Slashdot Mirror


Buffy MMO Announced, Firefly MMO Delayed

Zonk brings word that Multiverse, the developer who in 2006 acquired the rights to make a Firefly-based MMO, has announced that a Buffy: The Vampire Slayer MMO is now under development. An interview with Corey Bridges from Multiverse seems to indicate that the Firefly MMO, though delayed, is not dead. He also provides a few details on what the Buffy game will be like. Quoting: "What we're doing with the Buffy game then is releasing it in stages. It will first be a flash-based virtual world, with the full Multiverse server behind it. ... So it will start as a 2D flash-based MMO where you can go on missions and interact with other players. This will extend even once we have the 3D client working, where you can both interact with players using the other point of view. We're going to have these shared spaces where 2D and 3D people can interact. All of this will come out in phases, with staged gameplay coming out. We're sort of blazing a path with this concept, and we're really interested in what this might mean for players of the two versions. ... I'd love to get [a public beta] out to players by the end of the year."

209 comments

  1. Buffy? by SomeJoel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This seems like kind of a flimsy IP to base an MMO on. Aren't there dozens of better choices?

    --
    <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    1. Re:Buffy? by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agreed. I would think that an IP based on a single person in each generation would make for a lousy MMO. Everything in the Buffyverse is about exceptions to rules, and that's believable when you follow a few characters around. But when you get into an MMO environment, the exception quickly becomes the rule as everyone takes the "chosen one" class or the "vampire with a soul" class.

      If only there were an IP they could acquire where it's a whole ass-load of people in far flung areas, maybe like the old west, or space or something, where small groups of people move around performing missions. That's the sort of IP that'd make for a great MMO, IMHO.

    2. Re:Buffy? by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Forget Buffy MMO! When does the Duke Nukem Forever MMO come out? I mean, after all this time, DNF ought to be single, multi, MMO -- pretty much the works, right?!?!

    3. Re:Buffy? by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Yes, but there are no vampires in World of Warcraft, Star wars galaxies, eve online, warhammer (I think), etc, etc. Sad to say, there's a massive crowd of emo kids they're probably looking to tap into, and it just might work. If it's anywhere near as fun as the Vampire Slayer mod for Half-life, then it's a sure fire hit.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    4. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there were an IP they could acquire where it's a whole ass-load of people in far flung areas, maybe like the old west, or space or something, where small groups of people move around performing missions. That's the sort of IP that'd make for a great MMO, IMHO.

      And roaming Reavers. If you're going to go old-west/space, you gotta have Reavers.

    5. Re:Buffy? by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Funny

      This seems like kind of a flimsy IP to base an MMO on.

      How so?

      Aren't there dozens of better choices?

      Such as?

    6. Re:Buffy? by Babbster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Agreed. I would think that an IP based on a single person in each generation would make for a lousy MMO. Everything in the Buffyverse is about exceptions to rules, and that's believable when you follow a few characters around. But when you get into an MMO environment, the exception quickly becomes the rule as everyone takes the "chosen one" class or the "vampire with a soul" class.

      To be fair, BTVS ended with the creation of thousands of mini Slayers. And, as a bonus, it would finally give dudes a good excuse to play a hot chick in an MMO.

    7. Re:Buffy? by hr.wien · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well the series pretty much ended with the creation of thousands of slayers so it doesn't seem that far fetched with bucketloads of them running around. Makes being a slayer a little less special though, which I guess was your point.

    8. Re:Buffy? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Starhunter Online would be awesome.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    9. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Angel of course!

    10. Re:Buffy? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      White Wolf is also planning on tapping that market.

      http://www.white-wolf.com/index.php?line=news&articleid=746

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    11. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Count me out. I plan to play a Watcher... of hot chicks.

      Speaking of Watchers, where's the Highlander MMO? It'd be hilarious if they made head slicing character death permanent, too.

    12. Re:Buffy? by Zenaku · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think there would be plenty of other popular choices for class. I'm pretty sure lots of people would choose witch, hyena-person, ex-demon shopkeeper, cyberdemon, goddess, or dude-who-just-wants-to-be-a-big-snake.

      I'm a tenth level werewolf guitarist!

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    13. Re:Buffy? by mR.bRiGhTsId3 · · Score: 1

      Yes please... I call dibs on the blue Demon that took over Fred in the last season.
      Er... what is this Angel you speak of.

    14. Re:Buffy? by philspear · · Score: 3, Funny

      There are dozens of other choices, but none where I can virtually fight vampires AND do virtual cheerleading. Also Buffy has lesbian witches. Therefore no, there aren't any BETTER choices.

    15. Re:Buffy? by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Vampire: The Masquerade would be a better vampire theme based MMO

    16. Re:Buffy? by monopole · · Score: 5, Funny

      Forget slayer, I wanna be Willow's girlfriend!!!

    17. Re:Buffy? by Caraig · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. Space Academy/Star Command Online.... >.> .

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    18. Re:Buffy? by k1e0x · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I don't know about Buffy, I think Firefly could be a much more complex and creative universe with people owning ships and being sent out to do job.. maybe even jobs against each other. There is so much there to work with..

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    19. Re:Buffy? by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      For the emo, Goth, or tabletop gamer crowd, yes. However, for the mainstream crowd, probably not as attractive.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    20. Re:Buffy? by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 3, Funny

      Heroic Class. Gotta wait some years for those expansions.

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    21. Re:Buffy? by Mechanik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Vampire: The Masquerade would be a better vampire theme based MMO

      Agreed. Thankfully, it appears that they are working on one already. Although I assume it's based on the new World of Darkness and not the old one.

    22. Re:Buffy? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, VtM is better structurally as the basis for an MMO. Either the Buffy MMO is going to be a bad MMO, or it's only very, very superficially have anything to do with the Buffy stories.

    23. Re:Buffy? by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      I think a VtM would be a better MMO, but I think a Buffy MMO would sell better.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    24. Re:Buffy? by Thyamine · · Score: 1

      I can't quite recall who you mean... hmmm..

      --
      I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
    25. Re:Buffy? by russotto · · Score: 3, Funny

      To be fair, BTVS ended with the creation of thousands of mini Slayers. And, as a bonus, it would finally give dudes a good excuse to play a hot chick in an MMO.

      Nope, they're verifying age and nationality. If you're an American guy, you only get to play the buttmonkey. (on the plus side, some of the women will be playing Faith...)

    26. Re:Buffy? by mR.bRiGhTsId3 · · Score: 1

      +1 Ironic Sig?

    27. Re:Buffy? by credd144az · · Score: 1

      I think an Escape Velocity MMO would be cool. Easy to do...

      Nevermind

    28. Re:Buffy? by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      it would finally give dudes a good excuse to play a hot chick in an MMO.

      Besides the excuse that if I'm going to stare at a character's butt for 100+ hours I'd rather see a girl's?

    29. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the Darla the hottest vampire ever" class?

    30. Re:Buffy? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I'm a tenth level werewolf guitarist!

      Is that like electric guitarist? Like, the guitar is a werewolf? Can you only play it on a full moon?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    31. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Women? On the Internet? Playing an MMO? One that is based on a hot chick killing vampires, with a lot of other hot chicks around and some girl-on-girl action?

      Gullible much, russotto?

    32. Re:Buffy? by PMuse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The robustness of the IP as a basis for development in a new media is best measured on its audience size to date. Check all that apply. Any dollars spent on one medium will double as a marketing investment for the next.

      [x] feature film
      [x] soundtrack
      [x] TV series
      [x] comic book
      [x] novelizations
      [x] dolls, toys
      [x] logo merchandise
      [ ] animated series
      [x] arcade game
      [x] MMORG
      [x] collectable card game

      In the immortal words of Mel Brooks, "Merchandising, merchandising, where the real money from the movie is made. Spaceballs-the T-shirt, Spaceballs-the Coloring Book, Spaceballs-the Lunch box, Spaceballs-the Breakfast Cereal, Spaceballs-the Flame Thrower."

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    33. Re:Buffy? by thepotoo · · Score: 1

      Are you serious?

      Go to TPB, download Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines, and play it. Beat the game. It gets better and better with every mission. Seriously, try it.

      Now tell me if that wasn't the best RPG experience you've ever had. I went into Bloodlines expecting the cheesiest, lamest excuse for a vampire game ever (I'm not a fan of White Wolf or vampires in general), but it is now far in a way my favorite game ever. The plot, the masquerade, the characters are all simply flawless. Theres very little in the game you could call goth or emo. It's mature, dark, funny, nihilistic, terrifying are all words I would use to describe it. Most of it could easily be adapted into an MMO.

      Side note: it's too bad all the other White Wolf branded stuff I checked out after VTMB sucked.

      Side note 2: the public ignored VTMB on release because it came out on the same day as HL2, and because it was full of bugs. The same is not true today. Also, they are adapting the WoD into an MMO, which may or may not be good. It's certainly worth checking into.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    34. Re:Buffy? by alta · · Score: 1

      Hey, I think you and I are the ONLY ones who knows what Escape Velocity is...

      For kicks I installed and played again last month. I never really took any of the story lines through to the end, I always seemed to get to a point in a line, and then forget which planet I was supposed to go to... At that point your screwed. Plus, kill the wrong guy and you ruin your line.

      Got any drop bear repellant?

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    35. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this effectively being made in the new World of Darkness MMORPG being made by CCP - the makers of EVE Online?

    36. Re:Buffy? by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      I take it you did not see my other psot where I said:

      "I think a VtM would be a better MMO, but I think a Buffy MMO would sell better."

      :-)

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    37. Re:Buffy? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Actually, while I'm no fan of the choices of the mass market, I think that widespread disappointment will be the main response to Buffy, and I don't think it will sell well - while I think VtM actually has a bigger long-term market. But we will see.

    38. Re:Buffy? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Is it based on The old WoD or the new one? (Did you see/hear the words "Mekhet" or "Daeva")

    39. Re:Buffy? by Thyamine · · Score: 1

      Intended as more of a +1 Funny, but at least you noticed.

      --
      I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
    40. Re:Buffy? by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      I'd agree that VtM has a nitch market, which if made with proper quality, would last for a long time. I also believe that a Buffy MMO will sell better initially then VtM, but will prove to not have nearly as loyal of a fan base as VtM for the long run. So, it is my belief that they are attempting to make as much as possible as fast as possible versus making possibly more profit over a longer term.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    41. Re:Buffy? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Would the Kestrel cheats work?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    42. Re:Buffy? by vaedur · · Score: 1

      The Collectors edition comes with tissues.

    43. Re:Buffy? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Actually MMOs (or at least WoW) are the most likely online game you'd find girls in. Now, girls playing Halo...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    44. Re:Buffy? by thepotoo · · Score: 1

      No one knows any details for certain (IIRC the game isn't even in development yet, just announced), but it will almost certainly be in the new WoD, as White Wolf is (to my understanding) no longer publishing material for old WoD. Have a look for yourself: facts and rumors.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    45. Re:Buffy? by credd144az · · Score: 1

      Ha!

      I finished the Maurrian...?

      Don't remember the name but it was pretty cool. Good writing

    46. Re:Buffy? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      You have been eaten by a grue^h^h^h^hvampire.

    47. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems like kind of a flimsy IP to base an MMO on. Aren't there dozens of better choices?

      So it will start as a 2D flash-based MMO where you can go on missions and interact with other players.

      It seems like kind of a flimsy MMO too, so maybe they will go together.

    48. Re:Buffy? by Tangent128 · · Score: 1

      Hullbreach Online is an experiment of that sort.

    49. Re:Buffy? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Preferring to run around behind a female ass instead of a male one, for hours after hours, days after days, months after months, and now, years after years, destined to be decades after decades, isn't enough reason to always play a hot chick?

      City of Heroes, build slider max, waist slider min, boob slider max, low riders or bikini or skin, tight or short top, Ms. Liberty or Kalinda, notutorialthxbie, go!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    50. Re:Buffy? by rktechhead · · Score: 1
      ... Really?... I had to read that 6 times to make sure that the text really said that it was happening. I don't know if I can go on living if that is released.

      There aren't just dozens of better choices, there are thousands.

    51. Re:Buffy? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, there'll be problems, alright.

      Post 3269: Nerf Watchers!!!
      Posted by SMGRulz416, 3:44 AM 12 July 2010

      the watcher class is supposed to be a support/utility class but they can beat a purped slayer easy!!! (Ed. Note: loaded with purple quality equipment and upgrades) Once they get the att accolade (Ed. Note: Ancient Tiki Taboo accolade, a reward for completing a long quest arc) they can use it to stun or debuf (Ed. Note: refers to the ATTs power to debuf the defense of a target by 90% or stun the target, either for 10s, 2 hour recharge time) buffs (Ed. Note: "buffs", i.e. slayers, i.e. Buffies, not to be confused with buffing someone) but since they also can delay-cast any spell on their glasses then zap it when they want, they can cast the debuff on their glasse, go find a buffy, zap stun, zap debuf, then beat on her, when 10s is up re-stun with 5s watchun (Ed. Note: watchun, bvsbbsspeake for inherent watcher stun ability) then more beats and poof she hm's. (Ed. Note: Hellmouths, or goes to the Hellmouth, where dead characters come back to life.) pvp its way worse they denad the stake and pop it on a lamp for the hps (Ed. Note: take the buffy's best wooden stake, usually teh bravery stake, hence de-nad, i.e. de-balls, i.e. de-bravery-ify, and expend it on a low level vamp yard trash to get the ash left from the disintegrated vamp, which is worth tons on the hall pass market because it's imbued with the method of destruction, in this case the 1-use-per-week special stake.)

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    52. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, they're verifying age and nationality. If you're an American guy, you only get to play the buttmonkey. ...

      I'd be able to fly right? That'd be so totally cool!

      Flying around screeching and flinging poo.

    53. Re:Buffy? by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm with you, but some find that excuse less "good" and more "creepy."

    54. Re:Buffy? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Without debabbelizing, it's quite intense:

      the watcher class is supposed to be a support/utility class but they can beat a purped slayer easy!!! Once they get the att accolade they can use it to stun or debuf buffs but since they also can delay-cast any spell on their glasses then zap it when they want, they can cast the debuff on their glasse, go find a buffy, zap stun, zap debuf, then beat on her, when 10s is up re-stun with 5s watchun then more beats and poof she hm's. pvp its way worse they denad the stake and pop it on a lamp for the hps.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    55. Re:Buffy? by owlnation · · Score: 1

      I think his point, and a valid one, is that while Joss Whedon's creations have many fervent fans, there are also very many people who find him overrated. I'm on the fence -- I like Firefly, don't care for Buffy. (Although I do think the episodes he personally wrote were very good, but some of the others left much to be desired.)

      I would have thought this was a commercial risk. Buffy and Firefly were not / are not nearly as commercially successful as most of the fans would have you believe.

    56. Re:Buffy? by Macgrrl · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Collectors edition comes with tissues.

      Surely it comes with cheese slices.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    57. Re:Buffy? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No, I meant Bloodlines.

    58. Re:Buffy? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      What about the Darla the hottest vampire ever" class?

      Or Fred the hot-scientist-inventor-chick class. Presumably before she turned into a deity.

    59. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget slayer, I wanna be Willow's girlfriend!!!

      This is Slashdot, not slash fanfic.

    60. Re:Buffy? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      You might check out Vega Strike. I've not spent a lot of time with it yet, but it looks like it's basically a 3D version of Escape Velocity.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    61. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vampire: The Masquerade would be a better vampire theme based MMO

      Aren't the Eve guys making this MMO?

    62. Re:Buffy? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      No, I meant Bloodlines.

      Old. There are proper Malkavians in it. They're fun to play, and the Malkavian-specific dialogue is terrific, but I preferred playing Tremere; they're just so much more stylish, and don't go about the place in a cowgirl outfit.

      And obviously everyone who ever played the game at some point created a Brujah called Cassidy. It's compulsory.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    63. Re:Buffy? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Those that find it 'creepy' are likely just jealous women who are jealous of the digitally perfect ass.

      I wouldn't call it creepy so much as just plain good old fashioned geeky sadness. I've never played any 3D MMOs, though I admit when I've played motostorm or whatever it is, that I preferred the female bike riders to watching the dudes wiggling their leather-clad asses around :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    64. Re:Buffy? by Durkheim · · Score: 1

      So my story about how to optimize sharing of large files over a LAN gets rejected, yet Buffy MMO is on the front page? Whoever decided this (or upvoted this) needs to have his brains checked quick. With a chainsaw.

    65. Re:Buffy? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Actually I completed Escape Velocity a few years ago, and more recently when I got a Mac again I completed one of the storyline paths in Nova (the one where you are a being that can create spaceships from your own energy, though you can also use the normal ships if you want). Great game :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    66. Re:Buffy? by etwills · · Score: 1

      Forget slayer, I wanna be Willow's girlfriend!!!

      If that role's gone, I'll take Watcher.

    67. Re:Buffy? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I'd agree that VtM has a nitch market, which if made with proper quality, would last for a long time.

      I think it depends a lot on how the VtM game was made. It could be absolutely brilliant, or it could be just another WoW clone but now with vampires and werewolves.

      There's plenty of room for intrigue between players, within clans and between clans. I think if done well, you'd get something much closer to EVE than to WoW.

    68. Re:Buffy? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Go to TPB, download Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines, and play it. Beat the game. It gets better and better with every mission. Seriously, try it.

      Now tell me if that wasn't the best RPG experience you've ever had.

      It was not the best RPG experience I've ever had. Planescape: Torment was. Bloodlines was a very good second, however.

      Theres very little in the game you could call goth or emo.

      Apart from the styling, the clothes, the music, the characters and the plot.

      It's mature, dark, funny, nihilistic, terrifying are all words I would use to describe it.

      In other words: gothic.

      Side note 2: the public ignored VTMB on release because it came out on the same day as HL2, and because it was full of bugs. The same is not true today.

      True. A guy called Werner Stahl just won't stop releasing new patches for this game. The vast majority of the bugs have been fixed (although it's still not bug-free), a lot of hidden content has been made accessible, and I believe there are even new features. But he also has a pure bugfix patch without all the new features.

    69. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that, I want to be Willow! Hot redhead lesbian witch - what's not to love?

    70. Re:Buffy? by V+for+Vendetta · · Score: 1

      No wonder. White Wolf was acquired by CCP, makers of EVE Online.

    71. Re:Buffy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, but what about Stephen King's Dark Tower Universe? Everyone could have the best of all worlds. Being a gunslinger, or one of the Mani folk, how about being one of many insane evil races or robots? Want a western, fantasy, sci-fi, or paranormal MMO? You got em all rolled into one with this universe. But hell, what to I know, lets do buffy.

    72. Re:Buffy? by alta · · Score: 1

      Well, it looks good. Installed it (455MB Download) ran the config, so far so good, ran the program. Crash...

      It may have a problem with 4 monitors. Although it probably doesn't like vista.

      I'll try it at home on XP.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    73. Re:Buffy? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      It is only version 0.5, but so far it seems a lot more polished than I would expect. I wouldn't know about Vista problems, but it runs fine on XP and Kubuntu for me.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  2. repeat after me by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    NO MO' MMO's!

    Seriously, I ain't got time for 'em, does anyone else? Just getting through a great single-player game like Oblivion kicks my ass, let alone this multi-player time-sink crap.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with the insult, but the point is spot on. There are millions of people playing WoW, not to mention hundreds of thousands of other gamers playing other MMOs. MMOs are here to stay, and as normal with the video games industry, someone will eventually top WoW.

    2. Re:repeat after me by arth1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If someone could invent an MMO that was immune to being overtaken by koreans and 13 year old boys (of any age), perhaps I would want to play it. As it is, the AGGR0, LULZ crowd ruins every single one of them -- there's no way to pretend you're part of a story when a kid runs up to you and asks you whether you want him to powerlevel you "reel cheep", or is named YO M0+H3R.

      As for the kind of people who are Buffy fans, that should speak for itself.

    3. Re:repeat after me by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      13 year old boys of any age?

    4. Re:repeat after me by brkello · · Score: 1

      Obviously people do. Why should you care what other people have time for and you don't? I'd say to you NO MO' telling people how they should spend their time.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    5. Re:repeat after me by Setherghd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As in, thirty year old men who behave like thirteen year olds.

      Go to 4chan. There's tons of them. You'll see.

    6. Re:repeat after me by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      Maybe you'd like to take a look into the various roleplaying Ultima Online freeshards. There are quite a few pretty nice of them out there, and I've never seen the kind of players you mentioned on those.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    7. Re:repeat after me by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      There's always MMOs like Merentha.

      Or for something more modern, you might consider City of Heroes.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    8. Re:repeat after me by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Aren't there RP servers for WoW that enforce things like that?

    9. Re:repeat after me by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Roll on an RP server.

      I'm not joking.

      It's amazing what getting rid of all the people who think there's a "cool" and "dorky" MMO server to play on does for the quality of the game.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:repeat after me by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      overtaken by koreans and 13 year old boys

      But I thought that in Korea, only old people played MMOs?

    11. Re:repeat after me by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Yes. Hundreds of thousands of people are playing MMs as you read this. Maybe that time could be used for something else. But books, movies, comics and TV are all passive single player entertainment. MMs are (somewhat) interactive, what the player does (sort of) changes the story.

      Not all MMs are time sinks. PlanetSide is an MMFPS (the O is a given) that i play to *play*, not to gain this or that widget or epeener, only to get the next widget. Been playing that every Thursday night for about 5 years and most of the time i love it.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    12. Re:repeat after me by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No. The RP servers for WoW selectively enforce character names for "inappropriate" (means "The blizzard monkey who saw it didn't get it") character names. Doesn't stop the PvPtards from flooding Ironforge (or whatever the Dwarf/Gnome capital is called. Been over 2 years) when a pair of dolts gets caught cybering in the tram tunnel.

    13. Re:repeat after me by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Dunno? Do they kickban people who use words like "aggro", "gank", "pwn", "epic phail" and "lulz"?

    14. Re:repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm not alone? At least not as far as my feelings on MMOs are concerned.

      It can even get bad with 16 player FPS games.

    15. Re:repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Korea, MMO's play YOU!

    16. Re:repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. And even on the non-RP servers, I haven't experienced what the GP is suggesting - Blizzard seem to be doing the anti-spam thing fairly well.

    17. Re:repeat after me by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Play on an official roleplaying server. Most MMOs have at least one. On WoW, they were pretty well policed and people who were actively damaging to other people's roleplay experiences (including people with unrealistic names) were normally quickly dealt with, either through warnings, forced name changes, or server bans. Maybe it's changed in the few years since I stopped playing, I don't know, but it used to be pretty good.

    18. Re:repeat after me by quadrox · · Score: 1

      I have never been to 4chan and have only a vague idea of what it is. But as someone apparently disliking it, you seem to know an awful lot about it :)

    19. Re:repeat after me by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      No, but those people are naturally more rare, because the kinds of people who act like that are the kind of people who think rolling on an RP server makes you a dork, as if that ship didn't sail the moment they installed WoW.

      It's really night and day, from quality of chat to quality of pick up group members. Sometimes the trade channel will get pretty bad, and I'll think the lustre is gone. Then I'll make the mistake of logging on with one of the characters I foolishly rolled on a normal server and it takes all of ten seconds to be reminded of how retarded most players are.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    20. Re:repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's no way to pretend you're part of a story when...

      Depends on the setting...in cyberpunk these idiots would fit in fine. In all seriousness, I get your point but it should be noted that the reason the immersion is so disrupted by these modern online persona intrusions is that most MMOs are based on Fantasy/Stylized SciFi settings. This could be solved with the right type of writing and some basic in game rules rather than out of character policing. Think of how much cooler it would be if you could report characters to a police terminal that would have in game effects rather than whining to the GMs.

    21. Re:repeat after me by initialE · · Score: 1

      Remove the gold. It's as simple as that. Koreans are finding it a profitable enterprise to do gold farming, therefore they don't just play for fun, they play for profit. And by gold I mean - anything that has to be obtained and increased through a tedious time-consuming process.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    22. Re:repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't play an open massively multiplayer game and then complain about having to deal with other people.

    23. Re:repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll be Chinese not Korean. The cost of living in Korea is about the same as the U.S, and gold farming doesn't generate enough money to live comfortably in either locations. China on the other hand is a lot cheaper to live in.

  3. Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We will release the Flash game and then this project will die because we can't make any money off that.

  4. Flatland: An MMO of Many Dimensions by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Funny

    shared spaces where 2D and 3D people can interact

    So what do the 2D players see when the 3D players jump?

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:Flatland: An MMO of Many Dimensions by LiquidFire_HK · · Score: 1

      Could be isometric or something of the kind. No reason you can't represent 3 dimensions in a 2D game.

    2. Re:Flatland: An MMO of Many Dimensions by tknd · · Score: 1

      Probably a gold colored box with a question mark on it.

    3. Re:Flatland: An MMO of Many Dimensions by jadin · · Score: 1

      The text cursor blinking.

    4. Re:Flatland: An MMO of Many Dimensions by omnispace · · Score: 1

      shared spaces where 2D and 3D people can interact

      So what do the 2D players see when the 3D players jump?

      They see their shadows.

  5. Can Hardly Wait(tm) by goose-incarnated · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... it will ... so it will start ...this will ... once we have ... we're going to have ... all of this will come out in phases ...we're sort of blazing a path ... I'd love to ...

    To be honest, DNF has a lower vapourware coefficient.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  6. 2D people by Alsee · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're going to have these shared spaces where 2D and 3D people can interact.

    We already have that here on Slashdot whenever an evolution-related story crops up.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:2D people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I'm pretty one-dimensional. Check my post history if you don't believe me.

  7. Already is a FireFly MMO by MrTripps · · Score: 1

    It's called Eve Online. http://www.eve-online.com/

    --
    "I'm not a quack, I'm a mad scientist! There's a difference." - Dr. Cockroach
    1. Re:Already is a FireFly MMO by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      you mean an mmo with stakes too much like the real world?

      where's the fantasy and escapism when a month of real time progress gets blown to bits by a gate camper?

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:Already is a FireFly MMO by 77Punker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      EVE Online doesn't actually allow players to fly their own ship or do any of the usual space captain things. Combat is pretty much exactly the same as any other MMO.

      I prefer to call Eve a "massively multiplayer 3D online chat room".
      Something like X3:Reunion except MMO would really be the space game everyone's been waiting for.

    3. Re:Already is a FireFly MMO by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean like Vendetta?

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    4. Re:Already is a FireFly MMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Combat is pretty much exactly the same as any other RPG.

      If you want to fly the ship and shot the lasers then don't play an RPG.

    5. Re:Already is a FireFly MMO by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly like Vendetta except more fun. Hopefully Vendetta can keep itself afloat for a few more years and actually become interesting.

      I played it for a good two months or so. The combat and such isn't bad, but I was never able to get into any groove playing the game. I never felt compelled to see what would come next or felt excited about what new abilities/property I would acquire next.

    6. Re:Already is a FireFly MMO by rudeboy1 · · Score: 1

      I think they need to revisit Freelancer. That game wasn't exactly a MMO, as you were on a relatively small, locally run server (always hated that I'd have to start from scratch if I was at a LAN party and someone wanted to play on a different server), but if they fleshed it out so that it wasn't quite so repetitive, that game would have kicked all kinds of ass. Basically, the combat system was pretty cool, though even it could use a bit of polish. If you were to add in a rich character development and storyline, you'd have... well, you'd have the makings of a good Firefly MMO.

      Firefly has the potential to break the back of WoW because it already has a fantastic "grind" system in place, one that allows for maximum enjoyment and time-sink without the "I'm gonna go kill tree frogs for 3 hours to get a new chest piece". Plus, for all those college professors who clearly don't have enough work to do, the economic ramifications are staggering with this game, assuming they can do a little to curb gold farmers, similar to WoW (you'll notice while there is inflation, it's not astronomic, like say SWG). Depending on how much of a traipse it is to get to outer rim planets, I could see the exchange rate differing greatly between planets/moons. That, and the existence of different types of currency. One could probably make a decent living as a currency changer on Persephone.

      I have reason to hope, but I'm trying my best to keep my feet on the ground.

      /you can't take the sky away from me...

      --
      Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
    7. Re:Already is a FireFly MMO by rgviza · · Score: 1

      My favorite description is a massively multiplayer online space screen saver. It's beautiful... and ultimately boring. I played for a couple of years and it never really got that interesting. I'm in a guild that has a division there (0.0 pvp corp in an alliance). I had more fun hanging out on teamspeak and shooting the shit than actually playing.

      It's kind of like long boring wars gatecamping and seeing if you could actually hit the victim before he was vaporized.

      It made an excellent backdrop for conversations tho. Once you've seen it all it's pretty meh. If big battles weren't so laggy, maybe it would be more fun, but probably not.

      I got bored and went back to swg, despite the dated graphics and play, it's still actually fun with friends, if you can get over what they did to the game with the first combat upgrade and NGE(aka CU2).

      At least there the space combat *is* twitch based and a lot more fun, if not just as beautiful. The ground game is good for a lot of laughs too if you pvp. I laugh pretty hard sometimes...

      -Viz

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    8. Re:Already is a FireFly MMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your answer shows you've never played it and you don't understand it.

  8. waste of effort by SirSlud · · Score: 1

    Man, what is the point of going through all that trouble? This reeks of wasted effort spent on getting the 2d side up and running, assets they can't re-use, and the trouble of bridging the 2d client over to the 3d client. Seems like a huge timesuck to me.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
    1. Re:waste of effort by AuralityKev · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I'd love to see how they formulated the business plan to get the backing for this.

    2. Re:waste of effort by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      While I think the idea is largely stupid, it will allow people to play when they shouldn't be playing. A browser-based flash game would make it so you can do your gold-farming in a background tab at work or school all day, then go home at night and fire up the 3D client for some immersive vampire-slaying.

      I wouldn't play it, but if it turns out being any good, that's what people are going to do.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    3. Re:waste of effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, what is the point of going through all that trouble? This reeks of wasted effort spent on getting the 2d side up and running, assets they can't re-use, and the trouble of bridging the 2d client over to the 3d client. Seems like a huge timesuck to me.

      Actually if you are smart you do the game isometric, render all the 3d assets out to flash and then they are totally reuseable.

      I don't think the game would be all shaderific in flash, but i can see where you could kill 2 birds with one stone.

    4. Re:waste of effort by Caraig · · Score: 1

      I think we've disovered what they think 'Step Two' is....

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    5. Re:waste of effort by Josef+Meixner · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      They're the same assets in 2D and 3D. We take the 3D assets and we 'shoot' em from a locked-down isometric point of view, then we turn those assets into 2D sprites. It looks very similar between the two formats.

      So they intend to render the 3D stuff and use that. But honestly that whole "interview" strikes me as odd. They can't talk about this, can't show that, they are not allowed to tell what happened with Firefly. They can't tell us the style of their artwork or the game play.

      For me it sounds like complete vaporware. I don't have the impression they actually have anything that works. I doubt there is any artwork done yet or can you imagine a game company passing on the ability to promote their game they want to release this year? I am not so sure you can just take 3D assets and turn them into useful 2D ones for a game. Things which work in 3D don't always work so well in an iso metric view. I simply don't understand the problems to go straight to 3D, if they have the 3D assets and the game mechanics. Especially if they have been developing on Firefly in 3D, shouldn't they have the code to do a 3D version yet?

      To me that whole thing sounds like a company in need of a new round of VC financing.

    6. Re:waste of effort by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      One of the biggest problems game companies encounter is the pipeline. You need to create a bunch of plugins and tools and utils to get the assets from 3ds/maya/whatever to your game. (Plus gui, plus captions, plus textures, plus blah blah blah.)

      Then you're building an isometric 2d render and a 3d renderer, which would employ totally different camera systems. And since you can take those 2d snaps without making sure the assets will look good in 3d, you'll render the 2d on the 2nd or 3rd pass, and drop it while you attempt to maintain your 2d client. Suddenly the deadline for the 3d client is coming up. Oh crap, look what fell through the cracks!

      You know why games get delayed so often? Why MMORPGs get cancelled too often? Cause it's a huge assload of work to create games, and because software development is always slower that expectations. Under promise, over deliver. This 2d to 3d thing sounds like a make work project. If the product is sound and good, then make it. Giving yourself extra work to let people experience a game before you even define the final graphical experience sounds like the best of both terrible worlds - more work, for a less sincere first impression.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  9. WHAT? by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    Do they think I'm 16?

    Really, I'm 14. I just have this account that says I'm 16.

    --If you believe THEM, wait'll you get a load of this . . .

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:WHAT? by Nathrael · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, come on. On the Internet, we are all 18 year old girls.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    2. Re:WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up, that was funny.

  10. Question by Sta7ic · · Score: 3, Funny

    How did this get modded up past the firehose? Buffy, Firefly, and MMOGs have nothing to do with-

    Oh, wait.

  11. Hey, now. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm flattered and everything, but I'm not sure I really lead the sort of life that's all that worth making an MMO about.

    1. Re:Hey, now. by jcdick1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps this is why the MMO is on hold. They are simply waiting for you to do something fun, exciting, and worth paying a monthly fee to do over and over!

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Hey, now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any relation to Rufus T. Firefly?

    3. Re:Hey, now. by Bicx · · Score: 3, Funny

      go outside with a steak knife and kill 1000 squirrels. Take the skins and return them to the nearest marketplace to sell. Then maybe they'll have a backstory for ya.

    4. Re:Hey, now. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Egotist. Whoever heard of Rob T Firefly? This MMO is about your uncle Rufus.

    5. Re:Hey, now. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Once again, I'm forced to live with that old Rufus over my head.

  12. The status is *not* quo... by Jupiter+Jones · · Score: 4, Funny

    Both of those MMOs sound nice. But if you really want my gaming dollars, how about one taking place in the Dr. Horrible universe?

    (Every five minutes your in-game chat would have to rhyme, of course.)

    JJ

    1. Re:The status is *not* quo... by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 3, Funny

      With my freeze ray I could stop the Buffy MMO

    2. Re:The status is *not* quo... by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

      lots of song and dance oriented quests... every other person choosing the race of "horse"... and the most popular user name being some variation of "t3hH4MM3RizMYp3n15"

    3. Re:The status is *not* quo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And every two hour, Joss Whedon shows up to kill the most popular person on the server.

    4. Re:The status is *not* quo... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      If clever wordplay and haiku-smithing are your thing, you might really get a kick out of Kingdom of Loathing.

  13. Most MMOs by PhasmatisApparatus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most MMOs focus on two concepts: a unique combat system and different skills to level. A Buffy MMO sounds interesting enough, until you realize that the developers would have to stray too far from the TV series in order to make it a good game.

    First, the combat in the Buffyverse has always been minimal. Buffy explains in painful detail to the vampires why they can't win, and she'll kick their heads in if they try anything. Once an episode, one of them tries somethings. Buffy kicks heads in. End of episode, at least as far as fighting goes.

    As for skills, well, there's not much of that in the series, either. Buffy has always been killing vampires. It's what she does. Giles is always the librarian who has read every book on the occult, but still never notices anything wrong until someone points it out first. +3 intellect/+1 cluelessness. But I am getting silly here.

    The point is, the game will either conform to the Buffyverse, or the game will distort the Buffyverse to make it work. Either way, it cannot end well.

    1. Re:Most MMOs by Grandiloquence · · Score: 1

      You stake the vampire rat through the heart. You gain 10 xp and 2 gold!

      Repeat for the next 500 hours with bigger and bigger rats.

    2. Re:Most MMOs by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Most MMOs focus on two concepts: a unique combat system and different skills to level

      And then they settle on D20 and call it a day.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:Most MMOs by cyber-dragon.net · · Score: 1

      And then the company goes under because they chose one of the worst systems for actual story and character development and end up tied to it and players realize they just spent $30 on something that is just like every other wannabe game developer out there and have nothing original. Then they either leave the industry or find a real RPG.

    4. Re:Most MMOs by bickle · · Score: 1

      First, the combat in the Buffyverse has always been minimal. Buffy explains in painful detail to the vampires why they can't win, and she'll kick their heads in if they try anything. Once an episode, one of them tries somethings. Buffy kicks heads in. End of episode, at least as far as fighting goes. ... The point is, the game will either conform to the Buffyverse, or the game will distort the Buffyverse to make it work. Either way, it cannot end well.

      While I don't think the MMO will work out, it's certainly not for this reason. Minimal combat? There has always been quite a bit of combat in the show, and with villains of different difficulty. This lends itself very well to the MMO genre. Regular vamps = trash mobs, Big Bads = bosses. One doesn't even have to look far for proof of how well the Buffy universe translates to gaming. The original Buffy game on the Xbox stayed very true to the show, and was a great 3D brawler. In addition, it was one of the few (if not the only) game to successfully transfer a 2d fighting system into true 3d space.

    5. Re:Most MMOs by Babbster · · Score: 1

      [blockquote]The original Buffy game on the Xbox stayed very true to the show, and was a great 3D brawler. In addition, it was one of the few (if not the only) game to successfully transfer a 2d fighting system into true 3d space.[blockquote]
      That game doesn't get enough props - probably because it was on a system that never truly caught fire. I played through the whole thing 3 times because killing vampires was just a blast, and the way fights played out really reminded one of the TV show (as long as one avoided "button mashing").

      Oh yeah, and holy water-filled super-soaker FTW. :)

    6. Re:Most MMOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many episodes of Buffy have you watched? Most of the time they were actually pretty creative with the bad guys. It was most certainly not the "every episode, Buffy kills vampires, the end" kind of show you seem to be implying.

  14. What about 4 dimensions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about an mmo with actual four-dimensional character classes?

    granted 5 dimensions might be a little hard for people to wrap their minds around as a playable character, but a four-dimensional character would be neat.

    you'd have the capacity to attack from multiple directions at once, adjust yourself to the specific needs of an encounter, etc.

    1. Re:What about 4 dimensions. by cthulu_mt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dungeons & Dragons is a 5 dimensional game:

      Strength
      Dexterity
      Constitution
      Charisma
      Wisdom

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    2. Re:What about 4 dimensions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charisma? Wisdom? Who needs those?

    3. Re:What about 4 dimensions. by vaedur · · Score: 1

      You forgot intelligence... oh the fun i could have with jokes based on the lack of.

    4. Re:What about 4 dimensions. by AtomicRobotMonster · · Score: 1

      You missed Intelligence. How... ironic?

      --
      Is that a ding I hear? GET BACK IN THE MAGIC HOUSE!!!
    5. Re:What about 4 dimensions. by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1

      Intelligence is a dump stat.

      Especially in 4thed where monotony is the law.

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    6. Re:What about 4 dimensions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like ten thousand spoons.

  15. Flash? by cyber-dragon.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does he really expect anyone to play a flash game? Or even pay for it? Might as well make it a facebook app where you "complete offers" to power up your character.

    1. Re:Flash? by Earered · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean, like dofus? http://www.dofus.com/

    2. Re:Flash? by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 3, Funny

      With a property like BTVS, you have to strike while the iron is hot! If they wait to have a worthwhile game to offer, Buffy's relevance may fade.

    3. Re:Flash? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Buffy's relevance faded a long time ago. When it was a cute little low-budget fantasy series, just a little bit more imaginative than the competition, it was fun. When it turned into a franchise, it got boring.

  16. Dear Multiverse and Fox, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't get the Firefly MMO back in full-time production, then I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you.

    -Summer Glau

    1. Re:Dear Multiverse and Fox, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swallow bugs much?

      btw...Summer wouldn't talk that way. That is something more along what Mal would say.

    2. Re:Dear Multiverse and Fox, by edraven · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about what the actress might say, or what the character might say?
      Near as I can tell, Summer's kind of a sweetheart, I don't think she'd threaten anybody. Just sayin'. As for River, it seems a little... coherent, don't you think? I agree Mal would say this. Probably in Chinese.

    3. Re:Dear Multiverse and Fox, by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I know the "Summer Glau" was an XKCD reference, but come on... She wasn't even IN that scene.

      My days of not taking slashdot seriously have certainly come to a middle... :)

    4. Re:Dear Multiverse and Fox, by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Mal did say it, more or less. "But if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet, I will end you."

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Dear Multiverse and Fox, by Secret+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      That isn't a Summer reference, it is a Mal reference. It is from the episode 'Our Mrs. Reynolds'.

  17. Buffy Quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant
  18. HEY NOW! by kenp2002 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    DON'T YOU DARE ACT SUPRISED SLASHDOTTERS!

    Any generation that can make a "Desparate Housewives" game and a sequel to "90210" deserves whatever nonsense MMO they birth!

    I've also see a BRATZ video game, too many Barbie games to count, and about 200 old crappy FPS games based off the old Doom and Doom 2 engines. I've seen really bad attempts at serious Murder-Mystery games (Myst and Phantasmagoria being a few of the exceptions to the wave of shit they put out in that genre).

    "Garbage in, Garbage Out. Counts for data, and counts for life"

    Face it, there is the future of the gaming industry. I bet they'll blame the low subscription rate on the conviently leaked source code and demand the government subsidize them due to the evil pirates.

    Down down down, right down the shitter only twice as fast as the movie industry's slide into irrelivance...

    Books: they don't crash, do need hardware upgrades outside of the occasional new pair of glasses, and so far none of the books I have read have any class imbalances except "Last of the Renshai", the hobbled warrior class was WAY OP'ed!!

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  19. give us Firefly ! by savuporo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Spacesim genre on PC has been basically dead since the late great FreeSpace 2. Okay, there was Freelancer which was semi-decent, but nothing compared to the old great hits like Tie Fighter, best of Wing Commander, Privateer, Tachyon, Independence War or even all the way back to Elite series.

    Do not even start about recent flops like Tarr Chronicles, SpaceForce : Rogue Universe or even the entire X series. Eye candy and insance technical requirements bundled with unworkable control schemes not a playable game make. ( A side note: EVE is not a space sim, not the kind that im talking about here )

    Now Firefly universe would be a perfect setting for Privateer-like game. You dont even have to be goddamn revolutionary game designer to pull a triple-A hit on this. Just use the best gameplay elements of the past, make a good story ( hey its not like good sci-fi writers are hard to come by), half decent graphics and playable controls and you have a sure winner on that currently barren field.

    Yes, i we know Elite 4 and Infinity ( infinity-universe.com ) will be ready Real Soon Now (TM) but i dont think advances in life prolonging medicine are happening fast enough to tide all us space simmers over until then.

    --
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    1. Re:give us Firefly ! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      C'mon, I know what you really want, but are afraid to ask for. It's okay. Let it out, and you'll be free. I know it's hard. I'll help. We can say it together. 3...2...1...

      Battlecruiser MMO!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:give us Firefly ! by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Spacesim genre on PC has been basically dead since the late great FreeSpace 2. Okay, there was Freelancer which was semi-decent, but nothing compared to the old great hits like Tie Fighter, best of Wing Commander, Privateer, Tachyon, Independence War or even all the way back to Elite series.

      I don't see Hardwar in that list, which is a shame, since it's a great game imo. Might be tough getting a hold of it, but it's definitely worth it.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  20. Blazing trails? by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

    Um, more like boldly going where angels fear to tread. At best you're going to create a shitty little flash game that acts as a teaser for the full-fledged client, and then discover that there is virtually no reusable code between the two. Nobody's done this before because it's a bad idea on its face-- at best, you're wasting precious coding resources on hype, which is what your PR department is for.

  21. bring on firefly by mcneely.mike · · Score: 1

    Screw Buffy (or, rather, that cute red head lesbian), bring on the Firefly game! Much more interested in it than Buffy.

    --
    soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
  22. translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    translation:

    wow, we can't program a 3d client worth shit yet, and/or our 3D artists suck ass.... but hey, we have a nice server... so we'll put up a quick shitty 2D client because we're out of money and don't want to fuck up our good IP on a bad launch.

  23. Ultima Online? by mynameismonkey · · Score: 1

    We're going to have these shared spaces where 2D and 3D people can interact. All of this will come out in phases, with staged gameplay coming out. We're sort of blazing a path with this concept, and we're really interested in what this might mean for players of the two versions.

    Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't Ultima Online available in 2D and 3D clients?

    --
    -- Religion is not an exact science
  24. So.. by Tsoat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you know when people are high and they come up with really great ideas like breeding and selling hamsters? This sounds kinda like one of those ideas...

  25. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    both series were crap. just give it up, star wars geeks. come just us in the human race where we don't need to indulge in trite fantasies to have a good time.

  26. Two levels by cybereal · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Firefly MMO was in private beta but they couldn't seem to figure out why just as you were about to ding level 3 the game would exit abruptly and show you a confusing array of cutscenes from the rest of the content...

    --
    I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
  27. Don't really care for MMO's, but. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    If I absolutely had to choose one, it certainly wouldn't be a Buffyverse. I don't even see how you could populate the game world realistically. I mean, how many Slayers can you really have? Does everybody have to be some red-shirt vampire? What is there to do? Do you need to collect money? Why? To pay for bigger stakes? Everybody but Cordelia was broke most of the time and that worked out just fine. And Sunnyvale is pretty small. . . In the first episode, it was put plainly that there was only one club in town and that things were pretty limited. Do you get points for doing homework and being bored?

    Whereas the Firefly universe is. . , well, it seems like the hands down most logical choice for a multi-player game universe. Spaceships, collecting money for vital supplies, lots of different and fascinating character classes, goods trading, shoot outs, futuristic cities, floating cities, desert towns, reavers and evil empires. . , I mean, jeez! It has absolutely everything!

    This silly decision sounds like it has one of two sources. . .

    1. The marketing gurus are simply counting heads and trends in terms of disposable income dollars and goth-girls with free time, (which frankly is silly since the fan base has all grown up since Buffy was a hit, and are probably less likely to be such huge fans).

    2. (And this is my personal opinion). The same forces over at Fox which deliberately deep-sixed Firefly for its anti-government, pro-revolutionist sentiment, (again, my opinion), aren't about to allow the same to get another toe-hold with some potentially massively popular game.

    Whatever. I don't play video games, and thank goodness, because the people who got these properties sound deeply uninspired and planning-impaired. What a shame.

    -FL

    1. Re:Don't really care for MMO's, but. . . by Gewalt · · Score: 1

      Actually, MMO's kinda flail when "guns" come into play. The combat turns into nothing more than a race to see who shoots first. Unless of course, you insist that the strongest gun in the game is no more powerful than an air powered bb gun. Then it balances nicely. (or you make up some ridiculous energy based armor) Historical MMO works because there is no expectation of technology. Mythical MMO works because we love to believe in magic.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    2. Re:Don't really care for MMO's, but. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading between the lines (and not TFA), I'd say it's because they're having trouble setting up a 3D game engine and they need money in order to continue to exist. Rather than sully the Firefly IP with some craptastic 2D flash engine, they're going to try and set up some kind of bullshit half-assed Buffy game and hope that the income from that will keep them limping along long enough to get their 3D issues worked out.

    3. Re:Don't really care for MMO's, but. . . by Wowlapalooza · · Score: 0

      In a more abstract sense, I think your point should be that there is a double balancing-act to be performed here.

      There is always going to be, in the first place, a balance of items, enhancements and abilities within the game itself (if something is horribly unbalanced then folks will gravitate to that thing and then, as you pointed out, it just becomes "a race to see who shoots first"). All of the other items/abilities/enhancements/etc. get sidelined, even if they're more interesting, and the game suffers from a lack of variety/diversity.

      The other balancing act is between in-game balance, as described above, and "realism".

      The problem with "guns" per se is that, in real life, they dominated and obseleted almost all other preceding weapons (swords, bows, polearms, etc) by a huge margin. So, to be "realistic" in an MMO they need to be really powerful, and that risks upsetting the delicate balance within the game itself. If you reduce guns' effectiveness, then you can maintain in-game balance, but it seems rather unrealistic, in historical terms. Guns exist in WoW, for instance, but they do roughly the same damage, and in some cases less damage, than bows or crossbows. This is historically unrealistic, of course, but necessary for game balance: otherwise, you'd have nothing but Hunters blasting their way through quests, instances and PvP (welcome to World of Guncraft)

      I guess my bottom line here, is that any item/ability/enhancement has the potential to upset in-game balance, but "guns" have more of a potential to do so, because of the temptation to make their power "realistic", in real-life, historical terms.

    4. Re:Don't really care for MMO's, but. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Well, that shows how much MMO-ing I've done, (none)!

      "Shoot-outs" and "Adventure game" seem to be make perfect sense until you describe it like you just did.

      I will stop proffering my opinion now. Thank-you!

      -FL

    5. Re:Don't really care for MMO's, but. . . by DeathCarrot · · Score: 1

      If I absolutely had to choose one, it certainly wouldn't be a Buffyverse. I don't even see how you could populate the game world realistically. I mean, how many Slayers can you really have? Does everybody have to be some red-shirt vampire? What is there to do? Do you need to collect money? Why? To pay for bigger stakes? Everybody but Cordelia was broke most of the time and that worked out just fine. And Sunnyvale is pretty small. . . In the first episode, it was put plainly that there was only one club in town and that things were pretty limited. Do you get points for doing homework and being bored?

      I'm guessing you didn't watch Buffy right to the end. If the setting is set after the TV-series, there should be plenty to base an MMO on.

      Granted, I would agree that Firefly would make a fantastic MMO setting, but Slayers/Witches vs Demons/Vampires would be pretty cool as well.

  28. Let me know when you by geekoid · · Score: 1

    get past the 2d/3d crossover stage and to the done stage.

    While I have no hopes at all for a good Buffy game(I'm bias, I thought the series sucked) I can see where the could move it more global and have 'Vampire Empires'. I think making it more like angel might be wiser. Many demons running around, most of them neither good or bad along with the vampires would create more story opportunities.
    I'm bias, I really enjoyed Angel.
    They could incorporate destinies as personal goals.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Let me know when you by mweather · · Score: 1

      I'm bias

      Bias is not a verb. Biased is.

    2. Re:Let me know when you by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ya, my bad, I rewrote the sentence but didn't change it to a verb.
      Meh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Let me know when you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot. What were you thinking?

  29. MMO by blackjackshellac · · Score: 0, Troll

    Pray tell, what the fsuck is an MMO?

    And why the fsck does it take 30 seconds to post to slashdot with this fancy new-fangled ajax commenting system? Damn that sucks.

    --
    Salut,

    Jacques

    1. Re:MMO by Wowlapalooza · · Score: 1, Informative

      MMO = Massively Multiplayer Online, typically used as the prefix in MMORPG (RPG = Role-Playing Game), and sometimes as an abbreviation for same. Although, technically, you could have MMOFPS (First-Person Shooter), MMORTS (Real-Time Strategy), or other variants, due to technology and design limitations, RPGs are currently the predominant MMOs.

    2. Re:MMO by gknoy · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMO

      Google and Wikipedia can answer many questions more efficiently than a fellow human, as the question has already been answered before. :)

    3. Re:MMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that the GP doesn't know what an MMO is, he must have been living under a rock for some time. There's a good chance he has absolutely no idea what Google and Wikipedia are, so go easy.

  30. Flash Site and 3-D World Interacting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "shared spaces where 2D and 3D people can interact"

    Twin Skies is already doing that, except that it's releasing a full 3-D world alongside a complimentary set of flash games and interactions for the world. They've already demo'd it at PAX. They've already proven they can do it. The BTVS team doesn't sound like it knows how it is going to pull this off yet and may be making it more of a gimmick than a useful feature.

  31. Lorne's = karaoke? by DdJ · · Score: 1

    I hope in the Buffy MMO you can wander into Lorne's club and play a karaoke minigame, something like the singing portions of "Rock Band". It would fit perfectly.

  32. Re:Marvel had 7 Dimensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fighting
    Agility
    Strength
    Endurance
    Reason
    Intuition
    Psyche

    So there! 8-p

  33. Too Many MMOs by hoofinasia · · Score: 3, Funny

    seriously? Lets make everything an MMO.

    Just announced! Slashdot MMO! play any one of 5 classes informative, funny, insightful, interesting, troll!

    Epic level cap of +1 to +5! Ability to ignore comments I mean players below level 2!

  34. Who's got talent? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Seems to me these guys are like the people they get on X-Factor or s got talent - and they claim they are world masters, but when they get up there they are terrible.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  35. Buffy doesn't make sense for an MMO by RobinH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you play an MMO based on a movie/TV show where there's a very small number of super powerful characters, then everyone wants to play the game as those characters and be super-powerful compared to everyone else. But you can't do that well in an MMO because not everyone can be uber. Obviously everone wants to play as a vampire slayer (or a vampire, I guess) just like in Star Wars Galaxies everyone wanted to play as a Jedi.

    I think something like a Harry Potter MMO would make more sense. You start off with little to no powers but earn them at every level, and you can make every character go through the same levelling (i.e. Hogwarts school). It would make more sense that the main character (you) is just like everyone else in the game.

    Most American action movies don't really lend themselves well to MMOs because there tends to be a single hero character with clear advantages over everyone else. Hard to model that in an MMO.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  36. I heard.... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    ......."So, in order to spend our current budgeted allowances, we are going to shove something out there, in a totally unfinished state, so much so, that the players will be our ALPHA testers, on live, permanent servers. We need to prove that, from the beginning, we have a solid player base to validate further spending. If the money comes in, then we will spend more."

    Destined for doom, before birth.

  37. That was the publisher's fault. by roystgnr · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I assure you, it also wasn't the designers' idea to have players start out at level 2, then advance through levels 3, 6, 7, 8, 4, 5, 9, 13, and 1, in that order.

    1. Re:That was the publisher's fault. by cybereal · · Score: 1

      And I assure you, it also wasn't the designers' idea to have players start out at level 2, then advance through levels 3, 6, 7, 8, 4, 5, 9, 13, and 1, in that order.

      Hold on... you lost me there...

      --
      I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
  38. New Multiverse ambition by Nodamnnicknamesavial · · Score: 0

    Failing spectacularly on two fronts simultaneously .. I thought the Flagsip guys had already blazed the way on that one, but guess not?

    --
    I have spoken'eth.
  39. So... by ghjm · · Score: 1

    ...it will be Ultima Online then? Because I remember how well the mixed 2D and 3D content worked for them.

  40. every one sees the money by setrops · · Score: 1

    Warcraft has become so big and is such a cash cow that everyone is salivating. But they started out with a killer licence, developpers with a track record of making good games, a lead programer that came from the "house of kick ass".

    Good luck to everyone trying to be the next big thing. how is Matrix Online doing by the way?

  41. It was an air dates joke by roystgnr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Aimed at whatever Fox executive decided to show Firefly episodes completely out of order.