Slashdot Mirror


Making Free Phone Calls With Google's GrandCentral

andrewmin writes with an enthusiastic pitch for Google's closed-beta call-aggregation service called GrandCentral, for which we non-beta-testers can at least reserve a number. Specifically, he's using GrandCentral in combination with Gizmo5 to make free VoiP calls. Excerpted: "Most of the time, I'm at my computer. Or near it. And if I had an internet device like a Nokia N810 or an iPod Touch, I'd have it with me 24/7. And since most of the time I'm at a place where there's a WiFi network, it makes sense for me to use VoIP rather than a regular phone line. ... I'm talking about making and receiving calls that are completely free (that is, $0.00/minute) forever (that is, no 30-day demo) for as much as you want (that is, no 30-day trial or five hour/week limit)."

144 comments

  1. knowing google... by ionix5891 · · Score: 1

    half way thru your call

    a soft 3rd part voice interrupts your conversation "this is Ads by Google: for free unlimited hosting please see http://..../"

    1. Re:knowing google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or, in the case of Slashdotters:
      "This is Ads by Google: Is your parents' basement becoming a bit to cramped for you and your Star Wars memorabilia collection? Do you long for companionship in your life? Do you wan't to experience this sex thing people keep talking about? Visit Russian Milf Dating dot com now!"

    2. Re:knowing google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried going to that Russian Milf site you listed, but no web site came up. I guess it's been hit with the Slashdot effect already!

    3. Re:knowing google... by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 1

      No you see google has text ads, which means all us phone phreaks out there are going to finally be cool for being able to actually understand the DTMF ads google plays! I fuggin love google! *puts on his phonelosers shirt*

      --
      www.isoHunt.com
    4. Re:knowing google... by slimey_limey · · Score: 1

      PLA ... some phreaker you are. I'm working on restoring a #3 ESS to service.
      Have any spare DC 6150 tapes lying around?

  2. Not available outside the US ... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So much for 95% of the world ...

    1. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      yeah sucks that I can't even reserve thanks to living in the third world

    2. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Step 1: Start your own -based Google
      Step 2: Offer free telephone call service not available outside <FOREIGN COUNTRY>
      Step 3: ???
      Step 4: PROFIT!!

    3. Re:Not available outside the US ... by ArIck · · Score: 1

      This is not completely accurate. I am in Canada and I had gotten a Grand Central number. Maybe it is for US and Canada only but, how hrd is it to use a proxy in the US to register (or ask a friend to do it) and use that phone number if you want!

    4. Re:Not available outside the US ... by rsax · · Score: 1

      >This is not completely accurate. I am in Canada and I had gotten a Grand Central number. Maybe it is for US and Canada only

      GrandCentral Requirements:

      "At this time GrandCentral is only available in the U.S."

    5. Re:Not available outside the US ... by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So much for 95% of the world ... So fucking what?!

      I don't go to Japanese sites expecting freebies from Japanese companies for my American ass.

      If it is in Google's interest to offer this product/service to <insert your country>, they will.

      It's like the Japanese video game market. A ton of crap gets dumped in the Japanese market, because most of the companies are a) in Japan, b) it's cheaper and easier to test a new game in a local market - before potentially pissing away money on a failure.
      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    6. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      Apparently it's not available in all of the US either.

      I only count 45 states and the District and Columbia on their reserve page..

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    7. Re:Not available outside the US ... by IconBasedIdea · · Score: 2, Informative

      The service is available in every state. However, numbers in every area code and/or state are not available at all times. Your number and your location need not match.

    8. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      what area code? I just checked 2 area codes in Ontario, and neither are available.

      --
      :x
    9. Re:Not available outside the US ... by robogobo · · Score: 0

      you didn't get the notice. that's out, not funny anymore.

    10. Re:Not available outside the US ... by adlucem · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some of the rest of the world already has free VoIP, though. For instance, ~50% of French households have broaband, and the typical monthly fee of 30 bucks includes free VoIP (and numeric TV). The big difference of GrandCentral seems to be that it centralizes all of your phoning devices, around a unique phone number.

    11. Re:Not available outside the US ... by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      Area code 603 is not available- and that covers the entire state of New Hampshire.

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    12. Re:Not available outside the US ... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      So... pick another state? Nothing says that you have to choose the state of your residence...

    13. Re:Not available outside the US ... by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess the point of wanting a local area code is so that it isn't long distance for everyone that you are likely to give the number out too.

      Could you imagine, Hey this is my new number that will be able to contact me anywhere I am at, you just have to call california at 10-15 cents a minute or more. but you can reach me at that number.

    14. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some of the rest of the world already has free VoIP, though. For instance, ~50% of French households have broaband, and the typical monthly fee of 30 bucks includes free VoIP (and numeric TV). Not only that, but the calls are free when calling no less than about 50 countries, US included. With some providers, you can can connect to your number through SIP from basically anywhere and place calls for free. Wish I had that here in Canada, where I get charged long distance whenever I call out of city limits.

      --
      -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
    15. Re:Not available outside the US ... by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      I think we're rapidly approaching the point where no one cares what area code you're in, or even country code soon. I'm already at that point. Just about everyone I know has a cell phone that can call nationwide (and Canada) at no additional cost for at least part of the day if not all the time. Plenty of people also have VoIP like Vonage or Lingo (which I have) where you can call anywhere in the US or western Europe for free any time.

    16. Re:Not available outside the US ... by dmbasso · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh, I see what you're doing!
      Step 1 - warn it's not funny
      Step 2 - ???
      Step 3 - PROFIT!!!1!!!

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    17. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      What is this "long distance" that you speak of?

    18. Re:Not available outside the US ... by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Just put a small PBX at home. I have an asterisk doing the same job for me. It aggregates my landline, 3 VOIP numbers (from 2 countries), 2 cell phones when I am in the home (via chan_bluetooth), etc and forwards to the correct number depending on the circumstances. There are plenty of live CDs floating around and all you need is a retired small PC to run it.

