Slashdot Mirror


The Real Body Snatchers

An anonymous reader writes "The BBC are reporting on a grisly trade lying behind the booming business for replacement body parts in medical procedures. Many unscrupulous "dealers" will procure body parts from anyone willing to deal them — e.g., undertakers, medics — and will process them for resale onto legitimate companies. Apparently a fully processed cadaver can fetch up to $250,000. Now, who says I'm worth more alive than dead?"

280 comments

  1. Attention teenage single mothers by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 5, Funny

    Want to own your own home instead of leeching one off the taxpayer? Apply inside. $250,000 could be yours.

    --
    If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    1. Re:Attention teenage single mothers by MrNaz · · Score: 0, Troll

      And there we have it ladies and gentlemen. The absolutely positively most tasteless joke ever made on Slashdot. Need I remind you, ladies and gentlemen, that this accolade is not a small achievement, as Slashdot is home of the recurring pointless meme, the overaggressive dupe Nazi, legions of spelling and grammar Nazis all trying to outdo each other on how insulting they each can be and of course, countless attempts to induce unsuspecting people to view an image of the inside of a man's painfully (or perhaps pleasurably as we know very little of the inclinations of the subject of *that* famous photo) distended anus. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the post just above shows a level of crass tastelessness that outshines all previous examples. Please put your hands together for Malevolent Tester (1201209)!

      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:Attention teenage single mothers by camg188 · · Score: 1

      Lighten up, Francis.

    3. Re:Attention teenage single mothers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    4. Re:Attention teenage single mothers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Killed any more cats recently?

    5. Re:Attention teenage single mothers by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      hmm, I thought it was considered bad form to comment on someone's sig.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    6. Re:Attention teenage single mothers by mjwx · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Gotta love the ./ moderation system.

      GP slag's off single teen mothers gets +4 Funny.
      Parent has go at GP gets -1 Troll.

      OK, now prepared to be modded -1 Redundant.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. I don't get the big deal.... by webmaster404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I honestly don't get the big deal with this. Now myself I am religious, but when I'm dead. I'm dead. And unless we figure out how to freeze people then revive them, this doesn't seem like a big deal. You get your grave for people to remember you, and your organs are put to good use. Seems like a fair trade to me.

    --
    There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
    1. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by duguk · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I've tried to look into seeing if my body could be worth something after I'm dead (I doubt it), but is there some system for this? Some extreme donor card perhaps?

      Anyone know how you might get into this - as stock, not an employee...

      DugUK

    2. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Corf · · Score: 1

      Carve me up and part me out. As long as it isn't before my time, I'm totally fine with that. A last bit of altruism, I guess, that doesn't even cost me anything.

      --
      The pain was excruciating and the scarring is likely permanent, but that just means it's working.
    3. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Informative
      I honestly don't get the big deal with this.


      The issue isn't that your body parts shouldn't be used to help someone else, the issue is that these folks were simply taking the parts, or the entire body, without the permission of either the deceased or their families. Essentially, they were grave robbers without the grave.

      It comes down to consent. Think of it as an extended form or Opt-in. Unless you specifically say you want your parts to go to someone else, they stay with you.

      Then of course there are the whole host of religious issues which don't need to be discussed but should be mentioned in relation to the above reason.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    4. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Personally I agree, but it's worth remembering that the term "religious" covers a whole lot of ground. While my own faith has no problem with stripping me for parts, rolling what's left up in a newspaper, and chucking it from the window of a speeding truck, someone else's beliefs may assign much more importance to leaving an intact corpse. Consent and proper procedure is important for this sort of thing.

    5. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I honestly don't get the big deal with this.

      I did RTFA, so the big deal isn't the sale or use of bodies or their parts per se, but the fraudulent and criminal means by which they are obtained.

      One example given was the crematorium owner in California who charged a woman for the cremation of her son. He gave her an urn of furnace scrapings and turned around and sold the parts of the man's body, keeping the unsold inventory in freezers in the attic of the funeral home. That's fraud. One could argue that it doesn't really matter whose cremains you receive, but it's still fraud even if you don't know you're being duped. Actually, it's fraud especially if you don't know you've been duped.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    6. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The thing is that it apparently isn't always done with your consent, or that of your family. For example, you die and you're sent to a crematorium which gets paid to cremate you, but in reality, they keep your body (or parts of it, at least) and sell it for profit, all the while claiming that they did cremate you and getting paid for that, too.

      Whether your body SHOULD be owned by you or your relatives after your death or whether it should be legally possible to use it for research etc. is another matter, but these cases involve lying, contract violations, and fraud.

    7. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by zwei2stein · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Big deal is medics they are dealing with: if dead person is worth up to 250 000 $, how hard would you really work to keep them alive?

      Hell, some could have idea of killing of healthy (aka, only minor issue like broken leg) patients to get body with top quality organs (people who get organ-preserving damage done to body like broken legs are generally healthy+active life types with bodies in good shape.). And medic can easily get untraceable kill. Embolism is bitch.

      And imagine if common thugs could cash you in too ... you would be walking quater million for them. Some kill for 100$, its quite imaginable them to kill for much, much more.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    8. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Your body, like anything else you owned when you were alive, should be dealt with by your will. If you decide to give your dead body to a family member, and he decides to sell it for parts so be it. You should also be able to specify that your body be sold for parts, and the proceeds sent somewhere of your choice.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    9. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      keeping the unsold inventory in freezers in the attic of the funeral home.

      Sounds unlikely to me: freezing destroys the cells. That's why transplantations are time critical.

    10. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      I read TFA as well and that particular part sparked my interest so I did a bit of googling to see exactly what he got 20 years for. I couldn't find much, but I found another similar article which said he was sentenced for "mutilating bodies" (source).

      Now that strikes me as a bit odd. These people are already dead. He didn't kill them. So my first question is: does a dead body have rights ? I'm pretty sure it does not. Does it belong to anyone ? This one I don't know. But assuming it belongs to his/her heirs then I think a conviction of theft, breach of contract, vandalism or fraud would be more appropriate.

      So what I'm wondering is exactly why "mutilating a dead body", one that you did not have any part in killing, is not only illegal but worth 20 years in prison ?

      Did this guy do something unethical ? Absolutely. I'm not condoning what he did. I'm just wondering how he could be convicted and sentenced to 20 years for cutting up dead bodies that were already dead. Of course these are just small sentences in long articles (articles which contradict each other BTW ... TFA said the guy was turned in by a jealous lover and the article I google'd said it was an employee) and so they both might be wrong. Without the details of the trial we won't know EXACTLY what he was found guilty of.

    11. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Applekid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thankfully, I've spent many years building a resistance to such attacks by being grossly overweight with liver disease, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperactive sweat glands.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    12. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by darkstar949 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if the others have brought this up or not, but there is also a lack of medical oversight involved that is needed to ensure that the organs are suitable for transfer and that the individual did not have any undiagnosed illnesses.

    13. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by evanbd · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are plenty of uses that aren't transplants -- various medical research, and especially training of new doctors. Working with real cadavers is still important; you can't learn everything from books and you don't want to start on live patients for everything. How much those applications care about freezing is beyond me (I'm not a doctor), but I'm guessing it varies between "not at all" and "somewhat, but not nearly as much as transplants."

    14. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I think the trouble is that the vast majority of people don't specify, and that it is opt-in by default. Personally I think it should be opt-out by default - that would solve the problem.

    15. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by ajcham · · Score: 3, Informative

      Having watched the BBC documentary, the bigger issue is that of the use of diseased or otherwise unsuitable bodies. For instance one guy they spoke to contracted Hepatitis from an illegally supplied transplant.

    16. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by JimDaGeek · · Score: 1

      It is a big deal because some sleazy "business" people are being dishonest and making a profit while doing it. If a family wants the body put in the ground, that is where it should go.

      My biggest beef is that the family of the deceased doesn't get any part of the profit. If the body is being used for science and some business dude can make up to $250K, why shouldn't the family get a nice chunk of that? Say half? This would be a good way to help people who don't have life insurance to help out their loved ones after they die. When they die they donate their body and the family gets some of the profits of selling the body/parts for science. Instant life insurance.

      Though I guess some people might want to knock off their wife/husband/mom/dad/etc if they knew they could get $100K or so. But that could be a positive and help clean up the gene pool. ;-)

      --
      General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
    17. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Okay, I should have RTFA.... You're right, and it's right there in TFA. Damn.

    18. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so a body is worth over a hundrd thouand dollars. what gives that woman the right to destroy SOCIETY's property anyway???

      oh wait nm this isn't communism.

    19. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Unless the frozen parts weren't organs for transplant. They could have been intended for sale to, say, medical schools, for the purpose of dissections.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    20. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by darkmeridian · · Score: 5, Informative

      The grave robbers in this case stole parts from people who died of hepatitus, HIV, and other highly-contagious and deadly diseases. Setting aside concern for the family of the dead; think about the living who receive bone implants from an AIDS victim.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    21. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by chikanamakalaka · · Score: 1

      If it is before your time, why would anybody want your organs?

    22. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by JimDaGeek · · Score: 1

      The frozen parts are sold for medical doctors/students to practice surgery on. Dead cells don't matter when you just want to practice the procedure and get the experience.

      --
      General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
    23. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      There's also this BBC article that touches on the issue. The problem there was that in falsifying the origins of the bodies, he also circumvented the measures in place to ensure that the parts taken from them were safe, thus endangering anyone who received them.

    24. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Deep+Orange · · Score: 1

      You are all missing half of the problem with this. Organ banks and Hospitals all have procedures for harvesting good, clean organs that will be both viable and healthy. I'm thinking that the mortuary's and other organ thieves may not be quite so scrupulous about cleanliness and if the future new owner of the organ will be better off with something that was half dead when it was taken from the "Donor". If I'm unfortunate enough to be in sudden need of some random organ I would very much like to have one that will do me some good and not a rotten hunk of flesh that someone carved out and sold for fun and profit.

    25. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all money is in transplants. Freezing is perfectly acceptable if you're going to be using parts for students to dissect.

    26. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      You get your grave for people to remember you, and your organs are put to good use.
      Your organs will be given to rich, unhealthy people to keep them alive for another eighteen months. In addition, doctors will be far less willing to save your life if their hospital can earn more money by selling your liver.

      People who support organ donation always forget that todays organ donation "industry" is fueled by dead Chinese prisoners, poor kidney donors, and yes, people robbing graves. It's funny, I can trace the beef I eat back to the farm, but not the organ I receive back to the person. Why is that? Because if people could trace organs, they'd become so disgusted their bodies would immediately reject the ill gotten tissue.

      Some, in response to this, call for mandatory organ donation. Fuck, that. The government, no matter how many needy orphans need them, does not own my organs. People are not walking spare parts storage, and any society with a shred of respect for its citizens will treat their bodies as they would wish it after their death. Arguments along the lines of "They're dead. They don't care." don't hold much weight with me. I'm alive, and I happen to care about their final wishes.

      I'm not donating my organs, not in the current climate. Despite the fact that this makes me "an evil person", I don't want to risk bits of me ending up in complete jerks, whose only reason for getting those organs was because they could pay for them. The thought of this happening is rather depressing. No doubt I will be labeled as selfish and short sighted for not helping all the needy people in private healthcare.

      What I find most offensive is the obscene profits reaped by those who traffic in stolen organs. The fraud, the secrecy, and the lies are all enough to show how these people really feel about what they're doing. Any empty rhetorical arguments are unneeded. Come back to me with a fully transparent, universal healthcare system, then we'll talk about my organ donation card.

