Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

10 Cool Gadgets You Can't Get Here

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the but-i-want-it-now dept.

molex333 writes "PC World has an article about 10 gadgets that are available in Asia but not here. It is a review of some quirky toys that the Japanese have and we don't!" Unfortunately it's one of those obnoxious stories that you have to click like 30x to read the whole thing, but there's some neat stuff.

49 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Face Bank ? by ijustam · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everything was a phone or computer... then that thing. Asia can keep that one.

    1. Re:Face Bank ? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You forgot the robot, but I guess you could categorize that as a computer. Anyway. None of this seems at all interesting. In the end, a phone is a phone, I don't really car if it's waterproof. It's a nice feature, but I wouldn't pay a premium for that. Some of the computers are just stuff you could build at home if you took your time. Like a silent computer you hook up to the TV. Or a home server that hooks up to your other computers via WiFi to be a media server. Not exciting in the least. It's nice that companies are finally starting to build these products, and release them to the masses already configured (if only in other countries). But I don't think I saw anything there I would fly to Asia just to obtain.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Face Bank ? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can't sleep, bank'll eat me.. can't sleep, bank'll eat me..

      --
      Slashdot Burying Stories About Slashdot Media Owned
    3. Re:Face Bank ? by cecille · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would care if it's waterproof, even if I do have to pay a premium for it. Water death seems to claim most of my phones, and paying more for a waterproof one just means that I won't be paying for a different phone when I drop mine in the lake or leave it too close to the sink.

      What actually surprises me though is not that they have waterproof phones in Japan, but that we DON'T have waterproof phones yet here. I mean, we can make waterproof cameras that can actually be USED under water, but we don't yet have a phone that can land in a puddle and come out alive? Come on now. Of course, if the phone was waterproof then they would probably sell fewer phones. Water death is probably a good source of phone-company income. I mean, if your camera isn't waterproof and gets fried, it's feasible to just let it slide and not buy another one. Not really the same thing with a phone since you're probably stuck paying the contract anyway.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    4. Re:Face Bank ? by FSWKU · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can't sleep, bank'll eat me.. can't sleep, bank'll eat me..

      One too many sub-prime loans for you, eh?
      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    5. Re:Face Bank ? by pthor1231 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not so much that they make cameras that are waterproof, as they put cameras that aren't waterproof inside of a huge chunky case that looks retarded in any other situation outside of you being near vast quantities of water. I'm willing to bet that a majority of people wouldn't buy a phone that was retardedly huge just because it was waterproof. Form over function for most Americans. Look at how many people bought the RAZR, and that thing was a piece of crap, functionality wise.

    6. Re:Face Bank ? by Drewmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it just me, or does that bank look like the Necronomicon from Evil Dead?

    7. Re:Face Bank ? by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It doesn't have to be huge and clunky. Many hand-held amateur radio VHF/UHF transceivers meet the mil-specs for dust, water, etc. and are not very large.

      Yaesu VX-7R hand-held VHF/UHF transceiver.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    8. Re:Face Bank ? by Zephyr14z · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, every nokia phone I've owned has survived some pretty extreme water damage. I just let it dry out for a day or so and it keeps working. They certainly aren't waterproof, but they do seem to be self-resurrecting after drops in the lake, etc. I'm not even talking about just the basic Nokia brick either. Their flip phones have also held up remarkably well.

    9. Re:Face Bank ? by Radon360 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll offer one better: Marine VHF hand-helds. Many today are built to be submersible...and they're just as small as the VX-7R. Icom even has one that has a "rumble" feature which is supposed to detect when there is water on the speaker and will vibrate it to expel the water. If it works, it would be a great feature as I've noticed that the audio output level on my submersible hand-helds drops significantly when the speaker has water on it.

      That said, the Yaesus are nice, tough little units.

  2. Winner: Roboremote turtle. Loser: Bank with face by andphi · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have impossibly kawaii (moe?) set side by side with "Takeitaway! Takeitaway! DearHeavensNo!" It's official. Japanese designers just don't know when to quit.

  3. Click 30 Times? by Serenissima · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean click 10 times to see the top 10 gadgets?

    --
    Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Click 30 Times? by rock217 · · Score: 2

      You mean click 10 times to see the top 10 gadgets?
      To be fair, there are 11 pages counting the intro "slide."

      So we have about 19 missing clicks to account for.

      Ok, well everytime you click to the next page you have to scroll down again to see the navigation, at least I do at 1280x1024. So that's 3 down mouse wheel "clicks" per page, so 11x3+11=44 clicks, shit too many!

      Ok I guess I can just hit Page Down instead of mouse wheeling, for the sake of argument we'll count that as a click as it is replacing a click function. That yields us 11+11=22 clicks...still short!

      Fine I relent, there aren't 30 logical clicks in there, taco was lying. Unless taco is one of those people who has to select their browser text to read it, as if it might come flying off if it weren't held down by your highlight color. In that case you could easily fill up 30 clicks!
      --
      Wah Sig!
    2. Re:Click 30 Times? by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're neglecting the word 'like' in his description. The debate should be "Are 30 clicks like 10 clicks?" I think that it's fair to say that they are - And furthermore, the approximation is appropriate. pcworld.com is an ad-supported site. I don't know about you, but I feel that it's my duty to keep ad-supported sites alive by encouraging advertisers. I always click on two links per page and purchase an item from one of the two vendors (doesn't everybody?) So...

      2 ads apiece from intro-slide + 10 gadget slides: 22 clicks
      Clicks to proceed through gadgets: 10 clicks
      Total: 32 clicks

      Of course, that neglects the clicks it took me to make 11 purchases while browsing the article, but I'd still say that 32 clicks are like 30 clicks and the approximation will help compensate for those readers that steal pcworld's content by reading it without purchasing anything advertised.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  4. Raon Everun by Zerth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Everun looked tempting with almost twice the battery life of the eeepc at roughly similar specs, until I caught the sticker price. I'd rather just buy a second battery.

  5. In brief by wombatmobile · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a phone,
    a small pc,
    another phone,
    a vista pc,
    a voice controlled robot,
    a laptop,
    a water resistant phone,
    a hdtv usb dongle,
    a media server + handheld pc + notebook,
    and a piggy bank.
    OK?

    1. Re:In brief by IBBoard · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or, with product names:

      Panasonic Viera P905i (Think of it as the world's smallest "big-screen" TV)
      Raon Everun UMPC (Ultra-mobile PC - a micro laptop)
      Samsung 'Soul' SGH U900
      NEC ValueStar W (Vista Media Centre that's extra quiet)
      Toshiba ApriPoko Robot (This 11-inch-tall robot--which looks like the love child of a bird Pokemon and the Pillsbury Doughboy--is actually a voice-activated remote control)
      Sony VAIO G2 (super-light laptop with all the normal features)
      Fujitsu F705i
      Aigo USB Dongle (HD receiver)
      NEC LUI (LUI stands for "Life with Ubiquitous Integrated Solutions - basically a combination of media server and PDA or laptop)
      Face Bank (Wave a coin in front of the bank's eyes (actually light sensors), and it opens wide to swallow your loose change. Afterward, it looks so pleased that you half expect it to emit a contented belch)

      So, how many of those are actually things we're really missing, as opposed to just not having?

    2. Re:In brief by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is why they are not available in the US. There really isn't a market for Gadgets.
      I can see two factors for this reason.

      Factor 1. The 0th commandment above all other. Thow shal not waste money.
      This is even shown on slashdot. Why buy a nice Apple Mac Book Pro where you can Build a Desktop that is 3 times more prowerful (5x if dont bother with the luxeries like insolated wires), it may look like it came from the wreck of the titanic, but I got a bargin out of it.

      Factor 2. Only spend extra if you can show it off. Who cares if that phone as more features and cost less then the iPhone. the iPhone looks so much cooler, when you whip it out in front of others and imeadeatly a conversation starts. You technically superior phone no one will notice. Why do you think we get the Big Screen HD TVS and no Small ones. We don't want small HD TVs we wont big ones so when people enter their house they are like wow that is a big TV.

      We tend to buy Crap Stuff for ourselfs and Nice stuff for others. If we don't attempt to impress someone else with your purchase you will get the cheapest possible, if you do attend to impress someone else then you are willing to pay a premium.

      Look at our big purchases. Homes, Cars, Clothing. We are willing to pay for things at huge markup prices just to show it off. But for things you don't show off you get what you need.

      Why is the Wii so popular (Technically weak compared to the other systems), it is designed to play with other (diverse group) people vs. the PS III which is designed for a bunch of Gammers in a basement to play with blank expressions on their face for hours.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:In brief by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do you think we get the Big Screen HD TVS and no Small ones. So more than one person can see the high-definition detail at once. It's the same reason that party video games have been developed for consoles rather than PCs: until HTPCs take off, consoles are more likely to be connected to a screen that four human bodies can fit around.
    4. Re:In brief by ccguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or, with product names:
      The things one has to do to get a +5...
    5. Re:In brief by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um... your commandments only make sense if you can quantify "use" and "waste" properly. Some of these gadgets have added value in entertainment, you do realise, or like the MacBook Pro bring enough to the table so that the investment in money beats the investment in time building your own.

      As for your second statement, well, I just haven't seen it in the real world. People really do buy nice stuff for themselves without intending to show off. We call those people "connoisseurs". Those people who really do look for the best experience in X, be it wine, or cars, or computers or whatever.

