Slashdot Mirror


The X300 Could Usher in a New Generation of ThinkPads

An anonymous reader writes "The ThinkPad has long been a favorite of IT departments everywhere and is the preferred notebook for legions of no-nonsense users. As times have progressed the ThinkPad has improved but the X300 marks the most significant change in its design since the butterfly keyboard. While we've already discussed a few leaked specs, official news of big changes like LED-backlighting (the first on a ThinkPad) and a widescreen display accompany a number of important but smaller design tweaks. Current thinking is that these changes indicate that the X300 is the first step in a series of larger changes to the ThinkPad. The notebook has already received a number of favorable reviews, but the other changes - the ones that will ultimately trickle down to the rest of the ThinkPad line - are perhaps more interesting than this specific $2500+ notebook."

132 comments

  1. I will wait for the second generation. by cyfer2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I will wait.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    1. Re:I will wait for the second generation. by thre5her · · Score: 1

      Well, hurry up then.

    2. Re:I will wait for the second generation. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I will pass completely.
      I for one am not going to buy any computer infected with a bullshit Trusted Computing TPM.

      Results 1 - 20 of about 22,600 for ThinkPad "Trusted Computing".

      The entire ThinkPad line is Trusted Computing Inside. Including the X300.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:I will wait for the second generation. by lloydchristmas759 · · Score: 1

      I for one am not going to buy any computer infected with a bullshit Trusted Computing TPM. I don't get it. Finally we have a computer we can Trust, and you are still whining!
      --
      I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.
    4. Re:I will wait for the second generation. by andy_t_roo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      don't you mean "I don't get it. Finally we have a computer Microsoft can Trust, and you are still whining!"

  2. LED Backlight by tecmec · · Score: 0

    Um, the x60s and x61s have had LED backlighting for at least a year.

    1. Re:LED Backlight by nanimo · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm sorry, but you are wrong. X60s and X61s do not have LED backlight screens.

    2. Re:LED Backlight by snarkh · · Score: 1


      Moreover, I get 5-6hours of battery life out of my x60s. 4 hours is not very impressive, especially considering that it has SSD, which supposedly improves battery life.

    3. Re:LED Backlight by tecmec · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, you appear to be correct. In my defense, it's a very common misconception. There goes my first +5 ...

    4. Re:LED Backlight by cleatsupkeep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh come on, on slashdot you don't have to be right to get a +5, you just have to SOUND informative. Which you did, hence you are at +5.

    5. Re:LED Backlight by pherthyl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah you still have it. The level of truth in a comment has no correlation with its rating... :)

    6. Re:LED Backlight by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      Humorously, someone has rated you a troll for saying that.

    7. Re:LED Backlight by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm going to guess you have the 8-cell battery.

      Just think - they're getting 4 hours out of (IIRC) a 4-cell. Half the size of your battery. Then it doesn't look so bad.

    8. Re:LED Backlight by jgennick · · Score: 1

      The X61s (only the s model) has had the option of LED backlighting for quite some time.

    9. Re:LED Backlight by snarkh · · Score: 1


      I think you are right, I ave an extended life battery. Well 8hours is very decent, although it will probably be 6-7 hours in practice. I would expect slightly more from the SSD, on the other hand the
      monitor is 13 inches vs 12 on X60.

    10. Re:LED Backlight by niko9 · · Score: 1

      You and the parent are both wrong.

      The X61s was the model that was available with an LED backlight for almost a year on Lenvo's site.

      You can Google to find some early reviews.

    11. Re:LED Backlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also go to their website and navigate to the X61s, and it tells you there is an option for a different screen. They give it some non-informative marketing name, of course, but that's it.

  3. They need to have somthing better then integrated by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They need to have something better then integrated video at $2500+ and even at the $1500+ price range.

    Put in a ati hyper memory or nvidia Turbo Cache card in or use the 780G amd chip set Integrated graphics with Side-port memory as local frame buffer.

    128mb - 256mb+ of system ram just for video in vista is a big hit and a joke at $1500+

  4. significant change; right..... by ntw1103 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "but the X300 marks the most significant change in its design" did you miss the x41? you know the tablet. yeah, I would think that the whole swivel-touchscreen would be the most significant change. look; after that they have released more tablets following the major change that occurred in the x41. it isn't all that strange for an ultralight either, there have been a lot of tiny thinkpads. yes this one does have a wide screen, but they have had other wide-screen thinkpads too. if you ask me, yes the some changes are there, but far from the most significant changes the thinkpad line has seen.

    1. Re:significant change; right..... by macshit · · Score: 1

      did you miss the x41? you know the tablet. yeah

      Hmm, for how many decades has MS been saying the tablet pc is the next big thing...?

      Never seems to happen though.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  5. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by jg1708 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How do you propose they get the extra heat out? Also, from what I have read, the X300's battery time is not all that great. The extra hardware would be one more power drain.

  6. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by ynososiduts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would you need that much dedicated VRAM in an office laptop? Set the Vram to 32MB and be done with it. I don't get why everyone is complaining about notebooks aimed at office work not having a dedicated video card, when modern integrated graphics are more than adequate. What is especially bothering is that this is slashdot, Intel has open source linux drivers, and everyone seems to be pushing the proprietary Nvidia and ATI graphics soultions.

    --
    622677120
  7. Ruining a legend? by dotancohen · · Score: 0

    It looks to me like they are ruining a durability icon. There are several points in case (ha! pun!), but I'll only mention the LED-backlit keyboard. Those things break. They use power. And real touch typists don't look at the keys. I personally have spraypainted the keyboard of my Inspiron black, so that there are no markings on the letter keys (the numbers and everything else was masked off).

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    1. Re:Ruining a legend? by tecmec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody said anything about a backlight keyboard. There is no backlight keyboard. The [i]screen[/i] has an LED backlight, but that's hardly new, even for a Thinkpad (see x60s and x60s)

    2. Re:Ruining a legend? by node+3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cut the guy some slack. He spray painted his keys black to improve usability by not being able to look at his keys, and also spray painted his screen black to improve his usage of slashdot by not being able to RTFA.

    3. Re:Ruining a legend? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Not me... I used white-out on my screen to blank out TFA!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:Ruining a legend? by exploder · · Score: 1

      And real touch typists don't look at the keys. The letter keys, no. But it takes a good while with a new laptop to learn where things like PgUp/Dn, delete, insert, home, end, the F-keys, and the Fn key live. Keyboard lights or backlit keyboards are nice. Of course, the ability to turn them off is important, too.

      --
      Yo dawg, I heard you like the Ackermann function, so OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD
    5. Re:Ruining a legend? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I swear I saw a backlit keyboard in there somewhere. I've gone mad.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    6. Re:Ruining a legend? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      That's why I only painted the letters. Even the numbers I kept.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  8. Advert? by NotZed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mate, it's just another laptop. What's so revolutionary about that?

    Sounds like advertising to me.

    I do like thinkpads myself, but the only thing revolutionary about the X300 to me is it's exorbitant price.

    --
    _ // `Thinking is an exercise to which all too few brains
    \\/ are accustomed' - First Lensman
    1. Re:Advert? by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      I couldn't help but be reminded about the article from Sony about the "race to the bottom" (yes i'm too lazy to post slashdot link).

      With the exception of graphics artists and programmers, most people simply do not need a laptop worth over 500 dollars or so. I'm not just talking about the eeePC, which is great in its own way due to its size, but any laptop which can reach that price point and still be a regular size laptop for ease of typing up a document, or any other purpose. As I type this from my eee the only thing I know is that i'll never pay 1000 bucks plus for another laptop ever again. I have a desktop for all the heavy lifting/gaming/programming/media, this I have for the web.

    2. Re:Advert? by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      I would be willing to pay an extra 100 or 200 dollars for, say, double the battery life, or a pound of weight reduction, or assurance of reliability. I agree however that performance wise the ability of the current technology has surpassed the level required for most tasks. That doesn't mean you there are not other areas that need work though, and hardware innovations are usually always initially price prohibitive for most people.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    3. Re:Advert? by GarfBond · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously. LED backlighting? Wiki tells me it's been on some VAIOs since 2006 and on MacBook Pros since 2007. Widescreen displays? Pretty much every manufacturer in 2007 (including Lenovo, for that matter), and a large few in 2003-2006, and as far back as 2001 for Apple. Revolutionary time for Lenovo? More like playing catchup and/or letting high-end features stay in their high-end (the X300 is a $2500 machine after all).

      Smells like astroturfing, or the dumbest kind of fanboyism, to me.

    4. Re:Advert? by donatzsky · · Score: 1

      Sorry to spoil your fun, but not really. The, now defunct, Z series came with a choice of titanium (or was it magnesium) lids for a while.

    5. Re:Advert? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Widescreen displays? Pretty much every manufacturer in 2007 (including Lenovo, for that matter), and a large few in 2003-2006, and as far back as 2001 for Apple
      Plus, widescreens are inferior (unless your main task is watching DVDs). They should instead be called "shortscreens." They have less surface area than a normal aspect screen with the same diagonal measurement. Ask yourself this question, do you do more vertical scrolling or horizontal scrolling?
    6. Re:Advert? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I think the change is that the Lenovo have been a no-nonsense business machine for a long time now. Switching to widescreen display with rubberized grips and various other touches implies that IBM's primary ultralite is aimed at more of a consumer-level target.

      The solid-state drive standard is pretty revolutionary, though that revolution has started sweeping over notebook lines as we speak.

    7. Re:Advert? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      we've finally hit the 640k limit!

      p.s your sig only applies to "american" libertarianism, in the rest of the world it means "a social system based on naivety and hoping for the innate goodness of man" (pretty much anarco-comunism, as compared to the american usage anarco-capitalism )

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    8. Re:Advert? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      AMEN!

      Personally, I now have moved my start bar to the left-hand side of my screen. That way I gain a bit height... But from a 1280x800 screen, that makes a 1000x800 screen or so... Not much difference with my old laptops 4:3 screen that was 1024x786 and a far cry from my dads 4:3 screen at 1600x1200.

      On Linux I can't seem to be able to put the menubar to the left because it also rotates the text which makes it unusable. (In Gnome, haven't tried KDE and I might just revert to WindowMaker like in the good olden days)

    9. Re:Advert? by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      I had many "normal" screens in last 20 years and I never liked wide screens until I actually used one. You must consider that many if not most applications have somewhat 'more horizontal' layout than vertical. Example: Photoshop. How Photoshop looks like on a normal ascpect screen? You put all the tools and mini windows on the side of the screen and suddenly you have very little space for your landscape photo which now actually would be better to be vertical. With wide aspect screen all the tools are in the 'wide part' of the screen and the photo still has enough space to be comfortably displayed in landscape.

      As for your last question, I think it is just the opposite. It is much easier to do a vertical scroll than a horizontal scroll. When you are reading this wonderful site you just move a mouse wheel and you are reading it comfortably whatever vertical resolution you have. If you really are pressed to do a horizontal scroll wouldn't be better to have a wide screen? Ask yourself this: how many people do you see with 90deg pivoted lcds for surfing/whatever?

      Maybe this discussion will be funny in 20 years time because we'll have projected or giant screens and wide/non-wide would be just a funny bit of computer history. Unless we would have more pressing matters in 20 years than computers.

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    10. Re:Advert? by bentcd · · Score: 1

      (...) Ask yourself this question, do you do more vertical scrolling or horizontal scrolling? To me, the important question is: which do you find the more annoying - having to scroll horizontally or having to scroll vertically? For me, any screen that reduces the need for horizontal scrolling has a clear advantage over the competition.

      Also, for programming I find it more useful to stack different tools/views sideways than on top of each other. In practice, for project tree views etc., having the horizontal space to have them on the side of the main editor view actually makes for less vertical scrolling than what would have been the case had I been forced to put them above or below the editor view.
      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    11. Re:Advert? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Try flipping open a 4x3, 15" laptop on an aircraft. Sorry, but the widescreen laptop is superior when it comes to portability, and I can think of few more important things in a laptop.

    12. Re:Advert? by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

      > They have less surface area than a normal aspect screen with the same diagonal measurement.

      I prefer to think they get extra diagonal length for the same surface area. The glass is half full after all.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
  9. Why would I need to? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    LOL, Have you ever used Vista?

    The X300 comes with XP.

    1. Re:Why would I need to? by pebs · · Score: 1

      LOL, Have you ever used Vista?

      The X300 comes with XP.


      What do you need Vista for? Use Linux (hey, this is Slashdot) or use XP if you have to, but what mobile user needs Vista?

      --
      #!/
    2. Re:Why would I need to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our eval X300 came with Vista installed, but it was missing a couple of drivers, so we loaded our standard XP software. It's remarkably close to the T61 and X61 driver-wise, only needed a new audio driver.

    3. Re:Why would I need to? by elipsey · · Score: 1

      aero runs great on my gma950 (as for the rest of vista well... my employer made me use it *grumble*). compiz is also swell. what's the problem?

  10. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by tecmec · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you'd be surprised. It really doesn't take much video horsepower to run Aero smoothly. I've not seen any modern integrated video not be able to handle it (and handle it well, at that). A notebook with a ULV CPU, does [b]not[/b] need anything more. There is no such thing as a sub-15" gaming laptop.

  11. They don't want you to use Vista, anyway by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you checked Lenovo's site? The X300 comes with XP by default.

  12. My GOD what a terrible video review! by spoco2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Cnet one linked to above has a guy trying SO HARD to do a 'TV presenter's voice'... And noooow, liiiive from Hollywood coooomes some dick doing a TERRIBLE video review.

    Urgh, stick to text.

    1. Re:My GOD what a terrible video review! by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Thanks. You are so right. I thought it was my european heritage but obviously this guy qualifies as a dick globally. ;)

    2. Re:My GOD what a terrible video review! by aclarke · · Score: 1

      That's because he's reviewing a "laaptap". This is how one reviews a laaptap.

      I hear people with an accent like that and I just want to sit them down and force them to learn how to pronounce the letter "o". Ooooooooooo. Say it after me.

  13. Why is this here? by TiberSeptm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm trying to figure out why this is news. It sounds like some minor tweaks to the x300, plus the OP seems ill-informed on what technologies have been used in thinkpads before.

    1. Re:Why is this here? by Symphonix · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree, this isn't news, its an infomercial. Sure, the X300 may be a signal of where IBM/Lenovo want to take their laptop line, but then you could say that about *any* new product.

  14. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GNAA fails once more. Why don't you just stop trying?

  15. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a business class ultra light laptop. light weight and small size being the primary objectives. a dedicated video takes up more space, creates more heat, and increases battery usage compared to Intels integrated video.A dedicated video in this laptop is a rather stupid idea. integrated video is not a universal solution, the fastest, biggest, most powerfulest isn't always the bestest. and as far as vista, who cares. xp wont be going anywhere any time soon especially with many bigger organizations still refusing to switch.

