Slashdot Mirror


The Electronic Bastille

smooth wombat writes "Imagine a database whose aim is to centralize and analyze data on people aged 13 or above who are active in politics or labor unions, who play a significant institutional, economic, social or religious role, or who are 'likely to breach public order.' At first glance one might think the country in question is Russia or Zimbabwe but the truth is, it's a democratic nation which is implementing this database. Specifically, France. Now, with the summer break over and as the people of France return to work, there is a small but growing movement to storm this electronic Bastille. Michel Pezet, a lawyer and former member of a body charged with protecting French citizens from electronic prying, had this to say about this new data-gathering law: 'The Edvige database has no place in a democracy. There is nothing in the decree that sets limits or a framework. Whether the database is used with or without moderation depends only on orders from up high. The electronic Bastille is upon us.'"

26 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. Probably not a first by jabithew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd be shocked if other Western governments, or at least their security services, didn't do something similar. The CIA and MI5 have been known to do this sort of thing in the past, especially during WWII and the cold war. At least the French know about theirs.

    In Britain they can take and keep your DNA if you're suspected of a crime, even if you've been acquitted. Many suspect this is why there were so many accusations of breaches of public order at this year's Notting Hill; the Met wanted the DNA of black Londoners.

    --
    All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    1. Re:Probably not a first by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What a lot of people suspect and what some anonymous sources acknowledge is that edvige is not something new, it is an old illegal and hidden practice that they are trying to make more transparent and legal. There has been a lot of reorganization in our intelligence agencies recently, akin to a merge between your CIA and FBI (Our president is a huge fan of all that Bush has ever made). I suspect this edvige file is a part of it. Probably a merge between two shadowy databases of the two agencies.

      Now, protests are two edged swords. If protests are too loud, this file will still exist, in a concealed way, if it is not loud enough, it will be abused. I'm going to the big protest in October but at least, I must admit that admitting the existence of this file was a very positive step.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:Probably not a first by vandan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is already quite widespread. Here in Sydney, Australia, I talked to an ASIO officer who openly admitted he was 'gathering data on activists'. He was walking around at a demo, with a digital video player and a notebook & pen, and interviewing people ( not telling them who he was ). I've also seen evidence that this data was then used to target individuals.

      To those who mindlessly parrot the old "if you're not doing anything wrong, you've got nothing to worry about", I have 2 responses ( well I have more, but 2 will do for now )

      1) The individuals targeted ( who were friends and comrades ) were violently attacked by riot police at a subsequent demonstration. They were arrested, roughed up, and released without charge. One was so shaken up by the experience that she pulled out of activism ( for 6 months anyway ).

      2) There's a difference between what's "wrong" and what's technically against the law. There are such things as bad laws. Here in Australia, we have some VERY bad laws. There are a group of a hundred or so builders who are facing losing their homes for not being able to pay fines imposed because they had the 'audacity' to protest over unsafe working conditions, and the high number of deaths in their industry. Sounds like a valid reason to be protesting to me ... but illegal.

    3. Re:Probably not a first by jabithew · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not my CIA and FBI, I'm British. :p

      Interesting reply. It's nice to get this sort of thing out in the open, but the case of the British DNA database has left me feeling somewhat powerless in the grasp of an over-zealous-yet-strangely-ineffective police state (introduced by our country's socialists, I hasten to add, before people start trying to blame the right).

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    4. Re:Probably not a first by dascritch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except that in France, we have an established institution (ssince 1978) , the Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertés (Nat. Commission Coputers and Liberties, note the meaning plurial), that cannot be overruled by the State.

      In fact, it is more than probable that Edvige wouldn't be accepted in front of the State Council. Or the European Commission.

      --
      (Sorry my bad French) Je fais parler les Guignols de l'Info. Le pied, quoi.
    5. Re:Probably not a first by Mornedhel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well the CNIL is good and all, but they really have no power whatsoever in this case.

      The law from August 2004 (modifying the Loi Informatique et Libertés from 1978) states that public administrations and organisms will not need the CNIL's authorization anymore in order to create precisely such files. Private enterprises and such still need it.

      What's more, the 2004 law is an adaptation of a EU directive to the French LIL laws. So basically, I have no doubts it would be accepted by the EU Commission. It's up to us now...

      --
      This /.-related sig is a stub. You can help Mornedhel by expanding it.
    6. Re:Probably not a first by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      introduced by our country's socialists, I hasten to add, before people start trying to blame the right

      Are you saying that the Lib Dems are the puppet-master which is really responsible for Labour's legislative output?

    7. Re:Probably not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      (introduced by our country's socialists, I hasten to add, before people start trying to blame the right)

      I wish New Labour would stop giving the left a bad name. Check the political compass, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are about as left wing as Margaret Thatcher.

    8. Re:Probably not a first by JCWDenton · · Score: 5, Informative
      A specific example of this happening in the US: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

      COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert and often illegal projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception; however the formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971.[2] The FBI motivation at the time was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order." Targets included groups suspected of being subversive, such as communist and socialist organizations; people suspected of building a "coalition of militant black nationalist groups" ranging from the Black Panther Party and Republic of New Afrika, to "those in the non-violent civil rights movement," such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Congress on Racial Equality (CORE), and other civil rights groups; "White Hate Groups" including the Ku Klux Klan and National States' Rights Party; a broad range of organizations lumped together under the title "New Left" groups, including Students for a Democratic Society, the National Lawyers Guild, the Weathermen, almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, and even individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation; and nationalist groups such as those "Seeking Independence for Puerto Rico."[3] The directives governing COINTELPRO were issued by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who ordered FBI agents to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" the activities of these movements and their leaders.[4][5]

    9. Re:Probably not a first by dargaud · · Score: 4, Interesting
      That's really too bad as the Loi Informatique et Liberte (link in french) is a law meant against abusive data gathering from the state. In short, the original intent was that every entity (ministers, private companies, ...) can keep you in their files, but they are forbidden to correlate their files.

      You can have a tax number, a social security number, an ID card, a driver's license, etc, but those numbers cannot be mixed in a bigger database. That was the original intent anyway, and it did prevent a lot of abuse. It was a good law while it lasted. Sob.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    10. Re:Probably not a first by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah but only in France are the DBA's going to the guillotine.

      Like "TRUNCATE `admin`;" perhaps?

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  2. Private enterprise is so much more efficient by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they were the US, they'd just license it from Google.

    (If they were the UK, they'd probably license it from Microsoft.)

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:Private enterprise is so much more efficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nah. In the UK we pay EDS an outrageous amount of money to fuck it up, then get something 10 years late and 20 times over budget.

      The only positive thing about UK ID card scheme is that the companies tasked with implementing the database couldn't organise a pissup in a brewery. If it was ever going to work I would be scared.

    2. Re:Private enterprise is so much more efficient by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah. In the UK we pay EDS an outrageous amount of money to fuck it up, then get something 10 years late and 20 times over budget.

      I strongly disagree with this. There is no evidence that EDS have ever managed to deliver a product, even 10 years late. They keep getting government contracts though, because they have lots of experience with government contracts. I'm still in two minds about this. On the one hand, I don't like to see the government wasting so much money. On the other hand, I don't like to see the government being too efficient. Personally, I'd like to see the EU establish a BuSab to take care of this kind of thing.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  3. Re:Sorry... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To be honest if there's one country I'd expect to actually get out of their chairs and protest in the streets over this, it's the french.

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  4. Re:Sorry... by johndmartiniii · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, they wouldn't necessarily get out of their chairs in protest, but they might raise a glass from a seated position in a sidewalk cafe in protest.

    --
    If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
  5. Not just the original person but all friends. by will_die · · Score: 5, Informative

    In addition to the person who is concidered to possibly being a threat the database will contain all relatives and people who contact with the person except for in a one-time only type relationship.
    The information stored will contain "civil status and occupation; physical addresses, phone numbers, email addresses; physical characteristics, photographs and behaviour; identity papers; car plate numbers; fiscal and patrimonial information; moves and legal history"

  6. Anglo-French rivalry at its best by rpjs · · Score: 4, Funny

    For years now the UK has been leader in the "Western Nation Most Likely To Become A Police State" league, and the French just can't bear to be beaten by us at anything, so in one daring move they've grabbed the crown from us. Vive la France!

  7. Re:Sounds good by w3c.org · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well I doubt if it's the case. In my opinion, it'll be a growing database of youngsters living mainly in residencies, the 'jeunes des cités' that every journalist talk about on the news. It'll be accessible only to cops and immigration police. But it gets worse: teachers are asked, in schools, to 'help complete the database' by giving every information about every children (country of origin, parents' nationality, everything), to help prevent immigration and to help track the 'sans-papiers' (people who just immigrated in France ans don't already have IDs, or people who just have their IDs discarded).

  8. Truth: by caliburngreywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Public order is antithetical to democracy. Democracy can only be effective in a system where some social disorder is present.

    1. Re:Truth: by jandersen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Public order is antithetical to democracy.

      That is manifestly untrue.

      What you mean is probably that public order is antithetical to freedom; which is still a rather dubious statement. Democracy is not some magical substance that guarantees freedom or anything else - it is only a form of government that allows part of the citizens a measure of influence on the government's decision making. It is perfectly possible to imagine a democratic society where everybody is happy and feels no need for unrest. Democracy was not introduced because it looked like a bloody good idea at the time - it was introduced because it was hoped that it would help solve the problems with unrest caused by the government not representing the people.

  9. mission creep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear World,

    Please stop giving our government these ideas.

    Thanks,

    USA

  10. Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I live in the UK where we don't stand for this kind of nonsense.

  11. Re:Sorry... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nos trois principes sont Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite.

    Je m'excuse, nos quatre principes sont Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite, et d'etre surveille.

    Entre nos principes sont...

    --
    One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  12. Re:Convincing politicians by Fred_A · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thinking without a head is pretty difficult, I'd say.

    Would it make that much difference to a politician ?

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  13. Re:Sorry... by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Beats raising the remote from a seated position on the couch, I'd say.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.