Slashdot Mirror


OCZ's Brain Mouse Hits the Store

John Roller writes "Three months to the day since Slashdot originally received word that OCZ's "brain-mouse" — the Neural Impulse Actuator was ready for shipping, the first in-depth review of the device containing pictures of the retail packaging along with several videos have arrived on the internet. Overclock3D.Net got the first look at the device, and although it's still early days, they managed to play a game of "Pong" using only brain power. The article is only part one in a month-long log of using the device, but it's extremely interesting to see what the people who have pre-ordered the device can expect from it when it arrives on their doorsteps shortly."

150 comments

  1. But can it play WoW? by c0ol · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am all for freedom from keyboard hunch

    1. Re:But can it play WoW? by bloodninja · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am all for freedom from keyboard hunch Why? You certainly don't need both hands for pr0n.
      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    2. Re:But can it play WoW? by GeordieMac · · Score: 1

      TFA doesn't seem to be available for some strange reason...

    3. Re:But can it play WoW? by BillGod · · Score: 1

      if you think of pr0n... does it automagically go to pr0n sites? If so.. I want one for home.. but not work.

      --
      MISSING - Sig file. 2 years old black and white and very funny. If found please email me.
    4. Re:But can it play WoW? by BillGod · · Score: 4, Funny

      CRAP.. what if you fall asleep with this thing? with my dreams who knows where the hell I will end up surfing!!!

      --
      MISSING - Sig file. 2 years old black and white and very funny. If found please email me.
    5. Re:But can it play WoW? by hords · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just imagine waking up to goatse on your screen.

    6. Re:But can it play WoW? by bloodninja · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just imagine waking up to goatse on your screen. Thanks, I won't be able to sleep for a week now.
      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    7. Re:But can it play WoW? by Capitalist+Piggy · · Score: 0

      I am all for freedom from keyboard hunch I would hope this would not be permitted in current multi-player games, as spending more money or running additional software to be a "better" player is one of the things killing the PC gaming market.

      I cite the farming bots in WoW as a nice example. Bots running 24/7/365, generating gold for resale ramped up auction prices for some items and completely destroyed prices for others. I, at least, did not wish to go buy gold from a Chinese sweat-shop, nor did I wish to sit at my computer for weeks manually farming, so I just canceled my account after seeing Blizzard wasn't doing much to stop these things. This was a long while back, but I wasn't going to pay $12/mo to sit around, waiting for months and months for things to eventually change.

      Also, showing up to raids for the first time and learning I needed to have all these macros and mods installed to be viable, which, in essence, made my character much more potent in PVP and PVE. This seemed REALLY cheap, as in the default HUD the extra steps/clicks were there for a reason and when I ran into another character of the same class and level in PVP land-- they had best have the same, or better, macros or they'll be making a corpse run in a few seconds.

      The same goes for FPS games on the PC. There's such a variety of hardware, mods, cheats, etc that give some players an advantage over others. This isn't fun if you just want to sit down and play a game and get honest-to-god good at it. Just look at the old TFC where you primed grenades and the advantage of a 5 second .WAV file that chirps every .5 seconds and gets played when you hold the 'prime grenade' button. My friends and I used this and we'd pity the folks who didn't, as grenades would always go off by the opponents head due to incredible timing given by having audible indicators.

      This is why I only play multi-player on the 360 now. I know when I sit down for a game of Halo3, it's very likely the persons I am playing with are using the same type of clunky controller I've got and they aren't running several applications or macros to assist in mowing me over. Even if someone figures out how to do a cheat, no bother, as their Xbox SN will get banned from Live and they won't be back until buying a new system. As a result, hardly anyone tries anything that falls under the shroud of cheating or exploiting.

      I'd love one of these devices, but again, I'd like it in a game designed around it's implementation as opposed to one it's hacked into and just used as part of the "hardware arms race" that goes on so often.

      Another nice thing about the console, you eliminate the "hunch" because you can lay back on your sofa or recliner.
    8. Re:But can it play WoW? by thegux · · Score: 1
    9. Re:But can it play WoW? by WaXHeLL · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just imagine waking up to goatse on your screen. Thanks, I won't be able to sleep for a week now. Can't sleep, goatse might eat me.
      --
      The troll with karma.
    10. Re:But can it play WoW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol@Capitalist Piggy, cry more n00b

    11. Re:But can it play WoW? by Capitalist+Piggy · · Score: 0

      Oh, I forgot to mention. People like this don't make the PC gaming community any more attractive. At least on a paid network you have the option to put people on an "avoided player list" so you don't have to hear their ignorant banter.

      There's nothing like playing a game and having a griefer follow you around, from server to server, demonstrating his willingness to piss in your salad.

    12. Re:But can it play WoW? by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      You must be new here...

      Slashdot effect

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    13. Re:But can it play WoW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would hope this would not be permitted in current multi-player games, as spending more money or running additional software to be a "better" player is one of the things killing the PC gaming market.

      Why? Most sports and competitive events allow people to spend money and get "better" things. Just because you're unwilling to use a piece of hardware why should nobody else be able to?

      You might like playing games on the xbox where everythings equal (except its not.. changing controllers, ping times can make a big difference) but I prefer things a bit more realistic. People are different, their abilities are different. I cant think of a single situation where someone doesn't usually make the best use of whats available to them. Sports, elections, wars, business.. we all use every technological advantage we can to win.

      I'd also like to point out that there are a lot of people like me for whom this device might level the playing field. Because of a spinal injury, I am unable to play most games properly. I can generally only do running, shooting and most other things one at a time. If this device works I might be able to play almost equally against some other players.

    14. Re:But can it play WoW? by gparent · · Score: 1

      If I spend my arm and my leg trying to buy a brain mouse, then it better fucking work in World of Warcraft. There is not much difference between the Keyboard Turning VS Mouse turning debate, the 400 DPI and 2000 DPI mouse debate, and the 2000 DPI mouse and brain mouse debate. People are gonna have to deal with it. Though I'm curious how accurate and fast it's gonna be. Instantly pinpointing something on a FPS could be disastrous.

    15. Re:But can it play WoW? by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Correction. Can it blend?

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    16. Re:But can it play WoW? by Capitalist+Piggy · · Score: 1

      Well, the PC came with a mouse and ever since Wolf3d, you could turn with a mouse. DPI increases never really did a great deal for me. I have always kept my settings to max sensitivity for maximum pinpoint speed while not wearing my hand out after hours of play. For instance, I went from an old MS wired mouse w/ LED optical up to a Logitech MX1000 and had no change in my frag output. The 1000 is more comfortable, but the battery running down got annoying so it's really more of a drawback than benefit in my eyes, as we'd often play for 6-10 hours straight during our LAN gatherings up until a couple of years ago.

      The idea of players running around with a virtual third hand in a game is just more reason to not play games on the PC anymore. There's no "people are gonna have to deal with it." there's viable alternatives to using a PC to get online and play the same level of play as always, just a forced level playing field when it comes to input-- with exception to custom built arcade-style sticks in fighting games.

    17. Re:But can it play WoW? by gparent · · Score: 1

      What you don't understand is that the PC playing field is already unlevel.

      People with better PCs are gonna have a better chance at a higher frag output than people with laggy PCs. People with higher DPI mice are going to have a better chance at accurate aiming in FPS. People with G15 keyboards are going to have an advantage over people that don't have a keyboard with macros on them. People with better monitors are going to have an advantage over people who can't see as much. Lastly, people who have a large FoV are going to see more than people with a smaller one.

      This is another change in a series of changes that have been happening forever now.

    18. Re:But can it play WoW? by Capitalist+Piggy · · Score: 1

      What you don't understand is that I've understood this for years and is WHY I gave up PC gaming a couple of years ago. If I didn't understand it, I'd still be buying the latest gadgets, video cards, and adding more drives to my RAID0 to get that level to load a bit quicker. :)

      I've been aware forever that a framerate of 70-80 fps gets way more kills than a machine running 30 fps on the majority of shooter engines. I just don't think the type of mice have very much to do with it, nor have I ever been bound to a particular PC due to being used to playing on a shitty one at work, then a nice one at home, so I could adjust well to a shitty one at a friend's house easily. Can't get 70 fps on a box? I'd run 640x480 if I had to.

  2. Hurray? by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hurrah? O.o
    This sounds interesting, at least. I wonder if it works on linux. Seriously. Does it work as a standard HID device?

    1. Re:Hurray? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wondered this myself, but the screenshots on the 3rd page make me think that it doesn't...

      They had a "calibration" option, and the application "profile" option (that has the word "joystick" on it).

      So out of the box Linux support doesn't look promising...

    2. Re:Hurray? by bloodninja · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wondered this myself, but the screenshots on the 3rd page make me think that it doesn't...

      They had a "calibration" option, and the application "profile" option (that has the word "joystick" on it).

      So out of the box Linux support doesn't look promising... Exactly what I was thinking. It includes a driver CD, so even if it is HID it will not be fully functional out of the box with Linux. Here's the page where you contact OCZ and let them know that we want Linux support for this thing:
      http://www.ocztechnology.com/contact/
      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    3. Re:Hurray? by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      That doesn't necessarily mean that it doesn't function as a standard HID device. I would love to see them port this to linux, if it doesn't already work. I would buy one JUST to support the company for making a linux version.

    4. Re:Hurray? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Most of the mice I've seen come with a "driver disk". They come with a little program to let you configure what buttons 3,4,5,6,... do. All the mice work fine in Linux.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Hurray? by bloodninja · · Score: 2, Funny

      All the mice work fine in Linux. My unfortunate experience is that mice like to turn corded peripherals into the cordless variety. I've had it happen twice, but I suppose that is the price to pay for having a pet rodent.
      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    6. Re:Hurray? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Most of the mice I've seen come with a "driver disk". At least some mice were weird. All "Hayes compatible" modems (were there even others) came with a "driver" that would let Windows know that +++ATH meant hang up. Back then, that was only a few years ago (or a lot, depending on your age), I found this utterly ridiculous (especially when I tried installing a modem without its driver and the $*%ù&# thing would just fail).
      <windows>like, duh</windows>

      (for those who don't know what "hayes compatible" could possibly mean, Hayes used to be a modem company back when we had to spell each character in morse over the phone line and they devised a modem command set which *everyone* used and which the hive mind at wikipedia was nice enough to make a nice page about right there : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayes_command_set
      Read it and be lucky you no longer have to memorise all that crap *plus* the network crap.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    7. Re:Hurray? by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny

      All the mice work fine in Linux. Something else. That's not a given. I once (before I switched to wireless rodents) plugged in a wired Microsoft mouse into my machine.

      Well, it looked like it was behaving, but no sooner had I left my seat that it had leaped in /bin and it started trying to strangle cat(1).

      Some hardware you just can't trust.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    8. Re:Hurray? by bloodninja · · Score: 1

      Anybody remember the prefix to dial with the Commodore modem? +AT-something or other, wow, it's been a long time...

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    9. Re:Hurray? by bloodninja · · Score: 1

      Well, it looked like it was behaving, but no sooner had I left my seat that it had leaped in /bin and it started trying to strangle cat(1). That's funny.

      $ pkill rampantRodent

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    10. Re:Hurray? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not completely gone... I still had to tweak with AT strings to connect to my Blackberry as a bluetooth modem.

    11. Re:Hurray? by randyest · · Score: 1

      Why, sure it's a standard HID device! So get down to the ATM machine, put in your PIN number, and get some cash so you can buy one! Or, if you prefer, you can stay home and use your ADSL line to order it over the Internet. While you wait for it to arrive, you can study for your SAT tests, write some BASIC code, watch the CNN news network, learn HTML language, or just play around with your PC computer and LCD display.

      --
      everything in moderation
    12. Re:Hurray? by brilanon · · Score: 1

      I have a real honest-to-god hardware modem on my ISA bus. Knowing the hayes command set is not optional for me. I use toneloc for my job.

    13. Re:Hurray? by sowth · · Score: 1

      Do more than just ask for Linux drivers. Ask them to release programming specs, then not only will you have open source drivers, but you can also find other ways to use it...

    14. Re:Hurray? by Sartian · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is a HID device. :) It was designed to work on as many platforms as possible that support USB without requiring custom drivers. At the moment, however, the only software that exists for it is Windows based. Software to support other platforms is expected in the future.

    15. Re:Hurray? by Sartian · · Score: 1

      Also, there are plans to release a SDK for the device as well so developers can use the biometric data for custom applications and integration (games, accessibility, biofeedback, science, etc).

      The NIA hardware captures EMG (muscle), EOG (eye), and EEG (brainwave) data although the first release of the product software only supports muscle-based signals (eye-brow perks, facial tension, etc).

      Muscle signal data is the easiest and most dependable across all body types which was why it was selected for first release to consumers. Other signals we record such as EOG/EEG are useful for input mapping, but require a fair amount of per user calibration because biometric properties can vary significantly from person to person. The other signals are not quite as "plug'n'play" as muscle is, which was why they are excluded from the initial product release.

      The hardware and the algorithms behind it were developed over many years as accessibility technology for people with physical disabilities. I helped develop the gaming component of the technology several years ago using the Cyberlink hardware and this new hardware and software is built upon many lessons learned since then. (Discovery Channel Interview: http://www.brainfingers.com/media/)

      We have some very cool stuff slated for release. Stay tuned! :)

      -Michael McIntosh

  3. Brain-Mouse??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're Pinky and the Brain, yes Pinky and the Brain;

    One is a genius, the other's insane;

    Two laboratory mice, their genes have been spliced;

    Before each night is done their plan will be unfurled;

    By the dawning of the sun they'll take over the world;

    Their twilight campaign is easy to explain;

    To prove their mousy worth, they'll take over the earth;

    They're Pinky, They're Pinky and the Brain Brain Brain Brain Brain Brain Brain Brain Narf.

    1. Re:Brain-Mouse??? by ThatDamnMurphyGuy · · Score: 1

      "Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking?"

      "I think so Brain, but why do I always have to wear the tutu?"

      One of the greatest cartoons of all times. That and Animaniacs wasted a lot of my Saturday mornings.

    2. Re:Brain-Mouse??? by Jack+Pirate · · Score: 1

      There's supposed to be 9 brains at the end of the song. You only put 8. Chump.

    3. Re:Brain-Mouse??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now for geek cred: did you 'copy and paste' or did you recite that from memory?

  4. Wired or Wireless? by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    Not referring to the brain-to-Headset interface, but the Headset-to-NIA interface. If both were to exist, and it somehow caught on, would we see a similar market to the mouse market? Leisurely users wearing a battery-powered headset around to add to their blue-tooth cell phone earpiece, and extreme gamers with a direct wired link to their PC to get the edge on the dimwits using laggy wireless devices.

  5. Great for non-gaming also by conlaw · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yes, this may help someone to do better in WOW or GTA IV but I'm thinking of some brilliant people whose bodies are hampered by cerebral palsy. Their main -- or sometimes only -- method of communication is through a computer which they may have trouble using because one or both of their hands is not fully functional. One of these units could make a major difference in their lives.

    Here endeth the sermonizing.

    1. Re:Great for non-gaming also by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      Just use speech recognition. It's not faster than typing or using the mouse, but it's plenty fast enough if you just want to browse the web or send an occasional email.

    2. Re:Great for non-gaming also by lawaetf1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True, this sort of tech could be incredibly liberating for someone with a neurological disorder. I expect, however, that we'll sooner see development in the porn and gaming industries. The demand is simply too huge.

      The world of Fahrenheit 451 and/or the Matrix is already here for those who spend their time in front of MMORPGs, SecondLife, and the like. Once we can eliminate the need for our clumsy appendages in interacting with the make-believe we can take another willful nibble of the blue pill. It's surely a bad analogy but I see resemblance between bugs in democracy (politicians avoid dealing with looming problems [budget deficit,etc] to achieve short-term goals [reeelction]) and bugs in the human psyche (if it feels good, do it again.. and again.. and again.. even if long-term consequences are massively negative).

      --
      CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    3. Re:Great for non-gaming also by kiehlster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree this has some nice benefits for the disabled, but it makes me wonder why someone like Stephen Hawking hasn't adopted this kind of device already, instead using a lever by his cheek and blink glasses. Yes he's using old software because he doesn't like the voices on newer software, but he could certainly speed his communication by using his bright mind to point to the text he wants to construct and say.

    4. Re:Great for non-gaming also by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That assumes that thier disorder doesn't affect thier speech too badly for speach recognition to work.

      There are people who's only means of communication is using a blink movement or similar to select words as a computer scans a grid.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Great for non-gaming also by Instine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to work for a lawyer with severe cp and who had very garbled speech, and little use of his muscles. While it took most people some time to understand him, his SR software (Dragon Dictate) seemed no less accurate than with any other user. But he was just one example... There are those whose voice is not up to it. But this could well be a better interface for the guy I know re cursor movement and other 'pointer device' actions (he currently uses a head stick with great difficulty)

      --
      Because you can - or because you should?
    6. Re:Great for non-gaming also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it took most people some time to understand him, his SR software (Dragon Dictate) seemed no less accurate than with any other user.

      Dragon is, like most recognisers, a "learning" software that needs to be trained. Some people with speech difficulties may nonetheless produce the *same* odd sounds each time they say a word, there's even a chance the sounds they make are more distinctive than a normal human speaker and thus easier for the program to learn. Also, freed of expectation of being comprehensible by humans, but only to their particular trained machine, a person is also free to adapt their own speech to whatever sounds they make best: this is similar to the way someone's sibling sometimes can interpret for them - the speech recognition program, like a sibling raised with them, can learn their peculiarities.

    7. Re:Great for non-gaming also by doomy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Similar devices are already being used to give paralyzed people the ability to walk around and explore virtual worlds. For example recently Japanese scientists from Keio University demoed a product that lets a physically handicapped user interact with a virtual world like Second Life.

      This is part of Keio University and Dentsu's joint venture into Secondlife, UI, interaction and social study.

      --
      ...free your source and the rest would follow...
    8. Re:Great for non-gaming also by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      Take that one step further. Allow Dragon to learn their speech, or "language" and convert it to text. Then pump the text through Festival, and you now have a functioning Rosetta stone for people with severe speech impairments. The computer functions as an automatic translator.

    9. Re:Great for non-gaming also by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's surely a bad analogy but I see resemblance between bugs in democracy (politicians avoid dealing with looming problems [budget deficit,etc] to achieve short-term goals [reeelction]) and bugs in the human psyche (if it feels good, do it again.. and again.. and again.. even if long-term consequences are massively negative).

      Well the fundamental problem is that those consequences are in the future, and the future is by its very nature hypothetical, and any future consequences are also thus hypothetical, and thus also possibly non-existent. It's a hedge of the immediate known reward vs a future potential but perhaps not guaranteed cost.

      Besides, sometimes the gamble pays off. After all, here I am over a decade into adulthood, and I have yet to sprout so much as a single hair follicle on my palm. So in at least that case, my psyche's "if it feels good, do it again and again" impulse didn't steer me wrong!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:Great for non-gaming also by Splab · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft might have a comment on that...

      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all

    11. Re:Great for non-gaming also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but he could certainly speed his communication by using his bright mind to point to the text he wants to construct and say.

      His mind is far away in other galaxies.

      The article mentions sensors to detect muscle movement so it might not be that useful. I think a recent documentary mentioned his condition had deteriorated.

    12. Re:Great for non-gaming also by Cosmic+AC · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a lawyer with severe cp Ahh, the dangers of child porn...
    13. Re:Great for non-gaming also by Instine · · Score: 1

      If I'd not commented already I'd be modding you up. V interesting dea.

      --
      Because you can - or because you should?
  6. I have to wonder by Starteck81 · · Score: 1

    I know it sounds a little far fetched but I have to wonder if this sort of thing could eventually read out minds. How scary would it be if some one could hack your computer and read your mind?

    It makes me feel like a Neuromancer future isn't all that far off.

    --
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    1. Re:I have to wonder by Verteiron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If someone read my mind they'd deserve every ounce of psychological trauma they received.

      Seriously though, this device has nothing to do with mind-reading. It's not even capable of reading brainwaves like an EEG machine. It's just measuring electrical signals to muscles on your face.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    2. Re:I have to wonder by Kugrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Stop winking at me!"

      "I'm not - I'm trying to send an email!"

      Seriously though, decades of keyboard and mouse usage have given me superhero-like fingers when compared to none computer users. Will extended use of this give me a face like a body builders chest?

    3. Re:I have to wonder by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      Freddy has a problem. He's fallen into a black hole called my mind and can no longer escape to terrorize the rest of you dreamers. In fact, Jason has been transformed into such a cute little kitten that can't cross the road to reach the katnip patch.

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    4. Re:I have to wonder by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a bit like putting a thermometer next to your PC and saying, 'Today we can only tell if it is hot or cold, but someday, we may be able to read every bit on the computer using only the thermometer!'

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    5. Re:I have to wonder by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      That's not so far-fetched. Remember they came up with a way to snoop on data connections by reading the flickering of a LED on the router from a distance. ;)

    6. Re:I have to wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you must be new here. From 2006:
      http://games.slashdot.org/games/06/04/25/2155256.shtml

      Or in 2007:
      http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/16/178248&from=rss

      More recently:
      http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/81923-OCZ-Neural-Impulse-Controller-Coming-Soon

      Here's something a little more extreme (invasive tech)
      http://medgadget.com/archives/2005/01/braingate_neura.html

      http://www.ocztechnology.com/aboutocz/press/2008/273

      And just as a side note, they can't "read" your "mind".

    7. Re:I have to wonder by randyest · · Score: 1

      OCZ's website claims it measures EEG (electro encephalograph; brain waves.) That's not to say it "read minds" in any real sense (it doesn't.)

      --
      everything in moderation
    8. Re:I have to wonder by grizdog · · Score: 1

      Presumably it could read a microchip that we had implanted inside of us, which some people believe we all have. It does conjure up images of the Planet of the Apes, doesn't it? or the Manchurian Candidate? It should make grist for some excellent fiction, and at least some of that fiction will invariably presage fact.

  7. GPS by slackoon · · Score: 0

    In car technology could become an auful lot easier and safer to use. This technology could easuly be ported to things such as changing songs and volume on an in car MP3 player and requesting directions to a GPS device. This could make driving more enjoyable and safer at the same time!

    1. Re:GPS by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      cars have these things at your fingertips on the steering wheel in newer models; one doesn't need to look away from the road to find a knob, or even take their hands off the wheel. Check out a showroom for details ;)

    2. Re:GPS by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      I'd have to disagree, they are already making cameras and even just lazers, that track your face and facial movements to do those things, which is far less intrusive (by my understanding) than wearing a headband sort of thing, safer, perhaps, more enjoyable? probably not.

    3. Re:GPS by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      from my comment: "cars have these things at your fingertips on the steering wheel in newer models"

      "lazers" you say? Ummm...no, I'm speaking to the controls on a steering wheel.

  8. What's taken so long? by porkUpine · · Score: 1

    I bought and used a "Brain Mouse" back in '97. The ISP I worked for in College bought one from CES that year. It worked great, but just kind of fell off the map... Hmmm....

    1. Re:What's taken so long? by Bandman · · Score: 1

      I played with one of those in a CompUSA. You put your hand on this trackball looking thing, except there was no trackball. There was a nub by your finger, and your micromuscle movements indicated to the computer what you wanted to do. I played that ski free game with it.

  9. hehehe log by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    only part one in a month long log

    I'd hope a month long log would have more than one part. It'd be exhausting otherwise.

  10. NOT news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This thing has been done before. Only problem is, you have to think in Russian. Once you manage that, it's no problem to hit the store.

    1. Re:NOT news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plot points in the movie you linked make it clear: in soviet Russia, brain mouse controls YOU!

    2. Re:NOT news! by meringuoid · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I don't want to have to think in Russian just to control a web browser. I'll stick with my trackball, thanks.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:NOT news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only certain weapon subsystems are in Russian. main flight controls are still manual manipulation analog control.

  11. Neat, but... by blindd0t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This looks really neat, really promising, and is very exciting to see. It does make me think of a few questions though...

    • It's not uncommon to use voice-chat while gaming. How is this device affected by those muscle movements and brain activity?
    • I often eat and drink while at the PC (i.e. I was on lunch break while reading the article). How do those muscle movements affect the device?
    • Given the two points above, is there any quick and easy means of temporarily disabling the device or ignoring the input from it? For example, a hot-key would work, or some head-phones have mute buttons built onto them. Of course, I don't expect it to be perfect, but something like that could help deal with its imperfections.
    • What's the price of this thing?!
    • How long from now until Hawking can kick our asses in a FPS? =P
    1. Re:Neat, but... by zsouthboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Mighty Steven Hawking is *already* a fucking quake master.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MC_Hawking

    2. Re:Neat, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mighty Stephen Hawking is a fucking Quake god,
      got my finger on the trigger and my eye on the quad.
      I know it's just a game, but I didn't come to play,
      the Hawkman cometh and he's bringing Doomsday.
      You say, "impressive", I already know it,
      I'm a hardcore player and I'm not afraid to show it.
      I got a Phd in pain and a masters in disaster,
      the mighty Stephen Hawking is a fucking QuakeMaster.

    3. Re:Neat, but... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I wanna know how long until the day that telepathic controllers will be banned from online FPS's due to unfair adventage. When all it takes is a single thought to get a headshot on the enemy you just noticed....

    4. Re:Neat, but... by Tom9729 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if someone else has mentioned the price here, but from what I've read the OCZ Actuator will cost about $300 and can only be bought online.

  12. Interesting idea ... Inconclusive Review by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    This review seems so inconclusive that I'm not even sure if the device really works, or is something faked up by a charlatan.

    A remarkable idea, but if it winds up killing off gamers instead of being their salvation, its life as a product would appear to be nasty, brutish and short.

    It seems almost like the Ouija board of computing.

    D

    1. Re:Interesting idea ... Inconclusive Review by Zarf · · Score: 1

      This review seems so inconclusive that I'm not even sure if the device really works, or is something faked up by a charlatan.

      A remarkable idea, but if it winds up killing off gamers instead of being their salvation, its life as a product would appear to be nasty, brutish and short.

      It seems almost like the Ouija board of computing.

      D If it runs under $120 I'm going to run out and get one. But, then I have a box of a half-dozen failed "revolutionary" new UI devices. It's sort of a hobby of mine.

      I suspect that it is exceptionally hard to use with out training but just like the twiddler, air-mouse, and the alpha-grip an extremely practiced user can make them work as well as the device its intended to replace.

      The problem is you need to be better than the device you are replacing. I keep buying these toys... I keep hoping. We'll see if this new toy can cross over to being a real enhancement.
      --
      [signature]
  13. Optimism by foobsr · · Score: 3, Informative

    From TFA: "Heading down to HQ, I knew the device would have limitations, but the little kid in me was imagining it granting me near-psychic powers. Unfortunately, after several hours of trying and still only being able to control one input, those limitations look to be greater than I thought. That being said though, I have every confidence that had I played with settings and kept the thing on my head for a few hours a day, I would learn to master more of the inputs and utilize them during gameplay. So if you are looking at buying the nia, I urge you to realize that you are buying a heavily scaled-down version of what you have envisaged." (emphasis mine)

    Hmm, given that it lasts a couple of years with continuous martial arts training to establish a process approaching a near optimum with regards to 'naturally given/wired' I/O I still believe that it is appropriate not to be optimistic indeed.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:Optimism by raddan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, I met a software developer for this device at a dinner recently. I, too was skeptical. He said that learning how to use the device takes quite a bit of practice-- because this is like an appendage you never knew you had-- but mainly because controlling things on-screen requires concentration. Basically the problem is this: we deal with distractions all the time; the human brain is really good at doing context switches. But when you wear this interface, those context switches (someone comes up behind you and says "Hi!") change the input to the device. You need to learn to control those state changes-- you can do it, but it takes practice. He assured me that after some practice, this becomes much easier.

      As a side note-- this would be a great tool for learning how to beat polygraph exams! "Escape from Gitmo" for PS3 coming soon! ;^)

    2. Re:Optimism by shirai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I take it that this is a lot like using a muscle you've never consciously used before. For example, when I first started taking dance lessons, I found it VERY hard to do things that seemed like they should be easy. Moving specific parts of your body in isolation is a lot harder than it should be. Especially if they are muscles you aren't used to using in your daily life.

      Similarly, I think if these products ever become popular, there will be a generation of people who will find using them completely natural. Perhaps even to the point where they can be used in place of physical inputs like typing at the keyboard or using a mouse and not just gaming.

      And since you aren't limited by your finger/hand's ability to move, ultimately they might be faster for input than traditional methods.

      --
      Sunny

      Be my Friend

    3. Re:Optimism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I take it that this is a lot like using a muscle you've never consciously used before.

      Well that would have to be the penis.

    4. Re:Optimism by foobsr · · Score: 1

      controlling things on-screen requires concentration

      Never yet encountered an interface as discussed here in vivo, but I would guess that 'concentration' might not be the proper way, I tend to think that an appropriate distribution of attention would do better. Within that model of thought, your 'context switches' change to a redistribution of attention.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    5. Re:Optimism by raddan · · Score: 1

      You're right-- "attention" is probably a better word.

    6. Re:Optimism by foobsr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      this is a lot like using a muscle you've never consciously used before

      Agreed; though, imagine you had the task to 'consciously' control all the muscles involved in an arbitrary day-to-day movement (e.g. something as 'simple' as walking :-)

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    7. Re:Optimism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after several hours of trying and still only being able to control one input Shit, my girlfriend is plug 'n' play, too, but at least she's got 3 inputs.
    8. Re:Optimism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad they've already been occupied by better-equipped and more functioning USB and Firewire devices.

    9. Re:Optimism by dilbert627 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other words.... "Free your mind."

    10. Re:Optimism by Whatsisname · · Score: 1

      I find it funny you emphasized 'really', considering most research shows our brains to be terrible at context switching:

      http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000022.html
      http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000691.html

    11. Re:Optimism by raddan · · Score: 1

      But the fact is that we do it naturally. I don't think those articles show that we are bad at it, just that we're slow at it. In computer-time, computers are really slow at it, too, but they do it just fine, and modern operating systems absolutely rely on this behavior to function. BTW, joelonsoftware and codinghorror barely qualify as "research" beyond the fact that they often have very insightful and yet anecdotal evidence.

  14. Stephen Hawking by yorkrj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if this would do any good for Stephen Hawking and others afflicted with ALS?

    1. Re:Stephen Hawking by n3tcat · · Score: 1

      Considering he's slowly running out of body parts to communicate with (it's his eyes now, right?), I'd say you're on the right thought track.

    2. Re:Stephen Hawking by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      The problem is that ALS is degeneration of the motor nerves, and this senses signals sent to those. True, it senses signals too small to actually move the muscle, but it still relies on the nerves that are degrading.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:Stephen Hawking by NetFusion · · Score: 1

      I can confirm that this is a real problem. I worked with a early release of the Eagle Eyes eye mouse with a family member with ALS. The signals were too weak at times to be usable. It was also very taxing to try to control and centering issues were difficult frustrating to deal with. If you are going to try this path, you should start before they really need it so there is time to train and learn to efficiently control the system.

  15. Head Mouse by rednip · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sorry, but this thing doesn't read minds, it measures movement in facial muscles, particularly in the eye brows. Many may find it useful because of a medical problem, cerebral palsy victims likely would, as fine grain muscle control is needed.

    Perhaps it should be call a 'head mouse', or 'face mouse', as 'Brain Mouse' is misleading.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    1. Re:Head Mouse by LandDolphin · · Score: 0

      This should be brought up more.

      IF it is reading facial movements, instead of brain waves, then it is no more a "brain mouse" then your standard mouse is.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    2. Re:Head Mouse by randyest · · Score: 1

      Source? The retarded "Overclocker 3d" (rolleyes) site /. chooses to link to for every story about this thing is dead, but Anandtech says it reads both brain waves and facial movements. OCZ's website says it uses electro-myogram, electro-encephalogram, and electro-oculogram -- electrical patterns from the face, brain, and eyes.

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:Head Mouse by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up for linking to an article that contains the phrase "Dr. Schutte frags with his mind".

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  16. Neuromancer by wilsoniya · · Score: 1

    Just read Neuromancer. William Gibson is an author with considerable foresight

    They should have called this device 'trodes'. Now I just need to get my hands on a Hosaka and I'll be set for cyberspace!

    --
    I can't remember the last time I forgot anything.
    1. Re:Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you call a beowulf cluster of those an intertrode?

  17. Hasn't hit any store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAICT this thing hasn't actually hit any store yet... including the OCZ website. Wake me up when I can buy one. Is anyone even willing to talk about price?

  18. P*ssing Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFS:

    Three months to the day since Slashdot originally received word... From TFA:

    Two months have passed since Overclock3D brought you news...

    Is Slashdot attempting to show that, for once, they're not the last to report on something?

    ;)

  19. Oww my head! by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

    Is a headache the new RSD?

  20. For work? by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

    How practical would such a device be for working? It would actually be pretty useful to remove the need to do all the point-clicky stuff and keep my hands localized to the keyboard; granted, does a lot of that already with its interface. I don't know if it would be feasible, because I bet far more neurons would fire when working on a hard problem, thus interfering with the mouse's accuracy. I wouldn't want the mouse to fly everywhere if I were trying to type hello world :).

    1. Re:For work? by Zarf · · Score: 1

      How practical would such a device be for working? It would actually be pretty useful to remove the need to do all the point-clicky stuff and keep my hands localized to the keyboard; granted, does a lot of that already with its interface. I don't know if it would be feasible, because I bet far more neurons would fire when working on a hard problem, thus interfering with the mouse's accuracy. I wouldn't want the mouse to fly everywhere if I were trying to type hello world :). I'm sure it doesn't work that way. In fact I'd bet it is something you need to spend about a week learning to do with any proficiency. Inside that first week the mental effort to shift attention to mousing versus the inconvenience of moving your hand to the physical mouse would probably favor the physical mouse ten to one.

      But that's just a wild guess on my part.
      --
      [signature]
  21. 1 dof by trb · · Score: 1

    Pong paddle control requires movement in only one dimension. A typical mouse coordinates movement in two dimensions (without scroll wheels, buttons, etc). I am not familiar with the OCZ device, but using Pong as a demo seems like a low hurdle for a pointing device or for a device that interprets brain stimuli.

    1. Re:1 dof by Bandman · · Score: 1

      I agree. Up and down is easy. Add right and left, and it gets just a bit more difficult.

      Maybe in another 10 years, we'll have

      "click here, vi /etc/hosts, etc etc"

  22. Where can you buy!!?!? by netsavior · · Score: 1

    I would buy one today (even if just pre-ordering) if there was ANY link anywhere on where to freaking buy it... anyone? The slashdotting of 3doverclockedz0mgkfcbbq.com or whatever doesn't help matters either.

    1. Re:Where can you buy!!?!? by DeathCarrot · · Score: 1

      Play.com has them for £99.99 in the UK. Not yet in stock, though.

  23. Woot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally.

    It's so hard to scroll through porn with my mouse hand which is also my...

  24. plug and play? by jaimz22 · · Score: 0

    I don't think it's plug and play, I tried one and it said "Sorry no brain found"

  25. Link Page Down by writerjosh · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Link Page Down by raddan · · Score: 1

      Only problem with that first link. If you're male, there's only one thought on your mind in the presence of that, *ahem*, demonstration person.

      Demo person: "Hrm... this is odd. All you seem to be able to do is make your character stand up."

    2. Re:Link Page Down by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Yes, took me about 30 seconds to realize she was holding one!
      Most distracting!
      Hmmmm.... I think I need distracted again. *reloads link*

      P.S. For those interested in the OCZ thingy, it's due out at the 'end of this year' and is expected to 'retail for around $300 USD'
      It took effort to RTFA instead of staring slack-jawed at the 'boothbabe', but the info was there.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  26. learn to read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wiki article is for MC Hawking, aka Ken Leavitt-Lawrence. He's not Steven Hawking, he creates parodies of Hawking.

    1. Re:learn to read by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Why don't you learn to ready, too? Because if you had read the page that was linked to:

      "I got a Ph.D in pain and a master's in disaster, / the mighty Stephen Hawking is a fucking Quake master." â" from "QuakeMaster"

    2. Re:learn to read by webheaded · · Score: 1

      Even more to the point, if he himself had learned to read, he would have seen that exact quote further down the page.

      "I got a Ph.D in pain and a master's in disaster, / the mighty Stephen Hawking is a fucking Quake master." â" from "QuakeMaster"

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  27. New Moderation request by gclef · · Score: 1

    Can we please have a moderation option for "missed the joke"?

    1. Re:New Moderation request by Zarf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can we please have a moderation option for "missed the joke"? Only if we can also have a moderation for complaining about missing moderation options.

      -1 bitching about missing mod option.
      --
      [signature]
  28. Ocz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lost almost all faith in OCZ when their budget-friendly phasechange cooler flopped.

    Almost, because they sure made good RAM.

  29. Inside the NIA by slifox · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those interested in whats inside the OCZ NIA, AnandTech has a product teardown available

    Anyone else have specific info on whats inside, etc? First thought that comes to me is, I want to make one myself!

    Teardown Article:
    http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i=452

    Picture Gallery:
    http://www.anandtech.com/Gallery.aspx?id=123

    1. Re:Inside the NIA by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      They use a PIC18F2455. A PIC18 with 24KB of flash and 2KB Ram and USB for about $5.

      http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=1335&dDocName=en010273

      You can use C too, judging from the app notes. Handy for USB stuff.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Inside the NIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to know... Will it blend?

  30. Components Inside by slifox · · Score: 1

    From the pictures in AnandTech's teardown:

    The controller for the whole board, and USB interface:
      * PIC18F.. - microprocessor (w/ USB transceiver)

    The input capture chip for the sensors:
      * PCM1803A - 24-Bit, 96kHz, Stereo, Delta-Sigma Audio ADC

    Misc supporting circuitry:
      * ..-2631 - 8-Pin DIP Dual-Channel High Speed 10 MBit/s Logic Gate Output Optocoupler
      * ADUM1300 - Analog Devices Triple-Channel Digital Isolator
      * Several HC595A shift registers
      * A ripple counter
      * Some other simple digital logic

    All-in-all this doesn't seem particular complicated. I'm interested in how this compares with OpenEEG designs: http://openeeg.sourceforge.net/doc/

    One interesting thing is the choice of the audio analog-to-digital converter as the sensor input capture device. Additionally, the use of the PIC18F as the main chip suggests that there's probably not a whole lot of processing going on in there (or else one would expect a dsPIC, or something else more powerful or better tailored to signal processing work).

    1. Re:Components Inside by pla · · Score: 1

      All-in-all this doesn't seem particular complicated.

      Offhand, I don't think the hardware shown could even work as an EMG, much less an EEG. I would thus presume they must have some form of differential amplification with a high CMRR in the visor itself.

      And without knowing that, we can really only make wild guesses as to exactly what this really measures.

    2. Re:Components Inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the hopes that some EE knowledge gets absorbed into the collective...

      Starting from the USB connector side:
      (someone buggered up that connector footprint or messed up the FCC test real good)

      Microchip (www.microchip.com) USB microcontroller
      http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=1335&dDocName=en010273

      gold metal covered part is an oscillator. 16MHz. The '393 part acts like a 1/4 clock divider.

      The set of 3 parts on the other side of the PIC are '595 chips - 8 bit shift registers. They help decode the output of the Analog to Digital Converter (ADC).

      Next, note the line down the center of the board. Isolation barrier. FDA takes a dim view of manufacturers wiring up someone's skull directly to anything line powered. Magic smoke and all. Three devices straddle the barrier.

      1) Isolated power coverter.
      2) Dual channel optoisolator
      http://www.fairchildsemi.com/pf/HC/HCPL-2631.html
      I'd guess that it supplies the clock and a sync signal to the other side
      3) High speed digital isolator
      http://www.analog.com/en/prod/0,2877,ADum1300,00.html
      Carries the ADC data back across the barrier.

      Now for the interesting stuff:
      Next to the ADuM1300 is a ADC. It's a Burr-Brown/TI part - a cheap 'n cheerful PCM1803A
      http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/pcm1803a.html
      Sigma-delta ADC's are a good fit for this application (google it), and it also explains the reason for the two different isolation devices. A cheap optocoupler for the easily cleaned-up clock, and a more expensive digital isolator for the high speed signal. Also the triple shift register makes even more sense - the ADC is a 24 bit converter, and each of the shift registers is 8 bits.

      The input to the ADC comes from the 14 pin part next to it. The TI logo and the "OPA4348" says it's a quad opamp chip. No chance in hell of identifying U4... Functionality-wise, the setup is probably a filter to get rid of the 60Hz AC noise that all E*G systems see, and add some gain.

      Now for the real core of the system, the small 8 pin JLA marked Analog Devices part next to the connector is the main amplifier. Note the symmetrical layout of components(gain setting resistors and EMI noise filter) between it and the connector - this is the first hint that it is an instrumentation amplifier. Analog Devices' part search identifies this as a AD8221, a differential instrumentation amplifier setup as a 50x (or is it 500x? resistors with legible labels are pretty rare). These amplifiers have good common mode rejection properties and are usually used as frontends to instrumentation. Near it is U3, a single opamp version of the quad, setup as a virtual ground rail.

      The remainder of the parts seem to be voltage regulators, although it is nearly impossible to identify 5/6 pin parts nowadays.

      In short, we have an amplified and isolated ADC converter on a USB cable. There are 2 analog channels on the converter, one of which is obviously hooked up to the signal chain. The second channel runs under the chip, and I can't identify if it is connected to anything, and who knows what's on the back side of the board. Might even be hooked up to the isolator as part of a self-test mechanism. There might even (unlikely) be another set of opamps buried back there. It looks like a E*G, quacks like one, and probably works (mostly) like one.

      Incidentally, the ideal way of "photographing" a board is to grab a flatbed scanner with a decent focal distance and scan the thing in at a decent DPI. Reading isometric blurry part numbers just isn't cool.

  31. Forget the games, think internet porn! by pesho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now that people don't need to keep their hands on the inputs at any time, I can see revolution in internet porn coming our way.

  32. I want this with a programmable interface by infolib · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This thing is probably Very Nice (if it wasn't slashdotted) but I'd want to pass the raw output to my own data analysis algorithms. Why should it just be a gaming device? I guess it can double as a sleep rythm detector, or maybe I can tune it to work with me, instead of the other way around.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    1. Re:I want this with a programmable interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, yeah your special retard-savant algorithms. I'm sure you can process random alpha waves REAL WELL. Fuck you clown. P.FUCKING.S. If you had any fucking clue to begin with you will be able to get what you need from any 'gaming device'

  33. it was slashdotted by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

    slashdotted ftw

    --
    -Noc
    1. Re:it was slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its back. whoooop. Lets see if we can take her down again!!

    2. Re:it was slashdotted by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

      aw shucks, everyone hit it again!! hahaha

      --
      -Noc
  34. It measured muscles not neurons ! by da.phreak · · Score: 1

    No, I did not read TFA.

    However, I don't think that those devices actually work by reading brain waves. Anyone who has worked with an EEG knows how motionless you have to sit in order to measure brainwaves. When we do experiments the subjects have to avoid muscle and eye movement as much as possible. Every movement of eyes or muscles exceeds any brain wave by magnitudes. There's a reflex that causes your eyes to move upward when closing them. So you also have to blink as few times as you can, which makes the procedure even less pleasant

    Playing games this way would be very uncomfortable over an extended period of time. Also, I think only moving the mouse could induce head movement enough to interfere with brain wave measurement.

  35. Can someone with biology background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tell me what what advatange of using direct input(the muscles are pretty close to brain) vs hands on mouse?

  36. Finally by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    Finally people can have furry anal sex on secondlife with their uberleet mind powers!

  37. Games... I wonder if they can do 'force feedback' by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    I wonder if when you are playing a game if it can somehow mimic something like 'force feedback' like you have in joysticks. When someone shoots your character in a first person shooter, can it run a hundred volts through your head. Give you a lot of incentive to play better.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  38. Best part, it's mass marketed by DrYak · · Score: 1
    GP:

    I'm thinking of some brilliant people whose bodies are hampered by cerebral palsy. Their main -- or sometimes only -- method of communication is through a computer which they may have trouble using because one or both of their hands is not fully functional. One of these units could make a major difference in their lives. and again, above :

    There are people who's only means of communication is using a blink movement or similar to select words as a computer scans a grid. Yup. I'm definitely with both of you here.

    Specially since specialized peripherals for handicapped persons are extremely expensive, because, well... they are specialized. (a couple of almost custom made peripheral sold to a very small population of users).

    On the contrary OCZ's creation is targeted at a much larger population which enable them to sell it at a much lower price.

    Even if a handicaped's version is going to be a tad more expensive (necessary certification to be sure that the device doesn't fail badly and leaves the poor patient with no controlling means and with no help within reach), it's going to be a lot less expensive than device which are only built a hundred per year, but never the less can help some specific patients (which still have retained enough facial- and occulomotor capability so the myogram/occulogram part of the device can function reliably).
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  39. Word from forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... is that you will not see any of these for 4-6 weeks while they do another shipment. Reporters have snapped up all the first shipment at very high prices.

    OCZ have been very cagey about the device itself, and a used by the name of Jaster on the overclock3d.net forums has been keeping people up to date about whats going on.

    So theres your inside goss :P

  40. But most importantly ... by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1

    Does it fit over or under the tinfoil hat?

    --
    Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
  41. Pong by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

    You know, at first I thought, "what, all they can do is play Pong?"  But then I thought, "Hey, holy crap, they're playing Pong with their Minds!" and realized that that is pretty freaking cool if you can do that with a consumer device today.

  42. Coding by Hansinator · · Score: 1

    Yeeha! I hope this one can replace arrow keys and copy & paste for coding !

  43. Think OK to accept the EULA by feepcreature · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine the possibilities if it really could read your mind?

    - Think yes to accept the EULA (and donate your firstborn to us...)

    - I know you didn't read it. Go back and read the licence properly...

    Next, the brain powered keyboard!

    --
    Paul "Say no to feeping creaturism"
  44. More pictures with screenshots by m0rphin3 · · Score: 1

    There's a nice bit on OCZ's forums where they show some screenshots of the software and what's in the box.. http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=38413

    --
    for great justice
  45. Better Than Life anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhh! The Red Dwarf gameheads are coming, soon we'll all be addicted to MMOs using our NIA's, or to put it another way "Better Than Life"!

  46. A smalll mistake in reading the title... by drolli · · Score: 1

    I really read "mouse brain hits the store". Would be more interesting....