Slashdot Mirror


Linux Desktop to Appear On Every Asus Motherboard

An anonymous reader writes "We first heard about Splashtop back in October, when the instant-on Linux desktop was announced. At the time it was a really exciting concept but Asus only rolled out the technology on high-end motherboards. Splashtop just announced that Asus will be expanding the desktop to the P5Q motherboard family and later on to all Asus motherboards. That's embedded Linux shipping over a million motherboards a month! The release also mentioned that the technology will be appearing on notebooks this year as well."

60 of 471 comments (clear)

  1. Out of curiosity... by neokushan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How many people "switch" to Linux every month? I mean, if anyone has such a statistic, I'd be interested in seeing just how much this figure could potentially impact that (I know, chances are 99% of the people using these motherboards will still boot windows, but satisfy my curiosity =P).

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    1. Re:Out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      1.17 million

    2. Re:Out of curiosity... by flyingfsck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In total, about 300 million Linux devices are produced each year. About 1% of that are servers and desktops. A larger proportion are laptops. Asus alone, sells more than a million Eee PCs per quarter. Consequently Linux laptops outsell Apple by a wide margin.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re:Out of curiosity... by neokushan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interesting. So 300million linux devices per year, 1% of those are servers/desktops, that makes 3million a year, right?
      That's not as much as I thought it would be, these motherboards should certainly boost that figure.
      I wonder how long before Microsoft start shipping an embedded Windows version....

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    4. Re:Out of curiosity... by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is absolutely no way of knowing. I know that last year I installed Mandriva on 5 computer newbie machines from the CD I downloaded. So if you're counting distro downloads, that metric is not reliable; one download can and probabally usually is more than one installation.

      Many people have their user-agent say they're using IE on Windows even if they're using Linux, bacsue dimwits still code their pages to not display if you're not using IE ("please upgrade to a modern browser? It's Opera's latest!") So web site metrics can't be reliable either.

      IINM it was Mark Twain (Samuel Clemons) who said "there are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and ststistics."

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    5. Re:Out of curiosity... by Ageing+Metalhead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You got to realise that almost all TV STBs are now using Linux, the only exceptions are the one's running MS Mediaroom (al la U-Verse). So I would suggest that it would be more than 300 million per year. AM

      --
      The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. - HGTTG
    6. Re:Out of curiosity... by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn ACs pulling numbers out of their asses...

      It's 1.18 million.

    7. Re:Out of curiosity... by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I switch to linux every month or so.
      But I get fed up.
      Then I promptly switch back to whatever OS I feel like installing.
      Then I get fed up again.
      And I think 'Oh, someone on slashdot said that this is the time to switch to linux! I should try it AGAIN!'...
      then I switch to linux.
      Until I get fed up...

    8. Re:Out of curiosity... by abolitiontheory · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This would be interesting to know in terms of other statistics, such as how many new computer users are there every month. If people are "switching" to Linux but that number is outweighed by the number of uninformed new users just picking up a Windows machine, then its just noise.

      The fact is it still takes a very informed choice to switch to Linux. This type of thing could go a long way towards solving that ("what, an operating system already onboard?!"), but at the same time this is only one manufacturer and its the kind of thing only people building their own PCs are going to see, anyway.

      The general market still has so much to learn about other options besides Windows. Mac is gaining popularity because of cool-factor and crossover conversions, none of which Linux has. Honestly, it won't be until you can fool someone into using Linux before they figure out its not Windows that you will see a change in general market trends. Either that or some unforeseen landmark change in the computer landscape is going to have to take place.

      In this regard, the comparison between open source solutions and alternative energy options makes sense here, except that the open source industry has had _superior_, WORKING solutions for the past decade, and the alternative energies industry hasn't. Its kind of like people choosing to stick with their internal combustion engine technology and refusing to try out a hydrogen car because "no body else does." But really, its because there's been no mass awakening to it, and unlike the energy crisis, there isn't likely to be unless someone brings it about.

