Slashdot Mirror


Prions Observed Jumping Species Barrier

palegray.net writes "Nature is reporting on new findings that prions jump species barriers. Believed to be responsible for ailments such as Creutzfeld-Jakob disease and 'mad cow' disease, prions are thought to disrupt biological processes by causing normal proteins to fold abnormally. Researchers at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston have observed infectious prions from hamsters causing abnormal protein development in mice, along with a range of other observations on prion actions in test tube environments. From the article: '... they also found that when a prion jumps species, it produces a new kind of prion. "This is very worrisome," says Claudio Soto, who led the research, published in Cell. "The universe of possible prions could be much larger than we thought."' Sounds like another good reason to donate your spare CPU cycles to projects like Folding@home."

214 comments

  1. Folding@Home by martinw89 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    On the flip side, if your energy source is dirty, turning off F@H might be more beneficial in the long run. It's a trade off.

    1. Re:Folding@Home by ozphx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Instead of donating energy to run Folding on your inefficient PC, where the results have to be triple-checked - consider just donating money directly to the project instead of via your power bill.

      Runtime on a trusted supercomputer / local cluster is going to be an order of magnitude more efficient in terms of data crunched per watt-hour.

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    2. Re:Folding@Home by narcberry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like every /. article is an opportunity to espouse the same posts in a previous article. Let me save all the future posters their breathe...

      Dirty energy is bad.
      Global Warming.
      Creationists are dumb.
      DMCA is stoopid.
      OMG zero day is here!

      There, someone e-mail me when there's a comment worth reading.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    3. Re:Folding@Home by martinw89 · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, I've never thought about that route before.

    4. Re:Folding@Home by g0dsp33d · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or do both. I think they'll be glad for any CPU and especially any GPU cycles.

      --
      lol: You see no door there!
    5. Re:Folding@Home by maxume · · Score: 1

      My CPU is usually idle, but I don't like listening to the fan when it is running full tilt.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't leave your e-mail address. I have a wonderful comment about a wealthy Nigerian prince that I'm sure you'd want to read.

    7. Re:Folding@Home by maglor_83 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your email isn't shown publicly, so I have decided to reply instead.
      There is a very insightful comment here

    8. Re:Folding@Home by chemisus · · Score: 0

      you forgot, "in soviet russia... home folds you!"

    9. Re:Folding@Home by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No problem. Just post your email address here, and I'm sure someone will be happy to let you know...

    10. Re:Folding@Home by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Informative

      >Runtime on a trusted supercomputer / local cluster is going to be an order of magnitude more efficient in terms of data crunched per watt-hour.

      Problem is, there ain't no such thing on this planet.

      From Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folding@home

      "On September 16, 2007, the Folding@home project officially attained a performance level higher than one petaFLOPS, becoming the first computing system of any kind to do so, although it had briefly peaked above one petaFLOPS in March 2007.[14][15]. In comparison, the fastest supercomputer in the world (as of June 2008, IBM's Roadrunner) peaks at 1.026 petaFLOPS[16]. In early May 2008 the project attained a sustained performance level higher than two petaFLOPS, again being the first computing system of any kind to do so. Now Folding@home computing cluster operates at above 2 petaFLOPS at all times, with a large majority of the performance coming from PlayStation 3 and GPU clients.[2] On August 20, 2008, the Folding@home project broke the three petaFLOPS milestone, once again being the first computing project of any kind in history to ever do so.[2]"

    11. Re:Folding@Home by RickRussellTX · · Score: 5, Informative

      Depends on when you run it. Coal plants burn more coal at night than they need for electricity to keep the furnaces hot for peak usage periods. If you run F@H between 9PM and 6AM, you're actually not having much impact on fossil fuel use, pollution or carbon footprint.

      That's why electric utilities and some companies are developing programs to make the best use of off-peak power. Electric cars, for example, are exciting because they could engage timers that charge them only during off-peak.

      F@H could do the same in principle, with a check-box to run only during late hours. I don't know if they have that feature now.

    12. Re:Folding@Home by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's like every /. article is an opportunity to espouse the same posts in a previous article. Let me save all the future posters their breathe...

      Dirty energy is bad.
      Global Warming.
      Creationists are dumb.
      DMCA is stoopid.
      OMG zero day is here!

      There, someone e-mail me when there's a comment worth reading.

      I think there's some inherent vulnerability of internet discussion sites to virulent memes. If you look at Digg at the moment it's got to the point where 50% of the stories on the front page are some dubious looking slur on Palin. A few months ago 50% of them where dubious looking slurs on Hilary. And a few months before that they were all posts containing that 09 F9 magic key. 4chan is plagued by self replicating javascripts because it doesn't have a CAPTCHA, but digg and slashdot get a different sort of replicator, one which needs human interaction to spread.

      It's like someone posts a meme, people mod/digg it up, there is a backlash, then more people digg it up and post it. People that disagree are eventually forced out. Eventually the meme uses up 50% of the bandwidth.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    13. Re:Folding@Home by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Then maybe your problem is that your CPU has a fan. ;)

      More seriously: I cool my PC passively trough convection. Sure the convectors are huge, but in a place where i don't see them anyway. And I don't need to turn on the radiator of the room.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    14. Re:Folding@Home by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or do all four: both, twice.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    15. Re:Folding@Home by somersault · · Score: 1

      Eventually the meme uses up 50% of the bandwidth.

      In Soviet Russia, bandwidth is 50% of memes!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    16. Re:Folding@Home by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's one of the most informative comments I've seen on Slashdot in a while. I've tended to run distributed computing clients on servers during off-peak processing hours (typically at night), and it looks like that choice is both good for business and the environment. Thanks for the info!

    17. Re:Folding@Home by colourmyeyes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where can I find parts/info on convection cooling a PC or server?

      --
      My grandmother used anecdotal evidence all the time, and she lived to be 120 years old.
    18. Re:Folding@Home by flowerp · · Score: 1

      Folding@Home is now at 3.4 Petaflops mostly due to the rise of the GPU as a processing device. It's time to re-evaluate your statement.

      My folding PC has a theoretical power of about 1.5 Teraflops alone, harbouring 4 nVidia GPUs. Power consumption is a mere 500 Watts.

      So yes desktop system have become very efficient in terms of Flops/Watt, if one can accept the restrictions of a GPU based programming model (they're not as versatile as a CPU).

      --
      --- Eat my sig.
    19. Re:Folding@Home by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Funny

      someone e-mail me when there's a comment worth reading.

      Or better yet, don't.

      Considering you've been here all of about a month and you're already complaining, save us some time and go fuck yourself.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:Folding@Home by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Troll

      You start with a convection oven and just turn it around.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:Folding@Home by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

      People that disagree are eventually forced out

      It's like the Republican convention, without the funny hats.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    22. Re:Folding@Home by flowerp · · Score: 1

      no dude I am married.

      --
      --- Eat my sig.
    23. Re:Folding@Home by dintech · · Score: 1

      Clearly not by many years yet. :)

    24. Re:Folding@Home by maxume · · Score: 1

      It's a laptop, so that probably isn't an option.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    25. Re:Folding@Home by jank1887 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      oh, you're paying for it all right. we all are.

    26. Re:Folding@Home by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      That would be silly... Either giving them money is more efficient or running their program is more efficient by a "work done per dollar" metric.

      If as the GP claims giving them money gets more work done than spending that same amount of money on your power bill for the extra processing then you wouldn't do both - instead of donating money and running the software, you'd donate more money.

      If running the software is actually more efficient (there would be administrative overhead associated with just giving them money after all) then yes donating additional money after you use up all your available cycles is reasonable, but that's not the GP's claim.

    27. Re:Folding@Home by g0dsp33d · · Score: 1

      Some people already leave PCs up and running with programs that keep disks spinning and monitors on. If so the loss is probably not really noticeable.

      --
      lol: You see no door there!
    28. Re:Folding@Home by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      when was the last time a pro life candidate ran for anything on the (D) side of things?

      They promote "choice", but in the end don't offer a "choice".

      There is much more variance on the (R) side of things than on the (D) side.

      Mind you, I'm (L) and I don't like either of (D) or (R) very much.

      And if you want to see "funny", you should watch the (L) convention. Starchild is a poster boy of "funny", not that there is anything wrong with it ;-D

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    29. Re:Folding@Home by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Here is a shop in Germany: http://www.webshop-innovatek.de/assets/s2dmain.html?http://www.webshop-innovatek.de/00000094271139704/000000942713b3501/50142494350d4401b/index.html
      These are the radiators.
      I don't know where to get them in the USA tough.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    30. Re:Folding@Home by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      You *could* do it. It just would not ...ehem... look that cool. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    31. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife does all the Folding@Home on Monday and Tuesdays, since laundry day is Monday.

    32. Re:Folding@Home by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      Cynicism is the perfect philosophy for a man without a soul, as Wilde said. A lot of marriages are quite different from favour exchanges.

    33. Re:Folding@Home by Milalwi · · Score: 1


      Coal plants burn more coal at night than they need for electricity to keep the furnaces hot for peak usage periods.

      No, they don't.

      The Incremental Heat Rate of the generators is higher at night when the load is low. This is why Pumped Storage is sometimes used to reduce the effective diversity in the load.

      Milalwi

    34. Re:Folding@Home by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      when was the last time a pro life candidate ran for anything on the (D) side of things?