      Body snatching for profit? Why don't we just take peoples naked bodies out of the ground for school children to throw rock at? It's about as dignified, if not more so.
      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    27. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by orielbean · · Score: 1

      But how did you die? By yourself, or did the medic with 2 car payments "forget" to put in the IV?

    28. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      The standard procedure is to check the implant before the transplantation. It surely will be checked for obvious infections like hepatitis and HIV.

    29. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by mlush · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't get the big deal with this. Now myself I am religious, but when I'm dead. I'm dead. And unless we figure out how to freeze people then revive them, this doesn't seem like a big deal. You get your grave for people to remember you, and your organs are put to good use. Seems like a fair trade to me.

      ... you may be dead and not worried about it, but I would not like to get organs of uncertain provenance. For example Alistair Cooke bones were stolen for transplants, and, given he died of lung cancer which had spread to his bones. I think the recipent may not be too happy.

    30. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      It comes down to consent. Think of it as an extended form or Opt-in. Unless you specifically say you want your parts to go to someone else, they stay with you.

      Also, they're making big $$$ over selling these parts, so it's not just a matter of helping people. And since money's involved, who's to say the parts they're selling are transplant quality.

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    31. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Telvin_3d · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, bodies do have rights. We have a lot of emotion tied up in these bags of meat that carry us around. Depending on the jurisdiction and country and what have you there is usually a law or two with names like 'inappropriate disposal of a body' or 'improper treatment of human remains' or, in this case, 'mutilating a dead body'. Mostly the laws get used to stop people form burying their relatives in the back yard or wherever.

    32. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by orielbean · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have described one of the big concerns, but there's another even larger concern regarding health care. We have structured our health care system to provide care to everyone and to try as hard as we can to keep people alive. We change how bill collectors treat medical debt, we force hospitals to heal illegal immigrants at the cost of taxpayers, we demand that the elderly be given some form of care even when they are old, chronically ill, and broke. It's like the adversarial system for lawyers; we protect the lawyers so they fight as hard as they can for their clients and don't have to worry about clients withholding useful information for fear of guilt. We want our doctors and nurses and emts to be driven into the field to help people. When these black markets spring up and take hold with lots of available money, it motivates the wrong people, and makes the right person make the wrong decision because the opportunity is available. I shouldn't worry that the emt at the accident scene is checking my kidney health as they are worth some bucks; he should worry about my blood loss or head trauma first!

    33. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Well, in Christianity one of the core beliefs is the physical resurrection of the dead at some point in the future. But, for that to be the case, God is going to have to re-create, re-build, reconstruct the organs of anybody (at least those who are 'saved') whose body was destroyed by disease, burned to ashes, wasted away because of the centuries between the death and resurrection, etc. The body is considered sacred by many of various creeds, because we are our body, but many also see the value of organ donation.

      For instance, I am Catholic, so I can really only speak to the Church's teaching. Cremation is only allowed if it's not done as a protest against the resurrection. I think organ donation is allowed without restriction.

      For me, the only problem I have with this is somebody is profiting from it. I would prefer that the only person who 'profits' from my death be the recipient of my organs, but I'd prefer to think that my corpse is of more value to my family than the value they could sell it for.

    34. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Shajenko42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Carve me up and part me out. As long as it isn't before my time, I'm totally fine with that.
      The bolded part is what worries me. As far as I'm concerned, as soon as I close my eyes for the last time the entire universe will cease to exist. But if a doctor who is responsible for saving my life is thinking anywhere in his mind, "There's a kid in Tennesee who could really use this guy's liver" and decides not to try so hard to keep me alive, I'm going to do whatever I can to keep that from happening even if it means my organs go to waste.
    35. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to lots of transplant patients who got cancer from it. Bad enough to need one and then to get a bad one.

    36. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered about these people who freeze themselves when they die, hoping to be revised when there is a cure.

      Two thoughts occurred to me in relation to this.

      1: A cure for being dead? Um....

      2: Why, when we can make millions of new people a day through highly enjoyable and natural (if somewhat sticky) methods, would we be wanting to defrost some dead people and try to bring them back? It's not like they'd be needed or anything.

    37. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 1

      Man have you not even seen the bugs bunny version of Frankenstein, where the blithering assistant brings back a brain he found from some guy named
      AB Normal?

    38. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      For instance, I am Catholic, so I can really only speak to the Church's teaching. Cremation is only allowed if it's not done as a protest against the resurrection. I think organ donation is allowed without restriction.

      This is a fairly recent Roman Catholic innovation. The Orthodox Church preserves the tradition against cremation, even against embalming.

    39. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The new slogan, live unhealthy and live longer!

      After all, who's gonna get the parts harvested from the fit, hmmmm?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    40. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by mlush · · Score: 1

      The standard procedure is to check the implant before the transplantation. It surely will be checked for obvious infections like hepatitis and HIV.

      How about lung cancer which had spread to the bones?

      Your also assuming someone as ethical as an body snatcher would bother doing these tests and not take the cheap and cheerful approach of fake documentation

    41. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      think about the living who receive bone implants from an AIDS victim.

      TFA is talking uses for medical purposes such as training surgeons. In fact, TFA specifically mentions that people who are unsuitable for organ donations due to disease may still be useful for this purpose.

    42. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      No, usually the transplantation clinic does this tests (also checking for contamination during transit, etc.).

      It's possible they might not notice cancer, though.

    43. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny
      And since money's involved, who's to say the parts they're selling are transplant quality.

      Transplant quality? Of course it's transplant quality! Here at Honest Ed's Used Body Parts, all our parts are transplant quality! Take this pelvis for instance, almost good as new. Belonged to a little old lady who only used it to walk to church on Sundays. What? Yeah, I suppose that could be a little osteoporosis there, but I'll have the boys in the shop fix that right up. Put a couple of titanium pins in and it's good as new. Listen, if it's such a big problem, I can even throw in a couple of ears to sweeten the deal, maybe a lung.

    44. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by sm62704 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We have structured our health care system to provide care to everyone

      You must not live in the US, I'm guessing Canada. Here the poor have no health care, and many middle class people have no health care either because they can't afford the insurance premiums. Since the poor can't go to a doctor and fix a problem when it's small, their only health care is the emergency room. Lack of mental health care causes massive homelessness for crazy people who could be treated and become productive members of society.

      Debt collectors for doctors hound you just as hard here as credit card companies. Doctors and nurses do it for the money - the dentist I had when young (he's long since died) said that when he was in college he decided on dentistry when his wife ran up huge dental bills.

      America is a land whose inhabitants worship the almighty dollar to the exclusion of everything else, where husband and wife work and strangers raise their children in day care centers, since the money is more important than their own kids (My ex stayed home, but we were the exception). Money here is even more important than life, liberty, love, and friendship. Money is seen to equal happiness.

      It is a land of plenty, but it is an impoverished nation when one considers the things that really matter. Because of the national religion of mammon worship (mammon worshipers who mostly consider themselves Christian) we are not very damned likely to ever get universal health care like the civilized world has.

      My best friend's name was Jim Dawson. I knew him since I was a teenager. His employer didn't offer health insurance, and he contracted appendicitis. When his appendix burst he was rushed to the hospital for surgery, and his credit was ruined as he struggled to pay off his medical debt. He knew something was wrong with him, but wasn't about to put his family through the hell they had gone through at the hands of the bill collectors.

      He died of a heart attack in 1992, two weeks short of his 40th birthday. Had health care been available to him he would be alive today.

      My country's method of paying for health care is nothing short of barbaric. I hope Jim's ghost haunts all of you who oppose universal health care.

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    45. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Your body, like anything else you owned when you were alive, should be dealt with by your will. If you decide to give your dead body to a family member, and he decides to sell it for parts so be it. You should also be able to specify that your body be sold for parts, and the proceeds sent somewhere of your choice.

      I agree - and the fact this isn't possible demonstrates the inconsistency in the law. The argument that body snatching should be illegal because people don't consent doesn't hold up, because the law does not acknowledge that people own their own bodies.

      This applies to everything from consenting to injury inflicted upon you (where, at least in the UK, the courts can decide that your consent isn't valid, and even sentence you to prison for your own body being harmed), to what happens after death, such as the examples you describe, or consenting to - well, I won't type it now, but I'm sure you can imagine a non-work-safe example that is illegal in many countries, even if the person consented to it when alive.

      The law at the moment is a hodgepodge of "You have no rights over your body, even when you're alive, but we'll criminalise things that we think are disgusting, or if enough people have religious objections to it".

      Either the law should be consistent that people don't have a right to their bodies after death - in which case, start making decisions of their use based on evidence rather than religion. Or properly grant people rights of consent over their own bodies, including after death.

    46. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by moeinvt · · Score: 2, Funny

      ". . .the issue is that these folks were simply taking the parts, or the entire body, without the permission of either the deceased or their families . . "

      I'm sure they asked the deceased, and hearing no objection, decided to sell the body parts.

    47. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Some kill for 100$

      About twenty years ago a friend who drove a cab for a living was called to pick up a fare at the Hay Homes, a now demolished public housing project. He'd just started his shift, and since cab drivers are dirt poor (tip your cabbie you cheapo bastard) he had fifty cents in his pocket.

      There was an attempted robbery and he was shot through the heart. He was killed for half a buck. RIP Danny.

      Sucks being past the half century mark, a lot of my friends are already dead.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    48. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1
      To put some numbers behind your idea:

      Each day about 63 people receive an organ transplant, but another 16 people on the waiting list die because not enough organs are available. http://www.fdhc.state.fl.us/MCHQ/Health_Facility_Regulation/Organ_Donors/index.shtml
      Although they cite no source for that statistic. I sent them an e-mail to find out. A web search shows others attributing the above quote to the US Department of Health and Human Services.
    49. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here the poor have no health care
      Not true at all. I'm sorry about your friend, but I think he may have had some options if he'd looked into them. If he thought something was wrong with him, he could have gone to clinics where an exam with a GP (which would be a start towards cancer detection) would have been free or nearly free.

      It is a land of plenty, but it is an impoverished nation when one considers the things that really matter. Because of the national religion of mammon worship (mammon worshipers who mostly consider themselves Christian) we are not very damned likely to ever get universal health care like the civilized world has.
      Please don't twist scripture. It says nothing in there about taking other people's money to pay for these programs. If you wish to pay for others' health care out of your own pocket, you can give it to them directly or contribute to charities like Ronald McDonald House or various hospitals who do treat people who are unable to pay.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    50. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Now that strikes me as a bit odd. These people are already dead. He didn't kill them. So my first question is: does a dead body have rights ? I'm pretty sure it does not. Does it belong to anyone ? This one I don't know. But assuming it belongs to his/her heirs then I think a conviction of theft, breach of contract, vandalism or fraud would be more appropriate.

      If it belongs to anyone (an open philosophical question), it's the family or the estate of the deceased. Just like the goobers at Geek Squad don't have a right to copy personal digital photos when they repair computers, the people processing cadavers do not have a right to take anything off a corpse without permission. If the family doesn't own it, the a-hole at the funeral home sure as fark doesn't either.

      Add in profit (and apparently LOTS of it) and it's basically a crime.

      That said, a lot of families have the cultural stigma of the body not being "divided up" or whatever and it's a shame a resource goes to waste. Someone should work on changing that, if even to simply make dying a positive or neutral financial event, rather than one that costs some unsuspecting family 15k.

    51. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by mcmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having watched the BBC documentary, the bigger issue is that of the use of diseased or otherwise unsuitable bodies. For instance one guy they spoke to contracted Hepatitis from an illegally supplied transplant.

      Spot on. Consent isn't really an issue in my mind. If the body didn't sign an organ donor card while alive, you can always get consent post-mortem. "If you have any reservations about me taking your organs, please let me know. What? No objections? Alright then." [Sound of chainsaw starting.]

