Slashdot Mirror


A Full-Time 2-Way Video Link To Grandparents?

uid7306m writes "We have elderly parents who live a long way off. However, my technological radar tells me that it's possible to set up a 24/7 video link between our kitchen and theirs. It'd be good for our kids and good for the parents, and we can now get pretty cheap nearly unlimited broadband connections at this end (UK). What's the best way to do it? Has anyone tried it? On the far end, it ought to have, in Dilbert's(TM) immortal words 'One big button on it, and we push it for you in the factory.'"

64 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. Apple iChat by rlobue · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Apple's iChat. Of course you need a Mac but I talk for hours full screen to my relatives around the world. With two semi-good broadband connections, it works flawlessly and the quality is second to none (in this price range). Of course the downside is that you'd both need Macs.

    1. Re:Apple iChat by Holi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why not Skype, I use that on my mac to talk with my friend in Hawaii who uses Linux on here laptop. Video quality is very good. Now if only my MBP had better speakers.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:Apple iChat by )parenthesis( · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, a PC with the Windows AIM client works very well with a Mac running iChat. I do it with my friends in Ohio all the time. So you could get your grandparents a cheap MacBook (or Mini), and you (assuming you're running a Windows box) only have to pitch in for a AIM-compatible webcam. Or if you wanted to go the Linux route, you could use Skype on your Platform Of Choice(tm).

    3. Re:Apple iChat by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    4. Re:Apple iChat by penguinbrat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Skype also has the API that you could always write a simple bash script to use, I believe it uses DCOP for the calls. Don't know how extensive it is, but any API can be very useful in obtaining the ultimate '1 click' stop and shop deal... Not sure if it is still active but they used to have it where communication between Skype accounts were free, there is also a ZOOM modem like thing for Skype now, pretty cheap at Wally world, that you can hook a normal phone up to it.

    5. Re:Apple iChat by rwven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just for anyone who hasn't tried iChat, I've used a LOT of video conferencing software and iChat's video conferencing is leaps and bounds ahead of anything else out there for the mainstream.

      I have no idea what they do to preserve so much video quality on the trip, but it's astoundingly good. Comparing it to Skype or regular AIM (or MSN or what-have-you) chat is pretty laughable and anyone who's really compared will vouch for that.

    6. Re:Apple iChat by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why not Skype

      Just because you ask: I think some of us don't like a 12MB encrypted binary executable file running on our system that nobody except the creators know what it does.

      --
      I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
    7. Re:Apple iChat by abigor · · Score: 4, Informative

      On Linux, Skype uses DBUS and X11 messaging. On Windows, it's a COM object. Either way, you are correct, it's pretty easy to get something up and running quickly - a simple gui written in PyQt with a single button: "Talk to Kids".

    8. Re:Apple iChat by ches · · Score: 4, Informative

      ichat worked well with my wife in Beijing and my daughter in Edinburgh this summer. iChat allowed simultaneous conversations, skype doesn't, AFAIK.

      One fun thing: inviting my wife 12 time zones away over to dinner with friends. The Mac is like Elijah, doesn't eat much, and cause dinner conversation worked well. Poor video quality wasn't a bother.

      ches

    9. Re:Apple iChat by Z34107 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just because you ask: I think some of us don't like a 12MB encrypted binary executable file running on our system that nobody except the creators know what it does.

      Well, if disk space is an issue, just gzip it or something. But, gosh, for 12MB... You should delete a few things, man.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    10. Re:Apple iChat by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just because you ask: I think some of us don't like a 12MB encrypted binary executable file running on our system that nobody [blackhat.com] except the creators know what it does.

      It appears to make phone calls over the Internet and to POTS phones. Mystery solved.

    11. Re:Apple iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another iChat vote. My family is spread across three countries and 13 hours of time zones. We are now all Mac users simply because iChat is the _only_ real option for video chat. It's the killer app.

      I'm a GNU/Linux user otherwise. Skype is shite for its performance and for its trojan horse qualities.

    12. Re:Apple iChat by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know, but this sub thread was about iChat, which depends on about 3 gigs of encrypted code, the majority of which only the dark Apple overlords knows what goes on inside of.

      Telephone networks, network switches at your ISP, cell phones, gmail, name servers, and non-local web servers all have code invisible to the end user.

      So, we might as well get paranoid enough to shun all modern communications technology if we are going to get our panties in a wad over a single closed source program.

    13. Re:Apple iChat by quenda · · Score: 3, Funny

      As it is also good at managing to bypass firewalls (as I understand) who knows what else it can do, does, or could be made to do?

      "What makes Skype so terrifying, said the FCC, is the fact that no program needs to be exchanged for a new computer to be infected. It can be spread through the existing e-mail systems of the InterNet. Once a computer is infected, one of several things can happen. If the computer contains a hard drive, that will most likely be destroyed. If the program is not stopped, the computer's processor will be placed in an nth-complexity infinite binary loop - which can severely damage the processor if left running that way too long. Unfortunately, most novice computer users will not realize what is happening until it is far too late. "

    14. Re:Apple iChat by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know there are floss alternatives, but to tell you the truth, the waterpik just doesn't get the stuff out from in between my teeth.

    15. Re:Apple iChat by sootman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've got a baby, a mac, and several distant relatives, some with macs and some with PCs. iChat is noticably better than skype. As a bonus 10.5 has screen sharing built in too, just as easy to use.

      For extra ease if use, Google for the terminal command to make iChat auto-accept incoming requests.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    16. Re:Apple iChat by swillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, you're talking about the fact that Skype will use port 80 if its default port isn't available. Much ado about nothing.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  2. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    24/7? Guess no more going out to the kitchen in your undies for a late night snack.

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's not an issue. In the UK, it's pretty chilly most of the year, so there's very little incentive to wander around in much less than a furry bathrobe.

  3. Bad idea by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unless you want your kids to see grandpa giving it to grandma over the kitchen sink, I wouldn't recommend it.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait. I think there's a channel dedicated to that kink.

    2. Re:Bad idea by Hokie06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or worse yet do you really want grandpa doing a 5 finger salute while he watches you give it to your wife on the kitchen table.

      --
      Kilroy was here.
    3. Re:Bad idea by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technically, that would be rule 35.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    4. Re:Bad idea by fmobus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rule 34 says:
      There is porn of it. No exceptions

      Rule 35 says:
      If no porn is found at the moment, it will be created.

    5. Re:Bad idea by hkmarks · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rule #34: If it exists, there's porn of it.

      Rule #35: If there's no porn of it, porn of it will be made.

  4. Skype... by purduephotog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... but that might be too complicated.

    I could see some advantages of streaming both ways to large flat panels. I think it would be a bit intrusive, though, because as much as I love my parents I'm very glad there is a 10 hour distance between us.

    If all else fails you could just do a webcast. While interestingly linked, I just can't get into the concept too much for fear that one day I might see my mother in law staring back at us ;)

    1. Re:Skype... by plenTpak · · Score: 5, Informative

      Skype might be good enough, because you can set it to auto-start, and you can set it to auto-accept calls (so you can initiate the calls from your end) and I think you can set it to auto-start in full-screen. That way, once you have it all set up, the most they'll have to do is turn on the physical power, and you'll be able to initiate the connection from your end.

    2. Re:Skype... by peragrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually if they already have large flat panel monitors, use a small computer like a mac mini, or one of the mini itx boards. Mount the video camera either above ore below the display and conceal it slightly if needed.

      that way they could simply push a couple of buttons on a remote and activate it. you get the big veiw, comfy chairs, of the living room while you chat.

      As long as you can turn it off occasionally it isn't bad.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Skype... by entrylevel · · Score: 5, Funny

      I told you never to call me on this wall!

      --
      Karma: Incomprehensible (Mostly affected by posting at +5, reading at -1, and metamoderating everything unfair.)
    4. Re:Skype... by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And change the combination on my luggage!

  5. Set top video conferencing appliance by weregeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am sure that there are other similar products, and at under $150 a piece, something like the DLink DVC-1000 here: http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=1&pid=8 would be hard to beat in terms of simplicity.

    --
    Those willing to give up freedom for the sake of short term security, deserve neither freedom nor security.
  6. iChatAV on OS X by piper5ul · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have tried it on numerous occasions - it is solid for home-home comminications.

    Also, everything is just a click away!

    You can also use skype but the quality is not consistent. Also, too many clicks.

  7. Bandwidth caps? by el_chupanegre · · Score: 5, Informative

    Are you with a decent ISP? (If there is such a thing)

    If you are with Virgin Media then you will easily exceed their bandwidth limits which you can find at the bottom of this page.

    I'm not sure what other ISPs set their limits at (or if they publish them at all like VM do) but I'm pretty sure you would exceed them also.

    I'd think about the possibility of other options, such as simply using a video-call when required. Most of the time you would simply be streaming video of 2 empty kitchens to each other wouldn't you?

    1. Re:Bandwidth caps? by Crookdotter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't there a way to only stream frames if they are changing? I would have thought that's how it's done now anyway - so that only useful, changing data is transmitted. When both kitchens are empty, the video stream isn't sending any data.

    2. Re:Bandwidth caps? by anagama · · Score: 5, Informative

      motion.

      http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/

      feature list:

      http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/MotionFeatureList

      You could have it trigger an external program to get that "one big button set at the factory" effect merely by walking into the kitchen.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    3. Re:Bandwidth caps? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nah, make a point of getting an analog clock with no seconds hand; you have an instant way of double-checking that the link is actually active, and a handy timeout prevention device. One frame per minute isn't going to kill your bandwidth.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  8. Ekiga by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have a Linux distribution, there is 'ekiga' which allows you to run video conferencing.

    But I've always wondered if there was something simpler that wouldn't need to go through a third party server, and would allow the webcam window to be resized.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  9. Skype by mrbah · · Score: 4, Informative

    Install Skype at both ends and start a video call between them. Enable full screen mode and presto, you have a 24/7 live video link.

    1. Re:Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition.

  10. Home made thing. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 5, Informative

    At your gramp's kitchen, two options:

    If you're not very adventurous: Any computer. Any video conferencing software (such as Skype). VPN software (such as OpenVPN). VNC software (such as RealVNC). The best is if you get a computer where the screen and computer are in the same enclosure. You don't even hook up a keyboard or a rat. If something happens, you lgo on their desktop thru the VPN and VNC and click on Skype again or whatever.

    If you are very adventurous. Buy a nice flat screen display. Take the damn thing apart and get rid of all the crap except the screen and whatever signal massaging hardware is hooked up to it. Get a single board x86 computer that has a watchdog chip on it and built-in flash and tons of RAM for your software installation. Attach it and the screen's signal massaging hardware to one side of a rectangular piece of sheet metal the size of the display, and attach the display on the other side of it. Make that sheet metal a bit taller than the display. Get a camera with built-in microphone; take it apart, and attach it above the display. This probably requires drilling a few holes, tapping is optional, and will probably require some nuts, standoffs, etc. Run the wires however you can, preferably the shortest distance possible. Make an enclosure for this out of wood or something. Install Linux, OpenVPN, X, VNC, and your video conferencing software (something like Ekiga, hacked to automatically initiate a connection to you upon startup) into the flash in such a manner that upon power-up or reset, the entire flash partition is copied into RAM that's treated as a partition and booted from there. At all other times, the flash is never touched. Upon the computer crashing, locking up, or being h4x0red/0wn3d/etc., (which might happen once in a while), the watchdog will reboot it, so a fresh, original filesystem image is loaded back into the RAM and rebooted. This can happen in a matter of a minute from reset thru the videoconferencing software coming up again. With OpenVPN, you can always log in and fix something unexpected if that happens. While we're at it, build yourself one of these. And for extra credit, document the whole process with photos and videos and post it online for everyone to respect you in awe for being such a 1337 h4x0rz yourself. Heck, you might even be able to make a business out of selling a bunch of these. Hint: If you want to do that, stock up on a bunch of the same model display, because those change all the time and you can never buy the same exact thing (with same hardware attached) twice. If you attempt to go through one of those flatscreen stocking companies, the same display will cost you double and not come with the added hardware.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
  11. Hard videophone is the option by neutrino38 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We have bought a pair of Grandstream videophone. The are cheap and much easier to use than PC for older people as they are basically ... telephones.

    You can even setup Grandpa's one in auto-answer mode but I would not recommend it for obvious privacy issues as one of the comments above maliciously reminded.

    AH and to overcome NAT and dynamic IP address issues, you have to setup a hosted SIP proxy and media relay such as Asterisk. I cheat here as this the very business of my company.

    By the way if you want a pair of free SIP accounts and the Grandstream videophone, we could sell them to you.

  12. Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by BLAG-blast · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...when Gramps and Granny pass away live over the video link... oh dear! On the other hand it's good for children to learn about death at an early age.

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
    1. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by iworm · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's something about the concept of "passing away live" that confuses me...

    2. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by blue+l0g1c · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gr4mp4_B3nny: I told u I was hardcore.

    3. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by seanellis · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is the UK. Grandma and Gramps are probably, what, 32? 33?

  13. "Unlimited Broadband" by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Umm haven't you heard? You only get that if you dont use it.

    Start doing 24/7 video and you will find your connection throttled, or gone.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  14. Surveillance systems by yuna49 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are a variety of IP surveillance systems on the market designed for people who want to monitor their vacation homes, etc. Most of these are pretty inexpensive and easy to configure. That might be easier than building your own system using PCs.

    This company seems to offer a wide variety of solutions, some standalone, some PC based: www.fgeng.com

  15. Simple by hax0r_this · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't see why everyone is recommending complicated video conferencing setups. Just set up apache on each end to stream from your webcam and use iptables to block connections from any IP except the one on the other end. If you don't have static IPs write a little script to update iptables on the other end every time the local IP changes. Then use dyndns so you never lose track of the other end (only apply the whitelist on the streaming port so ssh doesn't get blocked. Then use ssh keys). Then all you have to do is point firefox to their dyndns address/port.

  16. Re:I have a suggestion... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It's a sad commentary on the "state of the art" of supposed Nerds here, too true."

    Don't you have 100 tacos to buy and a Doctor Who marathon to watch?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  17. Hardware Options by WebManWalking · · Score: 2, Informative

    You made no mention of what your hardware was, nor even whether or not you had a video camera.

    A few years ago, I bought some DLink webcams to set up a custom home video surveillance system, with remote monitoring from work. I believe that the model number was DCS-5300. But since they're mounted on-high, I'd rather not climb up on a ladder to find out for sure.

    For bandwidth and security reasons, I chose to get the 10/100Base-T versions, not wireless. The wired versions were also cheaper. You're going to have to run power cords to the wherever you mount them anyway, so why not an Ethernet wires at the same time?

    They're designed to be always on (for home surveillance), as you indicated you wanted, 24/7. I don't even remember if they have an on/off switch. They draw considerably less power than a computer and webcam combination.

    They came with their own Web server and have their own IP addresses on my home LAN. Of course, they're configurable with a Web page interface.

    You wanted using the system to be a no-brainer, presumably to help out your less-than-techno-savvy kids and parents. You can't get any more simple than these webcams. You just browse to them with any Web browser. You can set the browsers up with Bookmarks/Favorites to make getting there simple.

    The cams serve up a Web page with the camera feed on it. If you've configured them for permission to control the camera, the page will also have controls to pan, tilt and zoom.

    If you use a broadband router as a firewall, you'll have to configure the router to expose the cam's server port to the Internet. If you're concerned about the security of doing that, note that the Web server software resides on a chip. It doesn't have a disk drive. It isn't even big enough to contain a disk drive. It's as secure as the Web server that comes built into most broadband routers these days.

    As I said, I bought them years ago. There are bound to be other brands by now besides DLink that do the same things, if you want to shop around.

  18. iRobot has it too (but do not sell yet). by snikulin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    iRobot has a very nice device ConnectR.
    Apparently they do not sell it just yet. And yes, I would be careful buying it because my mom could be very... um... advisable?

  19. iChat is the best by jordandeamattson · · Score: 3, Informative

    Several have already said it, but I had to endorse iChat.

    I have 7x24 video conferencing up and running with a remote test team in India. The idea is that it is muted unless one or the other side wants to say something.

    We tried both Skype Video (another frequently mentioned option) and iChat. We are staying with iChat due to the simplicity, robustness, and quality.

    With Skype we had the connection drop multiple times in a night. With iChat it runs and runs and runs.

    With Skype, we had significant video and audio artifacts all of the time. With iChat they are infrequent occurrences.

    For Skype I had to write up an instruction guide. With iChat folks just got it.

    So, I say go with iChat.

  20. 24/7? Nofreakingway by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Funny

    On behalf of my fellow elderlies (I'm only honorary, at 53, but I'm in training), you do not want a 24/7 link. It needs to have a call siggnal and an on/off switch. You, and we, do not need to deal with your trauma of seeing grandpa bending grandma over the sink for a sneak-up quickie.

    Don't think we don't. You don't want to think about it at all, so consider the reasons why you don't want to.

    If you want a global on switch, fine. Let us have an override off switch. Put an hour delay cut-off on it if you like. We're old, it takes us more than the 10 minutes you kids take. (Just wait until you get to enjoy that aspect). And we're gladly admit that an hour is plenty, and we should be looked in on after that. Especially if we spend the whole hour.

    On the other hand, I've heard said "We wouldn't even bother to do it anymore, but the kids like to watch." If your elders have that mindset, go ahead and give them the means to offer you instruction 24/7. You don't think they haven't learned a few novel tricks in 40 or so years?

