Slashdot Mirror


Smart Self-Service Scales

Roland Piquepaille writes "German researchers have developed intelligent self-service scales for supermarkets, able to recognize fruit or vegetables placed on them (photo). The scales automatically recognize the item being weighed and ask the customer to choose between only those icons that are relevant, such as various kinds of tomatoes. The scales are equipped with a camera and an image evaluation algorithm that compares the image of the item on the scale with images stored in its database. Store managers can add items to the database. The scales are now being tested in about 300 supermarkets across Europe."

279 comments

  1. From me by niceone · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It would be more useful the other way round: if I told it they were tomatoes at it could figure out exactly what type they were.

    1. Re:From me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it could figure out the type op the tomatoes, it should also be able to recognize the things as tomatoes...

    2. Re:From me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My friend used to buy only onions. Coca-Cola onions, chicken onions, etc. Instead scanning the barcode he used to put them as loose items. The cheapest ones were onions. So he always had lots of receipts for several kinds of onions. Funny, illegal but saved him quite a lot of cash.

      No he'll need to behave like proper citizen...

    3. Re:From me by Narpak · · Score: 1

      So basically digital scales with a small computer screen displaying price, weight and information about the product would satisfy.

    4. Re:From me by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can't stand these systems. I said TomAto. It said ToMato. Then I went and tried to get some PotAtos. It said poTato.

      Then I just called the whole transaction off.

    5. Re:From me by tom17 · · Score: 1

      All we need is edible RFID! Problem solved.

    6. Re:From me by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you just do what the cashier does, and enter the 4 digit number on the sticker that's on the tomatoes?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:From me by GhostChe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Armark has edible rfid out now. My company has been contracting with them to put them in various foodstuffs. http://www.rmark.org/ Not much information on the site, but the tech is pretty cool, and completely foodsafe.

    8. Re:From me by lgw · · Score: 1

      OK, that is scary. How will my tinfoil hat protect me when I can be tracked by the unique combination of RFIDs that I ... urm ... excrete?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:From me by prodevel · · Score: 1

      I remember reading about 7.5 micron thick (thickness of paper) RFIDs coming out from Hitachi ealier this year. All Big Brother has to do is spray a few on their target and they are double-plus happy.

  2. Too bad.. by matt4077 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I quite enjoyed the apparent abolition of self-service scales in favor of weighing fruits at checkout. Let's hope they don't make a comeback.

    1. Re:Too bad.. by aproposofwhat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But given the level of knowledge of the average checkout person, this might be more useful at the tills - having to explain to the staff what 'fennel' or 'parsnip' (I kid you not - it actually happens) is can get kind of frustrating after a while.

      I can see this technology helping the checkout staff - of course, staff training might help as well (looking at you, Tesco...)

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    2. Re:Too bad.. by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      No kidding!

      "No, that's endive... this is parsley, and that is cilantro."

      Could be worse. I cant count the number of times I have bought romaine for the price of iceberg.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    3. Re:Too bad.. by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Around here, the cashiers don't have to know what it is. Just throw it on the scale and type in the PLU code that's on the sticker.

    4. Re:Too bad.. by Swizec · · Score: 2, Funny

      How the hell can someone not differ between a salad and a spice? I'm a sworn meat eater and even I can tell the difference!

    5. Re:Too bad.. by sirambrose · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My grocery store has self service scales and I really love them. They are meant to be used with the portable self checkout scanners. The scanners allow me to scan and bag my groceries as I shop. When I leave, I pay at a small kiosk by the door. I don't have to wait in line even if I shop when the store is very busy. I wish this sort of system was more common.

    6. Re:Too bad.. by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      It's because McDonalds doesn't sell fennel or parsnip.. meanwhile after looking at the image, the recognition might not be much more than comparing the average hue against the known blue weighing platform..

    7. Re:Too bad.. by smchris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah. Daikon in my case. Isn't that just an indication these people _won't_ be retrained as rocket scientists? I hate auto-check-outs and never use them. More work for me, I assume more profit for the supermarket instead of lower prices, and I get to pay for somebody's unemployment/retraining. And, to be honest, you go back to the same place every week, there is the sociological angle as some of them become "familiar strangers". Why do I want to crap on them?

      Nonetheless, "reprogramable" object recognition simple enough for a supermarket manager to use is a good hack.

    8. Re:Too bad.. by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fresh Cilantro or Curly Parsley look somewhat similar, and are often thrown in the same bin in the produce department.

      You'll sure as hell notice the difference when cooking though!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    9. Re:Too bad.. by Narpak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well knowing all the PLU codes for all the types of vegetables can be hard, depending on how big a selection the store has. Used to work at a grocery store; had a very very wide selection of stuff. I imagine any vegetable recognizing application would be useful regardless of whether you weight on scales in the shop or at the checkout.

    10. Re:Too bad.. by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 1

      Not only that, they're often priced the same so in the long run it really doesn't matter to the cashier (or the produce manager for that matter).

    11. Re:Too bad.. by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      More work for me, I assume more profit for the supermarket instead of lower prices, and I get to pay for somebody's unemployment/retraining.

      Possibly more profit for the store, assuming that's not offset by the cost of the machines. But frankly, you're not paying for anybody's unemployment; corporate wouldn't pay to have more cashiers without the self-checkouts (since they often don't pay to have enough with them!). The customers would just wait in longer lines.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    12. Re:Too bad.. by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That depends on how granular it gets. It sounds like it could only narrow it down to "apple" or "tomato"; the weird stuff that drove me batty as a cashier would probably just come up as "weedy thing"...

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    13. Re:Too bad.. by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think they are talking about fruit and veggies you bag mate, the ones without any stickers. There is no associated code on the bags and the attendant has to know the type of food before weighing it.

      This device could help identify the various types that look similar. Although I gotta wonder how it's gonna handle the difference between a McIntosh and a Red Delicious apple. From the article it seems that it will just identify "apple" and then give the user choices. Which makes me wonder how much more useful this identification will be over the typical self-checkout you see in grocery stores.

    14. Re:Too bad.. by bytesex · · Score: 1

      I had a checkout girl wagging a courgette at me, asking me 'what's this ?'. I was at the point of making a very, very dirty joke but then I checked myself. Such behaviour would probably get you arrested in the States, but luckily around here, it's still legal.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    15. Re:Too bad.. by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know who they pay to do it, but over here (in New Mexico, anyway) the grocery stores have nearly every piece stickered. Every last apple, orange and peach. And all the veggies, too. Our cashiers can be (and often are) blithering idiots.

    16. Re:Too bad.. by 4solarisinfo · · Score: 1

      The trouble with technology 'helping' the dumb checkout people through better technology is that it insures they will always be dumb. There was a time when cashiers could actually make change, but thanks to modern cash registers, there is no chance of that anymore. Heaven forbid you give the moron an extra penny so you get back an dime instead of a nickel and four pennies, they will have to void the sale and start over to 'figure it out'.

    17. Re:Too bad.. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I prefer checkout to be as quick as possible, as not everyone in the queue is buying weighed goods. In our local shop you weigh your own produce, and at the checkout the barcodes are simply scanned, and you're away. It doesn't make a great deal of sense to have a person look up what the produce is when you already know what it is, especially when you can bag it, weigh it, and price it yourself. But I guess I'm not that lazy ;)

    18. Re:Too bad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time when cashiers could actually make change, but thanks to modern cash registers, there is no chance of that anymore. Heaven forbid you give the moron an extra penny so you get back an dime instead of a nickel and four pennies, they will have to void the sale and start over to 'figure it out'.

      This has happened to you maybe one time in ten. The other nine times they gave you your dime without skipping a beat. Lose the hyperbole.

    19. Re:Too bad.. by frogzilla · · Score: 1

      Can you give a hint as to where you live? The city? Maybe just the name of the store? I would love to use this system.

    20. Re:Too bad.. by Narpak · · Score: 1

      Well I reckon as with all applications they will get better, and if they get good enough they are going to quickly become standard. Whatever makes the line move quicker at the register is a benefit for the company.

    21. Re:Too bad.. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Fresh Cilantro or Curly Parsley look somewhat similar,

      Only if you're blind. Cilantro has a broad, flat leaf, while curly parsley is just that... curly, and very much so. You can tell the difference by touch, let alone by sight.

    22. Re:Too bad.. by sirambrose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The store is Giant Eagle in Frederick Maryland. I don't know if all their stores have the system. There is an article about it here.

    23. Re:Too bad.. by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Holy shit balls. Here in Florida they are labeled with the orchard label, farm label, etc (eg Sunkist) but no PLU labels.

    24. Re:Too bad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to name this innovative store?

    25. Re:Too bad.. by Arterion · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I don't know what those look like either, nor what the taste like. I consider myself an educated person. I'm not sure I can really fault a supermarket cashier for not knowing, considering their wages.

      And that's just the issue, I think. In an effort to cut costs and lower prices, they pay their employees less, and offer less training. After all, training costs money, and trained employees cost more than untrained ones.

      I would guess if you went to a farmer's market, or a specialty food store, you could get the kind of service you're looking for, but you're going to pay for it in either higher cost of goods, or inconvenience.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    26. Re:Too bad.. by Arterion · · Score: 1

      I try to avoid doing arithmetic at all costs. I rely on a calculator. I am just very bad with it, and I make a lot of errors. I can do high level math fine, assuming I don't get the arithmetic wrong. I think some people are just better wired for doing it in their head.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    27. Re:Too bad.. by Arterion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I usually punch in my Pink Lady apples as Red Delicious, because they're cheaper. I'm such a scoundrel. Haha, maybe they why they want the cashier doing the lookups.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    28. Re:Too bad.. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I generally like the auto-checkouts. I use them when they're available and a much shorter wait than the regular checkouts (which is usually the case).
      For me, it's usually much faster to go through them. (It would be *faster still* if you didn't have to plop it back down on their scales or waaaaaaait for the "don't bag" prompt.)

      The only issue I've had sometimes is that various coupons can't be read (and some that don't even have a UPC).. but the one employee overseeing the 4 self checkouts deals with that.

    29. Re:Too bad.. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      It "insures" they will always be dumb? How ironic!

    30. Re:Too bad.. by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? You know a PLU is just a 4-5 digit number, usually in small print on the orchard sticker (not a bar code or anything like that). Go to Publix (since I know they use PLU codes at least around here) and look at the stickers. You should see 4011 on bananas, 4664 on tomatoes-on-the-vine, 4065 on green bell peppers, etc.

    31. Re:Too bad.. by chubs730 · · Score: 2
      4023 on the red seedless grapes, 4282 on the grapefruit, 4088 for the red peppers, 4064 for the avocados, 4066 for green beans, 4062 for cucumbers, 3121 for orange peppers, 4072 for russet potatoes, 4080 for asparagus, 4017 for granny smith apples, 4020 for golden delicious, 4044 for "orchard perfect" peaches, 4378 for "orchard perfect" nectarines, 4440 for plums, 4159 for vidalia onions, 4082 for red onions, 94068 for organic scallions, actually throw a 9 in front of anything for its organic variants, yeah...work sucks.

      I'm working on breaking into the server room though, to program one of the buttons to start up nethack or something on my down time.

    32. Re:Too bad.. by lgw · · Score: 1

      I used to deliver pizza, and I wore one of those change-makers on my belt. I could make change in about a quarter of a second. People would look at me like I had performed a magic trick! Subtracting a number from 100 quickly was totally beyond their experience. Some would very carefully check the amount, convinced that I was trying to scam them or something, seriously unable to believe that I was just making change.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    33. Re:Too bad.. by prodevel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I buy curly kale almost every trip and get asked every other time, but I buy it b/c it's healthy and nutrient rich. Not because I want RFID's inside me or god-knows-what nano type chips. Double-plus bad.

    34. Re:Too bad.. by Green+Salad · · Score: 1

      Anyone competent working around food should know a "fennel" is used in the kitchen to guide grains or liquids through a small opening...

    35. Re:Too bad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or someone in the produce department is dishonest and is using the stickers to cover up bad spots on the produce to trick people to buy it. I bought an apple with a wormhole covered up by one of these stickers.

      Now I peel the stickers off before I buy produce nowadays....

  3. Oblig. by elguillelmo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome our new intelligent self-service weighing overlords

    --
    Dawkins Revisited: A person is shit's way of making more shit -- Steve Barnett, anthropologist.
  4. Not shown in picture by frisket · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Except that the linked picture shows strawberries on the scales, but the screen shows a choice of all kinds of other fruit and veg, not different kinds of strawberry.

    1. Re:Not shown in picture by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      That is because at that store the strawberries are sold only in 500g packages, and are not at all in the database. There are two solutions to this: 1. enter the 500g strawberries in the database put output on the screen that these things need not be weighed. 2. Have a PR-department that has not only a sense of aesthetics (strawberries look good on pictures), but also have a clue about what they are doing. Why would you put a picture of your new machine behaving faultily in a press release!!!!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    2. Re:Not shown in picture by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      [parent: mismatch between object on scales and displayed choices]

      ... Which highlights one of my first thoughts: when---not if but when---this fails, you will need a manual override or selection of some sort. How often does this happen? How much time is wasted (compared to ye olde one button per veggie type scale) when it happens? How will this affect consumer acceptance?

      If we can't (or don't) write algorithms that deal intelligently with stuff already presented to the computer in an easy-to-digest way (see Silicon Slaves at Logically Critical), how well will we fare at connecting "round and red" with tomato and not strawberry nor cherry nor cherry tomato?

      Okay, maybe I'm overestimating the difficulty of the image recognition problem (because it's outside my area of expertise), and maybe I'm blowing the usability problems out of proportion (because I've been bitten by incorrect computer "intelligence" too often), but I'm not the only one skeptical about the technical merits, am I?

      (the business merits I leave to someone else; presumably the ones deploying this believe it will move more green paper in their direction).

    3. Re:Not shown in picture by gr8dude · · Score: 1

      Maybe the photo illustrates the system in a "demo" state, one has to press a button first in order to let it analyze the object.

  5. Just waaaaay too lazy! by forgoil · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is just plain silly and useless. If you fail to see why, I am sad for you. Cool software/hardware has its place, but this will just cost consumers more for no gain whatsoever.
     

    1. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I guess it falls in the "because we can" category. Kind of like voice recognition for phone services.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two sides to this argument.

      Your side: Less "work" for the customer.

      The other side: Less work for the checkout person.

      I personally like the idea of less work for a checkout person, why? Because the less that person needs to think/work, the quicker I get out of the store again! I dislike waiting in long queues and if customers before me have bags of various fruits & vegitables that are not already priced, I need to wait longer before I can pay and leave the store. I don't mind doing a little work, if it means I'm outta there quicker.

      If I wanted to hang around and be social I'd go to the local pub, not the supermarket!

    3. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I think it depends on the implementation. UPC codes are okay and were a good leap forward but it seems to have been stationary since then, except for self-checkout lanes which have been a boon if you buy a small amount of items.

      It would think the next leap forward if just RFIDing everything and once the cart gets pushed through those narrow checkout aisles, it would total up everything within seconds and the few items that can't due to weight (would notify the cashier). It's probably doable today, but to get all the manufacturers on board as well as supermarkets adopting it.

    4. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by cnettel · · Score: 1

      It is useful if you otherwise need to navigate through several steps of a touch menu, or alternatively woodpeck over a large table where muscle precision will be needed every time to hit the very right button.

    5. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by jimallison86 · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I don't believe it makes things any quicker, in fact it slows things down.

      The local supermarkets have got entirely self service checkouts, which are almost always slower than going to the cashier for two reasons.

      1. Supermarkets don't trust you, all your food gets weighed after scanning which takes much longer than it should.

      2. Cashiers have been trained to do their job, and have had hours doing it, so they should be able to do it quicker than you can

    6. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Maybe I could open a shop where every product has approximately the same cost per unit mass, then just charge customers by the kilo.

    7. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by houghi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because the less that person needs to think/work, the quicker I get out of the store again!

      Untrue. They will not reduce the wait time. They will reduce the staff. So instead of 10 people doing checkout, they will have only 8.
      It will indeed reduce your time at the checkout, but it will not decrease and perhaps even increase your total shopping experience.

      Stores want you as long as possible in their store. It will make you buy more. If you then have a perceived time gain (not a real one) that is even better.

      Obviously the time spend must not be irritating, otherwise it is counterproductive. So they know how long it takers before people will start to get irritated and have moved your time with the girl to a minimum, as people think that time is the most 'wasted' while not decreasing the overal time.

      For some it might take less time for others it might take more time overall. You can be sure that the profit is calculated. If the store would not gain, it would not happen.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    8. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by drspliff · · Score: 1

      I do think there's a middle point that's beneficial for all when enough self service checkouts are available. When I do my shopping at least half of the people there only have a single basket of stuff, yet have to queue up with at the same checkouts as people with large trolleys.

      They will reduce wait time because self service checkouts are smaller and more compact, fitting 4 or 6 in the same area as two normal checkouts, meaning that while you may have to spend an additional 30 seconds fiddling with getting it working you would've avoided waiting 5 minutes behind a huge trolley load of stuff because of the increased throughput.

      Or to put it in a way /. may understand more, it's simple QOS with prioritization of smaller packets, albeit applied to humans.

    9. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering you seem to be Dutch, HEMA ring a bell, it used to sell all products for one price (had to give it up later on as it just was not doable)

    10. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      injecting mercury into oranges has been tried before but it does not have the desired effect.

    11. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 1. Supermarkets don't trust you, all your food gets weighed after scanning which takes much longer than it should.
      Here in Switzerland they do trust the customer. In the 7 years that I've been living here, NOTHING has ever been re-weighed!

      > 2. Cashiers have been trained to do their job, and have had hours doing it, so they should be able to do it quicker than you can
      That is exactly the point of the automated weighing machines. Just place the fruit on the scales, add the price sticker to the product, done...

      Here in Switzerland (and a lot of other European countries) this technology would be great! I don't know which country you're from, but if your supermarkets don't trust it's customers, then you've to greater issue than which technologies to or not to use...

    12. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by legirons · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe I could open a shop where every product has approximately the same cost per unit mass, then just charge customers by the kilo.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_store

    13. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by houghi · · Score: 1

      When I do my shopping at least half of the people there only have a single basket of stuff, yet have to queue up with at the same checkouts as people with large trolleys.

      They solved that here by having a 'basket only' checkout which replaces basically the 'ten items or less' one.

      They will reduce wait time

      indeed, but only at the moment you are at the checkout. The time you waste by weighing your stuff yourself needs also to be calculated. It is not so much the time one person spends at the checkout, but the time ALL the people spend in the store AND the amount of people they need at the till, without making the average queue time longer.
      They will remove staff from the checkout of the lines become too short.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by sirambrose · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem with regular self check registers is that even though they are more compact, the store still never installs enough of them. If I have to wait in line to use a self service register, it doesn't really save me time. On the other hand, my grocery store has a rack of 100 portable self checkout scanners at the entrance. These allow me to scan and bag my groceries as I shop. This is much more efficient than a self service register or even an actual cashier because I don't have to unload my cart at the register. I've never had to wait to get one and I've never had to wait more than a minute to pay when I'm done.

    15. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Here in Switzerland they do trust the customer. In the 7 years that I've been living here, NOTHING has ever been re-weighed!

      Maybe not that you've noticed, but generally, with self-serve checkouts (which are the type the GP was talking about), the entire bagging platform is a scale.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    16. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine the possibilities:

      There's hardly any staff around when you need them; OTOH the store might be able to-- and this might be stretching it-- keep open longer hours as the staff can be spread out for odd-shift workers. Have them man the cash registers while you go through your usual shopping list. You now have the pleasure of stocking the fridge with good grocery stuff instead of having to make do with convenience store items.

    17. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Or just price everything the same... say $0.99

      You could call it a 99 cent srore... you'd make thousands!!!!

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    18. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is I that feel sad for you because you are unnecessarily self-righteous.

      My grocery store has done this for years now here in Michigan, and I'm not sure why this is even news. I put bananas on the scale and it knows they are bananas. That saves me 5 seconds because I don't have to go through the menu screen and put in the PLU, which in turn saves everyone in line behind me 5 seconds. 5 seconds may not sound like much, but multiply that times millions of customers shopping there dozens of times per year each and you get quite a savings.

    19. Re:Just waaaaay too lazy! by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1

      Many South American counties have 'por kilo' restaurants. They are basically a buffet where they weigh your plate and multiply it by a fixed cost. Meat, veg, soup, everything. Very easy.

  6. I really hate self service scales.. by tjstork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which is better for me as a customer, having someone in checkout that just grabs my tomatoes and enters the price, bags them, or, a stupid robot that makes me do everything. This technology doesn't benefit me at all, it benefits the store. I refuse to use it.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur. And if you screw up then you are liable for the mistake (or worse, you may be charged with shoplifting). If the store screws up then it is their own damn fault.

    2. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by tjstork · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stores that do this, too, just don't understand that the whole reason people do retail these days is because of the people. A supermarket is a social occasion, and, actually talking to a checkout person for 5 seconds is, well, a human experience. I was loyal to my Wawa (a convenience store) for the longest time largely because the person who worked there took 2 seconds to throw in a sausage egg and cheese into the oven for my wife when they had run out of the ones they'd already made. You can't get that kind of flexibility out of a robot.

      --
      This is my sig.
    3. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TO you it may be a social occasion. For me, its a once weekly annoyance. I want to get in and out as fast as possible, and get on with my life. Anything that shaves time off is appreciated, and these sound like they'd be great when combined with self-checkout lines.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The only way you'll get me to do the job of the cashier is to give me a small discount on my purchase. I'm saving the store money by using the self-service checkout (which hardly ever works properly), so there needs to be some benefit to me to use it. And also it's rarely quicker than the regular line (person in front of you wants to use a coupon, or the item doesn't ring up at the price marked on the shelf, etc).

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    5. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not only this, but (I've used them - they are deployed often by the Real grocery stores) they are horrible. They often don't even recognise things of the right COLOUR, so it's faster to do it yourself - but German is the land of NO CUSTOMER SERVICE so you need to weigh them yourself anyways (which you always needed to - the NEW thing is just the colour sensing), bag everything yourself as some hag crams it forward as fast as she can, etc etc...

      And don't get me started on their Windows XP Professional based stick-20-serial-devices-onto-a-plain-PC-in-a-box-and-call-it-"embedded"
      "self-service" cashiers. I used them as they're faster than waiting in line, but they *ARE SLOWER* than an actual cashier and don't have half the functions (Have three bread rolls? Have fun scanning each one individually and waiting for the woman at the counter to manually OK that you've put them in your bag as the weight scale won't register as them being added).

    6. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, is it really quicker to scan, check and bag everything yourself, when the alternative is having it done by somebody who does it all day, every day?

    7. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      > Which is better for me as a customer ...

      Wait a minute.
      You've made a treacherous assumption.

    8. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by ricegf · · Score: 1

      The benefit for me is in time - self-checkout lanes are always open and usually available, while the few full-service lanes open usually have a 2-4 person queue.

      Perhaps that's thanks to your unwillingness to use self-checkout, come to think of it. Thanks! :-)

    9. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Corbets · · Score: 2, Informative

      here in Switzerland, self service produce weighin is everywhere. People accept without comment, and indeed seem to have nothing against it.

      I suspect these devices will see much broader deployment in Europe than the US.

    10. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by gaggle · · Score: 1

      That's cool. All the more tomatoes for me. Refuse all you want in the meantime.

      I have plenty principles I adhere to, but this is not a slippery slope into a government-controlled fascistic future. It is you weighing your own goddamn tomatoes because the checkout lady wastes a ton of time doing that for you, and this technology tries to make that burden easier for you.

      I suggest you shop somewhere more expensive if you want them to do the weighing, or make your own store that caters to your market segment if you feel it's that important an issue.

    11. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by legirons · · Score: 1

      In the UK it's occasionally seen (although you can't use them if you're buying beer since the machine can't verify age)

    12. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No offence, but if going to the supermarket is a social occasion, then you really need to get out more...

    13. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by kklein · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I don't want to talk to the person behind the counter. I use the machine whenever possible.

      My wife can't figure them out, though.

      Where I want a social experience in a store is when I want to ask someone where something is because they move things around every night, sometimes according to utterly bizarre logic. Then I can't find anyone.

    14. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      In my experience, as both customer and cashier, you're just unlucky.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    15. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by tibman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I like the self-checkout, it's fast and convenient. Kroger's works great, Walmart's isn't that good (i dislike the store a bit too, tbh).

      But the small discount is probably doable if we take the money saved and convert it. Let's say they convert 2 normal lanes into 6 self-checkouts. That removes 1 employee (still need one to oversee the self-checkouts). Let's say 9 US dollars an hour is saved. You could get a discount of 15 cents US per minute. Ah, but wait, there is 6 self-service lanes which means you get 2.5 cents US per minute discount. Hardly worth it, imo.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    16. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by tibman · · Score: 1

      I agree, it's amazing how many people queue up within eye-sight of the empty self-checkouts. It's great if you have tons of coupons or exotic fruit or something too.. there's nobody behind you to sigh absurdly loud or act like an asshat.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    17. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish. If you've ever waited in line at the cash register for a couple of extra minutes because someone in front of you bought two dozen different kinds of vegetables and fruits that the cashier doesn't recognise, you'll appreciate this.

    18. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by chloroquine · · Score: 1

      You know how you get to the line of registers and there's only one person working and a line that extends back into the store? Wouldn't that self check out option be nice right about then?

    19. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell? How lazy are you? You sound incredibly ignorant. I hope you realize that in the good old days EVERYTHING in a supermarket used to be served to you by someone working there - so it'd be best to refuse to go there anymore because you have to get things yourself. We'd be better off with people like you starving yourself to death anyway.

      It does benefit you because it lowers the cost for the supermarket resulting in lower prices for YOU, the customer. Yes, its called MAKING PROGRESS WITH TECHNOLOGY. People like you are the reason robotics are not more predominant in society. I still can't believe you REFUSE to use it. Whining about it wouldn't be bad but you are just retarded by refusing to use it.

    20. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You people are all weird. I *love* self service scales. Around here (WA, USA) the stores that have them treat them as other express lanes. That is how I treat them as well.

      My purchases are never big. I usually have at most 8 items. Waiting in line seems like a right waste of time when I can step up, scan real quick and be on my way.

      I liked them even before I got a temp job as a cashier.

      I guess if you like dealing with people that's your bag, but I mean come on. You are posting on Slashdot. You should be all over the self service robots (oh my!) and not wanting to talk to people!

    21. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Choose for yourself. At my supermarket, the self checkout is almost always the quickest way to get out the door. Seems to me it benefits both the customers and the store.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    22. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I go to the grocery for food, not chit chat. There's a grocery chain here whose slogan is "there's a helpful smile in every aisle." I'm sorry, but I don't want your forced fake friendliness. I don't want to pretend I'm happy to see you, and I don't want to feel like a jerk for ignoring you.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    23. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      This technology doesn't benefit me at all

      Then you don't go to the grocery store very often. If you've only got a dozen or so items, self-checkout is *much* faster. And the greater density of machines versus human-operated tills means the total throughput is much higher, as more people can checkout at once.

    24. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      I see the same thing, self-checkout lanes are usually open and empty while manned-lanes have a waiting queue, hence I almost always use the self-checkout lanes.

      What annoys me is when there's full lines on a handful of manned lanes, and set of self-checkout lanes that are all CLOSED!

      All they need is the one teenager who sits on a chair in the middle reading a newspaper, to open 4 self-checkout lanes, but instead they just run 4 manned lanes. They can't just do 3 manned lanes and 1 self-checkout?

    25. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Given the competence of the average checker? Yes. Especially since for every manual aisle they can put in 2 or 3 automatics, reducing line time.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    26. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by amohat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But can't we use this tech to eliminate those little produce bags?

      Why do I need my apples to be separate from my oranges?

      At home they go into the same fruit bowl. Sometimes the bags are useful and are re-used. Most of the time I have a couple hundred saved up to throw away (no local recycling).

      The bags are mostly for the checkout process. If we can weigh and pay for produce properly, we can cut back on stupid bags.

      The only reason we partition our fruit and veggies before we put them in the final bag to go home is to make it easier for the cashier to handle. A little tech might allow us to try to change such a wasteful and silly cultural shopping habit.

    27. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      Just an anecdote here, but... last time I was at Walmart, they had *HALF* of the self checkouts turned off during what had to be one of the busiest days. I don't know why I keep going back for more :(

      Of course they had maybe a third of the regular checkouts going. Makes you wonder what sort of apocalyptic day it is when they have all of them firing!

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    28. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Arterion · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you, if the supermarket staff were friendly and interesting. But like anything worthwhile these days, that would cost extra. I blame this squarely on the huge big-box retailers that ran most of the little guys out of business.

      But again, that's the consumer's fault for choosing to save a little on the bill over supporting the local guys. So go figure...

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    29. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by chubs730 · · Score: 1

      I'm an average incompetent checker, you insensitive clod! I don't believe you're actually more efficient than most checkers, and at the very least don't know the PLU numbers for fruits and veggies. If you actually timed yourself going through the computer checkout as opposed to the human checkout you might be surprised. I've actually timed it, purchasing the same thing every day on my break. Time is very important when you only have 15 minutes, and human checkouts are always much faster, even with a 2 or three person line (depending on the sizes of their orders of course).

    30. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by Itigya · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for other chains, or even other stores, but at the Kroger's I work at there are very few cashiers actually trained to run the self-checkout. Most of the teenagers are too young (cashiers under 18 can't sell alchohol (/sigh @ Michigan)), or are only there for the summer or can't work til closing (when self-checkout is the only thing open) so the managers don't see it as worth the time to train them. Many of the other cashiers absolutely hate running it and/or avoid being trained on it.

    31. Re:I really hate self service scales.. by rootooftheworld · · Score: 0

      Anonymous Coward, huh? Damn, can't you guys get some throwaway acounts, maybe ask twitter? I'm really itching to make a 'you must be new here' joke, and damn do you deserve it! */karma-whore-joke*

      --
      I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
  7. just curious by joeava · · Score: 1

    where is the camera?

    1. Re:just curious by tsadi · · Score: 1

      in the photo, there's a tube protruding behind the monitor (behind the "Mettler Toledo" brand/logo) - near the end of the tube is most likely where the camera is, looking down at the fruits being weighed.

    2. Re:just curious by GigaHurtsMyRobot · · Score: 1

      and how does it see through the bags (which reflect light quite well) ? lame and pointless tech! it will only raise prices due to purchasing it.

  8. I'd do it if they paid me. by xzvf · · Score: 1

    We should get a discount for doing all the work and saving them a salary or two. Of course we pump our own gas now and it is just a matter of time until they turn it around and start charging a premium to scan and bag.

    1. Re:I'd do it if they paid me. by rockout · · Score: 1

      We don't all pump our own gas. In NJ there's no self-service gas stations and the price of gas is still one of the lowest in the country. $3.47/gallon as I type this, at the station nearest me.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    2. Re:I'd do it if they paid me. by T3Tech · · Score: 1

      Gas is cheap in NJ because half of the State is refineries and storage tanks, keeps the cost down.

      Of course I'm joking, but based on my experience in drafting and design work years ago for a tank company, all that exists in Bayonne and Carteret are oil tanks and I'm sure I only did the drawings for a fraction of them. :)

      --
      Of course I didn't RTFA... why would I do that? You really are new here aren't you? Don't let my UID fool you.
    3. Re:I'd do it if they paid me. by rockout · · Score: 1

      That fraction must be 2/3.... we have some in Linden too but hey, two outta three ain't bad.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
  9. A great idea but bound to be executed badly by jimicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know how widespread these are outside the UK, but ever used one of the self-service checkouts that are appearing? Scan item, bag it, scan next item etc...

    Great idea. Except that the whole point is to save time, and these things were clearly never tested by someone in a hurry because it's trivially easy to scan and bag faster than the checkout can keep up. Well, it would be except the damn thing refuses to scan item 2 until item 1 has been bagged and it takes forever to register that item 1 has been bagged.

    They're only faster if the supermarket is full of technophobic customers and the checkouts have a queue going out the door.

    1. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tried the self scan in a Delhaize in Belgium ... when you go to pay the girl takes everything out of the bag and scans it again. I don't quite see how doing something twice works out faster.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by RMH101 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Great idea, flawed execution - you're not wrong. Whilst I still use them at my local Tescos, I use them because I take a calculated guess that I can deal with the self-service system and its bugs and short queue quicker than queuing up in the long line at the conventional checkout line.

      I'm usually the guy who's standing there muttering "C'mon, c'mon!" under his breath whilst waiting for the damn thing to recognise that I really have scanned my purchase and placed it on the checkout roller. The annoying thing is you could see how it could be really great - better scanners, faster recognition: swipe, bag, insert card and you're done.
      (Thinking about it, having self-checkout that's a bit of a pain to use unless you're slightly geek-savvy might not be a bad thing - keeps the queues down for us)

      On a related note, to those of you who also buy clothing at supermarkets, bear in mind the self-service tills neither offer to remove the security tag from clothing, nor remind you that there's one present. Happily, there's lots of guides on the internet that'll walk you through removing these things at home using nothing more complex than a butane lighter.

    3. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      I saw one at woolworths here in Melbourne which crashed to a windows desktop. The staff got a bit upset when I started to play with it. It would have been interesting if there were any test or debugging tools floating around. Perhaps I could have "fixed" it for them.

    4. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I tried the self scan in a Delhaize in Belgium ... when you go to pay the girl takes everything out of the bag and scans it again. I don't quite see how doing something twice works out faster.

      They used those over here for a while - you walked around with a little scanner and you were "randomly" chosen for rescanning.

      The machines I'm talking about are intended to replace the "10 items or less" checkout with a machine.

    5. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by drspliff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Please remove your item from the scales"
      WTF.. there's nothing on them
      "Please put your items in the bags to the left"
      I only got a sandwich and a can of coke!
      "Please put your items in the bags to the left"
      *hrmmm*
      "Please remove your item from the scales"
      *cancel*

      I hate those infernal machines!

    6. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by will_die · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is as bad as the old system you saw in alot of Communist countries, seen in Poland, czechoslovakia and Bulgaria.
      There you would go to one person they would select the items you wanted from behind the shelves and place them in a basket, this would then be passed on to the second lady who would then total up your costs and give you a paper listing your total, the basket would then be passed to a third lady who would wrap up your items and place in bags you provided and that would finally be passed to the last lady who was at the door who would take the slip of paper so you could pay then hand you your items.
      All of them were seperated so the lady with the basket would have to walk them over to the next station.

    7. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by jimicus · · Score: 1

      The annoying thing is you could see how it could be really great - better scanners, faster recognition: swipe, bag, insert card and you're done.

      Even more annoying: if you've ever worked in a supermarket, you'll know that the scanners on the "normal" checkouts are very reliable and very fast. How they messed up the implementation on the self-service units I don't know.

    8. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      That was actually for two reasons: the first was that everybody was obliged to work, so many jobs that were not strictly necessary were created, the second to make it harder for employees to steal from the store.

    9. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by nbert · · Score: 1

      On the other hand it makes full employment more feasible. In China they have a very similar system for all kinds of services. When you check in at a hotel with 4 other people there are at least 6 people behind the counter (one person who speaks English would be much more useful btw). In restaurants it happens that more waiters are standing around your table than the number of guests. It can result in a rather creepy experience IMO.
      In general the system is somehow inefficient but there's enough cheap manpower to compensate for it. And as a benefit it provides many jobs to low-skilled workers.

      Since you mentioned Poland: One thing that astonishes me every time I visit are those boy scouts in the supermarket who bag everything as a good deed. I've never seen this in any other country...

    10. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by mspohr · · Score: 1

      This system seems to also be prevalent in a lot of the Commonwealth countries. For instance, a small bakery shop in Lahore has one person to select and package your items, another to write up a list and price it, and a third to collect the money (go back to the second person to collect your pastry).

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    11. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by sirambrose · · Score: 1

      I use that kind of scanner all the time and I've never seen anyone chosen for rescanning. I guess my store only does it if they see someone on the security camera bagging items without scanning them.

    12. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by sirambrose · · Score: 1

      The scanners on the self checkout lines are usually the same. The problem is that the system needs to verify that the weight of the item you put into the bag is the same as the recorded weight of the item you scanned in order to detect fraud. The scale in the bag stand takes a few seconds to stabilize after an item has been added and the register will not let you scan another item until it has.

    13. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by dyftm · · Score: 1

      Traditional check out style ones with the conveyor belt work much better, with those it can normally keep up with me.

      Also, with the bag style ones, you don't actually have to bag the items, you can just put it down on the shelf below the bags.

    14. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by s7uar7 · · Score: 1

      I've not had a problem with the scanning part, but really can't see the whole point of the bagging check. You've scanned the item, so you're going to pay for it, and if you're trying to pull a fast one and not pay for something you're hardly likely to put it in the bag.

    15. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      They're only faster if the supermarket is full of technophobic customers and the checkouts have a queue going out the door.

      Which is great, because in the UK that means there's at most 1 other person in the store using them every time I've had the misfortune to go to tesco. You don't need to bag the item, btw - just stick it on the conveyer belt, and have your partner bag, or just bag it up afterwards.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    16. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      That seriously sounds like they just needed to give people jobs.... and fill up the work day with as much unnecessary make-work as possible.

      Communism... gotta love it

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    17. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      How is it a great idea? What's the point at all?

      Why does it matter if the scale "knows" what's being weighed? Is a pound of grapes heavier than a pound of potatoes?

    18. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      They still might not be faster if you say, have produce and don't remember the PLU (good luck digging through the menu system trying to find something that's seasonal or a special item)

      I'd honestly rather stand in line rather than add a tick to the "number of people who use our nifty self checkout" counter.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    19. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Communism... gotta love it

      OR ELSE!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    20. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by jimicus · · Score: 1

      How is it a great idea? What's the point at all?

      Why does it matter if the scale "knows" what's being weighed? Is a pound of grapes heavier than a pound of potatoes?

      No, but it costs more ;)

    21. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over here in Houston we've got one set of self-checkouts - at Kroger supermarkets. Its FANTASTIC - the normal cashiers are black women (of the mmmhmmm!!! type) who just don't give a fuck. Most people go to the self checkout. In the space of one normal checkout, there are four self service. I've used it enough now to know exactly what it will say in any situation, so when I want something quick, even during rush hour(s), I just zip in, grab my shit, then boop-boop-boop and I'm out instead of "mmmhmmmm! thats wha i sayed!" for five minutes before getting to me.

    22. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 1

      My neighborhood Kroger has similar produce scanner / image ID tech as described in the article at the self-check lanes (suburban Nashville).

      Instantaneous it is not. It took about 6 or 7 seconds, each, for the green beans and asparagus I bought yesterday to be ID'd by the thing. But it did work.

      --
      sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
    23. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      The price tag is sitting right next to the thing you're weighing, which is right next to the scale. I still don't get the point.

    24. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by jimicus · · Score: 1

      The price tag is sitting right next to the thing you're weighing, which is right next to the scale. I still don't get the point.

      I imagine that these scales are the type which print barcoded labels so you can get through the checkouts quicker - they won't be the cheap and cheerful spring-balance type you use to get an idea for how much you'll be spending.

      These have existed in the UK for several years but are typically fairly unsophisticated devices with just a bunch of buttons and a photo on each button of the item you're weighing. They generally take up too much space for them to be placed so regularly as to always be right next to the thing you're weighing.

    25. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Hum. I've never heard of that. It sounds goofy as hell to make 500 customers all go through this annoying process instead of training 10 checkers to just type in the product code, but whatever.

    26. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Hum. I've never heard of that. It sounds goofy as hell to make 500 customers all go through this annoying process instead of training 10 checkers to just type in the product code, but whatever.

      Well, you generally don't have to weigh your own fruit & veg. But it might get you through the checkout slightly quicker and if you're only buying one or two items means that you can generally pay at the cigarette kiosk (which you otherwise wouldn't be able to do because they seldom have scales).

    27. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Over here we have "10 Items or Less" (or the even better "About 10 Items") checkout lanes next to the cigs, and they all have scales. Unfortunately, they also take checks, which kind of defeats the purpose of an "express" lane, but oh well.

      I guess that makes sense, but it still seems easier to me to just install a scale for the checker.

    28. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Over here we have "10 Items or Less" (or the even better "About 10 Items") checkout lanes next to the cigs, and they all have scales. Unfortunately, they also take checks, which kind of defeats the purpose of an "express" lane, but oh well.

      I guess that makes sense, but it still seems easier to me to just install a scale for the checker.

      TBH, I think it's an excuse so the companies that manufacture the scales can extract more money from the supermarket. The cashiers still have scales and I don't really think the expense of installing them is justified by any convenience to the customer. Most of the supermarkets seem to be of a similar mind; few have invested in the scales I described earlier.

    29. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a related note, to those of you who also buy clothing at supermarkets, bear in mind the self-service tills neither offer to remove the security tag from clothing, nor remind you that there's one present. Happily, there's lots of guides on the internet that'll walk you through removing these things at home using nothing more complex than a butane lighter.

      You might be a redneck if...

    30. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I must have diplomatic immunity then (odd, I didn't know about it) because I've never even been accused, let alone convicted, of shoplifting.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:A great idea but bound to be executed badly by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It saves on soap, only one of them needs to have clean hands.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  10. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by Swizec · · Score: 1

    In Slovenia we have those guys in all the large supermarkest, especially during "rushhour" when there's up to five and each has their own scale. Really makes the whole process easier on everyone, but I bet none of those weighers love their job ... who cares though, they're our robots until we can figure out a way to properly replace them with actual robots.

  11. My first real world experience by grungeman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just a few days ago when I was shopping with my family at a "real" store (maybe comparable to WalMart in the US) in Potsdam (near Berlin), I was confronted with this kind of scale. The scale looks similar to the standard self service scales, but it sports a touch screen instead of the panel with selection buttons. The camera is also included in the touch sceen.

    After I had placed a clear bag with nectarines on the scale it displayed a number of selections that it considered the appropriate type of fruit. None of the selections came even close, so I had to select "nectarines" manually on the touch sceen.

    Generally this is a nice idea, but it just does not seem to work, maybe also because we always place the fuits in bags before putting them on the scale.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
    1. Re:My first real world experience by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should just inject the nectarines with RFID tags when they are packed. As a bonus the customer gets tagged multiple times as well.

    2. Re:My first real world experience by dw604 · · Score: 1

      rfid on the sticker....

    3. Re:My first real world experience by bitflip · · Score: 1

      The store nearest my house went through some growing pains with their checkout system. At first, it was definitely more of a hassle than it was worth.

      Since then, they've kept tweaking the system. I now find it _much_ faster to use the self-checkout system for small baskets. Plus, there's seldom any wait.

      A gallon of milk is a two minute trip, tops.

    4. Re:My first real world experience by shdwtek · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know, when you walk into the grocery store the next time, a Bonzi Grocery Buddy will be talking to you from your shopping cart. "Would you like more nectarines? Looks like you ate 3 of them. Or how about some pears this time?"

    5. Re:My first real world experience by CityZen · · Score: 1

      They just need to genetically modify the produce to grow its own RFID tags!

    6. Re:My first real world experience by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      They just need to genetically modify the produce to grow its own RFID tags!

      Yes I had that thought to. If you ingest the tags they will wind up back in the food chain eventually. Before long they will be in the soil and the fertiliser, ready to be reused.

  12. Self-Checkout scales are badly calibrated... by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    Half the time, self-checkout scales are badly calibrated. To exacerbate this issue, about half the people who use them don't realize they operate on product weight.

    This leads to accusations of theft when people lean on the wrong portion of the machine, or simply out of nowhere because the AC kicked in blowing onto the scale.

    Adding yet more application of the scale's reading toward functionality will create even more glitches in this regard.

    Additionally, the self checkouts in my area are used at nazi-mart, where half the inventory requires a card not by law, but because the waltons are invasive (explatives deleted)

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:Self-Checkout scales are badly calibrated... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Try buying a small bag of finishing nails (quantity 5) at Home Depot with the self-checkout thing. I had to get creative and put my finger on the scale for the damn thing to stop telling me to "put my items into the bagging area.

      --
      The game.
  13. Bye bye service industry by damburger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have stopped making things, and now increased automation is rendering the service industry pointless. To be honest, like most of the public, I would rather deal with a machine than another human being, if only because that other human being is inevitably some slack-jawed sack of cynicism and self-loathing who hates their job and thus a large percentage of their existence.

