Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Astronauts Complete First Spacewalk

As_I_Please writes "At 8:40AM (GMT) this morning, Chinese astronaut Zhai Zhigang successfully spent 18 minutes in a tethered spacewalk outside the spacecraft Shenzhou 7. This is an important step in China's goal of building an orbiting space station and sending astronauts to the moon."

221 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. Successful Spacewalk at 8:40am! by Toonol · · Score: 3, Funny

    This announcement brought to you by the freedom-loving Chinese Press at 7:20am.

  2. Is it for real this time? by johanatan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if the dialog amongst the spacemen was any different this time?

    1. Re:Is it for real this time? by khchung · · Score: 1

      Of course the dialog would be the same!

      This 20-minute spacewalk must have been practiced hundreds of times on the ground already, do you think that everyone involved would not already know exactly who would say what at exactly when?! Especially if everything went according to plan?

      The only glitch in the whole process was some problem opening the door. If the reported dialog does not contain that part, anyone who have ever seen one of their practices could have written a report with dialog before the rocket left the ground.

      Sometimes I wonder about this China blindside I see in Slashdot, is it a language problem? The whole spacewalk is broadcasted live, and you can hear the dialogs (and if you understand chinese) were mostly the kind like "astronaut 1, please report status", "astronaut 1 report, all is fine", etc. The speech the astronaut delivered after getting out (basically greeting China and the world) and the flag waving is so obviously scripted, that all reporter with inside contact must have had it days ago.

      --
      Oliver.
    2. Re:Is it for real this time? by johanatan · · Score: 1

      I didn't read TFA (or T original FA from a couple of days ago) but I figured that there'd be at least some ad lib-ing going on. Wouldn't it be rather boring to have an entire mission scripted? Is that really the way they do things? I think that even in a military setting (which you would think would be more serious than a mere space mission), there's some room for creativity (at least if any of the movies I've seen on actual combat are any indication).

    3. Re:Is it for real this time? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I wonder about this China blindside I see in Slashdot, is it a language problem?

      A legacy of the cold war, the Korean wars and the Vietnam wars, where it was "the world vs. the communists".

      Also the incredulity that a non-democratic state could actually rise up to rival the world's "superpower", giving doubts to whether this "democracy" thing is really as good as they were told.

      I mean, the mindset "No you can't be better than us... you're an authoritarian state and we're a democracy!" runs rampant around here.

      Sometimes the problem is intensified by language problems, but I doubt it's the root cause. Many people here seem to take it personally that China isn't playing this "democracy" game.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  3. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by pembo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    See, I don't mind being skeptical. What I don't understand is this blind of some countries, and unbridled skepticism of others.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  4. SZ7 by garconcn · · Score: 1

    Congratulation!

  5. Old news by SL+Baur · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read about this last week on an English language Chinese news website.

  6. Right. by Kid+Zero · · Score: 1, Troll

    This is an important step in China's goal of building an orbiting space station and sending astronauts to the moon

    Yeah, right. You've got a couple more steps before you can move into the Moon Base, speedy.

    1. Re:Right. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right. You've got a couple more steps before you can move into the Moon Base, speedy.

      Not a problem, it's all CG.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Right. by turgid · · Score: 1

      Last ever Moonwalk: Apollo 17, 1972.

      The next Moonwalk will not be American.

    3. Re:Right. by savuporo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it took US exactly four years from first spacewalk ( july 1965 ) to first manned moon landing ( july 1969 ). Indeed, a couple more steps.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    4. Re:Right. by murdocj · · Score: 1

      As to who will do the next moonwalk: before you get too impressed with the Chinese spacewalk, you might want to compare the 30 or so minute walk they did with the upcoming mission to the Hubble telescope: 5 days of two astronauts working 7 hour days outside the shuttle. The Chinese spacewalk is a great achievement. I'm not belittling it in the least. But there is a HUGE gap between what they've accomplished, and what the US and Russia have learned about living and working in space.

      To say who is going to be next to the moon is impossible at this point. How many spacecraft have the Chinese soft-landed on another world? How will their country hold up on the stresses of dealing with enormous growth, with pollution, with reconciling new economic prosperity and an oppressive government regime? I'm skeptical because we've already been thru the whole "planned society will outperform weak-minded free market capitalists" a few times. Khrushchev certainly thought so. We all know how that turned out.

    5. Re:Right. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      The first US space walk was June 3, 1965 and the first landing on the moon was July 20, 1969. So we could see the Chinese on the moon by 2012?

    6. Re:Right. by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      If you think Chinese society is still "planned", look again.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    7. Re:Right. by turgid · · Score: 1

      It really pains me to say this, because I'm very respectful of the US space programme despite the space shuttles technical shortcomings, but I'd be very surprised if Constellation goes anywhere other than LEO. In fact, I'd be very surprised if it gets that far given the current political and economic climate.

      Ares 1 doesn't look like a very good design either.

    8. Re:Right. by murdocj · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the Chinese Central Committee will be fascinated by your theories.

    9. Re:Right. by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      The last Moonwalk wasn't done in 1972. Ask Michael Jackson.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  7. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's probably why they broadcasted it "live" on TV?

  8. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it's something about announcing launches, with detailed transcripts of conversations, before they happen. Sending underage athletes to international events, swearing they're of age even after evidence is found that they're not. Sadly, the list goes on and on.

    At some point, distrust and skepticism becomes the norm.

    Your point is well taken that all governments lie, and necessarily so. Some governments lie a lot about things that don't seem worth lying about.

  9. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by 8127972 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your skepticism is likely well placed. These are the same people who posted details about the launch hours before the actual launch took place:

    http://gizmodo.com/5054776/china-launch-success-hits-web-hours-before-actual-blast+off

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  10. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by MrMista_B · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh, I don't blindly trust any countries government. Rather, I trust any countries government to say only what makes them look best, true or not.

    More importantly, because just recently, China announced the exactly same story http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/25/2145209 *before* they had even *launched*...

    Well.

    Just as it's not good to discount /everything/ that some countries announce, sometimes the skepticism is well earned.

  11. Why this anti-chinese winds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are all posts so anti-chinese?

    I love democracy and I live in a liberal western democratic country (Sweden), but I do not at all understand why all posts have to be so negative.

    Lets critisize china when they do something bad. When they do something good like this, lets congratulate them! This is a great step forward, not only for china, but for all of humankind.

    I honestly believe that China will be the space super-power during the 21st century and the faster they get there the better for ALL OF US - EVEN AMERICANS!

    So lets just cheer and celebrate this success! Congratulate the astronauts and engineers that made this possible. It is impressive and it is a fantastic work no matter if you are a russian, american or chinese.

    1. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you say, "All posts", by my count there were 14 posts before yours. One of them was congratulating China, and the rest rather than being anti-Chinese were debating whether the article was true or not, given the history of Chinese news reporting - with two links to articles about previous false reporting on this very issue in the Chinese press. I'm sure some of the posters will be willing to congratulate China once they have independent verification of the feat.

    2. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Why are all posts so anti-chinese?

      You must not have seen this, from Thursday:
      http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/25/2145209

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Why are all posts so anti-chinese?

      Because they're an authoritarian government that lies all the time?

      This is a great step forward, not only for china, but for all of humankind.

      This is almost old hat for Russian and American astronauts (or cosmonauts or whatever). Any country could work with those two space programs and complete a space walk on their own. I wouldn't be surprised if the ESA has already done this as well and I just haven't heard of it. In other words, the third or fourth country doing this isn't a great step forward for all humankind, it's one more country catching up to where other countries were decades ago.

      In addition, China's extra space capacity isn't a good thing. Space so far has been nothing but a wagging match between Russia and the US, it's been relatively free of military conflict. If we want space to become something other than a place to conduct science and take some pictures, then increasing China's space capabilities is a great way to start.

    4. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, refreshingly sober post amid considerable "my penis is shrinking and I have to strike out at somebody" comments.

      I guess some people just cannot stand others doing well, especially when their own economy is in the toilet, crime is getting out of control, and their own society is in almost certain decline.

    5. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because they're an authoritarian government that lies all the time?

      that sounds like a certain western country we all know about

    6. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm perfectly willing to celebrate, once I know it's true. Remember, just awhile ago, the posted details of the launch, /before/ they launched: http://gizmodo.com/5054776/china-launch-success-hits-web-hours-before-actual-blast+off

      Why is it anti-Chinese to want to celebrate /real/ Chinese achievements?

      The concern that I have is that this may also be faked.

    7. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by rocketman768 · · Score: 1

      I guess you're right.

      Good job Chinese! You're following the U.S.' footsteps to faking the world that you're going to the moon! Hooray!

      :)

    8. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      So, competition is good, unless its by a country you really dont like? That seems to be what you are saying...

    9. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by vertinox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because they're an authoritarian government that lies all the time?

      As compared to our pseudo-authoritarian government that lies all the time?

      Sure I can speak out against the government and not worry about being hauled off (generally), but the USA actually has a greater ratio of its citizens in prisons than China does in there.

      So statically, if you are an US citizen you are more likley to be in prison than you are a Chinese citizen. Maybe we just have more criminals over here, but sometimes it just feels like this anti-Chinese sentiment is pot calling kettle black.

      Also the top three nations of users of the death penalty are China, Iran, and the US (in that order). Seems like we have a lot in common.

      Sometimes I start to wonder to myself that the only difference between the USA and China is that over there they know they aren't free while over here we're just duped into thinking that we are until we actually break a law.

      Yeah, given the choice I'd rather live here than over there, but sometimes I wonder if only that pent up frustration against China could be directed at our own government so that we can actually someday hopefully change the path towards a more democratic state for everyone and not just those are in the majority way of thinking.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    10. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by copponex · · Score: 1

      Why are all posts so anti-chinese?

      Because they're an authoritarian government that lies all the time?

      Name one non-authoritarian government, or even one that tells the truth.

      This is almost old hat for Russian and American astronauts (or cosmonauts or whatever). Any country could work with those two space programs and complete a space walk on their own. I wouldn't be surprised if the ESA has already done this as well and I just haven't heard of it. In other words, the third or fourth country doing this isn't a great step forward for all humankind, it's one more country catching up to where other countries were decades ago.

      In addition, China's extra space capacity isn't a good thing. Space so far has been nothing but a wagging match between Russia and the US, it's been relatively free of military conflict. If we want space to become something other than a place to conduct science and take some pictures, then increasing China's space capabilities is a great way to start.

      China is letting the West know that the militarization of space is a game that they can play as well. The technology required to put a human in space isn't anything to sneeze at. Considering that China's economy was a failure in the same period that we had the Apollo program, it's one of the many signs that they are ready to become the worlds most powerful economy.

      We'd do well to recognize real threats, like resource wars involving the militarization of space between world powers, and have some diplomatic summits to address these issues now before they are species threatening. This would require serious politics, which I'm afraid isn't possible in America, especially with viewpoints like the one you just presented.

      Russia is going to present their draft UN resolution against the militarization of space on September 29th. It will not be covered in a major way by any American news organization.

      Here's an interesting paper from 1989 discussing the topic. It's conclusion: the world must develop a new ethic towards war -- someday -- to avoid the destruction of every major civilization, but until then, the US needs to build weapons for placement in orbit. I'm not sure the writer realized what he was saying.

      http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/library/report/1989/DCA.htm

    11. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by randomc0de · · Score: 1

      sometimes it just feels like this anti-Chinese sentiment is pot calling kettle black.

      What if the pot and the kettle are both black, and we just hope to god screaming about it might clean things up.
      What's your alternative? That we stop complaining, stfu, and slit our wrists?

      --
      Three rights make a left. Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly.
    12. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I start to wonder to myself that the only difference between the USA and China is that over there they know they aren't free while over here we're just duped into thinking that we are until we actually break a law.

      As an outsider (non-American) I don't wonder -- I think that ;-p

      Most people in China know what they're missing out (Chinese don't know about the Tienanmen Square incident? You gotta be kidding. It was widely reported until the day of the crackdown). Most Americans think America is the land of the free. Eh.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    13. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Mr.+Stibbons · · Score: 1

      I can definitely see why many people are skeptical about this. As a previous poster mentioned, after enough lying/propaganda, it gets hard to simply take their word for it. I myself have to seriously wonder. However, I am inclined to believe them, this time, at least. Achieving a spacewalk shouldn't be that hard for a sufficiently modern, industrialized society. And if they really have, then YES! Let's celebrate! Not just for their own success, but for the sense of competition that (hopefully) our scientists and (especially) politicians will feel to actually push forward again in this area.

      --
      I was going to have a amazingly funny and clever sig, but I forgot, and failed miserably.
    14. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Korveck · · Score: 1

      "Sure I can speak out against the government and not worry about being hauled off (generally), but the USA actually has a greater ratio of its citizens in prisons than China does in there.

      So statically, if you are an US citizen you are more likley to be in prison than you are a Chinese citizen. Maybe we just have more criminals over here, but sometimes it just feels like this anti-Chinese sentiment is pot calling kettle black."

      That's a misleading statistic. China's population is so much larger than the US. Do you think China can afford putting so many people in prison? Don't forget China executes far more criminals, who would be serving decades or whole life in prison in US for the same crime committed.

    15. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Sam00 · · Score: 1

      the USA actually has a greater ratio of its citizens in prisons than China does in there.

      As if statistics concerning people in prison in China were valid. I lol'd.

    16. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by CWRUisTakingMyMoney · · Score: 1

      Any country could work with those two space programs and complete a space walk on their own.

      I take it, then, that you're against competition in other realms as well? I mean, hey, anybody can work with Microsoft or Apple and make hardware or software. Heck, anyone can work with RIAA to make music too.

      --
      Those who anthropomorphize science and/or nature already believe in an intelligent designer.
    17. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by bXTr · · Score: 1

      So statistically, if you are an US citizen you are more likley to be in prison than you are a Chinese citizen. Maybe we just have more criminals over here, but sometimes it just feels like this anti-Chinese sentiment is pot calling kettle black.

      And what was what third kind of lie, after lies and damned lies, called?

      --
      It's a very dark ride.
    18. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      I'm not against competition by any means. But if i started building cars that run on an internal combustion engine, I would hardly call it a great step forward for mankind.

    19. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're full of shit.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    20. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by robertl234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot is always anti-Chinese. It's a symptom of a people whose country is on the decline desperately grasping at any excuse to convince themselves that they will remain on top forever. 150 years ago, the Chinese still thought that they were the most advanced country in the world. Now it's the Americans' turn.

    21. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      Yeah, given the choice I'd rather live here than over there

      That's good, because you left out probably the most important comparison: you can make your Slashdot post over here without ANY fear of government reprisal whatsoever, but over there, it'll get you hauled off for "re-education," prison, or worse, to be a participant in the next BodyWorlds exhibit. No country's perfect, but the Chinese have a loooooong way to go.

    22. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by syousef · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I start to wonder to myself that the only difference between the USA and China is that over there they know they aren't free while over here we're just duped into thinking that we are until we actually break a law.

      Yeah they put you into prison for stuff like killing, robbing or raping people. I was shocked! Shocked I tell you!

      You're making the same mistake a lot of people do when talking about freedom. Freedom doesn't mean you get to do whatever the hell you want to with complete disregard for negative effects on society. Freedom means you have a choice in what you do WHILE STILL PLAYING NICE WITH OTHERS.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    23. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Cuz we are jealous. What, we have to spell everything out for you?!

      But that's ok. We are about to send a mission with the mother of all spacewalk - gonna upgrade the baddest space telescope, the Hubble itself, IN SPACE! Read that one task requires removal of panel with 111 screws IN SPACE!! :-)

      See, we've got Hubble, and what have you got? NOTHING!!! :-)

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    24. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by eln · · Score: 1

      It's because many people still harbor some childhood bitterness toward the Chinese for their well-known tendency to urinate in other people's Coca-Cola.

    25. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by pbhj · · Score: 1

      In other words, the third or fourth country doing this isn't a great step forward for all humankind, it's one more country catching up to where other countries were decades ago.

      But china did it for 100USD and provided you don't lick the paint (or attempt re-entry) you'd never know they skimped on the manufacture and used child labour to fit the electronics.

      [incidentally that was a joke, we buy the stuff that china churns out and so tacitly we cast our vote that says they should keep the poor down and exploited]

    26. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      Some day you are going to have to realize that not all arguments can be won by sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "George Bush!"

      Nobody brought up the US before you, the subject in question was the reliability of Chinese press releases.
      If you have nothing more intelligent to add than an Ad Hominem attack then maybe you should just save bandwidth.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    27. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      I'd choose China over US anyday! At least with China I'd know what I was getting into.

      --
      This is blinging
    28. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      Because they are fascists. Fascism is an anathema to democracy and freedom.

      All fascist governments to date have had personality cults (e.g. Mussolini and Hitler). China had such a cult (nearly deifying Mao), but that was when the country was Communist. Where is the personality cult now?

      In addition, "Fascism is marriage of government and corporations", according to Mussolini, the first fascist. This is not true of China, not yet. In fact, the U.S. is much closer to fascism by this definition.

      So by at least two indications, China is not fascist -- not yet.

    29. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Yet a large proportion of people in jail in the USA are there due to prohibition. Prohibition is basically a political crime where certain people don't like a substance and illegalize it.
      Also a large number are in jail because they had the misfortune to be born to the wrong class with all the negative ramifications that follow from that.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    30. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      Sure I can speak out against the government and not worry about being hauled off (generally), but the USA actually has a greater ratio of its citizens in prisons than China does in there.

      That's only because we don't execute our prisoners as often for as many crimes. Pro-Chinese sentiment or even congratulating Chinese accomplishments, tacitly supports the same kind of behaviors exhibited by third world dictators. North Korea is worse, but I don't really discriminate between differing levels of inhumanity.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    31. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      as opposed to china where theres lots of people that should be in prison but arent (particularly in the area of corruption and business practices).

      Not like our prisons are brimming with business crooks. Most law-enforcement effort in the US is focused on violent crime. We don't have the resources to go after many non-violent criminals, like your stock broker etc.
           

    32. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Good one.

      I'll try to remember this.

      Some day you are going to have to realize that not all arguments can be won by sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "Chinese Communists!"

      As repeated over and over again, the premature release was most likely due to a bad mistake than any intentional deceit. Laugh, they made a stupid mistake. And then fscking Get Over It.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    33. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      In that case, why not opt for another Hitler or Stalin? Both of them made their intentions quite clear, and followed through on them.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    34. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      That's only because we don't execute our prisoners as often for as many crimes. [ .... ] North Korea is worse, but I don't really discriminate between differing levels of inhumanity.

      What's the difference between the executions in the USA and in China? Difference in levels?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    35. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      It makes you feel good doesn't it?

      Painting the world black and white, and then assuming yourself on the good side ALWAYS induces a high.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    36. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      Why are all posts so anti-chinese?

      Because Americans are scared. So they lash out.

      Of course, China is still a third world country in many important ways, and will be in no position to challenge the U.S. for decades if ever. Most Americans know this thoroughly.

      So when they lash out in fear, that fear is not really of China. No, their fright comes from what they have been doing to themselves, especially over the last eight years. They realize that their problems have been self-inflicted, and are terrified of what their failing political system will inflict on them next. They desperately need to take some revenge on their elites, but these people have been very good at hiding, at looting the country from the shadows. So the angry Americans need a scapegoat, and China is it (as Japan was twenty years ago).

      The sad thing is that Americans have no idea how quickly they are ruining their reputation in China. They won't be called Mei Guo (beautiful country) for much longer.

    37. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1
      I completely agree with you about the knee-jerk anti-chinese paranoia around here; it's due to the Slashdot-posting population being predominantly Americans, who've noticed over the last decade that the effect of 15% GDP growth averaged over a few decades means that they're not actually able to conquer every other nation on earth, militarily.

      This is a great step forward, not only for china, but for all of humankind.

      And how, exactly, do you work that one out? They done exactly what Leonov did four decades back. (Hint: You'll notice that Russians haven't moved to the moon, either, although their ballistic missiles are far more advanced and reliable now than they were back then.)

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    38. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by coretx · · Score: 1

      ah, you mean just like how people hate american's and american lies today? Yes, that is evil. I also have no doubt about your words. Dominator's are always evil. Just take a good look at history. Maybe you got trolled for stateing the obvious ?

    39. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Sure I can speak out against the government and not worry about being hauled off (generally), but the USA actually has a greater ratio of its citizens in prisons than China does in there.

      Who needs prisons when you have bullets?

    40. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by samsamsamj · · Score: 1

      Oh that's so funny hahaha...

      Do you know when the massive earthquake strike, where were all those kid died? In SCHOOLS. Not in factories. That was in the most remote and backward counties in China, but all those kids died in SCHOOLS. A typical Chinese parent would sell blood to keep the kids in school. I doubt those US high school dropouts face the same pressure from the parents.

      Yeah there still are child labors in China. So are in India, Mexico, and even in the US. But it's the economy, stupid. It's the extreme poverty that drives the kids to work. And you think you are so extremely helpful by laughing at them?

    41. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by samsamsamj · · Score: 1

      This Chinese government, strangely, seems to enjoy more support from its people than most "democratic" countries. The reasons are obvious to the Chinese, but not to the others who choose not to be interested.

