocomplete!

    37. Re:Corporate Image by Mackmannen · · Score: 1

      And I thought Duke Nuke'em was vapor, but they have a trailer!

    38. Re:Corporate Image by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Those girls have Sharp knees!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    39. Re:Corporate Image by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And the storage devices with built-in LCD display that shows how much space they have left. I sure hope that display can interpret file systems besides FAR32 and NTFS There is a real product that does this, and I spent far too much time figuring out how to make an E Ink fuel gauge work on all know file systems -

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=417786&cid=22048494

      That said if I were making a flash drive with a fuel gauge, I'd only support the FAT variant it was pre-formatted with. Anything else will lead to ruinous support costs. There's a subtle device cost issue too - if you hardwire it to only support FAT you can reduce the amount of Ram the code in the flash disk controller needs.
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    40. Re:Corporate Image by pev · · Score: 1

      Re: 3.5mm jacks with optical digital ; it's not whether people *will* make them or not - I've got a portable Sony MD Recorder from about 8 years ago that I still use that has this kind of connector and I have the requisite cable too. Very handy!

      ~Pev

    41. Re:Corporate Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what, in the blue hell, is a 'nanomicron'?

    42. Re:Corporate Image by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Doh! I looked right over the editor line since it was CSS... nice.

      I also didn't scroll down far enough to see what you described. Maybe his 13 year old is running GIMP?

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    43. Re:Corporate Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's some foulness. There were a couple of mediocre "babes" in there, but the majority of them make the drunken one night stands I've had look like supermodels.

    44. Re:Corporate Image by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Probably just UD.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    45. Re:Corporate Image by KURAAKU+Deibiddo · · Score: 1

      I guess. It's hard to imagine WHAT program they could be using to create such lousy images. While personally, I use Photoshop on a daily basis, GIMP is a very functional editor, and can do much of what Photoshop can. (GIMP can even a few things that Photoshop cannot, particularly with regards to opening certain image types, although at the moment, I'm at a loss to remember which image format it was that I had to use GIMP for, because Photoshop wouldn't open it. I think it may have been XPM.)

      If I had to hazard a guess, I'd figure that they were using Microsoft Paint, on Windows 2000 or before. Back when it could barely write JPEG if you had the right additional software.

      The particular image that I was talking about can be found here. It's full of visual artifacts and bad editing. Only a fool would think it was an actual product. @.~

  6. SCI branching out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they are applying their not-reviewed paper policy in a cross-discipline fashion, giving awards to not-reviewed products?

  7. Do the dew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sounds like Atom Chips does the Dew:

    "The company has developed a series of new Quantum and Quantum-Optical devices for storing and processing information in a way that permits high-speed data accessibility, with a high degree of reliability, non-volatility, and extremely high-density in an extremely compact size."

    1. Re:Do the dew? by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like something made with the Dilbert Mission Statement Generator. (With apologies to Dilbert and his assistant Scott Adams)

      Codifex

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    2. Re:Do the dew? by JeffSchwab · · Score: 1

      "High density" is a widely applicable description of industry.

  8. Fools and their money are soon parted by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the rate at which fools part their money to other fools is astonishing.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    1. Re:Fools and their money are soon parted by wfstanle · · Score: 1

      The atom chip sounds a bit like the "cold fusion" claims of the 1980's.

    2. Re:Fools and their money are soon parted by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I would describe the person who ends up with all the money (and gets away with it) as a fool.

  9. Worst Website Ever! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Can we send them the Worst Website Ever award from Slashdot?

    1. Re:Worst Website Ever! by Phisbut · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Can we send them the Worst Website Ever award from Slashdot?

      Nope... that award still goes to the Time Cube for use of an ugly background, random font sizes and random font colors, as well as the layout (centered text in a narrow column spanning well over 25 pages), and I'm not even talking about the content of the site here...

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    2. Re:Worst Website Ever! by FalconZero · · Score: 2, Funny

      Argggg! That nearly made my eyes bleed.

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    3. Re:Worst Website Ever! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Owww, my eyes!

    4. Re:Worst Website Ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. I was only there for a minute or so and it gave me a headache. Who makes a site look like that?!

    5. Re:Worst Website Ever! by LowKeyLieSmith · · Score: 1

      Ouch, I think that site just caused a brainsplosion from which I'll never recover. Somebody please mod that out before we all turn into blabbering idiots for just looking at the ineffable inanity that is the time cube.

    6. Re:Worst Website Ever! by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the web site "design" was a treat compared to the insanity written on it. Did that guy skip his meds or something? Wow.

    7. Re:Worst Website Ever! by Spikeles · · Score: 1

      His honourable Dr. Gene Ray, Cubic - The "Greatest Thinker" and "Wisest Human" in existance with a "Doctorate of Cubicism"

      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    8. Re:Worst Website Ever! by alx5000 · · Score: 1

      The Googles, they do nothing!

      --
      My 0.02 cents
    9. Re:Worst Website Ever! by thomas.galvin · · Score: 5, Funny
      From the Time Cube site:

      This site is a collection of data for a coming book Please, let this be true.
    10. Re:Worst Website Ever! by Tringard · · Score: 1

      There is much to be scared of here, but I think the scariest bit was when I saw, "Supporters of Ray, however, see his circle-based philosophy as a natural precursor to the Time Cube."

    11. Re:Worst Website Ever! by seeayegee · · Score: 1

      http://www.archangelmichael.info/ Michael the Archangel, the next president of the USA, has the worst website by far.

    12. Re:Worst Website Ever! by zaddikim · · Score: 1

      Dont ever do that again without giving a warning to those susceptible to migraines or epilepsy!

      Holy FSM, that was freaking horrible.

      You are so paying for therapy...

      --
      Keen idea man lynches
    13. Re:Worst Website Ever! by shrikel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Holy stinking cow. I sure hope that site was generated by a semi-random-text generator (it reads like it was), because if not... well, let's just say that if the author wasn't crazy before he started he would have DRIVEN himself crazy just coming up with that much and that quality of bunk.

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    14. Re:Worst Website Ever! by xPsi · · Score: 1

      Ouch. That's what happens to your html skills when you view too many myspace pages in one day.

      --
      i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
    15. Re:Worst Website Ever! by kalel666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Awesome, from the website: "I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND
      CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS"

      That is my new answer to anything my wife and/or boss asks me. Fuck it, thats my new sig, too.

      --
      I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
    16. Re:Worst Website Ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that website's content randomly generated? It makes about as much sense as something generated by MIT's random paper generator.

    17. Re:Worst Website Ever! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      That site is amazing! So much gibberish, so little time (but it's cubic time so maybe that's okay).

      I've skipped through it and really gained a feel for what complete, raving, screaming-at-mice insanity must be like. It's fascinating in a way, like a mental train-wreck that I can't quite look away from.

      Still, it must be hard for a being "far wiser than any god" to think down to our level so I'll cut him some slack.

    18. Re:Worst Website Ever! by noamsml · · Score: 3, Funny

      Timecube: the goatse of the thinking man.

    19. Re:Worst Website Ever! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      Well, he's recently figured out that Google is Evil, in fact, they are "Oneness Evil".

      Bill Gates, eat your heart out.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    20. Re:Worst Website Ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have to disagree with you on that.. Worst Website Ever? Try http://www.partytentcity.com/.

    21. Re:Worst Website Ever! by Cuppa+'Joe'+Black · · Score: 1

      The Knower of 4 corner simultaneous 24 hour Days ... must have SLACK?

      This stuff does read kinda like Church literature.

      --
      Technically, murder-suicide does not violate the golden rule.
    22. Re:Worst Website Ever! by thedeadswiss · · Score: 1

      You can't have seen the following then: http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=230962657

      Try scrolling for the full horror...

    23. Re:Worst Website Ever! by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      I once trained a hidden markov model based chatterbot on timecube and set it loose on my contacts list over MSN. It was pretty funny.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    24. Re:Worst Website Ever! by logixoul · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ; this design has impact. :D

  10. No way this is real by Cussin_IT · · Score: 1

    There is absolutly No way this is real. Check out this and look at the photo on the left, halfway down the page which is quite obviosly a headphone/audio jack. Most of the others are photoshoped or have a cobbled together look(remember Brian Frouds photo books? Particularly "Strange stains and misterious smells").