    The economy of western Europe, therefore, is developing into one based entirely on producing reality TV shows and suing people for sharing them on the Internet. Hooray.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:Bye bye service industry by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      We have stopped making things, and now increased automation is rendering the service industry pointless. To be honest, like most of the public, I would rather deal with a machine than another human being, if only because that other human being is inevitably some slack-jawed sack of cynicism and self-loathing who hates their job and thus a large percentage of their existence.

      The economy of western Europe, therefore, is developing into one based entirely on producing reality TV shows and suing people for sharing them on the Internet. Hooray.

      well, at least the self-serve checkouts cant rebel, form a machine nation called "zero-one", then crush humanity and plug them into a power grid

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:Bye bye service industry by WDot · · Score: 1

      Where do you go with such workers? I will agree that this may be the case for many workers, but they are paid to not show it when they're dealing with customers, even if the customer is difficult. Some give me a smile and some don't, but as long as they can do their job reasonably well I don't care too much--I'm in a hurry anyway.

      I almost never use the self-service machines because they're poorly designed and because I'm not THAT antisocial--yet.

    3. Re:Bye bye service industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Download the latest episodes of "MTV - The Free World" onto your NeuroPad (TM) today!

      Will Trevor succeed in finding water in the nuclear desert? Find out only at MTV - Mecha Torture Vision

    4. Re:Bye bye service industry by andersh · · Score: 1

      The economy of western Europe, therefore, is developing into one based entirely on producing reality TV shows and suing people for sharing them on the Internet. Hooray.

      That is utter rubbish! You might be damn near incompetent and incapable of working but the rest of us are not. From Nokia to Alcatel, Western Europe is full of innovative companies! We produce things in all industries from chemicals, electronics, software to space technology!

    5. Re:Bye bye service industry by damburger · · Score: 1

      Wrong

      We don't produce any of those things; we produce the plans for such things. Physical manufacture is largely done elsewhere. Thus we are slaves to increasingly stifling IP legislation because our economy depends on such ethereal production.

      I was being flippant originally, but underneath that is a point: we are slowly moving from primarily adding value to the world economy to primarily rent seeking.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    6. Re:Bye bye service industry by damburger · · Score: 1

      A lot of people feel the same. I however have difficulty in most human contact situations, even more so with strangers, so I will often go for the self service. I know I am an outlier in terms of sociability, but think of me as the canary in the mine. Technology that I currently use to alienate myself from society will eventually temp you into doing the same.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    7. Re:Bye bye service industry by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I will start using self checkout when they start giving me a discount on my purchase for the money they save on a cashier. Until then I'll keep on using the cashier lines, that is while they still exist.

    8. Re:Bye bye service industry by ozbird · · Score: 1

      In some cases, I'd rather deal with the wetware. If they think golden shallots are brown onions, who am I to argue?

    9. Re:Bye bye service industry by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And while you're lined up, waiting for some jackass to count out change while the cashier is scanning their dozen coupons, I'll already be out the door.

      But please, keep it up! The more people like you there are, the more likely it is the self-checkout will be open and available. :)

    10. Re:Bye bye service industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a 'rewards card'. Use cryptic/misleading info to get it if you want to/have to.

      Use it to identify yourself in the self-serve lanes.

      Otherwise you are wasting your time. Management is encouraging the use of self-serve checkouts by 'deleberately' under-manning the flesh-and-blood cashier checkouts. Time and time again I see it when I got to the store from Wal-Mart on down to the smaller store chains.

      The time you waste waiting in line is the price you pay for 'maximizing shareholder value' :P

      If you are in a hurry and MUST use a real cashier, do what I do and look for one that is 'tendering' a customer and get behind that customer ASAP!

  14. whoops.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    it's based on photo scanning now..

    we all know image recognition is so much more advanced than weight sensitivity.

    a little smear on the scanner (all the scanners ive seen even on the human operated machines are filthy) and it's mistaking apples for oranges, oranges for grapefruits, and pineapples for watermelons.

    I stand by my analysis though, and predict utter failure if implemented.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  15. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by houghi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the whole process does move a lot faster at the checkout when labels are printed in advance

    And that is the whole point. That way they can use less staff there. The process for the customer as a whole takes more time. Often I need to wait for the scale to be free then I need to look for where the selection is. So for the customer it take more time, but the store saves.

    Also I have used supermarkets where you do NOT put a sticker on it. The person at the checkout has a scale in the same place where the scanner is and enters the PLU. This is as fast as scanning, while not having the need to scan them myself. (I can still check if I want to)

    As for people doing the packaging. I have seen it and it takes me again much more time. I do not care what time I spend at the checkout. I care about the time I spend for the whole experience.

    To compare it: I am not interested if you have the fastest computer in the world that does a process 2 seconds faster if I as a user lose 5 seconds by needing more time to enter the data.

    And then there is the self-checkout. The only advantage I see is not so much the speed. It is that they can use one person instead of 4 to man them. The same with the scanners you walk around with yourself.

    OK, the last two might indeed save me about 5 minutes. It will also give me the not so nice feeling that just put some people out of a job, so I can have 5 minutes more to waste on /.

    So I now take my time whenever I go shopping. If somebody runs to get in front of me, I let them. I do NOT use the self-checkout lanes, even if there is nobody there and I do have the technical knowledge.

    To not use the scanners you can use is also because I do not use a customer card. They can not link my stuff I buy to the way I pay. The privacy laws here do not allow it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  16. Self-Service is not Self-Repair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I read the headline I interpreted it as a scale that can repair itself when it breaks.

    But then again, that's why I'm an anonymous coward.

  17. My girlfriend... by PotatoFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    My girlfriend unwittingly leaned across one of these scales to reach a bag of apples, whereupon the screen started showing pictures of different kinds of melons. Fairly accurate, I'd say.

    --
    "Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty as well as the abuses of power." -- James Madison
    1. Re:My girlfriend... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend unwittingly leaned across one of these scales to reach a bag of apples, whereupon the screen started showing pictures of different kinds of melons. Fairly accurate, I'd say.

      Its a bit like how spell checkers give computers a sense of humor. Optical processing and an obsession with fruit have given this checkout an obsession with round things.

    2. Re:My girlfriend... by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      Very nice fiction. You do know this is slashdot don't you? Girlfriends are a myth.

    3. Re:My girlfriend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what kind of melons does she have?

  18. Melons? by RudeIota · · Score: 4, Funny

    My girlfriend unwittingly leaned across one of these scales to reach a bag of apples, whereupon the screen started showing pictures of different kinds of melons

    ... You never removed the bar code from your inflatable life partner? :\

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    1. Re:Melons? by plasmacutter · · Score: 0, Troll

      bzzt! the correct response is: "she needs to watch where she slings her stomach"

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:Melons? by Green+Salad · · Score: 1

      Pictures please!

    3. Re:Melons? by rootooftheworld · · Score: 0
      +1 Sadly Insightfull

      I really need to get a life. Maybe I'll become a drugie? *wipes tears*

      PS: Don't get me started on the sig, okay? please?

      --
      I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
  19. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by drsmithy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Usually stores do have the facility for the check-out person to enter the code and weigh the fruit themselves at the checkout, but as they only do this when tourists come to town (or the OAPs who forget) they don't remember the codes off the top of their heads and have to spend a while looking them up.

    In Australia, it is standard for the "checkout chick" to weigh fruit & veg (or anything else) as part of of the checkout process. The scales are built into the bench/barcode scanner and it takes maybe a second longer than a typical barcode scan.

    (Which resulted in a bit of minor confusion and embarrassment the first time I visited a grocery store in Switzerland after we moved here.)

    Having seen both systems in action, I'm in favour of having it done at the checkout. It doesn't add any meaningful amount of time, is more convenient for the customer and removes the ability for dishonest people to game the system by deliberately using an incorrect label on their goods.

  20. Doomed to Fail by Bazman · · Score: 4, Funny

    My usual lunchtime shop has trouble reading BARCODES on half the stuff I buy. Swipe, nothing, swipe, nothing, swipe, nothing... Type in tiny number, beep. Yeah, that's time saving. And now I'm being told computers can tell the difference between tangerines and satsumas? Heck, I can't even do that!

    I call shenanigans. Either:

      * each vegetable has a secret RFID chip in it
    or
      * the picture is sent to some outsourced call centre where someone sits at a screen watching vegetables all day and clicking on what they are.

    1. Re:Doomed to Fail by dw604 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      B might actually work

    2. Re:Doomed to Fail by xehonk · · Score: 1

      If you had bothered to read even half of the summary, you would have noticed, that the scale would detect that it's some kind of orange, round fruit and show you a selection of possible matches, including tangerines and satsumas.

    3. Re:Doomed to Fail by Asztal_ · · Score: 1

      Replace "outsourced call centre" with "CAPTCHA for gmail", and you'll have spammers rushing to solve the problem for you.

    4. Re:Doomed to Fail by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      the scale would detect that it's some kind of orange, round fruit and show you a selection of possible matches

      I think you missed the OP's point. How many varieties of 'orange, round fruit' do you suppose there are. I've seen lemons that were almost indestinguishable from an orange. I've seen oranges, the size of a large grapefruit. There are varieties and hybrids that only an expert could identify. Now, make me choose amongst say, a half dozen, photos of 'orange round fruit', and what are you gonna get ??

    5. Re:Doomed to Fail by slashname3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Amazingly I always get the cheaper one that is displayed. Don't you?

    6. Re:Doomed to Fail by Alexei · · Score: 1

      It's the manager's responsibility to make sure the computer has a record of each variety in stock.

  21. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by suso · · Score: 1

    And that is the whole point. That way they can use less staff there. The process for the customer as a whole takes more time.

    Actually, I don't think that is what the goal is for the retailer. They've already been able to cut staff using the self-scan systems. I think for the retailer the goal is better accuracy. And not just to prevent theft, its probably also to help order replacements for the right item. I know Wal-Mart at least has a Point Of Sale system in place that automatically reorders whatever is bought. And that was 10 years ago. They probably have the same thing at supermarkets too.

    It might not always be the customer trying to cheat the store either, for instance, sometimes I'll buy a tomato and I don't know exactly what type of tomato it is because I forgot to look at the sign over them.

  22. That's why we need biometric photography by meist3r · · Score: 1

    So the scale can send your picture and ID to the FBI for large scale vegetable fraud and conspiracy to fruit theft when your puny human brain can't decide whether the apple on the picture is slightly larger or less reddish than the one you are actually trying to pay for.

  23. Refuse to use them by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I refuse to use self-service checkouts. They have installed two of them in the local Tesco (occupies the position that Wal-Mart does in the UK market).

    Every time I go in, a clipboard-wielding junior manager tries to make me use them. I usually just say "No", but next time I've resolved to explain why.

    Completely aside from the fact that the implementation is dreadful, the things are designed to do people out of a job, in a town that sorely needs jobs. Two of these things are typically supervised by one worker, instead of requiring two people to man two manual ones. You only spend on capital if you have an expectation of increased quality or reduced labour costs, and I can't see these things increasing quality.

    People who work grocery retail are at the bottom end of the labour market, so where are they going to go? I don't feel comfortable helping the the likes of Tesco line their pockets like this. I'm starting to feel close to the line where I stop shopping there (if only they hadn't managed to crowd out all the local greengrocers and fishmongers, which I suppose is partially my fault).

    1. Re:Refuse to use them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who work grocery retail are at the bottom end of the labour market, so where are they going to go?

      The workhouse? Oh wait, you don't have those anymore.

      I don't feel comfortable helping the the likes of Tesco line their pockets like this.

      It is inescapable. Creeping modernity slowly insinuating itself into English life. Workhouses gone out of style. And now you've got supermarkets of all things! It is almost as if the 1970's have finally caught up with England.

    2. Re:Refuse to use them by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two of these things are typically supervised by one worker

      In the Tescos I use, it's generally more like 1 worker for 6 or 8 of these, and quite often there's no-one there at all (there is a button you can press to call for assistance).

      I refuse to use them too, for exactly the same reasons - they're taking jobs away from people who can probably work in very few other places. That probably makes me a Luddite; so be it. I'm not opposed to technology, but I am opposed to the relentless effort by most companies to save money, often at the expense of the employees.

      I'm all for increased automation and efficiency and thus increased leisure time, but society just isn't set up to support the people who find themselves with no jobs and no money because of it.

    3. Re:Refuse to use them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...the things are designed to do people out of a job, in a town that sorely needs jobs.

      Since when do we owe these losers jobs? You should have seen the kids at my brother's old school. None of them gave a shit about their GCSEs, despite (because of?) the fact that they were going to be leaving school straight after them. They couldn't be arsed to work and seemed to think that the world owed them a living. I always wonder what percentage will grow up to look back on their GCSE exams and realise that they should have worked harder.

      Most of my friends on the other hand have worked their arses off at top universities but are finding it impossible to get the jobs they wanted because of the credit crunch and companies tightening their belts. Yet you think we should be hiring unskilled wasters instead of the talented people who have worked their whole lives?

      Here's a list of some other things we should therefore get rid of:

      • Automatic traffic lights
      • ATMs
      • Being able to order things online without phoning someone up

      They all reduce employment, right?

      (Posted as AC, as no doubt someone will think rewarding the people who spend time and effort to do well at school over the layabouts is fascism of some sort.)

    4. Re:Refuse to use them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disliked them at first, but have now started to like them. Many bugs are now fixed, and if you don't press any screen prompts you don't get the patronising loud voice (just scan the food, insert the money without pressing the screen) and it's great.

      Usually saves me about 5 minutes, rather than having to queue up behind everyone buying cigarettes and lottery tickets.

      Also I've not noticed a reduction in staff in my local tesco express. Before, they often only had one member of staff behind the tills, with a queue of 20 people and 3 staff pointlessly re-arranging the already stocked shelves. Now they still have this scenario, but I just whizz through the self-serve.

    5. Re:Refuse to use them by esme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least in the US, grocery checkout staff are far from the bottom of the labor market. I used to think it had to be the lowest job imaginable, but then there was a major strike of grocery workers in Southern California a few years ago. There was a lot of discussion in the newpapers about their wages, benefits, etc. and it turns out they make decent wages (1.5x to 2x minimum wage) and have good benefits -- they were mostly striking over the details of health insurance. So I was mystified why they were striking, since it seemed like they were getting a fair deal for unskilled work.

      But then the strike dragged on long enough that the stores brought in scabs. It changed my opinion of grocery workers immediately. The scabs were awful -- they didn't know any of the codes for the fruit, so it took them a minute to look up each code. They couldn't bag the groceries properly. They were twice as slow, etc.

      And in the UK, my experience was that the grocery workers were much more competent than in the US. Generally more personable and helpful, like noticing if a package was damaged or letting me know if there was a special two-for-one price.

      -Esme

    6. Re:Refuse to use them by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      That depends on where in the US you live. In southeastern Michigan, that payscale is far from the case; I only made perhaps 10-15% over minimum wage.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    7. Re:Refuse to use them by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      They have installed two of them in the local Tesco (occupies the position that Wal-Mart does in the UK market).

      Since Asda is owned by wally world, I'm surprised they don't have that dubious distinction.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    8. Re:Refuse to use them by Shados · · Score: 1

      It will depend on the grocery store too. Where I am, there's 2 grocery stores competing against one another (sitting 200 meters apart, give or take).

      One is "fancy". From what I understand, people there all make over 10$/hour, everything is expensive, but if you ask for help, they know what they're talking about. Service is amazing, everyone's polite, there are always twice as much cashiers as you need (except weekend evening, where laws here dictate a maximum, unfortunately), plus the people who bag your stuff. And the people who man the specialities (meat/fish counters, etc) are supposed to be paid quite a bit more too.

      Then there's the other one. Which garentees that everything is cheaper than everywhere else and will price match (including walmart). Everyone there is paid minimum wadge, it stinks, they're yawning in your face, quality is awful, etc. I'm guessing they take all the people that the other place won't take.

      So really, it will depend on the grocery store.

    9. Re:Refuse to use them by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      True, it probably will. We don't have any of your "fancy" stores locally There's one chain that I'm sure would like to claim that they are, but while they've got "everything is expensive" down pat, there's only half as many cashiers as they need at any given moment and rarely have enough baggers. I've been sufficiently unimpressed that I haven't risked asking for help.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    10. Re:Refuse to use them by genner · · Score: 1

      Here's a list of some other things we should therefore get rid of:

      • Automatic traffic lights

      ....because old fashioned stop signs are looseing their jobs?

    11. Re:Refuse to use them by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely aside from the fact that the implementation is dreadful, the things are designed to do people out of a job, in a town that sorely needs jobs.

      Yet another instance of the Broken Window Fallacy. Yes, increased efficiency may put these individuals out of a job. But it also means that the grocer saves money, and we do too. That money doesn't just disappear from the economy, we spend it on better things. Maybe we go out to eat more often, and maybe the owner of the grocery can afford to add on to his house now. Those activities create jobs. Efficiency is better for everyone.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Refuse to use them by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Completely aside from the fact that the implementation is dreadful, the things are designed to do people out of a job, in a town that sorely needs jobs.

      Damn right, let's smash the spinning jennies!

    13. Re:Refuse to use them by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      no, Asda were dumb enough to advertise themselves as "part of the Wal*Mart family", so those of us with a bit of sense refuse to shop there - pumping Tesco up may not be clever, but it's preferable if it means they can squeeze Asda out of the market. Clash of the Titans indeed.

      pracie:
      Asda is not top dog because we're not all flocking there because we know that it's really Wal*Mart because they told us it was.

      --
      FGD 135
    14. Re:Refuse to use them by bnenning · · Score: 1

      I'm not opposed to technology, but I am opposed to the relentless effort by most companies to save money

      Huh? The entire point of technology is increasing efficiency, producing more output with less labor. Do you refuse to use email because it costs jobs at the post office?

      I'm all for increased automation and efficiency

      Obviously not.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    15. Re:Refuse to use them by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely aside from the fact that the implementation is dreadful, the things are designed to do people out of a job, in a town that sorely needs jobs.

      Agreed! That's why I refuse to use electric light bulbs. I mean, what are the lamplighters to do if there are no gas lamps to light? Huh?? They're just a way for the city to continue to take my taxes while putting people out of a job!

    16. Re:Refuse to use them by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      I like ours, too. If you have one of their shopper's club cards, it remembers you and doesn't try and tell you what to do. They don't even say thank you to me any more, they just beep!

    17. Re:Refuse to use them by Life+Liberty+Freedom · · Score: 1

      No, but a traffic light at a cross street could be replaced by 4 people holding a stop sign at each entrance to the intersection. When a car is present they can rotate the sign and allow one car or more cars to pass. To further reduce unemployement, one person could be used for each lane.

    18. Re:Refuse to use them by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      Why do I often feel that liberal capitalism is a religion? Maybe it's because their followers tend to use parables instead of sound and documented reasoning?

      "Efficiency" is a mystery just like the sacred trinity. On the one hand they argue that nobody can't measure or decide the criteria for the overall well-being of society, and on the other hand they are prone to point out how acting on the "right principles" will always be beneficial to the society, even if the weak must be slaughtered on the sacred altar of efficiency.

      I'm all for the protection of individual freedoms, but those scaremongering about pseudo-fallacies based on scary tales (about 'broken windows' or 'invisible hands') are just ridiculous. Specially when, for each of the parables, there will be an economist of a different school showing how the opposite behavior is just as beneficial as the one the parable supports.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    19. Re:Refuse to use them by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Didn't you ever watch the Flintstones? Those poor animals are out of work.

      But seriously, a long time ago, police controlled the traffic lights manually.

  24. Self service discount by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

    Self service discount? Over here we call it shoplifting :).

    --
  25. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having experienced both, I totally agree.

    As you mention, weighing stuff yourself means that you can weigh it, get your label, and then add another tomato (or whatever). (Not that I've ever done that, but the possibilities... What was it that Bruce fella said about shoplifting and security?)

    When I first moved to Swiss land I used to forget to weigh stuff and then (not speaking any of the three main languages) had to be embarrassed as I went and weighed whatever it was (holding up everyone behind me).

  26. I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    We have so many plants out there that common people just call them weeds because it'd be too hard to learn names for everything. If you had a hand held device that told you what type of plant you're looking at, you could have names for everything. There is a lot of potential for things like this.

    1. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      I"m sure there is enough DNA in there for a sample to be taken without decreasing the weight by too much :)

      That should give just about enough information to label the species.

    2. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by baldass_newbie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you had a hand held device that told you what type of plant you're looking at, you could have names for everything.

      The problem is that no such device exists not because we can't build the device but because there is such a paucity of taxonomists and so many varieties of plant life that we don't really have a bead on how much is out there. If you can't build a database, having an interface for it is useless. Data first.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    3. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, because it would be such a disaster for taxonomists if they had a machine that they could point at unfamiliar plant life and press a button that said "Is this in the database".

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right - and these plants just uproot themselves from the jungles of darkest Peru, randomly arrive in the supemarket and teleport themselves onto the shelves do they?

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    5. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      You would need taxonomists, first. That's my point.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    6. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by maxume · · Score: 1

      My point is that the magic scanner part is a lot harder than the building the database part. You only need a few thousand taxonomists (maybe a few dozen!) to set up the rules for the database, and then anybody with the magical device can put information into it (if you can identify that something is not in the database, it is trivial to give it a placeholder name and associate that placeholder with the information that allows you to specify that the specimen is not in the database).

      The most likely path to such a magic device is hand-held genetic sequencing; it is a ways off, to say the least. If hand-held genetic sequencing was widely available, it would not be a big deal to harvest information about millions of specimens (including photos, location information, etc.) and then fit the pieces together (it would be *expensive*, but it would be straightforward from an organizational/process perspective).

      What it comes down to is that once your scanner works well enough that it can tell what a tomato is by scanning a tomato and it can tell what tobacco is by scanning some tobacco, it will work well enough to tell you that something is somewhere in the middle. That the thing in the middle does not have a name is not a problem for the scanner, compared to the being able to actually mechanically classify anything at all.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by Misch · · Score: 1

      Something like Marker Assisted Selection?

      I seem to recall that scientists are developing tools that can run DNA analysis in the field on the cheap. Essentially, they can run this on very young plants and leave only the plants that meet the genetic expression the producers want.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    8. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      yes, something like that :)

      I don't think it will be long before we'll see one-shot full genome tests that cost just a couple of bucks, as soon as they reach the fraction of a penny we'll see them incorporated into checkout machinery.

      Another neat application would be a mechanical (as in non-poisonous and environmentally friendly) weed control system, take a sample of a plant, test against db, if it's classified as a weed trace it down as far as you can to the ground and rip it out.

    9. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      My point is that the magic scanner part is a lot harder than the building the database part. You only need a few thousand taxonomists (maybe a few dozen!) to set up the rules for the database

      See my point about taxonomists again. Maybe it will sink in this time.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    10. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by maxume · · Score: 1

      Where in it did you establish that there are not currently enough taxonomists to set up the organizational characteristics of such a database?

      Or did you just assert that there aren't enough?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by maxume · · Score: 1

      There isn't any need to manually catalog everything. If you have a scanner that can readily tell a tomato plant from a tobacco plant, it is very unlikely that it would be unable to tell you that you have something between the two, and it would be enormously helpful in gathering information towards cataloging your new specimen.

      He is arguing that the scanner isn't worth much until you have a relatively complete database.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by T3Tech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One species' weed is another species' diet.
      Or something like that.

      --
      Of course I didn't RTFA... why would I do that? You really are new here aren't you? Don't let my UID fool you.
    13. Re:I've envisioned something like a Tricorder by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      It definitely is, but right now what we (or actually the farmers) do is use pretty broad spectrum poisons to get rid of weeds (or genetically modified food that is more resistant against the poison).

      So a mechanical solution based on correctly identifying the species that is selected to remain would be *much* more environmentally friendly than the current methods.

      Every year vast quantities of poisonous stuff makes it into the aquifer, that could be changed.

  27. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    The problem here as I see it, is unfortunately this:

    in the life of being an engineer, anytime you automate something, people lose the ability to do their current job because you can automate it. Mean you're stuck in one hell of a conundrum if people can figure out that you engineered something that caused them to be outdated/lose their job.

    Of course the upside is that in a good corporation those same people will be able to do something else beneficial within the company. However for companies such as walmart and others that dont' value emplyoees at all I'm sure they will just let the unneeded people go in lieu of new training.

  28. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by pimpimpim · · Score: 3, Informative

    Depends on the store. In germany they often do it at checkout, also probably at aldi in switzerland. At one particularly annoying store in germany (edeka), you have to type in a 3-digit number at the scale. So you spend a lot of time looking for the place where you got your fruit or vegetable, remembering the number, going back.

    These "smart" scales have been around for more than a year now at some Real,- stores, and if they are supposed to intelligently learn, they are apparently still not doing a very good job. Still, anything beats the number system.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  29. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by jacquesm · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's definitely not 'redundant'.

  30. Active Industry by andersh · · Score: 1

    We don't produce any of those things; we produce the plans for such things. Physical manufacture is largely done elsewhere.

    Wrong yourself. You better tell my customers that they don't produce those products themselves right here in high-cost Northern Europe. You are making political "points" ignoring the truth or you are simply oblivious to it!

  31. sounds like a job for decision support by cyb97 · · Score: 1

    rather than smart computer.

    I'd rather have the scale suggest to me (and me confirming or choosing something else) the type of fruit/veg rather than telling me.

    As I can quite clearly envision the scenario where scale is wrong (tangerine, kumquat, etc.) and I have to track down some scarce-in-supply worker to actually override the scale (or just accept that it is wrong and deal with what ever that means in price).

    It is much more suited for computerised decision support than computerised recognition. It would probably be right in the majority of cases (the easy ones) and when it comes to the difficult ones, the customer usually knows what (s)he is buying anyway...

  32. Auto checkout by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

    What is involved in having every item of food tagged so that you simply bundle it all in bags and then as you go through the checkout it adds it all up and gives a total to the checkout monkey? I know fruit and veg might be difficult, but I've always thought that handling every single item and pushing it past a laser if very inefficient. I thought we were living in an age of technlology? Where is super cheap mass RFID at the moment?

  33. Bar code fruit stickers by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Or, they could just put a bar code on the fruit stickers... nah, that's too easy.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Bar code fruit stickers by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      That's been done on occasion by vendors before, but with the POS software I've used, that doesn't work. Either it uses the current scale weight (and you have part of the weight still in hand when you're scanning), or the scale is empty so it asks for a manual weight (which isn't exactly something that can be done at a self-scan).

      Said POS software is also well-deserving of the POS acronym, however. :)

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
  34. Do we care? by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    This is Slashdot. We don't care if the checkout line is sentient. What we really want to know is..
     
    Does it run Linux?

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    1. Re:Do we care? by prestomation · · Score: 1

      Mettler-Toledo runs both Windows XP Embedded and Suse 10.sumthing on their scales depending on customer requirements.

  35. More self serve lines by slashname3 · · Score: 1

    This is just another move towards getting rid of cashiers and making the customer check their own goods. This trend has been increasing in the last the year or two. Now there are more self serve checkouts at Home Depot, Lowe's, Sam's and other stores.

    Eventually they will have huge warehouses where the customers never see a live person that works there. Combined with ATMs and fast food drive up windows a person would not have to talk to anyone at all.

    Some how I don't think this is an improvement. How can a self checkout improve the customer experience? And just imagine the backups when that item you picked up does not have the barcode on it. Who is going to help then?

    1. Re:More self serve lines by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      A self-checkout may not improve the experience in a qualitative manner, but it does tend to reduce the wait time at the checkouts.

      As for when the item doesn't have a barcode—that's what the cashier is there for.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    2. Re:More self serve lines by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      Reduce the wait time? Are there actual stats that show that or is that a pipe dream?

      And what cashier are you talking about? The one that is monitoring all 10 lines? And is busy fixing something or showing someone how to use the system? Sounds like the wait time just increased. Seems like this is where time could be saved by manning all the lines.

    3. Re:More self serve lines by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Purely observational evidence, I'm afraid. (I've never seen a store dumb enough to have a cashier monitoring more than six—with four being the usual at all but one chain. Six is doable, depending on the cashier, but more is just asking for failure like you said happens...)

      But if you replaced the U-Scans with regular registers, you'd get 3 lines per U-Scan block, not four or six (the typical block sizes) or ten. And there's no way in hell the store would have people at all three of them. Maybe two, if it's the day before Thanksgiving or something...

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
  36. People aren't convenient... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I quite enjoy the self service scanners in Tesco, it enables me to rid myself of all my small change on a much more regualr basis, have you ever tried counting out small change at the till while the check out girl sits there with her hand out tutting and looking at the other customers who all then beginn sighing and tutting themselves? It's a nightmare, you would think anything less than a pound/euro isn't real money anymore. On one occasion (not in tesco) while on holiday and trying to rid ourselves of the foreign currency my girlfriend handed over a fist of change and the shop girl actually tutted and held out the money for her fellow till monkey to see! If this is the sort of people we no longer have to deal with then i say roll on self service!

  37. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by cmaurand · · Score: 1

    I don't do self checkout. 1. I won't work with a machine that talks "down" to me. If I could shut off the stupid voice...I might, but still, see #2. 2. Its putting some college student or high school kid out of a job. 3. It takes any social interaction out of the equation and I think that's generally bad. 4. It takes longer. If you pay with a credit or debit card, you're purchases are getting linked. If they're not getting linked at the store, they're getting linked somewhere else like ChoicePoint. Ever read a privacy statement? You don't have any.

  38. Good idea if done right. by meyekul · · Score: 1

    This would be good in the capacity of a suggestion type thing, like predictive text on your cell phone, but I think it would be wrong far too often to actually narrow your choices. I mean, there are produce items in the grocery that I can't tell apart myself, like most of the green, leafy products, and they are going to write a program to do it? I can't imagine a computer could reliably tell the difference in lettuce and cabbage just by looks, but maybe if Clippy popped in and said, "I think you want to buy a head of lettuce, is that right?"

  39. RFID by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    This would be trivial with RFID stickers. Oh, but I forgot, the paranoid idiots out there are afraid of technology.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:RFID by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Trivial to a point; you'd still want something like this as a backup,to at least insure that the sticker is from the right class of product. Otherwise, people will be ringing up their jalapeño peppers as much-cheaper bananas.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
  40. Don't work very well by tmk · · Score: 1

    In a supermarket nearby I have found some of these new self service scales.

    It takes between 5 and 10 seconds to get a result. And it is more like a lucky guess. In half of the cases the scale cannot identify anything and I have to use the touchscreen. In 30 to 40 percent of cases the computer gives me a choice of three or four vegetables.

  41. The new CAPTCHA by Comboman · · Score: 1

    the picture is sent to some outsourced call centre where someone sits at a screen watching vegetables all day and clicking on what they are.

    Better yet, we use the data for a new CAPTCHA system. "To enter this website, please type the name of the fruit or vegetable in the following photo."

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  42. Self-checkout suxors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, I find self-service checkouts pretty annoying. I don't *want* to scan my own crap. I'll bag it, but scanning it myself is a hassle, and it doesn't save time because I can unload while the cashier is scanning, which means two things getting done at once.
    I have resisted using the self checkouts for the sake of speed, and because I think the cashiers provide a service that is worth paying for.
    I've had enough of companies cutting thier costs by pushing the work onto their customers. ATMs are OK because they add convience. Self-checkout is NOT OK because it will slow down checkout.

  43. oblig: Big Bang Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leonard: "Call McFlono Mcfluniloo"
    Phone: "Calling; Rajesh Koothrapalli"
    [Rajesh's phone rings]
    Rajesh: "Oh, that's very good. And a little racist"

  44. Bad idea by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with self-service scales in the supermarkets I've been to is not that it's hard to enter the item, it's that frequently _the item isn't in the database_. Or the PLU sticker is missing from the item or the shelf tag... and can't be looked up because it demands an exact name match and you don't know whether a sweet Vidalia onion begins with O or V or S.

    The premise that it can recognize produce visually is unlikely to say the least. Do you really think it can tell the difference between bananas at $0.69 a pound and organically grown bananas at $1.19 a pound? How about a Fuji apple and a Gala apple?

    I'm willing to bet that the system does more to impede legitimate purchases than to facilitate them.

    I'm bet that "ask[ing] the customer to choose between only those icons that are relevant" sounds like a smokescreen and a pretext. I'll be these scales really being sold to control-freak store managers who fear that customers are building a better retirement by ringing up expensive orange peppers as cheap green peppers, and is willing to spend $50,000 to prevent a couple of customers a day from bilking the store of $2.67.

  45. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by dave420 · · Score: 1

    But it introduces the problem of a checkout person trying to figure out exactly what kind of produce is in the bag, causing every single person in the queue to be delayed. If you buy the produce, it makes sense only you get the time penalty. It might only be a few seconds for the person being served, but it adds up in long queues. I like the German way, personally. Quick, efficient, painless. Those ruthless Germans.

  46. Same old question.... by ziggy00001 · · Score: 1

    Just as long as it doesn't ask me 'Does this make me look fat?'

  47. Adoption of this tech in the Pacific NW by u-bend · · Score: 1

    hehe. I bet Seattle will think twice before investing in this.

    --
    u-bend
  48. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by ubercam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah when I lived in Germany, they always did the weighing at the checkout. I never shopped at the big supermarkets like Real or the super-sized Edekas or Aldis because I lived too far away from the large shopping centres and didn't have a car. I just shopped at the small local stores around the corner. They never really had problems with identifying the produce. If they were unsure they usually referred to a guide with pictures to find the right code. If they still couldn't find it they just asked you or someone else. Didn't take long.

    Same deal in Canada. I can't speak for the whole country, and have no idea how its done anywhere else, but in Winnipeg at the various Superstore locations I've been to, they have about 4-6 self-checkout kiosks which have the computer scales built in, but definitely are not smart whatsoever. Real Human Beings® still exist as cashiers in far greater numbers. Safeway seems to get the idea that people are better. Their recent store renovations (to the darker more luxurious look with wooden floors and all that) don't have any of the self-checkout kiosks at all. Maybe their next round of renos will put everyone out of a job, who knows.

    For bulk purchases, like at Safeway buying a bag of candies or spices from the bulk bins, you still are asked to write down the number on the twist tie, but if you forget, don't worry about it, they can look it up in their guide. Very easy.

    Once in the UK, we tried using the self-checkouts at Tesco and they were the hugest pieces of garbage on earth. The machine supervisor/manager guy basically waited beside us the whole time and constantly had to intervene where the machine screwed up. Double-scanning and not sensing the items in the bagging area were par for the course. Took about 10 minutes extra just to do that while people with full carts who went to the Real Human Beings® after we'd started were already loading their cars before we were finished wasting our lives with relatively few items vs. vastly inferior technology. The least the supervisor/manager could have done was to void everything and take us to a proper cashier to get it done in no time. Hopefully they've fixed those things up by now.

    Moral of the story: go see the Real Human Beings® because they are harder, better, faster, stronger.. well maybe better and faster. Plus you can chat with them, or chat them up as the case may be, not have them talk down at you in some stupid disembodied voice. Human interaction is much more pleasant than interacting with a computer. I know this is Slashdot, and that may not be a universally held view, but it is the truth. Even Slashdotters have to emerge from their dens and get some food sometime...

  49. I prefer non-self-service for fruit by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    Because people can't stop touching, sqeezing, pressing and fumbling all the fruit and vegetables which lets them get bad much faster.
    The exception is the super-expensive fruits that the general public don't touch because they're too expensive.
    When I had a greengrocer next to where I lived, I would always buy the stuff there - only the staff was allowed to touch the fruit and as a result, it lasted much longer than anything available elsewhere - even though it was more ripe than usual supermarket-fruit.
    I really hate self-service - but mostly because of the other people who can't behave and pretend they are the last shoppers on earth.

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  50. RTFA? by argent · · Score: 1

    Do you really think it can tell the difference between bananas at $0.69 a pound and organically grown bananas at $1.19 a pound? How about a Fuji apple and a Gala apple?

    In either of these cases it will pop up a set of pictures for the customer to select from.

    This is not intended to prevent fraud, but to help the customer who can't recall whether the PLU was 637263 or 631263.

    1. Re:RTFA? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

      "It will pop up a set of pictures for the customer to select from." And how does the customer choose between a picture of a regular banana and a picture of an organically grown banana, since they look alike?

      (For my second example I chose Fuji and Gala apples precisely because these two varieties look almost the same).

      If the banana has a PLU sticker on it, there's no need for a picture or for visual pattern recognition, and if it doesn't have a PLU sticker on it, neither the computer nor the customer can make the right selection visually.

  51. service standards determine staffing by sirambrose · · Score: 1
    I believe that most stores staff their registers based on a desired level of service. The store I work at considers having more than two people in one line unacceptable. Enough cashiers are scheduled to meet that standard. If we ever did add self service lines, we would probably reduce cashier staffing to keep the same service level as staffing for no waiting ever is prohibitively expensive.

    I would assume that other retailers do this as well, but they just have a different standard. Walmart seems to expect a line length of 3 to 7. Late at night when fewer people shop, they seem to have less staff and the lines are still 3 to 7 long. I would assume that their level of service was the same before the self service registers were added. I really can't imagining the lines were any worse before.

  52. Organic ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it differentiate between organic and regular produce ? If it doesn't and asks the customer, then good, organic produce will become cheaper.

  53. Too tempting by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I got some "fruit" for it to try and recognize.

    Scanner: "*ding* Tea bags."

    Wow! It *is* good!

  54. If I have to do all the work... by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

    I have a better idea. How about you go to the checkout stand and let someone else ring up the items. After all, if the store wants my money, they can put a real human there to collect it from me, to answer questions, etc. I can't stand the fact that I have to do all the work of ringing up my items on those automatic machines that say, "Please put the item back in the bag" when I never removed it in the first place. Or, better yet, if they want me to ring up my own stuff, there better be a 10% discount on my entire purchase, because if I'm doing all the work to save them the money of paying a cashier, then I want to save some money too.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
  55. Bye China, Hello UK! by andersh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In fact the trend has just started to change again, the transportation prices are rising making it increasingly profitable to produce closer to home.

    Just the other day I read an article from the UK about companies moving manufacturing home from China. And don't forget that the same thing is happening in the US [in some areas].

    And China is experiencing problems with higher labor costs following a real lack of available manpower. People in China are getting picky about what jobs they take and the wages they get.

  56. Speaking as one with retail drone experince... by Talthybius · · Score: 1

    I can say almost nobody likes self-check machines. I work for a grocery store an I refuse to use them if I have more than a couple items. Customers can't explain or reason with them. Stores have to devote an experienced cashier to monitor them. Funny thing is though, a halfway decent cashier can process as many items per minute as three self-check machines. A really good cashier can compete with four or five. If you are losing a cashier to babysit the machines, the store isn't scanning any faster in terms of items per minute. In fact, the store is definitely losing valuable customer interaction and, possibly, efficiency. That is, unless, you have six or more self-checks. In that case, you are a Walmart, and you don't care about customer interaction or service, just price and volume. But that's a whole different rant.

    1. Re:Speaking as one with retail drone experince... by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      But if you're Walmart, then you only have 2 of those 6 self checkouts open. Ever.

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  60. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  61. What about tomatoes? by RandySC · · Score: 1

    Tonight I saw somewhat local tomatoes for USD 0.75 equivalent per kg. They were ugly, but looked like what I would have grown myself. If I had picked at eye level, I would have gotten Dutch imported ones that look absolutely perfect, but cost $8.55/kg.

    They are both red and round, but the expensive ones are a little bigger. Maybe this is why the EU has standards where perfectly good fruit is destroyed because it was a few mm to small or a banana wasn't bent enough. It has to meet an OCR standard. Otherwise, it is like trying to implement OCR for documents from people with bad handwriting.

    --
    Organization: alphabetical, sometimes numerical or messy
    1. Re:What about tomatoes? by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      hm, as a dutch person, maybe I'm qualified to comment on those 'perfect' tomatoes, they *look* perfect but they taste like shit.

      The best tomatoes are the ones that are not force grown to look perfect and be nothing but bags of water, but the ones that grow in real soil under a real sun with a bit of insect damage thrown in for authenticity.

  62. Nice try :) by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Not quite. I usually shop almost daily, and get 12 items or less, and get out through the line before the guy next to me is done fumbling with the self service machine.

    Nice try though.

    1. Re:Nice try :) by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      So your (almost) daily shopping is taking more time & gas than my weekly trip and using the self checkout machine (at the one store I frequent that has them).

    2. Re:Nice try :) by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      I prefer fresh ingredients. I don't eat anything pre packaged so fresh meat/fish/produce is a must. The store is also only a mile from home. Keep trying.

  63. I have seen them by AlchemyX · · Score: 1

    Funny thing but I encountered such scale in Poland, Szczecin city, but not sure which supermarket. I was watching it closely and it was dectecting food properly most of the time. Cool stuff, which makes shopping more fun :).

  64. Re:Wonder how many liberals do self checkout. by chloroquine · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No, silly, the liberals are all off weeding their organic gardens with gardening gloves made by disadvantaged youths from developing countries. They wouldn't be so crass as to shop at a store owned by a corporation which only employs part time workers so as to avoid giving them health insurance. Besides, using the self check out supports the union workers who make the self check out as well as those who install them and maintain them. My point was that there are some direct and immediate advantages to the consumer in the self check out, something which your previous post suggested did not exist. Sorry if my response appeared flippant. As a matter of fact, when there is a single line at the register and it gets really long, I do sometimes try to find the manager and ask if they could open another register. There isn't a self check out in West Philly.

  65. You all miss the point. by BentPenguin · · Score: 1

    I don't work for free. Would you?

    Self serve checkouts don't eliminate a job, they eliminate the cost of getting the job done.
    When I'm asked by a manager if I wouldn't like to get out of line and use a self serve checkout terminal, I tell them I'll gladly do it, but only for some sort of a discount. I've had this conversation several times, and they all got perplexed in a "we never looked at it that way before" look on their face.
    Sure you didn't...

  66. Not impressed. by rew · · Score: 1

    The photos hows strawberries, and the machine suggests all kinds of fruit that have "red" in them.

    Sure it's an improvement over the old system, where you always had to chose from 70 or so choices, but it's not that it only doesn't know the difference between roma tomatoes, and regular ones.

  67. Re:Twice the time, twice the frustration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you do it like in Denmark, you put a "cartoon" picture of the fruit on the scale buttons and press that. Guess thats makes us either really smart or really stupid :)

  68. Get over yourself princess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is your argument: people who didn't try hard at school shouldn't be allowed to have menial jobs becuase my mates who did work hard at school are struggling to find emplyment. Mate, you're a dick. Your mates struggling to find work has absolutley nothing to do with "layabouts" working in supermarkets unless for some reason your mates had their eyes on the lucrative career that is checkout-drone at the local supermarket and were pipped by people you don't like. I don't think you're a fascist, I think you're a dick. In the small (UK) town where I used to live the counters at the supermarkets were staffed by middle-aged and "retired" folks who needed a little bit of extra income. If you introduce automation they lose their jobs. Why is that a good thing?

  69. I've used them - they are crap. by treczoks · · Score: 1

    The local are mall "HUMA" in St.Augustin uses them for some time, and I am not impressed, to say the least.

    Out of curiosity (and because I was shopping), I tried different vegetables and fruits, and about 80% of the time the scale presents a random guess from its database instead of showing that it recognised the item.

    I do not expect that it can tell one kind of apple from the other or that it knows the difference between an organic and el-cheapo tomato. But more often than not it even fails to differenciate between basically round and basically long objects (i.e. it took a lime for a cucumber, or presented me everything but potatos for the potato I put under the camera).

    And as soon as the fruit or vegetable is inside one of those (transparent) bags they provide, the recognition rate goes terminally downhill. The same problem arises if you put several of one item on the scales (i.e. a handful of potatos). And no, I'm not going to weight and pay my potatos individually ;-)

    The only positive aspect is that the menu to manually select the item to weigh is up-to-date. In a tree-like structure, you can choose "fruit or vegetable" (with apples and bananas as extra toplevel items, them being the top selections) and travel down the tree until you reach "Apple, Organic, Granny Smith". The downside is that you need this menu most of the time.