Slashdot Mirror


The Scream Aliens Hear From the Earth

onehitwonder writes "Astronomers have discovered that the Earth emits awful, ear-piercing chirps and whistles that could be heard by any aliens who might be listening, according to an article up at Space.com. The sounds are created by charged particles from the solar wind colliding with Earth's magnetic field. This article explains more about the sounds and links to an audio recording of it."

223 comments

  1. Great by phagstrom · · Score: 5, Funny

    If anyone ever makes first contact with us, it will to complain about the noise. Not a good start.

    1. Re:Great by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      [X] We're ALIENS! We dont HAVE ears, you ignorant clod!

      It could be worse ... "You mean that wasn't the call to dinner? Well, we're hungry, and we've got this great book - How to serve Man."

    2. Re:Great by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

      WAIT, there's dust on the book...

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Great by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Let's not be too hasty, the book "How to Serve Man" could be their title for the "Idiot's Guide to Being an Ood"

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:Great by linzeal · · Score: 1

      God, and think about how much respect we treat the freshman dorm with. That is the loudest thing in miles around here.

    5. Re:Great by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      But the first thing they'd do is abduct our leaders :D result!!!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    6. Re:Great by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      [X] We're ALIENS! We dont HAVE ears, you ignorant clod!


      That's true, I've seen it in some movies and on Stargate SG-1.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    7. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see it now... The earth gets a cease and desist from the Inter-Galactic Recording Industry Association of Astronomical distances (IGRIRAA) for performing the latest single of Ignoxtrix Umglalaut non-stop.

    8. Re:Great by BeataD · · Score: 1

      a b cde

    9. Re:Great by WED+Fan · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can see it now... The earth gets a cease and desist from the Inter-Galactic Recording Industry Association of Astronomical distances (IGRIRAA) for performing the latest single of Ignoxtrix Umglalaut non-stop.

      And due to an incidental wormhole, Ignoxtrix Umglalaut was released after George Harrison's "My Sweet Lord" and Vanilla Ice's "Ice Ice Baby", and contains rifts and lyrics oddly similar to Iron Butterfly's "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida". So, the IGRIRAA can shove it down their six gullets into their four compartmented bowels until it rests where the Alpha Proxima doesn't shine.

      I am so suing you for taking my novella and turning it into an AC /. post.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    10. Re:Great by sBox · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. Loud music and sleep deprevation are not part of GW's interpretation of torture. We are in the clear.

    11. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So will this be the them of the next "You Got Served" sequel. Breakdancing aliens might make the movie worth not poking your eyes out

    12. Re:Great by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      If anyone ever makes first contact with us, it will to complain about the noise. Not a good start.

      Shouldn't all planets make noise like this? We have nothing to fear from our noisy neighbor overlords

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    13. Re:Great by Quasimodem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry, been here, done that. Left our pod replicants to carry on in their stead.

    14. Re:Great by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 4, Funny

      Breakdancing aliens might make the movie worth not poking your eyes out

      You didn't see Men in Black then?

    15. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That episode was actually on last night!

      I never understood a few things. Like, why would the alien that makes first contact have the cook book with them? None of the Earth-bound aliens would need that. Why didn't the alien try to get the book back?

      I also thought it lame that the aliens seemed to write in English but with a different character set.

      Also. It seems you wouldn't need to figure out the title to determine it's a cook book seeing as most every line would start off with a quantity and with so many repeated things like units of measure, basic ingredients, and basic cooking instructions.

      I know it's just a TV show but that episode of the Twilight Zone always seemed hacked together to me.

      The ending monologue is also really bad.

    16. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone ever makes first contact with us, it will to complain about the noise. Not a good start.

      Not a very nice way to start by calling them 'it'. My neighbour - noise or not - would certainly not like me for calling him 'it'.

      Just a thought.

    17. Re:Great by atlastiamborn · · Score: 1

      what if "he" is a she? or perhaps the aliens don't have genders like us. it seems like it causes too much trouble to be evolutionary beneficial. but then again, evolution seems to have proved me wrong already. damn you, evolution!

      --
      I never apologize. I'm sorry, but that's just the way I am.
    18. Re:Great by dannyboyumd · · Score: 1

      Does the book cover say "How to Cook Humans" or "How to Cook For Forty Humans"? (Thank you 'Treehouse of Horror')

    19. Re:Great by lilfields · · Score: 1

      At least we have confirmed that earth is a female...nag nag nag nag

    20. Re:Great by LouisZepher · · Score: 2, Funny

      Vanilla Ice's "Ice Ice Baby"...

      Don't you mean 'Under Pressure', by Queen?

    21. Re:Great by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Geez, don't go to that planet. They're torturing everyone!!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    22. Re:Great by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      "To Serve Man" is one of my favourite Twilight Zone episodes. Awesome

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    23. Re:Great by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean 'Under Pressure', by Queen?

      sigh...I was hoping the George Harrison reference would avoid that.

      That sound, by the way, wasn't the U.S.A.F., it was the joke going by, overhead.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    24. Re:Great by scottrocket · · Score: 1
      why would the alien that makes first contact have the cook book with them? None of the Earth-bound aliens would need that. Why didn't the alien try to get the book back?

      My impression is that it was an arrogance driven head game: They knew that we wouldn't automatically assume that the book was a cookbook (why would we? They seemed benevolent!) It seems the Kanimits like to play with their food.

    25. Re:Great by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      The scream the aliens here is me finding out the missus is pregnant...

  2. I thought by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

    that in space, no one can hear you whistle.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:I thought by Vectronic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Animals (which includes us, and likely the aliens) can't... machines can, sound travels basically the same "out there" as it does in here, its just there isnt enough particles to produce a wave large enough for our ears to detect...but anyways, assuming that aliens are listening, would generally imply they had the technology to do so, rather than just sticking an ear out.

    2. Re:I thought by Simian+Road · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm afraid that's not true. Assuming that a sound wave could travel (particle to particle) in a gas density like that of outer space (1x10^-11 Pa), quantum effects would completely destroy any signal contained years before one particle could collide into the next.

    3. Re:I thought by Vectronic · · Score: 2, Informative

      well, I was using particle ambiguously as in pretty much anything, not specifically as a piece of dust, or something somewhat "large", but anything that isn't a vacuum (atoms, molecules, etc)

      Black Hole Strikes Deepest Note

      Astronomers have detected the deepest note ever generated in the cosmos, a B-flat flying through space like a ripple on an invisible pond. No human will actually hear the note, because it is 57 octaves below the keys in the middle of a piano.

      Sound travels, there just isn't enough pressure for our ears to hear it at any distance, I would imagine that even screaming right next to eachother would probably only make it a few feet before becoming inaudible and dropping down like the "57 octaves below..." I doubt that the sound actually started that low, but who knows...

    4. Re:I thought by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sound is the propagation of a wave within a medium, and in space, there is no medium with the density required to propagate a wave of any kind. Sound can travel within a medium such as a gas, however when the gas density decreases such as an atmosphere does as you get further from the surface, the sound wave attenuates, eventually petering out to nothing.