      As far as non-US the Grandcentral business model will _NOT_ work outside US. It works due to the vagaries of the US mobile market. In the US called person pays for receiving calls. So if GrandCentral has a telco registration it can by collecting the termination fee pay the forwarding fee and break even (I still do not see where the profit is). In the rest of the world the calling person pays for the whole call. So Google/GrandCentral will not be able to offer this service using the same terms and conditions.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    19. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Nemo's+Night+Sky · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I have been trying to tell people about asterisk for ages!

    20. Re:Not available outside the US ... by cain · · Score: 1

      It's not free when calling land lines or cell phones. You need to pay when connecting from SIP to POTS.

    21. Re:Not available outside the US ... by skiddie · · Score: 1

      It's not free when calling land lines or cell phones. You need to pay when connecting from SIP to POTS. It depends on providers-- with free.fr it is free to call landlines in around 70 countries, including the US, China and Australia. This is for less than 30 Euros/month.
    22. Re:Not available outside the US ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      This is not completely accurate. I am in Canada and I had gotten a Grand Central number. Maybe it is for US and Canada only but, how hrd (sic) is it to use a proxy in the US to register (or ask a friend to do it) and use that phone number if you want!

      You can't get an area code that's local to Canada. I looked it up. Kanuckistan isn't exactly 3rd world. Also, you're in violation of their TOS. Why not just grab a copy of iCall (to talk to phones) or Eyeball Chat?

    23. Re:Not available outside the US ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      By 2020 it won't matter. Everyone will have a wireless palmtop that connects to the local mesh|lillypad network for internet/phone/video calls/etc.

      You can already do that with a lappy - it's just a question of shrinking it down more, and getting more people to "donate" their unused bandwidth to the mesh.

    24. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Ox0065 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really?

      I thought it was because they couldn't be 'bothered' doing the translation, & didn't really value anyone else's opinion anyway.
      Perhaps that sums up the (USof) American problem too.

      I want to know how this relates to android. Live WiFi to GSM handoff anyone? cough from da good ol US of A?

      --
      thx e
    25. Re:Not available outside the US ... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I don't think that level of saturation is as high as you think for most people. I know plenty of people, perhaps more then you because of the nature of being on call all the time, who don't have anything but regular POTS service. Many small to medium businesses don't mess around with Vonage or other VoIP products unless it is to connect satellite stations and so on. Most of my customers have cell phones but they still use POTS services to call me because instead of using their minutes on the cell phone, they can use their call as muxh as you want locally, POTS line. I'm not aware of any cell phone company offering unlimited service for less then $100 month. If you use the home phone half the time, the cell phone the other half, you can easily get by with paying half that if not less.

      I doubt the reality of the situation is the way you think it is.

    26. Re:Not available outside the US ... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Long distance is the term given to when you have additional rate assigned to your calls outside a local area. The local area is some arbitrary land mass that I'm sure there is a reason for but I can't figure it out so it looks random, but it is where you can call without the additional charged.

      If I remember right, it was originally assigned when your call went to more then one operator board or crossed lines onto another network. For some reason, they kept it around when they became monopolies and went to computers instead of actual operators switching the calls. They expanded the area a little but failed to encompass and entire area code in some places. Some areas, because of the population density, you can make local call to multiple area codes with certain prefixes.

      Now assuming that your not making a joke about cell phones and VoIP not having long distance charges, I should remind people that they pay more then standard POTS service when they employ these other technologies. VoIP, you have to have high speed Internet. That's another $20-$60 a month on top of the normal service. For cell phones, unless your not going to make more then 2 eight minute calls a day, your not going to find service for less then $40-$50 a month compared to a standard POTS line for local calling which you should be able to get for around $20-$30 a month and these days, they add the bells and whistles in with the basic packages. And don't forget that most cell packages at those prices charge for incoming calls too.

      As a matter of fact, I just looked and ATT, Sprint, Nextel, Verizon, all offer a 450 minute plan at $39.99 a month which comes out to around 11 cents per minute which is surprisingly similar to state to state long distance rates except with a POTS line, you don't have to pay for incoming long distance calls. I guess the quesion might be, is it free long distance when every call costs as much as a long distance call?

    27. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      $40/mo for unlimited calling to anywhere in the country on my cell with MetroPCS. Cheaper if I don't want voicemail.

    28. Re:Not available outside the US ... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Valid point; but realistically with today's landline and cellphone market, it's becoming more and more common for long distance to be included at a flat rate.

    29. Re:Not available outside the US ... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I really shouldn't have to point out the obvious but 30 euros a month isn't free.

    30. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, I live in France and when I'm in the UK at my friends house, if someone phone my landline in Paris I get the call on my SIP mobile (Nokia S65) from my friend's wifi ... for free
      I've been doing that for about 1 year now

      About the quality, to be honest sometimes it sucks but most of the time it works great (~ 9/10)

    31. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      They should use a Google.US Domain for that service and block those non USA countries IP blocks reaching! ;)

      Google's interest doesn't worth shit. When I hear "VOIP over PC", Skype comes to my foreigner mind. A client which supports my language, offers me to select real numbers all over the planet, even my Nokia E65 phone connects to their network over 3G/WLAN/GPRS via third party client. When you do anything regarding voice over IP, you will be compared to Skype.

      So, Google offers free number but blocks everyone outside USA? Like WE CARE. Really... Google's interest should be search and they should stop playing with their search-box-monopoly search dollars to make joke to foreigners.

      It is also sad that this non standard, closed source, closed codec thing will be de-facto standard for years to come.

    32. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Well, there is a site/client named www.skype.com and it seems working. At least we, in potential axis of evil countries can use their services. ;) Just checking, it got 10.276.342 people online right now.

      Funny is the Gizmo mentioned in story... I remember I was supporting Gizmo big time (since OSS/standard based) and advertising them to everyone until... Some genius suit there decided to offer Free real phone calls BUT made a huge list of countries you can't call saying something like "Big fraud happening in those countries!"

      While not being citizen of any mentioned country, I uninstalled Gizmo right away as a protest, accepted sad reality of Skype.

    33. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I have seen few (if any) LD providers that provide the deep discounts during off-peak periods that call providers do.

      Pretty much every service provider has either unlimited nights/weekends or virtually unlimited. (For example, AT&T's lowest voice plan gives you "only" 5000 night/weekend minutes instead of unlimited.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    34. Re:Not available outside the US ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      FFS, then != than

      WhyTF are there so meny people thet cen't fegure thet one out??

    35. Re:Not available outside the US ... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      You will have the niche coverage offering low rate plans in select cities. I picked the major carriers because that is what the majority of people have to choose from. MetroPCS is available in what, small parts of 5 or 6 states?

    36. Re:Not available outside the US ... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Sure it is becoming more common but you have to look at people with existing services and perhaps the payphone call from a loved one stranded with a dead battery or something who needs to get a hold of you for a ride or jump or something. Then again, you can just give out the local numbers and hope they have enough quarters to get you at home, or on your cell phone, or at work, if your there and in range.

    37. Re:Not available outside the US ... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      My Nextel nights and weekends start at 9pm. It would be great if I did most of my stuff between 9pm and 6am or 7am but for the majority of us, we don't. If you happen to have that kind of lifestyle, great. You will find that it won't last long though. As you get older and settle down, it will change and you will end up being like the rest of us for the most part. At least enough so that you end up needing to make and receive calls during the day

    38. Re:Not available outside the US ... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Now assuming that your not making a joke about cell phones and VoIP not having long distance charges, I should remind people that they pay more then standard POTS service when they employ these other technologies. VoIP, you have to have high speed Internet. That's another $20-$60 a month on top of the normal service.

      That $20-$60 per month is money you're already paying, so your choice is between POTS+broadband or VoIP+broadband. For VoIP, I'm currently paying $35 per year plus $0.019 per minute for outbound calls. Comparable POTS service would cost at least $250-$300 per year; I'd need to waste over 1000 minutes on the phone every month for POTS to become more economical.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    39. Re:Not available outside the US ... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It isn't necessarily something you would already be paying. I know plenty of people who still use dial up because broadband isn't available in their area or it costs too much. I also know quite a few people who still don't own computers. So as for the you would still be paying it anyways, well that's if you fit a subjective profile.

      Also, your already paying about $250 a year for your VoIP without adding your inet service. Think about it. You stated 1000 minutes a month at 1.9 cents ($0.019). That come out to about $19 a month times 12 months leave you with $228 plus the $25 a year for a grand total of $263 a year without any taxes or fees associated.

      I can almost bet that with the structure of your statement that you didn't know you were paying that much. You might have known but never considered the context of it. It doesn't matter, the point is that they are still similar in costs except for the VoIP, you have to have the internet access so if money gets tight, you can't shake that bill for a couple of months and still have a phone.

  3. Innovation by hey · · Score: 1

    If only Google would innovate a bit ;)

    1. Re:Innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you're joking. Or do we only remember that technology is purchased when Microsoft buys it?

    2. Re:Innovation by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I hope you had a sense of humor when you were born, because it's sure been ground out of you now, along with the pattern recognition wetware to recognize those funny symbols at the end of his post.

  4. Damn it! by Aranykai · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone already reserved (314)159-2653.

    --
    If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    1. Re:Damn it! by magarity · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, but how about 876-5309 ?

    2. Re:Damn it! by siwelwerd · · Score: 1

      Then go for a better approximation, rather than just a truncation: (314)159-2654.

    3. Re:Damn it! by MrMr · · Score: 1

      The last 3 should be a 4 anyway.
      or reseserve (589)793-2385

    4. Re:Damn it! by v1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      maybe you should try 867-5309? (I believe 876-5309's owned by a typo squatter?)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:Damn it! by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

      Or maybe 853-5937 for us who prefer Squeeze to Tommy Tutone?

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    6. Re:Damn it! by Jardine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but how about 876-5309 ?

      PEnnsylvania 6-5000. And get off my lawn.

    7. Re:Damn it! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Well I'm an old Rush fan so I would rather have 100-1001. Of course I wouldn't mind THX-1138 either. And I'm not on your lawn. I'm posting this FROM INSIDE YOUR HOUSE!!! :-o

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont forget 5318008

      oh wait this is slashdot... they might not know anything about these

    9. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 867-5309. Believe me, we had 867-5039 as an additional office number for awhile and every time the song came on the radio we'd get loosers who couldn't dial right.

    10. Re:Damn it! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      during college the 'inhouse' dorm hall phones had an 867 prefix and yes, one of them was 867-5309. We had good fun with that as you can imagine. Hmm... what would kids today do if their only option to make phone calls was a pay phone in the hallway!

    11. Re:Damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm...I do. Definitely a tit man.

  5. Only 45 states can reserve numbers. by doctorsmoothy · · Score: 0

    Maine just got indoor plumbing, you'd think we would be candidates for VOIP.

    1. Re:Only 45 states can reserve numbers. by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Maine just got indoor plumbing They only want you to have to learn one technological advance at a time. Don't want y'all to get confused, then angry, then defect to Canada. That would be awful.
    2. Re:Only 45 states can reserve numbers. by AMSRay · · Score: 1

      Now that you've got indoor plumbing, sign up for Google TiSP (Beta) and you'll have the high-speed internet you need for VOIP. www.google.com/tisp/

  6. VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And since most of the time I'm at a place where there's a WiFi network, it makes sense for me to use VoIP rather than a regular phone line. As someone who hates cell phones, I used a softphone (reaching back to an Asterisk server) on my laptop for a few months. Anytime I used WiFi outside my house (campus network or coffee-shop style coverage) I had nothing but problems: garbled communication, one side of the conversation not hearing anything, etc. Almost completely unusable--you know service is bad when it makes cell phone quality look fantastic in comparison.

    Anyway, Grand Central may be a replacement for a land-line phone, but I think Andrew is being a bit optimistic about the adequacy of using it as a "mobile" phone.
    1. Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by seidojohn · · Score: 4, Informative
      This apparently isn't designed to replace cell phones or land lines. From what I understand from TFA:

      1. Give GrandCentral all your phone numbers (Home, Cell, Work, etc.)
      2. Tell GrandCentral when you will be around each phone
      3. Tell all your contacts you have a new phone number, and give them your GrandCentral one
      4a. Someone calls at a time which you told GrandCentral you would be at work, so your work phone rings.
      4b. Someone calls when you're on your lunch break, out of the office, and your cell phone rings.
      4c. Someone calls when you're at home, and both your cell phone and land-line ring.
      4... Repeat for whatever configuration you have set up.

      From TFA:

      With GrandCentral, you get:
      All your calls through a single number. Add your other numbers to your GrandCentral account and then make your own rules for how and when your phones ring.
      All your voicemails in one place, saved for as long as you want. If you don't answer a GrandCentral call, your callers will be sent to your GrandCentral voicemail. You can then check messages by calling your GrandCentral number, by logging into your account, or by checking the GrandCentral notification email.
      Handy features that work the same way across all your phones:
      *ListenIn as callers leave you a message
      * Record calls on the fly so you never have to fumble for a pen again
      * Switch phones mid-call without your caller knowing
      * Block annoying callers at will
      * Record custom greetings for different caller or groups of callers
      Later in TFA:

      To use GrandCentral, you just need a touch-tone phone and a Flash-enabled browser. Visit the About Adobe Flash Player page to find your version of Flash or confirm that your already downloaded it.
      Also this:

      Note: GrandCentral won't charge you for these calls; however, if you use a cell phone, regular cell phone airtime charges may apply
      Sorry for so many quotes, but if people won't look at the website they're commenting on, perhaps they'll read this... ;)
    2. Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 1

      You are correct; to be clear as to what I was referring to, I should have said Grand Central+Gizmo5 (what the author was describing in the summary).

    3. Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have any Sprint plan, you can get cheap unlimited calling by registering your Grandcentral number as a 'Sprint to Home' number. It's $5 a month for unlimited calling to and from your 'home' number, and GC does count!

    4. Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by a.ameri · · Score: 4, Informative

      As part time Asterisk developer let me second the parent.

      Not only VoIP, but any real-time application is useless on nearly all current implementations of 802.x due to two major reseason:

      * Response time is too high irrespective of bandwidth. Lag is not acceptable in situations where you can't buffer. Your YouTube playback will not suffer because even a tiny buffer can eliminate the problem, but you can't buffer RT applications.

      * Most importantly, the concept of QoS, while theoretically feasible on 802.x, is completely absent from the current implementation. I have heard but I'm yet to see a real Wifi device with QoS. Without QoS, VoIP sucks.

      And then, there is also the issue of enhanced emergency services compliance, or what's in US called E911. In Australia where I live, most VoIP providers either completely block calling '000' (our emergency service number) or require you to submit a physical address for your static IP and REMAIN in that location.

      To sum it all up, if you're holding your breath for VoIP on Wifi, dream on. I've tested various VoIP clients (from the top of the market Siemens and Snom IP phones with Wifi to softphones like Counter path, etc) using various VoIP servers (Asterisk, Cisco, Nortel, etc.) using various UDP protocols (SIP, AIX2, H.323, Skinny etc.) and it DOESN'T WORK(TM).

      Until we have full end-to-end QoS support on wireless networks, or something like WiMAX which promises to drastically lower response time and lag, VoIP on wireless will remain a toy for geeks to play with and nothing more.

      --
      -- /* Those who don't underestand Unix, are condemned to reinvent it poorly */
    5. Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a statement! Having Sipura SPA-3102 working 24/7 over 802.11g for more then a year at home is probably just in my dream? Exceptional audio quality even while connecting to private SIP proxy over the internet on Comcast cable - thanks to using G711u codec.

    6. Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by hacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      You missed one of the slickest features of GrandCentral, one which is not highly advertised...

      Let's say you have your Work, Mobile and Home numbers registered with GrandCentral.

      You receive a call to your GrandCentral number, which rings in your office at 4:50pm, and you need to catch the train down the road at 5:30, and it's a 20-minute walk.

      You accept the call in your office, have your conversation, then TRANSPARENTLY switch the call to your cellphone, continue talking there, without ever dropping the call. You take your train home and reach your house just as your cellphone battery is dying. You then transparently transfer the call to your home phone number, and continue to talk there. The whole time, the call was never dropped, nor did you ever lose connection.

      THAT, in my opinion, is the slickest part of GrandCentral.

    7. Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by seidojohn · · Score: 1

      You accept the call in your office, have your conversation, then TRANSPARENTLY switch the call to your cellphone, continue talking there, without ever dropping the call. You take your train home and reach your house just as your cellphone battery is dying. You then transparently transfer the call to your home phone number, and continue to talk there. The whole time, the call was never dropped, nor did you ever lose connection.

      You are correct, sir. How did I miss that!?!
    8. Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile in the U.S. offers VoIP calling for several models of phones that support 802.11. If you're within range of your home wireless router, you can initiate a call over WiFi. Then, when you walk out the front door, the call will automatically switch over to the cellular network. They do charge a flat fee for this service, but WiFi calls are unmetered, and by all accounts the VoIP system works quite well.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    9. Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only VoIP, but any real-time application is useless on nearly all current implementations of 802.x due to two major reseason:

      * Response time is too high irrespective of bandwidth. Lag is not acceptable in situations where you can't buffer. Your YouTube playback will not suffer because even a tiny buffer can eliminate the problem, but you can't buffer RT applications. I use skype on my n810 perfectiy fine. I talk for hours without interruption or glitches. I actually like to use it better than my cellphone. voice quality is comparable to my cellphone. Sorry i dont belive wifi voip is unusable.
    10. Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but if it's just around your house that you're interested in, a regular DECT phone with the basestation connected to a Grandstream (or similar) box connected to T'Internet will work just fine.

  7. FreeWorldDialup, Asterisk and IPKall by viking80 · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.freeworlddialup.com/ Gives anyone a free phone number forever, globally, and you can dial to and from most VOIP services.

    It works great with any VOIP SW or HW or Asterisk for a fancy home answering machine.

    If you need the POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) world to call you, http://www.ipkall.com/ will give you a free Washington phone nuumber.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
    1. Re:FreeWorldDialup, Asterisk and IPKall by mrbluze · · Score: 5, Funny

      http://www.freeworlddialup.com/ [freeworlddialup.com] Gives anyone a free phone number forever, globally, and you can dial to and from most VOIP services.

      That just doesn't have the same feeling of excitement as getting up at 2am in the pouring rain, going to a telephone booth with a 555 timer chip and piezo, making freaking calls with your computer next to you plugged into the 12V socket of your car, then posting abusive messages anonymously on your favourite BBS. And all for free, man!

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  8. Nokia n810 grandcentral and gizmo5 by spacepimp · · Score: 1

    This is not entirely accurate. I have been doing this on my nokia n810 for some time. It has worked, and worked nicely and freely to boot. However a friend of mine using this set up was told he'd need to purchase minutes in that he was over using the free service. He went back to using vonage. I have used the two in tandem and not had any problems with it whatsoever or had a limitation on phone minutes.

    1. Re:Nokia n810 grandcentral and gizmo5 by mscdex · · Score: 1

      It sounds like your friend was calling through gizmo and not grandcentral. I did this on accident initially when I set up gizmo and grandcentral. In order to call out through grandcentral instead, you need to log into your account at the grandcentral webpage, or the mobile version of their webpage and dial from your address book. There is currently a maemo application in the works here that will allow you to dial your grandcentral contacts without opening your browser.

  9. Reserve a number? by calebt3 · · Score: 1

    Hmm. My UID is 7 digits long...

  10. Only Free?!? PAY US for info harvested from calls! by ivi · · Score: 1

    Just as Google "earns" (however indirectly) from what we search for (eg, enabling it to increase its ad revenues, by positioning "relavent" ad's beside our search results)...

    so can it (very likely) continue to earn even more, eg, automatically listening-in on our future phone conversations - using well-developed voice-to-text technologies - to gather valuable information from them.

    Perhaps we should be -paid- for each use of Google's "free" VoIP service, ie, if/when it is unfolded before us... more as harvested info is sold at higher prices, less before it is sold.

    A similar rewards model should also apply to Google Mail messages sent & received.

  11. Re:Only Free?!? PAY US for info harvested from cal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, while you hold out for that, the rest of us will just enjoy free service.

    Let us know how it works.

  12. Please qualify the statement... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Specifically, he's using GrandCentral in combination with Gizmo5 to make free VoiP calls

    He's making free phone calls to the USA. I am pretty sure he cannot call Benin or Nepal free of charge. That is the nature of the industry. Once this Google product is out, free calls will not be to every device that can receive them all over the world. Free calls will be to USA and Canada.

    By the way, can anyone tell me what determines the cost of an international call? My provider (Sprint Canada) charges an average of 49 cents/min for a call to Asia though you can use some of the many pre-paid phone cards and make a call at about 7 cents/min to the same destination.

    1. Re:Please qualify the statement... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mostly it is the company you are buying the service from, and the contracts it has with terminating companies in the destination country.

      One thing to be aware of is the prepaid cards are generally given the lowest quality of service routes. The phone company already has your money, so it doesn't really care whether the call goes through or not. If you are placing the call on a billable basis then the phone company doesn't get any money if the call doesn't go through.

    2. Re:Please qualify the statement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can anyone tell me what determines the cost of an international call? Switching costs, termination costs, and operator profits, for the most part.
    3. Re:Please qualify the statement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, can anyone tell me what determines the cost of an international call? My provider (Sprint Canada) charges an average of 49 cents/min for a call to Asia though you can use some of the many pre-paid phone cards and make a call at about 7 cents/min to the same destination.

      It's called supply & demand. Like most businesses, they charge what they can get away with.

      There is long-distance competition in Canada, so SHOP AROUND! Personally, I love Yak Commnications. Despite the silly name, they are a legit phone company and have been around for years. Great prices.

    4. Re:Please qualify the statement... by eharvill · · Score: 1

      By the way, can anyone tell me what determines the cost of an international call? My provider (Sprint Canada) charges an average of 49 cents/min for a call to Asia though you can use some of the many pre-paid phone cards and make a call at about 7 cents/min to the same destination. It's pretty messed up. My wife calls back home to Spain all the time on her ATT cell phone (from the US). If she calls a land line it's like 2 cents a minute. If she calls a cell phone it's nearly 50 cents a minute. WTF??? I get pissed when she calls someone's cell for obvious reasons!
      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    5. Re:Please qualify the statement... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      7 cents/minHere in the UK they do that by having 270 minutes per hour.

      The voice says "you have 110 mintes" and 8 minutes later, it says "you do not have enough credit for this call".

      I am not sure why the telephone regulator has not done something about this, but I suspect corruption might have a bearing on it.

      In other cases, notice that an unactivated phone card is worth about $0.005, while an activated one is worth $5. If you wanted a convenient waay to launder money, perhaps you should consider carrying a suitcase filled with unactivated phone cards over the boarder, and then activating them? More profitable than smuggling drugs, and you are less likely to go to jail.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  13. calls not free to landlines by cain · · Score: 1

    VoIP to landland or cell phones are not free, at least if your time and friendships are worth something:

    "Users NEW to the All Calls Free plan get 20 minutes of free calling simply by getting ONE friend to sign up for a new Gizmo account. There are no commitments and no hidden fees."

    http://gizmo5.com/pc/network/mobile-or-landline-calls/

    1. Re:calls not free to landlines by Darundal · · Score: 1

      Only if you make the call through Gizmo itself, and not GrandCentral. Through GrandCentral, it is free.

    2. Re:calls not free to landlines by cain · · Score: 1

      How do you make calls through grand central? All I see is people call your grand central number and it gets routed where you want it. I don't see how you can call out using the grand central number. If you see that, please let me know. I know of no way to make VoIP calls to land lines or cell phones without paying.

    3. Re:calls not free to landlines by Darundal · · Score: 1

      That is it, basically. You go to the Grand Central site, put your Gizmo SIP number in as one of your phone numbers, and then when you are in your addressbook, click the call them button for one of your contacts and make sure that Grand Central routes to your Gizmo number. They don't charge you a dime for this.

    4. Re:calls not free to landlines by cain · · Score: 1

      Yes, but try calling a non-SIP number - a cell phone or a land land. Then they charge you or you have to use this "free" account, which, as I pointed out in the original post, is only free if your time or friends aren't worth anything to you.

    5. Re:calls not free to landlines by cain · · Score: 1
      To be more clear: Grandcentral routes the call to your Gizmo account for free, but then Gizmo will charge you for PC-to-phone calls. From the Gizmo site:

      Any call to a Gizmo5 user is free. No matter when, no matter where, no matter how long. Free. There's no monthly service charge. Nor is there a set up cost. Gizmo5 is free.

      But,

      The only calls you could ever have to pay for are calls to offline phones, i.e. mobile phones and landlines. But with Gizmo Call Out credits these calls are cheap and easy to administer.

      Therefore calls from GrandCentral to cell and land lines (via Gizmo or anything I've ever found) are not free.

      For reference: http://gizmo5.com/pc/network/free-computer-to-computer-calls
    6. Re:calls not free to landlines by cain · · Score: 1

      (replying to self)

      I think I've been missing a step. GrandCentral will call the POTS line for you, call your SIP line, then connect the two. Since GrandCentral is making the call to the POTS line, they pay for it. Correct?

      I finally understood once I read this post: http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=542462&cid=23289436

  14. skype by urban_warrior · · Score: 1

    for the extra $3 a month i'd rather purchase the skype unlimited north america plan, the service and call quality are good and i dont't have to garble together a bunch of different services, for my $3 its just not worth the extra hassles to use gizmo or grand central.

    just my $3

  15. EPIC is coming... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    ...sooner than you think. 2015 is way off. 2009? Maybe...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:EPIC is coming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, quit wasting our collective time with this trash.

  16. Anyone read "The Religion War?" by cwolfsheep · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The idea of universal and free phone access was raised in Scott Adams' "The Religion War," as a hacker's dying act to make all telephone calls in the world free. The war ends almost as quick as it began, and society rededicates itself to sustaining this new and free communication network.

    --

    Life is irony, and nothing ever goes as planned.
  17. Another one?!? by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    How many of these services are there now, hundreds at least. Maybe Google should make a search engine for VoIP services, so we can compare all the freeness.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  18. bollocksware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm trying to think of a name for this technology. It's not vapourware, because it actually exists. It's not malware, but the amount of trouble it causes is comparable. It's like Linux was in 1990, fine if you have time to burn and want something that works 5% of the time to get a warm, smug geeky sense of satisfaction. I've tried Skype. It was bollocks. Worked about 10% of the time at most. Asterix systems too. All bollocks. Dropped calls, unintelligable connections, configuration nightmares, lots of "enterprise" companies offering things but no service or readable documentation from anyone. Like a secret club of people who don't really want you to know how to do it. Lot's of partial truths about the resquirements, hyperbole, talking it up as new panacea when in reality its unusable. That's the reality of VOIP. Sure it will "get there". In about 5 years when the ISPs carve up the land. Then it will cost as much as regular telephony and nobody will notice the difference. I name VOIP "bollocksware". It will never be anything but a geek curiosity in its present form.

    1. Re:bollocksware by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      no no. it works. you just need to be connected via T1 ... and so does the party you're calling ... and they've got to be close.

      Bollocks, I say. Skype works and has the same sorts of limitations as calling overseas (call quality sucks for that regularly!).

    2. Re:bollocksware by Locklin · · Score: 1

      I've got a Linksys SPA 2102 connected to a regular/crappy DSL line -it does traffic shaping on my home network, so it's much better than a soft phone. Calls are as clear or clearer than POTS calls, and I can get cheap or free SIP termination and DIDs in virtually any country (Acanac.com in Canada; combining them with voxalot.com). While a bit difficult to parse, there is a lot of information about providers on www.voip-info.org

      I also try to use a soft phone over my school's wireless occasionally -and I can see why many people think voip is poor quality.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  19. So ummm... by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Isn't it actually Gizmo that is making and receiving the free phone calls? So why not just use it? Or did I miss a big piece of the article because to me it just looks like the author is using Grand Central to push a call through Gizmo.

    1. Re:So ummm... by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      AFAICT, what he is doing is placing a call from the grand central address book. Google then calls your phone (or in this case the SIPphone (GIZMO) account). When you pick up, Google then dials the party you selected, and connects the two calls. I'm guessing there is some reason why he is using a sipphone (GIZMO) account rather than a regular phone. I'm not sure what the reason is. But the point is Google is making two phone calls, (only one routed over POTS though), and thus is the one footing the bill for the call (as the caller always pays under the US system, except for "toll-free" calls, third-party billing, or collect calls).

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    2. Re:So ummm... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      But...but...Google!! Google!!

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  20. combine this with a hosted pbx and unified system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use www.innoport.com which allows APIs for customizing access...

  21. Re:Only Free?!? PAY US for info harvested from cal by zeroduck · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using the beta for a few months now, and its pretty slick. I think the intention is to charge for the service at some point. On the settings tab, they list what "plan" you have.

    Right now there is no advertising on the website or inserted into your calls.

  22. Re:combine this with a hosted pbx and unified syst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations douchebag.

  23. +1 funny by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

    but alas, I've already posted. damn.

    --
    :x
  24. Fsck apple ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iwank touch does not have a microphone. How does one intend to speak? I know you apple fanboys ignore facts, but overcoming impossibilities will surely shatter your gay world?

  25. IPKall by glomph · · Score: 1
    IPKall has offered a free inbound number (which you can use with ANY publicly-reachable SIP service worldwide, including Gizmo/sipphone) for years. The numbers are in Washington State, but will work anywhere. Super-simple to set up. And it does not do the silly ringback method (hit 1 to receive the call, etc.) that GrandCentral does.

    To -make- calls, if you have no other option, the GrandCentral web system (http://m.grandcentral.com/) is a bit clunky, but OK for residents of FreedomLand.

    (I signed up long before the Google acquisition; my number still works after a LONG period of inactivity)

    IPKall takes away your number if you don't use it for a few weeks.

  26. Re:Only Free?!? PAY US for info harvested from cal by quickgold192 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gmail *does* pay you - with a free email account.

  27. why bother? by bwy · · Score: 1

    I've never understood people's desire to use VOIP over WiFi on their cell phones. What is wrong with just using your phone?

    My wife and I share a family plan and we get plenty of minutes, and they roll over which is a big help because we don't have to have a plan that allows for that one month when we have higher than normal usage.

    I guess some people are on the phone constantly and have to buy a prohibitively expensive plan? But are we talking 5000 minutes or what? Business folk who are on the phone that much every month probably need some mobility- i.e. you'd like to be able to leave your hotspot while on an important phone call.

    1. Re:why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry sir, I will need to have your Geek License removed. Step aside. Real geek route their calls through china, north korea, and then write perl scripts that hook into asterisk to place calls from their voip-enabled iphones.

  28. Re:Only Free?!? PAY US for info harvested from cal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The payment you are receiving is the service itself. You are under no obligation whatsoever to use it, and if the benefit of the service does not outweigh the privacy issues in your opinion, that's fine. For others, the service may be good enough to warrant the problems you spoke of.

  29. also you need a blasted invite by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    I've still not gotten an invite ever for this, so don't forget about that aspect either.

  30. what I love about grand central. by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    I love being able to record calls, I love the call screening, and I love being able to select which number I receive calls on.

    voice mail in your email, selectable ring-ins.

    I love grand central.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  31. Exactly by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Most public wi-fi spots are so saturated with traffic that IP telphony is next to useless. When you have 50 people all swilling nasty over roasted Starbucks coffee while watching Youtube videos you are not going to get a very good IP-phone connection.

    1. Re:Exactly by Nemo's+Night+Sky · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is why we tell hot spots to go f themselves once handset battery technology has improved to a point where running SiP over a fully switched mobile mesh network is possible. Gotta have some kind of incentive though for running exit nodes. Like for every guy sharing his FiOS for calls that MUST go to the PSTN, his mobile device is allowed to have a higher bandwidth exchange on the mesh. Obviously a difficult idea to implement until there are enough companion handsets out there to mesh with. Did i say difficult? Probably closer to impossible. The Telcos arent going anywhere soon.

    2. Re:Exactly by Magada · · Score: 1

      FON.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  32. Google Voip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another thing Google can do and MS or Apple or ? cannot do because of antitrust. How is Google able to do basically whatever it wants to and no one else can(specifically M$FT)? I smell a rat, but I sure the bulk of true /. people just love the monopoly Google is trying to develope as /. ers and others try to destroy the bad M$FT Just thoughts

    1. Re:Google Voip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Nothing is stopping Microsoft or Apple from doing this. Microsoft was guilty of leveraging it's monopoly to kill off competitors. Microsoft can do this as long as it doesn't prevent competitors from doing it on their platform/technology. I don't see why Apple would be prevented from doing this either. What monopoly does Apple have? iTunes? No there is enough competition out there. Stop being a retarded douchebag.

  33. Works well with "My Circle" plans as well... by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    GrandCentral - from whom I've had a number since before Google bought them - gives you the option of providing either (a) the caller's caller-ID, or (b) GrandCentral's caller-ID. If you use option (b), you give up knowing who's calling you before picking up the phone, but you can add GrandCentral to your "Fave-5" or whever you might have.

    GrandCentral will still tell you who's calling, of ocurse...

  34. One place for ALL msgs by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    What I love about GC is checking my email ALSO gets me my voicemail. No more checking a cell's vm, home machine, email all separately.

    The time savings is great. Add that I get messages sooner that way too.

    Finally, unlike the article's comment, it was just a few hours from when I reserved a number (in a more useful calling area for me) to when I was included in the beta (how sweet is that?)

    It will be interesting to see what their revenue model is after beta...

    1. Re:One place for ALL msgs by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      It will be interesting to see what their revenue model is after beta...
      That's the great thing about it. Since Google bought it, you know it will be in beta forever!
      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  35. No, thanks! I prefer to pay xebba.com for privacy by AngryDad · · Score: 1

    Before you sign up, read GrandCentral's terms and conditions. I'd suggest using Xebba instead. They are not completely free, but they specifically mention that they do not record calls and do not harvest anything from your conversations.

  36. Flash? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1
    From the Grand Central homepage:

    You need Flash to use GrandCentral. Get it here Ok, is there any chance of this working with actual, published, open protocols for making and receiving calls?

    Or do I need to have Flash on my phone?
    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Flash? by Wingman+5 · · Score: 1

      If you read the article it says grand central gives you a sip number, you can use that with any sip device (thats what the other program is for, you could really just use any softphone.

  37. free calls... who cares? by nguy · · Score: 1

    Phone calls are not all that expensive anymore, and most people who really need free calls just use VoIP.

    I think GrandCentral needs to do a lot more to appeal to people. Right now, its model is that you give out its number to everybody and it then connects to your devices. I think that model is too rigid. They should offer different services (voice mail, forwarding, parallel forwarding, voice response, VoIP, etc.) and let the users decide how to connect those services to each other and to phone numbers.

    Also, there are some really important pieces missing, like the ability to forward SMSs.

    1. Re:free calls... who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey nguy,

                Maybe you didn't look closely at what GrandCentral is offering. They do offer voice mail, forwarding, VoIP, call transfer, call recording, call now buttons (masking your number), simultaneous ring (calls mobile, land, gizmo), call screening, call blocking by number, and several other features. They are definately in beta but I think they have plenty to "appeal to people." http://www.grandcentral.com/home/features

    2. Re:free calls... who cares? by nguy · · Score: 1

      Hey Mr. anonymous, what about reading what I wrote?

      Yes, GC has lots of features, but they are bundled in a way that makes them useless to me and most other people.

      I know because I have a GC account and I'm not using it.

  38. The ol' Ringtone game... by swokm · · Score: 1
    I distinctly detect the reek of 'evil'...

    Q: GrandCentral users have been able to upload sound files for their own ring back tones. Will this feature continue to be offered?
    A. GrandCentral users will be able to choose from a selection of licensed sound files made available within the GrandCentral service, but will not be able to upload their own files. Knee-capping an existing service in order to force people to rent crappy 1k midi files for eternity?

    Yep. Evil, alright.
  39. Any service that'll forward a landline 2 ur cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to get rid of my landline to save money but I've had that phone number for 10 years so I'd rather not lose it. Are there any cheap services that can forward a landline to a cell number?

  40. My Options Are Disappearing by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    It's getting more and more difficult to be "out of touch", and I'm pretty sure I don't like it. Once upon a time, you could avoid somebody for a while without being flat-out rude to them.

    Now we can't even use expense as a reason not to be at everybody's beck and call. I guess I'll just have to amend my message to say something like, "Dave only collects voice mail once a day, and it looks like you already missed today's check-in. Sorry."

    More to my taste would be something like, "Fuck off, I'm busy", but for some reason it's frowned upon in a business environment.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:My Options Are Disappearing by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      I just tell people my cell phone is for my convenience, not theirs. I tell them I usually leave it turned off (even though I leave it on and the ringer is set to "1-beep"... I just ignore a lot of calls that I don't feel like answering right then). You can also train people without having to use the words "Fuck off". I try not to get angry about those who are resistant to training, it's much more fun if you look at it as a game (ohhhhh... how else can I try to train you???).

  41. how free is it really by rhade · · Score: 1
    I understand where you are coming from, but you still need to pay for the internet that you are using it on, as well as internet on your phone, which I bet isnt cheap. Now im sure its possible to use outside free internet and free wireless on your mobile, but for most of the time you are paying for your internet, of course this is an expense you would have anyway and the price of internet is only going down but you still pay.
    I'm not disagreeing with you, I have recently signed up for voip with my isp Iinet, ( I am advertising this, if your in aust and you arent with them you are getting ripped off, I dont get paid for this i've just done my homework) here in OZ which offers free local and national calls, within what they call reasonable amounts, which I have never exceeded. Telstra have recently allowed to use the phone line without paying for the line, iinet call it naked im not sure what it is actually called. Which also means when overseas I can use my voip details on my laptop to call home, to anyones landline, for the cost of my internet. I have my mobile on a company offering free voice calls to people on the same network, so I have all my family on them, I wont say who im not advertising this.

    Then there is regular overseas calls which we use Skype for. The only things I pay for, apart from the cost of internet and my mobile, are calls to mobiles on different networks. And you know this is only going to get better. Internet is getting cheaper and cheaper and easier to access outside the home all the time.

    --
    http://www.awfullybigmoustache.com
  42. Whats new here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the system to be reliable, we need an actual phone in addition to the laptop anyways, or a phone with internet connection (even more expensive)! T-mobile already offers regular mobile phones that can switch to ur wi-fi network and route calls thru Voip and use the cellphone network when wi-fi is unavailable. The calls routed over the wi-fi are free.

  43. asshat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks for posting it on slashdot so that it is sure to be not free in the very near future.

  44. Gizmo? by wall0159 · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't recommend giving Gizmo your money. I've sent them money (two weeks ago) and am yet to receive any credit. A check on their website (http://forum.gizmo5.com/viewforum.php?f=26&sid=a017ebef79d1fed2787c5d0b244f4245) shows me that this is not an isolated problem.

  45. another setup in 2600 by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

    Current issue of 2600 magazine (Spring 2008) had an in-depth article about something like this... with your cell phone and Skype, I think (I just took a glance through). Leaf through a copy at your bookstore and see if you want to pick it up.

  46. Re: by clint999 · · Score: 0

    Area code 603 is not available- and that covers the entire state of New Hampshire.

  47. Excuse me while I adjust my tin hat... by V.11.1997 · · Score: 1

    ... but not taking advantage of free VoIP phone calls from one of the world's worst privacy offenders is something we can manage to do just fine.

    1. Re:Excuse me while I adjust my tin hat... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      No kidding, I think "Spare my personal voice data" whenever I hear Google makes attempts to get into voice business. Would it be like "Free number but we will keep your conversations until 2038"?

  48. hard phone by 74nova · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for the Wi-Fi hard phones, but the Polycom hard phones we have around here have enough built into them to cancel a good bit of the crap you get with voip. Even with our Switchvox appliance internally, you can hear a major difference between employees on a soft versus hard phone. I would guess that the Wi-Fi phones are at least similar, though probably not as much so.

    --
    use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy