Slashdot Mirror


High School Sophomores Discover Asteroid

Several readers sent us the story of three high school sophomores in Racine, Wisconsin who were just notified that a celestial body they had discovered during a science project has been verified as an asteroid. The students at Racine's Prairie School will be given the opportunity to name the asteroid in about four years. They used a telescope in New Mexico, belonging to a college in Michigan, that they controlled over the Net.

126 comments

  1. Uhoh by DrXym · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's hope its not called Wolf-Biederman

    1. Re:Uhoh by Kamineko · · Score: 2, Funny

      Curse your fast typing! :D

    2. Re:Uhoh by Goffee71 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm guessing it'll be called Asteroid '[INSERT SCHOOL BULLY'S NAME HERE] is a dickwad' -
      that would be sweet revenge for all science class geeks.

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    3. Re:Uhoh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucifer's Hammer, oh the memories...

    4. Re:Uhoh by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      I'm voting for Jack Schitt!

    5. Re:Uhoh by gsslay · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nope.

      It's going to be called omfg!noob!lol!111 Just so everyone knows how awesome and kewl it is.

    6. Re:Uhoh by BakaHoushi · · Score: 4, Funny

      This reminds me. I work part time at a grocery store, where I've seen a set of stuffed animals whom allow you to name stars. When you buy it, you get a code to go to some international astronomy society (I can't remember its name off the top of my head) where you get to give a name to a star somewhere out there.

      Now, this is kinda cute, and something I'm sure little kids might enjoy, and it's not like we are running out of stars. But someday, I can't help but picture a fateful day when we try to explain to our once-peaceful alien neighbors why the citizens of Earth have chosen to name the sun that their planet revolves around "Mr. Snugglekins III."

      Thus beginning an inter-galactic war that will leave trillions dead.

      My point is, having anyone other than scientists naming celestial bodies is a potential recipe for disaster. God forbid these kids decide to name it "Dick Face" and the asteroid decides it would rather be a meteorite...

    7. Re:Uhoh by Gospodin · · Score: 4, Informative

      It might make you feel better to know that those star naming deals are scams. They are not creating official names. What they tell you (in very careful language) is that the name you choose will go in the [insert important-sounding catalog name]. But that catalog is really just one they keep. Scientists don't use it.

      Also, according to Wikipedia, when these high-schoolers name the asteroid, the IAU gets to vet the name. If it's "Johnsmithisajerk", they'll probably say no.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    8. Re:Uhoh by jank1887 · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI: Toy name: Shining Stars website: www.shiningstars.com some international astronomy society: International Star Registry yup, the same guys that have been letting people buy star names for the past decade or so for about $50. The new $15 stuffed toy is a bargain. It even gives you a cheap Webkinz knockoff website to play on. Took my 6 year old less than a half hour to get thoroughly disgusted with it and request playing Webkinz next time. The toy itself is half decent though.

    9. Re:Uhoh by boris111 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean that star my ex bought me meant nothing!

    10. Re:Uhoh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I know one thing: those guys are going to get a lot more sex!

    11. Re:Uhoh by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Ferris would be a cool name.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    12. Re:Uhoh by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      Yeah they're scams, but the few of us here or have (or had) girlfriends know that the average girl doesn't know that, and for $40 bucks you're off the hook for another anniversary and you get laid. (It's cooler than a stupid teddy-bear and looks better sitting around the house).

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    13. Re:Uhoh by mseidl · · Score: 1

      SELECT * FROM new_overlords

    14. Re:Uhoh by superskippy · · Score: 1

      So basically what you are saying is that women are stupid, but not stupid enough to go out with Slashdot readers.

    15. Re:Uhoh by AdamTrace · · Score: 1

      I hope so... :(

      --John Smith

    16. Re:Uhoh by Korin43 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did anyone else see the headline and think "What took them for long, I've been playing Asteroid for years.."?

    17. Re:Uhoh by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

      they're from Wisconsin and so am I so sorry to post a major spoiler but they're gonna name it either Packers, The Packers, or Packeroid :D

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    18. Re:Uhoh by DiscipleN2k · · Score: 3, Funny

      Worked great for my first anniversary. Seriously, how may great gifts can you get for the "paper" anniversary? For like $25, I was hero! Our 5th anniversary was even easier. I didn't even have to buy anything for "wood" ;)

    19. Re:Uhoh by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      What is 'The Favreroid' taken?

      If I ever get the chance, I'm going to name my asteroid something like 'Mikeroid"); drop table asteroids' and then in four more years I get to name ALL of them!

    20. Re:Uhoh by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      MOD UP, GOD DAMN IT! This is funny! Think about it...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    21. Re:Uhoh by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      "No, you can't name it Morgan Webb. No, not Olivia Munn, either."

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    22. Re:Uhoh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At first, I read the title as "High School Sophomores Discover Alcohol"

  2. Why wait 4 years? by Loibisch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can anyone please explain to me please why they can name "their" asteroid in about 4 years? I mean, it's cool to wait a little to make sure everything is alright and this wasn't just speck dust on the lens...but 4 years seems a long time to peer-verify something like this and give them permission to name it.

    Also: I suppose those guys must ace all those two-picture "spot the 10 differences" tests after this...

    1. Re:Why wait 4 years? by RuBLed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmmm.. maybe it got something to do with the estimated 5yr orbit of the asteroid. One has to be sure that it is a unique one and not another one that strayed from its recorded orbit. (by collision with another asteroid)

    2. Re:Why wait 4 years? by rpillala · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's because of the powerful asteroid naming lobby. Or the writer's strike.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    3. Re:Why wait 4 years? by segedunum · · Score: 1

      That's after it hits us.

    4. Re:Why wait 4 years? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It should be like particle physics: awards should be given to those who DON'T discover a new particle :)

    5. Re:Why wait 4 years? by ryeinn · · Score: 1

      If I recall my Astronomy they have to know the trajectory of the orbit very precisely before naming the rock.

    6. Re:Why wait 4 years? by slackoon · · Score: 1

      It would not take 4 years to do that though. Based on relative positions over a few months (lets say even a year due to difficulty acquiring telescope time) they can extrapolate the orbit. 4 years is quite excessive. I say it's well worth the wait though!!

    7. Re:Why wait 4 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is not! It's because of the scientists who are defrauding governments of funding for global warming research!

    8. Re:Why wait 4 years? by A+New+Normalcy · · Score: 1

      Because all of the existing names are stored on 3x5 inch cards in a recipe box?

      --
      ...Lorenzo / I'm into kinky crustaceans. I just discovered internet praWn.
    9. Re:Why wait 4 years? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.. maybe it got something to do with the estimated 5yr orbit of the asteroid.

              The rule is, IIRC, that the object has to have had an orbit determined which is good enough to be "useful in the establishment of identifications" (from http://www.ss.astro.umd.edu/IAU/csbn/mpnames.shtml ). That would normally be a minimum of 2 apparitions ; potentially as little as one year. However, for an "interesting" object you can establish a preliminary orbit from a few nights of observations and spend the intervening days trying to find the object on archived images. Since these often go back to the late 1940s, you rapidly get a long baseline of observations. IF you can put the time in on the re-calculation of candidate orbits, and the searching of databases for images with the correct combination of direction (on the sky), time, and limiting magnitude. AND you get a moderate amount of luck in the archives.
                There are institutional constraints on the time to naming as well : "From Transactions of the IAU XVIIIB : All names proposed for minor planets will be reviewed for suitability, even when names are proposed by discoverers. The review will be done as indicated in the 1979 Commission 20 resolution, except that in the case of a name proposed by the discoverer, the six-month waiting period for a newly numbered object can be reduced to two months. Names shall be limited to a maximum length of sixteen characters, including spaces and hyphens."

      One has to be sure that it is a unique one and not another one that strayed from its recorded orbit. (by collision with another asteroid)

      Collision is certainly possible, but has never been observed directly. There's total confidence that it has happened (for example, the matching compositions of 4 Vesta and the Vestoid asteroids and the HED family of meteorites strongly indicate a common origin in the geologically differentiated interior of Vesta), but excepting the Deep Impact mission, we've never actually seen a space collision. Equally, no-one has seen a lunar crater being formed, but only creationists and such-like retards disbelieve that it happens. (It has been proposed that the lunar crater Giordano Bruno was seen being formed in 1178, but this is disputed by other researchers.)
      The interaction of gravitational fields between the planets is perfectly adequate to explain the complexity and evolution of asteroidal orbits (look up "Kirkwood gaps") to a first approximation. The interacting gravitational influences of the other asteroids then complicates matters considerably.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. How does that work, exactly? by rasman1978 · · Score: 1

    Say I'm looking through a telescope at a bunch of bright orbs in the sky. How do I report one dot to the authorities to see if it's known yet or not?

    --
    MHNATY.
    1. Re:How does that work, exactly? by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 1

      Well, it helps if you know what you're looking for in the first place. Then you can spot things that don't belong. Do some research before you attempt to report, though, cause anything that you can see through a backyard telescope has a high probability of already being categorized.

      --
      Just -1, Troll talking to another.
    2. Re:How does that work, exactly? by yotto · · Score: 2, Informative

      You wait a while and check again to see if it moved.

    3. Re:How does that work, exactly? by Sperbels · · Score: 2, Informative
  4. too bad... by Elminst · · Score: 4, Funny

    will be given the opportunity to name the asteroid in about four years.
    Unfortunately, this will be 5 months after it collides with the earth.

    --
    No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  5. Obviously by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because they're in high school. If you let them to name the comet now, you'll only get suggestions such as "The Big ASSteroid" or "Your Junk" (I can just hear it now - "Your Junk is soo small, you need a telescope to find it"). I'm sure they're just giving them enough time to mature.

    --
    Just -1, Troll talking to another.
    1. Re:Obviously by fastest+fascist · · Score: 1

      yes, because certainly calling it "The Big ASSteroid" would totally discredit science as we know it.

    2. Re:Obviously by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you let them to name the comet now, you'll only get suggestions such as "The Big ASSteroid"

      I vote for Mister Vacuumy Pants!

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:Obviously by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

      No kidding. People have been laughing at Uranus for years. It's no wonder that astronomers worldwide don't want to repeat that mistake.

    4. Re:Obviously by Moniker42 · · Score: 1

      I agree, they're a possibility they would name it "your mom", leading to exchanges in the observatories like... "your mom's mass is so great she's going to destroy the earth!"

    5. Re:Obviously by Tailsfan · · Score: 1

      LOL. You make any teenage boy laugh.

    6. Re:Obviously by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      "Your Junk is soo small, you need a telescope to find it"

      "Asteroid Yurdick" would work a lot better with this one.

    7. Re:Obviously by KudyardRipling · · Score: 2, Informative

      Names of which to be wary:

      * S.C.Johnson, Horlick's, Case or other local manufacturer
      * Arthur's Diner (fictional)
      * names of models of AMC automobiles (Rambler, American, Classic, Ambassador, Matador, Javelin, Hornet, Gremlin, etc.) Oh ,wait, that's KENOSHA up the coast.
      * Anything Danish.
      * Max Hardcore

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    8. Re:Obviously by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      They said in 4 years they'd let the highschool name it. That means nobody who's currently at the school will be there when it's time to name it.

      Suckers!

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    9. Re:Obviously by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Actually if my understanding of the future is correct, these sort of naming conventions will one day be the norm for astronomers (or "Star-Looking Smarty Fags" as they will be known then).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Obviously by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      No kidding. People have been laughing at Uranus for years

      Maybe they've been laughing at yours but not at... oh, skip it.

    11. Re:Obviously by ibwolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      People have been laughing at Uranus for years. It's no wonder that astronomers worldwide don't want to repeat that mistake. Indeed, I move that we immediately rectify the situation and rename that planet Urectum!
    12. Re:Obviously by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Nahh, i'm pretty sure its not so much of a double entendre to the greeks.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    13. Re:Obviously by Scroatzilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      In four years they will have matured enough to inject subtlety: Asteroid 3MTA3.

    14. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all.

      What's it called now?

      Urectum.

    15. Re:Obviously by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      That's why I support renaming Uranus to Urectum. (preferably before the year 2620)

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    16. Re:Obviously by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      They should name it: Mohammad!

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
    17. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its time to end that silly joke once and for all, astronomers should rename the planet to Urectum.

    18. Re:Obviously by cataBob · · Score: 1

      No kidding. People have been laughing at Uranus for years. It's no wonder that astronomers worldwide don't want to repeat that mistake.
      That's why scientists changed the name to Urectum.
    19. Re:Obviously by wallsg · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Astronomers got so tired of that joke that they renamed the planet. It's call "Urectum" now.

    20. Re:Obviously by Tailsfan · · Score: 1

      You sure they woill not call it "porn"

  6. This is more common than you'd think by ThreeGigs · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bob Holmes' website:
    http://ari.home.mchsi.com/index.htm/

    List of asteroids discovered this school year:
    http://ari.home.mchsi.com/mp_discoveries_table_2007.htm/

    And some info on the telescope he uses to capture images:
    http://bi-staff.beckman.uiuc.edu/~melockwo/telescopes/holmes32/holmes32.html/

    Same deal as this article. He uploads pics for students at participating schools to work with.

    1. Re:This is more common than you'd think by CarAnalogy · · Score: 5, Funny

      404 "Object not found!"

      Does that mean he didn't find any yet?

    2. Re:This is more common than you'd think by DeeQ · · Score: 1

      I love the fact this was modded to 5 for informative when NONE OF THE LINKS WORK.

    3. Re:This is more common than you'd think by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

      Remove the last slash on all the links.

      Yes, it was sloppy, but we all know that file extensions don't end with a slash, right..? :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:This is more common than you'd think by jc42 · · Score: 1

      we all know that file extensions don't end with a slash, right..?

      True, but directory pathnames do, and there's no reason that a directory's name can't contain a dot. I've seen a few sites that do this to categorize their files. Thus, for package foo, they might have a directory foo.html/ that contains the package's web pages, foo.jpeg/ that contains the package's images, and foo.pdf/ that contains the package's PDF files. Try it with your web server; you'll probably find that it works fine.

      It's yet another reason that, back in the 1970s, the guys at Bell Labs that invented unix decided not to hard-code any suffix-to-type mappings. They were already dealing with networks of computers of mixed types, and had learned that you can't tell anything at all from a file's name. If you hard-code such knowledge into your file system, some perverse users of other systems will name their files in a way that your system misinterprets, and the only solution will be to rewrite part of your kernel. The only reliable way to determine file type is to examine the data. Any other clues (including HTTP headers and HTML META tags) can and often do lie about the data format.

      This was rediscovered recently by the malware writers, who found that they could get their code into a lot of systems by merely putting a misleading suffix on a file name.

      One of the fun parts of writing network code is all the web servers that send any unrecognized file suffixes as "Content-type: text/html". I've seen any number of network newbie programmers going through the throes of understanding that there's nothing at all you can do to make someone else's computer do this right, especially since some of them do it maliciously. All you can do is write code that's skeptical of such things, and tries to determine the actual format. Or you can write code that doesn't work right, which is easier (but doesn't work right ;-).

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    5. Re:This is more common than you'd think by ThreeGigs · · Score: 1

      Whoops! Color me an idiot for those bad links, and thankee for reposting correct ones. I don't know why but I do this every time, although I usually catch it in a preview. I think it's because in the example on the posting screen, there's a slash before the closing sign, which makes sense in a 'close your damned tags' sort of way to me.

    6. Re:This is more common than you'd think by ThreeGigs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, seeing +5 even though I screwed up the slashcode format has bolstered my faith in the moderation system, as people moderating are obviously intelligent enough to realize my mistake, and corrected for it. Smart people are moderating, and that's good. Now I know why I rarely get mod points :-)

    7. Re:This is more common than you'd think by CarAnalogy · · Score: 1

      Huh? I didn't repost correct links, even though I probably should have. Or is that sarcasm there?

  7. Dottie by bradjs · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Nah- they'll name it Dottie 'cause she's a vicious lifesucking bitch from which there is no escape

    1. Re:Dottie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no "-1 Too Obscure" mod.

    2. Re:Dottie by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I picked it. Deep Impact was still a better movie, though :p

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    3. Re:Dottie by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      What movie was that?

    4. Re:Dottie by Zymergy · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was the best quote from the movie "Armageddon" - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120591/

    5. Re:Dottie by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      Oh wow - I guess I only catch it about halfway through on TNT these days... Thanks!

  8. These gaming articles are boring by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yesterday we get "What Was Your First Gaming Experience" and today it's "High School Sophomores Discover Asteroids". So what? Who hasn't played Asteroids?

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  9. A genuine question from a genuine ignoramus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One has to be sure that it is a unique one and not another one that strayed from its recorded orbit. (by collision with another asteroid)
    I am not familiar with the system of naming, but how do they refer to the asteroid now? Whether or not it is unique seems irrelevant, since they still have to call it something. Presumably it's something like 'Asteroid ABCXYZ-31415' or something like that. So why can't they give it the name they want, and if it turns out not be unique, they just say "Asteroid PrincipleSkinnerBlimp turned out not be unique" as opposed to "Asteroid ABCXYZ-31415 turned out not to be unique"?
    1. Re:A genuine question from a genuine ignoramus by kundziad · · Score: 1

      I would guess that if it's not unique, it already has a name and all the waiting is just to clear it up... Not to make any mess with double-naming.

  10. OB Simpson reference! by laejoh · · Score: 0

    Kyle

  11. .. or grew bigger :-) by cheros · · Score: 1

    Just in case you're nicely in line with its trajectory :-).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  12. I discovered Asteroids in grade school by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    I liked the shield feature in Asteroids Deluxe better than the hyperspace feature in the original, though.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  13. I doubt THEY really discovered it by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The students also located other potential objects that may be asteroids, and are currently conducting follow-up research.

    this leaves with the impression this guys just got lucky. It's like they identified each faint dot as an asteroid, and one just turned out to be exactly that. I imagine they just pointed at each dot

    Students:Is this an asteroid?
    someone knowledgeable:No
    Students:Is this an asteroid?
    someone knowledgeable:No
    Students:Is this an asteroid?
    someone knowledgeable:No..wait Yes
    Students: Ha we are smart!

    However I do give the students credit for initiative, it's refreshing to see that some kids still have interest in science (other then computing)
    1. Re:I doubt THEY really discovered it by Marcosll · · Score: 1

      You call searching for asteroids with a telescope science? Singles Benalmadena

    2. Re:I doubt THEY really discovered it by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 1

      science -The investigation of natural phenomena through observation, theoretical explanation, and experimentation, or the knowledge produced by such investigation.
      so...yes.

    3. Re:I doubt THEY really discovered it by stuckinarut · · Score: 1

      They found it by controlling the telescope over the net so they were probably looking for something cool to be doing in their computer class and so I'd say their interest was more in computers than science.

    4. Re:I doubt THEY really discovered it by eh2o · · Score: 1

      Current estimates put the total number of asteroids between 1-2 million (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid), only about 300k of which are cataloged. About 5000 more are discovered each month, nearly all of which are found by entirely automated systems.

      So, if you can find *any* asteroid at all with a telescope, chances are better than 70% that it is a new discovery. And, finding one probably isn't all that hard with a modern telescope... just point it at the Kupier Belt and take a few pictures.

      So, I wouldn't say they were "lucky", since the probability of success was pretty high going into it. And their discovery, while it was probably fun and educational, is hardly news-worthy as it is dwarfed by the ~150 other asteroids that are discovered *every day*.

    5. Re:I doubt THEY really discovered it by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      And, finding one probably isn't all that hard with a modern telescope... just point it at the Kupier Belt and take a few pictures.

      Considered how most objects in the Kuiper belt are smaller and as far away as Pluto, you might want to try with a pair of binoculars instead ;-)

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    6. Re:I doubt THEY really discovered it by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      this leaves with the impression this guys just got lucky. It's like they identified each faint dot as an asteroid, and one just turned out to be exactly that. I imagine they just pointed at each dot

      Not exactly. Although most asteroids are found by trained eyes (to distinguish among artifacts on the photograph from a 1 mile object thousands of miles away) the students were at least able to narrow their search by looking at objects that were on 1 photograph but not on the previous ones taken in the sequence. Anything new would be a possible asteroid or a possible artifact but they at least wouldn't have to just point to each and every dot visible in the photograph.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  14. So let me get this straight by CFD339 · · Score: 4, Funny

    These kids are in high school. They're discovering new things. They spend a lot of time examining these new things they've discovered. They're to watch to see just how they move, and if the grow larger. Some time later, it is possible they'll have something named after them -- but they can't know for sure right away.

    Yep. Sounds like high school to me.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  15. Ignored an asteroid bouncing off the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Around 2000 I witnessed a naked-eye celestial event, an asteroid bouncing off the moon. It wasn't until a friend showed me a movie downloaded off of a P2P filesharing system of the same event that I witnessed that I believed it was real. Does anyone know what this asteroid was finally named? Cause I call it 'Skippy'.

    1. Re:Ignored an asteroid bouncing off the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can see many scars on the face of the moon where an asteroid has scimmed the surface

  16. I call it by DeeQ · · Score: 1

    A HAWKING HOLE!

  17. simpsons by comm2k · · Score: 2, Funny

    Skinner:"Noooooooooooooooooo."

    1. Re:simpsons by corychristison · · Score: 1

      He he... that was the first thing I thought of when reading this.

  18. EZ by UID30 · · Score: 1

    Chuck Norris. 'nuff said.

    --
    "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte
  19. Texting... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

    Worse yet, the kid may want to name it some text-message garble like "ZOMGDIDUCMEP" or somesuch. Or, worse yet, the kid's a gamer and names it "noob" or "qq pvp server," or EVEN worse...

    ROTFLCOPTER.

    1. Re:Texting... by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      Dude! Please, do not, I repeat DO NOT ever try to name something!

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    2. Re:Texting... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      I christen thee "dorkface!"

  20. I can hear it now.... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Wisconsin, eh? Then it went something like this:
    Tommy: "Ohhhhh...Looky 'dere, Billy! There's somethun' up in sky o'ver 'dere!"
    Billy: "Ohhhh...that's one of them 'dere asteroids, don't ya know!"

    1. Re:I can hear it now.... by Av8rjoker · · Score: 1

      Eh now. I used to live a mile from Racine (in Kenosha). Over der, we put "eh" at the beginning of our sentences. Either way, I'm sure the asteroid will either be named after Miller, Harley, cheese, snow, or some German name. Not much else exciting in Wisconsin.

    2. Re:I can hear it now.... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      My wife's family is from / still lives up there. I love it up there. But as a life-long Southerner, it's still a hoot listening to them. I'm sure they think the same about the South.

  21. Now we know by maroberts · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sophomores use their telescopes for watching asteriods.
    I use my telescope for watching sophomores.....
    (/perv)

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  22. So, I wonder by skulgnome · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Are they going to get expelled for this? I mean, being visible on the Internet, factually representing your school, that's got to be tantamount to insubordination. Children these days need to be taught the value of respecting authority!

    Come on, at least give them a few years' detention. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time, is what I always say! Young miscreants such as these cannot be permitted to go unpunished!

  23. SciFi by gblackwo · · Score: 1

    If science fiction has taught me anything, there are fields of these asteroid things all over the place. They make for great cinematography and space battles. Let me know when they find something other than a big rock or ball of gas.

  24. The school will have a vote . . . by cashman73 · · Score: 0, Troll
    The students will have to decide on naming the asteroid one of two things:

    • Giant Douche
    • Turd Sandwich
  25. Wow, the 'Superfriends' by jjm496 · · Score: 1

    I wonder which one is Cosmos?

  26. Deep Impact by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

    Let's hope this one doesn't head for the Earth.

    --
    Beetle B.
  27. Working Links by Somegeek · · Score: 1

    Bob Holmes' website:
    http://ari.home.mchsi.com/index.htm

    List of asteroids discovered this school year:
    http://ari.home.mchsi.com/mp_discoveries_table_2007.htm

    And some info on the telescope he uses to capture images:
    http://bi-staff.beckman.uiuc.edu/~melockwo/telescopes/holmes32/holmes32.html

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  28. College in Michigan? by ejdmoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Try Calvin College...yeesh. Just because Taco went to Hope (bitter rivals)...grumble grumble...

    Pictures of the telescope.

  29. If I could propose a name... by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

    Could I suggest "Doombringer" for this asteroid?

    --
    I have nothing to say.
  30. Asteroid Name by kryliss · · Score: 1

    mybffjill

    --
    --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
  31. I can see it now. by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    School officials expel students for illegal asteroid use after reading their blog.

  32. What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The students named the asteroid Caca cause it was found near Uranus. Ha ha. Get it? Asteroid - ass turd. Uranus - your anus. Ha ha. Me so funny.

  33. Relax.... by z0l0pht · · Score: 1

    It'll burn up in atmosphere and whatever's left will be no bigger than a Chihuahua's head.

    1. Re:Relax.... by celle · · Score: 1
      "It'll burn up in atmosphere and whatever's left will be no bigger than a Chihuahua's head."

      That will turn out to the most efficient power source available and we destroy ourselves fighting over it.

      Why should nature destroy us when our own greed will do a better job.

  34. This is just the sort of thing .... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... that happens when some kid gets a telescope for Christmas. He doesn't tighten down the azimuth axis while he's looking in the bedroom window of the girl next door and the next thing you know, the damned thing ends up pointing toward the sky.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. wow by loafula · · Score: 1

    Wow, flip through the comments and the overwhelming majority poke fun at the situation. Sounds to me like a bunch of angry nerds who are a little jealous they never did anything this cool in HS. Give the kids a break. They are kids, ya know, and I think discovering an asteroid is a pretty cool accomplishment for a kid, regardless of what kind of help they recieved.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
  36. Please stop the rude comments by AlexJ555 · · Score: 1

    I may be able to clear a few things up, I am a friend of all three of the sophmores, in their class at their school. They are not naming it yet because the people in charge have to make sure its not just a piece from another asteroid that broke off. They monitor it for a year, and then are able to name it. They can not name it what ever they want the people in charge of the minor planet center thing regulate it. They can only suggest. All three students are not planning on naming it something stupid. Any other questions just reply.

    1. Re:Please stop the rude comments by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      I may be able to clear a few things up, I am a friend of all three of the sophmores, in their class at their school. They are not naming it yet because the people in charge have to make sure its not just a piece from another asteroid that broke off. They monitor it for a year, and then are able to name it. They can not name it what ever they want the people in charge of the minor planet center thing regulate it. They can only suggest. All three students are not planning on naming it something stupid. Any other questions just reply.

      What the fuck are you doing posting on /. on a school night? Is your English homework done, Mr. RunOnSentence?

      -A fellow Cheesehead

    2. Re:Please stop the rude comments by Ontology42 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you take the web, in particular this site too seriously. 400 posts, id say your a poor miserable fuck with no life wasting other peoples time. Why don't you make the world a better place and die?

  37. Citizen Science by permaculture · · Score: 1

    Astronomy is one of the areas where amateurs can make a significant contribution. I listened to a radio program about this the other day. Ah, here we are:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/citizenscience.shtml (N.B. May not work in the USA?)

    "Some of these enthusiasts get a thrill out of seeing sky sights with their own eyes, while others patiently scan the heavens to discover things that no human has seen before.

    David Tate monitors the skies from a small fibreglass dome which he built himself in his back garden near High Wycombe.

    He has set up a telescope with a webcam attached which he uses to record movie sequences of the planets. After processing, some of his images rival those produced by the professionals.

    Mike Oates in Manchester doesn't need to watch the skies in his search for comets: he uses a home computer rather than a telescope.

    By monitoring images taken by the NASA/ESA SOHO satellite, published daily on the Internet, he can record comets which graze the sun and sometimes crash into it. So far Mike has discovered 145 comets without even looking down a telescope.

    But the top prize for amateur dedication must go to Tom Boles in Suffolk.

    Every night that it is not cloudy he goes to his little observatory and uses three telescopes simultaneously to scan about 12,000 distant galaxies every week.

    On the cloudy nights he studies each galaxy to search for the faint flashes of distant exploding stars or supernovae. Over the decade he has been doing this, he has clocked up a world record of 202 discoveries!"

    --
    Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.