Slashdot Mirror


Estonian Cyber Defence Hub Set Up

w1z4rd writes "The BBC reports that seven Nato nations have backed a new cyber defence centre in Estonia, which last year blamed Russia for weeks of attacks on its internet structure. The US will initially send an observer to the project, which will have some 30 staff when fully operational in August."

95 comments

  1. Obligatory: by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did anyone else read that as "Elbonia" when they first read it? I was picturing an ungodly amalgamation of mud, wooden slingshots, 286s, and farm animals...

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    1. Re:Obligatory: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIAA factbook info on Estonia: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Estonia

    2. Re:Obligatory: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, because I can read.

  2. bummer by the+brown+guy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Cyber Defence sounds so much more cooler than it actually is...

    --
    Orbis terrarum est non altus satis
    1. Re:bummer by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      I work for the Department of Disinformation and Psychological Warfare at Microsoft. Sounded cool when I applied but I just spend all my time trolling slashdot and submitting bits of Windows source code to ReactOS.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:bummer by RuBLed · · Score: 1

      If you get to +5 it would terribly reflect on your performance rating...

  3. What happen ? by jddj · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somebody set up us the hub!

    1. Re:What happen ? by tankadin · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a wicked hub. 3-Com 8-port hub with a sticker: "Da Fence!" on it.

  4. Press release from the kremlin: by AlexCGilliland · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hackers of the world unite! you have nothing to lose but your DRM.

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the purple monkey dishwasher
  5. NATO ? Russia ? by bytesex · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Doesn't sound at all like another attempt by NATO to encroach upon what Russia considers her former sphere of influence. Not at all.

    It's not like I'm some sort of advocate of Russian politics, but someone inside NATO must have a clue about these things and does them deliberately.

    Weird.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by thealsir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Estonians have always rejected Russian interference in their affairs.

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
    2. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, Estonia is an independent nation and a member of NATO - how much more "encroachment" can this be?

      And if you ask me, the rest of the world pays far too much attention to Russian whining about the lost glories of their empire as it is. The Russian government deliberately and systematically attacked Estonia's infrastructure last year - now NATO should place the defence hub somewhere else so as to be sensitive to Russian feelings? Ridiculous.

    3. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Estonians have always rejected Russian interference in their affairs. Except for the few (many) that sold out and became party members and kissed the backsides of mother Russia.
    4. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Let alone mention that such an institution could in the future help the pesky Ests defened themeselves against cyber attacks. Such as the ones directed against them by Russia when they dared remove a soviet statue from the center of Tallinn. NATO is clearly trying to provoke the peace loving Russians!

    5. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahhaha!! oh wow.."dared remove a soviet statue", "peace loving Russians" - these lines cracked me up most

    6. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by bytesex · · Score: 1

      I know that. But this isn't just a case of Estonians doing something - I applaud them for wanting to defend every one of their borders. It's a case of NATO being an undiplomatic elephant here. I just wonder who is making these policy decisions, what goes on in their head and what their aims are. Last I checked, NATO was a military defence organisation, not an IT outsourcing company.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    7. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by Mental+Maelstrom · · Score: 1

      ...an action easily understood when the only alternative is persecution, deportation or death.

    8. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that difficult to understand but you'll have to read Carrol Quigley and Anthony Sutton. The whole mess is by and large the outcome of something which was started before the first worldwar. Then take a close look at who the New York bankers are and who the Russian maffia. Explains why they hate Putin too.

    9. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by mauri · · Score: 4, Informative

      "The Russian government deliberately and systematically attacked Estonia's infrastructure last year"

      This is of course pure bullshit (tm). And yes, I am Estonian too and know quite a bit about this "attack". Essentially some pissed of guys bought DDoS against some Estonian websites (mainly media and some government) and that was it. There were nothing special in this DDoS, just http queries coming from host of usual suspects (countries with lax security & no ISP filtering of bad traffic) - no notable traffic from Russia.
      Of course the DDoS was bad in our context, our 100mbit line was something like 98-99% full and only upstream filters at ISP managed to block it. But was it cyberwar by Russia? Hardly.

      --
      __
      L.
    10. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Former sphere of influence, indeed.

      I guess when the Brits or the French (or the Spanish, for that matter) would make demands of the former colonies that call themselves USA, the Americans should just roll over, then? Alaska used to be part of Russia, so in theory Russia has a claim of "former sphere of influence" in here as well.

      What Estonia does as a NATO nation should not be dictated from Moscow. The same is true for every other NATO nation.

    11. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      be careful with the word "always".
      estonia was a part of the russian empire for two centuries.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    12. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the jews in WW2, oh wait they're all dead.

    13. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But was it cyberwar by Russia? Hardly. I think there was a period of time when people strongly suspected Russian government involvement or that the Kremlin was looking the other way. I can imagine some NATO people starting plans for "cyber defense" during this time.
    14. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by lusiphur69 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the whole 'Russian attack' angle was cooked up as grist for the propaganda mills. Meanwhile, we deploy anti-missile weaponry in former Soviet satellite states, fund dissidents in the country and bind as many former USSR states into NATO as possible.

      Now, were I playing a game, I would suspect NATO's intentions as well. It's too bad that NATO leaders wish to play this game. For all our military might in the West, the USSR can still annihilate the world several times over.

    15. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by mauri · · Score: 1

      Yes, and obviously it was very good PR work on part of our government. And NATO guys found it also usable trick probably. And the rest is history...

      --
      __
      L.
    16. Re:NATO ? Russia ? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say it was PR work of US or NATO. The Kremlin was very obviously and openly critical of Estonia for moving their statue, stood by idly while the Estonia was blockaded by Putin-youth, and then there was a DDoS attack from inside Russia aimed at some Estonian government ministries. It's not hard to jump to conclusions there.

  6. "set up" is ambiguous, no by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    I first read the title expecting to see some kind of uber-social-engineering against an existing defense hub. I'd wonder if the ambiguous use of "set up" was actually intentional, but yes, I'm familiar with Hanlon's Razor.

  7. Estonia, estonia... by redtuxrising · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ah, here it is! Let's see... Area: 17,413 sq mi, Population: 1,340,602. Huh, well you don't *need* a gov't/military power to DDoS that country. The state of Oregon has more servers and IT personnel than the country of Estonia. I'm guessing their websites cater mostly to Estonians which basically means they consistently failed to take scaling into account. Estonia doesn't need a Cyber Defence Hub. Just a bit of common sense.

    1. Re:Estonia, estonia... by shiznatix · · Score: 5, Informative
      Seriously dude, the article is 8 short paragraphs. Try reading them next time before looking like an idiot.

      The centre will provide research, consultation and training on the development of cyber defences for participating national governments.
      This is a training ground. Not a bunker with a bunch of geeks waiting for someone to DDoS them so they can unleash hell on them.

      I'm guessing their websites cater mostly to Estonians which basically means they consistently failed to take scaling into account. Estonia doesn't need a Cyber Defence Hub. Just a bit of common sense.
      Thats just stupid. Since nearly every single bank user in Estonia uses online banking and since there are a million different services provided online by the government the servers have been setup with scaling in mind. That 1.3 million will hit the tax website on the first day that you can file you taxes (yes, we do all our taxes online) and the server does just fine. Common sense is saying that they are doing things just fine with scaling.
    2. Re:Estonia, estonia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, here it is! Let's see... Area: 17,413 sq mi, Population: 1,340,602. Huh, well you don't *need* a gov't/military power to DDoS that country. The state of Oregon has more servers and IT personnel than the country of Estonia. I'm guessing their websites cater mostly to Estonians which basically means they consistently failed to take scaling into account. Estonia doesn't need a Cyber Defence Hub. Just a bit of common sense. And what if outside attack renders the services unreachable to those few Estonians? That's exactly what happened a year ago...
    3. Re:Estonia, estonia... by PenGun · · Score: 1

      Indeed once one has some presence in their little crib, which I imagine will be almost instant, then the training will commence. I dunno if they will benefit from it though. ;)

        Damn a million services, 1.3 million people on line, wow man you guys are fantastic. A billion combinations and plus big time traffic, you know this may just be the real problem.

        Teh intranets are just such massive fun.

    4. Re:Estonia, estonia... by redtuxrising · · Score: 0

      Wow mate... You really gotta chill. Who said anything about bunkers, you presumptuous insensitive clod!? Only 57% of Estonia's population are internet users. Many are not required to file taxes. Many choose paper filing. 1.3 million will NOT hit the tax website. Make it half a mil. Will they all wait until the last day? I believe the "tax website" (www.emta.ee) was not even under attack. Ministry of finance (www.fin.ee) was. What the heck are you even talking about? It's simple economics. Your banks, have bankers and they know about the Opportunity Cost so they will NOT invest in the infrastructure that supports millions of users when it only needs to support 100K tops. Same logic was applied elsewhere and that's how this whole "Evil Russias DDoSing us, halp!" thing came to be. Well that and people like yourself were refreshing their banks' frontpages thinking their interwebs are broken.

    5. Re:Estonia, estonia... by antirelic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Estonia, like many other Baltic nations and former Soviet satellite nations, are in the middle of a constant power struggle between East and West. Your argument comparing Oregon and Estonia is pretty much irrational, due to the fact that Oregon does not have the Russian foreign service trying to alter its foreign agenda. Russia, which has pretty much dominated Estonia and most other Baltic nations since the early 19th century, has become a resurgent power with expanding capabilities and has been using those resources to coerce its former vassals to move away from the influence of the EU. This can be accomplished in a number of ways, including utilizing cyber attacks on an emerging economy. For many nations, the Internet is a key tool in bringing their economies up to date and becoming competitive.

      --
      20th century Marxism is not progress...
    6. Re:Estonia, estonia... by redtuxrising · · Score: 0

      Look, all I'm saying is that it doesn't take a (former) superpower to conduct a successful cyber attack on a small country like Estonia. Instead of saying "Lesson learned. Let's improve, integrate, and secure." they started screaming "Evil Russia is attacking us!" If you want to blame someone for your own shortcomings, fine. As long as you're not lying to yourself.

  8. Obvious Foreshadowing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think this is evidence of a trend towards international organizations to create divisions or authorities responsible for cyber governance/monitoring/standardization/accountability.

    I am keeping my eyes peeled for a new division/center in the UN for cyberspace soon.

  9. Re:Obligatory. (Borat edt.) by noz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Borat: My computer, it is dead!

    Victim: That's terrible!

    Borat: No, is OK. My friend Igor give me 386 for massage with, how you say, happy finish.

  10. Blame Russia? by hazee · · Score: 0, Troll

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't those attacks eventually turn out to have nothing at all to do with Russia, being instead the work of a single person?

    Funny how no-one thought to mention this before diverting large sums of money to setting up the centre.

    And it's shameful that the BBC can't be bothered to do basic fact-checking any more.

    1. Re:Blame Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't those attacks eventually turn out to have nothing at all to do with Russia, being instead the work of a single person? Nope, they had everything to do with Russia and there were a lot more involved than one person. For example, in various russian forums there were number of "requests to 'ping' some Estonian servers".
    2. Re:Blame Russia? by shiznatix · · Score: 5, Informative

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't those attacks eventually turn out to have nothing at all to do with Russia, being instead the work of a single person?
      Here, I will do it since everyone on slashdot believes this even though in the original slashdot article that is cited when this is said says nothing of the sort. Dmitri Galushkevich was the guy who was fined. Somebody had to be hung, he was the only one to get caught. The Russian Youth leader idiot guy claims responsibility as well link let alone the probability that there were others who joined in but who knew how to keep their mouth shut. When a bank is robbed by a group but only 1 person is caught, he was the sole perpetrator all of a sudden? The original article even says:

      Because the attacks were botnet-driven and launched from servers all over the globe, however, it's impossible to state definitively that only a single individual was involved.
      Oh and blaming Russia is a fairly safe bet here. You don't think the Russian Youth is funded through charity I hope. Also, the blockade of the Estonian Embassy in Moscow just magically had electricity and all the finer points of camping. And all the people who joined in the blockade just magically were able to quit their jobs for quite some time because it would be just unheard of if they had been paid to protest.
    3. Re:Blame Russia? by VON-MAN · · Score: 1

      Yes, that story was reported someplaces. However the attacks took weeks, so the Kremlin had ample opportunity to act. Which it didn't. We heard this single person theory after the attacks. I'd say this whole things reeks of the Russian federal security service FSB, and is typical of the bully Putin.

    4. Re:Blame Russia? by iNaya · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter whether who did it; cyber-defence is still relevant, especially if they don't want their servers going down again.

      --
      The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?
    5. Re:Blame Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyber war is relevant only for one thing and this is set up infrastructure for spying over own citizen.
      Sure blame me now for idiotic conspirasy theory but history almost always show proof for that.

    6. Re:Blame Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is, whether these requests resulted in a successful attack? One could put up a request in a forum for people to start throwing tomatoes at a building, but it doesn't mean it it was them, who destroyed it, when they did. :)

    7. Re:Blame Russia? by megaditto · · Score: 1

      I don't really care one way or another, but this Estonia situation reminds me of 9-11 somewhat:

      What we observed: A bunch of Saudi Arabian fanatics hijacked 4 planes in 2001 and killed thousands of Americans.
      Our conclusion: A bunch of Shiite kooks in Afganistan were to blame
      Our response: Captured and killed a bunch of Sunni kooks in Iraq

      I'd be laughing right now, but Russia still has some nukes (and my family happens to live exactly where most of those weapons are targeted).

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    8. Re:Blame Russia? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Also, the blockade of the Estonian Embassy in Moscow just magically had electricity and all the finer points of camping. And all the people who joined in the blockade just magically were able to quit their jobs for quite some time because it would be just unheard of if they had been paid to protest. Also the police were just standing around and magically unable to intervene. That was far more telling to me than any DDoS attack; that a youth group could blockade an embassy and attack cars entering it while the government just stood by watching. Maybe that sort of thing happens in third world countries now and then, but this was in Russia...
  11. Interesting, but really needed? by Yogiz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Being an Estonian I can say that the so called attacks weren't really such a big deal. Basically a few government web pages (parliament's, government's president's and couple more) were DDOS'ed for a couple of hours from Russian ips. It's not like this caused too much trouble (the government's infranet still worked just fine, the citizens just couldn't access the pages). I do think that the idea of Cyber Defence is quite cool and I'm glad, that we're the pioneers here but it does seem that this really is the primary reason here, to pioneer something. It might still become useful one day and I'll be interested to see how this rolls out. I do enjoy the fact that the small size of Estonia allows us to try all the new IT solutions on quite a large scale very fast. So far we've done quite well and I hope that we can do something revolutionary on the international scale as well. The IT innovation part of Estonia is really something I'm proud of.

    1. Re:Interesting, but really needed? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      I do think that the idea of Cyber Defence is quite cool and I'm glad, that we're the pioneers here but it does seem that this really is the primary reason here, to pioneer something. It might still become useful one day and I'll be interested to see how this rolls out. New? Pioneers? Morris worm was launched, and defeated by co-operating sysadmins and programmers in 1988, 20 years ago. CERT was founded in the same year. Bugtraq mailing list is operating since 1993. CVE exists since 1999. And those are organizations that are maintaining ongoing up to date information on security-related matters. OpenBSD was founded in 1995. SELinux was released in 2000. grsecurity in 2001. Those are only most prominent software projects related to security.

      The only thing you are "pioneering" is a way of getting piles of other governments' money for a basic network security awareness program.

      I do enjoy the fact that the small size of Estonia allows us to try all the new IT solutions on quite a large scale very fast. So far we've done quite well and I hope that we can do something revolutionary on the international scale as well. The IT innovation part of Estonia is really something I'm proud of. More like dumping ground for proprietary "IT solutions". The rest of the world is busy trying to get rid of them.
      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    2. Re:Interesting, but really needed? by tomatensaft · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Where are my mod points? Well said! :)

    3. Re:Interesting, but really needed? by Svippy · · Score: 1

      While Estonia may not pioneering on this issue. Estonia was the first country in the world to use Internet voting (known as "e-voting" in Estonia) back in March, 2007. Accordingly, about 30 000 people used the Internet to vote for their candidates.

      But your parent poster made a good point. Estonia is small enough to try these computer systems, and since its IT infrastructure is rather new, it can allow for quite newer methods and do it a lot faster.

      A good comparison is the Copenhagen Metro. Many cities in Europe and beyond have had metros for years, but it is something only a few years old in Denmark. Which means we can use quite modern technology (such as computer controlled trains). And you think it is without reason it has been labelled as the best metro in the world?

      --
      Clicked pie.
    4. Re:Interesting, but really needed? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      While Estonia may not pioneering on this issue. Estonia was the first country in the world to use Internet voting (known as "e-voting" in Estonia) back in March, 2007. Accordingly, about 30 000 people used the Internet to vote for their candidates. Why exactly is this supposed to be a good thing?

      But your parent poster made a good point. Estonia is small enough to try these computer systems, and since its IT infrastructure is rather new, it can allow for quite newer methods and do it a lot faster. Newer methods are not called "IT solutions". You have "IT solution" when an outside consultant brings you massive amount of various companies' marketing materials, and half a year into the project you are running most expensive software packages ever made by SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, HP, Siebel, and $deity knows what, yet your paid-by-the-hour consultants seem to be incapable of making those things provide anything that is actually useful for your company. You have "competent people in IT department" when some people who work for your company implement things that improve your processes and provide benefit to whatever the company does.

      A good comparison is the Copenhagen Metro. Many cities in Europe and beyond have had metros for years, but it is something only a few years old in Denmark. Which means we can use quite modern technology (such as computer controlled trains). And you think it is without reason it has been labelled as the best metro in the world? Computer-controlled trains are not an "IT solution", either. They are not even related to IT, they are "equipment control systems". "IT" applies computer-based technology to the company's information-handling processes.
      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  12. What?! by phagstrom · · Score: 5, Funny

    They'll never defend anything with a hub. At the very least they should get a router. ~

    1. Re:What?! by Digestromath · · Score: 1

      If they build a hub, do they not then need at least a hubcap for protection?

    2. Re:What?! by phagstrom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jeez, it gets worse and worse. First they use a hub, now they are capping the connection.

    3. Re:What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they should get a router

      Bah. Set up a sandvine and frustrate the attackers into quitting.

  13. At first, they should grow up by RCL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Estonians should get real and find the ways to cooperate with Russia, not to pretend that Russia does not exist. You just can't deliberately ignore a 100 mln people living next to you, not to mention enraging them. You should account for their feelings when making political decisions.

    And that does not mean that Estonia should give up its sovereignty. You just cannot be totally independent from your neighbours. Estonia is no island.

    1. Re:At first, they should grow up by Mental+Maelstrom · · Score: 1

      No, Estonia can't ignore Russia, and it wont. But Russia MUST STOP trying to rule Estonia and respect Estonia as a sovereign nation. Until Russia stops the offensive towards Estonia, Estonia will have a defencive stance towards the nation which has brought them so much great suffering in the past.

      Shouldn't Estonia defend itself? Should we instead bow to the hostile soviets looking to swallow us?

    2. Re:At first, they should grow up by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Estonians should get real and find the ways to cooperate with Russia, not to pretend that Russia does not exist.

      Being a member of the EU now, Estonia must answer to its fellow EU members when it formulates foreign policy decisions. If Estonia makes a decision that could in any way weaken Estonia, it weakens the EU.

      You just can't deliberately ignore a 100 mln people living next to you

      Based on current trends, Russia's present population doesn't necessarily serve as an argument that it is a major player worth taking into account. The birthrate of ethnic Russians is going down quickly, the birthrate of minorities (many of which, like the Finno-Ugrian Mari, support Estonia against Moscow) is going up, not to mention the huge presence of Chinese squatters all over the Russian Far East. Russia is going from a big, strong important nation to one very close to being torn apart. That's why a lot of people think bullying Estonia and trying to re-establish a sphere of influence is a sign of desperation.

    3. Re:At first, they should grow up by RCL · · Score: 1

      For Russians, the victory over Nazis is an important part of national identity. For Estonians, the enmity towards Russia is the same thing.

      Both sides' behavior is immature. Estonia exaggerates Russia's role in the country's troubled past (some even go that far to claim that siding with Nazi Germany would be a better option, or at least no worse), and treats all of its past and present citizens siding with Russians as traitors, which is obviously wrong (if that's their cultural preference and/or heritage, why blame them for what they are, which only antagonizes them?). OTOH, Russians are ignorant about the outside world and don't really care about international opinion, behaving like Russia spanned the entire globe. Neither of country is trying to understand the other's POV.

      Given the new barriers that are emerging between the countries (EU borders etc), I don't think that both sides will be able to learn more about each other. The stereotypes you are referring to are likely to remain and the situation will only get worse.

      P.S. I'm a Russian citizen, though not pure Russian ethnically. Having said that, I am likely to be considered biased from now on, but I tried hard to abstract myself from any particular POV when writing this.

    4. Re:At first, they should grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Both my grandpas were murdered by russians after we "cooperated" with Russia in 1941. Practically every estonian have relatives who have been murdered, deported or imprisoned by russians. What a wonderful neighbours we have for cooperation!

    5. Re:At first, they should grow up by RCL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Based on current trends, Russia's present population doesn't necessarily serve as an argument that it is a major player worth taking into account. The birthrate of ethnic Russians is going down quickly, the birthrate of minorities (many of which, like the Finno-Ugrian Mari, support Estonia against Moscow) is going up, not to mention the huge presence of Chinese squatters all over the Russian Far East. Russia is going from a big, strong important nation to one very close to being torn apart. That's why a lot of people think bullying Estonia and trying to re-establish a sphere of influence is a sign of desperation. You know, even if Russia's population halved today, it would still be larger than Iran, let alone Iraq. You can't ignore opinion of such a large group of people being in your direct neighbourhood, nor you can't prevent them from flooding the neighbouring EU countries (e.g. if civil war breaks out in Russia), and becoming an important minority in those.

      Isolationist policy won't help here. It would help for overseas territories like US, but it won't for EU. EU is setting a time bomb by trying to isolate itself from Russia. The more open the borders are, the better people will understand (and know) each other -> better stability in the region. You won't consider guys you went to college with as your mortal enemies, at least it's not that likely :>
    6. Re:At first, they should grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some even go that far to claim that siding with Nazi Germany would be a better option, or at least no worse Well - as for Estonia - The Nazi occupation WAS way better than the Soviet occupation. It's not "going that far" - it's just the truth - there were many many many times more people slaughtered under the Soviet occupation.

      True - both of them were really bad but If I had to choose - I wouldn't choose the side that killed many of my relatives (Russia). I just couldn't do that.
    7. Re:At first, they should grow up by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      The birthrate of ethnic Russians is going down quickly, the birthrate of minorities

      Estonia must answer to its fellow EU members when it formulates foreign policy decisions.

      Slightly offtopic... but what you say about Russia is even more true in Western Europe. If you consider that Russia is close to being "torn apart", I wonder what is your opinion on the rest of the EU (I think you're right BTW, since I think that Europe is also close to being torn apart).

  14. How exacly they can help? by foobar123 · · Score: 1

    AFAIK DDoS is more quality of service and ISP issue... Is it going to be training center where ISPs can send their employees to take IPv4, "packet filtering" and "upstream traffic tracking" courses? Or they will hack ISPs routers, track streams themselves and will nuke "areas of origin in a question" from the orbit?

    1. Re:How exacly they can help? by tankadin · · Score: 0

      Good luck filtering packets coming from botnets. Obligatory Soviet Russia quote: "In Soviet Russia the botnet filters your DoS-attacks!" .. Oh, wait... USAF Considers Creation of Military Botnet http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/12/1525257

    2. Re:How exacly they can help? by foobar123 · · Score: 1

      Actually it is interesting approach... If you cant force ISP of an foreign country to comply by law, you can just nuke them with yet another botnet so bad, that they will be forced to buy a equipment, resources and do the legal work with their peers to be able to maintain QoS in case of DDoS... So when next time somebody uses their networks to stage DDoS, they will be ready and able to track the stream and filter out zombies...

    3. Re:How exacly they can help? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      ...or, alternatively, they will just raise oil prices and sell some tanks and fighter jets to someone you don't like. International pissing matches 2.0 -- now over the Internet!

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  15. So the pertinent questions is... by religious+freak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is it that whenever I read about nationwide, concerted, coordinated and serious efforts related to IT security, the USA is never mentioned?

    Sure, we've got the airforce doing this and some twig of the FBI doing that, but where's the real commitment to security? Where's the offensive capability and overwhelming manpower the Chinese supposedly have? Where's the planning that seems to be happening in Europe? We're sending an "observer" -- WTF?

    I'd love to believe we're just smarter about it. What's the point of broadcasting you have attack power on something as covert as IT -- in peacetime? But somehow I doubt it.

    NSA is near god-like in terms of technical prowess; does anybody think we're utilizing it like we should?

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    1. Re:So the pertinent questions is... by iNaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why is the USA never mentioned?? Because the NSA is behind all cyber-crimes in the world. Hacking, spamming, DDoS, Nigerian scams... It's all one big cover up!!1!11

      --
      The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?
    2. Re:So the pertinent questions is... by Glenn+Rubenstein · · Score: 1

      One school of thought would suggest that by not making a big deal out of it, the USA isn't putting out information to help others beat the system, etc. Just a thought.

      --
      Glenn Rubenstein
  16. Re:Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why bother with a nation which at state level acknowledges fascism"

    Where did you get that from? I AM an estonian and I can assure you that this is absolutely ridiculous. You are either a troll or you read the russian propaganda news.

    Please - stop posting this nonsense.

  17. Re:Pissing away tax money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fascist government? What are you smoking dude?
    I (as an estonian) can assure you that all the news that you read from russian newspapers are lies. Stop trolling

  18. Re:Estonia by Mental+Maelstrom · · Score: 5, Informative

    Russian propaganda has got you nevertheless... The exaggerated glaims by Russia which are fed to their public are very hypocritical considering the facism, neonazism, racism, putinjugend and human rights violations present in Russia.

    I'd say its not Estonia playing up, but Russia, whose people still worship the old Soviet Nation. Can you believe they actually believe the soviets "liberated" Estonia in World War II? But estonians still very well remember the mass deportations and silent genocide conducted by the KGB.

    As for present-day Russia - they're cocky again and are looking to rule over neighbouring nations. The false information they're planting into the minds of their citizens clearly indicates they are hostile toward other nations. It's definately a global threat!

  19. A Hub ... Priceless by PenGun · · Score: 1

    Amazing but I must encourage this fortifying of the internet against the terrorist and evil forig ....... collapses helpless with laughter. A hub, a fucking hub. These people are way beyond clueless.

  20. Re:Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's definately a global threat! Sure it is. Then again, so is the United States - can you actually believe that Americans "liberated" Vietnam, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, etc?
  21. No, no by widman · · Score: 1

    Just let them think you are using floppy disks and 1200 baud modems.

  22. Re:Estonia by Mental+Maelstrom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You anonymous coward! Need I remind you the soviets had already conquered Estonia by the time the nazis came? Therefore the nazis were at first seen by many as someone to liberate us from the soviet rule which had oppressed us by then already. Estonians just wanted to have their free country, not to be under russian influence. Nazism as an ideology was not supported! Estonians remember the crimes of nazis in Estonia, but the crimes soviet russia did in Estonia during and after the war are by far greater in number and extent.

    Estonia commemorates all estonians that fought for the freedom of Estonia. We fought alongside germany when the soviets conquered us, and we fought alongside russia when nazis conquered us. We supported neither ideology, all we ever wanted is a free country and peace. Both nazis and soviets tried to enslave us, russia succeeded for a short while. As far as most estonians are concerned the nazis and the soviets were not much different. Both were ruthless tyrants towards Estonia, "pigs" if you like. Russia still appears to be a tyrant nation as indicated by its foreign policies.

    Russia, for God's sake, leave us be! We're no match for your military - please stop bullying us.

  23. NATO not Nato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organization
    There is no such organization as Nato as spelled in the article summary and possibly the article but who reads the articles?

  24. Re:Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really understand why are you so excited. I didn't say that Russia has been always nice to Baltic states - it hasn't. Yes, I am aware of the conquest and of the armed opposition that took place after it. However, my point was that the United States (or any other major power for that sake) is no better. They just handle propaganda much more skillfully.

    Besides, has there been an independent Estonian state before the Russian Empire dissolved around 1917? No? For how long? Oh. So, one may also say that Russia aka USSR in 1940 retook the territories it lost in 1917, which had been its part for literally centuries?

  25. Re:Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    if FREEDOM, as you put it, comes at a price of fighting on NAZI side - this is definitely NOT the kind of freedom quite a few of us see, and you can't buy that.

  26. fight em over there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if we dont fight em over there we will have to fight em over here.

  27. Re:Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    United States (or any other major power for that sake) is no better.

    How the hell is that supposed to justify what Russia has done to Estonia? Why are we even talking about the US?

  28. I think reality is ruining the value of irony by idontgno · · Score: 0, Troll

    Setting up a cyber-defence HQ in Estonia akin to building a strategic nuclear command-and-control facility in Nagasaki.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  29. Re:Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Defining moral laws (sort of 'do not invade' or 'do not lie') is meaningful as long as there's a possibility not to violate them. If there's an example of a modern state being rich and powerful while at the same time always respecting other countries (not bombing them, not occupying, not sabotaging their production or inciting revolts), then all those countries who do not follow the same rules are to be condemned.

    The thing is that there are no such countries. All the powerful countries I know about protect their national interests, using military force if needed. The only difference between them is the quality of the propaganda they produce to justify their actions.

  30. We get torrent. by AioKits · · Score: 1

    What!

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  31. Propaganda: Disgruntled Youth or Evil Russians? by intnsred · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Security guru Bruce Schneier's Cryptogram newsletter has a good blurb on this issue and the topic of whether this was some disgruntled Estonian youths or was the "evil Russian gov't" that was responsible for the attacks.

  32. That was a tomb, not just a "statue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Few people would care about a statue and launch a cyber war. That was a tomb where Russian soldiers were buried.

  33. Re:Estonia by Darinbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because I think Russia (and a lot of other places) use the argument "if country X is a bastard, then I can be one too". It's a stupid argument, and Russia and the US should defend their own actions without referring to others.

    As far as this issue goes, I think Russia is getting over some self identity issues, and Estonia has aggravated this. Russia used to be a big empire, both under the Czars and the Communists, and this is part of the national psyche. So after the fall of the Soviet empire, there was some moves made to at least keep a sphere of influence. Also, Russians considered their country to be a hero and great liberator in World War 2. Another part of their national self esteem.

    So now here's the loss of face issue: Estonia, who used to be a part of USSR, firmly within the desired Russian sphere of influence, rejects them. A country that Russians feel should be grateful, after all they were "liberated" from the Nazis and had many decades of Soviet control. But instead, the Russification hadn't taken hold and the Estonians actually joined NATO instead.

    To the Russians, having a former "friend" join NATO is a major insult and a severe loss of face. Then it all blew up badly when a statue commemorating Soviet Occupation (or liberation, whatever) was moved.

    (In parallels with the US, note that many people were pissed off that France didn't back us with the Iraq war, citing that the US had liberated them from the Nazis. Some quotes being "if it weren't for us, they'd be speaking German today". The parallel attitude being that if we helped you in the past, you should to be our toady today.)

    Interesting to see a parallel with Finland. Both have a similar language. Both countries were part of the Swedish empire for a long time, then taken over by the Russian empire and had a period of Russification. Both declare independence after the Russian revolution, and both have Nazi and Soviet occupations. Finland though keeps independence after the war and acts as a buffer between the east and west, whereas Estonia was forcibly annexed during the war. So any talk of "Estonia was part of Russia for centuries" is silly if it also ignores Finland. (and "centuries" is two by the way)

  34. Re:Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have borderline personality disorder, or are you just retarded.

  35. Re:Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are talking about the US because every political discussion around here devolves into US-bashing. At the risk of stating the obvious, there's a lot of anti-US venom in the world. In an international forum like this, sooner of later someone will choose to justify a position by comparing xyz atrocity to something the US has done.

    Sometimes they use historical fact (sometimes distorted), sometimes they will trot out their favorite conspiracy theory (attn. tinfoil hatters: I'm not saying you're wrong, just that I'm not often convinced by your "proof"), or they will troll a fat pack of lies.

    Regardless of the validity of their accusation, they always seem to miss the point: You can't justify bad behavior by pointing out other bad behavior.