Slashdot Mirror


First Looks at Microsoft's New "Live Mesh" Platform

technirvana writes "Microsoft's Live Mesh service launched today as an invite-only 'technology preview.' It is Microsoft's attempt to tie all of our data together. Live Mesh synchronizes data across multiple devices (currently just Windows computers, but theoretically it will extend to mobile and other devices in the future) as well as to a web desktop that exists in the cloud. It can sync data across devices used by a single users, as well as create shared spaces for multiple users." And since it's run by Microsoft, you know you can trust it.

208 comments

  1. like plays for sure? by bagboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "you know you can trust it" Yeah, I'm gonna trust it in about the same fashion.

    1. Re:like plays for sure? by totmacher · · Score: 3, Interesting

      pfft "technology preview"?

      Try PowerFolder. It's a mature alternative:
      * The software works since 2003
      * It gets actively developed
      * It's open source - a free Basic client is available
      * There is a commercial Pro client with advanced security and connectivity features and 5 GB Online backup space

      http://www.powerfolder.com/

      Best regards,
      Christian

    2. Re:like plays for sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering if am I the only one that can't tell if that was meant sarcastically...

    3. Re:like plays for sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yup, technology previews are awesome. Remember the good ol' days when they came out with the *exciting* longhorn previews? Compared to the current Vista platform, they were offering magic.

    4. Re:like plays for sure? by calebt3 · · Score: 2, Funny
    5. Re:like plays for sure? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      I would not trust it no matter what company created it. They can have my data when they pry it from my cold, dead computer.

  2. EULA Love. by willeyhill · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Trust a company that demands the right to delete any file they suspect of violating copyright? No thanks, not on any machine much less as a sync service to ruin other OS.

    1. Re:EULA Love. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust a company that demands the right to delete any file they suspect of violating copyright? No thanks, not on any machine much less as a sync service to ruin other OS.
      Why bring Apple in to this? Nothing has as happily deleted my music files as introducing iPod/iTunes into a multi-machine setup with lots of existing songs and habit of believing I could keep multiple copies of it on multiple devices and still sync without having it wiped..
    2. Re:EULA Love. by aedan · · Score: 1

      What did you think "sync"meant?

      Turn off sync and manage manually to do what you require.

  3. so it's like... ".mac"? by phooka.de · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So they "invented" something like .mac by Apple, right? The latter is of course being overpriced and lacking compelling reasons to subscribe, but still, you can access your Mac from anywhere, it offers email, storage etc.

    So, anything new here?

    1. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by phpmysqldev · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just what I was looking for!
      A way to organize all of the unethically gathered data Microsoft has collected on me!

      Thank God! I thought they might actually have to look in two databases to realize I don't like Vista, but I do like pizza and bunnies...I mean first person shooters...yeah...FPS...def not bunnies

    2. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by sm62704 · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, anything new here?

      Apple invented it but Microsoft INNOVATED it!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by nvivo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, anything new here? Yes. Now you can share all your viruses and spyware with your friends and family on your online desktop.

      Actually, you could do it already. Microsoft is just making it easier.
    4. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by cbart387 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So they "invented" something like .mac by Apple, right? There's nothing new under the sun. I'd write more but that pretty much sums it up.
      --
      Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine.
    5. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you get to share EVERYTHING with Homeland Security too :-)

    6. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, anything new here? Yes. Try reading the fucking article.
    7. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by pallmall1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple invented it but Microsoft INNOVATED it!
      While the quote is funny, I fear that the truth may not be. Microsoft's announcement times neatly with the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) move to windows-only:

      OLPC to scrap Linux for Windows

      The OLPC XO laptop has developed very effective Mesh Network. To see how it works, click on the demo on this page.

      This technology was made usable by the same "open source fundamentalists" that Nicholas Negroponte now marginalizes now that he's benefited from their tireless efforts and financial contributions.

      I wonder if this technology found it's way to Microsoft and into "Live Mesh"?
      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    8. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what MS does. But they're damn successful at it and continue to be. Apple rolls out some great idea, market it craptastically, use it poorly, and then MS will polish it, market it like a pro, and implement it successfully. MS are excellent 'innovation thieves', and MS fanbois reap the rewards, and Mac fanbois cry like emo kids about how unfair it all is. Except in the mp3 player market. MS can't do mp3 worth a damn, and Apple really shines.

    9. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by lansirill · · Score: 1

      Okay, this is certainly going off into off-topic land but son of a bitch? I was disappointed about the EeePC line picking up a Windows version but, hey, ASUS is just another company. Shipping a Windows version does make sense after all, considering the hardware seems to run it just fine.

      This news about the OLPC however makes me feel horribly dirty for buying into their G1G1 program. Aside from the Flash issue mentioned in the Computer World article (and even that's a stretch) I don't see what the advantage is in running Windows on these things. It's not like the kids need Photoshop or Unreal III FFS. I'm not so sure about other areas, but I know math and stats have some pretty solid open source offerings that can be used if anyone put some effort into taking a small subset of features and putting on a kid-friendly interface.

      They aren't necessarily switching to Windows only, although it sounds like a Windows option is going to be a reality, but it really does sound like Negropronte is (to mix stories further) pulling a CDDB move here.

      Even more offtopic: I just realized that while reading or hearing 'maths' drives me absolutely bonkers, 'stats' is just fine. Heh.

    10. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by realthing02 · · Score: 1

      You're right, I mean thank god Microsoft is making their own hardware now, too. Oh wait. Apple having bad marketing? Are you kidding me? Everyone and their mother wants an iphone, and that's something that Microsoft did first with smart phones, although not as refined/cool.

    11. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they "invented" something like .mac by Apple, right? The latter is of course being overpriced and lacking compelling reasons to subscribe, but still, you can access your Mac from anywhere, it offers email, storage etc. So, anything new here?
      Well, the new thing must be the technical level of Slashdot discussions/comprehension, but that's not so new anymore either unfortunately. This is like .mac? really? Regardless of what you think of Microsoft or Apple... are you sure you really want to say that after reading the article and hopefully understanding the full extent of what Live Mesh is and can do? iDisk may be close for some purposes, but still no sigar.
    12. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, UNIX invented it, Apple "invented" it, and Microsoft INNOVATED it.

    13. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by DECS · · Score: 1

      .Mac isn't iDisk. .Mac is integrated into Mac OS X's Sync Services so that users can upload all their synced data (PIM phone and iPod data, Address Book contacts, calendar items, web bookmarks, app preferences, keychain passwords and certificates, Dock items, Dashboard widgets, email account settings, mail rules and signatures and smart mailboxes) to .Mac as a central repository, allowing multiple Macs to be kept in sync with the same data. Sync Services also allows developers to package their app preferences and other data for syncing with .Mac.

      This isn't new, it was rolled into Mac OS X Tiger in 2005, and sharpened up in Leopard. It's one of the more useful things about .Mac.

      Ironically, Apple introduced ".Mac" as a play on .NET (which it really has very little relation to apart from the idea of networked data sharing) at a time when Microsoft was touting the potential to be a gatekeeper for PC users with Passport.

      MS never really delivered those promises (it did f-up data integrity with Passport's high profile data leaks), but Apple quietly delivered it as a system that just works. Now Microsoft is announcing that it's "introducing" something that is nothing new as a beta.

      Windows Vista, 7, and Singularity: The New Copland, Gershwin, Taligent

    14. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      .mac "just works"? Come on. There are a multitude of people who have issues with every single part of .mac - from Apple's neglect of it, from huge issues with sync, usability. Good idea, if in need of much polishing and TLC, but really? "just works"? No.

    15. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by jaminJay · · Score: 1

      I like Bunnies. But not as much as Hef likes Bunnies...

      Bunnies are way better than FPS... <Cue mum's basement jokes>

      --
      Leela: "Is all the work done by children?" Alien: "No, not the whipping."
    16. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by Ma_ntz · · Score: 1

      Apple invented it but Microsoft INNOVATED it!
      While the quote is funny, I fear that the truth may not be. Microsoft's announcement times neatly with the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) move to windows-only: OLPC to scrap Linux for Windows The OLPC XO laptop has developed very effective Mesh Network. To see how it works, click on the demo on this page. This technology was made usable by the same "open source fundamentalists" that Nicholas Negroponte now marginalizes now that he's benefited from their tireless efforts and financial contributions. I wonder if this technology found it's way to Microsoft and into "Live Mesh"? You really have no idea do you? Why posting a comment on something you only know by name?? Makes you look a bit silly, but then again how could these threads grow so insane otherwise.
    17. Re:so it's like... ".mac"? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      WHOA! That one should have been posted as a /. front page story, I probably missed it when I was getting vitreous sucked out of my eye.

      Thankfully the text said "may" rather than "will". We can only hope that the OLPC people come to their senses.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  4. Looks interesting by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its an interesting idea, the limitations of synctoy are quite apparent. There is no reason why backup should be a separate operation these days it should all be automatic. Be nicer when they support mac as well.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Looks interesting by just_another_sean · · Score: 3, Funny

      Be nicer when they support mac as well. Maybe they can get ISO to turn it into a standard so we can get an open source implementation as well. I hear MS has a nice, tight relationship with ISO so it's possible. :-)
      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:Looks interesting by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Maybe I don't want all my desktop shit backed up to the psp or ipod. Then I leave it on the subway and can spend the next 20 years innovating against identify theft. No thanks.

  5. Enterprise Computing agrees! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And since it's run by Microsoft, you know you can trust it.


    And, looking at the operating system installed base, as well as the most popular web browser, as well as the most popular Office suite... everyone seems to be in agreement!
    1. Re:Enterprise Computing agrees! by mweather · · Score: 2, Informative

      And I'm sure this service will be popular for the exact same reason those products are: abuse of Monopoly.

    2. Re:Enterprise Computing agrees! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm sure this service will be popular for the exact same reason those products are: abuse of Monopoly.


      Keep telling yourself that, and watch MS's innate superiority create another marketplace success, while all that "free as in worthless" crap continues to languish in obscurity (as in it's security).

      Vista's install base exceeded the entire install base of Teh Lunix on it's first day of commercial release. The iPhone's user base likewise exceeds the install base of Teh Lunix. So please... explain to the class how Teh Lunix continues to fail because of some mysterious and sinister monopoly.
    3. Re:Enterprise Computing agrees! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need it explained, it is a wonder you can read.

  6. Live BAIT is more like it (nt) by Jerry · · Score: 1

    nt

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  7. Sounds vaguely like some of what .Mac does... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...w/r/t the syncing of data across multiple machines.

    Being able to keep my contacts, calendar, bookmarks, etc synced effortlessly on my multiple Macs has been worth $99/year to me.

  8. Yeah, that's great. by khasim · · Score: 1

    In one proof-of-concept demo, a photo that was taken via a cell phone camera, was automatically synced to a Mesh that pushed the pictures out to a Facebook photo album.

    It was certainly impressive to see data -- in this case a cell phone camera picture -- almost instantly synced across multiple devices and saved to a web service immediately after it was created.
    Prepare yourself for the flood of home-made porn (BAD home-made porn) that is "synced across multiple devices".

    And for the first people fired for "uploading" their porn collection to their workstations at their jobs.
    1. Re:Yeah, that's great. by just_another_sean · · Score: 3, Funny

      Prepare yourself for the flood of home-made porn (BAD home-made porn) that is "synced across multiple devices".

      And for the first people fired for "uploading" their porn collection to their workstations at their jobs. Prepared. Can't wait!

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:Yeah, that's great. by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      I don't see what the fuss is about putting a cellphone pic on facebook, my Blackberry Pearl has been able to do this for ages

      http://na.blackberry.com/eng/devices/features/social/facebook.jsp/

    3. Re:Yeah, that's great. by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      Prepared. Can't wait!

      [looks around office]

      [shudders]

      I can wait. Believe me . . . I can wait . . .

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    4. Re:Yeah, that's great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any device capable of sending email can send a picture to Facebook. So, what? Your link doesn't work BTW.

    5. Re:Yeah, that's great. by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      Damn, I always get links wrong, thanks for pointing it out.

  9. Antitrust? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one who thinks of the movie Antitrust when I hear this? I wonder if Microsoft bumped off a few OSS developers to get the code for Synap-- err... I mean... Live Mesh? And now that I think about it, is my wife really my wife or actually a Microsoft spy? Hmm.... /insert paranoia and tinfoil hats

    1. Re:Antitrust? by styryx · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of the best Hollywood 'puter movies ever:

      "Check it out, I programmed it in code!"

    2. Re:Antitrust? by rmadmin · · Score: 1

      HA! I tip my hat to you sir. :)

    3. Re:Antitrust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rachel leigh cooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooook!

    4. Re:Antitrust? by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Are you allergic to sesame seeds?

      Yes, I admit to watching that godawful movie. But Claire Forlani was the bomb in mallrats.

    5. Re:Antitrust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hans reiser thought his wife was a spy too!

  10. To paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's M$, it's crap!

  11. Live Mess! (TM) by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    Can't believe I got there first with the common pejorative. If their music sync skill is any indication....

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  12. Intergrated service by Narpak · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a great idea. Now when Windows inevitably crashes it will lock down ALL your data; not just one device. Not to mention the inherent security quality so common in Microsoft products.

    1. Re:Intergrated service by zappepcs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is probably the most compelling reason to avoid it until after SP3 or equivalent. With Vista soaring to the top of the OS charts, IE and Office losing ground to competitors... well, things don't look so good for MS. Add the Yahoo! games, impending class action Vista Ready lawsuits, all they need now is one disgruntled employee to blow the whistle on nefarious dealings with the NSA regarding your web surfing habits and we can finally begin to smell the rot on the corpse that is MS.

      IANAL nor a veteran of synch software coding but I'm willing to bet that MS will NOT support Mac or Linux with this product. I also do not beleive that they will support end users who lose their data. In fact, I'm willing to bet that there is less support from MS than F/OSS for lost data, so the price comparison really hurts the product. Sure, it will get used by default in places where they are too entrenched to move away from MS, or think they are.

      The people that they need to sell this to first have to be taught WHY they need it. I don't see a very big splash being made with this product.... that is unless Sony gets involved, in which case the splash will be followed by a flush....

    2. Re:Intergrated service by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Funny

      Add the Yahoo! games, impending class action Vista Ready lawsuits, all they need now is one disgruntled employee to blow the whistle on nefarious dealings with the NSA regarding your web surfing habits and we can finally begin to smell the rot on the corpse that is MS. Whoa, hold up. I knew Yahoo! Games was pretty awful, but it's hardly Windows-specific. Last I checked you could run them in Firefox on Linux too, if you really want to. So it's not exactly fair to call out Windows on this "flaw".

      I swear, the anti-Microsoft Slashdot groupthink gets worse by the day.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:Intergrated service by zappepcs · · Score: 1, Informative

      tap tap tap... hello McFly!

      When MS threatened a unfriendly buyout of Yahoo! is what I'm referring to as Yahoo! Games.

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&output=googleabout&btnG=Search+our+site&q=yahoo%20buyout%20microsoft

      You pick the source you want to read about the story. Perhaps you might stop to think that not all the bad or flippant comments about MS are posted by people simply out to bash MS. Some of them are deserved and well earned comments.

    4. Re:Intergrated service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can finally begin to smell the rot on the corpse that is MS.
      But, it's still moving ...

      OH SHIT!!!

      Grab Your Bike and Ride!
    5. Re:Intergrated service by menace3society · · Score: 1

      Someone please tell me how this is different from running rsync in the background whenever someone connects a device.

      Right now it only connects between computers: check
      In the future it could be connected to more mobile devices: check
      We would need to dick around with the program a lot to be able to do that: check

    6. Re:Intergrated service by just_another_sean · · Score: 2, Insightful

      tap tap tap... hello McFly!

      When MS threatened a unfriendly buyout of Yahoo! is what I'm referring to as Yahoo! Games.

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&output=googleabout&btnG=Search+our+site&q=yahoo%20buyout%20microsoft

      You pick the source you want to read about the story. Perhaps you might stop to think that not all the bad or flippant comments about MS are posted by people simply out to bash MS. Some of them are deserved and well earned comments. I know you're upset about MS. Who isn't? But slow down, breathe, note the Funny mod on the GP post. It was a joke. A pun. A play on words and not a bad one either.

      Sometimes the only thing to do when MS comes along, steals tech from OLPC, "borrows" the look and feel of KDE and releases a half ass tech preview of something that will probably end up being as useful as Plays for Sure is to laugh.

      Standard disclaimer: All of the above is rampant speculation based on history, current news and other /. posts. I have no idea which , if any, of the above statements are true. (although I suspect they all are).
      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    7. Re:Intergrated service by Arrak+Esterhazy · · Score: 1

      Okay, what part of "Organize BEFORE they rise" don't you understand?

      *headshake* Bloody amateurs.

    8. Re:Intergrated service by Degrees · · Score: 1
      It's actually much closer in function to Gnome Conduit, except of course that Conduit has a much higher chance of being ported cross-platform. ;-)

      Don't think storage replication as much as content replication between service providers (adapting each conduit to work with the peculiarities of each provider (flickr, facebook, multiply, linkedin, etc.) MS is calling it a mess, er, mesh, and I suppose each single link will be called a wire or something. But the readwriteweb link definitely showed something that looks like Conduit.

      --
      "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
    9. Re:Intergrated service by Bafoon · · Score: 0

      i'm sorry ....what numbers have you been looking at? Vista sales are up...office is selling nicely. openoffice and linux ARE NOT taking bite size chucks out of their share...as for IE7 it is definetly gaining back users which means Firefox is small potatoes once again.

  13. Microsoft's naming policies... by owlnation · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MS needs to fire the marketingdroid they have working out the names of things.

    From the people who brought you "squirt" as a verb, now you have "mesh". A word that most people immediately associate with the word "trap".

    I suspect the marketingdroid may be a saboteur.

    1. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of a geek are you?

      Squirt is a verb, women squirt ... never mind you have never seen the moist "squirting" spot :)

    2. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect the marketingdroid may be a saboteur.

      Nah, he's just a former ISO employee.

    3. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      The entire marketing team is trapped in a basement and the only way they have to ask for help is through the product names.

      Hmmm, let me see... Office visual studio enterprise vista team...

      ...

      ...

      Bah, let them rot.

    4. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the marketingdroid runs linux :)

    5. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by Aram+Fingal · · Score: 2, Funny

      WinCE and WUS (Windows Update Server) are good examples too although both have since been replaced with other names. Just pronounce the acronyms as words.

    6. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by frogzilla · · Score: 1

      Squirt has been a perfectly acceptable verb for hundreds of years. I don't understand your comment. Mesh also seems fine. Perhaps you need to read more?

    7. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by hercubus · · Score: 1

      MS needs to fire the marketingdroid they have working out the names of things. From the people who brought you "squirt" as a verb, now you have "mesh"....


      i guess it's just me but i was thinking marketing missed the way too obvious pun 'Live Mess' that this "product" _should_ get tagged with

      and for this situation i prefer the urban definition of "mess" -- and that would be "shit"

      and for any MS fan who'd like to berate me, no i really don't need to try the product first to be critical, MicroMess is guilty till proven innocent

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    8. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time when squirt was not a verb?

      "Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
      squirt Audio Help /skwrt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[skwurt] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
      -verb (used without object) 1. to eject liquid in a jet from a narrow orifice: The hose squirted all over us.
      2. to eject a spurt of liquid: The lemon squirted in my eye."

    9. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      The entire marketing team is trapped in a basement and the only way they have to ask for help is through the product names.

      Does this explain "Bob"? I didn't think it rained that much in Redmond.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    10. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by clicktician · · Score: 1

      Admit it. Live Mesh is so much better than Dead Mesh... almost.

      --
      Son, someday all this will belong to your ex-wife.
    11. Re:Microsoft's naming policies... by darthflo · · Score: 1

      Squirt has been a verb for quite some time now. You sure you didn't mean the social (n)?

  14. Same old, same old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Until they decide to close down the service because it isn't viable for whatever reason. Read a previous article where MS is shutting down their music store servers.

    Another example of their take-the-money-and-run attitude. Thanks, but no thanks.

    1. Re:Same old, same old by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      I used to use a Hotmail account as my preferred email service. I was away when they switched it to "Windows Live" so I probably didn't access the account for about a month and a half. Next time I logged in, they'd deleted all my mails cause I did't click the new EULA in time. I sent an mail to support simply stating "you suck" and vowed never to use a MS service again.

    2. Re:Same old, same old by darthflo · · Score: 1

      IIRC hotmail had this policy of emptying accounts after 30 days of inactivity. They may have not deleted the account for another 60-120 days (for a total of 90-180 days of inactivity) to protect it from malicious re-registration by other users.
      Hardly a nice gesture from them, but the service is free. Don't expect them to hold your data for years without you paying by looking at their ads.

    3. Re:Same old, same old by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Well for the price of storage thesedays (this was when they only gave you something like five megabytes of storage, GMail gave you Gigabytes) and considering the Ad-loaded tie-in pestering service hotmail is, I wouldn't have thought it would be too much of an expense to keep my email, especially for a company like Microsoft. There are other free services which allow you to access your account without wading through their web portal first. Microsoft forced it on me every time I wanted to check. That is, unless you buy MS Office and use their stupid MS Outlook.

  15. sorry your wrong by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It will only work with Windows Mobile devices. Compatibility with any other OS is strictly prohibited by military MSFT doctrine.

    This mesh won't work with generic phones, Linux phones, the iPhone, or any one else. Remember it took the EU years in court and a billion dollar fine to just get MSFT to release Networking Protocols.

    *note some sarcasm was used above, if you can not detect it your sarcasm meter is broken, or running windows and constantly pegged*

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    1. Re:sorry your wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm bored, so take this:

      "sorry your wrong"
      "sorry you're wrong"
      "Sorry you're wrong."
      "Sorry, you're wrong."

      Figure out the fucking difference.

    2. Re:sorry your wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it seems the whole point of this as a framework/platform is that anyone can build an application using standard ATOM pub-sub and talk to the cloud, regardless of their platform (http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=399577) -> video on the architecture

      MS might not build a client for Linux, but since you can talk to the cloud using RSS/Atom, you can probably very easily build your own client on Linux or iPhone or whathaveyou.

    3. Re:sorry your wrong by notaprguy · · Score: 1

      Ummmm....wrong. MESH will work with non-Windows OS's.

    4. Re:sorry your wrong by hercubus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm bored, so take this... sorey yore board
      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    5. Re:sorry your wrong by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      And you know because.... ? Please, enlighten us.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    6. Re:sorry your wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because it says so here: https://www.mesh.com/Welcome/LearnMore.aspx

      Imagine all your devices--PCs, and soon Macs and mobile phones
    7. Re:sorry your wrong by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Excuse me if I remain unconvinced.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    8. Re:sorry your wrong by peragrin · · Score: 1

      really how? Mesh is using custom activeX controls with RSS. Since RSS can't do two way file transfers it stands to reason you can only remotely view your data but not modifiy it with non windows systems.

      MSFT is well known for making totally closed locked down systems first.

      Oh and how is your PlayforSure music player working? So Glad you you believed MSFT's marketing material. It Playsforsure until august.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    9. Re:sorry your wrong by ribond · · Score: 1

      I love that slashdot is still fighting MS, regardless of what they do. This is an announcement for a private beta to sync data between devices -- and the response is all piss & vinegar about how someone else might have sync'd (sank? sunk?) data first.

      Genius, someone tag that with "insightful".

      Where are the responsible posters? I miss arguments with thinking slashdot participants.

    10. Re:sorry your wrong by darthflo · · Score: 1

      This mesh won't work with generic phones, Linux phones, the iPhone
      Please, I beg you, stop it. If you're talking about iPhones in general or plural, leave the marketing bullshit behind and use normal grammar. One iPhone isn't the iPhone, it's an iPhone out of many (millions sold to date). Your Apple-branded personal computer isn't the Mac, it's a Mac. Incompatible software doesn't not run on generic phones, Linux phones, Nokia phones, hamburger phones and the iPhone, it doesn't run on generic phones, Linux phones, Nokia phones, hamburger phones and iPhones.

      Apple's marketing may be everywhere, but please stick to the actual language when using it. After all, Zurich and McDonald's spend a lot in marketing too, yet nobody is lovin' how change happenz.
  16. Could be great. by SkankinMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Despite the source, this could be a great tool for people if implemented correctly (and free). I already find myself using addons for firefox like FoxMarks to synchronize myself across several desktops/OS`. If this had even limited cross-platform support, or an open-API I'd imagine it could go pretty far.

    1. Re:Could be great. by Uncle+Focker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this had even limited cross-platform support, or an open-API I'd imagine it could go pretty far. Did you miss the part where it's a Microsoft product?
    2. Re:Could be great. by SkankinMonkey · · Score: 1

      Notice I had a caveat at the beginning of my post. I do not believe Microsoft will completely open it up, but if a rival company (say google) were to break open with a competing suite, they (MS) may be forced to open up their API, to an extent, so they can compete.

    3. Re:Could be great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please somebody tell me why.. oh why must software be written for free? Can't anybody just make money for writing the dammed thing? Is there a problem with that? Seriously. Do you all really LOVE writing code that dammed much that you will give it away for free, or down and actively make war against a company, an individual, hell an entity even that just wants to make money WRITING CODE. Not supporting code. WRITING CODE. Give it fuckin rest already with the free code shit.

    4. Re:Could be great. by jmataya · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's the beautiful thing about the EU's anti-trust measures: Microsoft will probably be forced to open up the protocol at some point. Look at Silverlight, last I heard MS is even helping with the Moonlight project. Sure, it could still be a trap, but maybe they (or at least some divisions within the company) are evolving.

      Or I'm completely wrong. Who knows.

    5. Re:Could be great. by archshade · · Score: 1

      please somebody tell me why.. oh why must software be written for free? well as in beer because i am a poor student and could not afford all the software i use if it wasn't for FOSS. I spose id just pirate the sw i needed


      It also eases my paranoia that i can examine all the source code although I don't always use this it makes me feel good to know i can (who has time to read there entire kernal code or the hole of OO.org)

      I don't mind people charging for there code but I'm not gonna use it. What i don't like is said company's using there wealth to keep FOSS in a shadow. A friend recently bought a copy of M$ works, they said they couldn't get it to do what they wanted - I came round and installed OO.org and there much happier with that. These where normal people who had heard of open office but assumed because it was free wouldn't be as good as works. M$ will be OK as soon as we educate the masses that there not the only way
      --
      Most Damage is done by people who are AWAKE
    6. Re:Could be great. by nysus · · Score: 1

      Seems you don't really understand free software. I know when I write free software, I get paid for it. What I don't so is get my clients over a fucking barrel and hold my code hostage just to make a buck.

      --

      ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    7. Re:Could be great. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "please somebody tell me why.. oh why must software be written for free?"

      Please tell me who.. oh who told software must (or should) be written for free?

      Just some two hours ago I've been watching TV (something about a bad humored, drug addict doctor with almost magical diagnostic abilities). Do you know how much did it cost me? Zero, Null, Nada. Do you think all those actors, guionists, technicians... did it for free? I don't think so. Did you see me telling they should do it for free? Of course not.

      Of course too, you are a troll, but that's quite a different story.

  17. Microsoft Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Microsoft Security approach Mesh means security holes all around.

  18. What if it were Google? by spazoid12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "And since it's run by Microsoft, you know you can trust it."

    I wonder if we'd get that comment if it were a Google service. Can we trust Google any more than Microsoft? Around here it sure seems like Google gets a free pass on everything and can do no wrong...

    1. Re:What if it were Google? by Uncle+Focker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Around here it sure seems like Google gets a free pass on everything and can do no wrong... Then you must not read much of the responses in Google threads. They get bashed all the time for their "privacy" policy among other things.
    2. Re:What if it were Google? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 3, Informative

      While I don't think they are saintly, Google hasn't pulled half of the shady shit Microsoft has. In terms of business ethics, Microsoft is really right up there with the uglier oil companies and tobacco company. They don't think in terms of what is legal; they think in terms of opportunity cost to illegal actions, with a healthy dosage of risk.

      One should suspect all companies, as they are built on profit motives, however, Microsoft has a very very shady track record to boot.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    3. Re:What if it were Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do have to remember that Microsoft has been around a lot longer than Google so has had more time to do these shady business tactics. It isn't like anyone else isn't doing it as well, just look at apple recently with their software update and crippling of certain products on their system. Just wait awhile longer and Google will eventually be like Microsoft as in the end it is their shareholders who will control them.

    4. Re:What if it were Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In terms of business ethics, Microsoft is really right up there with the uglier oil companies and tobacco company. One thing I love about Slashdot, is that everybody has such a great sense of perspective.

    5. Re:What if it were Google? by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      While I don't think they are saintly, Google hasn't pulled half of the shady shit Microsoft has. In terms of business ethics, Microsoft is really right up there with the uglier oil companies and tobacco company.

      Yeah! The day I started smoking--there was a dude from "big tobacco" who came up to my house and handed me a cigarette from a pack that HAD THE SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING SCRATCHEDOFF!!!11one1!. Tehy are evil!!!!

      Whatever. And how the hell are oil companies evil? Because the largest cost of a gallon of gas is STATE AND FEDERAL TAXES.

      In fact, here in my state, the government takes more in taxes than the "evil" oil companies make in profit.

      One should suspect all companies, as they are built on profit motives, however, Microsoft has a very very shady track record to boot.

      OMG! Beware! Companies try to make profit! NO REALLY--I'M SERIOUS!!

      Who the fuck would open up a company with the goal of not making money? And what company with the goal of going bankrupt would ever last?
      That's what I want--my car dealership to try and lose money when they sell vehicles--that way when I need a new car in 3-4 years, I can't get one because the dealership went bankrupt. And it'd be great if the gas stations in my town went bankrupt--I mean--there's probably 30 gas stations. If they all went bankrupt, it'd be awesome. I couldn't fuel my car. ...and then one gas station would swoop in and offer high priced gas...and people would have to pay because there's no alternative.

      You really are an idiot. Go read a book.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    6. Re:What if it were Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Microsoft employee, I can assure you that there are is a very active team of lawyers inside Microsoft making sure everyone knows what is illegal and only acts in a legal manner.

      Although you may be right. Perhaps Microsoft simply understands that long term costs for illegal actions vastly outweigh any short term gain.

    7. Re:What if it were Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do be careful throwing all that hyperbole around. You might accidentally break stuff, you know.

      As to what you actually were saying, besides all the crap you spewed (sorry, but yeah, you did):

      Who the fuck would open up a company with the goal of not making money? A slightly more balanced view on things, and a somewhat differently worded (still rhetoric, though) question, could be something like: "Who the fuck would open up a company with the goal of making money, while not blatantly disregarding any sense of decency whatsoever?"

      Well, I for one, would. And did. Really.

      You really are an idiot. Go read a book. You really are a moron. Go get some perspective.
    8. Re:What if it were Google? by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      I trusted Microsoft with my emails and got shit thrown in the face. Google on the other hand give me a free IMAP account with more and more space all the time.

    9. Re:What if it were Google? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      This must be a new state of affairs, then.

      What about the Stac Electronics case?
      What about the ongoing EU sanctions for not releasing protocol documentation?
      What about the falsified videos Microsoft presented to the court regarding the possibility of removing IE from Windows 95?
      What about Microsoft's anticompetitive and illegal tactics regarding DR-DOS?

      I'm sure I could keep going, but that's just a few highlights. Nothing evil/illegal/immoral going on there, huh? I would probably agree that the rank-n-file is monitored for legality, however, there is quite a bit of evidence that the upper management at your organization has no problem flouting the law.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  19. Microsoft hein ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be looking forward to Google's version of it.

  20. This will be great... by igotmybfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... until they turn the servers off. Yesterday's PlaysForSure debacle comes to mind.

  21. I'd trust MS before Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And since it's run by Microsoft, you know you can trust it."

    Um, isn't it Google's slashdot favorite GMail service that has had "trust" problems, including whole email accounts deleted, entire message boxes erased (unrecoverably), and multiple security flaws allowing bad guys to hack into people's accounts?

    GMail has been very untrustworthy (compared to Live/Hotmail and Yahoo).

  22. We've seen this before by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft has tried this before, and the industry already told them "Go away, Microsoft. We don't want HailStorm acting as the official Microsoft Big Brother of our technology lives."

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:We've seen this before by esocid · · Score: 1

      The difference between the that and Live mesh is that LM isn't solely designed to store things on their servers. It does have that capability, Live Desktop, but someone would have to be crazy to store all your personal, financial, and sensitive information on a data retention server, owned by MS no less. I would have no use for LM, but would be very skeptical of using it if I did. Set up a VPN if you are that intent of viewing something at home from work, or vice-versa. MS may be heading in a direction, but I don't think it's in the right way.

      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  23. I don't think it's necessary to RTFA by jimicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Live Mesh synchronizes data across multiple devices (currently just Windows computers, but theoretically it will extend to mobile and other devices in the future) as well as to a web desktop that exists in the cloud.

    Extend to other devices? Unless they're running Windows Mobile, pull the other one.

    To my mind, this is an attempt to create a killer app which will tie everyone to Windows for another 5-10 years much like "I want shared calendars in Outlook and I'm prepared to pay a lot of money to get it" has tied businesses to Exchange for so long.

    1. Re:I don't think it's necessary to RTFA by Archis · · Score: 1

      All these lockin arguments are highly irrelevant to the Mesh. The Mesh storage is all XML feeds over HTTP. Unless "GET http:///" is impossible on anything except Windows, I don't understand why everyone keeps harping on the lockin.

    2. Re:I don't think it's necessary to RTFA by jimicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So?

      OOXML is all XML, that doesn't mean it's particularly usable as a standard for others to implement right now.

    3. Re:I don't think it's necessary to RTFA by Archis · · Score: 1

      I presume nobody can read Atom, RSS, Json, etc. anymore. :-) I forgot to mention in my last post, the XML is in multiple formats which are widely prevalent and the content - you get to choose your blobs. It's a transparent XML blob for the Mesh storage. So long as you store it in a format to your liking....

    4. Re:I don't think it's necessary to RTFA by jimicus · · Score: 1

      OK, now that I will concede does put a rather different spin on things.

      However, I would point out that the reason for so much paranoia is that Microsoft have spent 25 years systematically destroying anything which stood in their way.

      Now, while I don't debate it's possible that they're trying to turn their business model around so that it no longer depends upon being the dominant OS provider on the desktop and the server, unless and until we start to see real, hard evidence of this, I along with a lot of other /.'ers will take it with a large pinch of salt.

  24. Re:Um, what? by businessnerd · · Score: 1

    OK, what do we get after clouds? Moonbeams?
    Close. According to Verizon, it's light beams.
    --
    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
  25. Live Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like another Microsoft poorly implemented technology initiative based around a marketing campaign.

  26. Re:ms isn't the evil empire any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do people feel they can trust google and apple and not microsoft? Um, experience.

  27. Activesync by esocid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So I'm guessing activesync is going to be abandoned in the future for Live Mesh in terms of mobile devices? I never personally used activesync but I wonder if LM will absorb its responsibilities, and compatibilities. As long as there is no phoning home, I can see this having some good applications, but skepticism is always healthy.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    1. Re:Activesync by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      I thought they already replaced ActiveSync in Vista. Presumably with something better, not that that's hard.

  28. Blue Light Special by Xygon · · Score: 1

    I find it obscurely funny that the servers doing much of this demo are msbluelight -- the new technology that belongs on the back shelves of K-Mart.

  29. Re:ms isn't the evil empire any more by just_another_sean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do people feel they can trust google and apple and not microsoft? They all have the same end goal and they all share the same 'evil' practices in one way or another... Personally, out of innate paranoia, I don't trust any of them or any other big corps for that matter. But I could be the most blindly trusting individual in the world and not miss the writing on the wall about MS. And besides, evil done by another is never an excuse for evil done by yourself. If Apple and/or Google are involved in shady, underhanded, "evil" practices that doesn't suddenly make it OK for MS to do it. And vice versa.

    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  30. Now you're in for it! by Chas · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just for that snide remark, you get to provide Ballmer with some chairs...

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  31. PowerFolder - free open source alternative by totmacher · · Score: 1

    Sorry for posting this again, but:

    Try PowerFolder. It's a mature alternative:
    * The software works since 2003
    * It gets actively developed
    * It's open source - a free Basic client is available
    * There is a commercial Pro client with advanced security and connectivity features and 5 GB Online backup space

    http://www.powerfolder.com/

    Best regards,
    Christian

    1. Re:PowerFolder - free open source alternative by Miroe · · Score: 1

      Yes i know i am using it too: nice product for cross platform stuff and best about this: its not Mircosoft.
      SO if you are making a little bit advertisement here
      for it i am the last to be angry. But don't overdose it. I really like the product and
      i use it in my VPN/LAN. As long as you are not Spaming here you don't need to be sorry, i think. Thx MI

    2. Re:PowerFolder - free open source alternative by Archis · · Score: 1

      There certainly are many file/folder sync software out there - some open, some free, some "commercial" (meaning proprietary), some commercial (you get GPL'd code when you buy them). Mesh Folders, however, are just one feature on top of Mesh. Mesh is about sync'ing all kinds of data and being able to write apps on top of it with very simple programming interfaces. Moreover, secure transfers are a part of Mesh - everything is unconditionally HTTPS outright. :-)

  32. Interface by KDE by alcmaeon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Plus, from the look of the website, they stole all the icons from KDE.

    1. Re:Interface by KDE by abigor · · Score: 1

      Haha, you are correct - I had to see this for myself, and they sure do look familiar. That is absolutely hilarious if true.

    2. Re:Interface by KDE by xerxesVII · · Score: 4, Funny

      This part of their effort to embrace OSS.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    3. Re:Interface by KDE by freemywrld · · Score: 4, Funny

      If by "embrace" you mean "grab by the throat and squeeeeeeeze..."

  33. From the department-of-no-department by JynXed · · Score: 1

    What the shit? Which slashdot department is this from? I don't know which bias I should read this story with now...

  34. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Firstly to things:

    1. I can't see the demo's, why? Apparently to "install Microsoft Silverlight to have a 'better' experience"... So no experience at all then.

    2. I just must have a "Windows Live" account to sign in.

    If these two small examples of Microsoft hubris, lock-in and lack of anything resembling open standards are to go by, then, no. No I shall not be partaking in their oh so, 'Wow' experience.

    1. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      1. So what? Would you complain about Flash demo ?
      2. You need an account for any online service. Why is this different?
  35. More high concept bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This reminds me of when .NET and hailstorm were first announced and it's another all-encompassing system; this time for social data.

    Microsoft approach problems from the top down;

    There's an emerging market here, how can we own it and what buzzwords are hot?

    For Microsoft cracking a nut involves copying competitors products and making sure only those with Microsoft brand gloves can use the resulting nutcracker. And again with the naming, .NET is a top level domain and not a java knock-off. A mesh network is a well understood term and has nothing to do with centrally hosted data storage services -- and no offline web apps aren't relevant.

  36. This just in... by cloudkiller · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft announced today that the Live Mesh servers are going dark on June 1. Any data that users stored in the Opens Fo' So' Live Mesh format will no longer be accessable. Microsoft would like to remind its customers that its users should begin printing and re-keying any important documents before the g-dark date.

    --
    [an error occurred while processing this sig]
  37. Herd mentality + need for an 'enemy' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If one drops the naively simplistic "MS bad, Google/Apple good" view, then it is harder to feel a sense of unity, because there is no real enemy out there. People, especially groups, need an enemy just as much as they need a force that can be considered a 'good guy.' Otherwise, it'd force people to admit that reality is far more complicated and they'd have to possibly even think a little bit before posting stupid memes to get bonus points that mean absolutely nothing.

    Once we move to a more utilitarian, level-headed analysis of available tools and how they fit various needs, we will be more able to have a reasonable discussion. So long as we deify the makers of tools and feel slighted when something comes out that doesn't praise them, we'll be unable to have reasonable discussions. Currently, it seems more like users need to root for whatever toolset they use as if it was the local baseball team.

  38. mesh.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how much they paid for mesh.com? Can't see what it used to be on archive.org, but I bet the previous owners wish they could have charged 100x more for it...

  39. Is it I$O spec yet? by Akita24 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now that everybody is pre-bought it should only take a week or 2.

  40. Is it just me, or is it a good idea by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    To avoid any Microsoft product with the term "Live!" in the title?

    Sure, actually, you should avoid all MS products, period. But especially the "Live!" Products. There's like... 200 of them on Wikipedia, and I've heard of maybe 10.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    1. Re:Is it just me, or is it a good idea by lilfields · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why was this even modded up? Anyone who says one platform has zero uses is just a psuedointellectual and pending on the situation either anti-Microsoft, anti-Google, anti-Linux or anti-Apple...of course the former is what it's in style apparently. I run Windows Vista x64, my server runs Linux, and I have a Google account. I used to have an iPod but now I have a Zune. Fanboys lose all credibility with statements like "you should avoid all MS products." If you are going to post such things you are contributing nothing to the conversation but libel; then again I guess we'd only have half the number of comments on any given Microsoft news.

  41. Thank god for CmdrTaco.. by stubear · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And since it's run by Microsoft, you know you can trust it. ...and the rest of the Slashdot staff for telling us how to think. I was afraid I was going to have to RTFA but that little quip at the end spared me from having to do anything other then clear away some space in front of my leg so I don't stub my toe.

  42. and you can trust Google? by xxdesmus · · Score: 0

    "And since it's run by Microsoft, you know you can trust it." Clearly we should all feel more trusting of Google I'm sure, right? The double standard is kind of a joke.

  43. It's in their DNA, Mr. AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when will people realize that MS is no longer the 'evil empire' it used to be? ... Why do people feel they can trust google and apple and not microsoft? They all have the same end goal...

    Although they might both be businesses, they don't share the same value system or skillsets. Microsoft has institutionalized their LACK of integrity (lying, broken promises, deception, no sense of collaboration or appreciation of real genuine industry standards) and selfish control-freaky aggression into their DNA, and Microsoft has proven themselves technically incompetent and thus not earned trust.

    You're probably right. I'll change my mind now that an anonymous coward has admits a company used to be an 'evil empire'... but now anonymously says it isn't. You're right, you're right, as for Microsoft we both love this company!.

  44. Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An excellent, up and coming alternative to this is Dropbox. Currently in beta, so you have to register for an invite. But it works on Windows, Mac and (in a few weeks time) Linux.

    I've been testing it for the past few weeks and it really is very slick. It stores a backup copy (up to 2GB in the beta) on their servers - actually hosting in Amazon's S3 - and syncs to all the rest of your computers. The service is integrated into your local filesystem, so it's very seamless. It also stores all revisions and allows you to roll back to any of them, and undo deletions.

    Anyway, I'm rather impressed.

  45. Cloud computing, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with the crashing to the ground in a burning wreck because of excessive bloat killing millions OH DEAR GOD PLEASE NO

  46. One Mesh to find them all by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    and in the Gitmo, bind them.

  47. MESH ALREADY MEANS ADHOC ROUTABLE NETWORKS DAMNIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Mesh" already refers to wifi networks that self-organise with mesh routing protocols. Microsoft is grossly abusing the terminology here. I noticed people are using the "cloud" meaningless buzzword where before they used the "grid" buzzword, and didn't care much - in general, good indication of hype-over-substance, but Mesh Networking is real and practical, there are IETF standards, protocols like BATMAN, etc. , and this "Microsoft Live Mesh" crap has jack shit to do with mesh networking.

  48. malicious link in parent post by unity100 · · Score: 1

    dont click.

  49. For real info on what it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:For real info on what it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Install Microsoft Silverlight for a better experience on this site. Experience Silverlight-enabled video content & more.

      The software is licensed, not sold. This agreement only gives you some rights to use the software. Microsoft reserves all other rights. Unless applicable law gives you more rights despite this limitation, you may use the software only as expressly permitted in this agreement. In doing so, you must comply with any technical limitations in the software that only allow you to use it in certain ways. [You also may not

      • - work around any technical limitations in the software;
      • - reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble the software, except and only to the extent that applicable law expressly permits, despite this limitation;
      • - publish the software for others to copy;
      • - rent, lease or lend the software; or
      • - transfer the software or this agreement to any third party.

      Sweet let's rebuild the internet with software that doesn't let you work around technical limitations. Perfect, this will work out well.

  50. what about the servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as long as they don't turn the servers off. After then DRM thing that was on here yesterday, can you image how much more screwed you'd be if they 'turned off' all your data?

  51. yea by unity100 · · Score: 1

    it was google which pulled the plug on bCentral ecommerce service and doomed thousands of estore owners. it was google which pulled the plug on their music service and shoved subscriptions of paying customers up their #sses. it was google which bribed standards boards in various countries to push their closed standard as an open standard. it is google which is being hammered by a class action lawsuit as of now because they fradulently named many hardware as vista capable despite they were not, suprisingly frankly and openly conspiring through emails records on their corporate network, which has been procured through court order and came to the light of day. are those enough, or do i need to go way back towards 1980s ?

    1. Re:yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was google which pulled the plug on bCentral ecommerce service and doomed thousands of estore owners. it was google which pulled the plug on their music service and shoved subscriptions of paying customers up their #sses. it was google which bribed standards boards in various countries to push their closed standard as an open standard. it is google which is being hammered by a class action lawsuit as of now because they fradulently named many hardware as vista capable despite they were not, suprisingly frankly and openly conspiring through emails records on their corporate network, which has been procured through court order and came to the light of day. are those enough, or do i need to go way back towards 1980s ?
      I'm not sure if this is irony or not, but I'll bite. Google _do_ doom thousands of estore owners on regular basis, through arbitrary changes to ranking algorithm with no information, no communication and no response to complaints. People go bankrupt over this. Read any forum relevant for this and you'll see massive amounts of pain (and no, this is not about ranking spammers).

      And Google was the _first_ of the major sites to pull the plug on a DRM licensing server (Google Video) rendering content users had bought useless.
    2. Re:yea by unity100 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if this is irony or not, but I'll bite. Google _do_ doom thousands of estore owners on regular basis, through arbitrary changes to ranking algorithm with no information, no communication and no response to complaints. People go bankrupt over this. Read any forum relevant for this and you'll see massive amounts of pain (and no, this is not about ranking spammers). microsoft has been doing that even before google was there, with its own search engines, browsers, mail services. hotmail have caused many web hosting businesses clients, and clients their web sites, just because of the arbitrary spam filtering shit they have been employing.

      additionally changing search algorithm and pulling the plug on your OWN service after totally locking in estore owners are two different things.

      And Google was the _first_ of the major sites to pull the plug on a DRM licensing server (Google Video) rendering content users had bought useless. one for google. how many for microsoft ?
    3. Re:yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      microsoft has been doing that even before google was there, with its own search engines,
      Microsoft didn't have its own search engine before Google was there. Live Search is what, 2.5 years old? Before that Microsoft didn't have their own search service, they used partners like Inktomi and Overture/Yahoo. And you might argue that Hotmail has caused the same amount of massive business distruption as Googles changes and policies, I would disagree, but that was not really the issue. Only pointing out that you (or someone) used Google as an example against Microsoft in areas where Google has been just as bad as Microsoft.

      one for google. how many for microsoft ?
      One? (MSN Music)
    4. Re:yea by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      The mistake is relying on Google for your only business. I'm not gonna feel bad for someone that builds their house on a beach and a tide comes and wipes it out, either.

    5. Re:yea by unity100 · · Score: 1

      i dont argue that hotmail has caused much trouble and business disruption, i say it. i experienced it first hand. and in regard to your argument that says google is as bad as microsoft, thousands of customers, partners, business partners, contractors they screwed since 1980s would staunchly disagree.

    6. Re:yea by unity100 · · Score: 1

      One? (MSN Music) are you a regular reader of slashdot ? are you really asking this question ?
  52. Google sounds worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Google's AdSense Mesh service launched today as an invite only "technology preview". It is Google's attempt to tie all of our data together. AdSense Mesh synchronizes data across multiple devices (currently just Linux computers, but theoretically it will extend to mobile and other devices in the future) as well as to a web desktop that exists in the cloud. It can sync data across devices used by a single users, as well as create shared spaces for multiple users."

    And since it's run by Google, you know you can trust it.

    That's so much better!

  53. give it up, Microsoft by nguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The days of single platform computing and lock-in are over. After Vista and "Plays for Sure", even the most die-hard Microsoft fans must have figured out that betting on all-Microsoft solutions is a sure way to lose.

  54. I guess none of you use MS Products? by HerculesMO · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because Sharepoint is kind of like this already, it keeps everybody in our organization synchronized as far as our documentation and other things.

    Of course, the willingness to bash is always entertaining, but the primary strength of Microsoft is its OWN interoperability, and making it easier for folks to keep synchronized only enhances their market position.

    But please, continue with the bashing... it really makes *Nix seem like a viable alternative when all the sysadmins for those systems shit on Microsoft, without having any other arguments why to go for Linux other than "Open Source".

    And for the record, I dual boot Ubuntu and Windows on my workstation PC.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a completely lame argument - the point is that MSFT cares not about the customer. They only care about getting as many people on their platforms as possible so they can manipulate them into spending more money. All of their business decisions are geared towards profits, not customer satisfaction. Yes MSFT is interoperable with itself, but at what cost? Witness the current Office 2007 format fiasco, which is yet another step in their never ending cycle of creating data no one can access unless you upgrade. This "Live" garbage they tout is the perfect way to hold user data hostage.

      What amazes me is the people who actually stand up for MSFT. They are the Sopranos of the IT world and are laughing all the way to the bank. Pay them if you want to, I'll sit on the sidelines and laugh, thank you.

    2. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      I'll bash away all i like, because my *nix machines run so smoothly I have the time to, unlike my GUI obsessed colleagues in windows land

    3. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      No Sharepoint isn't really the same and anyone forced to use Sharepoint will agree it's pretty shit.

    4. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by HerculesMO · · Score: 0, Troll

      Okay...

      That just means you're a shit Windows admin :)

      I haven't had a problem on any of my Windows boxes.

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    5. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All windows admins are shit. :(

      You've never had a problem _that you've detected_ on any of your windows boxes. I've yet to meet a "windows admin" that even notices when a windoze bitty box had joined the ranks of a botnet... though unix/linux admins just happening to find themselves stuck on windows sometimes (e.g. me) at least sometimes do.

    6. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      Just having a quick read of what I posted, I missed the bit where I said i was a windows admin, perhaps you could point it out to me ?

    7. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      Good quantification.

      It's just entertaining that while both OSes have their place in certain activities, folks here (especially) will shit on MS just for the sake of it.

      I honestly think Sharepoint is one of their best products... but please enlighten me why it's "shit".

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    8. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I work in a company with hundreds of people and the company is very pro-MS with a lot of technologies yet I've still yet to meet one person that likes using it within the company. So whether my reason would be down to fanboyism or not, that is hardly the case with most other users I've talked to.

      The biggest problem with it is that it doesn't seem to want you to find anything. The GUI is a mess and it requires too many clicks to get all the files to show under your section.

      It also doesn't help it's not visually appealing and, while being functional in Firefox, it's best used under IE...big surprise there.

    9. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      So you're basing your judgment on your 'company' who uses it, and doesn't like it? And you find the GUI a mess and too many clicks?

      Sorry to tell you, but Sharepoint's power is leveraged through the people who support it, develop it, and have a vision for using it. I'll agree with you with regards to Firefox, but this is not a surprise -- I mean, even Outlook webmail looks like crap in Firefox.

      Being visually appealing, easy to use, etc... is a function of how it's set up. I admit the defaults aren't great, but if you can't navigate through the default menus, you have no business using a computer.

      And yes, I'll chalk this up to MS blind hatred, because you can't produce a single argument that tells me why it's bad software in and of itself -- just that it has a bad GUI. The users you talk to obviously share that sentiment, and I think mostly the fault lies with your shit admins for those boxes... but that's just a guess.

      We have had rave reviews since we brought it online here, because we've consolidated so many things into it, and also streamlined change management process and other workflows into it. It helps though, that our devs are familiar with developing the workflows and using Sharepoint, and so am I.

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    10. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I did provide my biggest gripe about it. It's not that I can't find things. I can find everything I want in Sharepoint.

      It's the fact it could be done much better and while the option should be there to customise it, the defaults should be better too. If I want to completely modify something and start writing huge chunks of code then I might as well get a free option that may even be initially lacking things because it's at least free so the cost is only in time not time and money.

      More so when Sharepoint doesn't exactly output the best HTML or have the best CSS. Again, that can be tolerated if the only cost in sorting things is time or even if it's just money but when it costs time and money then it's not worth it, imo. IN fact I'm told it's not exactly that nice to customise.

      I think you'll find a lot of people will agree the navigation is lacking. You might be able to steer a car with cats tied to your hands but that doesn't mean it's ideal and that more or less sums up my opinion of the navigation.

      There is simply no reason someone should have to do two clicks to view all the documents in a workspace when the first click says documents....not top 10 documents or silly like that and it's certainly not that intuitive to move between workspaces.

      Microsoft has always had poor interface design. Even when they copy others (mac) they manage to do it their own way which is not as good.

      I think that is why Microsoft continues to fail when it comes to online products. This is the internet. They can't just block out the competition so easily. Even with making Live Search the default for IE7 they're still below google and Yahoo. When you have have bad UI design and a wealth of competition you can't win and that's been MS' story online. Sharepoint suffers this as well and it's quite expensive.

      It's ok as a document management system but for that kinda of money I expect more than something that thinks it's cute to mimic File explorer. If I want to navigate my files that way, I could get a shared drive and just tell people to map it to their system.

    11. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Of course, the willingness to bash is always entertaining

      I thought the willingness to bash was due to the unpronounceability of "ksh" and "zsh".

      And I'd rather use LaTeX with CVS than be locked into Microsoft.

    12. Re:I guess none of you use MS Products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running a computer in your mom's basement with linux on it doesn't make you an administrator you fucking loser.

  55. Future Microsoft Email by quonsar · · Score: 1

    As of August 31, 2010, we will no longer be able to support the retrieval of license keys for the songs you purchased from data stored in MSN Music Microsoft Live Mesh folders...

  56. it's so SHINY by ichbineinneuben · · Score: 1

    Wow, the icons on that page are sure shiny. Even the folders are made out of chrome. Blue chrome folders so shiny you want to put them in your mouth. Who wouldn't want to be part of that?

    1. Re:it's so SHINY by Mybrid · · Score: 1
  57. Live Mesh Website by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is finally using PNG with alpha channel on one of their website. Is this new? Can we ditch IE6 in web contracts yet?

  58. Oh, they stole this from Apple to? by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    This looks very similar to the iDisk system from Apple...

    They make a big deal out of passwords too, but Microsoft's technical support gives your Windows Live ID password out to anyone who calls the Xbox Technical Support claiming to be you....

  59. Re: First Looks at Microsoft's New 'Live Mesh' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And since it's run by Microsoft, you know you can trust it.

    Yeah, trust that it will be complete garbage like everything else Microsoft has a hand in.

  60. I'll pass by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Like I want to have my data all in one place being secured by those buffoons.

    Besides, I've been using Rsync.net for ages and have access to all the data I want access to from anywhere and there are no issues with it if I choose to use in on a non-MS Operating System.

  61. maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they had done this a number of years ago, i'd think it was cool...because, a number of years ago, i was still using ms products. too late.

  62. Where's the beef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The link tells me almost nothing about what this really is. A few utterly unanswered questions:

    1) Can I defined new types of structured data to sync at will?

    2) Can I define relationships between structured data types?

    3) How are conflicts handled? Merging with resolution code and then ask user or what?

    4) Is there a mechanism for specifying integrity constraints on synced data.

    As usual with MS I see fluff and big claims but little substance.

  63. Remember Microsoft Passport? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Remember Microsoft Passport? That was another attempt to dominate users.

    Google: "Do no evil."

    Microsoft: "The only way we know how to make money is by doing evil."

    My opinion, but I'm not the only one who thinks that way.

    1. Re:Remember Microsoft Passport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft still uses Passport for its own stuff. They did try to get it widely adopted by others but a coalition headed by Sun and others proposed an alternative to block Passport, and they succeeded. But that Sun-led coalition disappeared too, without ever releasing a damn thing (classic example of "vaporware" by Sun, et al).

    2. Re:Remember Microsoft Passport? by intangible · · Score: 1

      Which is fine by me, because now we have a real open working standard called "OpenId" getting more popular and not controlled by one company.

  64. Powerfolder? Maybe not. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I certainly wouldn't trust data to a company that can't make a web site that renders well in Firefox. They have made an assumption about what minimum font size you will use.

    1. Re:Powerfolder? Maybe not. by Miroe · · Score: 1

      Yes they did but they are basically an Open source Project which turns into a company and they are really putting a lot of work in the Product. and they are not backed up by some big company and they are not feeding some greedy venture capita. So I thrust them even if you can make their homepage look bad when you scale your font size. non the less you are right they should have made it better. I am only talking about the page. the Product is very nice.

    2. Re:Powerfolder? Maybe not. by Allador · · Score: 1

      Looks beautiful in Opera 9.27, at various zoom levels.

      It looks great in FireFox too, unzoomed.

      If you're using zoom levels or nonstandard font sizes in FireFox, then thats a firefox problem, its never handled that well, while browsers like Opera handle it beautifully.

  65. Novell called - why did it take 7 years? by Degrees · · Score: 1
    Novell called - why did it take MS seven years to "innovate" iFolder?

    Does not being cross-platform qualify as "innovation" now?

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
    1. Re:Novell called - why did it take 7 years? by Degrees · · Score: 1

      After I posted my snarky comment, I RTFA. Turns out Live Mesh is more a clone of Gnome Conduit

      --
      "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  66. Re:ms isn't the evil empire any more by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

    As soon as a year goes by without Microsoft doing something shady, I'll consider starting to trust them again. They've already fucked up this year with the ISO stuff, so the earliest I might consider trusting them is in the middle of 2009. Assuming they don't do anything stupid between now and then.

    But we all know what happens when we assume.

  67. If aynone can save Microsoft, Ray Ozzie can by theolein · · Score: 1

    Although I'm a die-hard Mac fan who owns three Macs and is a Mac system administrator, I have recently become to loath Apple, more and more, because, although the Mac experience is great, Apple is, in my eyes, becoming more and more like Microsoft in its policies, if not its products.

    Witness the fact that Apple dropped Java as a core programming language on OSX two years ago, and has now stopped developing the C/C++ API known as Carbon, leaving you with exactly one native programming language to develop GUI applications on in OSX: Objective C, which, while it has many great features, is definitely slower than C or C++ (amongst other things, such as almost no compatibility). Apple is, in my eyes, trying to pull a Microsoft.

    Microsoft is trying to do the same thing with Silverlight, the Flash competitor, and DirectX, having relegated OpenGL to second class citizen status on Vista. Microsoft's various web platforms, although they have been fairly good technically, have had the same driving policy. All the embrace and extend policies make many people despair.

    But where does one go? On the one hand you have an balding manic prancing around a stage, who never shies from using aggression to threaten partners and employees, guided by an intellectually bright but totally out of touch nerd who has been wrong on so many occasions it's simply painful. On the other side, you have a nasty, money grabbing style fetishist with good ideas but a control obsession.

    Linux is, in the world I live in, not (yet) an answer. There aren't enough high quality software packages out there. Period. There is no After Effects, there is no Illustrator.

    My hope is that Ray Ozzie, who has a history of good and truly innovative products, eventually takes over from Ballmer and Gates, to bring back Windows from the depths of slow, crapware that it has become, to drive Apple into being more open again, instead of becoming ever more a second Microsoft.

  68. imesh? by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

    if it's anything like iMesh then I'm staying the hell away!

  69. Re:Um, what? by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

    OK, what do we get after clouds? Moonbeams?

    Close. According to Verizon, it's light beams.

    Then we get ponies.

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  70. Just for reference... by LordVader717 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Just for reference... by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      A few of those crystal icons bear more than a passing resemblance to some of Apple's OS X icons.

  71. One word Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ActiveSync

  72. Microsoft Passport is now Windows Live ID. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Microsoft still uses Passport for its own stuff."

    Yes, but now they call it Windows Live ID.

    After several nasty vulnerabilities and extremely bad press, they changed the name. Hey, maybe Jabba the Hutt could change his name and apply for a job as a supermodel.

    The description of Windows Live ID says, "Simplify your sign in". Yes, simplify, give Microsoft control, and increase the chance of vulnerabilities. If Microsoft didn't take advantage of the technical ignorance of its customers, how much profit would it make? In my opinion, far less.

  73. Re:ms isn't the evil empire any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This site has become so fucking sad and pathetic, that the parent got modded a troll for suggesting that MS isn't evil.

    Pathetic.

    He even knew that he had to post as AC if he's saying something pro-MS

    Not one post in this thread discusses the technology behind mesh, what it might mean for computing, etc. - only MS bashing everywhere.

    Fucking useless site this has turned into..

  74. More malware coming soon by TheDeivix · · Score: 1

    With Live Mesh one will be able to access their home pc, access it's content and even run programs on it remotely, pcs using it will be exposed to the outside world.

    Now, we all know that microsucks products are every hacker's favorite target, we also now they are shitware, and they are closed source, meaning that bug fixes and security updates can only be provided by them and only them.

    Oh man!... i cannot even start to imagine the amount and sort of exploits there will be for this thing, it will be a hell of a lot of work to maintain a thing like this being closed source, which means no help from the developer community worldwide.

    Good luck with that microsucks, i'll enjoy watching you go down in flames.

  75. Signup for the Program is Hideous by jgertzen · · Score: 1

    It's been clear to me for years now that M$ is on a major b-line for the tank. For a perfect example of WHY, you just need to try and signup for the beta of Live Mesh. I'm not kidding when I'm telling you that I had to go through 10-15 web forms, including a click-through email confirmation... just to be given the privilege to get on the waiting list! And thats with already having an MSN / Live ID. I'm not sure what Balmer and those guys are thinking with Live Mesh and a number of there other stupid moves lately *cough* Yahoo *cough*. But it's clear to me that they suffer from the classic issue of brand dilution. I mean seriously... they need to cut about 50% of the B.S. initiatives that they have and refocus on their core.... otherwise, they are as good as gone in the next 5yrs.

  76. Go Web 2.0 (was: like plays for sure?) by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
    Personally I like what IBM's doing for collaboration -- building their own set of secure Second Life servers based on an agreement with Linden Labs. Although I think a collaborative environment based on Warcraft might be more fun, and better team building.

    They could even introduce their own gold spammers from the Sales department, trolling for pre-sales resources. "Are you annoy with current position? Spending too much time mining gold when better use of time? Talk to ERP sales team at http://xxxintranet.thingy.ibm.com/"

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  77. Why do you thing they named it live mess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  78. You're right. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Good point.