      The real issues are quality control. Did the donor have any diseases or parisites that could be passed through donation? If there are requirements such as matching blood type, is the donation properly labeled? Is the thing even from a human?

      And perhaps the most startling question, was the donor dead (other than being killed by the act of donation)? There are enough ethical questions regarding the line between life and death before the added temptation to help folks cross that line.

    52. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are absolutely wrong.

      I lost my job in the tech bust, lost my health care, nearly lost my house. It only took 8 months of unemployment to do that. Could happen to anyone. I didn't qualify for any free health care. I looked into it extensively. I got bronchitis which developed into pneumonia from lack of care, I ended up with several thousand dollars owed to the hospital and permanent lung damage.

      I paid my premiums for 20 years, never got sick, and the one time I needed health care it wasn't there for me through no fault of my own. Now I can't buy insurance at all since I have a pre-existing condition. For me, and millions of other Americans, the system is broken.

      I can't believe it's legal for insurance companies to take premiums from healthy people and then refuse coverage when you start to need it.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    53. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by morari · · Score: 1
      Not too many things can be more disrespectful to the dead than being sent away to a funeral hoe to be embalmed anyway. Now that is a screwed up procedure, and a fine way for grieving family members to get ripped-off in the process.

      Me? I want to be plastinated, then cut into sheet layers and put on one of those flip-through poster racks...

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    54. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by module0000 · · Score: 1

      I'm inspired to inject myself full of HIV infected blood on my deathbed after reading your post.

      To hell with the rich and "entitled".

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    55. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by morari · · Score: 1

      Big deal is medics they are dealing with: if dead person is worth up to 250 000 $, how hard would you really work to keep them alive? Exactly. This is a huge issue for those carrying around donor cards as well. You succumb to a major accident but could probably be saved through some major work, or maybe you are lying on the operating table and will die for sure, who knows. The doctor decides to go through with some invasion technique to keep you alive just long enough to take a few organs that are needed on the list however, and then your family gets billed for the extra procedure (not that passing on debt after death really works).
      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    56. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      In December 2001, Jim Farrelly, a 45-year-old Californian, died after a long battle with Aids.

      It was over a year later that his mother, Joyce Zamazanuk got a phone call.

      "This young woman said we have got some of your son's body parts in our morgue," she said.

      The call had come from Riverside, California, where police had made a gruesome discovery in a local crematorium.

      In the loft space above chapel and crematory ovens they found a collection of freezers full of dismembered body parts wrapped in cellophane.

      The crematorium owner, Michael Brown, had set up as a tissue broker supplying doctors and medical device companies with bits of the bodies he was meant to be cremating.
      Yup, put those organs to good use.
      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    57. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      They're actually fairly likely to be brought back to life...by a mad scientist who needs an enslaved zombie horde.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    58. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Not true at all. [links to wiki articles on medicaid, medicare, and schips]

      Medicaid (your first link) only covers the destitute. If you work, you aren't eligible. Most poor in the US hold jobs, and their jobs don't offer insurance.

      Medicare only covers the elderly; you must be over 65.

      SCHIP only covers children.

      If you work two minimum wage jobs and are 20 year old, you have no health care. Care to link a Wikipedia article on some program that will help the guy who asks if you want fries with that, or who drives a cab or a school bus?

      It says nothing in there about taking other people's money to pay for these programs.

      I never implied that it did. I said most people who consider themselves Christians put money way before God, and I suspect you may be one of them.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    59. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 3, Informative

      I work in neuropathology and we always need more brains to work on. I'm guessing you're in the UK, so you could look up the 'brain bank' at the IOP in London and find out how to donate. Some people prefer to donate their brain rather than their body because then relatives still get to bury you within a reasonable time.

    60. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by corifornia2 · · Score: 0

      I agree, and I also think its retarded that you can't "will" your organs to people when you kick it.

    61. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by duguk · · Score: 1

      I am in the UK, thanks very much for your reply.

      There's a lot of information at http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/departments/?locator=380 with an FAQ for others interested in this.

      I've requested an information pack - thanks very much for your advice!

    62. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by blhack · · Score: 1

      Tell that to lots of transplant patients who got cancer from it. Bad enough to need one and then to get a bad one. [Citation Needed]

      Techincally, an organ transplant IS cancer.
      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    63. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by robertjw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Freshness

    64. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      All the best organs are from people who would otherwise still need them. Car crash fatalities provide a lot of them, because someone who died from head trauma (for instance) will still have nicely functional liver/kidneys/heart/lungs and probably retinas.

      Unless you mean 'before your time' as in 'before god willed it' in which case it's not possible to die before then. If you're fatally injured and God doesn't want you to die, you despawn at 40%, saying "A terrible and costly mistake you have made. It is not my time, mortals."

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    65. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by apt142 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that it's illegal to mail human remains. The funny things I could have done with that...

    66. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Please don't twist scripture. It says nothing in there about taking other people's money to pay for these programs.

      So if scripture says nothing about it, then it shouldn't be addressed by the government? Perhaps Christian scriptures don't say much directly about universal health care, they do advocate feeding the hungry, clothing the poor, visiting the sick and the imprisoned as the way to salvation. Not to mention how to treat your neighbor. I'm pretty sure you don't want to say that government (of the people) shouldn't address concerns that lay outside the scriptures, because there are some issues near and dear to U.S. "Christians" that definitely fall in that category.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    67. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heres the rub w/ implementing universal healthcare: What happens to everyone who already has good healthcare?

      Take my wife and I for instance. My wife works for a state government. She has very good insurance that covers our entire family, myself and our daughter included.

      Now, implement universal healthcare.

      What incentive does the state now have to continue to offer this healthcare? None.

      So what will happen to us? We'll end up going on the same healthcare plan as the welfare bums and crack addicts - because theres no incentive for employers to offer healthcare.

    68. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I bet your stomach could help two or three people with stomach cancer. Better get working on those ulcers!

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    69. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I have good health care, too. What happens isn't that you get the care that "bums and crack addicts" get (and I find your classism appalling), what happens is that the "bums and crack addicts" that clean the toilets where your wife works and cook the hamburgers at McDonalds (and there's a woman that goes to Farley's who works at McDonald's and is, in fact, a crack addict) will get the same health care you are now priveliged to get.

      You get the bonus of not having to pay health insurance premiums. The "bum" cleaning your toilets at work will have a lower co-pay than you will likely be the only difference between you and them, healthwise. You won't NEED health insurance; it will be "free" (as in "free roads and schools") and should be every bit as good as what you have now, unless you elect dipshits.

      Your taxes may go up, but with the middleman removed (insurance company) it will go up far less than you're paying for insurance now. If we can afford to wage a war in Iraq for non-existant WMDs we can surely afford insulin for diabetics and pennicillin for the woman waiting tables at the expensive restaraunt for less than minimum wage's skin infection.

      All you lose is your sense of smug superiority. The only losers are the insurance company executives and stockholders, whose gravy train runs out of track.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    70. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like a fair trade to me.

      Remember that next time you get an organ transplant from some guy who died of AIDS.

    71. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It IS a big deal because you start with readily available cadavers, then pretty soon, when there are not enough you start arranging for more being available by fortunate "happenstance". Pretty soon, homeless people start disappearing from the streets etc, etc. It's lots of money. Besides, maybe the best potential donour match you know of for a rich client has the bad taste of still being alive? What will you do then?

    72. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      And just think of how much all of that overhead costs. Even without subsidies, most people could probably afford healthcare for the few times they are sick or break a bone if the for-profit insurance companies simply went away. How many people, paid salaries, work in the health insurance industry? How much extra cost does the overhead of allowing/denying a claim add jacking the price up even more?

      Get rid of insurance. Use government subsidies where necessary (medication for long-term disease, etc).

    73. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't get the big deal with this.

      You will when the local gangsters realize that they can make $250,000 dollars by kidnapping, killing and selling you peacemeal. No need to smuggle drugs or blackmail the local shopowner and no need - indeed, no chance - to leave the victim alive. Just grab some poor soul from the street and to the butcher's shop we go.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    74. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      If someone is going to make $250,000 from my body, I'd like it to be me (or at least my wife/descendants.)

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    75. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      So if scripture says nothing about it, then it shouldn't be addressed by the government? Perhaps Christian scriptures don't say much directly about universal health care, they do advocate feeding the hungry, clothing the poor, visiting the sick and the imprisoned as the way to salvation.

      The brand of Christianity that is most popular in the US teaches that belief in Jesus is enough to get into heaven, and all the good works don't do you any good. It's pretty convenient that way- you can act like a total asshole, but if you believe in Jesus, you've got your ticket to heaven.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    76. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was thinking of this guy who stole body parts from corpses, falsified documents, and then sold the parts for use as implants. The guy sold tissue that came from HIV and hepatitis victims, and sold bone tissue from corpses whose cancer had spread to their bones.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    77. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by rkowen · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sure, I feel sorry for you, but you could have used the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) to continue your group health care (at your own expense). Therefore, you made a choice and unfortunately you gambled and got bit by the consequences.

      Now you're griping because some other insurance company doesn't want to pick up a pre-existing condition. Why should they? It was your choice not to have health insurance. They're under no obligation. Would you buy a used car or house with serious problems? No, so why expect someone else pay the cost for your own choice.

      --
      I hate sigs (especially yours which is a waste of my bandwidth)
    78. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      No it's not. Thats just about the most inaccurate thing I've ever heard/seen.

    79. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Pendersempai · · Score: 1

      But if a doctor who is responsible for saving my life is thinking anywhere in his mind, "There's a kid in Tennesee who could really use this guy's liver" and decides not to try so hard to keep me alive, I'm going to do whatever I can to keep that from happening even if it means my organs go to waste.
      Of course, perhaps it would be easier for the doctor to keep you alive if there were more transplantable organs on the market. There are two sides to this coin, and the side you're talking about is much more easily addressable (through regulation, reputation, and the threat of medical malpractice liability) than the other.
    80. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Pendersempai · · Score: 1

      While my own faith has no problem with stripping me for parts, rolling what's left up in a newspaper, and chucking it from the window of a speeding truck, someone else's beliefs may assign much more importance to leaving an intact corpse.

      Sure, but there have to be limits. If I proclaimed that my faith exempted me from paying taxes, the IRS would gently suggest that perhaps this isn't the right country for me to live in.

      Giving organs saves lives. Every person who leaves behind healthy organs that cannot be harvested because of their faith lets other people die who could otherwise be saved. Why do you have any more of a right to be assured that your organs will rot with your corpse after you die than not to pay taxes, especially when it means that innocent people will die?

    81. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I got COBRA coverage but was unable to keep paying the premiums. They were nearly $1000/month at a time when I was unemployed.

      Of course I'm griping about not being able to get coverage. They were happy to take my money when I was young and healthy, now they want to leave me with nothing. That is a scam. And it can happen to anyone. It could happen to you. You could be diagnosed with cancer and have your policy rescinded. You could lose your job or company healthcare and run out of money and be forced to drop coverage to feed and house yourself.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    82. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Pendersempai · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to legalize the sale of organs. Then there can be a universal tracing system, nearly impossible to evade since every organ carries with it the indelible ID tag of its DNA, and it would be that much easier to track down the source of the hot organs and thus the criminals behind them.

    83. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Big deal is medics they are dealing with: if dead person is worth up to 250 000 $, how hard would you really work to keep them alive?

      Hell, some could have idea of killing of healthy (aka, only minor issue like broken leg) patients to get body with top quality organs (people who get organ-preserving damage done to body like broken legs are generally healthy+active life types with bodies in good shape.). And medic can easily get untraceable kill. Embolism is bitch.

      And imagine if common thugs could cash you in too ... you would be walking quater million for them. Some kill for 100$, its quite imaginable them to kill for much, much more. My sister who is a MD told me to keep on riding fast, I'll make an excellent organ donor. She works in a hospital next to a crash prone section of Autobahn and has first hand experience. I hope she was only half serious.

      Yes I do have organ donor paperwork in my wallet and I don't care what happens to my body, but reading this makes me think of good old Coma.

    84. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Shajenko42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't control the law. I can control what the option under "Organ Donor" says on my driver's license.

    85. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if a doctor who is responsible for saving my life is thinking anywhere in his mind, "There's a kid in Tennesee who could really use this guy's liver" and decides not to try so hard to keep me alive, I'm going to do whatever I can to keep that from happening even if it means my organs go to waste.

      But if that kid's from Orange County, you'll be more than willing to give up your parts? Sheesh.
    86. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by dzurn · · Score: 1

      I used to have to search the huge Medline medical database. If you used the wrong search term, you got very few searches. The most interesting thing? They didn't index under the term "cancer", but under "neoplasm".

      And "Neoplasm" literally means made from Keanu Reeves. You've been warned.

    87. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash: it's not our job to keep you alive, it's yours. If you want to be safe from all eventualities, you'd better save a lot of money. If you couldn't afford a 1k premium for a while then you obviously didn't save that much in your *twenty years* of work.

    88. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop making consistent, thoughtful arguments. This is Slashdot, you insensitive clod!

    89. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      I would love to take the salary deduction that I get because of "employer-provided" healthcare and be able to set it aside as a health-fund on which I could collect interest. Add that to my savings in premiums and I would be a happy camper. Instead, I get to live with the lie that my employer provides healthcare and still pay premiums.

      Still, I prefer this system to a system where you can't opt to pay cash for faster service and still have that condition treated by the 'state' system, or a system where you have to wait on a drug lottery if you have a rare or advanced stage cancer, or where your triplets are sent all over hell and a half acre because there can't be any exceptions based on your family situation, as that would be unfair to the rest of the recipients of the state provided system.

    90. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by blhack · · Score: 1

      To the body, a transplanted organ is a big giant mass of cells that don't match the DNA of its own.
      These cells that don't match the rest of your bodies DNA reproduce themselves.

      Explain to me how that ISN'T the same thing as a cancer.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    91. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a case in Poland already where ambulance doctors left patients to die, and collected bribes from funeral service companies.
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1783243.stm

    92. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I can sum it up for quite succinctly what there is to fear in body part trading, 3rd world exports. Be careful where you go overseas on holidays, you might end up coming back baggage class.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    93. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by epine · · Score: 1

      When genetic testing becomes less expensive, I expect prior to every transplant, a DNA sample of the transplant tissue is tested against a federal data bank of consenting donors, which should also contain cause of death information, etc.

      This isn't hard to police once genetic sequencing becomes cheap. Only the agreed donors need to be registered.

      There are some potential privacy issues (for the living) in maintaining a genetic registry for the deceased. Nevertheless, I have trouble believing it won't happen in some form or another.

    94. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. It wasn't available for free to you, but you could have purchased health insurance when you were laid off. No fault of your own that nobody gave you something for free? You have a right to free stuff because you're an American? Why?

      It isn't legal for insurance companies to take your premiums then refuse coverage when you need it. It is legal for them to refuse to resume covering you if you quit paying until you needed it. Any other way, you'd only have sick people insured, and then it's not insurance anymore.

      Your entitlement perspective is massively screwed up.

    95. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      You yanks fucking sicken me with your excuses for not providing you fellow Americans with good healthcare.

      Richest nation on earth?

      Land of the free?

      My fat ass it is.

    96. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Universal heathcare is something more suited to the Soviet Union. Might we in America consider something like Health FREEDOM not government-mandated controls? Check out www.heathfreedom.org for some real ways to fix healtcare. Besides, we can't do universal healthcare anyway now, our government is broke, they can't afford to pay for it!

    97. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >Now myself I am religious, but when I'm dead. I'm dead.

      Can I have your house and car when you die? How about your savings? The point is that your organs are part of your estate and have worth. Why should someone be able to steal them, make, say 10,000 dollars, and not give any to your kids and grandkids?

      Lastly, this is the logical outcome of for-profit non-socialized healthcare.

    98. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that we have more rights as to what goes into and comes out of our bodies AFTER we're dead.

    99. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      In neoconservative USA, you have more freedom to control of what goes into or comes out of your body AFTER death than you do before.

    100. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by triclipse · · Score: 1

      ... it's still fraud even if you don't know you're being duped. Actually, it's fraud especially if you don't know you've been duped.
      Actually, it's fraud only if you don't know you've been duped. An essential element of fraud is "reliance." If you know you've been duped, then you aren't relying upon the fraudulent act, and hence there would be no fraud.
      --
      No Inflation Taxation without Representation
    101. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Explain to me how that ISN'T the same thing as a cancer. Something to do with the new cells (a) not reproducing in an uncontrolled manner, and (b) not spreading to other parts of your body and proceeding with point (a)?
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    102. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you and your friend do have health care. I mean, shit, if he didn't have health care, he would have died of the burst appendix. Wait, oops, that's realitiy interfering with your rant. You meant health insurance. I'm sorry, jackass, but it's people like you who are unwilling to pay that cause the prices for everyone else to rise. Yup, when I pay my medical bills, I'm also paying yours, because you didn't. Fuck you. I have no pitty. The poor here have health care. So do the rich. And yup, we spend a fuckload more money keeping old people alive then the glorious "free, universal health care" systems, which just let old people die. Whoops, sorry to expose the dirty secret of European health care systems. It's a trade off either way, and we'd rather make you pay for your health care now, then make everyone pay for less when they're old. Fuck you.

    103. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      To the body, a transplanted organ is a big giant mass of cells that don't match the DNA of its own. These cells that don't match the rest of your bodies DNA reproduce themselves. Explain to me how that ISN'T the same thing as a cancer.
      Noun
      cancer (plural cancers)
      (medicine, oncology, pathology) A disease in which the cells of a tissue undergo uncontrolled (and often rapid) proliferation.

      transplant (plural transplants)
      (medicine) An operation in which tissue or an organ is transplanted.

      So there's the definitions, now what does that mean cancer is? It's what happens when a cell in your body starts dividing when it shouldn't due to a whole series of specific mutations (theres quite a few different things that could happen, if you want to get into it we can but honestly for out purposes you can just look it up)

      What you must be thinking of is the person's body rejecting the organs which is an immune response. This is not due to "different DNA" as many of your cells at this point include altered DNA (assuming you're not 1 week old) because environmental stuff (radiation, chemicals you ingest, etc)have altered it and there is competition leading to natural selection taking place amongst your own cells all the time. Your body (i.e. immune system) doesn't normally attack these cells because they don't express anything that antigens (chemicals that have one end that stick to known bad things and the other that sticks to cells that eat them up) will stick to. This is because you were born with your cells having certain things sticking out of them and your body knows they should be there.

      If you "get cancer" that means that cells your body sees as ok start dividing when they shouldn't and keep doing that but your body doesn't know how to stop it because they've mutated and stopped responding to the signals that tell them to stop growing/dividing. An organ transplant causes an immune response because the other persons organ is made up of cells that have foreign molecules at the ends that antigens will stick to because they haven't been trained not to during the course of your life (they see it as an infection). Two completely different things.
    104. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      If I proclaimed that my faith exempted me from paying taxes, the IRS would gently suggest that perhaps this isn't the right country for me to live in. Well put. While you live, your physical "assets" are yours. When you die, why should your corpse be treated any differently to your other material possessions? If you have made a legal will regarding the distribution of your organs, then that should be followed, otherwise the corpse belongs to the next of kin (who I can't imagine wanting it) or the state, just as your house or whatever would if no will was given.
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    105. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by CptPicard · · Score: 1

      There's hope in America, I see :) Good for you -- warms the heart to see Slashdot has people like this, and not just a bunch of brainwashed Libertarian sociopaths. I'm in Europe, and despite some of our Conservatives hopelessly trying to parrot American arguments, people just simply see that the universal health care system *works*... it may not be 100% perfect, but those issues are fixable. Mostly it just comes down to providing resources and making them to best use through appropriate logistics. No need to resort to the American model of "having the best healthcare in the world for those who can pay". Personally, I don't really even want to deal with people who would consider your situation has being somehow "normal", it is, as you said, a barbaric way to think about things.

      Americans haven't had an example of a working universal system, so it is easy for them to believe the bullshit they hear from their radio talkshow hosts... fortunately I feel the USA is in for some really hard times economically in general, and that too without even having any of the social safety net that usually always gets the blame -- so maybe, when enough of the electorate suffers enough, they will take a little look across the Atlantic and wonder how the hell the Europeans do it...

      --
      I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
    106. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      It's only the British system that lets old people just die, not all are like that (and really, how do you expect a retired person to pay for health insurance anyway?). Besides, if you don't like the public system you can go to a private health insurance instead.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    107. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't get the big deal with this.

      Having watched the program a few days ago ... there are several "big deals" :
      • Many of the illicit body dealers are selling on bodies (or parts) without the consent of the body's previous inhabitant, or if the next-of-kin owns the body, without the consent of the next-of-kin. That's theft, by any other name.
      • Often body parts that are extracted from a cadaver and sold on for transplant or for tissue-use are mis-described. When Alastair Cooke's long bones were put up for sale, there was no indication that they came from a 90+ year-old man. That's mis-description at the very least, regardless of any risks of latent/ cryptic infections in the tissues.
      • Sometimes it's just pure, simple re-sale of stolen goods. Which is illegal in all jurisdictions that I'm familiar with.

      Even without religious scruples, that's a big list of big enough issues to be concerned with. Personally, I've no problem with organ donation myself - I carry a donor card and my wife knows my opinions, and I support the concept of "required request" (broadly : requiring medical staff to request the next-of-kin to give permission for harvesting organs from an unresponsive potential-donor) - but I can understand that some people could be unhappy about it.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    108. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      You originally said "The grave robbers in this case". I followed the parents, and no other case was mentioned. So "this case" must refer to TFA, which had nothing to do with transplants.

      Admit it, you got caught not RTFA and attacking a straw man. Nothing new on Slashdot, but when you're wrong, you're wrong.

    109. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Universal heathcare is something more suited to the Soviet Union

      No, it's more suited to Europe, Canada, Maxico, Cuba, China, and how about Holland and Finland, where they have far more freedom then we fools do?

      Go ahead and drink the neocon kookaid the insurance companies are feeding you.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    110. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I have no pitty

      I do, and I pity you, fool. BTW I have good health insurance. Many people I know don't.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    111. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      feel the USA is in for some really hard times economically in general

      I had to read the book Only Yesterday by Frederick Lewis Allen in a general studies history class back in the lat 1970s, and it is a very good book; very readable and interesting.

      And scary. There are alarming similarities between the Bish years and the Coolige years.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    112. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by madclicker · · Score: 1

      To stop this type of behavior, death of a person should be tracked in just the same manner as birth is. It is to say that, individuals with bad "money/power hunger" syndrome should not be allowed to run amok, instead a Government should have a better control of such places; funeral homes etc.