      It is folly and insulting to denigrate how others spend their money, really. We all get enjoyment from different things, and from different aspects of those things. To look down at someone as "wasting" their money merely because you personally don't see the benefit is silly.

    6. Re:In brief by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Why is the Wii so popular (Technically weak compared to the other systems), it is designed to play with other (diverse group) people vs. the PS III which is designed for a bunch of Gammers in a basement to play with blank expressions on their face for hours

      I largely agree with your post, but this is one thing I don't.

      I always find it strange when someone mentions the "why is the wii popular, the technology isn't as good!" argument. No one cares about technology except people who think technology is a giant pissing contest.

      The Wii is very popular because someone figured out that games are ALSO about the UI people use to play the game, and not just about the graphics. I'd bet someone at NES looked at the sales of games like DDR, and realized that was a whole new market of gamers that played these games who just weren't into the game because they didn't like the traditional button+direction-pad that's been prevalent for 25 years. Give those people a UI where they get to interact in a more natural way, and they'll buy it like mad. Hell, it may even go down to a basic brain level where many people can't extend "themselves" through the button+direction pad, but can through motion.

      Come to think of it, the Wii actually IS technically superior to the PS3, it's just superior in a different way. (Accelerometers + IR Bar + Software vs. raw computing power). Judging technical merit on one aspect of the system alone is just misleading.

      --
      AccountKiller
    7. Re:In brief by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The "Sharper Image" (glossy, overpriced, not particularly original) theme doesn't come from Japan. It comes from the poor PCWorld writer, tasked to create yet another "top 10" list, and straining to find stuff to fit on it.

      The big name web sites seem to be on a "top 10 binge" lately. I guess it's an easy way to fill up space and provoke reader interest. It's getting old, though.

    8. Re:In brief by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      Help, I'm stuck and I can't get out! :(

      --
      which is totally what she said
  6. USB HD receiver by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm pretty sure there are plenty of USB HD receivers available here in the States. Maybe not that exact same model, but I've definitely seen some listed online. It seems like the biggest issue with them would be the size of the antenna, though.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:USB HD receiver by Shatrat · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know you can get an ATSC (digital TV, which I assume is what everyone is trying to say when they say HDTV in this context) USB tuner from Hauppage at any Radioshack for about 60 bucks.

      I don't know if the chinese "HDTV broadcasts" are ATSC or some other similar standard but ATSC would be the only one useful here anyway.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:USB HD receiver by PPH · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Not just the antenna size, but the broadcast protocol. We use one different from China, Japan and Europe. So a gadget on the gray market may end up being a cool looking brick.


      As far as size goes, once the obligatory DRM features are built into the USB dongle for the American market, it'll end up being a 2U rack sized box.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  7. TV on mobile phones in Japan by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 4, Informative

    What they forgot to mention about TV on those japanese phones is that the programming _sucks_...

    Seriously, it's all game/talk-shows, news or sumo. Might as well do something else while sitting on the train in Tokyo, like watching the local girls or reading.

    --
    - These characters were randomly selected.
    1. Re:TV on mobile phones in Japan by ephesus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I often thought the same thing while I was in Japan. It can't possibly be as bad as Korean television though, and I see people on the subways with TV on their phones constantly.

  8. Nothing impressive... by PortHaven · · Score: 2, Informative

    Really, I saw nothing that really stood out or impressed me.

    Okay, the bank think was cute...but I think it'd be better if the eyes could also identify a coin and track it. And if it was like "feed me, feed me...oh oh...pretty puh-lease".

    But 80% of what I saw, I'd seen equivalents before here in the U.S. (I swear Samsung makes a phone for Verizon that does both the top and side flip.)

    The Remote Robot was cute...and somewhat useful.

    But I really was disappointed.

  9. In verbose by PlatyPaul · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's the Panasonic Viera P905i,
    the Raon Everun UMPC,
    the Samsung 'Soul' SGH U900,
    the NEC ValueStar W,
    the Toshiba ApriPoko Robot,
    the Sony VAIO G2,
    the Fujitsu F705i,
    the Aigo USB Dongle,
    the NEC LUI,
    and the Face Bank

    (links provided only to direct sale points or official corporate pages)

    And (as I'm sure someone else will point out) "not here" only holds for certain values of "here".

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  10. In all fairness... by THESuperShawn · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "coolest" gadget on the list (also basically the one thats not a phone) isn't "available" in Asia either- unless you work for the lab that is working on it. The IR learning robot "is nesting in Toshiba's research labs, awaiting its first solo flight". Heck, I bet we have some cool stuff nesting in our labs here that you can't buy in Asia yet either.

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
  11. e-Cigarette by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's a device I wanted my roommates to start using called an e-Cigarette and I tried looking for it here in the states but ended up having to order it from China either due to the fact that they have th patent or that someone here (conspiracy!) has it and choses not to manufacture it.

    I'm shocked I hadn't heard of this before but I am really concerned for my roommates' lungs as they smoke almost a pack a day and they get very very upset when they don't have it. Plus they could probably smoke these in the house or in bars as they're just water vapor.

    A great gadget that I haven't found here. Actually, I think this could save a lot of people money (cheaper) and improve their health and duration of life.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  12. Videos... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few videos courtesy of YouTube:

        http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=facebank

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Videos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Holy communion, Batman!

  13. Re:At least one is by MadJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is this 'informative'?
    It's a link to one of this years Think Geek April Fools prank.
    Did the moderators even look at the URL?

    --
    80 CC D8 AF AE D3 AB 54 B7 2E CE 67 C7
  14. Re:But.... by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does it have iphone?
    Wrong. The question is "does it run Linux".

    Sheesh, you must be new here...
    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  15. I Got One Of Those Face Banks by Skeetskeetskeet · · Score: 5, Funny

    I waved something else in front of it and now I'm stuck.....get some help please?

    --
    Yeah, my karma sucks....but so do the mods.
  16. Article title: "Junk that America won't buy" by lancejjj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    PC World has an article about 10 gadgets that are available in Asia but not here. It is a review of some quirky toys that the Japanese have and we don't! Just because the manufacturers have determined that American's don't want to buy some of their junky products doesn't mean that American's are missing out on "great stuff".

    At the same time, the people in Asia don't have a lot of the junk sold in American stores. That's because a lot of American junk wouldn't be attractive to that market.

    Remember why Chrysler was complaining that the Japanese were not importing American cars? I wonder if the Japanese thought they were missing out on something awesome, like that 1982 LeBarron.
    1. Re:Article title: "Junk that America won't buy" by somersault · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uh.. does anyone import american cars? Okay you can get that new model Mustang, and I saw a big mahusive cadillac or something on Top Gear a few weeks ago.. but seriously, American cars tend to be like 20-50% bigger than our biggest cars, but you can get away with it because your roads are much wider. A lot of American cars handle like boats too, again because you have big wide roads, and all the intercity roads probably go in straight lines.. over here we have nice 'twisties' to negotiate.. there are motorways but even they don't just go in a straight line. I would probably fall asleep at the wheel if I had to drive across america.. :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
  17. Re:But.... by capnkr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As far as running Linux, it looks like the NEC LUI is a poor, proprietary cousin of LinuxMCE , which you *can* get in the States, and just about everywhere, for that matter...

    --
    "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
  18. Printer Friendly Link by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Printer friendly: http://www.pcworld.com/printable/article/id,144127/printable.html

    Just because they don't show you a printer friendly link doesn't mean it isn't there.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  19. That's strange by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I better tell my daughter that her U900 does not exist.

    I bought her one and had it imported from a ebay seller last month. it works great on AT&T/Cingular/AT&T/Cingular/AT&T/.... as it's a quad band GSM phone and defaulted to english out of the box.

    It IS available here in the USA, you just got to find it and buy it. No you will not find one at your local costco or phone store, but then none of the good phones are ever available at a store.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  20. Not available "here"? by skraps · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not available "here"? As in "the internet"?

    --
    Karma: -2147483648 (Mostly affected by integer overflow)
  21. 30-page click-thrus are not obnoxious by kindbud · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unfortunately it's one of those obnoxious stories that you have to click like 30x to read the whole thing...

    They're not obnoxious, nobody on /. gives a shit, they'll click through anyway. They way to get 30-page click-thrus to go away is not to apologize for them, but to stop posting them on fucking Slashdot! Until then, YOUR the obnoxious one for posting the link to it in the first place, jackass!

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  22. Two NES phones that you can't get in the USA - by VitrosChemistryAnaly · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/nes-slider/gionee-nes-phone-lets-you-stomp-goombas-on-the-go-268486.php

    http://www.gadgets-weblog.com/50226711/lenovo_phone_sports_nes_emulator.php

    Why, oh why can't I get these in the US? I would love a phone that is a *good* NES emulator.

    Anyone know the best routes to get this stuff in the US?

    --
    "It's a tarp!" -- Dyslexic Admiral Ackbar
  23. Re:Clatto Verata Nicto by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was wondering if they do a Sperm Bank version? Obviously it would sell better if it had a less creepy face..

    That little robot dude is a great idea too :)

    --
    which is totally what she said
  24. Amazing! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A slide-open cellphone! An UMPC! A DVB-T USB dongle! And a set of devices designed to be used together!

    Asia truly lives in the future!


    Admittedly, the robot remote is somewhat cool, albeit impractical, but the rest of the stuff is pretty weak.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  25. sigh... by Simulant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because it's not like every /. reader doesn't already have about 5 gadget sites bookmarked.