      From my point of view, this Chinese government is far more competent than the one in the US. I don't have to look at my 401K account to know that "greed, censorship, and political corruption" is far from a unique China thing.

    42. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by ViVeLaMe · · Score: 1

      People here have forgotten how the industrial revolution looked in the, say, late 1800's.
      Children went to work in factories in the (gasp!!) western world. And you know what? They loved it. It was all kind of better than working the fields, which was the alternative.
      I have no doubt that China, in a lot of places and ways a backwater country, has childs working the factories. They're having their industrial revolution about a century late.

      --
      i had a sig, once..
    43. Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? by quenda · · Score: 1

      Yeah they put you into prison for stuff like killing, robbing or raping people. I was shocked!

      If thats all it was, the US would not have far-and-away the highest imprisonment rate in the developed world. Huge number are in prison for victimless "vice" offenses - drugs and sex. So much for freedom.

  12. competition by wizardforce · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hopefully China will make a real push for space forcing the US to get off its arse in regard to the final frontier...

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:competition by Nutria · · Score: 1

      forcing the US to get off its arse in regard to the final frontier...

      A country that sends half it's money to foreigners and transfers the other half from Earners to Dead Weight isn't going anywhere.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:competition by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Hopefully China will make a real push for space forcing the US to get off its arse in regard to the final frontier...

      Yes, because The Universe works on the "finders, keepers" principle.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:competition by Tweenk · · Score: 1

      Why do we take the notion that space exploration and colonization is desirable as granted? Will it make us feel better, or is this some attempt to find new resources to fuel our consumerist frenzy for which the Earth is becoming too small? Would you want to live on another planet in the solar system, where you couldn't go outside without a pressure suit, where you'd have to depend on complicated machines to support every second of your fragile life?

      Of course there are other important considerations, including less egoistic ones. However, the gist remains valid. The concept of colonizing other planets is exciting, and this may happen in some very distant future, but for now the fact is that Earth is the best place for us, and I for one wouldn't want to live anywhere else. Rather than finding new worlds to consume we could start caring more about our own, so it remains the best place for humans to live.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    4. Re:competition by wizardforce · · Score: 1
      there is nothing wrong with consumption, there is most definitely something wrong with exhausting Earth's resources and forcibly taking resources against the will of one person for the benefit of another. limiting consumption in of its self will not solve the problem, only prolong it- what we need to do is find less ecologically damaging methods of producing what we need. don't forget that some of the most ecologically damaging technologies were born out of poverty not excess [see china]

      Why do we take the notion that space exploration and colonization is desirable as granted?

      because Earth has a finite quantity of resources that we'd be foolish to exhaust and frankly given a choice between exhausting all of the resources of Earth, our home planet and all its inhabitants and some dead rock out in space, I'll take exhausting the dead rock in space any day.

      Would you want to live on another planet in the solar system, where you couldn't go outside without a pressure suit, where you'd have to depend on complicated machines to support every second of your fragile life?

      well, yes if I had the opportunity I'd be all for taking the risk. Why? I'd rather risk my life to learn something new and explore than sit here on Earth completely safe but unable to go out and explore what is out there.

      Rather than finding new worlds to consume we could start caring more about our own

      why do you assume that it needs to be one or the other? .2% of our GDP goes to space exploration, less than .0001% resulted in spaceship one and the beginnings of space tourism. by contrast, we spent nearly 6% of our GDP on the military [holy forty times that batman], much of which is used for meddling in our countys' affairs, heck we have 200,000 troops sitting in Germany and Japan [our allies no less] consuming an order of a magnitude more resources than the space program ever did for no good reason! I think you're confused as to where our resources are being wasted.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    5. Re:competition by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      whoever gets space travel pinned down first is going to have a pretty good advantage over other nations. The GPS constellation, satellites in general and space resources [energy, research and mining to name a few]

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    6. Re:competition by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Why do we take the notion that space exploration and colonization is desirable as granted?

      because (admittedly in a few billion years from now) one day our sun will die, and if we're not off this planet by then, our species will die with it.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    7. Re:competition by evilviper · · Score: 1

      whoever gets space travel pinned down first is going to have a pretty good advantage over other nations.

      "Pinned down" is quite a stretch, implying some sudden, overwhelming breakthrough that gives a huge competitive advantage.

      Instead, space travel is like any other scientific or engineering endeavor. Progress is linear, and what one group learns can be applied by others soon after. It's a ridiculous stretch to claim that putting a person on Mars first is going to give whatever nation responsible a substantial advantage in other unrelated endeavors, like putting up communications satellites.

      In other words, it might well be cheaper and easier to let someone else go first, and then replicate and improve upon their methods. ie. Second-mover advantage.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:competition by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      Instead, space travel is like any other scientific or engineering endeavor. Progress is linear, and what one group learns can be applied by others soon after

      it depends on your definition of "soon", just take a look at most nations' space programs... decades behind the US and Russia, even the EU with its combined economic power greater than the US is still far behind in terms of their space technology. Technological advancement does spread from its originating country eventually but the fact is that even though this has to some extent occured in regard to space travel technology, the world is far far behind the US with the vast majority doing nothing particularly sophisticated even decades after the US and Russia accomplished the feat.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    9. Re:competition by khallow · · Score: 1

      Why do we take the notion that space exploration and colonization is desirable as granted? Will it make us feel better, or is this some attempt to find new resources to fuel our consumerist frenzy for which the Earth is becoming too small? Would you want to live on another planet in the solar system, where you couldn't go outside without a pressure suit, where you'd have to depend on complicated machines to support every second of your fragile life?

      From the tone of your post, I get the impression you think the answer should be something other than the obvious. It is desireable to travel and see new things. Yes, it will make us feel better and it is an attempt to further our civilization both in knowledge and extent. And yes, the Earth is too small. And yes, someone (me, for example) would want to live on another planet where they would need a pressure suit and other protective gear to live. Remember people already live many places on Earth where protective gear is required in order to survive outside. This is not unusual.

      Of course there are other important considerations, including less egoistic ones. However, the gist remains valid. The concept of colonizing other planets is exciting, and this may happen in some very distant future, but for now the fact is that Earth is the best place for us, and I for one wouldn't want to live anywhere else. Rather than finding new worlds to consume we could start caring more about our own, so it remains the best place for humans to live.

      That's pretty shoddy reasoning. Just ak yourself this. Why do people live in places on Earth that aren't suitable to humans? There are people living underwater, people living in Anartica, people living in the middle of desert, and so on. A lot of people don't live in nice environments. Why is that so? As I see it, there are reasons for living in environments that have little to do with how nice the environment is. Maybe they are disfranchised and can't live anywhere else. Maybe there's oil. Maybe they're exploring the region.

      Civilization exists in the first place because we have adapted our environment to ourselves. There's no reason that we can't do the same tricks in space or on another planet. The technology will be different, the environment more dangerous, But the same reasons that have spread humanity into most regions on the planet, will propel humanity off of Earth, assuming someone or something doesn't kill humanity first.

    10. Re:competition by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      This seems like another post from someone who's grown up watching too much star trek. Manned space travel is a dead end until we come up with radical advances in technology and engineering. Chemical rockets just aren't enough.

      This whole "everyone else is besting NASA, we need to send more people into space" meme that I see constantly on /. is a bunch of bunk. What matters is probes, rovers and satellites conducting basic research. Anything else is a waste, and China conducting a space walk merely shows that they can be wasteful too.

    11. Re:competition by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      It's because the Star Trek fantasy of space being the new wild west (count the number of uses of the word "frontier" in the comments here!) is far less depressing than the mundane reality, which is that our current global society is utterly unsustainable and that we're all going to have to get used to either cataclysmic climate changes essentially destroying it, or living a much much less energy-intensive lifestyle, with very little long-distance travel, trade in bulk goods, etc. (Personally, I think it's going to be both; the latter will slowly start to kick off just as the latter starts to kill people in the tens of millions, rather than the tens of thousands as is the case today*.)

      *What's that, Skippy, you don't read the news and hadn't heard of any such events? Well, Google is your friend, you ignorant marsupial.)

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  13. Sponsored by... by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...your local Walmart.

  14. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

    I have to agree though, considering just how recently they announced their successful launch before they ever left the ground.

  15. That's not quite the point... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The point is that they are building their space program. You have to consider Asian, and especially East Asian thinking. They aren't like the west with its "profit immediately or forget about it" thinking. When I see China putting men into space (the third country to do so after Soviet Russia and then the USA) and now doing space walks, that means they already have a long term plan to set up semi-permanent if not permanent colonies in orbit or on other celestial bodies.

    See, they are not in a space race. They are doing this for their more distant future. When they do something like this, they aren't thinking of the next quarter's profits or even the next year's. They are thinking in terms of the next generation or the generation after.

    And, I applaud them for it. It is nice to see homo sapiens thinking long term about getting off this pale blue dot of ours, and not only thinking about it but taking active steps towards such a goal. I couldn't care less what language they are speaking or what country they are from. They are humans and they are making the effort that others seem to have given up on. Power to them.

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    1. Re:That's not quite the point... by Tweenk · · Score: 1, Troll

      When they do something like this, they aren't thinking of the next quarter's profits or even the next year's.

      Instead, they are thinking about the propaganda benefits. It's something they must do to remain in power, so in a way they are also thinking short-term. Their primary motivation is not the advancement of humanity but maintaining the iron grip on the peoples' minds. Soviets have been there before.

      PS: I think this was not faked, because propaganda has not to lie at least sometimes to work.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    2. Re:That's not quite the point... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      As much as I'd like to subscribe to that theory I think both this, the Olympics and several others activities they do is mostly about national pride. Whether it was the Cold War, the UN (where Taiwan had China's seat), the G8 (where Russia is a member and China not) and many other places China never seemed to get much attention nor cared much about it. With the turn to market economy though, clearly they've also wanted to show the world their prowess in engineering (olympic stadiums), culture (spectacular shows), sports (most gold medals), science and technology (spacewalk), environmentalism (they tried) and so on. Nothing negative or unusual about that, most people are proud over their country and its achievements and a lot of symbolic value that has all sort of positive effects. Some negative too but I don't see any reason to Godwin this story. I'm just saying that I think they do it a lot more for the here and now than any long term idealistic notion of mankind travelling the stars.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:That's not quite the point... by sydneyfong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes and no.

      In China, the lack of democracy means that you could plan for a distant future, as opposed to how you could get yourself (or your party) elected next term. In the west it's not "profit immediately or forget it" -- but rather "profit immediately, or otherwise the other party will revert it next term". China's current top-down approach in administration means it could move things with a definite purpose, rather than many individual working on their own interests.

      But then, short term thinking is a common trait of the human species. On a national scale China is definitely heading in a clear and steady direction, but in smaller things I doubt there's much differences between the Chinese and anything else. For example, The Chinese, despite official prohibition, are really into gambling -- more so than the average westerner. And of course gambling is going to cause you to lose a lot of money in the long run...

      The milk crisis in China now is of course another example as pointed out by another poster.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    4. Re:That's not quite the point... by zoogies · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What was the point of landing on the moon? Advancement of humanity, or inspiring the nation? "Propaganda benefits", you could say. We just really, really needed to prove that we could beat the Soviets.

    5. Re:That's not quite the point... by savuporo · · Score: 1

      Why US first went to the moon is largely irrelevant to why we ought to go. Yes, US went because of national prestige, competition with communists, ordered by a president who didnt give a shit about space, just beating the russians. But that doesnt mean that other countries couldnt come up for other, more productive uses for the Eighth Continent up there. Theres energy, theres raw materials that are controlled by very few entities on earth ( platinum group metals, Norilsk Nickel ), theres real estate. Im sure the chinese can come up with productive uses for lunar resources, just as long as they build their program in sustainable way, not breaking the bank with big freaking rockets or half-assed "reusables" like Space Shuttle.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    6. Re:That's not quite the point... by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What was the point of landing on the moon? Advancement of humanity, or inspiring the nation? "Propaganda benefits", you could say. We just really, really needed to prove that we could beat the Soviets.

      None of the above.

      The moon landing sent one message quite clearly:

      The US has the ability to fire a rocket at the moon with enough precision to land two men safely on it's surface, and not only that, but a rocket large enough to contain a smaller rocket which itself has enough precision and power to safely return those men to the earth. Consider what that implies about the size and precision of nuclear weapons delivery systems that the US also possesses.

      The People's Republic of China's main goal with their space program is, very likely, the Republic of China.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:That's not quite the point... by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

      They are doing this for their more distant future.

      Yeah, right! The Chinese are pumping tens of billions of dollars into their space program because it's a fantastic propaganda show, for their own citizens and for other third world countries they need to impress nowadays.

      Plus it also means their rockets can send huge payloads to literally *any* place on Earth. Example payloads: nukes.

      That's nothing bad per se, Americans and Soviets / Russians are doing it for decades already, but let's not kidd ourselves about the forward-looking wise Chinese.

      It's just business as usual, nothing more, nothing less.

      --
      Catalin Braescu
      Ofaly.com
    8. Re:That's not quite the point... by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      Plus it also means their rockets can send huge payloads to literally *any* place on Earth. Example payloads: nukes.

      Sorry, you are wrong. China has already been able to send ICBMs anywhere on Earth for decades: it's actually much easier to do this than to launch a satellite into orbit. And China has been able to do the latter for almost 40 years.

      The manned Shenzhou vehicles represent a quantum jump in China's space capability, but this has nothing to do with nuclear weapons.

    9. Re:That's not quite the point... by simonsleeper · · Score: 1

      Well, ironically, what you said here about China is exactly what the Chinese governmental propaganda says about US.

      I think it would be unwise for both of us to believe what these two governments said about each other.

      By the way, the "world domination" thing is sooooo cold-war-ish, and I almost mistakenly believed that you're quoting from the Soviet Ministry of Truth of last century, or some cartoon series.

    10. Re:That's not quite the point... by master_p · · Score: 1

      Dude, they only do this because China's population would be 10 billions in 200 years!!! they have to find another planet!!!

    11. Re:That's not quite the point... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      You gotta be kidding.

      Beijing could have nuked Taiwan if they wanted to decades ago. IIRC China had nukes in the 1960's. Do you think they planned to deliver the nukes by truck?

      Military action towards Taiwan in these days is seen as a last resort. An ever present threat, sure, but it's hilarious to think that the whole point of the space program is to send nukes to Taiwan.

      Taiwan is actually less than an hour flight from the South China's coasts. You need a space rocket for that?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    12. Re:That's not quite the point... by kcelery · · Score: 1

      Apart from from building the first Chinese restaurant there first, this could be the motivation behind the lunar exploration: http://www.asi.org/adb/02/09/he3-intro.html

    13. Re:That's not quite the point... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      They don't want to nuke Taiwan. The probably don't even want to nuke US.

      But they do want to absorb Taiwan, and discouraging outside support through the same kind of vague threats that saw us through the cold war with minimal casualties seems like a pretty logical move on their part.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    14. Re:That's not quite the point... by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      It is nice to see homo sapiens thinking long term about getting off this pale blue dot of ours, and not only thinking about it but taking active steps towards such a goal.

      Sure, sure, 'cos the Chinese are going to build (1,200,000,000 / 3 == three hundred million rockets and all go and live on the moon, where the corn grows as high as your head in a couple of weeks, the rains are always soft and refreshing and arrive on time, and the rivers so full of fish you can walk from one bank to the other on salmon.

      I swear, the thing that most pisses me off about hte average slashdotter is how quickly they abandon rational, informed discussion of science and engineering topics when it comes to manned spaceflight. "Ooh! ooh! moonships! Captain Kirk! I've got a laser gun, zap! zap! Look out, here come the aliens!" Grow up, for chrisake.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    15. Re:That's not quite the point... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Even without the space program China has a strong economic and military influence to discourage other countries to support Taiwan. Maybe it adds a small chip on the bargaining table, but it would be very insignificant.

      From my perspective it's less about another cold war, and more on "yes we can" for the Chinese. More of a nation building thing to boost confidence in the nation's "power", if you will.

      And of course, why would China want to nuke the US? You don't nuke your the largest customer... Besides, who doesn't like MacDonalds and KFC?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    16. Re:That's not quite the point... by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

      It just means BIGGER payload = more nukes more targets.

      --
      Catalin Braescu
      Ofaly.com
  16. You mean Taikonaut by OricAtmos48K · · Score: 1

    A chinese astronaut is called ...

    1. Re:You mean Taikonaut by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1

      The proper term is Tychonaut.

  17. They mean that the space walk is tomorrow! by itsybitsy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since they like to make announcements of upcoming events as if they already occurred it's likely that they really mean that the the space walk is happening tomorrow.

    1. Re:They mean that the space walk is tomorrow! by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      You...stole...my...post!

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  18. Jealousy, of course by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China is sending men into space. We are scrapping our only way of getting into space. Talk about progress...

  19. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Compulawyer · · Score: 1, Troll

    The same way the fireworks at the opening ceremonies of the Olympics were broadcast "live" ?

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  20. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by vertinox · · Score: 1

    Forgive my skepticism, but this is exactly the sort of thing that China commonly lies about.

    The fact they had a spacewalk or the fact they did it without loss of human life?

    Really, there is nothing gained long term if they lie about a space walk and frankly Soviets did it without lying. They could have, but so could the Americans about the moon.

    Secondly, it would be easier to send up a few people to die than actually fake it. Not to mention that anyone can intercept the signals they are broadcasting. Sure they could have sent up a video to broadcast from space, but if they are going to do that they just need to shove someone out into space and get home without incident.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  21. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by DavidD_CA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think it's that unusual for a press agency to write about events before they happen. They're expected to put out a release almost immediately to various wires (like AP), or they'll get scooped by other reporters and bloggers.

    I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt and suggest that they wrote the release as I would expect, and it somehow got out before it should have.

    You can also bet that both of our US Presidential candidates are already working on their acceptance speeches, and will have them completed days before the election even takes place. I'm sure their campaigns' press releases already have quotes in them, too.

    --
    -David
  22. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, like theres never been a press report of a major event that hasn't gone out accidentally before time? Like, say, the BBC News report of Building 7 collapsing several minutes before it actually did.....

    It was a fuckup, nothing more imho.

  23. Bah! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    It's CHINA! There are, like, a BILLION of them! They could get to the moon by standing on each others' shoulders!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Bah! by flewp · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is.... it's turtles all the way down, and Chinese all the way up? Interesting....

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  24. Nice! by JackassJedi · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/27/chinas-first-spacewalk-a-success-video/

    "Zhai lifted himself through the hatch and waved at the camera attached to the service module on the outside of the craft, with Earth looming overhead."

    "He then tried to take off the helmet for a 'nicer portrait shot'."

    (After the implosion of his body, another astronaut from the 344 person manned spacecraft was sent to replace him.)

    --
    Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
    1. Re:Nice! by Da+Cheez · · Score: 1

      http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/27/chinas-first-spacewalk-a-success-video/ (After the implosion of his body, another astronaut from the 344 person manned spacecraft was sent to replace him.)

      Implosion of his body? In a vacuum? Hmmmm... If anything it would explode. But that wouldn't happen either. There would probably just be unconsciousness, bloating, and boiling of some liquids in and on his body. He would then die if one of the other 344 astronauts didn't get him back into a pressurized area within 60 to 90 seconds.
      But there would be no implosion. Now if it had been an undersea, um, "seawalk" there may be implosion.

    2. Re:Nice! by JackassJedi · · Score: 1

      Woops yeah i meant EXplosion and yes i know it would be exaggerated!

      --
      Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
    3. Re:Nice! by Da+Cheez · · Score: 1

      Haha- I figured it was just a typo. But couldn't resist nitpicking. Anyway, I've always thought vacuum exposure sounds like a fun, erm, interesting way to die.

    4. Re:Nice! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "He then tried to take off the helmet for a 'nicer portrait shot'."

      (After the implosion of his body, another astronaut from the 344 person manned spacecraft was sent to replace him.)

      Implosion? I think you mean explosion, though I don't think the the pressures in the astronaut's body would be enough for even that.

    5. Re:Nice! by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      If you would take the pain to look it up on Wikipedia. You don't either implode or explode, your blood doesn't boil off, however saliva in your mouth evaporates. It apparently is safe for a few seconds, and doesn't cause any sort of lesions or anything, provided you don't try to forcibly retain air in your longs. If you stay there longer you just die of asphyxia. The way it was depicted in 2001 A Space Odyssey seemed pretty accurate, that is when HAL refused to open the bay doors..

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  25. Misread the name by Speare · · Score: 3, Funny
    I misread the name of the taikonaut.

    Chinese astronaut Zhang Ziyi successfully spent 18 minutes in a tethered spacewalk outside the spacecraft Shenzhou 7.

    My first thought, "that's pretty dangerous, in every movie she's been in, her clothes are ripped off suddenly and forcefully."

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  26. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i would have agreed with you when i first read that article yesterday, but i couldn't understand why the Chinese government would lie about a launch that they already spent so much time and money preparing for, and were clearly going to carry out.

    it wasn't until some other slashdotters remarked that this could have simply been a prepped news story, which is a common practice in mainstream media, and that the transcripts were probably holder text--still a bad idea i think, but at least understandable.

    and it should be noted that this time there was live video footage. and it would be a pretty stupid thing to try to fake a space mission. i mean, cheating in the olympics, or any other sports, is something that you can get away with (and i have no doubt that plenty of countries have gotten away with on many occasions), but faking a space mission is more along the lines of lying about achieving cold fusion. there's just simply no way you can deceive people about that for more than a few weeks or months at most. so unless they plan on being ridiculed by the world later, it would be a very stupid thing to do.

  27. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think it's something about announcing launches, with detailed transcripts of conversations, before they happen.

    If I am remembering correctly a news outlet in China published "accidentally," the story with a conversation transcript. While it is possible that that was exactly what was going to be published following the launch/spacewalk it could well have been a "template" for the real story to be published after the launch. China likes to script and practice things with meticulous detail prior to the actual "public" event. They're trying to prove to the world and themselves that they are worthy of attention as a global powerhouse and it starts for them by putting their best foot forward. They don't want mistakes and/or embarassments and this is their way of mitigating it.

    These folks have done in 10 years what has taken over 100 in the US in terms of industrialization and economics. Cut them a bit of slack... I'm grateful to the Chinese for their pursuit of space exploration. It provides healthy competition that has been lacking since the fall of the USSR. It may well be what is needed to get the money flowing back into NASA and instead of the likes of Blackwater and DoD more generally. Even if there's a bit of exageration--which may or may not be the case--it isn't as if we weren't doing the same thing to the Russians with our own space program.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  28. Long-term planning by Comboman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have to consider Asian, and especially East Asian thinking. They aren't like the west with its "profit immediately or forget about it" thinking.

    Riiiiight. Because putting melamine in milk powder and antifreeze in toothpaste isn't about immediate profits, it's a long-term strategy for building a trusted brand.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Long-term planning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And putting the mad into cows. Oops, that's a Western specialty.

      Face it, Western farmers didn't know what would happen from feeding sheeps' brains to cows. And Chinese manufacturers didn't know the consequences of spiking milk with melamine -- they thought they were improving the milk. You're just a hypocrite if you think only China makes fatal mistakes.

    2. Re:Long-term planning by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      This is a trick, a step in their long term strategy to make you think they are "profit immediately" type.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    3. Re:Long-term planning by S.O.B. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And Chinese manufacturers didn't know the consequences of spiking milk with melamine -- they thought they were improving the milk. You're just a hypocrite if you think only China makes fatal mistakes.

      Of course they knew exactly what they were doing. According to this article in April of 2007 from the New York Times it was an open "secret" that melamine could increase the appearance of protein in animal and human food products without adding any nutritional value.

      "Many companies buy melamine scrap to make animal feed, such as fish feed," said Ji Denghui, general manager of the Fujian Sanming Dinghui Chemical Company, which sells melamine. "I don't know if there's a regulation on it. Probably not. No law or regulation says 'don't do it,' so everyone's doing it. The laws in China are like that, aren't they? If there's no accident, there won't be any regulation."

      I'm amazed at how many apologists there are for these violations of public health by Chinese businesses and the lack of oversight by the Chinese government, a government that has no accountability to anyone. And because of how much China exports these corrupt business practices affect the health of people outside their borders.

      I for one try, as much as possible, to avoid any products that come from China because I have no idea what I'm getting.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    4. Re:Long-term planning by S.O.B. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And my point was that unlike western farmers feeding sheep brains to cows, Chinese manufacturers did know at least by early 2007 that melamine was dangerous. I know this is Slashdot and you're only an AC but did you even try to take two minutes to read the article that I posted the link for. If you did you would see it is clear that Chinese manufacturers were absolutely, 100% aware of exactly what they were doing.

      Also, if you took the time to read the article you would see there was harm and foul in early 2007. So why has the Chinese government done nothing about it? Because they are not accountable to anyone. You see in a democracy us "westerners", as you put it, have a way to make our governments do what is right. It doesn't always work but it's better than communist elites that live a life of luxury without having to answer to anyone.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    5. Re:Long-term planning by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      The effects of melamine on health have been known for a long time. That's why it was so easy to point fingers once the first babies got kidney stones (and then died).

      You know, it's not only the melamine in milk and dairy products. It's alos the cheap, lead-containing paint on toys, tainted toothpaste and other such chinese shite.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    6. Re:Long-term planning by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Troll?

      I don't know where you're from, AC dude. But not even the press in China claims that the manufacturers didn't know the effects of melamine when added to milk.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    7. Re:Long-term planning by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Can't say I know anything about food science, but isn't it shady practice to put dubious substances into food? I don't know whether they knew the exact effects of adding melamine to milk, but aren't there things called food safety regulations (which actually exist even in China) that forbids people to add random chemicals to food?

      Obviously greed. Ignorance? I think not...

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    8. Re:Long-term planning by Tesen · · Score: 1

      He is a dick for avoiding products from China? Or is he using his god damn right to decide where to purchase his products from? I agree, you are a dick. Get a clue.

    9. Re:Long-term planning by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      According to Wikipedia, Melamine by itself is nontoxic in low doses. The milk packagers probably assumed it would be safe. The fatal interaction with cyanuric acid was detected only last year, when pets started dying from kidney stones.

      It would have been silly to ban melamine merely because it might have been poisonous at high dosage. Lots of useful and commonly ingested substances are similarly safe when the concentration is low but become fatal when the concentration increases. Oxygen, for example: a partial pressure of 1 bar of pure O2 would kill you. Feel free to ban oxygen from your intake.

    10. Re:Long-term planning by eli+pabst · · Score: 1

      And Chinese manufacturers didn't know the consequences of spiking milk with melamine

      You don't think that massive recall of melamine-spiked pet food that killed all those dogs in 2007 might have been a tip off?

    11. Re:Long-term planning by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      I understand where you come from, and I can accept that maybe the manufacturers didn't know it could be *that* bad.

      But isn't adding some dubious "somewhat toxic, we-don't-know-what-exactly-it-does" substance just to fool quality tests more than just stupidity?

      I bet the persons in the know wouldn't drink that stuff they produced.

      Besides, if you look at the "chronic toxicity" part, the 1953 report on dogs is telling. Kidney problems, precisely. Of course they wouldn't have much studies on its effects on people, since you don't tell people to eat toxic substances just to see what happens.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    12. Re:Long-term planning by ViVeLaMe · · Score: 1

      Wait, i thought regulations were "baaaaad, m'kay?"?

      --
      i had a sig, once..
  29. Obviously a fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Check out the video

    The cut to the long shot at the end with the guy clearly dangling from wires is hilarious! Like a bad pantomime.

  30. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    Hey, I am not suggesting that you blindly trust the Chinese government to tell the truth.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  31. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

    Forgive my skepticism, but this is exactly the sort of thing that China commonly lies about.

    Finally conspiracy tards will be satisfied, there really will be a faked moon landing.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  32. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just try not to kill everyone on the planet when you do it, mmmkay?

  33. American Presidential Election Results...? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    . . . so I guess I won't have to stay up on election night waiting for the results . . .

    That site will have them a week in advance . . . yoo-hoo!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  34. er ... cough, cough ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think it's something about announcing launches, with detailed transcripts of conversations, before they happen. Sending underage athletes to international events, swearing they're of age even after evidence is found that they're not. Sadly, the list goes on and on.

    At some point, distrust and skepticism becomes the norm.

    Your point is well taken that all governments lie, and necessarily so. Some governments lie a lot about things that don't seem worth lying about.

    I think it's something about announcing imminent danger and WMD's, with detailed descriptions and sworn statements, when they don't exist. Sending armies to make war under false pretenses, swearing that enormous threats exist even after zero evidence is found that they exist. Tragically, the list goes on and on.

    At some point, distrust and skepticism becomes the norm.

    Your point is well taken that all governments lie. Some governments lie a lot about things that then cause a lot of unnecessary death, misery and anguish for others.

    Still, their people get to keep driving Hummers, so that makes it OK, right?

  35. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

    so unless they plan on being ridiculed by the world later, it would be a very stupid thing to do.

    Exactly. I am still amazed by the people here who think the Chinese government could be that stupid on a national scale.

    Even the Bush administration isn't that crazy.

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
  36. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by sycotic · · Score: 1

    Surely someone can get out a telescope and see if there is a little man floating around in the sky?

    --
    -- If I were a fish, I'd be wet
  37. Old News by BobandMax · · Score: 1

    This is old, I read about it before it happened.

    --

    "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
    -- Pablo Picasso
  38. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

    Given that China is emerging as a new player in space technology, the USA is probably watching the event closely. Ask them.

    But then, this is exactly the sort of thing that US government lies about ;-p (other countries having threatening technology that could be applied for military use)

    Seriously, when has China lied about space missions?

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
  39. it is the same business by hackingbear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While they can make up whatever high goals -- to boost nationalism, to save the world, or whatever -- the entire execution is contingent on money and profits. China is a highly profit-driven place; a lot more than rich places. Companies have to see profits to do the tasks. And just like the U.S. and everywhere else in the world, China has to face the hurdle of creating job opportunities. Huge projects like these can save thousands jobs in their defunct state-owned factories. They also need to absorbs millions of college graduates every single year. Along the lines, officials also need to use these opportunities to take bribes to profit themselves.

    That's exactly what happen in the U.S.: many companies need NASA projects for which they will hire thousands of people. Think about the scenario of laying off all the workers for the Shuttle program. Along the line, the politicians need to get donations.

    So while pride and nationalism may play a role, these are largely about business and money.

  40. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by calmofthestorm · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Bush administration did fake the Iraq war to scare Americans into voting Democratic. I am so sick of these liberal ploys to take over the white house.

    --
    93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
  41. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    And there is only a faked laser reflector on the moon too.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  42. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by freya_bacchus · · Score: 5, Funny

    china faked a spacewalk and the US faked a moonlanding, US still ahead

    Nothing to see here...

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity!
  43. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by zoogies · · Score: 1

    Why is this modded troll?

    Seriously, guys.

  44. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by zoogies · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You mean the fireworks that actually happened? How much do you know about your supposed fake fireworks anyway?

  45. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by CWRUisTakingMyMoney · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To clarify (and agree), the fireworks depicted during the opening ceremony did in fact go off as shown. The actual footage everyone saw, unless they were in Beijing, was a computer-rendered simulation of the same fireworks. The reason they were animated for broadcast is that the shot shown of the fireworks would have been at best difficult and dangerous, and at worst impossible, to do for real and live. I don't really see the big deal for this; it's basically some special effects showing an angle that couldn't otherwise be shown. It's like all the news networks doing a story about West Bumfuck, Iowa, and using Google Earth to do a fairly nifty zoom-in-from-orbit effect because that obviously can't be done for real. But nobody screams at CNN for that. Of course, that being said, I don't exactly give China the benefit of the doubt for things they have a real motive to lie about, like space missions.

    --
    Those who anthropomorphize science and/or nature already believe in an intelligent designer.
  46. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by colmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well... except there are a lot of countries out there (ours very much included) with lots of technology watching the sky. I would *think* that if you wanted to fake something in Space, you'd need to have NASA complicit in your hoax. I kind of doubt that happened.

    I'm skeptical of China too. But, I love space. Congrats guys, amazing accomplishment.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  47. Yeah, but... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but... is it for real?????

  48. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    If the Canadian government announced they had landed on the moon, I would likely not believe that. China, well, it's not particularly surprising they were able to put a man in orbit. Almost a non-event.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  49. Chinese space-wear fashion by MavEtJu · · Score: 1


    In addition to proving China's ability to maneuver in space, the spacewalk showed that China can produce reliable and safe space equipment. During his space venture, Zhai wore a new Chinese-built spacesuit, dubbed Feitian (Chinese for "fly the sky").

    The suit, which reportedly cost 30 million yuan (about $4.4 million), did its job protecting Zhai from the harsh temperatures and radiation of space. It has 10 layers of insulation, weighs about 265 pounds (120 kg), and takes up to 15 hours to assemble and put on, the official Chinese news agency Xinhua reported.

    15 hours to assemble and put on, let's hope they don't need it in case of an emergency!

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  50. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

    wag the dog?

  51. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 2, Funny

    More importantly, because just recently, China announced the exactly same story http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/25/2145209 [slashdot.org] *before* they had even *launched*...

    So you are saying the Chinese pulled a dupe?

  52. Congrats by S-100 · · Score: 1, Troll

    The Chinese deserve due credit for their achievements, in space. However, their government lacks any kind of credibility and that diminishes what has been accomplished.

    It took them 40 years to catch up with the other superpowers in accomplishing this spacewalk, which should serve to amplify the effects of their oppressive regime and communist philosophy overall.

    The Chinese news agency will fabricate whatever suits them, so any narrative going along with this accomplishment should be ignored. Their Olympics wowed us with their faked opening ceremony, underage athletes supported with government-supplied cover stories, biased judging and who knows what else that went undetected.

    How much slave labor is used in their space program is unknown. How much stolen and misappropriated technology they've used is unknown. How many people that were sickened, injured or killed by the hazardous materials and working conditions prevalent in their space program is unknown. But we already know that the authoritarian state of China would forbid dissemination of this information, and we know that there's no reason to believe that these kinds of sufferings of their people have not ceased. This is what tempers our enthusiasm for their achievement.

    1. Re:Congrats by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Normally I wouldn't label somebody as a hypocrite so easily. But then....

      The Chinese deserve due credit for their achievements, in space. However, their government lacks any kind of credibility and that diminishes what has been accomplished.

      They either did it, or they didn't. Which?

      It took them 40 years to catch up with the other superpowers in accomplishing this spacewalk, which should serve to amplify the effects of their oppressive regime and communist philosophy overall.

      "We got here first"?

      The Chinese news agency will fabricate whatever suits them, so any narrative going along with this accomplishment should be ignored. Their Olympics wowed us with their faked opening ceremony, underage athletes supported with government-supplied cover stories, biased judging and who knows what else that went undetected.

      "We lost the Olympics, you must have been cheating"

      How much slave labor is used in their space program is unknown. How much stolen and misappropriated technology they've used is unknown. How many people that were sickened, injured or killed by the hazardous materials and working conditions prevalent in their space program is unknown.

      "You got into space (just like us), there must be something afoul here (you can't be that good!)"

      Man, if you're giving "due credit" with so many reservations you might as well shut up and flame the Chinese government like all the other posters here.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    2. Re:Congrats by S-100 · · Score: 1

      I guess all you can understand is a tirade, but that's not what I presented. I made a distinction between the people responsible for their technical achievement and those in the government that control communications. Maybe you'd be happier if I just lumped everyone together and called them all "chinks".

      As for the Olympics, don't you find it statistically interesting that the host country did so well? It's not about "winning" even though the USA did win more medals than China. I've been on the planet long enough to have seen quite a few Olympic competitions, and this one was chilling. The media was in fear of being ejected or excluded from coverage so the on-site commentary had blinders on. The pre-teen Chinese gymnasts were just the tip of the iceberg in an Olympics where the host country would do whatever needed to be done to win - it was their national imperative.

      Our early satellite program was conducted by non-military groups, which were quickly surpassed by the Army group which had the assistance of the German scientists which surrendered to the USA at the end of WW II. Eisenhower wanted our first orbital satellite to be a non-military project, which is why we were second into orbit. But after the formation of NASA, the Von Braun team was integrated into this non-military agency. So it's clear from our own well-documented history that the USA did not succeed as it did completely on its own. Our triumphs were disclosed as well as the failures. And while the worker safety and environmental standards of the day are not as stringent as they are today, the USA space program was run pretty much as any other industrial project. With the exception of the astronauts themselves, no human lives were unduly risked. Can anyone that knows anything about China say the same?

    3. Re:Congrats by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      (Note: I'm not the AC ;-p)

      I'm too lazy to find the actual statistics, but I Read On The Internet Somewhere (probably on Digg) that the number of gold medals China has won for the past few olympics have been rising steadily, and if interpolated would mean that China would surpass the US on the medal count. This was before the games started.

      As for the failures, the time (2003) when they sent a man into space (as opposed to machines and satellites), there was a recap here (Hong Kong) about the history of China's space programs. I recall it mentioned a rough beginning where some of the attempts to send spaceships into orbit failed. Of course you wouldn't have heard about that because it wasn't news for you.

      And please, you *think* you're criticizing the Chinese government, but I really don't see how you're just targeting the "government". "it was their national imperative"? I'm not going to defend the age of the gymnast -- I personally don't think there was a need to fake her age, but that's besides the point as there are bad apples everywhere (which country hasn't had an athelete who got caught taking drugs) -- It isn't the national imperative of China to cheat to win.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    4. Re:Congrats by S-100 · · Score: 1

      The Chinese deserve due credit for their achievements, in space. However, their government lacks any kind of credibility and that diminishes what has been accomplished. It took them 40 years to catch up with the other superpowers in accomplishing this spacewalk, which should serve to amplify the effects of their oppressive regime and communist philosophy overall. The Chinese news agency will fabricate whatever suits them, so any narrative going along with this accomplishment should be ignored. Their Olympics wowed us with their faked opening ceremony, underage athletes supported with government-supplied cover stories, biased judging and who knows what else that went undetected. How much slave labor is used in their space program is unknown. How much stolen and misappropriated technology they've used is unknown. How many people that were sickened, injured or killed by the hazardous materials and working conditions prevalent in their space program is unknown. But we already know that the authoritarian state of China would forbid dissemination of this information, and we know that there's no reason to believe that these kinds of sufferings of their people have not ceased. This is what tempers our enthusiasm for their achievement.

      This gets modded Troll?

  53. Space renaissance by Unsung+Bovine+Herd · · Score: 1

    This is almost old hat for Russian and American astronauts (or cosmonauts or whatever). Any country could work with those two space programs and complete a space walk on their own. I wouldn't be surprised if the ESA has already done this as well and I just haven't heard of it. In other words, the third or fourth country doing this isn't a great step forward for all humankind, it's one more country catching up to where other countries were decades ago.

    The early Renaissance was old hat to the ancient Romans. But the Europeans had to make that first step back to the level of technology and culture enjoyed by their ancestors, or they would have been stuck in the Dark Ages. Think of the Chinese space effort as a complement to the venture capital-funded new space economy of (mainly) the US. Most of the technology used by these small space companies are just mash-ups of old pre-Apollo technology. Yes, sometimes it's necessary to reinvent the wheel. Sometimes not just once, but many times over.

  54. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by pbhj · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    These folks have done in 10 years what has taken over 100 in the US in terms of industrialization and economics. Cut them a bit of slack...

    Turned from a proud and upright nation into a nation run by capitalists swine that couldn't care less how many people they trample so long as they get more money than everyone else? ... No not that one? Oops, sorry.

  55. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by pbhj · · Score: 1

    Check Google "orbit view" on Google Sky ... I think he was scratching his balls at the time.

  56. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by AoT · · Score: 1

    We do that in the U.S. as well. The last few years I've read a story on yahoo news about what the president said (past tense) in the State of the Union Address, the morning of the day it is going to take place. You see speeches leaked regularly, almost always from the Bush administration, less from senate and house politician.

    And seriously, why do the taikonauts get cooler spacesuits than the American astronauts?

  57. Re:Ah, the joys of Imperialism. by Wonderkid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting. And a good reason for races to inter procreate. Let's mix it up and save ourselves from domination by one specific (possibly evil) gene type.

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

  58. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by AoT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That sounds somehow familiar.

  59. China feeds our greed; cf child slaves in W.Africa by pbhj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And because of how much China exports these corrupt business practices affect the health of people outside their borders.

    I for one try, as much as possible, to avoid any products that come from China because I have no idea what I'm getting.

    You know what. China is serving global demand. Global business demands profit at all and any cost. Consumers don't care who sewed their shirts, that those people despite working hard can't afford healthcare and education.

    They say "don't care was made to care". Well the developed nations have sown the seed of their contempt for the humanity of the people of those manufacturing nations by not caring except about price. Now we're beginning to reap what we have sown.

    You've all heard of companies using child/slave labour. Clothing manufacturers, computer makers. Much of the worlds chocolate supplies are tainted with slavery #1 ... none of these companies go out of business.

    But now our constant drive for the bottom line is affecting the health of our home nations, now will we sit up and say no to globalised exploitation?

    ---
    #1 about 50% of cocoa comes from West Africa (Ivory Coast, Ghana, Mali) where child slavery (abduction of children to work for no money) was considered widespread in 2001/2002. I have never seen any reports of a solution to this problem. See eg, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/1963617.stm http://www.365act.com/actions/2.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/apr/19/globalisation.benstafford;

    Other sources http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_exploitation_in_the_chocolate_industry particularly http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/24/news/international/chocolate_bittersweet.fortune/ (read that one if nothing else).

  60. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by TheSambassador · · Score: 1

    HA! This coming from someone who's probably from America. Everyone knows we faked the moon landing...

  61. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    and it should be noted that this time there was live video footage.

    Like the Olympics? Yeah, I'll wait for confirmation from NASA or similar. Surely international organizations were monitoring this pretty closely.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  62. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by khallow · · Score: 1

    it wasn't until some other slashdotters remarked that this could have simply been a prepped news story, which is a common practice in mainstream media, and that the transcripts were probably holder text--still a bad idea i think, but at least understandable.

    I figured that was what was going on. A real classy thing for the voice of the State to be doing, but not as dumb as the alternatives. But who knows, maybe someone over there with a bit of power is that stupid. You don't need to whole government in on the act.

  63. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by ljgshkg · · Score: 1

    The space walk was actually not the main point of this mission. The actual reason of the guy doing this space walk is to take back two experiments (container, I think) from outside in which these results will be used for their next mission. The space walk is, well, a symbolic thing that's really not the main point. Their scientist actually say that the general public and medias mistakenly identify this space walk as the main point. But it's actually not because Russia and USA etc. already carried out a few hundred of these missions anyway.

  64. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure, nasa will certainly be able to detect your craft and work out it's approximate size but I'm not so sure they would be able to tell if for example a spacewalk had really been performed or if that was just video footage prepared in a faking lab and sent up with the spaceship. Hell I don't even see how they can tell for sure if there are live humans on board.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  65. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

    And if he claims tomorrow that he won the election you're more than welcome to have a few doubts.

  66. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by GweeDo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "These folks have done in 10 years what has taken over 100 in the US in terms of industrialization and economics."

    They bought a capsule design from Russia (and modified it to their needs) and then designed their own EVA suit. I think from 1959-1969 we pulled off a bit more than that.

  67. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by ljgshkg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, and it's actually not a space walk. He actually use his hands to hold the handles on the ship to move towards the target. So it's really not a walk at all.

  68. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i think most people recognize that. it's a pretty ethnocentric attitude to think that only the U.S. can conduct legitimate space research and everything China does must have an ulterior motive behind it. of course, if you see China as the enemy, then you can't concede to the fact that they might be genuinely interested in space exploration or recognize any achievements by the Chinese people.

    it's really saying that we can be proud of our own space program, but China can't be proud of theirs. frankly, i think the more countries venture into space, the closer humanity as a whole gets to the possibility of space colonization. so who cares what flag is sewn onto their uniform? the are far worse things to spend time and resources on than space exploration.

  69. In my best Ben Stein voice by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    Wow

  70. +5 Insightful to -1 Flamebait to +5 Insightful by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

    Just figured I'd comment that my post here has seen a heck of a ride.

    Metamoderators, you paying attention?

  71. Film is good enough for me by tresriogrande · · Score: 1

    There is film released in 2002, which was filmed on film, not digital, and talks about the girl in question could be a international start at age 10. The medias conveniently don't mention that.

  72. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by tmach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As someone who writes a lot of those news stories (on the local, not national level) I can attest to the fact that sometimes generic scripts are pre-written, with details to be filled in later. Usually they're for events that happen in pretty much the same way every year (parades or festivals, stuff like that). However, I doubt the Chinese launch article was one of those. It reportedly included detailed dialogue between astronauts and the ground. For obvious reasons, you don't include detailed quotes in a pre-written "skeleton" script or article.

  73. DUPE! by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    Oh wait, nevermind. That was just the Chinese government posting it a day before it happened...

  74. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
    I would *think* that if you wanted to fake something in Space, you'd need to have NASA complicit in your hoax.

    Dept. of Defense would have to be included in the conspiracy too, since they have *much* more money and assets in space than NASA.

  75. Space Wok? by gemada · · Score: 1

    couldn't resist.....

  76. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    If this were any other subject, i'd take it as a joke, but when I read your post the image of a Chinese military offical on the other end pops into my head.

  77. wake up time by steveneo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Honestly, I gradually believe Chinese politic system is not very bad. See US can elect Bush, the liar, stupid ever person. See US critic always discussed chinese financial system is in dangerous. but the fact is not always like most so-call democratic oriented expected... it is time to wake up...

    1. Re:wake up time by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      No system is invincible. What matters are the quality of the people.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  78. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's that unusual for a press agency to write about events before they happen. They're expected to put out a release almost immediately to various wires (like AP), or they'll get scooped by other reporters and bloggers.

    Horsehit. Reporters and bloggers, and the AP, get this kind of information from the press agencies.
     
     

    I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt and suggest that they wrote the release as I would expect, and it somehow got out before it should have.

    Horseshit again. This wasn't a press release, but a complete and detailed article including descriptions of events and air to ground dialogue that had not happened yet.

  79. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Like2Byte · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Press releases....sure. Transcripts!?

    You're joking, right?

    A press release for a successful mission would read like, "The People's Republic Of China successfully inserted their latest spaceship into LEO."

    If it's circulated after the event it's non-fiction - provided the ship didn't actually burn on the launch pad. If it's circulated *before* the event has taken place it's called fiction....or, dare I say, propaganda. See the difference?

    As far as the transcripts go, I take it with a grain of salt. China is so in the habit of blatantly attempting to make their shit smell like roses that their roses now remind me of cow manure. You guessed it, I'm totally mistrustful and very skeptical towards any Chinese press release.

    As for your example of acceptance speeches for the two US Presidential Candidates...If either one of them released their acceptance speech before they we're elected, they'd be laughed off the ticket. That being said, any prepared entity(person/business/Gov't) makes preparations for eventualities. Releasing them early plays very well into propaganda stratagems - therefore, free thinkers are more inclined to question the motives behind the press release and question the validity of any future press releases.

  80. Beijing Evening News, perhaps? by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    Let me guess, it was the Beijing Evening News, right?

  81. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    Forgive my skepticism, but this is exactly the sort of thing that China commonly lies about.

    No it's not. China lies about internal dissent and such when it's embarrassing. They don't make up achievements out of whole cloth. (Not since the era of Chairman Mao, anyway. If you go back 50 years to the Great Leap Forward, there was a lot of bullshit propaganda. Not so much now, they know they couldn't get away with it.)

    Are there any sources of information on the validity of this that aren't controlled by the Chinese government, that verify their claims?

    Look up in the sky with a telescope. I'm sure that the military authorites of dozens of countries monitored the launch and orbit. You think they would all go along with China if it was fake?

    Yeah, so no one knows if they REALLY did a spacewalk. That's pretty trivial compared to getting them in orbit, no real reason to fake that. Thay use a Russian spacesuit, thay certainly work.

  82. Obligatory Titan Reference by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    In other news, the next manned mission is to rendezvous with an asteroid on track for a near collision with earth.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  83. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Jzanu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Reading comprehension please. Industrial development is the subject here. The United State did not launch into space in 1860 much less 1830 or so did it? That is the point here. China has gone from backward agricultural slaves for European Empires to having a space program in a very short time frame.

  84. Get your facts straight by damburger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am seeing a lot of uninformed, and often racist, sentiment regarding this. Here are the facts.

    1. This is not a Russian capsule. The three module shape is dictated by the principles of capsule design in general, not by China simply buying a set of blueprints
    2. They are not moving that slowly, they are simply being economical with the number of missions they fly. It took Russia and the US 4 years to get from men in space to spacewalks, it has taken China 5 years.
    3. Their spending money on this whilst there are *gasp* still poor people on China is not something that can be criticised from a country bailing out wall street whilst letting the poor rot. At least Chinese people will eventually benefit from space technology. Who will benefit from bankers being insulated from the consequences of their actions? Everywhere has inequality. No reason to crucify China specifically for it.
    4. Shenzhou is the most technologically advanced manned spacecraft flying. The Shuttle has more capability but it is nearing the end of its life and when it retires, Americans better get used to play to second fiddle to China for a while.
    5. Being racist makes you a dick. Chinese people are just as capable of this as you are.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:Get your facts straight by Transcendz · · Score: 1

      I can't see anything being racist when it comes to criticize a political regime, not their people. Of course, this spacewalk is something great for the chinese in terms of technology and power. But I think that people are now educated to the fact that space is a great place for propaganda, and that lunar manned missions didn't give that much information about space, satellites or planets, but a lot more about who had to do it.

      --
      --/ TZ /--
    2. Re:Get your facts straight by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      Very good points!!!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    3. Re:Get your facts straight by damburger · · Score: 1

      It isn't racist to criticise the PRC, its just a bit dumb when you look at what they are achieving with what is still really a developing economy.

      Yeah, they suck balls on human rights, but human rights don't pay the bills

      Chinese people seem genuinely interested in their space programme (admittedly this is from someone who has never set foot in China) - national pride on this level isn't something to be sniffed at. China isn't looking to best the US just yet, they are just looking to get some political capital and motivate their population by showing they can equal the achievements of the leading nation - and in that they have been 100% successful.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    4. Re:Get your facts straight by orcrist · · Score: 1

      I am seeing a lot of uninformed, and often racist, sentiment regarding this. Here are the facts.

      Please show/link/quote just one single racist post. Preferably not one which has been moderated to oblivion.

      1. This is not a Russian capsule. The three module shape is dictated by the principles of capsule design in general, not by China simply buying a set of blueprints
      2. They are not moving that slowly, they are simply being economical with the number of missions they fly. It took Russia and the US 4 years to get from men in space to spacewalks, it has taken China 5 years.
      3. Their spending money on this whilst there are *gasp* still poor people on China is not something that can be criticised from a country bailing out wall street whilst letting the poor rot. At least Chinese people will eventually benefit from space technology. Who will benefit from bankers being insulated from the consequences of their actions? Everywhere has inequality. No reason to crucify China specifically for it.
      4. Shenzhou is the most technologically advanced manned spacecraft flying. The Shuttle has more capability but it is nearing the end of its life and when it retires, Americans better get used to play to second fiddle to China for a while.
      5. Being racist makes you a dick. Chinese people are just as capable of this as you are.

      1. ok
      2. ok
      3. non sequitur - but if you don't understand the current situation, at least take a look at the history of the great depression and tell me if the only people suffering were bankers... This bail-out is meant to prevent a scenario like that.
      4. Americans have been second fiddle in a bunch of categories to a whole slew of countries -- most particularly in western Europe -- for ages and most Americans haven't even noticed. That said, let me know when America really is second fiddle to China in any category which truly matters. And, no, GDP growth is not such a category, unless you consider Azerbaijan, Bhutan, or Angola (the current leaders in that category) to be countries to which China is playing second fiddle.
      5. Again, show a racist post or STFU. Being a reactionary who shouts "racist!" at any critique equally makes you a dick since it minimizes the problem of real racism. It's like crying wolf.

      And yes, as my sig indicates, I am a liberal from the SF Bay Area, but I have one large area of disagreement with typical liberal views:

      I just do not understand how someone can criticize the U.S. human rights record (quite rightly), and then turn around and defend countries with significantly *worse* human rights records as if only an intolerant/racist asshole would criticize them.

      The fact of the matter is, as bad as the U.S. has been, and as bad as the U.S. has gotten, it has a bit of a ways to go before it sinks to the level of human rights China has *risen* to. Call me when China has done a turn-around on the level of what Germany has done since WW II. Now *there's* a country which made huge leaps in human rights from a facist, racist, genocidal country to one which is a model of human rights compared to most countries.

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  85. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by wisty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Space travel is pretty old. All it really takes now is good engineering, and a lot of money. China may still be stifling innovation with central planning, but it is a lot better than the USSR in the days of Sputnik and Yuri Gargarin. If China says they can send a man into space, I really don't care to doubt them. The zero-carbon city they are building is a lot more interesting.

  86. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by terryducks · · Score: 1

    I think that it's a fantastic accomplishment. Making it and buying it are two very different things. Yes they've modified it and that takes expertise but if I buy a diesel submarine and modify it does that mean I can produce another one with out buying the platform ?

  87. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But then again they didn't have to invent industrialization first, they could buy industrial stuff from many suppliers. It's a bit like flying from Spain to the US and saying you're better than the discoverers because it was faster.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  88. Just a cover-up by Myraq · · Score: 1

    If it were true, China is just disclosing this information while they are setting up a military base on the moon... With tools that are "Made in China"

  89. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    So the European union is beefing up their science, and China now has a get it done attitude. Who are we to criticize. We should be way ahead.

  90. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by KreAture · · Score: 1

    The problem with China as I see it, is that they reherse, prepare and pre-approve of everything that is to be said , done or published. This boils down to one thing: They do not trust the people entrusted with saying, doing or publishing. In short, they do not trust their people.

    Other countrys have it like this too, but they still have to trust their people in the end.
    If a news reporter has read the script 3 times, but decides to say: "This has been the news, and I'm a little teapot." at the end of his segment, then nobody in their right mind would blame his country for that. Grow up! People are teapots!

  91. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by trout007 · · Score: 1

    I work in the space industry. Lack of funds is not the problem. The problem is lack of leadership. NASA has a budget of around $16 Billion a year. That's a lot of money. It could be spend a lot better with proper leadership. But as with all government projects there is way too much waste. I'd say you could reduce the workforce by 1/2 and not effect the people actually doing the work. It seems 1/2 of the money is spent tracking where the other 1/2 is going. What the bean counters don't understand is that most of the technical people are space geeks. We spend hours at home and off the clock thinking and working out problems. I've spend my own money to order parts and get them in next day for a project as opposed to waiting weeks for procurment to plod along. I've painted things at home with Krylon because to do it on the center you would need to use paint specs and certified contractors. We do it because we love human space flight. I could get paid a lot more working in another field but the benefits of working with the hardware we get to work with is worth the difference. And for those that say "It's not rocket science". Actually rocket science isn't that hard anymore. Most of it has been figured out. It is now a matter of good management and practical engineering.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  92. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

    Space colonization? Don't be absurd. When we've colonised the bottom of the Atlantic and the Gobi Desert, I'll be a little less sceptical. Until then, save it for the convention.

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  93. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

    It may well be what is needed to get the money flowing back into NASA and instead of the likes of Blackwater and DoD more generally

    Not in America, not until you've paid off a trillion-dollar war debt and the same again in subsidies for those tens of millions of people living in those insanely over-priced cardboard boxes you call "houses" over there.

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  94. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

    That is why China, and Russia, and Venezuela, and Iran, and North Korea and all the other countries you invaded and explored are getting together for the day that we going to destroy your pathetic country and take our revenge!

    Boy, that's SOME COALITION you got there.

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  95. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    These folks have done in 10 years what has taken over 100 in the US in terms of industrialization and economics

    Easily said with the help of reverse engineering rather than invention. China has an old history going back hundreds and thousands of years, but now the government is looking around and letting people catch up. Once the people catch up, the government's power is far reduced so it takes a braver government to trust the people to take the country into the future.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  96. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

    America faked an economic boom, too.

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  97. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by ianalis · · Score: 1

    Hanlon's razor:
    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

  98. Congratulations are in order by ozarkcanoer · · Score: 1

    I think it is significant and praise-worthy that the Chinese have reached this milestone and we can hope there are more in the future. Near-space is important to mankind to develop technology for future long distance missions to the planets and asteroids and for perhaps building power-sats for beamed power from orbit to earth and eventual elevators to reduce the cost of lifting mass from the surface to low orbit. We should encourage the Chinese and perhaps get them to join in the International Space Station project as well.

  99. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by moniker127 · · Score: 1

    The reason we are skeptical is because they announced that it was a success before it was launched the other day. The report they filed included conversations by the astronauts, but the mission hadnt even been launched yet. They quickly took the report down, but it made it to slashdot before they did.

    We arent skeptical for any racially charged reasons.

  100. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "These folks have done in 10 years what has taken over 100 in the US in terms of industrialization and economics."

    Are you truly that stupid or are you chinese? Technology has changed by leaps and bounds when the US did it over 30 years ago. Plus the US did it purely from their intelligence and work, not based on stolen technologies and ideas that came from spying scientists sent to foreign countries to steal some more.

  101. Re:China feeds our greed; cf child slaves in W.Afr by gregbot9000 · · Score: 1

    Well you see health care isn't a right, hells it's not even a privilege, it's a straight luxury. So is having your own bedroom, or even bed.While working a sweat shops sucks no one forces them to, it's just the best option available and consumers can't be held accountable for lack of better options. That doesn't include situations where better options are forbidden through slavery, legislation (like the chines "black" people), caste systems, or emigration restrictions which should be slapped down.

    Every thing I have ever read about trade liberalization shows that it is pareto-efficient, that is, Both sides win. The US gets things cheaper and other countries get jobs that pay more then substance farming. If you mandate through legislation that the cost to use their labor goes up guess what happens? investment leaves. Thats not some crazy republican lie, thats fact and has happened several times. Mandating through law that you get paid more then your work is worth doesn't make it worth more. Many goods can be made in the states by low labor machines but it is cheaper to use low tech labor intensive processes over seas because labor is cheaper, if you increase the cost of their labor without increasing its value you have a problem.

    The Japs knew this and spent considerable effort to create high value labor when they industrialized. The reason a western laborer gets more things like cars appliances and health care is because our labor is really valuable and it is cost effective to invest expensive medical treatment to double our productive lives or cars to allow more time savings.

    I care very deeply for the poor in the sweet shops, and wish there was a way to help them out that didn't take self-determinism on their part and generations to accomplish. I just know that nothing comes free. They are screwed, and flawed socialist policy or heavy handed western intervention has always failed. sometimes the best thing to do with a painful wound is stop picking at it.

  102. Re:*When* they do something bad? by samsamsamj · · Score: 1

    How many times do I have to say? It's the economy, stupid.

    Since when the former slave traders become such kind-hearted patronages? When your country sits on the sidelines watching the Africans starved to death, or sets unacceptable political conditions for every cent's aid, China at least sends in investments and builds the factories and roads.

    In the 1980s China first opened up its own country for the west to exploit. We didn't complain about the low pay. We tighten our belt and save every penny we can to build our country. The Africans can too, and China is giving them a chance.

    If you're not doing anything better than this, please don't get in the way.

  103. Re:China feeds our greed; cf child slaves in W.Afr by pbhj · · Score: 1

    Many goods can be made in the states by low labor machines but it is cheaper to use low tech labor intensive processes over seas because labor is cheaper, if you increase the cost of their labor without increasing its value you have a problem.

    And you support that position?

    Do you know what else is cheaper, harvesting organs and bloods from live subjects rather than waiting for donors or using synthetic replacements. The only difference is how quick you kill the people who are serving your needs.

    I never said healthcare was a right but the compassion we share for fellow humans should be such that we feel bound to provide basic healthcare and education for low-paid workers.

    If you mandate through legislation that the cost to use their labor goes up guess what happens?

    That depends on how you meet the cost. Fairtrade chocolate and coffee are not appreciably more costly at the POS (I realise they're not representative crops), some are cheaper than "luxury brands". The difference is how much the shareholders make in profit. Your decision is whether you feel people need extra disposable income in the developed nations or if they need basic necessities in developing nations. Your vote is at whichever shops you use. Your argument was levelled in the UK about minimum wages, except when they came in no one really noticed ... 10% of city bonuses maybe?

    They are screwed, and flawed socialist policy or heavy handed western intervention has always failed.

    I guess that as I live in a house in dire need of maintenance but with scarcely enough money to feed and cloth us, despite working hard. I've suffered the position of medicine or food and I don't think "they are screwed" is a good enough response. They are screwed because of a) over-population, but importantly, b) greed and c) lack of active compassion. I don't think it's a done deal ...

  104. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by quenda · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Plus the US did it purely from their intelligence and work

    Yes, and the best German scientists money could buy.

  105. ALRIGHT CHINA by Friendly+Pyro · · Score: 1

    China's a little late to that party.

  106. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by orcrist · · Score: 1

    It's like all the news networks doing a story about West Bumfuck, Iowa, and using Google Earth to do a fairly nifty zoom-in-from-orbit effect because that obviously can't be done for real. But nobody screams at CNN for that.

    Maybe because CNN always says something to the effect of "and here depicted on Google Earth..." as opposed to implying or saying that it's a live shot. Pretty huge fucking difference.

    Yes it is reasonable to show a simulation, but it is also reasonable to expect that what's being shown is clearly labeled as a simulation.

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  107. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by CWRUisTakingMyMoney · · Score: 1

    Calm down. IIRC, in the NBC (in the States) broadcast of the Opening Ceremony, the commentator said that the fireworks being shown then were animated (I can't remember exactly what he said, but I figure it can be looked up). The catch is that he said it in the context of a pun, so some people didn't catch the fact that he was really saying "this is an animation." Others did. So, maybe it wasn't crystal clear, but it wasn't something being hidden. While we're at it, CNN doesn't announce at all that the animation you're seeing is a Google Earth production. There's a logo in one corner of the screen, but it's easy to miss. Of course, the animation is so over-the-top that it's clearly not a real camera shot, but still.

    --
    Those who anthropomorphize science and/or nature already believe in an intelligent designer.
  108. Done in water? Check Spacewalk video at 47' by chiefwebguy · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM Someone claims to have good eyes spotted something in the video

    1. Re:Done in water? Check Spacewalk video at 47' by chiefwebguy · · Score: 1

      Is much cheaper to shoot it in a studio? Like the Apollo missions http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM

  109. Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? by orcrist · · Score: 1

    Okay. That certainly puts a different face on it.

    Incidentally, I'm quite calm, I just tend to swear gratuitously for emphasis. :-)

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence