Slashdot Mirror


Inside India's CAPTCHA Solving Economy

Anti-Globalism points out an analysis of India's CAPTCHA-solving industry posted at ZDNet. It begins: "No CAPTCHA can survive a human that's receiving financial incentives for solving it, and with an army of low-waged human CAPTCHA solvers officially in the business of data processing while earning a mere $2 for solving a thousand CAPTCHAs, I'm already starting to see evidence of consolidation between India's major CAPTCHA solving companies. The consolidation, logically leading to increased bargaining power, is resulting in an international franchising model recruiting data processing workers empowered with do-it-yourself CAPTCHA syndication web based kits, API keys, and thousands of proxies to make their work easier and the process more efficient."

167 comments

  1. Proof that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you CANNOT stop advertising/spam. There is simply too much money in it. I think Ani said it best when she said "Fuck this time and place".

    1. Re:Proof that by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually AI is both going to kill the "captcha solving community" soon enough, and solve the spam problem, but a bit later.

      Unfortunately you can also bet that China (and the democrats) are going to use it to select "acceptable" viewpoints only.

    2. Re:Proof that by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately you can also bet that China (as all other governments) are going to use it to select "acceptable" viewpoints only.

      There, fixed that for ya.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:Proof that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      best way to stop spam is by educating the recipient that it is bad to buy from a spammer.

    4. Re:Proof that by Butisol · · Score: 1

      Maybe spam can't be totally stopped, but it can be seriously curtailed with proper protocols and laws. Either the cost or the risk (or some combination of the two) of sending out spam has to outweigh the risk of sending it before it's significantly reduced.

    5. Re:Proof that by billcopc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or, as the consensus on /. seems to be, we could just kill all the spammers in ritualistic fashion.

      It could be the next extreme reality show for TV... Fear Factor Spam Edition! Have them go through the trials, eat pig rectums and get covered in bees, then the winner gets to shoot the other participants in the head - and then of course, we off the winner too!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:Proof that by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Yeaaaaah.... I'm going to have to ask you to look at all the Scandinavian countries....

      "Doin' it wrong" is not a basic component of government. There are more and less corrupt systems.

    7. Re:Proof that by ciej · · Score: 1

      no, tell them all your going to kill all them but the winner gets to die quickly.

    8. Re:Proof that by Jimmy_B · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, even if no one ever bought a single thing from spammers, the spam would still continue. You see, spammers don't need to sell anything to make money; they only need to convince gullible merchants to pay them to spam. In fact, I suspect that this is the sole driving force between spam today; there is so much spam of such low quality that it seems highly implausible that there are enough suckers to support it all.

      No, the real root problem is multi-level marketing, which turns suckers into salesmen who, having fallen for one scam already, will easily fall for another. MLM tricks people into buying huge quantities of merchandise that they can't sell, so they turn to spammers for help. That's why the overwhelming majority of spam is for the small handful of products which are sold using MLM. The rest is scams (which only need one person to fall for them) and viruses (which can persist long after their author has moved on).

    9. Re:Proof that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offering illegal drugs to children is currently illegal in most parts of the world yet spammmers do it daily. If you have kids and they get and offer, are you going to report it to your local county DA?

    10. Re:Proof that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scandinavian countries are some sort of secluded paradise, and you cannot even arrive at their airports without Scandinavian people trying to burn you alive with Molotov cocktails, just because you are a black guy coming from the United States.
      Anyways, they don't count or are important for the world economy or politics.
      The "as all other governments" thing was referring to our ole USA, with our PATRIOT Act, illegal wiretapping, Guantanamo bay spa, and that woman Palin firing her brother in law from the state police force, without any justifiable reason, just because her sister wanted her to do so... Our little Adolph-Hitler-in-skirts from Alaska...

    11. Re:Proof that by Kooty-Sentinel · · Score: 1

      Why was parent marked troll? I think this is a perfectly valid point.

      --
      Your evaluation period for Productivity 1.0 has ended. Please purchase more coffee to continue using this product.
    12. Re:Proof that by Kooty-Sentinel · · Score: 1

      Damnit... MODDED Troll.

      --
      Your evaluation period for Productivity 1.0 has ended. Please purchase more coffee to continue using this product.
    13. Re:Proof that by erenzin · · Score: 1

      you CANNOT stop advertising/spam. There is simply too much money in it. I think Ani said it best when she said "Fuck this time and place".

      It's not just about advertising and spam. There are actually legitimate uses for this type of resource. http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/video/videopage?videoId=3394568&categoryId=3060647&n8pe6c=2

    14. Re:Proof that by ypctx · · Score: 1

      I suggest you read more about the AI. Saying "AI is going to change /insert some little thing here/" is an act of ignorance - strong AI is going to change everything, and in none of the ways that we are able to predict.

    15. Re:Proof that by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Oh you want the long version. Okay, weak AI, consisting of isolating the letters followed by letter recognition by a feature-detector-based neural net single letter detector (can be expanded in various ways, but this simple setup breaks a hell of a lot of captcha systems) (this theory was invented in the 1960's btw it's "perceptron" with backpropagation training (which admittedly came later))

      Current problem is the size of the neural nets necessary to do this : to get started, you need a neural net of 1600 input neurons for basic recognition, which don't even do any processing but need to be connected. So for a "full mesh" connection, the most simple type, we're talking 1600^2 processing steps per captcha at least.

      Fortunately 4 months ago a paper came out how to do the same (well 900^2 processing steps) in about 10000 processing steps by using feature detector neurons, offering a nicely working way to eliminate connections that are going to end up zero'd out anyway. I don't think captcha's will survive that paper, even if they probably have a few months left.

      These systems will become obsolete once it becomes possible (using GPU's ?) to actually simulate 1600^2 neural nets fast enough. If you can grow them, you'd need about (320*200)**4 neurons to solve any type of captcha better than any human possibly could.

      The theory is sound, and is proven to be working beyond human capability. It's just the hardware that needs to catch up a bit. After all you can't have a cluster of computers working 2 minutes on a single captcha (never mind the training time).

      A system that can simply read any possible captcha a programmer might come up with which is still "somewhat" decipherable by a human, is not long. Perhaps a few years.

    16. Re:Proof that by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Really? I have yet to receive a single e-mail for MLM products. And I'm an e-mail administrator too, and see the spam trap of multiple people.

      The type of spam varies over time, but generally consists of:

      - Drugs. Most noticably viagra, cialis and rogaine, but also more mundane drugs.
      - Sex-related snake oil.
      - Nigerian 419 scams.
      - Fake watches, purses and other designer products.
      - Portuguese, Korean and Russian spam which I have no idea what is for.
      - Indians with job offers. They're not really recruiters, they just want to submit the resume of thousands of people to thousands of real job recruiters, in the small hope to get a finder's fee every now and then.
      - Kooks who spam their latest religious/philosophical discovery.
      - Spam from Network Solutions, the Hotel California of internet businesses.

      None of these are for MLM based products, unless the Korean/Russian/Portuguese ones are.

    17. Re:Proof that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweden is Scandinavian. Governments are corrupt and totalitarian everywhere.

    18. Re:Proof that by Jimmy_B · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? Sellers who got their stuff through multilevel marketing schemes generally don't disclose that fact. I don't know what percentage of spam can be traced back to MLM (determining that would take some serious investigative work), but I do know that one of the major MLM companies is Herbalife, which (a) sells drugs and (b) doesn't allow its distributors to disclose their relationship. Also, those finders fees you mention are a form of MLM themselves.

