Slashdot Mirror


The Physics of Football

Ponca City, We Love You writes "There will be a program on applied physics and real time strategy that you might want to watch on television today. Conservation of momentum during elastic and inelastic collisions is one aspect on which to focus as players tackle their opponents. It is of critical importance that the Patriots bring down New York's huge and powerful running back, 6-foot-4, 265-pound Brandon Jacobs. An average-size NFL defensive back's mass combined with his speed — on average, 4.56 seconds for the 40-yard dash — can produce up to 1600 pounds of tackling force. A tackle with half a ton of force may sound like a crippling blow, but the body can handle twice that amount because the player's equipment spreads out the incoming energy, lessening its severity." Nanotech specialists from Cornell have developed their own take on the "physics" of the Super Bowl by creating the world's smallest trophy, which will be awarded today to a contestant who best explains an aspect of football physics. Just some food for thought while you watch the game on your brand new HD television, though you'd better not be watching it in a church.

107 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Go Giants! by Ang31us · · Score: 2, Funny

    Momentum = Mass * Velocity Brandon Jacobs is HUGE and runs very fast.

  2. For those who are interested.. by run4power · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those who want to view the submissions, all submissions are uploaded to youtube with the tag "nanobowl".

  3. Wrong title by Affenkopf · · Score: 2, Informative

    As an European I'd like to point out that the article is not about football but about some strange American sport where the foot isn't even used (or at least not that often,I have no idea to be honest).

    1. Re:Wrong title by sayfawa · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd like to point out that this blog is written in American (yes, American, not USian) English. A dialect distinct from the English you may be used to. And in this language football is, in fact, the name of the current subject. Complaining that we use the "wrong" words for things is as silly as complaining that the Spaniards say "juegos" instead of "games". It's a different language. Get over it.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    2. Re:Wrong title by Ang31us · · Score: 1, Troll

      Hahaha...that's hilarious! New Yorker here (my Giants are playing today)...they kick the ball to open the game (kickoff), after a 6-point score (1 more point after the touchdown), after every score (kickoff), to push the other team back after 3 consecutive failed attempts to advance 10 yards (punt), or to score 3 points if they are within 50 yards of the uprights (field goal).

      I'm happy to call it American football if you're okay to call soccer European or world football.

    3. Re:Wrong title by carpe_noctem · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but the ball itself somewhat resembles a foot. So by using those terms, it's not the Europeans who are backwards!

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    4. Re:Wrong title by drewmoney · · Score: 2, Interesting

      20 out of the top 21 leading point makers of the regular 2007 season are kickers. Guess how they put points on the board.....yeah, they kick the ball. NFL Scoring Stats

    5. Re:Wrong title by RobBebop · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but the ball itself somewhat resembles a foot

      If this is what your foot looks like, sir, then I suggest you seek the help of a professional foot doctor. Your egg-feet will scare the children.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    6. Re:Wrong title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'd like to point out that slashdot is also American. This is why we have things like the "American Politics" section.

    7. Re:Wrong title by Blitz22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The term "football" probably comes from the fact that the sport is played "on foot" as opposed to on horseback. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football/ So yeah, it IS about football.

      --
      If I went around claiming I was an emperor...they'd put me away!
    8. Re:Wrong title by UnxMully · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm happy to call it American football if you're okay to call soccer European or world football.

      Feel free. Though I should point out that Soccer is a contraction of Association Football, there's a good article here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_(soccer)#History_and_development, and predates American Football by some time - the first rules being codified in the 1850s. The less charitable among us followers of more robust codes tend to call it Wendyball or poofball, mainly because of all the falling over, rolling about and crying that goes on.

      Then there's Rugby Union (football), which dates from around the same time, and the bastard child Rugby League, aka the thickhead crashball game. Not to mention a whole host of other games including a number of forms played in Ireland (Gaelic) which have been played for close to 700 years.

      Compared to all of these games, American Football can be considered something of a johny-come-lately.

      So call it Football if you want, but the rest of the world differentiates different styles of football even if you're not aware of their existence.

    9. Re:Wrong title by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Wow, it like touches someone feet like a 20 times a game, as opposed to about 20 times in 20 seconds. Also, no-one is using a stupid name like European Football, because unlike the US we are a little more inventive with our sports (as opposed to the only sports invented in the US; rugby with big pads (cos your too girly), netball (girls game) with bouncing and rounders (another girls game) with a big bat, total originality; zero) and there are loads of different types of football here, Association Football is just one of several.

    10. Re:Wrong title by PietjeJantje · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's true. Regarding Slashdot, if your target audience is national, "football" is ok..on the other hand if your target audience is international use "American Football", unless you want to communicate you're ignorant of the biggest sport on earth named with the same sequence of letters, and serve your percentage of international viewers a title which means something different to them.

    11. Re:Wrong title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know! It's so hard to consider context! I need to be spoonfed my stories!

    12. Re:Wrong title by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      So if you have no idea, why are you complaining about something in which you've confessed you know very little about?

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    13. Re:Wrong title by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      Football is the most popular sport in the world, yes, but popularity != best. For example, GWB was the most popular guy in 2004 and I wouldn'd say we've had four banner years... would you?

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    14. Re:Wrong title by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://slashdot.org/faq/editorial.shtml#ed850
      Slashdot seems to be very U.S.-centric. Do you have any plans to be more international in your scope?

      Slashdot is U.S.-centric. We readily admit this, and really don't see it as a problem. Slashdot is run by Americans, after all, and the vast majority of our readership is in the U.S. We're certainly not opposed to doing more international stories, but we don't have any formal plans for making that happen. All we can really tell you is that if you're outside the U.S. and you have news, submit it, and if it looks interesting, we'll post it.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    15. Re:Wrong title by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Compared to all the people living to today, American football is older. So age is actually nothing meaningful at all in this context.

      Of course, I don't get a hard on for knowing something happened a long time ago, and never understood why anybody would, so maybe I'm wrong - but I doubt anyone could give me a factual reason that I am.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    16. Re:Wrong title by Cederic · · Score: 1


      Going to the world as a whole, no, I strongly suspect GWB was not the most popular guy in 2004.

    17. Re:Wrong title by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about you guys, but I'm definately not playing neither horseball nor donkeyball!

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    18. Re:Wrong title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you can't even tell a language and a dialect apart (and you obviously can't, given that you refer to US-American English as both), you really shouldn't talk about linguistics. Shut your trap and don't embarass yourself.

    19. Re:Wrong title by Idiomatik · · Score: 1

      Not even in the states was he the most popular. The american idol girl got 70million votes and GWB only got 60~. And from a global perspective GWB is vehemently hated and no1 has heard of the american idol people. And Oprah gets more viewers than GWB's adress the nation speeches. Infact i'm sure more people have seen 2girls1cup than GWBs speeches....

    20. Re:Wrong title by Shetan · · Score: 1

      The strange American sport evolved from Rugby Football, in which the foot isn't used that often either. The name didn't make sense long before the colonists customized it.

    21. Re:Wrong title by afabbro · · Score: 1
      I have no idea to be honest

      Thanks for stopping by to share this insightful commentary.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    22. Re:Wrong title by finiteSet · · Score: 1

      If you can't even tell a language and a dialect apart .... you really shouldn't talk about linguistics. Shut your trap and don't embarass yourself.
      While it is pretty cut-and-dry for British-vs-American English, the distinction is not always non-controversial. Usually there are political motivations for clouding the distinction, e.g. various "dialects" of Chinese that are mutually unintelligible, or the various Scandinavian "languages" that are to different degrees mutually intelligible (I could go on). Some linguists prefer the term "variety" to avoid the whole dialect-language controversy altogether.
      --
      If we start buying CDs then the terrorists have already won.
    23. Re:Wrong title by repvik · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same as with handball. Bit more skills needed there ;)

    24. Re:Wrong title by RincewindTVD · · Score: 1

      Football is the most popular sport in the world?

      yes... If you mean soccer
      no... if you mean american football

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_sport#Countries_by_most_popular_sport

    25. Re:Wrong title by SilentBob0727 · · Score: 1

      Whereas you guys say lift, loo, and colour instead of elevator, bathroom, and color, and yet *somehow* we still get the gist of what you're trying to say.

      English is a pretty widespread language, and regional/generational variance in any language is completely normal -- that's how languages evolve. There's no "right" version of English, but they don't teach you that until college (that's right, screw you, Junior High English teachers!!).

      --
      Life would be easier if I had the source code.
    26. Re:Wrong title by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd also like to shout out to Microsoft for improving HTML to suit their needs...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    27. Re:Wrong title by KeensMustard · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Have you been in a coma for 40 years? If so, that would explain your basic lack of understanding of the world you live in and share with others.

      I find it amusing that the rest of the world sucks up as much American culture as possible, from our music, In my CD stacker: Coldplay, Dire Straits, Bjork, REM, Midnight Oil, Crowded House. I think maybe REM is American.

      movies Curious thing. I checked my DVD collection. Maybe 1/3 American. 1/3 not. 1/3 a mix of American and others. Much of what is ostensibly American, turns out to be a mix of a number of cultural influences and participation.

      and television shows Couldn't really get a representative sample because I don't watch much TV (although Top Gear is a must watch, along with Mythbusters).

      to going in droves to our crappy McDonald's that are popping up all over the world (hint: McDonald's sucks. Stop going). Actually I quite enjoy an occasional visit to McDonalds - I like the thai chicken wrap if it is lunchtime and the espresso is passing grade (good considering how much training the barrista must get) if it is just a short break. Like most people I generally end up at McDonalds because they have outlets on the roads I travel. Notably McDonalds tries to approximate the foods we like to eat - we influence McDonalds, McDonalds doesn't influence us. Hardly the burgeoning frontier of American culture.

      But then they get all prissy when we call football football. We call your football soccer, but we call our football football. It's the way we do things over here. If you don't like the names we use for sport, fine. But don't get all in a huff over it. But "we" in this case is the audience and members of /. And We call any number of games football, just like We mostly use metric and not the exaggerated length of the foot of King James II as a unit of measure. For reasons of clarity then, it is necessary to qualify the language used to suit the international audience on this site.

    28. Re:Wrong title by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      As an European I'd like to point out that the article is not about football but about some strange American sport where the foot isn't even used (or at least not that often,I have no idea to be honest). Funny. If I criticized an article because I didn't know what Cricket was, I'd be an ignorant American and modded down.
      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    29. Re:Wrong title by cuby · · Score: 1

      Why don't slashdot cut the access to foreigners? The site is in America, but it was taken by the world long time ago. Don't you be so isolationist.

      --
      Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
    30. Re:Wrong title by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      the article is not about football but about some strange American sport And the "world cup" is some kind of international jock strap, isn't it?

      How that can be moderated +5 "informative" is beyond me. Hey moderators, pass the crack pipe!
    31. Re:Wrong title by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Which brings up a whole new argument. Do you mean American Football, Association Football, Australian rules Football, Canadian Football, Gaelic football, or Rugby football?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    32. Re:Wrong title by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Couldn't that be because there's usually only 1 kicker on the team who actually plays? Of course there's probably a back-up for when he is injured or whatever, but really there's only 1 kicker on each team. Contrast that with the fact that there are many different players on each team who could run the ball in, or catch it in the endzone.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    33. Re:Wrong title by Javit · · Score: 1

      The FAQ says the "vast majority" of Slashdot's readership is in the US: http://slashdot.org/faq/editorial.shtml#ed850.

      --
      Support NRA, America's oldest civil rights group.
    34. Re:Wrong title by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      If you watched the England-Wales home international on Saturday (twll du pob Sais!), you'd have seen an awful lot of the use of the boot, mainly by England giving posession away.

      Bloody marvellous, it was!

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    35. Re:Wrong title by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      Bloody good game it was too!

      England were way too confident by the 2nd half, Wales deserved the win.

      Can't wait for the rest of the 6 nations tournament.

    36. Re:Wrong title by mike2R · · Score: 1

      The point is that we're not complaining about the US centric nature of slashdot. We're just complaining about calling American Football "Football" at all. It's a silly name let's face it. Wimps Rugby would be my proposal :)

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    37. Re:Wrong title by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      "American website" is an oxymoron. The "web" part stands for the World Wide Web. In what meaningful sense is this site American? I once made a website for an Australian with a business based in France. I wrote it in three languages, clearly and without dialectal usage. I expressed all prices in a variety of currencies, and expressed all measurements in both metric and imperial units. When customers gave their address, there was no assumption made about what country they might be ordering the product from. It would never have occurred to me to be such a wanker as to declare, "Sorry, this is a French site, so we only use these units, etc."

    38. Re:Wrong title by IRGlover · · Score: 1

      I would just like to make it known that I have never, and will never, use the word 'loo'. It is a pointless euphemism only used by the ever-squemish middle-class. The word 'toilet' is far superior (and more accurate for those who have constipation!) and has the bonus of being easily translatable to other languages, e.g. French.

      Bathroom is often an inaccurate word to use as there are few public places that actually have baths next to the stalls/traps and (if you're male) urinals/troughs. It is another pointless euphemism, and one that has the (very limited) potential to confuse.

    39. Re:Wrong title by SilentBob0727 · · Score: 1

      Linguistic preferences aside... bash it all you want. People are still going to use it.

      While I'll agree that it's inaccurate, "bathroom" is so ubiquitous here in the states that there's almost no chance of confusion.

      --
      Life would be easier if I had the source code.
    40. Re:Wrong title by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yes but if it were split a still very respectable percentage of points in most games does indeed come from kicks, either from a field goal or from the extra point attempt that accompanies almost every touchdown (2 point conversion attempts are rare and usually only tried when a team REALLY needs that extra point).

      Bottom line is that we call that sport football. Soccer has such a small popularity base over here (not that I care one way or another, but it's seen by many as somewhat of a "pansy" or "weak-man" sport) that you'll never get us (at least not for several generations) to qualify the usage of the name of the most popular sport in the country for fear of associating it with a very minor sport that almost no one (here) cares about.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    41. Re:Wrong title by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      And if you so wish, there is always "restroom" which is in pretty common usage as well, and has no reference to "bath". Still, you are correct that "bathroom" is pretty well understood to be "the place where you poop", with the simple understanding that if it's at home (or somewhere like a hotel room or some truck stops) there will be a bathtub present and in most public places there won't be.

      If the real world usage of the word causes no confusion then any predicted confusion on paper is using the wrong set of criteria to predict confusion.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    42. Re:Wrong title by rjshields · · Score: 1

      "restroom"
      Yeah, remind me of that next time I fancy a nap in a urinal.
      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    43. Re:Wrong title by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Here in the states, where slashdot is located, we call Football Football and nobody talks about Rugby or Soccer.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    44. Re:Wrong title by enderjsv · · Score: 1

      what? You've never?

    45. Re:Wrong title by drewmoney · · Score: 1

      Couldn't that be because there's usually only 1 kicker on the team who actually plays?

      Possibly, but even if the points were spread evenly across two or even three equally good kickers (they aren't usually, that is why there is one starter) the points would remain the same. The points would have still been scored by a football being kicked.

      My comment was a response to the original poster:

      As an European I'd like to point out that the article is not about football but about some strange American sport where the foot isn't even used (or at least not that often,I have no idea to be honest).
    46. Re:Wrong title by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      the "vast majority" of ICANN is also in the US, I'd say 100%; but does it make all internet American?

    47. Re:Wrong title by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Well yes, but that's because the meaning of the word "cricket" is perfectly unambiguous to everyone. It's not like the sport shares its name with something completely unrelated, like, say, a small nocturnal insect, or a dart game, or a children's magazine, or a ridge structure designed to divert water on a roof, or an early American automobile model.

    48. Re:Wrong title by Javit · · Score: 1

      No. What's your point?

      --
      Support NRA, America's oldest civil rights group.
  4. Brandon Jacobs trucks Charles Woodson by Ang31us · · Score: 1

    While we're on the topic, check out the clip of Brandon Jacobs opening up a can on whup-ass in the first play of the game two weeks ago in Green Bay. Note 265 lbs of running-back muscle flattens the tiny little corner-back. :-)

    1. Re:Brandon Jacobs trucks Charles Woodson by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

      I still wonder why people still play rugby without the aids NFL athletes have...

    2. Re:Brandon Jacobs trucks Charles Woodson by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Cause HIV isn't very helpful for getting some cheerleader ass?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  5. Watch Sport Science by sponga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a show called 'Sport Science' on Fox Sports where they take all these extreme athletes of all types of sports in America like NBA, NFL, NHL, I.R.L., softball, soccer, billards and it goes on. The text article is nice but they provide so much more info on the show and visual demonstrations with great players like Jerry Rice, Ben Roathlisberger

    The MMA one is a really interesting one when you have Bas Rutten making the scientest jaws drop with the amount of pressure they hit a target. One hit I remember broke the 1000lbs of force and they were telling these guys that they are throwing concussion hits.

    Good episodes like...
    Human Flight: Who Are The Highest Flyers in Sports?
    Sudden Impact: Who Hits the Hardest in Sports?
    Reaction Time: Who Reacts the Fastest in Sports?
    Cheap Shots: What does a Cheap Shot feel like in Sports?
    Out of Control: Elements of the Game you can't Control

  6. Rugby... by Bazman · · Score: 4, Funny

    England could do with some of those guys in their rugby team, assuming they don't mind playing without helmets and body armour - oh, and multi-million pound/dollar sponsorship deals...

    So no chance then.

    1. Re:Rugby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      And you can't play either of them.

    2. Re:Rugby... by EaglemanBSA · · Score: 1

      LOL while I'll give you that rugby certainly is a rough sport, the contact in football's a little different. I myself have dislocated a shoulder and wrecked an ankle playing, and I know people who have split their fiberglass helmets, broken other people's arms with their facemasks (which are steel, btw), and the like.

      I tire of people assuming because the players are wearing pads, it's kids play. Scrum? Try getting a 1-yard head start and see what the impact difference is like. If that doesn't convince you, an inside linebacker usually has more like 4-5 yards. Also, most football (not soccer) players are notably larger than rugby players (e.g.: a guard, loosely the brother of a tighthead prop in rugby, will usually weigh around 300-350 lbs [21-25 stone for the Brits in the audience], compared to 220-275 lbs for a prop [16-20 stone]). Just my 2 cents.

      --
      Quiz: True or False -- On a scale of 1 to 10, what is your middle name?
    3. Re:Rugby... by pbhj · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>> usually weigh around 300-350 lbs [21-25 stone for the Brits in the audience]

      We've been metric since before I was born, I'm 31. I'll let you off though as no-one over here seems to have noticed either.

      So it's 135-160 Kg, thanks.

    4. Re:Rugby... by Durf · · Score: 1

      I've seen rugby played, and there are no rugs involved at all. Who gave it that idiotic name?

    5. Re:Rugby... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I've met lots of girls who played rugby. Only one who ever played football. Anyway, our men play football because we leave rugby and soccer to our girls.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    6. Re:Rugby... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Hmm. The BBC guys still seem mighty quick to announce weight in "stone" on all the programs I've seen. So my guess is they either have a secret agenda or your old system is still a little more commonly used than you'd let on.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    7. Re:Rugby... by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I should be scared of the the girls in your country or look for a female bodyguard there.

    8. Re:Rugby... by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Me >>> I'll let you off though as no-one over here seems to have noticed either.

      Old habits die hard. The government at the time refused to be hardline about it and so we have a continuing roll-out 30+ years later.

    9. Re:Rugby... by enderjsv · · Score: 1

      What age is 31 in metric?

    10. Re:Rugby... by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Hello Anonymous Coward who clearly has never played both Rugby and American Football; American Football is far far far more violent then Rugby could ever be. Why? Because you wear pads. Pads and helmets give the player a feeling of invincibility hence they fly in to tackles at full speed with reckless abandon. Any rugby coach worth his salt, will yank a guy out of practice and teach him NOT to tackle like that. Why? Because first, you'll be breaking your nose when tackling and second you'll break your spine if you come in that hard with improper form.

      Rugby has lots of cosmetic injuries; lots of bruises, lots of scratches, lots of blood on jearsey's. My experience was, serious injuries had to do with torn ACL, MCL and PCL's. Not good injuries to have but I never met a rugby player who lacerated organs because a hit was so hard (probably has happened but it's rare, happens about 5-6 times a year in the NFL).

      Here's a great way to think of it, Rugby is a contact sport. There's lots of contact, lots of hitting but the mechanics of the game make it so field position is relatively unimportant and possession is everything. American Football is the exact opposite, field position is everything and possession is not nearly as important. You don't get first downs in Rugby, you just need to keep the ball in your teams possession and as long as you don't turn things in to a total clusterf&ck the ref let things happen. American Football, you get four downs to get ten yards, if you don't you lose possession thus football has become a collision sport. You need to hit the guy with the ball so hard that he doesn't move another inch, only inside the five meter line in rugby does that matter.

    11. Re:Rugby... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Well, at the time (I was 16 so my judgment was questionable) they seemed fairly attractive. The bruises just added to the effect.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  7. Apparently theres a game on today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I cant wait till its over so everyone will shut up about it.

  8. Hey, I'd love to watch it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What channel is it on? BBC1? BBC2?

    1. Re:Hey, I'd love to watch it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      BBC2 10:50pm

  9. Re:Slow news day by Robber+Baron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Must be a slow news day. This is neither "news for nerds" nor "stuff that matters". Sure it is. Now when the jocks beat you up or stuff you in a locker, at least you'll understand a little of the physics behind it.
    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  10. Oh? Is there a football game today? by thomasdz · · Score: 1

    I know there's a bunch of really good commercials showing up on YouTube today, but I didn't know that there was a football game today.

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
  11. More physics by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    I will be conducting a careful study of wave propagation through viscous silicone mediums subject to oscillating vertical acceleration.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  12. Fast downloads by Nexus7 · · Score: 1

    I, for one, will be getting fast downloads during the game. I'll be receiving an 15-20 Mbps MPEG-TS stream (after conversion) containing the live game broadcast from my antenna.

  13. Re:Why bother with physics when you can just cheat by Ang31us · · Score: 1

    Of course, the Patriots won't need an asterisk if the Giants somehow pull off the un-thinkable this evening.

  14. Re:For those OUTSIDE of the USA by KTheorem · · Score: 1

    The majority of native English speakers are American. So to most of the English speaking world, football is the game played with the oblong ball and soccer is the one with the round one. If you insist on using a minority dialect of English you should really stop being so sensitive when the majority doesn't use it.

  15. Re:Slow news day by plopez · · Score: 1

    That whooshing sound was the joke going over the moderators, and other posters, heads.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  16. Re:For those OUTSIDE of the USA by jeremyp · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yes but the majority of the non English speaking World also use the word "football" or some variant thereof to refer to soccer rather than the pansy version of rugby that you use to stop the advertising breaks from running together.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  17. Without the pads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And this is what half a tonne of force looks like without the protective gear.

    1. Re:Without the pads? by drcagn · · Score: 1

      Bait, but I guess I'll bite...

      Padding allows the players to do more than their Rugby counterparts. I've heard this argument a thousand times, but the truth is that if the players have padding, they will play harder to compensate. If you give your rugby players padding, will they play the same way or will they play harder? It's a different focus on playing. American football and Rugby are different sports, even if they are closely related.

      In addition, American Football is more about the strategy in moving the ball than Rugby is. There is time between each play for the players to talk strategy and swap benched players. This is 45 seconds in the NFL, 25 seconds in college. The stadium screens and television networks usually play a replay of the previous play from angles to show the viewers exactly what happened the last play, which is often necessary to completely understand what happened.

      If you don't like American football, that's fine. We Americans really aren't offended nor do we care. But I think both American football and Rugby are respectable, but different, sports. That goes for soccer, too.

      --
      Scorta futuere amo!
    2. Re:Without the pads? by repvik · · Score: 1

      Padding allows the players to do more than their Rugby counterparts. I've heard this argument a thousand times, but the truth is that if the players have padding, they will play harder to compensate. If you give your rugby players padding, will they play the same way or will they play harder? It's a different focus on playing. American football and Rugby are different sports, even if they are closely related.

      Player injuries are also reduced from 157.7 to 16 injuries per 1000h played. On the upside, you're about twice as likely to die from the injuries in american football as in rugby. I still mean that american football is rugby for wee little girlies.
    3. Re:Without the pads? by seven7h · · Score: 1

      Dear Unknown Nationality

      The grandparent post is actually liking to an average tackle from a sport calle Rugby League (Or league for short).

    4. Re:Without the pads? by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      Actually, it's quite common (more so in League than Union) for players to wear padding under the shirt - it's not in any way as heavy as that used in American Football, but it's there.

      I used to play Union, love watching both codes, but will be watching the game tonight and rooting for the Giants (New Englanders are so snooty :P).

      It's different to rugby, but some of us in the UK can appreciate the planning and skill of the game - same as we enjoy baseball but play cricket (there was a thriving baseball league in South Wales after WWII, but it died out - my Grandpa used to play).

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  18. Re:Why bother with physics when you can just cheat by Reverberant · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Patriots had broken a rule that had recently been explicitly laid out by the league. (See article).

    Pats fan here. Yes, the Patriots broke the rules and were punished for it, but let's put this into perspective:

    1. It's not against NFL rules to steal signs
    2. It's not against NFL rules to steal signs using video cameras
    3. It is against NFL rules for clubs to use video-recording equipment outside certain designated areas during games.

    The Pats got in trouble for #3, not #1 & 2.

    Of course #3 apparently contradicts league guidance on shooting from end zone positions ("but there are no restrictions on shooting from both upper end zone positions as long as the opportunity is provided to both teams") which apparently means there is some room for interpretation.

    And c'mon... did they REALLY need to cheat against the Jets? The 4-12 Jets? You would think that wiser head couches would save their cheating for games against stronger teams.

    The incident happened in the first half of the first game of the '07 season. In the prior year, the Jets were a playoff team that beat the Patriots in November '06 (which I remember because I was there). There was every reason to expect that the Jets would have been a strong contender this past season.

  19. Re:For those OUTSIDE of the USA by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

    Then think of how many languages are spoken in India, there are 22 official languages.

  20. Behind the Scenes Equipment Testing by flyneye · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I personally worked for a paint factory that manufactured the paint that goes on the helmets(Yes,the NFLs helmets made by RYDELL).The problem we were overcoming was the old paint weakened the strength of the helmets causing splits and cracks.Our method of test consisted of 10 ft. of 4inch PVC duct taped to a pillar.At the bottom of the pillar,a box,little bigger than the helmet w/4 inches of foam rubber.The helmet sat in the box and two 10 lb.sledgehammer heads duct taped together were dropped to dent the helmet upon which it was inspected for cracks or splits radiating from the dent.The old paint wouldn't withstand a single hammer head.Ours withstood both in the end.
              Cost of research,less than $50 U.S. Scienterrific,huh?

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    1. Re:Behind the Scenes Equipment Testing by flyneye · · Score: 1

      What,are you a spelling Nazi or some grandmother?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  21. Re:Why bother with physics when you can just cheat by Ang31us · · Score: 1

    I really do like your analysis, Reverberant, but I also want you to know that your "perfect" Patriots are overdue for a loss (that's as close to a flame war as I will get on Superbowl Sunday).

    Also, did you know that Hitler is a Cowboys fan? ;-)

  22. Arguments about words asside, why is it on Sunday? by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

    Really, why do you guys play it Sunday evenining? It'd make way more sense to play on Saturdays - then you could all stay up late and get real pissed. Plus, then those of us who live in Europe could join in the fun.

    Heck, after England's second half performance against Wales, I needed something to cheer me up. Superbowl would have been perfect.

  23. Re:Arguments about words asside, why is it on Sund by barzok · · Score: 1

    I agree. It makes having a party for the game with me, my wife, and 10 of our closest friends, on our 55.9 inch screen (so as to not run afoul of the No Fun League's lawyers) pretty difficult.

    I think it's just done on Sunday because Sunday is traditionally pro football day.

  24. Re:Honest question by repvik · · Score: 1

    Actually, looking at the incredible amount of "flamebait" and "troll" moderations on posts critical of American Football, it is both obvious that not only does a lot of slashdotters see american football, but they're stupid as hell too.

  25. Re:Rugbyforpansies? by oojimaflib · · Score: 1

    AS for the rugbyforpansies tag...nice try. It seems like every English rugby player who tries to make it in the NFL usually ends up in the strong safety position. Too small to play linebacker, too slow to play defensive back, and absolutely no individual skills (other than smashing into other humans). Perhaps American Football is rubygforpansies, but funny how many ex-rugbyers are third on the depth charts and playing on kick coverage. Forgive my ignorance here, as I know little of American Football, but as I understand it your argument is this: American Football is not rugby for pansies because the only rugby players that play American Football are pansies... I struggle to comprehend the point you are trying to make.

    Note: I shall not take a view on the pansiness of American Football myself as, in my opinion, if you play either sport you are a) not a pansy and b) need your head examined.

  26. Re: why not Saturday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    To clarify what was said in http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=440450&cid=22284928 about "pro" day:

    American football takes place on both Saturdays and Sundays during the football seasons (~September thru ~ January). College football is played on Saturdays, and professional (mostly synonymous with NFL) football is played on Sundays. High school football is played on Friday nights. The NFL season ends later than the college season, so indeed Saturdays are free for pro football starting in December and the NFL holds playoff games on both Saturdays and Sundays. The NFL also has a single "featured" game on Monday nights, and some Thursdays too of late.

    As far as the effects of after-game celebration the day after: people seem to get away with a lot on Monday-After-Superbowl as it's often considered a day of amnesty by the cultural magnitude the event has. "The Superbowl" is no longer just a game, but a massive cultural event in this country that far transcends the sport and its followers. Superbowl Sunday is a holiday in all but official name.

  27. 1600lbs = 1/2 ton?? by ecavalli · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm doing the math wrong, but I've always been led to believe that 1600 pounds is a hell of a lot more than half a ton. In fact, it's 60% more than half.

    Anyone wanna tell me what I'm missing in that summary?

  28. Re:Rugbyforpansies? by minorproblem · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why people compare the two, the types of tackles between Union and American Football are completly diffrent and they have completly diffrent rules. Hence why one has helmets and padding and the other one doesn't.

  29. It's Jonah Lomu, all over again by LadyLucky · · Score: 2

    If you haven't seen it, his classic try against England in 95.

    --
    dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
  30. They're not critical. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    They just spout the same old bullshit arguments about how:
    1) American Football is misnamed.
    2) It's a wussy game (woo rugby)
    3) It's for retards.
    4) Too many breaks
    5) Companies spend a lot of money on marketing THEY ARE EVIL HURRRR

    I'm not going to address these comments because they are loaded or strawmen and others have done it better than me. I think it's great. It's a lot of fun to watch and talk about, and I hope the Giants win today. The rest of you haters can go back to whatever the hell you were doing.

    Oooh the Tuck of the Giants just got an interception! WOOOO

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  31. Re:Arguments about words asside, why is it on Sund by beat-ofen · · Score: 1

    I don't know... I hate this. I love American Football, but here in Germany, its 2 am. and I have to work tomorrow. This sux.
    PS: Patriots will win :D

  32. More turn-based than real-time... by Langfat · · Score: 1

    I always thought of American football more as a turn-based strategy than RTS -- after all, there's a break after every play and each team gets to choose their next move before they try it out. Stuff like soccer or hockey feels much more 'RTS' to me with the constant motion back and forth, and being a turn-based fan, perhaps that's the reason I enjoy watching American football more than most other team sports.

  33. Re:Arguments about words asside, why is it on Sund by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 1

    If it was Saturday we Hasidic Jews couldn't turn on our TVs, you insensitive clod!

  34. Re:Honest question by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

    Its a game of strategy and anticipation, as well as skill, reflexes, teamwork, liability, physic, and everyone can pretty much find a useful position on it regardless of your body build. Its very popular once you understand it. Theres a lot of European trolls it seems that get pretty pissed when its "misnamed" (mind you that there is canadian football and australian football as well, and the game was originally very running centric) or because they think the draw of the sport is two people running into each other. Its good that these people are modded trolls and flamebait, because hopefully these people will learn to speak on topics that they actually know about, rather than spout out shit as if they actually have experience. Imagine these same people talking on other (non-sport) topics criticizing someone else's idea much in the same way.

    And they do fit the roll of the troll or flamebait because they incite a response by trying to piss people off.

    Like you.

  35. Re:Rugbyforpansies? by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

    Witty, but I don't know whether you intentionally missed the point for the sake of it or whether you're actually confused, so I'll bite.

    His point was that rugby fans call football rugby for pussies, but rugby players who actually attempt to play football are quickly relegated to being backups or put at positions that demand very little skill because they're unfit to play the rest. No one said that the only rugby players that play football are pussies, just that rugby players lack the skill, size, or speed, to play football.

    If you feel like doing a little wikipedia reading, back when Rugby was an Olympic sport the entire US team was generally just some football players they rounded up before the games, and they were incredibly successful.

  36. Re:Why bother with physics when you can just cheat by amliebsch · · Score: 1

    +1 Prescient! W00t w00t!

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  37. Re:Why bother with physics when you can just cheat by RobBebop · · Score: 1

    That YouTube Hitler video was good. I like when he says, "At least I can still see the Patriots make history with a perfect season."

    And in your other reply to me, you said "if the Giants can do the unthinkable." Well... I've been saying for about two months that the Patriots are a one dimension team (that dimension, being "Passing"). Ask Peyton Manning how great it was to have a one dimensional team in 2004. Sure, he got 49 TD passes in the regular season, but none in the second round of the playoffs and the Colts were beaten easily by the Patriots 20-3... to be knocked out of the playoffs.

    So yeah... one dimensional teams are beatable.

    Then again, hindsight is 20/20 and in the weeks leading up to the Super Bowl I wouldn't have run my mouth to badly out of fear of embarrassment of being ultimately proved wrong. But I must say, being proved right is grand!

    btw... real Giants fan here.

    Of course, I'll probably get modded Flamebait again for talking Football on a "News for Nerds" site... so I will at least point out that I am typing this from a laptop running Ubuntu (you know, to appease the mods).

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  38. Re:Rugbyforpansies? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    Incredibly successful ? They beat the one other country who had entered - France.

    As to the parents point about rugby players making only mediocre American Football players; like duh ! What do you expect they've spent most of their lives playing a totally different code of sport of course they're not going to be as skilled in some of the more specialist positions than players who have spent all their lives simply training for that position. Having said that they do seem to be more successful than the American Football players who convert to Rugby. And lastly how much have American Football teams offered Johnny Wilkinson to come and kick for them ?

  39. Re:Rugbyforpansies? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Not to mention American football player are bigger, faster, stronger and more skilled.

  40. most popular by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

    Does most popular mean most watched? I thought a different 'sport' had that title? The one where some people drive 'cars' really fast around tracks. And a lot of poeple weatch it at the track and on TV.

    Other then the commercial or news highlight I have yet to actually watch nascar or any other kind of car race (morning/evening rush hour does not count) I thought it was title the most watched sport in the world?

    Most popular == most watched?
    or
    Most popular == most money made by a sport?