    Got a problem with this? Get over yourself. You're halfway to this age yourself, and I'm betting when you get there you'll have no plans on stopping.

    Go ahead and mod this funny, since you don't have a "+1 elders' wisdom" mod.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  21. Re:webcam video cast by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yup. VLC passing off to a Darwin Streaming Server and being viewed by VLC on the other end. Easy to do, no issues until power goes out

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  22. Re:I have a suggestion... by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't you have 100 tacos to buy and a Doctor Who marathon to watch?

    Yes, but because I took the time to fucking think about it, the PVR in my PC is working just fine so I'll timeshift the Dr Who marathon a bit and take the time to reply to you. Anyway, the Tacos are on their way and it takes a while to stuff 100 of them into the delivery guy's car (so i hear).

    I agree with the parent's sentiment - what has happened to the nerd way of doing something because it needed to be done? Very few people want to think about their problems anymore.

    The powerful scientific pocket calculator was the start of all this hoo haa. Kids were dumbed down and started forgetting to do basic arithmetic (yes, there are many who can't work out how much change I get when the till is down and I've just ordered a hundred tacos).

    The Intarwebs has been the other downfall. People are only too happy to put "i want to do X" into Google and click pages. If no useful results come up they bitch and moan that there is no way to do X (maybe X is just something so menially boring that nobody documented it, or it's just dumb, or nobody ever thought of it yet) but these people don't care.

    What you're seeing people is the well-established decline in intelligence and determination which comes with the "google-it" culture.

    --
    I drink to make other people interesting!
  23. I hate to sound cynical, but: by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You likely won't get away with the bandwidth you'll use doing this -- especially if it's Comcast. Inside the first month, they'll be all up in your business, threatening to shut you down, etc. because you dare to use the bandwidth you're paying for. I don't imagine it's going to be any better with any other ISP either, unless you buy business-class service, in which case they have less of a right to "manage" the bandwidth you're paying (way too much) for. A better idea would be to have a video link-on-demand instead of 24/7; sorry, pal. :-/

  24. the best tool for fighting for privacy with by alizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a 24/7 video link is your hat. Take it . . . and drop it over the camera when you're doing anything you don't want the viewer to see.

    1. Re:the best tool for fighting for privacy with by Loibisch · · Score: 2

      That doesn't solve the audible problem.

  25. Re:In the us unlimited broadband may be going away by Provocateur · · Score: 4, Funny

    Considering the depths this thread has gone to, did you misspell streaming on purpose?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  26. WiFi or Ethernet Webcams... by TavisJohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are self contained WiFi and Ethernet webcams (Most have a mini web server built in). That, a router and a Dynamic IP Name Service ( http://www.dyndns.org/ ) will finish off the bill. Many routers have built in support for some Dynamic IP Name Services. You set the router to forward Port 80 (Or whatever port the webcam ues) to the IP address of the webcam. Then you just point the computer at the URL and you are seeing still images or streaming video. Most Webcams even support a password system so only those who you want to have access will. No dedicated computer, software, or anything like that.

  27. Re:I have a suggestion... by crossmr · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet you have an automatic machine that chases whipper-snappers off your lawn.

  28. VLVC by atarione · · Score: 3, Informative

    seems like a easy and free / multi platform and open source solution is the VLVC plugin for VLC

    http://www.vlvc.net/en-home.html

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
  29. Re: Japan has been there for a long time by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 2, Informative
    In 1974 I was stationed in Japan and they had a midnight TV show from the public baths where you got to see breasts.

    The Japanese have had porn for a while, but they are clever about it. For instance they have porn magazine vending machines on the street, but a cover comes down over the magazines till after 8PM, then you can see what you would be buying. They also have beer vending machines. In some ways they are very advanced.

  30. iChat has AUTO ANSWER! by MrHatken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just to second the suggestion for iChat and point out that iChat has a (command-line enabled) AUTO ANSWER facility. So when you ring your GrandParents they don't even need to click to answer.

    I don't find the iChat "Chat Request" panel to be that intuitive (for GrandParents). It just displays a pane with the request annoucement but no buttons. You need to click on the panel to make it expand to show the accept/reject buttons.

    Auto-Answer can also help if GrandParents aren't computer literate or have trouble seeing the small on-screen pointer.

    Of course, most people don't like the invasion of privacy that this allows but then if you are thinking of video-chatting 24x7 this should not really be a problem.

    Google for how to do it ...

    Cheers,
    Ashley.