Slashdot Mirror


Flaws In a BSA Software Piracy Report?

Ian Lamont writes "The Business Software Alliance has just released its state piracy study (full PDF also available). The BSA says that one in five pieces of software in use in the United States is unlicensed, and notes that piracy rates are highest in Ohio (27%). However, as noted by the Industry Standard, there are problems with the state study, and the way the BSA is presenting the data: the study only includes eight states, and it is making some questionable connections, including the claim that lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to 'hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers.'"

288 comments

  1. Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, they're not as bad as the RIAA, but they certainly don't support customer interests.

    The only use I've ever had for the business software alliance is to report a bad employer to them, and get 'paid' for the tip.

    1. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not as bad as the RIAA?

      Does the RIAA have jack booted thugs that can walk into your office with body armor and machine guns? Do they fine you millions of dollars if you can not produce the receipt for every version of software ever purchased or installed on a machine? Etc.

    2. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think it's time for the Boy Scouts of America to file suit and get their acronym back.

      Hey, the World Wide Fund for Nature did it...

    3. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Hyppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Jack booted thugs with body armor and machine guns? I would seriously doubt that. If they did, I would love to report myself with a false tip and have them walk face-first into a claymore.

      Welcome to Florida, where I can lawfully defend my home and private business with lethal force!

    4. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by maxume · · Score: 1

      How can you criticize them if you are complicit in their actions?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Joeyspecial · · Score: 1

      Did you really get paid?

    6. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They are equally bad as the RIAA. Not sure how they operate in the US, but here in Belgium and the Netherlands, they don't have the best reputation. If they "suspect" piracy, they'll come knocking on your door and demand to have access to all computer-systems (though in some cases, they do announce their visit one or two weeks in advance). Everyone is ordered to move away from any computer system and they'll start snooping around while you dig up all license information. People not working costs money, but then again, it is not the BSA's money.

      What's worse is that if you are not able to find all proper licenses in time, you have two options. Let the BSA confiscate your equipment and go to trial, or sign a settlement. Most business will do the latter. In Belgium, a Printing Shop recently won a case against the BSA which had opted to do the latter (sign the settlement, for 60.000,-, which was cheaper than losing their workstations for an unspecified time) because they were unable to locate all licenses in time (visit wasn't announced). But when did locate all the licenses and asked the BSA their money back, the BSA refused to undo the settlement. In the end the Printing Shop got back their money though the courts, 60.000,00 plus interest plus expenses, but AFAIK, cases like this show that the BSA is nothing more than another money grabbing machine.

    7. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by haystor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is one major reason to buy retail and not a corporate license.

      The only thing that allows them to do this is your consent to inspection.

      --
      t
    8. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Danse · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it's time for the Boy Scouts of America to file suit and get their acronym back.

      Yeah, right. You think they want to piss off the BSA? They'll be back to cutting notches in sticks to calculate their finances instead of using software. The BSA can find issues with anyone's accounting of their licenses.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    9. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by hostyle · · Score: 1

      That cannot be legal. Sounds more like the Mafia tbh. Who or what gives the BSA legal power to do any of that?

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    10. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Theoboley · · Score: 0

      This sounds like a case for Detective John Kimball. Hope you leave enough room for his fist because he's going to ram it into your stomach.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    11. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but I would say the government? A really abysmal translation of the original news posting can be found here: http://66.196.80.202/babelfish/translate_url_content?.intl=us&lp=nl_en&trurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.itprofessional.be%2Fnews.cfm%3Fid%3D87654/

    12. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://news.cnet.com/2008-1082_3-5065859.html
      I am having difficulty digging up other articles about the BSA using armed police (in some european countries the police carried machine guns) on their audits. IIRC there were a few slashdot articles on this a couple years ago.

      Oh, and my bad. It looks like the RIAA does use jack booted thugs with machine guns...
      http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/18/magazine/18djdrama.t.html?_r=1&ref=slashdot&oref=slogin

    13. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      Well, if they are using government law enforcement officers, that's a different thing altogether.

    14. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Applekid · · Score: 1

      they certainly don't support customer interests.

      Sure they do. Adobe, Apple, Microsoft, Symantec... their interests are being supported just fine.

      You don't really think WE are the BSA's customers, do you?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    15. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't have anyone in my "foes" or "friends" lists. There have been a whole lot of people I have been sorely tempted to put in my empty "friends" list, but this is the first time I ever gave thought to adding a "foe".

      I sincerely hope you're just trolling. First your user name - I was a victim of Sony's rootkit.

      Second, and finally on topic, do you realise that you are a narc? A rat? A snitch?

      And the worst kind of snitch; one who does it for filthy lucre. Judas. I don't care how bad someone mistreats you, only an evil asshole narcs for pay.

      If you had any ethics or morals at all it wouldn't have taken a bad experience to get you to turn them in. You would have turned them in because you thought it was the right thing to do, or more intelligently not at all.

      You really should consider just how loathed people like you are. I have no idea how you got modded insightful for stating the obvious, then saying you narced on someone, but it I see the comment you just made while I metamoderate, well, like they say on "My Name Is Earl", karma is a funny thing. Now go crawl back under your rock, troll.

      Mods, I'm checking "no karma bonus" but mod me down further if you wish. The parent flamebait really pissed me off and I can easily take a downmodding.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    16. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have told that to the Business Software Alliance before they stole BSA!

    17. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe the parent was referring to the BSA's ability to get the government to come in on its behalf to seize equipment and software and generally intimate you. RIAA, to my knowledge, still relies on using lawyers who, like stormtroopers, can't hit the broadside of a space ship.

    18. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Stanistani · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then perhaps another acronym is in order: RICO
      The BSA apparently have a long-established pattern of illegal behavior.

    19. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Granted you can legally defend yourself but can you legally buy a claymore mine in Florida?

    20. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They are using law enforcement (and therefore public resources) to enforce civil contract and copyright law. That is illegal in many jurisdictions and unethical for most.

      One of the articles I had a hard time finding was one that stated that the BSA had armed civilian agents operating in a few places. Either I have a wacky paranoid memory, or my google-fu is weak.

    21. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      This is one major reason to buy retail and not a corporate license.

      The only thing that allows them to do this is your consent to inspection.

      The risk of an inspection will be considered sufficiently negligible as to be worth it to most businesses, particularly considering that the corporate licensing can easily knock 70% off the price.

    22. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "The only use I've ever had for the business software alliance is to report a bad employer to them, and get 'paid' for the tip."

      How much money? That could be worth keeping in mind as a vengeance option. :)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    23. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      It depends on the amount of piracy involved, they pay you based on what they get from the company you rat out.

    24. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Darundal · · Score: 1

      Could have been referring to the long, pointy type...

    25. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by DarthJohn · · Score: 1

      ...have them walk face-first into a claymore.

      Welcome to Florida, where I can lawfully defend my home and private business with lethal force!

      The stabby stabby kind, or the explody kind? I always think of the second type when I read claymore, but I'm guessing that one would be illegal to have around your home or private business.

    26. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      "narc"? "rat"? "snitch"?
      Are you the kind of person who calls policemen "pigs" and think that people who help policeman against criminals are "snitches"? That it is good to cover the crimes of friends?
      And you talk about moral?
      Wow...

    27. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you the kind of person who calls policemen "pigs" and think that people who help policeman against criminals are "snitches"?

      To me, a "narc," "rat" or "snitch" is someone who gets caught at something, so he rats out others who were doing the same thing as he was so he can get off lightly, thus profiting from whatever he was doing wrong, then further serving his own interests at the expense of others by ratting them out.

      This case is different. The above-mentioned douche bag set up his former employer and profited from it, while his co-workers - who had nothing to do with his pay dispute - were effectively screwed in the process.

      So, yeah, I'd go along with rat, and any number of other epithets.

    28. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      I had never looked at the Wiki article for the "explody kind" before. It gave me warm fuzzies to learn that a guy named MacLeod invented and named the Claymore mine.

    29. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      To me, a "narc," "rat" or "snitch" is someone who gets caught at something, so he rats out others who were doing the same thing as he was so he can get off lightly, thus profiting from whatever he was doing wrong, then further serving his own interests at the expense of others by ratting them out.

      These words are used by criminals to label people who cooperate with policemen. And are you seriously suggesting it is wrong to cooperate with the police? A specific case: if Joe is caught by the police and he knows that John and Bob are drug dealers, are you seriously saying that Joe should not talk to the police about them?
      Again, wow...

      This case is different. The above-mentioned douche bag set up his former employer and profited from it

      Did he say he set them up?

    30. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he say he set them up?

      Yes

    31. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      I personally think that calling someone a "rat" or "snitch" as you call it is the stupid thing. I am pretty sure that my current employer has about 1/4 th of the working force covered with licenses. Some licenses are just bought and put on a company image. If I would go to my boss, my career would end. If I would report on some software they would figure out who I am and my career would end.

      So if I go away, you can be sure I'll anonymously report him, for the sake of all the honest programmers out there.

      Calling someone a snitch is a simple negative reaction by somebody that does bad and doesn't want to be hold responsive for it. As long as the actual society isn't rotten, reporting crime should not be called ratting or snitching. It becomes different when there is a clear difference in "class" between the reporting party and the enforcer, or when the crime is relatively small in proportion to the punishment. Or, of course, when you do it for profit as the grand parent does.

      But there would be a hell of a lot more justice when there would be more ratting and snitching in the sense that a bully or a rich company "gets it". This is why rich company snitching is called whistle blowing. Sound a lot better, doesn't it?

    32. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These words are used by criminals to label people who cooperate with policemen.

      Actually, these words are used by criminals to label other criminals who have been caught then cooperate with policemen as it is in their interest to do so.

      And are you seriously suggesting it is wrong to cooperate with the police?

      I'm suggesting a person being informed on by another person who is just as guilty would think it is wrong to cooperate with the police, hense the word choice "rat."

      A specific case: if Joe is caught by the police and he knows that John and Bob are drug dealers, are you seriously saying that Joe should not talk to the police about them?

      And from a previous comment of yours:

      And you talk about moral?
      Wow...

      Let me ask you, if Joe has been "caught" by the police, and he "knows that John and Bob are drug dealers," what kind of a person is Joe? Just a good citizen doing his civic duty?

      The reason they're called "rats" is because they are turning in their own friends. A citizen staying at an accident scene to act as a witness, or calling 911 because it sounds like the woman living next door is getting the shit beat out of her, or the citizen who finds lost money and turns it in to the police are doing their civic duty. They're not referred to as "rats" by anyone, as far as I know. Cooperating with the police may bring consequences. They may be threatened, they may be intimidated or even assulted, kidnapped or murdered. Likely the least of their worries at that point would be name calling.

      But you raise the spectre of morality, and apparently give anyone who cooperates with the athorities for 30 peices of silver a pass.

      Wow.

      I'd say Joe is pretty much a filthy scumbag who got caught doing something, then chose to sell out John and Bob - who may simply be fall guys. May Joe was on his third strike, and didn't want to get federal time. He will probably go back to his scumbaggery at the very next opportunity (which will come sooner now, thanks to his deal with the police) since he's already demonstrated that he always acts in his own self interest, even if it means breaking the law and ratting out his cohorts.

      Again, wow.

      Did he say he set them up?

      Read his comments above. In a nutshell, he didn't get some money he thought was owed to him, so instead of persuing legal remedies (presumably; maybe he did fight them legally and lost), he offered to and then installed unlicensed software on his company's computers, then reported them to the BSA, pocketing $8500.00 in the process and probably ending the employment of his coworkers.

      Sorry to be so prickly, I'm just having my morning coffee and I have to leave soon.

      I think if you are in a position to rat someone out by definition you have to be just as bad as the people you are ratting on, so I have no problem with calling them rats, even if they benefit society in some instances.

      The guy above is not a rat, however, as he simply set up his boss and coworkers to take the fall for his little scam. I don't know what we should call him, but I guess you're right - he's not, technically, a rat.

    33. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the guy we are all talking about thinks he's a rat, too.

      I am pretty sure that my current employer has about 1/4 th of the working force covered with licenses

      So why don't you work with your company to get their licenses in compliance, or report them anonymously if they refuse?

      If I would go to my boss, my career would end. If I would report on some software they would figure out who I am and my career would end.

      Oh, so it wouldn't be good for you. Well that makes sense.

      But, wait -

      So if I go away, you can be sure I'll anonymously report him,

      Ah, so as soon as it wouldn't inconvenience you, you'll rat them out anonymously and probably put innocent former coworkers in a tough spot. Your rationalization for this cowardly act?

      for the sake of all the honest programmers out there

      Ah, think of the programmers. What's the phrase? "Programmers, programmers, programmers."

      Wouldn't have anything to do with reward money you could collect for your anonymous tip to the 'ol BSA, I guess.

      If you see something wrong and do nothing because to act may bring bad consequenses to you, you may be a coward but hey, who's to say how brave any of us would be if put unexpectedly in a bad situation.

      If you see something wrong and do nothing because it would be inconvenient for you, you are selfish and probably deserving of an "accessory" charge for your compliance.

      If you are up to your eyeballs in something wrong, get caught and flip on your cohorts to get some kind of advantage for yourself, you are a rat.

      I am all for getting people to rat out thier cohorts if it benefits society, I'm simply not willing to elevate a rat above rat status. If you think otherwise you are entitled to call rats whatever you want to.

      Oh, and by the way, if you were serious about the license situation at your place of employment and are in any way responsible for that I strongly suggest you don't wait til you leave to drop a dime on them - the BSA runs commercials urging people to "rat out" their employer. You wouldn't want someone to beat you to the punch and get left holding the bag.

      Even if you wouldn't be held directly responsible, it would be lousy to work in a place going through one of their audits, especially if the result is heavy fines. I wouldn't expect a raise or a bonus any time soon after that..

    34. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      Let me ask you, if Joe has been "caught" by the police, and he "knows that John and Bob are drug dealers," what kind of a person is Joe? Just a good citizen doing his civic duty?

      No. He is a criminal. But we would be a worse criminal if he did not cooperate with the police.

      The reason they're called "rats" is because they are turning in their own friends.

      Their *criminal* friends. Those who will commit more crimes if not arrested.

      A citizen staying at an accident scene to act as a witness, or calling 911 because it sounds like the woman living next door is getting the shit beat out of her, or the citizen who finds lost money and turns it in to the police are doing their civic duty.

      Of course.

      But you raise the spectre of morality, and apparently give anyone who cooperates with the athorities for 30 peices of silver a pass.

      The 30 pieces of silver concept refers to Judas Iscariot, who *betrayed* Jesus. Not "ratted".

      Traitor: One who violates trust. Word has positive connotations on those who are betrayed: it is assumed that they were doing nothing wrong, and should not be persecuted for their actions. It is immoral to betray.
      Rat: One who cooperates with the authorities, reporting that his (criminal) friends were committing a crime - when they were indeed committing a crime! Word has criminal connotations on who uses it: it assumes that those who were "ratted" were committing crimes, but they should not be arrested by the police, because their crime is nobody's business, and "the pigs" should "stay out of our way".

      So:
      A policeman who gives classified information to drug dealers, is a traitor. His action is immoral.
      A drug dealer who cooperate with the police gets called a rat by other drug dealers. His action is moral (the cooperation - not his previous crimes), but as it is not in the interest of the drug dealers, it is "criminally immoral" - that is, it is immoral in the distorted morality of the criminals.

    35. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, every company I have seen with a corporate license (especially MS) purchases Dell's or HP's that already come with the licenses.

      This is a reason why you used to find OEM licenses for sale all over the place. It would seem that the 70% savings would be offset or negated quite a bit by that.

    36. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, every company I have seen with a corporate license (especially MS) purchases Dell's or HP's that already come with the licenses.

      This is a reason why you used to find OEM licenses for sale all over the place. It would seem that the 70% savings would be offset or negated quite a bit by that.

      Then I can only assume you haven't looked at the terms of the licenses very closely.

      The corporate Windows site licenses are "upgrade only" - you can't use them against PCs which don't ship with OEM Windows.

      Similarly, the licensing terms of OEM versions of Windows explicitly forbid using one as the base of an image for mass deployment (unless, presumably, you are the OEM).

      Oh yes, one thing I almost forgot. It is commonplace to find that the OEM builds aren't actually terribly good. Think "wireless drivers which supply their own GUI which remove much of the functionality of the native Windows GUI", think "network drivers which sort-of work and sort-of don't", think "just as much crapware as the consumer line". I have on my task list a bunch of now-complete issues which all stemmed from "relying on the OEM windows build". As soon as we started using our own build, 90% of these issues evaporated.

    37. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I personally think that calling someone a "rat" or "snitch" as you call it is the stupid thing. I am pretty sure that my current employer has about 1/4 th of the working force covered with licenses. Some licenses are just bought and put on a company image. If I would go to my boss, my career would end. If I would report on some software they would figure out who I am and my career would end.

      But did you work at making those numbers a reality? The rat in question did. He put his employer in that light then falsely assured him that everything was OK.

      So if I go away, you can be sure I'll anonymously report him, for the sake of all the honest programmers out there.

      That wouldn't put you into the same catagory as this guy. Reporting something you know is wrong is one thing. Waiting until your in a position not to be financially or physically harmed to do so is a variation of that same thing. Morals and circumstances can dictate that pretty easily. But, if your only reporting something to settle a grudge, or if you worked at putting the situation in place, then you would be a rat too.

      From what you have mentioned so far, you wouldn't be one.

      Calling someone a snitch is a simple negative reaction by somebody that does bad and doesn't want to be hold responsive for it. As long as the actual society isn't rotten, reporting crime should not be called ratting or snitching. It becomes different when there is a clear difference in "class" between the reporting party and the enforcer, or when the crime is relatively small in proportion to the punishment. Or, of course, when you do it for profit as the grand parent does.

      A snitch is someone right in there with you who commits the crime or act and then tells on you to save their own skin or somehow profit. If your association to the incident is incidental to something else, like witnessing a murder or something, then you aren't the snitch/rat whatever. If however, you loaded the gun, handed it to the shooter and drove the getaway vehicle, your a snitch.

      You see, you pretty much have to be involved and benefiting somehow. Drug dealer snitches usually snitch to get rid of their competition.

      But there would be a hell of a lot more justice when there would be more ratting and snitching in the sense that a bully or a rich company "gets it". This is why rich company snitching is called whistle blowing. Sound a lot better, doesn't it?

      Actually, whistle blowing is separate. It is when you aren't doing anything wrong and end up telling on someone who is. It really is no difference then witnessing a crime or reporting some violations or something. Ratting and snitching imply complicity which simply wouldn't be the case with whistle blowing. And if a company forced the whistle blower to do whatever is wrong that they are blowing about, the whistle blower protection laws usually won't shield them from that wrong doing.

    38. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Then I can only assume you haven't looked at the terms of the licenses very closely.

      The corporate Windows site licenses are "upgrade only" - you can't use them against PCs which don't ship with OEM Windows.

      I think your confusing the licenses from the software assurance program with site licenses from open value and similar programs. In fact, the open value licenses give or come with a PUR agreement that allows the use of any of the covered products on any machine.

      I had to check with a site I was dealing with today, their licensing is the way I described so I called our MS rep and he assured me that we had a site license that would include custom builds as long as we didn't go over out "limit". Now typically, what happens is that a site will license 100 or so copies of something, then when a computer dies, instead of building one and imaging it, they buy a Dell or something with an OEM version already there. You can buy OEM licesnes through your site license channel i your adding but that typically doesn't happen because of limitations with logistics in larger operations. For a fresh start up or a company wide upgrade, it might also be beneficial.

      imilarly, the licensing terms of OEM versions of Windows explicitly forbid using one as the base of an image for mass deployment (unless, presumably, you are the OEM).

      Right.

      Oh yes, one thing I almost forgot. It is commonplace to find that the OEM builds aren't actually terribly good. Think "wireless drivers which supply their own GUI which remove much of the functionality of the native Windows GUI", think "network drivers which sort-of work and sort-of don't", think "just as much crapware as the consumer line". I have on my task list a bunch of now-complete issues which all stemmed from "relying on the OEM windows build". As soon as we started using our own build, 90% of these issues evaporated.

      I have seen the same problems. I also find that getting people off the blue E eliminates a lot of issues too. Typically, it is impossible to do this because of third party dependencies so we generally lock it down and tell users to use Firefox for personal browsing and threaten deducting the repair bill from their salary if a problem results from them using IE for anything other then Specific work tasks.

      Of course I have a few sites where a partner of owner must have AOL installed. They then think they can fix any problem with the AOL fix tool which usually ends up screwing things up worse. I had this happen just the other day where AOL told the user that they needed a firewall installed and he ended up with two separate anti virus programs locking the computer up randomly, a software firewall, and no access to any network resources that weren't specifically mapped using windows.

    39. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Then I can only assume you haven't looked at the terms of the licenses very closely.

      The corporate Windows site licenses are "upgrade only" - you can't use them against PCs which don't ship with OEM Windows.

      I think your confusing the licenses from the software assurance program with site licenses from open value and similar programs. In fact, the open value licenses give or come with a PUR agreement that allows the use of any of the covered products on any machine.

      I had to check with a site I was dealing with today, their licensing is the way I described so I called our MS rep and he assured me that we had a site license that would include custom builds as long as we didn't go over out "limit".

      I can only assume that we are in different regions and the license varies by region.

      Page 54 on the Microsoft Volume Licensing Reference Guide:

          http://download.microsoft.com/download/a/7/0/a70853c1-a783-4d48-a7ad-f404abdb1e7d/Microsoft_Volume_Licensing_Reference_Guide.pdf

      states:

      "In Volume Licensing, the desktop PC operating system is an "upgrade license". You may only upgrade devices for which you have already licensed a "qualifying operating system". A list of "qualifying operating systems that qualify for an upgrade is contained in the Product List, which can be found at .... If you acquire software assurance, you have the right to use "Windows Vista Enterprise Edition" on the device instead of Windows Vista Business. This also permits you to run up to four additional copies or instances on the device".

    40. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Like I said, I think you are confusing the software assurance program with the open and site licensing programs. The software assurance used to be separate but now it comes with the site licenses and open licenses except they don't apply to some OEM software.. You can however, get the software assurance separately. Or at least you could in the past.

      The software assurance is a program that does what you mention, it give an upgrade path to ensure that your software purchases aren't outdated during the useful life to you. A site and open licenses cover any use of specified products company wide (and beyond in some cases) They cover the OS, server products, CALs, office, and any other product specified in the agreements. You build a configuration and each product lists points and after certain levels, you get a certain discount for that software. But if you have a site license for 15 OSes and 15 office programs, it doesn't matter which computers they are on as long as the company owns or controls them.

    41. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Like I said, I think you are confusing the software assurance program with the open and site licensing programs. The software assurance used to be separate but now it comes with the site licenses and open licenses except they don't apply to some OEM software.. You can however, get the software assurance separately. Or at least you could in the past.

      The software assurance is a program that does what you mention, it give an upgrade path to ensure that your software purchases aren't outdated during the useful life to you. A site and open licenses cover any use of specified products company wide (and beyond in some cases) They cover the OS, server products, CALs, office, and any other product specified in the agreements. You build a configuration and each product lists points and after certain levels, you get a certain discount for that software. But if you have a site license for 15 OSes and 15 office programs, it doesn't matter which computers they are on as long as the company owns or controls them.

      I know what the various bits of licensing are; the PDF states that operating systems are available through the volume licensing schemes only as upgrades (in other words: it's equivalent to the "Windows XP Upgrade Edition" box you can get from a retail store which is cheaper than the "Full version" box but you're only allowed to use on a system which already has an older version of Windows on).

      Software Assurance is just an add-on to the license scheme that allows you to upgrade from the version you originally licensed if/when a new version is released. Sucks to be you if they don't release an upgrade during the course of the license agreement.

      This isn't just my understanding; I've confirmed it with account managers from a number of Microsoft resellers in the UK on a couple of occasions.

    42. Re:Flaw? With the BSA? What a surprise... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I know what the various bits of licensing are; the PDF states that operating systems are available through the volume licensing schemes only as upgrades (in other words: it's equivalent to the "Windows XP Upgrade Edition" box you can get from a retail store which is cheaper than the "Full version" box but you're only allowed to use on a system which already has an older version of Windows on).

      There must be something different with the agreements I have experience with. Our MS rep specifically told me that building systems to replace systems taken down was acceptable. The document you provided does say "Upgrade" But I'm able to use older versions of the software (like windows XP instead of Vista and even 98) and activate them all without any issue. All my media came with the product packs they give when we renew the program. It is this way at three separate sites. Unless this is a regional thing (the PDF you listed didn't show anything indicating it was), or we have some other program in place, I'm not sure why we are different.

      Software Assurance is just an add-on to the license scheme that allows you to upgrade from the version you originally licensed if/when a new version is released. Sucks to be you if they don't release an upgrade during the course of the license agreement.

      Actually, this was a problem with the windows XP release. There was such a lag behind Vista that a lot of people who purchased a 3 years agreement in 2003 didn't have any upgraded programs to benefit from. Office didn't release a new version until office 2007 and vista wasn't available until the end of 2006 with similar time lines on the server products.

      This isn't just my understanding; I've confirmed it with account managers from a number of Microsoft resellers in the UK on a couple of occasions.

      Like I said, I confirmed it with our account rep. I don't have access to our actual license program and documentation as they are put up for upper management to drool over but I have access to the MS account rep who sold it to us. I'm going back in in a day or so and I will call and asked him again and point to this thread for clarity.

  2. I doubt there are flaws by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    because the bsa has really nothing to gain by providing numbers that don't accurately reflect the true situation with regards to the use of unlicensed software.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:I doubt there are flaws by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Informative

      I had been under the impression that the BSA data was faulty due to their business plan rather than anything else. No car salesman is ever going to tell you the transmission is about to crap out. Of course this car is a great deal!

      The BS Alliance has a history of some shady tactics, many worthy of SCO fame. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bsa+complaint+software&btnG=Search gets about 133,000 hits. That usually means there are plenty of people in the world ready to tell you they are unhappy about the BSA.

      Yep, no flaws in that data. It's showing you exactly what they want you to see.

    2. Re:I doubt there are flaws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The flaw is the in the definition. Buy a new computer move your programs. Leave the old ones on even if they are not used = Piracy. Have the wrong Disk, Box, license, receipt = Piracy. Have 1 copy of MS Office = Piracy * 5; one for each program.
      The companies supporting BSA should have a uniform proof of ownership rule. And and easy way to move the license to a new machine. But that would cost THEM Money.

    3. Re:I doubt there are flaws by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      The BS Alliance has a history of some shady tactics, many worthy of SCO fame. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bsa+complaint+software&btnG=Search gets about 133,000 hits. That usually means there are plenty of people in the world ready to tell you they are unhappy about the BSA.

      Bad search terms. Did you look through the results? Even the top few?

      Most of those results are references to the BSA lodging a complaint against an infringer, not the other way around.

      This doesn't mean your point isn't valid... but it does mean that you need some better evidence.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  3. I just can't imagine how they figured this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Do you pirate software?"
    "Yes."
    "Okay, thanks. Have a good night."

    1. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wouldn't say "Yes." They'd say "Aye, matey"

    2. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aye, ne'er will words be spoken tru'arrr

    3. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Do you pirate software?"
      "No."
      "Well obviously a filthy pirate like you would lie about it, I'll put you down as a 'Yes'."

    4. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by bluesk1d · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah this is the same flawed logic the RIAA uses. They make the assumption that you would have bought Photoshop, had you not pirated it. Therefore, any pirated program is a loss of revenue in a 1:1 ratio. That simply ISN'T the case. About 11tybillion people downloaded applications that they never would have paid for in the first place. Actual revenue losses are much less than 1:1.

    5. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by lordofwhee · · Score: 1

      Of course. I'm not going to pay $600 for a piece of software, but I'll most definitely pirate it. Piracy is the new scapegoat. Used to be physical theft, now it's unauthorized copying. What's next, masturbating?

    6. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by shark72 · · Score: 1

      The BSA does not make this assumption. Many people make the ASSUMPTION that they make this assumption, but that's not the same thing.

      When the BSA does their calculations, they use indices based on the percentage of pirated software that their studies tell them truly represents a lost sale (and -- again -- they don't use 100% for this figure). Of course, this index isn't something that they like to talk about publicly, as it lends credence to the fact that not every pirated copy is a lost sale. But they're smart enough to understand that it's not 1:1.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    7. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

      "Do you pirate software?"
      "Only Windows XP."
      "That doesn't count as software, anything else?"

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    8. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by bluesk1d · · Score: 1

      Well, if that is true, that is the most important part of the entire investigation since that is the biggest variable that affects how they arrive at their "total loss" figure. Until it is revealed how they calculate this figure, this report is meaningless.

    9. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      The formula goes something like this. They take the tangent of the coeffecient for drag on a box of windows xp held outside of a truck and invert it and then add on the amount of BS people are willing to buy from the BSA minus the amount of catching wind people are getting of their scheme AND THEN A MIRACLE HAPPENS plus 25% just for good measure = Software Piracy cost the world 11tyBillion Dollars.

    10. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1

      "Do you pirate software?" "Only Windows Vista." "That doesn't count as software, anything else?"

      Fixed. You can't pirate malware.

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    11. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as its your own mosquito-sized dick you're stroking, then nobody much cares if you masturbate. Hell, some of us would APPLAUD your peeling your own chilies instead of passing along your demon seed to some unsuspecting shemale. OTOH, if you tie down Ron Jeremy and give him a happy ending against his will which results in his not being able to spooge enough to satisfy the director on his next porno and he gets shitcanned from his role as a result, then THAT'S piracy.

    12. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by conlaw · · Score: 1
      The BSA's methodology is laughable. Using Florida as an example, the most recent data I found show that in 2007 there were approximately 18.5 million residents (http://edr.state.fl.us/population/population-1april07.pdf) and 1.5 million companies in the state (http://www.sunbiz.org/corp_stat.html). Out of these they interviewed 100 consumers and 100 companies http://www.bsa.org/country/Research%20and%20Statistics/~/media/Files/statestudy07/statestudy07.ashx at p.11). They then added the results of these interviews to their other information sources, which appear to be mainly SOP estimates. (The full methodology can be found at p.4 of http://global.bsa.org/idcglobalstudy2007/studies/methodology_globalstudy07.pdf

      In other words, except for pirated software found in an audit of a specific company,these numbers appear to be as accurate as if they had beenn drawn out of someone's hat.

    13. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      If you own a PC and haven't got a windows license your a pirate. That's the logic these sorts of people work with.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    14. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      The RIAA don't know anything about marketing.

      Heres an old saying "Its only worth what someone is willing to pay for it"

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    15. Re:I just can't imagine how they figured this out by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Actually, if Joe's company has a license for 4 out of 6 copies, they showed a willingness to buy it. Also, I'm betting that a lot of people use the excuse that someone must have copied it without telling us about needing another copy.

      We are talking about businesses making money from the use of the software. This isn't really a situation where the entertainment is ok as long as you don't have to pay for it like personal piracy (RIAA) and so on would be.

  4. hmm by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers.'

    By definition, won't most experienced police officers already have jobs? Say, as police officers?

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're forgetting about gritty ex-cops who retired in protest of the widespread corruption in the system, only to take up the badge again one last time when duty called, because they're the best damn cop the state has seen and the only man alive who can get the job done. There are a lot of those.

    2. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I guess they forgot to use additional experienced. What is more important they missed to report is how many more additional experienced police officers a state could hire if they replaced MS software with FOSS. I bet it would be enough for every one in the state to be hired as and officer.

    3. Re:hmm by i_liek_turtles · · Score: 1

      Never mind the fact that this money would likely be utilized in other ways, where the state would still be able to collect revenue.

    4. Re:hmm by joocemann · · Score: 3, Insightful

      'hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers.'

      By definition, won't most experienced police officers already have jobs? Say, as police officers?

      And how would they raise taxes from something that a pirate would not buy? How do they draw a conclusion that, if forced to choose, a pirate would PAY for the software instead of not use it?

      Thats ridiculous. Purely ridiculous.

      The reasons a pirate doesn't pay for software can be various, but I can assure you that only a small portion of pirates would actually pay/buy the software if forced to choose. They would instead not use it.

    5. Re:hmm by uxbn_kuribo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Guys like that are loose cannons. I won't have people like that on my force! Except, I must admit, they get results. Otherwise, I'd have their badges so fast, it would make their heads spin!

      --
      No portion of this post may be rebroadcast without the express, written consent of Major League Baseball.
    6. Re:hmm by infalliable · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which is the major flaw in any of these "studies." They all gloss over it and throw out insanely inflated numbers. Just like the MAFIAAs did a while back where they computed the loss from piracy was greater than the GDP of France.

    7. Re:hmm by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      [insert Chuck Norris joke here]

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:hmm by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we need a better unit of measure. How about "make ___ photocopies of the library of congress". It somehow seems appropriate.

    9. Re:hmm by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1
      You're missing the point. Read between the lines: when the BSA says

      "...hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers. "

      They mean

      " Larger 'donations' for politicians. "

    10. Re:hmm by zmollusc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey man, don't get so worked up! Remember how close you are to retiring!

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    11. Re:hmm by neo8750 · · Score: 1

      This point is a good one but at same time you have to consider that if they did that they would have to spend the money the saved on teaching officer bob or desk clerk sally how to use/fix the software. That is at least what the microsoft sales man told me...

    12. Re:hmm by lordofwhee · · Score: 1

      ...France HAS a GDP?

    13. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because Microsoft software is so easy to use.

    14. Re:hmm by shark72 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "And how would they raise taxes from something that a pirate would not buy? How do they draw a conclusion that, if forced to choose, a pirate would PAY for the software instead of not use it?."

      They make estimates of how many pirated copies truly represent lost sales; or, more accurately, they have estimates of the attainable conversion rates of businesses that currently use pirated software, to law-abiding businesses. Although it's a popular myth around here, the BSA doesn't assume that every pirated copy is a lost sale.

      "The reasons a pirate doesn't pay for software can be various, but I can assure you that only a small portion of pirates would actually pay/buy the software if forced to choose. They would instead not use it."

      Remember -- this is a BSA study. The RIAA tends to concern themselves with individual customers, where the BSA focuses on enterprises that use multiple copies of Office, Windows, PhotoShop, and the like. It's a romantic notion that companies that are busted can simply switch to Linux or GIMP, but the BSA already knows (from experience) that many companies pay up and move to licensed copies of commercial software.

      Your statement holds very true for the 14-year-old collector who got Illustrator via BitTorrent and might have used it three times. But that's not who the BSA is after.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    15. Re:hmm by Altus · · Score: 1

      MENDOZAAAAAA!!!!!

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    16. Re:hmm by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Maybe they meant "25,000 nearly experienced police officers"

      It also didn't say what they could hire them for...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    17. Re:hmm by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

      additional experienced police officers a state could hire if they replaced MS software with FOSS

      But then the BSA wouldn't need as many officers to wear jack boots and body armor and carry automatic weapons.

      -- Every OpenOffice download means another cop's kid goes hungry.

    18. Re:hmm by nomadic · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting about gritty ex-cops who retired in protest

      You have to be careful about retiring; if your partner is grittier than you, then that makes you the sidekick. And if you announce your plans to retire, you're getting offed your last day.

    19. Re:hmm by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Also about the gritty ex-cops that got fired for being a child molester or planting evidence or beating a petite woman bartender for not serving him.

      Stellar employees, those ex-cops.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    20. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers.'

      And if the cities didn't have to pay the Microsoft tax and license fees they could hire nearly 43,782 experienced police officers. And another 18,822 if they didn't have to spend money protecting themselves against BSA accusations.

    21. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains how they can afford them. They fire them, then they hire them again.

    22. Re:hmm by Kz · · Score: 1

      It's a romantic notion that companies that are busted can simply switch to Linux or GIMP, but the BSA already knows (from experience) that many companies pay up and move to licensed copies of commercial software.

      I thought that when you're busted for using illegal software, you no longer have the option of replacing it with free software, at that point you have to pay. Only after that you can choose to use the (forcibly) acquired packages, or switch to something else.

      --
      -Kz-
    23. Re:hmm by shark72 · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. My understanding is that BSA settlements consist of the retail value of the pirated software, plus some sort of punitive or administrative fine tacked on. So, to your point, Microsoft'll get their money even if the IT manager uses the BSA bust as the impetus to move the company to Linux.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    24. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sarcasm maybe?

    25. Re:hmm by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he's too old for this shit.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    26. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B*llshit.

      The "romantic" notion is that companies necessarily have the money to buy software, have nothing better to do than decipher the legalese that accompanies software "sales" and should pay up again because somehow having paid for Word with an older computer that failed doesn't entitle you to using it on its replacement.

      Maybe there are a few companies out there that are raking it in yet somehow make a conscious decision not to buy licenses. Yeah. Right.

      The BSA, just like the RIAA, is there to tell congress what software companies want them to hear, and that's the end of it.

    27. Re:hmm by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Wow... you killed it.

    28. Re:hmm by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, the BSA only goes after businesses using software in their efforts to make money. They most likely take an estimate over how many businesses purchased the software in use after the audit as part of the fines. They then take that to their estimate of infringements.

      It really isn't a situation where someone just wants to fool around with it or listen to something that they wouldn't normally purchase. A lot of these companies rely on the software to make their money which makes this a little more realistic in potential purchases.

  5. Tax revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, according to the BSA, when you don't buy software, you put the cash you didn't spend under your mattress so the city doesn't get any tax revenue from it (past income taxes, I assume).

    Man, I'd better check under my mattress when I get home! I might just be RICH!

    1. Re:Tax revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only thing under my mattress are dirty magazines :D

    2. Re:Tax revenue? by Sunshinerat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now I did quick mental check of the non-licensed software and must say that i can only think of three products. I could do without it, I am hardly using it. The other hundereds of software are validly licensed and not paid for in dollars and cents.

      Regarding the economic principles, money can only be spent once. If people are not spending their money on software, they are spending it on food, clothes, ipods etc. Which would produce tax income for the states.

      Unless everyone who does not pay for some software product puts the equivalent in the bank, the assumption that it would generate heaps of additional cash for the states is simply False. Check the current balance on the average persons credit card.

      So this person(s) who produced this report have tunnel vision, have different interests or are copying the things they see daily on tv (political tunnel vision).

      --
      Load New Commander (Y/N)?
    3. Re:Tax revenue? by lapagecp · · Score: 1

      Its really worse than that. Of course all of my software is licensed but lets say that half of it is unlicensed. You have to take into account that I don't ever use over half of the programs installed on my computer so chances are if they were not pirated I would have used an open source option or not gotten it at all. But even assuming I bought the software, what if I bought it online? Who gets the tax money then? Of course I didn't sock the money away for a rainy day. I went out and bought a coffee with it at a non chain coffee shop or used it on a rainy day and paid tax then. People are not saving or making money by pirating software. At worst they are saving money on software and spending it on gas or groceries.

    4. Re:Tax revenue? by chromatic · · Score: 1

      Nice work, bringing the "let's raise taxes on the rich!" class welfare argument up.

    5. Re:Tax revenue? by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, according to the BSA, when you don't buy software, you put the cash you didn't spend under your mattress so the city doesn't get any tax revenue from it (past income taxes, I assume).

      Evidently yes. I mean what else would they do with it? Spending on expanding the business? Surely not!

      Of course, that assumes they ever had the money in the first place. I mean, if I have 0$ and I chose to pirate MS Office... well.. sure that counts as a lost sale, and lost tax revenue to the BSA... but since I had 0$ left in the budget, I was never going to buy the software or anything else for that matter.

      But what REALLY bugs me about the BSA is that they consider upgrades for which you can't prove a complete chain for as a 'unlicenses/unauthorized/pirated'.

      I mean, I have Vista Ultimate Upgrade on my PC. I obtained that legally, by upgrading my copy of Windows XP Professional Upgrade, which I obtained legally by upgrading my Windows 98 upgrade, which I obtained legally when I upgraded my Windows 95 retail which was purchased on 25 floppy disks over a decade ago. I do not have those floppy discs or license anymore from the original 95 purchase. (And it might even have been an upgrade to Windows 3.11 for Workgroups... I don't even remember.)

      If I were audited by the BSA they would find my copy of Vista as 'unlicensed'.

      This sort of scenario happens all the time in BSA audits where companies that bought a 5 user VLA in 1992, then in 98 upgraded them to a 10 user VLA (5 new licenses, 5 upgrade licenses), then upgraded to a 20 user VLA in 2002 (10 new licenses 10 upgrade licenses), then upgraded to 25 licenses in 2006 (5 new licesnes, 20 upgrade licenses)... and the BSA shows up...

      And you pull out your licenses ... and all you've kept are the 2002, and 2006 ones, but you misplaced or discarded the old 92 and 98 ones, so they determine that you have 15 valid licenses. (the 10 new ones bought in 2002 and upgraded in 06 plus the 5 new ones in 06. The rest are unsubstantiated and you better pay up quick you lousy crook!

      Meanwhile the company your dealing with has been bought twice since 92, and the product has been renamed 3 times... and they have no record that you bought a VLA from a company acquired by a company they acquired years ago. Even the accounting records have been destroyed. All that old shit takes up valuable space.

      And that's the VLAs... Its far more difficult for a small business to keep every box and license of every piece of software they ever bought just so they can show the BSA one day, especially after a few rounds of upgrades. And small businesses with 4 or 5 people don't usually have VLA's, just a cupboard where they have a bunch of stuff, and when the cupboard is full they usually toss the old versions of old software they've upgraded from...)

      Its pure bullshit.

      Can you imagine the BSA doing an audit of your home, not for software, just for everything in it. How much of the stuff in your home can you "prove" is legally purchased? You have receipts for every CD, every book, all your cutlery, dishes, pots, clothes, furniture?

      Of course not, but that doesn't mean its all STOLEN.

    6. Re:Tax revenue? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Not at all. See, you'd continue buying everything else you currently buy, but you'd charge the software on your credit card. A credit card you eventually wouldn't be able to afford to pay off, so you'd file for bankruptcy.

      So, since you didn't buy the software and file for bankruptcy, you are essentially stealing tax money from your state and handing it to the wealthy credit card companies. How can you live with yourself knowing that?

    7. Re:Tax revenue? by hostyle · · Score: 1

      And I thought i was posh with a .sig and all, but this guy! Look, he's got two of them. Filthy rich! Better tax him quick smart!

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    8. Re:Tax revenue? by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

      Thats just what I'd expect an economy hurting hippie pirate to say. You stopped Adele from affording a Boeing 747!

    9. Re:Tax revenue? by DannyO152 · · Score: 1

      How did you get cash? I think it got to you via check which, when it was deposited it was -boom- income. Having not written the check to Jane's Software, expenses were lower and profits were higher and the tax liability increased for the company or its owners.

      Meanwhile, if you paid for that fifth license, you wrote a check to the software company, likely to be in a different state, and they posted the income and paid taxes there. The state they chose to be in, what are the odds that it was chosen because tax rates were lower or non-existent?

    10. Re:Tax revenue? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      You're suggesting that, even with the original media in your hands, the BSA would then accuse you of having pirated that software? I think even the BSA couldn't make that argument providing you have the official media... cause otherwise, they'd have to accuse you of illegally pressing perfect duplicate copies of your software, and that would be craaaaaaazzzzyyy!

      You painted a total nightmare scenario in your hypothetical. Imagine if RIAA, MPAA, and BSA were to form a single cartel, pool their resources, and use their authority over local law enforcement (which they've blackmailed) to conduct such raids of your home.

    11. Re:Tax revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the real story here is the fact that you've upgraded Windows four times without your computer catching on fire.

    12. Re:Tax revenue? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Uhm, many times you download the ISO and you don't get an "OFFICIAL COPY". This is even though it IS LEGITIMATE. Microsoft for instance does this all the time.

    13. Re:Tax revenue? by vux984 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're suggesting that, even with the original media in your hands, the BSA would then accuse you of having pirated that software?

      First, they don't say its 'pirated' (except in their lobbying rhetoric) they call it an 'unlicenced' copy, which really amounts to the same thing to them.

      Secondly, when you buy a VLA, you often purchase media 'separately'; e.g you might pay 20,000$ for 200 licenses of software X at 100 per copy, and then buy 2 media kits (installation CDs) at $25 a shot. And having the media means nothing, its the paperwork that counts. Plus these days, its pretty common to just download the iso.

      As for non-VLA software, if you've got a 'full version' installation media your probably ok, provided you have enough original disks... but if you'v got an 'ugrade version', its not a valid license unless you also have the version you upgraded -FROM- right down to the start of the chain.

      Their reasoning is that you could have bought one copy of Office 2000, then bought 10 copies of Office XP Upgrade, and used the original Office 2000 media as the basis for each of the upgrades. So if you can only produce one copy of office 2000, 9 of your Office XP upgrades are 'unlicensed'.

      Or in the case of more trusting software, maybe you even bought the upgrade, without ever having owned the original, or maybe you sold the previous version...)

      You painted a total nightmare scenario in your hypothetical. Imagine if RIAA, MPAA, and BSA were to form a single cartel, pool their resources, and use their authority over local law enforcement (which they've blackmailed) to conduct such raids of your home.

      It would be a nightmare scenario.

      And the BSA already does this to businesses -- its generally a nightmare for them, as all but the most organized of megacorps who have a full time staff dedicated to their internal software inventory and licensing have a shot of satisfying the BSA.

      Everybody else, even if they actually did buy everything they use, aren't going to be able to prove it.

      Plus most businesses fail legitimately. After all even 'good' businesses get nailed on things like Winzip shareware (owned by Corel, a member of the BSA), [I use and recommend 7-zip because of this] or on fonts... e.g. they'll have unlicensed copies of the TrueType font XYZ used in their logo on floating around (which is owned by Adobe, a member of the BSA), for example....

      So they get just about everybody on something, and a BSA audit is more about "how much" its going to cost you rather than "if".

      Its really quite sick.

    14. Re:Tax revenue? by Cyberax · · Score: 3, Informative

      They can. And the do.

      It has happened with the parent company of my own company. It turned out that BSA needs proof-of-purchase and original media with license numbers printed on disks IS NOT a proof-of-purchase.

    15. Re:Tax revenue? by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Enjoin the BSA with the media cartels (RIAA, MPAA, international equivalents), and you have an entity who would like nothing more than to control or sufficiently influence governments in order to maintain a continuous racketeering scheme.

      "And that's not funny, because it's probably true!"

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    16. Re:Tax revenue? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I think the real story here is the fact that you've upgraded Windows four times without your computer catching on fire.

      You do realize its not the same original PC of course.

      That's the joy of retail windows, really, they don't even -try- to tell you can't move your license from one box to the next as you upgrade hardware.)

      The Vista upgrade's previous version install requirement is pure BS though, and MS better come up with an alternative next time around, because I am absolutely not going to install XP so I can install Vista so I can install windows 7, when I replace a hard drive.

    17. Re:Tax revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what REALLY bugs me about the BSA is that they consider upgrades for which you can't prove a complete chain for as a 'unlicenses/unauthorized/pirated'.

      I mean, I have Vista Ultimate Upgrade on my PC. I obtained that legally, by upgrading my copy of Windows XP Professional Upgrade, which I obtained legally by upgrading my Windows 98 upgrade, which I obtained legally when I upgraded my Windows 95 retail which was purchased on 25 floppy disks over a decade ago. I do not have those floppy discs or license anymore from the original 95 purchase. (And it might even have been an upgrade to Windows 3.11 for Workgroups... I don't even remember.)

      That's because it very well might BE unlicensed.

      Upgrading an upgrade may not be permitted by your license. Upgrade licenses are often only valid on FULL licenses of qualifying products.

      Moreover, even if your upgrade products are qualifying products for further upgrades (sometimes you can be in a position where that is true), you NEVER get rid of your original, full, site license. That invalidates your entire upgrade chain.

      If you got burned, it would be because you are a terrible record-keeper. The whole point of auditing is to check that you're keeping records. If you can't document it, it's not in compliance. Do you think the IRS would take your word that you did your taxes properly, even though you didn't bother to keep the documentation?

    18. Re:Tax revenue? by liusu119 · · Score: 1

      In other news, using the data from BSA, the Pirate Alliance public a study shows that the money saved from using pirate software created 108,000 jobs in retail and service sector, relieved 324,000 people from poverty and reduced the government employee head count by 48,000 from social welfare and law enforcement departments because of the reduced crime rate and new employments. Students that's enough to fill up 100 middle schools can go to college without worrying about getting deep into debt. So, don't put money under your mattress, spend it.

    19. Re:Tax revenue? by Pepebuho · · Score: 1

      Jeffrey Archer had a Short Story about something similar. In his book "To Cut a Long Story Short", there is a short story about a thief who steals a tie at a store, making sure all the guards see him and he goes to his home. As the police goes to his home, they a large lot of "stolen" articles, but the police could not prove that any one of them has been stolen (no reports, no complainst, whatever) therefore Police had to follow the presumption that they were the thief's and it was recorded so at the station after the investigation. Police could only convict him for stealing the tie, a petty crime with just a small fine.

      Why is it that we cannot presume of in this case that the software had been properly purchased and the BSA HAVE to prove that it is actually illegaly copied?

    20. Re:Tax revenue? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that WinZip was owned by a major software firm now. That's especially frightening. I remember how often I found evaluation copies of WinZip on university computers.

    21. Re:Tax revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minor correction. Typefaces are explicitly exempt from copyright law. Their stored form is copyrightable, but if you're just using the font to make a raster image, you should have no problems.

    22. Re:Tax revenue? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Most importantly: People don't generally pay sales tax when purchasing across state lines, and most people don't bother paying the use taxes they're obligated to pay. It seems in general that if you don't pay sales tax on an object because you bought it out of state, you're then technically liable for use tax. Most people just don't realize it. Since we're talking about Ohio, here's what Ohio's site has to say:

      The most common situation that gives rise to a use tax liability is when an Ohio customer makes a mail order purchase from an out-of-state seller. Use tax is also due when the purchaser improperly claims exemption from the sales tax or if the sales tax paid is less than the total use tax in effect in the county where the item is used or benefit of the service is received.

      One of the main reasons for the use tax is to protect Ohio vendors from unfair competition from out-of-state sellers, since the in-state merchant is required to collect sales tax when selling to an Ohio resident or business. All states that have a sales tax have a use tax.

      There was a big stink about use tax in recent months, when Maine started enforcing its use tax against folks flying into the state in their personal planes and leaving their planes in the state longer than 20 days, thereby making them liable to the state's use tax.

    23. Re:Tax revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this like the "broken window" fallacy, though?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window

  6. What the BSA knows... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    is this: if a company pirates (arrrrr, mateys!) a piece of software, they immediately take the money that would have been used to buy that software and stick it in an underground vault, never to be seen or spent again. That's why the state gets no tax revenue.

    What a bunch of schmucks.

    1. Re:What the BSA knows... by Spydeh · · Score: 1

      Wait don't pirates put rum in the vault and bury their valuables, otherwise how would you drink the rum? But what about the rum???

    2. Re:What the BSA knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What if I buy legit copies of all that unlicensed software....

      By MAIL ORDER?!??!

      Oh snap! The BSA is happy and the state still doesn't get 25000 officers!

    3. Re:What the BSA knows... by jeiler · · Score: 1

      It's gone. It's always gone.

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    4. Re:What the BSA knows... by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "is this: if a company pirates (arrrrr, mateys!) a piece of software, they immediately take the money that would have been used to buy that software and stick it in an underground vault, never to be seen or spent again. That's why the state gets no tax revenue."

      A lot of people are missing the point here. The BSA's activities include catching companies who use pirated software, and getting them into compliance (ie extracting money from them). It's the revenue from these settlements that would be taxable.

      The point of the BSA study is to get the local governments on their side, and support their efforts to get companies into compliance. If the BSA busts a company in Ohio and the settlement is $100K, that's $100K of taxable revenue for the BSA, which Ohio might use to hire police officers or whatever.

      It's all too easy to pretend that the BSA is claiming that each pirated copy is a lost sale, or that (as you put it) the money not spent on software isn't otherwise put into the economy. This makes the BSA look like idiots and, thus, makes us look a little bit smarter. But I think it's essential to have a deepter understanding of what the BSA's doing here. It's a big mistake to underestimate your enemy, and I think that's what a lot of people are doing here.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    5. Re:What the BSA knows... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      California fixed this problem but it's on the Honor System. You are still responsible for "USE TAX" on that purchase which is equal to what you would have paid in sales tax. It's payable at the end of the tax year.

    6. Re:What the BSA knows... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right. This is *another* special case. If someone settles with the BSA, they actually get to print their own money to pay it. That's right! It's not money that they would have otherwise spent on something useful.

      In case you don't understand sarcasm, this is known as the "broken window theory". It's well-known to be absolutely wrong.

    7. Re:What the BSA knows... by shark72 · · Score: 1

      Well, the thing is that if you're busted by the BSA, you have to pay up. How you come up with the money isn't their concern. It's not a safe assumption that you would have otherwise have put the money into the economy. I think they're using the same logic that drove the so-called economic stimulus package, that the money was better put into the economy by taxpayers rather than languishing in some government bank account.

      I'm familiar with the broken window fallacy; it's applied to matters of piracy all the time.

      If you make the assumption that companies who opt to pirate software would otherwise spend the money elsewhere, then your point is perfectly valid, and all those local governments will be able to hire their police officers anyway. But the BSA is taking the position that they'll be able to squeeze money out of companies that otherwise would not have spent that money -- in other words, a forceful economic stimulus!

      Stuff like "if you don't understand sarcasm" is not helpful.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    8. Re:What the BSA knows... by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      But the BSA is taking the position that they'll be able to squeeze money out of companies that otherwise would not have spent that money -- in other words, a forceful economic stimulus!

      Yes squeeze money that wasn't being spent. The company could always sell their assets, lay off workers to pay off the settlements. And hows that's good for the economy?

      Stability in companies is valuable. Thats why they need to keep savings for a rainy day. The long term effect of large settlements is that other companies need to keep more savings on hand.

  7. The more you pirate! the less police there are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Everyone get on TPB quick!

  8. Experiences officers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to "hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers", which being experienced are already working somewhere else. So do we move 25,000 officers from another state to Ohio? Why? Would the source state like it?

    1. Re:Experiences officers? by ozamosi · · Score: 4, Funny

      What they don't tell you is that those 25.000 cops are Indian and working in India to lower the costs.

    2. Re:Experiences officers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would expect that state and local governments could hire plenty of additional experienced police officers with all the money they're saving by pirating software...

      - T

    3. Re:Experiences officers? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Apparently the more we break the law the less Police there are!

      I always thought it was the other way round.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  9. Assumptions by Stevenovitch · · Score: 1

    I always like it when they assume that every piece of pirated software is lost revenue. Given that the pirates have already demonstrated that they don't find the software valuable enough to pay for, it seems more likely that if the option to pirate software is removed a good portion of these people would find a free alternative or another solution to their problem... or they would just go without.

    1. Re:Assumptions by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "I always like it when they assume that every piece of pirated software is lost revenue."

      They don't. You are assuming that they do, but you're incorrect.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    2. Re:Assumptions by Stevenovitch · · Score: 1

      Well then, my comment was appropriately titled.

    3. Re:Assumptions by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      It's probably pretty close to one to one, but only if you only look at the people the BSA deals with. . The BSA only focuses on businesses, and then again, is only really able to investigate businesses with some valid copies (which is how the BSA gets its hooks in you, to my understanding). The result it, most of the time the BSA ends up going after companies with 900 valid licenses, and 100 pirated copies. Frequently this is an honest mistake, or a rogue employee at fault, sometimes the company is just trying to save 10% on the software, in really horrific cases, they just lost the COAs, and are being forced to pay twice.

      Now, if you had the choice of paying 50 grand for the unlicensed copies, or losing the rights to use the 500,000 in software you already payed for, which are you going to choose (remember, you're a businessman, not a /.er in this question, you've never used Linux, and you assume its crap because its cheap.)

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  10. BSA/**AA by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

    and the way the BSA is presenting the data: the study only includes eight states, and it is making some questionable connections, including the claim that lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to 'hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers.'

    Heh heh. I'd like to see what happens when the BSA members are told that online purchases of software will be taxed locally and by the states...

    I'll bet their maths for calculating lost state and local tax revenue from pirated software would change.

    The other factor being, if people couldn't get the 'free as in beer' copies of that software, they wouldn't pay for a legit copy. But that's been rehashed approximately 6.022 x 10^23 times on slashdot, so I won't go any further.

    On a side note, why did the BSA have to break tradition and not use an acronym ending in AA? They've made it much more difficult to lump them into the bin with the MPAA and RIAA. Sigh... BSA/**AA is four too many characters.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:BSA/**AA by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      Well, we used to call it the MAFIAA (Music and Film Industry Associations of America). I don't know about you, but "SMAFIAA" just doesn't have the same kick to it.

    2. Re:BSA/**AA by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, we used to call it the MAFIAA (Music and Film Industry Associations of America). I don't know about you, but "SMAFIAA" just doesn't have the same kick to it.

      True, but it does make me think of them as small and blue, which helps.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:BSA/**AA by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      But it sure sounds close to Smegma, which is about the same level I rate their lot.

    4. Re:BSA/**AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > True, but it does make me think of them as small and blue, which helps.

      Aren't you confusing them with the SMURFIAA?

  11. For crying outloud.... by Seakip18 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because somebody pirates something doesn't mean they would pay for it if that was the only way. They would instead just NOT BUY IT. The entire premise that if you are losing so much in taxes is bunk. Pirating may cause harm in disrupting some tax money, just not that much.

    I mean, honestly, could people even raise that kinda of tax money if they had the cash to buy the software?

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
    1. Re:For crying outloud.... by Seakip18 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow. I wonder if mods could actually look at time stamps before modding redundant. Ah well.

      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
  12. This study also shows... Open Source will kill Gov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just think about it... There's no tax revenue on Open Source software! People are using it for FREE! It's the end of the government! OH NOES!!!!

  13. putting the money in another pocket by RichMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Suppose companies were paying salaries with the money they save by pirating software. Then rather than
    X * 0.05 = 25,000 police
    we would have
    X = 20*25,000 = 500,000 unemployed people

    So another way of looking at the statistics is that the BSA wants to put 1/2 a million people out of work in each state.

    Lies damn lies and statistics, learn to master them.

  14. switch to GNU/GPL/FOSS/Linux by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Informative

    then use your computer with a clear conscience for free...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:switch to GNU/GPL/FOSS/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to say that I continue to use unpaid-for software, and I still have a clear conscience.

    2. Re:switch to GNU/GPL/FOSS/Linux by eln · · Score: 2, Funny

      No you fool, didn't you read the summary? If you don't buy commercial software, there will be no police officers! It will be total anarchy! If you want to bring down civilization, then fine, go use your AnarchyWare (tm) aka "Open Source", but don't come crying to me when the rioting starts.

      The BSA's point is clear and impeccably reasoned: If you don't pay for commercial software (and lots of it!), we are all going to die. Do you really want to be responsible for that?

    3. Re:switch to GNU/GPL/FOSS/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch out! This poster wants you to use unlicensed software! It's not licensed by a BSA member company, therefore it's ILLEGAL and IMMORAL to use! Be vigilant and report these ANTICITIZENS whenever you notice their COMMUNIST software installations!

      SOFTWARE IS NOT FREE. Stay alert, stay alive!

    4. Re:switch to GNU/GPL/FOSS/Linux by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Funny

      My conscience is the clearest when I pay for software, it's a little bit murky when I use free software, and it's totally opaque when I use pirated software.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    5. Re:switch to GNU/GPL/FOSS/Linux by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      fuck you! how dare you mod me as a troll!

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    6. Re:switch to GNU/GPL/FOSS/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Only rejects do any modding the rest of us decent people post.

  15. From future reports by Captain+Spam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not having RTFA or RTFR referred to by TFA, I still have to say I'm amused by the last line in the summary (presumably paraphrasing the report) and its implications to further reports...

    "The lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to save the lives of HUNDREDS of poor, sick people, assuming they could afford the hospital costs after becoming poor from buying software regulated by our association."

    "The lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to pay the ransom on this CEO's poor daughter, kidnapped by evil software pirates, and because you selfish greedy bastards had to go and murder her by pirating software, they didn't have the money to pay to get her back! I HATE YOU ALL!"

    "The lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to save the lives of five hundred innocent kittens from being pulverized in our patented BSA Kitten Pulverizing Machine, whose sole purpose is to abduct and pulverize kittens constantly and whose operations may only be tempered by a continuously-accelerating stream of revenue. Why do you selfish pirates want the kittens to be pulverized? It's all your fault, you know."

    --
    Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    1. Re:From future reports by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      The lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to save the lives of five hundred innocent kittens from being pulverized in our patented BSA Kitten Pulverizing Machine

      There's a new way to huff kittens? Count me in!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  16. Sales tax? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    Who pays sales tax anymore? Especially since the invention of the internet. Here in Chicago, the lack of sales tax more than covers the cost of shipping.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Sales tax? by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1

      New Yorkers pay sales tax.

    2. Re:Sales tax? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      New Yorkers pay sales tax.

      Notice how New York didn't make the list.

      California, Illinois, Nevada and Ohio all had piracy rates over the national average

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    3. Re:Sales tax? by bangwhistle · · Score: 1

      Well, some states with sales tax require citizens to pay a "use tax" on items bought out of state, and it's usually comparable to sales tax. Kinda similar situation to pirating software- not paying something you are supposed to. Of course enforcing either is tricky, and it's probably a given that more people legally license software (majority) than pay use taxes (small minority).

    4. Re:Sales tax? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      I'm familiar with this concept. I was helping a friend out with her Indiana state income tax and there was a line to declare sales tax on items purchased through the mail. The records one would have to keep to fill out that section would be ridiculous.

      On the other hand, some states give you a deduction on your income tax if you can provide receipts for sales taxes paid. Illinois has a version of this system, but the sales tax has to be above a certain dollar amount. Basically the only thing that qualifies for the deduction, is a car.

      People are much more likely to prove they paid sales tax to get money back than to volunteer information about avoiding sales taxes.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  17. Yet another statistic shows by soast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If every big corporation did not out source we could employee 10,000,000 United States Citizens and therefor increase tax money to employ 500,000 experienced police officers.

    1. Re:Yet another statistic shows by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      Funny how on slashdot people are almost universally opposed to outsourcing, presumably on the grounds that it puts their jobs at risk, while they are almost universally not opposed to software piracy even though it also puts their jobs at risk (but they get some "free" software yey)

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    2. Re:Yet another statistic shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And?

    3. Re:Yet another statistic shows by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      Funny how on slashdot people are almost universally opposed to outsourcing, presumably on the grounds that it puts their jobs at risk, while they are almost universally not opposed to software piracy even though it also puts their jobs at risk (but they get some "free" software yey)

      And your use of universally makes your commentary universally silly. "Slashdot People" (of which you are presumably one, since you post here) may, as a group, object to outsourcing jobs.

      That is, presuming you specifically mean outsourcing jobs to India, Pakistan or some country not represented here in large numbers. I suspect that jobs outsourced to the UK from the US, for example, or vice-versa would not meet your assertion.

      Universal or nearly Universal acceptance of software piracy is going to be difficult to prove, and I believe it to be categorically inaccurate.

      I'd say that a substantial proportion of the slashdot community opposes piracy, but opposes the methods being employed to combat even more and you seem to be failing to distinguish between the two.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    4. Re:Yet another statistic shows by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can nitpick all you want about the term universal but, if you read the comments and follow the modding patterns on any of the stories dealing with piracy or outsourcing you don't need to be a statistician to see which way the overwhelming majority votes.

      I'd say that a substantial proportion of the slashdot community opposes piracy, but opposes the methods being employed to combat even more and you seem to be failing to distinguish between the two.

      Possibly, but it doesn't seem that way to me. The methods used to combat software piracy seem fairly mild compared to the methods used to combat most other types of crime. The perpetrators are almost never caught (hence the widespread problem) and when they are, the penalties are not that severe. Compare this to drug or prostitution enforcement where people end up in jail for years despite the fast that they have never hurt anyone, financially or otherwise, which you certainly couldn't say about software piracy.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    5. Re:Yet another statistic shows by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Well said. But no, ultimately we do not care about our country, or neighbor or our own lives. The government let the corporations destroy our economy so that they could be independent multinational corporations with no ties to America other than the CEO's living in rich gated communities where freedom truly exists in America.

      The rest of America gets fucked. Learn Chinese... our government will be speaking it soon.

    6. Re:Yet another statistic shows by pimp0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The methods used to combat software piracy seem fairly mild compared to the methods used to combat most other types of crime.

      And you don't think that could have something to do with copyright infringement not usually being a crime? Unless you mean actual piracy, which often involves eyepatches and speech impediments..

    7. Re:Yet another statistic shows by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but software piracy DOES NOT put my job at risk. BZZZt, try again?

  18. Ho Hum by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    Would I be the only one surprised if the BullShit Association told the truth?

    Anything from them is a M$ policy ad.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  19. untapped resources by electricbern · · Score: 1

    including the claim that lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to 'hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers.

    And the lost of sun light due to lack of solar panels would be enough to power the whole world.

    --
    alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
  20. These people are morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IF (and that's a big IF) the 4.2 billion in lost sales is true then there is no way that the states affected could hire 25,000 police officers. Police officers cost about $ 100,000 per year including all salary & fringes. If you multiply 25,000 by 100,000 you get 2.5 billion. That is 59.52% of the estimated lost revenue. So in essence what they are saying is that they don't know how to do math or they live in a state where the total tax rate is 59.52% on business property - These folks need to get real!

    Your local friendly CPA.

  21. Or in other words... by hedwards · · Score: 1

    You heard the AC folks, Open Source software is the software of anarchists and libertarians.

    If you use Open Source the terrorists win. Also for no apparent reason the fire fighters will stop getting Timmy out of the well and the alternate Back to the Future II version of the US will result.

  22. Realize this is software used by BUSINESS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Piracy among home users is much higher. Proof? Look at yourself !! you thieving leach !!

    1. Re:Realize this is software used by BUSINESS by TheRudle · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't have a home, you insentive clod!

    2. Re:Realize this is software used by BUSINESS by smilindog2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, so true. However, I only use Ubuntu at home (even my kids use it). My only illegal software is the DVD player hack that let's me watch the DVDs I legally purchased. It kills me that I have to break the law or buy a M$ product.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    3. Re:Realize this is software used by BUSINESS by Atti+K. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My only illegal software is the DVD player hack that let's me watch the DVDs I legally purchased. It kills me that I have to break the law or buy a M$ product.

      You can also buy an Apple product or a DVD player to legally play DVDs. Even the latter is more intelligent than a M$ product ;)

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    4. Re:Realize this is software used by BUSINESS by paazin · · Score: 1

      You can also buy an Apple product or a DVD player to legally play DVDs. Even the latter is more intelligent than a M$ product ;)

      Yes, but you still need to deal with the nonsense of not having permission to view the content you purchased (i.e. region encodings) because the MPAA said so.

  23. ETHICS!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I make this point at least once a month.

    There used to be an assumption of ethics. If someone was caught in a lie or fabrication, it would be shameful and cause harm to the individual or an organization. Even organizations with which you disagree would probably be telling the truth.

    Those days are long gone. There isn't any effort into presenting the truth. No one cares. Everyone merely selects facts that support their position and tosses the rest. If you dare to present opposing facts, it just becomes a dispute.

    Look at "intelligent design" for some reason news agencies seem to think they they deserve equal time with actual science. That is no different than putting astronomers and astrologers on equal footing. Yes, Carl Sagan said there are billions of stars, but madam Maria predicts that there only 100,000 and half of them are in retrograde until 2012. Dial in, who do you believe? 1-900-USA-fucked

    There is no ethics or common sense. There is no public outcry or demand that public statements be factually accurate. We expect people to lie. We then use the lies we like to bolster our opinions based on our prejudices.

    Communication is impossible when everyone is lying.

    1. Re:ETHICS!! by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are you lying about?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:ETHICS!! by compro01 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Everyone merely selects facts that support their position and tosses the rest.

      You presume they even bother to find facts rather than just make up some impressive sounding nonsense.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:ETHICS!! by lordofwhee · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are these 'facts' you speak of? Didn't the MAFIAA say they didn't need proof? That's good enough for me! Kill the pirates!


      I swear, I'm going to end up breaking one day, buying a gun, and hunting down the nearest BSA/MAFIAA employee.

    4. Re:ETHICS!! by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      Those days are long gone

      You speak of days that never truly existed in any of our lifetimes.

      Your strawman argument is exceptionally flawed. Evolution is the upstart pseudo-science with pick-and-choose evidence and no proof (incoming: groupthinkers). Intelligent design is rubbish, of course, but "EvOlUtIOn" is rated the most important discovery of the last 1,000 years, according to those polled for "The 100 most Important Scientific Discoveries" (Polled from Discover magazine or Scientific American, I'm not sure).

      Evolution is seen, in society, as more important than DNA, Nuclear Fission, Genetics, Thermodynamics, Electricity, Cellular biology, Chemistry, Quantum Physics, Relativity, or any Mathematical formulae discovered over the last 1,000 years. This doesn't signify a hideous retardation in our armchair scientific community? No one has benefited from the study of evolution but those getting paid to study it or write books about it. Genetics? Yes, of course. Evolution? No. Not one single person. Evolution, correct or incorrect, has less scientific importance than the discovery of bananas being rich in potassium.

      And somehow you cite Intelligent Design as a sign of a hemmoraging society losing all its common sense and ethics? You, sir, are the very core of the problem.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    5. Re:ETHICS!! by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 0

      Fall of the Empire... Pull up a lawn chair (made in china) and watch it go down.

      We're doomed because we are a nation of bullshit. Our politics is a great example. Look at this presidential election. There hasnt been one word of substance out of any of the so called "candidates" mouths.

      We dont know their policies, they never debate their policies, they never do anything in depth at all. Jesse Jackson calls Barrack Obama a Nigger and the news doesnt even cover it. Jesse Jackson says "I'd like to cut his balls off" refering to Barrack Obama, and no one cares... NOT EVEN Barrack Obama! Instead he turns around and kisses Jesse's ass with a nice comment. Nevermind the fact that Jesse Jackson is supposedly running an organization to end racism, and he himself is a racist. What has the "rainbow colition" ever done besides collect money and buy Jesse Jackson fancy suits, AND employ his entire family with great salaries?

      We're a nation of bullshit. We stand for nothing, we say nothing of substance... and everything is done secretly.

      Our children are told that it is a representative democracy... We're told we have freedom of speech. The truth is... We have giant corporations pretending to be tv news organizations telling us what to do and think... The average man is not allowed to play that game.

      The so called middle class, and poor are held at arms length, seperated from the wealthy in every area including freedoms, representation and legal justice.

      This country is not suppsoed to have separate laws based on economic classes. Just because the corporations own all of the tv stations, does not give them the right to spoon feed us bullshit. After all under law, they are using the people's airwaves. But no one really gives a fuck about that. Its all about the money. Say and do what you want when you want, cause you have the dollar. And you will obey those who have dollars to give, because freedom be damned, that is all you really care about yourself.

      We're a fucked up nation in so many ways. Our congress does nothing, our senate does nothing... They say nothing. They relay no information to the public. They dont even respond to the public when you contact them.

      They are SEPERATE from the rest. There is that word again....

      Seperate, because their money affords them the America we have hired them to provide us...

      Instead they keep providing for themselves.

      We are a broken nation, and dont you think for a second that it will change. We have been raped, and all that is left is the bruises, pain and destruction of our civilization at the cost of money.

      What did you think corporations were going to do when you let them sell to us, but not hire us...? They're about making money. We still have some of it, but our buying power will run out...

      Economists say there is a leveling of the playing field that is happening, and the middle class will feel the pain hard. The wealthy wont.

      Who let them do this to our country?

      We did.

      Wipe your ass with your vote, and be thankful you'll be dead in 30-50 years, because it is over.

      Can we stop playing that stupid starspankled banner at baseball games already? NO ONE FUCKING CARES ABOUT OUR COUNTRY.

    6. Re:ETHICS!! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Sheeit! You were on to something with the Ethics thing and then you went on a tangent about Intelligent Design and you totally fucked yourself. ID does have statistics behind it and statistics are a kind of science. But you would rather make straw man arguments then keep your argument about ETHICS ETHICAL. Oh the Irony is killing me.

    7. Re:ETHICS!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 2

      ID does have statistics behind it and statistics are a kind of science.

      If you care to post one, that's right, one credible argument that supports ID, I'll apologize and retract what I wrote. BTW: it must not be an obfuscated "god did it" argument.

       

    8. Re:ETHICS!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Evolution is the upstart pseudo-science with pick-and-choose evidence and no proof

      There is a HUGE body of evidence to support the evolutionary process. Everything from germs acquiring resistance to antibiotics to butterflies wing color changes as an adaptation to pollution.

      The process of evolution is hardly pseudo-science, indeed, it is probably the single most important scientific discovery of man. It represents a victory over religious and superstitious nonsense and an important step in understanding our place on this planet.

      Genetics? Yes, of course. Evolution? No. Not one single person. Evolution, correct or incorrect, has less scientific importance than the discovery of bananas being rich in potassium.

      I would submit to you that "genetics" as a science would not be possible without an understanding of the evolutionary process.

      As for the "value" of studying the path of human evolution, you may say that has no value, but that view also would tend to assert that sciences like anthropology or archeology have no value either.

    9. Re:ETHICS!! by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      May I refer to parent as Exhibit A for my GP post.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    10. Re:ETHICS!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      May I refer to parent as Exhibit A for my GP post.

      What "GP post?"

    11. Re:ETHICS!! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      First off you need to understand that Intelligent Design is just a re-phrasing of the Teleological Argument. Now for some statistics. http://www.raptureready.com/featured/funk/statistics-probability.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity just to start.

    12. Re:ETHICS!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      First off you need to understand that Intelligent Design is just a

      Why do people, upon disagreement with another, assume the other person does not know or understand?

      It may be a purpose driven argument, but the "ID" movement itself is based on evangelical christians trying to get past the first amendment.

      The rapture ready link is such bunk, numerology is not statistics.

      Ahh, I knew an idiot would try to promote "Irreducible complexity" it is nonsense and throughly debunked. I'm just waiting for the "watch on the beach" argument.

      ID is a scam and nonsense put forth by an intellectually dishonest group of evangelical christians in an effort to preach religion in the secular classroom against the U.S. constitution.

      The problem is, again, ethics. Rather than accept facts and law, they construct plausible sounding theories that less knowledgeable will accept or the cynical can use. The problem is that "plausible sounding" is not the same thing as "plausible."

      The process of evolution has been proved. It is a fact that organisms change and adjust over generations to changing environments in accordance with survivability and reproduction. This has been documented and proved beyond any possible argument. The "Theory of Evolution" is the explanation of this process. "Evolution" isn't "just a theory" it is the process by which life has come to be so varied on this planet.

      Charles Darwin, in the origin of species, knowing the religious implications of his work, was careful and meticulous in his research. It is a very large body of well documented work. Wehn the "ID" people can come up with real facts and not just "plausible sounding" arguments (which they can't) I'll listen.

      ID is devoid of reason. It is vacant of fact or evidence. It makes no predictions and can not be verified. It is not science.

    13. Re:ETHICS!! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but what part of the first amendment are you talking about? The part that says we have a freedom of speech? Maybe the free press part? Just what are you talking about? I love when people reference the Bill of Rights and then don't even know what's in it.

      Second of all most people don't have a problem with the idea of evolution as a general "fact that organisms change and adjust over generations to changing environments in accordance with survivability and reproduction". Really it's true. Even Evangelical Christians believe this is true. What astounds people is how far pseudo-scientific people then expand upon that and say that basically life came out of nothing and there was no order and then bang order and no being had anything to do with the order appearing out of disorder and it was all of natural consequence.

      First off where to the laws of nature come from. For that matter where to the laws of logic and reasoning come from. Man didn't make them. They just discovered these already true principles. All ID is saying is that maybe species were designed to a point where they took the shape/form/arraignment of organs etc. of the creatures we now see walking the earth and swimming the oceans. That is all. I personally also have a hard time with speciation happening because of evolution. In other words entirely new species popping up just because of natural selection.

    14. Re:ETHICS!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but what part of the first amendment are you talking about? The part that says we have a freedom of speech? Maybe the free press part? Just what are you talking about? I love when people reference the Bill of Rights and then don't even know what's in it.

      As a member of the ACLU I can quote the bill of rights. The part that is important is this:

      "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

      This passage has been interpreted, using John Hancock's supporting papers, to establish a separation of church and state.

      The ID people try to wiggle around this by creating a plausible science-ish sounding religious movement.
      What astounds people is how far pseudo-scientific people then expand upon that and say that basically life came out of nothing and there was no order and then bang order and no being had anything to do with the order appearing out of disorder and it was all of natural consequence.

      It isn't "pseudo-science" at all, I woulkd hardly call our world "ordered," and lastly, just people are astounded doesn't make it not true. People were "astounded" that the earth wasn't in the center of the universe and it wasn't flat.

      First off where to the laws of nature come from.

      Why do they have to come from anywhere?

      For that matter where to the laws of logic and reasoning come from.
      Again, why do they have to come from anywhere?

      All ID is saying is that maybe species were designed to a point where they took the shape/form/arraignment of organs etc. of the creatures we now see walking the earth and swimming the oceans.

      ID is not saying "maybe" it is saying that they "are." ID offers no proof.

      I personally also have a hard time with speciation happening because of evolution. In other words entirely new species popping up just because of natural selection.

      News flash: The earth is round, it orbits the sun, the sun is in our galaxy. Species do not "pop up," over many thousands or millions of years, they genetically drift apart and separate.

      Why are bonobos so close, genetically, to humans?

    15. Re:ETHICS!! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Why are bonobos so close, genetically, to humans?

      Answer: Because the same being created them that way? All your evidence goes both ways. And yes ID is the act of arguing the point. It is not a statement of fact. It's the argument that maybe life came out of something which itself was already intelligent and ordered. Futhermore, the extension of Evolutionary Theory into speciation and origins (Which it doesn't lend itself to) is jut an argument about another idea of where we came from. MAYBE both belong in a PHILOSOPHY class.

      Second of all you quoted "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" but you just ignore the last part. Congress cannot be the thought police and they can't dictate that religion cannot be taught about in public school. This restrains congress and makes it so the Government cannot sponsor a STATE RELIGION. It however does not put a GAG ORDER on teachers. Luckily my school (Which was public) didn't take your moronic interpretation of the Constitution and did have classes about Religion and all sorts of other things people like to get their panties in a twist about.

    16. Re:ETHICS!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      Answer: Because the same being created them that way? All your evidence goes both ways.

      Why would a creator do this? It makes far more sense, and it can be seen in the fossil record that we descended from a common ancestor.

      It's the argument that maybe life came out of something which itself was already intelligent and ordered.

      As a scientist, where is the proof? Maybe the universe was created by the "Flying Spaghetti Monster," without fact, ID is no more or less relevant than the easter bunny.

      Congress cannot be the thought police and they can't dictate that religion cannot be taught about in public school.

      That, of course, is wrong. The 1st amendment specifically forbids "law respecting an establishment of religion," and using hogwash created by evangelical christians to get around this restrictions is wrong.

      Luckily my school (Which was public) didn't take your moronic interpretation of the Constitution and did have classes about Religion and all sorts of other things people like to get their panties in a twist about.

      It isn't *my* interpretation, it is *the* interpretation of the 1st amendment. If you would care to say which school is teaching ID, maybe I can pass that info to the ACLU.

      I assure you that *my* public schools, should they ever try to teach ID crap, will be sued for a 1st amendment violation ASAP.

    17. Re:ETHICS!! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      HAHA. The ACLU that bastion of fairness that it is. NOT! They have a vendetta against religion in society. Look, I don't know why you can't understand the constitution but it says nothing about teaching. It says something about the establishment of laws regarding religion. Hence, there should be no laws regarding religion that prevent it's teaching. It's just basic understanding of the English Language. The fundamental flaw is how far liberal judges took the "Separation of Church and State" ideal that THEY MADE UP as opposed to gathering it from the actual constitution and then went on to say that now all people who are public servants are also prohibited from speaking about religion while they are working. It's not in the Constitution at all. It's been woven like some terrible web of deceit.

      Second of all my school offered these classes as electives like they should be and did everything by the book. Just so you know the fundamental idea of ID was not around when I went to High School but the teleological argument was and I learned about that. I read parts of Dante's Inferno in high school and I learned about all the world's major religions in another class. It's amazing I know but I was actually given all the knowledge and then allowed to decide on my own. But you don't want that. You want censorship and banning of books. You are like Hitler in that respect.

    18. Re:ETHICS!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      The ACLU that bastion of fairness that it is. NOT! They have a vendetta against religion in society.

      No, just violations of the 1st amendment. As an atheist, why should *my* tax dollars go to faith based anything? The government may not recognize the establishment of religion, thus should not be involved with it in any way.

      Look, I don't know why you can't understand the constitution

      The constitution is a document about specific ideas on the foundations of this country. Where there has been ambiguity, the supreme court has referenced contemporary documents of the authors to understand better the meaning of the words as used. John Hancock's own words were used for the interpretation of religion clause of the 1st amendment as creating a "wall of separation between church and state." No church, no religion in government. That means public places including public schools.

      You are like Hitler in that respect.

      Godwin violation, you lose.

    19. Re:ETHICS!! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Godwin is not a violation; it is an inevitability.

    20. Re:ETHICS!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      Godwin is not a violation; it is an inevitability.

      In my experience it is only an inevitability to people who have to defend an irrational point of view.

    21. Re:ETHICS!! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      But you are for censorship so my point is valid because so was Hitler. Maybe I could have left out Hitler and just mentioned the censorship part but you know how people get caught up in arguments over the Internet and all.

  24. Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have three linux machines at home. Every time I fire one up I run several hundred 'programs', including X, Qt, the TCP/IP stack, flash, firefox, amarok, ipchains. My two little headless linux computers, one disguised as a DSL modem and the other as a firewall, likewise run at least dozens of programs. I know there are tens of thousands of computers hosting websites all over the world that, likewise, are running dozens of 100% free programs.
    For their 1 out of 5 statistic to be right, within the United States, there must be a dozen people running nothing but pirated software just to make up for me.
    I know nine other people who are, likewise, running multiple computers, including several Windows machines, that have 100% legit/free programs on them. So now we're up to a hundred or so people running nothing but pirated software just to make up for me and my nine friends.

    Are there vast underground barracks filled with armies of illegal software users in Ohio and Florida? Is China outsourcing its goldfarming to the ghettos of East LA?

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  25. Re:Sadly my cousin died while being a pirate by gooseupfront · · Score: 1

    How does a dead person recover?

  26. Defined As? by maz2331 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder what their definition of "unlicensed" is. Are they using their definition that unlicensed means you can't find the original invoice for the software? You know, the one where you can have every COA stuck to the case of each machine, but no invoice is considered unlicensed because you can't prove that you didn't buy the licenses after the fact?

    Do they consider Open Source code to be unlicensed? Or shareware? Or what?

    Are they counting companies that shift licenses around when employees leave and PCs are retired?

    1. Re:Defined As? by hellwig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is some legitamacy to the BSA's claims, but not that much. Many companies incorrectly implement site licenses of software, or misenterpret the scope of the license. Therefore, a company may not knowingly be violating the terms of the license, and therefore not be pirating the software, but may still be out of compliance.

      You've got to think about how those licenses work anyway. Every time your business orders a new Dell or HP workstation, it comes with a Windows2000/XP/Vista license sticker. What happens to the old sticker that was on the machine your company returned? Where did the new sticker come from? What if the sticker is for XP, but you are running 2000? What about Office/Visio/Visual Studio/etc... that came pre-installed. Some licenses don't allow downgrading, but even though you have an Office 2005 license, you HAVE to install 97/2000 because of the other applications you may be using. There's lots of ways "unlicensed" software can be installed on a companies PC without anyone thinking about it. Now, is that justifiable cause to fine/sue a company out of existence? No way, but then again, I don't work for the BSA.

      --
      Eggs
      Milk
      Bread
      Cat Litter
      Soda
      ...
  27. Not to mention by kilodelta · · Score: 3, Informative

    Then there's the process the BSA uses to initiate action against an entity. The first thing it does is look at the financials of the company in question.

    I know, I submitted a former employer and was told that the company was in poor financial condition and would not be a viable target because of that.

    So if you're not making much money, pirate away!

    1. Re:Not to mention by dahitokiri · · Score: 1

      Submitted a former employer? Man, takes 'disgruntled employee' to a whole new level. It's almost like turning in your ex-gf/bf to the MAFIAA.

    2. Re:Not to mention by hellwig · · Score: 1

      Well duh, the BSA is a for-profit organization. I mean, they aren't persuing software pirates out of the goodness of their hearts nor because they're trying to right some social injustice they've born witness to.

      The BSA has the proper attitude. Unfortunately for the RIAA and MPAA, companies as a whole don't tend to pirate music and movies, so they're aren't any big cash cows to go after (not since Naptser fell). Unless you count GooTube, but the individual studios are going after that giant, bypassing the MPAA/RIAA processing fee.

      --
      Eggs
      Milk
      Bread
      Cat Litter
      Soda
      ...
    3. Re:Not to mention by celle · · Score: 1

      So the BSA is just a bunch of racketeers. The claymore is to good for the bastards, kill'em individually on national TV and youtube with an olive fork in the middle of CSI:whatever(more shows per week more kills). And start with the genitals, especially with the women.

    4. Re:Not to mention by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I know, I submitted a former employer

      Oh behalf of everyone here: fuck you. Seriously.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Not to mention by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Why? The president of the company forced the I.T. staff to install pirated software. I knew it and the company controller knew it.

      I specifically warned the company president of the potential liabilities too.

  28. Road of least obstacles by Sunshinerat · · Score: 1

    There is also another effect. In the (IT consulting) company I work for it is just a pain in the behind to get paid for licenses on tools I may use on one project. Now, don't get me wrong here, if there is a valid reason, I can get it.

    However, for many tools I do not think there is any valid reason to go and purchase something. Either stuff comes with a developer license (Oracle's SQL Developer vs. Toad; [note: I am not saying the one is better than the other]) or you pull it out of the open source community. Works for me, keeps my conscience clean and keeps the license checking folks of my back.

    So again, license fees that -eventually- pays for police offices and DMV personnel are down for a good reason.

    --
    Load New Commander (Y/N)?
  29. Who cares about more police officers? by LM741N · · Score: 2, Funny

    We need many more mental asylums.

  30. A-Team by Sunshinerat · · Score: 1

    Heck, even the A-team could be in a valid paying job.

    --
    Load New Commander (Y/N)?
  31. BSA methodology may count FLOSS as piracy by Geof · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The BSA numbers are highly suspect. Here's their forumla:

    Infringement = (machines shipped) * (usage estimate multiplier) - (legal BSA) - (legal non-BSA) - (legal FLOSS)

    As Russel McOrmond points out, only two of these numbers are actually known: the number of machines shipped and the amount of legal BSA software. The usage estimate multiplier is an estimate of the average amount of software on a machine in a given region. The essential number, however, may be the amount of legal open source software. How on earth do you calculate that? If it is low, then the piracy numbers could be way off. I distribute some open source code, and even I don't have a clear idea of how many people use it. McOrmond says FLOSS not shipped with a PC is often not included. Read McOrmond's article for an in-depth explanation.

    My Mac has only a few BSA apps - the OS, iLife, and Photoshop Elements. How is the BSA to know that I'm also running Firefox, Thunderbird and OpenOffice (all FLOSS), or Scrivener, Tinderbox, and NetNewsWire (all legal non-BSA stuff written by and purchased from individuals)? How about my parents' machines, on which I've installed OpenOffice software? They probably wouldn't remember it was open source even if asked.

    1. Re:BSA methodology may count FLOSS as piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't need to actually know what each computer runs, they can just do statistics - go through a couple of hundred computers and make their conclusions based on that.

  32. BSA sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and we all know it. Why pay attention to them at all?

    1. Re:BSA sucks by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Because business runs on bullshit, and you're just a pawn in their chess game. You dont matter... you never did. The public isnt a factor in this. It is just another Business to business money making organization and you are used in their numbers games to help leverage laws and built wealthy people nice homes that you, if you're lucky can some day mow for $3.50 an hour.

      Suck it up. America is dead. Think like a businessman, not like an American.

      America is just a set of failed ideals, raped by its own capitalistic society. The laws favor businesses more than civilians. Enjoy.

    2. Re:BSA sucks by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Because if enough of us get pissed we'll organize the equivalent of a pitch fork and torch protest of their organization and shut them down once and for all.

  33. Well, I can pull numbers out of the air, too by zogger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Eliminating the failed prohibition model "war on some drugs" would result in being able to fire 25,000 cops as "not needed at all", as the main result of said war has been an accelerated crime rate related to black market prices and the associated violence with those huge sums of money. No telling how much savings there, but I would imagine it is in the billions. Switching to free and open source, just with governmental use on governmental machines, and especially if magically it could be retroactive back 10 years or better, would have freed up enough cash to give every person in ohio a free computer on savings over software licensing fees, said fees based completely on the "artificial scarcity" model of busy-ness as it relates to digital copies. And probably allow them to give upgrades every few years as well, using the same exact cash levels they are spending now.

    Now mine is thin air and I admit it, but at least it is closer to reality than the BSA and MAFIAA "enron styled" accounting figures, and that tie in with cops and crime was just too obviously *lame*.

  34. can you say... by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

    trying to justify it's own existence? ..... I knew you could.

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  35. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    I used to run almost nothing but pirated software.

    Of course, my monetary situation has changed in the years since I graduated high school.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  36. Reading between the lines by dave562 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to 'hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers.'

    In other words, get on board with the anti-piracy program and you will have more revenue to trample peoples rights outside of cyberspace.

    Keep in mind that part of the target audience of the report is the law enforcement community who at some point has to see some benefit for themselves if they are going to enforce anti-piracy laws. Notice that they don't talk about it in terms of after school programs, or more teachers. Nope, not here in Amerika. We need more cops damn it! The people are getting too uppity.

  37. How they managed to find law-abiding businesses... by martin_henry · · Score: 1

    BSA: "Do you pirate software?" Pointy-haired Boss: "I'm not sure we even own any ships." BSA: "Have a nice day."

    --
    www.purevolume.com/martyd
  38. I'm sick and fucking tired by noric · · Score: 1

    of hearing about all the police officers, city parks, and free massage parlors we could finance with all the money we've 'lost' due to piracy. Why do I never hear about the thousands of police officers that could be financed if only they bought 9 rockets instead of 12?

  39. Aoeaoeaoeaoaeoaeroaekjfelasjfv by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

    Every time I read 'BSA' I can't help but think of it as "BullShit Alliance", but it's too true, as it is with any business who's goal is inherit to their trade, that is, every business.

    I'll assume the BSA was (at least mostly) founded on keeping tabs on 'piracy' and stuff, particularly in the business sector.

    Restaurants make their money on selling food and service, they have to make themselves more appealing by putting that food and service in the best light they can.

    Colleges make their money by selling education, they have to make their campuses and services look as appealing as possible.

    The BSA is in the business of WTFPWNing 'software pirates' and disseminating information about it. They have to make their business appear worthwhile to their members.

    Many fast-food chains are well known for making their greasepatties and other less than perfectly healthy options seem much more wonderful than they are.

    Colleges are only getting more expensive and it's only getting easier to argue the need for such high tuition fees in a world where we need to focus on the quality of education yet so many people aren't learning anything new.

    Where does that leave the BSA?

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  40. Re:Sadly my cousin died while being a pirate by hostyle · · Score: 1

    Emphasis mine

    CART MASTER: [clang] Bring out your dead!
    CUSTOMER: Here's one.
    CART MASTER: Ninepence.
    DEAD PERSON: I'm not dead!
    CART MASTER: What?
    CUSTOMER: Nothing. Here's your ninepence.
    DEAD PERSON: I'm not dead!
    CART MASTER: 'Ere. He says he's not dead!
    CUSTOMER: Yes, he is.
    DEAD PERSON: I'm not!
    CART MASTER: He isn't?
    CUSTOMER: Well, he will be soon. He's very ill.
    DEAD PERSON: I'm getting better!
    CUSTOMER: No, you're not. You'll be stone dead in a moment.
    CART MASTER: Oh, I can't take him like that. It's against regulations.
    DEAD PERSON: I don't want to go on the cart!
    CUSTOMER: Oh, don't be such a baby.
    CART MASTER: I can't take him.
    DEAD PERSON: I feel fine!
    CUSTOMER: Well, do us a favour.
    CART MASTER: I can't.
    CUSTOMER: Well, can you hang around a couple of minutes? He won't be long.
    CART MASTER: No, I've got to go to the Robinsons'. They've lost nine today.
    CUSTOMER: Well, when's your next round?
    CART MASTER: Thursday.
    DEAD PERSON: I think I'll go for a walk.
    CUSTOMER: You're not fooling anyone, you know. Look. Isn't there something you can do?
    DEAD PERSON: [singing] I feel happy. I feel happy. [whop]
    CUSTOMER: Ah, thanks very much.
    CART MASTER: Not at all. See you on Thursday.

    --
    Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  41. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by Limburgher · · Score: 1

    Shit, ipchains? Not an upgrader, are we? ;)

    --

    You are not the customer.

  42. As a Buckeye all I can say is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're number one! We're number one! Woooo!

  43. Canada by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

    So, really, what you're saying is that the report is just a bunch of BS, eh?

  44. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    I'm not what you'd call an early adopter. That particular machine has a GPIB card in it to talk to my 1978 function generator, and a serial connection to my 1989 Amiga, which between them have dozens of other not-pirated programs running every time they're powered up.

    (I swear if I could get my 1964 oscillator interfaced to my computer I'd jump at the chance...)

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  45. BS? by zeptobyte · · Score: 1

    How can you trust any group with BS right there in its name?

  46. I dunno.... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that it is the business of the BSA to present software piracy as a significant problem, whether it is or not. I mean, their business model is to earn money by uncovering violations, right? So it would be bad for business if their software piracy report uncovered, say, a sharp decline in piracy. With such a clear conflict of interest, how could anyone believe what they say?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  47. Yup! Nopiracy.com by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    yup, last year. use www.nopiracy.com

    I didn't get paid one paycheck, and got told I'd get it on the next one. Since I had unofficially done some of their IT fixing (basic networking stuff), when I offered to upgrade the office to Vista (from XP) for the boss, he jumped on the opportunity. I also switched office 03 to office 07, installed norton and acrobat 8. It was only about 40 computers.

    Two weeks later, when they 'forgot' to give me my commission from the previous paycheck, so I cashed the check, called the BSA and reported the problem. When they called to let my boss know they'd be investigating, he asked me if he should be worried. I told him that I was sure that our windows licenses were good for ANY version of windows, and not to worry.

    A few weeks went by, and another paycheck, ... but eventually, I got to sit back and wonder what my boss was going through in the office, and when he finally stormed out and demanded the licenses from me, I asked him what he was talking about, and said 'Hey, I'm just a sales guy, I don't know!'

    Since it was my word against my bosses word and he couldn't provide the licenses, he opted to have the computers confiscated (maybe because he didn't have the money?). He told everyone that they could work from home, and he'd continue to pay them. I'm not sure how many people got paychecks after that, but I never tried ... I figured he'd be just a little upset.

    I guess I could have taken him to court for the backpay, but that wouldn't have been very nice.

    1. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by Applekid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      . . . I offered to upgrade the office to Vista (from XP) for the boss, he jumped on the opportunity. I also switched office 03 to office 07, installed norton and acrobat 8. It was only about 40 computers.
      . . .
      When they called to let my boss know they'd be investigating, he asked me if he should be worried. I told him that I was sure that our windows licenses were good for ANY version of windows, and not to worry.
      . . .
      Since it was my word against my bosses word and he couldn't provide the licenses, he opted to have the computers confiscated (maybe because he didn't have the money?).

      So the moral of the story is that it's easy to make unauthorized copies of software and bait a company into being an accessory to it and use the BSA as your personal army to settle your backpay vendetta?

      You should consider running for office.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by Joeyspecial · · Score: 1

      So wait, you installed the illegal software, then called them yourself? Did your boss know that it was not legitimate software?

    3. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      He never thought he'd get caught, and when they called, I assured him it was no big deal because the upgrades were legal, just like 98 to 98se.

      and yes, they screwed me out of money, so I screwed them and got paid. I thought it was all even in the end...

    4. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      If you get fired, just leave some stuff behind that is hard to find, and then report them as you walk out the door.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by hmar · · Score: 1

      I thought to get the BSA payout you had to prove that you weren't complicit in the piracy.

    6. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what they require for proof isn't substantial.

    7. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by sheepofblue · · Score: 1

      Hopefully your ex boss reads this and takes action. They were wrong to not pay you if that is what happened however I doubt that is the whole story as you are a confessed liar.

    8. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Troll

      ah, but a debt-free, stick it to the man, rebel with a cause liar type. Besides, I know I'm a liar, so does he... he just can't prove it, and I don't think he's in business anymore because he screwed the wrong person.

    9. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by couchslug · · Score: 0

      They asked for it.
      I applaud your actions, for I firmly believe that if someone screws me over that they just eliminated any moral obligation or ethical obligation I might have had to them, except that of revenge.

      So how much loot was involved?

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      I got about $8,500 ... I have NO idea how much it was worth to my old boss.

    11. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I offered to upgrade the office to Vista (from XP) for the boss, he jumped on the opportunity ... when they 'forgot' to give me my commission from the previous paycheck, so I cashed the check, called the BSA and reported the problem.

      That would be the problem you created.

      When they called to let my boss know they'd be investigating, he asked me if he should be worried. I told him that I was sure that our windows licenses were good for ANY version of windows, and not to worry.

      Clever, clever boy, aren't you. I'm sure there is no way that could come back to bite you.

      He told everyone that they could work from home, and he'd continue to pay them. I'm not sure how many people got paychecks after that, but I never tried

      I guess it would be too much to hope that someone will figure out your role in all this and see that you get what you deserve. Maybe your former boss, or one of your ex-coworkers, will read this, put it all together and take matters in to their own hands. The fact that you're bragging about it here on Slashdot tells me you're not smart enough to know when to keep your mouth shut.

      Or maybe you will get away with it this time. But people like you always fuck up sooner or later. You'll pull this kind of shit with the wrong person some day.

    12. Re:Yup! Nopiracy.com by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      maybe I will mess up, one day. Except, I don't usually screw with people unless they've screwed with me. And I make sure I cover my tracks. Maybe talking about it on slashdot will come back to haunt me. Probably not... the BSA has bigger fish to fry, and they *did* catch someone. They're kinda like the RIAA, they don't need to catch the RIGHT person, just so long as they appear to be effective.

  48. What they count as piracy by techiemikey · · Score: 1

    Looking through, I just found another thing they counted as Piracy I havn't seen anyone mention yet. In the talk about the benefits of using legal software, they say "It simply works better than the pirated versions, which are often trial or beta copies;" If they are counting trial software, hell, a dell comes with so many programs that 30 days after purchase become "pirated". That's where 1 in 5 come from. Win-zip!

  49. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by lordofwhee · · Score: 1

    I run about 75% pirated software (really, only stuff that's legit that's on this box are free, or the OS), so I make up for... about 1/9th of one of your friends.

  50. Re:Sadly my cousin died while being a pirate by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    I first read it as 'Please pay for his speedy recovery'.

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  51. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    Part of my point is that the BSA, and the companies the BSA represents, have a problem: every year, fewer applications need to be bought because there are free versions that work well enough. We don't expect to buy driver programs hardware -- they're free. We don't expect to buy internet connectivity programs -- they're free. Many window managers, garbage collection programs, data compression programs, codecs, bluetooth protocol stacks, are free.
    What the BSA is saying is that 1/5 of the OS installations, Photoshop installations, and Excel installations are pirated. That's possible. But right now my computer is running 72 processes, and only ten of those are programs that can be purchased. You can't pirate free stuff, and an increasing amount of software, even on Windows systems, is free stuff.
    That, in my opinion, is what the BSA is really concerned with in the long term.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  52. Piracy formula by techiemikey · · Score: 1

    The formula they use for piracy is as follows:
    They take the number of Software units installed and subtract the number of software unit's purchased/obtained legally, and the resulting value is the number of pirated software units. Now how did they get those numbers? Well, look at page 11 of the report for that, because if my interpretation of what they are saying is correct, the software units installed = hardware units times the software load (which if that means how much can be put on, will lead to inaccurate numbers) and the numbers legally obtained is Software Market revenue divided by the cost per unit.

    Yea...um, that formula really sketches me out.

  53. Warping the definition of piracy by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    Just like RIAA set out to do with the definition of music downloads. Most of the "piracy" are simple oversights. I read about one engineering firm that got dinged because they had software on retired workstations that were then used for a different purpose (at the same company). They forgot to uninstall...I think it was some CAD tools...and they got fined big for that. They had licenses for all their working drafters, just neglected to delete the old software off re-purposed machines.

    That's why I'm happy to be setting up a Linux network. Doesn't necessarily insulate you from a BSA audit. But unless their software runs on Ubuntu, they can go pound sand.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  54. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, I know that I shouldn't ask why you've connected the function generator and Amiga to it because I consider "just because you can" a sufficient reason for a geek but I must ask if they also serve some useful purpose? If they do, it's obviously even more cool :)

  55. One other factiod about the BSA by Rastl · · Score: 1

    One thing that doesn't get mainstream media coverage is the piracy rate of BSA members.

    From what I hear that's a pretty substantial number of unauthorized copies (per BSA requirements) but it would be bad publicity to acknowledge that even their own members are pirating* software from each other.

    If their own member companies can't prove ownership using the BSA 'chain of licensing' then you know it's a crock.

    * That's 'pirating' for a specific definition of pirating. Kind of like a certain ex-US president asking what the definition of 'is' is.

  56. What do you have against babysitters? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Apologies to Pixar.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  57. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shhhhh...
    you'll give away ALL our secrets on how to get rich...

  58. John Kimball does newspapers, not software. by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    Its true. Check it out here

    1. Re:John Kimball does newspapers, not software. by Theoboley · · Score: 0

      LMAO!!!! Couldn't have been put or stated any better. Thank you for confirming my suspicions. Wish i had mod points... i'd mod this one funny

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  59. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    You sure about that? I think you're counting the same biased way the BSA is. I bet your printer driver program's not pirated. Ditto your keyboard-scanning program, or your web browser, or the default text editor or the program that displays the load average and the currently running processes. How about the program that shows what hardware is connected? Or the one that defragments the hard drive?
    There are hundreds of programs interacting to keep a computer running, and only a very few ones right on the very tip-top are still sufficiently unusual to warrant purchasing.

    Now, if you're running a pirated OS, then you *are* running probably 75% pirated stuff, in a manner of speaking, and there are a lot of people doing that. But even then I'm betting it's nowhere near 1/5 or even 1/50th of the people in the US simply because computers are so cheap and installing an OS is something that most people have not the ability, motivation, or willingness to do.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  60. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by ya+really · · Score: 1

    As a resident of Ohio, let me assure you our barracks are only full of life saving supplies in case the apocalypse. After all, we may need 1 million copies of AutoCad to rebuild the earth after a major disaster.

  61. I got a good laugh. by sr8outtalotech · · Score: 1
    If these turkeys didn't posses the ability to cause significant disruption to most businesses they visit, they'd be a complete joke.

    # California has the highest portion of workers in small business and a higher-than-average use of volume licensing, which may lend itself to lax software management. These factors push the state's piracy rate to 25%, one-quarter above the national average.

    So they're blaming Microsoft, one of their members, in part for pushing up piracy in California?

    # Florida had the lowest use of volume licensing and the smallest percentage of PCs and software purchased from non-brand-name sources, resulting in a 19% piracy rate, slightly below the national average.

    So we should eliminate non-brand-name PCs to reduce piracy?

    # In Illinois, 61% of consumers said they installed new software on older computers in 2007, compared to a national average of 51%. This helped drive the state's piracy rate above the national average, to 22%.

    Yes, you're automatically a pirate if you install that copy of software package X on a new computer. I personally enjoy this one since when I recycle computers, the recycling place tosses any MS disks/manuals/licenses in the appropriate garbage bin. They use Ubuntu. Obviously, this copy of Windows XP that I bought in 2002 is pirated because I've installed it on 3 computers and removed it from 2 computers I donated.

  62. I'm touched how concerned the BSA is for America. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    I really am touched. It is so important to see how Ohio could have hired 25,000 new policemen, because we need more policemen. We need to kick our public's ass. No, we dare not hire 25,000 new teachers... or improve the school system or raise teachers salaries... but instead... hire more gun legal state cowboys.

    No one really gives a shit about this country anymore. Its all about money. We're fucked because we eat ourselves alive. If piracy stopped tomorrow, i'm sure Adobe would NOT be charging $10 for photoshop. No, I'm pretty sure the price would go up on the product because of supply and demand. If it were impossible to pirate photoshop, many would find free alternatives. Adobe would be forced to increase prices due to the fact that photoshop users, pirates and legal users.... have now moved to other applications which are cheaper or free. Adobe doesnt really want a world where photoshop isnt the standard.... even at the cost of piracy.

    But dont worry, the little man will lose... he/she always does.

  63. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    The amiga was initially just to get 10 megs (the size of the hard drive) copied off the amiga and onto the linux machine, without using the floppy drive. (If you remember Amiga floppy drives you'll know why. If you don't, it's because I don't hate my neighbors and it scares my dog.)

    The function generator, I use to produce very precise timing for a bunch of stepper motor drivers I'm using for CNC machining stuff. But, in general, it's really nice to be able to interconnect test&measurement equipment to computers: I can precisely measure the curve of current flow into a disk drive as it spins up and seeks/writes, at 50 measurements a second, with a computer interfaced to a digital multimeter. I have a plan, involving a strain gauge glued to a milling machine bit, and connected through a DMM, so I could do real-time calculation of tool deflection and not break off any more milling bits because I was making too heavy a cut. Stuff like that.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  64. Re:Yuo 7ail 1t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this how you spend your entire day? Desperately trying to troll people who would point and laugh at you if they were ever unfortunate enough to meet you face-to-face, sitting in a public library somewhere while waiting for your next welfare check? Go kill yourself.

  65. Unlicensed Software? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Thats a nice way to twist the truth a bit and rope in people that use free software to give it a bad impression to the average Joe.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  66. TFA - and questions by Madball · · Score: 1

    BSA report link

    IDC Global Study Methodology Details

    Economic Input Methodology

    Comments on the contents:

    1. Tone is funny. Does not pretend to be scientific, but rather a position paper.

    2. Note, study does not include Server/Mainframe software.

    3. Basically, they take the Sales Quantities and divide by Install quantities to get "Legitimate Installation" percentage. The install quantities are based on surveys from 100 folks in each state and extrapolated to the state level.

    4. Open source software is theoretically included. It's fairly easy to track installs for this (assuming the interviewee's include these in their responses and are honest). However, I have no idea how the shipments end of open source would be calculated (seeing as most of it is likely downloaded). Thus, it's possible that open source is causing the perceived piracy rate to be increased, lol (note, it is stated that lost economic value of OSS is zero).

  67. you got hit with a sony rootkit? by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    So.. you're saying I should have accepted the surprise pay 'cut', and avoided my civic duty to report a crime? ;)

    Hmm.. well, I guess if you're too smart to turn autoplay off on your cd drive, then you're too smart for me.

    Then again, maybe you're just emo - I read your journal, and it seems to say "Oh, my suburban rich lifestyle is soooo hard... booo hooo". Not all of us have an easy ride in life, and some of us have to work. If you get screwed out of a paycheck and can't pay rent because you just paid tuition, you'd be upset too. I guess not as upset about losing a date with Kathy, but then again, you've always got your hot hooker-married-to-a-politician friend to rely on.

    1. Re:you got hit with a sony rootkit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      So.. you're saying I should have accepted the surprise pay 'cut', and avoided my civic duty to report a crime? ;)

      You sound like the perfect person to run as a politician.

      Seriously, keep your fork tongue in your mouth.

    2. Re:you got hit with a sony rootkit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So.. you're saying I should have accepted the surprise pay 'cut', and avoided my civic duty to report a crime?

      If your former employer really did screw you out of money you were in entitled to, you still had other options available than committing fraud and screwing your former coworkers in the process. As for reporting the "crime," since you are the one who committed it I'm not sure reporting it was the smartest thing to do. Then again, you are apparently not too smart to brag about it on Slashdot; I'm sure it probably doesn't take much to get you to run your mouth about it in person either.

      I sure hope you haven't spent that $8,500 you got from the BSA. I have a feeling they're going to want it back.

    3. Re:you got hit with a sony rootkit? by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      I only mentioned it here because it was relevant and interesting. If everyone abstained from 'bragging', as you put it, there would be very few posts, and very little of it would be interesting.

      It has been over a year, and the BSA hasn't had a problem with it so far... if they do come knockin', I'll let you know... but they've got bigger fish to fry and probably won't bother (as you can see from the article).

    4. Re:you got hit with a sony rootkit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only mentioned it here because it was relevant and interesting. If everyone abstained from 'bragging', as you put it, there would be very few posts, and very little of it would be interesting.

      Yeah, because Slashdot is totally about half-assed vigilantes reporting about their latest efforts in promulgating misery while avoiding risk to themselves. I just couldn't survive without your generous contribution.

      You might not have noticed, but most countries have laws that require employers to pay you, and a system in place that allows you to make use of them in case you can't just talk the thing through. As it stands, you just made an effort to cover your ass while profiting from the fact that you, yourself, screwed them over. Congratulations, you're a douchebag.

    5. Re:you got hit with a sony rootkit? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I think he's saying you should have been a man and done the right thing such as finding another job (which you had to do anyhow) instead of opting for cowardice after you aided in the commission of a civil offense. Do you think of all the people you put out of work much?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:you got hit with a sony rootkit? by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      uh ... no. Thinking about others doesn't put food on my table. I was a salesman at the time, which means I thought even LESS about others.

    7. Re:you got hit with a sony rootkit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      correction, a douchebag with money at the expense of a crooked employer.

    8. Re:you got hit with a sony rootkit? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The op was right. If you were going to do it, do it for the right reasons, not revenge. The corect action for the cut in pay would have been to discuss it and then goto court if you still weren't happy. And no, most of the time, if you have a case, it won't cost you anything because the lawyer can get legal fees in the judgment.

      There are some things you just don't brag about. You seemed to hit that area pretty hard. Being a salesman and with the reputation sales people have, I can understand you not seeing the problems with what you did after probably 50 other people have pointed it out to you. Tell me, what's your new occupation? Are you a used car salesman now? Or maybe a door to door annuities life insurance salesman?

    9. Re:you got hit with a sony rootkit? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      So.. you're saying I should have accepted the surprise pay 'cut', and avoided my civic duty to report a crime? ;)

      I'm saying you should have accepted the layoff like I and so many others have done. I never took vengeance on any company for laying me off. Waiting until they laid you off was cowardly.

      Autoplay was turned off. My daughter trusted Sony and ran the program deliberately. I was not onlt rooted but trojaned.

      "Oh, my suburban rich lifestyle is soooo hard... booo hooo".

      Not suburban; I'm in a small city very close to the ghetto. And I'm far from rich. My life isn't hard, just lonely (despite a wealth of friends).

      you've always got your hot hooker-married-to-a-politician friend to rely on

      I don't do married women whether or not they're sluts or hookers. Thanks for reading the journals though, hope you enjoy them.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    10. Re:you got hit with a sony rootkit? by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Uh... did you read the post? obviously not. I didn't get laid off.

      And ... uh, small cities are 'ghetto' (90s slang), but not 'a ghetto' (a poor, rundown neighborhood within a large city).

      Maybe you'd do better as an english 'author' if you bothered to learn some english first.

  68. That might be true for home users... by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    Your reasoning isn't correct for business users. Most businesses, even if they are pirating software, don't want garbage (or even unused software) on their computers.

  69. BullShit Alliance... by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    I read about the way the BSA makes their numbers:
    they ESTIMATE "how much software" a usual PC needs and compare that number to how much software was sold... so using free software or freeware or sticking with old versions is considered "piracy"...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Software_Alliance#BSA_annual_software_piracy_study

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  70. Where's the money coming from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Disclaimer: As a software engineer I absolutely in no way shape or form support software piracy.

    I have serious issues with studies like this which indicate that "lost tax revenue" could do this or that for the population. Where do these groups think the money is coming from? The taxpayers would be the ones coughing that cash up, and in an economy like this there's no more cash to cough up.

    Don't compare things to real dollars unless you can prove there is a market willing to pay those real dollars!

  71. huh? by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

    ... lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to 'hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers.'

    Is slashdot doing a joint story with the Daily WTF today?

    --
    "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  72. Re:Dude. Someone's got to be really busy pirating. by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

    I know there are tens of thousands of computers hosting websites all over the world that, likewise, are running dozens of 100% free programs.
    According to groups like the "don't copy that floppy" BSA, there is no such thing as free software.

    --
    "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  73. Only 1 in 5? That's amazing. by Flicker · · Score: 1

    Nice of them to offer to fund 25,000 police salaries with the money they'll make when pirating is snuffed out.

    --
    this is not a sig
  74. Correction... by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    Can we stop playing that stupid starspankled banner at baseball games already? NO ONE FUCKING CARES ABOUT OUR COUNTRY.

    Correction: No one cares about baseball *in* our country.

    1. Re:Correction... by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Correction: No one cares about basketball in our country :)

  75. Are they counting open source sw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably not. Probably only proprietary software, and only from their members. I'm guessing even open source from their members (say IBM) is not counted. That is all that can be counted if they only base the result on "piracy reports", as it says in the link. Of course open source is trivially easy to licence in most cases, and would probably bring the numbers down.

    A study factoring in open source would be nice (but it would need different data gathering methods). It would show the real percentage of pirated software. After all when they claim piracy in ALL software, they showld inclde ALL software. And I am not even touching the methodology problems in the second link (that seems to have missed his obvious problem)

  76. Paying sales tax? by Skapare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Normally, when a product is sold in a state with a sales tax, the business doing the selling collects the tax and submits it to the state. Is the BSA actually doing that with the money they collect for pirated copies of commercial software? Inquiring minds want to know.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  77. Proud Ohioan by stinerman · · Score: 1

    It's about time we were first in something good!

  78. Re:Sadly my cousin died while being a pirate by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    You do the recovering. Of the body. Pirates only die in a few ways.

    For instance, being made to walk a short platform into the unforgiving sea. Or being killed near the edge of something, and fall over a railing into the ocean. Washed overboard by a wave. Left for dead in a raft (though this usually results in washing ashore at the most opportune location possible). And several others I've forgotten. Also, rum-poisoning.

    Anyway, you want to recover the body quickly because of the speed at which it becomes all decayed and eaten, and barely recognizable.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  79. 25,000 less police officers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...lost state and local tax revenue from piracy would have been enough to 'hire nearly 25,000 experienced police officers.'"

    And how is this bad?

  80. interesting by rvJJax · · Score: 1

    in my country, one in five pieces of software is licensed. oh wait, i think it's one in hundreds. ehm.. okay, i don't know, never saw any licensed one.

    --
    S.S.D.D