Slashdot Mirror


Gmail Reveals the Names of All Users

ihatespam writes "Have you ever wanted to know the name of admin@gmail.com? Now you can. Through a bug in Google calendars the names of all registered Gmail accounts are now readily available. All you need to find out the names of any gmail address is a Google calendar account yourself. Depending on your view this ranges from a harmless "feature" to a rather serious privacy violation. According to some reports, spammers are already exploiting this "feature"/bug to send personalized spam messages."

70 of 438 comments (clear)

  1. Is it really that big of a deal? by i'm+lost · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I was worried about privacy with my gmail account, google wouldn't have my actual name to have the ability to give it out.

    1. Re:Is it really that big of a deal? by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I was worried about privacy with my gmail account, google wouldn't have my actual name to have the ability to give it out.

      That's all well and good until you decide to start using actual Google services (Checkout, AdSense, AdWords, and the like). It's possible to do these things with a non-GMail email address, but you have to create a Google account anyway, so I'd venture to say most folks use their GMail address if they already have one.

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  2. Re:This only punishes the foolish by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

    This bug really doesn't affect me as my email address is my real name.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  3. Re:This only punishes the foolish by thedullroar · · Score: 4, Funny

    oh noes! they can figure out my real name just by using google calendar and my email address (first.last@gmail.com)!?

    --
    Didn't your mother teach you not to do things you would be ashamed to see on the evening news?
  4. Re:This only punishes the foolish by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean really... Does anyone with a lick of sense actually give their real name to a free web-based service?

    In short, yes. Ever since GMail was launched and people discovered that its way more convenient that Outlook/Yahoo/etc., there's been a steady conversion of addresses in my contact list to "@gmail.com". People are moving to GMail as their primary mail accounts -- I don't know if you've been listening since 1998, but "free web-based email" is now often much, much better than whatever your university/company offers.

    So yeah, this is a pretty big deal -- not so much for spammers, but as a privacy violation. You can't do a name lookup for an arbitrary e-mail address, and you shouldn't be able to do it for a GMail address. Someone should get an ass-kicking for this.

    --
    An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
  5. D'Oh by Atari400 · · Score: 5, Funny

    chunkylover53 is going to be most displeased.

    --
    IBM doesn't play chess with the Universe.
    1. Re:D'Oh by ChowRiit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fortunately for Homer Simpson, that's @aol.com

    2. Re:D'Oh by rice_web · · Score: 4, Funny

      Surely that's the first time it's been fortunate to be on AOL.

      --
      The Political Programmer
  6. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Shados · · Score: 4, Funny

    ahah! But now the spammers KNOW FOR SURE that there isn't an underscore/dash/whatever between your first and last name! You're so screwed!

  7. I can't believe Google would do this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Really, now everyone will know my name is John Smith? I am outraged and will see my lawyer immediately!

    -- john.smith@gmail.com

    1. Re:I can't believe Google would do this! by janrinok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only if he is an American..... The rest of us don't really care too much about other nation's laws.

      --
      Have a look at soylentnews.org for a different view
  8. Is This Evil? by abirdman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But, does this constitute evil? So far so good. My gmail account is my real name anyway. I'll be looking out for the evil...

    --
    Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    1. Re:Is This Evil? by Admodieus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If this story was about a similar bug with Hotmail and Windows Live Calendar, yes it would.

      --
      "It's a reverse vampire...they....they crave the sun!"
    2. Re:Is This Evil? by gujo-odori · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, but it constitutes a serious bug. Evil usually requires intent. Stupidity, on the other hand, can be completely unintentional.

    3. Re:Is This Evil? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But, does this constitute evil? So far so good. My gmail account is my real name anyway. I'll be looking out for the evil...

      So if it doesn't affect you, then it is ok?

      I think you have defined for us what evil is and you are a shining example of it yourself...

    4. Re:Is This Evil? by dhavleak · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure, it's an unfortunate bug. Yes, the spam has potential to annoy--but it's spam; would you even notice a few more in the spam box?

      It's more serious than that. Once the spammers know your name they can construct more personalized messages which has two implications:
      - Increased chance of success in a social engineering attack.
      - Better chance of fooling a spam filter.

      If you're the kind of person who emails others without disclosing your real name, why would you give your real name to the email provider?

      Spammers don't wait for you to email them. They buy lists of email addresses in bulk. For this particular vulnerability, they can even use a random generator and just keep track of the hits when adding appointments to the calendar.

      Unless I'm a spambot, I'm not going to sit down and type out random strings of words and numbers to find out the name data on some arbitrary addresses. Whether it's Hotmail or Yahoo or Gmail doesn't matter here.

      Assume you are a spambot then -- that's what TFA is about -- a security vulnerability in Gmail that spammers can take advantage of. Spammers are usually interested in creating spambots.

      I don't know where OP's question about "evilness" comes in. Google deserves the benefit of doubt (about this being an honest mistake) as long as they fix it, rather than issuing some BS reason not to.

  9. Re:This only punishes the foolish by nbannerman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone should get an ass-kicking for this.

    Agreed. I'll certainly be asking for my money back...

  10. Head in the clouds by gamanimatron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is exactly why I remain leery of applications in the cloud. I've got a google account for work, and that's the only use it ever sees. And it's under real.name.company anyway, and has no other useful information associated with it.

    I try really, really hard not to leave to broad a trail online. Those databases just never die (except when they do, of course - but the timing is subject to Murphy's Law, so it's never in my favor).

    I'm gonna go hide in my cave now.

    --
    cogito ergo dubito
  11. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gmail strips out punctuation. So email to First.Last@gmail.com goes to the same inbox as FirstLast@gmail.com

  12. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know individuals with a hell of a lot of sense who would give their real names in such a situation.

    So? Part of the reason for that is that full names in and of themselves are not really a security risk. I walk around all day in public with an ID badge that gives my first and last name. Big deal. Our names are our public identifiers.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  13. Just how personal is this new spam by Pollardito · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does this mean they're only sending spam to people who really need Cialis?

    1. Re:Just how personal is this new spam by LoonyMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not yet but soon, just wait for the medical data to be compromised in a similar way.

    2. Re:Just how personal is this new spam by c_sd_m · · Score: 5, Funny

      Any chance they could just do a dumb filter and exclude women with obviously female names? I'm really tired of getting spam about enlarging my [non-existent] penis, especially the more explicit ones. It would not 'give my partner more pleasure'.
      At least change the 'your' to 'his'. That might even get you more sales than sending it to the men.

  14. Re:Ouf by game+kid · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...after which exercise balls (in lieu of the usual chair) will be thrown in a fit of unbridled anger (several tech websites will report a mysterious colorful stream of balls spilling out the Google offices).

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  15. Re:This only punishes the foolish by NickCatal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would they have such an unnecessary expense?

    I have no problem giving people my gmail account address for business-type-transactions because it is a hell of a lot easier to keep track of my conversations and actually get business done using gmail. When I do need a "professional" email address I usually just have it forwarded to my gmail account, again, because it is easier to keep my life organized that way.

    Not to mention how great gmail and Google Calendar Sync work on my BlackBerry.

    It has really become a first-rate application suite for just about every use.

    --
    -nick
  16. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Shados · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then they'll know what part is your first and last name regardless of capitalization! THIS IS HUGE!

  17. Re:This only punishes the foolish by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    for a small business owner, why not. I manage a few websites. Very, very small. Less than 20 people have write access. They wanted email. some users would use outlook or outlook express, others wanted a web mail front end. The email client the hosting service had was horrible so I hooked them up with a gmail hosted services. It works very, very nicely for them.

    there are some cases where Google is a good alternative to other options.

  18. Oh that tears it. by aztektum · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is horrible. This is an outrage! I'm writing Google a letter telling them how awful this is an how they need to work on the Q/A. I mean my GMail address *IS* my full name, but I'm not going to let that fact stop me from acting like an emotionally charged idiot!

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  19. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Zymergy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ditto.
    Since all names are really all about pretense, I set up mine on Gmail as "firstnamelastname@gmail.com" (Where 'firstname' and 'lastname' are my actual names.
    I think there are only eight or ten other people in the US with my same spelled the same anyway. Regardless, I think Gmail's spam filters have only let a couple of false negatives into my Inbox.
    *THIS* is why I use very different passwords for web mail as say, my banking or credit report service passwords, etc... If the password file were to be breached, I would only have one to change.
    I suggest a good password management app such as this one: http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/

  20. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Nasajin · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, your parents named you Quantum G?

  21. Bugs are to be expected... by elnico · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a good thing they caught this in beta, before it affects a large number of people!

  22. Finally Sean Penn will have justice by John+Meacham · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    http://notanumber.net/
  23. Re:This only punishes the foolish by RevMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    So yeah, this is a pretty big deal -- not so much for spammers, but as a privacy violation. You can't do a name lookup for an arbitrary e-mail address, and you shouldn't be able to do it for a GMail address. Someone should get an ass-kicking for this.

    You know what else... Someone left a thick softcover book on my doorstep the other day that listed the names, addresses, and phone numbers of everyone in my region. Hundreds of thousands of people, maybe millions. I called the police about this, but they seemed unconcerned.

  24. The *real* security risk... by Peet42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...is that this will allow Phishing scams aimed at GMail users to *seem* so much more plausible.

    What? You expected humour?

  25. Serious FERPA Violation by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Families Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 allows a student at a university to require the university to not release their name to anyone. For example, if you check for my name at my school's phonebook, you'll find I'm not listed. If you call my registrar's office and ask for information on me, they'll tell you that they don't have a student by my name. You see, it's against the law for them to even confirm that I'm a student.

    Since many schools have outsourced their email systems to Gmail, anyone can generate a full roster of student names through this trick. This could obviously result in many violations of FERPA.

  26. Privacy... by db32 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok...so I only see this as an issue for people trying to hide their identity for something nefarious. I mean christ, I give out my full name a dozen times a day to people I don't know. "Hello, we have a circuit down and need to open a ticket." "Hello, I have a few questions about your product." and damned near every other statement you might make when calling another company is almost IMMEDIATELY followed by "Can I have your name please?" Of course this is after they answer the phone "Hello, my name is..."? Now granted they don't always use their last name if they are just phone jockeys, but almost anyone worth anything in terms of sales/technical/etc reps will give you their full name, email address, phone number, etc.

    In other news, purchasing cigarettes and alcohol require you to disclose your first and last name when you show your ID! Even worse, there are rumors that every time you make a purchase using anything other than cash you have to disclose your first and last name. This isn't a privacy issue, maybe a privacy irritation, but certainly not anything to get in a ruffle about. It isn't like names are even really unique identifiers. Now if it revealed birthdays or SSNs or credit card numbers or something then I would understand.

    Course, maybe there is something here I am ignoring. Do the people getting in a ruffle about this freak out when someone of the opposite sex asks their name? "Oh my god they are trying to invade my privacy!" Generally it is considered "normal" to give them your name so they have something to call you other than "freak" or "uberhax4234".

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    1. Re:Privacy... by 22_9_3_11_25 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many people set up an email account to use with an online dating site. 12% of recently married or engaged couples met online. People use a nickname or screen name with an email account to hide their identity and weed out potential dates and then only give their real name out if they were actually going to meet someone in person for a date. That is not a nefarious purpose but it is a big privacy concern, especially if you are female. I am surprised with all the comments no one has mentioned online stalking or harassment.

  27. OMG ... first names... then what? Last names? by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Honestly - your name isn't a secret...

    and if you're trying to hide your identity and you put your real first / last name into a free service, you're a moron.

    1. Re:OMG ... first names... then what? Last names? by mrbluze · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly - your name isn't a secret...

      It is to people who don't know it.

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  28. Re:This only punishes the foolish by CorporateSuit · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean Bob Marley, Elvis Presley, Jimi Hendrix, and Al Gore HAVEN'T come back from the dead and signed up for emails with Gmail thousands of times from thousands of different locations? -Registered Spammer

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  29. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Sparr0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    citation needed. seriously, what you describe would be a huge security/privacy hole, and I don't believe you.

  30. Spam doesn't worry me, it's privacy. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This goes well beyond the scope of SPAM. Once they match your real name with your e-mail, they can start finding out what you do online, what sites/forums you visit, etc (Google knows everything).

    I'm much more worried about ID thieves finding out about my life than about getting personalized spam.

    1. Re:Spam doesn't worry me, it's privacy. by archkittens · · Score: 3, Insightful

      my solution to that is to act schizophrenic on almost every website i visit. any ID thief who tries to profile me just wont get anything they can wrap their tiny criminal minds around, other than perhaps the desire to . your best bet is to have a healthy separation between your life on the internet and your real life.

    2. Re:Spam doesn't worry me, it's privacy. by Zymergy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good Point, Sir.
      But... What if were to tell you that my real Gmail address is "ToddDavis@gmail.com" AND I AM Protected With "LifeLock"!!
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zuom4j3-dGY

  31. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Arivia · · Score: 3, Funny

    Posting to clear moderation because I was brainless and didn't get the joke.

    --
    The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
  32. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Drakonik · · Score: 4, Informative

    False. For GMail, dots are invisible in regards to who receives the email. Emails sent to foobar@gmail.com and foo.bar@gmail.com and f.o.o.b.a.r@gmail.com all go to the same address. Messages sent to foo.bar@gmail.com don't go to bar@gmail.com.

  33. Real info? by pyrote · · Score: 4, Funny

    Really, I wonder how many times people have used bugs like this to steal an identity, only to find that it's all fake info anyhow.

    Personally, every few years, I Re-invent someone... Use a fake(completely fake, not false) identity for everything from Cellphones to gmail.

    I google my real name, nothing, google my 'fake' like 20 pages. My 'fake' identity is WAY more famous than I am... I'm kinda jealous.

    --
    THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  34. Re:This only punishes the foolish by pha7boy · · Score: 4, Informative

    you are incorrect. john.richards@gmail.com send mail to johnrichards@gmail.com not to richards@gmail.com. Stripping the punctuation means gmail ignores it, not kills off the first part.

    what you are talking about is using + in your email address: see here Google Blog

    --
    -- All this knowledge is giving me a raging brainer.
  35. Re:This only punishes the foolish by 3vi1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, her parents named her Moon Unit. What kind of fucking name would "Quantum G" be?!?!

  36. Re:This only punishes the foolish by ThePengwin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait, the Rolexes are fake?!?!

  37. Re:This only punishes the foolish by billj04 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This actually is a security risk -- a lot of websites use your name as proof that their email is legitimate, and not originating from a phisher. For example, eBay's emails contain the following text at the top:

    eBay sent this message to FULL NAME (account)
    Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more.

    The "Learn more" link takes you to http://pages.ebay.com/help/confidence/name-userid-emails.html which explains

    Since people who send out spoof emails often don't have your first and last name as well as eBay User ID, receiving an email that contains this information should increase your confidence that the email was sent by eBay.

  38. Re:This only punishes the foolish by 3vi1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whooosh.

  39. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Sparr0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am aware of the period-ignoring feature, by which gmail treats Bob.Smith@ and Bo.bS.mith@ and BobSmith@ as the same person. That is not at issue. The parent claims that email sent to Bob.Smith@ is also delivered to [just] Smith@, which I believe to be false.

  40. Re:This only punishes the foolish by zamboni1138 · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are two X's in Rolexx.

  41. Re:This only punishes the foolish by aldo.gs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where 'firstname' and 'lastname' are my actual names.

    Damn! Some nasty name you got there! Perhaps I'll name my son 'firstname' too!

  42. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh man! So email can be sent to me at the.rapist@gmail.com or therapist@gmail.com?

  43. Gaping security hole reveals same info I send out by pugugly · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was like, really concerned for a minute. I thought spammers had managed to access something *important* or something.

    So, this is about someone that already knows my email address accessing the "name" that I show on every email I send out?

    To quote "The Whole Nine Yards" -
    *Oh* *My* *Gawd*!

    Pug

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  44. That's why my gmail address... by rivaldufus · · Score: 4, Funny

    is just my Social Security number.

  45. Re:This only punishes the foolish by antek9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, and using the exploit referred to in the article, your real names will be revealed as Jekyll and Hyde, respectively.

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  46. Re:This only punishes the foolish by antek9 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Correct. Gmail explains it this way (try sending an e-mail to yourself, putting in some dots, and you'll of course receive it yourself, with a small link in the header next to the recipient address (appropriately named, 'yes, this is you'):

    Sometimes you may receive a message intended for someone whose address resembles yours but has a different number or placement of dots. For example, your address might be homerjsimpson@gmail.com, but the message was sent to a Homer.J.Simpson@gmail.com. What's going on?

    Gmail allows only one registration for any given username. Once you sign up for a particular username, any dot or capitalization variations are made permanently unavailable for new registration. If you created yourusername@gmail.com, no one can ever register your.username@gmail.com, or Your.user.name@gmail.com. Furthermore, because Gmail doesn't recognize dots as characters within usernames, adding or removing dots from a Gmail address won't change the actual destination address. Messages sent to yourusername@gmail.com, your.username@gmail.com, and y.o.u.r.u.s.e.r.n.a.m.e@gmail.com are all delivered to your inbox, and only yours.

    If you're homerjsimpson@gmail.com, no one owns Homer.J.Simpson@gmail.com, except for you. Sending mail to Homer.J.Simpson@gmail.com is the same as sending mail to homerjsimpson@gmail.com, or even HOMERJSIMPSON@GMAIL.COM. If you're getting mail addressed to Homer.J.Simpson@gmail.com, most likely someone was trying to send a message to Homer.J.Sampson@gmail.com, or Homer.J.Simpson1@gmail.com, and made a mistake. You might even get messages from mailing lists or website registrations because the intended recipient accidentally provided the wrong email address. In these cases, we suggest contacting the original sender or website when possible to alert them to the mistake.

    For security reasons, when you log in to Gmail, you must enter any dots that were originally defined as part of your username.

    Note: Google Apps recognizes dots. If you'd like to receive mail with a dot in your username, please ask your domain administrator to add the desired username as a nickname.

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  47. Just google being google by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've used about every service that they have had, and this is pretty much how everything they do works. You don't opt in for anything, you have to figure out how to eventually opt out.

    You fumble through the options screen and finally find the right combination of checkboxes that doesn't throw your name out there, and let everyone see everything by default.

    "Hey guess what users, we added this nice option that lets everyone see your real name, address, and link to a picture of your house on google maps. Don't worry, it's been already enabled for your convenience!"

  48. Re:This only punishes the foolish by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They also ignore anything after a + sign, so I use username+site@gmail.com to sign up for legit stuff where I think there's a chance of getting spammed in the future, if I do get spammed on that alias I write a rule to drop it to the floor and contact the company letting them know they now have zero chance of getting future business with me. The only problem is when a stupid validation script writer doesn't know how to read an RFC and claims the address is invalid. In that case they get my old excite address which is nothing but a spamhole. I guess I could use my google apps address, but it's too much of a pain to create a new user just for one site and I never read the catchall mailbox unless I know I'm missing an important email.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  49. Re:This only punishes the foolish by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

    And two O's in Roloxx. You know it's the real thing because the dial on the watch face goes up to eleven.

  50. Re:This only punishes the foolish by jacquesm · · Score: 4, Funny

    mine goes to thirteen...

  51. Easy How To: by Raven737 · · Score: 3, Informative

    just create any calender entry (single click on an empty field) with just the gmail address in the main 'What:' field, select 'don't send' and open it up (double click)... there you see the full user name of the gmail account.
    Not sure why the article makes it so complicated...

    So the admin@gmail.com guy is named 'smart ass'... poor fellow ;)

  52. A reverse lookup phone book is much harder to find by Shirotae · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may have been given a book that does name->phone-number lookups for those who have not chosen to opt out but I believe that it is very much harder to get access to the inverse function that does phone-number->name lookups. I suspect that it varies by jurisdiction but I believe that in some places at least, people can be in serious trouble for giving access to the database that performs that function to those who do not have the proper authorization.

    Those who are familiar with security will know the concept of work-factor. You can reverse lookup with a phone book but if all you have is a printed copy it is a lot of work. The cost of doing that work is the deterrent. Modern technology has made it easier, but it is still costly. The idea is to adjust the cost/benefit ratio so that an attack is not worthwhile.

    The concern for the revealing of names from addresses is that it makes it cheaper for confidence tricksters to deliver some plausible message that will trick people into giving them some of their money. If the average cost of creating the plausible message becomes less than the expected return then the level of scamming will increase. Those of us not taken in by the tricksters will still suffer from increased level of junk so it is in all our interests to take this kind of thing seriously.

  53. Re:This only punishes the foolish by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check the message headers. Probably, the envelope recipient (SMTP RCPT To) was your account and the header "To:" was the address you don't own.

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  54. Re:This only punishes the foolish by ReptileQc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually there is another feature of Gmail that was advertised through their blog. And it states that me+nospam@gmail.com is directed to me@gmail.com

    So basically all the characters after the + sign (including it) in the email address is stripped to determine to receiver. You will see that the email has been sent to me+nospam@gmail.com and then can filter on it. If used intelligently, it can tell you which site is selling your email address to other 3rd party companies.

  55. Re:This only punishes the foolish by wembley+fraggle · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm going to name my kid 'lastname' instead.

  56. So's mine. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wondered why all the spam was suddenly titled, "Hey Satanic!" and "Dear Mr. Puppy"

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.