Slashdot Mirror


China Has Largest On-Line Population

Smivs writes "China now has the world's largest net-using population, say official figures. More than 253 million people in the country are now online, according to statistics from the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). About 95% of those going online connect via high-speed links. Take up of broadband has been boosted by deals offered by China's fixed line phone firms as they fight to win customers away from mobile operators. Despite having a greater number of people online, China's net economy still has a long way to go to match or exceed that of the US or even that of South Korea. Figures from Analysis International said China's net firms reported total revenues of $5.9bn (£2.96bn) in 2007. By contrast, net advertising revenue alone for US firms in 2007 stood at $21.2bn (£10.6bn)."

132 comments

  1. Inflation. by FatSean · · Score: 5, Informative

    Didn't we just have a story about how advertising on the web is way over-valued?

    I wouldn't trust the Chinese government to report on the color of the sky, but I suppose there are ways to validate their claims.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Inflation. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well being that the population is well over 1.3 billion people So only one in 5 Chinese are online. Which isn't really that good. Being the most populated country in the world and not having the largest Online Population is kinda silly. I would suspect fairly soon India will be #2

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Inflation. by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust the Chinese government to report on the color of the sky, but I suppose there are ways to validate their claims.

      I'm very mixed on that comment. I don't know if I'd "trust" any national government to put out accurate stats about itself. I'd have to trust them all to lie somewhat equally though. If a government lies or stretches the truth too much it'll be found it. It's much easier long term to just put out stats that you have reasonable faith in.

      (That still doesn't mean that the stats right, just that those that are compiling them think that they are.)

      Heck, I know that the police stats in the US are all slanted as much as they can in the direction that the given police departments want. (Be it up or down depending on where the grant money lays this year.) You have to just adjust to the fact that all human organizations lie as much as they can get away with. When you take it as a given life is just so much easier to adjust to.

    3. Re:Inflation. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only 1 in 5 are online. That is because the other 4 in 5 are monitoring them.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:Inflation. by Sigismundo · · Score: 5, Informative

      NPR's On The Media ran a great story about the media in China a few months ago. Well worth a listen. One of the interesting things they noted was that while reporting on national issues is often self-censored due to fear of reprisal, on the provincial and local level it is possible to do hard-hitting investigative reporting on neighboring areas.

      Not much of this stuff ever hits the Western mainstream media, but it is there, and it's made an impact. Censorship on a national level is still a huge problem in China, but there are reporters out there doing good work, and getting that work published.

      Here is a link to a partial transcript of the show.

    5. Re:Inflation. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      When they tell you that the sky isn't blue, they may not be consciously lying. Have you seen the pollution in Beijing?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Inflation. by Darfeld · · Score: 1

      Actually, the ones monitoring are counted online...

      In fact they are only 42.

      --
      (\__/) This is Lapinator
      (='.'=) copy it in your sig
      (")_(") so it can take over the world
    7. Re:Inflation. by ljgshkg · · Score: 1

      There is a sky in Beijing? XD Not at some times, unfortunately.

    8. Re:Inflation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just need the number of subscribers to services either for internet or mobile internet. Pretty much covers the entire scope. It's not like they are counting hits to a website. The problem is they can inflate these figures easily with erroneous accounts or state that they ran a survey that claimed that there are people who have in their lifetime used the internet or share connections with other people, etc.

    9. Re:Inflation. by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I thought the other 4 were just bots from the first, sending out viruses and scams.

    10. Re:Inflation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other one is gold farming on World of Warcraft.

    11. Re:Inflation. by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the impression you can get if you just follow any Chinese news portal for a small while. But who cares! All we need is to drum up exaggerated accusations which will reinforce with the popular anti-China sentiment mutually.

      While there is this and few other more balanced stories published here and there, they will never go to the front page, just like the tons of anti-government comments you can see in a Chinese discussion forum would never make to the FP. Same effect, different paths.

    12. Re:Inflation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Many /. commenter are as close minded as the communist government.

  2. Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by wild_quinine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's one thing to say that China has the largest on-line population, and it's an interesting factoid. But I'm not sure it counts as net access, since it is somewhat (as in noticably) restricted as such. With all due respect that's like saying that the USA has the highest proportion of outdoor workers in the western world, because most of the offices have clean windows and sometimes you can see a few trees.

    1. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by SirShmoopie · · Score: 0

      A lot of users of my website come from China. Ok my site is pretty specialist, being scientific in nature and not political, but I thint the perception that the Chinese people have a small list of approved sites is nonsense.
      If it were approved sites only mine would never make the list, since its probably too obscure.

      On their economic use of the web, it likely is true that in order to have a vibrant on-line economy, you need to stop trying to control how people use the web. I suspect the Chinese government have a long way to go before they will be able to do that.

      On a historical point, it's not just 'communist' china that's the cause of this restrictive and population controlling behaviour, China's rulers have been at it for thousands of years, its a cultural thing.

    2. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Within the borders of China, there is the world's largest number of connected computer users. The fact that their communications across the border is restricted doesn't change the fact that they are online, it just means that they are not online in a "global" sense. Really, within China, the policing of the Internet is done by citizens who are following the laws of that nation; it is a stricter version of laws that require hosting services to take down kiddie porn here in the US. I'm not saying that China is justified in its laws, I'm just saying that the existence of those laws does not mean anything in terms of counting the number of connected users.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On a historical point, it's not just 'communist' china that's the cause of this restrictive and population controlling behaviour, China's rulers have been at it for thousands of years, its a cultural thing.

      Indeed. They are moving towards capitalism and democracy, but you can't just suddenly shift to a totally new system overnight. The Chinese have a massive history and tradition compared to new countries like the US, which was built by a bunch of people who moved out there to be 'free'. I doubt any of those complaining about the way the Chinese government operate have much experience running even small projects, let alone a country with >1 billion population and different concepts of respect and authority (basically I don't really see any respect for authority in the western world, we're always complaining about the way things are done, and I don't see many people offering alternative solutions either).

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be 253 million online, of which approximately 1/4 of which are standing outside cyber cafes trying to sell you prepaid internet access cards.

    5. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by dnwq · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's massively important because these online Chinese can still visit many, many sites - they might not be able to go to pages with political content, but they can still support Chinese Ebays and Craigslists and whatnot.

      Frankly it's likely that Digg and Slashdot have vastly larger Chinese equivalents, and most /.ers would have no idea because they don't read Chinese.

      And political discussion still goes on, albeit through euphemisms and with some care. The restrictions exist, but they're not all that effective.

    6. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by daniorerio · · Score: 1

      >[...]but you can't just suddenly shift to a totally new system overnight.

      Like you can not shift overnight to let's say, a communist system?

    7. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I doubt any of those complaining about the way the Chinese government operate have much experience running even small projects, let alone a country with >1 billion population

      Lack of experience running a country of >1 billion people didn't stop Mao from trying his hand at running the place. How'd that work out again?

      different concepts of respect and authority

      Japan had a culture not far removed from a feudal system (complete with the Emperor supposedly descended from the gods) just 70 years ago and today it's a functional and stable Democracy. So I don't know if I buy the argument that there is something unique about Chinese culture that isn't compatible with Democracy.

      basically I don't really see any respect for authority in the western world, we're always complaining about the way things are done

      Isn't that the point? We aren't supposed to trust or respect authority.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      it is a stricter version of laws that require hosting services to take down kiddie porn here in the US.

      Yes, because outlawing kiddie porn is really comparable to outlawing speech that's critical of the Government.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't we respect authority? If you don't respect them, why vote them into power in the first place?

      Fair point about Japan, it has a similar kind of culture to China, and is also densely populated, but it still isn't on the same scale as China. The people in Japan are still very respectful though, the culture is still totally different. I wouldn't say it's incompatible with democracy, but neither do I think western versions of 'democracy' is as great as everyone makes them out to be. As a British citizen I don't feel like I had a choice in things like whether we went to war in Iraq, or any number of issues. I have never voted either, so some will say "then you can't complain", but I honestly see very little difference between the parties, and I don't see how voting one of 3 or 4 choices gives me much of a say at all - apart from on some very specific issues which are usually not relevant to me anyway. I've never been a lover of politics, though slashdot has made me slightly more aware of politics on a world scale.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do understand your desire to be able to say "We're #1! Woohoo! U-S-A! U-S-A!" at every possible opportunity, but seriously, you're just making a fool out of yourself.

      Yes, censored net access is still net access. And given that China has more than *four times* the population of the USA, I'd say it's inevitable for them to pass you sooner or later with regard to the absolute number of people with Internet access, don't you think?

      If you do want to console yourself, though, feel free to keep in mind that for precisely the same reason, the actual ABSOLUTE number of Internet users is meaningless, and if you look at the relative percentage, the USA are still #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9.

      On the other hand, this also means you'll lose the ability to use absolute figures when comparing greenhouse gas emissions etc... tough luck.

    11. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Meh, fair point :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      As I said, I am not defending the Chinese government. But the method of policing kiddie porn here is essentially the same as the method of policing speech within the Chinese borders: ISPs and hosting services take down content, and the police occasionally raid higher priority figures.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    13. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't we respect authority?

      Because everything in our history tells us that we should treat authority with skepticism? Don't get me wrong -- I have respect for our institutions (one of the coolest things I've ever gotten to do was to sit in the House gallery and watch a session) but I don't have automatic respect for "authority". Authority should be questioned and viewed with skepticism. Would you not question this guy? How about this dude?

      but neither do I think western versions of 'democracy' is as great as everyone makes them out to be

      Winston Churchill said something like "Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried." Our system isn't perfect but it beats living in China, Russia, Burma or Saudi Arabia. Can you think of another system of Government anywhere in the World that sprung up on the basic premise that the individual has inalienable rights and can limit the power that the Government has over him?

      We don't always manage to live up to the ideals outlined in our documents (the Magna Carta and US Declaration of Independence being my two favorites) -- but I do think that on balance the Western World is still the place where I want to live.

      As a British citizen I don't feel like I had a choice in things like whether we went to war in Iraq, or any number of issues

      Eh, Democracy doesn't mean that you always get what you want. I had a voice through my Congressman and Senators. Congressman voted against it -- Senators both voted for it. Presumably you had your MP? Did you write to him? Contact his office? Picket outside?

      I have never voted either, so some will say "then you can't complain"

      I wouldn't say that you can't complain but I would encourage you to still get out there and vote. I'm pretty disillusioned with my choices this year but I'll still find the ten minutes to go out and vote for the people whom I think will do the least amount of damage. What more can you do?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    14. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      But the method of policing kiddie porn here is essentially the same as the method of policing speech within the Chinese borders: ISPs and hosting services take down content, and the police occasionally raid higher priority figures.

      Do you know a different way to police content on the internet?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    15. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why shouldn't we respect authority?

      Because respect is earned, not given. If the government is performing their duties in fairly representing the people, without corruption, they will earn respect. I've never seen that anywhere, although obviously it's a large spectrum and some governments do much better than others. "Our government is better than China's" isn't enough of an accomplishment to deserve respect, though.

      If you don't respect them, why vote them into power in the first place?

      Because the alternative to an elected government is even worse? If you've got a solution, step up man! I'm not smart enough to come up with one, but I'll stand behind anyone who can convince me with evidence that their way is actually better.

      Fair point about Japan, it has a similar kind of culture to China, and is also densely populated, but it still isn't on the same scale as China. The people in Japan are still very respectful though, the culture is still totally different.

      I'm guessing that what you mean by "it has a similar kind of culture to China" and "the culture is still totally different" is that their culture are similar in some ways, but very different in others. I think I agree I guess.

      About the people in Japan being "very respectful," that's a stereotype like "Asians are good at math." Japan has a very rebellious young population. And the level of freedom their government allows can't be compared to that of China's in any way whatsoever. Hell, in some ways, they allow more freedom than the US. I think their animated underage rape games would be illegal here (although I'm no lawyer, so I'm not sure).

      As a British citizen I don't feel like I had a choice in things like whether we went to war in Iraq, or any number of issues. I have never voted either, so some will say "then you can't complain", but I honestly see very little difference between the parties, and I don't see how voting one of 3 or 4 choices gives me much of a say at all - apart from on some very specific issues which are usually not relevant to me anyway. I've never been a lover of politics, though slashdot has made me slightly more aware of politics on a world scale.

      So...you feel like your government's actions are not representative of your wishes, you feel like you haven't been given a choice as to who to vote for, and you're advocating respect for authority? I think I may have completely missed the point of your message or something, because that doesn't make sense.

    16. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by SirShmoopie · · Score: 0

      Japan had a culture not far removed from a feudal system (complete with the Emperor supposedly descended from the gods) just 70 years ago and today it's a functional and stable Democracy. So I don't know if I buy the argument that there is something unique about Chinese culture that isn't compatible with Democracy.

      There was that small mater of having their entire system of governance lopped off at the neck and replaced with an america aproved one for a decade or two.

    17. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well when I said totally different I meant Japan has quite a different culture to ours in the 'west', though yes it won't be identical to China's either, but Asian cultures are a lot more similar to each other than they are to western civilisation, thinking from simple things like using chopsticks right through to religious things like a predominance of mystic-type religions, and generably more honourable and respectful traditions. The Chinese government banning all religions would have damaged their traditions quite a lot though I'd expect :/

      Respect for authority is just a healthy thing. I am not good at it I admit (I got banned from driving for speeding a couple of months ago), but I can see the value in it. As you point out most governments don't do anything to earn respect, and in most cases they do the opposite, but they do keep our countries running and are representative of us. Perhaps if we gave them more respect they'd do a better job *shrug*

      I tend to play devil's advocate a bit too much, which may be where part of my inconsistency comes from, but there is also the fact that I'm still trying to work out my stance on these issues as well. It's very hypocritical of me saying it, but I think respect is admirable as long as you're not letting people walk over you at the same time. I've met a few guys from China (though most were from Hong Kong which is a bit more westernised), Malaysia etc - I just think they're nice people and like their culture, and perhaps we could learn from them as well as trying to force all our own ideals and politics onto them.

      I don't believe I need a choice who to vote for - I have been given a choice in that - I just feel like I should be given a more fine grained choice. How does choosing between basically 2 main parties in any way reflect my opinion on the tends of thousands of different matters that come up in government each year? They may as well just flip a coin on each vote for a law and be done with it! I recently saw people advocating 'Open Source Government' here on /. , and it does sounds more in line with the system that I'd ideally want to follow. I wouldn't want to spend all my time voting on political matters, but I'd like to be able to vote directly on matters that are important to me rather than trusting some MP to do so. I could write letters to MPs, but again I'd rather just vote than try to persuade some two-faced "public servant" who is just trying to grab some power and money for himself.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    18. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Everything you say is true, and as I am trying to fit myself into the mould of a "responsible adult", I probably should start doing things like writing to local MPs. I certainly feel disillusioned with the whole process before having even gotten involved with it, what with all the scandals and mud slinging that goes on in politics, but I've started to become more acquainted with the different parties and ideologies through simple things like posting on slashdot and starting to watch slightly more adult television programs (usually political satire, but you still learn a bit about politics through it ;) ). I still get too pissed off and depressed when I watch or listen to the news though, the world really is a horrible place.

      As for living in China, it might not be as nice as out here in the west, but compared to certain places in Africa, and North Korea, it's probably like living in Disneyland. I also had a friend go over to Saudi Arabia recently for a few months, and he liked it - but he was out there working for an oil company, so perhaps that makes all the difference.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    19. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I certainly feel disillusioned with the whole process before having even gotten involved with it

      I'm more disillusioned after getting involved in it but I still think it's for the greater good in the end. You'll never change everything -- but if you can manage to make a small impact somewhere (which is much easier to do on a local level) then you've done some good.

      As for living in China, it might not be as nice as out here in the west, but compared to certain places in Africa, and North Korea, it's probably like living in Disneyland

      Until you criticize the communist Government that is.... Granted, I'd take China over North Korea any day but let's not pretend that being better than North Korea is something to brag about.

      I also had a friend go over to Saudi Arabia recently for a few months, and he liked it - but he was out there working for an oil company, so perhaps that makes all the difference.

      Add a leading 's' to the words that I highlighted and then tell me if your friend would have had the same experience. Saudi Arabia == sexual apartheid. I'm hard pressed to think of a worse place on this planet to be female.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    20. Re:Does it count if it's not unfettered access? by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      Like you can not shift overnight to let's say, a communist system?

      I don't know if you're being sarcastic or not, so I'm not sure if I'm agreeing or disagreeing here, but...

      You can't shift to any drastically different system overnight. It's a disaster every time. It was bad enough in the early days of Russian communism that Lenin himself introduced capitalistic reforms to avert an economic disaster. Millions of Chinese died when Mao made drastic economic changes. And Easter Europe is full of people who can tell you all about the joys of switching back to market systems overnight after decades of central planning.

  3. In China? Easy to explain... by rodney+dill · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... just an hour after viewing internet prOn, they need to get back online and view more.

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  4. Does it really count? by yamamushi · · Score: 1

    If they're stuck behind that big ass firewall of theirs?

    --
    - Aetheral Research -
    1. Re:Does it really count? by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they're stuck behind that big ass firewall of theirs?

      The Great Firewall of China...visible from space!

    2. Re:Does it really count? by duvel · · Score: 1
      The Great Firewall of China...visible from space!

      Small correction: The Great Wall of China is visible from space (which is amazing enough in itself) but the Great Firewall of China is visible from routers on the other site of the earth! Imagine that!

      --

      I have a photographic memory for numbers. I know almost a hundred of them.

    3. Re:Does it really count? by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Technically, if they have more Internet presence, it is us who are stuck behind their firewall.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    4. Re:Does it really count? by BPPG · · Score: 1

      The Great Firewall of China...visible from cyberspace!

      fixed

      --
      What's the value of information that you don't know?
    5. Re:Does it really count? by ljgshkg · · Score: 1

      People who care about information/knowledge in mainland China actually install softwares to bypass the firewall. And people who post in forums actually used many different methods to bypass the stupid software censors. When the no. of people going on line is in such huge number, it's impossible to check it all. And as people's understanding and caring on their rights granted by laws increases over time, with the no. of people online, it'll become unstopable force. In fact, you can see that force growing in China... (Yeah, they made good laws and make it better time after time. The thing is just that the communist government is not using the laws... and local governments hold powers of local courts so that problems are hard to track down in federal level.)

  5. USA! USA! USA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least the United States still holds both titles for "Largest Uncensored On-Line Population" and "Largest Monitored On-Line Population."

    Take that, People's Republic of What's Left of Chairman Mao!

  6. But... by NuKeLiTe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about the restrictions they have?

    How can you count one "online person" when this person can't visit many of the most popular sites on the net and doesn't generates all the in/out traffic that the rest of us create?

    --
    Recave
    1. Re:But... by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean the same sites that are in a language he majority of them can't understand at all? The fact the overwhelming majority know just Chinese is a bigger fiewall than the one the government setup will ever be.

  7. And this is supposed to impress me why? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

    Even if it sounds impressive because that's almost as many people with internet connections as America has altogether it's still only right around 20% of their total population. I'd find a country with 90% of their population regularly using the internet to be a lot more impressive.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    1. Re:And this is supposed to impress me why? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd find a country with 90% of their population regularly using the internet to be a lot more impressive.

      Here ya go.

  8. Re:USA! USA! USA! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Largest Uncensored On-Line Population

    That's right! I can say whatever I want! I can even say that In Iraq, Bush &*&)&(&)(*&()&)(&(F*&(R*# nikmkam sf,d. f,/. ....
    Nothing to see here. Move along.

  9. News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    China Has Largest * Population

    1. Re:News at 11 by RandoX · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean the most /. subscribers?

    2. Re:News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      æï¼OE飿æ£ç®çsã.

  10. Just what we need.. by molo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just what we need, more people for the "human flesh search engine", the name given to people who hunt down those who say unpopular or anti-party sentiments. See here.

    This has been used to find unpopular people. From selfish idiots commenting about the earthquake, to Chinese students abroad supporting Tibetan independence. They and their family are then subject to harassment until they repent.

    Sorry, I just heard about this, and I'm pissed. This is what totalitarian one-party states are about, you're either "one of us" or you're marginalized until you can no longer function in society.

    This may be a great leap backward.

    Fortunately, we have sites like EastSouthWestNorth to sift through the state party-line bullshit and bring us stories like this.

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:Just what we need.. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      This has been used to find unpopular people. They and their family are then subject to harassment until they repent.

      This is different from the Daily Kos how exactly?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Just what we need.. by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Nah, more like scientologists, except tamer.

    3. Re:Just what we need.. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      This is different from the Daily Kos how exactly?

      The Great Orange Satan isn't backed up by guys with guns.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Just what we need.. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I decided to google that phrase, and was disappointed that "human flesh search engine" got only 755 hits. It seemed funny that there would be so little mention of it online, so I tried hunting down the actual Chinese phrase. Translating it back to Chinese took a minute or so, mostly because there's no "engine" in the Chinese. The phrase turns out to be "", which will probably be garbled by /.'s software (and it's time for another request for permission to use UTF-8 ;-). The pinyin is "ren2 rou4 sou1 suo3" -- and the Chinese 4-char phrase gets 4,930,000 hits. To put these numbers in some sort of perspective, the 2-char Chinese term for the Olympics gets 17.8 million hits.

      So in Chinese, it's apparently a hot topic. I don't read Mandarin well enough to decode much of it, but what little I could follow made it clear that it's considered what we might call "social pathology" by the Chinese writers, too.

      And we might note that this isn't primarily something being done to "dissidents" by the Chinese authorities. It's mostly a case of "vigilante action", carried out by people who know they'll get away with it because the authorities aren't particularly interested.

      And it's hardly anything unique to Chinese society. This sort of vigilante action is common anywhere that the authorities permit it. It's common wherever there's a particular dominant religious group. But it's not particularly tied to religion. That BBC article is about a woman who was complaining about the TV coverage of the Sichuan earthquake disaster. It was interfering with her access to entertainment. Her attitude was "Who cares about those people? Give me back my TV shows." For some reason, her extreme callous attitude seems to have offended a lot of people.

      It'll be interesting to see what, if anything, the Chinese authorities do about this sort of mob rule. Lessee, would I be risking an attack if I predict that they'll do little or nothing?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    5. Re:Just what we need.. by molo · · Score: 1

      Interesting, thanks for the research. But please read more of the accounts. The popular ones are the one about the selfish TV earthquake person, and the woman who killed a kitten with her high heels. I suspect these are popularized because they are seen as worthy of retaliation. The stories of harassment over political speech aren't as widely reported, but are there also (from my bit of reading in english).

      Yes, this kind of action is not limited to China, but couple it with a society that forces everyone to be like-minded and it has the potential to be pervasive and difficult to defeat.

      The Chinese authorities will do nothing about this as long as the mob is enforcing its Maoist goals. That will happen as long as the government still has popular support (which it continues to have, unfortunately).

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    6. Re:Just what we need.. by ins0m · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that Daily Kos was the home of hackers on steroids.

      --
      Never attribute to Hanlon that which can be adequately attributed to Heinlein.
    7. Re:Just what we need.. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      The Chinese authorities will do nothing about this as long as the mob is enforcing its Maoist goals. That will happen as long as the government still has popular support (which it continues to have, unfortunately).

      Yeah, probably. But this attitude long predates Maoism, going back to Confucianism which emphasizes this sort of social control. And lots of people are pointing out that the current Chinese rulers are Maoist about like American rulers are Christian: They use the words for their social effects, but their behavior says they don't believe the ideology at all. Both China and the US are now effectively run by the corporate capitalist crowd, no matter what language they use to mask their real goals.

      It's common for Chinese people to suggest that in most situations, they have a lot more freedom than people in most Western countries. Their explanation is that the Chinese government only pays attention to people who do something that's directly threatening to the governing clique's power. But other than that, the rulers don't much care what you do. The masses are mostly invisible from the top. It's only by speaking up publicly that you get their attention.

      Of course, the down side of this lassez faire attitude from the authorities is that it enables the sort of vigilante activity that we're talking about. People know that, as long as it's not political activity, they can get away with it without punishment. (As long as you don't do something criminal enough to get the attention of the local police. ;-) At least that seems to be the explanation from a lot of Chinese.

      One of the interesting bits of Chinese government crackdowns is their highly-publicized attempts to do something about the difficulties in driving around the Beijing area. Part of this is about making the streets safer for visitors during the Olympics. The fun aspect is their attempts to fix the often charming "Chinglish" translations on street signs, replacing them with something that actually makes sense in English. A few days ago, there was a nice example of how successful this has been. This site has lots of other great examples, but this one is fun because it's actually a new sign talking about the Olympics.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  11. How many computer users now? by suso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Strange. I was just trying to find out how many computer users there are worldwide. I can't get a good estimate.

    1. Re:How many computer users now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget the users, count the computers. Humans are now the minority.

    2. Re:How many computer users now? by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      you mean actual persons using computers? or the total number of individual user accounts on all the computers?

      Here's mine:

      $ wc -l /etc/passwd
      45 /etc/passwd

      But this is on my personal laptop ;-)

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    3. Re:How many computer users now? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I will start:
      1

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  12. Online and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    already signing up for their WoW accounts and getting in on the gold farming action.

  13. They can't read this... by PetiePooo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tiananmen Square Massacre!
    Tiananmen Square Massacre!
    Tiananmen Square Massacre!

    They're not online enough to read this comment... Does that really count as online?

    <retrospect>Was that cruel? I figured it as a way to invoke curiosity when they think they're going to an article about something good, and they end up being blocked by that stupid firewall...</retrospect>

    1. Re:They can't read this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You raise an interesting question about creating false positives for the "great firewall" and to what extent this can be used to create a denial of service attack.

    2. Re:They can't read this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tiananmen Square Protest!

      Tiananmen Square Protest!

      Tiananmen Square Protest!

      What is the Tiananmen Square Protest? I can't find anything about it.

    3. Re:They can't read this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then they did a pretty good job...

    4. Re:They can't read this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tiananmen Square Massacre!

      Tiananmen Square Massacre!

      Tiananmen Square Massacre!

      They're not online enough to read this comment... Does that really count as online?

      Apparently we are. Replying from my home in Beijing.
      I think they only do deep packet analysis for a selected few sites, and /. is not among them.

    5. Re:They can't read this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My Lai Massacre!
      My Lai Massacre!
      My Lai Massacre!

      I have no ploblems accessing this flom china.

    6. Re:They can't read this... by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      And they are yet to implement IPv6 wiretapping.

      Many colleges in Beijing have IPv6 connection. Use an IPv4-to-IPv6 broker (There are free ones. STFW for them.) and you have access to the ``banned'' IPv4 sites through IPv6 traffic.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    7. Re:They can't read this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey you just killed my internet connection you insensitive clod! Now I have to use this slow proxy...

    8. Re:They can't read this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Tiananmen Square event is well-known among China's youth, at least for college students. In my university, tons of old newspaper and books narrate the event from the government's perspective. You can actually get roughly the casualty of both sides from the propaganda. When you grow up with propaganda, you are not that dumb to believe what the Party says. It's like the emperor's new clothes, everybody knows what happened though nothing can be shown on the web in China. However, what is interesting is that most Chinese, though empathize the students on the square in 1989, do not agree with the direction they want the country to go down. In 1989, most Chinese hated what happened on the square, now people still disapprove with the the blood-shedding, but do agree the restoration of order of the society by the government.

    9. Re:They can't read this... by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      Touché!

      We all have forefathers that have done things we're not so proud of. Witness Manifest Destiny as another I'm not particularly fond of...

      My intent was not to just bring up a sore spot in your nation's history, but rather to point out that your current government continues to try to conceal it.

      I'm traveling in Berlin at the moment, and one thing that stands out is how the Germans openly discuss the past two world wars and their parts in them without shame. Its a part of their history, and they should not repeat their ancestor's mistakes, but neither should they forget, lest it happens again.

  14. Wait until they bring out DNS 2.0 by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    It supports Hanzi characters but not ascii

    1. Re:Wait until they bring out DNS 2.0 by fliptout · · Score: 1

      What about pinyin?

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    2. Re:Wait until they bring out DNS 2.0 by sykodoc · · Score: 1

      the funny thing is, I was just trying to post to /. in Hanzi... just for fun. It didn't work. slashcode doesn't support funny looking script, eh?

      --
      "Our enemies will talk themselves to death and we will bury them in their own confusion!"
  15. But can they read slashdot? by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

    They have the most users online, but can these users even read slashdot?

    1. Re:But can they read slashdot? by gzipped_tar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here I am, reading /.

      Many of my fellow Chinese don't read slashdot because:
      * they can't read English (Most of them);
      * they are not interested in the topics (News for nerds);
      * they prefer other sites such as ArsTechnica etc (Some of them don't feel good in the slashdot atmosphere).
      Or
      * They can read /. but can't express their opinions fluently in English. So they don't show up by sending in their comments.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    2. Re:But can they read slashdot? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      They can read /. but can't express their opinions fluently in English.

      Tell them that they'll fit right in here.

      (Hmm ... What happens if you translate that word-for-word into Chinese characters?)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:But can they read slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An extra bit of info...
      Many of my fellow Chinese don't APPEAR to read /. because:
      * a lot of us are Anonymous Cowards

  16. Big deal. by Nullav · · Score: 0, Redundant

    With a population of ~1.3 billion, 253 billion people online is just terrible.

    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    1. Re:Big deal. by pxc · · Score: 1

      It's not just terrible, it's impossible!

      An implosion of the universe would be terrible indeed.

    2. Re:Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was an implosion of the universe, would anybody be around to care?

    3. Re:Big deal. by Nullav · · Score: 1

      253 billion of them, apparently. (I suppose that's what I get for not proofreading.)

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  17. Statistics by RandoX · · Score: 1

    About 95% of those going online connect to 86% of the Internet via high-speed links.

  18. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are also more English-speaking people in China than there are in the USA. Yawn?

    1. Re:So? by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

      You mean Engrish, right?

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    2. Re:So? by gzipped_tar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks for the brilliant link :)

      However there's a real shocker:
      http://initiative.yo2.cn/archives/629858

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    3. Re:So? by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

      +5 Funny :))
      Well, that explains everything! =))

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    4. Re:So? by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

      Parent link seems to be gone, here's the picture from somewhere else http://craphound.com/images/translateservererror.jpg

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
  19. 99% of them... by gmac63 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So they have the largest online population. Of course, it would be that 99% of them are members of the Chinese Communist Party [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_China].

    --

    INSERT INTO comment VALUE('Doh!') WHERE user='you';
    1. Re:99% of them... by Firehed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who cares if they're communists? If they don't subscribe to free market economics, that's their business. It's the completely unrelated fact that China's government are a bunch of overbearing, censorship-obsessed crazies that you want to watch out for.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  20. Hasn't this been reported... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen this report about 1 millions times, it isn't news.

  21. Re:USA! USA! USA! by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

    Actually, I would be surprised if we were the largest monitored population. I would suspect China takes that award. There's no telling what the Russians are up to today as well.

  22. In the words of The Hon'ble Mr. Smith.. by l0cust · · Score: 3, Funny

    What good is a phone call if you are unable to speak?

    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  23. largest online pollution?? by duvekot · · Score: 1

    mmm Largest online pollution .... after water, air, ground ... they moved to the internet and started to pollute that also ...

  24. Speed of internet access by FooBarWidget · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's impressive that 95% of the population has high-speed Internet, but "high-speed" is limited to within the country only. Links to foreign countries are slow - VERY slow. Especially to U.S. sites. It took a very long time to load Slashdot.

    That said, the links within the country are insanely fast - and cheap. People over there don't even use Bittorrent: they host all their movies on public HTTP servers. Bandwidth is so cheap that they don't even need Bittorrent. There is even some kind of urban myth over there which says that Bittorrent will wear off your hard drive because of excessive hard drive activity.

    1. Re:Speed of internet access by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is even some kind of urban myth over there which says that Bittorrent will wear off your hard drive because of excessive hard drive activity.

      At least they don't believe that electric fans will consume all of the oxygen in the room and kill you in your sleep ;) No, I didn't make that up either!

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Speed of internet access by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      > There is even some kind of urban myth over there which says that Bittorrent will wear off your hard drive because of excessive hard drive activity.

      About five years ago this was a widespread rumor among Windows users, perhaps because of the old Windows filesystem being prone to heavy fragmentation. I have never tested myself, though.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  25. Revenues... by IBBoard · · Score: 1

    Figures from Analysis International said China's net firms reported total revenues of $5.9bn

    I'm guessing that doesn't include the gold miners, etc, in World of Warcraft et al.!

  26. unfettered access? did you see it? by kubitus · · Score: 1

    please tell the US that Nazi rightist pages should be censored. And a few Sex pages do not make your youth become murders, but violent games and websites do! At least China and the US both censor Sex-related pages! And the US killed many to in the last few years - just not in front of the White house, but in the Twin Towers. I would love to see the number of occurences of severe violence exchanged with the number of sex-scenes and vice versa. Make love not war!

  27. The price of tea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this means what to the price of tea in London?

  28. Fork!! by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    We better make a china.slashdot.org or the chinese /. equivalent will be able to DoS us!

  29. Well, when your country has... by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 1

    1/7th of the world's population, it would make sense that you have the most participants, right?

    --
    Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
  30. Suprising second by philspear · · Score: 1

    Unexpectedly, Tuvalu (official population of around 11,000 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuvalu) is the second largest online population. Go figure.

  31. Re:USA! USA! USA! by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    There's no telling what the Russians are up to today as well

    I'd be all for a Great Firewall of Russia if said firewall would cut down on the spam and the ssh hacking attempts that always seem to come from Russian IP addresses.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  32. that is why net is socialist repeats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My net is about as evolving as an alzheimers victim.The repeats are phenomonal.My searches are for anything but reality in return, or someone cramming the lies (attempting to) of products in my face. I mean to the point where a psychosis would emerge if I were a bit crazy as a dailiy internet user, must be over 100k hours since 99 (I mean nearly every freaking day for 9 years). As computers go, strongest energy wins, even when commanded otherwise.So its chinas fault. All thier fault. So now that china has taken over everything...with about as much solid state as a plastic gi figure...I'll just shut off my pc and go back to welding the manliest little car that ever came from japan. The only one. Ever.Optimism right? yes optimism. I'll talk to myself,and no one else until I go postal.

  33. Re:Waco, waco, waco. by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Waco is a dumb comparison. Kent State is better (protesters being shot by troops) but even still..... situation that gets out of hand resulting in four deaths compared to a situation where the Government sent in the troops with the specific mission of cracking down on the protesters and which ended in hundreds of deaths.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  34. Backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do they get away with saying "even that of South Korea" when South Korea is light years ahead of the US and plenty of other western countries.

  35. Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article fails to mention whether they are connecting from home or from internet cafes, and I'd venture to guess that since computers cost the same in China as in the U.S. while the average person's salary is a fraction of that in the U.S., the majority of "net-connected" Chinese are actually using internet cafes (or possibly school computers) for internet access. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that, but keep in mind that 95% broadband market share is easy to do if most of the market is internet cafes. Also, although China has a vast landmass like the U.S., its population centers are incredibly dense, making broadband a much more feasible in the first place.

  36. Re:USA! USA! USA! by megaditto · · Score: 1

    You do realize that if you'd lived in China and tried that little joke of yours about Mao, you'd be someplace like the local Super Happy Peace and Harmony facility, crouching on the concrete floor trying to put your teeth back in.

    In absolute terms, people have lots more personal freedoms in the US of A compared to China. Now if we look at the trends, that's another story...

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  37. Odd by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

    What a coincidence, I just checked Wikipedia and it seems that China also has the world's largest overall population. How strange.

    --
    If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
  38. Remove the bots and voila 1/10 of real value by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how many of these lines are used for business oriented links with webfarms as long as the eye can see, botting on hundreds of diff. games to make an economy worth while for some chinese population trying to make a small living.

    The chinese gov. has admitted that gaming is a big economy for them right now.
    I wonder if used only legit traffic, and remove gaming traffic, if it would be as high

  39. Re:USA! USA! USA! by ljgshkg · · Score: 1

    Actually, from what I heard from friends in China or were in China, people just don't really care about jokes about that guy these days except some communist officals in more offical events. I've seen soft jokes (in the form of pics and text) about the communist leaders passing everywhere online amoung Chinese communities even on forums in mainland China. I just don't think those people cares at all.

  40. Re:Waco, waco, waco. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and who's filter that? are they not on google or yahoo?

  41. There's nine hundred million of them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in the world today, you'd better learn to love them, that's what I say. http://www.mwscomp.com/sounds/mp3/chinese.mp3

  42. ...and by msoori · · Score: 1

    China also has the worlds largest in-line and out of line population. Whats the big story here?

  43. Not as much profit in China by minion · · Score: 1

    Figures from Analysis International said China's net firms reported total revenues of $5.9bn (£2.96bn) in 2007. By contrast net advertising revenue alone for US firms in 2007 stood at $21.2bn (£10.6bn)."
     
    Not as much profit to be made when you're in China, buying products made in China.

    --

    -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
  44. Definition of terms? by jc42 · · Score: 1

    So how do we know what people are measuring when they claim that country C has some number U of internet users? I can't tell from this or any other article I've seen on the topic how they define a user. As far as I can tell, they don't distinguish a person who has used the Internet once from a person who works full time on the Internet.

    Is there any actual meaning to such supposed measurements? Or should we just consider them as meaningless PR?

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  45. Re:USA! USA! USA! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1
    Yes. The parent poster is a victim of American propaganda spread about China by the U.S. government through media outlets in the hopes of
    1. Making China look particularly bad in terms of civil and human rights so that the U.S. can somehow justify its particularly hard-line stance against its own major trading partner and
    2. Making citizens in the U.S. feel more comfortable about the civil and human rights that have been taken away from them in the interests of 'combating terrorism.'

    If you actually talk to people from and in China, they don't really understand why we think that they have it that bad, especially since its not much better here.

  46. Most people but... by Puffy+Director+Pants · · Score: 1

    fewest websites.

  47. Creating Jobs? by Lazyrust · · Score: 1

    The real question is: How many of them are farming gold on WoW?

  48. Other News: Boiling Water is Hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China + population is never news.

  49. Welcome to the future we promised you... by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    We had big dreams for the internet back in the 80s and 90s, we haven't really won the war for freedom of information if almost a quarter of the worlds 'internet' users are behind a highly censored firewall. I'd go with the above implications here that it's hard to say china's net users are really net users considering the narrow pipe with which they can talk to the rest of the real internets. A friend of mine in china was speculating the internet at the media village costs so much because they have to pay for the truely deep inspection of traffic and special equipment has been set up to monitor and capture data. Just speculation of course, but believable.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  50. reminds me of a simpsons episode by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    For those of you familar...Homer is asking Flanders "I thought you had cable?". Flanders replies, yep, 493 channels....blocked out. The only channels he had were religious and the weather channel. Kind of reminds me what China's internet is probably like. Yep, unlimited access! You only get to the web sites WE want you to see. So, given China's population, I bet they have more internet users, but, they don't have the FREEDOM to see the TRUE internet.

    1. Re:reminds me of a simpsons episode by zz_fish · · Score: 1

      correction: China is using blacklist, not whitelist. Now if there are only 30 sites on the net, that won't make a difference, but luckily there are a few more than 30.

  51. I'm the 1 of 253 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. I need proxy and google reader for Slahdot's rss and I don't think 512k or 2M is a "high speed" connection. but most of these 253 Million have no idea what is IP address?, how to use email client, there is a censorship?, and they don't visit non-chinese web site. they only knows how to use QQ(ICQ like IM) to track girls. and play MMORPG.

  52. Iraqi massacre ! Iraqi massacre ! Iraqi massacre ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What fucking good would it do if they did know about Tiananmen?

    The great and holy USA with their unfettered (until recently?) net access still continues to SUPPORT AND ENCOURAGE AND ENABLE the most significant genocide in modern times, one that overshadows all others in terms of the longevity of the poisons left for the new generations.

    I sadly think there are as many ignorant, lazy, uneducated, unthinking selfish fucks in China as there are in the USA (hard to believe sometimes) or anywhere else, and showing them a little movie about Tiananmen wouldn't be the panacea so many seem to imply.
    The famous great firewall of China is something we love to rant about, and conveniently ignore the plank of wood in our own eyes of how we willingly ignore our own complicity and exacerbate destruction and exploitation of our own making.
    People in glass houses shouldn't throw so many stones...

  53. Online persons by jandersen · · Score: 1

    It is strange to see - although not at all surprising - how a group of people make a heroic effort to explain away facts now on /.: "A person is not online unless (s)he can access the same crap everybody else can". Wow, you guys really have found "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth". Last time I looked 'online' simply meant 'connected to the internet'; but then I am not the guy who has got it all sussed, of course.

    Funny how some seem to think - or perhaps it is not so much thinking as knee-jerk reaction. First the general tone was that all the Chinese were oppressed and really hated their Communist government; then it came out that in fact they were quite happy, the ungrateful bastards. But then, fortunately there is the censure and the Great, Big Firewall - which it turns out isn't all that effective, and probably not needed at all, since most Chinese aren't interested in Good, American Family and Freedom Values, such as internet porn and SPAM; because, can you believe it, they don't read English. I mean, sometimes you despair - it is as if they don't even make the effort to do as they are bloody well told and reach for Freedom(TM). So, obviously, they aren't really online at all.

    Or could the truth be that the continuously repeated mantras about China are simply false? If you are moderately interested in the truth, at least you should entertain the possibility that what you hear repeated over and over by people who don't really know anything could actually be wrong.