Slashdot Mirror


The Pirate Bay Blocked In Italy

imhassan tips us to news that The Pirate Bay has been blocked in Italy. Other attempts to block the popular P2P site have been somewhat less than successful. From TorrentFreak: "Pirate Bay's IPs and the domain name are inaccessible, as they are blocked by ISPs all over the country. Whether these blocks will be very effective, however, is doubtful, since The Pirate Bay has already announced several countermeasures. An insider working at an Internet provider in Italy told TorrentFreak that all the relevant large access ISPs in Italy have complied with the request to block the popular BitTorrent tracker, which was sent out yesterday. Italy is taking a stand against BitTorrent sites, so it seems. Two weeks ago, the largest Italian torrent site, Columbo-BT, was shut down by the same prosecutor who is responsible for the Pirate Bay block."

247 comments

  1. Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or worse?

  2. Pirates blocked in Italy?!?! by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was it the mafia? I heard that the mafia doesn't like pirates or fascists for that matter.

    1. Re:Pirates blocked in Italy?!?! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or ninjas.

    2. Re:Pirates blocked in Italy?!?! by ThePengwin · · Score: 2, Funny

      They must really hate fascist pirate ninjas then

    3. Re:Pirates blocked in Italy?!?! by WingedEarth · · Score: 1

      Fascist pirate ninjas? You mean like Master Shredder? That would make sense. And the folks at Pirate Bay never got caught because they're burrowing through the Earth in their Technodrome.

    4. Re:Pirates blocked in Italy?!?! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Yes it was, as when they tried to send Guido to the address listed at the registrar
      to get their cut of the profits, they couldn't find anyone, so they decided this was bad for business.
      They told their friends in the Italian oval office, and needless to say what they decided goes over there...

  3. Pirate Bay by Oscar+Wilder · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only thing worse than blocking Pirate Bay is not blocking Pirate Bay.

    1. Re:Pirate Bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 - Mods are illiterate and need to read more. Or just listen to some Python, for fuck's sake...

  4. Tor is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tor is the answer to everything.
    Use Tor to access the trackers. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Tor is the answer by Moryath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I actually have a setup to do that already - I've seen a couple trackers "go down" due to core router / dns problems, and it was quite handy to use Tor to see if an alternate exit point had the same problems.

      I'd suggest people get the Tor package installer on general principles, it's quite useful to be able to torbutton for a bit if you're having trouble getting somewhere.

    2. Re:Tor is the answer by neokushan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed, my ISP (bethere.co.uk) had some serious routing issues just last night, I couldn't even access the likes of Google and OpenDNS was entirely unreachable. However, good ol' Tor saved the day and I was able to browse as normal (Albeit slowly and carefully, so as to not send any important cookies or passwords) for the 2 and a half hours or so it took for them to fix it.
      Bollocks to privacy and all that, Tor has many applications and uses that I've come to rely on.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    3. Re:Tor is the answer by quakehead3 · · Score: 1

      What if they also block Tor?

    4. Re:Tor is the answer by nilbog · · Score: 1

      As if torrents weren't already slow enough..

      How about you grow up and use usenet like an adult.

      --
      or else!
    5. Re:Tor is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible to get 80 kBps using I2P. Sure, that might be slow compared to regular torrents, and things like usenet, but it's certainly not bad.

  5. Yeah, that will be effective. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless and until every system connected to the Internet needs a unique key of some sort before it's allowed to exchange packets, blocking anything will be completely ineffective.

    The current net neutrality debate is the first line of defense toward preventing such a system.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Yeah, that will be effective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      even when they finally force us to logon to the internet via retina scans nothing will change. i'll simply resort the methods I used during the mid 80's... placing free ads in a cheap national magazine requesting "Atari ST contacts - swap hints and tips" and trade items via post just like the good-old days.

    2. Re:Yeah, that will be effective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      labaia.org is also much shorter to type.

    3. Re:Yeah, that will be effective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless and until every system connected to the Internet needs a unique key of some sort before it's allowed to exchange packets, blocking anything will be completely ineffective.

      The system doesn't need to block 100% of users for it to be effective. Although you or I may know countermeasures, I've no doubt this will stop all but the most dedicated of Italian Pirate Bay users.

    4. Re:Yeah, that will be effective. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Or if they just start requiring 'logging devices' on each PC that connects and if you try to access anything forbidden, your service is cut off and the local authorities are contacted.

      Sure that wont stop the hard-core, but it will stop 99% of the average joes out there.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:Yeah, that will be effective. by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

      That's why I think setting up labaia.org as well as changing IP was a very good move, Italian users (for now) don't have to know how to use tor or OpenDNS, or even what an IP address is to get access again.

      They just need to hear from someone that labaia.org leads to the same place but isn't blocked.

    6. Re:Yeah, that will be effective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasn't that more or less what tcpa was all about? trusted computing platform... something? it never got that far either. i don't think anyone will ever actually implement your doomsday scenario, or at least not until we give up our control anyway. and the trend is the other way around, people gaining more control and knowledge about their computers through microsoft and government screwups :P we should thank them for doing the work for us!

    7. Re:Yeah, that will be effective. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Trusted computing isn't gone, its just moving into our systems more stealthily. Until its pretty much embedded across the entire landscape we wont hear much about it. But once it is, look out!

      Yes, i sound paranoid, but if i had told you 40 years ago your music would be 'magically' locked to your stereo, or that the TV station could block you from viewing a TV show, you would have laughed at me. But look, we have that today and its only the tip of the iceburg.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  6. at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by Essequemodeia · · Score: 5, Informative

    Our fine Italian friends can still access TPB at labaia.org. Here's to hoping for as little irritation as possible.

    1. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by neokushan · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm just too simple to get it, but is there a joke behind "labaia.org"? Does that mean something in italian or sweedish?

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    2. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by Vectronic · · Score: 5, Informative

      La Baia
      The Bay

    3. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by neokushan · · Score: 1

      Ahh, of course. I am simple after all.
      Still, cheers for that informative post and double cheers for not making a dick out of me!

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    4. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by exley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Our fine Italian friends can still access TPB at labaia.org.

      Except for the people who read that as "labia.org" and end up someplace completely different, although maybe not entirely disappointing to them...

    5. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by Ruediger · · Score: 1

      It means "the bay"

      --
      "...personality goes a long way."
    6. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by compro01 · · Score: 1

      La Baia = The Bay in Italian.

      They state as such on the blog (http://thepiratebay.org/blog)

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    7. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Ok, must've made a typo with the link.

      http://thepiratebay.org/blog

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    8. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by Adradis · · Score: 1

      From The Pirate Bay's Blog:

      "(La Baia means The Bay in Italian)"

    9. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Labia.org -- the official website of the Humanitarian Fund for Labias."

    10. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by bmo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I went to labia.com and labia.org and I was disappointed both times.

      Both are parked domains.

      I do this difficult task so you don't have to.

      --
      BMO

    11. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by In+hydraulis · · Score: 1

      [OT] Heh, coincidence? I THINK NOT!

    12. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by Alsn · · Score: 1

      I would mod you +1 useful if only I could!

    13. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by Riven.exe · · Score: 1

      labaia.com not labia.com It means the bay in Italian.

    14. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by kaos07 · · Score: 1

      This should've been funny, not informative.

      Mods not getting the joke? Hint, use a dictionary.

    15. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by yanyan · · Score: 1

      *facepalm*

    16. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you missspelled it !
      try copy&paste, it works.

    17. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by bmo · · Score: 1

      Ya know, I just don't know what to say. Not much surprises me online anymore, but this +5 informative *did*.

      --
      BMO

    18. Re:at least TPB has a sense of humor about it by omuls+are+tasty · · Score: 1

      Dude, this is Slashdot. Most of us have never heard of a labia before, let alone seen one. +1 informative definitely!

  7. Common Carrier? by eggman9713 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I am just an ignorant American, but I believe if an ISP is now taking it on themselves to filter content, then they are possibly no longer a common carrier and as such can be subject to many other sanctions to block "bad" content. In Italy it may be entirely different, but either way, if the ISP does not say in their TOS they can block sites at their will, then they could be in big trouble for breach of contract, if such a thing flies in Italy.

    1. Re:Common Carrier? by propanol · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      ISPs do not have common carrier status. This has been discussed before, but supposedly US law distinguishes between voice and data -- voice having common carrier status, data not.

    2. Re:Common Carrier? by thermian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of what relevance is US law to Italy?

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    3. Re:Common Carrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of what relevance is US law to Italy?

      Mafia(a). Something being illegal usually makes it a strong possibility for a source of income. Likely, they don't want TPB in their territory. If everyone could get sex for free, look what that would do to the prostitution market. If everyone could grow their own marijuana the price would drop dramatically. If hard drugs were not illegal not only would the price drop but the related crime rates reducing trafficing in stolen merchandise as well as likely reducing the popularity of the drugs since it is no longer forbidden fruit.

      US IP laws have been being force fed to other countries via political maneurvering. International corporations are also major pushers in this regard. They want to be the only dealers in town.

    4. Re:Common Carrier? by neokushan · · Score: 1

      What's actually stopping people from growing their own Marijuana?

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    5. Re:Common Carrier? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      <parody>
      What do you mean? Italians have to obey the law, just as everyone else
      </parody>

      I think the US is infamous for imposing its laws on other countries, in particular those relevant to the movie and music business, through sanctions of one form or another; ISTR a story about the US using the WTO for this purpose.

    6. Re:Common Carrier? by eggman9713 · · Score: 1

      It very may not be. I am just presenting a potential argument.

    7. Re:Common Carrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nancy Reagan?

    8. Re:Common Carrier? by orzetto · · Score: 1

      Because our current prime minister is a hysterically waggling lapdog of your president, I suppose. He's the only one that, when put beside Bush, makes him look like he's the smart one: check here.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    9. Re:Common Carrier? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Not much...
      You need to grow it indoors, if you grow it outside where it can be seen expect a visit from the cops.
      You need to give it lots of light to grow, which consumes a lot of power and generates heat, makes your electric bill abnormally high (which flags warning signs) and gives your house a large infrared footprint...

      If you just grow a small amount i'm sure you could get away with it, the cops are more concerned with people who are producing and distributing large quantities than someone who has a small amount for their own use.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    10. Re:Common Carrier? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      US IP laws have been being force fed to other countries via political maneurvering(sic).

      I think it's a little disingenuous to say that these are cases of the US exporting their IP laws.

      It's not so much the US government that is "forcing their laws" on other countries, as it is international corporations forcing these fascistic, protectionist laws down the throats of sovereign countries, just as they have done here in the US.

      Would you say that the behavior of Sony Music or EMI are the fault of the US?

      Those of you who still see the world as a game of Risk don't seem to realize that these multinational corporations see borders, and liberty, as damage and route around them.

      So you've got these incredibly wealthy and powerful multinational corporations vs. a group of nerds who can't even agree on Net Neutrality laws. Who the fuck do you think is going to win that one?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Common Carrier? by eaman · · Score: 1

      I sould point your attention to the fact that Italy new Prime Minister is Silvio Berlusconi, who happens to own at least three television channels, plus some new "digital with fee" one for films and football. He also keeps very good relations with the public service as well (dig some "Berlusconi Sacca Bergamini RAI") just in case some one comes with a different point of view on same substantial matter...

      So he is quite sensitive to the case, and he feels confortable to propone laws for is very own welth.

    12. Re:Common Carrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just grow a small amount in the front garden everyone will assume no one will be stupid enough to grow it so openly and will think its another plant. Bonus points for growing it among ferns that look like it as a friend of mine did.

    13. Re:Common Carrier? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      That's the great thing.

      The new CFL's generate the same light with 1/5 the heat.

      I'm sure industrial growers would have an issue but the closet farmer is fine.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    14. Re:Common Carrier? by number17 · · Score: 1

      I think you are forgetting about the all important lobbyist. The large corporations use lobbyists to get the government to do half of the work.

      A large portion of the US economy now rely on these laws being passed in foreign countries.

      I would say Sony, EMI, and the US are at fault.

    15. Re:Common Carrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On August 10th, eggman9713 said

      I am just an ignorant American, but...

      Bingo. Nuff said.

    16. Re:Common Carrier? by brainnolo · · Score: 1

      I guess you are not Italian. The kind of mafia you talk about is not the one corrupting our government, is the one they are more or less fighting. The "new" mafia is the one which manages to "win" every "auction" for public services and to build public structures, and in some case the outcome is a disaster. Of course to "win" there you need political support, but there is a lot more money to be made.

      BTW: I am not using OpenDNS but still I had to no problem accessing TPB today.

    17. Re:Common Carrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US government is actively and enthusiastically promoting the adoption of IP laws around the world. Yes, the people who run the large corporations are pushing it too, but the US government ( and increasingly, other governments too ) are a major player.

      The large corporations can manipulate, blackmail and spread FUD but ultimately, it is the politicians and the governments which they form, which make the laws.

      Take it out on them.

    18. Re:Common Carrier? by You+ain't+seen+me! · · Score: 1

      IIRC ISPs in the UK claimed common carrier status under EU law, to prevent them from blocking p2p sites. Because of this they were coerced into sending out warning letters to p2p customers on behalf of the BPI instead. The last time I checked Italy was still part of the EU, so I guess their ISPs should also have common carrier status.

    19. Re:Common Carrier? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Since the U.S. Government in this context acts as an arm of those corporations, then yes, it's the U.S.

    20. Re:Common Carrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You need to give it lots of light to grow, which consumes a lot of power and generates heat, makes your electric bill abnormally high (which flags warning signs) and gives your house a large infrared footprint..."

      Posted Anon for obvious reasons! Off topic from original post but responding to parent. From about 2 years of experience & many hours reading the CC forums YMMV:

      In the US the courts ruled that the police can not fly over and look for IR anymore so that is not really an issue. I have heard that the Canadian police work with the elec. CO to flag accounts that draw abnormal amounts of power however like your post stated a small grower with a 500 watt Halide lamp, about $250-300 & around $100 of stuff from the home-depot / plant store you can easily produce 5 nice sized plants every 4 months or so and pull about as much as other household appliances in a space as small as 4' x 4'.

      The biggest fear for growers is the public. I thinks its safe to say most small time growers get caught because someone finds out and payback, greed, or envy comes into play. I have read so many posts about my friend / girlfriend / informant snitched.

      The extreme downside is that because this is an illegal hobby even close relatives and girlfriends or significant others become dangerous if they feel they have been wronged in some way. This Obviously leads to very paranoid groups of people that want nothing else but to be left alone & not have to pay street prices for something that is easy to do yourself.

      Even for medium outfits that are for profit rather then the owners head, robbery & snitches tend to get people caught more the CSI style detective work. In either case when a snitch isn't involved the police or fire department are usually responding to another unrelated call and find what they weren't supposed to.

      Since becoming a family, & having a child my lamp has gone dark, and will stay so until it is safe, since I will not give the state leverage against me to take away my son. Unfortunately that means I'm back to dealing with dealers & street prices which have their own downsides.

             

  8. la baia ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    http://labaia.org/ .

    The italy government sucks. Someone really should to put a bullet through Berlusconi's fascisti face.

    1. Re:la baia ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually all of this has little to do with the Italian government. The blocking order has been issued by a public prosecutor, which in Italy is part of the judicial system, which is independent from the government (the executive power).

    2. Re:la baia ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "independent" on paper only.

    3. Re:la baia ! by iminplaya · · Score: 2

      Someone really should to put a bullet through Berlusconi's fascisti face.

      Advocating violence is hardly insightful. I do believe he did win an election. Maybe something more along the lines of not voting for him would be more appropriate, no?

      --
      What?
    4. Re:la baia ! by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      At the risk of invoking Godwin's Law: people voted for Hitler, too.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    5. Re:la baia ! by Homburg · · Score: 1

      Actually, they didn't. Hitler wasn't elected, he was appointed Chancellor by President Hindenburg.
      People did vote for the Nazis, in large numbers, but the Nazis never won a majority in a contested election.

    6. Re:la baia ! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They were the largest party though. Their opponents like Schleicher planned to abolish parliament and form a grand coalition of all the non Nazi Parties (and the left wing of the Nazi party) to keep them out of power.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_von_Schleicher#Chancellorship

      chleicher hoped to attain a majority in the Reichstag by forming a so-called Querfront, meaning "cross-front," whereby he would unify Germany's fractious special interests around a non-parliamentary, authoritarian but participatory regime. Thus, he reached out to the Social Democratic labour unions, the Christian labour unions and the more left-wing branch of the NSDAP or Nazis, led by Gregor Strasser. Strasser, however, was already losing the internal power struggle with Hitler.

      Although Schleicher made some initial progress, he was rebuffed by both sides. Meanwhile, the ousted Papen now had Hindenburg's ear, because the latter was beginning to have misgivings about Schleicher's "cryptoparliamentarianism" and willingness to work with the SPD, which the old President despised. Papen was urging the aged President to appoint Hitler as Chancellor in a coalition with the Nationalist DNVP, or Deutschenationale Volkspartei (German National People's Party) who, together with Papen, would supposedly be in a position to moderate Nazi excesses. Unbeknownst to Schleicher, Papen was holding secret meetings with both Hitler and Hindenburg, who then refused Schleicher's request for emergency powers and another dissolution of the Reichstag. The President dismissed Schleicher, calling Hitler into power on 30 January 1933.

      In many ways it makes you wonder what would have happened if the CIA had been around. Presumably they would have backed anyone but the Nazis or Communists, even dubious types like Schleicher.

      The fact of the matter was that the democracy was doomed - either it would be replaced by Schleicher's authoritarian grand coalition or by Hitler as dictator. And if the Nazis had crushed the Communists, they would have taken over and set up a Communist dictatorship.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:la baia ! by dark_knight_ita · · Score: 1

      Agree.
      When the Prime Minister can force the Parliament to approve a law that blocks all processes against him, "independence" is a dream. And this is what happened at the end of July.

      Oh, this is OT.

  9. Tor/proxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That useless : use tor or another proxy to connect to the search engine/tracker (doesn't need high trafic).

    Once you got the *.torrent you want and the ip of the peer that share the file, you can connect directly to them without needing to pass by a proxy...

    1. Re:Tor/proxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Distributed Hash Table ftw

  10. This Reeks, But It's Still Not That Stinky Yet... by Kneo24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While this certainly has a lot of terrible implications, those people could just use other torrent sites. The only reason TPB is being blocked here is because of their notoriety. I honestly can find my trackers easier using other bit torrent sites anyway. And what will Italy do once people get their TPB trackers from other sites?

  11. Problem solved then... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    Then Italy has solved the problem right? Good thing there are no other trackers out there...

    Perhaps someone should inform them tpb hosts no files, so the people actually hosting the files are unaffected as are those attempting to download.

    The boat leaks from millions of places and you have put a patch on a hole well above the water line.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  12. The Italians giving into authoritarian government? by damburger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Say it isn't so!

    You know that Mussolini's party is still active in Italy right?

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  13. It's not blocked here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am in Italy and I can surf to Pirate Bay right now. My ISP is Tiscali.

    1. Re:It's not blocked here... by badpazzword · · Score: 1

      I can confirm the above.

      --
      When ideas fail, words become very handy.
    2. Re:It's not blocked here... by Psicopatico · · Score: 0

      TPB is surfable with Libero (Vodafone) here

      --
      Mastering the English language is fucking easy: all you have to do is to put an f* word in every fucking sentence.
    3. Re:It's not blocked here... by nevercome · · Score: 1

      same here, same provider.

    4. Re:It's not blocked here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CONNECTION LOST @#$%@#...

    5. Re:It's not blocked here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From http://thepiratebay.org/blog/123 - which I can access even if I'm in Italy too (infostrada ISP)

      We have already changed IP for the website - that makes it work for half the ISPs again. And we want you all to inform your italian friends to switch their DNS to OpenDNS so they can bypass their ISPs filters.

      On one hand, I couldn't care less about piratebay material, I prefer investing time in free as in freedom stuff. On the other hand I feel that familiarity with TOR could one day be useful.

    6. Re:It's not blocked here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's blocked on Fastweb: http://www.flickr.com/photos/oleevia/2753278896

  14. wikileaks a target? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since wikileaks.org is operated by the same guys, I wonder if wikileaks.org has been blocked in Italy as well? If so, that's probably the real reason.

  15. Proxy Server by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Informative

    And have they managed to block every proxy server that can connect to every other proxy server that can see and connect to TPB? It just sounds like more press grandstanding to this observer.

    And how about an ICQ that serves up torrent files? The file you need to get from TPB just isn't that big.

    And how about IMBF (Information Must Be Free) people offering to e-mail in .tor files upon request? Got that blocked yet?

    Strikes me that shutting down TPB countywide (unless you're China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, or the like) isn't easy, or likely.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Proxy Server by javilon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They know that it is impossible to stop people from getting to it. But they also know that if they manage to reduce the amount of people that uses P2P down from what it is now (my guess is 80%~90%) to something like below 20%, then they will be able to say that this people are criminals.

      Right now, they should send to jail the whole country.

      --


      When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
    2. Re:Proxy Server by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Does Obama really think he'll force us into Alternative Energy technologies by giving us no other choices?

      No, I think he knows that we'll be forced into alternative energy technologies by the Lomonosov-Lavoisier law. Our only real choice is to either slowly adjust our lifestyles now (by developing the alternative energy technologies quickly enough to handle our energy needs) or rapidly adjust our lifestyles later (in an economically catastrophic way).

    3. Re:Proxy Server by base3 · · Score: 1

      I suggest we all write our congressmen to demand this unpatriotic Lomonosov-Lavoisier law be repealed, then! I don't think our capitalist system should be denied its SUVs based on some silly conservation law.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    4. Re:Proxy Server by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

      Our only real choice is to either slowly adjust our lifestyles now (by developing the alternative energy technologies quickly enough to handle our energy needs) or rapidly adjust our lifestyles later (in an economically catastrophic way).

      I'm all for alternative energy in the long run. It eventually will become necessary, especially if nuclear is included in carbon-free renewable alternative energy. What I'm not for is the unnecessary suffering getting to it when abundant existing energy still exists.

      I've worked in the "oil patch" and I understand drilling. We're an economy that runs on cheap available oil and I d@mn well don't want to go through unnecessary pain just because someone else doesn't think we're moving to renewable energy fast enough to suit them.

      And I especially don't want to go through that pain due to some young, inexperienced idiot who is just so certain that he knows better than I do what's best for me.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  16. Re:The TPB guys will do absolutely nothing about t by HappySmileMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    They've already changed their IP address and bought the domain name labaia.org for Italians to access the site. Seems very different from "absolutely nothing"

  17. Re:The Italians giving into authoritarian governme by badpazzword · · Score: 4, Informative

    Had you said, "Mussolini's *daughter* is in politics", you would have been correct.

    --
    When ideas fail, words become very handy.
  18. Re:The Italians giving into authoritarian governme by damburger · · Score: 3, Informative

    They changed the name, but it was the same party, consisting of all the people who weren't hanging from lamp posts by the end of the war: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Social_Movement%E2%80%93National_Right

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  19. "web of trust" by khasim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Local groups sharing between themselves. Able to physically meet and verify each other.

    At the borders of that group, individuals physically moving material between groups. Very easy now with portable hard drives of a terabyte or more.

    So instead of material being available instantly ... it will be available in 7 days to anyone, anywhere. Because we all know that there are only 7 degrees of separation between any two people.

    1. Re:"web of trust" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeh, 7 days to everybody reading this, but Kevin Bacon will get it in 6, the bastard.

    2. Re:"web of trust" by arth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Local groups sharing between themselves. Able to physically meet and verify each other.

      It doesn't work, due to moles and snitches. Sooner or later someone is going to trust someone they shouldn't have -- it's human nature. And then the rest of the group inherits the trust, because that's also human nature.

      The only reasonably safe way of organizing a network is through cells, where even if one cell is corrupted, it won't spread to others. This holds true for computer networks too, but few if any applications support such a model. Those that are vaguely similar fail by having the node belong to multiple cells, thus making the impact of subversion much higher.

