Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Announces Idle Section

For the last few months we've been beta testing Idle.slashdot.org, our offtopic humor/meme/viral video/pictures section. Like many of you, we spend most of our waking hours on-line seeking stuff to entertain our brains, but most replicators out there pick so much content that it's incredibly boring filtering through the mediocrity to find the funny. We intend to fill our idle section with a very small collection of the very best the net has to offer, making it the most efficient way to waste your time. Some of this content will make it back to the Slashdot mainpage, but much of it will be new content that we wouldn't dare soil the precious Slashdot mainpage with. We are also using it as a test bed for new functionality on Slashdot — currently the page is a reasonably dynamic/interactive experience with various voting controls and filtering options. Finally you will see occasional original content, starting with a recurring special feature today where Samzenpus shares some real tech support email from some of our most intelligent readers. We hope you will enjoy wasting a slice of your day with us, and in addition will submit content through the usual channels, but put it into the 'Idle' section so we know not to take it seriously. Now go about your day — it's mid August, so I'm sure everything you do is urgent, exciting, and oh-so-interesting.

64 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. Can you feel the excitement? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We intend to fill our idle section with a very small collection of the very best the net has to offer, making it the most efficient way to waste your time.

    Translation: Porn, stupidity, and bugzappers.

    I tried visiting idle.slashdot.org once. I was outright embarassed by the content. So much so that I changed my sig in response to Slashdot's, "Never visit idle.slashdot.org" teaser. My reply? "Good idea."

    I hate to say this, but Slashdot does attract a lot of intelligent people. They're not always the ones who post, but they frequent the site anyway. Attempting to "entertain" the more intelligent types with the same sort of filth/LCD* they see on their television is a counterproductive goal. Slashdot and Slashdot-Idle cannot coexist.

    Sorry guys, but it's time for you to go back to marketing school. Using brand recognition for a product that does not represent the brand will only devalue the brand. You may see short term gains on the new product, but in the end you will see long-term losses across the board. If you want to do something like Slashdot-Idle, try making a new site rather than lumping it in with Slashdot.

    * If you don't know what LCD stands for in this context, you should turn in your geek card. Assuming you had one to begin with...

    P.S. What's this fascination with making a Digg-like site, anyway? 95% of what's on Digg sucks. Stop trying to be like them.

    P.P.S. Idiocracy was not a documentary. Stop trying to bring it about.

    1. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed, the last thing we want is for the cesspool of Digg-reading, MySpace dwelling, Pokemon-playing LuSerS!!!!!1 to spill over into where the grownups are trying to have intelligent discussions.

      If you think Slashdot is infantile now, just wait until idle goes live! It would be eternal September all over again!

    2. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by Lovedumplingx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I feel the same way. If I want content like that I'll read fark or digg.

      Besides...the only times that I've been to idle they've had stories that were already featured on other websites.

    3. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're missing the point, this is great news. If idle becomes a "real" section, we'll finally be able to block it from the front page.

    4. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agreed, the last thing we want is for the cesspool of Digg-reading, MySpace dwelling, Pokemon-playing LuSerS!!!!!1 to spill over into where the grownups are trying to have intelligent discussions.

      You forgot "Wikipedia-linking".

    5. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You forgot "Wikipedia-linking".

      [citation needed]

    6. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by Daimanta · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    7. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      idle is the cancer that is killing /.!

    8. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wikipedia? Bah, I do my research using Uncyclopedia!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    9. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed, the last thing we want is for the cesspool of Digg-reading, MySpace dwelling, Pokemon-playing LuSerS!!!!!1 to spill over into where the grownups are trying to have intelligent discussions.

      But this is already happening, people mess with every post theses days.

      I hope Idle somehow 'cure' the offtopic/meme/first post/* attitudes that we constantly see here, by moving the Trolls away to a place that fits them best.

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    10. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      while the rest of us can have the "enlightened" discussion we are accustomed to.

      You mean such as:

      • vi vs. emacs
      • Firefox vs. Opera
      • Gnome vs. KDE
      • Kirk vs. Picard

      Yes, I see what you mean.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    11. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you obviously must not real politics here, this place is just as lacking in intelligence as Digg ever was.

      The bleed over under the guise of science sometimes astounds me. I guess they knew no one would read some of it if labeled politics so they slip in elsewhere when they can.

      As long as idle is off by default I think we are safe. It should be off for anonymous coward surfing as well.

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    12. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by timster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, I think we've all pretty much settled on the correct answers to those (vi, Firefox, KDE, and Picard of course).

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    13. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      * If you don't know what LCD stands for in this context, you should turn in your geek card. Assuming you had one to begin with...

      Liquid crystal display, naturally. Now what about the posts with titties in them? It was made quite clear that there would be titty.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    14. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by pitchpipe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Attempting to "entertain" the more intelligent types with the same sort of filth/LCD* they see on their television is a counterproductive goal.

      It might be that this trend is inevitable. Look at the devolution of the Discovery Channel*, what are they discovering, how to use grinders and say FbeepK. I think that I figured out why this is though. If the average IQ is 100 and IQ distributions fit on a bell curve, where does the bulk of the population lie? Now where does the bulk of the money lie (I don't believe that IQ and income are highly correlated)? Now if you're into making money (aren't we all) then what is the logical thing to do (disregarding principles)?

      I come to Slashdot to learn from the many fellow geek who are a lot smarter/more experienced than I. I know that I go for the funny a lot, but I try not to post unless I think that it is really good (not much beats a good laugh).

      *Excepting Myth Busters.

      If you don't know what LCD stands for in this context, you should turn in your geek card.

      I don't know what this is in this context, so maybe I should. LCD to me = liquid crystal display.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    15. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your naivete is adorable.

      The idle section won't reduce the trolling on "regular" Slashdot even a little bit. It will just give the trolls yet another place to go. If the introduction of the "Politics" section wasn't sufficient to isolate the trolls then nothing will be.

    16. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's vi, Firefox, Gnome, Kirk you mouth-breathing idiot. Go back to idle.slashdot.org!

    17. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by genner · · Score: 4, Funny

      while the rest of us can have the "enlightened" discussion we are accustomed to.

      You mean such as:

      • vi vs. emacs
      • Firefox vs. Opera
      • Gnome vs. KDE
      • Kirk vs. Picard

      Yes, I see what you mean.

      No all of those issues have been settled once and for all.
      The correct answers are:

      Pico
      Lynx
      FluxBox
      Janeway

      Now if you'll excuse me I have to go settle this little scuffle in the middle east.

    18. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As long as idle is off by default I think we are safe.

      Actually, that was the question I wanted to ask. When Idle was still in 'beta' (nice how it never said beta anywhere on it), it was impossible to block it from the front page. Is it now possible? If not, then this would be my biggest feature request, slipping in just above getting support for non-ASCII characters back to where it was six months ago.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    19. Re:Can you feel the excitement? by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I feel the same way. If I want content like that I'll read fark or digg.

      I think that's the reason for it. I'm fine with idle though; no-one is putting a gun to my head and forcing me to read it.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  2. Does this mean... by k_187 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That the CSS on idle.slashdot.org won't suck ass and/or be ass ugly? I'd really prefer that no ass be involved in the layout or design of the page.

    --
    11 was a racehorse
    12 was 12
    1111 Race
    12112
  3. Slashdot Users Announce It Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, you've already rammed it down our throat enough for us to hate it, now we can hate it even more.

    It's not funny, it's not clever, and it's not even a good waste of time. It is pointless.

  4. I see the tag beat me too it by TheCycoONE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there any difference between this new service and... Digg? (or XKCD because the best the net has to offer is already posted there.)

  5. I have my worries, and my hopes. by pwnies · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have my worries about this, and I have no doubt that we all do here on /.. What I definitely do not want to see is /. becoming another digg/reddit/delicious. On the other hand, hopefully slashdot will be able to mold the content more so that it doesn't just become a "HERE'S ANOTHER FUNNY CAPTION PIC FROM 4CHAN" fest. Don't get me wrong, those things have their place and are sometimes humorous, but it doesn't fit the niche that is /.. Remember, the slashdot tagline is "News for Nerds" - not "Funny Image of the Day for Nerds".

    With any luck, it will hopefully become something more along the lines of Daily Wtf, which still provides insight while remaining humorous. And in any case, congrats on rolling out a new feature for us /. staff.

    1. Re:I have my worries, and my hopes. by pwnies · · Score: 2, Informative

      sorry... typed an extra '/' before that link, http://thedailywtf.com/Default.aspx

  6. Goatse by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not enough people post goatse or rick-rolling links in Slashdot, so we needed to dedicate an entire new area to it?

