Slashdot Mirror


DNA Bar Coding Finds Mislabeled Sushi

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times reports that Kate Stoeckle and Louisa Strauss, who graduated this year from the Trinity School in Manhattan, took on a freelance science project to check 60 samples of seafood using a simplified genetic fingerprinting technique called DNA Bar Coding to see whether the fish New Yorkers buy is what they think they are getting, and found that one-fourth of the fish samples with identifiable DNA were mislabeled: A piece of sushi sold as the luxury treat white tuna turned out to be Mozambique tilapia, a much cheaper fish that is often raised by farming. Roe supposedly from flying fish was actually from smelt." (More below.) "Seven of nine samples that were called red snapper were mislabeled, and they turned out to be anything from Atlantic cod to Acadian redfish, an endangered species. The project began over dinner with Stoeckle's father, a scientist and early proponent of the use of DNA bar codings. Instead of sequencing the entire genome, bar coders examine a single gene. Dr. Stoeckle said he was excited to see the technology used in a new way and compared the technique to GPS. 'The smaller and cheaper you make something,' he said, 'the more uses it has.'"

285 comments

  1. So..?? by FredFredrickson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are you going to do? Please, don't waste your research and not.. report these! I want a certified sushi organization. There's money to be made!

    --
    Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    1. Re:So..?? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      I want a certified sushi organization. There's money to be made!

      I actually think that's a good idea... and good for the consumer.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    2. Re:So..?? by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

      As a sushi lover, I support this.

    3. Re:So..?? by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I saw this on Yahoo News this morning, I think it was an AP or UPI story so it could have been the same one, but the article I saw didn't even mention sushi, but different species of fish, and named the species that were misrepresented.

      One sample was from an endangered species.

      Seems that it should be a government function, say the FOOD and drug administration, to not only make sure that your food won't kill you but that what you pay for is what you get.

      Restaraunts here sell walleye, but walleye is in dangered and illegal (at least accorsing to a restaurant owner I talked to) so they sell pollack and call it walleye. IMO it should be illegal to put "ribeye steak" on the menu and serve you dog.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    4. Re:So..?? by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, perhaps a certification kit could be made that consumers could use every so often to check on their fishmongers and Sushi bars. Hopefully it wouldn't cost that much but costs would be proportional to the type of food tested. I know some rare sushi can get expensive. I would like to know I'm getting my money's worth. You could then pool the resources and rate different establishments on honesty. Obviously there might be a potential for abuse. So even if i just randomly check and can take the box to the kit comes in with me so they know I'll be looking and give me the right stuff, I would know I got my money's worth and probably find a trusted supplier that I would frequent.

    5. Re:So..?? by Myopic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Did you say "in dangered"?

      That's hilarious. I've never seen that mistake before.

    6. Re:So..?? by idontgno · · Score: 1
      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:So..?? by The+Insane+One · · Score: 1

      Come on. Cut McGrew a little slack. He probably just got back from Felber's or any of the other dozen bars he frequents.

    8. Re:So..?? by Moridineas · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seems that it should be a government function, say the FOOD and drug administration, to not only make sure that your food won't kill you but that what you pay for is what you get.

      I wonder if it's the restaurants pulling one, or their suppliers (or both)

      Restaraunts here sell walleye [wikipedia.org], but walleye is in dangered and illegal (at least accorsing to a restaurant owner I talked to) so they sell pollack [wikipedia.org] and call it walleye. IMO it should be illegal to put "ribeye steak" on the menu and serve you dog.

      Walleye endangered? I've never heard of that...sounds wacky to me, they're all over the great lakes, etc. (correction after looking it up -- the BLUE walleye has been extinct for about 30 years, but there are still lots of regular walleye).

      I had walleye on a stick at the Minnesota state fair--it was great! My dad used to catch them when he was a kid too.

    9. Re:So..?? by dosius · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ain't there truth in advertising laws? Pretty sure there was and that was the name.

      Oh, that's right, Big Business owns the USA and gets to do whatever it pleases, the customers be damned.

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    10. Re:So..?? by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      I think you are somehow getting "walleye" confused with "cod."

      They are both fish, so it's an easy mistake. I guess.

    11. Re:So..?? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 0

      No, the food and drug administration should do the least possible to insure that food and drugs wont kill you. Everything else is advertisement and buyer beware. If you order to both maintain a free market and keep from being crushed under even more government control.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    12. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's McGrew and what's Felber's? Is there a backstory to sm62704's always oddball posts?

    13. Re:So..?? by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fraud is no part of a free market and does not deserve any protection.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    14. Re:So..?? by mooingyak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I used to work with a guy who would routinely write "another words" in emails.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    15. Re:So..?? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      but it is also not the governments responsibility to police labeling. current laws are already in place to say that labels must be correct. It is up to the buyer to to decided whether or not they are being duped.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    16. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fraud is no part of a free market and does not deserve any protection.

      Why do you hate capitalism? It's what made this country what it is.

    17. Re:So..?? by Jerf · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't take a kit like that in the hands of very many consumers to have a radical effect on honest labeling.

      People often point out that capitalism assumes perfect information on the part of the consumer, which doesn't exist, but this is how it largely keeps going; a few consumers can cause enough pain for a liar (with government assist) to keep the market disproportionately honest. Even a single kit-assisted lawsuit could have a surprisingly large effect.

    18. Re:So..?? by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

      I used to work with a woman who would type an email containing Blackberry activation passwords as follows:

      "You're password is v as in victor."

      She didn't realize that (besides the obvious misuse of your/you're), while this may be necessary on the phone, the user can see the password as is when it is in an email and that the words only confuse them.

    19. Re:So..?? by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

      Another words, for all intensive purposes, the TFA in hails deeply.

    20. Re:So..?? by DittoBox · · Score: 1

      You can screw with people on the phone very easily by going phonetic on them without saying "a as in."

      Yes the name is, Delta India Tango Tango Oscar Bravo Oscar X-Ray.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    21. Re:So..?? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is illegal to mis-represent items for sale. You want more legislation than that?

      How about enforcement? I'm not going to perform random DNA samples on my food. But I still expect to be sold what it says on the label/menu, so someone has to do that verification.

    22. Re:So..?? by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fraud falls under criminal law so yes, it is the govt's job to police that. A fraudulent label waiting for someone to fall for it is no different from a fraudster standing at a street corner looking for a suitable mark, except it's much easier to prove that there was intent to deceive with the label.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    23. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another words, for all intensive porpoises, the TFA in hails deeply.

      fixed that for ya...

    24. Re:So..?? by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      It might be a state law. I know for a fact that you cannot have sturgeon in Nebraska, as it's endangered here.

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    25. Re:So..?? by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      Short of doing the test yourself you have no assurance of anything.

      Nobody has to do any verification they choose to do so or they're paid to do so.

      The FDA is an unelected body and cannot be sued by the individual or corporation. It acts almost autonomously and always in it's own best interests not yours.

      What I object to is people calling for more ineffective government bodies rather than face the reality of the situation.

      If you wish to have people test restaurants in this manner then gather together with others and organize a body to do it. You charge both your memebers and restaurants. You publish your methods and your results. Your members and restaurants would flock to you if this was seen as a good thing. Think michellin guide but on a whole new level.

      Of course you won't do the above, not because it's not a good idea but because you are too lazy/cheap and want other people to pick up the tab for what you deem a necessity.

    26. Re:So..?? by chemisus · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a Mozambique tilapia lover, I support this.

      there, fixed that for ya.

    27. Re:So..?? by geobeck · · Score: 1

      Mod parent 50% Insightful, 50% Subtle

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    28. Re:So..?? by vux984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Short of doing the test yourself you have no assurance of anything.

      I trust 'a government body doing testing' more than 'no one doing testing'.

      The FDA is an unelected body and cannot be sued by the individual or corporation. It acts almost autonomously and always in it's own best interests not yours.

      I've dealt with the FDA in the course of work, and while they make operate in their best interests, and they burden business with a shit-ton of make-work; but they don't seem particularly corrupt to me. Bureaucratic and arbitrary, but not corrupt.

      If you wish to have people test restaurants in this manner then gather together with others and organize a body to do it.

      I already did that, I formed a government, and then elected representatives to form bodies like the FDA for precisely this purpose.

      You charge both your memebers and restaurants. You publish your methods and your results. Your members and restaurants would flock to you if this was seen as a good thing.

      They do indeed see it as a good thing. If we deny them a license to sell goods or operate, they are finished. If we find they have violated the laws we have passed they are punished.

      Think michellin guide but on a whole new level.

      I'm already operating on a whole other level.

      Of course you won't do the above, not because it's not a good idea but because you are too lazy/cheap and want other people to pick up the tab for what you deem a necessity.

      I do pick up the tab. I pay a healthy dose in taxes to fund these government regulatory bodies.

      And at the end of the day, I don't WANT a voluntary organization that restaurants sign up to. I don't want to to go into a market or restaurant and have to check the for logos and certifications just to be confident that when I order Alberta beef tenderloin that I'm not served mexican donkey.

      I want standards to be mandatory and enforced nationwide.

    29. Re:So..?? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      If you need a kit to know if your getting your moneys worth, you probably wouldn't be getting your money's worth, even it you get the real stuff.

    30. Re:So..?? by Hyppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      For all intensive purposes, he could of meant it the way it was typed.

    31. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like some more government in my sushi please.

    32. Re:So..?? by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      Go old school, with the pre-NATO phonetic alphabet. It even screws up most military-types.

      Your name is Dog-Item-Tare-Tare-Oboe-Baker-Oboe- X-ray.

    33. Re:So..?? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      I know some rare sushi can get expensive. I would like to know I'm getting my money's worth.

      I thought that's what your taste buds were for.

      --

      Question everything

    34. Re:So..?? by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      I think this is good thing also.
      We need to protect the endangered species that poachers use in reverse. Like Talipia for White Tuna.
      However, the money for getting illegal items is so high that poachers will do anything to get these so we need to stop the market for these illegal items. Stopping people who have money and willing to pay for it first order. If they won't pay for these items then the poachers will have no incentive to poach.
      We need DNS bar coding so we can truly what we are getting.

    35. Re:So..?? by Darkfred · · Score: 1

      Ahh i see we have a liberatarian here. When the revolution comes we are going to remove the FDA. Instead we will make idiots like you line up to test all the canned food for botulism and meat for salmonella. You see this way we kill two birds with one stone.

      Seriously though? how the hell do you think this would work? Regular people are not equipped to do testing of all their food. There are contaminents that are tasteless and don't kill for months or years. (iron, mercury etc.)
      And the concept of an anarcho-capitalist honor system is complete fantasy. In real life companies have only to change their names and move on. These rules are there for a reason.

      --
      ----- 70% of all statistics are completely made up.
    36. Re:So..?? by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with what you want or do not want. That's your business as is what you consider fair in taxation.

      But you are not paying for your fair share and you are asking me to pick up the short fall for something I do not want.

      Where are my wants/needs taken into account in your model? They are not plain and simple. You get what you want and bugger everyone else who has to pay for something they do not want. You may call it democracy I call it theft plain and simple. Equal rights for all both those in the majority and those in the minority.

      I also deal with the FDA on a near daily basis. The make work is their way of ensuring they have a job and the work they make others do is not even solving the problems it was introduced to fix. I'm all for a voluntary FDA but never will I agree that an autonomous body works in anything than it's own interest.

      I sincerely doubt you formed a government. You probably played a very small role in casting a vote that you hope in some small way influenced the outcome. Still that's better than 60% of the population! Hang on, a system that excludes 60% of the results is a democracy?

      Again you want national standards, fine, I do not. Yet my money is stolen from me to fund your wants. If you want it so bad you pay for it and leave the rest of us alone.

    37. Re:So..?? by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      I lived in Taiwan for a while and it is illegal to serve dog there, although that doesn't stop certain shady places from selling "good smelling meat", which is just a codeword meaning you want to eat dog. Never tried it myself but that's what the natives tell me.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    38. Re:So..?? by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm generally in agreement with your point, but what if it's the first time you've ever tried it, and you honestly don't know what it's supposed to taste like? You might lose out on an immensely delicious dish just because the first time you ordered it you got sea rat instead.

    39. Re:So..?? by blantonl · · Score: 1, Funny

      For all intents and purposes I suspect you meant to say "all intents and purposes." Otherwise that is one strong purpose, or set of purposes.... you are proposing.

      --
      Lindsay Blanton
      RadioReference.com
    40. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Japanese government did try to make such organization. Dubbed as sushi police by the media.

      http://www.maff.go.jp/gaisyoku/kaigai/english.html

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/23/AR2006112301158.html

    41. Re:So..?? by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      Good guess, but yes I'm of a libertarian/constitutionalist bent. What gave it away :-)

      Regular people currently do test their food. It takes time and costs money but they are willing to do so themselves because they feel it is important.

      Now you, like me, are not that extreme.

      Testing for most toxins is a simple test but is iron now considered a toxin? Lead and mercury but good old Ferrous?

      But if the FDA was not a governmental department it's role would be performed by a private sector organization.

      But I guarantee more people would die with out the FDA. But your odds of dieing would be directly related to how much care you took with sourcing the food you put in your body. That seems fair to me.

      The reason that companies can do what they want now is down to the stupid laws in particular removing individuals in a company their responsibility to their fellow man. Fix that and companies would return to what they were originally planned to be. Large corporations would not be possible, small family firms would flourish.

      Now all joking aside if your family/neighbors died of food poisoning caused by the local slaughter house not implementing sanitary conditions just how long would the owner of said slaughter house remain above ground?

      Yes it's harsh but it's a damn sight fairer than what we have now.

         

    42. Re:So..?? by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this directly applies, but I live in the Vancouver B.C. area. There's a group of restaurants that are part of a locally-based cetifying program that the fish they bought are not endangered species and (I think) the type of fish served tends to focus on farmed fish. At the least, in this way you won't be ordering Shark shashimi etc. I don't know that there are any sushi restaurants that are part of the program. Some of the Japanese restaurants are still offering shark on the menu.

    43. Re:So..?? by Arterion · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Who cares what is it as long as it tastes good. This is snobbery at its finest.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    44. Re:So..?? by D'Sphitz · · Score: 4, Funny

      woosh

    45. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about hot dogs? It is not even real dog!!!! When I learnt that i was outraged.

    46. Re:So..?? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I guess we need to have the invisible hand of the market learn how to operate this DNA testing shit?

    47. Re:So..?? by warsql · · Score: 1

      There is also the option of an organization such as underwriters laboratory. How often do you end with dangerous, defective electical devices?

      --
      878659 - yep its prime.
    48. Re:So..?? by warsql · · Score: 1

      With a kit like that and your local 6pm news, why would you need the government involved?

      --
      878659 - yep its prime.
    49. Re:So..?? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      What I object to is people calling for more ineffective government bodies rather than face the reality of the situation.

      /quote>

      Who said anything about calling for ineffective government bodies? I would like some EFFECTIVE government bodies to work on this stuff, but shit-for-brains Republicans and Libertarians keep trying to prove that it's impossible by either appointing the dumbest possible people, or criminals, etc., etc. to offices, or pointing to exclusively those types of proof. Telling me that a moron cannot effectively regulate something is not exactly news.

    50. Re:So..?? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that's not how society works. If I tried to get my money back for things you want that I consider stupid (like roads, for example), and 10 people each of us know all did that, all of us would be nowhere.

      In summation: STFU.

    51. Re:So..?? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I see it's not just me that had trouble getting DNA to come out of my fingers rather than DNS. :)

    52. Re:So..?? by vux984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and you are asking me to pick up the short fall for something I do not want.

      That's part of being part of a democratic society. We disagree, we take a vote, we act. Someone is always unhappy about something.

      I think overall that we do in fact want, as a collective society, to set standards on food quality and to enforce accuracy in labeling so we are going to enact an agency of some sort to do that. Every country I'm familiar with has such rules and enforcers. So even if we had a perfect democracy and you could call a referendum tomorrow and have a well informed population vote on it, you'd probably find we'd end up choosing to have such an enforcement body.

      Granted the actual democracy pretty much sucks, and I don't think ANYONE wants the FDA in its current form, but the solution isn't to abolish them. And even if we got rid of them, we'd likely just create another one shortly thereafter. Its what the majority wants.

    53. Re:So..?? by spike2131 · · Score: 1

      > If you want it so bad you pay for it and leave the rest of us alone.

      Please name a functional society that actually works like that. Stone age tribes don't count.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    54. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess... You're not the sharpest knife in the drawer?

    55. Re:So..?? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      no, it's what made it what it was. It has become some kind of Socialist playground since WWII. Have a vote, "We need money if you give up just 2% of your wages we can win the war." Now it's 33%. Obama wants 50+% Why even bother with a job, at some point I'll just wait for the government to assign me my tasks and provide me my daily rations.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    56. Re:So..?? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Granted the actual democracy pretty much sucks, and I don't think ANYONE wants the FDA in its current form, but the solution isn't to abolish them. And even if we got rid of them, we'd likely just create another one shortly thereafter. Its what the majority wants.

      And this would play exactly to my plan. There would no longer be full time federal government employees. They would all be on mid-term contract 1-2 years with no option to renew, until after 50% of the time has passed, into the same position. All government programs would have a sunset clause. Each year a program will be required to go back to vote with an increase of 1% per year. (simple majority to start 51% after first year, 60% after 10 years etc... up to ~90%) It should be obvious after a program has been running that it is doing well as intended otherwise it needs to be removed and rebuilt from scratch and entirely new people.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    57. Re:So..?? by ktappe · · Score: 1

      but it is also not the governments responsibility to police labeling.

      On the contrary, it's ONLY the government's job. What on earth do you think governments are for?? The government, by definition, has a monopoly on police. Or do you want every Tom, Dick, & Harry to be starting his own police force to whose whims you are subject??

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    58. Re:So..?? by interactive_civilian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So says Arterion:

      Exactly! Who cares what is it as long as it tastes good. This is snobbery at its finest.

      So, you don't mind being charged double or triple the cost of something because it is labeled as something more expensive? As long as it tastes good, that isn't a issue for you?

      --
      "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    59. Re:So..?? by pseudometrometeorgin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I eat much sushi, and have been ripped off before. For example, flying fish roe (aka tobiko), looks very similar to smelt roe (aka masago). The difference is that tobiko is much tastier and much more expensive than masago. Some establishments assume I can't tell the difference, but I can. Usually, when I correct their mistake, I am compensated with some free sushi.

    60. Re:So..?? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Seems that it should be a government function

      Why is that ? This article deals with fraud, fraud can be settled in court. A court system is not always been linked to a government.

      A much better idea by the first poster, an organization certifying sushi would be much better, and the cost would be on sushi eaters rather than on tax payers.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    61. Re:So..?? by Walkingshark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, for example, if someone slips some corn product into a food product and doesn't put it on the label because "buyer beware" then when I, a person with an allergy to corn, eats it and gets sick/dies, guess I'm just SOL? I guess so, in your world. I guess it would also be ok for me to pop your head like a melon from 1000 yards and then take all your stuff, since you're so against government regulation of private behavior.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    62. Re:So..?? by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Good point. I'm guessing you spun the fiber optic that connects you to the backbone yourself. I bet you installed it with tools you forged yourself. I bet you paved every piece of raod you ever drove on yourself. I bet you sew all your own clothes out of fibers from plants you grew yourself, using needles which you produced by smelting ore which you mined yourself, using tools which you cast from bronze which you also mined/refined and worked. I bet you can do everything by yourself and don't need the government or society for anything.

      The rest of us have fucking brains and prefer efficiency, rule of law, and the other benefits of civilization.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    63. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news: baby back ribs are not from the backs of babies!

    64. Re:So..?? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      And.. what, precisely, is wrong with eating dog? Seriously? Pigs are smarter than dogs, and we've got no problem eating them.

      I know, you might not like the idea of consuming Fido, but neither would you eat a pet pig. Unless you were live-or-die starving, but that goes for everything.

      Is there some health reason why canis lupus is verboten?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    65. Re:So..?? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Guvernment haz a flavr?!?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    66. Re:So..?? by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      I really don't get this attitude. If I got together a group of people and organized a body to do this testing. Guess fucking what!!! That's a government agency.

      A bunch of citizens got to together and decided to contribute money(taxes) for activities performed by a body on their behalf.

      You small government folks think that you can get rid of government and replace it with government.

      This is what government is, it's the people getting together to manage stuff. Is the FDA ineffectual, yeah, but is it better to have them than it would be without them. In this day and age where it's a lot easier to sneak stuff by and testing is a lot harder, yeah.

    67. Re:So..?? by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      You don't get the choice about picking up the tab because you're a cheap selfish idiot.

      You live in a society where for the most part you don't have to worry about dieing every time you go out to eat because the kitchen out the back of that flashy restaurant you went to is covered in filth you didn't get to see.

      You live in a society where you can be fairly certain that the drugs you are prescribed aren't going to be worse than the disease they're trying to cure, and where you get told about the side effects that are known.

      You can be fairly certain that the fruit you buy isn't going to be so full of pesticides that it's going to give you and your kids and your kid's kids birth defects.

      You benefit from all these things, and from what all these things have allowed western society to become. You benefit every day from the fact that your government builds roads, and controls what gets pumped into the air or poured into the water.

      The only reason we can both post on slashdot today is because the government was willing to "waste" tax dollars on something which might have never been successful and which certainly wasn't profitable for years after most companies would have given up on it.

      Our society is the way that it is because the government spends money on things which we as individuals or corporations wouldn't. Yes our government is often wasteful, and at times it is appropriate to complain about them. But until you're willing to give up on all the benefits you get out of the government(and that includes anything that was transported over a road anywhere, any drug that has had any reasonable clinical testing, any use of a river or land that some greedy company might have poured toxic waste into or onto, and eating any food you personally haven't tested for safety, then you can just shut the hell up.

      I'm sick to the teeth of libertarians benefiting from modern society and not wanting to pay for it.

    68. Re:So..?? by PensivePeter · · Score: 1

      Surely the whole point of the capitalist market economy is that something is worth as much as someone is prepared to pay for it. "Caveat emptor" - up to the client to decide whether they are so anal that they want to know the DNA composition or not - me, I'll settle for Salmon eggs because I'm not interested in the supposed higher quality of Beluga caviar with its price tag. But I will pay more for some oysters if they claim to be better than others - I can't always tell the difference or be sure but "wisdom of crowds" suggest that if too many clients feel scammed or overpriced, the price is going to eb forced down anyway...and dining is too precious to be wasted on such details...

    69. Re:So..?? by caluml · · Score: 1

      My favourite (which works best over the phone/face to face):

      p as in psychology, k as in knight, g as in gnome, x as in xylophone.

    70. Re:So..?? by anilg · · Score: 1

      Nutritional values not considered, the answer to your question is Yes.

      Better tasting food cost more than the others. Whats hard to get about that?

      --
      http://dilemma.gulecha.org - My philospohical short film.
    71. Re:So..?? by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      No, it's simply a cultural reason. Egyptians wouldn't eat cats, we won't eat dogs, Indians won't eat cows and other cultures won't eat horses (which I for one like to eat from time to time). Health reasons are never a concern, most animals can be consumed pretty safely as long as you cook them well. But every culture has its own little quirks :P

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    72. Re:So..?? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      but it is also not the governments responsibility to police labeling. current laws are already in place to say that labels must be correct. It is up to the buyer to to decided whether or not they are being duped.

      The buyer frequently has no practical way to determine whether or not they are being duped before the fact. Further, when said 'duping' can result in death or serious injury, it is most certainly the Government's job to get involved.

    73. Re:So..?? by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is there some health reason why canis lupus is verboten?

      Since dog meat is illegal to sell [in that location], it is a given that any of it being sold has not been subject to any sort of meaningful quality control. Which means you might be eating a purebred St Bernard, strangely missing from the household of the richest man in the area, or you might be eating whichever mangy, disease-ridden, mongrel was unlucky enough to be in the alley behind the restaurant twenty minutes ago.

      So, yes, in places where dog is illegal to sell there are almost certainly health reasons why it is a bad idea.

    74. Re:So..?? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Surely the whole point of the capitalist market economy is that something is worth as much as someone is prepared to pay for it. "Caveat emptor" - up to the client to decide whether they are so anal that they want to know the DNA composition or not - me, I'll settle for Salmon eggs because I'm not interested in the supposed higher quality of Beluga caviar with its price tag.

      The problem is people are buying Salmon eggs, but being told it is (and being charged for) Beluga caviar.

      Which is fraud, plain and simple.

    75. Re:So..?? by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

      My favourite was spelling "millennium" to someone over the phone, who kept asking "minellium?"

      M as in Moron, I as in idiot, L as in lackwit, L as in lackwit, E as in stupid, N as in numbskull, N as in numbskull, I as in idiot, U as in utterly stupid, M as in moron.

      She didn't clue in to the "E". :)

    76. Re:So..?? by schon · · Score: 1

      eats it and gets sick/dies, guess I'm just SOL?

      You'll be SOL, but your family can sue the manufacturer and be set for life. If this happens enough, producers who don't label their products will be forced out of business, and the ones who did label properly will prosper - the free market solves all of the world's problems!

      So some people will die in the meantime - that's the price of a healthy economy! Only leftist pinko-commie-terrists-democrats would think that human life outweighs the benefits of a Free Market.

      Why do you hate America?

    77. Re:So..?? by Bananenrepublik · · Score: 1

      Only leftist pinko-commie-terrists-democrats would think that human life outweighs the benefits of a Free Market.

      You forgot "christian" in that list :)

    78. Re:So..?? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      With capitalism, the other biggest point is that you get what you paid for. Whoever is willing to pay for something is willing to do so because he is getting something specific. If you purchased a car with a blown motor from an auction and they delivered a wagon with a dead horse, that isn't buyer beware, that is outright fraud. A customer has just as much right to get what they are promised as anyone has a right to sell something. And when you use a different fish, or substitute something that wasn't originally represented in the deal and fail to disclose that, then the transaction isn't capitalism anymore, it is outright fraud.

      In your caviar example, that would be fraud because whoever purchased them would have done so at whatever price based on the representation that the fish eggs were Beluga caviar or one of the other high dollar caviars not a less common salmon or catfish egg. Therefore someone has been cheated.

    79. Re:So..?? by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

      That was so funny, I peed a little.

    80. Re:So..?? by gluis · · Score: 1

      and he probably meant: 'he could HAVE meant...' i don't know what 'could of' means. (btw, i don't know why it sa

    81. Re:So..?? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Ummm, yea. Except it's called civil court.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    82. Re:So..?? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Which is why I said specifically beyond insuring that it wont kill you there is nothing for the FDA to do. Fraud is all ready illegal. If you have been duped, call the police, if they don't do anything sue.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    83. Re:So..?? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Not when it's criminal fraud.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    84. Re:So..?? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      So what about allergies, the FDA can't ban substances that people might be allergic to but without clear labelling it can kill people. There's one guy in this discussion claiming to be allergic to all non-salmon fish so this case could definitely apply for "potentially fatal".

      Also what's the threshold for "kill", should it kill you after one meal? Is it bad if it kills you over twenty years? What about things that just cripple you instead of killing you?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    85. Re:So..?? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Which is why I said specifically beyond insuring that it wont kill you there is nothing for the FDA to do. Fraud is all ready illegal. If you have been duped, call the police, if they don't do anything sue.

      Some of us prefer a more pro-active stance when health and safety are involved.

      Additionally, as mentioned, the buyer frequently has no practical way of determining whether they are being 'duped'.

    86. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walleye are not endangered at all. Of course I sell them at www.walleyedirect.com so I may be biased.

      Very common in Midwest and all of Canada.

      Blue Walleye are indeed extinct and there are many X-prixe type awards for anyone able to produce one. (for reproduction--not for eating)

    87. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all intensive purposes, he could of meant it the way it was typed.

      I think you mean "intents and purposes"?
      and that's "could have"

    88. Re:So..?? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Govenment's function is to protect you from me. Otherwise there's no need for government at all.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    89. Re:So..?? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      That's what a restaraunt owner told me last year, but I just looked it up on wikipedia and google and found nothing about it being endangered. So I assume I was lied to, or the restaraunt owner was misinformed.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    90. Re:So..?? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I can't beleive I did that in the first place or missed it on preview; boy is my face red. I did say "endangered" first, though.

      I must not have had enough coffee. It's usually Monday when I make a stupid mistake like that.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    91. Re:So..?? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I'm McGrew, Felber's is a bar I journal about. My journals may be NSFW; usually has vulgarity and obscenity, often sex and violence.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    92. Re:So..?? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it.

      When the Civil War erupted, the Congress passed the Revenue Act of 1861, which restored earlier excises taxes and imposed a tax on personal incomes. The income tax was levied at 3 percent on all incomes higher than $800 a year. This tax on personal income was a new direction for a Federal tax system based mainly on excise taxes and customs duties. Certain inadequacies of the income tax were quickly acknowledged by Congress and thus none was collected until the following year.

      By the spring of 1862 it was clear the war would not end quickly and with the Union's debt growing at the rate of $2 million daily it was equally clear the Federal government would need additional revenues. On July 1, 1862 the Congress passed new excise taxes on such items as playing cards, gunpowder, feathers, telegrams, iron, leather, pianos, yachts, billiard tables, drugs, patent medicines, and whiskey. Many legal documents were also taxed and license fees were collected for almost all professions and trades.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    93. Re:So..?? by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      w..h..o..o..s..h

    94. Re:So..?? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      So, you don't mind being charged double or triple the cost of something because it is labeled as something more expensive?

      If you can't tell the difference, or the expensive one doesn't taste better to you, you're better off not buying it.

      --

      Question everything

    95. Re:So..?? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      I would like to try some sea rat.

      After all, I like sea ants... Insects? Shrimp!

      --

      Question everything

    96. Re:So..?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a common mistake. It is "For all intents and purposes".

  2. I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito... by Eg0Death · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...can you check the DNA in that? I hope it's not anyone I know.

    --
    Why is this thus? What is the reason for this thusness?
  3. Damn.. by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 1

    I wish I knew which sushi restaurants to avoid, it appears to be most of them.

    1. Re:Damn.. by sjhs · · Score: 1

      As if we needed another reason.

  4. Someone is gonna be in trouble. by Tenrosei · · Score: 1

    "Acadian redfish, an endangered species." Right now Animal Activist Are break down the scientist's door asking them what restaurant the fish was found in.

    1. Re:Someone is gonna be in trouble. by kd5zex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Judge to convicted sushi restaurant proprietor:"Out of curiosity, what does Acadian Redfish taste like anyway?"
      Convicted sushi restaurant proprietor:"A lot like Atlantic Salmon."

    2. Re:Someone is gonna be in trouble. by Thaddeaus · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up funny!

  5. Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by dakirw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It'll be interesting to see whether the sushi shops or fish vendors mislabel on purpose. There's powerful incentive to misidentify if you can get away with it - substitute some cheap fish for premium ones, like the premium tuna example in the article. Also interesting that the students found endangered fish samples as well...

    1. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To have that many mislabelings, most of them must not be mistakes. As the article points out, though, it's not certain whether the mislabeling happens at the store/restaurant itself or earlier in the supply chain--although one would imagine that at least the sushi restaurants themselves would be able to easily tell the difference between the real stuff and the knock-offs.

    2. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by perlchild · · Score: 1

      I imagine the technique could be spread to locate the upstream fish provider who illegally caught the endangered fish... Is there any movement in that direction?

    3. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "although one would imagine that at least the sushi restaurants themselves would be able to easily tell the difference between the real stuff and the knock-offs"

      Why would you say that? Can you tell the difference between a slab of kobe beef and regular supermarket steak without either tasting it or looking at the packaging? Fish are fish, and I daresay there are many species that look more or less identical, pespecially once they've been butchered.

    4. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, what are the Japanese names of the fish in question?

      After all, the North American "Trout" is really closer to a salmon than the European "Trout". A North American "Bass" is really just a big sunfish. People came over here and used the old fish names for critters of similar size and habits.

      The "Chilean Sea Bass" was a deliberate renaming of the Patagonian Toothfish to have a more commercially desirable name.

      So, all in all there are at least five different distinct families of fish that are called "bass".

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course there is, as the article (and even the summary) indicates. This problem has existed for some time. Various cooking shows (no doubt watched by these kids parents) have done "Fresh Fish Shopping" exposes, identical to these kids. Even the forensic analysis of fish DNA is standardized within the wildlife management sector. In other words, how is this news?

    6. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Amouth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you can tell the diffrence by looking at it and touching it. (you can tell through gloves or thin plastic)

      if you work with fish enough - you should be able to tell what fish you are working with by just looking at it and maybe touching it.

      while i wouldn't know some exotic south specific fish - any that are found off NC i could identify quite easily - then again i used to work at a fish mart. and fished alot growing up.. so i was exposed to it.

      i would expect any sushi chef worth a damn to be able to do the same for what he is serving.

      and as for the diffrense between kobe beef and normal stuff you get.. again you can tell the diffrence by just touching it - if you know what your are looking for

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    7. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 1

      It's news because I say it's news.

    8. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by clodney · · Score: 1

      Not quite a comparable case, but there was a mini scandal here in Minnesota recently when it turned out that in many cases what a restaurant sold as walleye (a local favorite) was actually zander.

      If I recall correctly, most of the restaurants put the blame on their suppliers, who sold them filets as opposed to whole fish. Without buying whole fish, the claim that the restaurant was duped is quite easy to believe.

      If the sushi shops are not buying whole fish, it would be easy to be deceived. But I have to believe that any quality sushi restaurant starts with a whole fish, and in that case the mislabeling would have to be blamed on the restaurant.

    9. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you say that? Can you tell the difference between a slab of kobe beef and regular supermarket steak without either tasting it or looking at the packaging?

      Any chefs worth their salt WILL be able to tell, that's their job - to examine and sample deliveries before accepting them. For these 'slips' to happen, either 1) the chef is incompetent/2nd rate, or 2) he's taking orders from the top to watch the budget and make the substitutions.

    10. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, most of the restaurants put the blame on their suppliers, who sold them filets as opposed to whole fish. Without buying whole fish, the claim that the restaurant was duped is quite easy to believe.

      And to safeguard their reputations, they probably need to start DNA-testing their purchases. A statistically-valid random sampling scheme wouldn't cost outrageously much, and being able to say that your tai is really red snapper ("Red snapper... very tasty!") would be (to coin a phrase) priceless.

      If the sushi shops are not buying whole fish, it would be easy to be deceived. But I have to believe that any quality sushi restaurant starts with a whole fish, and in that case the mislabeling would have to be blamed on the restaurant.

      Damn straight. Even in the arid midst of the Great American Desert, you can get good sushi and bad sushi, and with the good sushi you can watch the chef slice the neta right off the fish. I wouldn't have it any other way, and no one should.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can attest to that, from the meat side. I used to work as a butcher's assistant - sure I didn't man the saw much, but I arranged the platters and handled it enough. You can tell quite readily between even normal meat and premium meat - to say nothing of organic gold like Kobe.

    12. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Please... they're MUTATED Chilean Sea Bass...

      And they're ill-tempered.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    13. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by kungfugleek · · Score: 4, Funny

      You could also tell by the way it smelt.

    14. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by geobeck · · Score: 1

      There's powerful incentive to misidentify if you can get away with it - substitute some cheap fish for premium ones...

      Years ago, I used to work in a U-Brew wine place. The owner had a low opinion of her non-regular customers, and she used to have us prepare cheap 4-week wine kits when the customer ordered a more expensive 6-week kit.

      It started when a customer wanted a wine we didn't have in stock, but quickly became a regular money saver. That was my cue to quit.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    15. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      Heh... he floundered into that one.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    16. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by zen_sky · · Score: 1

      For all intensive purposes, "south specific" is a geographic location? Add that to the list of neo-homophonics, eexcelent!

    17. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      Kobe beef is easy. It looks like marble. I would think it would be much harder, though, to tell the difference between similar fish species.

    18. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But I have to believe that any quality sushi restaurant starts with a whole fish, and in that case the mislabeling would have to be blamed on the restaurant.

      That depends on the fish. Salmon sure, but not tuna. An Albacore Tuna is 20-45 lbs and doesn't stay sushi grade for very long. I buy my sushi fish (for home) from a market that cuts up it's own fish. They'll answer any questions, like where it came from, when it arrived, when it was cut, etc. As the top fish store in town, they'd be fools to try to fake anything. If you eat fresh tuna, in the city, they are probably the ones who cut it, unless it was distributed frozen.

    19. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by ThaddaeusV · · Score: 1

      Common names are vague, disorganised, and often misleading. Latin names are not. Unfortunately, not many fishmarkets label their wares in Latin, but some do, and for any given piece of fish I'll bet you that at some point in the logistical train from ocean to market *someone* unambiguously identified it and represented to a buyer as a particular species. So, the study is certainly asking a reasonable question.

      --
      Thaddaeus A. Vick, Speaker for the Coyote
    20. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by HebrewToYou · · Score: 1

      For all intensive purposes

      Intents AND purposes. Don't be an idiot.

      --
      I'm not popular enough to be different.

      Homer Simpson, The Simpsons

    21. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Smurf · · Score: 1

      Can you tell the difference between a slab of kobe beef and regular supermarket steak without either tasting it or looking at the packaging?

      Heck, yes! Kobe beef is beautifully marbled, much more than any cut of regular beef. Just look at this photo:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:4_Kobe_Beef,_Kobe_Japan.jpg
      If you get THAT as regular steak in your supermarket... I want to move to your city!

      And that's within one species. People who really know about fish can easily tell apart meat from species that look identical to us by just looking and touching it.

      What this article shows is the sorry state of the gastronomic industry in the US: here even the so-called sushi chefs can be fooled. Hmmm... too bad...

    22. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooogh

    23. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

      Of course it is on purpose. In Japan every so often a mislabeling scandal pops up regarding some mislabeled dairy or meat...

      This story is about sushi because the scientists chose sushi for their project, but don't be surprised if 1/4th of everything in the supermarket is mislabeled.

      It is more common than anyone would like to believe, and insiders of the business know all about it. When you are in a low margin business with a lot of ways to cheat, you cheat.

    24. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Apocros · · Score: 1

      sure, kobe (wagyu) beef would be much more "marbled". the visual difference, especially uncooked, is quite striking.

      --
      "onward!" cried the copper man, little knowing brass corrupts...
    25. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Common names are vague, disorganised, and often misleading. Latin names are not.

      Latin names can be wrong too. As the OP alluded to, trout were once considered distinct from salmon and char. The fish were categorized into these groups based on morphological and behavioral differences (trout = Salmo, salmon = Oncorhynchus, char = Salvelinus ).

      Then DNA testing became available and totally destroyed the well-established taxonomy. Rainbow trout, which for centuries had been the archetypical example of a trout, turned out to be more closely related to the salmons. Atlantic salmon were a trout. Lake trout in the Great Lakes were a char. Click on the above Wikipedia links and you can tell how much damage was done to the taxonomy by comparing the common names to the genus. Rainbow trout (aka steelhead) which were formerly Salmo mykiss are now Oncorhynchus mykiss.

    26. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by tuomoks · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that picture link - I haven't seen good meat in 30 years! Used to be common when I was young - now, forget it, but I'm still looking. When was last time you got a rare (of course) filet mignon, cut with a fork? Mostly sashimi today - easier to find and, actually, no very expensive in some places.

    27. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      For all intensive purposes, "south specific" is a geographic location?
      Add that to the list of neo-homophonics, eexcelent!

      Did you just fucking actually type "for all intensive purposes" AND try to hold an intelligent conversation at the same time?

      Fuck. Seriously. Fuck. Stop posting.

    28. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by zen_sky · · Score: 1

      Obviously you weren't here two days ago when "for all intensive purposes" was enshrined in the /. lexicon. (at least in my book!) So re-facking-lax, I was trying to be funny! :)

    29. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha...I get it, smelt!

  6. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by samcan · · Score: 1

    I hope it's not anyone I know.

    Reminds me of the Pearls Before Swine comic strip where Pig says that "BLTs taste so ... good."

  7. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Freeside1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    come to think of it, I haven't seen the taco bell chihuahua in a while...

  8. Big Surprise by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is anyone really surprised that a business is selling cheaper fish off as a more expensive one.

    --
    "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
    1. Re:Big Surprise by zarkill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here in Tampa, Florida area, this was recently a very big deal. One of the things Tampa is famous for is Grouper, and several well-known restaurants were found to be serving cheaper fish instead of Grouper.

      6 out of 11 restaurants served cheaper fish.

      According to that article though it's hard to tell whether the deception was intentional, and even if so, who was deceptive: the restaurant, the wholesaler, etc.

    2. Re:Big Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not. That's the American way!

    3. Re:Big Surprise by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Not me. Here in Florida, there was a huge "scandal" over Tilapia being passed off as Grouper and the state actually enforcing "truth in labeling" laws for such things, handing out fines to offenders. It's why a Grouper sandwich costs so much here, Grouper is in shorter supply and they used to simply label Tilapia as Grouper.

    4. Re:Big Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily instead of buying Grouper you can apparently buy the cheaper Tilapia instead.

    5. Re:Big Surprise by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's interesting is that it actually takes a DNA test to determine this. For the most part, people can't taste the difference between these fish. So, in these high-end restaurants, you're really just buying into an illusion. I wonder if foodies and other food connoisseurs would be able to tell the difference.

    6. Re:Big Surprise by Applekid · · Score: 1

      What's interesting is that it actually takes a DNA test to determine this. For the most part, people can't taste the difference between these fish. So, in these high-end restaurants, you're really just buying into an illusion. I wonder if foodies and other food connoisseurs would be able to tell the difference.

      Not really that interesting. Bait and switch (pun unintentional but welcome) is a pretty damning charge so you'd better make sure your evidence is better than subjective flavor opinions from imperfect humans.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    7. Re:Big Surprise by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      We secretly replaced this group's sushi with Folger's crystals. Let's see if they notice...

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:Big Surprise by illegalcortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, yes and no. With any dish, ingredients are going to vary in quality and the cooking/preparing will also vary. So you go into a restaurant, order Red Snapper and after eating it you thought it was just OK. Maybe the chef didn't know what they were doing. Maybe that particular fish just wasn't a good specimen. Maybe it's been frozen a bit long. Maybe it's a bit past the sell by date.

      Or maybe it's not Red Snapper.

      In my personal experience, I've had really good Red Snapper, and I've not so good Red Snapper. Was the difference because of the former factors, or because of the latter? Not having a raw sample and a DNA test, I couldn't tell you for sure.

    9. Re:Big Surprise by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Isn't bait and switch when you advertise a deal but upon arrival tell the customer it's no longer available but there's this slightly more expensive alternative available? Mislabelling the goods you sell is fraud.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    10. Re:Big Surprise by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      The proper connoisseurs should, though I'm sure there are many poseurs.

    11. Re:Big Surprise by ThousandStars · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Freakonomics just had a post about wine drinkers and taste: "Their conclusion: fancy people with lots of training can tell cheap wine from expensive wine, but regular people cannot." Interesting stuff.

      I used the same article as a component of a short essay on artistic taste.

    12. Re:Big Surprise by Born2bwire · · Score: 1

      We secretly replaced this group's sushi with Folger's crystals. Let's see if they notice...

      Excuse me sir, did you know you're actually drinking Folger's decaf coffee crystals?

      What?

      Those are Folger's decaf coffee crystals. .... YOU SON OF A BITCH! You lied to me!

    13. Re:Big Surprise by geobeck · · Score: 1

      I've had really good Red Snapper, and I've not so good Red Snapper.

      Any time I've had no-so-good red snapper, I've gone to my doctor for one of the 'special' tests...

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    14. Re:Big Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the most part, people can't taste the difference between these fish.

      Or maybe you've never had the real one before, because restaurants keep selling you cheap stuff with the wrong label. How would I know if I can tell the difference or not? Am I supposed to have caught my own first just so I can tell if the chef is a fraud?

      So, in these high-end restaurants, you're really just buying into an illusion.

      In the case of the Acadian redfish, I think we all hoped it was more than just an "illusion" that we weren't eating an endangered species.

    15. Re:Big Surprise by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      They say if it smells like fish, it's already gone bad...

    16. Re:Big Surprise by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Penn and Teller "Bullshit" did explore that they could make a $5 meal with a $3 bottle of wine fool all but a very few food critiques with a great presentation at a classy restaurant.

      Though the industry should want some policing. IE I bought "good" sushi, and liked it, but not more than a good steak. So I don't buy sushi. Perhaps I just got screwed, and buying the right stuff would make me a sushi lover.

    17. Re:Big Surprise by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

      Well, obviously the restaurant will point the finger to the wholesaler who will point the finger to their supplier who will point the finger to the farmer, who is just honestly shipping his orders.

    18. Re:Big Surprise by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's amazing how much of the popularity (and price) of seafood relies on its cachet rather than its taste. In colonial times, lobster was considered trash and people resented having to eat it too much. Pollock and haddock were considered bycatch in the pursuit of cod. Until the cod fisheries were wiped out and the fishermen needed to find something else to catch. Now the pollack and haddock are the staple foodfishes (if you've ever eaten frozen fish sticks or a fish sandwich, it's probably one of these fish). As halibut declined in numbers, sole and flounder were marketed as replacements.

      .
      The same thing happened to orange roughy and monkfish (both some of the most hideous looking fish you'll ever see), and shark (difficult to prepare because of the high ammonia content in the meat). All were once considered trash and literally shoveled overboard in the pursuit of (at the time) more valuable fish. Now that those more valuable fish have been overfished, the industry spruces up the image of what was formerly considered trash fish to sell to the public.

      BTW, what's sold as red snapper often isn't red snapper. Pretty much any of the snappers and frequently any of the rockfishes (aka rock cod) are sold as red snapper. Most of their meat is pretty similar, but there are subtle differences.

    19. Re:Big Surprise by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a bit past the sell by date.

      Or maybe it's not Red Snapper.

      In my personal experience, I've had really good Red Snapper, and I've not so good Red Snapper. Was the difference because of the former factors, or because of the latter? Not having a raw sample and a DNA test, I couldn't tell you for sure.

      This is part of the problem with American food culture versus that of Europe or Asia.

      We purchase, prepare and serve our fish and meats whole in many cases, especially if the fish in question is of outstanding quality and/or freshness.

      I can't imagine chefs, especially sushi chefs who did not know what they were serving, as opposed to were knowingly using cheaper fish to substitute for more expensive fish at the same price.

      Patronize reputable Japanese restaurants and you _should_ be ok.

      On a separate note, Japan has had its scandals in recent times where premium restaurants were caught red handed engaging in dodgy practices. Like re-using leftover food.

      http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20080529a5.html

    20. Re:Big Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that makes me feel good. I've never liked lobster at all.

    21. Re:Big Surprise by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I know one data point does not mean much, but if I'm eating cheap whitefish, orange roughy is my preference. I find the taste and texture far more pleasant than cod, pollock, haddock, etc.

      And after a recent trip to the coast, I I have to agree on lobster being trash. At least, not worth the cost. Give me a good crab or a pile of crawfish instead - far more flavor at the same or lesser cost.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    22. Re:Big Surprise by illegalcortex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I picked red snapper for my example specifically because it was one of the fish most often substituted for. It was actually reading an article many years ago that centered on red snapper that first made me aware of fish fraud. Though typically a restaurant won't be so bold and still claim it's red snapper. They call it "bay snapper", or "gulf snapper" or "pacific red snapper" or, the worst of all in my opinion, just plain "snapper."

      Ah, here's the article I read many years ago that opened my eyes to the whole thing:
      http://www.houston-press.com/2001-11-01/news/fish-fraud/full

  9. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by spun · · Score: 1

    Ever see the early South Park DVDs with the special features called "Makin' Bacon with Macon?" Matt and Trey put on a cooking show with their mascot, Macon the pig. They make all kinds of bacony treats, and feed the leftover bacon to the pig.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  10. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't cooking destroy DNA?

  11. Watch out for the Mafia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just exposed one of their most profitable scams.

    1. Re:Watch out for the Mafia by Minwee · · Score: 1

      There you go, confusing the Mafia with the Moonies again.

    2. Re:Watch out for the Mafia by wiggles · · Score: 1

      More like the Moonies. Didn't you know Rev. Moon supplies most of the sushi we eat?

    3. Re:Watch out for the Mafia by terrymr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amazing, the stuff you can learn here. Like Sea monkeys

  12. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doesn't cooking destroy DNA?

    This article is about sushi. He's eating his burrito raw.

  13. Confucius say by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 4, Funny

    Confucius say "Man who check fish too closely never get bone in freelay."

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Confucius say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'golf clap'

    2. Re:Confucius say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Confucius say "MuthaFucka who quote me always not capable of thinking for self."

  14. Long Dong Sliver. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "'The smaller and cheaper you make something,' he said, 'the more uses it has'"

    Condoms are cheap.

  15. Roe by TenBrothers · · Score: 1

    Give me a break. If you can't tell masago (smelt roe) from tobiko (flying fish roe) then you have simply never seen the two. You don't need a DNA scanner to tell the difference because masago is dull and solid, tobiko is jewel-like and transluscent.

    1. Re:Roe by phulegart · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with you. However, does this mean that if you have never seen tobiko, you should still pay for tobiko when you eat masago? Because if so, I've got some great Northern Free-Range Angus beef I can sell you... as well as some rare Chilean Zucchini that takes some extraordinary greenhouse conditions to grow properly.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
  16. Another article by thepacketmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This was also covered in an article in the Toronto Star.

    --

    --

    Luck is just skill you didn't know you had.

  17. seems to be common by fermion · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Seems like test like this were run last year as well. Product was mislabeled and sold as a product that was percieved to be more desirable. The funny thing is that, as shown here, most people cannot tell the difference, which begs the question of whether it matters that a product was substituted. Sure, from a legal and honesty perspective yes. But if a restaurant that was serving tilapia, and pricing it as such, would the diner have enjoyed it as much? In addition, I seem to recall restaurants are subbing food because the real product is either not available or prohibitively expensive, so the diner would be denied the experience of dining just because ingredients are not available.

    Again, if the restaurants substituted food, they are being dishonest and should face whatever legal consequences occur. OTOH, sometimes we humans are willfully gullible just so we can enjoy the experience of eating without having to pay for it. We drink fruit drinks with almost no fruit, eat beef burritos with almost no beef, and heart healthy omelets with almost no eggs. Life, in many cases, is a fiction, and the only issue are those that believe it. Although the tech is cool, we are not going to reduce our meals to a science experiment.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:seems to be common by Bloater · · Score: 1

      "the diner would be denied the experience of dining just because ingredients are not available. "

      You mean if a restaurant hasn't got any white tuna in I can't go and buy a steak?"

    2. Re:seems to be common by citylivin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The funny thing is that, as shown here, most people cannot tell the difference, which begs the question of whether it matters that a product was substituted."

      I've had godawful salmon at sushi restaurants but what is your recourse? Don't eat there pretty much. Its not like your going to call out the owner and say - hey this is shome shite fish you got here! I'd imagine most people can tell that its not as good as the normal sushi they are used to, but attribute it to bad chefs or lack of freshness. Of course some people who have never known good sushi (east coasters) would have no idea what to expect. Maybe the people who frequent these places simply have no idea what the correct fish is supposed to taste like.

      "we are not going to reduce our meals to a science experiment."

      If they made a handheld personal computer which took a sample of food and judged its purity, or broke down its components by DNA, there would for sure be a market. If for no other reason than to not pay for inferior food. The device would pay for itself in a month for someone who eats out alot. Empowering people to make smart buying decisions themselves always has a market. Dont think of it as a science experiment, but more of a game. Many people obsessively care about what they put in their bodies. That is why mandatory nutritional information has been on all foodstuffs since the mid 90s.

      People love to catch other people in a lie. It makes them feel superior, and rightly so.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    3. Re:seems to be common by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You mean if a restaurant hasn't got any white tuna in I can't go and buy a steak?

      Not if they only have duck.

      Colonel Hall: [reading new menu] Duck with orange; duck with cherries; duck surprise.
      Mrs. Hall: What's duck surprise?
      Basil Fawlty: Er... that's duck without oranges or cherries.
      Colonel Hall: I mean is this all there is: duck?
      Basil Fawlty: Yes... done of course in three extremely different ways.
      Colonel Hall: And what do you do if you don't like duck?
      Basil Fawlty: Well, if you don't like duck... you're rather stuck.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:seems to be common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that we should all live lies because we don't know any better? Because someone else benefits by telling me something that just isn't true? Life may be a fiction many times, and maybe I am sometimes happier for it, but I also want to know what is true and what is not. Just because I can live my life in an ignorant bliss doesn't mean that I should.

    5. Re:seems to be common by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course some people who have never known good sushi (east coasters) would have no idea what to expect. Maybe the people who frequent these places simply have no idea what the correct fish is supposed to taste like.

      It's charming the way that West Coasters, especially Californians, imagine they have better food than other regions. Dead wrong, but charming.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:seems to be common by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I agree - quite often I'd bet it's not that people can't tell a difference, it's just that people generally don't open their mouths.

      I personally love sushi. I generally eat "real" sushi once per week (I'll stop off for a california or spider roll at the little local Japanese restaurant more often, but that's not a "real" sushi place IMHO). Now, in my general area I've been to around 7 or 8 various sushi bars. All but 2 were of unacceptable quality - the unacceptable ones ranged from just below par, to really bad, to even one place that I had 3 roaches crawl across the bar while I was eating (called the health dept on that place).

      Anyways, for all the ones rated unacceptable, I didn't pitch a fit or go to the manager. I just finished off what I'd ordered (if it was at least edible - if not I left it) and then never went back. Instead I whittled down my visits to just the 2 places that do serve sushi that I enjoy. The other places aren't likely to know that I didn't enjoy their food or that anything was wrong with it, but I'm certainly not going back.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    7. Re:seems to be common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      {{fact}} Opinion and speculation. [[WP:RS]]

    8. Re:seems to be common by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      If it was Italian food yes, greek food maybe, but do you think a New Yorker has no rights bragging about Pizza? Much of the American version of Sushi originated in California, and yes the American Sushi bar are about as Japanese as Pizza is Italian.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:seems to be common by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      American Sushi bar are about as Japanese as Pizza is Italian

      I think you're going to the wrong sushi bars, then.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    10. Re:seems to be common by lgw · · Score: 0

      What's called "pizza" varies from region to region. People tend to have a favorite and declare it the "authoritative version" of pizza, presumbly on the authority of their personal tastes.

      Objectively, however, avocados in sushi are a disgrace and source of national shame. Avocados are not food; they are an alien mind-control device much like Slurm. Actually, alien mind control would explain a lot about California - excecpt the governator, who's position on aliens is well covered in this documentary.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:seems to be common by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      It's charming how a nation of 300 million or so is divided perfectly in twain on the issue of restaruant quality due to their proximity to coastlines.

    12. Re:seems to be common by lgw · · Score: 1

      Nah, the best food is in Houston, better than "either coast".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:seems to be common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's charming how a nation of 300 million or so is divided perfectly in twain on the issue of restaruant quality due to their proximity to coastlines.

      Hmmm.... My map of North America indicates that the contiguous United States of America borders the ocean on more than two sides.

      Meanwhile, I observe that the GP post simply noted the California was not alone in producing good food (with no indication that the East Coast, or any other region, had superiour restaurants.)

    14. Re:seems to be common by photon317 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree. I've traveled all over the US (and abroad), and on average, Houston has more restaurants with better quality food (and a wider variety of cuisines) than just about anywhere in the US. If you love eating out, Houston is the place to live really.

      That being said, while there are a number of *great* sushi places in Houston with some really creative chefs making great preparations, the quality of the actual fish meat itself is noticeably superior in the SF Bay Area.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    15. Re:seems to be common by geobeck · · Score: 1

      "Anyone for trifle?"

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    16. Re:seems to be common by Bloater · · Score: 1

      but if I don't like tilapia and order grouper then if the restaurant gives me tilapia to be sure I still get the opportunity to dine on grouper then I've just got the fish that exactly isn't grouper and that I can't eat - how has that helped me in my quest to eat grouper?

      they should just say "we have no grouper would you like to choose something else?"

    17. Re:seems to be common by Zwicky · · Score: 1

      The rook might be available.

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
    18. Re:seems to be common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that most of the Gulf shrimp in Houston restaurants are frozen, right?

    19. Re:seems to be common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want crappy sushi? Go to Colorado Springs. Last time I buy sushi in the desert.

      Rick DeBay

  18. Ahhh, a RED SNAPPAH. Mmmmm, very tasty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kuni: Okay, Weaver, listen carefully. You can hold on to your red snapper...

    Kuni: ...or you can go for what's in the box that Hiro-San is bringing down the aisle right now! What's it gonna be?

    Phyllis Weaver: I'll take the box. The box!

    Kuni: You took the box? Let's see what's in the box!

    Kuni: Nothing! Absolutely nothing! STUPID! You're so STU-PIIIIIIIIIIID!

    1. Re:Ahhh, a RED SNAPPAH. Mmmmm, very tasty. by ckthorp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Supplies! Whoever modded the parent insightful apparently hasn't seen an awesome movie.

    2. Re:Ahhh, a RED SNAPPAH. Mmmmm, very tasty. by Tr3vin · · Score: 1

      Eat your Twinkie-wiener sandwich and be quiet. Having the movie reference modded insightful is awesome.

    3. Re:Ahhh, a RED SNAPPAH. Mmmmm, very tasty. by pcgabe · · Score: 1

      Ah, TV as it was meant to be seen. In a theater.

      Bob: I don't know about this, George. We don't know the first thing about what goes on in a television station.
      George Newman: Don't worry, Bob. It's just like working in a fish-market. Except you don't have to clean and gut fish all day.

      Man, how many on-topic quotes does this movie have?

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    4. Re:Ahhh, a RED SNAPPAH. Mmmmm, very tasty. by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      ckthrorp found the marble (s)he gets to drink from the firehose!!

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  19. Obligatory Jokes by thewiz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Roe supposedly from flying fish was actually from smelt.

    Of course, the roe from flying fish are from smelt; they're the ones that are being dive-bombed!

    Seven of nine samples...

    Leave it to the Slashdot crowd to put a Star Trek reference in a story about seafood.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:Obligatory Jokes by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

      Oh you could do even better. I'm thinking along the lines of something involving "Seven of Nine" and "white tuna".

  20. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by stretchpuppy · · Score: 1

    Haven't you noticed the absence of your neighbors pet, Fluffy, lately?

  21. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I thought sushi was rice, not fish?

  22. Mr. Leonard is going to be very happy by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If NY works the same as holland then this guy is going to be very busy, the one place whose fish passed all tests?

    In holland a newspaper called AD has a feature where they test fries, patat.

    The ones that win proudly display the article and do massive business because of it. With so many bad fast food places being tested as being the best is an excellent piece of advertising.

    If you were going to buy fish/sushi and you just read this article, where would you go?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Mr. Leonard is going to be very happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were going to buy fish/sushi and you just read this article, where would you go?

      Not New York City?

  23. Tobiko vs. Masago by jcr · · Score: 3, Informative

    FTA: Roe supposedly from flying fish was actually from smelt.

    Cheaper sushi bars do this all the time, and you don't need DNA sequencing to spot the difference. Tobiko (flying fish roe) eggs are larger than smelt eggs, and they're a clear orange color.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  24. sounds like fraud to me. by DragonTHC · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The people responsible should be held accountable.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  25. Re: by QuincyFree · · Score: 5, Informative

    Steve Palumbi did this back in the mid-90's for whale and dolphin products being sold in commercial markets in Korea and Japan (Baker and Palumbi 1994 Science 265: 1538; Baker et al. 1995 Molecular Ecology 5:671). Essentially they went around the fish stalls taking samples and amplifying and sequencing them in their hotel room. From the latter article abstract:


    This 'spot check' revealed a surprising variety of species for sale, including minke, fin and humpback whales and one or two species of dolphins sold as 'kujira' or whale. In the Korean survey, DNA amplifications were conducted by two of us (C.S.B. and F.C.) working with independent equipment and reagents. The two sets of DNA amplifications were returned to our respective laboratories and sequenced independently for cross-validation. Among the total of 17 species-specific sequences we found a dolphin, a beaked whale, 13 Northern Hemisphere minke whales (representing at least seven distinct individuals) and two whales which are closely related to the recognized sei and Bryde's whales but could not be identified as either using available type sequences. We suggest that these two specimens represent a currently unrecognized species or subspecies of Bryde's whale, possibly the so-called 'small-form' reported from the tropical waters of the Indo-Pacific.

    Until these guys went out and actually did the sequencing, no one knew for sure how much illegal whaling activity was going on.

  26. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Japanese cuisine, sushi is vinegared rice, usually topped with other ingredients, including fish, various meats, and vegetables.

    Outside of Japan, sushi is sometimes misunderstood to mean the raw fish itself, or even any fresh raw-seafood dishes.

    In Japan, sliced raw fish alone is called sashimi and is distinct from sushi, as sashimi is the raw fish component, not the rice component.

    The word sushi itself comes from an archaic grammatical form of a word that is no longer used in other contexts; literally, sushi means "it's sour".

  27. We Don't Need No Regulation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Free Market will fix it. The Free Market fixes everything!

    1. Re:We Don't Need No Regulation! by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the USA doesn't have a free market.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:We Don't Need No Regulation! by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For certain meanings of fix.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  28. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry, your beef burrito contains 0% mammal tissue.

  29. sushi, sashimi by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 4, Informative

    Technically, raw fish is "sashimi", but is often combined with rice and seaweed and other ingredients to make sushi. Not all sushi contains sashimi, but most does. I don't think rice by itself counts as sushi.

    1. Re:sushi, sashimi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, sushi is just vinegared rice. You can wrap it in seaweed if you want (makizushi) or you can make it into little mounds (nigirizushi). There are other forms too. You can add raw or cooked fish, or vegetables to it. But "sushi" is really just the rice.

    2. Re:sushi, sashimi by ari_j · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only that, but can't sushi also contain cooked fish? That said, when the article talks about one quarter of fish with identifiable DNA, it seems obvious that he's not taking DNA from cooked seafood or from rice.

    3. Re:sushi, sashimi by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      As I recall, it's actually the rice that makes it sushi, not the other ingredients.
      (Picked up on Good Eats, confirmed via Wikipedia)

    4. Re:sushi, sashimi by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not only that, but can't sushi also contain cooked fish?

      Of course. I've had many a sushi roll containing tempura shrimp, tataki-style tuna, and so forth.

    5. Re:sushi, sashimi by molo · · Score: 1

      Yes, sushi is the combined thing. But the ingredient that makes it sushi is the seasoned rice (with rice vinegar). That mix is then called sushi rice. So it is the rice that makes everything else the sushi.

      Consider inari sushi (inarizushi) for example, it is sushi rice stuffed into fried tofu wrappers. No fish, no seaweed, just sushi rice and tofu.

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    6. Re:sushi, sashimi by spike2131 · · Score: 1

      In Honolulu, they make it with Spam.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    7. Re:sushi, sashimi by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Sushi as most Americans perceive, the shaped rice platform with an ingredient on top is Nigiri Sushi.

      Gunkan Sushi the rice platform, with a seaweed wrap around its circumference with loose or chopped ingredients on top. It keeps the Salmon roe, chopped scallops etc in place.

      That said, if you can't tell the difference between raw Tilapia or Dory and Tuna in sashimi or sushi form, you shouldn't be wasting your money at dodgy sushi restaurants.

    8. Re:sushi, sashimi by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Delicious indeed, but my favorite roll of all time is an eel tempura roll. I can only find it at a few places tho.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  30. allergies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i am allergic to all fish species except salmon (dont ask me how), so having sushi is a dangerous choice.

    seeing that i tell the waiter and only order vegetable and salmon rolls, if the fish is mislabeled, i could be dead.

    this is something that needs to be done!

  31. Seven of nine's samples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seven of nine samples that were called red snapper were mislabeled...

    The borg do not make mistakes. You will be assimilated. DNA Recoding is futile.

  32. half a pun by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want to do some sort of pun on Roe v. something but I can't think of anything fishy that rhymes with Wade.

    Eh, the best one was from Katrina.

    "What does Bush think about Roe vs. Wade?"

    "He doesn't care how they get out of New Orleans."

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  33. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Lostlander · · Score: 1

    That's good I prefer chicken anyway.

  34. This method has some limitations by Zerth · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since this relies on segments of mitochondrial DNA(not the nucleus's DNA), it fails in species with endosymbiotic bacteria, such as many arthropods and the Wolbachia bacteria. So it's unlikely this will work on, say, crab or lobster.

    Wolbachia is an awesome bacteria, as it can cause those infected with it to be unable to breed with those not infected, which could possibly induce the divergence of species. Some species have been infected with it so long, generationally, that they go sterile if you give them antibiotics.

  35. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rats are mammals, right?

  36. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh don't worry: If it's from Taco Bell, it doesn't have any organic matter in there anyway.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  37. Great... by Translation+Error · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now they're performing deep packet inspection on our sushi. If we eat the wrong kind of fish, do we get throttled?

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    1. Re:Great... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Throttled? No, I'm pretty sure my wife would shoot me if I started eating the wrong fish.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Great... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Throttled? No, I'm pretty sure my wife would shoot me if I started eating the wrong fish.

      Or if you tried cooking it and then dousing is in soy sauce, I would imagine...

    3. Re:Great... by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Funny

      Getting it hot and covering it with a salty...oh, hell, I'm not even going to finish that one.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we eat the wrong kind of fish, do we get throttled?

      I thought fiber was supposed to solve throttling problems.

    5. Re:Great... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Getting it hot and covering it with a salty...oh, hell, I'm not even going to finish that one.

      I would have paid good money for you to not even have started that one.

      How can I get the images out of my head?

    6. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they're performing deep packet inspection on our sushi. If we eat the wrong kind of fish, do we get throttled?

      Only if it goes down the wrong way...

  38. mod parent up by toby · · Score: 1

    He's right, you know. "Make a profit any way you can." It's as American as Mom's Fake Apple Pie!

    --
    you had me at #!
  39. yeah, I've noticed by toby · · Score: 1

    Anonymous Coward does that all the time. I'm sure he's on BOTH their hit lists by now. If they ever find him, things are going to be pretty boring around here.

    --
    you had me at #!
  40. not if the Christian Taliban get their way. by toby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    n/t

    That said, the hypocrites probably own plenty of contraceptive industries.

    --
    you had me at #!
  41. Something's fishy here! by rts008 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "If you were going to buy fish/sushi and you just read this article, where would you go?"

    Uhmm...fishing?

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  42. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Myopic · · Score: 1

    You thought correctly. Sushi can be served with fish, or with other things; and the fish or other things can be cooked or raw.

    Raw fish is a popular form of sushi, so the mistake can be excused as synecdoche.

  43. Used to be quite common in Minnesota by Enlarged+to+Show+Tex · · Score: 1

    In a state well-known for its walleye, a local television station ran an investigative report a couple of years ago on restaurants that proclaimed to serve walleye in various forms...and found a number of them trying to pass off zander as walleye (usually by trying to call it "European walleye"). A number of them were shamed into switching to the genuine article.

  44. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by dosius · · Score: 1

    Mad pig disease HERE WE COME! xD;

    *runs like hell*

    -uso.

    --
    What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
  45. Common Practice in the Food Industry by Kneo24 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is a common practice in the food industry. While there might be a few cases of people really not realize what they've bought for their consumers is the wrong stuff, by far and large, especially in the restaurant biz, they know it's not what they've claimed it to be.

    Why do this do this? Profits of course! Charge $18 for a mahi meal and serve them cod or tilapia instead. The average persons taste buds aren't refined enough to know the difference.

    I've been kindly asked to leave sushi places before when my "fresh super white tuna from Korea" tasted a lot like farm raised cod, which I rudely pointed out when the waitress asked me if "everything was ok". At least I got a somewhat free meal out of it!

    And now that I think about it, all of the Sushi places I've been too, there's only been one or two places that actually served what they advertised. Hands down, best tasting sushi I will ever have.

    Ultimately, I don't think this will change anything on the restaurant side. Grocery store side? Maybe. When you can make large profits from misrepresenting what you're selling and get away with it, the barcoding won't stop it. All it will do is help the honest business stay honest.

    1. Re:Common Practice in the Food Industry by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Why do this do this? Profits of course! Charge $18 for a mahi meal and serve them cod or tilapia instead. The average persons taste buds aren't refined enough to know the difference.

      Mahi mahi (dolphin fish, but people freak out if you tell them they're eating dolphin) keeps very poorly when chilled or frozen. Pretty much every sample I've tried from the supermarket or in a restaurant is mush compared to fresh caught (they're probably the most beautiful fish in the sea). Frankly, you're probably better off with the cod or tilapia.

      I've been kindly asked to leave sushi places before when my "fresh super white tuna from Korea" tasted a lot like farm raised cod, which I rudely pointed out when the waitress asked me if "everything was ok". At least I got a somewhat free meal out of it!

      I'm kinda surprised they can pull this off. Albacore (white tuna) looks and tastes nothing like cod. The meat is textured like regular tuna, but has a pale red to light pink color when raw, off-white when cooked. It's never white like cod or tilapia.

  46. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry, your McNugget contains 0% avian tissue.

  47. Sign me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want one of these devices, packaged with neat software... this way when I go to buy sushi at my local retailer, and I pay 10 bucks for a lobster roll, and get zero lobster, I can sue the living fish out them.

  48. I knew it! by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

    There was always something fishy about those sushi restaurants!

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    1. Re:I knew it! by m3rck · · Score: 1

      Zing! Didn't see that one coming.

    2. Re:I knew it! by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 1

      You son of a bitch...

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
  49. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    Mad pig disease HERE WE COME!

    Isn't that another name for PMS? Or is Mad Cow Disease the only alternate name for that time of the month?

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  50. Walleye are not endangered just expensive by voss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So theyll sell pikeperch which tastes almost exactly the same but costs a lot less. Its illegal to mislabel to do so but hard to enforce

    1. Re:Walleye are not endangered just expensive by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't be enforced.

      Let fools pay more money for 'exotic' sushi that isn't really. At least the fish won't go extinct.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  51. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by maxume · · Score: 1

    Omnivores/carnivores don't seem to have as much trouble with cannibalism and prion diseases as herbivores do.

    That doesn't really fit with human prion issues (but perhaps human cannibalism just concentrates prions from other sources).

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  52. Re: by Nazlfrag · · Score: 0

    Whales are bottom feeders, the cockroaches of the sea. They want to be slaughtered by us, why else do you think they beach themselves? Harpoon them all I say.

  53. Grouper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own part of a restaurant on the coast as well. The major vendors like Sysco will tell you exactly what you're getting - falsely advertising grouper can carry some hefty fines if they come by and check up on it. Any restaurants that claim they are being duped are lying or simply dumb. You know what you're getting when you pay the bill, if price is too good to be true...

    (Here's a helpful tip from a restaurateur: DON'T OPEN A FUCKING RESTAURANT. Really.)

  54. And the .. by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    .. albacore I had last night turned out to be seared liver.... ewww

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
  55. To earn $ to pay to fix her snaggleteeth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the internet; fair game.

  56. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mad pig disease HERE WE COME!

    Isn't that another name for PMS?

    If and ONLY if she's in uniform. Plainclothes don't count.

    *ducks*

  57. This is the sort of fraud... by Mahjub+Sa'aden · · Score: 1

    This is the sort of fraud, the prevention of which could really spur the development of remote DNA testing. Imagine how hand that would be!

    --
    What is is all that is. Isn't that obvious?
  58. Re:Big Surprise (OT) by geobeck · · Score: 1

    We secretly replaced this group's sushi with Folger's crystals. Let's see if they notice...

    I think the response would be much like the John Candy SCTV sketch on the subject.

    No one did indignant rage like John Candy!

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  59. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't cooking destroy DNA?

    It's certainly harder to do this sort of stuff on cooked samples, but it's not impossible.

  60. snicker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sort of the pretentious "gourmet" meets audiophiles in the monster cable aisle. Just charge 'em enough, they will believe what they are getting is quality and never notice the difference. I think they have done similar tests with those wine..whiners, slap table wine into expensive labeled bottles, "ohh, it has an earthy nose with a hint of wild woodland moss and..." yada yada nonsense. Or modern art done by chimpanzees.

    Ya, what the bogus fish sellers are doing is wrong, it is still funny as heck though, c'mon, admit it!

        People make fun of us southerners and good old boys, but we know the difference between a pork chop, some fried chicken, some bass and then that "sushi" which is dollars a bite stuff we would call *bait* stuck in a ball with some cheap white rice and seaweed washed up on the beach.

    And we use used recycled lampcord from busted appliances for speaker wire. Works perfectly fine.

    1. Re:snicker by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      People make fun of us southerners and good old boys, but we know the difference between a pork chop, some fried chicken, some bass and then that "sushi" which is dollars a bite stuff we would call *bait* stuck in a ball with some cheap white rice and seaweed washed up on the beach.

      Yeah, maybe the piss-poor shrinkwrapped sushi that you trailer park boys buy from Safeway is crap, but if you go fishing using real sushi made out of salmon, eel and avocado as bait, you need a serious lesson in economics.

  61. Compared to abortions... or kids... or AIDS... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Yes!

    Compared to say... Q-Tips... meeh.. not as much.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  62. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of the 40 or so whale species, gray's are the only bottom feeders afaik. But you don't sound like you really care about facts anyway.

  63. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about performing the test before cooking while its still raw?

  64. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Adambomb · · Score: 1

    it doesn't have any organic matter in there anyway

    Excrement is still organic matter. Things like Cyanide naturally occur in plant seeds and such as well.

    Give them a break, there might be SOME organic matter in there somewhere.

    oh...right.. =)

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
  65. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world outside of Japan is perfectly correct to call the raw fish itself "sushi." It's an English word borrowed from Japanese and used to denote either raw fish or raw fish and rice. Apparently in Japanese it means something else, but we don't have to be slaves to the Japanese meaning anymore than they have to be to the foreign words they adopt.

  66. mod child down by HebrewToYou · · Score: 1

    Nothing like misrepresenting free-market capitalism. Goober.

    --
    I'm not popular enough to be different.

    Homer Simpson, The Simpsons

  67. A subject I am actually an expert on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work as a fish wholesaler. We deal mostly with restaurants but we do a few retail establishments too.
    The fish business is surprisingly crooked. With the Russian mafia controlling the caviar trade and various fly by night operations selling foul product that has been color treated to look new.Having a competent chef is vary important when dealing with fish quality. Labeling is a constant problem in the fishing industry even with the COOL act. Domestic red snapper is the worst of the lot when it comes to company's labeling poorly. Mainly because on a wholesale level the fish sells for 13.95-14.95 per pound fillet (regional price only), while tilapia is often sold at 6.95-7.95 per pound fillet. Other things that get sold as red snapper is red rock, corvina, lane snapper, ling snapper. (although ling is often not cheaper) It is so bad that the USDC stepped in and only 1 genus of fish can be sold as red snapper, 2 in California. The trick to buying red snapper is to only buy it skin on, preferably whole. If it is skin off fillet pass because it's almost impossible to identify then. Selling tilapia as tuna is retarded those two fish do not even taste similar although if the fish is drenched in soy sauce and wasabi it is difficult to tell even the widest of gaps in fish taste.

    Also since this is going to come up at one point. Scallops that are marked sea scallops or processed scallops ARE NOT skate or shark. These scallops are treated with tripolyphosphate so they soak up water. Dry pack scallops are not treated so they are a better quality scallop. It is very difficult to cut skate in such a way on an industrial level to make it look like a scallop especially when the yield from it would cut into profit and most chefs can tell the difference.

    And while I'm at it:
    Amberjack is not mahi
    Ahi meens tuna or yellowfin tuna. Saying ahi tuna is silly
    Ono and wahoo are the same god damn fish just buy the cheaper wahoo
    Langostino is from a squat lobster which isn't really a lobster but it still tastes good.

    1. Re:A subject I am actually an expert on by greysunrise · · Score: 1

      a competent chef is vary important

      I agree, the necessity of a competent chef does vary, depending on what smells like fish.

    2. Re:A subject I am actually an expert on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russian Mafia doesn't control the caviar trade. It's a common myth perpetuated in movies.

    3. Re:A subject I am actually an expert on by precogpunk · · Score: 1

      I'd say the guardian is a reliable source:

      "London raids expose mafia caviar racket"
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2003/nov/09/ukcrime.london

    4. Re:A subject I am actually an expert on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the lingo in this comment could potentially be names for Linux builds. Now, I understand why fishmongers read /.

  68. done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone wrote an excellent book about fish market fraud and this has become a favorite for network news investigations. these girls don't deserve to be in the new york times. they are stealing valuable page-real-estate from obama.

  69. The real problem by spike2131 · · Score: 1

    If eating the cheap stuff is roughly as enjoyable as eating the fancy, expensive fish, why are we wasting money and contributing to the overfishing of rare species when common, cheaper fish can provide a similar experience at a lesser environmental cost?

    --
    SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
  70. What's the big deal? by 10053r · · Score: 1

    On the one hand, while allowing false advertising and fraud is a bad thing in the vast majority of circumstances, this isn't really that bad. Someone who can tell the difference will ask for their money back, and get it. Someone who can't will enjoy their sushi that they bought because it was expensive... and enjoy it because it was expensive. It's not like they are serving contaminated fish or something. It's probably cheaper because it's less rare, so this practice probably helps protect against overfishing.

  71. DNA Barcoding by jannesha · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, this work was based on a really cool research project - to catalog all the species on the planet via a short, standardized region of their DNA.

    There's an online database, and much of the data is publicly available. (follow the "Published Projects" link to log in anonymously).

    They also provide a taxonomy browser which is a bit more fun to play with (there are pictures).

    Fish in fish markets is but the tip of the iceberg: customs officials can use this to halt the import/export of endangered and/or invasive species, it can lead to the discovery of new species, and help us to quantify biodiversity on the planet (and how quickly we're fscking it away)....

    --jjj

  72. The Rev Moon by grolaw · · Score: 1

    Controls most Sushi-grade fish distribution in the US.
    See: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/chi-0604sushi-1-story,0,3736876.story

    So, what else to expect from the new Messiah? Tilapia to Maguro = PROFIT!

    Funny thing - Maguro and Tilapia have very different textures, flavors and colors. I could (remotely) buy a novice eating Tilapia instead of Albacore - but, once again the textures and taste are vastly different.

  73. What's this?!?!?! by WheelDweller · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Seven of nine samples that were called red snapper were mislabeled, and they turned out to be anything from Atlantic cod to Acadian redfish, an endangered species."

    OK, first:

    - No one said there'd be "Seven of Nine" Samples. Jeri Ryan would want to know this. (Well, it did SAY sushi...)
    - Red Snapper: I'm leaving that alone.

    Can you see how distracting this kinda labeling can be? :>

    Ask anyone with a penchant for sea food; "Crab meat" rarely is. And "Sardines"? They're a category of fish, not a species. Just passing the word.

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
  74. There's a lesson here by teakillsnoopy · · Score: 1

    If you need a DNA test to tell you the difference between cheap sashimi and expensive sashimi, perhaps you're better off ordering the cheap stuff in the first place. Adam

  75. Re:I'm wondering about the contents of my burrito. by tuomoks · · Score: 1

    Correct but often misunderstood. I'm just a little amazed that an article can make these mistakes? And I love sashimi except not so much the less common, but not unusual, sashimi with vegetarian ingredients items such as yuba (bean curd skin) or raw red meats, such as beef or horse.

  76. Re: by belphegore · · Score: 1

    And the anti-whaling people say that all this whaling by japanese and koreans isn't really for the purported "scientific research". But look! These guys found a new species!

  77. The point is freshness, not rawness by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    Sushi and sashimi are meant to highlight the natural taste and texture of extremely fresh ingredients. For many kinds of sushi toppings, this means that they're served completely raw and unadorned, but not for all. Many sushi toppings are very lightly cooked (e.g., by brief boiling or steaming); some items also are served with a sauce that improves their flavor; others may be raw but marinated.

    The association of "sushi" with "raw fish" outside of Japan is because non-Japanese find the idea of eating raw fish a bit shocking, but really, the best explanation of sushi is extremely fresh seafood, with the bare minimum of preparation needed to make it enjoyable, eaten with vinegared rice.

  78. Who ever smelt it, dealt it. by Servo · · Score: 1

    Any real fan of sushi knows that Flying Fish Roe is almost always really smelt roe. It is cheaper, and actually available to most diners whereas real flying fish roe is prohibitively expensive since it is rare outside of certain places. It looks and tastes the same to me, so ultimately I think you are getting what you paid for.

    Same goes for crab. With the exception of softshell crab at sushi places the crab is always made from a imitation fish cake made from pollack.

    The trick to good sushi is knowing your chef, which I find is a lot easier to do since you are usually sitting in front of him while he is preparing your meal. They will tell you what is fresh, what's really in such and such, etc.

    It doesn't surprise me that a lot of fish is mislabeled... Since most of it is being caught on the other side of the world it goes through many hands before hitting your plate. Any number of people filling out forms, purchasing, etc, may get the type wrong... especially once it is cut up. There are no doubt scammers out there but I tend to believe it is more ignorance than malice that is mislabeling the majority of the fish. There are so many sushi places springing up that just don't have the history and training that sushi chefs in Japan have.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin