Slashdot Mirror


Uwe Boll To Quit Making Movies With 1M Signatures

An anonymous reader writes to mention that Uwe Boll, the infamous German director behind such video game adaptations as House of the Dead, BloodRayne, Dungeon Siege and Postal, has recently admitted that he would retire from making movies if enough people want him to stop. When FearNet mentioned to Boll a petition online signed by 18,000 people requesting that he cease making films, Boll responded that '18,000 is not enough to convince me.' So how much would be enough? 'One million,' Boll said."

86 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. Signed, signed, SIGNED! by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where do I sign? Do you need blood? Money? A donation? How many times can I sign? Fucking I'LL SIGN!

    1. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Androclese · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Where do I sign? Do you need blood? Money? A donation? How many times can I sign? Fucking I'LL SIGN! I reacted slightly differently. At first, yes I was eager to sign this ... but then I paused ... what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars?
      --
      My work here is dung.
    3. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank you, ok, clicked the link. Sign petition button... they want my name... alright, Wil...Wheaton... email, wil@...wilwheaton.net... comment. Oh, this should be good. Alright, "Dr Shitboll, if the Special Olympics had a movie-making competition, you would win a medal... and not just one for participation like Wes Anderson."

      There, that should do it. Well now Wil can't petition... he probably wouldn't use his own name anyway. I'm sure he'd go with Brent Spiner or something. Ok, done and done.
    4. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars? Obviously you haven't been keeping up with Hollywood's latest technology. At this point you could do a whole season of MST3k just by hitting IMDB and doing a search for any movie featuring a dragon.
    5. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

      what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future?

      The problem is, there's nothing "so bad, it's good" about his movies, they are in what I like to call the "Shat Out With the Least Amount of Effort" category - not much MST3K can do with that.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    6. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Psmylie · · Score: 2, Funny

      And won't someone please think of all the B-movie actors who would be out of a job?

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    7. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come on spammers and botnet scammers, we need your l33t skills to get 1 million names entered in. Just use the ones you put in the "from" line.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    8. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by SoulDrift · · Score: 5, Funny

      he probably wouldn't use his own name anyway .

      Yeah, he'd probably come up with some sort of clever nickname.

    9. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Poltras · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is there a C-movie category for him? Because even B-actors often regrets having been in one of his movies...

    10. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Bob9113 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I reacted slightly differently. At first, yes I was eager to sign this ... but then I paused ... what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars?

      Nothing wrong with him making crap films. The problem is with making crap derivative works. Crap derivative works that the original artists in most cases are opposed to.

      But, then, that's more a problem with copyrights being owned by corporations. The artists get boned and the lawyers and MBAs get paid. And oh how those (sociopathic, since we increasingly select for that in the corporate world) lawyers and MBAs love to sell their children to cannibals for a few bucks.

      Copyright to support the progress of the useful arts? If that is truly the goal (and I'm not saying it is, or should be, just if it is), then give the artist more non-transferrable authority.

    11. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Peeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars? Honestly, I am more worried about ruining the video game-to-movie adaptation genre than I am a shortage of parody ripe movies. There is definitely no shortage of bad movies while there is a shortage of good video game adaptations.

      At the current rate of signature growth (~ 1 per second, it should reach a million within 2 weeks. If we ALL go and sign it now, then I think the slashdotting of the online petition website might send an even stronger message to Mr. Boll.
    12. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Alcoholic+Synonymous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I recently made good on a promise that if they released Bloodrayne back in my store, I would buy both 1 & 2 since they come with the opposite PC game. About a month later, we had both.

      I watched them, and the movies took me back to the low budget films of my youth and how much fun they were to watch. Then as a young adult, working with a low budget film company, how much fun they were to make.

      I can appreciate that people don't like the way he is butchering licenses, but honestly, I have seen far worse films than his, and enjoyed them.

      Bloodrayne was my introduction to Uwe Boll, and after all of the ruckus on /. about him, I had very low expectations. The film wasn't that bad. It was better than some of those b-flicks I like. Bloodrayne 2 lowered the bar substantially, but it was the same vein of steaming crap that some of us out there actually love.

      I'm not saying the man is a genius, but he does have a place in the film world. Maybe instead of quitting, he should just give up direct video game adaptions and make derivative films instead. I would pay to see more so-bad-it's-good films from him.

      And also, we really need to get back to hating the fucker's that made the Doom movie. It takes real effort to make something that bad, and defiantly piss off the fan base before you have even began shooting. (No, really, who did they think was coming to see this movie?) If we get them, it may serve as a "scared straight" program for the rest working on game-to-film adaptations.

    13. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Teflon_Jeff · · Score: 4, Funny

      And now I've signed. This may be the best use of the internet ever. I knew Al gore invented it for a reason.

      --
      "Teach a man to build a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."
    14. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you say publicity stunt?

      For fuck's sake, don't give this clown any more publicity.It's all he lives for.

    15. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by davetd02 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the modern version of "vote early and vote often."

    16. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Does anyone believe for a minute he would really give up no matter how many signatures?

      He would just say: All these people SAY they hate me, but it means a million people know who I am and have seen my movies. Doesn't matter whether they like them or not, I still get paid.

      As Oscar Wilde said, "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about".

    17. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, that's not how Uwe Boll makes movies. He takes A-list actors, and turns them into B-list actors by featuring them in C-list movies...

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    18. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Khaed · · Score: 2, Funny

      I still don't know how they fucked up Doom so bad. they turned a movie about demons and hell into a movie about... pretty much the same type of zombies that were in the Resident Evil movie, or (insert 90% of zombie movies).

      It's such a damn simple script:

      Guy (or even the typical hollywood team-captain-planet crew) trapped on Phobos. He (they) find out that the moon base is directly over hell. It was easier than making Ramen, and they fucked it up. One of the cooler parts of Doom? The creepy-ass "Hell" parts. Like some of the twisted wall textures in the game. It had a mood to it. There was no "omfg a virus that makes you CRAZY!" in Doom.

      But as to Turd Boll, see his Alone in the Dark movie. THAT is fucking horrible. I saw it before I realized he was involved, and I rented it without realizing Tara Reid was in it. there's not even any "this is so bad, it's good." It was like all the worst parts of every movie I've ever seen condensed into one shitfest. The only way it could have been worse would be if it had a full on hardcore sex scene between Michael Moore and Jabba the Hut. Actually, in retrospect, I'd probably watch that over Alone in the Dark if I had a gun to my head.

    19. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have no idea who he is. I'm signing the petition anyhow because I believe in calling bluffs.

  2. Sign the petition! by JediLow · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Sign the petition! by CogDissident · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its just a PR stunt. Stop pandering to the tax-loophole-exploiting jerk.

    2. Re:Sign the petition! by dvanduzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      He can't possibly challenge all of us to boxing matches, right?

    3. Re:Sign the petition! by sherpajohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its just a PR stunt. Stop pandering to the tax-loophole-exploiting jerk. A PR stunt it may well be, but I take exception to your characterization of his financing methods. At least according to his Wikipedia entry, he is one of the few people in Germany using the German tax laws in regards to German film fiancing on the way the German government intended it. the article states most "German" film financing using these "tax-loopholes" are mere exploits used to finance American films.

      His movies may suck, but at least he is using the money and tax laws as they were intended!
      --

      Going on means going far
      Going far means returning
    4. Re:Sign the petition! by Kozz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ed Gruberman, is that you?

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  3. What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by oncehour · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him? He's got some serious hate going on on the internet, and I'm just a bit curious as to why?

    1. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by JediLow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He makes your eyes bleed... seriously. (I've tried to watch some of his stuff, I couldn't take it)

    2. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by downix · · Score: 2, Informative

      His non-videogame based movies aren't bad. The problem is he tries his hand at videogame adaptations and they always turn out the same, overpriced and underwhelmed.

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    3. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Svenne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      His movies are bad. Really, really bad. Unfortunately, they're not bad in the kind of way that they become unintentionally funny, they're just mindnumbingly bad.

      Please, take my word for it. Don't watch any of them just to find out. I'd hate to have another human being waste 2 hours on that dreck if I can help it.

      --

      Slagborr
    4. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him? He's got some serious hate going on on the internet, and I'm just a bit curious as to why? Imagine a modern hog factory farm, imagine the veritable rivers of semi-liquid feces squelching downhill from the oinking, shuffling pigflesh. Imagine a rope around your leg, the far end attached to a speedboat. Imagine being pulled backwards through that stinking mass, mouth clenched tight against your bile but still the runny shit makes it up your nostrils and down your throat, between your eyelids, burning your retinas, the impact of the brown waves against your body like sledgehammers.

      If you can tell me what's so bad about that, I can tell you what's so bad about Uwe Boll movies.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    5. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Schnapple · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him?
      • -His movies are bad. Really, universally accepted as terrible.
      • -He keeps getting handed video game franchises to make movies out of, which is problematic because video game fans hate to see their favorite franchises turned into crappy movies, but it has further reaching implications in that it states, essentially, that the movie industry has no respect for the video game industry since they keep letting this man make shitty movies (that lose money, no less)
      • -His initial career was only made possible due to a loophole in German tax law which allowed him to spend other people's money on his bad movies since they could write off the loss for tax purposes. Once that loophole was closed, he decided to stop making expensive ($1M+) movies
      • -He's quite arrogant and usually pretty angry (which you might be too if people kept shitting on your movies
      • -He lured critcs out to a charity fight and then beat the snot out of them, sending one to the hospital
      On a deeper level, whereas people like you and me have to work our asses off, he's rich off his no-talent works because of a (now closed) loophole. He wipes his asses with video game franchises (the Postal movie actually made 9/11 jokes) and he's a pretty despicable human being (see the Wired article above).
    6. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him? He's got some serious hate going on on the internet, and I'm just a bit curious as to why? He engenders the degree of hate (particularly on the internet) that he does for a couple of reasons. The first is that his movies are bad -- and I mean really, painfully, teeth-grindingly bad. Of course that alone doesn't generate that much hate; there are, after all, an endless supply of incredibly bad movies and abysmal movie makers in the world. The second point is that Uwe Boll has a great love of "adapting" computer games for the screen, and he is highly prolific at doing so. This manages to piss of geeks by raping their fond memories of games (Boll has a habit of going after older games, as far back as the 80s) by butchering what made the game good and simultaneously making something that, while attractive from the title, is painful to sit through. For those who have wised up and don't attend his films, there's still the niggling fact that, by producing so many video game based films that are so very bad, Boll has gone a long way toward discrediting both video games, and the idea of making films based on video games (in this latter point he is hardly alone of course). Since internet geeks and video game geeks have a nice large overlap, this makes internet based Boll hate something that gets noticed.
    7. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Funny

      He makes your eyes bleed... seriously. (I've tried to watch some of his stuff, I couldn't take it) Maybe he should change his name to Ewe Bola!
      Ba-dum-dum!
      Thanks, I'll be here all week!
      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    8. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by norton_I · · Score: 3, Interesting

      His movies are really, really bad. But I would never sign the petition. Better to try making moving and totally suck that be a bunch of whiny jerks on the internet who can "hate" someone for simply making movies which they can choose not to watch.

      As for "loophole tax shelter"--it was never a loophole, it was an incentive to get people to make movies in germany, which he did. If I were a tax paying german, I could see being upset by this, but since I am not, I don't really see any reason to do this.

      Yes, I am being whiny jerk on the internet. That doesn't affect whether what I say is true or not.

    9. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by dougmc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure it's entirely his fault. After all, video game movies have a history of sucking, even before Uwe started making them. But you would think he'd either 1) get the hint and stop, or 2) find out why they suck and fix it and if #2 is impossible, there's always #1.

    10. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As someone who actually works in the film industry, I'm not too quick to complain, since all of his films generally result in people working....

