Slashdot Mirror


LittleBigPlanet Delayed Due To Qur'an-Sampling Audio

Several readers have pointed out that Sony's much-awaited LittleBigPlanet has hit a snag and will be delayed worldwide. The delay came after it was discovered that a song licensed for use in the soundtrack contained audio samples from the Qur'an. All advanced copies sent to retailers for the target release of October 21 in North America, 22 in PAL territories, and 24 in the UK and Ireland, have been recalled. "The post, by user 'Solid08', indicates of the specific references in the composition: 'In the 18th second: "kollo nafsin tha'iqatol mawt", literally: "Every soul shall have the taste of death' ... almost immediately after, in the 27th second: "kollo man alaiha fan", literally: "All that is on earth will perish."'"

127 of 995 comments (clear)

  1. ANd? by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what if it has that there?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:ANd? by DanTheManMS · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So what if it has that there?

      Perhaps they merely do not wish to anger potential customers now that it's been discovered and publicized. This isn't the first time it's happened or anything. For example, look at Zelda Ocarina of Time: original versions of the cartridge contained Muslim chanting in the background of the fire temple music, which was taken out of later copies. Later re-releases of the game on the Gamecube also changed some symbols in-game that resembled the crescent moon. No real reason to remove these things other than to prevent conflicts among the audience.

    2. Re:ANd? by Somegeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sony is pulling it to avoid offending anyone who would not like phrases from the Qur'an used in association with such a game.

      In my mind Sony is actually going above and beyond to do the correct thing here. (Never thought that I would find myself typing those words.) I still believe they have a long way to go to make up for all of the DRM crap that they have pulled in the past though.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    3. Re:ANd? by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cowering from bullies is not the right thing to do.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:ANd? by Somegeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to see this as Sony paying respect, not as them knuckling under to threats. I would like to think that they would do the same thing if it was a passage from a Buddhist text which had offended Buddhists with its inclusion. (ashamed that I can't name a Buddhist text without looking it up)

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    5. Re:ANd? by alta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, use anything from the Qur'an in jest or light, and you can expect a bombing of your headquarters by muslims. Make fun of the Bible or Christians and expect to be prayed for, but never told you can't do it.

      Which is the religion of peace again?

      Doing this because you don't want offend all of your customers is probably the right thing. Bowing down to terrorists isn't. Which do you think they're doing? Personally, I sure wouldn't want to hear anything from the Qur'an in a game I'm playing.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    6. Re:ANd? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "And not taking the feelings of others into consideration is?"

      Irrelevant.

      "...you'd be okay with that?"
      If a game says something I don't like, I don't buy it. I do not apply pressure to force the artists to remove their content.

      "What's the problem?"

      Forcing an artist to change what they do becasue it offends someone is the antithesis of freedom.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:ANd? by randyest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which would be odd, since there are no such passages. In fact, the only other religion I can think of that has a problem with their religious text being reproduced is Scientology.

      Neither deserves to get their way just because they want it, yet some followers of both use terrible means to try to enforce their way. Pretty sad, eh?

      --
      everything in moderation
    8. Re:ANd? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everything offends someone.
      freedom of speech means you can say what you want. Of course, nobody has to stay an listen.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:ANd? by nsayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're an American there are parts of your own country where that isn't true

      [Citation Needed]

    10. Re:ANd? by Otto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not paying respect, it's being a coward and knuckling under to idiotic demands. I don't care whether somebody believes in something or not, to demand something like this is completely out of line and should be ignored by all right-thinking people.

      Just because it's "religious" does not make it also not stupid.

      I will absolutely not be purchasing this game because of Sony's actions on this matter.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    11. Re:ANd? by Talderas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sony could have had a patch released for the game, which is what the Muslim group that complained suggested.

      You know, save the ton of money wasted recalling, reprinting and reshipping the product and not piss off the fans that weren't offended.

      I'm sorry, but recalling was not the smartest or best choice. Instead of offending a religion, they've pissed off those that wouldn't have been offended. They would have ended up with fewer people with negative opinions on the game with a patch.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    12. Re:ANd? by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 4, Informative
      I wondered the same thing, too. From the article:

      The post, by user 'Solid08', indicates of the specific references in the composition: "In the 18th second: "ÙfÙ ÙÙØ ØØØ¦ÙØ© ØÙÙ...ÙØ" ("kollo nafsin tha'iqatol mawt", literally: 'Every soul shall have the taste of death')... almost immediately after, in the 27th second: "ÙfÙ Ù...Ù ØÙÙSÙØ ÙØÙ" ("kollo man alaiha fan", literally: 'All that is on earth will perish')." It also comments: "I asked many of my friends online and offline and they heard the exact same thing that I heard easily when I played that part of the track. Certain Arabic hardcore gaming forums are already discussing this, so we decided to take action by emailing you before this spreads to mainstream attention. We Muslims consider the mixing of music and words from our Holy Quran deeply offending. We hope you would remove that track from the game immediately via an online patch, and make sure that all future shipments of the game disk do not contain it."

    13. Re:ANd? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course, nobody has to stay an listen.

      And that's the thing. Assume Squaresoft released a game that happens to offend many christians, for example by having the bad guy have an uncanny similarity to popular depictions of Jesus. Do you think that game or subsequent Squaresoft games would still sell well in countries like the USA? At the very least they'd get lots of negative PR in mainstream media. Lots of negative PR means lots of lost sales. Lots of lost sales means lots of lost money. Lots of lost money means the shareholders want to have a word with whoever's responsible for making the bad guy look like Jesus (and not catching that before release).

      Free speech is nice and dandy - if you're a real person. If you're a corporation you can speak freely all you want as long as it doesn't negatively affect sales. If removing Qur'an chants from the game makes it more likely that the game will sell better in muslimic regions then removing Qur'an chants is most probably a good idea.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    14. Re:ANd? by Neoprofin · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean like Xenogears, where you KILL GOD?

      It has lesbians too, and it's still incredibly popular, the only thing that held it back was that part of it's budget was redirected towards FF7.

    15. Re:ANd? by JPLemme · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lots of negative PR means lots of lost sales? It depends on the source of the negative PR and on the target audience.

      The mainstream media rarely mentions GTA in a positive way, but it hasn't hurt the series' sales any because your average GTA player takes Fox News' approbation as a Good Thing.

    16. Re:ANd? by moogied · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually the most enlightened Buddhist is in Nirvana, and is free from being human...

      --
      So basically, -1 troll/offtopic is really slashdots way of saying "I hate that you thought of something before me."
    17. Re:ANd? by LionMage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We Muslims consider the mixing of music and words from our Holy Quran deeply offending.

      Ah, so this explains some of the enmity directed toward Sufis, then. FWIW, I don't think this view that mixing sacred scripture and music is a bad thing is entirely universal, merely a view held by the conservative elements within Islam. Which seem to be the most vocal. (That said, I am also aware that many Wahabbists view music in general as un-islamic or anti-islamic, so Sufis get a lot of hate just for that...)

    18. Re:ANd? by dangitman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which is the religion of peace again?

      None of them?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    19. Re:ANd? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I gotcher cite right here.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  2. So what? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Qur'an is out of copyright by now, so what's the problem?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:So what? by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem seems to be worry that you'll get the same sort of reaction from a group of people whose religion tells them to burn effigies over cartoons, or stick knives in people's chests, for "offending" them.

      Just look at what happened to Theo Van Gogh and Salman Rushdie, to name just two.

      Now ask yourself whether that's really a "religion of peace" or something else. I can understand why the Little Big Planet studios were afraid of this.

    2. Re:So what? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but the West left most of their worst religious-nutball-inspired-violence behind hundreds of years ago. Muslims are still doing it.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:So what? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but the West left most of their worst religious-nutball-inspired-violence behind hundreds of years ago. Muslims are still doing it.

      Most but not all. I wouldn't want my religion being judged based on abortion clinic bombers.

      It is fair to say that the Islamic world has a serious problem with violent extremists, a problem that must be addressed.

      To mockingly say "Religion of Peace indeed", and imply that Muslims in general are engaging in violence, is not only unfair it's bigotry.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:So what? by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please link to some news stories of Christian suicide bombings. Then your silly "everybody does it" argument might at least be factual. (It's still a ridiculous argument, even if everybody did do it -- but everybody doesn't.)

    5. Re:So what? by plague3106 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, it's not a suicide bombing... but it's a bombing:
      http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/37363/

    6. Re:So what? by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The scale is nowhere near the same, and you know it. When millions of Muslims protest (violently), but only dozens of Christians are involved in clinic bombings (and those haven't happened in many years), it's disingenuous to compare one with the other.

      Besides which, the real difference between the two aren't the modern followers, it's the founders. Jesus was a pretty nice guy who could be counted on to provide extra booze at a party (even if he was a mite touchy about conducting business in a temple). Mohammed raped and slaughtered thousands of people, kept slaves, and taught his followers to kill anyone who disagreed with them (and not in parables that people can take out of context, but in direct orders). Not even remotely similar.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    7. Re:So what? by Trojan35 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or burn people at the stake.
      Or lynch people for the color of their skin.
      Or torture people to "confess" their sins.

      All carried out by church-loving citizens. Oh wait, we were bashing Islam here. My bad.

    8. Re:So what? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The line can be drawn quite simply.

      Practice highly visible public heresy, for example by quoting particularly unflattering passages of a particular religion's holy book.

      Now: how many death threats do you receive?

      If the answer is not "zero", then you can start with the snide remarks.

      I can't recall ever hearing about someone who declined to publish something naughty about Christianity because they feared for their lives. But the same thing happens routinely with Islam.

      There is a qualitative difference between having a small group of nutballs angry at you and having the government of a major middle-eastern power decide that you should die because you insulted their religion.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    9. Re:So what? by Maudib · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "religious-nutball-inspired-violence behind hundreds of years ago"
      Nonsense. Absolute nonsense.

      -Europe had a nice bout of Christians on Muslim Genocide in the 90s. 250,000 murdered in the name of Christ.
      -Then there was that Holocaust thing. Lets not forget how many "Christians" in France and Italy were gleeful participants.
      -Wiping out Native Americans throughout the 1800s most certainly had a religious component. Civilizing the saveges, etc.
      -A MAJOR component of American fear and hatred for Communism stemmed from a Christian hatred for aethiesm.
      -The Iraq war. How many Americans justified this or were motivated by Christianity? GWB certainly did to an extent. As did Pat Robertson and his moronic followers.

      And in the U.S. how often are Christians beating and murdering gays, doctors at abortion clinics, etc?

      Sorry religious violence is rampant in the West to this day. That is because religion is by necessity, violent.

    10. Re:So what? by couchslug · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The Qur'an is out of copyright by now, so what's the problem?"

      Fanbois, with big knives.

      Just be happy the RIAA hasn't discovered their methods.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    11. Re:So what? by hafez.parnas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      umm, scales being unequal and all that jazz, you're still a bigot. mohammad didn't rape and slaughter thousands. he was elevated to the leader of his tribe as he gained more followers, and in a effort to protect him and his followers he lead muslims in war.

      its true that there was slavery in arabia at the time of mohammad, roughly 650 AD (i hear there was slavery in the US till not too long ago)... the religion brought rules and fair treatment of slaves to the a region that even the arabs now call a region plagued by 'jahilia' (ignorance). if you read the quran instead of spouted off charged sound bites, you'd know that the quran OK's the practice of slavery in one line, and in the next line says "but it is best if you set them free". repeatedly in the quran it talks about freeing a slave (the punishment for manslaughter, the cost of remarrying your wife, the cost of breaking your vow) and prohibits both the abuse of slaves and the sources of slaves to just prisoners of war.

      personally i find the fact that this book, revealed in the 7th century to a people who called themselves 'ignorant', just set up a system for the ethical treatment of slaves and prisoners of war in one deft move impressive. it also set the framework for abolitionism in the middle east a full 12 centuries before abe lincoln. the practice of slavery is now antiquated, and disgusting universally, and that includes the 1.2billion muslims in this world.

      regarding this supposed order to kill anyone who disagreed with them...? what? also in the quran, chapter 2, verse 256. "there is no compulsion in religion". and again throughout the quran it talks about people who refuse to believe, and it tells the believers to ignore them, that god has made them this way and that god will judge them fairly.

      the quran was actually very very liberal a book in its time and in many ways still is.

      the problem with islam today is two-fold:

      a) the majority of muslims suffer from a lack of education and are as a result easily swayyed and cowed and tricked by eloquent bastards who preach hatred (there's 1.2 billion of them, and they're not all cheerfully educated in the west, and of the ones educated in the west there are two types, the type who stays in the west and tries to live a comfortable good life and the type who'll go back to their third world home and preach of the evils of the west, think harvard educated redneck bigot)

      and b) that a muslims have a hard time seeing reading between the lines of the qur'an. the qur'an again and again asks muslims to be better human beings, to let god judge, to be kind and save life ("if you save a life its as though you've saved all of humanity, and if you take a life its as though you've slaughtered all of humanity") and instead read the surface of the qur'an, which for example sets the punishment for a wayward wife as a light, beating that leaves no marks, in a time when wayward wives were killed and buried by the next morning.

      the quran set up a lot of rules for being a good muslim in 7th century arabia, and those should be a framework for being a good muslim in our connected 21st century. like the constitution of the US, which itself had rules to govern slaves, but the framework has been built upon and changed, always mindful of its original intent.

    12. Re:So what? by afabbro · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Qur'an is out of copyright by now, so what's the problem?

      It was out of copyright, until the Sunni Bono Copyright Extension Act was past.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    13. Re:So what? by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You see, the difference here, is that we have admitted our crimes, apologized, and on the whole, have attempted to move on from these wrong actions which do not, in any way, come into alignment with the one we follow (Jesus).

      The crimes of Islamic practitioners are neither hundreds of years in the past, nor have they been apologized for (nor have they ceased to occur for the most part). Islam is not a religion of peace. Some of the main tenants teach violence to all who do not follow Islam.

      The Christian religion is clear, in the new testament, that we are to forgive, turn the other cheek, and leave the punishing and judgment to someone who has the ability to do the right thing (God).

      If you think the Christian Religion is anything other than that, I encourage you to read my sig, and follow it's instructions.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    14. Re:So what? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In all of the cases you mention, religion was not a major component. Yugoslav wars were centered around ethnicity, with religion being merely a partially determining factor for the former. Holocaust was very much not religious, though some WW2 atrocities were (e.g. Ustashe). And so on.

      Here's another take on it. Let's see how many countries in the world still have death penalty for blasphemy and/or apostasy on the books:

      • Saudi Arabia
      • Qatar
      • Yemen
      • Iran
      • Sudan
      • Afghanistan
      • Mauritania
      • Pakistan

      Guess what's the official state religion in all of them? And don't give me crap about "tyrannical monarchies" - more than half of the countries on the list above are republics, "Islamic" or otherwise.

    15. Re:So what? by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Informative
      it also set the framework for abolitionism in the middle east a full 12 centuries before abe lincoln.

      Setting a framework is good. Action is better. When was slavery actually abolished in Muslim lands, and why?

      Slavery in England had been banned since at least 1215, possibly 1102, and serfdom died out by 1600; a court ruling in 1772 confirmed that no English law permitted the condition of slavery to exist in the country any way. Slavery was abolished across the whole Empire in 1807. The United States abolished slavery in 1865. Saudi Arabia abolished slavery in 1962.

      the practice of slavery is now antiquated, and disgusting universally, and that includes the 1.2billion muslims in this world.

      Antiquated. That's a funny way to refer to an institution that's been gone for all of 46 years.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    16. Re:So what? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

      he was elevated to the leader of his tribe as he gained more followers, and in a effort to protect him and his followers he lead muslims in war.

      That's a very interesting kind of defensive war he waged there then, the one in which borders of his realm expanded manyfold...

      its true that there was slavery in arabia at the time of mohammad, roughly 650 AD (i hear there was slavery in the US till not too long ago)... the religion brought rules and fair treatment of slaves to the a region that even the arabs now call a region plagued by 'jahilia' (ignorance). if you read the quran instead of spouted off charged sound bites, you'd know that the quran OK's the practice of slavery in one line, and in the next line says "but it is best if you set them free". repeatedly in the quran it talks about freeing a slave (the punishment for manslaughter, the cost of remarrying your wife, the cost of breaking your vow) and prohibits both the abuse of slaves and the sources of slaves to just prisoners of war.

      It also okays sexual slavery and rape (and explicitly identifies it as a sole workaround for the prohibition on adultery, effectively promoting it).

      personally i find the fact that this book, revealed in the 7th century to a people who called themselves 'ignorant', just set up a system for the ethical treatment of slaves and prisoners of war in one deft move impressive.

      Oh, it's a great book for the 7th century, no arguing. Now if only the book itself didn't say that it's the final and most authoritative source on the opinion of God on all the subjects it cover, and forbade ever changing any dogma enshrined therein...

    17. Re:So what? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Really? The holocaust did not have religion as a major component? The collaborators, and there were an awful lot of them, were certainly motivated by religion.

      No, they were motivated by ethnicity. Not in any objective way - it can often be impossible to distinguish a European Jew from his fellow non-Jewish countrymen genetically - but Nazis had their own theories, and according to them, Jewish were ethnically and racially distinct, and their unique religion was only used as an identifying mark. Remember that the definition of a Jew in the Third Reich, for the purpose of persecution, was not "one who practices Judaism" - it was "one who is more than 1/8th Jewish by ancestry".

      The claim that Bosnia was an ethnic conflict with out a major religious component seems disingenuous when the division between the two ethnicity was religion.

      Religion is cetainly not a sole factor dividing Bosniaks, Croats and Serbs (and all of them are typically offended by such claims, except for some pan-Yugoslavists, who mostly tend to be Serbs).

      Have you read much of the primary sources or quotes of leaders during the cold war? They routinely invoked god and atheism of communism in order to instill fear and motivate the population.

      Well, yes, and Soviet aggressive anti-clericalism with massive persecution of all religions, and particularly Christians (because they were the dominant group) might have something to do with it. I'm not justifying the Red Scare, but it wasn't one-sided.

      I am not saying that Islam is not violent. I totally agree with you that it is violent and oppressive. I am just asserting that Christianity is by nature no better. Religion is violent. The degree to which various religions engage in violence may wax and wane over time (likely corresponding to their influence) but in the end it doesn't matter.

      That's where we disagree. Judging by what I see, it seems that Christianity has been on the steady decline as far as violence is concerned for the last several centuries. It's unmistakenly the influence of the rising secular rational consciousness in the West, so Christians shouldn't claim much credit for that - but, they did adapt pretty well. There's more to be desired, of course, but the tendency is clear, and the present level is tolerable.

      Islam, in contrast, seems to be ramping up its violence component for the last half a century or so, and its mainstream shifting more and more from the liberal interpretations to fundamentalism.

    18. Re:So what? by AlXtreme · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is a deeper problem with Islam than merely a lack of education or not reading between the lines of the Qur'an.

      First, the Qur'an is the direct word of Allah/God. The words came to Muhammad, who wrote it down word by word (at least, so Muslims believe). This in contrast with the old and new testament, which were written by disciples. The difference is slight, but this difference means (according to Islam) that no deviation from the Qur'an is possible. Where Judaism/Christianity are able to interpret their holy books differently, Islam specifically forbids this as theirs is the direct word of God. Changing a single word would be sacrilegious, even translating the Qur'an was considered problematic (for it is no longer the direct word of God after translation).

      Thus, a true Muslim will not read between the lines of the Qur'an, for he/she is not allowed to.

      A second deeper problem is that Islam is more than just the Qur'an. Scribes/imams have interpreted the Qur'an in certain ways, leading to laws for Islam (Sharia). These are the laws that (in certain regions) prescribe hangings and stoning of (in our eyes) innocents.

      The Catch-22 is that (again, in certain areas) these laws are unchangeable without near-unanimous support, but that wanting to change them would lead to persecution. Why? Allah is perfect, thus he wouldn't mislead the imams into making false statements about the word of god. Thus the Sharia must be correct. Over time, the laws have snowballed into something that for a Muslim from the 7th century wouldn't even be recognized as Islam.

      Over time (and unlike Judaism/Christianity) Islam has become less moderate. It was indeed quite a liberal religion in the early centuries (at the time) but these two facets of Islam, often overlooked, have lead to a religion that isn't susceptible to change.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    19. Re:So what? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've never so much as heard of anyone receiving a death threat for publishing an anti-Christian cartoon or depicting Jesus. Got cite?

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  3. And we reproduced the lines here? by Cheeko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought writing the lines in text was a reproduction just as much as the audio? Yet /. just posted them?

    Or maybe I'm just confused and there is a difference between writing them and the audio copy.

    1. Re:And we reproduced the lines here? by eln · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why would reproducing a work that has long since been in the public domain be a problem? If it is, hundreds of publishers are in deep shit.

      From what the article says, it seems some Muslims got offended at their holy scriptures being put to music. So, Sony is bowing to a few fundamentalist Muslims to keep from generating any bad press about how they offend Islam or whatever.

      Personally, I think if they're going to start bowing down to any fringe group that complains on the Internet, they're going to have a hard time releasing any games ever again.

      People are so scared of "terrorists", and associate Islam so closely with those terrorists, that they are scared to death of offending anyone that calls themselves a Muslim. This just makes it much easier for the radical wing of Islam to not only be heard, but to wield influence out of proportion with their numbers. Of course, you could argue the same thing has been done with regard to the more radical wings of Christianity in other spheres as well.

    2. Re:And we reproduced the lines here? by eln · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, if that's the case, the solution is simple: Re-release the song, but instead of just sampling those two parts, sing the entire book! I smell a platinum record!

  4. Uh Oh. by flitty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Delayed PS3 game + angry gamers + Anon. internet forums + Western distrust of Islam = A lot of wasted /. Moderator points slaying trolls.

    --
    Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    1. Re:Uh Oh. by Moryath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Delayed PS3 game + angry gamers + Anon. internet forums + people who've actually studied Islam as opposed to trolls who don't know shit about it but flame about people "misunderstanding it" anyways = A lot of wasted /. Moderator points slaying trolls.

      There. Fixed that for you.

      Now go do some research on Islam. Here's a reading list for you:

      #1 - Koran.
      #2 - Hadith. Read both the Sunni and Shi'a preferred sets. For extra credit, check into other schools that have their own "authoritative" sets.
      #3 - Read up on the various fatwa that are considered "core" to belief, or to interpretation, by each of the major branches.

      NOW come back and tell me you've actually studied it, in depth, before declaring it a "religion of peace." Because it is most definitively not one, unless you believe that slavery, definitive tiers of haves and have-nots based on who's a member of the official state religion, definitive tiers of haves and have-nots based on which genitalia you were born with, and an admonition to subjugate, enslave, or otherwise wipe out anyone who doesn't believe in the state-sponsored religion can actually be a "religion of peace."

    2. Re:Uh Oh. by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1) Personally? I'd like to introduce you to some of my friends. Sadly, you don't seem to know enough Muslims.
      2) Sheik Tantawi
      3) Adultery is not a punishable? I'd dare you to find one RELIGION where that's not punishable (and no, Hedonism doesn't count).
      4) I've got a few more: Sayyid al-Qimni, Abd-al-Karim, Ridwan al-Sayyid.... a quick google brings up plenty of moderate Muslim scholars who aren't considered apostate by most other Muslims. They are, of course, apostates by the standard of radical Fundamentalists, but that's not what we're talking about, are we? Unless, of course, you're arguing that the majority of Muslims are radical Fundamentalists. In which case, I can't help you.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  5. What are they afraidn of? by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not like some militant Islamic sect would burn down the distributor's house... oh, wait.

    1. Re:What are they afraidn of? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Careful, Joe, Muslims got mod points!

  6. Just want to clarify by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So I can publish games that include demons, prostitutes, foul language, and abhorrent levels of bloodshed and violence--just as long as it doesn't piss off a Muslim somewhere?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  7. Qur'an verses in media by qbzzt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see the big deal here, since Muslims are supposed to want to distribute the Qur'an. But I can see how people would be extra paranoid about offending Muslims, since some of them take offense violently.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
  8. To quote Bill Hicks by einer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah? And? So? What?

    1. Re:To quote Bill Hicks by einer · · Score: 5, Informative

      From: http://kotaku.com/5065106/nsiders-letter-to-sony-and-media-molecule-re-quran-references

      "We Muslims consider the mixing of music and words from our Holy Quran deeply offending. We hope you would remove that track from the game immediately via an online update, and make sure that all future shipments of the game disk do not contain it."

      Personally, I consider censoring art "deeply offending." Sony, you're losing a customer if you cave to the demands of any religious group. Hey Muslims, don't buy the game.

    2. Re:To quote Bill Hicks by sdnick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We Muslims consider the mixing of music and words from our Holy Quran deeply offending.

      Then I'd say that Muslims should definitely refrain from doing this. However, we aren't all Muslims - why would the rest of us be expected to follow their beliefs?

  9. Logical followup by Agent.Nihilist · · Score: 3, Funny

    I support the immediate recall of all games containing biblical samplings and verse references.
    It is well known that religious references are debase and cause conflict, therefore have no place in today's games /satire

  10. Re:Peace by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another look at the meaning is clearly only stating the obvious: Just as every life has a beginning it also too must have an end. It does not say that everyone must perish in a cruel, agonizing, bloody death. Even the bible has some pretty dark lines surpassing this one.

  11. Different Sony, right? by igorthefiend · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not the same Sony who didn't see anything wrong with Manchester Cathedral being used in Resistance, despite the church itself complaining? Not that I think either should be grounds for a game to be pulled, but there is the faint stench of double standards...

    1. Re:Different Sony, right? by SupremoMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's different. Christians don't blow stuff up... anymore... I think...

    2. Re:Different Sony, right? by abigor · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's all about calculated risk - piss off some English Catholics, you get some peeved letters in the local paper. Piss off Muslims, you get explosions, beheadings, and people living out their lives in hiding.

  12. Re:Peace by Moryath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmm... do religions of peace say things like:

    (Sura 2:191-193) "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]...and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah."

    (Sura 8:12) "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."

    (Sura 8:59-60) "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

    (Sura 9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and fought jihad with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."

    (Sura 9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

    (Sura 9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them"

    (Sura 9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and fight jihad with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew."

    Yeah. I'm sure they were worried about "offending" people whose idea of responding is to kill anyone who "offends" them. Like, say, Theo Van Gogh or Salman Rushdie.

    Sad day to see this happen.

  13. Everytime you self-censor Islamic references, by eddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the radicals and the terrorists win acceptance of the idea that they alone get to dictate how the world handles their pet delusion.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  14. Big Deal! by TheNecromancer · · Score: 5, Funny

    My pvp guild in WoW says that EVERY DAY!!!!

    --
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
  15. So? by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who fucking cares? Is the Qu'ran copyrighted or something? Stop coddling these bullshit religions.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  16. They just want to be sensitive by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, it's amazing how sensitive people can be when offending some religious group might get your building bombed or your artists shot or stabbed.

  17. Re:I don't get it by FatalTourist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More people will be offended by the delay of the game! In fact, when I heard the news I let loose a stream of offensive words... causing even more offense. Oh sweet irony.

    --


    Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
  18. Re:The original complaint by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what? Having a game censored because of pandering to some primitive superstition is highly offensive to me.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  19. Sephiroth! by argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Noooooo! Don't take my Final Fantasy CDs away! Not my Evangelion! Not Ghost in the Shell!

  20. Brian Eno & David Byrne by a+whoabot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Eno and Byrne had a song called with Quran verses in the 80's and they were told by some imam that it was blasphemy to put the words of god to "grooves" (Byrne's word I think), so they took the song off the album.

  21. Re:Peace by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, that line "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" scares the hell out of corporate executives. "Blessed are the peacemakers" give Republicans the willies, and "Blessed are the pure at heart" terrorizes the Democrats.

  22. Re:Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    and for everyone else, there's the old testament

  23. Re:Peace by ciderVisor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lo! they cannot escape.

    I misread that as "Lol".

    4114h00 4kH bR !!!

    --
    Squirrel!
  24. Re:Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "I will also send wild beasts among you, which shall rob you of your children." (Leviticus 26:22)

    "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourself every girl who has never slept with a man." (Numbers 31:17-18)

    "The Lord commands: "... slay old men outright, young men and maidens, little children and women" (Ezechial 9:4-6)

    "When the Lord delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the males .... As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves." (Deuteronomy 20:13-14)

    "You will eat the fruit of the womb, the flesh of the sons and daughters the Lord your God has given you." (Deuteronomy 28:53)

    "The Lord said to Joshua [...] 'you are to hamstring their horses.' " (Exceedingly cruel.) (Joshua 11:6)

    "... Go and smite the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead with the edge of the sword and; also the women and little ones.... every male and every woman that has lain with a male you shall utterly destroy." (Judges 21:10-12)

    "This is what the Lord says: Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass .... And Saul ... utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword." (1 Samuel 15:3,7-8)

    "The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their women with child ripped open." (Hosea 13:16)

    "A curse on him who is lax in doing the LORD's work!
    A curse on him who keeps his sword from bloodshed!" (Jeremiah 48:10)

  25. Re:Peace by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, but crazy Islamo-nutballs don't come blow up your building when you quote the Bible.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  26. The fuck is going on here? by M1rth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many slashdot trolls had mod points today?

    Seriously - this has meaning. The guess that they pulled the game because of fears over rioting/threats or actual violence is a pretty good guess given the "objectionable" content that's being removed from the game.

    Would you think they'd have removed it for a couple of lines in Yiddish? Or a Biblical quotation, or a Celtic pagan quotation? You can be 100% sure that they wouldn't.

    Give Parent Poster his karma back. This wasn't "flamebait."

    --
    If you can read this sig, congratulations, you have your glasses on!
  27. Help! Help! I'm being repressed! by Detritus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is no right to "not to be offended". Especially when the group in question, or at least its more vocal components, respond to satire and criticism with riots, bombs, and assassination. In some parts of the world, all it takes is an ill-founded rumor that someone interprets as a slight to Islam to trigger riots and mob violence. The solution isn't to appease the mob. If people act like thugs, they should be treated like thugs.

    Give us a call when you get tired of living in the dark ages.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  28. Audio samples from the Qur'an? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 4, Funny

    Would that be the original release or the digitally remastered 5.1 version from just a couple of years ago? Personally, I prefer the vinyl version because digital just can't carry the warmth of Allah's vocals and that sweet guitar.

  29. Re:Peace by Kandenshi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dunno, seems like a pretty odd thing for a peaceful religion to say sure. Of course, cherry picking to find offensive things in the Quar'an isn't any better than quote mining the Bible. I think that there should be more of a push to get people to actually read their religious texts, in my extremely informal sampling of my friends/classmates/housemates/etc it seems that there's very little of that amongst those who describe themselves as belonging to a certain religion.

    Proverbs 20:30 Blows and wounds cleanse away evil, and beatings purge the inmost being.
    - Hence, Jesus was *really* pure when he finally got crucified? And bullies in schools are just trying to make their victims more godly?

    Deuteronomy 7:1 When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations ... then you must destroy them totally. 2 Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy.
    - Peaceful indeed.

    Leviticus 21:18 For no one who has a defect shall approach: a blind man, or a lame man, or he that hath a flat nose, of anything superfluous.
    - Shun those with physical abnormalities. And yet, Jesus supposedly hung around with the blind, lepers, clubfooted people all the friggen time?

    Ephesians 5:22-23 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church, and he is the saviour of the body.
    1 Timothy 2:11-12 Let a woman learn in silence with full submission. I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she is to keep silent.
    - That's right. Get back in the kitchen! Get back to submitting and quit telling me to take out the garbage.

    Deuteronomy 22:5 A woman shall not wear man's clothing, nor shall a man put on a woman's clothing; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD your GOD.
    Deuteronomy 22:28 If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.
    - Pants are bad but rape is OK as long as you pay for it and marry her.

    Luke 19:27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.
    - Jesus explaining what he wants people to do when he returns.

    Leviticus 25:45 Moveover the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land; and they shall be your possession.
    Numbers 31:17-18 Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man by sleeping with him. But all the young girls who have not known a man by sleeping with him, keep alive for yourselves.
    Isaiah 13:15-16 Whoever is found will be thrust through, and whoever is caught will fall by the sword. Their infants will be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses will be plundered, and their wives ravished.
    - "Stab all those people over there, bash the head's of their babies in against a rock, then rape their women(especially the young cute virgins)." Sounds more like the order of a corrupt general than an omnibenevolent diety.

    Leviticus 20:18 And if a man shall lie with a woman having her sickness, and shall uncover her nakedness, he hath discovered her fountain, and she hath uncovered the fountain of her blood. And both of them shall be cut off from among their people.
    - Because we all know that menstrual blood is icky and if people fuck when she's on the rag they should be killed.

    Exodus 21:20-21 And if a man smite his slave, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished

  30. Buddha says by Moryath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buddha says I should forgive you and remind you that two wrongs don't make a right.

  31. Re:Peace by HanClinto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Part of the trouble is that the verses you're referencing in the Old Testament were from a specific war -- "Go and kill the inhabitants of Jabesh-Gilead" or "Destroy the Amalekites" -- particular people who they were fighting at the time. Unlike the Qu'ran, the Old Testament doesn't say that these instructions to wage war are standing orders.

  32. Re:Peace by wanderingknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's even got paedophilia.

    The Bible's got incest, rape, mass-murder (and it advocates some mass-murders, too), and all sort of cruelties that were committed by both Jews and Christians--such as any other people in the history of humanity.

    How 'bout you read the old testament for a change?

  33. Re:Peace by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well done. You just pointed out a different religious text that tells it's followers to kill and teaches hate. That in no way it a counter argument to the posters point.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  34. A Muslim is not Islam by Rand+Race · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... the licensed LBP soundtrack song 'Tapha Niang' by Muslim artist Toumani Diabate's Symmetrical Orchestra uses voice excerpts from the Qur'an in its musical composition.

    ...

    We Muslims consider the mixing of music and words from our Holy Quran deeply offending.

    What's this "we" shit?

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  35. Changing culture... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm convinced that this sort of thing is a last gasp amongst the extremists to hold onto the old ways. The fact is that the world is changing and nobody can stop it. The Middle East is being exposed to the outside world via the internet and other media. The religious hardliners are realizing that they're losing their hold on the people and I suppose like most people they don't like change.

    I realize American imperialism is brought up as the reason for this violence. But I'm convinced that's bullshit. The widespread dissemination of foreign cultures is the more real and subtle threat.

    I think it's similar to certain Christian groups in this country coming out trying to denounce evolution and force creationism on people. Deep down they realize their religion is being marginalized and are grasping at straws trying to make it relevant.

    The problem is that they're confusing a crumbling power structure for faith when the two aren't connected. There's no reason whatsoever why a person can't be devoutly religious and still accept science and progress.

    The key difference, however, is that Muslim extremists are more likely to blow things up to get their way, or at least threaten to do so. Sure, you get the occasional Christian nut who tries to shoot an abortion doctor or something, but that's the extent of it. But Christians consistently denounce the act. On the other hand, at best Muslims won't say anything at all and at worst will run into the streets in celebration.

    But ultimately these small victories are insignificant in the long run. And having heard some guys complaining about how Middle Eastern is growing increasingly liberal the days of religious extremism are numbered.

    Political correctness has crippled America. By no means am I endorsing bigotry and racism, but we should be able to have open discourse about issues without it devolving into claims of racism.

    The percentage of the Muslim population in the US is .6% to 1%. The last time I checked we still had free speech and the presence of this passage in a game is not intentionally offensive from what I can tell.

    When Andres Serrano dumped a crucifix in urine and photographed it he wasn't banned from displaying his work. Hell, a nun actually stated in an interview that the work was not blasphemous but rather an example of what people have done to Christ.

  36. Re:Peace by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's an interesting difference, though, isn't it? Islamic fundamentalists trying to get rid of public displays of pictures of Mohammed, trying to eliminate people reciting the Quran in products, and so on, and meanwhile, Christian fundamentalists are insisting on public displays of pictures of Jesus, trying to get readings from the bible everywhere, and so on.

    It's just a different kind of crazy.

    --
    Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you?
  37. What are you smoking? by M1rth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    how come any time someone talks about what's wrong in the Muslim faith, the knee jerk reaction is from a bunch of /b/tards who want to shit all over other religions?

    This has nothing to do with the argument, and NeutronCowboy's argument is "crap" as he puts it. It is entirely possible for MULTIPLE religions to be wrong and trying to distract from Islam's problems by attacking another religion is a poor debate tactic, a desperate attempt to distract the argument from something he knows he can't honestly defend.

    Remember, hell is exothermic.

    --
    If you can read this sig, congratulations, you have your glasses on!
  38. Re:Peace by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    And the bit about the moneylenders in the temple frightens both the capitalists AND the televangelists. That's right, you rich greedy bastards, when Jesus comes back, he's totally going medieval on all your asses.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  39. Re:Peace by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Informative

    The more enthusiastic priests and ministers quite like these ones though:

    "And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him."

    and

    "If there be found among you ... that ... hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them ... Then shalt thou ... stone them with stones, till they die."

  40. Re:Peace by wanderingknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That people in Christian countries who usually mention Muslims as being a bunch of religious fanatics are usually, you know, Christians.

    Either way, I believe you're misguided if you believe the only reason why the so-called terrorism exists is because the Qu'ran advocates mass murder of infidels.

    Unfortunately for American media and the US government, reality is much more complex than that.

  41. Sure by waldoj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's one:

    [C]onsider the 19-year old Loula Abboud, a dark curl kissing her forehead and a golden cross around her neck. A Lebanese Christian, she was one of the first women to earn the title of istishhadiyah when she blew herself up in 1985 as Israeli troops moved in to capture her guerilla group near the town of Aoun in southern Lebanon

    But that's rather beside the point. Suicide bombings are committed almost exclusively in defense of homeland against occupying forces (or, rather, the belief that such a thing is occurring), especially forces of a different religion, and especially when those doing the defending live in relative poverty. There are very few cases of countries with poor, heavily Christian populations that are occupied by people of other religions. Ergo, hardly any Christian suicide bombings.

  42. Re:Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All quotes from the Bible reference specific commands to the Israelites at a specific time in their history. Yes, they are pretty barbaric. However, none of them are commands for the Christians or Jews of today. If I'm not mistaken. the quotes from the Qur'an are not specific commands for specific individuals at a specific time, but commands for all Muslims, all the time.

  43. This Muslim's buying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... and I know a lot about Islam. I teach it to other Muslims. Yes, the religion teaches that the Quran must not recited in conjunction with music. It must be vocal only, although most of the reciters inflect their voice so that it is beautiful to hear, much like music is. The musician that Sony licensed it from should be contacted about it. I wouldn't blame Sony for it. But I can see why some Muslims might be offended by it. Grow up. It's only two phrases, not an entire passage. I personally think it is kind of cool to have it in a game, as long as it is innocuous and not used to promote an anti-Islamic agenda (other posters here have cut and pasted text for that). "Bismillah" ("in the name of God") is in The Bohemian Rhapsody by Queen and I love it everytime I hear it. And then Beelzebul shortly thereafter takes me back to the D&D days...

  44. Re:Peace by unlametheweak · · Score: 3, Informative

    This fact is often understated. The average Muslim is just about as religious as the average Christian. That being said we don't see rioting in the streets (all that often) because of religious differences. It's usually the leadership (and the Fundamentalist versions of Brown Shirts) that spur things on.

  45. Re:Peace by CaptSaltyJack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lo! they cannot escape.

    I misread that as "Lol". 4114h00 4kH bR !!!

    No, you're right. It does say "Lol". Full excerpt:

    "and let not n00bs who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip ALLAH'S PURPOSE!!!!1 lol they cannot escape. make ready for them all u can of armed force and of...OMG PONIES!!! rofl. so um..that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and u can haz victory."

  46. It does seem to be a double standard by nobodyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Church of England got miffed when one of their churches was featured prominently in one of the levels of Resistance: Fall Of Man. This is a seemingly bigger offense than including a couple snippets of the Quran, yet Sony refused to recall the game.

  47. Re:Peace by florescent_beige · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please my friend can we stop with the Islam bashing? I'm begging.

    I'm just a good old Canadian boy who happened to marry into a family of Muslims and let me tell you the only thing that the entire lot of them want to do is have six-thousand course dinner parties that go on for hours and dance. I'm serious.

    If they worry about anything, which they don't seem to much, it's that their religion has been hijacked by nutcases. I guess we could talk about how the nutcases seem to always come from fundamentalist dictatorships that America had a hand in creating and supporting (The House of Saud, the Wahib clan, The Shah of Iran, the Taliban, Musharraf, Assad).

    But that is another discussion. If anyone holds to the belief that inside the heart of every Muslim is a bloodthirsty jihadist looking for the right time to strike, well, you couldn't be more wrong. Why not just go with the flow and enjoy the fact that middle eastern women tend towards the large-chested and friendly?

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  48. Re:Peace by Tenek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well then, I guess the people in Amalek, Samaria and Jabesh-Gilead must have taken great comfort in knowing that they were only part of a finite list of butchered victims.

  49. Re:Peace by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's all great, but all of the most cheesy lines are from the Old Testament. Now Christians also have the New Testament, and the majority of them worldwide (all Catholics, all Orthodox, most Protestants) believe that the New Testament had done away with those old commandments, so that they're no longer in force, and also don't take the suspect lines from NT (such as "Not to Bring Peace, But a Sword") literally. Of course, there is also a "fire and brimstone", stone-the-gays minority that believes they're very much in force, but it's a tiny minority - and the one largely ostracized.

    Can you point me at the equivalent of the New Testament in Islam that would discard the laws such as stoning for adultery or beheading for apostasy, or name a mainstream Islamic school of law that considers those laws to not be in force today? Have you ever met a non-homophobe Muslim?

  50. Flying spaghetti monster says by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Many Noodly Caresses to you, my followers".

  51. Re:Peace by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The situation in Islam countries is often of major poverty,

    That is quite an important (and occasionally overlooked) point; the most dangerous people in the world are those with nothing left to lose.

  52. Re:Peace by thedonger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you sure God just doesn't really like Colt Firearms: Colt Peacemaker

    --
    Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
  53. Re:Peace by Moryath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll make you a deal.

    They stop treating their women as if they were afraid of womens' sexuality (keeping in mind I've done PLENTY of study of Islam) and stop sticking their women in beekeepers' outfits, and I'll be more than happy to "appreciate" the fact that middle eastern women tend towards large-chested and friendly.

    In all seriousness, though... "worrying" that your religion is "hijacked", and actually standing up en masse and saying so, are two different things. And by and large, Muslims seem just fine letting people "hijack" their religion all day long. That creates its own set of problems. Let's face it, the number of people at various "not in our name, you don't represent Islam" rallies is a mere fraction of those who rally for death and murder in Islam's name across the world.

    I wish it weren't so. I wish your relatives the best, I really do. But there's a long road ahead and they are, sadly, VERY much in the minority concerning their interpretation of the Muslim faith.

  54. Re:Peace by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Have you ever met a non-homophobe Muslim?"

    Absolutely. This is a retarded question attempting to pigeonhole a huge group of people simply because it's easier than treating people like individuals.

  55. Re:Peace by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's modded "funny" as was intended, you humorless fool. I'm guessing you're either a religious fanatic or an athiestic fanatic. I'm not sure which is worse, but you really need to chill.

  56. Re:Peace by coolsnowmen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you ever met a non-homophobe Muslim?

    I don't know, but then again, "Do you hate homosexuals?" isn't really the best conversation starter with a new friend.

  57. Family values facade by unlametheweak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yet all of the Muslims I've ever met are charming, peaceful friendly people. Big on family values, very law abiding, and socially responsible.

    You probably haven't gotten to know them very well. The majority of people are dishonest, hypocritical, untrustworthy and at least condone some measure of violence against their opponents. This is despite any religious or political facade that underlies the way they think and act.

    Show me a "family values" person and chances are that they are intolerant, prejudiced, and hypocritical.

    1. Re:Family values facade by mollymoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      The majority of people are dishonest, hypocritical, untrustworthy and at least condone some measure of violence against their opponents.

      Wow, either you live somewhere seriously shitty or are projecting. The majority of people are honest, trustworthy and non-violent (but I agree on the hypocritical). If the majority really were dishonest, untrustworthy and violent society just wouldn't function.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  58. Re:Peace by kungfugleek · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Reading the old testament isn't always as easy as it appears. Because of the mixtures of genres in there it can be easy to come to some inaccurate conclusions. The writers of the narrative books, for example, assumed that the reader would make the right connections between stories usually by alluding to elements from earlier stories while not openly saying, "This was just like that one time in Ur..."

    While there are definitely some racy parts of the old testament, I don't know of any place where incest or rape is okey'd by God, but there are a few places where God's silence on the issue leads people to assume he's ok with it. Other passages usually make it quite clear that he isn't. But there is still the question of Adam & Eve's kids, and I'm not sure biblical scholars really agree on what that's all about.

    The times where mass-murder is advocated are interesting. God establishes the precedent in Genesis (when he floods the world and when he tells Abram that his descendants will come back and destroy the Amorites in 400 years because their evil was not yet fully grown) that he waits until a people group is wholly, completely, evil before wiping them out. In other passages he isn't as explicit, but in those cases there are examples of individuals within those societies who turned to God and were spared from being destroyed (this happened in Sodom & Gomorrah and in Jericho, and in the Exodus some of the Egyptian slavers left with the children of Israel, etc). The point being, that while it isn't as explicit as most of us would be comfortable with, there is a precedent there of still allowing individuals a chance to repent if they were really open to it.

    Not that I can explain away every strange passage in the Bible; I don't think anyone can. I just wanted to mention that when it comes to a text that was written thousands of years ago in a culture that none of us were a part of, in a language most of us don't speak, it needs to be read with a little more care than most (including myself) usually want to put into it.

    As for cruelties that have been afflicted in the name of God (some of them even in biblical times but without his blessing), I don't think there is any justification for them. Just a bunch of religious leaders who decided to abuse their power like any human would be tempted to do. And I know they like to justify their actions by finding passages in the Bible, but if you're going to just take verses out of context you can really make the Bible say anything you want.

    Also, knowing that about the Bible makes me hesitant to take a passage from any other religious text (the Qur'an included) out of its context and make judgements based on it. Someday maybe I'll have the time to study the Qur'an, but not yet.

  59. Re:Peace by rezalas · · Score: 3, Informative

    The bible says "though shall not murder" not "kill". The translation from many bible versions is wrong, and has been corrected over time. Kill != murder, there is a difference.

  60. Re:Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, it's totally like rain on your wedding day.

  61. Re:Peace by Missing_dc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Um, no. He might go "Roman" on their asses, but it will probably be a new testament hand slap:

    "oh, come on you big thillies, you knooow thatth bad!"

    What ever happened to the pillar of salt justice or city leveling anger of the old testament god?
    Not being a follower, but having read the bible, I always wondered why, despite being referred to as male, "God" got emasculated in the new testament.

    --
    How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
  62. Re:Peace by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You seriously lack perspective. Look again...with an open mind...

    In response to items like:

    "10/15/2008 Afghanistan Lashkar Gah 6 0 Six local police are taken out in a brutal Taliban ambush on their checkpoint."

    I suggest:

    US strike kills 9 al Qaeda and Taliban in North Wazirstan
    http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2008/10/us_strike_kills_9_al.php

    US kills 6 in strike in Baitullah Mehsud's territory
    http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2008/10/us_kills_6_in_strike.php

    US Kills al Qaeda in Iraq's deputy commander
    http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2008/10/us_kills_6_in_strike.php

    When we do it, its framed as a 'strike against $evil_people' not as an invasion force killing people in their homes, like when they fight back.

    In response to something like:

    "10/14/2008 Afghanistan Uruzgan 9 6 Two children are among nine civilians murdered when Taliban bombers target a minibus."

    how about:

    Unmanned US drone kills school children...
    http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/index.php?sid=403793

    What do you think would be written if it had been their unmanned drone and our children?

    And as for this:

    "10/13/2008 Pakistan Murid Wal 1 0 A young man is forced by honor to kill his mother when she refuses to break off an 'illicit' relationship."

    Gee that sounds awful.. but doesn't REALLY sound much different than this:

    "An 18 year old boy, Sean Powell, was shot to death in his car outside the home of the married teacher he had been having an affair with. Local police have arrested the woman's husband, Eric Mclean, in the shooting."

    Same motivation, Same result, same difference. Oh wait... you mean to say it was a state sanctioned murder? gotcha...luckily we have those too...

    "Kevin Watts, 27, was pronounced dead on Thursday at 6:17 pm Texas time (2317 GMT), spokeswoman Michelle Lyons told AFP.

    It was Texas' tenth execution since the start of the year, and the second execution to take place this week. Ten more inmates are scheduled to be killed in Texas by the end of November."

    Granted we don't do it for adultry... but on the other hand, we don't exactly have the best track record for even properly ensuring our victims are guilty...

    http://www.abanet.org/irr/hr/fall97/deathpen.html

  63. Re:Peace by Trespass · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think not.

    Best regards,

    UTW

    Consider starting.

  64. Pastafarians! Rise up! by Ngarrang · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Noodly appendages of FSM command you to rise up and slay with Prego sauce anyone who offends His Noodliness by including words of wisdom from his Great Cookbook in their songs or slashdot posts. Unless, of course, proper accrediting is given, including a sprinkle of oregano and paprika.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
  65. Re:Peace by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll make you a deal.

    You stop talking about Muslims as if they were a homogeneous hive mind, and I'll stop considering you a flame-stoking bigot.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  66. Re:Peace by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ephesians 5:22-23 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church, and he is the saviour of the body. - That's right. Get back in the kitchen! Get back to submitting and quit telling me to take out the garbage.

    That's one of the Bible verses which is most often quoted out of context. If you read it in context then the wife gets off lightly. She only has to submit to her husband: he has to sacrifice his life for her.

    Deuteronomy 22:28 If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her. - Pants are bad but rape is OK as long as you pay for it and marry her.

    It's not saying that rape is OK. This needs to be read with the cultural context in mind: without this law, the woman would simply be left unmarried and unmarriageable. The remedy for this tort is that the man must give her social status and support her financially for the rest of her life. Sure, she gets a rough deal, but it's better than she would have got otherwise.

  67. Actually... by mbessey · · Score: 3, Informative

    At least, I do not believe any Pope ever has apologized for the crusades, to name just one tiny thing.

    The prior Pope did actually explicitly apologize for the crusades, among other things.
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1071456

    The current Pope has also apologized for other failings of the Catholic church.

  68. Re:Peace by l0cust · · Score: 4, Funny

    You never know. It might be the start of something beautiful if he answers "No" and smiles at you the right way

    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  69. Re:Peace by tempestdata · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hi, I'm a non-homophobe muslim.

    Wish I could say I was pleased to make your acquaintance you ignorant, prejudiced and ill informed person, but I'm not.

    --
    - Tempestdata
  70. Re:Peace by sexconker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well it is, you know, kind of written in their religion that they have to kill the homosexuals.

    I have a hard time believing that most people who call themselves Muslim actually practice and follow their religion. (Same goes with any religion, really.)

    I don't get why people cling to religion. Sure, people say they're catholic/christian/jewish/muslin/etc, but that's usually a cultural thing.
    The number of people who actually BELIEVE their religion is much, much smaller. And the number of people who actually adhere to their religion's laws is infinitesimal.

  71. Re:Peace by tempestdata · · Score: 4, Informative

    I apologize for my previous comment. It was made in anger. Apart from your prejudice showing, your post appeared to be that of a reasonable person.

    How many muslim's do you know? How many countries have you known them in? How many different age groups, races, social classes have they belonged to?

    You think that by talking to a handful of muslim's you have a grasp on the entirety of the beliefs of 1 billion+ people?

    I am a non-homophobe muslim. My wife is highly educated and an equal partner in my marriage, she does not wear a burkha or even a scarf. I do not think Jews are evil, that America is a great Satan, or that infidels should be slaughtered en masse.

    Do not presume to think that I'm a non-practicing muslim either. I've never had alcohol, or eaten meats I'm not allowed to. I fast, and I pray. I contribute to my mosque, I pay zakah, and have been for umrah several times. I hope to go for Hajj soon. Insha'allah.

    The assumptions you make from a handful of individuals that you do not understand are the foundation of all types of bigotry. From relatively harmless ones like 'women are bad drivers', to dangerous ones like 'black people are dumber than whites'.

    --
    - Tempestdata
  72. Re:Peace by Null+Polarity · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not being a follower, but having read the bible, I always wondered why, despite being referred to as male, "God" got emasculated in the new testament.

    He settled down and had a kid.

  73. Re:Peace by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought he said, "blessed are the cheesemakers."

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  74. Re:Peace by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you are arguing for the tribe's innocence, Amelek is probably the worse example you can come up with. IIRC, they raided the rear of the procession coming out of Egypt.

  75. Re:Peace by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's not being literal, he's referring to any maker of dairy products.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  76. Re:Peace by cbraescu1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Its funny you mention elections, because the most prosperous Muslim-majority nations are the ones that are democracies (Indonesia) or closer to it on that spectrum (Pakistan).

    According to this Wikipedia article, the biggest per-capita GDP, on a PPP basis, is... Qatar (a Muslim country).

    Let's see which other Muslim countries have a better rank than your Indonesia and Pakistan: Brunei (#4), Kuwait (#9), United Arab Emirates (#14), Bahrain (#24), Oman (#36), Saudi Arabia (#38), Libya (#58), Malaysia (#59),

    The first Muslim country that is a democracy is Turkey, coming at #61.

    So whatever your point was... it was dead wrong.

    --
    Catalin Braescu
    Ofaly.com
  77. Re:Peace by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As an atheist I am far more offended by the atheistic fanatics.

    At least the religious people think that what I think matters if they are a dick about it.

    The atheists trying to put down the religious are just dicks with no justification.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  78. Re:Peace by fbjon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hardcore atheists define themselves by opposition to religion. Without religion, there would be only agnostics.

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.