    I look forward to all the lemon party and meat spin misleading links.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  7. Natural order by iXiXi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Order -> chaos /. -> #$%&*

    1. Re:Natural order by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

      Order -> chaos /. -> #$%&*

      I hate examples written in Perl.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Natural order by JamesTRexx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Careful, not everyone who has Tourette syndrome is a Perl programmer.

      --
      home
  8. I come to Slashdot because it *isn't* Digg. by JimXugle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I want LOLcats, I go to Digg.
    If I want Pseudo-Politics, I go to Reddit.
    If I want to know about the latest announced Apple product, I go to appleinsider.
    If I want to know about the worlds largest TV, I go to The Register.

    If I want actual Intellectual articles with in-depth discussions, I come to slashdot.

    Please don't ruin this for me.

    --
    -jX

    Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
    1. Re:I come to Slashdot because it *isn't* Digg. by Matt+Perry · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I want actual Intellectual articles with in-depth discussions, I come to slashdot.

      Boy, are you in the wrong place. You were supposed to take a left turn at Albuquerque.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  9. Anyone else... by Seakip18 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    thinking CmdrTaco has hit some hard times? I mean, let us look back of the past few months...

    1. No funny April Fool's this year.
    2. Various off hand comments about stuff. (Java, Olympics, etc.)
    3. Just up above he's kinda of an ass. I mean, some people are probably working pretty hard. I know End of Fiscal year for some people is going on.
    4. I dunno, maybe getting tired of being squeezed by other sites like reddit or digg or other stuff?

    Anyone know more or want to spread light on the matter?

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
    1. Re:Anyone else... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny

      1. No funny April Fool's this year.

      I'm confused. When did Slashdot do funny April Fools?

    2. Re:Anyone else... by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Informative

      When did Slashdot do funny April Fools?

      OMG Ponies!!!

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:Anyone else... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny

      That wasn't funny. That was terrifying.

      Oh, and thanks for reburning that shade of pink into my retinas. I just managed to recover, you jerk!

  10. Out of beta? by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You mean the google version of out of beta or the microsoft's one?

    For being beta it added several stories to the main (in production?) slashdot site in the past months. This will mean that it will really add a lot (daily) from now on?

  11. Re:a Slashdot article aboutSlashdot by AutopsyReport · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, but we'll see the dupe in a day or so.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  12. Uh by Compuser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Horrible site. Poorly organized, old content, just terrible.
    BTW, Fark already has a geek section. Just link to that.

  13. Is this news? by randyest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is this "News for Nerds" or "Stuff that matters?" Is there anyone here that hasn't seen the "Idle.slashdot.org is a total waste of your time, never go there" teaser atop the page? Besides the fact that it's embarrassing to have such tripe "social link sharing" site associated with slashdot, idle honestly adds zero advantages or new things over digg/reddit/etc.

    In my humble opinion it's a terrible idea to dilute the slashdot brand at a time when it's already pretty weak.

    --
    everything in moderation
  14. Great... by CaptainPatent · · Score: 2, Funny

    The site that has been the number 1 most efficient waster of my time at work just got more efficient?!?!?

    I can smell the pink slip from here!

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  15. Viral? by Gat0r30y · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe that this isn't viral anymore, it is now bacterial -like the clap.

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  16. Please don't by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I frequently read slashdot.org/palm from my blackberry and this idle crap keeps appearing there. It's just horrible, not to mention that very little of the content in idle is mobile friendly. The only comments are things like "is this Digg now?" Please, don't do this. Create a whole new site if you feel like this is really what you want to do with your time, but don't associate with slashdot.

    I never would have thought it possible to make slashdot appear any less credible, but you may have just found a way.

    Don't do it. We've all had grand ideas that got abandoned and I know it feels bad, but you should cut your losses now before it's too late. Really. Stop.

    --

    -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  17. Re:Hmm by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't worry, it doesn't work under IE7 either.

    --

    ÕÕ

  18. Shadowbans by starling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can we have pillow-biting nancy moderators and shadowbans and a filter to censor naughty words too, like they do on Fark?

  19. Re:Critical thinking... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reality TV [has its] place in the life of an intellectual.

    Let me see. What's the best way to phrase this?

    No, no it doesn't.

  20. Re:Critical thinking... by exley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reality TV [has its] place in the life of an intellectual.