      The 2006 election, when the D's took over both houses of congress, there were dozens of pro-life Democratic congressional candidates.

      There is much more variance on the (R) side of things than on the (D) side.

      Last wednesday, at the RNC, there were SIXTEEN black people on the floor of the convention hall out of nearly 15 thousand.

      Archangel Michael, you are simply not paying attention. Maybe it's because you're listening to too much talk radio or something, but you are so wrong.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    35. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spinning disks and on monitors don't cause the CPU to use 65+ W. Unless it is the middle of winter, and you can offset some of your heating, donating cycles is pointless.

    36. Re:Folding@Home by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      You should see what the Black community says about Condi Rice, Clarence Thomas and Michael Steele. See what they said about Bill Cosby, when he called to task his own community. It is no wonder that most are (D).

      I am paying attention, I just understand that the black leadership is mostly (D) because it enslaves another generation of blacks to failed politics of race baiting and class warfare. As if the (D) party has done anything to actually help get people out of the Gettos.

      Talk about failed leadership. The problem is that everyone still expects the government to hand them something for "nothing" and then squanders it. Katrina Cash cards are a great example. Being spent on strippers and guns and ...... rather than buying things to improve one's life (computer, education ....)

      The failed leadership of BOTH (R) and (D) in this regard is HUGE. Government being Paternal to a whole race is just evil. It is modern Slavery and Racist. It is sick.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  2. Rudimentary by retech · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Considering that we force feed cows and chickens the meat bi-products of the industry, we're actually causing a great deal of this to happen. In a perfect world we'd not feed herbivores rudiments and accelerate this type of process. But then again, garbage in garbage out, we deserve what we get.

    1. Re:Rudimentary by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Informative

      Considering that we force feed cows and chickens the meat bi-products of the industry.

      That's been illegal in the U.S. for cows for many years. I'm not sure about the current law for chickens. From a 2003 USAToday article:

      The United States and Canada in 1997 made it illegal to feed cows meat and bone meal made from ruminants. The feed bans in both countries do allow use of that feed for poultry and pigs.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Rudimentary by retech · · Score: 3, Informative

      [sarcasm]I'm sure there are plenty of inspectors to enforce that law as well.[/sarcasm]

      Mad cow disease, just so you understand it, is prion based. It does not just randomly happen. It is impossible for the brain to just make up prions. It must first come in contact with them by consumption or injection. Considering the fact that no one goes around injecting the bovine population with syringes filled with prions we must conclude a cow get's them by ingestion. That would mean that a "mad cow" infected animal got that why be eating the brain or spinal tissue of another MAMMAL.

      http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=1629

      http://www.organicconsumers.org/madcow/silence51104.cfm

      http://www.goveg.com/ABD_madcow.asp

    3. Re:Rudimentary by wormBait · · Score: 1

      Certain mutations that cause misfolding of proteins will de novo generate novel prions. However, as they take a long time to accumulate and feed cows are usually killed very young, they are primarily transmitted via feeding. While cows are not fed to cows, sheep and cows (and other mammals) are commonly cross-fed to each other.

    4. Re:Rudimentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then I guess its a really good thing that nobody ever does anything illegal in the U.S

      I was concerned there for a second... whew

    5. Re:Rudimentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the fact that no one goes around injecting the bovine population with syringes filled with prions we must conclude a cow get's them by ingestion.

      Yeah, and I have yet to meet anyone who can explain to me why prions are not broken down into amino acids during digestion, like all other proteins are...

    6. Re:Rudimentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that we force feed cows and chickens the meat bi-products of the industry.

      That's been illegal in the U.S. for cows for many years. I'm not sure about the current law for chickens. From a 2003 USAToday article:

      The United States and Canada in 1997 made it illegal to feed cows meat and bone meal made from ruminants. The feed bans in both countries do allow use of that feed for poultry and pigs.

      It is also illegal here in Australia. However there is a _minority_ of farmers (you know the real redneck hicks) that don't care and will do anything to save a few pennies and just 'cause 'those city slicker politicians' tell them it's illegal they do it anyway because those other city slickers (the scientists) don't know what they're on about y'know.

    7. Re:Rudimentary by MicktheMech · · Score: 2, Informative
      The GP wrote...

      The United States and Canada in 1997 made it illegal to feed cows meat and bone meal made from ruminants. The feed bans in both countries do allow use of that feed for poultry and pigs.

      Since both sheep and cows are ruminants, that would mean that they aren't fed to each other. At least sheep wouldn't be fed to cows, the quote doesn't state anything about sheep feed.

    8. Re:Rudimentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because not all proteins are broken down into amino acids during digestion like hair for example.

    9. Re:Rudimentary by dubyrunning · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's been illegal in the U.S. for cows for many years.

      Not so. The FDA ban on feeding cattle protein to cattle excepts proteins derived from blood products and fat, and beef tallow is still used as a feed supplement at cattle farms. Also, since the bovine meat and bonemeal that used to be fed to cattle are still fed to other food stock like pigs and chickens - whose meal is, in turn, an accepted protein supplement for cattle - there is still a chance that infectious prions could find their way back into cattle (and us). Check out Michael Pollan's book, The Omnivore's Dilemma, for more info.

    10. Re:Rudimentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wow, prions are like apostrophes. Once you see one moron misuse them you start misusing them too! "get's", dude? Get is, get was, something belonging to the "get"?

      "t is impossible for the brain to just make up prions."

      What are you babbling about? Prions are naturally in the brain, just folded the right way. Bad prions fold the bad way.

    11. Re:Rudimentary by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      nice sarcasm there....
      I'm more afraid of what people in the US would do on purpose than I am of what might happen by accident. Can I just mention foreign owned ports inspecting goods from foreign lands... Chinese cat food for dinner anyone?

      When farmers and ranchers want to have all their stock inspected they run into government intervention to prevent it.

      The way the US government is run in this and many other respects, all I can tell you is that if you wake up tomorrow, call it a good day.

      Yeah, no links... Google for it

    12. Re:Rudimentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be true, but it is legal, and common practice, to feed cow products to poultry, and then feed poultry bedding (straw, poop, etc.) back to cows. In addition to being a rather disgusting practice, the bedding includes lots of dropped chicken food, partly composed of the forbidden cow products. Therefore, though directly feeding cow products to cows may be illegal, it is legal to do so indirectly.

    13. Re:Rudimentary by daniel_newby · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... why prions are not broken down into amino acids during digestion, like all other proteins are

      The prion form of the protein is resistant to the enzymes that normally break down proteins, which is why prions are a problem in the first place. Even then the digestive tract blocks large proteins out pretty well, but very rarely one makes it through to start a prion infection.

    14. Re:Rudimentary by magsk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Though you are correct that cross feeding of downers has been illegal for years now... I worry that the large spike in feed prices (corn) will cause some struggling farmers to do things that they wouldnt normally do when feed prices had been lower....like feeding the chickens the downed cow from his neighbor.

    15. Re:Rudimentary by cnettel · · Score: 1

      Of course it randomly happens. Some individual was the source, huh? It's even likely that some individuals have a genetic propensity towards a mal-folded protein, but as soon as you have that, the prion can transfer to other individuals through ingestion. What all this means is that we should always expect a very low background frequency of cases. We are very far from the epidemic proportions once seen in the UK these days.

    16. Re:Rudimentary by thebonafortuna · · Score: 1

      I was told by my bio professor in college - when discussing prions, mad cow, etc. - that meat from Whole Foods comes from cows which were never fed from cow...extracts.

      Can anyone confirm this? If so, its a good reason to spend a little extra on your beef...

    17. Re:Rudimentary by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Uh, remnants of a slaughtered animal can be rendered into protein feed that can then be fed to other livestock, which is how BSE started spreading in the first place, and why it is now illegal to feed cows to cows.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  3. Corrected article link by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those with access to the journal Cell, you can view The Castilla, et al, paper online (this abstract should be available for all). The nature link in the summary goes to a write-up about the article, not the actual article itself.

    Those with subscriptions to Cell can also get the full text, Full Text in PDF, and the Supplementary Data.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Corrected article link by g0dsp33d · · Score: 1

      Haven't they proved this happening before by the fact that mad cow disease travels from tainted beef to humans? Or was that what they think caused the disease and they had no way of proving the jump with out risking someone's health?

      --
      lol: You see no door there!
    2. Re:Corrected article link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Girlfriend is a veterinarian, and says it's old news

    3. Re:Corrected article link by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      There was circumstantial (epidemiological) evidence that vCJD appeared mostly (or only, can't remember) in heavy beef consumers. Obviously, you can't *prove* it without experiments. But it has been proven that animals do get infected by feeding them prions from other species so it was assumed that this applies to humans too. Now, being able study the infection in vitro, they should be able to prove which prions can infect humans, and maybe come up with a test that doesn't require dissecting the brain.

    4. Re:Corrected article link by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      That's just hippy propaganda. Meat makes you a bit staggery, that's all.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  4. Re:comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mods, note that the parent post is NOT offtopic. It's talking about mad cows.

  5. The bigger story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nature is reporting on new findings that prions jump species barriers

    It's confirmed. Our planet (i.e. Nature) is sentient and into science journalism!

    1. Re:The bigger story by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      Great! I bet she has the answer key.

    2. Re:The bigger story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't try to cheat. You can't fool Mother Nature.

    3. Re:The bigger story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing. All of that in just 6,000 years!

    4. Re:The bigger story by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Yes, but depending on the punishment for doing so, the consequences of the act may outweigh the consequences of being caught!

  6. Oh No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's nothing. I have peons swarming my village.

    1. Re:Oh No! by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      I have Priuses swarming mine!

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    2. Re:Oh No! by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "That's nothing. I have peons swarming my village."

      Heat and pressure have been observed to kill prions, and should work for your situation.

      Give it a try and post results!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:Oh No! by conureman · · Score: 1

      IIRC heat and pressure have been known to NOT destroy prions. Where is your source?

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    4. Re:Oh No! by couchslug · · Score: 1

      http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/05/030508074341.htm

      "To conduct the study, the scientists prepared a paste of scrapie prion-infected brain tissue mixed with hot dogs. They then exposed the paste to temperatures of 120-135 degrees Celsius (250-275 degrees Fahrenheit) and short bursts of ultra high pressure, in excess of 100,000 lbs. per square inch. The scientists found that they were able to retain the basic texture and flavor of the processed meat while reducing the prions to non-infective levels. This may have application in improving the safety of meat products.

      The combination of temperature and high pressure has been used commercially for the past 15 years to reduce the amount of bacteria in foodstuffs and to preserve ham, chicken, salsa, and other foods. Dr. Brown said his team "took the process one step further, to see if it would kill prions, which it did." He called the discovery a relatively inexpensive, practical step to potentially improve the safety of processed meats. "

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  7. Help feed a hungry test tube. by Ostracus · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The universe of possible prions could be much larger than we thought."' Sounds like another good reason to donate your spare CPU cycles to projects like Folding@home."

    Can I donate my spare prions instead?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  8. Re:comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL.

  9. While troubling, also cool. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I certainly wouldn't want to get any of the prion diseases, they are all rather nasty, I find the existence of prions fascinating. They are arguably even less alive than viruses, though not by much, and yet they multiply(in a sense), and exist in all sorts of variants.

    It seems like any sufficiently complex system(biological proteins in this case), is at considerable risk of having something analogous to life spring up and cause trouble.

    1. Re:While troubling, also cool. by jd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Prions appear to exist in a space somewhere between crystals (they "multiply" in a way mot dissimilar to crystals growing and do not make anything "new" the way a virus would) and the lower end of what is considered "true" life. This suggests to me that there is a continuum and that the terms "living" and "non-living" are not descriptive of anything fundamental. If that is correct, then I suspect we will find that prions were an important stage in getting to what we call "life". However, it is not obvious as to how you'd get from a free-floating RNA/DNA strand and a prion to a living cell, so there must be other stages in between, if that indeed was the sequence. I suspect that a study of prions could yield such an additional step, but only if the researchers are willing to accept such a stage could exist.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:While troubling, also cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prions won't ever be classified as "living" unless they can reproduce themselves. They are simply misfolded proteins that induce misfolding and aggregation of other proteins. They don't make copies of themselves.

    3. Re:While troubling, also cool. by oldhack · · Score: 5, Funny

      It seems like any sufficiently complex system(biological proteins in this case), is at considerable risk of having something analogous to life spring up and cause trouble.

      Your name is not "Murphy" by any chance?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    4. Re:While troubling, also cool. by irtza · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess it all depends on how you define life... Most of these things are more semantic and issues because of our desire to fit things into categories. What's intersting is that prions in principle are similar to digestive enzymes in a way. Trypsin forms trypsin from trypsinogen in a self catalzying reaction. At the same time other enzymes may activate it as well. - Would you consider trypsin to be alive? The fact that prions exist as a pathology is interesting though. Furthermore, it points to the complexity of life and cells - the notion of what came first. Proteins are needed to transcribe DNA and to assist in the final layout of the newly formed protein, but the basic design of the proteins are held in that same DNA. I will be more impressed when they find proteins that can seqence proteins into self similar molecules rather than something that comes into being by cleaving a larger protein from which it is derived.

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    5. Re:While troubling, also cool. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have you heard of Cairn's-Smith's clay theory of abiogenesis

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Cairns-Smith#Clay_theory
      In simplified form, clay theory runs as follows: Clays form naturally from silicates in solution. Clay crystals, as other crystals, preserve their external formal arrangement as they grow, snap and grow further. Masses of clay crystals of a particular external form may happen to affect their environment in ways which affect their chances of further replication â" for example, a 'stickier' clay crystal is more likely to silt a stream bed, creating an environment conducive to further sedimentation. It is conceivable that such effects could extend to the creation of flat areas likely to be exposed to air, dry and turn to wind-borne dust, which could fall at random in other streams. Thus by simple, inorganic, physical processes, a selection environment might exist for the reproduction of clay crystals of the 'stickier' shape.

      There follows a process of natural selection for clay crystals which trap certain forms of molecules to their surfaces (those which enhance their replication potential). Quite complex proto-organic molecules can be catalysed by the surface properties of silicates. The final step occurs when these complex molecules perform a 'Genetic Takeover' from their clay 'vehicle', becoming an independent locus of replication - an evolutionary moment that might be understood as the first exaptation.

      Richard Dawkins said of this that he doesn't believe this particular theory of abiogenesis but something like this must have happened.

      He memorably said that one day a robot equivalent of Cairns Smith may note wryly that silicon based machines like him eventually took over from carbon based life like us that built them as tools in the same way that carbon based replicators took over from silicon based clay lifeforms that built them as tools.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:While troubling, also cool. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      However, it is not obvious as to how you'd get from a free-floating RNA/DNA strand and a prion to a living cell, so there must be other stages in between, if that indeed was the sequence.

      I'm no biologist, but I imagine viruses are one of those in-between stages...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:While troubling, also cool. by rve · · Score: 5, Informative

      These prions are single molecules that have a harmful effect on the host. I believe the word 'toxin' is a better description.

      Prions don't self replicate, it's a substance that catalyzes (speeds up) the reaction of refolding an existing protein into another shape, not the formation of a protein out of other substances. If it catalyzed a different kind of reaction, you'd call it a toxic enzyme, not something on the continuum of life.

    8. Re:While troubling, also cool. by rve · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, viruses have more in common with computer viruses than with life. They're not life, they're escaped pieces of 'code' that force a host to replicate and spread it.

      The process of selection has made some of these viruses more complex than the original fragment of RNA or DNA code, but they could not exist without life any more than computer viruses could exist without computers.

    9. Re:While troubling, also cool. by rve · · Score: 1

      I guess that makes us part of a botnet when we're sick

    10. Re:While troubling, also cool. by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the best description I've heard so far. Bad prions are a particulary nasty biological toxin because they can survive conditions that destroy other biological toxins. They can apparantly pass through digestion repeatedly, aren't destroyed by an ordinary autoclave, and survive for a long time exposed to sun and oxygen. It's apparantly hard to sterilize medical equipment in such a way that prions are destroyed.

      The good news is that prion-based diseases are vanishingly rare. Avoid cannibalism and you're safe: so far meteor strikes are about as dangerous a threat, along with heart-attack induced by the stress of winning the lottery.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:While troubling, also cool. by rve · · Score: 1

      That's because they're short, simple molecules, already in a 'relaxed' state. When you autoclave (boil) an egg, the proteins in the egg 'denature', they unfold to a more relaxed state. When you autoclave a boiled egg, the proteins don't denature any further. If you want to destroy the proteins in a boiled egg further, you'll have to turn up the heat far enough for the proteins to start to burn. At these temperatures, the equipment you are trying to sterilize in your autoclave will melt or burn.

      I once managed to melt my lab setup when I didn't add enough water to the autoclave... It formed a nice little plastic ball with bits of glass and rubber tubes sticking out of it. I'm sure any remaining protein residue was gone though :)

    12. Re:While troubling, also cool. by daniel_newby · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, viruses have more in common with computer viruses than with life. They're not life, they're escaped pieces of 'code' that force a host to replicate and spread it.

      That definition starts to get questionable for the larger viruses. For example, mimivirus has a genome larger than some bacteria, and has many genes of its own for fundamental metabolism. If it used its own cell wall, instead of dissolving into the host cell, everybody would call it a parasitic bacterium.

    13. Re:While troubling, also cool. by ircharlie · · Score: 1

      Murphy? As in Robocop? Oh, I get it - sufficiently complex... Analogous to "alive"... Springing up and causing trouble.

      Your name isn't "Clarence" by any chance?

    14. Re:While troubling, also cool. by julesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The good news is that prion-based diseases are vanishingly rare. Avoid cannibalism and you're safe: so far meteor strikes are about as dangerous a threat, along with heart-attack induced by the stress of winning the lottery.

      Don't overestimate the threat of meteor strikes. While there have been a lot of near misses and property damage, there are apparently no recorded instances of somebody being killed by a meteorite since 1929.

      Just so you know.

    15. Re:While troubling, also cool. by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Prions won't ever be classified as "living" unless they can reproduce themselves."

      Viruses can't reproduce themselves, yet many scientists reckon they're a form of life.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    16. Re:While troubling, also cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genesis 2:19

      "And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof."

      Makes you wonder :)

    17. Re:While troubling, also cool. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Genesis 2:19

      "And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof."

      Makes you wonder :)

      I'm not sure what you point is. Your story has a very complex entity (God) creating life. My story has something much simpler than life doing it.

      Clays will be formed on a sterile planet spontaneously with a probability of 1, DNA/RNA based cells have a much lower chance of forming spontaneously. God seems even more improable. In fact the point of my story is that you need something simpler than current life as a bootstrapping device. The point of your story is that you need something much more complex to explain everything. Even if it were true it would still raise the question of how that more complex entity came to exist.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    18. Re:While troubling, also cool. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      I'm no biologist, but I imagine viruses are one of those in-between stages...

      Very unlikely. Viruses need the "higher" stages to reproduce. If the higher stages are not present, any virus that forms will be unable to reproduce.

    19. Re:While troubling, also cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No point, I just find the apparent similarity between the two ideas intriguing.

    20. Re:While troubling, also cool. by cartman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Prions don't self replicate, it's a substance that catalyzes (speeds up) the reaction of refolding an existing protein into another shape...I believe the word 'toxin' is a better description.

      You're mistaken. Prions self-replicate by inducing other proteins to fold into prions like themselves. Prions thereby replicate and increase their numbers exponentially until they damage the organism. When symptoms appear, this process of exponential growth is already 95% complete and the organism will soon be dead. At that point, the organism is much more infectious because the number of prions is far higher than originally.

      Because prions replicate themselves, they bio-accumulate over time. Since organisms can "inherit" the prions of other organisms by ingesting them, the prions can accumulate across generations. Which means that you can feed cows to other cows continuously, and the number of prions in the cow population will increase over generations. It may take several generations of cow cannibalism before disease will become apparent.

      The prion hypothesis was interesting precisely because it proposed a mechanism of replication and infectivity which was not based upon DNA or RNA.

    21. Re:While troubling, also cool. by zacronos · · Score: 1

      These prions are single molecules that have a harmful effect on the host. I believe the word 'toxin' is a better description.

      Prions don't self replicate, it's a substance that catalyzes (speeds up) the reaction of refolding an existing protein into another shape, not the formation of a protein out of other substances. If it catalyzed a different kind of reaction, you'd call it a toxic enzyme, not something on the continuum of life.

      I would agree that they are a type of toxic enzyme, but I would also say they are a grey area in the spectrum of life. Prions don't self-replicate, but then neither do viruses. The key thing that (in my mind) makes prions something more than other toxic enzymes is the fact that their presence catalyzes a reaction that forms more of itself. I don't think most toxins actually increase concentration in the body over time (when left to their own devices), while this is indeed what we expect to see from diseases. Thus, prions seem to be somewhere between a toxin and a disease.

    22. Re:While troubling, also cool. by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      I think there is a difference in the definition of "replicate" that you are using. Prions are "misfolded" proteins. For prions to propagate, there need to be ribosomes, protein synthesis, etc. So, in one sense, the prions are not self-replicating because they rely on cellular machinery (as most viruses do). On the other hand, a prion protein can refold a precursor protein and in this sense can self-replicate. The resulting prion aggregates are what can be damaging to the cell. If you have access to PNAS, here's a recent commentary on what goes into determining the structure of prions (http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2008/09/03/0806234105.full.pdf+html).

      Some proteins also aggregate, and these aggregates can lead to disease (tau or amyloid-beta proteins in Alzheimer's, for example). The aggregated structure is often different from the soluble structure, so in this sense these proteins also undergo a refolding event. Interestingly, some dyes can stop this aggregation from occurring, and I suspect there are similar molecules that will hinder the aggregation of prions. Then again, the commentary linked above argues why prions are different from protein aggregates.

    23. Re:While troubling, also cool. by lgw · · Score: 1

      And there have been, what, 6 or so cases worldwide of death from Mad Cow? The threat is of the same order of magnitude.

      More generally, unless you're a worker in the field where a risk occurs, a good rule of thumb is that it's a waste of time to worry about any danger that you hear about on the news. If it happens rarely enough to be newsworthy, it's not a danger to you (with the exception of natural disasters, which are both newsworthy and common). Driving and domestic violence are real threats.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    24. Re:While troubling, also cool. by julesh · · Score: 1

      And there have been, what, 6 or so cases worldwide of death from Mad Cow? The threat is of the same order of magnitude.

      Since 1990 there have been 1334 in the UK alone. Baseline figures for the US (in absence of any contaminated food sources, etc.) are 1 per 9,000 adults aged over 55, which based on a back-of-envelope calculation means somewhere in the region of 200 per annum.

      More generally, unless you're a worker in the field where a risk occurs, a good rule of thumb is that it's a waste of time to worry about any danger that you hear about on the news. If it happens rarely enough to be newsworthy, it's not a danger to you

      That I can subscribe to. :)

    25. Re:While troubling, also cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This assumes the yet-another-new variant of CJD now being reported in the US is indeed a form of the original CJD and not prion-based. It also assumes that America (where testing cattle for BSE is apparently illegal if it's done on more than an insignificant, barely-existing fraction of a percent, and where the CDC has now admitted to understating cases of easily-identifiable diseases by 50% or more) has been honest (yeah, right) as to the number of CJD cases there have actually been. My guess is that hundreds, if not thousands, of cases of CJDnv have been effectively excised from the record by labelling it as one form of dementia or another.

    26. Re:While troubling, also cool. by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      He meant "Murphy's Law", which is phrase similarly.

    27. Re:While troubling, also cool. by jd · · Score: 1

      Evolution NEVER works in giant leaps. That is not how systems change. Ergo, as viruses are fairly complex molecules that can perform assisted self-replication, there must be simpler systems that perform even more primitive forms of self-replication, stretching right the way back to organic building-block material that cannot self-replicate at all. It seems to me that prions - which are organic molecules with crystal-like properties - are a necessary and fundamental step from "inert" proteins that sit there and do nothing at all. They are not the only step. DNA and RNA must have evolved independently and externally of the "cell" structure we see today. But prions and their ability to alter structure around them would seem to be absolutely a fundamental, key step to moving towards a cell body where the component proteins must tessellate. Prions are geometry-defining proteins and must have played some role in this process.

      Does that make prions "living"? Maybe. I think that no matter how you define "life", there will be a grey area between living and non-living. The spectrum is near-enough continuous and therefore wherever you draw the line, the step immediately over that line will not be obviously distinct.

      Except for extremely generalized categorization, I do not think the concepts of "living" and "non-living" will hold out for much longer. They are not scientifically meaningful, offer up no verifiable hypothesis independent of the data used to draw up the definitions, and are essentially a religious viewpoint that has been extended into a legal framework. But to science, these terms mean nothing. Only life over a certain level of complexity can alter its own environment as per Lovelock's Gaia Hypothesis, which is the most generic and universal of all biosystem models. Primitive first-step free-floating DNA couldn't alter conditions as he describes, that doesn't become possible until after the first true cell, which post-dates the origin of measurable life by perhaps quarter of a billion years, and therefore the true origin of life by longer still.

      This reminds me of the argument of whether a machine can think, with some arguing that of course machines cannot think, they do not have an organic brain. That may be a requirement for a specific class of thinking (and that's unproven), but clearly if you go back far enough, there is some precursor to that specific type of thinking that does NOT have such a requirement and is computable. But is it then still thinking? I say the question is flawed and assumes an arbitrary dividing line exists that has a scientifically valid definition and objective purpose. No such line exists, except in the minds of those who believe that mind is a spiritual thing that should not be sullied with the physical.

      Many lines are important. But many are not, and interfere with critical thinking. If you do not wish your thoughts turned into a self-inflicted slurry, banish those lines from your mental processes. Only accept divisions that serve a useful purpose in a scientific sense. All others are illusions, generated by an irrational need to be "better than" something else. If you have that great a need to be better than a rock, you will find greater benefit from re-examining your needs than from labeling the rock.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    28. Re:While troubling, also cool. by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly with everything in your post.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    29. Re:While troubling, also cool. by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      It may be that evolution has a fail safe. It would be difficult for a species to survive if it prefers to eat its own kind. Cannibalism seems to be a last resort, a sign that the individual has major issues . These issues may be caused by genetic belief systems gone bad. Prions may be the answer to weed out these defective individuals. It must have taken alot of time and money to get this disease to jump species.

    30. Re:While troubling, also cool. by jd · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind that Y chromosomes are actually defective X chromosomes. From a purely mechanical sense, this means the system is not functioning according to what might be called "specification" (no implication of a specifier intended). Nonetheless, this defect is extremely valuable.

      Prions alter nearby proteins to the same set of folds, giving you the ability to build a consistant structure out of a random set of proteins. It is possible that early pre-life exploited this, as a tesselating structure has a lot of advantages. True cells may therefore be a defective version of such a pre-cellular structure.

      (Experiments on creating life from scratch have been based on using minerals like sulpher and molecules like fatty acids, and that may well have been the absolutely first step, but a spongy prion structure seems a logical next step, as DNA/RNA can create proteins not fatty acids, which means you've support for growth, and a sponge structure is good for trapping the raw materials.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    31. Re:While troubling, also cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make an interesting point. However, I would expect that if prions had anything to do with the evolution of life as we know it, the following stage of life would have defensive capabilities against the more nefarious effects of prions on further evolved life.
      (Then again, I am as drunk as a post-glasnost soviet premier and should not be posting at all.)

  10. Ah-HAH! by IonOtter · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    --
    [End Of Line]
  11. Why is this news again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So prions can make proteins into prions in other species, e.a. cross the species barrier? Big deal. We knew this in the nineties when the whole mad-cow disease was all over the news.

    I'm sure it has some scientific significance, but I think the real question is how (ingested) prions reach the central nervous system, where the damage is done. And why it takes so long or doesn't happen at all in most cases.
    Now that would shed some light on the amount of risk that eating a possibli infected piece of meat would pose. That would be news.

    1. Re:Why is this news again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i may have read the article wrong, but i'll give this a shot.

      you're right that we know that prions from cows can cause problems in humans. but i think what the article said is that it creates a new kind of prion as well. so where there used to be just one mis-folded protein messing with you, now there are two mis-folded proteins messing with you, and each is mis-folded in a different way and can do a different thing to you. so while you used to just have apples, now you have apples and oranges to deal with. two different fruits, with two different tastes. and you have to think that for every one instance where they caught this, they missed ten other instances. thinking of it that way, this could be huge.

      again, i haven't read the full article, and i may have read the synopsis wrong, but that's the impression i got out of it

    2. Re:Why is this news again? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Not only did we know it could affect humans, but it's been apparent for a long time now that the Mad Cow Disease is a very close relative to Scrapie in sheep, and that one can transform to the other.

      Which is precisely why there's a ban on using sheep remnants in cattle feed.

    3. Re:Why is this news again? by julesh · · Score: 1

      So prions can make proteins into prions in other species, e.a. cross the species barrier? Big deal.

      The summary's wrong. Yes, we've known this for ages. What's new is we have a nice, fast, reliable way of studying without actually infecting animals, which could help us answer the important questions, like 'can this particular prion infect humans?'

  12. Folding a bit too close to home by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    I guess prions take the Folding@Home idea a bit too literally.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  13. The science of fear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work for one of Claudio Soto's former PhD students. From my brief skimming of this paper, it seems to be a simple proof-of-concept transmission between mice and hampsters. The discussion section, like a lot of science, is pure speculation - logical, but no need for slashdotters to scream "OMG we're all going to die!"

    I'm an avid MN deer hunter (and consumer...) and I've done a significant amount of work with PrP infected mice. While not worried about going crazy and having my brain melt in 15 years, I have quit giving blood to the Red Cross. In my opinion, nobody has any "28 days" type fears to raise.

    1. Re:The science of fear. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Can anyone else understand what this guy is saying?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:The science of fear. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      I think he's saying he has teh mad cow.

  14. Re:comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry..had to reply to change my moderation - damn automatic mod system :/

  15. Ailment? by ghoti · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sorry, but Creutzfeld-Jakob disease is a bit more than an "ailment." It's deadly and incurable. I think a slightly stronger word would be in order.

    --
    EagerEyes.org: Visualization and Visual Communication
    1. Re:Ailment? by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

      "Sounds like another good reason to donate your spare CPU cycles to projects like Folding@home."

      Sounds like another damn good reason to stop eating mammals.

    2. Re:Ailment? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because we all know vegetables can't make you sick.

  16. Folding@Home sounds like a cool project by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Just as long as it's not folding@mybrain!

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  17. Prof. X got a name for them by jsse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Prof. Charles Francis Xavier:
    "This process is slow, and normally taking thousands and thousands of years. But every few hundred millennia, evolution leaps forward."

    "We called them, X-Prions"

    1. Re:Prof. X got a name for them by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      I think you just jumped the shark prion.

    2. Re:Prof. X got a name for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, shark jumps you prion.

    3. Re:Prof. X got a name for them by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or is the title 'Xavier: renegade angel' seem way too related to this?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  18. Adds another twist by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    to the old saying "you are what you eat"

  19. Prion Fears Hurting Blood Supply by strelitsa · · Score: 0

    The US Food and Drug Administration has banned donations of blood from people who lived in Britain during a certain time. All to prevent the spread of an ailment that so far (in my case at least) has had 30 years to manifest itself but hasn't as of yet. At this rate, I won't contract Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease until I turn 150.

    --
    No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
  20. Worrisome? by Telepathetic+Man · · Score: 1

    Worrisome for who? The cannibals? Stop eating brains!

    --
    Just because you can, does not mean you should.
    1. Re:Worrisome? by rrohbeck · · Score: 0, Troll

      Problem is, the spinal cord (also infected) of animals is splattered all over the place if the slaughterhouse workers aren't careful.
      "Stop eating dead cows" would be more appropriate. Of course, since Americans have the "beef is good for you" meme down pat (false, but ingrained by decades of advertising) that's not going to happen.

    2. Re:Worrisome? by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Stop eating brains!

      But if I do that, how will I learn things?

      *points to sig for the slow among the readership*

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  21. Been known for quit some time by transporter_ii · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I couple of years back, I did a lot of reading on Mad Cow. There were so many examples of it jumping the species barrier...and some of them many, many years old.

    Here is an example from 18 years ago:

    -=-=-=

    http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-111779850.html

      WASHINGTON -- Eighteen years before last week's first confirmed case of mad cow disease in the United States, investigators concluded that an epidemic of a brain-wasting disease on a Wisconsin mink farm was probably caused by a malady similar to mad cow disease.

    The Wisconsin farmer had fed his mink a steady supply of "downer" cows -- too sick or injured to move on their own -- like the one that tested positive for mad cow disease in Washington state last week. On Tuesday, the Department of Agriculture banned such animals for human consumption.

    Long before the USDA action, the mink industry began discouraging farmers ..

    -=-=-=

    It is basically that anyone who did a little study would know that it could jump the species barrier...but it just can't do that until some people in white coats tell us it can do that...then it can.

    transporter_ii

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    1. Re:Been known for quit some time by tloh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      mod parent up. I did some reading last year on Cronic Wasting Disease (CWD was mentioned in the article) for my infectious disease class and examples like the outbreak at the mink farm just mentioned was very prevalent in available literature. I think most people are getting the wrong idea because the article is badly written for a non-technical audience. The novelty seems *not* to be that prions can cause cross-species infections, but that it has been demonstrated in vitro (by way of "protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) protocol") in such a way that elucidated some details (multiple forms as revealed by novel strain properties) that were not apparent before. This is interesting *not* because it is a ground breaking new discovery, but because it serves as a starting point for further studying cross-species prion interaction from a different perspective using different techniques.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    2. Re:Been known for quit some time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > On Tuesday, the Department of Agriculture banned such animals [mad cows] for human consumption.

      Wait a second... 18 years ago, the banned the consumption of cows that were affected by those prions... on Tuesday?

      I know it was awhile ago so they didn't know, but doesn't the incubation period for this disease go up to 20-40 years? Doesn't that mean there could be a lot of people or animals affected by this, and we don't know until they go crazy, die and we dissect their brains to find out?

    3. Re:Been known for quit some time by julesh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhuh. The summary is just wrong, is what's going on here. If you read the article, what it's actually about is a new way to study prions in vitro and test them to determine whether there's a possibility of them crossing a particular species barrier.

      Which is, when you think about it, a very useful test to have available.

    4. Re:Been known for quit some time by pugdk · · Score: 1

      Yup, summary is wrong. Apparently the poster has not followed prion research at all during the last 20 years or so ;-).

      Why else would BSE (British Standard of Excellence or eh... that other abbreviation ;-) infected meat be banned from stores? If there was no proof of prions being able to jump species we could just eat it...

    5. Re:Been known for quit some time by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      On that note, I may completely misunderstand the issue, but woudln't the fact that humans have gotten the disease from cows indicate that it crossed the species barrier? Not kuru (that was inter-human), but the modern bovine form.

  22. Scary by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It made me wonder, if it changes when it jumps species, maybe prion diseases are something new, so I did some quick checking on Wikipedia. I didn't track down more stuff yet, but I plan on following up. I didn't realize this, but it appears that a lot of prion diseases are fairly recent developments. Scrapie showed up in 1732, Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy in the 1800s, CJD showed up around 1920, Kuru in 1957, Chronic Wasting Disease in 1967, Feline Spongiform Enecephalopathy 1990.

    And these are more than half of the diseases caused by prions, I believe. That's more than a bit disconcerting.

    1. Re:Scary by rrohbeck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I didn't realize this, but it appears that a lot of prion diseases are fairly recent developments.

      People didn't eat as much meat as they do today, didn't live as long, and they certainly didn't feed their livestock with slaughterhouse waste. The latter is what got prions into the food chain in significant amounts.

    2. Re:Scary by registrar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Smallpox had been around for thousands of years, but it was only in the last few centuries that people identified it as being distinct from chickenpox, measles and other poxes. It doesn't prove that there's been a proliferation of poxes, just a lot more classifying going on.

      That said, our changing living patterns do expose us to new diseases (see sibling post) like BSE, SARS and HIV---all depending on who you mean by "us". There's truth in what you observe, but it's not a huge deal because that same change in living patterns means that we know what caused it and what to do about it. Life expectancy has gone up dramatically despite the introduction of new diseases.

    3. Re:Scary by neonsignal · · Score: 1
      It is difficult to know when prion diseases first developed. Take the case of kuru-kuru in the Fore area of Papua New Guinea, a prion disease that was transmitted because of burial practices (including eating the brains of the deceased). This area was only accessed by Europeans from the late 1930s, so it is not surprising that Kuru was not known to Western science until the 20th Century.

      The researcher took some time to prove it was a disease agent, because of the long incubation time of the disease. However, some women from the adjacent Awa area who married Fore men were also contracting the disease, which helped rule out genetic causes.

      So the disease existed before European contact. Moreover, the trade barriers (mountainous terrain and internecine warfare between villages) means that it is unlikely that contaminated foodstuffs were traded into the region before air travel.

    4. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What will be very scary is when they began to spread through air contact, like a flu virus.

    5. Re:Scary by Pedrito · · Score: 1

      There's truth in what you observe, but it's not a huge deal because that same change in living patterns means that we know what caused it and what to do about it. Life expectancy has gone up dramatically despite the introduction of new diseases.

      True, but if prion diseases are starting to pop up out of nowhere then I'm a bit concerned, because the ones that have been around for a while, like CJD, have no cure.

    6. Re:Scary by Pedrito · · Score: 1

      What will be very scary is when they began to spread through air contact, like a flu virus.

      Fortunately, that will never happen. Prions are misfolded proteins. They're enormous compared to viruses and far too dense to be airborne spread.

    7. Re:Scary by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Well, to some extent, that's like saying that Indium showed up in 1863 and Francium in 1939 -- it's likely that many of those diseases have existed forever and we didn't know enough or have enough observational data to give them specific names. CJD is known to occur spontaneously in about 1 in a million people and probably has been doing so for thousands of years, but previously looked like other senile dementias.
      The issue is that until the advent of large-scale agricultural farming of animals, there wasn't a lot of used animal brain tissue going into food stock. To really get a good amplification of CJD-like diseases, you need to be consistently acting like zombies and dumping lots of brain tissue from each generation into the next generation.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    8. Re:Scary by eluusive · · Score: 1

      enormous? This word, I do not think it means what you think it means. (A prion in a single protein, instead of a collection of proteins and RNA like viruses)

  23. Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by nido · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... Mark Purdey was, of course, the British beef farmer who had a different theory about Mad Cow. In the 80's the British government required all cattle to be dosed with an Organo-phostate pesticide, to combat a warble fly epidemic (these bugs punch holes in cattle skin, making the hides less suitable for leather seats).

    Purdey was an organic farmer, and sued to protect his right to keep synthetic pesticides away from his herd. He won. A few years later Chernobyl went off, and some time after that the first Mad Cow epidemic occured. Purdey's cows were mostly immune. He had a few mad cows, but these were mostly transplants to his herd which had, presumably, been dosed with the pestacide.

    As the years went by, Purdey turned into a scientist himself, doing the research that the british government wouldn't do because of their potential liability in having caused the mad-cow epidemic (by require farmers to poison their herds).

    Basically, the pesticide used chellated (removed) copper from the treated body. Somehow manganese substitutes for copper, but it isn't a good subsitute. The radioactive fallout from Chernobyl didn't help things either. It's been years since I first read Purdey's site, so I don't remember the details.

    He commented that the Mad Cow in Washington (the northwest state) came from a copper-deficient pasture in Canada, into an area where quite a bit of nuclear weapons research had been done in decades past. The mad deer in Colorado also occupy a site with extensive radiologic environmental poisoning.

    So basically, Purdey's theory is that prions are an effect of environmental poisoning, not the cause of Mad-Cow-esque disease.

    Purdey is deceased now (brain cancer?), but his site's still live. Definitely recommended reading.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by timmarhy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      sounds like nonsense to me, just a crack pot theory piecing bits together combined with 1/2 truths.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by devotedlhasa · · Score: 1

      Purdey is deceased now (brain cancer?)

      It was prions.

    3. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by Reziac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but now I'm wondering... DNA can be damaged/mutated by environmental factors; proteins can be damaged by chemicals (when I was in college, we used the crude method of boiling proteins in a saturated lye solution to break them down into their various amino acids); why should prions be immune?

      Which says nothing pro or con re this Purdey fellow's theory of the origin of BSE; he could be dead-wrong on that, yet correct as applied elsewhere. Or he may be completely off-base in every way, yet we should still look at *what* causes prions to "fold wrong"; who knows what we'll learn?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by oldhack · · Score: 1

      So... (soil?) copper deficiency is somehow the same as effect of nuke testing and they are all "environmental poisoning".

      Do stop. This is why some relious people are accusing the science of same bullshit.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    5. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by oldhack · · Score: 1

      I agree that we should look into why prions fold wrong, but I'm sure the folks are doing that (aren't you?!). But "environmental factor", is that what life is? What does it mean specifically?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    6. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by tfoss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Purdey's theory is that prions are an effect of environmental poisoning, not the cause of Mad-Cow-esque disease.

      First off, those two statements are unrelated. Prions can cause TSEs regardless of if copper or manganese from the environment causes them. Secondly, it is pretty well accepted by the scientific community that prions are the cause of TSEs. You can infect animals with PrP-Sc (the misfolded form of the prion protein (PrP-C being the normally folded version) and cause TSE. If you knock out the PrP protein, mice are not susceptible to PrP-Sc.

      What causes the first misfolding of PrP-C to PrP-Sc is unknown (unfortunately), and it is clear that PrP-C has copper-binding repeats, so an effect of Cu on the protein is a very likely possibility.

      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    7. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Could mean anything. Whatever chemical or energy forces affect the proteins. Yeah, I agree that's ridiculously nonspecific :) but some are already known, so make a reasonable starting point.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by afaik_ianal · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, consider the following:

      Agent Orange was heavily used in Vietnam. Some time later, a plane blew up over Lockerby in the UK. Now Vietnam is free from mad cow disease, while there have been many cases of BSE in the UK.

      Clearly, it follows that the Libyans are to blame for BSE, and Agent Orange is a suitable preventative treatment, right? Or have I just listed a bunch of completely unrelated things.

      Now reread what Mark Purdy says, and see if you can find a single scrap of evidence supporting a causal relationship between any of the points. You've even pointed out evidence *against* it (that he had infected cows), yet he glossed over that by adding another unrelated complication into the hypothesis.

      There are literally millions of things that one can claim could have led to BSE, but without any supporting evidence, none of them are any more credible than another.

    9. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by taj · · Score: 1

      Having lived in the Colorado front range, some of the comments sounded odd enough that I looked at his site and try to read between the lines - some of the comments blur the lines of politics and science. His copper and magnanese observations may be pointing to something that will later make sense in a more refined theory.

      Mark sounds like he was an intesting person. It looks like he itching to know if a copper supplement helped.

    10. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Ridiculously nonspecific hmm? That's a good woody word, isn't it? Ridiculously nonspecific... Good, yes. Good woody type word.

      Goooooornn.....

    11. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by cartman · · Score: 1

      I read some of Purdey's stuff.

      I'm always extremely skeptical when a scientific outsider claims that his scientific discoveries are being suppressed by conspiracies and totalitarian forces.

      Not to mention, Purdey's hypotheses seem to be based on nothing more than coincidences and selective correlations.

      But Purdey seems to pay attention only to some correlations. He ignores the correlations which would destroy his hypothesis. For example, he ignores that Kuru disease (a prion disease affecting humans) has only been found in cannibal tribes in the South Pacific, and has never occurred near nuclear waste facilities or anywhere else. Furthermore, he ignores the fact that variable crutzfeld-jacob disease occurred almost exclusively in Great Britain where feeding cows to other cows was widespread; the disease occurred only rarely anywhere else, and it almost never occurred in the Ukraine around Pripyat/Chernobyl where the radioisotopes like strontium-90 are much more common.

      ...It seems that Purdey's method of "total environmental analysis" could easily lead to spurious correlations. If you look carefully through thousands of factors to find correlations, you will always find some by chance. In some fields, that method is called "torturing the data until it confesses".

    12. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      >The mad deer in Colorado also occupy a site with extensive radiologic environmental poisoning.

      The first CWD deer in Colorado were noticed at/near Fort Collins, which has little or no radiologic environmental poisoning. There aren't any uranium mines in the area and the nearest nuclear power plant was 60 miles away and never had a significant leak during its operational life. It's a pretty pristine area. CWD was probably noticed there because it's one of the foremost agricultural-focussed colleges in the West, so people are on the lookout for odd behavior in wildlife. (Although some people have claimed that prions actually made a species jump from animals at CSU's research farms/herds to deer.)
      But the idea that CWD is linked to radiation poisoning, while interesting, is not supported by any data from the discovery of CWD in Colorado.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    13. Re:Mark Purdey's alternative hypothesis by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Right up there with "amorphous mass" ;)

      BTW love your tagline, fits right in with this thread :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  24. Re:cross species? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    rodent would be the genus, hamster would be the species.

  25. Is that surprising ? by aepervius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many of the proteins of the mammals are qu7ite in common except sometimes for a few details. If those few details make no difference to the attack site of the prion, it ain't that surprising that other similar brain protein can similarly badly in other mammals. Sooooo we should simply ban utterly to feed other dead mammals protein to other specy which are for human consumption (cue the sales of meat carcass into pet food....).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  26. Obvious solution by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

    Just build a giant wall between our species and the rest. Use lots of high tech things like cameras, UAVs, and the like. That'll work.

    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  27. Folding@Home alternative by vrjim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Become a vegetarian and loose the risk of contracting a scary prion disease from your food. Prion diseases are awful- I'd take an STD or physical handicap any day over one of those. Now I understand that the USA only randomly checks 1% of cattle for mad cow disease. Since we HAVE had cattle found with it before that stands to reason that cattle with prion diseases have made it into the food supply. The scariest part is these prion diseases can have incubation periods in both cattle and humans for many years. If a cow does not show symptoms it is not likely to be checked for the disease even if it carries it. A tainted burger your parents bought you from McDonald's (containing meat from who knows how many different cows) when you were 10 might not show symptoms till you're 40+ and at that point how could anyone ever trace it to any particular time/place/meal? No- I'm not a vegetarian, but I am seriously considering dropping all animals from my diet except birds and fish.

    1. Re:Folding@Home alternative by Weedlekin · · Score: 2

      "Become a vegetarian and loose the risk of contracting a scary prion disease from your food."

      The incidence of that scary prion disease in humans is extremely low. Even the the UK, where 400,000 infected cattle entered the food chain in the 1980s, has only had 193 cases (suspected and confirmed) over 25 years in a population of over 60 million people, and their figures are more accurate than anyone else's because they're the only country to have instituted mandatory reporting of cases with symptoms that even suggest the disease to a specialist government surveillance unit. To put that in context, the UK had well over a thousand confirmed deaths from salmonella alone during the same period, and the probability of significant under-reporting in these cases is very high indeed (the real incidence is estimated to be _at least_ double the reported incidence).

      "No- I'm not a vegetarian, but I am seriously considering dropping all animals from my diet except birds and fish."

      There are a wide variety of diseases that can be caught from eating birds and fish, especially if they're not properly cooked (fish and shellfish can for example give you hepatitus-A, and birds and their eggs are a common vector for salmonella). As the recent outbreaks of salmonella from spinach indicate, you're not safe eating vegetables either, so the only way of ensuring you don't get any fatal diseases from food is to avoid eating.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    2. Re:Folding@Home alternative by caluml · · Score: 1

      Become a vegetarian and loose the risk of contracting a scary prion disease from your food.

      Untie the risk! Set it free - it will find its way home!

    3. Re:Folding@Home alternative by vrjim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since the incubation period in humans can be 50 years with an average 30 years (according to June 21, 2001 Wisconsin State Journal and some other sources I looked at) we likely have yet to see the extent of how many people were affected by the outbreak in the 80s. It's also easy to misdiagnose without proper testing- I imagine many doctors writing certain cases off as encephalitis or meningitis or a rapid onset of Alzheimer's (remember it sets in later in life due to the long incubation period) Yes, there are diseases you can get from vegetables, like salmonella, but unlike prion diseases you can destroy salmonella simply by cooking it. Prions aren't inactivated even by BOILING them. And though you can get Hepatitis A from consuming foods many of us have been vaccinated against it- not to mention the vast majority will fully recover from it in as little as 2 weeks with no permanent damage to the liver. Prion diseases on the other hand have no vaccine, no cure, and when they damage your brain you're damaged till death (which probably wont take much longer after).

    4. Re:Folding@Home alternative by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Since the incubation period in humans can be 50 years with an average 30 years (according to June 21, 2001 Wisconsin State Journal and some other sources I looked at)"

      These figures are all based on observations of kuru, which is a similar disease, _but not the same disease_. Furthermore, the studies they're derived from have been criticised by other scientists because they assume that funerary cannibalism ceased entirely in Papua when it was banned in the 1950s, whereas work by anthropologists suggests that the practice continued on a wide scale until the early 1990s, and may still be quite prevalent today.

      NB: groups of scientists have been issuing warnings about vCJD epidemics that would begin to manifest themselves after a period which gets longer whenever the prior "danger line" is crossed without the much-ballyhooed epidemic appearing.

      "we likely have yet to see the extent of how many people were affected by the outbreak in the 80s."

      The incidence of new cases is declining every year in the UK, which is by far the best source of information due to (a) having been subject to a massively bigger outbreak of both BSE and vCJD than anyone else, and (2) their mandatory reporting system for any symptoms remotely suggestive of the disease that significantly reduces the chances of it being misdiagnosed (patients who are reported as potential victims must be autopsied on death and tested foe vCJD prions even if they've subsequently been diagnosed as suffering from something else).

      "It's also easy to misdiagnose without proper testing- I imagine many doctors writing certain cases off as encephalitis or meningitis or a rapid onset of Alzheimer's (remember it sets in later in life due to the long incubation period)"

      This isn't the case in the UK due to their extremely stringent reporting requirements, and the majority of cases (both suspected and confirmed) have occurred there, so their doctors are also the most likely to be aware of the disease.

      "Yes, there are diseases you can get from vegetables, like salmonella, but unlike prion diseases you can destroy salmonella simply by cooking it."

      You can destroy it by sustained temperatures of 100C or greater, so some cooking methods such as stir frying aren't adequate -- you'll basically be reduced to eating heavily boiled stuff. Note that oven cooking techniques require temperatures of at least 160C for several hours to destroy bacteria because hot air is notably ineffective at that particular task.

      "Prions aren't inactivated even by BOILING them."

      Autoclaves use steam at 134C to sterilise instruments because there are a large number of pathogens (bacteria, fungi, protozoans, and viruses) that can survive lesser temperatures (and indeed much higher ones for sevral hours in environments other than steam). Prions are also deactivated at 134C, although they require "cooking" for about 20 minutes rather than the 3 minutes that most autoclave cycles use to kill living organisms and their spores (stove top autoclaves use lower temperatures and longer times, so they don't destroy prions).

      "And though you can get Hepatitis A from consuming foods many of us have been vaccinated against it- not to mention the vast majority will fully recover from it in as little as 2 weeks with no permanent damage to the liver"

      It still kills about 100 people each year in the US, so it's a much greater danger than vCJD, which at its peak was claiming 10 people a year in the "prion hotspot" UK, and has now dropped to less than 5 new cases a year. Scaled up by a factor of 5 to account for population differences, this would mean that the US would have experienced 50 cases a year at the peak times if there'd been massive exposure to infected meat products like that in the UK, and about 22 annual cases nowadays, so you'd be five times more likely to die of hep. A than vCJD.

      "Prion diseases on the other hand have no vaccine"

      There isn't one yet, but German scientists have managed to treat mice in a way that makes them generate

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  28. Folding for Someone Else's Pocket by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like another good reason to donate your spare CPU cycles to projects like Folding@home."

    So the public is donating a lot of computing time and electrical energy. What does the public get back?

    If Folding@Home goes towards lining the pockets of a university endowment or a drug company's coffers, count me out. If the research product is required to be free from patents, and available for public good...full speed ahead. Somehow, I seriously doubt that any successful results will be freely available.

    1. Re:Folding for Someone Else's Pocket by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      So the public is donating a lot of computing time and electrical energy. What does the public get back?

      If Folding@Home goes towards lining the pockets of a university endowment or a drug company's coffers, count me out. If the research product is required to be free from patents, and available for public good...full speed ahead. Somehow, I seriously doubt that any successful results will be freely available.

      The project is run by a non-profit company. Results are routinely made public. I don't see any reason to be concerned here.

    2. Re:Folding for Someone Else's Pocket by padre999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ever heard of world community grid?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Community_Grid#Outreach
      "Also, as part of its commitment to improving human health and welfare, the results of all computations completed on World Community Grid are released into the public domain and made available to the scientific community."

    3. Re:Folding for Someone Else's Pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just check out their site and find all these questions answered.

      Yes, all the research is public domain. That means that anybody who can find a way to make a profit can, but won't be able to have exclusive use of the research findings.

      Yes, all the results are freely available, you can already view some of them.

      As for the requirements to be free from patents, you can't patent research. If somebody creates a product, etc. then they can patent that. There is no way to prevent someone from using knowledge to create a new product, and if there was one, you could be sure it would be patented already.

  29. idle cpu? by stm2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is not such a thing as "spare CPU cycles" since when you run a *@home program, CPU power consumption pikes.
    In a laptop, when running any CPU intensive distributed program, battery level is stuck since all the power goes to the CPU instead of charging the battery.

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    1. Re:idle cpu? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      I dunno what laptop you have, but the manufacturer did not include a large enough power brick. Every laptop I have seen or owned will charge even when being run at full tilt.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:idle cpu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "spare cpu cycles" oh but how i love it when the McRib is in hunting season!

    3. Re:idle cpu? by Taint+Bearer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There is not such a thing as "spare CPU cycles" since when you run a *@home program, CPU power consumption pikes. In a laptop, when running any CPU intensive distributed program, battery level is stuck since all the power goes to the CPU instead of charging the battery.

      Or you could just tick the box that says "Pause work while battery power is being used (for laptops)" in the F@H menu. Its not that hard.

      --
      For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert. Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - 2008)
  30. Am I the only one by dmsuperman · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who read that as "prisons" and immediately wondered why we started locking up animals?

    --
    :(){ :|:& };: Go!
    1. Re:Am I the only one by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes you are.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  31. Rosetta @ home by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Informative

    For this issue Rosetta at home (Boinc) might be a better choice for protein structure. It's already wokring on the prion problem.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  32. Re:comparison by buswolley · · Score: 1

    Jim the crowbar is in my prion.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  33. they reproduce by r00t · · Score: 1

    They eat normal protien. Bad protien is both offspring and a waste product.

  34. "Prion diseases" not caused by prions by SpringRevolt · · Score: 2, Informative

    While Mark Purdey may not be right about organophosphates (although they may have been a contributing factor) he is (was) correct that the scientific orthodoxy about CJ-like diseases is wrong.

    Although prions are not directly my area of research, I have been an interested observer. It is my belief that the idea tha prions are a self-reproducing pathogenic protein (the idea that won Stanley Prusiner a Nobel Prize) is fundamentally wrong. So called "prion diseases" do, in fact, have have nucleic acid genome.

    Now, there are not many people who are willing to go up against a Nobel Prize winner and 20 years of research - getting funding for such heretical ideas is not easy.

    However, I do believe and hope that the truth of the situation will become apparent and "Science" will have some serious questions to ask itself... how can we have been so wrong about this for so long..?

    So, while some of the results of Folding@Home are pretty amazing, spending any CPU time on the structure of prion proteins is utterly pointless.

    BTW, if you want to play with protein structures, check out FoldIt (fold.it), it's made by the same people who made Folding@Home, it's pretty cool (there is no "Linux" version - so not that cool (it does run under Wine though)).

    1. Re:"Prion diseases" not caused by prions by nido · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the comment.

      getting funding for such heretical ideas is not easy.

      So true - prions and any other field of scientific inquiry... Funding flows easily to 'safe' experiments, while controversial lines of inquiry get starved. The tokamak & the new collider (LHC?) come to mind, whereas Cold Fusion gets starved for attention & funds... Recent developments (the japanese team's May demonstration of a reproducible cold fusion setup) are making Cold Fusionistas impossible to ignore for much longer.

      However, I do believe and hope that the truth of the situation will become apparent and "Science" will have some serious questions to ask itself... how can we have been so wrong about this for so long..?

      Western science's accepted theories undergo semi-regular revolutionary revisions - see Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions. It seems that the world is right on the cusp of another series of dramatic revolutions.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
  35. prison break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to express my disappointment at the title *not* being "Prisons Observed Jumping Species Barrier", which is what I swear it was until I clicked the link.

    I would also be in dire need of sleep.

  36. does anyone actually enforce the law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the meat industry. im sure that they follow all the safety laws as well as the follow immigration law.

    and im sure the governent is enforcing saftey law about as well as it enforces immigration law.

    especially when meat companies buy off politicians every day, especially in rural states

    especially when politicians think the law is an annoyance to their grand schemes.

  37. Sh!t: For a second i read Prisons... by freedom_india · · Score: 0

    For a second i read Prisons and my thought was flying to two facts:
    1) All the homo stuff makes new *species*--i mean how is that even possible???
    2) Mad Cow??? Do they serve all the bad beef in prison???
    Note to submitter: Pls. be clear when you submit things like this: It shocks the hell out of some people.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  38. (Sigh)!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The prion hypothesis was developed many years ago. The term is the condensed form of the "protein only" theory, prion... Whereby CJD developed presumably from scrapie or MCD... Which involved the transfer across the species barrier and made headlines... And now in 2008 you slashdot nerds have come across a new revelation that prions cross species barriers when that is how the term was originally coined... Deary me. Perhaps someone will discover that the world is really round.

  39. same old junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This and that

    I don't know how this applies.

  40. The Andromeda Strain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prions come from outer space and mutate under radioactive conditions that cause epilepsy in scientists...

  41. Repent before it's too late! by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
    I for one welcome our new micro overlords.

    All hail the Prions Of Ori!

  42. But why is it news ? by DrYak · · Score: 1

    The jumping accross species is known and documented for quite some time, specially regarding prions from mad cow disease.
    Similarily, I remember reading articles in 3rd year medicine(*) about difference in prion foldings between species (explain the initial slow development of inter-species spreading compared to intra-specie spreading) and emergence of newer folding pattern (after a while a new more efficient pattern emerges)

    I fail to see how this is news worthy, except maybe some lab trying to justify spending the grant it has obtained.

    Oh yeah, I know. /. is all about dupes and they found a new meta-dupe : two /. entries giving the same info but sourced in different articles :-P

    ---

    *: And just to show how it is old : since then I graduated and had even had time to get a 2nd master.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:But why is it news ? by BlackCreek · · Score: 1
      DISCLAIMER: I have a science background but not in Medical science.

      More often than not, up to date university staff will be able to give students much more insightful tips on break through / newsworthy articles than, say, slashdot. Surprised? I am not.

      The fact that slashdot doesn't get that many *up-to-date* good science stories is, most probably, due to the lack of more up-to-date stories submissions. It certainly isn't due to lack of slow news days anyway...

      In any case, I often like slashdot better than the average popular science magazine. Once you scroll the kids making silly jokes out, you often do get a couple of PhDs (in areas I know nothing of)

      1. making well informed comments,
      2. explaining things,
      3. giving books and articles suggestions.

      This interaction with people in other areas, actually discussing a subject and giving literature suggestions is (for me) the best thing in the Science section.

      I reckon articles in areas you know a lot of, sound boring and uninformative. But otherwise, 3 or 4 year old articles are still interesting for those of us who like science, but are not from the specific field.

  43. No miracles required by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what you point is. Your story has a very complex entity (God) creating life. My story has something much simpler than life doing it.

    Some versions of Intelligent Design have the Designer doing it all through initial conditions. But you're right in that such out of band effects are irrelevant for science.

  44. Sounds like by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1

    an even better reason to go vegetarian. Or at least not eat beef.

    1. Re:Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > an even better reason to go vegetarian. Or at least not eat beef.

      To paraphrase Bill Hicks:
      "Vegetarians die every day. Sleep tight!"

  45. Importance of this work by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Now that I am at work, where I have access to cell, I can read the article and attempt to explain its significance. I will attempt to do this without violating copyright - although I see the work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, which requires that the papers be released to the public (within a certain time frame).

    The paper mentions that the species barrier has been crossed by some prions (BSE) but not others (scrapies). They are looking for a way to show cross-species interactions without having to use whole organisms. One of their findings was a "novel" prion by using cell extract of two different species (mouse and hamster).

    They also commented that there is no current method for predicting which prions will cross species barriers - after all it is driven by a protein-protein interaction, as the prion-based conditions carry no genetic component of infection.

    They further mentioned that their in vitro work showed prions can move across the species barriers without cellular material, generating unique prions in this manner. From my perspective, I would say this could be one of the more significant parts of the study - it could mean that the prions are stable enough to not need a cellular carrier, and could potentially be picked up through secondary contact.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  46. the police by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    don't stand don't stand so close to me ...... The accusations fly Its no use, he sees her He starts to shake and cough Just like the old man in That book by nabakov ... Dont stand, dont stand so Dont stand so close to me

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  47. if i donated them... by nimbius · · Score: 1

    then they wouldnt be spare cpu cycles then, would they?

    and with processor frequency scaling, i admittedly have even less of these "spare" cycles to spare.

    wouldnt it make more sense to use ACPI to power off my pc when im not using it? id be donating spare kw/hr's to research labs in the area. not to mention a bit of spare bandwidth.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  48. Re:comparison by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    Shot of a Prius with a monster-truck lift kit,
    driven by some hayseed from Appalachia,
    head and arm sticking out the window,
    coming down a huge hill to pick up speed,
    bearing down on cattle arranged along a riverbank,
    hitting a ramp and sailing over the 'species barrier',
    with a triumphant 'Woo hoo!'

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  49. future slashdot poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to see a slashdot poll for how people misread this tile in their head..

    Read it right
    Peons Observed Jumping Species Barrier
    Prisons Observed Jumping Species Barrier
    Prons Observed Jumping Species Barrier
    CowboyNeal Jumped My Barrier

  50. thus spaketh titor by citylivin · · Score: 1

    One more step toward the titorian worldline!

    we'll see if mccain gets elected and starts ww3 with russia (also looking probable)

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
  51. It's the Drakh Plague! by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    Mutating in species jumps!

  52. Well, there you go ... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

    Dude, if you're married, you're paying more per lay than anyone.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  53. prions have been cured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the article is in review right now..but will probably be in nature or science.

    I heard the talk.

    finito...will probably help alzheimers...

    regards

  54. Re:comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Prions" sounds like "Prius" which is the car that lesbians drive.

    It also looks a bit like "pr0n", which sometimes has extremely unrealistic (as in, not totally fat and ugly) lesbians in it.

  55. This Research Is Not 'Groundbreaking' New Science by Magdalene · · Score: 1

    This was originally suspected, then researched in the seventies to early eighties. Prions (or whatever undiscovered mini virus that causes them.) were first discovered and named at that time. They were first seen to be infective in a disease called Kuru in a tribe in New Guinea and was later linked to how they prepared their dead, as part of the ritual involved the women relatives of the deceased eating a piece of the deceased brain. Then they showed up in the UK (plaque forming encephalic disease called 'scrapie' in sheep, to animal protein in feed, feed to cow, MAD COW, cow to meatpacker, cow to beef, beef to hamburger, hamburger to humans) then later in the US: (researching a disproportionate ratio of Creutzfeldt-Jakob among families whom had a member who hunted to provide extra food on the table, researchers started testing the animals that these families were known to eat. It was found that in the southern states where it was a custom to fry and eat the brains of squirrels, 'mad squirrel' was in abundance in the wild squirrel population. and a plaque forming encephalic disease similar to scrapie and mad cow was common among the elk and deer populations throughout.

    All Nature or the lab in question seems to be attempting to build up hype and fear mongering, and they are misrepresenting the actual research they have done as new and unique.

    I can't actually tell atm which of the parties is responsible as the article is behind a "You need to pay for a subscription to read this article in full" barrier, I usually get my Nature mags at the library book sale for a quarter a piece.

    --
    -Magdalene --"there are 10 types of people in the world, those who read binary, and those who don't"