      When the article says that the Earth "screams" and "whistles", it's not talking about acoustic sound waves, rather, the acoustic translation of the radio waves that are given off as a result of the helio-terrestrial effects. Whatever sensory capacity aliens have may not actually consider it to be noise, to them, it may sound pleasant, the way the waves on a beach sound to us. They may be translating it into their native sensory package, which may be "eyes" that are only sensitive to microwaves, or "ears" that only "hear" sound in a band outside of our 5hz-15khz range. Once translated, we have no idea how they'd perceive the resulting sensory experience to be. It could be a piercing shriek to them, or a gentle soothing experience.

      --
      I hate printers.
    5. Re:I thought by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Informative

      "quantum effects would completely destroy any signal contained years before one particle could collide into the next"

      I think you mean "obscure the signal", to "destroy" it would imply you can destroy information. /pedant

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:I thought by pipatron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why would the signal drop in pitch?

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    7. Re:I thought by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would imagine that even screaming right next to eachother would probably only make it a few feet before becoming inaudible and dropping down like the "57 octaves below..." I doubt that the sound actually started that low, but who knows...

      an octave is a measurement of a signal's frequency, not amplitude. space would not change the pitch of your words, it would render them completely silent.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    8. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Red shift. Most astronomical stuff is moving away from us, owing to universal expansion.

    9. Re:I thought by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If your a few feet away and relatively stationary, no red shift should be occurring. The dB would drop, not the Hz. Question really is how fast the dB would drop to 0 on any given sound.

    10. Re:I thought by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      you were being pedant but you actually have a point he quantum effects would be symetric so they reduce the signal noise ratio but the signal would still be there.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    11. Re:I thought by Darfeld · · Score: 1

      He is very busy right now, call back tomorrow...

      --
      (\__/) This is Lapinator
      (='.'=) copy it in your sig
      (")_(") so it can take over the world
    12. Re:I thought by tgd · · Score: 1

      Because God made it drop in pitch, just as He evolved^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcreated you unable to hear it.

    13. Re:I thought by Sabz5150 · · Score: 1

      Astronomers have detected the deepest note ever generated in the cosmos, a B-flat flying through space like a ripple on an invisible pond. No human will actually hear the note, because it is 57 octaves below the keys in the middle of a piano.

      That's nothing. You should hear some of the cars these kids are driving.

      --
      "Who modded this informative? Whoever it is must've been smokin' some of that martian pot!"
    14. Re:I thought by lurcher · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but, if you take two seperate masses in a vacuum, and cause one to vibrate, then the other will also, because the gravitational interaction between the two will couple the vibration from one to the other. So that seems to fit your definition of sound.

      Yes, I know its nothing to do with the OP, but does that matter?

    15. Re:I thought by Simian+Road · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True. However, I specifically said signal, not information for a reason.

      The hypothetical situation I was thinking of was an interstellar medium density so low that the "sound" would be transmitted by a single particle travelling through space. Assuming that this particle is going to travel onwards until it hits another particle and transfers its information across, the "signal" (actually meaningful information) would be destroyed. As you cannot predict the exact state of the particle due to quantum effects, the original signal is lost.

      "Information" is still transferred but it is not the same information you started with. In summary, there is no way (given solely the information at the receiving end) of reversing the quantum effects in order to retrieve the original "signal".

    16. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sound is the propagation of a wave within a medium, and in space, there is no medium with the density required to propagate a wave of any kind.

      Gravity waves propagate quite well in space.

      Sound is the propagation of a wave within a medium, and in space, there is no medium with the density required to propagate a sound wave.

    17. Re:I thought by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, that's gravity. I don't know about you, but I can't hear gravity. The only way I can hear vibrations is if there is an atmosphere for the vibrations to act upon.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    18. Re:I thought by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but, if you take two seperate masses in a vacuum, and cause one to vibrate, then the other will also, because the gravitational interaction between the two will couple the vibration from one to the other.

      Damn straight--all you need is a neutron star and something to shake it back and forth a few meters a couple thousand times per second, and you've got yourself something that might be as effective at transmitting signals as a 1 watt radio transmitter is with EM. ;)

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    19. Re:I thought by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Sound is the propagation of a wave within a medium,

      Well it's a little more complicated than that. Sound is MICROSCOPIC VIBRATIONAL modes propagated within a medium without any bulk motion. Matter waves of other kinds propagate through vacuum just fine.
      http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0512047

      Also, the rotating double-spiral structure of our own galaxy is believed by astrophysicists to be a soliton (a special kind of wave).

      and in space, there is no medium with the density required to propagate a wave of any kind

      not quite, since not all waves require media to propagate. Radiation doesn't, and it propagates through space just fine.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    20. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sounds" in cases such as the article you linked are not actually propagated all the way to our planet, but are measured as vibrations "over there" by other means (namely, light).

      If you really think that sound travels through space, you need to take some physics classes.

    21. Re:I thought by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whatever sensory capacity aliens have may not actually consider it to be noise, to them, it may sound pleasant, the way the waves on a beach sound to us.

      Everyone seems to want to ask, "what if it sounds good to aliens?" I guess that's kind of interesting and all, but I think the better question is, why would the aliens be listening? I'm just thinking that there are an awful lot of sources of EM radiation in the universe. If, among all those sources, they manage to detect these radio waves from Earth's atmosphere, why would they go pumping *that* into their stereo systems to listen to the sound?

      I guess we're supposed to believe that they'd go through all that trouble just to listen to it, and hope that it might be musical. And when they're through, they'll hate us for not having a musical planet? It all sounds pretty absurd to me.

    22. Re:I thought by Gospodin · · Score: 5, Informative

      So let's see. Middle C is about 260 Hz (with Bb slightly lower). 57 octaves lower is 2^-57 * 260 Hz, which is 5.5 x 10^14 seconds per cycle, or about 17.4 million years per cycle. Yeah, I think it's fair to say that humans aren't going to hear this signal.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    23. Re:I thought by edrobinson · · Score: 1

      Sound does not travel in a vacum. Sound is propogated only in a medium such as air, water, rock, etc.

    24. Re:I thought by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Radio is not sound.

      The sound you hear out of your radio is the result of sound being modulated at the radio station, transmitted as radio waves, and then demodulated at your end.

      Radio waves are a form of EM, which is only partly a "wave". The property that makes it propagate through a vacuum is the part of it that deviates from the definition of a wave. This is why EM radiation is given its own classification separate from waves and particles, as it exhibits features of both, and yet cannot be said to be either.

      --
      I hate printers.
    25. Re:I thought by trevdak · · Score: 1

      ... and yet John Cage probably used it in at least a few of his works.

    26. Re:I thought by TheSeventh · · Score: 1

      I thought, but didn't want to actually READ the article, so I just posted something anyway, and then others can think for me.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not out to get you.
    27. Re:I thought by thelandp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sound is the propagation of a wave within a medium, and in space, there is no medium with the density required to propagate a wave of any kind.