    19. Re:Proof that by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      One thing to keep in mind is that the EU has some "interesting" side-effects that make thing a bit more complex; I don't know the details and I might be wrong but I've read some time ago that there is a EU-wide directive that makes it compulsory for a country to deport one of its own citizens to another country if they broke a law there.

      The last example I hear was about a Danish national who was deported to Germany because of his involvement in a "nazi" music label, and that carries a prison term in Germany even if it isn't illegal in Denmark.

      Problem being that since they are "nazis" anyone complaining is immediately shut down with "Don't tell me *you* are a Nazi!" - kind of like the Internet and kiddie porn.

      Again, not sure on how this works, but I wouldn't be surprised.

    20. Re:Proof that by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Yes it is.

      "Government" by *some* people... is inherently flawed and doomed to fail in the long run.
      The reason for this is the conflict of interests between the leader's personal interests and the interests of the people he has to lead.
      It only works, as long as there are common interests, as in any relationship.
      But because of the basic nature of humanity - whether you deny it or not -, to work for the own propagation*, those that became leaders, did so to gain more resources via power. Which means: Less resources for the rest.

      So to get a working government, you either have to put masochists up, who - because of some behavioral disorder - put themselves below the people,
      or you create an open system that lets the people themselves decide.
      This is what metagovernment.org tries to do, although they are still far from the more advanced model I'm developing. But we'll see...

      ___
      * Which is why you exist. Because your parents could get the resources to propagate. Nowadays you have to count the mental resources and propagation too. Also nowadays, you begin to get into bigger resource conflicts, that were not there some millennia ago. So nowadays, this conflict or interests becomes more and more visible. Prepare for some hefty civil wars as soon as food problems reach the "western" states.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    21. Re:Proof that by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Just to note: My correction of the post correcting you in no way means that I don't disagree with you wholeheartedly.

      Seriously: you mean to propose that the current thrust of censorship and control of discourse is coming from the Democrat side of things? I think you'll find that the primary actors in the various "Control your personal life" and "spy on you" initiatives are pretty much all elephants, buddy. Specifics include the propagandizing of the military by fundamentalist Christian doctrine, the Patriot Act, the telco immunity scandal...

      Also, on a "WTF, Mate?" level, what exactly is strong AI captcha solving going to do for censorship? And what is the chance of us solving strong AI "Soon," given that we've been trying since the 60s and gotten... you know, nowhere much?

    22. Re:Proof that by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      So charge a penny to receive e-mail from strangers! When people sign up for a newsletter, after the first e-mail, they add the new address to their whitelist, which automatically sends an e-mail back to the sender to refund the penny. Then watch as spam almost vanishes.

    23. Re:Proof that by Count+Fenring · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't buy the "the only motivations are power and progeny" arguments. For one, they don't explain history. For example, how the last Russian Tsar was a huge reformer, despite that weakening his power base, for one.

      Humans are complicated. Any system that treats them as simple, say by reducing their possible motivations to one or two, is flawed by nature.

    24. Re:Proof that by ypctx · · Score: 1

      1. the improvements in the processing efficiency and power are nice, but there's still the training time required for each specific captcha. So until strong AI, teams of humans will always be needed.
      2. what if the captcha creators switch to logical questions? Like "can 2 meters wide car pass through 1 meter wide bridge?" - these type of questions can be easy to generate, but hard to answer by AI without very large memory and a good reasoning.

    25. Re:Proof that by Viperpete · · Score: 1

      So you're saying MLMs (Multi-level Marketing) sells people goods, those people turn to MLMs (Mail List Managers) to spam as advertising.

      --
      loose: not fitting closely or tightly != lose: to suffer the deprivation of
  2. Interesting. by jcuervo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The going rate is $1k. For a simple /usr/share/dict/words attack on some random account on some random site, it'd cost you about $100.

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    1. Re:Interesting. by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that should've been $1/1k.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  4. This was quite predictable by rumith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Provided you have a sufficient number of dedicated employees, any technical problem is solvable. So when we have densely populated areas with extremely low cost of sustaining life (i.e. warm underdeveloped countries), it's much more rational to assign thousands of locals to perform simple recurring actions than to hire an adequate number of qualified professionals to develop software capable of the same thing.

    A list of measures that could help includes eradication of population in warm underdeveloped countries, and making the said countries either cold (or otherwise unsuitable for life without certain expenses) or much better developed, which would ruin this business model as far as I can see.

    1. Re:This was quite predictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A list of measures that could help includes eradication of population in warm underdeveloped countries,

      Wow, that was modded +3 insightful? You really meant to advocate genocide? Disgusting.

    2. Re:This was quite predictable by rumith · · Score: 1

      Not advocating genocide, just stating that theoretically it would solve the problem. Unfortunately for many, lots of people who do have enough power to exercise genocide do not find it disgusting (as the history has shown multiple times). If you still don't get it, treat that part of my post as an ill joke.

    3. Re:This was quite predictable by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Provided you have a sufficient number of dedicated employees, any technical problem is solvable.

      Bzzt. Epic fail on your premise.

    4. Re:This was quite predictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "eradication of population", and you got modded 'insightful'..tsk

      you 'eradicate' fools in developed countries like USA first, that will solve the problem for good.

    5. Re:This was quite predictable by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      A list of measures that could help includes eradication of population in warm underdeveloped countries

      I hate spam as much or more than the next fellow, but am unwilling to advocate "eradication of population" to solve it. And I find it amazing that a post that includes such a suggestion can get a +3 Insightful mod.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    6. Re:This was quite predictable by rumith · · Score: 1

      Yes, terminating the target market of spammers should work nicely, too :). Also please see my reply regarding "advocating genocide" here.

    7. Re:This was quite predictable by rumith · · Score: 1

      Please see my reply regarding "advocating genocide" here (you're at least the third poster who replied to me in this manner). In case you care, I am an ethnic Armenian, and due to certain events in the history of my people you'll hardly find someone less sympathetic to the cause of promoting genocide as an instrument of fighting spam than I am.

  5. Re:If you had to choose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd go for Anonymous Coward Just like you

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Temporary problem... by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    or much better developed, which would ruin this business model as far as I can see.

    It's starting to happen. Give it another 20 years and Indian wages will be high enough that this sort of stuff won't happen because Indian wages will be almost as high as a US worker's wages.

    China, I think, will take a bit longer, but I think they'll end up using up their own labor that's coming off the farms and such for the most part during the later stages of their industrialization.

    Heck US manufacturing goods exports and domestic production have been increasing recently, and that hasn't happened in years.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Temporary problem... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's starting to happen. Give it another 20 years and Indian wages will be high enough that this sort of stuff won't happen because Indian wages will be almost as high as a US worker's wages.

      Then the problem will simply move elsewhere. There will always be someone at the bottom of the wage food chain, willing to work for relative peanuts.
      This is already happening.

    2. Re:Temporary problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not going to run out of poor people any time soon. There are billions who would gladly solve captchas for $5 a day.

    3. Re:Temporary problem... by thedonger · · Score: 1

      I doubt very much twenty years is enough to bring the median income in India to $30k+. It is bound to happen eventually. Also, many Indian people live in the US currently, and I suspect will return to India with there retirements, spawning industry in India to support their needs. And that may be true for other countries, too.

      But back to that matter at hand, maybe this is a sign that CAPTCHA as we know it is on the way out.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    4. Re:Temporary problem... by discards · · Score: 1

      I think you have India and China confused there. India's economy is nearing recession while China is still growing as fast as ever. In 20 years it will be Chinese wages which are as high or higher than Western ones

    5. Re:Temporary problem... by maxume · · Score: 1

      There will always be someone at the bottom, but they won't always be willing to work for peanuts.

      That there are jobs that are not economic in some areas demonstrates this (because immigration laws limit the labor pool to the local barrel).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Temporary problem... by rumith · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that local and overseas powers make great use of keeping countries like India in the condition of cheap labour camps. So I don't believe that cheap labour and poor living conditions will ever disappear.

    7. Re:Temporary problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recession ? I don't think so. As of this month the GDP growth rate was 7.9% which is pretty high. The growth rate has come down from the 9% peaks it had hit earlier, but thats not the same as a recession (drop_in_growth_rate!=recession).

      Also, with the Communist parties no longer dictating what the government does, the next wave of reforms will be implemented which should prop the growth rate up.

    8. Re:Temporary problem... by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      It's starting to happen. Give it another 20 years and Indian wages will be high enough that this sort of stuff won't happen because Indian wages will be almost as high as a US worker's wages.

      Before that happens, Bill Gates will build new universities in other countries to keep the outsourcing race to the bottom alive. They can just iterate through a stack of countries. Don't expect it to help Hati or Papua New Guinea though - by the time of a few economies after India and China, software will write itself.

    9. Re:Temporary problem... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Then the problem will simply move elsewhere.

      Then where else, if not China/India? The only other major non-industrialized areas I can think of are Africa. Africa only has a population of ~922 million. India alone has 1.13B, China 1.3B.

      In addition, Africa is crippled by internal strife and warfare in ways that the other two aren't. Even if you toss in the Middle east, that's only another 197 million. South America is 371 million. And I wouldn't consider them unindustrialized.

      Even if you add those three regions up, we're still around half that of our current outsourcing targets. Don't forget that at that point China and India will be looking to outsource.

      There will always be someone at the bottom of the wage food chain, willing to work for relative peanuts.

      True, but in the future I don't see it being nearly as regionalized as it is now, resulting in wholesale outsourcing.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    10. Re:Temporary problem... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I doubt very much twenty years is enough to bring the median income in India to $30k+.

      You'd be surprised, I think. Part of it is that it doesn't have to actually reach median, just reach enough to make outsourcing there uneconomic, on average. You'll always have some back and forth, and that's not a bad thing.

      I suspect will return to India with there retirements, spawning industry in India to support their needs.

      Putting more demands on the Indian labor pool.

      It's creating a self-feeding cycle that I see raising effective wages. The Indian people themselves wanting and consuming more, enjoying a higher style of living, for example.

      Besides, it's not just the wages going up in the USA, it's also wage stagnation, deflation happening in the USA.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    11. Re:Temporary problem... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      India's economy is nearing recession

      While we're arguably in a recession right now. Part of the reason for the slowing of the growth in India is the cost of oil, which is making everything more expensive.

      Another part is that expenses in India have hit a point where it's no longer worth the expense to outsource many things there. Without the constant addition of jobs and such from the USA and other countries, growth will slow.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    12. Re:Temporary problem... by Butisol · · Score: 1

      Or US wages will decline to the level of Indian wages...

    13. Re:Temporary problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he did say "20 years from now". For comparison, think about 20 years AGO. 1988. It was still the Cold War, and we didn't know at the time that it was almost over. China and India weren't on the outsourcing radar yet for tech jobs; it was all about Japan. Eastern Europe has changed a lot since then, too.

      20 years from now? How do we know there won't be cheap labor in Pakistan, Iran, the rest of the middle east, Africa, South America? Indonesia? And most of those have much higher population growth rates than the West.

      [We also don't know who will go to war with who in that timespan. Hell, we can't make good guesses beyond one year; last year no one really knew there'd be a war in Georgia. In 1998 no one really knew Iraq would invade Kuwait. And so on. If India or China are involved in any conflict, that changes the outsourcing equation.]

    14. Re:Temporary problem... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      It's really ironic that the story was submitted by someone named "Anti-Globalism". The long-term solution to this is globalism. As wages around the world normalize, the difference between highest paid and lowest paid people in the world decreases, making this sort of thing economically unfeasible.

    15. Re:Temporary problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In twenty years Indian wages will have surpassed USAian wages and the outsourcing will be from India to USA. Employment is elastic just like my economics professor said.

    16. Re:Temporary problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will always be someone at the bottom of the wage food chain, willing to work for relative peanuts.

      This only works if there's multiple orders of difference in the wages and the cost of living. The difference between the acverage income in "poor" and "developed" countries has actually been decreasing at a steady pace in the past decades. If this continues there may one day be only so small a difference that a dozen programmers/engineers are the better choice to solve almost any problem instead of a horde of wage slaves that essentially perform the jobs of monkeys with typewriters.

  8. antispam wetware by Horar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe the next logical step is for someone to start an industry based on organizing cheap labor to combat the spam that gets around our automated anti-spam measures. Fight fire with fire.

    1. Re:antispam wetware by erikina · · Score: 1

      Uggghh... I hope you're going for funny mod.

      Seriously, if it's come to this - I'd like a web-of-trust based reputation system. Take a look at the freenet project, they got some very promising ideas.

    2. Re:antispam wetware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Some of us are already doing this. I employ an India-based 'personal assistant' to do a lot of the pointless tasks I don't want to waste my time with.
      This costs me $45 U.S. a month for about 15 hours work. One of the tasks she does for me is log into my email account a few times a day and delete and spam. Simple, really.

    3. Re:antispam wetware by Horar · · Score: 1

      Thanks for mentioning that because it is exactly the kind of service that I had in mind when I wrote my original comment. I'm just wondering where it will lead in another year or two as those 'personal assistant' businesses scale up and amalgamate in the same way that these nuisance businesses have been.

    4. Re:antispam wetware by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are plenty of anti-spam systems that aggregate 'This is spam' clicks from their users (I'm pretty sure that Google and Yahoo! do, I think there are systems that are more explicit about it).

      The only payout is in supposedly lower spam->inbox rates though.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:antispam wetware by Horar · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I use gmail to filter my email for that very reason. However there is always still some spam that gets through and maybe adding some cheap intelligent labour to the system will get those false positives even closer to zero.

    6. Re:antispam wetware by AlpineR · · Score: 1

      One of the tasks she does for me is log into my email account a few times a day and delete and spam.

      With assistants like that, who needs enemies?

    7. Re:antispam wetware by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I employ an India-based 'personal assistant' ... One of the tasks she does for me is log into my email account a few times a day and delete spam.

      How ironic, she's probably right next door to the people who created it to begin with.

      This reminds me of a company I used to work for. One division created toxic waste and another division was paid by the Federal gov't to clean up that very same waste. It was a great racket while it lasted.
             

    8. Re:antispam wetware by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      This costs me $45 U.S. a month for about 15 hours work. One of the tasks she does for me is log into my email account a few times a day

      In that case, I hope you're not receiving any information by email worth more than $45/month.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:antispam wetware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know for a fact you can get a servant in India - 24/7 - cooking, cleaning, grocery shopping etc... for $45. For the whole month.

    10. Re:antispam wetware by New_Age_Reform_Act · · Score: 1

      so you trust them with your password huh?

      --
      "The New Age. The New Beginning."
    11. Re:antispam wetware by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      His e-mail password, yes.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    12. Re:antispam wetware by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      What kind of information would that then be? A new business idea or something? Because if you are a personal assistant, I don't think you'd be interested in a new business idea.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    13. Re:antispam wetware by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Passwords to any system containing personal or financial information, and, yes, new business ideas. A personal assistant might not be interested in such things, but he or she is in a rapidly growing economy, surrounded by people who are and might well be willing to pay a lot more than $45/month for them. If you employ a PA in your own country, then they're bound by the same set of laws as you, in the same jurisdiction as you for matters of contract violation, and (most importantly) easy to track as a physical person if they do something unethical.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  9. So let me get this straight... by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...you're going to reduce the human population by cloning the U.S. military's Reporting and Planning Terminal?

    1. Re:So let me get this straight... by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      Well, you'll certainly reduce the human population on the Internet with threats like this:

      http://www.sed.monmouth.army.mil/comm/cms/RAPTer.htm wants to load an applet.
      GNU Classpath's security implementation is not complete.
      HOSTILE APPLETS WILL STEAL AND/OR DESTROY YOUR DATA!

  10. Captchas need to evolve by pcjunky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of asking people to type in badly form text how about answering a question only an English speaker could. Like what is the forth word from the beginning of this sentence?

    1. Re:Captchas need to evolve by hcetSJ · · Score: 1

      Um, they speak English in India. At least, it's relatively common there compared to other parts of Asia (comes with the former-English-colony territory).

      I've also seen a prediction that in some small number of years (like 10), China will become the world's largest English-speaking nation.

      --

      This side up.
    2. Re:Captchas need to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your plan is perfect, because these captcha solving droids do not understand English.

      Piglatin is the only way to protect our Ticketmaster tickets!

    3. Re:Captchas need to evolve by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 4, Funny

      Instead of asking people to type in badly form text how about answering a question only an English speaker could. Like what is the forth word from the beginning of this sentence?

      Most brilliant ironic troll message...ever.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    4. Re:Captchas need to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Instead of asking people to type in badly form text how about answering a question only an English speaker could. Like what is the forth word from the beginning of this sentence?

      That would probably eliminate 80% of Americans.

    5. Re:Captchas need to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of asking people to type in badly form text how about answering a question only an English speaker could.

      It is an awesome idea to capitalize on language differences. With only 90 million English speakers in India, it seems like this step will significantly reduce the problem.

    6. Re:Captchas need to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they speak English in India.

      ...and they probably can spell it better than the GP, as well.

    7. Re:Captchas need to evolve by brjndr · · Score: 1

      It's estimated that 8% of India speaks English, which would be 90 million people. That's second only to the United States.

    8. Re:Captchas need to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You didn't interpret this correctly. The sentence he was referring to was, "Tomatoes left on the vine will rot in humid weather." You see, here the forth word is "rot", which means rotate the stack. And forth keywords are English based. Next time don't be so quick to judge.

    9. Re:Captchas need to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would probably eliminate 80% of Americans.

      They should base the questions/language on the type of site though, for example klingon captchas for slashdot would be an interesting experiment.

    10. Re:Captchas need to evolve by dubz · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I smell language-based racism. Other than that, most Indians do speak English, and the number of English speakers in China is also growing very rapidly.

    11. Re:Captchas need to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of asking people to type in badly form text how about answering a question only an English speaker could. Like what is the forth word from the beginning of this sentence?

      Most brilliant ironic troll message...ever.

      Instead of asking people to type in badly form text how about answering a question only an English speaker could. Like what is the forth word from the beginning of this sentence?

      Most brilliant ironic troll message...ever.

      well the guy who slove CAPTCHA also knows english i guess

    12. Re:Captchas need to evolve by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Um, they speak English in India. At least, it's relatively common there compared to other parts of Asia (comes with the former-English-colony territory).

      So why can't Americans speak English? ;)

    13. Re:Captchas need to evolve by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I came across something like that recently to post on someone's blog. It has questions like 'what is nineteen times sixteen' and 'what is the number after five'. Since the blogger was French, so were the questions (the ones I posted are rough translations), which probably put a lot of people off commenting since the post in question was in English.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  11. Re:More Evidence for me by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 1

    Rapters are fast and intelligent, hunt in packs, and hell.. they can even open doors! Support rapter cloning!

    Surely such intelligent rapters would know how to produce more rapters without cloning?

    --
    She made the willows dance
  12. Well, what do you expect? by oiron · · Score: 1

    When the prevalent economic theory is that the entire responsibility of a corporation is to make a profit for the shareholders, and lots of willing serfs (hard to blame them, really) ready to do even the most dumb of tasks, here's where you end up. Well, here and gold farming on MMORPGs... Honestly, at least this is something with a practical purpose. Gold farming strikes me as one of the most pointless things you can do. "WILL BREAK CAPTCHAS FOR FOOD?"

    1. Re:Well, what do you expect? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Gold farming is roughly equivalent to producing any sort of shlock media.

      Someone is willing to pay for it and pretty much all it takes to produce it is a bit of time.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  13. CAPTCHA Farming by Scott+Kevill · · Score: 1

    The natural parallels with MMO gold-farming are interesting.. and depressing. The world is broken.

    --
    GameRanger - multiplayer gaming service for PC and Mac games
    1. Re:CAPTCHA Farming by erroneus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was rather thinking along the same lines, but with a little more extremism.

      We've all heard the "thousand monkeys with typewriters" thing. Well, they actually HAVE a thousand monkeys with typewriters and they are using them. (And before anyone gets all cross-ways about my use of the term monkeys, to know me knows I use the term affectionately and I consider myself to be a monkey as well.) The fact of the matter is, there is such a tremendous disparity between standards of living between out "first world" and their "third world" that is was a matter of time before someone decided to tape the potential between the two. (The means by which we extract energy from everything is by exploiting the difference potential between two points whether that may be a difference in temperature or a difference in ionic charge or a difference in air density.) In this case, it's the difference in economic levels that is being exploited and it's a very dangerous and damaging path that is being taken. Consider what happens you have two vessels of liquid and a hose. A siphon can be created to exploit the difference in water levels. And while this could be made to boost the level in the more empty container, the more full container will forever lose its potential and value as nothing could, in turn, be used to re-fill its container -- the flow is exclusively one-way.

      Now one might suggest that we simply shift to more advanced economies. We said that long ago when farmers were complaining... we said that when manufacturing workers were complaining... we say that today while information workers are complaining. The trouble is, once IP and information is fully exploited, what will be left to move on to? I'd say we just ran out of markets to be dominant in. And this is NOT new. This is exactly how the Roman and British empires fell.

    2. Re:CAPTCHA Farming by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      The natural parallels with MMO gold-farming are interesting.. and depressing. The world is broken.

      It's for added realism to the game.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:CAPTCHA Farming by Scott+Kevill · · Score: 2

      Arbitrage. The differences tend to resolve themselves as an equilibrium is reached.

