Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Government Webmaster Shot Dead By Russian Police

J.Tatar and a number of other readers alert us to the shooting death of an anti-government webmaster while in police custody in Ingushetiya, a volatile province in southern Russia. Police took Ingushetiya.ru owner Magomed Yevloyev off a plane that had just landed in Ingushetiya. "Yevloyev ... was a prominent opponent of the pro-Kremlin president of Ingushetia, Murat Zyazikov [a close ally of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin]. Prosecutors have opened a preliminary manslaughter investigation after Yevloyev was shot in a police car in Narzan, the capital of volatile Ingushetia, a mostly Muslim region that borders Chechnya, Russian media reported. A spokesman for the prosecutor's office, Vladimir Markin, said 'an incident' took place after Yevloyev was taken into a police car 'resulting in a shooting injury to the head and he later died in hospital,' Interfax reported."

85 of 513 comments (clear)

  1. Don't jump to conclusions by Haoie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He was shot, and shot by police [for an unspecified reason].

    But this still doesn't automatically mean he was "eliminated" for his views on the Russian government.

    --
    If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
    1. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      -1 naive

    2. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by LurkerXXX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, because police shoot people in the head (who they already have in their custody and in a police car) all the time. It just happens... right. I'm sure it's not just because he was stirring up unrest against the Russian government.

      Maybe an alien had taken him over and they were killing it. Got any other alternate theories?

    3. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

      Suicide.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by n+dot+l · · Score: 4, Informative

      [for an unspecified reason]

      A BBC article on this says:

      Reports quoting local police said Yevloyev had tried to seize a policeman's gun when he was being led to a vehicle. A shot was fired and Yevloyev was injured in the head.

    5. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by meist3r · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ingushetia website owner killed by police: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/01/russia1

      "As they drove he was shot in the temple ... They threw him out of the car near the hospital," Kaloi Akhilgov told Reuters by telephone. "He was discovered there and they quickly put him on the operating table, which is where he died."

      Sounds pretty conclusive to me. The last time I shot someone in the head "accidentally" with my gun, I also threw him out of the car because I was "careless". Wake up.

    6. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      He was a terrorist! ... oh wait, in russia. not in the usa. *siiigh* ... My theories never work out.

    7. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by tetromino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are correct. He was eliminated for his views on the Ingushetian provincial government - specifically, for his views on Ingushetia's governor Zyazikov, whose policies have brought the province to the brink (some say over the brink) of civil war. It is a great mystery just why the Kremlin continues to support Ingushetia's current administration.

      Sometimes, the federal government has to give its support to a competent, but thuggish, local administration in order to restore order and peace (see Chechnya for an example). But if the thuggish local administration is failing to do its job, why the hell is it still being propped up?

    8. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe they were duck hunting at the time?

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    9. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe the police officer's was Dick Cheney's evil Russian twin. You know, accidently shooting folks in the head ;)

      Ahh, what am I thinking, Dick Cheney IS the evil twin.

    10. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by fictionpuss · · Score: 5, Interesting

      -1 naive

      While it looks suspicious, and certainly goes along with the current wave of anti-Russian sentiment, I have to agree with the GP - let's wait for more information instead of jumping to conclusions.

      While a Slashdot thread has a minor effect on overall public opinion, every single increment brings us closer to "accepting the inevitability" of an actual conflict with Russia - something which Bush and Putin would both seem to benefit from wrt power consolidation.

      We're geeks, we have brains if we choose to use them - we can do better. And yes, I am new here.

    11. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Better yet, suicide by cop. Instant martyr and story on /.

      The odds are that we will never know the truth. If we do, there will always be some doubt.

    12. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      every single increment brings us closer to "accepting the inevitability" of an actual conflict with Russia - something which Bush and Putin would both seem to benefit from wrt power consolidation.

      The practice of setting up straw dolls as a focus for enmity is hardly confined to recent history.

      But many of those of us who lived through the Cold War, in the expectation that someone like Ronnie Ray-Gun was highly likely to push the button and blow us all to hell might not see this as such an increment.

      Russia is not the same nation as it was in the '70s and '80s. It is nearly broke, and has a disorganised and ill-equipped military. Russia cannot afford a major conflict with the US or Europe, regardless of what bellicose rhetoric Putin might spout.

    13. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by exley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, this is the only "in Soviet Russia" joke I see right now, and it showed up about a half hour after the story was posted. Does this indicate progress for Slashdot or Slashdot's further decline?

    14. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by packeteer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The odds are that we will never know the truth. If we do, there will always be some doubt.

      Unfortunately this is something people can count on often. Corrupt officials use this as the perfect getaway. Not that i know what really happened here, i just want to comment on how often something ends like that.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    15. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by andot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no wave anti-Russian sentiment. Truth is that Russia is most fascist country on earth right now. Attacking his neighbours, killing nonrussians in their major citys and so on. Russian politics and rethorics is identical to nazi germany in 1930. Georgia and South Ossetia conflict is exactly like German occupation of Czechoslovakia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_occupation_of_Czechoslovakia. Remember what happend last time!

    16. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Got any other alternate theories?

      Yes, the Kremlin is hard at work on another Soviet Union. Oh, and your votes count so long as your voting for the right people. If you don't, they will paint a nice red picasso with your brain matter.

      Does that about sum it up?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    17. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by DrMrLordX · · Score: 3, Funny

      IN SOVIET RUSSIA, further decline indicates YOU!

    18. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Got any other alternate theories?

      John Travolta was leaning over the back seat, gun casually dangling from his hand while he debated philosophy with the prisoner. Driver hit a speed bump, finger squeezed the trigger and before you know it Yevloyev's head is all over the back window.

      Complete accident!

    19. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Funny

      And O.J. was with him! They both found the one-armed webmaster who had killed their wives.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    20. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by KGIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      Godwined in the first three sets of page down comments. I'm not sure if that's a record but it's damned close.

      Err... Well played my good sir?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    21. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by andot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Godwin or not, but this is truth. Of course i should have written "Russian politics and rethorics is identical to germany in 1930" to avoid the issue. But that what happening in russia and if world will react like last time then we are heading to WWW III.

    22. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Russia is not the same nation as it was in the '70s and '80s. It is nearly broke, and has a disorganised and ill-equipped military.

      As opposed to the US which has a highly organized military that is heavily dependent on the drip-feeding of massive quantities of tax dollars that are fast becoming scarcer and scarcer, fed to it by a government that is now so deep in debt that it it unlikely that anyone alive today will ever see it balance.

      If you ask me, Russia has a greater capacity to wage war than the US currently, after when you factor in the miserable state of US government financial conditions and the world at large's hostility towards US military adventurism.

      --
      I hate printers.
    23. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by ya+really · · Score: 4, Funny

      That reminds me of a crude joke that seems to have truth in it at times regarding law enforcement.

      "What did the Alabama patrolman say in regards to the black man found shot 16 times in the back? Worst case of suicide he'd ever seen."

    24. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Google turned up this article mentioning Kaloi Akhilgov from three weeks ago. Magomed Yevloyev is mentioned in that repeated calls to him went unanswered. Apparently the editor of ingushetia.ru fled the country in the middle of July.

      If anyone cares to read the article they'll find these paragraphs near the end:

      "Violence against journalists in Ingushetia is a well-known and well-documented fact," Guseinova said, citing the November abduction and assault of Ren-TV journalists by uniformed men.

      Malsagova could easily convince foreign governments that her life and the lives of her family members are in danger, because Ingush authorities have demonstrated that "any means are acceptable" in dealing with the media, Guseinova said.

    25. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it's 'the truth', let's see some strategic forecasts. Let's see logistical analysis, nuclear force readiness reports, military intelligence.

      Let's see some Russian geopolitical analysis- well reasoned, well thought-out analysis of Russian leaders, their past behavior, and their likely future behavior with probability analysis and explanations.

      Let's see strategic forecasts for Russia's major neighbors; force readiness reports from China and the major EU nations; geopolitical analysis of the Chinese, the EU, and the Americans; logistical analysis of EU/Chinese/American tactical and strategic response to Russian aggression.

      I'm not saying you're necessarily wrong, although I think you are. What I am saying is that if you want people to take you seriously, crying "OH NOES ANOTHER GERMANY" is not the way to do it.

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    26. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by dafrazzman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anti-Russian sentiment? I assume you're referring to the Georgian conflict.

      There's a big difference between wanting to help Georgia and being anti-Russian. Take the Korean war for example. While we fought, in a way, against the Chinese, it was in defense of Korea. There was no massive anti-Chinese sentiment (for the most part, MacArthur advocated invasion). Nobody wanted a giant conflict with China; few wanted the Korean war at all.

      This incident may make us feel negative about Russian government, but in much the same way (though perhaps more significantly) we sometimes feel about our own government, or Germany's (for example), or any other country's. Upset, but not revolutionary. Besides, still immersed in middle eastern conflict, I don't think the American public is in any danger of going crazy and demanding an invasion of and/or nuclear war with Russia.

      --
      My preferred name is frazz, but someone keeps taking it. If you see him, tell him I said hi.
    27. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by zoogies · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As our great leaders have said to Russia time and time again in recent weeks, "The time for nations invading nations and deposing their leaders through force, are over."

      (for countries not named U.S.A, anyway...we're not dangerous, we're just...helping. >_>)

    28. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, remember when Czechoslovakia attacked its separatist region which German troops were charged with protecting under a UN-mandated peacekeeping operation?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    29. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Kreigaffe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you for posting that so I don't have to.

      This is exactly how I picture this whole escapade went down.

      "RUSSIAN MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU SPEAK IT!"

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    30. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by mpiktas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the usual rule is that, you must earn the benefit of the doubt. I think Russia never even tried to do that for a period longer than a blink of an eye.

    31. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by n+dot+l · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nono. You're dead on. That's exactly how this is going to be (has been?) presented in Russia.

    32. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by andot · · Score: 5, Informative

      Webster definition describes exactly what is happening in Russia. Definition 1:"often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government" - It has been the case in russia all the times during at least past 150 year. "headed by a dictatorial leader" - Do you think Putin is honest good democratically elected leader? NO. There can't be free elections when there is no free mass media or journalism. Putin is former KGB officer. KGB officers were not misleaded average guys. They knew perfectly where they were working and what they were doing. I have lived in the country ruled by KGB, I know. "severe economic" - russian government is taking over major russian companies. For example Yukos. Ff the business owners doesn't agree the they are thrown to prison (Mihail Hodorkovski case) "and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition" - for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_journalists_killed_in_Russia

    33. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by binarylarry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think the word fascist means what you think it means.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    34. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jean Charles de Menezes, 22nd July 2005, Stockwell Tube station, London, United Kingdom. de Menezes was shot eight times while on the floor being restrained by several police officers.

    35. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Jesrad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Yes, Georgians did attack"

      Well, not quite. The separatists and russian troops combined an attack on the 6th of august, and this is what the Georgian troops reacted to by going through Tskhinvali.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    36. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by GnuDiff · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Just for the record, after Ossetians were shelling Georgian towns for quite some time, trying to provoke Georgians.

      There is information circulating - in Russian, so I doubt it is of any use to quote here - Russian radiostation Echo Moskvi interviews - that Russia was preparing for the war for quite some time and trying to edge Georgia towards doing something that could lead to invasion.

      At any rate, the probable truth is this:

      - there have been tensions between Ossetian region and Georgia for quite some time, blood feuds and what not;

      - it is conceivable that Georgian behaviour towards Ossetian inhabitants where they had power was as bad as Ossetian towards Georgian. This could be related to the old grudges when Georgians had to flee Ossetian territories earlier.

      [You know a good old blood feud when you hear about atrocities commited from both sides and nobody can make neither head nor tail of it.]

      - Georgian current president has been pro-West oriented, and plans were underway for making an oil pipeline through Georgia that would bypass Russia.

      So, essentially what we have here seems to be Russia trying to prevent Georgia from supplying West with oil by egging on old feuds in the region.

      As regards support for Ossetian independence - it is probably a good move. One can only wonder why did Russia went to war TWICE with Chechnya recently, in order to PREVENT their independence though.

    37. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Russia is not the same nation as it was in the '70s and '80s. It is nearly broke, and has a disorganised and ill-equipped military.

      What??? I don't know about the military part, but the 'nearly broke' part is a joke. Russia has HUGE commercial EXCEDENT these days, mainly from gas and oil exports. In fact, it's probably one of the richest countries right now. They have natural resources and they're playing them really well.

      But you're right in some respect - Russia is not the same country as it was in the past - say, the 90's. Unfortunately - for some of us who live rather close to its borders.

    38. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by digitig · · Score: 2, Informative

      Attacking his neighbours, killing nonrussians in their major citys and so on. Russian politics and rethorics is identical to nazi germany in 1930. Georgia and South Ossetia conflict is exactly like German occupation of Czechoslovakia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_occupation_of_Czechoslovakia. Remember what happend last time!

      Except that South Ossetia was disputed territory, and it was the Georgians who went in with guns blazing, killing Russians. How do you think the USA would respond if the Mexican government started killing all US citizens in Tijuana? And that's not even disputed territory (except perhaps for one or two bars on a Saturday night).

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    39. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by MrMr · · Score: 2, Funny

      How is that better?
      In Soviet Russia police may also shoot you in the head for no particular reason?