    3. Re:"web of trust" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, i think it only works if Keven Bacon is actually cracking the stuff himself then distributing it onwards - and he pretty much lost it when star-force came out.

    4. Re:"web of trust" by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work, due to moles and snitches.

      If you do unspeakably horrible things to grasses, then this happens much less often.

      Forcing them to watch mashups of every line Jar Jar Binks has ever spoken, on a loop in a dark room for 8 days, with thier eyes clamped open and given huge does of proplus and redbull.

      Either that or the severed head of Chewbacca on thier pillow.

    5. Re:"web of trust" by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That seems like an awful lot of work for free entertainment. Why not just work some shit job and buy it?

    6. Re:"web of trust" by arth1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do you presuppose that anonymous sharing is only used for entertainment of the buyable kind?
      What if you're trading movies and books that are banned for blasphemy where you live?
      What if you're trading erotica that can't be sold where you are due to "decency" laws?
      Or what if you're trading video footage and documents which the government wants hushed up?

    7. Re:"web of trust" by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Why do you presuppose that anonymous sharing is only used for entertainment of the buyable kind?

      Read carefully: he didn't. He "presupposed" that people are looking for entertainment (as you did). He was suggesting that instead of finding free entertainment from anonymous sharing (legal or illegal, if that's what you're getting at), you could get a job and pay for some other entertainment. I'm afraid you are the one who presupposed (and lost).

      Or what if you're trading video footage and documents which the government wants hushed up?

      Then you would persevere, even if it was a lot of work? I believe it was a suggestion, not a legal mandate.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    8. Re:"web of trust" by phorm · · Score: 1

      Hmm, in my case it's because I can't find a lot of the stuff I like. To be fair, a lot of it is older movies/music, but most of the big-box stores are only carrying the new stuff, and the used retailers haven't heard of it, or the hot stuff get snapped up right away.

      Even the semi-recent stuff is sometimes hard to find. I've been trying to track down earlier seasons of "The Outer Limits" and everywhere, from HMV to the little used-disc shop on hidden street is out-of-stock.

      Finally gave up and decided to torrent it, though I'll still keep my eyes out for the real thing (because some things are worth buying).

      I guess the end resolution is: yes, it's worth paying for, but sometimes not worth the hassle of finding a vendor that actually carries the stuff.

    9. Re:"web of trust" by redscare2k4 · · Score: 1

      The only reasonably safe way of organizing a network is through cells, where even if one cell is corrupted, it won't spread to others. This holds true for computer networks too, but few if any applications support such a model. Those that are vaguely similar fail by having the node belong to multiple cells, thus making the impact of subversion much higher.

      Then the MAFIAA will say we're organizing terrorist cells and we'll all end up in orange pyjamas sharing cell (as in "prison cell") with a funny guy that insists on kneeling in direction to Mecca several times a day.

    10. Re:"web of trust" by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      wait two to ten years for an anime to be sold over here (if ever)?

  20. Re:It's not blocked here... (and "aliased") by GennarinoParsifalle · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can confirm I can access the site (I'm in Italy, my ISP is Fastweb). Just in case it is blocked by some Italian ISP, it seems that labaia.org is a new alias. ;-)

  21. this... by owlnation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...is what happens when you elect a media owner as your country's president.

    Ciao free speech!

    1. Re:this... by antibryce · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're thinking of the Prime Minister. The president isn't involved in media companies.

    2. Re:this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Theoretically speaking Italy doesn't have a Prime Minister. It has the President of the Minister's Council, since no minister should be above others.

      Well, this would be right if in Italy the Constitution was worth more than wiping tissue.

  22. Why again was China bad? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh right, they block websites that could threaten what props their system up.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  23. Did they get a court order? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they didn't get a court order isn't this kind of blocking illegal harrassment and interfering with internet communications. It is severely outlawed at least here. Piratebay should file a criminal suit against them for running illegal interference.

    1. Re:Did they get a court order? by devman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure the owners of TBP don't want to step anywhere near a courtroom, even less for one not in their own country.

    2. Re:Did they get a court order? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't they? They are not breaking any laws in Sweden.

    3. Re:Did they get a court order? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Because it's a big pain in the ass and if they just tell people on the net about it, their point will come across just nicely. Just like it is.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  24. Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by dada21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've used TPB for legal torrents as well as the "illegal" ones. I taste movies before buying them, and TPB is a great way to try before I buy. I actually spend MORE money on DVDs purchased legally because of this method.

    So the Italian prosecutor would call me a criminal. Fine. He's using public funding against what would be a "crime" between private parties. He's using the taxpayer's dollars to do the work the "harmed" party should be doing.

    In reality, Italy has far larger problems than issues between two private parties. There is RAMPANT corruption that is costing REAL dollars to the taxpayer. The Italian government should be seeking out bad seeds amongst themselves as a priority. There is also massive amounts of theft and loss within their own body; maybe they should focus on those problems?

    1. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by devman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've used TPB for legal torrents as well as the "illegal" ones. I taste movies before buying them, and TPB is a great way to try before I buy. I actually spend MORE money on DVDs purchased legally because of this method.

      Unfortunately the purpose for the download of copyrighted material does not make it anymore legal, no matter how one rationalizes it, it's just simply not your right.

      So the Italian prosecutor would call me a criminal. Fine. He's using public funding against what would be a "crime" between private parties. He's using the taxpayer's dollars to do the work the "harmed" party should be doing.

      If I assault you or defraud you, that is also a crime between private parties, yet the state will still prosecute it. You need to define your terms more carefully. Should the state be handling what should ultimately be a civil matter, no not really, but private parties has little to do with it.

    2. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately the purpose for the download of copyrighted material does not make it anymore legal, no matter how one rationalizes it, it's just simply not your right.

      At which point we get into the question of "why should I accept that my rights are defined by who can pay the most money to the legislature"?

    3. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by Shados · · Score: 0

      If it was that simple, you wouldn't have the right to buy a used copy of copyrighted material, fair use clauses wouldn't exist, etc. Jeez, maybe there is ::gasps:: a balance to such things! And who would have thought... people making copyrighted work are... HUMANS TOO! Wow!

    4. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by thealsir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right. Like the extension of copyright terms into the stratosphere. Like the inability to copy parts of a DVD for fair usage. Like the current DRM'd media fiasco. That sure as heck sounds "balanced."

      Then there are the issues of media sharing and how it has often benefited artists, but not middlemen. This is a complex issue, because it is technically illegal, but people have done it dating back to the 60's with sharing phonograph records and tapes, and recording things off radio, and I guarantee you certain bands would not be as popular if that were not the case.

      How about this: Admit that the system is unbalanced in favor of one party instead of posting that "everything's fine" on Slashdot. "People making copyrighted work are humans too"...nice red herring that adds nothing to the discussion.

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
    5. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I've used TPB for legal torrents as well as the "illegal" ones.

      I love the quotation marks there. Do they meant "I've decided that these laws don't apply to me"?

      He's using public funding against what would be a "crime" between private parties. He's using the taxpayer's dollars to do the work the "harmed" party should be doing.

      How is this any different to any police force and national prosecution authority taking action against someone who breaks any law? Certain aspects of copyright infringment have legally been criminal rather than civil issues for several years now in many jurisdictions, including the US and EU.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    6. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      How about this: Admit that the system is unbalanced in favor of one party instead of posting that "everything's fine" on Slashdot.

      Could you please give a link to a comment in this discussion where someone who is generally not on TPB's side on this one claims that "everything's fine"?

      I obviously can't speak for anyone but myself, but I am very careful not to claim such things, not least because I don't for an instant believe them. Today's intellectual property frameworks are clearly flawed in many ways, and unbalanced at times. But that doesn't excuse rampant violation of a reasonable basic principle, which is what TPB openly advocates.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    7. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I for one certainly don't accept copyright is a "reasonable basic principle"! (well, the restrictions on redistribution of copyright law; I don't necessarily object to anti-plagiarism measures). If you don't want something copied, don't release it!

    8. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by thealsir · · Score: 1

      Well, that was mainly in response to the GGP's post, which was addressing GGGP's accusation that most laws these days are bought and paid for. Yes, there is a balance, but that balance was created eons ago before the days of rampant lobbying. The fact is that it is eroding faster than anyone can see. An eroding balance is not a balance. And claiming it is is in a way arguing that everything's fine.

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
    9. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      I suspect the quotes around illegal are intended to reflect that at least some copyright violations are still mere torts, not crimes, as you yourself point out later. 'illegal and/or tortuous' is a terribly awkward phrase, and having to constantly be that precise in discussing this seems pretty nitpicking, particularly when the 'other side' doesn't have to constantly explain that they don't mean peg-legs and parrots every time they use the word pirate. In the same way, the argument about investigations makes more sense if you assume that at least some of what is being investigated at public expense includes those tort violations. That's been a U. S. issue however, and I don't know if it is an Italian one - the article doesn't indicate that the Italian government is gathering information that is only relevant to tort violations rather than crimes.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    10. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      The fact is that [the balance] is eroding faster than anyone can see.

      But is it, really?

      It's easy to look at laws that extend copyright durations and prohibit DRM circumvention, and forget the rest. But you have to consider that in the Internet age, mass copying of music, video and software is taking place on an unprecedented scale. Systems like DRM are a (flawed) response to that, and laws prohibiting DRM circumvention are the next step when the flaws come to light. Personally, I'm not a fan of DRM for two or three quite specific reasons, and I think market forces will drive everyone toward better alternative approaches in the future, but in the meantime, it's not like companies invest time and money in investigating and implementing DRM without any motivation. Some people are ripping them off.

      Likewise you can talk about copyright extensions, but several countries actually rejected the latest round of proposed extensions. Moreover, the UK, for one, is currently working towards opening up some daft laws that mean everyday and indeed industry-supported actions like format shifting are technically illegal. So it's not all one-way traffic.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    11. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the purpose for the download of copyrighted material does not make it anymore legal, no matter how one rationalizes it, it's just simply not your right.

      One reason we don't shed a tear for the recording, radio, cable TV and movie industries is they were all founded on piracy themselves. Film makers didn't set up shop in Hollywood just for the nice weather, they did it to get away from Thomas Edison's patents on cameras. The rest took advantage of loopholes to make money from other people's content without paying for it.

      Copyright violations aren't the problem these industries have with Napster or Bittorrent, it's that they aren't controlled by industry so they can make money from it.

    12. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by redscare2k4 · · Score: 1

      I've used TPB for legal torrents as well as the "illegal" ones.

      I love the quotation marks there. Do they meant "I've decided that these laws don't apply to me"?

      Or maybe he lives in a country where downloading movies and music is not illegal yet (like Spain), or maybe he points to the fact that a .torrent file can never be illegal (it has no copyrighted content by itself).

    13. Re:Instead of fighting obvious crimes... by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      Laws that are made in the spirit of corporate interests definitely dont apply to me. Why would they? They were not written to increase public trust. They were written to hold back the freedoms of the digital age. Who would support a law that is designed to hold back progress? Blindly following laws that dont serve public interests is not the way I plan on living my life, but you are free to restrict yourself as you see fit.

  25. Re:Torproject by thermian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I don't wish to distract from what is, in many respects, a premier example of the genus 'angry rant', I feel I should point out that no-one in Italy (or anywhere else that I know of) is actually blocking bittorrent.

    They are blocking a website which serves bittorrent files. There's rather a lot of difference.
    Also, lets get real, most of thepiratebays content links users to content which is being provided contrary to the laws of their countries.

    Is this wrong? Well, the debate goes on, but we get nowhere by pretending that everything's lovely with downloading 'unauthorised' content, and get with the real problem, that copyright itself is very broken.

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
  26. Re:It's not blocked here... (and "aliased") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can confirm I can access the site (I'm in Italy, my ISP is Fastweb).
    Just in case it is blocked by some Italian ISP, it seems that labaia.org is a new alias. ;-)

    Here the bay is still reachable too! I think the control may be in the DNS system (like for the *forbidden* betting sites)!

    I'm happy with openDNS! :-)

  27. This prosecutor looks like a dedicated guy... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suspect he has a lucrative career ahead of him in the entertainment industry. Wouldn't be the first case of that happening.

  28. Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italians by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the webpage:

    Fascist state censors Pirate Bay

    We're quite used to fascist countries not allowing freedom of speech. A lot of smaller nations that have dictators decide to block our site since we can help spread information that could be harmful to the dictators.

    This time it's Italy. They suffer from a really bad background as one of the IFPIs was formed in Italy during the fascist years and now they have a fascist leader in the country, Silvio Berlusconi. Berlusconi is also the most powerful person in Italian media owning a lot of companies that compete with The Pirate Bay and he would like to stay that way - so one of his lackeys, Giancarlo Mancusi, ordered a shutdown of our domain name and IP in Italy to make it hard to not support Berlusconis empire.

    We have had fights previously in Italy, recently with our successful art installation where we had to storm Fortezza in order to get our art done. And as usual, we won. We will also win this time.

    We have already changed IP for the website - that makes it work for half the ISPs again. And we want you all to inform your italian friends to switch their DNS to OpenDNS so they can bypass their ISPs filters. This will also let them bypass the other filters installed by the Italian government, as a bonus. And for the meanwhile - http://labaia.org/ works (La Baia means The Bay in Italian).

    And please, everybody should also contact their ISP and tell them that this is not OK and that the ISPs should appeal. We don't want a censored internet! And the war starts here...

  29. Re:The Italians giving into authoritarian governme by badpazzword · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And how many seats do they currently hold in the parliament?

    You're really beating the wrong cat. ;)

    --
    When ideas fail, words become very handy.
  30. Domain name or IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thepiratebay.se resolves to 83.140.176.200 in the free world, so what happens if you just open that IP address in Italy?

    No this is not a rickroll, goatse, tubgirl or lemonparty.

    PS: What, do I sound like I've been burned before?

  31. Blocking and filtering will never work. by Eternal+Annoyance · · Score: 1

    Ok, so they want to block information on a tool that is designed to make sure information gets distributed (the internet)? GOOD LUCK!

    If they want to make sure information doesn't get distributed, better make sure the people don't have access to the tools to do so (in other words: forbid access to the internet altogether).

  32. By the way... by creaktive · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Pirate Bay SSL proven ineffective: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=803927

  33. Censorship....WTF??? by WwWonka · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Seriously folks, what is happening here? Question these moments both in the case of Pirate Bay and that of individuals who lose their jobs for freedom of speech.

    ....a woman censored by being fired for writing a book! And she works in a library....the irony.

    DIGG Story on Women being fired for writing a book

  34. Another solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OpenDNS.

    Man. What a poor job they've done to block the website -- and still they can claim they did.

    Suddenly, I love my country again!

  35. Free Advertisement by fluch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What a great country which provides again free advertisement for the Piratebay! After the pitfall of Denmark trying the same impossible thing ... will they ever learn?

  36. From the site itself by houghi · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://thepiratebay.org/blog/123 or http://labaia.org/blog/123 for people in Italy

    Copty and paste
    (I sure hope they don't sue me for copyright infringement)

    Fascist state censors Pirate Bay

    We're quite used to fascist countries not allowing freedom of speech. A lot of smaller nations that have dictators decide to block our site since we can help spread information that could be harmful to the dictators.

    This time it's Italy. They suffer from a really bad background as one of the IFPIs was formed in Italy during the fascist years and now they have a fascist leader in the country, Silvio Berlusconi. Berlusconi is also the most powerful person in Italian media owning a lot of companies that compete with The Pirate Bay and he would like to stay that way - so one of his lackeys, Giancarlo Mancusi, ordered a shutdown of our domain name and IP in Italy to make it hard to not support Berlusconis empire.

    We have had fights previously in Italy, recently with our successful art installation where we had to storm Fortezza in order to get our art done. And as usual, we won. We will also win this time.

    We have already changed IP for the website - that makes it work for half the ISPs again. And we want you all to inform your italian friends to switch their DNS to OpenDNS so they can bypass their ISPs filters. This will also let them bypass the other filters installed by the Italian government, as a bonus. And for the meanwhile - http://labaia.org works (La Baia means The Bay in Italian).

    And please, everybody should also contact their ISP and tell them that this is not OK and that the ISPs should appeal. We don't want a censored internet! And the war starts here...

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:From the site itself by lbbros · · Score: 1

      Fascist state censors Pirate Bay

      Wow, how bad can spin get? My country is still a democracy, and besides, the blockade has been done due to a court order. Right or not, law is law. The post you quote is very biased: I suspect it comes from the political parties that were wiped out of the parliament during the last elections.

      --
      A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
  37. Maybe not, however... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In English, it's extremely close to "labia", which I guess grandparent was joking about ("Hoping for as little irritation as possible").

  38. Not true - now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Works perfectly now here in Milan. Just downloaded a few torrent files to check.

    Yesterday and the day before it was unaccessible though.

    Perhaps the Polizia Postale (yes, it's the postal police who checks on the net here) is helpfully unblocking it on Sundays?

  39. Re:Yeah, that will be effective by stevet_az · · Score: 1

    They have got to be kidding. I can't believe that the "Government" of a country can't figure out or hire someone to explain to them it won't work. What passes for govenmental bodies now days is scary.

  40. It's working from here (Apulia/Puglia) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm in the very heel of Italy, Puglia, and it's working swimmingly. Needless to say I am also on some random's open wifi connectiont too ;)

    1. Re:It's working from here (Apulia/Puglia) by Blackstealth · · Score: 1

      Completely dead here in Ostuni (Puglia), that's on a Telecom Italia business connection. Just need to swap to OpenDNS on my machine here - cheap arse Italian Pirelli router doesn't allow the DNS addresses to be changed!

  41. "mamma mia!!!" by frito_x · · Score: 2, Informative

    in the words of mario mario (yup... his last name's mario)

  42. Re:Yeah, that will be effective by monsul · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It doesn't need to work. It's a gesture, you see.

    Knowledgeable people in Italy will just use Tor or whatever to bypass the block. Less knowledgeable people will just move to the next big thing (mininova, kazaa, etc...)

    The "Goverment" will look like it has made as much as possible to protect the interests of the artist lobby groups that are pushing this

    ...and everybody is happy :)

    --
    Make It Secret Protect your privacy
  43. Still working for me by gigarello · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use the biggest italian ISP, Telecom Italia, and TPB is still reachable!!! I'm using opendns, maybe italan ISP just removed TPB form their dns...

  44. Seeing things as they are by westlake · · Score: 1
    You know that Mussolini's party is still active in Italy right?
    .

    Mussolini had his own way of dealing with the petty thief - and that - stripped of all pretense - is what the downloader has become. Films like The Dark Knight aren't produced as a free gift to the geek with a network connection and a DVD burner.

  45. Re:This Reeks, But It's Still Not That Stinky Yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they came for The Pirate Bay I did not complain, because I used Mininova. When they came for Mininova I did not complain, because I had a Demonoid invite. When they came for Demonoid...

  46. Better yet - get involved by btarval · · Score: 5, Informative
    Go one step further beyond being a leech, by downloading and setting up a Tor exit node.

    And, since the usual RIAA fanbois usually pop up once you mention Tor, casting FUD to scare people away from it, here's the EFF's legal FAQ, and here's the Tor FAQ.

    Also note carefully what the parent said, namely, "Use Tor to access the trackers". Tor is, by default, set up to disable bittorrent transfers, since it heavily loads the Tor network. Here's one article which well explains Why you shouldn't run bittorrent over Tor.

    And if you look at the default exit node policies (see section 4.16 of the Tor FAQ), the standard bittorrent ports are explicitly rejected. So you really don't want to run bittorrent over Tor.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
    1. Re:Better yet - get involved by Stellian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Go one step further beyond being a leech, by downloading and setting up a Tor exit node.

      I would be very careful with that. Running a TOR exit point will get your IP on all kinds of black lists and you will soon find you can't use your internet connection normally, you get strange timeouts, captchas whenever you try to search Google and so on. Just sniff a bit and see exactly what people are doing over your IP - you will be appalled. There are also all kinds of spiders that keep black lists of TOR proxyes (even non-exit nodes !). So I recommend running a TOR server only if you either have a dynamic IP, or you can dedicate a separate static IP to it.

      Also note carefully what the parent said, namely, "Use Tor to access the trackers". Tor is, by default, set up to disable bittorrent transfers, since it heavily loads the Tor network.

      To emphasize the GP's point, he was talking about setting the tracker (http announce) connection over TOR; this is totally negligible in terms of load (a few 1KB connections per hour, per active torrent) and perfectly effective against the mafia block. Running the actual bittorrent file transfer across TOR is quite a pointless thing to do: most exit nodes allow a very small white list of ports to connect to, so there's little chance of getting decent download speeds - you will only connect to very few peers or only over the very overloaded exit nodes with a more relaxed policy. All this aside from the implicit slowness of TOR. Simply put, I don't think you could download anything (thankfully - we need TOR for other things than piracy).

    2. Re:Better yet - get involved by MagdJTK · · Score: 5, Informative

      Running a TOR exit point will get your IP on all kinds of black lists and you will soon find you can't use your internet connection normally, you get strange timeouts, captchas whenever you try to search Google and so on.

      Very true. I've played around with Tor and a number of sites (understandably) ban all tor exit nodes from contributing. Wikipedia is an obvious example.

    3. Re:Better yet - get involved by BountyX · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I have been running Tor exit nodes on my home office and my office for over a year with only 1 problem (Nintendo complained about mario kart sharing, which was due to improper setup anyways). A properly configured Tor exit node (lets say binding to port 80 only and rejecting all other traffic) will allow you to still download the trackers and get the information you need to run the torrent. I don't think Italy is blocking the default bittorent port...

      --
      Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
    4. Re:Better yet - get involved by jessedorland · · Score: 1

      I am thinking about trying Tor myself -- although I find this thing very suspicous.

      --
      Even veals have more autonomy!
  47. And the theft of corporations from the PD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What should we do for that? They have no corporeal body and the government aren't stripping them of corporate status, so what should we do?

    I know, take from them like they took from us.

    Payback's a bitch, isn't it.

  48. Wishful thinking by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love these wishful thinking posts.

    Here's a newsflash for you: the authorities and big business have way, way more control over the Internet than you appear to realise. Companies like Google have the resources to index the entire web. Every major international pipe is controlled by one of a pretty small group of major telecomms companies. Despite the grand redundancy claims, there are plenty of single points of failure that will disconnect, or at least seriously inhibit, flow of data to or from entire countries.

    You can make defiant noises about how impractical it would be for the authorities to police everything and how important net neutrality is, but TPB is the enemy here, because by its very existence and public position on openly breaking the law in most countries, it provides all the evidence that politicians and their major contributors need to justify not fighting for net neutrality and pushing for ever more surveillance and control.

    A few years ago, there was all this talk about the Internet being some new, special place. Sorry, but it's neither above international agreements nor above individual countries enforcing their own laws and cutting off anyone who doesn't play nicely with their efforts to do so.

    The world will be a better place for most people if the freedom that generally exists on the Internet is preserved, but if that freedom is abused by a vocal minority, the rest of us will all get shafted by the consequences.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Wishful thinking by EdIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's a newsflash for you: the authorities and big business have way, way more control over the Internet than you appear to realise

      Every major international pipe is controlled by one of a pretty small group of major telecomms companies

      You are oversimplifying things a great deal. You are not incorrect in stating that governments and businesses have a large control over the pipes themselves. However, there is a HUGE difference between controlling the pipe and controlling what goes through the pipe.

      You could say that the pipes and their routers would be like large highways with millions of people walking. At the intersections you could be checking the identity of every person and searching the contents of their bags. If this were true, then yes you would be right, a large amount of control could be exerted by governments and the corporations which control the highways and intersections.

      However, the Internet is not like that. You just cannot simply turn off a route and eliminate all flow to another network (which can affect a whole country) as often it would be like shooting a fly with a cannon. You would eliminate 1% undesirable traffic while also eliminating 99% of all the desirable traffic.

      So what do you have left as options to eliminate only the 1% of the traffic which is undesirable? Packet Inspection. There are several challenges to overcome if you are going to effectively block anything:

      1) Encryption. It's hard to tell with 100% accuracy what is going on with a session when you cannot read the packets. Encrypted packets, IPSec, VPN, etc. all raise the level of difficulty significantly which necessitates the next step.

      2) Behavioral Analysis. When you can't decrypt, sometimes you can tell what is going on by looking at other factors and clues.

      Now I know what you may want to say, that you can just block all traffic going to TPB's servers. What do you do about mirrors? What about VPN connections to servers that will host torrents and reside on wholly different networks outside of your control? How do stop the fact that somebody on the Internet can create a secure session with somebody else that does not have the same restrictions on their own network?

      With all due respect, the "Grand Redundancy" claims are valid. As long as a SINGLE country allows connections of any kind to a restricted network, while also not being restricted from the rest of the countries, people WILL be able to establish connections to the undesirables. This cannot be stopped.

      Please note that I am not writing this in support of The Pirate Bay or IP Piracy in general, but only to point out that your statement is just not factually correct. It IS wholly impractical for authorities to police the net as they will never be able to take the steps necessary to accomplish their goals as it would hurt more than help.

      Now if you disagree with my assessment, please provide a more detailed technical explanation of how such control can be exerted other than superficial observation that corporations own the pipes and governments can exert control over corporations.

    2. Re:Wishful thinking by surpeis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Glad to see 2 well formulated posts on the subject. Props.

      I will not dive deep into the technical issues as it would take a whole lot of "what ifs" and "What nots" to predict what technology could and would be implemented at some stage to counter illegal filesharing.

      But the parent post adds a very interesting point:
      The Internet is a carrier of freedom, but here as everywhere else in society it doesnt come without responsibility. TPB does not advocate this responsibility, in my view, at a very high level. Further down the road, this _could_ lead to stronger control of user activities and/or net neutrality. I dont think most small-time pirates gives this much thought, and it _could_ prove a high price to pay. Since stuff like P2P and spam takes alot of bandwith without any of the service and content providers making money, it is not far fetched to think that ISPs in the future will consider giving up identities behind IPs that are "too active" on illegal filesharing or similar activities. Or even be forced to do so by governments.

      Even though the regular slashdot-user can throw up a few proxies and dive into the comfort zone of being anonymous in no time, this is not the case with most filesharers. And the minute the neighbour's kids start getting lawsuits in their mail, parents will stop bragging about the net skills of their prodigys and how they "just download whatever they want" (like my parents did), and start learning them about property rights instead. Trust me.

      I am in the position that I have run 2 companies for the about 10 years. Rarely enough, the first one doing high end web programming, and the second a small Indie recordlabel. Needless to say, I have been puleld between my love for the net, and my love for music. For years I have been in heavy conflicts with most of the music biz, advocating offensive use of the net as a new distribution channel rather than lawsuits and war with consumers.

      However ive started to come to the conclusion that this is a sociological issue rather than a technical one. There are elements in the arguments coming from filesharers that rises issues not possible to solve through technology.

      1. The "War on the greedy music biz" is failing. Or that is, it might be won, but at a high price. Running a small label I slowly started realizing that Im the one loosing the battle, not the major labels. The reason is simple. You wont find my music on TPB. And even when i put it there myself, people would still look around for Britney Schmears or whatever other brand the majors are launching at any given time through advertisements, media control and whatever. And even in the rare case they DO seek up my music, and even want to support my label by buying the record, they most likely wont be able to as most indies cannot distribute their records to all corners of the world until long after the air is out of the balloon.

      In this way, people using illegal filesharing strenghtens the market position of the MAJOR labels, not the vivid but oh so weak Indie scene. Market power sucks, eh?

      2. There seems to be alot of kids out there who really thinks music is free, and that the attempts to put down the likes of TPB is taking something away from them that they always had. This is disturbing. Ive had kids mailing me to have me send them rips of CDs as they had trouble finding them on the net. They dont thank me when I do, as they see it as a given right, and bad service from us when its not available for download. Needless to say, this is not the kids that will drive forward a music scene in the future. I dont know what this means in practical terms, but its a new kind of customer that will be pretty close to impossible to serve. This is not ideal for a number of reasons that most can work out for themselves.

      3. The filesharers has a free choice to avoid stealing and hustling music they dont own any tights to. There is free music out there for several lifetimes of listening. Still people wants the stuff that they have to pay for. Why? Partly due

    3. Re:Wishful thinking by Roxton · · Score: 1

      Great, a well-educated Italian guy who has the expertise to understand the problem, the ability to leverage obscure community resources to find ways around the problem, and who has a lot of time on his hands can access The Pirate Bay. Nevermind that these services derive their value from having a critical mass of users. Government control is clearly not a critical factor. Nope.

    4. Re:Wishful thinking by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      They can ban encryption.

      I guess it is not hard to just drop packets they cant analyze from hosts they don't have on "trusted host, can encrypt" list.

      That way, if you need encryption for acceptable uses, you have no problem as your host is trusted by ISP. If you want encryption for something else, well, its time to look into stenography.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    5. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were a web programmer, why don't you set up a site to sell the music instead of giving it away for free? Why are you complaining you can't distribute CDs worldwide when you can sell through the net.

    6. Re:Wishful thinking by cyborch · · Score: 1

      If you want encryption for something else, well, its time to look into stenography.

      stenography
      noun
      the action or process of writing in shorthand or taking dictation.

      I think you ment to say:

      steganography
      noun
      the art and science of writing hidden messages in such a way that no one apart from the sender and intended recipient even realizes there is a hidden message.

    7. Re:Wishful thinking by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      Oh, right, i must have had hot-ish geeky women on my mind when i wrote this.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    8. Re:Wishful thinking by catxk · · Score: 4, Informative

      The world will be a better place for most people if the freedom that generally exists on the Internet is preserved, but if that freedom is abused by a vocal minority, the rest of us will all get shafted by the consequences.

      How can you call it freedom if it's removed if you take advantage of it? If I have freedom, you cannot remove it. If you can, it's not freedom. That's sort of the point.

      TPB is not the enemy here. TPB is an indicator on how corrupt our political overlords are, especially in Italy. Once a fascists...

      --
      Don't be crazy anymore!
    9. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting post, but something sort of bugs me.

      [...] the creative youth might start realising there is no money to be made in music, as opposed to the dream of wealth and stardom that drives a BIG part of the current popular music scene. Im not saying it will kill music, im just saying it _could_ make the music scene less diverse and more commercially oriented.

      So, you are saying that weeding out the "artists" that are in the music "business" to make big money, would result in a more commercially oriented scene?
      How does this work?

    10. Re:Wishful thinking by UnixUnix · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Excellent posts, this and parents. Let me add a small point: I know a number of "kids" in various European countries who live on 700 -800 Euros a month. They tell me, after paying rent, water and power and making a trip to the supermarket for groceries they are down to coin money until next month. So the music they obtain through P2P is not music they would have bought otherwise; rather, they would have done without it. As it is, I do get to find out what music they play -- and I for one do buy music that I like. The net effect for those selling music is positive.

      I do believe the evils of music sharing are being overstated.

    11. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I dont think many people would disagree that if they make something, wether it be music, art, film or car parts, they themselves should have the right to choose how they want to distribute it"

      That is exactly what I disagree with. In the past, with physical media it was relatively easy to control distribution. Today, the degree to which computers are networked and more importantly the easy of sharing that it enables makes control of distribution very difficult. In fact, proper control of distribution requires significant loss of privacy and control on the part of the user. This is unacceptable in my opinion.

      Disruptive technologies force societies to change how it operates. This is just one of those cases. In exchange for a free, open, democratic Internet, privacy, user autonomy, etc.. content creators must give up control of distribution. They still have control over whether or not to release it. Just not how it is distributed. Is this exchange worth it? I think so. Clearly the people who make money off of the current system of content creation will not. It's their income source after all. They will probably let the society go into a totalitarian hell as long as they can keep holding on to their-way-of-making-money.

    12. Re:Wishful thinking by omuls+are+tasty · · Score: 1

      An interesting post. Re: weeding out the crap. Yes there's too much stuff out there to do it yourself, but I'd really rather have people I know I share tastes with do it for me instead of some record company exec. I'm not a Myspace user. I've seen some great music there but using the damn thing simply takes too much time with all the social networking crap and its terrible interface, so I only listen to music there when it's linked to from other sites. But one site that really has helped me find great music on its own is last.fm. Have you tried it and what do you make of it?

    13. Re:Wishful thinking by mhelander · · Score: 1

      "Needless to say, this is not the kids that will drive forward a music scene in the future. "

      I humbly disagree. I think that these are precisely the kids who will drive forward a music scene in the future. And the musicians who learn to adapt will be making the music on that future music scene.

      It is all about a) _first_ finding ways to become popular/widespread (making your music available for free is probably becoming a necessary but, as you note, perhaps not sufficient criteria. Making good songs also helps, for instance.) and b) _then_ finding ways to capitalize on your popularity. Concerts. Ads. Sponsorships. Anything but trying to charge the listeners directly for copies of the songs themselves, since the spread of those copies constitutes most of your bargaining position when negotiating your _actual_ deals.

      I'm not trying to argue that you shouldn't have the right to decide how you want to distribute material you have created. I just think that, even discounting piracy, the market is trending towards musicians exploiting the edge that "free" can give them and the listeners will decide to go with that, ultimately establishing alternative routes of reimbursment.

    14. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      The thing is, as I see it, this one really is very simple. Most countries would consider TPB's position illegal. Currently, TPB have moved to a country where this is not so, but they use the Internet to continue supporting illegal activities in other countries. The traditional response by the international community to such a situation is to isolate the country sheltering those who are attacking the laws the other countries have in order to pressure that country into getting its house in order.

      Given the power of those involved here, is it really so inconceivable that the international community would threaten to literally disconnect an entire country hosting services like TPB from the Internet? I say "threaten", because it seems almost certain that the country's government would bring their laws into line with the international concensus and close down TPB long before allowing the disconnection to happen. You could even wind up with a two-tier Internet, where any other country that refused to participate in the block would themselves be isolated. Since most people in the first world wouldn't miss all the spam and cyber-attacks from countries likely to be excluded as a secondary effect, this is doesn't seem entirely unrealistic either.

      Of course, even if that approach is a little draconian for your credibility, there is a whole scale of things leading up to it, such as blocking encrypted traffic, bandwidth caps, and so on.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    15. Re:Wishful thinking by Spellvexit · · Score: 1

      I second your endorsement of Last.fm. I've found a lot of obscure and nascent artists through them. It generates playlists based on what a user listens to, and it finds matching artists fairly dependably. Users can also listen to radio stations based on tags such as "trance" or "reggae," meaning that if you, as an artist, post your tracks to Last.fm and tag them appropriately, your music will show up on searches and pop up in the appropriate radio stations. And unlike torrents, where people already have in mind what they want to download, Last.fm users are considerably more receptive, actively searching for new artists to listen to.

      Whether or not people will pay for your music is another thing, but if you're looking for exposure as well as some control of how your music is distributed, Last.fm seems like a good place to start!

      --
      The moon may be smaller than the earth, but it's much farther away!
    16. Re:Wishful thinking by EdIII · · Score: 1

      The thing is, as I see it, this one really is very simple. Most countries would consider TPB's position illegal

      Given the power of those involved here, is it really so inconceivable that the international community would threaten to literally disconnect an entire country hosting services like TPB from the Internet?

      It really is inconceivable in most cases. What you are talking about is exactly like an embargo. Over TPB? Not likely. An embargo is a serious thing for countries to consider. As I mentioned before the Internet does have an awful lot of redundancy in most cases. For an embargo to be successful the country would have to be without any routes of any kind to any other networks. That is not an easy thing to do in most circumstances.

      So I understand your point, but it would require the UN to pull of something like that. As for your assertion that a country would most likely bring their laws into line with the international consensus, that does not represent reality. Cuba, Iran, and North Korea all have Internet (Nuclear in some cases) and Iran and North Korea are certainly not conducting themselves according international consensus. Cuba has been defying the US for about 50 years.
       
       

      You could even wind up with a two-tier Internet, where any other country that refused to participate in the block would themselves be isolated. Since most people in the first world wouldn't miss all the spam and cyber-attacks from countries likely to be excluded as a secondary effect, this is doesn't seem entirely unrealistic either.

      Like I said, easier said than done. Cuba gets it Internet from the Venezuelan government now. So although you are right that most people won't miss spam and cyber-attacks, it does not make it easy to isolate those networks entirely.
       
       

      Of course, even if that approach is a little draconian for your credibility, there is a whole scale of things leading up to it, such as blocking encrypted traffic, bandwidth caps, and so on.

      Bandwidth caps won't have any effect on behavior in most cases, unless you are talking about at a country level. That brings up the embargo question again. As for blocking encrypted traffic that would include IPSec, VPN, etc. There is far more legitimate business traffic that is encrypted than that of illegal file sharing traffic. Blocking encrypted traffic will just never happen since so much of the Internet absolutely depends on it. The only way to manage encrypted traffic is a key escrow system. Those proposals have never made it past the preliminary stages and certainly have never made it into law. To accomplish a key escrow system would totally destroy all privacy and confidence in communications over the Internet.

      I can see how you feel that TPB is just giving ammunition to the governments to lock down the Internet, but actually doing that is far more difficult and fraught with serious consequences to legitimate uses.

    17. Re:Wishful thinking by surpeis · · Score: 1

      Thanx for posting.

      One shouldnt exclude the other, and we have our music available as DLs directly from our own server. There is several implications, though. First, there is a minimum "tax" that we have to pay for every file downloaded, regardless of us giving it away or charging for it.

      This is special for norway, i guess, but shows clearly that even if I wanted to dump prices, im not free to do whatever I want. This is a (semi)political struggle, and of course its hard to compete with the major labels in getting our point of view through to government officials.

      It aims to secure a minimum income for the artists no matter how bad deals they sign, so its not all bad. But its one of the things tying my hands and feet.

      Also, my most succesful artist was indeed available from tens of thousands of seeders on torrents. Only a handful bought the files available. Its hard to compete with a free lunch. On the other hand, it most definitely helped spread the word. It just turns out to be very hard to make any profit from it.

    18. Re:Wishful thinking by rootooftheworld · · Score: 1

      This is why i love /.!!!

      --
      I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
    19. Re:Wishful thinking by surpeis · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your reply.

      You are right, it sounds a bit counter-intuitive. This is something im guessing, not something i know.

      My point is that music is a tool of dreams. Most people that I know picked up their guitar because they wanted to be a star some day. Money is definitely a major part of this dream. At some stage the music might be important enough to drive them forth even with no commercial success, and ill admit that these probably often turn out to become the best mucicians.

      On the other hand: if there never is an economic incentive to start playing music, we might loose many a good artist that never picked up the imnstrument to start with.
      My point was merely that low recruting to the music scene is not good for music. And the less diversity, the more power to the major labels.

      This is not a fact, but a subjective prediction based on how I concieve the music scene and what drives people to have such an interest in it.

    20. Re:Wishful thinking by surpeis · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your post.

      Well, as mention in my parent post, there is enough music out there to fill a lifetime. So there is no _need_ to enter illegal filesharing.

      The economical strain on young people is not something I feel I can answer for, but I dont think they would run into a fashion store and grab clothes they want. If you cannot afford what you think you need in life, its a political problem.

      This is excactly my point: it is the combination of music being easy to distribute digitally and ISPs securing anonymity for their users that allows the development of someone just taking what they want. If a vaccum cleaner could be distributed digitally, Im pretty sure you would see people arguing that they could not afford it at current prices and therefore saw it their right to download it for free. But you would never see the same people walk into a store and demand a vacuum cleaner. Out of the safehaven of anonymity, this would not be socially cceptable behaviour. And its actually more weird with music, because as mentioned there is plenty of free music out there. Its just not the music you see in advertisements and on MTV.

      And as said I dont think piracy is killing music as a whole. But the semanthics of TPB and their likes aggregates that this is a war on major labels, while it in my opinion strenghtens the market position of majors and rapidly killing indies.

      So my point is that filesharing _might_ advocate the opposite of what the "aware" filesharer thinks. And i dont really think TPB gives a rats ass about is :-)

    21. Re:Wishful thinking by surpeis · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting.

      Well I disagree with you here to a certain degree. First of all: I know its impossible to control what the individual user does. But thes "pirates" (i dont like the term) have a choice. There is free music out there for everyone to fill their HDs. Supporting these artists instead of running like mindless sheeps to download whatever you saw on MTV would advocate change. But this is not what happens.

      The music business is not only about distribution. Its also about quality assurance, artist development and knowledge about trends in the market. Most all files you find on TPB are there because of this work being done (yes, in the hope of making a profit).

      You might very well be correct about a totally new model developing from this, but it clearly will be very, very different from what people see today. Neither you nor me can say much about how it would be but its not possible to maintain the semi-professional scene that Indies provide and TPB profit on within these boundaries as its simply not econimically .

      And im not sure people want that. They would like the best of both worlds, but im not sure it can be had in long run. In danger of repeating myself: its hard to compete with a free lunch.

      The point being that good music always has a market potential. This is something filesharers must deeal with. If you want music to be free, the best way to provoce change is not downloading the artists that charge for their music, but supporting thos who dont. This is sociology, not technology, and it plays an important role in how the music scene will develop. Filesharers cant expect the distribution system to change without the product (or quality(diversity of the product) to change as well.

      I am merely asking if most file sharers give this any thought. Im of course well aware that it is technologically impossible to control, but im also well aware it can be controlled alot more than today, and im interested in what price this comes at. So should the filesharers be.

    22. Re:Wishful thinking by surpeis · · Score: 1

      Im a dedicated user of last.fm for about 3 years, and i agree with you in most all you say. Still, last.fm needs a vivid music scene to avoid stagnation and becoming a rating on what most people has been listening to the last months or years. So last.fm or similar services might very well be one of the main legs of a future music scene, I totally agree with you there...

    23. Re:Wishful thinking by surpeis · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting.

      Your post needs some thought. Shooting from the hip I am not sure that sponsorships will generate the vivid scene that _me personally_ would like to see. Lots of this is already happening, and you are definitely onto something here. But the implications of an "anarchistic" music scene is very big, and would leave us with something very different from what people see today. I am not sure people are ready for this... yet. AT least im not sure I am... :-D
       

    24. Re:Wishful thinking by surpeis · · Score: 1

      that came out wrong. What i meant was that I need to think a bit about your post... :-)

    25. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They dont thank me when I do, as they see it as a given right, and bad service from us when its not available for download. Needless to say, this is not the kids that will drive forward a music scene in the future.

      Erm, how do you know they aren't going to be so inspired by the music that they decide to start a band? Isn't that "driving forward a music scene"?

      I dont know what this means in practical terms, but its a new kind of customer that will be pretty close to impossible to serve.

      You are thinking in terms of "customers" not "listeners". From a purely artistic point of view, it's not how many people buy the music that matters, but the number of people who listen to the music. In fact, in a services based model, you want to maximise the number of listeners, as this maximises the number of potential customers for your services. (where services are live concerts, public appearances etc).

      There is free music out there for several lifetimes of listening. Still people wants the stuff that they have to pay for. Why? [snip] ...mainly because most music you will find on Garageband, Myspace or whatever.com is utter crap... [snip]

      So its actually quite comfortable to have people sorting out the good shit from the bad shit, it might turn out. Its just not comfortable to pay for it [snip]

      You seem to grasp that if there is good music out there buried under a layer of crap then money can be made from the filtering process. You fail to see that people don't have to pay for it directly for this to be profitable. How much do you pay google to perform a google search? $0.00 right? So that means google isn't profitable, right? Well, no, google is insanely profitable right now, due to advertising. So have an ad-supported filtering site, that reviews and links to free music across the world.

      A few years down the line the creative youth might start realising there is no money to be made in music, as opposed to the dream of wealth and stardom that drives a BIG part of the current popular music scene.

      It is totally wrong to say that there is no money to be made from music, as there will always be a demand for live music played by skilled musicians. There may not be as much for the people who used to be the top earning 1% of musicians, but the idea that no-one can make any money from music due to file sharing is utter rubbish.

  49. Today it works again by Verunks · · Score: 1

    it didn't work in the last two days, but today it works again, my isp is fastweb

  50. Just the DNS A replies are squishy by eaman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I semms like that Telecom, wich is italian n.1 priver, is just gibbering the DNS replay: A query for thepiratebay.org returns 127.0.0.1 .
    So just a static record in you /etc/hosts should do:

    # echo -e "83.140.176.200 thepiratebay.org\n83.140.176.156 torrents.thepiratebay.org" >> /etc/hosts

    Or you (gentle italian reader) can just use a different DNS. Http is fine, so appears to be the peer to peer thing.

    You know: it's not like I fell the need to download some copyrighted materials, it's just that _I_'m used to be the one who blocks things in my net, and I go mad when someone tricks my DNS (they did some other trash on those DNS some time ago as a sort of forwarder for mispelled domains: some one in there found a new toy and since then each day they play a new trick...).

  51. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's just a glorified ad hominem attack. TPB's openly admitted purpose for existing is in violation of Italian law. When you break the law, you forfeit certain legal protections and certain freedoms. A public official blocking them from helping people to break the law isn't fascism or censorship, it's simply enforcing the law, and some random group of people who don't agree with the law do not get to decide what is the law for an entire country.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  52. Re:This Reeks, But It's Still Not That Stinky Yet. by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

    I fully understand the implications of said action. I'm just not particularly worried in this incident. They can *try* all they might to block TPB, but it won't work. Even if a few users are affected, there's so many torrent sites out there that it won't matter. Besides, there's always Tor.

  53. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If the law is fascist then yes, enforcing the law IS fascist.

  54. OpenDNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's blocked by at least one ISP here in Denmark as well. OpenDNS FTW!

  55. Re:Yeah, that will be effective by cyb97 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Less knowledgeable, or pragmatic?

    Not being able to access PirateBay isn't really critical. People can get their less-than-legal software and porn elsewhere, it's the principle that's important.

    For what it's worth, I'm somewhat doubtful to whether or not most of the piratebay users really give a crap about free speech, net neutrality and so on, as long as they can download stuff for free...

  56. Oblig... by Save_Clippy · · Score: 1

    Arrrrgh!!

  57. OK, everybody say it with me now: by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You can't stop the signal, Mal!

    1. Re:OK, everybody say it with me now: by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1
      Gimme a break here, will ya? Rather than go on for a whole paragraph with the usual soap-box rhetoric on how it doesn't matter if they try to censor the internet, people will find a way around it, I just cut straight to the Firefly quote for once. Well, fine. You get the long version then.

      So the Italian government is trying to make themselves look good to their constituency by "blocking the bad 'ol pirates". My my, wouldn't Moussolini be proud. Seriously? You're a bunch of idiots. The tighter you squeeze, the more P2P will slip through your fingers. The RIAA still hasn't learned that lesson regardless of how much MediaSentry gets spanked for picking on broke college kids, little old ladies, and soccer moms who don't even know or are able to comprehend what P2P means or what BitTorrent does, let alone have any MP3s or know how to rip a CD! Sure, why should you fascist bastards be any different than the RIAA? Go right ahead and waste taxpayer money and time that could be spent working on solutions for REAL problems and REAL crimes. Or better yet, why don't you get a collective brain, wake up and smell the coffee? People will ALWAYS find a way to share files and music, even if it's sneakernet -- even if it's SneakerNetOverCarrierPigeon -- so give it up because you can't stamp it all out, ever!

      ..or, like I said originally: You can't stop the signal, Mal!

      I'm done now. Go right ahead and mod me down to -1, Troll or somesuch if you like, because I really don't give a flying fuck, you little tin-plated dictators. Get off my lawn.

  58. Tutto me l'dice con: by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Non potete arrestare il segnale, Mal!

  59. First the world cup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah I say let the Italians (pronounced here in the US eye'talians) whine a bit, I mean we've seen them whine at football (us we call it soccer lol) I'd say after about three months they'll be begging PB to set servers up in the vatican just to shut the whinny people up. Trust me If you don't think it'll work ever seen a bunch of whinny people get to together. Its Usually poop and diapers everywhere, and its not a pretty site!

  60. This is wonderful! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Now Italy will be exporting its wealth to the rest of the world and becoming relatively poorer.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  61. Re:The Pirate Bay needs to disappear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. The western world needs more totalitarian dictators. Isn't it nice to have a Kim Jong-Il or Saddam Hussein in your country?

  62. The Everwise Senator Organa says, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more you tighten your grip, the more systems will slip through your fingers.

  63. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A public official blocking them from helping people to break the law isn't fascism or censorship, it's simply enforcing the law

    Enforcing the law or not, it is censorship. Whether you agree with it or not does not change the fact that it fits the definition of censorship.

    some random group of people who don't agree with the law do not get to decide what is the law for an entire country

    Are you objecting to people discussing what the law actually is, or discussing whether the law is right?

  64. I'm Italian. This is much worse than torrent sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our fascist corrupt government is trying to set up a precedent to block a bunch of sites which at present are the only way people can oppose the bastards who are governing us.
    The criminal Silvio Berlusconi, our premier, already owns some of our major TV networks and controls what the others air, plus he owns or controls newspapers too. In other words people who are trying to oppose him cannot get any coverage on mainstream media; today the Internet is the only remaining media we can use to spread the word about his crimes, and he wants to block it as well.

    Please don't let us alone, it's getting worse every day.

  65. Re:I'm Italian. This is much worse than torrent si by uassholes · · Score: 1

    Would you please explain why you continue to elect such a corrupt, criminal asswipe as Berlusconi?

  66. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 1

    TPB's openly admitted purpose for existing is in violation of Italian law.

    This is actually why their letter is NOT an ad-hominem attack. "Fascism" means (among other things) using the government to restrict people's freedoms. Thus, their accusation of fascism calls into question the validity of Italian laws, and provides a reason for them to ignore those laws.

    If you want a reply with more punch, take the parent post and replace "TPB" with "the Dalai Lama" and "Italian" with "Chinese."

  67. Only a DNS Poison by Matador · · Score: 0

    They are only blocking it like the gambling sites, through a DNS Poison.

    Just changing to OpenDNS (Like I have 1-2 years ago) solves it.

  68. Re:I'm Italian. This is much worse than torrent si by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

    In other words people who are trying to oppose him cannot get any coverage on mainstream media; today the Internet is the only remaining media we can use to spread the word about his crimes, and he wants to block it as well.

    Hmm.

    --
    "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  69. Linus54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Pirate Bay was banned by the Italian internet regulators. They are accusing the regulators of being fascists. Having lived in Italy I can tell you that the Italian government is not run by Fascists. However Berlusconi does take the interests of businesses (usually his own) into consideration somewhat to the exclusion of others.

  70. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want a reply with more punch, take the parent post and replace "TPB" with "the Dalai Lama" and "Italian" with "Chinese."

    OK...

    Berlusconi is also the most powerful person in Chinese media owning a lot of companies that compete with the Dalai Lama and he would like to stay that way...

    Wow, I had no idea!

  71. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    It's all so clear to me now.

    I must kill the prime minister of malasia!

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  72. "the law" does not equal morality.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They have no right to strip away your capacity to consciously choose to break a law you feel is unjust.

    They have a right to prosecute or litigate against you for it, but they don't have a right to impede your free will!

    When you start doing this, it's called fascism. Information gets censored because it's "dangerous" and will "incite criminal actions". Butcher knives should be banned too! they are clearly designed with the express purpose of slicing flesh, and humans are made of flesh.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:"the law" does not equal morality.. by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Whoa whoa whoa... By that logic, anyone should be able to assassinate the President, since they are impeding your free will by stopping you.

      No, you need to add some more qualifications to that, such as: As long as it doesn't step on anyone else's rights.

      But then, if you did that, this case wouldn't apply, would it? Since the IP owners have rights and you'd be stepping on them.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:"the law" does not equal morality.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      Whoa whoa whoa... By that logic, anyone should be able to assassinate the President, since they are impeding your free will by stopping you.

      No, you need to add some more qualifications to that, such as: As long as it doesn't step on anyone else's rights.

      But then, if you did that, this case wouldn't apply, would it? Since the IP owners have rights and you'd be stepping on them.

      IP owners don't have any right.

      there is no amendment in the US bill of rights, nor is there an article in the universal charter of human rights, which reads "and IP owners hereby have more rights than others, including the right to veto all other rights detailed herein, because it threatens their almighty pocket books"

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    3. Re:"the law" does not equal morality.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascism in Italy? Why, that's so improbable it isn't even worth considering!

    4. Re:"the law" does not equal morality.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote: Butcher knives should be banned too! they are clearly designed with the express purpose of slicing flesh, and humans are made of flesh.

      here in the UK the medical profession are ahead of you, they ARE trying to get kitchen knives banned since they see instances where they have been used for assault, they have decided that these knives are dangerous (notice what incredible deductive powers a university education enpowers you with).

      I sometimes wonder if I am on the same planet I was on in 1970...or was I abducted by aliens?, I don`t recall people being this crushingly stupid in my youth, maybe its something in the water Dr Strangelove?

      anon cos registering for every trivial action/comment/idea is such a bind

  73. Or I2P... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Or if you want to go a step further: use I2P for the entire download. That way, you're also fully anonymous.

  74. So do you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it hilarious to see someone who's done far, far less to make the world a better place whine about TPB. TPB, on the otherhand, has brought a lot of enjoyment to this world to people who otherwise wouldn't have it. And helped bring about changes to a corrupt business industry which needs to be abolished.

    I thank TPB for their efforts.I hope they get rich off of it. It looks like they are.

    Let us know when you've managed to do something one millionth as noteworthy.

  75. Business acumen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The "War on the greedy music biz" is failing. Or that is, it might be won, but at a high price. Running a small label I slowly started realizing that Im the one loosing the battle, not the major labels. The reason is simple. You wont find my music on TPB. And even when i put it there myself, people would still look around for Britney Schmears or whatever other brand the majors are launching at any given time through advertisements, media control and whatever. And even in the rare case they DO seek up my music, and even want to support my label by buying the record, they most likely wont be able to as most indies cannot distribute their records to all corners of the world until long after the air is out of the balloon.

    It sounds more to me like the business model you have for your music is wrong.

    1) I find it very hard to believe in this day and age that you couldn't sell world-wide through the Internet.

    2) The fact that you don't even publish a link to your music here on Slashdot makes me believe that you're missing important business opportunities. Or is this connected with (1) (you would have no way to profit from Slashdotters being interested in your music)?

    3) Your music may just be too "niche", in which case you'll just have to live with the reality that you're never going to be the next Brittney Spears, and will have to keep a day job also.

    1. Re:Business acumen? by surpeis · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your input.

      Well, I dont have any idea what the "right" model would be, but here is what I have tried:
      - FLAC downloads for a very low price
      - Free low res version of entire albums on torrents with links to buying high res files.
      - Webads
      - eCards for sharing with friends with free streaming of albums and links to FLACS
      - Lowered prices to about half of market price

      Im not saying im doing things right, im just saying I have tried alot of the things i usually see filesharers request in discussions on the topic. Also, all of the above have had an effect, but not enough to make it even worth the worktime. A $2000 ad in a magazine about pre release free instant FLACS for people who pre-ordered one of our records generated 1 sale and about 200 extra visits to the campaign site as an example. So people doesnt even seem to be interested enough to check it out. 1 week after relase, the same album was seeded by about 500 people on TPB.

      To answer your other points:

      1. I did not mean digital distribution. But getting distribution for PHYSICAL objects worldwide is very, very expensive and impossible to roll out for small indies. Thus major labels will always have an advantage since the can afford to make their music more available for "spontaneous buys".

      2. I did not post any link because I thought it would get me flamed for advertising in the forums. Im not here to sell records, but to get input on what I could do to improve my sales. If people need reference as "proof" for what im saying, I will provide. But I dont see that its needed to run this discussion, unless people find my arguments not trustworthy.

      3. Im definitely not mainstream, but I have close to 30 releases in a wide variety of sounds, and a considerable label in unonsiderable Norway. One of my releases has been on Pitchforks top 50 albums of the year, and been nominated for a (niche) MTV-award. As a curiosa, I might mention that this artists is probably the most niche of them all :-). With this in hand, it should not be to hard to find out what label I run for the Sherlocks out there :-)

  76. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    The problem is... You have to be breaking Italian law to make your argument valid in Italy, and there's a lot of stuff on TPB/LB that's quite legal to download in Italy simply because it either is free or not protected in Italy (the same goes for the all other countries). So, you say that because someone does download something illegal in Italy it is quite okay that all Italians loose certain freedoms and legal protections?

    That's not enforcing the law, that's fascism.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  77. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by und0 · · Score: 1

    When you break the law, you forfeit certain legal protections and certain freedoms.

    Well, Italy prime minister broke the law for more than ten years (a single entity can control no more than 2 of 12/13 national TVs) or changed the law to avoid prosecution in a corruption case, so in Italy it depends on who you are.

  78. Not blocked by telecom right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as of now, i can access TPB as well as always. but i have experienced some blocks in the past few days.
    this is via ISP telecom italia business' network. Oh wait, I am using openDNS and maintain our own dns server.. so that would be the cause? so this block is via DNS only?

    1. Re:Not blocked by telecom right now by dark_knight_ita · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but this is not enough. Right now, Alice (Telecom Italia brand for home use) is partially rewriting the labaia.org webpages, by denying access to the .js script (http://static.labaia.org/js/tpb.js) included in all the pages.
      If it's not in the browser cache already, of course.

  79. Law? by muffen · · Score: 1

    To me, this brings up a few questions, and maybe someone with a bit of knowledge about italian law can help me here.

    1) How was this allowed to happen, what law was used here? I mean, they can't shut down access to a website because they don't like it (and with they I am referring to the Italian government). If they simply shut it down without applying a valid law then what is stopping them from shutting down access to, for example, cnn.com, if they don't like the content?

    2) Had TPB been sued in Italy? I would assume that anyone should be given a fair chance to defend themselves, and if Italy feels TPB is breaking Italian laws, then they should sue them. I understand shutting down access to the site while the lawsuit is going on, and it is very likely TPB won't go to the Italian courts, but at least if it was done this way TPB would be given the option of defending themselves.

    3) Stopping access to sites without the backing of a law simply has to be wrong, so if I am right in my assumtion that TPB has not been sued, any person should be able to sue the government / ISPs no?

  80. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by jabithew · · Score: 1

    But it's a glofiried ad hominem attack on Silvio Berlusconi, and hence is richly deserved.

    --
    All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  81. Re:I'm Italian. This is much worse than torrent si by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Not just Berlusconi, look at the mayor of Rome
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Alemanno

  82. in Italy? for what reason? by Turiko · · Score: 1

    Seriously, Italy and Belgium are the only countries in europe that have a monthly limit. Why stop the small ones? the bigger oens are in countries that offer the golden standard of UNLIMITED broadband a month, at a fixed speed.

    1. Re:in Italy? for what reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some Irish ISPs have a monthly cap too. It's so huge I've never hit it, but it's there.

    2. Re:in Italy? for what reason? by shikhark · · Score: 1

      Seriously, Italy and Belgium are the only countries in europe that have a monthly limit. Why stop the small ones? the bigger oens are in countries that offer the golden standard of UNLIMITED broadband a month, at a fixed speed.

      Actually,there are unlimited plans available too. I have an unlimited plan (http://www.fastweb.it/offerta/famiglia/internet/fibra-ottica-adsl-flat/) [senza limit = without limit] Also,TPB and labaia are still blocked by my ISP ,although TOR works fine.

  83. ISPs economic incentives... by js_sebastian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since stuff like P2P and spam takes alot of bandwith without any of the service and content providers making money

    Excuse me, but how do the ISPs make money? from users subscription. And why do users care that their internet access have decent bandwidth (beyond the cheap basic service they need to read their mail on google or yahoo?) because of large, multimedia downloads, which are effectively distributed (legally or illegally) over P2P.
    The ISPs have no natural economic incentive to block whatever the users want to do, unless either:

    a) they have a flawed billing model, where they provide extremely high bandwidth at a flat rate and expect users not to use it

    OR b) anticompetitive, vertical integration: the ISPs are also content providers, and want to hook you into whatever shit they are selling you

    Of course, anti-P2P regulation can provide such incentive (by giving ISPs big fines if they don't block P2P, for instance).

    1. Re:ISPs economic incentives... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      a) they have a flawed billing model, where they provide extremely high bandwidth at a flat rate and expect users not to use it

      ...which almost every major ISP does, at least in my country. Most users do not use the bandwidth continuously, so high peak bandwidth and high contention ratios work in the interests of most customers.

      Actually, I wish the ISPs would all move back to a more realistic billing model. Then I could stop subsidising the P2P/BT freeloaders, who would have to pay many times what they currently do for their connections.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:ISPs economic incentives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I could stop subsidising the P2P/BT freeloaders, who would have to pay many times what they currently do for their connections.

      Yeah, lousy freeloaders, how dare they use the connection they paid for in the way it was advertised?

    3. Re:ISPs economic incentives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you go to an all-you-can-eat buffet, and glare at anybody that takes more than a piece of toast?

    4. Re:ISPs economic incentives... by surpeis · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting.

      Im not sure where your going with this, but one of my points is that things like net neutrality might be challenged if most of the bandwith the ISPs should have given you is taken by spam and P2P traffic that only lowers the general quality of their products, or putting them under immense pressure from global companies like the major labels. Semi-political arrangements like dedicating parts of the grid for certain content is already being discussed here in Norway. Is this a desired direction?

      Apart from that, i dont think most people would disconnect from the Net unless there was P2P technology available. I know I wouldnt, I still need my daily fix of slashdot knowhow... :-)

      but of course it could make people go for lower bandwith subscribtions. Which would allow the ISPs to sell more subscriptions on a lower investment in the grid.

    5. Re:ISPs economic incentives... by surpeis · · Score: 1

      Its a well established fact that there is not enough bandwith for all to actually fill the pipe they subscribe for. Anyways, this is not something you can blame on the music biz, wether major or indies...

    6. Re:ISPs economic incentives... by surpeis · · Score: 1

      No, but if someone started handing the food out the window to their non-paying friends I would.

  84. Re:Yeah, that will be effective by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    ...and everybody else apart from the artists and publishers are happy, until a few years down the track when music/movie proliferation goes down and prices come up :(

    Fixed that for you.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  85. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Enforcing the law or not, it is censorship.

    OK, strictly speaking, you're right. But in that sense, all IP laws are a form of censorship.

    Are you objecting to people discussing what the law actually is, or discussing whether the law is right?

    I'm not objecting to anyone discussing anything. I'm objecting to people breaking the law. Those people are free to pretend that they are on some moral crusade to justify that action, just as I am free to say their argument is a load of weasel words completely lacking in substance.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  86. Re:Official The Pirate Bay announcement for italia by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    OK, just stop with this one, please! TPB openly and repeatedly advertise their services directly to those who wish to break the law, and I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that a heavy majority of the material identified by TPB is infringing.

    There is a valid argument that technologies that have positive uses should not be prohibited just because they also have negative uses. That is a very important principle, but it does not apply here, because the Italian government is not going after BitTorrent technology, they are going after specific users of that technology whose publicly stated aim is a violation of Italian law. It's the difference between banning cars and banning drivers who think doing 90mph through a residential area is a legitimate use of cars. It's the difference between banning knives and banning the guy who sells combat knives outside a school known for its problems with violent pupils with a banner saying "If you don't like someone, just stab them!".

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  87. perception of value by sbt323 · · Score: 1

    One of the big issues with the piracy problem is the situation the music industry got itself into in the first place. Humans are a rather stupid race when it comes to our perceived value of entertainment. 15$ is a reasonable representation of what a CD would cost you to purchase at a retailer. The CD itself is worth less than 1$, but letâ(TM)s assume we take the entire life of the CD as a music distribution medium and say that the IP is worth about 12$ of that ticket price. That leaves us with 1$ for the CD and 2$ for the box art, printing, and the plastic casing. 12$ for a recording of a performance is, well, completely outlandish. That is way too much money for what we get. The music industry should have NEVER been what it is today. It is not a host of talent filled individuals becoming famous for their talents; rather, it is marketing companies providing the population with what they will pay most for. The music industry is a heartless machine that sucks individuality out of our lives and replaces it with the same mundane crap day in and day out until we get bored. Lets be reasonable here, does anyone actually believe that a professional musician deserves more respect and money than say, any given engineer? Of course he/she does not. Musicians should only make about the same amount of money any other person with a 4 year education (yes, you should be required to attend a musical institution before you can be classified as a professional musician). Obviously, some people will bypass this and still make the same amount of money, just like inventors who can market their ideas without degrees. There are outliers, just like there are in every other professional field, but the general mass of professional musicians is streamlined into a bell curve of yearly earnings. The corporate industry behind the labels makes more of course, but just like respectable engineering firms they are not all filthy rich. Suddenly, the perceived value of the IP changes from being a penny from a heartless millionaire to the earnings of a respectable professional. Society would view it entirely differently. A compact disk featuring the IP of a band should be somewhere around 5-6$. With the option of purchasing individual tracks online for a reasonable price (10-12cents). If you feel that musical talent is hard to come by, and that they really do deserve that kind of money and respect, sit down and try to learn and instrument. If you take courses, learn the history and how music works, I assure you it is fairly easy. Anyone is capable of learning how to play an instrument. There is NOTHING special about being a good guitar player, or having a singing voice. It is a skill that is developed by rigor and training. Just like any other educational and marketable skill. If you make the music industry seem human, and introduce some hard work into the filthy money they make people will change their opinions on pirating. I know itâ(TM)s a sad place for indie music developers because they are exactly what the music industry should be, but there is nothing you can do about the situation. Youâ(TM)re a grain of sand in a beach full of boulders, I feel for you, but thatâ(TM)s just the way it is. The dream of being rich should have never, ever been there, you do not deserve it. The fact that society actually let people who produce the same crap over and over again have a higher income than those who spend years in university to save our lives and better our civilization makes me sick.

  88. Re:The Italians giving into authoritarian governme by dark_knight_ita · · Score: 1

    And, I might add, this party is explicitly against Italian Constitution.

  89. waaaaa criminals waaaaaaaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if TPB wasn't a criminal organization, I might be worried, but guess what...they are nothing but criminals. /.'ers like sex (ok, they enjoy the thought they may have it someday)...so are they going to jump to the defense of rapist as well?

    stop defending the criminals.

  90. Why? by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    Tor is the answer to everything.
    Use Tor to access the trackers. Problem solved.

    Tor is only the "answer" if you think pirating movies, apps, music, etc is cool. Otherwise, the "answer" is to reform copyright law, and then respect it. Not everyone on Slashdot thinks all copyright violation and piracy is a good thing.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  91. What's the BFD with Pirate's Bay? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Isn't it just another torrent? Why does the Pirate's Bay get so much more press than all the other torrents?

  92. haha, wait till Italy blocks Google too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just google for what you want:

    site:thepiratebay.org Nirvana ... and then click the "cache" links.

    Incredibly useful when TPB is down, too (more often then not)

  93. Re:Torproject by anyGould · · Score: 1

    Also, lets get real, most of thepiratebays content links users to content which is being provided contrary to the laws of their countries.

    Lots of people use their cars to speed, which is contrary to the laws of their countries - I don't see anyone advocating banning automobiles.

    It's the same as the old VCR case - just because you could use something for illegal purposes doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to use it for legal purposes.

  94. funny idea of rights vs what you shoul've said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IP owners don't have any right. ...
    there is no amendment in the US bill of rights, nor is there an article in the universal charter of human rights...

    They certainly do have rights (though not extreme ones of course!). It is up to the governed to give up (willingly!) certain rights to facilitate their affairs (called "consenting to government"); it is not up to government to exist by fiat and hand out rights.

    Even though the people who wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights felt this was obvious, it is made very explicit in the ninth amendment to the US Constitution:
    "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

    Human social government is an amicable (typically, and hopefully, that is) limitation on rights, not the broker of rights, let alone their source.

    there is no amendment in the US bill of rights, nor is there an article in the universal charter of human rights, which reads "and IP owners hereby have more rights than others, including the right to veto all other rights detailed herein, because it threatens their almighty pocket books"

    It's dishonest to say "they don't have any right" and then to back up your argument with an example that is exaggerated to the point of false caricature: "see, they don't have these unreasonable rights, therefore I can claim they don't have any right". I think you know your position is not rigorously founded, but since you like it anyway you thought demolishing a straw man was justified.

    Your original statements are indeed insightful:

    They have no right to strip away your capacity to consciously choose to break a law you feel is unjust.

    They have a right to prosecute or litigate against you for it, but they don't have a right to impede your free will!

    but they do require the modification suggested (at least):

    No, you need to add some more qualifications to that, such as: As long as it doesn't step on anyone else's rights.

    But then, if you did that, this case wouldn't apply, would it? Since the IP owners have rights and you'd be stepping on them.

    Of course it would apply. The whole point you were making (without being so precise) was that the "rights" the IP owners have are derived through a social contract you (and others, as you probably guess!) find unjust. Their monopolizing "the useful arts" in effective perpetuity causes harm to society at large. Worse, their litigious "defense" (er, expansion) of these "rights" makes a beachhead for rights at the expense of others' rights, and draconian laws in general.

    You just over-reacted to insightful but misapplied criticism.

  95. Current situation in Italy by 4v4l0n42 · · Score: 1

    I've been reading over this over the last days. Right now I'm on a free WiFi on a camping in Italy (yes, I do this even in vacation ^_^).

    Here is the current situation. http://labaia.org/ was accessible yesterday night, currently http://thepiratebay.org/ http://labaia.org/ and even 83.140.176.200 try to point to localhost, so adding

    echo -e "83.140.176.200 thepiratebay.org\n83.140.176.156 torrents.thepiratebay.org" >> /etc/hosts

    to /etc/hosts was of no use. Using OpenDNS did not help. Probably back home, by having complete control over my internet connection, I could get around it somehow, but from here all I could do to make it work was to use a free online proxy (name yours, I used http://www.youtubeproxy.ws/ for the sake of the example). The Italian blogosphere reports that Tor works as well, but this is a much easier and faster solution IMHO, which does not require additional software installation.

    As I wrote on the coverage of the event, this will only help strengthen the popularity of the torrent community and stimulate ways to circumvent government censorships. Italian politicians are generally very ignorant about internet-related topics, and this case makes no exception.

    I can still remember when colombo-bt, the biggest Italian torrent tracker, was shut down by the police, the replacement page was made with front page....

  96. Re:It's not blocked here... (and "aliased") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At present, most of Italy's ISP are blocking the old TBP IP at access/core router level and/or fake the DNS answer to make it point to 127.0.0.1 or something like this.
    Using OpenDNS should be enough to bypass the filter, since TBP changed to a new, unblocked IP.
    A bad news is that "stop page" for the blocked site is hosted by a IFPI associate in UK. This means that they are recording IP addresses and requests made to the trakers/homepage/blog.
    Even worse, after reading the order from the judge, and even if I'm not a lawyer (but I used to work as consultant in IT related topics during legal trials), I point out that there's no legal support for the judge to grant the "seizure" of TBP.
    The preventive seizure is based on unproven assumption, deal without any law-based fundation, cite absolutely unrelated laws (basically the only stuff cited that is somehow related is a grant of innocence for ISP bearing E-Commerce related traffic in case of an external fraud.. I mean, what the hell should it be related to block of TBP?).
    Moreover the Penal Prosecution Code (Codice di Procedura Penale) can't give any stuff to them since it was last updated in 1989 and is based on something written in early 1900 years.
    Last, but not least, the same Code states that no foreign seizure can be requested or executed if there's no real chance for a final sentence of extradition, and it's not the case for sure, since Sweden justice already claimed TBP innocent, so the alleged crime simply isn't a crime in Sweden.
    So they are basically playing out of their own rules, and I bet that if someone proposes appeal, it's going to win easily (given a good lawyer, of course).