      Still, this is the extreme value of Linux to me: it's portability. Not *mobility*--we'll have to wait for Andriod for that--but its ability to fit on almost any system in any way. Scaleability and flexibility also apply here. I'd love to have a trusted operating system living at the hardware level of my comptuter. It seems to make sense in a way, even: the logical extension of CMOS in a way. Honestly, you're telling me motherboard hardware has improved for the past 10-15 years but we still have no better built in soft/firmware?

      I'm doing more brainstoming than actual technical analysis here, but these are the kinds of things that get me excited like that: speculating, hypothesizing, dreaming about a more open and inherently good future.

      Technorant, out.

    9. Re:Out of curiosity... by edbob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I don't think it is so much that people are "switching" to Linux as much as additional people are using it. For example, these mobos will probably be sold to people who will then add hard drives, optical drives, etc. and then install some form of Windows. These people would be using Linux without exactly switching to Linux. At home, I have both Windows and Linux boxes for different things. Using Linux does not mean that I've abandoned Windows. As much as I would like to go all-Linux, there are practical considerations that prevent such a move at this time.

    10. Re:Out of curiosity... by fwarren · · Score: 5, Funny
      Here let me fix that for you

      I switch to Widnows every month or so.
      But I get fed up.
      Then I promptly switch back to whatever Linux I feel like installing.
      Then I get fed up again.
      And I think 'All the marketing says that Windows is better than Linux! I should try it AGAIN!'...
      then I switch to Windows.
      Until I get fed up...

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    11. Re:Out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why must someone be "uninformed" to use Windows.

      Maybe instead they are informed of what software they wish to use, what OS it operates well with, and thus make a VERY INFORMED decision to not use an OS that would require substantial work to use with their software of choice.

      Just because someone doesn't use Linux, doesn't mean they are stupid.
      And with this type of prevelant attitude among Linux user's, you can bet that they will remain a very small minority.

      The true competition to Windows isn't linux, not on the desktop. It's Apple, and will be becuase Linux lacks quite a few things that everyday people require.

    12. Re:Out of curiosity... by StarkRG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wonder how long before Microsoft start shipping an embedded Windows version.... Probably as soon as they can get vista to fit in 1gb of flash memory, make it boot instantly, be cheap, and not be a POS...

      It's one thing to have your OS die and you've got to reboot. It's another if your motherboard dies and you've got to buy another.
    13. Re:Out of curiosity... by wampus · · Score: 3, Informative

      A few STB's may be running Linux, but a good chunk of them are running SARA or Passport.

    14. Re:Out of curiosity... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, 1.18 was the 31 days of January, and he is quoting for February.

    15. Re:Out of curiosity... by H0p313ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      why must someone be "uninformed" to use Windows. Maybe instead they are informed of what software they wish to use, what OS it operates well with, and thus make a VERY INFORMED decision to not use an OS that would require substantial work to use with their software of choice.

      preamble:

      • Comp. Sci. degree
      • DOS since 1.0
      • Windows since 3.0
      • Linux since 0.9 (experimental machine current runs Ubuntu 8.04)
      • shipped products written in Smalltalk, C, C++, VB, Python and Java

      Very well said. I like to think of myself as well informed, but you can't pay me enough money to run Linux on a games machine I share with my teenage son. It's just too much damn work for a lower framerate.

      In fact I would argue that the reason that my game machine is Vista on a quad-core is because I'm very well informed.

      However, I could do all my work on a linux box but since I get 100% IT support with no arguments if I keep using whatever came with my corporate laptop why bother since it only makes my life harder and saves no money until the entire organization gives up on Windows?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    16. Re:Out of curiosity... by neokushan · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's probably no mention of it running windows because of the defining amount of jokes that would be made about your car crashing...

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    17. Re:Out of curiosity... by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I don't know if it includes it,but I have found that "refurbing" old Windows boxes makes a great way to get reliable computers into the hands of those that don't have them. I often find working with SOHO shops that they have a couple of old machines they are getting ready to toss. Most are happy to donate them to me when i tell them I'll wipe the drive and put a free Linux on them and give them away to single mothers so their children have a way to work at home.


      I found that Puppy seems to be the best mix of size and usefulness,especially on former Win9X machines. I just think it is a shame how many functioning machines end up in the dumpster when they could be given a good home. Hell,my first gaming rig,which was a Pentium 100Mhz with a whopping 32Mb of RAM is still in use at a local lumbar company running DOS 3 as a ISA controller for an ancient lathe they have making custom columns. So the thought that folks will throw out a good running computer still just strikes me a wasteful to the extreme. But that is my 02c,YMMV.


      Oh,and as a disclaimer-I have actually thrown out a running machine in the past. I had a girl bring in her old computer to see if I could upgrade it for her in class. This poor girl had actually been doing her schoolwork on a 30Mhz with 12Mb of Simm RAM running Win 3.11. I took one look at that ancient thing and told her to leave it and I'd see what I could do. When the girl left the teacher asked "you aren't actually going to try to UPGRADE that thing,are you?" I told him HELL no! And when she showed up the next day I presented her with a 550Mhz that one of my SOHO clients had donated. Last I heard her kid was still doing his reports on his "new" machine,just as happy as a clam. I tried for a week to find a use for that 30Mhz,but damned if I could find a use for it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    18. Re:Out of curiosity... by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      Truly, 2008 is the year of Linux on the Set Top.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    19. Re:Out of curiosity... by ozbird · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder how long before Microsoft start shipping an embedded Windows version....
      Probably as soon as they can get vista to fit in 1gb of flash memory, make it boot instantly, be cheap, and not be a POS...

      They'd probably push Embedded XP. They've already backflipped on XP availability for the Asus EeePC etc., which does nothing to improve the image of Vista. ("Look, our soon-to-be discontinued 2001 OS can compete with Linux in the 'ultra-low cost' computer market!")

      However, I think they've painted themselves into a corner. If they bully Asus into providing an embedded XP version of the motherboards, the customer is bound to ask: "I don't want Vista; why can't I run XP as the OS on the same motherboard?" The more features that can be crammed into the embedded Linux version, the sillier Microsoft's inevitable justifications will seem ("It's not really XP", "you can't do real work in an embedded environment" etc.)
    20. Re:Out of curiosity... by ThePengwin · · Score: 4, Funny

      only 32.4 percent of people know that though

    21. Re:Out of curiosity... by mollymoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's also the 93% of the world's population who don't live in the USA. Some of them have businesses and computers too.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    22. Re:Out of curiosity... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Asus alone, sells more than a million Eee PCs per quarter.

      Huh? Asus reported 350k the last quarter of 2007, and 700k for first quarter 2008. They project 1.2 million for second quarter. However, a majority of that will be the models that come with Windows.

      Consequently Linux laptops outsell Apple by a wide margin

      Not even close. Apple sold 1.4 million laptops first quarter. Asus's 700k plus the rest of the Linux laptop vendors don't come anywhere near that.

  2. Huh. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always bought Asus anyway; they make good boards, and the few times I've had problems they've replaced them...Once I even got a free upgrade because they'd discontinued the board I had.

    So it's not going to change my purchasing, but it's still nice.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Huh. by Znork · · Score: 5, Interesting

      they make good boards

      I have to agree. I've made some forays into MSI (a relationship that was abruptly and permanently terminated when I discovered I had to have XP to upgrade the BIOS), EPoX and AOpen.

      But after that MSI foray I'll be sticking to ASUS for the foreseeable future; I have yet to purchase an ASUS board that I haven't been perfectly happy with throughout its lifecycle (well, I had one or two die of the bad capacitor issue a few years ago, but that was only 30% of my ASUS boards while 100% of the other branded boards died from it).

    2. Re:Huh. by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He said "a few years ago"

      I'm assuming it was those specific few years ago when a Taiwanese capacitor company was selling bad caps. These caps had electrolyte in them made with a formula stolen from a Japanese company. Said Japanese company, though, was wise to the industry pirates and slipped them a time bomb.

      Those caps made it in *everywhere* -- or so it seemed. And is actually probably why it's so much easier to find Slot 1 and Socket 370 CPUs than it is to find boards to put 'em in.

      Oh, look, here's a nice wikipedia article about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  3. In other news... by erroneus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...ACME brick has set up a lucrative partnership with Microsoft. As it turns out, Microsoft brick-shitting production has been increasing over the past few years and their surpluses have been able to yield a sustainable production rate. Microsoft has been unavailable for comment on their deal with ACME brick, but an ACME spokesman has been noted as having quested that Microsoft boost its dietary fiber intake in order to boost the quality of their new product.

  4. Year of the Linux of Desktop by ehaggis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe Duke Nukem Forever will also be included.

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
    1. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by jmorris42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      > This will not happen until the Linux Kernel has native support
      > for an install mechanism...

      By writing this you reveal yourself to be clueless. The kernel would never do anything so complex, that is what userspace is for. But anyway, assuming you really mean a Linux distro....

      > ..where by I can double click on a single file and have it install a
      > whole program including notifying and automatically installing
      > programs it is dependent upon.

      And just where have you been the last five years? Most RH/RPM based distros will do just that. Click on an RPM package and it will ask if you want to install it. But nobody smart does it like that. At most you would use the click to install bit to install a REPO and then just use the same package manager you use to install the distro supplied packages.

      Why limit yourself to the old painful way Microsoft and Apple do things when technology is being innovated over here in Linux/UNIX land? What could be more convienent than adding a repository once and then making that 3rd party software collection a seamless part of the system. You get automatic notifications through the update widget, exactly the same as if it were included from the original OS vendor.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Maybe Duke Nukem Forever will also be included."

      "This will not happen until the Linux Kernel has native support for an install mechanism where by I can double click on a single file and have it install a whole program including notifying and automatically installing programs it is dependent upon."
      I don't see why everyone is calling you clueless. You are dead on the money. Duke Nukem Forever and putting things that clearly do not belong in a kernel in the Linux kernel will happen right around the same time. When penguins migrate to Hell for the cooler climate.
      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by basiles · · Score: 3, Informative

      This will not happen until the Linux Kernel has native support for an install mechanism where by I can double click on a single file This will hopefully never be the role of the Linux kernel. Installation mechanisms (such as package managers like aptitude) are in user land (they are ordinary programs doing system calls). Also, the kernel does not manage mouse clicks. It manage only peripherals (like USB mouses) which are sending bytes. Some application (like the X11 server and toolkits) has to understand these as meaningful clicks.
    4. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > but what if I want Apache on my installation and they don't offer it?

      Bad example since they all do include Apache, but I get your point. Ok, here is how it works. Lets take Fedora since I was talking about RPM based systems and I don't know nearly as much about Debian based ones.

      Fedora is based in the USA and sponsored by Red Hat, Inc. so they can't include certain radioactive bits that almost everyone wants, like mp3 support. So you just hop over to rpm.livna.org and click on the link for your version of Fedora. It serves you up an RPM package for their repository and the browser does the right thing. Up pops a dialog box asking if you want to install the package and if you say yes it prompts for the root (administrator for you Windows folk following along) password. Once that one small package is installed all of the software maintained by Livna (safely outside the USA) is a part of your system.

      But nothing much has actually happened yet. Next you launch the same package manager you use to add/remove OS components and you find that a lot of new things have appeared. And when Livna updates a package it appears in the list of packages that need to be updated right along with the ones Fedora updates.

      Contrast with the Windows/Mac world. Each 3rd party application, game, utility, etc. has to have it's own mechanism to find out if it has been updated, code to bug you to update, etc.

      The best comparison would be to imagine a world where Microsoft made Windows Update an open platform that everyone could use. So that one unlucky morning you booted up and the Windows Update gadget in the toolbar announced you had a critical update to IE, a couple of random Windows bug fixes, bug fixs from Adobe for Photoshop and Flash Player and a new version of your fav utility that displays your hard drive temp was available. Grr. there goes an hour and a couple of reboots. :)

      And it all 'Just Worked.' You don't have an OS and a motley collection of 3rd party apps, you have a seamless System.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    5. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by L+Boom · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't think they're misunderstanding, they just disagree. I'll put it this way: I just switched to Linux this past January and I'm extremely happy with it. With the exception of the wireless in my laptop (Broadcom), it was incredibly easy to get Ubuntu (and a few other distros I was messing around with) up and running, and be able to play around with it.

      I was completely illiterate with regard to command line stuff, but I've figured out a great deal along the way. Even when I first began, installing packages was probably the single easiest thing to do in the OS. Installing a package from Synaptic is ridiculously easy, and it grabs all the dependencies an application needs. Anyone with so little knowledge of how computers work that they can't figure out a package manager is someone who wouldn't be doing anything like installing their own programs in Windows, so that's really not a fair comparison.

    6. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by ArtDent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then, if you're on the command line, there's the question of what it's named. The question is easily asked and answered:

      apt-cache search marks great app

      Before you complain about not knowing the magic incantations, remember you're the one who raised the command line. It's easier to search for packages in the GUI tools that all modern distributions provide.

      Mac and Windows just work so much easier for installing software. Go to author's site, download 1 file, and double click. At this point if it's Windows you have a few dialogs to click through, or if Mac, even easier, just drag the application to your Applications folder. Always the latest, always the same, always easy. I believe all you've said is the obvious: if the author provides a packaged version of their software for your operating system, it is very easy to install it. That is true for Windows, Mac OS, and every modern Linux distribution. Fortunately, distributions like Debian and Fedora package thousands of pieces of software themselves, without requiring any effort from the original authors.

      If a piece of software is overlooked by a distribution and the author wants to package it themselves, they can. They can provide a package and it will be just as easy to install as any other package on the targeted distribution. If they provide a repository, then it will be automatically kept up to date along with the rest of the system.

      The reality is that package management on modern Linux distributions is far superior to Windows and Mac OS.
  5. Is it really that exciting? by melonman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Including an OS on the motherboard makes sense for Asus - at least it is then possible to do basic hardware diagnostics independently of, say, Windows diagnostics.

    But, in terms of Linux adoption, it's only exciting if people keep linux once they've finished building the computer, and the precedents here are hardly promising.

    And, even if you like Linux (which I do), would you want to keep the version supplied with your m/b? On my first EeePC, I tried to get to like Xandros, I really did, but in the end I wiped it and installed Kubuntu. My Dark Side Brother played with Xandros until he broke it, and then installed XP. And it's going to happen even more with the EeePC 900, since the Linux version has a larger SSD than the Windows version (at least in the UK), so you buy the Linux version in order to install Windows.

    --
    Virtually serving coffee
    1. Re:Is it really that exciting? by joggle · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought the way they're doing this is this is a minimal Linux distro and is embedded in the motherboard. At boot, you would have the option of booting off your hard disk as usual or you could chose to boot off of the embedded OS if you just want to check your e-mail, talk on skype or browse the web. Seems pretty neat to me, especially considering it would boot in just a couple of seconds.

    2. Re:Is it really that exciting? by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > And, even if you like Linux (which I do), would you want to keep
      > the version supplied with your m/b?

      You would probably keep Splashtop because it is in flash, probably in a larger BIOS chip. It isn't intended to be your primary OS. ASUS fully expects 99% of these motherboards to end up with Vista on a normal hard drive before it is delivered to the end user.

      The right question is how many of those end users will try Splashtop and find it handy for quick excursions into the net. If that number is large Splashtop will prosper and begin to add more and more features. Five years from now will be interesting if that happens.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    3. Re:Is it really that exciting? by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The place where this will likely cause the biggest problem for MS is when Joe Sixpack has problems with their Windows install. Whether it is from a virus, malware, or just the natural degradation of Windows, eventually most people end up with some kind of problem on their Windows System. Right now, most of them take the system to someone to fix the problem, just live with what they know is a problem, or chuck the whole computer and buy a new one. With a Linux desktop installed in the BIOS, many will learn the key combination that lets them boot to Linux. They don't care what OS they are using. They just want to access their MySpace page. Once they have spent a year using Linux because it worked well enough to keep them from spending the money on repairs or replacement, the idea of using Linux will not seem so strange.

    4. Re:Is it really that exciting? by Taibhsear · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is how it is implemented. I have the P5E3 PREMIUM. The Linux boot is called Express Gate. It boots in about 5 seconds and gives the option to go into bios, the installed OS, or the express gate. You can use email, web browser, skype, and use flash drives (I believe this was first implemented to help update the bios more easily). Uses Splashtop desktop. Here's some quick info on it.

  6. Still don't see the point of burning it into ROM by iamacat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just include an SD card reader on the motherboard and let OEMs/end users integrate a system of their choice? In their approach, the system is not getting any security fixes. Potentially, the built in browser can be owned by simply visiting a web site. There is no way to install even a single extra application. Sounds like this has more to do with marketing than technology.

  7. I RTFA and cursed by sm62704 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's that damned juvenile geek.com, and TFA's not much longer than the summary.

    And it ends with "Read the press release" that the submitter should have linked in the first place rather than that incredibly BAD geek.com) "here".

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  8. *Fwooosh!* by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somewhere in Washington state, a chair is launched on a direct trajectory towards Asus's offices. Naturally NORAD is confused at first till they calculate the launch location.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  9. Re:Ok this is good... Now I have a couple of quest by Gat0r30y · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because even though people will now have the option of booting into an instant on linux desktop - 99% will wait 10 minutes to get into vista just to check their email and play on the internet anyway.

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  10. Re:Ok this is good... Now I have a couple of quest by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is Microsoft relevant or have I missed them being marginalized to oblivion?
    Close. What you've been seeing lately between the failed Yahoo buyout, the attempts at getting all friendly with the Open Source community, and their wrecking ball thrown at the ISO organization is Microsoft grasping at straws, trying to maintain their monopoly.

    Microsoft will remain a player, but they are being marginalized more, day by day. A few years ago, ASUS wouldn't have dared done anything like Splashtop.

    Go ahead, fanoys, mod me down because you know I'm right.
  11. Can you roll your own Splashtop? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is only useful if I can make my own splashtop image. Then it's useful for ALL KINDS of things, including media centers and most especially THIN CLIENTS. Also if you have... uhh, kexec I think? That lets you load a linux kernel from a linux kernel? Then you could jump from this right into your real distribution without having to re-POST.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Re:Debian "Moles" What Prevents Them? by LingNoi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since all packages have been signed off by someone we'd know exactly who had done it. It's not exactly like all packages and code can't be traced every step of the way.

  13. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by iamacat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because you can not install applications in ROM, doesn't mean you can not infect or format local disks, USB devices or launch an attack on the Intranet which is otherwise behind a corporate firewall.

  14. Neat - but not all that useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have one of the ASUS P35E Deluxe motherboards at home, and one of the reasons I picked it was for Splashtop. It wasn't the main reason, but I figured it was a neat addition. But honestly, Splashtop isn't all that useful.

    For one thing, for all that it's "instant on", it still doesn't load all that much faster than XP. Now maybe it's just because I have a hot processor, or a really lean XP installation, but honestly the difference isn't that noticable. Splashtop does load faster, but it's hardly "instant on"; you still need for the OS to boot.

    Then, there's the fact that all my info -passwords, bookmarks, etc.- are on my hard-drive and thus not accessible (at least, not by default) to Splashtop. So I'd have to punch all that info into a second OS (and there's no security on Splashtop, so I'd recommend against leaving any passwords in the browser).

    I suppose for laptop users Splashtop may be marginally more useful, although even they may prefer to load up the main OS, since it doesn't take that much longer to run and then they get access to all their information.

    I do like having a security blanket of having a way to check the web for help just in case XP hoses itself. Boot to Splashtop, surf the web for an answer, and then use that information to fix Windows. But in the end, Splashtop is more of a toy than a genuinely useful feature.

  15. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by hike2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, so your READ ONLY boot-up OS is owned ... OMG, what are you going to DO? I know, REBOOT! 5 seconds later you can browse again, just don't go back to that same site ... I say with Gmail and the Google apps I would only boot my computer to a full OS if I want to save something on fixed media or play a game.

    --
    Fourty-two!
  16. This is not Linux by JeremyGNJ · · Score: 5, Informative

    People get so excitable every time they hear the word "linux". But the fact is, this is not really Linux, not in a form that people would run as an OS.

    It's just a way that Asus found to leverage something that is free, in order to avoid having to write their own own code for motherboard diagnostics and such. No one is going to "switch to linux" because their motherboard has a linux based diagnostic included.

    Maybe Asus will put the work "Linux" in bold letters of the mobo box, but this will not do anything. It will not "bring linux to the masses", because anyone who's actually buying a motherboard (as opposed to buying a pre-built computer), already knows what Linux is and will either run it, or not.

    1. Re:This is not Linux by bberens · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think it would be really interesting to boot my computer into "energy conservation mode" which doesn't even power up the hard disks but allows me to browse the web and send e-mail with near-instant on capability. Then, if I needed more 'stuff', I could switch to "normal" mode and get to all the rest of my stuff if need be. Having spent some time using things like feather linux, the responsiveness of using a RAM disk would make almost ANY average user wet themselves with glee.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    2. Re:This is not Linux by Shatrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No one is going to "switch to linux" because their motherboard has a linux based diagnostic included I expect a lot of people will try linux for precisely that reason. There is a pretty large community of hardware tinkerers and overclockers that know lots and lots about cache sizes and bus widths but fairly little about software. I have met lots of these types who convince themselves that linux is "free as in crap" so that they won't have to learn anything more powerful that windows XP.

      Now if ASUS which is a darling of the hardware enthusiast community says that linux is a powerful tool I expect some of those perceptions will be changed.
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  17. Bad Precedent by geekmansworld · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This seems like a really bad idea. Microsoft is immediately going to feel the need to compete with this (irrational as that may be). Soon enough we'll have Windows APIs embedded in the ROMS of major motherboards, and we'll pay more for these "Microsoft certified" motherboards because the added loading speed is a "feature".

    Hardware should never be tied to an operating system. I'm a Mac user, and even I believe in that sacred tenet. The consumer needs to be able to choose whatever components they want, and tose components should work together to the best of their ability.

    Because it's free, Linux on Asus boards may not impede my consumer choice at the moment. But it sets a precedent which could greatly damage the environment of choice we currently enjoy.

  18. Motherboard Malware! by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rock on... I'd like some integrated malware instead of this 'operating system' bullsh*t.

    I might even be able to steal some myspace passwords with it ... and pretend I've got friends ...

  19. Also by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Also, the vast majority of those 1 million motherboards per month are sold to OEM's who may or may not enable the Linux functionality on their finished product. How much do you want to bet that MS will quietly put pressure on said OEM's to disable it?

    ASUS has great overclocking options in their BIOS too...until OEM's get a hold of them and put their customer BIOS in place that leaves out all the good stuff. This will be the same.

  20. Big target. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft and their sympathizers have claimed that the main reason it's the big victim of malware is that it is the big target, and that if other OSes were as widely deployed they'd be as riddled. Linux, BSD, Firefox, Apache, and other FOSS projects claim that it mainly Microsoft's poor security, not just the monoculture providing a big target.

    Now we have million motherboards a month shipping with an identical OS - including a network stack and a browser - in the BIOS. Heavily used in this mode by the purchasers. If this is successfully suborned by malware it can romp all over the hard drive, even if the main system install isn't booted.

    Seems to me this is a showdown between the Microsoft and FOSS sides' claims. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  21. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love, love, love the idea of a RO OS!!!

    Currently if I go to my banking site, I have no idea whether my system is currently owned, and some keystroke logger is busy sending off my bank passcode to somebody who is going to empty my account.

    With a RO OS, I can reboot, and I'm much more likely to be able to complete the transaction without it being subverted.

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  22. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by TechForensics · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What do you bet M$ will make sure it can't handle NTFS?

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  23. Re:Ok this is good... Now I have a couple of quest by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Informative

    but my new Vista machine boots up to the desktop

    Sure, it looks like it's booted to the desktop...but have you tried doing anything?

    Windows has been progressively delay-loading more and more, so while the upfront cost is cheaper, and it seems to be quicker, the time until you can actually do something of use hasn't really improved.
  24. Wintop! by argent · · Score: 3, Funny

    Meanwhile, Microsoft has announced that a new version of Windows Mobile including Pocket Internet Explorer and Pocket Windows Media Player will be available for motherboard manufacturers in the third quarter. "The initial release will be limited to a 320x240 screen resolution and controlled by tapping the "reset" and "power" buttons to simulate mobile phone controls, but we think people will find this a big improvement over those messy mice and keypads".