    Let me see. What's the best way to phrase this?

    No, no it doesn't.

    Wow, I'm sorry that not everyone's tastes line up with yours. I didn't know that to be considered an intellectual everyone has to fall into some narrow regime of likes and dislikes. And this is coming from someone who personally hates reality TV and the like.

    Anyone who thinks this narrowly can't be taken seriously as the intellectual that they think they are. To sum up, get off your high horse.

  21. Cool, thanks! by snarfies · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thanks for making Idle official and full-time!

    Because now I can adjust my preferences so that I never see this unfunny garbage again. If I want "teh funnay," I'll visit 4chan, k thx.

  22. Conspiracy Theory! by dysfunct · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a suspicion that idle might actually be a good thing to happen to slashdot. Here's my conspiracy theory:

    IIRC Taco has full control over the stories and editing of slashdot, but marketing, advertisement and other things are mandated by corporate overlords. I somehow suspect that a bunch of trained monkeys in the marketing department created a lot of pressure to make Slashdot more Digg-alike and in a moment of pure genius, Taco created idle - the best parody of Digg the world has ever seen. It's colorful and flashy to please the marketing department, contains the worst stories and oldest mémes out there to convince them this isn't going to work out, all the while preserving the rest of Slashdot and consuming the least money and effort possible.

    I mean just look at it and the way it's announced. It's as if the Slashdot team wants us to hate it.

    --
    :/- spoon(_).
    1. Re:Conspiracy Theory! by jamie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, it's every other new feature of Slashdot that we hate. This one we actually think is fun.

    2. Re:Conspiracy Theory! by CmdrTaco · · Score: 5, Informative

      You have no idea how accurate this is.

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    3. Re:Conspiracy Theory! by Hemos · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suspect you to be an agent of the Psychic Friends network.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
    4. Re:Conspiracy Theory! by scc · · Score: 5, Funny

      We have an Idle section now?

    5. Re:Conspiracy Theory! by ScuttleMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.

      Please enjoy the shiny and click on our ads. /jedihandwave

    6. Re:Conspiracy Theory! by dysfunct · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a subscriber you insensitive clo... ooh, those just might be the ads I'm looking for!

      --
      :/- spoon(_).
  23. What are you doing? by christurkel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To quote John Scalzi: "What the fuck is wrong with you?"

    I mean, seriously, was there some demand for this I missed? Some void the /. editors thought needed to be filled. "Oh our current content isn't engaging enough, let's pile on some crap!"

    I agree with other posters. Start a new site for this garbage; it has no place at /.

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
  24. Hope you've got a big ramp... by porkmusket · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's a hell of a shark you're trying to jump.

  25. Re:Critical thinking... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You'll have to forgive me if you find my stance offensive, but reality TV epitomizes stupidity and Lowest Common Denominator thinking.

    Fast Food? Not even sure why it was included. It's fine.
    Beer? Fine.
    Crude Humor? Fine on occasion.
    Sitcoms? Sometimes incredibly stupid, but mostly fine.
    Interest in fishing, NASCAR, sports, or other non-nerdy pursuit? Perfectly fine.

    Reality TV? No.

    Reality TV is a trap of the most dangerous and intellectually lethal kind. It encourages people to track the personal lives of others to a point that makes gossiping look tame. Yet like gossiping, it can become a trap that lures people in and encourages them to waste their time, judgment, and critical thinking. In effect, it causes you to stoop to the level of those who would participate in the activities of having their lives bared for all to see. (Which usually means they're the type to appeal to sex and voyeurism.)

    The end result is that your thinking becomes stuck in a quagmire of complex personal matters that are not of your own. Which has negative effects on your thinking, priorities, and thus day to day life.

    You may think ill of me all that you want. But "reality television" as it is defined today is NOT something I think any intelligent person should see as "entertainment". And I am highly suspect of anyone who claims otherwise. If anything, they are likely to be faux intellectuals who would rather put on a show of intelligence than actually make an effort to *be* intelligent.

  26. Re:Critical thinking... by exley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You'll have to forgive me if you find my stance offensive...

    I don't find your stance personally offensive, I just find it incredibly arrogant.

    As I mentioned once, and I will reiterate here, I am not a reality TV fan. But to generalize like you have, to say that an intelligent person can't have mindless escapes like that, is just ridiculous. To generalize like that (which we are all guilty of at one time or another, of course) shows a complete lack of critical thought. Like that t-shirt sold by The Onion says, stereotypes are a real time saver, aren't they?

    You also talk about the negative effect that reality TV has on a person's priorities... I find that statement interesting from someone who is so up in arms over this issue and wasting all this time bitching about it on Slashdot.

    If you don't like reality TV, you don't have to watch it. If you dont like idle.slashdot.org, then you don't have to go to that section. If you don't like that Slashdot has idle, then you don't have to come here.

    /faux intellectualism

  27. Re:well, la by AmishElvis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oops. I just took a look at the idle section and you're right. I'm very sorry. Jokes about poo would be a step up.

  28. off-topic - moderation by Ogive17 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, the article is about /. and so is my post.. but has anyone else noticed a difference in how mod points are awarded? I check /. this morning at work and had 15 moderator points. Anyone else see this? The FAQ still says you only get 5 points and they expire after 3 days.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  29. Re:Critical thinking... by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Deadliest Catch and Ice Road Truckers are not what I think of when someone says "Reality Television".

    If only the world conformed to your definitions, your thoughts on the matter would make a difference.

  30. Re:Critical thinking... by savi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Which usually means they're the type to appeal to sex and voyeurism."

    Ah, yes. Sex. Voyeurism. The true enemies of intellectuals everywhere.

    Oh yeah, except for all those intellectuals who were delightfully perverted. (Most of them).

    Anyhoo, I'm off to look at Kafka's porn collection.

  31. Re:Critical thinking... by Kozz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You may think ill of me all that you want. But "reality television" as it is defined today is NOT something I think any intelligent person should see as "entertainment". And I am highly suspect of anyone who claims otherwise. If anything, they are likely to be faux intellectuals who would rather put on a show of intelligence than actually make an effort to *be* intelligent.

    Hey, dude. I read lots of your posts, and frequently agree with what you've said. But I think the quote above comes across quite elitist. I know where you're coming from, but it may be that there exist some reality TV (henceforth RTV) shows out there that you would probably even like if you gave them a chance.

    I'm speaking for myself, of course, but I imagine there are others reading this thread who follow a few RTV shows but fear stating such, expecting to get blasted as "faux intellectuals".

    I've regularly watched (with my wife) Amazing Race, Survivor, America's Got Talent, Rock Star (cancelled now, I guess?), various Food Network competition RTV programs, Wife Swap, Super Nanny, Biggest Loser and others. That being said, I'd never watch Big Brother, Fear [Gross Out] Factor, and many others that are perfect tens on the "stupid" scale. I realize in writing it down, that this list mostly illustrates that I watch too damned much TV (although RTV is far from the only fare I watch).

    And you know what? I do think I'm intelligent, and I do think that many of them are reasonable entertainment. I'm also capable of keeping my perspective. I find many of them to be good fun, but I don't get so emotionally invested as you seem to suggest. So my friend, AKAImBatman, I think you're generalizing a bit much about the viewers of these kinds of programs from a rather high horse.

    Respectfully in disagreement,

    Kozz

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  32. Re:Critical thinking... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    -1 Offtopic? Apparently some folks don't like well thought out answers. Too bad. Stupid troll mods.

    As usual, mod abuse will not be tolerated. Here is the post again:

    --

    To generalize like that (which we are all guilty of at one time or another, of course) shows a complete lack of critical thought.

    If you were looking for a more specific answer, ask a more specific question. General issues raised will result in general answers given. One cannot apply further critical thinking to a matter for which further data for consideration has not been presented.

    In this particular case, I can say that watching Reality TV in general is definitely NOT a sign of intelligence. If you were to bring up specific examples, however, you'd get more specific answers. Some which would seemingly disagree with the general statement. Such is the way of things.

    You also talk about the negative effect that reality TV has on a person's priorities... I find that statement interesting from someone who is so up in arms over this issue and wasting all this time bitching about it on Slashdot.

    You seem to be suggesting that Slashdot is a priority for me. Which I can assure you is far from the truth. In fact, it has always been more of a release for me. I mean, where else can you have entire conversations in hex code* or about RC4 encryption?

    I enjoy my day life and I enjoy my work. But sometimes it's nice to just plain geek out. :-P

    (* Sorry for the lack of a link, but the hex code conversation is a bit hard to find in Google.)