    I smell investor bait and patent grabing: in ten years time, when this is actualy possible I see them coming out of the woodwork and suing anyone using this emerging tech.

    --
    Read my blog you know you want to
    1. Re:No way this is real by JMLang · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, the patent grab claim is unlikely. All but one of the US patents listed in the photographed flyer have been abandoned according to the US Patent office (failure to pay maintenance fees). Looks like they don't have much in the way of patent rights now, and they probably won't have much more in ten years time if they can't come up with the cash to pay maintenance fees now. Caveat Investor...

    2. Re:No way this is real by shawnce · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not that I believe any of their website ... but some vendors (Apple comes to mind) provide TOSLINK optical connections using a 1/8" combo audio jack.

    3. Re:No way this is real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it unlikely?

      It clearly states "PATENT PANDING"

      Haha.

    4. Re:No way this is real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CA2163739C also expired

    5. Re:No way this is real by PolarBearFire · · Score: 1

      Haha, all their pics look to be "photoshopped" on MS Paint. You can actually see the square pixels that they modified. All the pics might as well be technical diagrams for the new Star Trek movie. Also, "Patent Panding"?

  11. Hmmm.... by Otter · · Score: 1
    Ya think there are enough links in that story? I could be convinced that this technology isn't going anywhere without separate links to "Hall" and "Shame"!

    Anyway, as long as we're heaping ridicule on gullible technoidiots who keep falling for the same hype year after year, how did 2007's "Possible Cure For Cancer!" stories here ultimately pan out? Can I take up smoking yet?

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by Surt · · Score: 1

      I would say the odds are pretty favorable that if you take up smoking now, the cure will be available for you in time. Still, you may not want to take this risk, and also, you'll smell bad.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  12. what by jay-be-em · · Score: 0, Troll

    Worst written summary ever?

    --
    "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
    1. Re:what by east+coast · · Score: 3, Funny

      Quick! Hire him as an editor!

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:what by superskippy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The fact this has only got 25 comments several hours later means that nobody has got a clue what this story is about. This summary is made of fail.

  13. Panel of Judges by WyrdOne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmm lets see, about 1/2 the Panel is made up of CEO's and Prisident/Founders of various businesses. People so far removed from the technology they work in they probably couldn't tell you how their own products actually work.

    Most of the other half are made up of Salesmen, Journalists, Evangelists and Marketing agents. People who don't know the right end of a lightbulb usually.

    I saw maybe 2-3 people in that whole list that *might* have a clue about how technology works.

    CES needs to get a new panel of judges who know their stuff. Maybe get some leading professors in the field to come judge? How about senior product "Engineers", you know the people actually making the stuff that ends up in CES?

    1. Re:Panel of Judges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You misunderstand the purpose of the CES Innovations awards. It's about making money - for CES. For about $25K (on top of the ~$10K you'll spend to do the smallest possible exhibit), you too can get your own CES Innovations awards.

      Having exhibited several times at CES, I can tell you it doesn't just start with their $1000 entry fee; once you "enter" you WILL get moved to the next stage, and that will cost more money. And so on... To the tune of around $25K by the time all was said and done...

  14. And now they seem like they're short of money by loftwyr · · Score: 1

    Why else would they have monetized (read:fake search page) their previous company web site? No content, just a nice money grubbing content free website.

    Maybe because with that site being linked from all over the web, they're going to rake in a carload of money?

    1. Re:And now they seem like they're short of money by cheese-cube · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know that by linking to them you are only increasing their profits.

    2. Re:And now they seem like they're short of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like this?

    3. Re:And now they seem like they're short of money by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      OMG!!! You've discovered the missing #2 in the "SUPER(tm) mystery of success" chain!!

      1: invent bullcrap
      2: ??
      3: Profit!!

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  15. Can someone explain by JamesRose · · Score: 1

    Why all I see on their website is a picture of a laptop (how the hell could you tell the specs from the outside) and some memory sticks (MMC, USB, and SD) which have been photoshopped(not photoshopped, MS PAINTED) to add 2 or 3 pins, and maybe crop a bit of it here and there, and then super impose a random set of "free megabytes" I mean honestly what the hell is going on- what happened at the show because from the looks of this site he would just be ignored! There's nothing plausible about this at all.

  16. Mmm... Atom Chips... by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 5, Funny

    Atom chips go great with quarkamole.



    Thank you, I'll be here all week! Support your bartender!

    1. Re:Mmm... Atom Chips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but to make really good quarkamole, you need 6.022x10^23 avogadros.

    2. Re:Mmm... Atom Chips... by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      god, that almost gave me a stroke from the sudden flash of nostalgic scenes involving one of the more insane, and yet great, chemistry teachers I had ever had =D

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
  17. Welcome! by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the World of Nanomicrons and Beyond!

    Nanomicrons? Is that 10^-15?

    1. Re:Welcome! by smitty97 · · Score: 0

      Nanomicrons? Is that 10^-15? No, it's the book from Army of Darkness
      --
      mod me funny
    2. Re:Welcome! by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Funny

      Klaatu! Verata! N... necktie? nickle? I'm sure it was an N word...

    3. Re:Welcome! by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      It's late, and I'm supposed to be in bed..so I browse from bed.
      Therefore I misread that as "narconomics". Which sounds like a
      proper word, and it's pretty self-explanatory.

  18. [OT] Re:Worst Website Ever! by FalconZero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hahaha. Even more humorous is the link at the bottom of the page "Next Page", which should really read, "YES! Please give my brain another good kicking". Whoever wrote this page is the internet version of a crazy old guy eating out of bins, mumbling and throwing cats at people who come too close.

    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:[OT] Re:Worst Website Ever! by Surt · · Score: 1

      You're just jealous because you're ignorant of Nature's Harmonic 4 Day Time Cube Creation, you dumb American.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:[OT] Re:Worst Website Ever! by Spikeles · · Score: 1

      It's not his fault he was educated stupid. All he has to do is acknowledge the natural antipodes of +1 x +1 = +1 and -1 x -1 = -1 exist as plus and minus values of opposite creation - depicted by opposite sexes and opposite hemispheres.

      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    3. Re:[OT] Re:Worst Website Ever! by volkris · · Score: 1

      Whoever wrote this page is the internet version of a crazy old guy eating out of bins, mumbling and throwing cats at people who come too close. Good to see that Ron Paul has career options after he gets pounded in this election...
  19. Mod Parent Up (FUNNY) by RobBebop · · Score: 1

    Seriously, the TimeCube page must have more than a couple "All Your Base..." gems buried in it.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  20. A display on a memory chip? by fuocoZERO · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This page suggests that the memory devices they are creating have a small display to show the free space on the chip. Wouldn't this suggest that they are making these chips filesystem aware and able to read free space? Adds to the bogus factor... not to mention the 3rd grade quality of their site...

    1. Re:A display on a memory chip? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Funny

      This page suggests that the memory devices they are creating have a small display to show the free space on the chip. Wouldn't this suggest that they are making these chips filesystem aware and able to read free space?

      Nah, they just treat every memory cell storing a 1 as "used", and every cell storing a 0 as "free".

      That calculation's much easier to do with the modest computing power of a USB stick than actual filesystem awareness would be.

    2. Re:A display on a memory chip? by fuocoZERO · · Score: 1

      How would that work? Live data contains both zeros AND ones so if it only counts the ones, it would be far from acurate.

    3. Re:A display on a memory chip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally think it works fine as a joke...

    4. Re:A display on a memory chip? by keeboo · · Score: 1

      Look more carefully at the pictures at the bottom of that page.
      Looks so real I'm speechless.

    5. Re:A display on a memory chip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ingenious! Now I can take filesystem snapshots using a digital camera!

    6. Re:A display on a memory chip? by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that they have no moving parts. How exciting is that! A microchip with no moving parts!

      If you want to read something really baffling, check out their solar chip page here.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  21. [OT] Re:A display on a memory chip? by FalconZero · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not file system aware.

    When you run the file system on your pc computer, it opens the quantum disk and reads to the LCD on the side for automatic update! Thank you. [Buy Now]

    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
  22. Performance art? by mevets · · Score: 1

    I don't expect many think it is real. I just wonder if it is a very obvious scam, or some sort of performance art demonstrating the foolishness of the industry.

  23. Trademark infringement, anyone? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how Seagate (who, if I am not mistaken are the present owners of Quantum's disk drive business) or Quantum feel about the use of the word "Quantum" on the "Combo Card"?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Trademark infringement, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how quantum could be trademarked, as it's an actual word.

    2. Re:Trademark infringement, anyone? by intangible · · Score: 1

      So is "Windows"

  24. Re:Best Website Ever! by Michael+O-P · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow. That is quite an eye-opener. My favorite page is "Greenwich Time Debunked," which states:

    "Old Hold For New Construction."

    Absolutely brilliant.

    --
    I'm Peggy.
  25. WHOIS Record by computer_guy57 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Their WHOIS record shows the registrant as "Domain Discreet," and their contact email as random-jumble-of-letters@domaindiscreet.com. If that doesn't scream "hoax" (kinda like everything else about them), then I don't know what does.

    1. Re:WHOIS Record by coutch · · Score: 1

      it's just a WHOIS privacy service, so that domain owners don't have to put their real address and telephone numbers in their out there on WHOIS ....

    2. Re:WHOIS Record by computer_guy57 · · Score: 1

      I know that that's what it is. What I'm saying is, if they're a reputable company, why wouldn't they freely put their name and contact as the ownership of their domain? Instead they feel a need to conceal it somehow.

    3. Re:WHOIS Record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why wouldn't they freely put their name and contact as the ownership of their domain?

      Because they're sick of junk mail that looks like an invoice for $50 to renew their domain? Because they're sick of scammers calling up their registrar and transferring the domain away? If you're IBM, then just maybe in the 30 layers of bureaucracy required to get a bill paid, someone might notice that the domain isn't due for renewal for another decade or so, but for any organization less than 500 people, it's not like anyone is actually paying attention.

      There are plenty of other good reasons not to let people know who owns a domain, or at least the name and address of the person in charge of it.

    4. Re:WHOIS Record by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      If it's a hoax, it's a half-decade old one. Be sure to check out the demo video if you can find it, and bear in mind that a 1.61GB Memory Stick was a big deal once upon a time.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  26. No real surprise here. by Telecommando · · Score: 2, Interesting

    CES is and always has been more about marketing and hype than any actual innovation.

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
  27. Watch out for getting sued... by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    ...coz it's all "Patent Panding!"

  28. Has the CES panel jumped the shark? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    It appears to me that they have proven that they will give out excellence awards to just about anyone, no matter how utterly stupid their claims are. I mean, that company has been showing off their vaporware since what, 2005? Virtually unchanged, too. Letting them in is a bit of an embarassment, but giving them an award?

    They couldn't have made bigger clowns of themselves by coming to CES wearing clown noses, red wigs, very large shoes and nothing else.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  29. Blocked AtomChip.com by StickyWidget · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It's gotta be a hoax, Websense is blocking it.

    Or porn. Or Liberal Propaganda. I'm just not sure these days.

    ~Sticky

  30. Not just Panding! Grantid, too. by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They appear to have actually achieved at least one patent. Their news page contains a link to a description of "quantum technology" Which appears to be an abstract consisting of a jumble of barely related words, a reference to an otherwise unknown "Gendlin effect." and a child's sketch of a design for magnetic core memory.

    However a google patents search uncovers an actual patent! Which is basically the same, but with more child's sketches, such as one of a transistor, and a page that appears to be practice isometric drawings, and several pages of black & white photoshop cloud noise renderings.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  31. Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL i should have used perview! How is Budgieton gonna grow this way?

  32. This guy won an Oscar? by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice his "Gold Oscar" award from Europe?

    --
    -William
    God is everything science has yet to explain.
    1. Re:This guy won an Oscar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, have you not seen the Euro Oscars? It's a very different ceremony to your's... Basically we just give out awards to people who've taken lots of money from gullible Americans. The more obvious a hoax, the better. The one shown on the website is a lifetime achievement award.

    2. Re:This guy won an Oscar? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else notice his "Gold Oscar" award from Europe?

      Yes - that one is partially believable. You'd have to be a good actor to keep a straight face while demo'ing this crap.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:This guy won an Oscar? by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  33. What a bunch of idiots by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Check this out on their website:
    http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page4.html
    Welcome to the World of Nanomicrons and Beyond!

    wtf is a nanomicron?

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:What a bunch of idiots by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      A femtometre, clearly. I'm apalled at your scant knowledge of SI prefixes.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  34. I bags this statement. by Hucko · · Score: 1

    You are educated stupid - an evil ANDROID, your opposite brain destroyed by Evil ONE

    --
    Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  35. LCD dislplay on comact flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of those supposed memory chips have lcd displays on them. I'd sure like to know how you get a display to work on your memory chip or flash drive, especially when it is unplugged and unpowered like the flash drive. Maybe he has the patent on this too!
      Where do I send money.

    1. Re:LCD dislplay on comact flash? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Actually someone did make a USB flash disk with an E Ink display.

      http://www.eink.com/press/releases/pr90.html

      Kind of easy to do on FAT too, just scan the FAT and count the zero entries.

      Actually for a 1GB disk you could have ~65000 clusters or 16K each. That's 256 sectors of FAT, each holding 256 entries. When the drive is plugged in, scan the whole FAT and work out a free cluster count and total cluster count for the drive.

      Whenever a FAT sector is overwritten just work out a delta between the old and new count of free clusters value in that sector and add it to the free cluster count for the drive, and update the display based on that. The cool thing is you don't slow down access at all, unlike if you need to rescan the FAT. You don't need to keep anything in presumably scarce controller RAM either, just a 32 bit free cluster count and a 32 bit total cluster count. And you don't need any software on the PC.

      For a file system like NTFS or EXTx which uses a bitmap to track allocation each 512 bit bitmap sector gives the allocation status of 512*8=4096 clusters. The algorithm doesn't really change though - whenever there is a write to one of the bitmap sectors, work out a delta and add it to the free cluster count for the drive and then use that to update the display.

      The drive firmware would recognize filesystems based on the boot sector and decide which sectors to monitor and which algorithm should be used to count the free clusters in the FAT or bitmap sector being monitored. For an unrecognized filesystem I'd blank the display, or maybe turn on a few segments in an error code pattern.

      Of course in practice you'd probably only support the fuel gauge on the preformatted version of FAT, for support cost reasons. You don't want ReiserFS users yelling at you when the flash drive firmware dies when they reformat from Reiser4 which you do tested with to Reiser5 which you didn't because it wasn't released when you were testing. Same with people reformatting the drive with Vista and changing the NTFS version to one you haven't tested with.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  36. Reinfecting gen Y are we? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Well, you whipper snappers, when I was in school half the web looked like that. And actually time cube was still there as well. Its old and funny, but also sad. I did converse with Gene briefly, but he really can't be helped. Luckily, his insanity is mostly harmless. Just don't invite him to your university to speak, any attention just makes it worse.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  37. remove immediately!!!!1!eleventy!!!!111!! by trey_killer · · Score: 0

    MICHELE SCHWINEHUNTZ INTERWEBS

    Our Case Number: MCDM-2008-997

    To Whom it May Concern:

    Pursuant to Title II of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"), namely, the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Act, you are hereby notified that certain potential copyright infringing materials are currently hosted by you in your capacity as an online service provider ("OSP"). This letter serves as written notification of claimed infringement.

    As required by 512(c)(3)(A)(i-vi) of the DMCA, the following information is provided concerning the claimed infringement:

    (i) A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. This signature appears below.

    (ii) Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed, or, if multiple copyrighted works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site.

    (iii) Identification of the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity and that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate the material.

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/14/1913224

    Hence, it is my contention that my rights under the DMCA are being violated by the continued presence of this article, and although the article itself is not hosted on your server, it is linked to in such a fashion that it is represented to be part of your website.

    (v) A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.

    I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above a
    allegedly infringing is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.

    (vi) A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

    I swear, under penalty of heck, that the information in the notification is
    accurate in that I am the copyright owner, in that the image, though belonging to
    another source is of me, thereby giving me certain copyright rights, and I believe
    that this matter is actionable under the provisions of the DMCA.

    The DMCA further provides that the OSP shall fall within the safe harbor provisions of the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Act only if it complies with this notification procedure. Specifically, the Act states that upon obtaining knowledge or awareness of the copyright infringement, the OSP must act expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material. See 512(c)(1)(A)(2), (c)(1)(C).

    Having now received such knowledge or awareness by way of this notice, such expeditious action is hereby requested.

    Sincerely,

    MICHELE SCHWINEHUNTZ

    SOLAR CHIPS LLBEEN

  38. Crap at CES!? by barl0w2 · · Score: 1
    No, I'd say that it can't be! Everything there is on the technological bleeding edge and made of micro neurons, right?

    Come-on - there's always crap and semi-crap at the show. There's vaporware by the load too. But most of the show was very cool, exciting, and stuff you can use today.

    Here are 145 cool things I found at CES that I took a photo of. Great show - I hope I get to go again next year:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/barl0w/

  39. It's Tony Clifton selling computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The greatest feat that Tony Clifton ever pulled was convincing people that he was for real. Well, this guy Shimon has made a serious effort to one up Tony Clifton. Wow. Everyone knows he's an idiot.... but, the entire web is talking about him. Shimon Gendlin +1 Rest of the Web 0.

  40. Kudo's by Woek · · Score: 1

    The most amazing thing this 'company' has achieved, in my opinion, is to win an innovation award at CES. They very successfully demonstrated the utter incompetence of the jury. Furthermore, if they are actually trying to trap investors with this, I think they should be allowed to. As the subtitle already suggests, this is a very effective method of weeding out the thickest of investors!

  41. Piece of cake... by mbessey · · Score: 1

    Allocated sectors will have approximately equal numbers of ones and zeroes, empty/erased sectors will be all zeroes (or all ones, depending on spin topology). So, you just count all the one bits (or zero bits), and divide by the total number of bits, then multiply by two.

    Easy as pie!

  42. Duke Nukem Forever Beta by ajs318 · · Score: 0, Troll

    A beta version of Duke Nukem Forever is actually available for download >em>right now, from this address. The file is a bootable .iso CD image. Burn it to a CD (be sure to choose the right option: you want to make a CD from an ISO image, not a CD with just one file on it ..... that won't work), then reboot your computer with the disc in the drive. At the boot prompt which appears, type "autonuke" (without the quotes) to automatically start a game of Duke Nukem Forever.

    Please remember this is beta test software and all features may not be complete.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  43. The video Atom Chip don't want you to see by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    The Atom Chip website has changed a lot since I first saw it, the only constant seeming to be the slogan about nanomicrons (femtometres?). "Back in the day", their website's images were mostly HTML-resized giganto-pics, but if you trudged through it, you found an absolute gem. They've taken it down for obvious reasons, but the Internet Archive still has the classic, the unforgettable, Solar Memory demo video.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:The video Atom Chip don't want you to see by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Oh... Wow...
      I'm at loss of words...

    2. Re:The video Atom Chip don't want you to see by lpangelrob · · Score: 1

      Ha. This video is just crying to be put up on YouTube. :-D

    3. Re:The video Atom Chip don't want you to see by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Your wish is my command. (Might not be live yet.)

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  44. De ja vu? by D,Petkow · · Score: 1

    boring, next please!

  45. Duke WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Romana. You have profaned the name of Duke Nukem. It's not "Nuk'em", you annoying twit... have you even played Duke Nukem 3D? I doubt it, or you'd know that. You are a fucking POSER.

  46. Re:Not just Panding! Grantid, too. by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

    Interesting... Does this mean that if another (reputable) firm does indeed develop a quantum memory device which they attempt to market, could Atomchip sue, claiming patent infringement? Maybe that's what's up here: the guy behind this does know enough to realize that someone, somewhere is bound to do so and he'll pick the right moment to pounce with his lawyers.

    Just spackulatin'...

    --
    Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
  47. The truth about conferences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are money making operations like no other.
    There is very little gatekeeping and quite a bit of coin counting.
    They don't even pay most of the speakers that give presentations!

  48. Meh... by Maavin · · Score: 1

    Actually, this is so damn stupid that it makes me really angry.

    --


    Crivens! I kicked meself in me own heid!