      The sentence above is the initial, much geekier version of the tagline, which was later reduced to "In space, no one can hear you scream"

      --

      -- the only thing we have to fear is really scary things
    28. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I think it's fair to say that humans aren't going to hear this signal.

      Yeah, but there's a reason they call it the brown note.

    29. Re:I thought by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Sound travels, there just isn't enough pressure for our ears to hear it at any distance,

      Or maybe it's just that with thin enough gas, the chances that any of the particles in the passing wave happens to hit you is pretty low.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    30. Re:I thought by Iron+Condor · · Score: 3, Informative

      to "destroy" it would imply you can destroy information. /pedant

      And that's problematic how? There's no law of conservation of information. Information is destroyed all around us all the time. Look up "second law of thermodynamics" one of these days.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    31. Re:I thought by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No human will actually hear the note, because it is 57 octaves below the keys in the middle of a piano.

      Whales, however, are extremely annoyed...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    32. Re:I thought by Vectronic · · Score: 0

      I never said how far it travels, but I would assume that for audible sound, it would lay somewhere between a few inches, and a few meters for human voice, scaling up or down for louder and quieter noise creation.

      If you think space is a pure vacuum, and thus no sound at all is possible, I suggest you remember where you are typing this from.

    33. Re:I thought by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      The "sound" in that article was detected by using Chandra to very carefully measure the of the gas in the Perseus galaxy cluster. There's no indication that the sound wave itself is crossing the 250 million light years to Earth. However, the article repeatedly mentions the sound waves imparting the energy into the surrounding gas clouds and causing the variations in brightness.

      If the article's terminology is correct, then the gas that makes up these portions of the Perseus cluster must be dense enough to support the propagation of sound waves through it. Unfortunately, this doesn't mean that sound can propagate through what we normally think of as the interstellar medium, merely that this cluster is unusually dense.

      If the article is not correct, or is improperly interpreting the original material, then some other force (such as gravity) may be imparting this wave-like motion to the surrounding gas clouds, and the imparted motion may have all the apparent characteristics of a sound wave resonating at B flat, 57 octaves below middle C.

      Either way, however, there's no indication that sound waves from a remote celestial object can propagate to Earth from other planets in this solar system, much less indications that such can occur from even more distant sources.

    34. Re:I thought by AnomaliesAndrew · · Score: 1

      In laymans terms, I'd hardly call that a sound, though I guess technically any pressure change in any medium could be considered such.

      --
      Move all sig!
    35. Re:I thought by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      i would have modded you up

    36. Re:I thought by VanessaE · · Score: 1

      Of course it does - haven't you heard of doppler shift? There is a reason that train whistle rises and then falls as the train blows by, even when you're standing 50 feet from the tracks.

    37. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *banal pedant mode ON*

      "The sound you hear out of your radio is the result of sound being modulated at the radio station, transmitted as radio waves, and then demodulated at your end."

      The sound you hear out of your radio is the result of sound being converted to an electrical signal by a microphone (or set of mics), which [the signal] is then modulated at the radio station, propagated as EM radiation by an antenna (transmitted as radio waves,) received by your radio's antenna (converted back to an electrical signal), and then demodulated at your end by the radio set, possibly amplified, and converted to sound by a speaker.

      *banal pedant mode OFF*

    38. Re:I thought by Wavebreak · · Score: 1

      Not to put too fine a point on it, but - according to SCIENCE - you're wrong. Information, much like energy, cannot be destroyed. Look it up, wikipedia has numerous great articles on information theory.

      --
      Nobody expects the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.
    39. Re:I thought by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Information is destroyed all around us all the time."

      All information is physical and it's entrophy can be calculated. Sure entrophy can make it irretrievable from a practical point of view but you can't destroy it without destroying the matter/energy that holds the information.

      Thankyou for the physics tip but I'm already well aware of the 2nd law, perhaps you (and the mods) should look up information theory one of these days.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    40. Re:I thought by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I have been out-pedanted. Touche! :)

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    41. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      american automakers need to expand into foreign markets...no, even more foreign than that

    42. Re:I thought by kelnos · · Score: 1

      Uh, what? You experience a Doppler effect with the train because the train is moving relative to you. For one stationary person yelling at another stationary person, there's no Doppler effect.

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    43. Re:I thought by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      Not to put too fine a point on it, but - according to SCIENCE - you're wrong.

      Not to put too fine a point on it, but you are advised not to talk about science when you don't understand any of it.

      When an excited atomic state decays resulting in the emission of a photon, the information that the state existed is lost. No amount of analysis of the photon will reveal that it was emitted by this kind of atom in that kind of process such many seconds (or years) ago. Conversely if the photon hits another atom and is absorbed, the information which direction the original photon came from is lost. No further study of the atom under consideration can bring it back. Spontaneous re-emission of another photon will be in a random direction.

      Look uo "spontaneous emission" in any decent undergrad atomic physics textbook.

      (Pointing to wikipedia for science information is a clear sign that you don't know what you're talking about.)

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    44. Re:I thought by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      All information is physical and it's entrophy can be calculated. Sure entrophy can make it irretrievable from a practical point of view but you can't destroy it without destroying the matter/energy that holds the information.

      This is absurd gibberish. There is no "hidden information" in any quantum systems - they contain as much information as can in principle be retrieved. And no more or less.

      When an atom is hit by a photon and absorbs it by going into an excited state, the spatial information where the photon came from is lost. It is not contained in the universe any more. No process, known or unknown, will retrieve it. Spontaneous emission of another photon (when the excited state decays) will be in a random direction.

      You are advised to learn a little science before you presume to lecture others about it.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
  3. Awful, ear-piercing reporting by geomobile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The usefulness of this discovery in finding planets or identifying if they have an atmosphere is interesting.

    It as interesting as the lengths they went to create a sensationalist headline ...any emission in any spectrum can be mapped to audible sound, I guess. Unless it carries information encoded in analog form meant to be replayed as sound, it will always sound like awful, ear-piercing chirps and whistles.

    News pattern:

    1. Find interesting scientific discovery that features emissions in any spectrum.
    2. Map emission to audible sound.
    3. Write "The screams X emits to anybody listening"
    4. Profit.

    Wait, no ??? line. I must have told it wrong.

    1. Re:Awful, ear-piercing reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/dsp

      I think my computer is talking to me, guys!

    2. Re:Awful, ear-piercing reporting by Drinking+Bleach · · Score: 3, Funny

      I did that once, but I had to turn it off once it started playing the newest Brittany Spears hit.

    3. Re:Awful, ear-piercing reporting by budgenator · · Score: 1

      young whipper-snappers don't know when they have it good, in my day we had to pick up pulses on the relay control line with an AM radio! Then we had to write our own music in assember!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:Awful, ear-piercing reporting by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Assembler? With those easy mnemonic codes? Luxury!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Awful, ear-piercing reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is science, the ??? is at step 4.

    6. Re:Awful, ear-piercing reporting by budgenator · · Score: 1

      yes but we had to hand assemble the code and toggle in the bit pattern one byte at a time!
      Actually I have a COSMAC ELF collecting dust in the garage.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    7. Re:Awful, ear-piercing reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just screaming for help?

      okay. . . okay, I'll get back in the VW bus. . .

    8. Re:Awful, ear-piercing reporting by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just screaming for help?
      okay. . . okay, I'll get back in the VW bus. . .

      It's sad to think that the mass majority of people think you're a dirty hippie when you say we're trashing our own planet. I guess, come the point of no return, people will then be saying "Wow, what insightful, in-tune-with-nature people those dirty pot smoking hippies actually are!" As they sit atop their 15MPG SUVs, clutching onto their iPods and wondering what will happen when the batteries for their cellphones lose charge - as the melted ice from the North Pole gently directs them to the center of the (new) oceanic floor.

      Lather, rinse, repeat.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  4. An idea... by Konster · · Score: 1

    The Earth should install Adobe Flash Player, then it would be completely silent unless aliens install the plug-in and the server isn't /.'d.

    1. Re:An idea... by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer not to see the Earth crash...

  5. Humming sound by statemachine · · Score: 4, Funny

    Our planet is also known to hum, a mysterious low-frequency sound thought to be caused by the churning ocean or the roiling atmosphere.

    No, that's from our warp engines. How else do you move a planet around?

    1. Re:Humming sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Planetary Bergenholm plus driving jets?

    2. Re:Humming sound by greebowarrior · · Score: 1

      a Transmat signal hidden in the Tandoka Scale

    3. Re:Humming sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like one of the colossus in God of War 2 are powered of course ;)

    4. Re:Humming sound by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      How else do you move a planet around?

      1. Find a long lever.
      2. Find a place to stand.
      3. ?????
      4. Move!

    5. Re:Humming sound by rant64 · · Score: 1

      Mammoth.

  6. In other words... by Per+Wigren · · Score: 4, Funny

    Earth sounds like a 16 kbps MP3 encoding of /dev/random

    --
    My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    1. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, her downstairs has now been IM'ed to switch off Eastenders. Normal service should resume shortly.

    2. Re:In other words... by ins0m · · Score: 1

      Nah, it just sounds like really glitchcore.

      Who would have thought Mother Nature actually was a fan of musique concrete?

      --
      Never attribute to Hanlon that which can be adequately attributed to Heinlein.
    3. Re:In other words... by ZeroFactorial · · Score: 1

      So do black holes sound like a 16 kbps MP3 encoding of /dev/null ?

  7. In space, you can hear the Earth scream? by tekrat · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Ridley Scott and/or Jim Cameron has to make a new version of "Alien(s)" in which we *can* hear the scream. And frankly, if I remember the original correctly, all Lambert did was scream. Sheesh Lambert, shut the f**k up! And of course, this time, Ash has to be a hobbit robot.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  8. Found it on Youtube by Konster · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:Found it on Youtube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :(

    2. Re:Found it on Youtube by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      I knew what was coming and still clicked on it. Love it.

    3. Re:Found it on Youtube by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 2, Funny

      You Fool! We rickrolled the universe? It is now certain, they will strike back!

      Someone, prepare a defense, find us Yoko Ono!

  9. I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mother nature is tone deaf?

  10. Right but that's by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that could be heard by any aliens who might be listening

          Assuming that "aliens" can hear at all.

          Of course "hearing" is based on the detection of vibrations in the surrounding medium - a sense that is very antiquated indeed - and available to even some of the most primitive organisms. On Earth. However it's difficult to use the mere existence of such a sense to apply it to possible creatures on entirely different worlds. Perhaps given very different environments with stranger density/pressure conditions other senses would be more vital for survival. Of course one could argue that as far as we know the conditions that are suitable for life would not be that different from our own, therefore hearing would probably have to exist.

          And then we can argue that the "screeches", etc, are merely the way we choose to make our computers interpret this data.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Right but that's by mh1997 · · Score: 4, Funny

      that could be heard by any aliens who might be listening

      Assuming that "aliens" can hear at all.

      What kind of racist thinks Mexicans can't hear at all? I would think their incidence of deafness would be roughly the same as any other population.

    2. Re:Right but that's by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course "hearing" is based on the detection of vibrations in the surrounding medium - a sense that is very antiquated indeed - and available to even some of the most primitive organisms. On Earth.

      How exactly is hearing antiquated? Lets see:

      • Predator/prey/Danger detection
      • Territorial alarm mechanism (coupled with the ability to vocalize of course).
      • Used in mating rituals.

      The list goes on. As far as how difficult it would be use hearing on a different world, I find that hard to believe as well. Given that sound is just vibrations traveling through a medium any planet with an atmosphere could conceivably have life that utilizes hearing for just such reasons as those listed above. In fact I would say that the ability to hear could very well be universal (or nearly so) in "advanced" lifeforms (advanced in the sense that they are more evolved than an amoeba for example).

      And then we can argue that the "screeches", etc, are merely the way we choose to make our computers interpret this data.

      Yes, because our brains are wired to listen for certain patterns, so what you're saying is correct. Of course, this could be true of a variety of lifeforms, so it could very well sound like that to them too. It would be interesting to encounter a lifeform that listens to those "screeches" and interprets them as, say, War and Peace (or the ET version of it), but I think it would be highly unlikely.

      --
      God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    3. Re:Right but that's by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      I think he meant that it was antiquated in the sense that it had been around since the earliest life, not that it wasn't still useful.

    4. Re:Right but that's by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmm, I see what you mean. Poor word choice if so... Or maybe antiquated doesn't mean what I think it means :-P

      --
      God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    5. Re:Right but that's by Wylfing · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In fact I would say that the ability to hear could very well be universal (or nearly so) in "advanced" lifeforms

      Quite so. I don't understand why people think xenos would have exotic senses that are nothing like our own. If there is a source of information about your environment, it is a survival advantage to be able to detect and process that information. A few great sources of information are vibrations, chemical makeup, and radiation -- all three of which ought to be bountiful on just about any planet. We take advantage of the first through hearing and touch, the second through taste and smell, and the third through sight (and a bit through touch as well). The particular way xenos detect this information is likely to be different, and how they process the sense data is probably wildly different, but it's a fairly safe bet that they have the same fundamental senses we do.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    6. Re:Right but that's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely the wrong choice of words: "ancient" or maybe even "primitive" would be more appropriate. Antiquated means that it's no longer useful or applicable, which obviously is not the case.

    7. Re:Right but that's by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 1

      You forgot mind-reading!

      --
      This space up for sale.
    8. Re:Right but that's by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      >>Given that sound is just vibrations traveling through a medium any planet with an atmosphere could conceivably have life that utilizes hearing

      You came so close to touching on probably the most important evolutionary reason to have hearing- It's almost free. Hearing is feeling. Feeling is essential for all but the simplest microbes.

      If a creature can feel at all, it can already detect very loud/low frequency sounds. It makes sense to evolve exquisitely sensitive feeling/hearing nerves using already available genetic material.

      I guess what I'm saying is that hearing uses the same 'stuff' that feeling uses. Even if aliens have some kind of goofy x-ray sensitive eyes or beta-radiation sensitive sense of feel, I'm almost positive they'd be able to hear acoustic vibrations as well. There is no reason not to, as long as you already have the nervous system capability to feel anything.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  11. Incomplete summary by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The summary could have mentioned that although

    Scientists have known about the radiation since the 1970s.


    somebody learned something new about the radiation produced by charged particles trapped in the Earth's magnetic field,

    But new data from the European Space Agency's Cluster mission, a group of four high-flying satellites, reveals the bursts of radio waves head off to the cosmos in beam-like fashion, instead.


    which seems fairly interesting. I wonder if anybody's got a model worked out yet to explain how a narrow planar beam gets generated.

    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    1. Re:Incomplete summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wonder if anybody's got a model worked out yet to explain how a narrow planar beam gets generated.

      Imagine a planet sized disco-ball.

      god exists, and he's groovy :D

    2. Re:Incomplete summary by tastygroove · · Score: 1

      I wonder if anybody's got a model worked out yet to explain how a narrow planar beam gets generated.

      relativistic beaming or aberration. if an object, emitting light isotropically (equally in all directions) is traveling very fast (close to the speed of light) relative to the observer, the emitted light appears to be 'beamed' forward in the direction that the emitting particle is traveling. the faster the emitting object is traveling, the narrower the beam. the featured article doesn't mention it, but i imagine this is the explanation for the beaming of this radio emission.

  12. To us... by Chysn · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...it's a scream. To the aliens, it's the siren's call of potential conquest.

    --
    --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
    -- See?
    1. Re:To us... by peragrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      funny i was thinking the opposite. Mother earth is warning the aliens to stay away.

      Call it an interstellar quarantine marker from the planet itself.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:To us... by Chysn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's insightful, but I think what it says to an advanced civilization is "This Planet Has An Atmosphere, And Therefore Edible People. Now Turn Down The Damn Radio."

      --
      --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
      -- See?
    3. Re:To us... by uberjack · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our alien overlords

  13. What about the scream we hear from other planet ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can't another planet emit those noises ?
    I suppose the answer is "Yes", if it has a magnetic field and if it orbits a usual star.
    So, can't we use those noises to detect extrasolar planets ?

  14. Actualy not the planet by houghi · · Score: 1

    It is Britney Spears singing who has the size of a planet.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  15. In space... by kcbrown · · Score: 1

    ...everyone can hear us scream...

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
  16. It's as if... by Khyber · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...a million voices cried out at once...

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:It's as if... by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      Please, could somebody please silence them suddenly?

      --
      I have nothing to say.
  17. It all depends on the encoding, doesn't it? by patio11 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The emission could just as well be playing a Britney Spears song -- its just that the programmers at Kl'agnorf Multidimensional Muzzak borked their encoding routine.

    (Unborking their encoding routine would probably cause an interstellar war, though, as the Intergalactic Association Of Recording Artists claims that Spears was clearly pirating Pu'oluk's Fuzzion album. And doing a poor job of it, which they privately concede they wouldn't have thought possible.)

    1. Re:It all depends on the encoding, doesn't it? by Temtongkek · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you just referred to yourself in the 4th person and gave me dysentery at the same time. Great. Thanks. Not only am I now scared of intermagicalactic war of a crappy recording artist, but I've shite me drawers and lost sense of all grammar knowing-stuff. Thanks, dick.

    2. Re:It all depends on the encoding, doesn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying Britney Spears is an alien? Not really surprising...

    3. Re:It all depends on the encoding, doesn't it? by jefu · · Score: 1

      A question for the lawyers out there. Suppose it were B.S.'s song being sent and it were received by an alien on a planet 200 light years away.

      Has the copyright expired?

  18. Complaint. by owlnation · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Magrathea Customer Support,

    it has come to our attention that the planet, namely the EARTH, which we purchased from you some millennia ago, may now be faulty. It appears to emit a high pitched screeching noise as it turns around its star. We are not sure at this point if it's perhaps an intermittent fault, however Benji can hear it every time he's out in his spaceship.

    We understand that the planet is still covered by warranty, thus we would be grateful if you could send some engineers around to have a look at it. Mornings suit us best.

    Kind regards
    The Mice.

    1. Re:Complaint. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, if we're not lucky, I'm sure they'll invent some intergalactic highway which collides with the earth...
      let's keep an eye on the dolphins!

    2. Re:Complaint. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      The next morning(*), in a galaxy far, far away.

      "I feel a great disturbance in the Force. As if millions of voices cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened."

      (*)Galactic unit.

  19. If you listen closely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you can hear Steve Ballmer throwing his chair.

  20. Lucy in the sky... by 12357bd · · Score: 1

    Apply apropiate transform function to the sensors data stream, and you could hear 'Lucy in the sky with diamonds' if you would...

    So what?

    --
    What's in a sig?
    1. Re:Lucy in the sky... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Apply apropiate transform function to the sensors data stream, and you could hear 'Lucy in the sky with diamonds' if you would...

      Apply appropiate transform function to the data stream on the Slashdot servers, and your comment could be pertinent...

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Lucy in the sky... by 12357bd · · Score: 1

      But then... your comment would still be pertinent? :)

      --
      What's in a sig?
  21. Sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA it seems more like they're talking about radiation.

  22. earth recordings by tacet · · Score: 2, Informative

    aurora recordings on earth is known many years already. even when you can't see auroras, you can hear them in VLF range. for example http://www-pw.physics.uiowa.edu/mcgreevy/

  23. vger by aXi · · Score: 1

    What about using our great friend vger (voyager) to relay back tv/radio signal to see what actually can be recieved from earth from large distances.

  24. needlessly anthropomophised by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Interesting
    earth's cries ...ear-piercing .... sounds .... heard by aliens ...listening

    I used to think that space,com had some credibility, but it looks like they're willing to give up any principles of sound (ooops, pun unintended) reporting in the pursuit of a good headline

    All that's happened is some scientists have concluded the solar wind interacts with our magnetic field to emit radio waves. Hardly a big deal, but I suppose it's a cheap, undemanding article that attracts the uniniatated (and slashdot readers) to their advertising.

    So much for a decent science article

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:needlessly anthropomophised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It Mother Gaea's cry of pain from how she's being treated; you insensitive clod!

      Yours in disgust:

      The Wiccas

    2. Re:needlessly anthropomophised by Spinalcold · · Score: 1

      There is nothing new here. We know that photons hitting magnetisphere's emit radio waves. If you get far enough away from the city you can use a car radio to listen to Jupiter.

  25. Sound without Medium?? by b1ufox · · Score: 1

    Isn't it that sound cannot travel in vacuum? It needs a medium to travel. Is this some other kind of sound which travels without a medium? Or Is it that the summary of the article is not correct?

    --
    -- "Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration" - TAE --
    1. Re:Sound without Medium?? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The summary is incorrect. It is absolutely correct that sound does not travel in a vacuum. TFA is also full of wild inaccuracies.

      After reading it, it became clear that this "discovery" is being used in attempt to get a bunch of grant money to build a new telescope. See, the whole world is in this mode of hysteria over spending trillions of dollars to solve imaginary problems that do not exist and that, even if they did exist, we could do absolutely nothing about. Global Warming is one example, and this "scream from Earth" is another. We must protect the hearing of our alien neighbors and not pollute their space with our noise, right?

      1) Fabricate an imaginary problem
      2) Blame Humans
      3) ...
      4) Profit!

    2. Re:Sound without Medium?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Or is it that the summary of the article is not correct?"

      NOOO!!! How can this be??? Is this not SLASHDOT, the one and only source of all true wisdom....

  26. In addition... by Bwana+Geek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Further baffling the astronomers, the sun appears to emit a deep, villainous laugh.

    1. Re:In addition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait another 5 billions years and we will see who has the last laugh Sol, you bastard.

  27. Ear piercing in space?? by gsslay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you take any kind of electro-magnetic wave and arbitrarily convert it to sound waves using a formula you've just made up, then amazingly it's going to sound awful. But the idea that the Earth is emitting "sound" that aliens may find "ear piercing" is misleading garbage.

    1. Re:Ear piercing in space?? by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      Calling it a sound is just a way of analogising it to a sensory spectrum we can perceive. We look at radio telescope images in false colour, so why not listen for anomalies too? I'm not a musician, but I can pick up patterns in noise pretty easily. There's hardly anything remarkable about me, so I'd say I'm certainly not unique in having that trait. A regularly repeated "noise" could be attributed to reactions within the star, however it could also be the magnetic field of a planet distorting regular radio wave emissions. It could be used to check known planets for a magnetic field, or it could be used in combination with the wobble when deciding if a star has a planet orbiting it. It hardly seems to be a huge breakthrough, but it's not unimportant.

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    2. Re:Ear piercing in space?? by gsslay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't disagree, converting to sound is a useful process for representing what would otherwise be invisible to our senses. A lot of our understanding of science revolves around models like this. But we need to appreciate that they are only models.

      Dumping your model straight back into reality and speculating what the results may be is just nonsense that suggests you've no understand of what the underlying phenomenon actually is, just the misguided idea that the model is the reality.

      If I converted the peaks of mountains into a sound wave, then played it back at a pitch related to population density, I would have a fair audio representation of geographical data. It would probably also sound horrible. But would I then be correct in suggesting that Switzerland emits an ear-splitting noise that might upset Italy? I don't think so.

    3. Re:Ear piercing in space?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait... They have pierced ears???

      OMG, they are all around us!!!

    4. Re:Ear piercing in space?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the idea that the Earth is emitting "sound" that aliens may find "ear piercing" is misleading garbage.

      You clearly haven't been listening to corporate radio lately.

    5. Re:Ear piercing in space?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would I then be correct in suggesting that Switzerland emits an ear-splitting noise that might upset Italy?

      Yes. Yodeling.

  28. Re:What about the scream we hear from other planet by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem with this is, the "scream" a planet produces is insignificant to the SCREAM the star it orbits would produce.

    Its like trying to hear what someone is saying when they are stood next to the speakers at a rock concert and you are on the other side of the stadium.

    You would be better getting a video camera with a telephoto lens and trying to lipread :)

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  29. alien biology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they probably can't hear in that spectrum anyway, much like how a husband can tune out a jilted wife. /not married //no gf either ///hence i'm here

  30. Really? by nastro · · Score: 1

    I blame Styx.

  31. So the Earth wolf whistles.....?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Astronomers have discovered that the Earth emits awful, ear-piercing chirps and whistles that could be heard by any aliens who might be listening..."

    It also shouts "Get yer tits oout fer the lads!" at any female comets that might be passing....

  32. Misleading FA by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's very likely the original auroral noise is much closer to your basic interstation FM hiss than "piercing chirps and whistles". Somebody put the noise through a FFT-like process which pretty much made up all the coherent beeps out of random noise.

    But studying random noise seems a whole lot less interesting than trying to make out words from the chirps.

  33. "Intergalacatic bus station" by GlueyPorchBoy · · Score: 1

    And here I was hoping to hear the new "Metal Machine Music", but planet Earth just can't compare, maaaan...

  34. That's no earth sounds by anarkavre · · Score: 1

    It's the cries of the Elder Things or the mimicking of Shoggoths. Tekeli-li! Tekeli-li!

    --
    "Without curiosity and knowledge, the mind is a vast void. Without the mind, curiosity and knowledge are nonexistent."
  35. Radio Waves, not audio by mbone · · Score: 1

    These are radio waves.

    And, since they don't penetrate our ionosphere, in order to do this

    The knowledge could also be used by Earth's astronomers to detect planets around other stars, if they can build a new radio telescope big enough for the search.

    Those radio telescopes would have to be built in space, not here on Earth.

  36. Common sense?? by Dskip2 · · Score: 1

    If this is true wouldnt that be a way to find other planets that are like ours??

  37. Re:What about the scream we hear from other planet by NoobixCube · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the important part is the distortion created in the general background scream. I don't know much about the possible methods of observation, but if the incomprehensible jabber of the star is distorted in a regular pattern (say a funny sequence of higher pitched clicks amid the chirping) which could look like an orbit when the position of the distortion over time is graphed, then there's a fair chance it's a planet. Or some other large body with a magnetic field... or a tiny body with an extremely large magnetic field :P

    --
    Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
  38. Humor intersects SETI and Drake by dpilot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Obviously a topic ripe with potential for humor, and once again Slashdot has attempted to meet the challenge. Some would say grandly, others would say falling short. It all depends on your sense of humor, of course.

    On a more serious note...

    There are those who believe that our emissions of radio and TV signals are advertising our presence to book ("To Serve Man") authors everywhere, and that letting our presence be known is a Really Bad Idea. (TM) They should be happy to hear that we're being drowned out quite effectively by the Earth, itself. From what I remember, a really good detector can fish signal out of this much noise, but you also have to have more of an idea what you're looking for.

    Which also has implications for SETI and such. Maybe there's more noise out there than we anticipated. We knew that suns make some serious noise, as do Jupiter-type planets. I'm not sure we knew how much noise Earth-style planets make.

    Plus there's the nature of "intelligent" signals themselves. You can listen to Morse code and pretty quickly come to the conclusion that it's modulated - not random noise. Even if the concept of a BFO is foreign, you can look at it on an oscilloscope and figure that out. Next would be an AM or FM modulated signal. Even if it's Brittany Spears, as others mention, you can probably figure out that it's a modulated signal. By the time you get to Adolph Hitler opening the Olympic Games it's starting to get rougher. But I guess if you hang a spectrum analyzer on the thing, you can figure out that it's a modulates signal, find the video fields, figure out that there's a second signal (audio) on a subcarrier, etc.

    Now from first principles try to intercept and decode an HTDV signal, even without DRM. Or how about spread-spectrum communications, or the various cellphone signaling mechanisms. In fact, good signal compression turns *any* signal into noise. That's because if there were anything in the compressed output that looked regular, then the compression would have been evaluated as lacking. This is even before we try to add any encryption, but in fact some compression/archive programs include password protection, because it does so good a job of de-regularizing data that it practically is encrypted.

    Which brings us to "Dpilot's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law" :
    "Any sufficiently advanced communications technology is indistinguishable from noise."

    (Need I state Clarke's Third Law: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.")

    Which brings us back to SETI and Drake... Maybe the signals of interstellar communication are all around us - and we're just not smart enough to recognize and decode it - yet.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Humor intersects SETI and Drake by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      However, the thought strikes me that since our magnetic shield plays such an important role in making our planet habitable, and that this shield is responsible for the noise... so wouldn't that at least provide a fingerprint for "planets with viable magnetic fields"? I'm just thinking that this might help make the "search for Earth-like planets" stuff a little easier.

      Right now, we keep finding stars with Jupiter size gas balls in Mercury's orbit... cosmic vacuum cleaners that probably keep rocky planets from coalescing in the thin habitable zone of their solar system. If instead, we looked for stars that didn't wobble really fast, and where we picked up radio signals characteristic of magnetic field interacting with solar wind, wouldn't that help narrow down the search?

      -- just a thought

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    2. Re:Humor intersects SETI and Drake by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Might be interesting - depends on how rare rocky planets with magnetospheres are. Right now at least part of our problem is that our methods of planetary detection don't lend themselves well to small rocky planets. As an aside to your thought, perhaps if we could identify characteristic "signature" differences between radio emissions of Earth vs Jupiter, that might yield a completely different way of searching for Earth-like worlds.

      And for the paranoid Beserker fans, the same goes for them.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    3. Re:Humor intersects SETI and Drake by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      Dpilot,

      That's along the lines of what I was thinking, but you said it far more succinclty. :)

      Oh, and glad to see another Saberhagen fan too.

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    4. Re:Humor intersects SETI and Drake by Bryan+K.+Feir · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's more like Shannon's Law, or at least part of Shannon's Theorrem. Part of his military work on data transmission and jamming ended up proving that the signal system best able to resist jamming is the one that looks the most like other noise.

    5. Re:Humor intersects SETI and Drake by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Obviously I've heard of Shannon, but no formal (or really in-depth informal) study. Maybe I'm dating myself, and he's more pervasively taught now, though I'll add that I wasn't even born until almost a decade after 1948.

      I have some friends who named their daughter Shannon. I often wondered if it would be come a self-fulfilling prophecy of a noisy child.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    6. Re:Humor intersects SETI and Drake by kjots · · Score: 1

      "Any sufficiently advanced communications technology is indistinguishable from noise."

      Umm, I think the decrypter/decoder might be able to make such distinction. In fact, one could argue that it is in fact a defining characteristic of such a device.

      With all due respect (and you know what that means in this forum :-P), a call Dpilot's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law bogus.

    7. Re:Humor intersects SETI and Drake by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the decrypter/decoder is from the *same* technology. The point I was trying to make was looking at a greater technology. Modern spread-spectrum communications wouldn't have even registered to a Marconi coherer, much less trying to differentiate between noise and signal. In "The Forever War" Joe Haldeman posited communications through modulated neutrinos. I think we could probably receive such a signal today, possibly tell it was modulated, but not decode it. When "The Forever War" was written, we couldn't have done any of those.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  39. Codecs?! by krugerl1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah man, its not really chirps and whistles, their just using the wrong codecs to listen to it... try using mplayer!!!

  40. Psst! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try playing it backwards.

  41. there goes the neighborhood by DustyCase · · Score: 1

    "the Earth emits awful, ear-piercing chirps and whistles"... which makes us the planetary equivalent of a Counting Crows concert. Nobody wants to be within earshot of either.

  42. The Led Zeppelin scream, or was it Ozzy? by onehitwonder · · Score: 1

    Kinda too bad the Earth's scream doesn't sound like Robert Plant's. Dontcha think?

  43. Re:What about the scream we hear from other planet by JerryLove · · Score: 1

    More importantly: can we determine if the extra-solar planets we know of (or find) have magnetospheres?

    The magnetosphere protects us from stellar and interstellar radiation. Without shielding, life as we know it on Earth could not exist (at least not exposed to the sky).

    It would, I think, be very interesting to know the presence or lack of magnetospheres on planets outside the solarsystem.

  44. Decepticons by nevillethedevil · · Score: 1

    Didn't these guys see Transformers. That's obviously a Decepticon signal............

    --
    Be gone from my sight or prepare to feel my flaming wraith!
    1. Re:Decepticons by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 1

      That is exactly the first thing I thought when I heard the noise.

      HOLY SH*T IT'S THE DECEPTICONS!!!11

  45. Andif you listen VERY closely..... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    You might be able to make out the Fab Four singing "I Wanna Hold Your Hand".

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  46. Bug-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's why aliens aren't visiting us in large numbers. We have a giant bug-away!

  47. ear piercing chirps? by bazorg · · Score: 1

    Vorglons have no ears, you insensitive clod!

  48. Not an SOS, but a warning beacon by whyde · · Score: 1

    The first thing that came to my mind was this exchange from Alien:

    Ripley: Ash, that transmission - Mother's deciphered part of it. It doesn't look like an S.O.S.
    Ash: What is it, then?
    Ripley: Well, I, it looks like a warning. I'm gonna go out after them.
    Ash: What's the point? I mean by the, the time it takes to get there, you'll, they'll know if it's a warning or not, yes?

  49. Brown noise found emitting from from Uranus by waveformwafflehouse · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it can be found somewhere in the electromagnetic spectrum. Quick, Someone transpose it make a press release! I'm running out of diapers here.

  50. That's headed for the charts! by cavis · · Score: 1

    I'll give it a 78, Dick. It's got a really good beat and you can dance to it.

  51. I just LOVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how sites like this talk about aliens as if it's a matter of fact that they are out there. It's like they are "definitely" out there but only "maybe" listening to us.

    Yeah right. Way too much junk science these days. I'm guessing it is from scientists who grew up with TV.

    1. Re:I just LOVE by Morpeth · · Score: 1
      Given the sheer scale of the universe, there is a decent chance that some other evolved forms of life do exist.

      I always liked Carl Sagan's example of a beach. Each grain of sand is a star (with the potential of an orbiting planet able to host life). Add up all the sand of all beaches on Earth, and you might get some sense of how many stars are out there.

      Now, the chance of intelligent life being within "earshot" (pardon the pun) is indeed incredibly small, that much I will give you. But I think it's sheer hubris to assume we're the only planet hosting intelligent life in the entire massive universe. It's hard to comprehend how really huge it is...

      --

      'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  52. Atmosphere, no. by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

    Atmosphere, no. Magnetic field, yes.

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  53. Nearest star is only 4 years behind by paj1234 · · Score: 1

    The aliens at Proxima Centurai are just settling down now for their TV coverage of the Athens Olympics 2004.

    http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~dolan/constellations/extra/nearest.html

  54. Short wave Radio by number6x · · Score: 1

    As kids we used to tune in between the stations on our short wave radios to listen to charged particles emitting radio waves as they spiraled through the Earth's magnetic fields.

    How is this process different?

  55. small planets with magnetic fields harbor life? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Distinctive sounds as this means a magnetic field, which in turns means a liquid magnetic core, which means a geologically alive planet, and potentially life. Venus and Mars are not geologically alive and have much smaller magnetic fields.

  56. WaitWaitWait by errxn · · Score: 1

    I thought that Earth was supposed to sound like some screwed-up version of 'All Along the Watchtower'!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  57. Re:What about the scream we hear from other planet by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

    Or solar flares. (What do you call solar flares made by stars other than sol?)

  58. I have identified the source by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    old broadcasts of HeeHaw streaming out into the Universe... with Minnie Pearl screeching "How-DEEEE!"

    So really, it's just the Earth saying hello ;)

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  59. It's the Force by blueforce · · Score: 1

    Maybe there's a simpler explanation.

    Maybe there's just a great disturbance in the Force. As if a million souls are crying out in torment and just haven't been silenced at once.

    Look for horses not zebras, folks.

    --
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  60. So, if aliens can really hear this radio noise by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't we be able to pick up the radio noise generated by earth-like planets in other solar systems?

  61. Dear Customer by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Thank you for bringing this to our attention. In our drive to reach the highest possible customer satisfaction, your free replacement planet will be delivered today.

    Your current planet will of course be recycled at no additional charge.

    Thank you for choosing Magrathea Planetary Systems and we look forward to your future business.

  62. I seem to remember... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    ...that my mother was hooked on a particular soap opera, called "As The World Turns."

    Perhaps that could now be brought back in the form of "As The World Screams."

    BTW, don't tell the televangelists about this. They'll probably want to try and find some way to organize a choir of all the system's planets. Gad, talk about "Music of the Spheres..."

    Now, where did I put my industrial-grade earmuffs...?

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:I seem to remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rofl XDDD pop culture references are so randum xD xD

  63. Just great ... by SubOptimalUseCase · · Score: 1

    ... we could be the alien equivalent of fingernails across a blackboard. That really knocks down our chances of survival.

  64. That's Galactic-speak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for "Oh God I'm cummminnnnngggggg!"

  65. So aliens listening to our planet... by pongo000 · · Score: 1

    ...would hear the voice of Heath Ledger? I don't get it.

  66. Re:What about the scream we hear from other planet by john83 · · Score: 1

    Or solar flares. (What do you call solar flares made by stars other than sol?)

    Patent infringement.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  67. Screams? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Earth was the Silent Planet.

  68. aliens... by quantumRage · · Score: 1

    Aliens on another planet: Can you hear the noise that planet is making? - Yeah, sounds dangerous, we should blast it. Hmm, as I recall a highway bypass is needed in that part of the galaxy... I'll get right on it!

  69. Re:What about the scream we hear from other planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even further, could we inject a signals into that noise? Let's just piggyback on Sol's random transmissions with some geostationary equipment that can use physical waveguides. Properly designed they could provide a guidepost long after our species is JALOHC (just another layer of hydrocarbons).

  70. Upside down sound by sbillard · · Score: 1

    I know this is borderline OT, but it's something I've wondered about recently.

    Why is it that I can "see" when things are upside down, but there is no such audible distinction?
    Is it because sight is reception of photons (EM), and hearing is pressure/vibration of air molecules?
    Why is it that I can immediately know my book or TV is upside down, but not when my speakers have been turned upside down?
    Is it that I can easily "see" in 2 dimensions, but that I only hear in 1 linear dimension?
    I'm sure there's a simple answer, but I don't have a clear understanding. Thanks in advance.

  71. It's not a scream, it's: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Universe's largest theremin!
    Posted anonymously by cellocgw 'caue I foolishly modded someone

  72. Shoddy reporting by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    This is just plain shoddy reporting.

    There is nothing new here: Earth's natural VLF emissions have been known and studied for decades. The only thing new here is a new standard of bad reporting.

    Sigh.

    ...laura

  73. the cries of the carrots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT WAS THE CRIES OF THE CARROTS! You see reverend maynard today is harvester day, and to them, it is the holocaust! (bad speller :P)

  74. Re:What about the scream we hear from other planet by DanOrc451 · · Score: 1

    Or, to put it another way, it would be a lot like trying to find a planet in the visually by trying to differentiate the tiny tiny light the planet reflects from the LIGHT the star emits. :)

    Still, it could be useful; it's clearly impossible to tell from this article. More potential avenues of planet detection can only serve to increase detection odds.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  75. Quandry by dannyboyumd · · Score: 1

    If the earth whistles and no aliens are around to hear it, does it make a sound?

  76. Uh oh by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

    "If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down? We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason." -- Jack Handey [Deep Thoughts] First contact - aliens with sensitive ears and planet buster bombs.

  77. Amazing coincidence! by Carbon016 · · Score: 1

    Those charged particles sound just like the new Dark Knight trailer!

  78. Wait... by Nafeasonto · · Score: 0

    This is a joke right?

  79. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The link in the story just shows a Batman trailer - Ah well..

  80. Oh the irony... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    How ironic that the natural sound of the planet being broadcast into space sounds incredibly like Lou Reed's Metal Machine Music. Aliens listening in might come to the conclusion that the inhabitants of the planet are all in possession of electric guitars, amps that go to eleven, and lots of high-quality cannabis.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:Oh the irony... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      On that note, the earth's magnetic field is just a really large pickup, and the earth is just a really large guitar, and the solar wind is merely a celestial Steve Vai blowing across the strings to create music.

  81. Re:What about the scream we hear from other planet by jc42 · · Score: 1

    The problem with this is, the "scream" a planet produces is insignificant to the SCREAM the star it orbits would produce.

    Oh, I dunno about that. I do recall some years back reading a comment by an astronomer that the main source of EM signals from our solar system is Jupiter. This is due to its humongous magnetic field, which is apparently much stronger than the sun's (and Earth's). So the loudest such "screams" are probably coming from Jupiter, not the sun or Earth.

    I wonder if anyone has detailed numbers on the topic? Maybe it's time to do a bit of googling ...

    (I also remember reading an article that claimed that, for certain parts of the spectrum, our military radar systems greatly outshine both the sun and Jupiter. Those signals would be very obviously artificial, so our military are loudly announcing our presence to every astronomer in range since military radars were invented around 60 years ago. I wonder if there's anyone inside that sphere that's listening?)

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  82. Batman? by jfsimard79 · · Score: 1

    Oh so the sound sample is the Batman trailer? Nice. Oh wait, that was an ad. Hmm I don't remember ordering one up.

  83. Horses by Elky+Elk · · Score: 1

    Like *lots* of horses

  84. It's 'cause we're killing it! by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    Can you hear the cries of the planet? As if to say "I hurt, I suffer".

    -- Bugenhagen, Final Fantasy VII, Observatory. He explains how all planets emit these sound waves but how ours cries in pain (and throws in the odd scream for good measure)

    Yep I'm an FF geek. But then, I guess this isn't all that new if people have already based fiction on it.

  85. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was expecting a rick-roll