      --
      "History is the realm of the true lie." A.Szerb
    113. Re:I don't get the big deal.... by Laur · · Score: 1

      To the body, a transplanted organ is a big giant mass of cells that don't match the DNA of its own. These cells that don't match the rest of your bodies DNA reproduce themselves. Explain to me how that ISN'T the same thing as a cancer.
      Cancer cells DO match the DNA of the body. Who else's DNA would it be?
      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
  3. Niven was right. by AltGrendel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Organleggers will exist until we develop proper organ cloning. The moral dilemma over cloning and stem cell research will hamper any progress in this area and allow the organleggers to continue, much like the drug trade has.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Niven was right. by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Interesting

      On the other hand, Niven did foresee an end to organlegging with the rise of alloplasty ("gadgets instead of organs"). Of course, in Niven's timeline that only happened in A Gift from Earth (republished in Three Books of Known Space IIRC), after hundreds of years of murders for organs, but we're already seeing exciting reports in tech news of progress in artificial parts, so maybe the barbarity of e.g. China's treatment of prisoners will pass fairly soon.

    2. Re:Niven was right. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      "Organlegger" would be an awesome name for a Dick Tracy villain.

    3. Re:Niven was right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How would we call illegal leg traders? Legleggers?

    4. Re:Niven was right. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Organlegging is a symptom of a culture in which the choice of who to treat lies not with who has a future ahead of them, nor with who will benefit society, but only with how much money you have.

      This will have to change, because there aren't enough young people to service all the old people, so the system will collapse if it continues to run as it has been. But it would be better if we could stop wasting resources on treating old sick people and start using them to treat young people with a future ahead of them.

      I look forward to watching all these bastards with their overdeveloped sense of entitlement coughing out their last breaths in some ditch searching for their last meal. I give it a decade or two.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    5. Re:Niven was right. by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But it would be better if we could stop wasting resources on treating old sick people and start using them to treat young people with a future ahead of them.

      That should be a permanent entry in your medical records.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    6. Re:Niven was right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      organleggers. I like that expression. Especially when the organ actually is a leg..

    7. Re:Niven was right. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Now that is funny.

      Come to think of it, I should put that in writing and put it in the safe with my daughters nest egg.

      I have no desire to linger on past my time. I know how many chapters there are in my life, and I have no desire to try to cheat the universe. I expect I will be basking in the radiance of my many accomplishments, marveling at what my progeny are doing with their lives and be rather tired of struggling by the time they're ready to start sticking tubes and pins into me, and that's ok with me.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    8. Re:Niven was right. by BarefootClown · · Score: 1

      Or a rock band.

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    9. Re:Niven was right. by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, when your palm-flower turns black on Lastday you can report to a sleepshop to do your duty.

    10. Re:Niven was right. by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      there aren't enough young people to service all the old people

      I'm 56, you ignorant clod. Where did you get such a stupid, heartless idea? I suppose you'ld kill my handicapped daughter, too, you asshole.

      But it would be better if we could stop wasting resources on treating old sick people and start using them to treat young people with a future ahead of them.

      Yeah wait 'til you're my age, buddy. You'll change your tune, you heartless dumbass.

      I look forward to watching all these bastards with their overdeveloped sense of entitlement coughing out their last breaths in some ditch searching for their last meal.

      That will be you in thirty years, moron.

      Why hasn't that awful troll been modded down yet? Or better yet, castrated so he can't pass his worthless genes to the next generation?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    11. Re:Niven was right. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Stem cell research will happen somewhere, at a medium pace. The market for organs and other such treatments is way too big to keep money out of it, so even if top scientists have to be moved to Luxembourg(or whatever...) to find a suitable legal environment, it will happen, at a medium pace.

      (and the drug trade comparison is interesting, but the logistics of implanting a kidney are at least as complicated as the logistics of traveling to India, whereas the logistics of smoking some pot are a little less complicated than the logistics of flying to the Netherlands, so creating a black market under the ban is less likely than creating a gray market outside the ban -- imagine cruise hospitals in international waters(which is actually sort of interesting on its own) and such)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:Niven was right. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      It was your generation that decided not to reproduce itself.

      It was your generation that made it seem like a good idea to poison your womb so you can get an education rather than be forced into a dead end job because no one cares about helping and they'd rather you be productive now than breed and have productive people around later.

      It was your generation that decided they'd rather have human rights than human beings.

      All these years, the wealth your generation enjoyed came from a strong imbalance between the number of dependents and the number of healthy working adults caused by the baby boom. But it wasn't enough... you had to neuter your population so no new dependents would come along and screw things up for you.

      So, fuck off and die. And take your daughter with you.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    13. Re:Niven was right. by john83 · · Score: 1

      How would we call illegal leg traders? Legleggers? What does that make bootleggers?
      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    14. Re:Niven was right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no desire to linger on past my time.

      While you're getting your will made out, be sure to let the President know of your plans.

    15. Re:Niven was right. by phlamingo · · Score: 1

      But it would be better if we could stop wasting resources on treating old sick people and start using them to treat young people with a future ahead of them.

      No, it would be better if people who have successfully navigated a lifetime of adversity could apply their experience to the problems of the future. And, if they have to harvest organs from a few callow, self-centered youngsters ... well, seriously, what are the odds that any particular young person will make a significant positive contribution? Pretty close to zero, don't you think?

      Can someone say "slippery slope?"

      --
      I had forgotten how much cooler teenagers look when they are smoking. Oh, wait ...
    16. Re:Niven was right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone needs a hug

  4. When does the government get involved? by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In his Gil "The Arm" Hamilton stories (collected in Flatlander ) Larry Niven speculated that once organ transplants were common, the government would end up making everything, even jaywalking, merit the death penalty to insure a good supply of organs. China has already started using organs from executed prisoners, how long before it spreads to India and even the West?

    1. Re:When does the government get involved? by polar+red · · Score: 4, Funny

      over my dead body !

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    2. Re:When does the government get involved? by joaommp · · Score: 1

      Similarities: There's an episode in SGA where they come across a world where the punishment for every crime was the exile to the island that hosted the stargate. The Wraith would come through the stargate and feed on the prisioners and leave the remainder of the world untouched. Until the SGA teams screwed up their very effective way of living, of course.

    3. Re:When does the government get involved? by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 1

      China has already started using organs from executed prisoners, how long before it spreads to India and even the West? I think the word you want is actually "murdered", not "executed".
      --
      If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    4. Re:When does the government get involved? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It's called "executed" when a government sanctions it...
      Murder is typically used to refer to unlawful killing, and since it is government who define the laws, they can simply declare the killing they perform to not be unlawful.
      Sometimes it's reclassified as murder after the government doing it has been deposed.

      When an american soldier shoots an enemy combatant in iraq, is that murder?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:When does the government get involved? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well if the prisoner wants to be an organ donor then I don't have any more problem with it than I already have with the death penalty. I happen to be against the death penalty for personal religious reasons.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:When does the government get involved? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      That can be arranged. Don't turn around, this won't hurt a bit.

    7. Re:When does the government get involved? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Yowza. Sounds just like a bad ST:TNG episode.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    8. Re:When does the government get involved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a related note, did you hear of the "blood farm" raided recently in India?

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7302649.stm

    9. Re:When does the government get involved? by riggah · · Score: 1

      You say potato, I say potato.

    10. Re:When does the government get involved? by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      Unlikely to spread to India ,where religious and ( litigious ) sensitivities would make it very difficult nor is it likely to spread to Europe where mengele is still infamous but the one country it can spread to is the US where prison sentences are no longer seen as reformatory but as a retributary exercise. As it is felons are to an extent non-persons and it isn't long before the organs of those on Death row are sold to provide 'compensation' to the families of the victims.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    11. Re:When does the government get involved? by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      They can have my cold dead fingers only when . . . Oh, never mind.

  5. There's another article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Healthwatch Blog has an interesting take on things. Very interesting

  6. Again, life imitates science fiction by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1, Informative

    Larry Niven coined the term "organlegger" to describe individuals who obtained and resold body parts through less than scrupulous means.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Again, life imitates science fiction by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      Larry Niven coined the term "organlegger" to describe individuals who obtained and resold body parts through less than scrupulous means.
      What a coincidence! I coined the term "legorganner" to describe someone missing both arms due to congenital defect or horrific accident who has subsequently taken up playing the organ using their legs.
      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  7. Hmmm by joaommp · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Now, who says I'm worth more alive than dead?"

    It depends... do you know the secret combination to a safe holding multibilion dollar amounts and are susceptible of talking under... preemptive advice?

  8. Did someone tell Tony Soprano? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only does this make it easier to dispose of the body after you whack somebody, but you make money at the same time!

    It's win-win!

  9. Hmm by TheLink · · Score: 3, Funny

    How much is my left little finger worth?

    Don't get the wrong idea, I'm quite attached to it.

    So you'll have to prise it from my cold dead hands (or over my dead body)...

    Oh wait...

    --
    1. Re:Hmm by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      How much is my left little finger worth?

      Don't get the wrong idea, I'm quite attached to it. LOL, this phrasing and surreal message made me think of Salad Fingers. :-)
      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  10. One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A recent staple of science fiction is the story of people optioning their body parts for money while they're still living (companies pay you based on the value of said parts and the odds that your body will still be intact at death and not crushed in a car accident or something). Personally, I think this is not so unlikely as many science fiction scenarios. After all, about the only thing standing in the way are medical ethics regulations, and when times get tight, you can bet that corruption will put a stop to those.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by joaommp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's very cool and then, soon after you get paid, you "accidentally" die of some cause that coincidentally doesn't harm the body parts you sold.

    2. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      What would minimize corruption in this area is legalizing sales of human body parts. If my estate would benefit from the sale of my body parts after I die, why shouldn't I arrange to have it do so?

    3. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would have to make you a little nervous. But, in practice, it's very unlikely that a company would ever risk a major go-to-jail-for-a-very-long-time-loose-everything scandal just to harvest a few bodies a little early. They would just adjust their rates accordingly.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by joaommp · · Score: 1

      Companies that can afford such a scheme, can afford the means to prevent them from getting caught or to prevent them from getting convicted even if they get caught.

    5. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by JimDaGeek · · Score: 1

      Because if a person who would benefit from the sale of your dead body was facing financial ruin, it may just be enough of an incentive to kill you or have you killed. Heck, there are people that have been killed over 10's of dollars, or a pair of shoes or even a beer or two. If you are worth more dead than alive, you might just find yourself dead sooner rather than later. It happens all the time to people with a big life insurance policy.

      Imagine if some ghetto/trailer trash could just knock-off a family member and get a fat pay-day.

      --
      General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
    6. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not crushed in a car accident or something I've always wondered, which form of death (self inflicted or otherwise) is the most likely to yield organs viable for donation?
    7. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      A brain aneurysm or massive stroke that killed your brain (while in the hospital) but left everything else untouched would be "best" in such a scenario, I suppose. The brain isn't worth anything as a transplant organ.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      Because if a person who would benefit from the sale of your dead body was facing financial ruin, it may just be enough of an incentive to kill you or have you killed. Heck, there are people that have been killed over 10's of dollars, or a pair of shoes or even a beer or two. If you are worth more dead than alive, you might just find yourself dead sooner rather than later. It happens all the time to people with a big life insurance policy.

      That's not a good enough reason to prohibit otherwise-lawful trade, much less something that can save thousands or millions of lives (by providing needed replacement organs). If you want murder to be illegal (as I do), then make murder illegal; don't make it illegal to do something that you think might increase the rate of murder.

    9. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor would Enron fix their books just to make cash.

      And I am certain banks wouldn't shoot themselves in the foot by over extending what they are lending by less credible means.

      Nope that could never go wrong....

    10. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by RogL · · Score: 1

      Auto-insurance companies (as well as trucking insurers) already do this for hardware: if your car is "totalled" in an accident, they pay you the insured value, then try to sell the mangled car (or trucking cargo) either whole or in parts to recoup what they just paid.

      So if regulations eased up to allow it: upon your untimely demise, your life-insurance company would payoff your insured amount, say $250,000, then sell off your salvageable organs to offset their cost.

      On the upside, more available parts, and cheaper life-insurance rates!

    11. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by merreborn · · Score: 1

      A recent staple of science fiction is the story of people optioning their body parts for money while they're still living
      Meanwhile, in the real world, there are dozens, if not hundreds of university "Willed Body" programs to which you can commit your cadaver. However, their FAQs mention that it is illegal for them to pay you for your donation.

      http://anatomy.ucsf.edu/WBP/index.html#10.html
      http://www.hsc.unt.edu/departments/pathology_anatomy/willedbody/faq.htm#q4
      http://www8.utsouthwestern.edu/utsw/cda/dept128871/files/128973.html#4

      Interestingly, 2 of the above 3 specifically cite *state* law. Are there any states where some version of the law isn't on the books?
    12. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in a world where organs are easy to move, what's to stop some meat head medical school dropout with a pistol?

      (the solution is to focus on preventing the use of illegitimate organs in general rather than worry about exactly who is fetching them, I guess by making it very hard for somebody who does something sketchy to continue to operate, regardless of how big an organization they are)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    13. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by maxume · · Score: 1

      Better me than Joe Undertaker.

      People are raising the specter of going into a covenant with the company and having them kill you; if there is a market for organs(even a black market...), what's to stop somebody who hasn't bothered to ask you if they can use your organs from killing you?

      I guess it becomes a question of whether a regulated market where most people get treated fairly will be better than trying to stifle a completely unregulated market where people get killed for their tissues. The existence of the regulated market could suppress the black market(hopefully it would be cheaper to get a organ with provenance than it would be to risk the black market), so there might be enough reason to reconsider whether it is actually immoral, or just repugnant(So if you believe that laws should address things that are actually wrong or harmful rather than simply distasteful...).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    14. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Why would medical ethics stand in the way? You aren't harming anyone.

    15. Re:One future cadaver for sale, liver not included by JimDaGeek · · Score: 1

      don't make it illegal to do something that you think might increase the rate of murder.
      Though there are already many laws like this. For example, it is illegal to sell or give a firearm to someone that is "mentally ill" (which could just even mean depressed). The two reasons I have been told is because of suicide risk and homicide risk. Down here in SC I just heard on the news something about making it illegal to own a gun if you have had any domestic violence conviction or even a domestic violence restraining order placed against you. Where did the 2nd amendment go?
      --
      General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
  11. They are trading bears? by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The BBC are reporting on a grisly trade lying behind the booming business for replacement body parts in medical procedures. According to Colbert, the number one threat to America is BEARS! These biological terrorists need to be stopped before the American Dollar is ruined.... oh wait
    1. Re:They are trading bears? by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      A grisly trade in a black market! The country is in bruins.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    2. Re:They are trading bears? by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Hey now, don't panda to the masses.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
  12. 250K a body!!! by NobleSavage · · Score: 1

    How can I get in on this?

    1. Re:250K a body!!! by sjaguar · · Score: 1

      More importantly, how can I get my community involved? There are several neighbors of mine that I would like to volunteer for donation.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0.
    2. Re:250K a body!!! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      How can I get in on this?

      Just lie down on this table and close your eyes. Sorry it's a bit cold, but you won't notice after a few moments.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  13. George Carlin was right, someonelse too by MrShaggy · · Score: 3, Funny

    'Thats why I dont sign my doner card. When you get into an accident and the abulance comes, and they see you have that card. Do you honestly think they are there to help you?? Hell no, they are looking for spare parts.' Or even better. knock.knock: Door opens. "Yes, can I help you??" 'Are yu such and such' 'Yes I am'. "We're here for you liver." ;)

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    1. Re:George Carlin was right, someonelse too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:George Carlin was right, someonelse too by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      You mean This?

    3. Re:George Carlin was right, someonelse too by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to get a hold of Carlin's drivers license to see if he really did pledge the only two parts he said he would give out during that bit: his rectum and his anus.

      Put away the oxygen, Don, this man's a DONOR!

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  14. A related BBC news article by u8i9o0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Quoting the summary:

    Now, who says I'm worth more alive than dead?

    How about this very recent article, also from BBC. The crime they describe is blood donations (for cash) from a farm of living people.
    --
    This is not my sig
    1. Re:A related BBC news article by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      That shouldn't be a crime, it's your blood, and selling a fairly small amount of it won't harm you.
      They don't like the idea of people selling blood, because then they won't be able to continue getting free donations. On the other hand, the number of people giving blood would increase massively if people were paid for it.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    2. Re:A related BBC news article by Dmala · · Score: 1

      From the FA, it sounds like the issue was that the people were being swindled, possibly held against their will, and they were being drained to an unhealthy degree. If I'm not mistaken, there are, or at least were, places in the US where you could get paid to give blood. The major problem with this is that it tends to attract the homeless, drug users, and other groups with a very high risk of hepatitis, HIV, and other blood borne illnesses.

    3. Re:A related BBC news article by u8i9o0 · · Score: 1
      You missed the point of my post entirely.

      That shouldn't be a crime, it's your blood, and selling a fairly small amount of it won't harm you.
      Even if you didn't bother to look at the link, the way I described it as "from a farm of living people" would hopefully indicate that the people were not selling their own blood to the bank, but rather that a broker/intermediary was selling it. If you did read the link it includes a witness quoting, "They could barely stand and on medical examination their haemoglobin levels were found to be very low", which indicates to me that the amounts involved were far from "a fairly small amount". The situation resembles vampires rather than properly compensated donors.

      They don't like the idea of people selling blood, because then they won't be able to continue getting free donations. On the other hand, the number of people giving blood would increase massively if people were paid for it.
      There is no profit motive on the demand side that is restricting the change. The patient already pays for any consumables during surgery so, in a situation where blood/organs are bought and sold, adding blood/organs to the cost of surgery would be identical (increased costs are always passed on to the consumer). The main incentive for a system that requires free donations is that it eliminates many forms of corruption.

      Some businesses just should not exist. I'm not completely convinced that the business of blood/tissue sale is in that group, but I'm most of the way there.
      --
      This is not my sig
  15. Remembering Alistair Cooke by seven+of+five · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Remembering Alistair Cooke by ajcham · · Score: 1

      Alistair Cooke's case was specifically referred to in last night's BBC documentary on this subject.

    2. Re:Remembering Alistair Cooke by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      It's sad, but I first read that as "This happened to Alistair Cookie" and thought something happened to Cookie Monster.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  16. I can beat that by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got a middle finger that I would gladly give George W. Bush for free.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  17. How much would organ donation help? by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    As an organ donor, I have to wonder how much those of you who aren't organ donors are to blame for this.

    How much of a market would there be if the organs were available as a result of donation?

    1. Re:How much would organ donation help? by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      On a related note, I wonder how many people who do not give away their auto mobiles are to blame for car theft. No need to steal a car if you can legally obtain one for free.

    2. Re:How much would organ donation help? by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

      "On a related note..."

      Where was that? I didn't see it in your post.

      "I wonder how many people who do not give away their auto mobiles after they die and no longer have any use for them are to blame for car theft. No need to steal a car if you can legally obtain one that has been donated for your use for free."

      I fixed your post to make it more accurately reflect the situation.

    3. Re:How much would organ donation help? by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 0, Troll

      I have to wonder how much those of you who aren't organ donors are to blame for this.
      None. You're not (usually) an organ donor until you die. And as far as I know, dead people can't read slashdot.
    4. Re:How much would organ donation help? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      So.. who donates their car after their dead? Usually it will end up with some relative that already has a car, and that relative will either sell his own or the inherited car. In neither situation is a car donated.

      Besides, due to religious reasons, many people believe they have a use for their bodies after they died. You'll be more likely to get cars donated to stop theft (as if such a thing would work, which was the point of the grandparent) then it is to get people to donate their bodies after death.

      p.s. I'm a registered organ donor.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:How much would organ donation help? by faloi · · Score: 1

      There would likely still be a huge market. Even if everyone was forced to donate organs, which isn't such a good idea in my opinion, there would be plenty of reasons why the organs from one particular donor or another can't be used. From horrendous accidents, cancer, the presence of any number of diseases... Even the medications the person was on, or places the person has visited might get them off the list. I can't even donate blood for a couple of years because I visited the Dominican Republic.

      The "advantage" people obtaining the organs fraudulently have is that they can make their organs fit the bill.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    6. Re:How much would organ donation help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, tough crowd tonight.

  18. Personal worth by simpsone · · Score: 1

    Now, who says I'm worth more alive than dead? I believe that would be Boba Fett.

  19. Sure sure... by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 3, Funny

    "My cousin went to school with a guy that this happened to."

    Are you sure it wasn't your cousin's mother's sister's uncle?

    1. Re:Sure sure... by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you sure it wasn't your cousin's mother's sister's uncle?

      He's from Arkansas, it's the same guy! ;)

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:Sure sure... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Naw, he meant his brother's mother's sister's nephew. His cousin. Things sure get complicated when you have a family directed-acyclic-graph instead of a family tree. In other news, has anyone else noticed that a few slashdot pages (especially repy / preview) load a buttload of page components from media.senses / ad.doubleclick before they display? Maybe it's a Firefox thing (I've been away for a month or two) but it sure seems strange to have it sit there on loading 'reply to post' for 5 minutes churning through ads that never get displayed. Not that I'd prefer that they were, of course.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  20. Shhhh..... by cdr_data · · Score: 3, Funny

    PLEASE don't tell my wife!

  21. Oblig. Futurama by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fry: Now that you mention it, I do have trouble breathing underwater sometimes. I'll take the gills.
    Shady organ dealer: Yes, gills. Then, uh, you don't need lungs anymore, is right?
    Fry: Can't imagine why I would.
    Shady organ dealer: Lie down on table. I take lungs now, gills come next week.

    1. Re:Oblig. Futurama by dintech · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking about this scene last night when I watched the trailer for the documentary...

  22. MOD PARENT DOWN by CRCulver · · Score: 1

    The parent links to GNAA's Last Measure shock site.

  23. Re:You think it's no big deal by kalirion · · Score: 4, Funny

    You forgot to mention that he woke up in a tub full of ice.

  24. So how long by overshoot · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... until we get to Larry Niven's dystopic idea that the demand for "spare parts" will grow so huge that legislatures first order that organs be harvested from all executed felons?

    After that, of course, public objections to the death penalty drop since it's a source of spare parts. Eventually death becomes the standard penalty for any felony.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  25. Sell yourself. by cheros · · Score: 1

    Bit of a recursive profit, but hey. You get to blow $250k, then get killed and math applied (divisions, mainly).

    Just get a guarantee for them to wait until you're dead before they start dividing you.

    Yeah, I know. Something I ate disagreed with me (and no, you can't have my stomach).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  26. Imagine if *you* had the right to sell your corpse by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yup, you're worth a lot of money dead. To everyone but you. Imagine if _you_ had the right to decide to sell your corpse for a profit, the good you could do: You could leave that money to your family, donate it to charities. You could also do wonders to eliminate the organ donor waiting list -- if, presumably, you could directly sell your organs to folks willing to pay for them.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  27. Re:You think it's no big deal by Applekid · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is officially now a race to produce a link to Snopes discussing kidney thieves.

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  28. Obligatory by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    You'd better make sure that we're properly dead before you start ol' Ripbeak!

  29. Sooo..... by RationalRoot · · Score: 1

    Who want's to start a web site where I can sell futures on my dead body.

    If I'm worth 250K in lets say 50 years when I'm dead.

    Assume that that goes up by inflation, (probably more).

    I'll sell of the rights to my dead body now for about 200k

    Any takers.

    [It will have to go through enough solicitors that you don't get my address and come 'round to ensure that you get to cash in sooner rather than later though]

    --
    http://davesboat.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Sooo..... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      How do you guarantee the quality of your organs? A lot can happen in 50 years, you could develop cataracts, liver disease, or be crushed in a car accident. You're going to have to offer a better deal than that.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Sooo..... by RationalRoot · · Score: 1

      Hey, if some random body that gets swiped from a mortuary sells for 250K....

      I swim about 4K a week, In the recent past I have run several half marathons*, I don't smoke (anything), I don't drink much. Apart from the fact that I might outlive you, I reckon this future corpse is going to trade for a premium.

      (*You may want to discount my knees)

      --
      http://davesboat.blogspot.com/
    3. Re:Sooo..... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Hence the "market" aspect of it. It would be a gamble, but not really any different than something like penny stocks. Buy into enough "futures" at the right price, and you'll end up ahead even after the occasional loss.

  30. Re:You think it's no big deal by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0

    He woke up in the hospital. Was that not clear?

  31. The Value of Taco's Body by airship · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has anyone EVER asserted that Taco was worth more than a quarter of a million? Anyone? Anyone?

    I didn't think so.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
    1. Re:The Value of Taco's Body by maxume · · Score: 1

      Ask his bank.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  32. There's a mark-up somewhere... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I'm probably not the only person who has received the "live or die" email claiming to come from a hitman. If by the email someone could take a body for $9,000 or less, and then by the story sell it for $250,000, then there is certainly money to be made.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:There's a mark-up somewhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hidden costs? $241,000 for your soul and the remainder of your life in jail isn't *that* good a deal.

    2. Re:There's a mark-up somewhere... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      remainder of your life in jail isn't *that* good a deal.
      Yeah, and we sure are good at catching al-qaeda guys, aren't we? Yep, I'm sure of it - bin Laden's gonna fall any day now.
      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  33. Re:You think it's no big deal by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    Whooossshhhh...

    rj

  34. Two Words... by MRe_nl · · Score: 0

    Soylent Green

    Bon appetite

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  35. Basic supply and demand... by nasor · · Score: 1

    People always argue that we shouldn't be able to buy and sell organs because it gives the rich an unfair advantage over the poor when they need an organ transplant - but this viewpoint ignores the fact that being able to pay for organs actually increases the supply of organs. I guarantee you that many, many more people would check the "I want to donate my organs if I die" box if they knew that their surviving family would be gettings some money for it. Likewise, people would be much more likely to allow the organs of their deceased family members to be harvested if they received money for it. In the end, allowing people to pay for organs results in more people getting transplants and surviving.

    1. Re:Basic supply and demand... by SkelVA · · Score: 1

      http://www.reason.com/news/show/125550.html
      Reason TV covered this topic nicely. Create a real, legitimate, consensual way for people to donate their organs and be compensated, and these black market deals dry up. If I give my kidney to you and get to pay off my student loans, everyone wins.

  36. Donations? by kernowyon · · Score: 1

    Whilst the article covers the stealing of bodies, which is pretty deplorable, there is an interesting question raised by it.
    Student doctors and some other trainee medical staff need to practice on deceased bodies. In the UK at least, it was possible to donate your body to science (and in the USA too I believe?). How do you go about doing this I wonder? Does the Donor Card, carried by many of us in the UK cover this as well - maybe they can't use your organs as donating material for some reason (disease, medications etc), but your body could be used for training the doctors of tomorrow?
    If that is the case, I would be quite happy for them to practice on me once I am dead (I take too many tablets for any of my organs to be of use), but it may not be a popular idea with some people for whatever reason (cultural, religion etc).Maybe the Donor Card needs to have an additional box - When I am dead, please use my body for training the Medical Staff of tomorrow. If enough donations were received, surely the kind of activity mentioned in the article would be stopped.
    I had a feeling that at one time you could specifically state that you wished to donate your body to science in the UK and, following your death, your body was handed to the students for their traning and then your remains would be cremated without any expense to your family.

    I have no problem with donating my body to science - hell, they already have my right kidney, complete with huge tumour, in a jar somewhere....!

    --
    Awful UID - but I have been here ages...
    1. Re:Donations? by bamwham · · Score: 1

      In the US it is a question posed to your next of kin or estate. I think the default answer is "no" which seems silly to this atheist. As with many things dealing with your final days it is important that as many people as possible (particularly the ones to whom the question will be posed) are aware of your wishes. The reason for Donor cards is that in the case of organ transplant there is not always time to contact the next of kin for permission to take these delicate tissues. Other parts such as tendons, bone, and cadaver usage for medical training or testing, are less time sensitive and can wait for the relatives to be asked. We should be able to use our bodies as payment for the cost of our care and treatment. It is so horrible that following a death families are often hounded by the hospital looking to collect money for a service which ultimately failed. My family is instructed to get what they can until all of my earthly obligations are taken care of, and then to donate what remains to a worthy cause.

  37. Oh, thanks a lot... by the_fat_kid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I have to change my will.

    Let's see:
    Organ donor card? check.
    Sunday NY times? check.
    1994 jeep cherokee? check.
    road map of my nations capitol with dump sites marked? check.

    All right, I'm ready for the end, when it comes.

    "I'm not affraid of dieing. Ijust don't want to be there when it happens."

    --
    -- Sig under construction...
  38. They can have my body by maroberts · · Score: 3, Funny

    As long as my head can be kept alive in a jar....

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  39. Re:Imagine if *you* had the right to sell your cor by wodgy7 · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure that this isn't legal. There is no property in bodies at common law, but you could sell a "chose in action" (technical legal term) granting a third party the right to obtain your corpse after death.

    It's a good idea. With the aging of the baby boomers and looming medical care costs for families, it makes sense.

  40. for example... by rilister · · Score: 1

    I came across this when noted (and lovable) BBC radio journalist and Masterpiece Theater presenter Alastair Cooke's body bits were stolen after his death:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alastair_Cooke#Later_Life_and_Death

    - the bodysnatchers changed his age on his death certificate from 95 to 85 (presumably to bump up his value), and ignored the fact that his cancerous bones would have been useless for transplant. Caveat emptor indeed.

    --
    'This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it' - Eeyore
  41. These black market body parts are bad because... by Rastl · · Score: 1
    Legitimate sources have to pass all kinds of inspections, tests to make sure the parts being harvested are safe for use, etc.

    The black market has no such controls. So the body parts being implanted in your favorite Aunt Florence could have come from a drug-addicted HIV-positive person with hepatitis C. The hospital has purchased the parts from a 'legitimate' source and now they can't figure out what happened to Aunt Florence over a simple hip replacement.

    The morals of such a practice are one thing. The actual physical dangers are quite another.

  42. No Bene tleilaxu references by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

    They were the ultimate body snatchers of all time.

  43. health concerns by peter303 · · Score: 1

    There are some diseases that survive death and transplant screening like HIV and listeria. Several cases of bad cartilage used in knee repairs and plastic surgery. You need to know the source of the material and cause of death.

  44. The "big deal" is that people are making a profit by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    If there's a profit to be made, the money should go to relatives/charity, not some double-dealing shyster.

    --
    No sig today...
  45. Re:You think it's no big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    People are laughing, but this one was reported in mainstream news

    http://www.theonion.com/content/video/anonymous_philanthropist_donates

  46. Re:Imagine if *you* had the right to sell your cor by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    Selling your organs is illegal in the US. You can _donate_ them to whoever you like -- I have relatives who have donated their bodies to science, for instance -- but you can't sell them. Ebay would be a far more interesting and lucrative place if you could.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  47. Re:Imagine if *you* had the right to sell your cor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great Idea, People are only murdered for inheritance now, with this idea, they will be killed for the body too, sort of a two for one deal.

    Could work but would bring up the euthanasia storm again - the controls would be tricky to implement for those truly wishing to sell their own body without risking being coerced, tricked, etc by greedy relatives.

  48. Obviously worth more alive by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

    I'm obviously worth more alive than dead. Think about it... I have some 25-30 good years of work left in me. Even if I only made $20,000 a year, that's still a worth of half a million dollars over the next 25 years. If an employer is willing to pay you that for your labor, that must be your worth. Add to that your contributions to society that aren't directly related to your job, and $250,000 seems paltry.

  49. Re:You think it's no big deal by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh man, tell me about it. My aunt's second cousin's dog's sister's father's owner's grandmother's great grand-niece's former roomate was kidnapped by aliens, but then the aliens were spaceship-jacked by a bunch of street thugs before they could even get the anal probe in all the way. She was taken to a secluded shack in Montana where Jimmy Hoffa came out with a rusty scalpel and a copy of "Home Surgery for Dummies". Luckily, a Sasquatch riding on a Chupacabra broke in just in the nick of time and took her off to his treehouse high up in the Rockies. After a few months, though, he kicked her out because apparently she was supposed to be paying half of the rent or something, and she ended up wandering around the forest for several days until she passed out. Anyway, she came to in a back-alley surgery, and there was a big guy in dirty scrubs negotiating with the zombie Jeffrey Dahmer over who got what part of her body. Luckily, she managed to break free, but as soon as she got out the door she was picked up by federal agents who flew her off to Area 51 in a black helicopter and locked her in a closet with some freaky squid looking thing from some planet in the vicinity of Alpha Centauri (or so he claimed). He was just setting out the silverware so he could devour her in a more civilized fashion when a bunch of those weird guys who like to look at Area 51 all day with binoculars in order to find government conspiracies broke in and whisked her off. Unfortunately, they were short on meth and had no cash, but they did have the phone number for the Harvard Medical School, so they knocked her out, and she came to a few days later in the middle of the 405 freeway in a tub of ice.

    Anyway, to make a long story short, she was missing three fingers, her left kneecap, three and a half yards of small intestine, three quarters of her right lung, and her spleen. Really scary stuff.

  50. Re:Imagine if *you* had the right to sell your cor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if I buy your body, because I need liver transplantation, what exactly will stop me from paying someone else to shoot you in the head in front of my hospital. I have nothing to lose - I will die if I don't get that liver... but I have money. It will be obvious that I am involved, but still I have a chance to get away if the cops don't find sufficient evidence that links the killing to me.
    Certain death or RISK of prison time/death sentence ?

  51. What Evil Demons Inhabit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This Cadaver?

    PatRIOTically As Usual,
    K Trout

  52. Try leaving the 'medics' out of this... by snorcup · · Score: 1

    "...Many unscrupulous "dealers" will procure body parts from anyone willing to deal them -- e.g., undertakers, medics..." First of all, I did read the majority of TFA, and I did not see them mention cases involving ambulances or Paramedics. Having quite a few friends in EMS, and having worked in an ambulance myself as an EMT, I can attest to the fact that it would be impossible to snatch a body a pawn it off to a doctor for research. As an emergency medical provider, you are essentially taking custody of a patient, similar to how a police office can take some one into custody. In that position you are liable for the well being of that patient, and ensuring they are treated well and delivered to their destination, be that a hospital, nursing home, or 'other' facility. Along with that responsibility comes the appropriate paperwork and documentation that demonstrates you lived up to your end of the deal. To insinuate that the hard working people that pull you out of a car when you wrap it around a tree, drag you out from between the toilet and the bathtub when you have your heart attack, or get up out of bed at zero dark thirty to pick your grandmother up off the floor when she fell are hawking bodies for some extra dollars is insulting. Please watch what you say

  53. $250k? Excellent! by Bretski · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a nice chunk of change for my family. Sort of a bonus on top of my life insurance. Gotta find one of these "dealers".

    1. Re:$250k? Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if life insurance companies would start to demand rights to the bodies at death before they'll pay out. I think they're probably sleezy enough to try.

  54. Is dr frankenstein running any part of this? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    And if he is will we see a monster made out of dead people parts?

  55. Re:You think it's no big deal by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

    hey! you cheated! False start!

  56. buying/selling spare parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of my colleagues have done research on the human chest wall (skin, ribs, etc.). When a body is processed for burial, some internal organs are removed, and a portion of the chest wall is also removed before the body is sewn back up. Some of these specimens wind up getting sold to researchers.

    These are above-board purchases, and probably legal more or less, but I sure doubt that proper donor consent was obtained in most cases . . .

  57. Cadaver Calculator by deafNewt · · Score: 1

    For your estate planning needs: Cadaver Calculator http://www.justsayhi.com/bb/cadaver

  58. "Mastromarino?" No kidding? by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    According to a related story, the mastermind of a major body snatching ring -- the one that looted Alistair Cooke's cancer-ridden corpse -- was Michael Mastromarino.

    I mean, wow! If there's a name that shouts "Unscrupulous Villain," it's Mastromarino.

    Maybe not as much as "Hans Darkbloode" or "Lucious Skjulreever," but still . . .

  59. Over my dead body!!! by AnomaliesAndrew · · Score: 2, Funny

    Think I'll let somebody sell my organs without giving me a fair cut of the profits?

    OVER MY DEAD BODY!!!

    --
    Move all sig!
  60. Repossession would be a real drag . . . by Domint · · Score: 1

    I'm not as concerned about getting black market body parts as I am about the consequences of missing a payment.

  61. Fantastic book about uses for dead bodies by smellsofbikes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Stiff" by Mary Roach. Goes into extensive detail about just how many uses dead bodies have. A few: forensics (letting them decay and recording what sorts of insects colonize them and when, which gives immense amounts of data to people who are trying to analyze time-of-death, also covered extensively in "A Fly For The Prosecution" by Madison Goff, and other books.
    Safety testing: putting corpses in cars and crashing them gives much better results on skull fractures and such than Buster The Dummy. Likewise, dropping corpses in elevators or off buildings into safety nets, or measuring the protective qualities of bullet-proof jackets. It's hard to get good results using pigs.

    (I saw Mary Roach read from this book one time, and it was creepy, not because of her and the book, but because just about everyone in the audience ended up asking really detailed, scary questions about treatment of dead bodies, since apparently most of them had experience in the subject.)

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  62. One often overlooked of human organ harvesting.... by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Something which is not very well known but probably is an instance of one of the largest violation of human rights and illegal harvesting and sale of human body parts, and which are healthy and normal body parts that are being illegally and unethically removed from the bodies of millions of children every year is circumcision. Foreskins, which are a normal and healthy part of the human body and for which there is no justifiable or medically sound and valid rationale for removing a normal and healthy part of the human body that has no medical diseases whatsoever, are harvested from young children, and then are sold to corporations, including pharmacuetical companies, where they are used to manufacture cosmetics and for testing. SkinMedica is one such product which is made from foreskin fibroblasts, and which has been promoted by Oprah Winfrey, who apparently is aware that a major component of the product is human neonatal foreskins stolen from genitally mutilated boys. Ironically, Oprah's show in the past has decried female circumcision. I suppose from Oprah's point of view, the genital mutilation and destruction of parts of boys anatomy is acceptable, this is only unacceptable when done to girls, since apparently only girls deserve to be protected from demeaning, dehumanising genital mutilations, torture and assault. Apparently girls are entitled to more rights to a whole body than boys are.

    If a person, as an adult, wants to be circumcised, male or female, they are free to make that choices for themselves, with fully informed consent. it should be the right of the person to make their own choices about removals of normal and undiseased parts of their bodies. It is a basic human right to physical integrity, and unless we uphold a medical standard and universal principle which requires an actual medical abnormality to be present on the part to removed from an unconsenting, this right is not being honoured and respected, and as well, we have no standard to define what is an assault. Any clear assault could be made permissable by society at its own whim, even if it is to the detriment of individual rights. Since circumcision cannot be undone and what is taken cannot be gotten back, the decision should be the person whose body it is, since only they will be able to decide what is best for them. Perhaps some men prefer to remain intact for aesthetic reasons or to retain full sensitivity. We should do what gives the individual the most freedom, since all rights and liberties are based in the individual. Parents do not have a right to do anything to their children and their responsibilities are to protect their children from harm. Children are not extensions of their parents bodies and children do have human rights which are seperate from the parents and are considered seperate, individual persons. Removing or destroying a healthy and undiseased part of a childs body is considered child abuse and it is an assault upon the child by definition , circumcision is a removal of a healthy and undiseased part of the childs body. Removals of parts of the body are permenant and cannot be undone later. A person can always change their beliefs later on, but they cannot undo damage to their body if they did not want this. Therefore, removal of normal parts of human anatomy should be deferred to a time when the person is of the age they can make with fully informed consent these decisions for themselves. The foreskin is a normal and healthy part of the human anatomy and has been a part of the anatomy of mammals and their predecessors for over 100 million years. All mammals have foreskins, including both males and females.

    Of course we already know that male or female circumcision is an invalid and wrong genital mutilation of children, since it violates medical ethics. Everyone has a basic human right to a whole body, and to not have parts of their body removed without their consent unless there is a serious, critical, present and current medical condition on that part and where removing it is necessary to treat that medical ab

  63. She sorta of knows by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    She sorta knows already (damn you got a small freezer) now get home so I can hear me 500.000 for today!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  64. Alcor plus selling your body = Profit!! by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    So to get your head frozen it costs like 50,000 dollors, but if you sell your internal organs and the rest of the body besides the head you can get roughly 200,000 from it, sounds like a good 150,000 profit plus you get your head frozen and someday they may beable to unfreeze it/virtualize your brain/etc.....

    Could be the right choice for childless nerds who want their legacy of nerditity to live on.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  65. Cash Advance by modernmyths · · Score: 1

    Wait, does this mean I can get a cash advance for my organs I'll be donating in the future?

  66. "who says I'm worth more alive than dead?" by caldodge · · Score: 1

    Not Mr. Potter, for sure.

  67. Price? by Cctoide · · Score: 1

    Apparently a fully processed cadaver can fetch up to $250,000. Now, who says I'm worth more alive than dead?"

    I thought I heard someone say that the average healthy adult is worth about $2 million in the human smuggling business?

    --
    "Let's face it, it's a good story. Accuracy would kill it."
  68. So.... by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

    1) Snatch up some of these foreclosing homes
    2) Make them burglary honeypots
    3) Harvest your catches
    4) Profit!

    No ???? needed! :-)

  69. Re:Braaaiinsss by maxume · · Score: 1

    Well, not for the receiver. It might be for the donor, if the technical issues could be worked out.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  70. Re:Imagine if *you* had the right to sell your cor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could be pressured by debt collectors to start selling parts of yourself off now.

    You could even take out loans against the organs that will still be presumably healthy when you die. Loans at extremely high interest rates. Oh, but wait, you actually lived too long, or died in a way such that not as many organs were still viable, so that debt will be taken out of the estate.

    If that sounds too extreme to be true, consider that just this morning I heard a commercial for loans against the future awards from lawsuits *still in progress*. And of course, there's the long-running structured settlement thing where they advertise "it's my money, and I want it now!" and neglect to mention that the lawyer who negotiates it into a lump sum is going to keep 60%.

  71. Re:Imagine if *you* had the right to sell your cor by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    The laws against homicide and solicitation of murder, perhaps?

    But if you're going to fry for my liver, I would recommend taking some onions and butter with you to the electric chair?

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  72. Re:Imagine if *you* had the right to sell your cor by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    I don't see it as being particularly tricky, but then, I expect that people are capable of _not_ being idiots. Anyone who does manage to find themselves as being an actual idiot, well, they pretty much deserve what they get. Anyone can think rationally. It's not that hard. That some choose not to, or do not do so wisely is not my concern.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  73. Re:Imagine if *you* had the right to sell your cor by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    If you manage to get yourself into stupid financial dealings, you're an idiot. There's (unfortunately) no law against being an idiot. (See recent other replies in this thread for more on that topic.)

    It's no different than the current subprime thing. Idiot people wanted to own things they couldn't afford; idiot banks lent them money they should have reasonably known the idiot people couldn't/wouldn't pay back; Idiot shareholders didn't tell the idiot banks to stop lending to idiot people and kept on investing in these banks anyways. Justice (in the sense everyone involved is getting what they deserve for their part in the whole thing) ensued, sans usual hilarity.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  74. Don't Forget Gold Teeth and... by littlewink · · Score: 1

    your titanium hip socket, or pacemaker!

    Those are worth their weight in gold literally and are usually removed before burial (whether legal or not in your state). There's lots of money in this.

    This is a good thing really. After death the state should take possession of the body and recycle anything that is economically viable. Why should we put good gold and titanium into the ground, along with stainless steel coffins!

    Years ago I struck up a conversation with a well-dressed gentleman who described this work.

    Apparently it's a very good living and a possible upward career move for former ASP.NET programmers.

    1. Re:Don't Forget Gold Teeth and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It is every citizen's final duty, to go into the tanks.. "

  75. Re:Braaaiinsss by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Here's to Brad Pitt having a stroke on the same day that my body is crushed in a machine press.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  76. Re:Imagine if *you* had the right to sell your cor by Pendersempai · · Score: 1

    That would be voidable on public policy grounds. For some reason, Americans find even the voluntary sale of organs distasteful. Unfortunately, that squeamishness means a lot of innocent people have to die for lack of an available transplant.

  77. Old News by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 1

    This was discussed in the pages of Reason Magazine nearly two years ago. Can't find the URL right now; I'm at work.

    --
    In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
  78. Re:You think it's no big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a Microsoft move. Bet they heard Negroponte was working on affordable kidneys so they dump hundreds of kidneys into the market below cost!

    Kind donation my arse....

  79. What if you have AIDS and didn't consent? by voxluna · · Score: 1

    This is a big problem, and has been going on for years. Read the book, "Body Brokers: Inside America's Underground Trade in Human Remains", or this MSNBC article about the illicit trade of body parts and tissues.

    Last year, several funeral homes in New York were charged with allowing these people to come in and harvest bits and pieces from their clients (the dead), sometimes replacing things like femurs with PVC pipe.

    TFA refers to cadavers for medical instruction, but regardless, the problems are twofold. One, often there is no consent. Two, there is little concern if the parts contain cancer or communicable diseases, and IIRC, several people have received infected tissue "donations" who later contracted syphillis, hepatitis, and worse.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." -- Voltaire
  80. Support Organ Donation by Stickerboy · · Score: 1

    ...ride a motorcycle. I've always liked that bumper sticker.

    --
    Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  81. organs on demand in developing countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's even scarier is that in most developing countries you can get organs on demand. If you got a bit of money you can purchase the organs you need, especially kidneys since they can take one from the donor without outright killing him/her. In most cases the donors are "voluntary" - people so poor they do anything to rake in a few extra dollars (or pesos in the country where I live). Some here even claim that there is an even more sinister underworld where unsuspecting "donors" are snatched from the street and diced up for resale. Don't know how much of this snatching part is true though. In any case, in the slums anything can happen when unscrupulous individuals offer lots money to the desperate...

  82. Little Miss Hilton by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    "parisites"

    Most. Accurate. Typo. Evar.

  83. Who's spelling now, Mrs. Scribna? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

    And my english teacher said my misspellings would never amount to anything.