      But on the other hand, his films are some of the most cynically exploitive junk you've ever seen. He uses a provision in the German tax code to get tax credits and free money, and uses those to bootstrap foreign distribution pre-sales and video-game tie in deals. In effect, he's made money before he even starts rolling the camera, and so the quality of his film itself is irrelevant as long as it cuts a good trailer, will have a good poster, and has enough "bankable" stars in the project to stimulate box office. It's essentially the Roger Corman model, just without the class and punk authenticity.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    11. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by dougmc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nothing wrong with 9/11 jokes. A Postal movie *should* be un-PC.

      (Not that I'm saying his movies haven't sucked. Or that video game movies didn't have a history of suckage even before he started making them.)

    12. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him?

      Perhaps this review of his version of Alone in the Dark will be instructive (as well as entertaining).

    13. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by kabocox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      His initial career was only made possible due to a loophole in German tax law which allowed him to spend other people's money on his bad movies since they could write off the loss for tax purposes. Once that loophole was closed, he decided to stop making expensive ($1M+) movies
      He's quite arrogant and usually pretty angry (which you might be too if people kept shitting on your movies
      He lured critics out to a charity fight and then beat the snot out of them, sending one to the hospital


      This guy is my new hero. WTH does it matter that you or I don't like his movies or that they were funded by a tax loop hole? Nada. There are similar tax loops here in the US. One of my college professors made movies using the US version of this. He was pretty up front about all of it. Yep the people who fund him don't care about money or where their money is being spent because they just need to lose some for tax purposes.

      I'm impressed that this guy had the guts to beat the snot out of his critics. Most of us would B.S. about it or try to bluff our way out of something, but we just wouldn't have the balls to do that. I'm sorry, but that's great. It doesn't matter how bad his movies are. He's defending them and some one is obviously paying him to make them. This guy now ranks above Cmdr Taco in my people that deserve respect for doing something that I should have done/would like to do book.

    14. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by phallstrom · · Score: 4, Funny

      You work for the US Government's Torture Oversight Committee don't you?

    15. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by ewhac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uwe Boll is the worst director EVER.

      No. Harold P. Warren is the worst director ever.

      Schwab

    16. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine a modern hog factory farm, imagine the veritable rivers of semi-liquid feces squelching downhill from the oinking, shuffling pigflesh. Imagine a rope around your leg, the far end attached to a speedboat. Imagine being pulled backwards through that stinking mass, mouth clenched tight against your bile but still the runny shit makes it up your nostrils and down your throat, between your eyelids, burning your retinas, the impact of the brown waves against your body like sledgehammers. Or to put it another way, if you were to take the paragraph above and adapt it as a screenplay, the result would be better than any Uwe Boll movie.
      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    17. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm impressed that this guy had the guts to beat the snot out of his critics. Most of us would B.S. about it or try to bluff our way out of something, but we just wouldn't have the balls to do that. I'm sorry, but that's great. It doesn't take a whole lot of guts to beat up a guy with no fighting experience who gets lured into the ring thinking the whole thing is a publicity stunt rather than an actual fight.
    18. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, brings to mind a description on a torrent site of the first (and co-incidentally last) I ever saw. I had to download it after I saw this. I thought it couldn't be that bad... I was wrong. Here's the quote: "Without doubt, this is the worst film ever made, and probably that will ever be made. It is not worth the cost of a cinema ticket, it is not worth the cost of the power it took to keep my computer running to download it, it is not worth the cost of the power to keep your tv on as you watch it. It is not even worth killing the electrons that power that tv's tube, infinitesimal though their brief, tortured lives were. Avoid."

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    19. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by boris111 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The more we hate him the stronger he becomes!

    20. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by glittalogik · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem is not that he's making movies, it's the movies he's making. He's being put at the helm of some of our favourite game franchise crossovers, and then butchering them mercilessly.

      Imagine your favourite game in the world. You've beaten it on Legendary 15 times. You've read every spinoff novel. You've unlocked every single outfit and cooking utensil. Not only have you rescued the princess, you've persuaded her to get hot-coffee-mod-freaky with you. You own figurines of every single character AND the entire dev team. There's a personal dedication to you on the inside cover of the walkthrough. You've taken out whole battalions with 100% headshots using a catapult and a bag of frozen peas.

      This game is your everything. Others might not understand, but it makes you happy, and that's all that counts. Then you find out that there's going to be a movie. On a given release date in the near future, your life will be complete. You impose a media blackout on yourself - no previews, no trailers, no interviews. Nothing that will spoil the anticipation, the cloud of pure joy on which you're floating. This is going to be the best shit ever.

      The day arrives. You're at the first screening in the country, sitting front and centre. You've driven 1500 miles to be there. Your hands are shaking. You can't stop grinning. ...

      Two hours later, your eyeballs are bleeding. The only reason you're still alive is that you chewed your own foot off. All that you know and love lies in smoking ruins.

      The credits roll... "Directed by: Uwe Boll"

      You get where I'm going with this, yeah?

    21. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine your favourite game in the world. You've beaten it on Legendary 15 times. You've read every spinoff novel. You've unlocked every single outfit and cooking utensil. Not only have you rescued the princess, you've persuaded her to get hot-coffee-mod-freaky with you. You own figurines of every single character AND the entire dev team. There's a personal dedication to you on the inside cover of the walkthrough. You've taken out whole battalions with 100% headshots using a catapult and a bag of frozen peas.

      [...]

      You get where I'm going with this, yeah? Umm, you really need a girlfriend?
    22. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or to put it another way, if you were to take the paragraph above and adapt it as a screenplay, the result would be better than any Uwe Boll movie. Unless that screenplay was then given to Uwe Boll.

      OK. That's not fair.

      Unless that screenplay was used for the basis of a video game which in turn was the basis for a Uwe Boll movie.
    23. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A publicity stunt where you're getting into a boxing ring and punching each other? Come on--Uwe Boll isn't a champion boxer or anything. You take a man up on a challenge, at least put in some time learning how to throw a punch.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    24. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by MukiMuki · · Score: 5, Informative

      Never mind that once someone with actual fighting experience stepped up to the challenge (and barely weighed less than Uwe), the fight was denied. Boll only accepted entrants who weighed significantly less and had no idea what they were doing.

    25. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Watch This. I challenge you to watch the whole thing without skipping. Yes, that includes the part where they recap the current scene twice.

      Now realize that this is probably the *best* scene in the movie, mainly because it isn't filled with lines like "Guys, check out this book. Looks pretty old, maybe it'll help us!" and "We finally got to the boat but it wasn't there."

      Avoid at all costs.

    26. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The day arrives.... Two hours later, your eyeballs are bleeding.

      You've just described the day I brought my friends to see Highlander 2.

    27. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Hubbell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He refused to appear on Attack of the Show after saying he'd fight one of the hosts. The hosts called Seanbaby up and had him come and guest host the show, and Seanbaby used to train heavily in muay thai and the like, and as soon as Uwe Boll found out he refused to appear. The guy is a pussy.

  4. The REAL reason he's quitting by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Boll is actually quitting because the German government recently closed the tax loophole that allowed Boll and other German filmmakers to set up their "films" as tax shelters for businessmen (with no intent of ever making any money). The gravy train has dried up and the scam is over.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:The REAL reason he's quitting by Sam1230 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That link doesn't say anything like that...

    2. Re:The REAL reason he's quitting by New_Age_Reform_Act · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a better article explaining the loophole.

      http://www.cinemablend.com/features/Uwe-Boll-Money-For-Nothing-209.html

      --
      "The New Age. The New Beginning."
  5. A Challenge by whisper_jeff · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bad move. Never challenge geeks. We'll always find a way to overcome.

    1. Re:A Challenge by calebt3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh of course. We stopped OOXML's ISO fast-tracking cold.

    2. Re:A Challenge by San-LC · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, tell that to Ron Paul.

  6. Re:Good lord... by tachyonflow · · Score: 2, Funny

    That, you autistic dorks, was what normal people call a "joke". Those of us with a sense of humor find signing the petition to also be quite funny. :)
  7. It's Like Wrestling by dcollins · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, yeah, I've seen this a bunch of times when pro wrestling is promoted. The heel "retires" and then comes back as a celebrity referee or manager, so he's still in your face all the time. C'mon, people!

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  8. just let him be by nguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't get it. Why petition the guy to stop making movies? Maybe his movies will be quickly forgotten, maybe they'll be cult classics 50 years from now. As long as he manages to finance them somehow and stay in business, who cares? If you don't like his movies, do what I do: just don't go.

    1. Re:just let him be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't get it. Why petition the guy to stop making movies? Maybe his movies will be quickly forgotten, maybe they'll be cult classics 50 years from now. As long as he manages to finance them somehow and stay in business, who cares? If you don't like his movies, do what I do: just don't go.

      You're missing the point. As long as he's in the business, no one's favorite videogames are safe from being turned into horrible movie adaptations, preventing decent adaptations from ever being made. It's self defense. ; )
    2. Re:just let him be by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As long as he manages to finance them somehow and stay in business, who cares? If you don't like his movies, do what I do: just don't go. I've seen Uwe Boll but never a Uwe Boll film. The problem as I understand it is that he doesn't write original scripts. Instead, he is often handed a gaming franchise, which he then proceeds to shit upon.

      So, if you've played a video game and loved the story, environment, characters, you're already invested in the franchise and, bluntly, "care". To see Uwe Boll shit on something you care about makes you angry. Plus, it is very unlikely that a video game whose movie fared poorly in the theater will get a second motion picture in the next few decades, potentially preventing us from ever seeing a movie about a story we love.

      You're point would be valid if Uwe Boll did what Woody Allen does - write his own stories - because then we could just all ignore them.
      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:just let him be by Idaho · · Score: 5, Informative

      What was the last German movie to gain any kind of international attention? Run Lola Run?


      How about these for example:

      - Good Bye Lenin! (2003) - nominated for Golden Globe (ok, perhaps that doesn't amount to much, but it's a nice movie)
      - Der Untergang (2004) - oscar nomination for "best foreign language film of the year" (where "foreign" means "not english")
      - Das Leben der Anderen (2006) - won the oscar for "best foreign language film", as well as many other awards in several international film festivals (Great Britain and Canada among those)

      That's quite a few movies since Lola rennt (1998). Looks like there are quite a few German directors who are actually doing better after all... those movies are all very much worthwhile watching, by the way (though quite disturbing).

      P.S. I'm not German so I'm bound to have missed several more good movies.
      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
  9. That's got to hurt by Devin+Jeanpierre · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd never sign such a petition. He can make whatever films he wants, so long as people are willing to pay. It's a lot more hurtful to try to convince him to stop with 1 million people asking. That's... well, that kind of thing hurts. The only thing that could lessen it is the whole idea that, chances are, the petition wouldn't really have had 1 million people sign it, but maybe 300 000 sign it 3 or 4 times on average.

    --
    -Devin Jeanpierre
  10. There's nothing that bad about Uwe Boll by goldcd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He makes averagely bad straight-to-video style films - yet rises above the mass of other jobbing directors with his ability to drum up publicity. FFS - how may other 'directors of his calibre' can you name? Reason he's working (putting aside tax breaks), is that he takes a relatively small amount of money from producers, rights for a computer game and makes them all money on the film he produces.

  11. and after all this time by joeflies · · Score: 2, Funny

    I never realized that the "Springtime for Hitler" scam in The Producers was for real!

  12. Free publicity by HexRei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is nothing but a scam to get Uwe more publicity. Right now he's a hack director, I doubt a million people are even really all that aware of him.

  13. In All Fairness... by sking · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This only makes sense if there is a petition to sign asking him to KEEP making movies.

    And does it really matter? Nobody has to watch the movies he makes. Let the market decide.

    --
    The AntiJoey
  14. Internet petitions... by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If my grandmother rolls her eyes at the idea of internet petitions, what reason is there to think that Uwe would stop making movies from one? Just because someone name Soukin McCocksoff said he's a bad man and should go away on the internet means he'll do it.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  15. Re:Does he know about Teh Internets? by dougmc · · Score: 4, Funny
    To be fair, if the list does hit one million, he'll just claim fraud. And based on your comment, he'd actually be right.

    Way to go! Uwe Boll will continue making video game movies, even if the petition reaches one million signatures -- and it'll be YOUR, peragrin's, fault.

    (Granted, I don't expect him to stop even if the petition does hit one million unique, verifiable signatures, but still, I'll blame you.)

  16. Reverse Pyschology by Herkum01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would think the fewer number of signatures would result in him having an increased chance of quiting. If they got 1 million signatures, that would mean that nearly 1 million people actually heard of him! He could claim that he has the presence to draw large numbers of people to his movies!

    If he was only able to get 20~ 25,000 signatures no studio is going to look at and say "His works are so beloved that they are not complaining about him!" His career would be over.

    The opposite of love is indifference. If you want his career over ignore him.

  17. I wouldn't do it by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't care what kind of movies he did - it doesn't really matter. What matters is to have self-esteem, and that means noone is going to tell me what I should or should not do. It's not a democracy; when it comes to my life, I am the only one responsible to make the decisions. If I feel that my movies have a value, then just because there's lots of people who disagree doesn't mean much. You know the saying: eat shit - one billion flies can't be wrong.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  18. Ever try to set up 950,000 Gmail accounts? by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a lot of work but worth it.

  19. Ah more publicity, the last thing he needs... by kentrel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This kind of hatred over a filmmaker who's creating something is really sad, pathetic and unhealthy. No, his movies might not be very good, and yes they are in fact terrible, but they're hardly the worst films ever made unless you've never seen 90% of the horror\musical genre, or anything made for youtube.

    Filmmaking was and never ever has been a democracy. This idea of writing petitions to DEMAND that he stop making movies that you don't ever have to watch or think about is pathetic. 99% of movies are released weekly around the world that you'll never ever know about, simply because you don't care enough. His movies aren't mass-marketed, they're not shoved in your face on TV or fast food restaurants. The only people who are shouting about Uwe Boll loud enough for ANYONE to hear are the people who hate him. Stop hating him, stop shouting about him, and he'll likely go away a lot faster. In fact, if he had been ignored like most other filmmakers he may have gone a long time ago.

    No member of the public has a say in who gets to make movies. It's not a democracy. If they want to vote, vote with their dollar. If enough people still pay to see the movies, such that the filmmaker is still in work, then nobody has a right to demand that he goes, except his business partners. That's life. Suck it up. There are bigger injustices in the world to worry about.

    Signing a petition is just hilarious and pathetic, and will probably have the opposite effect people intend. This kind of hatred is unhealthy. Have some perspective people. He's not answerable to any of you. Fanboys need to stop kidding themselves into thinking that they have any say in what filmmakers do. They don't. Filmmaking has been a business since its inception, and still is. Even if there were a million signatures he's under no obligation to do anything that a bunch of deluded movie geeks "demand" of him.

    He could make a movie where he prints those signatures out, laughs at them, tears them up, and posts the resulting video on youtube. Don't fanboys ever see that the more they are outraged at something inconsequential like this the more ridiculous and hilarious they appear to the rest of us? Pick your battles.

    1. Re:Ah more publicity, the last thing he needs... by TheAngryIntern · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are forgetting one thing....he's the one that brought it up first. He said he would stop making movies if enough people wanted it to, it was at *THAT* point they mentioned there was a petition out there already, and then he made the comment about it would take a million signatures, that 18,000 was not enough. BTW, that number has jumped to over 65,000 as of a few minutes ago. It's not that his movies are the worst ever made (although some might be close) it's that he insists on taking video game franchises that are well loved by their fans, and he makes absolute craptastic film adaptations, most of which barely have anything to do with the game it's based on. Granted, most video game -> film adaptations are pretty bad (Tomb Raider, anyone?) but his are exceptionally bad, like he's doing it on purpose. That being said, I have actually heard some good things about his latest, Postal. I've heard it's pretty funny and not nearly as bad as his previous efforts. Even if he does get the million signatures (doubtful) I'm betting he won't quit making movies for the simple fact that he gets huge sums of subsidy money from the German government to make movies. I wouldn't quit if I was him either.

    2. Re:Ah more publicity, the last thing he needs... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But voting in writing as well as with money is better than only voting with money.

      If the studio gets enough people writing in saying "We'll forever hate you and your children if you license our beloved franchise XYZ to Uwe Boll, and we'll never buy your games again", that's more powerful than simply not seeing the movies.

      Someone else pointed out as well that if Uwe Boll makes a craptastic film "version" of a video game, the chances that someone who is capable of making a good movie making a good film version of that video game is virtually zero.

      The moral of the story is, if I want someone to make a good film version of Half-Life, to pick a random example, I'd better complain loud and incessantly if Valve mentions possibly licensing the franchise to a crappy director. Only if the complaints and letters fail would I have the need to vote with my wallet.

      They're two separate forms of protest used at different times. Sometimes, neither is sufficient without the other.

  20. An old saying from my country by black_lbi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "If someone says you're drunk, he might be wrong. But when two people say you're drunk, maybe it's time to go to bed."

  21. How many signatures .... by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... will it take to stop Vista SP2?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  22. Re:what's the loophole? by kesuki · · Score: 2, Informative

    no no, it's a 'tax shelter' if you donate 12 million of your 'income' to this 'tax shelter program' they reduce the amount of tax you owe by 6 million.

    you don't really make a whole lot of money doing it that way, but consider this, if you're $5,000 into the next tax bracket, and you donate $10,000 to drop you down to the next lower tax bracket, and dropping yourself down to the next lower tax bracket saves you from paying $20,000 in taxes total, you would do it in a heart beat.

    and the worst of it is as long as the company who owns the rights to the movie is in Germany, and as long as they produce actual films, the tax loophole HAS NOT CHANGED. consider too, that since the holding company is German, they have to pay German taxes on profits. Obviously Uwe Boll doesn't make profits, but his holding company may very well make profit on the books, and have to pay German taxes. since they pay X for rights, and lease the rights for y. if y is greater than x then they pay taxes, but if both companies are owned by boll, then x would equal y... unless that jeopardized his loophole as far as the government is concerned... and it might.

    so far they haven't closed the loophole if the production of the film is done in America. If they do, boll will bolt from making movies in America and will make them in Germany the way the law intended.

    And because tax laws always lag behind a growing economy, this means there are a lot of people who if they donate X dollars they get Y dollars more back from the government, where Y is greater than X. So potentially he could be raising hundreds of millions of dollars just for saving a few million Germans a few grand every year. Ironically what the government did change about the loophole, is that they made it a crime to fraudulently claim you donated money to a company that never produced films. so now Boll has even more money to spend, because he's the real deal, and the fraudsters can't compete unless they start making bad money losing films too.

  23. STOP by loafula · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what the hell is the point of this, aside to prove what a dick you are? if you don't like his movies, don't watch them. you don't have to go signing petitions against the man. and fyi, i have never seen a single one of his movies.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
  24. Re:Good lord... by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah. Do you see the Foot icon to the right of the article? What do you think that means? What ? He's going to make a movie version of the Gnome desktop ?

    Ok where's that petition ?
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  25. Re:Anyone who beats up on critics can't be all bad by pionzypher · · Score: 2, Funny

    He improves civilizations in some ways [Citation Needed]

    --
    I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
  26. That isn't how tax brackets work. by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

    consider this, if you're $5,000 into the next tax bracket, and you donate $10,000 to drop you down to the next lower tax bracket, and dropping yourself down to the next lower tax bracket saves you from paying $20,000 in taxes total, you would do it in a heart beat. That's not how it works. Tax brackets mean the first X dollars of your income are taxed at A%, the next Y dollars are taxed at B%, the next Z dollars after that are taxed at C%, and so on.

    If you have $5000 of your income in the C% bracket, and you donate $10,000 to drop down to the B% bracket, your net income after taxes will decrease, not increase -- because the higher C% rate only applied to that last $5000, not your entire income.
    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  27. Snopes' Take by ecavalli · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think Snopes' entry on internet petitions sums this whole thing up nicely:

    Claim: Signing and circulating online petitions is an effective way of remedying important issues. Status: False.