Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot's Disagree Mail

I am responsible for reading most of the help requests sent to Slashdot. Most of the mail I get in a day is what you would expect, comments and concerns about postings, user accounts and Slashdot itself. There are a very special group however that get passed around the office due to the inordinate level of anger, lack of understanding and just plain weirdness they possess. Through the years I've collected many and still get such gems on a regular basis. We thought it would be fun to share some of our favorite rants, ramblings and ruminations with the rest of you. I give to you the first of many installments of Slashdot's disagree mail. The names have been changed to protect the idiot — hit the link below to drink it in.

Our first entry starts off by explaining:

"Every time I try to login it tells me that my password is bad! I know I'm using the right password why won't you let me in? My account is *******"

I'm sorry but I don't see an account with the name *******. I also don't find an account with the email address you're using associated with it. Do you happen to know what your uid is?

"Try lookin harder cause I was using AOL a few days ago just fine but now I can't! I'm mailing you from the library right now cause you won't let me on the internet!"

AOL? Can you not log into Slashdot or is the problem that you can't get online at home?

"Whats Slashdot why am I given you guys money for internet if I cant use it?!"

Slashdot is the website you are writing to. If you were banned here for some reason I might be able to help you but I'm not in charge of the whole internet, at least not yet. It sounds like you need to get a hold of AOL tech support and hopefully they can solve your problem.

"If you can't help me why are you on google when I type in help with the internet? If you don't want to help people when they need it maybe you shouldn't be on google!"

Our last email this week demonstrates something, but I'm not exactly sure what it is:

from ***************
to banned@slashdot.org
date Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 6:46 PM
subject stop sending me mail
"If your so fucking smart that you created the great and awesome slashdot why can't you figure out that I don't want your stupid bulshit mail! Everyone here acts like they are so much smarter than everyone else and that a teenager can't know what is right because he isn't fat enough from sitting around eating twinkys and playing games on the computer. You never even had a girlfriend I bet because you're to busy being smarter than everyone else. Fuck you stop sending mail just because you can't handle me!

P.S. Sorry I didn't write that my little brother did but I really don't want to get mail from you anymore can you help me please?"

55 of 489 comments (clear)

  1. Years worth of emails by Gr33nNight · · Score: 5, Funny

    And he posts two. Must be a tough job.

    1. Re:Years worth of emails by kraada · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are only 10 hilarious emails he's ever gotten.

      And he posted them both.

    2. Re:Years worth of emails by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are only 10 types of people in the world --
      those who understand binary, and those who get laid.

    3. Re:Years worth of emails by LordKazan · · Score: 4, Funny

      but.. how do you classify the people who fit in BOTH groups?

      LAID 1+0?

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    4. Re:Years worth of emails by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are only 10 types of people in the world -- those who understand binary, and those who get laid.

      What about the other 8 types?

      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
    5. Re:Years worth of emails by Saxerman · · Score: 5, Funny

      but.. how do you classify the people who fit in BOTH groups?

      There are two bits. Turn them both on. I.e, this one goes to 11.

      --

      A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

    6. Re:Years worth of emails by duckInferno · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ohhh I get it.

      Yes... what about those other 8 types then?

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    7. Re:Years worth of emails by deek · · Score: 3, Funny

      There are only 10 types of people in the world -- those who understand binary, and those who get laid.

      What are the other 14 types?

  2. Re:It is most munificent of you, by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Stupidity in the /. community :P

    There sure is an abundance of it!

    So as they say in soviet russia... /discuss

  3. Re:It is most munificent of you, by nharmon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Send complaint to: banned@slashdot.org

  4. Re:Horrible stylesheet by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    Style sheet? I though Someone swallowed the blue and yellow Playdough and threw up on my monitor.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  5. Re:It is most munificent of you, by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, wtf do you expect us to discuss?

    How about the unholy heinousness that is idle's design? It looks like hammered shit. No, I take that back. It makes hammered shit look good.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  6. Typical Slashdotter even if he doesn't know it by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone here acts like they are so much smarter than everyone else and that a teenager can't know what is right because he isn't fat enough from sitting around eating twinkys and playing games on the computer. You never even had a girlfriend I bet because you're to busy being smarter than everyone else.

    Despite a complete lack of clue he sounds just like any other Slashdotter.

    Scratch that, he does sound just like any other Slashdotter.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Typical Slashdotter even if he doesn't know it by D+Ninja · · Score: 3, Funny

      No. You're doing it wrong.

  7. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF? Is that it?! 2 emails? Where's the rest of it? What do I pay you for? WHat are you doing on the internet if you can't share more than 2 emails? Grrr! I'm so angry!!!

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Angry? U r angry? U can't know what is angry because u r a fat teenager fat from sitting around eating twinkys and playing games on the computer.

      If u ever even had a girlfriend i bet ud know what is angry because that fat bitch would sit around eating all ur twinkys .

  8. Re:It is most munificent of you, by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am going to have to agree with you. Really bad web design etiquette if you ask me. I mean I have always loved slashdot because they do a great job having a really clean website.

  9. D'oh by greywire · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, I was going to post a whole rant about how you got me all excited to read about some really funny emails from a bunch of idiot readers only to find you only posted two of them, and only the first one was kinda funny.

    But then I realized maybe the whole point of setting us up for nothing was to see how many irate people would sent you hate mail and post rants about the pointlessness of this article, thus bringing the whole thing full circle:

    10 Get irate email
    20 post lame article about it
    30 goto 10

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
  10. The ladies by qoncept · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you ask a chick what she looks for in a man, she'll say a good sense of humor. It's a complete lie -- what she really wants is a good looking dude. That would mean you are screwed. You might be tempted at that point to feel a little better, saying "Hey, at least I do have a good sense of humor.."

    But you don't. You clearly posted these support emails thinking they would be good for a laugh, but, instead, they were just really boring.

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:The ladies by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

      God, I hope this "post anonymously" button works, or else the wife is gonna be pissed...

      You'd let all of Slashdot miss out on comedy gold to save your marriage? Bros before hos, dude.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  11. Priceless by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh man, those were priceless! Of course, so are grass clippings.

  12. And they still haven't by g0bshiTe · · Score: 4, Funny

    fixed my internet.
    I hope you know I called Google and told them to remove you from the search list for "fixing the internet"
    I swear you guys are like the Maytag Repair man of the internet.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  13. Not a stylesheet... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...more a grotesquesheet.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  14. Best reply wins... by RingDev · · Score: 2, Funny

    An evening of navel gazing with CowboyNeal!

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Best reply wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Here would be my reply to the first guy:

      Dear Sir,

      Thank you for taking the Internet Intelligence Test.

      Unfortunately, you are not smart enough to use the internet. For your own safety, please cancel your AOL account immediately, and sell your modem. If you do not, you will be mercilessly humiliated by all of the people who actually have a clue.

      Sincerely,
      The Internet

  15. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like I'm not the only one who used to hammer shit as a kid.

  16. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make sure it is a good rant.

    By the way, thanks for making the comment box about 2 inches by 2 inches large. I guess it is a form of text compression.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  17. Re:this part killed me by genner · · Score: 2, Funny

    First IDLE now this.
    You guys had a board meeting didn't you?
    How many times do I have to warn you about those!

  18. Twinkes = I.Q. by eagee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good thing I ate all those twinkies!

  19. needed more emails. by jdinkel · · Score: 2, Funny

    This was like promising sex and delivering a strip tease :(

  20. Re:It is most munificent of you, by harrkev · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe we can discuss how obnoxious the white-on-green text is? Please?

    Back in my day, we had green-on-black text. If you were really lucky, you had AMBER on black. Now, those were the days.

    Now where were we? Oh yeah--the important thing was that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time.

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  21. One of the biggest ones... by kdawson+(3715) · · Score: 2, Funny

    I once got an email bomb where someone called me gay. This was back around 2000 before we implemented filters. My mailbox, about 20mb at the time, was completely filled. I kind of laughed because of the irony (it's true) but was livid at the fact that I had to write a script to clear the emails out of our ancient POP server.

  22. Disillusioned by Experiment+626 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've always pictured the life of a Slashdot editor as a glamorous one. Partying with hot supermodels like Hugh Heffner, flying around the world in the Slashdot Learjet, racing Ferraris against CowboyNeal, pouring hot grits on Natalie Portman... that sort of thing.

    After reading this article and discovering that the above emails were "very special" "gems" that brightened the editors' day, I think I may have to lower my image of them a bit.

    1. Re:Disillusioned by David_W · · Score: 4, Funny

      Partying with hot supermodels like Hugh Heffner

      Hugh Heffner is not a hot supermodel.

  23. Re:It is most munificent of you, by qoncept · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's not green, buddy. It's teal. Which is incredibly annoying regardless of any other factors.

    --
    Whale
  24. Re:Oh crap by sinistermidget · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad. You should have sent an irate email about it to slashdot. It looks like samzenpus can use the material.

  25. Preview by Nick+Mitchell · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe the editor posted before previewing?

  26. more needed by m0llusk · · Score: 4, Funny

    time to crank up the weirdness, people

  27. Re:It is most munificent of you, by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

    You should see someone about that

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  28. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time.

    You misspelled slide rule, but point taken.

  29. Re:It is most munificent of you, by rvw14 · · Score: 2, Funny

    My XT Clone had a turbo button on it! Boy did Wordperfect fly with the turbo on.

  30. The rest were ok by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

    But I didn't care for the last one or the first one.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  31. Intriguing by Compulawyer · · Score: 3, Funny
    Dear Sir:

    I am intrigued by your thoughts and ideas and would subscribe to your newsletter or pamphlet.

    Respectfully,

    Intrigued

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  32. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Namors · · Score: 2, Funny

    He's not a guy, oh wait this is /.

    --
    Dual Century Programming: Yeah I know ... But it sounds Good
  33. Re:It is most munificent of you, by seededfury · · Score: 3, Funny

    are you one of those guys writing these emails to slashdot?

  34. Re:Do they speak English in What? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 2, Funny

    And of course in fitting with one of the Laws of the Internet, my complaint about grammar contains a misspelling. Sigh.

    --
    If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  35. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why is it that every time I hear the words "negative space" I just thick "fucking prick" and stop listening?

  36. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Burma Shave

  37. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Funny

    When was that, nineteen dickety two?

  38. Yeah, I had dual monitors in '88... by Grog6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    CGA and Text. OOOOOOOH!

    Then I bought a Hercules graphics card, and lost that capability...

    the dual 24" widescreen monitors I have now are driven by a graphics card that has 50x the memory of my hard drive that was in that system, and 1000x the memory.

    Windows runs just as fast, tho...

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  39. Re:It is most munificent of you, by megaditto · · Score: 5, Funny

    I pasted this into my address bar, thinking "why the hell not"

    The fact that it actually worked is just plain scary...
    What's next? Address bar pong?

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  40. Re:First one is actually a useful lesson... by corbettw · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn, my ex-wife hangs out on Slashdot.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  41. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you were really lucky, you had AMBER on black.

    Who is this Amber you speak of, and where can I get her phone number?

  42. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    so _that's_ where you got all those freckles!

  43. True or not, one of my favorites... by UncleWilly · · Score: 5, Funny

    The story behind the letter below is that there is this nutball in
    Newport, RI, named Scott Williams who digs things out of his backyard
    and sends the stuff he finds to the Smithsonian Institute, labeling
    them with scientific names, insisting that they are actual archaeological finds.
    This guy really exists and does this in his spare time!

    Here's the actual response from the Smithsonian Institute. Bear this
    in mind next time you think you are challenged in your duty to respond
    to a difficult situation in writing.

    Smithsonian Institution
    207 Pennsylvania Avenue
    Washington, DC 20078

    Dear Mr. Williams:
    Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled
    "93211-D, layer seven, next to the clothesline post . . .Hominid
    skull". We have given this specimen a careful and detailed
    examination, and regret to inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents
    conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two
    million years ago.

    Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie
    Doll, of the variety that one of our staff, who has small children,
    believes to be "Malibu Barbie". It is evident that you have given a
    great deal of thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain
    that those of us who are familiar with your prior work in the field
    were loathe to come to contradiction with your findings. However, we
    do feel there are a number of physical attributes of the specimen
    which might have tipped you off to its modern origin:
    1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are
    typically fossilized bone.
    2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic
    centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified
    proto-homonids.
    3. The dentition pattern evident on the skull is more consistent
    with the common domesticated dog than it is with the ravenous
    man-eating Pliocene clams you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time.

    This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses
    you have submitted in your history with this institution, but the
    evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too much
    detail, let us say that:

    A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog
    has chewed on.
    B. Clams don't have teeth.

    It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your
    request to have the specimen carbon-dated. This is partially due to
    the heavy load our lab must bear in its normal operation, and partly
    due to carbon-dating's notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic
    record.
    To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were produced prior to
    1956 AD, and carbon-dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate
    results.
    Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National
    Science Foundation Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning
    your specimen the scientific name Australopithecus spiff-arino. Speaking
    personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of your
    proposed taxonomy, but was ultimately voted down because the species
    name you selected