    40. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by andot · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes. I'm estonian. Let me to tell you a story. When i was a kid, I asked from my granny - where is my grandpa. My granny told me, that my grandpa died in a prison in Siberia. He was simple fisherman, who gave food to his relative who was seeked by russian police. Then I asked my father, where is my other grandpa. My other grandpa was forced to Red Army and was killed there. My mother in law was sent to Siberia by russians, when she was about 6, with her old grandma, because her mother wasn't cooperative enough. And this is the story of average estonian family. Of course i'm brainwashed by media!

    41. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by quadrox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriosuly - compare what you are saying to what the US is doing. invading countries, guantanamo bay, anti-terrorism laws. etc. The US is not different, russia is simply reacting in order to stay in the game and not be controlled by the US.

      Maybe what Russia is doing is wrong on some ethical level. But it sure as hell is no worse than the US, so get of your high horse.

    42. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by mrvan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some facts to make you feel less comfortable spouting patriottic nonsense:

      1) You're wrong. The US is #26 in debt with 60% GDP. Some european countries are worse (eg belgium at 85%, france at 64), some are much better (eg holland at 46%, UK at 43%, spain at 35%).

      2) US citizens don't save money, but are in debt themselves (eg creditcards). This means that most of the US debt is in the hands of foreign countries or nationals, while a large part of the european public debts is in European hands since europeans save a lot more.

      3) The US imports way more than it exports (currently, the trade deficit is 600 billion (!), down from 800 due to the extremely weak dollar). Since these goods have to be bought capital flows out (eg to gulf states for buying oil). This capital flows back in the form of investments in US companies. This sounds good, but what it means is that you are selling Americal companies to foreigners to pay for your consumption. The EU countries generally have trade balance or surplus

    43. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I'm not so sure that Russia's politics are any worse than China, North Korea, Iran, etc"

      Etc. being some weird abbreviation of the United States?

      I mean, Russia invaded a neighbouring country and (mostly) left within a month.

      Iraq ain't next to Texas baby, and it doesn't look like the US army will be leaving very soon ...

      --

      ---
      "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    44. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by hattig · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to accounts by people who haven't been told the events

      * South Ossetia is a firecracker, but 50/50 South Ossetian/Georgian.
      * The South Ossetian militias attacked first.
      * Georgia's military is helping the US in Iraq - but their depleted military and reserves attacked back.
      * The South Ossetian's women and children had been moved to North Ossetia in Russia prior to the attack.
      * Oddly enough vast numbers of Russian troops just happened to be nearby to help out the South Ossetians.
      * Clearly the Georgians aren't angels either.

      This is clearly a planned attack by Russia and the people that it has been giving free passports to (but who are not Russians otherwise). Right now it is looking like the West has swallowed the Russian view of events hook, line and sinker, when it appears that Russia has the most to gain from lying about all this.

    45. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by rugatero · · Score: 2, Informative

      He was killed by a soldier rather than police, but the shooting of Yasser Salihee in 2005 seems relevant.

      --
      This comment is for entertainment purposes only. Any similarity to real insight or information is purely coincidental.
    46. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

      My mother in law was sent to Siberia by russians

      Say, you wouldn't still have the phone number for those guys, would you?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    47. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are no documents to support this idea, and the Georgian reports dating from August 8th, when the fighting broke out in the fullest, did not mention Russian invasion as the reason for attack on Tskhinvali. It only came up after the whole thing ended. Of course, it may still be true, but I have my doubts.

    48. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Futile+Rhetoric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes. I'm estonian. Let me to tell you a story. When i was a kid, I asked from my granny - where is my grandpa. My granny told me, that my grandpa died in a prison in Siberia. He was simple fisherman, who gave food to his relative who was seeked by russian police. Then I asked my father, where is my other grandpa. My other grandpa was forced to Red Army and was killed there. My mother in law was sent to Siberia by russians, when she was about 6, with her old grandma, because her mother wasn't cooperative enough. And this is the story of average estonian family. Of course i'm brainwashed by media!

      And you think this makes you special? Most people in Europe will have sad stories to tell about the generations past. I could tell you stories just as sad about my (extended) family. Besides, let's not forget who bore the brunt of the brutality of the Soviet (and mostly Stalinist) regime -- the Russians themselves. Most Russians could tell you stories even sadder. So could a lot of Germans, Italians, Spaniards, Frenchmen, British, Jews -- and a lot of Arabs could tell you sob stories about stuff happening right now that our wonderful democratically elected governments are responsible for. Sorry, but sob stories don't make your misinformed opinions any more credible. Your russophobia, while wholly understandable, prevents you from taking any kind of an informed, objective stance on the matter.

      You speak of the elections, and make an appeal to the majority opinion (in the West, anyway) -- "you don't honestly believe that Putin was fairly elected, do you?" Well, yes and no. Is 71% of the vote believable for a president who oversaw the largest increase in wealth that the public can remember? The Russian opposition is a joke that doesn't have a foot to stand on, especially as long as the standard of living continues its crawl upwards. I'm sure you'll bring up Kasparov -- who is equally a joke. Oh, certainly, he has made his little television tour through the United States and is thus very well-known in all the right circles, but there is zero substance to the man's "heroic struggle against fascism". He got locked up a few times for staging illegal protests. Illegal protests? But there's supposed to be free speech! Fascism! Not quite. I would suggest you google the fabled American "free speech zones".

      You bring up the Russian media, and how it's supposedly government-dominated, but all anyone can ever say is that the three largest television networks are controlled by "Kremlin loyalists". So, apparently it's also fascism when someone who agrees with particular government policy controls a television network. Question: how many large networks are there in the United States, and who are they controlled by? Just how hard did they question, say, Bush' invasion of Iraq? But, you not only overstate the importance of these television networks, you also ignore everything else. I quote (it's a long-ish read):

      Discussions of the Russian media typically imply that state control is total, when in fact there are more private media in Russia today than at any time in its history.

      In 1997 there were just over 21,000 registered periodicals, virtually no electronic media, and just under 100 television companies. More than half of all media were owned by the state. A decade later, there are more than 58,000 periodicals, 14,000 electronic media, and 5,500 broadcasting companies. The state's share in the newspaper and journal market in 2006 was estimated to be less than 10%, while its share in electronic media, which today reach 25 million people, is even smaller. Today it is not the Russian state but foreign companies that own shares in more than half of all Russian broadcasting companies.

      Critics, however, have zeroed in on the one area of the media where the state's presence still predominates - national television. Through its control of seats

    49. Re:Don't jump to conclusions by Cyberax · · Score: 2, Informative
  2. Good thing he wasn't in... by FooGoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Minneapolis.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    1. Re:Good thing he wasn't in... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank god we are slighlty less storm trooperish here than in Russia.....for now

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  3. 'The shooting injury' by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Realize that Magomed was shot in the temple, that's a guaranteed way to kill someone. It was no accident, it was premeditated.

    1. Re:'The shooting injury' by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the temple houses the reason center of the brain, the guaranteed kill is actually behind the ear, where the primitive autonomic systems rest.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:'The shooting injury' by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Magomed was arrested by some police forces of Nazran (capital of republic Ingushetia, Russia), he was taken away by a number of people, there were multiple police cars who participated in arrest. Later Magomed was found shot in the temple. The arrest was made after Magomed got off of an airplane. The airplane had president of Ingushetia, Murat Ziazikov on it as well. There was a group of cars belonging to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the republic in the airport, Magomed was arrested and put into one of the cars, half of the group has left and after this Magomed was killed. People were expecting him to get off the airplane and then killed him. Given the kind of people we are talking about, this was a premeditated murder.

  4. Re:Paging Yakov Smirnoff by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You have such nice things in the U.S...like warning shots!"

    --
    What?
  5. It was an accident by Zerth · · Score: 5, Funny

    The officer just tended to emphasize things by pointing his pistol and the roads around there are very bumpy. Complete and unfortunant chance. Could happen to anybody.

    Haven't you ever seen Pulp Fiction?

    1. Re:It was an accident by joetheappleguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Did you see a sign out in front of my house that said 'Dead Ivan Storage?'"

  6. Re:Same old Russia by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Indeed. Why are we giving these twits money again?

    They are a third world nation with first world aspirations, but they can't seem to get it right. How long before we get back to the old USSR? I'd guess sooner rather than later. Problem this time is, the US and Europe aren't going to let Russia roll their tanks into every Eastern European nation bulldozing their people into submission. Fool us once...

    --
    It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  7. Why the irrelevant factoid... by mvdwege · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why is it relevant that Ingushetiya is mostly Muslim? What does that irrelevant factoid have to do with this news?

    The only thing that I fear it is relevant for, is for the inevitable Kremlin propaganda offensive to paint themselves as defenders against the Muslim barbarians. A tactic that worked very well to get the Chechnyan separatists out of the Western news and gave Russia a free hand to do whatever they wanted in Chechnya.

    Obligatory disclaimer: the Chechnyan separatists were bastards. That does not wipe out the strong suspicion that Russia played on fears of Muslim terrorism in the West for propaganda purposes.

    Mart

    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    1. Re:Why the irrelevant factoid... by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is it relevant that Ingushetiya is mostly Muslim? What does that irrelevant factoid have to do with this news?

      AFAICT, the Kremlin has even less respect for Muslims than they do for the rest of the population. They committed massacres in Chechnya. Would they have done the same thing (on the same scale) to White Russian Christians? I doubt it. Hell, they're actually supporting the independence of two of the next-door provinces.

  8. Re:Same old Russia by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Problem this time is, the US and Europe aren't going to let Russia roll their tanks into every Eastern European nation bulldozing their people into submission.

    I have not in my lifetime seen any amount of guts displayed by the Europeans (or at least the Western ones) over any issue whatsoever. There is absolutely nothing that would lead me (or the Russians) to believe for a second that they would stand up and do anything of consequence. Hitler himself could reincarnate, and Europe would do the Neville Chamberlain thing all over again. And as for us in the US, I don't know that we'd really fight Russia over an Eastern European country. Just look what we did when the Russians rolled their tanks into Georgia. Still though, I suppose we sent aid and a few diplomats, military advisors and some military hardware. That's more than the rest of the Europeans did, as usual (and we also had the excuse of already being in two other wars).

    Note: I'm not saying we shouldn't fight for those Eastern European countries, just that it's exceedingly unlikely anyone would. Which leads me to ask the biological origin question that I know everyone is wondering about: do the Europeans have the same evolutionary line as the rest of the world? Observational evidence so far would make it appear that they're invertebrates...

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
  9. Re:Same old Russia by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Problem this time is, the US and Europe aren't going to let Russia roll their tanks into every Eastern European nation bulldozing their people into submission.

    Of course we will. You don't see any U.S. peacekeepers on their way to Georgia, do you? Well, except maybe for the other Georgia just in case the hurricane goes four or five hundred miles to the east before it makes landfall, that is.... :-)

    Okay, to be fair, if they start to encroach on Georgia's oil fields, the U.S. might get involved. The rest of those former Soviet states, though---the ones who aren't sitting on oil---I think it's safe to say they're on their own. I'm not saying it's right; I'm just saying that if you think the current U.S. government is going to lift a finger to help anybody without it being for their own significant political gain, you've clearly been living under a rock the last eight years.

    Bush Presidency Countdown Clock

    Fool me... you can't get fooled again....

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  10. look to the past by Quila · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you heard a report back in 2000 that Saddam Hussein had had yet another person killed, you'd think it was just par for the course. If rumor was that Bush allowed another fat-cat single-source contracting deal with his friends, you'd think it was probably true. Why? Because it falls in with that person's modus operandi.

    Putin's Russia has been a very dangerous place for anyone who has opposed him, or even tried to investigate what was happening under him. Many are dead, exiled or in jail. So while I won't automatically put this in the "It's true" category, it does belong firmly in "Most likely true."

  11. In Soviet Russia... by caywen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh wait, never mind.

  12. they are baaaaaack! by Locutus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There was Putin and his public dislike of all things US. The radioactive poisoning. Some FBI link to a SPAMMER inside of Russia but Putins government would not let US prosecutors go after them. The election where Putin creates a seat so he's still on top. More anti-US rhetoric. And more recently the Georgia incident where Putin is the one in the press on the first and second day. After that it is the acting President but it was pretty obvious Putin is da man.

    Now a hole in the head of a webmaster while INSIDE a Police car. It all sounds like the old USSR and KGB era tactics to me. Well, it was good for some while it lasted. IMO

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    1. Re:they are baaaaaack! by kaos07 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While a lot of Russia's actions are to be condemned it's naive and one-sided to say that we have a new "Cold War" upon us due to the aggressive nature of Putin and Medvedev. The Cold War wasn't simply the USSR vs. the USA it was them and all their allies against each other mainly in geographical locations slightly removed from both superpowers. The new stuff that's going on is all within Russia's sphere of influence and the flipside of it is saying that the "Cold War is back!" if the US started intervening in South America (Which they already do).

      The only reason it's a return of the Cold War when Russia pulls of crap like Georgia etc. is because the US, through Nato, has a huge presence in that area, something Russia doesn't have in the American hemisphere. US warships are currently crowding the Black Sea, a staunch US ally killed several hundred Russian civilians, the US is currently establishing missile basis in two Russia neighbouring countries and we say that *Putin* is bringing the Cold War back?

    2. Re:they are baaaaaack! by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it were a simple question of power balance, they could just build their own shield.

      1. Exactly where close to the U.S. border can Russia build one? On Greenland? In Canada?
      2. Believe it or not, Russia does not want another arms race.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  13. Democracy and the Russians.. by houbou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, we should count ourselves lucky that we have free speech. Obviously, the poor bastard who was running that Anti-Kremlin website, is now going to be a martyr to the cause of free speech, being a casualty of it.

    I feel for those russians who know there is a better way of life, but are stuck in this transitory stage where many of them are forced to co-exist with the "old school" russian way of thinking.

    Anyways, it is always sad to read news such as this.

  14. More Information about This Brutal Murder by reporter · · Score: 4, Informative
    According to a report just issued by "The Washington Post" (TWP), the Russian police under direct orders from the Kremlin arrested Magomed Yevloyev, the owner of an anti-Kremlin Web site (Ingushetiya.ru), and then shot him in the head during his ride in the police car. The police then dumped his corpse onto the road near a hospital. According to the TWP, "Ingushetiya.ru has been one of the few sources of independent information about [a low-grade Islamist insurgency in the province of Ingushetia]".

    For additional information about this heinous crime, read the report just issued by the "Daily Telegraph" (DT). According to the DT, "Mr Yevloyev is the most prominent anti-Kremlin journalist to be killed since Anna Politkovskaya was shot dead in the lift of her apartment block in October 2006. ... Russia is considered to be one of the world's most dangerous countries for journalists."

    The "Wall Street Journal" provides more information about this and other suspicious deaths of well-known journalists. According to the WSJ, "Mr. Yevloyev was the latest in a series of Russian journalists to have died in suspicious circumstances. The death of Anna Politkovskaya, who was shot in October 2006 at her Moscow apartment, highlighted the dangers faced by Russia's independent press. Ms. Politkovskaya was a lead reporter at Novaya Gazeta, a Moscow-based newspaper that specializes in muckraking and probes of government corruption. She was the third journalist at the paper to die under mysterious circumstances. Paul Klebnikov, editor of the Russian edition of Forbes magazine, was shot on a Moscow street in July 2004."

    After I read these news articles, I could think of only 4 words: God damn the Kremlin!

  15. The Bear will always be The Bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Bear does things like shut off natural gas to Poland in the middle of the winter.

    The Bear does things like shoot you (it's easier than shipping you to North Central Asia to build log bridges).

    The Bear does things like running anti-aircraft artillery exercises during which they state that the target areas were the spaces between the aircraft flying the Berlin Airlift.

    The Bear (or whatever local bumpkin minion) doesn't always think before acting (or thinks initiative might be rewarded). That's how KAL 007 got shot down: somebody finally decided they didn't want to take the heat for the thing being in the wrong place because SOMEbody was going to take the fall for it...

  16. Now what are the Reaganites going to say.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was Putin and his public dislike of all things US. The radioactive poisoning. Some FBI link to a SPAMMER inside of Russia but Putins government would not let US prosecutors go after them. The election where Putin creates a seat so he's still on top. More anti-US rhetoric. And more recently the Georgia incident where Putin is the one in the press on the first and second day. After that it is the acting President but it was pretty obvious Putin is da man.

    Now a hole in the head of a webmaster while INSIDE a Police car. It all sounds like the old USSR and KGB era tactics to me. Well, it was good for some while it lasted. IMO

    LoB

    This kind of puts the damper on the whole "won the cold war for us" rhetoric..

    now i guess it's "sprayed air-freshener over the diaper pail that was communist russia and claimed to his wife he had emptied it"

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  17. Citation needed by tetromino · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where in the article does it say that the murderers were "under direct orders from the Kremlin"? As far as I can make out, these were local cops who acted under the orders of the provincial governor Zyazikov - the main target of Yevloyev's criticisms.

  18. where are the apologists? by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    those who say invading georgia is like the usa invading iraq?

    where are those who say russia's invasion of georgia is the usa's fault?

    it's all morally relative, right? we have to let russia do anything they damn well please, because the usa did something bad once, right?

    i have a crazy idea: why can't we condemn them both?

    why can't you condemn the usa, AND condemn russia?

    given that, with all of the vitriol some of you found to fling at washington dc in recent years, why can't you fling some of that now at moscow?

    or do crimes of war only stick to the west?

    are you motivated by principles? or some weird geopolitical vendetta? (and therefore, part of the problem)

    if you are motivation by principles, you must condemn russia now as hard as you condemn the usa

    fight imperialism, wherever the fount

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:where are the apologists? by Xiroth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why can't you condemn the usa, AND condemn russia?

      Uh, duh? What do you expect us to say, 'We wouldn't stand for a journalist to be murdered by the USA government, but this is Russia - it's just part of their culture'?

      No. Killing journalists for reporting on your corruption is IMO worse than anything that has happened in the USA under Bush. Yes, even worse than Guantanamo, although they're pretty close in terms of nastiness. The press-slaying tops simply because even though it's only one person compared to hundreds, it's a pre-mediated effort to remove the ability to do anything about the cancer that's reclaiming Russia by its opponents. Guantanamo is bad, but at least there's hope at the end of the tunnel, of things being put right some time in the future - Putin's administration (and it still is Putin's) is doing its level best to make sure there's no hope at all for decades to come.

      And for the record, yes, Russia invading Georgia is just as bad as the USA and allies invading Iraq. What pleasant company we keep.

    2. Re:where are the apologists? by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except Gore would NOT have invaded Iraq over false evidence. So the only tool in your scenario is...you.

  19. Re:Same old Russia by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Problem this time is, the US and Europe aren't going to let Russia roll their tanks into every Eastern European nation bulldozing their people into submission.

    I have not in my lifetime seen any amount of guts displayed by the Europeans (or at least the Western ones) over any issue whatsoever. There is absolutely nothing that would lead me (or the Russians) to believe for a second that they would stand up and do anything of consequence. Hitler himself could reincarnate, and Europe would do the Neville Chamberlain thing all over again. And as for us in the US, I don't know that we'd really fight Russia over an Eastern European country. Just look what we did when the Russians rolled their tanks into Georgia. Still though, I suppose we sent aid and a few diplomats, military advisors and some military hardware. That's more than the rest of the Europeans did, as usual (and we also had the excuse of already being in two other wars).

    Western Europe != France and Germany. The rest of Nato would likely back Eastern Europe. And the US would intervene to help once pictures of civillians getting blown to bits appeared on CNN. It took the world a while to act in Kosovo, but I think most of it would if the Russians actually attacked a Nato country.

    Hell, I think even the French and Germans would fight once the rest of Nato did, they did in Kosovo.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  20. This is strange by archeopterix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even during the cold war the communist governments werent this open about killing their opponents. A possible explanation for this mode of operation is that someone wanted to send a clear message along the lines of "we do what we want - fear us". Or maybe it's just a tragic occurence Hanlon's razor (they police might actually be that stupid).

    1. Re:This is strange by Vectronic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, maybe its just 20+ years later and we have stuff like the Internet, and countless mobile phones... if it wasnt for the internet, would you have heard of this? Is it in your local paper? Is it on your local news?

    2. Re:This is strange by yoprst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all very strange while you think that Russia is Soviet Union. If you don't, on the other hand it's trivial - Russia is governed very differently than SU. There aren't James Bond-style KGB agents that can get anyone they want. Russia employs local warlords, or people pretending to be local warlords to manage troubled areas. Sometimes warlord do their thing.

  21. Do jump to conclusions by PietjeJantje · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To all the people who support the thesis:

    We don't know what happened, as nerds we should wait for more information instead of jumping to conclusions.

    You're plain wrong, and just silly. The exact design of this assassination is:

    You know exactly what happened, and that we can get away with it. Fear that.

  22. Re:Unlikely by beav007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, TFS says he was shot in the car. For these to both be true, the cops would have had to have found a drive-through temple. I guess it would make confession more convenient.

    Given, however, that the incident occurred in a Muslim area, finding such a temple seems unlikely...

  23. no. it IS naive by unity100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this is not a single or rare occurrence. in the last 5 years all kinds of opponents all around russian federation have been killed 'accidentally' in numerous 'incidents'.

    anyone who would think that this was a real accident is thoroughly naive or stupid.

  24. 'cause we all know blogs are reliable source of in by melted · · Score: 2, Informative

    'cause we all know blogs are reliable source of information. US Ambassador in Moscow must have been lying when he said that they've tried to dissuade Saakashvili till the last moment on August 7th when the attack was launched. Then Russia spent a precious day trying to get help through diplomatic channels. And only THEN they kicked the Georgians out and took away their toys.

  25. Re:Why do you people always leave this out? by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sigh. I'm not sure it is worth trying to point you toward some references where you might actually learn something since you clearly already consider yourself an expert, but I'll try. Here is a reasonably well written explanation of what is being discussed. The Wiki article is very incomplete, but you can try it too. Any standard freshman undergrad textbook (e.g. Samuelson) will cover this material as well.