Slashdot Mirror


Linux Desktop to Appear On Every Asus Motherboard

An anonymous reader writes "We first heard about Splashtop back in October, when the instant-on Linux desktop was announced. At the time it was a really exciting concept but Asus only rolled out the technology on high-end motherboards. Splashtop just announced that Asus will be expanding the desktop to the P5Q motherboard family and later on to all Asus motherboards. That's embedded Linux shipping over a million motherboards a month! The release also mentioned that the technology will be appearing on notebooks this year as well."

97 of 471 comments (clear)

  1. Out of curiosity... by neokushan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How many people "switch" to Linux every month? I mean, if anyone has such a statistic, I'd be interested in seeing just how much this figure could potentially impact that (I know, chances are 99% of the people using these motherboards will still boot windows, but satisfy my curiosity =P).

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    1. Re:Out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      1.17 million

    2. Re:Out of curiosity... by flyingfsck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In total, about 300 million Linux devices are produced each year. About 1% of that are servers and desktops. A larger proportion are laptops. Asus alone, sells more than a million Eee PCs per quarter. Consequently Linux laptops outsell Apple by a wide margin.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re:Out of curiosity... by neokushan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interesting. So 300million linux devices per year, 1% of those are servers/desktops, that makes 3million a year, right?
      That's not as much as I thought it would be, these motherboards should certainly boost that figure.
      I wonder how long before Microsoft start shipping an embedded Windows version....

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    4. Re:Out of curiosity... by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is absolutely no way of knowing. I know that last year I installed Mandriva on 5 computer newbie machines from the CD I downloaded. So if you're counting distro downloads, that metric is not reliable; one download can and probabally usually is more than one installation.

      Many people have their user-agent say they're using IE on Windows even if they're using Linux, bacsue dimwits still code their pages to not display if you're not using IE ("please upgrade to a modern browser? It's Opera's latest!") So web site metrics can't be reliable either.

      IINM it was Mark Twain (Samuel Clemons) who said "there are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and ststistics."

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    5. Re:Out of curiosity... by Ageing+Metalhead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You got to realise that almost all TV STBs are now using Linux, the only exceptions are the one's running MS Mediaroom (al la U-Verse). So I would suggest that it would be more than 300 million per year. AM

      --
      The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. - HGTTG
    6. Re:Out of curiosity... by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn ACs pulling numbers out of their asses...

      It's 1.18 million.

    7. Re:Out of curiosity... by ReverendLoki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm wondering if this figure of 3 million includes all of the small IT shops putting out Linux boxes for their clients, or the in-house IT departments picking up some bare hardware and putting Linux on them. Or even the old "obsolete"* MS Windows boxes that are being repurposed as Linux installs.

      * Obsolete in this case meaning that it doesn't have the muscle to adequately run Microsoft's latest and greatest, but still has enough oomph to run an OS that isn't a resource hog.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:Out of curiosity... by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I switch to linux every month or so.
      But I get fed up.
      Then I promptly switch back to whatever OS I feel like installing.
      Then I get fed up again.
      And I think 'Oh, someone on slashdot said that this is the time to switch to linux! I should try it AGAIN!'...
      then I switch to linux.
      Until I get fed up...

    9. Re:Out of curiosity... by abolitiontheory · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This would be interesting to know in terms of other statistics, such as how many new computer users are there every month. If people are "switching" to Linux but that number is outweighed by the number of uninformed new users just picking up a Windows machine, then its just noise.

      The fact is it still takes a very informed choice to switch to Linux. This type of thing could go a long way towards solving that ("what, an operating system already onboard?!"), but at the same time this is only one manufacturer and its the kind of thing only people building their own PCs are going to see, anyway.

      The general market still has so much to learn about other options besides Windows. Mac is gaining popularity because of cool-factor and crossover conversions, none of which Linux has. Honestly, it won't be until you can fool someone into using Linux before they figure out its not Windows that you will see a change in general market trends. Either that or some unforeseen landmark change in the computer landscape is going to have to take place.

      In this regard, the comparison between open source solutions and alternative energy options makes sense here, except that the open source industry has had _superior_, WORKING solutions for the past decade, and the alternative energies industry hasn't. Its kind of like people choosing to stick with their internal combustion engine technology and refusing to try out a hydrogen car because "no body else does." But really, its because there's been no mass awakening to it, and unlike the energy crisis, there isn't likely to be unless someone brings it about.

      Still, this is the extreme value of Linux to me: it's portability. Not *mobility*--we'll have to wait for Andriod for that--but its ability to fit on almost any system in any way. Scaleability and flexibility also apply here. I'd love to have a trusted operating system living at the hardware level of my comptuter. It seems to make sense in a way, even: the logical extension of CMOS in a way. Honestly, you're telling me motherboard hardware has improved for the past 10-15 years but we still have no better built in soft/firmware?

      I'm doing more brainstoming than actual technical analysis here, but these are the kinds of things that get me excited like that: speculating, hypothesizing, dreaming about a more open and inherently good future.

      Technorant, out.

    10. Re:Out of curiosity... by edbob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I don't think it is so much that people are "switching" to Linux as much as additional people are using it. For example, these mobos will probably be sold to people who will then add hard drives, optical drives, etc. and then install some form of Windows. These people would be using Linux without exactly switching to Linux. At home, I have both Windows and Linux boxes for different things. Using Linux does not mean that I've abandoned Windows. As much as I would like to go all-Linux, there are practical considerations that prevent such a move at this time.

    11. Re:Out of curiosity... by AmaDaden · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well at least I know who to call when i'm having problems installing an OS.

      In all seriousness I've been there. my best advice is dual boot but set some ground rules on what you permit your self to have in windows(or what ever OS you work best in but want to get off of). Personally I have the "no casual web browsing in windows" rule. Not doing anything that is windows only and want to browse the web? time to reboot. It keeps me in Linux 90% of the time so i (finally!) learned a lot about keeping a Linux system running. It hurt at first but I've gotten to the point where me in Linux is more productive then me in Windows.

    12. Re:Out of curiosity... by fwarren · · Score: 5, Funny
      Here let me fix that for you

      I switch to Widnows every month or so.
      But I get fed up.
      Then I promptly switch back to whatever Linux I feel like installing.
      Then I get fed up again.
      And I think 'All the marketing says that Windows is better than Linux! I should try it AGAIN!'...
      then I switch to Windows.
      Until I get fed up...

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    13. Re:Out of curiosity... by belligerent0001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Instead of dual booting why not virtualize. Then you can install many different distros and try them out, when you get fed up you can go back to the host OS for a while until you decide to try another. Plus you don't have to constantly dump you installs, keep them for year that way. Plus you can clone it, screw it up then us the clone to fix what you screwed up. Just a thought. Try virtual box from sun, its free

      --
      "...a civilian some of the time, a soldier part of the time and a patriot all of the time." -Brig. Gen. James Drain
    14. Re:Out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why must someone be "uninformed" to use Windows.

      Maybe instead they are informed of what software they wish to use, what OS it operates well with, and thus make a VERY INFORMED decision to not use an OS that would require substantial work to use with their software of choice.

      Just because someone doesn't use Linux, doesn't mean they are stupid.
      And with this type of prevelant attitude among Linux user's, you can bet that they will remain a very small minority.

      The true competition to Windows isn't linux, not on the desktop. It's Apple, and will be becuase Linux lacks quite a few things that everyday people require.

    15. Re:Out of curiosity... by StarkRG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wonder how long before Microsoft start shipping an embedded Windows version.... Probably as soon as they can get vista to fit in 1gb of flash memory, make it boot instantly, be cheap, and not be a POS...

      It's one thing to have your OS die and you've got to reboot. It's another if your motherboard dies and you've got to buy another.
    16. Re:Out of curiosity... by neokushan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well now come on, there's been embedded versions of windows for quite some time now, I believe there was an image floating around of an Embedded XP that was about 50Mb or so, so it's not entirely infeasible.
      Not to mention Minwin, if Microsoft really does pull off a minimalist, modular version of windows, then it's just begging to be stuck on a ROM on a motherboard.
      Plus, what better way to lock down a system than to have the OS as part of the hardware itself?

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    17. Re:Out of curiosity... by wampus · · Score: 3, Informative

      A few STB's may be running Linux, but a good chunk of them are running SARA or Passport.

    18. Re:Out of curiosity... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But they do know how many devices other than desktops have been made and run Linux. As someone else mentioned, Linux is in a shit load of products. People who slag it off probably don't realise how often they use Linux in their day to day life.

    19. Re:Out of curiosity... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, 1.18 was the 31 days of January, and he is quoting for February.

    20. Re:Out of curiosity... by timbck2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well now come on, there's been embedded versions of windows for quite some time now My car's (Acura TL) navigation system runs Windows CE. Not that you'd ever know it, there's no hint of a Windows-type interface at all. I think all Honda nav systems are the same.

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    21. Re:Out of curiosity... by H0p313ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      why must someone be "uninformed" to use Windows. Maybe instead they are informed of what software they wish to use, what OS it operates well with, and thus make a VERY INFORMED decision to not use an OS that would require substantial work to use with their software of choice.

      preamble:

      • Comp. Sci. degree
      • DOS since 1.0
      • Windows since 3.0
      • Linux since 0.9 (experimental machine current runs Ubuntu 8.04)
      • shipped products written in Smalltalk, C, C++, VB, Python and Java

      Very well said. I like to think of myself as well informed, but you can't pay me enough money to run Linux on a games machine I share with my teenage son. It's just too much damn work for a lower framerate.

      In fact I would argue that the reason that my game machine is Vista on a quad-core is because I'm very well informed.

      However, I could do all my work on a linux box but since I get 100% IT support with no arguments if I keep using whatever came with my corporate laptop why bother since it only makes my life harder and saves no money until the entire organization gives up on Windows?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    22. Re:Out of curiosity... by neokushan · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's probably no mention of it running windows because of the defining amount of jokes that would be made about your car crashing...

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    23. Re:Out of curiosity... by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Informative

      Very well said. I like to think of myself as well informed, but you can't pay me enough money to run Linux on a games machine I share with my teenage son. It's just too much damn work for a lower framerate. Not trying to convince you otherwise, but, oddly enough, two of the three games I've played on my desktop in the past 3 years actually run BETTER in linux.

      Oblivion doesn't (or didn't) like Cedega when I tried it. WoW and Guild Wars would blue-screen in Windows, but ran without many problems in linux (other than WoW breaking every 3 weeks because of some weird patch)

      Of course, I've ditched WoW and grew bored with the mechanics of Oblivion, so now GW and I live happily in Linux... though I may have to switch back to windows for awhile, depending on whether or not TexMod works under wine as well...
    24. Re:Out of curiosity... by StarkRG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're right, there's an awful lot to be said about designing your OS to work perfectly on a limited hardware set over designing your OS to usually work somewhat well on most hardware.

    25. Re:Out of curiosity... by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I don't know if it includes it,but I have found that "refurbing" old Windows boxes makes a great way to get reliable computers into the hands of those that don't have them. I often find working with SOHO shops that they have a couple of old machines they are getting ready to toss. Most are happy to donate them to me when i tell them I'll wipe the drive and put a free Linux on them and give them away to single mothers so their children have a way to work at home.


      I found that Puppy seems to be the best mix of size and usefulness,especially on former Win9X machines. I just think it is a shame how many functioning machines end up in the dumpster when they could be given a good home. Hell,my first gaming rig,which was a Pentium 100Mhz with a whopping 32Mb of RAM is still in use at a local lumbar company running DOS 3 as a ISA controller for an ancient lathe they have making custom columns. So the thought that folks will throw out a good running computer still just strikes me a wasteful to the extreme. But that is my 02c,YMMV.


      Oh,and as a disclaimer-I have actually thrown out a running machine in the past. I had a girl bring in her old computer to see if I could upgrade it for her in class. This poor girl had actually been doing her schoolwork on a 30Mhz with 12Mb of Simm RAM running Win 3.11. I took one look at that ancient thing and told her to leave it and I'd see what I could do. When the girl left the teacher asked "you aren't actually going to try to UPGRADE that thing,are you?" I told him HELL no! And when she showed up the next day I presented her with a 550Mhz that one of my SOHO clients had donated. Last I heard her kid was still doing his reports on his "new" machine,just as happy as a clam. I tried for a week to find a use for that 30Mhz,but damned if I could find a use for it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    26. Re:Out of curiosity... by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      Truly, 2008 is the year of Linux on the Set Top.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    27. Re:Out of curiosity... by ozbird · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder how long before Microsoft start shipping an embedded Windows version....
      Probably as soon as they can get vista to fit in 1gb of flash memory, make it boot instantly, be cheap, and not be a POS...

      They'd probably push Embedded XP. They've already backflipped on XP availability for the Asus EeePC etc., which does nothing to improve the image of Vista. ("Look, our soon-to-be discontinued 2001 OS can compete with Linux in the 'ultra-low cost' computer market!")

      However, I think they've painted themselves into a corner. If they bully Asus into providing an embedded XP version of the motherboards, the customer is bound to ask: "I don't want Vista; why can't I run XP as the OS on the same motherboard?" The more features that can be crammed into the embedded Linux version, the sillier Microsoft's inevitable justifications will seem ("It's not really XP", "you can't do real work in an embedded environment" etc.)
    28. Re:Out of curiosity... by ThePengwin · · Score: 4, Funny

      only 32.4 percent of people know that though

    29. Re:Out of curiosity... by mollymoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's also the 93% of the world's population who don't live in the USA. Some of them have businesses and computers too.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    30. Re:Out of curiosity... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Asus alone, sells more than a million Eee PCs per quarter.

      Huh? Asus reported 350k the last quarter of 2007, and 700k for first quarter 2008. They project 1.2 million for second quarter. However, a majority of that will be the models that come with Windows.

      Consequently Linux laptops outsell Apple by a wide margin

      Not even close. Apple sold 1.4 million laptops first quarter. Asus's 700k plus the rest of the Linux laptop vendors don't come anywhere near that.

    31. Re:Out of curiosity... by You+ain't+seen+me! · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's also the 93% of the world's population who don't live in the USA. Some of them have businesses and computers too. Yes, but the USA have been doing their bit to reduce that figure in the last few years.
    32. Re:Out of curiosity... by demallien2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What a load of rubbish. I write libs explicitly to be deployed on STBs as a day job. Although the high end boxes that are starting to hit the market certainly are running linux, it's far from the majority. I see a lot running things like OS21- mostly because ST seems to supply a huge percentage of CPUs for the STB market. To date I have integrated the libs on linux exactly twice, and one of those was for a product that never came to market.

      That said, I'm sure that in the years to come, Linux is going to take an evergrowing slice of the pie. But I wouldn't expect it to have a majority for at least another 3-4 years. And with the advent of Media Server PCs, XBox360/Playstation, AppleTV, I rather expect the traditional STB to disappear before Linux ever becomes dominant.

  2. Huh. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always bought Asus anyway; they make good boards, and the few times I've had problems they've replaced them...Once I even got a free upgrade because they'd discontinued the board I had.

    So it's not going to change my purchasing, but it's still nice.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Huh. by Znork · · Score: 5, Interesting

      they make good boards

      I have to agree. I've made some forays into MSI (a relationship that was abruptly and permanently terminated when I discovered I had to have XP to upgrade the BIOS), EPoX and AOpen.

      But after that MSI foray I'll be sticking to ASUS for the foreseeable future; I have yet to purchase an ASUS board that I haven't been perfectly happy with throughout its lifecycle (well, I had one or two die of the bad capacitor issue a few years ago, but that was only 30% of my ASUS boards while 100% of the other branded boards died from it).

    2. Re:Huh. by atrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've learned to buy Asus and SuperMicro boards only as well. You can't beat the SuperMicro boards when you need a solid but still affordable Dual-Xeon setup with 16GB of RAM :)

    3. Re:Huh. by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He said "a few years ago"

      I'm assuming it was those specific few years ago when a Taiwanese capacitor company was selling bad caps. These caps had electrolyte in them made with a formula stolen from a Japanese company. Said Japanese company, though, was wise to the industry pirates and slipped them a time bomb.

      Those caps made it in *everywhere* -- or so it seemed. And is actually probably why it's so much easier to find Slot 1 and Socket 370 CPUs than it is to find boards to put 'em in.

      Oh, look, here's a nice wikipedia article about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    4. Re:Huh. by Znork · · Score: 2, Informative

      It depends on the board. Some MSI boards are flashable with the metod you mention; for the K9N Neo-F I can't even get a bios file to download from MSI. You apparently _have_ to use Live Update to update it.

      Had it supported the method you mention, that would have been perfectly acceptable (I went through the whole read-manual-'Ok, no load from USB disk, well, I'll just use a CD... oh, no CD, I'll write a bootable floppy, uh, where's the download link for the BIOS... uh... there isn't a download link for the BIOS. I have to use _WHAT_? An ActiveX control or a XP program??);

      That not even DOS based updates are possible is what had me quite appalled, the very idea of making a motherboard that cannot be updated without being up and running in a full copy of windows had previously struck me as unthinkable.

      I've had no problems with MSI boards otherwise, and as long as you do your research to avoid the Live-Update only boards you're probably fine. For me, however, the mindset that produces products with that kind of issues leaves me with a bad taste.

    5. Re:Huh. by Znork · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep, exactly right. They really were everywhere; it went so far I even got a bunch of replacement caps and recapped a couple of boards and some PSU's. Really annoying failure modes also; mostly the affected equipment would just develop tendencies to lock up or crash when spiking in power usage (games, number crunching, etc), until one day it would fail to start (usually after 18-36 months, at which point warranty returns might be more trouble than it's worth).

      Apart from geeks actually tearing the equipment apart and noticing the suave way the capacitors were slobbering I expect most people ended up retiring the equipment early. I can barely imagine how much frustration and lost work the problem has caused worldwide.

  3. In other news... by erroneus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...ACME brick has set up a lucrative partnership with Microsoft. As it turns out, Microsoft brick-shitting production has been increasing over the past few years and their surpluses have been able to yield a sustainable production rate. Microsoft has been unavailable for comment on their deal with ACME brick, but an ACME spokesman has been noted as having quested that Microsoft boost its dietary fiber intake in order to boost the quality of their new product.

  4. Year of the Linux of Desktop by ehaggis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe Duke Nukem Forever will also be included.

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
    1. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by jmorris42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      > This will not happen until the Linux Kernel has native support
      > for an install mechanism...

      By writing this you reveal yourself to be clueless. The kernel would never do anything so complex, that is what userspace is for. But anyway, assuming you really mean a Linux distro....

      > ..where by I can double click on a single file and have it install a
      > whole program including notifying and automatically installing
      > programs it is dependent upon.

      And just where have you been the last five years? Most RH/RPM based distros will do just that. Click on an RPM package and it will ask if you want to install it. But nobody smart does it like that. At most you would use the click to install bit to install a REPO and then just use the same package manager you use to install the distro supplied packages.

      Why limit yourself to the old painful way Microsoft and Apple do things when technology is being innovated over here in Linux/UNIX land? What could be more convienent than adding a repository once and then making that 3rd party software collection a seamless part of the system. You get automatic notifications through the update widget, exactly the same as if it were included from the original OS vendor.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by ratboy666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Linux kernel will never have such support. Native or not (whatever that means).

      The Linux kernel manages computer resources (CPU, memory, devices) on behalf of applications. It pretty much stops after loading initrd and executing /init on it. Anything after that is an application from the kernels perspective, and the flow of control becomes application driven.

      Yes, it is possible to implement an entire application at this level (I've built installers that only use this), and I suspect that the Asus effort will be implemented at this level.

      But double click installing of applications? Not the kernels responsibility.

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    3. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Maybe Duke Nukem Forever will also be included."

      "This will not happen until the Linux Kernel has native support for an install mechanism where by I can double click on a single file and have it install a whole program including notifying and automatically installing programs it is dependent upon."
      I don't see why everyone is calling you clueless. You are dead on the money. Duke Nukem Forever and putting things that clearly do not belong in a kernel in the Linux kernel will happen right around the same time. When penguins migrate to Hell for the cooler climate.
      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by basiles · · Score: 3, Informative

      This will not happen until the Linux Kernel has native support for an install mechanism where by I can double click on a single file This will hopefully never be the role of the Linux kernel. Installation mechanisms (such as package managers like aptitude) are in user land (they are ordinary programs doing system calls). Also, the kernel does not manage mouse clicks. It manage only peripherals (like USB mouses) which are sending bytes. Some application (like the X11 server and toolkits) has to understand these as meaningful clicks.
    5. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > but what if I want Apache on my installation and they don't offer it?

      Bad example since they all do include Apache, but I get your point. Ok, here is how it works. Lets take Fedora since I was talking about RPM based systems and I don't know nearly as much about Debian based ones.

      Fedora is based in the USA and sponsored by Red Hat, Inc. so they can't include certain radioactive bits that almost everyone wants, like mp3 support. So you just hop over to rpm.livna.org and click on the link for your version of Fedora. It serves you up an RPM package for their repository and the browser does the right thing. Up pops a dialog box asking if you want to install the package and if you say yes it prompts for the root (administrator for you Windows folk following along) password. Once that one small package is installed all of the software maintained by Livna (safely outside the USA) is a part of your system.

      But nothing much has actually happened yet. Next you launch the same package manager you use to add/remove OS components and you find that a lot of new things have appeared. And when Livna updates a package it appears in the list of packages that need to be updated right along with the ones Fedora updates.

      Contrast with the Windows/Mac world. Each 3rd party application, game, utility, etc. has to have it's own mechanism to find out if it has been updated, code to bug you to update, etc.

      The best comparison would be to imagine a world where Microsoft made Windows Update an open platform that everyone could use. So that one unlucky morning you booted up and the Windows Update gadget in the toolbar announced you had a critical update to IE, a couple of random Windows bug fixes, bug fixs from Adobe for Photoshop and Flash Player and a new version of your fav utility that displays your hard drive temp was available. Grr. there goes an hour and a couple of reboots. :)

      And it all 'Just Worked.' You don't have an OS and a motley collection of 3rd party apps, you have a seamless System.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    6. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by L+Boom · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't think they're misunderstanding, they just disagree. I'll put it this way: I just switched to Linux this past January and I'm extremely happy with it. With the exception of the wireless in my laptop (Broadcom), it was incredibly easy to get Ubuntu (and a few other distros I was messing around with) up and running, and be able to play around with it.

      I was completely illiterate with regard to command line stuff, but I've figured out a great deal along the way. Even when I first began, installing packages was probably the single easiest thing to do in the OS. Installing a package from Synaptic is ridiculously easy, and it grabs all the dependencies an application needs. Anyone with so little knowledge of how computers work that they can't figure out a package manager is someone who wouldn't be doing anything like installing their own programs in Windows, so that's really not a fair comparison.

    7. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by TheBig1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      When penguins migrate to Hell for the cooler climate. So, about 2012 with global warming....
    8. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by alexgieg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you're looking into this from the wrong perspective. The thing is, thinking about Linux as if it were one operating system is simply wrong. If you think on that "Linux" thing as being just some inner piece of software used by operating systems (plural), then things become much easier to understand:

      You have an OS called Windows XP. You have another OS called Ubuntu. Then another OS called MacOS X. Then another called Fedora. Then another called FreeBSD. And so on and so forth. All of them different OSes.

      So, if your OS is, say, Ubuntu, and you want to run some piece of software, say, Firefox, you shouldn't ask whether it has a version that runs "in Linux", but whether it has a version that runs in Ubuntu. Because your OS isn't "Linux", it's Ubuntu.

      And then it becomes easy. If it supports Ubuntu, you'll find in the manufacturer's website a file you can download, double click, and it'll be installed. Just like its Windows XP package. Or its MacOS X package.

      If you think this is crazy, think again. MacOS X is also, roughly speaking, a distribution of NextStep. Many of the core components are the same, or very similar ones. But you won't find people complaining because a software available for MacOS X doesn't run unmodified in NextStep, or vice-versa. If it's available for both OSes, you just download the correct installer for the one you're using, and install it. If it is available only for one of them, you might get it working on the other, but it won't be a trivial thing to do.

      And yes, the same goes for Windows. Suppose I'm still running Windows 95. A lot of software installer with those beautiful ".exe" extensions won't run. If the manufacturer doesn't provide a Windows 95 compatible version, I'm screwed. Is this something I should blame on Windows 95? No. So, why should I complain if I find a software that is labeled "for Slackware" when I'm not running Slackware? No reason at all.

      Search for softwares compatible with your OS, and they'll be easy to install. Double-click easy in fact. Try to install something that wasn't designed for you, and it's anyone's guess whether you'll succeed or not. In any case, it's not the fault of either the software you downloaded, or of the OS you're running. It's you who are trying to do things you're not supposed to.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    9. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by TwinkieStix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows is a class of operating systems - Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows Mobile. Linux is a class of operating systems - Ubuntu, Fedora, Slackware, etc.

      Each distribution of Linux aims to achieve a different goal just as Windows Mobile and Windows Vista are inconsistent and aim to achieve a different goal. You can't install just any Windows Vista package on your Windows Mobile phone can you?

      Linux is not inconsistent. Linux distributions are inconsistent, but that's ok. What we really need to do is stop calling our distributions "Linux" and start calling them by their proper names (Ubuntu, Slackware, Debian). Then the myth of inconsistencies will start to fall away.

    10. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by brunascle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its slower
      that's completely dependent on how you use it.

      for example, i just had to add a mime type into IIS. it took about a minute, because i had to remote login through RDP. waiting for that to connect, then waiting for a usable desktop, then clicking through the drill downs, then switching to the right tab, then clicking some buttons took about 99% of that time.

      if there was a text config file i could easily open it in notepad from my own desktop (because i would have it's drive mapped), ctrl-f for "mime" or something, and that would be it.

      speed is actually one of the biggest advantages of command lines and text config files, once you're familiar with them. with a GUI, there's an absolute minimum amount of time a change will take. with command lines and config files, it's almost entirely dependent on how fast you can type.
    11. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by ArtDent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then, if you're on the command line, there's the question of what it's named. The question is easily asked and answered:

      apt-cache search marks great app

      Before you complain about not knowing the magic incantations, remember you're the one who raised the command line. It's easier to search for packages in the GUI tools that all modern distributions provide.

      Mac and Windows just work so much easier for installing software. Go to author's site, download 1 file, and double click. At this point if it's Windows you have a few dialogs to click through, or if Mac, even easier, just drag the application to your Applications folder. Always the latest, always the same, always easy. I believe all you've said is the obvious: if the author provides a packaged version of their software for your operating system, it is very easy to install it. That is true for Windows, Mac OS, and every modern Linux distribution. Fortunately, distributions like Debian and Fedora package thousands of pieces of software themselves, without requiring any effort from the original authors.

      If a piece of software is overlooked by a distribution and the author wants to package it themselves, they can. They can provide a package and it will be just as easy to install as any other package on the targeted distribution. If they provide a repository, then it will be automatically kept up to date along with the rest of the system.

      The reality is that package management on modern Linux distributions is far superior to Windows and Mac OS.
    12. Re:Year of the Linux of Desktop by nahdude812 · · Score: 2, Informative

      One is a user-friendly version, one is a developer-friendly version. Complaining about Synaptic Package Manager is like complaining about Registry Editor or Library entries on OSX.

      A number of the developer packages (like Apache) aren't available in Add/Remove Applications because there's no way to provide a default install which would satisfy even most users, nor are normal users going to want a local web server. Putting them in here would needlessly clutter up this interface with packages only advanced users would be interested in - thus there's a clear need for separate package managers (though I'd buy the argument that it would be useful to put an "Advanced" button in the Add/Remove Applications which drops you into Synaptic, and vice-versa with a "Simple" button).

      Even still, "apt-get install apache2" (or selecting apache2 from Synaptic) is still an order of magnitude easier than Windows or OSX.

      I agree that collision between "Synaptic Package Manager" and "Synaptics Touchpad Driver" is unfortunate. At least they qualify the menu entry fully.

  5. Is it really that exciting? by melonman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Including an OS on the motherboard makes sense for Asus - at least it is then possible to do basic hardware diagnostics independently of, say, Windows diagnostics.

    But, in terms of Linux adoption, it's only exciting if people keep linux once they've finished building the computer, and the precedents here are hardly promising.

    And, even if you like Linux (which I do), would you want to keep the version supplied with your m/b? On my first EeePC, I tried to get to like Xandros, I really did, but in the end I wiped it and installed Kubuntu. My Dark Side Brother played with Xandros until he broke it, and then installed XP. And it's going to happen even more with the EeePC 900, since the Linux version has a larger SSD than the Windows version (at least in the UK), so you buy the Linux version in order to install Windows.

    --
    Virtually serving coffee
    1. Re:Is it really that exciting? by joggle · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought the way they're doing this is this is a minimal Linux distro and is embedded in the motherboard. At boot, you would have the option of booting off your hard disk as usual or you could chose to boot off of the embedded OS if you just want to check your e-mail, talk on skype or browse the web. Seems pretty neat to me, especially considering it would boot in just a couple of seconds.

    2. Re:Is it really that exciting? by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > And, even if you like Linux (which I do), would you want to keep
      > the version supplied with your m/b?

      You would probably keep Splashtop because it is in flash, probably in a larger BIOS chip. It isn't intended to be your primary OS. ASUS fully expects 99% of these motherboards to end up with Vista on a normal hard drive before it is delivered to the end user.

      The right question is how many of those end users will try Splashtop and find it handy for quick excursions into the net. If that number is large Splashtop will prosper and begin to add more and more features. Five years from now will be interesting if that happens.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    3. Re:Is it really that exciting? by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The place where this will likely cause the biggest problem for MS is when Joe Sixpack has problems with their Windows install. Whether it is from a virus, malware, or just the natural degradation of Windows, eventually most people end up with some kind of problem on their Windows System. Right now, most of them take the system to someone to fix the problem, just live with what they know is a problem, or chuck the whole computer and buy a new one. With a Linux desktop installed in the BIOS, many will learn the key combination that lets them boot to Linux. They don't care what OS they are using. They just want to access their MySpace page. Once they have spent a year using Linux because it worked well enough to keep them from spending the money on repairs or replacement, the idea of using Linux will not seem so strange.

    4. Re:Is it really that exciting? by Taibhsear · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is how it is implemented. I have the P5E3 PREMIUM. The Linux boot is called Express Gate. It boots in about 5 seconds and gives the option to go into bios, the installed OS, or the express gate. You can use email, web browser, skype, and use flash drives (I believe this was first implemented to help update the bios more easily). Uses Splashtop desktop. Here's some quick info on it.

    5. Re:Is it really that exciting? by thelexx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure about that. On PC's I'm familiar with anyway, you aren't 'entering the BIOS' when you hit F10 (or whatever) at startup. You're entering the part of the BIOS code that allows user configuration. The BIOS is in fact what shows you and allows certain key presses to do things at startup to begin with. If the BIOS is altered to not show and not act on those keypresses, then Slashtop won't be available.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  6. Still don't see the point of burning it into ROM by iamacat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just include an SD card reader on the motherboard and let OEMs/end users integrate a system of their choice? In their approach, the system is not getting any security fixes. Potentially, the built in browser can be owned by simply visiting a web site. There is no way to install even a single extra application. Sounds like this has more to do with marketing than technology.

  7. I RTFA and cursed by sm62704 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's that damned juvenile geek.com, and TFA's not much longer than the summary.

    And it ends with "Read the press release" that the submitter should have linked in the first place rather than that incredibly BAD geek.com) "here".

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  8. *Fwooosh!* by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somewhere in Washington state, a chair is launched on a direct trajectory towards Asus's offices. Naturally NORAD is confused at first till they calculate the launch location.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    1. Re:*Fwooosh!* by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please explain to me how this change from ASUS could possibly affect the number of Windows licenses sold. I'm savvy with the chair-throwing "joke", but it has to at least slightly make sense in context.

  9. Re:Ok this is good... Now I have a couple of quest by Gat0r30y · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because even though people will now have the option of booting into an instant on linux desktop - 99% will wait 10 minutes to get into vista just to check their email and play on the internet anyway.

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  10. Re:Ok this is good... Now I have a couple of quest by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is Microsoft relevant or have I missed them being marginalized to oblivion?
    Close. What you've been seeing lately between the failed Yahoo buyout, the attempts at getting all friendly with the Open Source community, and their wrecking ball thrown at the ISO organization is Microsoft grasping at straws, trying to maintain their monopoly.

    Microsoft will remain a player, but they are being marginalized more, day by day. A few years ago, ASUS wouldn't have dared done anything like Splashtop.

    Go ahead, fanoys, mod me down because you know I'm right.
  11. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by neokushan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would imagine the main purpose is to fix any broken OS you install afterwards, instead of digging out that old copy of Knoppix you have lying around or whatever.
    True, there's a bit of a security risk, but as you said it's burned to a ROM, meaning you can't install any applications, so what IS the risk, really?

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  12. Can you roll your own Splashtop? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is only useful if I can make my own splashtop image. Then it's useful for ALL KINDS of things, including media centers and most especially THIN CLIENTS. Also if you have... uhh, kexec I think? That lets you load a linux kernel from a linux kernel? Then you could jump from this right into your real distribution without having to re-POST.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Can you roll your own Splashtop? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I could see this particular feature being write-protected to "protect you". Then they expect you to buy a board with SD or something if you want to roll your own.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Re:Debian "Moles" What Prevents Them? by LingNoi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since all packages have been signed off by someone we'd know exactly who had done it. It's not exactly like all packages and code can't be traced every step of the way.

  14. Re:Great timing! by Gat0r30y · · Score: 2, Interesting

    booting faster. Instant on desktop is hard to beat in boot times! Which raises a question - How are we going to compare boot times with 0 boot time? How long does this splashtop actually take to load? Is it really instant on or just really fast? What can we expect coming down the pipeline? I would like to see a hybrid where most of what you need for an OS is stored in flash but if you need access to a program on the disk, you can get it.
    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  15. VERY useful ! by unity100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    imagine your original os crashes and burns. what to do ? go seek out bootable cds - is the cd drive working anyway ? etc.

    no need. go bios, go linux, fix your hd, and install your os. or even, recover it.

    i liked that.

  16. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by iamacat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because you can not install applications in ROM, doesn't mean you can not infect or format local disks, USB devices or launch an attack on the Intranet which is otherwise behind a corporate firewall.

  17. Neat - but not all that useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have one of the ASUS P35E Deluxe motherboards at home, and one of the reasons I picked it was for Splashtop. It wasn't the main reason, but I figured it was a neat addition. But honestly, Splashtop isn't all that useful.

    For one thing, for all that it's "instant on", it still doesn't load all that much faster than XP. Now maybe it's just because I have a hot processor, or a really lean XP installation, but honestly the difference isn't that noticable. Splashtop does load faster, but it's hardly "instant on"; you still need for the OS to boot.

    Then, there's the fact that all my info -passwords, bookmarks, etc.- are on my hard-drive and thus not accessible (at least, not by default) to Splashtop. So I'd have to punch all that info into a second OS (and there's no security on Splashtop, so I'd recommend against leaving any passwords in the browser).

    I suppose for laptop users Splashtop may be marginally more useful, although even they may prefer to load up the main OS, since it doesn't take that much longer to run and then they get access to all their information.

    I do like having a security blanket of having a way to check the web for help just in case XP hoses itself. Boot to Splashtop, surf the web for an answer, and then use that information to fix Windows. But in the end, Splashtop is more of a toy than a genuinely useful feature.

  18. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by hike2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, so your READ ONLY boot-up OS is owned ... OMG, what are you going to DO? I know, REBOOT! 5 seconds later you can browse again, just don't go back to that same site ... I say with Gmail and the Google apps I would only boot my computer to a full OS if I want to save something on fixed media or play a game.

    --
    Fourty-two!
  19. This is not Linux by JeremyGNJ · · Score: 5, Informative

    People get so excitable every time they hear the word "linux". But the fact is, this is not really Linux, not in a form that people would run as an OS.

    It's just a way that Asus found to leverage something that is free, in order to avoid having to write their own own code for motherboard diagnostics and such. No one is going to "switch to linux" because their motherboard has a linux based diagnostic included.

    Maybe Asus will put the work "Linux" in bold letters of the mobo box, but this will not do anything. It will not "bring linux to the masses", because anyone who's actually buying a motherboard (as opposed to buying a pre-built computer), already knows what Linux is and will either run it, or not.

    1. Re:This is not Linux by bberens · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think it would be really interesting to boot my computer into "energy conservation mode" which doesn't even power up the hard disks but allows me to browse the web and send e-mail with near-instant on capability. Then, if I needed more 'stuff', I could switch to "normal" mode and get to all the rest of my stuff if need be. Having spent some time using things like feather linux, the responsiveness of using a RAM disk would make almost ANY average user wet themselves with glee.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    2. Re:This is not Linux by Shatrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No one is going to "switch to linux" because their motherboard has a linux based diagnostic included I expect a lot of people will try linux for precisely that reason. There is a pretty large community of hardware tinkerers and overclockers that know lots and lots about cache sizes and bus widths but fairly little about software. I have met lots of these types who convince themselves that linux is "free as in crap" so that they won't have to learn anything more powerful that windows XP.

      Now if ASUS which is a darling of the hardware enthusiast community says that linux is a powerful tool I expect some of those perceptions will be changed.
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  20. Bad Precedent by geekmansworld · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This seems like a really bad idea. Microsoft is immediately going to feel the need to compete with this (irrational as that may be). Soon enough we'll have Windows APIs embedded in the ROMS of major motherboards, and we'll pay more for these "Microsoft certified" motherboards because the added loading speed is a "feature".

    Hardware should never be tied to an operating system. I'm a Mac user, and even I believe in that sacred tenet. The consumer needs to be able to choose whatever components they want, and tose components should work together to the best of their ability.

    Because it's free, Linux on Asus boards may not impede my consumer choice at the moment. But it sets a precedent which could greatly damage the environment of choice we currently enjoy.

  21. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i would imagine Asus has this set up so you can update the embedded Linux on the motherboard much like updating the firmware on any other piece of hardware or like the BIOS or router firmware...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  22. Motherboard Malware! by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rock on... I'd like some integrated malware instead of this 'operating system' bullsh*t.

    I might even be able to steal some myspace passwords with it ... and pretend I've got friends ...

  23. Also by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Also, the vast majority of those 1 million motherboards per month are sold to OEM's who may or may not enable the Linux functionality on their finished product. How much do you want to bet that MS will quietly put pressure on said OEM's to disable it?

    ASUS has great overclocking options in their BIOS too...until OEM's get a hold of them and put their customer BIOS in place that leaves out all the good stuff. This will be the same.

  24. Re:Great timing! by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm waiting for a machine that turns on before I actually push the power button.

  25. Big target. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft and their sympathizers have claimed that the main reason it's the big victim of malware is that it is the big target, and that if other OSes were as widely deployed they'd be as riddled. Linux, BSD, Firefox, Apache, and other FOSS projects claim that it mainly Microsoft's poor security, not just the monoculture providing a big target.

    Now we have million motherboards a month shipping with an identical OS - including a network stack and a browser - in the BIOS. Heavily used in this mode by the purchasers. If this is successfully suborned by malware it can romp all over the hard drive, even if the main system install isn't booted.

    Seems to me this is a showdown between the Microsoft and FOSS sides' claims. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  26. it isn't bundling .. by rs232 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Don't get me wrong, I'm a Linux-ite through and through, but .."

    Is there ever anyone who posts here who isn't a 'Linux-ite' :)

    "if bundling is wrong for one, how can it be right for another? Just because you don't have the majority of the consumer market, doesn't make the practice any more justifiable"

    Because Asus doesn't hold a virtual monopoly on the OS, the Applications and the server protocols. And it isn't as if they are forcing you to use it.

    "Within seconds of turning on the P5E3 Deluxe motherboard, you can boot into this Linux environment"

    And unlike MS and BeOS, they won't force you to boot from a floppy to access Windows.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  27. Re:Great timing! by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Informative

    But really, how many appliances are truly instant-on besides the fridge and the coffee maker?

    Neither one is instant-on. It takes the fridge up to 24 hours to initialize (get cold) before you can store food in it, and coffee takes five to twenty minutes to perk.

    The radio is instant on. The light bulb is instant on, unless you get a really cheap CFL.

    My generation is weird; befor the transistor nothing was instant-on, after computers were built into everything nothing is instant-on. They shouldn't call us the "boomer generation" (even if some of us did blow stuff up REAL GOOD), they should call us the "instant-on generation".

    But an under five second computer boot? That's PDQ!

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  28. Re:Ok this is good... Now I have a couple of quest by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

    1) No it hasn't, it's been pretty steady once they were past the bubble burst.

    2) The only big fall is there because you cherry-picked a timeframe that included the last-gasp of the tech bubble, thereby ensuring it'll show a huge drop. Any other tech company's stock price graph will look the exact same way. Bump your graph forward to 2001, and suddenly it looks... pretty steady.

    Cherry-picking values to show what you want to see != "roller coaster decline."

  29. Re:Ok this is good... Now I have a couple of quest by Gat0r30y · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone has grossly misinformed you about the nature of my bubbles sir.

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  30. This is the year... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the year of Linux on the... wait, motherboard? Who changed the script?

  31. Finally? by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I may be confusing this with something else... but, does this mean I will FINALLY get my "5 seconds to KDE" boot time?

    Bundling?
    rs232 makes a very good point above...

    Because Asus doesn't hold a virtual monopoly on the OS, the Applications and the server protocols. And it isn't as if they are forcing you to use it.
    rs232 is quite correct.
    Go back 10 years... You simply could not buy a piece of (retail) hardware without getting a bunch of "goodies" on the driver and utility disks. Many major vendors that no one had ever heard of, got to be well known using this kind of marketing. Give it away for free, or include a trial version, as name recognition, even without monetization, can only be good for a company.
    Unfortunately, some of the goodies were crap. Second rate antivirus software, CD virtualization tools, and "backup" software were very common. Even so, you weren't FORCED into installing them. They were optional. That is VERY different than overtly or covertly installing a piece of sub-standard, or insecure software WITH the OS. (To me, the quality of the software isn't the big issue with bundling, though it plays a big part in how happy or unhappy I am when falling victim to the "bundling" problem.)

    Personally, I am very excited about this, and cannot wait to get one of my own....me and about a million other geeks, nerds, and ./ers/
    --
    Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
  32. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love, love, love the idea of a RO OS!!!

    Currently if I go to my banking site, I have no idea whether my system is currently owned, and some keystroke logger is busy sending off my bank passcode to somebody who is going to empty my account.

    With a RO OS, I can reboot, and I'm much more likely to be able to complete the transaction without it being subverted.

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  33. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by TechForensics · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What do you bet M$ will make sure it can't handle NTFS?

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  34. doesn't matter by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, I think it is bundling. But that doesn't matter, because, despite what the original post claimed, there's nothing wrong with bundling per-se. Bundling happened to be one of the mechanism MS used to illegally maintain and leverage their monopoly, but that doesn't mean that bundling is inherently wrong. Kicking a ball into a goal may win you praise; kicking an infant into a goal is likely to get you arrested. The problem is not the kicking, it's the circumstances and the target.

  35. I can't find a clear answer on their site. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This splashtop stuff looks like a cute toy, and more linux is always nice; but I'm a bit nervous about the tivoization potential. The software image being used is mostly FOSS(skype and flash excepted, as usual) and they seem to have released the relevant source; but I've not been able to find anything about how open the environment is, can you replace the image, install your own stuff on it, etc.

    If the system is an open one, it could be quite useful, and great fun to play with, I'd want several. If this is just another tivo, then it is pretty unexciting and disappointing.

  36. Re:Still don't see the point of burning it into RO by ahfoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, but see this is where it's getting fun because they can play that game but they're not holding all of the cards any more. In the low-end of the market, it's a bit of a toss up already. If an OEM decides to go with these boards in a low-end machine they can just do Linux. Wal Mart and Dell are both selling Linux machines nowadays.

    This is the same problem with MS reversing themselves on XP in the sub-notebook category. They came to Taiwan's OEMs and said OK, now you can still get XP licenses on these lightweight notebooks but you have to follow these restrictions like small screens and limited RAM. But they're playing a tricky game there because they no longer run the only game in town. What the OEMs are faced with is using XP on the crappy ones with small screens and less RAM and Linux on the sweet next generation ones with the full sized screens and 2Gigs of RAM. This is a situation being created by Microsoft's ham handed attempts to pretend they remain in control when they no longer have the control. Playing the restrictions game no longer puts them in the drivers seat. Quite to the contrary, they're insisting on being left out of the action completely.

  37. Set-top box by HeroreV · · Score: 2, Informative

    STB means "Set-top box" according to Wikipedia.

  38. Re:Ok this is good... Now I have a couple of quest by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Informative

    but my new Vista machine boots up to the desktop

    Sure, it looks like it's booted to the desktop...but have you tried doing anything?

    Windows has been progressively delay-loading more and more, so while the upfront cost is cheaper, and it seems to be quicker, the time until you can actually do something of use hasn't really improved.
  39. Wintop! by argent · · Score: 3, Funny

    Meanwhile, Microsoft has announced that a new version of Windows Mobile including Pocket Internet Explorer and Pocket Windows Media Player will be available for motherboard manufacturers in the third quarter. "The initial release will be limited to a 320x240 screen resolution and controlled by tapping the "reset" and "power" buttons to simulate mobile phone controls, but we think people will find this a big improvement over those messy mice and keypads".