  16. T60 by fat_mike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In my opinion this was the pinnacle of IBM (Yes, mine says IBM Thinkpad on it) and their laptops. We've bought T61's since I got my T60 two years ago and I hate supporting them. My T60 just works. It plays Oblivion, my movies and music and I've seen it sit for two weeks in standby mode with the lid closed.
    It is also the most durable laptop I've ever had and I beat the hell out of my laptops. Traveling, punching it (see Oblivion above), dropping it, knocking it around during my job.
    And yes, I'm old. My first "portable" was this:
    http://img128.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ibmportfy0.jpg

    1. Re:T60 by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      The T60 was made under Lenovo. Yes, it says "IBM Thinkpad," but they all say that, including my dad's Z61m. Lenovo has the rights to the logo for a few more years. The Lenovo logo wasn't added until the 61's. The T60 has a Windows key, which IBM wouldn't put on themselves.

    2. Re:T60 by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      No modern notebook sits for "two weeks in standby mode". There's not enough juice in the battery to keep the DRAM refreshed. I have a friend with a T61 and the 9-cell battery, and it's dead (from full) in around 5-6 days of suspend, which is actually quite long for a notebook. His notebook has 1 1GB DIMM; with 2 DIMMs expect about half that life.

      Some notebooks have "hybrid suspend"; this saves the memory to the disk and shuts down. That's probably what you're seeing.

    3. Re:T60 by exploder · · Score: 1

      If I charge mine and leave it in suspend (to RAM--not hibernate) overnight, it comes back with 99% juice. Sounds like two weeks isn't out of line, although I'd hate to be without my lappy that long.

      --
      Yo dawg, I heard you like the Ackermann function, so OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD
    4. Re:T60 by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1

      My T60 has a Lenovo logo on it, right beside the T60 writing on the inside. The lower right corner of the inside and lid still says "IBM ThinkPad" though. As of the T61, "IBM ThinkPad" has been replaced with just "ThinkPad".

    5. Re:T60 by sphealey · · Score: 1

      > The T60 was made under Lenovo.

      Lenovo had been making the majority of IBM's laptops and desktops for years before IBM sold the division to them.

      sPh

  17. I hope Lenovo gave you a big check for that... by smitth1276 · · Score: 1

    ...because it reads like an advertisement.

  18. Anonymous Coward by Lunatrik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can only begin to guess who the "Anonymous Coward" that posted this story might work for....
    Go Go Slashvertisements!

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but have you seen the newest MacBook specs?!?!?

  19. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

    That's been my experience with aero as well. Although the compositing works well in vista, the slowness of the rest of the system is a huge drain on laptops. But for things like dragging, minimizing windows, it's usually always smooth and without tearing on all the hardware I've tried it on including laptops with integrated video. I can't say the same for compiz, which still doesn't work on a large number of mobile graphics chipsets and works only poorly on even more. This is mostly an ATI problem though, it wouldn't even be an issue if they'd opensource the drivers.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  20. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I rather enjoy my Pentium 3 laptop's heated keyboard.

    I dont know why they dont advertise it as a feature. ;)

  21. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by jg1708 · · Score: 1

    If forced to choose, I actually prefer the nut-warmer option.

  22. UltraBay by Hannes2000 · · Score: 1

    I just hope the optical drive can be replaced with another harddrive in the good ol' ultrabay-fashion. 64gig just isn't enough.

  23. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

    They need to have something better then integrated video at $2500+ and even at the $1500+ price range While that may be nice from a performance perspective, the current crop of nVidia cards at the very least will kill the battery life. I was recently looking around at all types of laptops and it's rather consistent, if you want good battery life you'll be using integrated video.
  24. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by stuff+and+such · · Score: 1

    Personally, "chestnuts roasting on a open fire" always gave me chills.

    --
    my UID occurs in pi starting at the 384,199 digit after the decimal point.
  25. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by blackirish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not only is integrated graphics good enough now, it also saves a whole heck of a lot of power. My Thinkpad T60 with discrete graphics gets an hour less runtime on battery than an identical T60 with integrated graphics. In a portable design with a SSD drive, LED backlighting and a bunch of other power saving features, just why would you want a power hungry graphics chip?

  26. It's for executives by gelfling · · Score: 1

    It's too expensive for a general rollout. It will be the executive only Thinkpad model.

  27. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by exploder · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The world isn't divided between corporate users and gamers. Scientists and academics value a capable, durable, no-nonsense machine like the Thinkpad series, and often need a fair bit of graphical horsepower for visualizations.

    --
    Yo dawg, I heard you like the Ackermann function, so OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD
  28. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by amirulbahr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why on earth would ThinkPad users want or need this? Integrated Intel Extreme graphics are more than sufficient for portable use. Heck, they can even run popular modest games reasonably well. For the savings in size, power use, money, going with Intel integrated graphics is the CORRECT design decision.

    I'm starting to wonder if I really want to associate with a Slashdot crowd that would mod parent insightful.

  29. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CAD.

  30. Re:Nothing to see here... move along by donatzsky · · Score: 1

    Who modded you down?
    The author of the article is indeed quite ill-informed. I got my first ThinkPad in 1999 (600E I seem to remember) and it had the rubbery surface - which I never understood why IBM ditched; it's far superior to the hard plastic they use now. Let's hope that it gets reintroduced in all the models.
    I'm also fairly sure that my T60 (2007-FVG - the one with FlexView/IPS panel) has LED-backlight.

  31. hm by anoneironaut · · Score: 1

    so will this new version of the think pads get rid of the random freeze ups and hibernation bugs =D? Because as far as I can tell the last 4 versions have only made it worse..

  32. Focus on business faltering by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The thing about the Thinkpad that makes them so appealing to corporate customers is there support life cycle. You knew that if you invested in accessories for a T40 those accessories would work with the T41, T42, T43, etc. until the number increments to T50 you were guaranteed your accessories would be forward compatible making the investment worthwhile for the 3/4 year life cycle your organization has planned for those devices. With the 60 series Lenovo has started to abandon this. Last year our company began implementing 60 series laptops. In less than a year the R60 was superseded by the R61. The R61 uses a new chipset and while pin compatible with their Advanced Dock I've yet to find a PCIe peripheral that will work with the R61. The R61 will not even boot with the Quad monitor video card we are using with the R60. Working with the Lenovo engineering group proved fruitless as ultimately they simply told me there was no way it would work and they had no plans on fixing it. The build materials aren't as hearty as they used to be either. I hope the x300 isn't just the next in a long line of abandoning the corporate customer that made the Thinkpad a household name.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Focus on business faltering by hacker · · Score: 1, Informative

      You knew that if you invested in accessories for a T40 those accessories would work with the T41, T42, T43, etc. until the number increments to T50 you were guaranteed your accessories would be forward compatible making the investment worthwhile for the 3/4 year life cycle your organization has planned for those devices.

      ...except batteries, docking stations, RAM and keyboards, of course.

      The T40 is not compatible with the T41, nor the T42 and so on with any of those components. In fact, the T42 and the T42p for example, don't even share compatible components.

    2. Re:Focus on business faltering by dabadab · · Score: 1

      That is utter bullshit. Basically all the components you list are compatible through the whole T4x range, just check out the Hardware Maintenance Manual. Yeah, the memory was upgraded from PC2100 to PC2700 in the T41(p), but that's all (and you can use PC2700 instead of PC2100, though mixing them may not work). And the T42 and T42p DO have compatible components.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    3. Re:Focus on business faltering by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      the T42 and the T42p for example, don't even share compatible components.

      hrmm.... Let's see, I used the word accessories (interchangeable with peripheral) and you use the word component. These are very different things.

      I'm sitting here with a T40, T41, T42, T42p, and T43 at my desk and they all seem to work perfectly fine in the docking station. Heck, even the T20, T21, T22, and T30 I have fit on the T40 series dock. The only reason they even introduced new dock with the T40 series was to be able to use that huge extended battery that sticks out the back. As far as the memory I don't consider that a peripheral so making a change there where warranted isn''t that big of a shock especially when the new memory will still work in the old series devices. So while you are correct about the internal components of the series sometimes being different / incompatible the external peripherals still work. The R61 will still fit on the Advanced dock but the dock is not fully functional since the R61 doesn't have any interrupts for the PCIe slot to use making it utterly useless.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    4. Re:Focus on business faltering by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      That's a lie. I originally bought a T40 and then replaced its motherboard with one from a T41. All of the T40 parts worked just fine with the T41 motherboard.

  33. Re:They need to have somthing better than VISTA! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    As you said, 128-256mb of system ram is a joke at $1500+.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  34. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And even if that had been a first post it would still have been a massive failure. That was truly pathetic.

  35. Yawn by ghjm · · Score: 1

    I'm typing this on a Dell XPS M1330. LED backlight? Check. Widescreen display? Got it. Lightweight form factor? Yep. 64Gb SSD available? Since December, although I took the 200Gb SATA. Core 2 Duo 2.2Ghz and 4Gb of DDR2-5300? Yep, although I only chose to pay for 2.0Ghz and 3Gb. And I got the Geforce Go 8400M video card with 128Mb dedicated graphics memory - not stellar by hard-core gamer standards, but worlds beyond the integrated graphics on the X300. Plus, my M1330 was at least $500 cheaper than the X300 will be.

    Can someone please explain to me what the big deal is?

    -Graham

  36. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by macshit · · Score: 1

    They need to have something better then integrated video at $2500+ and even at the $1500+ price range.

    Designing a machine is all about picking the appropriate compromises. "Integrated graphics" has its issues, but is often pretty good these days, and certainly powerful enough for running compiz and other blingerific GUIs, opengl-based stuff (blender or whatever), etc. The memory hit can be annoying, but then you can just bump up your system RAM, which is generally more useful and cheaper than dedicated memory [I don't know how much the speed it is due to bus contention or whatever... anybody have a clue?]

    Maybe not the first choice for the insane FPSes, but then very little that doesn't require liquid-nitrogen on tap for cooling is.

    --
    We live, as we dream -- alone....
  37. Shopping for a new notebook (ThinkPad or MacBook) by ahaning · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been looking around for a new notebook recently after my 3 year and 3 month old T42 with a 3-year warranty started to have problems due to the BGA method of attaching the mobile Radeon 9600. See this thread at thinkpads.com for more info.

    I really like the durability of my ThinkPad but this experience has left a pretty bad taste in my mouth. My 9 year old Gateway Solo 2500 still runs fine except that I've had to replace the hard drive a couple times.

    As a student and employee at a higher-education institution, however, the 34% discounts available to me on ThinkPads still makes them pretty attractive. Couple that with opting for SuSE Linux and I've got a pretty well-priced notebook.

    I am not ruling out a MacBook, however. Now that they come with Intel processors, I can pretty much have my pick of OSes other than OS X installed.

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  38. it not just the power it's the ram hit. by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    it not just the power it's the ram hit. Why can intel have on board video with 32mb-64mb-128mb of it's own ram?

    Ati / amd is working on that.

  39. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by zeenixus · · Score: 1

    on 13.3 inches diagonal?

    puh-leez.

    --
    In Bob we trust.
  40. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by FreonTrip · · Score: 1

    What if you connect an external monitor?

  41. Could be better by Richard_J_N · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a longtime thinkpad user (since the 770, now with a T60), there are several things Lenovo have got wrong:

    - No line-in for audio. This is a big problem for doing audio recordings
    - No enough ports (only 3 USB, no firewire)
    - Widescreen. Ugh. Repeat after me, laptops are for documents, not for movies. "Widescreen" just means "missing the top and bottom of the display" - it should be renamed "shortscreen".
    - Lid catches: IBM used to have two, carefully balanced; Lenovo reduced this to one as a deliberate measure, but it is now harder to open with a single hand.
    - side-mounted ports for ethernet - so the cable gets in the way on the desk.
    - Windows keys (used to be absent) - making the Ctrl and Alt keys too small.

    Thinkpads are generally quite Linux friendly (see thinkwiki.org), but still, can't we have the nice Intel i810 cards on the high-end models, instead of crippling them with useless ATI cards?

    The older models (eg 560, 770) were very well engineered, and seemed to have been designed with a little more "love". The T60 is not a bad machine, but it doesn't inspire affection and delight in the same way.

    1. Re:Could be better by AsnFkr · · Score: 1

      - Widescreen. Ugh. Repeat after me, laptops are for documents, not for movies. "Widescreen" just means "missing the top and bottom of the display" - it should be renamed "shortscreen".

      Wait, what? Laptops aren't for movies? Tell that to all the people that travel with them. And besides, I like widescreen laptops. I can throw my buddy list over to the right and have a nice sized firefox window open with the rest of the screen and see both at the same time. I see what you mean about documents getting cut off, but I'd rather not lug around a giant laptop all the time for that luxury. If you want a good laptop for documents, get a 17inch screen with a nice resolution and you should be good to go.

    2. Re:Could be better by seebs · · Score: 1

      While I was not happy about the change in resolutions, going from a 1600x1200 display to a 1920x1200 display has been a big win.

      News flash: My field of vision is wider than it is tall.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    3. Re:Could be better by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      What annoys me is that frequently you get downgraded from a 15.1" regular screen to a 17" widescreen, or even worse, a 15.4" widescreen, both of which are *smaller* than the original 15.1" display. The remaining area is simply wasted. Also, most software is designed to work in "portrait" mode, so by the time you have a widescreen, and then loose the area from the taskbar, title-bar, menus, statusbar, etc, your actual "working" area is very thin! For documents-editing, programming, and even web-browsing, a thin screen is not ideal. And while I do take your point about multiple windows being tile-able, a laptop screen is already so small that most apps need to be full-screen. As for watching movies on a laptop, you can always have black-bars on the top and bottom of the screen. The best I ever used was a 15.1" display at 1600x1200 on the T60p.

      Incidentally, why is all TV going widescreen too? It's insane for most things. As a result, almost all the TV images you see are either cropped (tops of heads missing), or stretched (fat people!), or mis-framed (zoomed out too far, so as to get the vertical size, resulting in much wasted area on the sides of the picture). The worst of the lot is when you get a movie that was shot in 16:9, cropped to 4:3 for TV, and then displayed on a widescreen, getting cropped again to 16:9!

    4. Re:Could be better by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      - Widescreen. Ugh. Repeat after me, laptops are for documents, not for movies. "Widescreen" just means "missing the top and bottom of the display" - it should be renamed "shortscreen".

      I used to have the same attitude. Then I bought a T61 and realized how wrong I was. A laptop should, above all things (in my mind) be portable. A widescreen display is shorter and wider, which means the fliptop takes up less room, making it workable in cramped spaces (like, say, on an airplane), while making the whole thing more stable.

    5. Re:Could be better by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1
      Uh, I have a T61, and you're wrong on most counts.

      No line-in for audio. This is a big problem for doing audio recordings

      Almost no notebook has this; the ThinkPad has a mic-level input which is arguably more useful for doing recording.

      No enough ports (only 3 USB, no firewire)

      Most ThinkPads don't have FireWire, my T61 being a notable exception. Few people use this interface for anything but video production, which you're not going to want to do on a machine with a 64GB SSD anyway. Get a MacBook Pro.

      Widescreen. Ugh. Repeat after me, laptops are for documents, not for movies. "Widescreen" ju3D performance sust means "missing the top and bottom of the display" - it should be renamed "shortscreen".

      Funny, I watch movies on my laptop all the time. Perhaps you should consider that there is more than one use for a notebook. Oh, and widescreen is great for document review too - you can see two pages at the same time on the 1440x900 screen that my T61 (and the x300) has.

      Lid catches: IBM used to have two, carefully balanced; Lenovo reduced this to one as a deliberate measure, but it is now harder to open with a single hand.

      How can you open two spring latches with one hand? And, FYI, the latch on the T61 "clicks" open after you slide it, so you only need one hand.

      Side-mounted ports for ethernet - so the cable gets in the way on the desk.

      It's on the back on the x300, but I have one word for you anyway: dock.

      - Windows keys (used to be absent) - making the Ctrl and Alt keys too small.

      These keys are extremely handy. CTRL and ALT are just the right sizes, though FN is in the wrong place.

      Thinkpads are generally quite Linux friendly (see thinkwiki.org), but still, can't we have the nice Intel i810 cards on the high-end models, instead of crippling them with useless ATI cards?

      The i810 is horribly out of date - I can't believe you called it "nice", considering that it had TERRIBLE 2D, video, and 3D performance and poor VGA output quality. You can buy a ThinkPad today with NVIDIA (Quadro NVS 140m) or Intel (GMA x3100) graphics, both of which are far better than the i810.

      How about some things that the older models LACKED: Intel Gigabit Ethernet, WWAN, Sudden Motion Sensor, Touchpad (many, including myself, prefer it), LCD protection (magnesium cage), ThinkLight.
    6. Re:Could be better by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      All the older thinkpads had the full 3 audio jacks. I'm actually recording from a mixing desk, so a stereo input at a sensible level (without huge amounts of noise) is much more useful. It costs almost nothing to add, and makes the laptop useful for 5.1 stereo too, so why not keep it? Likewise with firewire - not that useful to that many people, but if you do need it, it's a real pain having to fiddle with PCMCIA cards.

      I agree with you that it is useful to have a wider screen. What bugs me is that the the laptops with allegedly "wider" screens have less area than their 4:3 counterparts. I'm not saying that movies are a bad idea, only that most laptop designers seem to think of movies as the *primary* justification for an expensive laptop! Incidentally, I do video-recording and real-time streaming on a T60, for which we explicitly hunted down a rare 4:3 LCD. For most video applications when people, rather than nature are the subject, the field of view has more width than necessary, and never enough height!

      The old latches on the A22 etc were actually very very clever - you could open with one hand, one after the other. It was designed for disabled users, but very useful to me when I had only one hand free. Lenovo seem to have missed the point! Also, the thinklight and magnesium case have been standard for years.

      I do use the Ctrl/Alt keys a lot, so I miss having large ones, whereas the Win keys are useless to me. Also, the nice thing about the Intel graphics is that is has proper working open-source drivers. The nvidia cards have good drivers, but they are closed source which means they don't "just work". The ATI Linux driver is unstable and crashes at least weekly, so I am stuck with the VESA driver!

      My main gripe is just the lack of "love" that goes into the design these days. Look at an X22, and compare to a modern one, and you'll see a huge difference in build quality.

  42. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by kylehase · · Score: 1

    It's only a "feature" in the Winter.

    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
  43. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by owlman17 · · Score: 1

    Very true. And just because they're corporate users or scientists, doesn't mean they're not gamers in their spare time. A lot of corporate users are in fact gamers. Not necessarily hard-core gamers who play Crysis at insane resolutions with AA enabled, but gamers nonetheless.

  44. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by ynososiduts · · Score: 3, Insightful

    LOL, Have you ever used Vista? Yes, I have. Disable Aero or upgrade RAM, and the problem is solved. Compiz Fusion works fine on my dell D420 with a GMA 950/Core Duo/2 GB RAM in it, so the intel chips aren't laking in the 3D model area. Oh, if you are going to do CAD work or other visualizations then the "geared toward being portable market" isn't for you. Get a T60.
    --
    622677120
  45. my thinkpad by sentientbrendan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the X61s by far the best designed laptop I've seen. It isn't pretty, but it is high powered processor wise and light. I think it is a shame that more companies don't look after the practical usability of laptops, but instead tend to focus on making 6+ pound behemoths with huge screens that you will never be able to move off your desk.

    Really, if you want that kind of hardware, get a desktop. As far as real laptops for mobile users go, thinkpad is the reigning king.

    1. Re:my thinkpad by Maavin · · Score: 1

      I couldn't have said it better. I love my X61s, too. And my X31.

      And I REALLY want to find me a S30 or S31 as they are sooo pretty :)

      --


      Crivens! I kicked meself in me own heid!
    2. Re:my thinkpad by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, you can get that effect w/o the S30/S31 should you go with Colorware. Unfortunately that means going with a T60/p or a T61/p - but they arent that bad at thinness.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  46. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    A lot of corporate users are in fact gamers.

    And that gives them the right to use their company issued laptop to play games? I'm sorry, I don't get that. I have a company issued laptop, and I leave it at work. There are two reasons in giving you a company laptop: You're on the road often or they hope to lure you to work in your spare time. I'm not in the first category, yet I got a laptop. My laptop stays at work, on my desk at all times.

    A company laptop is for work. If you want to game, buy a machine yourself. Even in the rare cases I got sent away for a few weeks, I took my company laptop and my personal laptop. Company laptop for work, personal laptop for play. It's not that I cannot install anything on my company laptop, I'm admin on it, works just fine.

    Company machines are for work only. Final point.

  47. All corners cut in quality/design... check. (Dell) by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    ...and unlike the Dell laptops, Thinkpads will still be rolling along long after the Dells break down. To go for a post-offshore Dell is much like gambling on support - you're hoping they'll understand you and 2) have enough intelligence to know what the problem is. With a Thinkpad, you're more likely to get a Denver/Atlanta call center on the line without having a business account. To have to go directly to the top on Dell is a mistake by doing so, for IBM/Lenovo it is a line of last resort that solves the problem.

    Thinkpads are there for people who want quality, not price. Even after the takeover, people still get quality.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  48. Re: Shopping for a new notebook by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    As someone who's had similar issues with a t42p, the later revisions of the board seem to have dealt with this issue. The only problem seems to come from those who still have their original board that has said flaw in it and are nearing the end of their warranty.

    On a good note, the T60p has taken care of this and has the often-wanted Flexview screen. Combine that with another thread talking about putting a 14" T61p's board in, you have a laptop that will have a very long lifetime.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  49. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by sandstig · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is no such thing as a sub-15" gaming laptop.
    Eh? ECS used to market laptops with 14.1" SXGA+ (1400x1050) screens equipped with the Mobility Radeon 9600 as well.
  50. I'll take it! by jwietelmann · · Score: 1

    Seriously, does anyone make heated (external) keyboards? My office is often very cold, and it's hard to type when your fingers are numb.

  51. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by maxume · · Score: 1

    So associate with the other Slashdot crowd. There are thousands of active users, you will find support for both sides of most discussions.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  52. You may be confused by ghjm · · Score: 1

    I agree it's a pain trying to get "Jack" from Mumbai to solve your problem with a Dimension or Inspiron. But all XPS support is US-based.

    As to build quality or design, it's meaningless to generalize to "all Dell" or "all Lenovo." Both companies have their share of dogs, but build quality on the M1330 is excellent. Design is in the eye of the beholder, but I routinely have people walk up and ask me about the M1330 (usually having walked past rows of throbbing-Apple-logo Macs to do so).

    -Graham

  53. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by jwo7777777 · · Score: 1

    So, why do you have discrete graphics?

  54. Re: shortscreen laptops by ducman · · Score: 1

    Hear, hear! I'm going to start calling the "shortscreen" laptops, to! I'd go for a "widescreen" if you could pivot it into portrait mode, though. That would me a much nicer feature than a folding keyboard.

    --
    "We have nothing in common, your attitude annoys me, and your political views are appalling."
  55. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by jp10558 · · Score: 1

    I wish more users thought like you. But for reasons unknown, it seems to be standard today for users to expect work "stuff", for lack of a better term, to be for personal use as well. Note the internet use getting people fired etc.

    --
    Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  56. keyboard layout is still a showstopper by Khopesh · · Score: 1

    First, I agree that Thinkpads are the best out there. They are more robust and more usable than anything else, with the exception of the first run of T60s when Lenovo first broke away from IBM. Unfortunately, the key placement has moved me to purchase Dells for my company instead.

    For reference, here are some pictures for keyboard comparison:
    Thinkpad X300
    Dell D420 keyboard
    Macbook Pro Air keyboard

    Escape and the Function key are in the wrong places ... Esc must be in the NW corner, left of F1 and above back-tick (`), and the SW corner should read Ctrl, Fn, Win, Alt, Space. (Recall the fact that corners are the most easily located/accessed spots by sight and touch, to speak nothing of habit). Browser navigation buttons by the arrows are made useless by rocker gestures and ALT+Arrows. Most of my users don't even know what they do. I prefer nothing (or PgUp/PgDn if you must). Apple's defaults of Fn+arrow for home/end and pgup/pgdn are very useful (Dell uses those key combos for brightness, but how often do you change that?).

    Apple's go the lack of a second mouse button (alleviated by multi-touch?) and Fn out of place, Lenovo has Esc and Fn out of place (plus funky web buttons blocking your fingers from arrow keys). I go with Dell.

    Yes, I use ctrl:nocaps. Not so easy to set up (or convince of its usefulness) for my Thinkpad-based Windows users, but they'll get Dells when they're upgraded in a few months.

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  57. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by owlman17 · · Score: 1

    Yes, I agree with your points. Company-issued computers should be for company use only. I was also thinking along the lines of those freelance developers and/or small companies who use their PCs/notebooks for both work and play, where the rules may not be as cut and dried or where the developers are the owners as well. I guess you know what I'm trying to say. I should have made the distinction clearer though. My bad.

    Again, I agree that one should only use their company-issued computers for their intended use.

  58. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    It's a very simple compromise: I don't use their machine in my spare time, but I don' *work* for them in my spare time either. I'm not there and you send me an email? Though shit: don't expect a reply.

    You see, many employers hope/expect that you work in your spare time (like process emails after hours). That's the same kind of double standard that employees use justify the usage of their work computer for play.

  59. Re:They need to have somthing better then integrat by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    You're excused ;-) I get it, but that's really a minority of laptops out there....