      --
      GameRanger - multiplayer gaming service for PC and Mac games
    4. Re:CAPTCHA Farming by sowth · · Score: 1

      The trouble is, once IP and information is fully exploited, what will be left to move on to?

      Nanotech? Genetic engineering?

      I'd say we just ran out of markets to be dominant in. And this is NOT new. This is exactly how the Roman and British empires fell.

      I don't think so. The Roman empire fell because they pissed off a hired military leader who was able to rally a whole people to war--Attila the Hun. The British empire fell because they relied on labor from their opressive rule over other countries. I won't say this will not happen to the US, but your reason doesn't seem plasible. Also notice the Roman (Itailian, Spanish, Portugese) and British people are still around and doing quite well, even if their empires have crumbled.

      Your view seems quite pessimistic to me. Maybe everyone in the US won't be filthy rich, but life won't suck unless you are spoiled. Craploads of money isn't everything...

  14. Best way to combat spam is to combat botnets by BlueParrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The main reason spammers can keep doing what they do without consequences is that they are hard to track as they exploit users with insecure systems. You can't punish the companies that are advertised, because it would make it very easy for a competitor to get his rival in trouble by sending spam in the victim's name. You can't punish the users who have their machiens compromised and used tos end spam because you would hit a sizeable fraction of the population, virtually all of which simply did not know how to protect themselves.

    No, there's only two places to adress the problem:

    Firstly the ISPs could use traffic analysis to determine which of their users are infected and allert them about the problem. The problem with this aproach is that such systems could likely be abused to spy on the clients, so some strict regulation woudl be necessary.

    Secondly you could start to actually penalise the main company responsible for having put millions and millions of extremely vulnerable systems into the wild. No, it's not just the fault of stupid users. Yes you would still get some infections because users are stupid, but it would likely be an order of magnitude fewer if it was not for Microsoft's downright pathetic security record. I know they made a bad attempt to adress it with UAC in Vista, but quite frankly they messed it up so bad that large number of users simply turn it off ( the fact they felt the need for a GUI setting that turns it off system wide says a lot about how messed up it is ). I'm not saying we should bitchslap every single software vendor that has security vulnerabilities in its code ( it is impractical for obvious reasons ) but when a company with the resoruces Microsoft has more or less ignores the problem for several years, and then makes a half arsed attempt at fixing it, then a charge of damage caused through gross negligence would not be out of line.

    1. Re:Best way to combat spam is to combat botnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Users need education too,

      If you have an infected computer , your routers outgoing traffic is likely to grow huge over time.
      Why not Enable the routers outgoing logging?
      This may be used to let you know the computer may be infected . Normal outgoing traffic will be things like automatic updates to anti virus , OS update checks and RSS feeds.and of course email requests and web page visits
          Let the machine idle for say several hours . Do not use it . If you have hundreds of K or many megabytes of outgoing data in your routers outgoing log, you may be infected or you need to to determine what is sending this traffic if legitimate.
        The point being .. People need to know what their computers are doing and too many don't know or care .
      People want to treat a computer as an appliance
      and it's too complicated to ever be just that .

    2. Re:Best way to combat spam is to combat botnets by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      You can't punish the companies that are advertised, because it would make it very easy for a competitor to get his rival in trouble by sending spam in the victim's name.

      This is where the Blue Security Model was a huge success?

      You simply could not pull that kind of shenanigans without ruining your own business model. You'd have to send enough spam to trigger the blue frogs to attack, but that would draw away all of your own customers. And once your "competitor" is gone, you can start up again, but you'll only get nailed by the Blue Frogs yourself.

      The Blue Security model was-and still is-the ONLY anti-spam technology that was effective.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    3. Re:Best way to combat spam is to combat botnets by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      ( the fact they felt the need for a GUI setting that turns it off system wide says a lot about how messed up it is )

      Can you tell me why there is a GUI setting to disable DEP?

    4. Re:Best way to combat spam is to combat botnets by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      The Blue Security model was-and still is-the ONLY anti-spam technology that was effective.

      Pardon? How was it effective?

  15. Re:If you had to choose by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Funny

    Heavens, no! At Slashdot, CAPTCHA-breakers are used for less lucrative motives than elsewhere. The posts are, in fact, originating from PROFESSIONAL CAPCHA ENTRY OPEATORS AND WE CAN DO EVEN 25000 ENTRIES PER DAY AS MY COMPANY IS A 25 SEATER FIRM SPEALISED IN DATA ENTRY.

    I saw a crack site once where the CAPTCHA you had to fill out to download the file had a myspace watermark. I believe it would be crackstorage.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  16. Pointers? by Luthair · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they have any pointers, I fail at CAPTCHAs all the time.

    1. Re:Pointers? by AceofSpades19 · · Score: 1

      const char* pointer = CAPTCHA; there you go

    2. Re:Pointers? by Splab · · Score: 1

      Yesterday I signed up with Google, took me 7 tries before I finally got one right - almost gave up on it.

  17. Turn it to advantage by Spacejock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If every site took up that reCaptcha thing all these paid captcha-solvers would be helping to digitise thousands upon thousands of old books ... on the spammers' dime.

    1. Re:Turn it to advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I checked out reCaptcha, and it's pretty cool. Then it dawned on me the system wouldn't know if it was asking users to solve a CAPTCHA of swear words... Which would be hilarious! (all the words come from books, so it's unlikely, but it could happen)

  18. If used to digitize books by transporter_ii · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At 2.00 for a thousand capatas, they could probably scan and convert books at a pretty fast pace, too.

    An army of people typing in a page at a time could probably turn out a complete book in less than an hour.

    Lots of legal and illegal uses for that.

    transporter_ii

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  19. It can be solved automatically and for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are some open source or free captcha breakers out there already:

    http://churchturing.org/captcha-dist/

    http://network-security-research.blogspot.com/2008/01/yahoo-captcha-is-broken.html

    etc.

    Captcha is broken, captcha is dead. Stop pretending that half-measures will secure anything. It isn't real security and it never was.

    1. Re:It can be solved automatically and for free by dw604 · · Score: 1

      my personal tactic is a CAPTCHA with a plain string of 4 letters repeated 3 times, all in the same random color, with mild random x/y offset and rotation. they overlap greatly and look nothing like the original letters, yet it is often easy for a human to figure out by looking at all sides. just how is OCR going to solve that??

  20. Re:More Evidence for me by Yoozer · · Score: 1

    Nature will find a way!

  21. Obligatory xkcd by The+Qube · · Score: 3, Funny
    --

    "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

  22. Re:More Evidence for me by haluness · · Score: 1

    > My proposal is to clone rapters

    Aah, why bother with that hassle? Just let people kill of people randomly - it does the same job as raptors and we don't need to have the hassle of genetic enginering

  23. Re:More Evidence for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your statement doesn't really work. You can't blame living too long or healing ourselves for overpopulation. Most countries that are first world have a birth rate that is less than 2.1 needed to sustain the population. Overpopulation is a function of poverty. Once you have money you start having less kids.

  24. Re:It is that hard??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would seem a website mostly visited by nerds and geeks of all kinds should be a little more intelligent than most

    Yes, most of us are indeed more intelligent than most. That's how we know what CAPTCHA stands for, without being told.

    clearly the evidence shows most visitors and posters are just as dumb as the average

    By this, you mean the ones who don't know what a CAPTCHA is? The ones who spend minutes typing out a reply to bitch about the acronym not being spelled out, when googling for the acronym would only have taken a few seconds?

  25. Re:More Evidence for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rapters are fast and intelligent

    Great! Can they solve CAPTCHAs?

  26. business opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well there's a good opportunity for Google to fight back, they could have another army of Indian Data entry operators who delete posts by advertisers who've hacked the captcha's.

  27. No Laws please by gerf · · Score: 1

    Lawmakers are incompetent and unable to adjust to the realities of day-to-day changes in spam techniques.

    I just with Gmail would go back to the "Invite only" approach, with SMS as a secondary measure, along with a remote possibility of snail-mail to cover everyone else. Unless we all use OpenID or some other general log-in function, small sites would be screwed by this approach.

    Hrm, maybe that's a good argument for OpenID.

    1. Re:No Laws please by Nullav · · Score: 1

      I just with Gmail would go back to the "Invite only" approach,

      The only way that would make a dent in Gmail's growth is if every existing user were booted off. (Which would kinda' kill Gmail.)

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    2. Re:No Laws please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... gmail goes back to invite only, I like this idea. I have 5 or 6 gmail accounts right now. Wonder how much I can make selling invites.

    3. Re:No Laws please by gerf · · Score: 1

      It's not about selling or limiting people, but making things traceable. If you can see that spams originate from any particular branching of invite groups, you can tell that spammers control those accounts.

  28. Not Bill Gate's problem by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Excepting the conspiracy theories about BG, this is pretty much what I figure will happen. Outsourcing to India/China encompasses far more than software writing, after all.

    Don't forget that once fully industrialized, China and India will be looking to outsource as well.

    The other major possible population centers for replacing China and India tend to have some rather severe problems, starting with lower population levels, not to mention the civil wars, the lack of even basic infrastructure in many areas.

    Not saying that it won't happen even there, but the increased expense will tend to slow outsourcing stuff down such that the majority of production left in the USA will stay here.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Not Bill Gate's problem by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

      These posts assume that India and China will continue to exist in their present form.

      China and India both have to resist internal pressures to splinter into a collection of smaller states. The break up of the former USSR is an recent example.

      It is a seeming improbability that India has not already started to fall apart. Many Indian states are already autonomous, and political reality is that India has has deteriorated into an conglomeration of territories ruled over by "war lord" politicians who owe little loyalty either to the national government or any national political party.

      Through out its history, China has osculated between centralization and fragmentation. The current Chinese government has held unified sway for only 60+ years. Conditions there may change quickly or slowly, but they will change.

    2. Re:Not Bill Gate's problem by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      These posts assume that India and China will continue to exist in their present form.

      Your post assumes that this matters. I'm simply looking at population levels in a general manner, correlated with wage levels and support service availability.

      China and India currently have the advantage of low wages combined with acceptable levels of support services(stuff like roads, electricity, etc...)

      Whether China fragments into a dozen states or not, it doesn't matter as long as there isn't a huge amount of fighting. If there is, it'll create a pressure to keep jobs domestic or at least outsource to more stable areas(at the moment).

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  29. Downward spiral... by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's starting to happen. Give it another 20 years and Indian wages will be high enough that this sort of stuff won't happen because Indian wages will be almost as high as a US worker's wages.

    Indian wages will rise and US wages will fall until they're in parity.

    Our standard of living is falling here in the US (except for the very small minority of CEOs, politicians and stars). Yeah, it's rising in these third world countries, but the overall effect is that we'll never see the standard of living that our parent's generation (grandparent's generation for some of you) enjoyed. We're all in this downward spiral. Labor, regardless of how skilled it is, is a commodity.

    I have a very pessimistic view of the future of this planet and I fear for you young folks who are just starting out.

  30. Re:More Evidence for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because we can.

    At the end of the day the mad scientist will lay in his bed, look at the ceiling, and smile, knowing that, while his knowledge of genetic engineering could have cured cancer, diabetes, and a huge number of other diseases, he created a raptor instead, which is way cooler.

    Remember, raptors run at 10 m/s and they do not know fear.
    - XKCD

  31. Re:More Evidence for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or just "WTF" until you learn to spell raptor properly. Not sure why you want to clone Red Tailed Hawks and Eagles and all, but they don't prey on humans.

    But then, perhaps you were talking about the Toronto Raptors? Sure, I hate basketball and would probably run in fear from a team of large basketball throwing individuals trying to herd us into canyons or whatnot. Might work.

    Could also be the US Marine Corp squadron "The Raptors". You are right, they CAN open doors. Or just blow them up. The few, the proud, the cloned... Dang, I thought only Yoda got to see the clone wars.

    What's this - dinosaurs you say? Oh, Velociraptor! Gotcha. That would work. People can be pretty stupid, you could probably even get folks to pay for distribution by selling the velociraptors as pets. All the "gullible" folks order them from that ad on their TV - no more gullible folks. Hmm, might solve SPAM then too as there wouldn't be any more money in it.

  32. Interesting . . . by Quixote · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A company rep was quoted in the article:

    As 1 person can do 800 captcha entry per hour . . . .

    Interestingly, that's also about the rate established by Ben Franklin for a manual postal worker to sort mail.

  33. Text messages as CAPTCHAs by wwb · · Score: 1

    Bank of America, and probably others, use something they call SafePass as the equivalent of a CAPTCHA: they send a text message to your cell phone which you have to type back into a web page.

    In the end, how strong a CAPTCHA system you use comes down to who feels the pain. A few spam emails sent by our system? Small price to pay to sign up new users for our [email|blog|whatever] service. An unauthorized transfer of $any_amount that we'll have to cover? Clamp down hard.

  34. Nice name.. by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, at least you have a good username for your spiel.

    I don't think it's quite as bad as you think. Frankly, I'm surprised that we've stayed up as high as we have, and some turning points have happened faster than I thought.

    Basically, the Indians and Chinese are coming up far faster than we're coming down. It doesn't help us that we're outnumbered about 2 to 1 (Including Europe, Canada, and Australia along with the USA). It also doesn't help that we're looking at the generation that gained the maximum benefit from outsourcing - cheap goods while still having relatively high incomes.

    So yeah, I figure it's going to be a while before those of us in the USA and rest of Europe see a rise in standard of living other than through sheer technological progress. Buying a second home might not be as feasable to much of the population any more, but on the other hand we have much more effective medical(if expensive), cell phones, faster computers, bigger TVs, etc...

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Nice name.. by muellerr1 · · Score: 1

      Buying a second home has never been feasible for most of the population. It's only been during the last 50 years or so when credit became more accessible that most people were able to buy even their first homes without saving for most of their lives for a down payment.

    2. Re:Nice name.. by dubz · · Score: 1
      BitterOldGUy:

      Indian wages will rise and US wages will fall until they're in parity. ... ... I have a very pessimistic view of the future of this planet ...

      If Indian wages rise and US wages fall, the future of this planet is bad?

      Firethorn:

      but on the other hand we have much more effective medical(if expensive), cell phones, faster computers, bigger TVs, etc...

      Dude, all those "cell phones, faster computers, bigger TVs, etc." are manufactured in Asia (China mostly). Indians and Chinese have as good access to the latest electronics as you guys. Maybe some can't afford it, but like BitterOldGUy said, wages are going up over there. Medical care is also improving in Asia, but I agree they won't be able to match Western standards for some time.

    3. Re:Nice name.. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Maybe some can't afford it, but like BitterOldGUy said, wages are going up over there.

      And a lot of stuff over there is half the price it would be over here. I think that what I was trying to say is that eventually, while it might not be LCD TVs or highly shippable cell phones, but at some point the company will look at manufacturing costs in China and, for example, the rust belt in the USA and build somewhere in the midwest where labor is available and land inexpensive.

      For that matter, there's small but established retirement communities for expat retired americans. Social Security goes a lot further in India, Mexico, etc...

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  35. Watermelon size cock formula, FREE DOWNLOAD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best way to combat spam is to give away the crap they sell. No market no spam.

  36. Re:More Evidence for me by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

    Nope, he distinctly said raptErs, which pretty much refers to a type of console used by the U.S. Army (see post below). =)

    If he said raptOrs, he might've been referring to producing his own line of 10,000RPM SATA hard drives -- which would be a good thing, since there's only one manufacturer in the market at the moment, if you don't want to go with them you need to go the SCSI/SAS route.

    It would take a lot of time and effort, but you could probably wipe out humanity with them. A glass/ceramic/metal disk spinning at 10,000 RPM can do a lot of damage.

  37. Is this all true by feenberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are we sure any of this is really true? I can imagine that MS might find itself to slow to respond, but other players could. My guess is that these are classic "work at home" scams, where the victim is the hopefull worker, who sends money for a "kit" to start work, and then never gets any work to do. The claims about size and workload are merely details meant to add verisimilitude to an otherwise implausible story.

    1. Re:Is this all true by ibsteve2u · · Score: 0

      lolll...open a website promising something expensive to its users, use captchas to validate username and passwords, then monitor incoming IP addresses..even with the use of proxy servers sited in the U.S. (ahhh, capitalism...), you'll note enough offshore addresses to affect your impromptu conclusion that the story lacks "verisimilitude"...

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  38. Change trust model: !accountable/accountable by davidwr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The trust model needs to be changed from "not human"/"human" to "not accountable/accountable."

    If you can hold the person accountable for abuse, you can give him more privileges. Knowing who he is so you can bill him or sue him is one way to hold him accountable.

    Those who are unable or unwilling to provide either real-life contact information or usable billing information will be stuck with limited services.

    Those who live in countries where they cannot be held accountable will be similarly limited.

    The Yahoos and Googles of tomorrow will offer free email accounts but limit traffic to so many outbound messages or outbound megabytes a day until the user turns over a credit card or notarized copy of his proof of identity and proof of address.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  39. US or EU "culture" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My experience is that Indians overal have no knowledge about US or EU "culture".

    So working CAPTCHA's are:

    ????, Dewey, and Louie

    I believe I can ???

    don't let the ??? bugs bite

    1. Re:US or EU "culture" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:US or EU "culture" by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      Besides, Europeans have assured me that Americans have no culture.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
  40. Resources by localman · · Score: 1

    Some three billion people in poverty in the world, each with a mind more powerful than any computer (as proven by this task), looking to make a miniscule amount of money for themselves and their families. And this is the best the market can come up with? Sheesh.

  41. Why is this even legal? by carou · · Score: 1

    Are there any legitimate reasons to operate or employ a CAPCTHA solving business? The only uses I can think of involve spamming forums or identity theft. Why are these companies allowed to operate? If it were in the U.K., it could very well be in voliation of the Computer Misuse Act - do they not have equivalent legislation over there?

    1. Re:Why is this even legal? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Would you expect your government to legislate against a business model that brings in a large amount of foreign currency? Or would you expect them to promote laws that protect it. If you think the first is more likely, I draw your attention to recent copyright laws.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Why is this even legal? by carou · · Score: 1

      Would you expect your government to legislate against a business model that brings in a large amount of foreign currency?

      There are a number of areas in which they already do. Why legislate against, say, class A drugs, when instead you could regulate and tax them? Presumably they perceive the downsides as being more significant than the potential profits.

    3. Re:Why is this even legal? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Not a good counterexample at all. Drug laws relate to the sale of substances. They are preventing you from buying things. If they are produced locally then it's a zero-sum transaction for the national economy. If they are imported (as a lot of class As are, particularly most opiates) then it's a net loss for the economy - money is flowing from drug users to people with opium plantations. CAPTCHA solving is exactly the opposite. I doubt many Indian companies are using this service, so it's a one-way flow of foreign money into the country. Now, you might argue that, if all drugs were legalised, then local production would increase and they wouldn't need to be imported, but even then there isn't much of an export market for them, so they still wouldn't benefit the local economy.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  42. Nothing is impossible by GoodNewsOne · · Score: 1

    The spam problem has a technical solution. The keyword is innovation. The programs that recognize CAPTCHAs could be defeated for example by using evolutionary CAPTCHA described here http://network-security-research.blogspot.com/2008/08/around-captcha.html Malicious human CAPTCHAs recognitions could be defeated as well. And perhaps such approaches will appear in a short period of time ;-)

  43. It won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no incentive for users to give you billing or identity information just so you can hold THEM accountable when the account gets hacked. It would be rather better for them to NOT do that, in fact (just worse for you).

    So if you limit all the users who don't let you shift the liability onto them, they will ignore you and flock to services (like the ones we have today) that DON'T shift the liability onto them.

    If only I could opt out of Visa's bogus scheme for shifting their liability onto me ("Verified by Visa") by just switching to a competitor. Sigh.

  44. Re:More Evidence for me by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The solution is simple: employ India's poor in condom factories.
       

  45. The solution was obvious. by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    CAPTCHAs were designed to delineate between machine and human, then preclude the machine segment.

    Solution? Use humans.

    This never occurred to the designers of CAPTCHAs?

    Ridiculous for anyone to assume that the time involved was not worth doing it manually, in bulk processing. To assume their time has the same monetary value as that of the rest of the world is pretty narrow-minded, and somewhat arrogant, in my opinion.

  46. Pron proxies are cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cheapest, easiest way to solve 1000s of CAPTCHAs remains the pron proxy. You pay nothing, they solve 1000s of CAPTCHAs.

    Start a web site, put in a few teaser images, proxy a captcha from some site, force users to solve captchas for you to view their pron. Profit.

    The Internet is still inherently very very insecure. If you aren't paranoid about it, you don't know enough yet.

  47. Re:More Evidence for me by tubapro12 · · Score: 1

    Essentially, we humans are yorn, and we need Harika?
    Or perhaps Wells' Morlock and Eloi...

  48. MLM is the Opposite of Spam by roninamano · · Score: 1

    Your conclusion seems to vary drastically from reality. By definition the MLM is the opposite of spam. Each member actually buys and sells only to/from people who want their product or service. In fact, MLM groups can get snippy when people don't choose to participate in the social aspect of distribution (meetings, etc.). Spam by definition is stuff forced down your craw whether you buy or not. MLM is just a distribution method that uses word of mouth and relationships to sell stuff. "Buy from me, your friend/ son/ daughter, instead of a faceless chainstore. MLM just stands for Multi-Level Marketing and it gets a bad rap because it eats into the corporate propaganda machine of Madison Avenue (of course some MLMs are scams, but many are not). Attacking all MLMs is much like closing all of Usenet to get rid of some illegal crap. MLM is just people, period.

    Spam piles advertising on millions of people whom the spammer does not know.

    They are opposites. Not similar.

    1. Re:MLM is the Opposite of Spam by WNight · · Score: 1

      MLMs only sell to people who want the product? HAH!

      Tell that to thousands of victims (neighbors, relatives, co-workers) of Amway, Herbalife, Pre-paid legal, etc.

      Spam is used by the MLMers as well. If you can push crap to your neighbors you can push crap via spam.

    2. Re:MLM is the Opposite of Spam by roninamano · · Score: 1

      The definition of spam sure has changed! I thought spam was unwanted ads/ scams from strangers sent to millions of others. I didn't realize it was an appeal, or word of mouth recommendation from friends, family, and coworkers. Under your definition I don't get any email BUT spam. Those pesky personal messages from people I know! Lets just limit email to corporate appeals from monopolies in control.

      But the best part of your reply was the millions of "victims" of Amway, Herbalife, and Pre-paid Legal. Geez, those poor victims of soap products, vitamin supplements, and affordable legal services! Better to pay $350 per hour for the trustworthy lawyers you can find in the yellow pages rather than the $49 PPL rate! Better the vitamins from the nearest drug store chain than get a bulk discount! Better the soap from the nearest corporate giant (does Amway even sell soap? Is Amway even called Amway anymore? I don't think so)*! How dare anyone suggest a real person you know make so much as a penny on the transaction. Let it all go to corporate giants!

      But seriously, how can you say stuff from friends is spam? That's just lame. Very lame. If you lack the intestinal fortitude to say no thanks to a friend that's your problem, don't bad mouth the friend. (This is not an endorsement of the Network Firms listed above- except for Pre-paid legal because they rock for certain things and beat the pants of regular lawyers for anyone who isn't a billionaire).

      *I was ripped off when I joined Amway over 20 years ago. But it wasn't the company that ripped me off, it was the friend! A college professor of mine who wouldn't give the service. Also, while I did not profit, I did not lose much. The rip-off was that he did not provide "up-line" support to take care of my orders. I blame the friend, and was disappointed with the Amway. I think Network Marketing can be abused if the company lacks checks and balances, but if its got good checks, or if you have really good, trustworthy friends, then it works great. Don't knock it for silly reasons.

    3. Re:MLM is the Opposite of Spam by WNight · · Score: 1

      If you don't think friends of Amway zombies are victims, please do not interact with regular people.

      Besides, if you weren't so festering fucking dumb you'd see I said spam can be used on anyone, neighbors or not. Maybe, just maybe, you'd realize that spam is bulk unwanted email, and it counts even if you know the person. But considering that all your post does is pump MLMs, I'd say that you DO know the difference and are trying to cloud it, to make MLMs (and the assholes involved with them) look good. Are there any of these scams you didn't get into, in your attempt to coast through life being nothing but a nuisance to those around you?

      Frankly, anyone who can read knows that PLP is a huge scam and that anyone who posts positively about it is a liar, trying to trap you into the nightmare they can't escape from. Amways, etc, are the same. It's not the people, it's the materials that encourage everyone to act exactly alike - a soulless selling machine who shuns family who don't "support" their craziness.

      Thanks, but I can buy soap cheaper at Costco, without the cult aspect, the family members running when they see me, and without having to lie to strangers online about how great it all is. You're a perfect example of the shitstains involved in this.

    4. Re:MLM is the Opposite of Spam by roninamano · · Score: 1

      So what's your real story? Did a soapy budget lawyer steal your one and only girlfriend with organic vitamins or something? LOL. Nevermind. You're just being a pathetic Troll. I ignore you. Go find a bridge and hide under it. And go rinse your ignorant mouth out with soap while you are at it.

      But for the benefit of anyone else who is reading this thread, MLM is just a marketing method primarily using word of mouth. It is neither good nor bad. It all depends on the product/ service and the people involved. Some are outright scams, just like other business models have scams (think Enron). Period. And it has nothing to do with spam.

      As for Prepaid Legal. That I can talk intelligently about. See my website (click on link by my name). Go to the news section and you will see two lawyers. Both of them are ready willing and able to assist me when called upon, and one went to law school with me- sat right beside me in most of the first year courses. Neither is affiliated with PPL.

      How is getting a $49 per hour rate a scam? This is the same plan, and often the very same lawyers that provide legal benefits to employees as part of a benefits package. A guaranteed rate of $49 an hour is fantastic in a world where every dingbat with a law license wants to charge $350 per hour and up. Now, even in my case, with legal friends around, am I going to pay $25 for PPL to fight my speeding ticket or waste my buddies time and energy on such drivel? And most lawyers here charge at least $150 to fight these tickets unless you are part of a plan. It's a great plan that I would love to have but they won't accept my application because I'm a cartoon. But unlike the Troll I don't hate on others have it.

      And then there are the "expensive" PPL plans were they charge $10 more and cover you for ALL pre-trial and trial legal fees on driving related felonies such as vehicular homicide. $10 extra to cover $100,000 worth of legal fees sounds like insurance, not a scam. PPL is like AAA for legal stuff. It's good when you need it but better for some things than others. In addition, since the state licenses attorneys it can't be a scam because they are bound by the rules of the bar. But I don't like that argument since I consider the bar and the profession to be a pack of bloodsuckers... But at least with PPL they are less expensive. LOL. (Obviously I am excluding from the bloodsucker label the good and talented attorneys out there like my pals and the NYCounty lawyer guy who seems to be on the ball. PPL gets a bad rap because some idiots buy it thinking that for $24 a month a lawyer will come and be their slave for no additional money. LOL.

    5. Re:MLM is the Opposite of Spam by WNight · · Score: 1

      No, PPL is a scam because it's an MLM pushed by scammers like you. There's always some shill willing to tell a story about how great PPL is, despite (supposedly) not being affiliated, etc... It's misrepresented, and when you try to deal with PPL management, or marketing (people like you) you get nothing but lies.

      If you weren't a scammer you'd look around online and see the horrible reviews PPL gets. Instead you'll just say that everyone complaining has some grudge and dismiss it all.

  49. Re:More Evidence for me by sahonen · · Score: 1

    Once you have money you start having less kids.

    So in other words, the people with the resources to raise children in the best way possible are the ones who aren't having them. I love the human race sometimes.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  50. Re:More Evidence for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which raptors?

    Owls?
    Bald eagles? Or hawks?

    Most of these raptors would have a hard time eating a human being...
    What ornithology degree program did YOU flunk out of?

    Raptors...! (snicker)

    Too much birdsnest pinoqachole in your liver I suspect!

  51. Cultural references by Belgarath52 · · Score: 1

    Use tests based on American cultural references. Won't fix everything but sure will make it harder for them to use foreign labor.

    1. Re:Cultural references by IngeniousCognomen · · Score: 1

      Actually, I already did something very similar. I run a specialized hobby forum which was absolutely plagued by spammers signing up so I installed KittenAuth - but instead of animals used images and questions specific to our hobby... all of which are totally incomprehensible to the average person without some Googling. And the spammers just disappeared; never had any since. I guess if it's going to take an unwanted visitor more than twenty seconds or so to get access they're just not going to bother.