Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Decentralize BitTorrent

A Cow writes "The Tribler BitTorrent client, a project run by researchers from several European universities and Harvard, is the first to incorporate decentralized search capabilities. With Tribler, users can now find .torrent files that are hosted among other peers, instead of on a centralized site such as The Pirate Bay or Mininova. The Tribler developers have found a way to make their client work without having to rely on BitTorrent sites. Although others have tried to come up with similar solutions, such as the Cubit plugin for Vuze, Tribler is the first to understand that with decentralized BitTorrent search, there also has to be a way to moderate these decentralized torrents in order to avoid a flood of spam."

262 comments

  1. It's a good start... by Smidge207 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...and hopefully with this companies will start to use BT as an alternative to http/ftp. The downside is that you have to have a client, but I bet that browsers will have integrated BT support soon (the new Opera does, FF has a plugin). And the savings for the server range from a LOT to none, and even none can't hurt, since if nothing else you at least have a great download client able to resume downloads, download huge files, etc.

    =Smidge=

    --
    Is it just my observation, or is eldavojohn an idiot?
    1. Re:It's a good start... by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Informative

      Opera has had bt support for a while. If you know what a torrent is, you're probably better off with a dedicated client, but for joe average clicking on a link to download, it's usable.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And exactly how many joe averages run Opera?

    3. Re:It's a good start... by philspear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Me, for one.

    4. Re:It's a good start... by bistromath007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're replying to a slashdot comment saying that you run Opera. What makes you think you qualify as Joe Average?

    5. Re:It's a good start... by BlowHole666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Opera and myself have been browsing the web for porn since 2000 :) I never leave my pants on the floor without it :)

      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    6. Re:It's a good start... by KovaaK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My mom recently told me that I should switch to Opera, and she just turned 60 a few days ago. But, she also plays WoW and is more active in web development than I am... so I guess my family isn't exactly "average".

    7. Re:It's a good start... by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're replying to a slashdot comment saying that you run Opera. What makes you think you qualify as Joe Average?

      He said "Me, for one" instead of "I, for one"?
      No /. elitist would munge their grammar in such a fashion

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:It's a good start... by Amouth · · Score: 4, Funny

      funny you mention that.. people whos computers i have had to clean viruses and crap off of because it was obvious they where browseing porn with IE.. install opera and inform them to use it instead... they have a odd face but hey i havn't had to touch any of their comps again (thankfuly)

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    9. Re:It's a good start... by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Funny

      No /. elitist would munge their grammar in such a fashion

      I propose that the poster is so elite that he is completely out of touch with Joe Average. Alas, due to this, his attempt at pretending to be average failed.

      The correct response should have been

      ME TOO

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    10. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to steal the thunder of (average) Joe the plumber!

    11. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Ie will never have bittorrent support. Because Ie will never have bittorrent support, most websites won't offer a download via that format. And if I were in charge of things for IE, it wouldn't get support until the browser supported all of css3 spec.

    12. Re:It's a good start... by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No /. elitist would munge their grammar in such a fashion

      Don't profess to know the mind of an Elitist Slashdot Grammar Nazi until you can write correctly.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    13. Re:It's a good start... by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Funny

      Opera and myself have been browsing the web for porn since 2000 :) I never leave my pants on the floor without it :)

      Uhh, too much inf... No wait

      -1, Informative ;)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    14. Re:It's a good start... by youthoftoday · · Score: 1

      But that's correct.

      --
      -1 not first post
    15. Re:It's a good start... by Radres · · Score: 1

      Was he supposed to write there or they're? Get out of here!

    16. Re:It's a good start... by philspear · · Score: 1

      My forged passport which reads "Joseph P. Average, citizen of Guatemala"

    17. Re:It's a good start... by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      No /. elitist would munge their grammar in such a fashion

      Don't profess to know the mind of an Elitist Slashdot Grammar Nazi until you can write correctly.

      It seems correct to me , but it might be a trap.

    18. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not correct. "Their" is the plural pronoun. "No /. elitist" is a singular subject. The correct form is to use "his", "her", or some alternate form like his/her.

    19. Re:It's a good start... by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      I would say the same to you, it's difficult to recognize proper grammar when you see it, isn't it?

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    20. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True Americans (Joe Sixpack)do not use Opera.

    21. Re:It's a good start... by kv9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      He said "Me, for one" instead of "I, for one"?

      I, for one welcome our new Joe Average Opera-using overlords.

    22. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong!

      No /. elitist would ever use the phrase "I, for one" unless he is welcoming new overlords.

    23. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      At first I read this as "she also plays WoW and is more attractive".

    24. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you mean "Joe the Computer Guy?"

    25. Re:It's a good start... by Goaway · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, this is pretty much exactly the opposite of what companies looking to replace http/ftp want.

      See, here's the thing:

      Bittorrent only does file transfer. All other p2p clients do file transfer and search.

      Bittorrent is massively popular. All other p2p clients are struggling to get anyone to use them.

      And what lesson do people learn from this? Apparently that Bittorrent needs search. These are hardly the first people to have tried this, and found that nobody wants it.

    26. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We know Joe Average doesn't use Opera. But does Joe the Plumber?

    27. Re:It's a good start... by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that using a plural possessive to refer to a singular subject of unknown gender is widely accepted.

      Then again, this is Slashdot...

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    28. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >My mom recently told me that I should switch to Opera, and she just turned 60 a few days ago.

      Time to look into placing her into the old folks' home, I guess. :(

    29. Re:It's a good start... by Darth+Cider · · Score: 3, Funny

      "No /. elitist would munge their grammar in such a fashion" That should be, "No /. elitist would munge HIS grammar in such a fashion." Not knowing this will cost you 50 points on the SAT test.

    30. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to the fact that "his" and "her" are supposedly both sexist, and "his/her" and various replacements are generally considered awkward and useless, "their" is now recommended when referring to an unspecified individual. So y'all can jest get off yer horse and learn the new rule.

    31. Re:It's a good start... by Digital+End · · Score: 1

      that makes me wish I had mod points

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    32. Re:It's a good start... by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      Bierce and Twain knew how to write. They also knew how to taunt better than you, Sir.

      What will you do, rush at me with a sharpened URL for Merriam-Webster, the Dictionary That Gave Up Trying?

      An Elitist Slashdot Grammar Nazi eats such challenges at afternoon tea, Sir.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    33. Re:It's a good start... by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be:
      "No /. elitist would munge his or her grammar in such a fashion."

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    34. Re:It's a good start... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Do you always do what your mom tells you to do, without thinking things through for yourself?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    35. Re:It's a good start... by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      Nice to meet you too, but the name is not Joe, it's Destructozor, Master of Chaos. Now bow down and kiss my feet. And fetch me some brownies.

      Of course with milk, you imbecile.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    36. Re:It's a good start... by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, yes, unless the voices in my head contradict her.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    37. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems correct to me , but it might be a trap.

      "Elitist" is singular. "Their" is plural.

    38. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to regard comment on this one.

      BT can't be FTP, because I don't think that people want to crawl around on FTP all night to find something.

      Is there a BT that downloads with Registry Code? I know that simple downloads don't cut it.

    39. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're replying to a slashdot comment saying that you run Opera. What makes you think you qualify as Joe Average?

      He said "Me, for one" instead of "I, for one"?
      No /. elitist would munge their grammar in such a fashion

      I'm glad to see that you are not a /. elitist yourself! Your third-person, plural, possessive pronoun does not match its antecedent. You should have written, "No /. elitist would munge his grammar in such a fashion[.]" (You also missed a period at the end.)

    40. Re:It's a good start... by HardCase · · Score: 1

      I think that we should all be interested in the case of Joe the Average. Which candidate is going to do the most for his browsing needs? Joe the Average doesn't want to be a victim of "spreading the porn"...oh wait...yes he does! And I support redistribution of porn! Those with vast quantities need to give it up and spread the wealth! And pledge to support Joe the Average in his quest! Because he is me!

    41. Re:It's a good start... by Killer+Orca · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shouldn't that be: "No /. elitist would munge his or her grammar in such a fashion."

      Their are no girls on slashdot, therefore the 'or her' is unnecessary.

    42. Re:It's a good start... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      But... that's KovaaK's mom, not Stifler's. She can't be a MILF.

    43. Re:It's a good start... by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      The Open Source world could give this a jump start by encouraging more people to use Bittorrent:

      1). Bittorrent in Firefox (like in Opera). Good configurable interface so I can limit my upload speed, and the upload speed of individual torrents. Make it office friendly of course, so that it prefers clients on the same subnet (so someone doesn't unknowingly kill the company's upload. The tech guys should be managing that anyways).
      2). Timed releases. Release OpenOffice 3 for direct download several days after releasing it for Bittorrent. This would encourage people to go figure out how this bittorrent thing works (or they'd just use their Firefox built in bittorrent).

    44. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is /. so no "her" here.

    45. Re:It's a good start... by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      ...this are Slashdot...

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    46. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/they.html

    47. Re:It's a good start... by Darth+Cider · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. The "his or her" construct is grammatically incorrect.

    48. Re:It's a good start... by youthoftoday · · Score: 1

      And this are serious thread

      --
      -1 not first post
    49. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think you qualify as Joe Average?

      He's not a plumber, but he plays one on TV.

    50. Re:It's a good start... by profplump · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the elitist has an unspecified gender, and people don't much like being called "it". Modern usage suggests the plural pronoun (which in English is typically gender-neutral) when the subject -- singular or plural -- has an unknown gender.

    51. Re:It's a good start... by DRobson · · Score: 1

      The correct response should have been

      ME TOO

      +1

    52. Re:It's a good start... by smaddox · · Score: 1

      Actually, neither one is correct a sentence, as there is no verb. Some might argue that the verb is implied. However, implied verbs are not an accepted part of the English language, though they are sometimes used by writers.

    53. Re:It's a good start... by Hucko · · Score: 1

      It is actually correct. The plurality of 'their' is only one function of aforementioned word. In other dialects of English (One is presuming the critic is an USA 'English' speaker), it is also an impersonal pronoun for use where the gender is unknown, undefined and/or unimportant to the reader.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    54. Re:It's a good start... by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      "Their" is plural.

      A common misconception. (I was tempted to write so is 'you').

      The use of 'their' as a singular pronoun dates back to about 1420, so it has a bit of a pedigree. One can find it in constructions such as "Many a Sarazen lost their liffe." (Arth. & Merl. [Kölbing] 1533). More recently it has been applied as a gender neutral singlular pronoun. I'm a bit old-fashioned, so I avoid it by never describing an abstract class of people in the singular. (i.e. rather than writing "a user" I always write "users").

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    55. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the word "one's" is not only recommended, but also correct. "Their" is not recommended because it's incorrect.

    56. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're replying to a slashdot comment saying that you run Opera. What makes you think you qualify as Joe Average?

      He said "Me, for one" instead of "I, for one"?
      No /. elitist would munge their grammar in such a fashion

      I thought /. was an intellectual crowd, meaning that /. users understand the linguists view that such constructions as "Me, for one" aren't really ungrammatical if native speakers feel that such constructions are actually quite natural; simplistic crusty-old-grammarial logic be damned.

    57. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, could not believe how fucking huge this thread had became.

    58. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are clearly not a /. elitist, as if you were you would have used the correct spelling of "there".

    59. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like my COCK!

    60. Re:It's a good start... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      The only downfall are the ISPs that block the torrent ports and lower traffic to save bandwidth for those that download from specific ports....verizon or comcast comes to mind.

    61. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess my family isn't exactly "average"

      so why the tedious irrelevant anecdote?

    62. Re:It's a good start... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bittorrent only does file transfer. All other p2p clients do file transfer and search.

      Bittorrent is massively popular. All other p2p clients are struggling to get anyone to use them.

      And what lesson do people learn from this?

      That having search functionality will make people not want to use a protocol?

    63. Re:It's a good start... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that people prefer to use familiar systems, such as the web, over some limited, unfriendly program designed for tech heads?

      I'd have thought that Slashdot, home of the Unix nerds, would appreciate the value of having a simple tool that does a single thing well.

    64. Re:It's a good start... by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Fine, fine:

      "No /. elitist would munge one's own grammar in such a fashion."

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    65. Re:It's a good start... by hexium119 · · Score: 1

      Or you could use sheets ...

    66. Re:It's a good start... by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is pretty much exactly the opposite of what companies looking to replace http/ftp want.

      You are wrong. If you have a central tracker, and anybody serving legit content would have one, you need no "search" function, just a link on a website.

      Bittorrent is the most efficient way yet developed to transfer large files, especially if you're trying to minimize your upload bandwith. Already, many video content sites and most file download sites have switched to Bittorent to save on beefy bandwidth costs. In the not-too-distant future I suspect it will be very difficult to download anything over 500 MB from commercial sites not using Bittorrent.

      Clearly for general P2P tasks Bittorent needs a search engine, but that certainly shouldn't prevent commercial use of Bittorrent now (and it isn't).

    67. Re:It's a good start... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Why are you telling me I am wrong and then agreeing with me?

    68. Re:It's a good start... by kayditty · · Score: 0

      both of you have really horrible form, which is hilarious. learn how to use a fucking comma. also stop placing two newlines between each sentence.

    69. Re:It's a good start... by kayditty · · Score: 0

      you're correct. it should obviously be "his (or her)." or it should be "his (and I'm pandering to stupid fucking politically correct dipshit faggots)."

    70. Re:It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Implied verbs are CLEARLY a part of the English language, as they are constantly used by speakers and writers. There is no "accepted" or not.

    71. Re:It's a good start... by rtechie · · Score: 1

      You were saying that Bittorrent was an inadequate replacement for http/ftp. It's that statement that I disagree with. Bittorrent has no search per se, but neither do http/ftp downloads. The only advantage http and ftp have is that the client is built into all web browsers (there might be a few browsers that don't support ftp). There is no pre-installed Bittorrent client on MacOS or Windows.

  2. Centralisation is why BT is so popular by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BT is popular because you can go to a reputable listing site, find a well seeded and good quality torrent with comments by others to back it up and download it quickly. Compared to the chances you take searching traditional P2P systems, full of dodgy encodes, fake file names and incompletes it's obvious why people turn to BT first.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Centralisation is why BT is so popular by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, and you can still do this even with Tribler. They're not mutually exclusive.

    2. Re:Centralisation is why BT is so popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Shut your face, as someone who is actually still stuck on dialup I find your comments offensive and insensitive; you know full well on your dialup days the downloads you attempt would have taken weeks. And even try to liken it to our suffering when you see speeds in the lower half of a hundred K that might take a couple of hours. For Shame Good sir, For Shame.

      (Yeah, I'm planning on suing the government and AT&T for retributions for the hardships and suffering our modem bound people have had to endure.)

      Seriously though, the answer to the rare file dilemma is that the website that is hosting the torrents needs to have a server running Bittorent and all the files with intelligent prioritizing of the worst seeded files. So when there are other people to take the load the website can outsource it, when its rare the website will have to share the burden like it would have had to via http anyways.

    3. Re:Centralisation is why BT is so popular by imroy · · Score: 1

      The eMule network has ed2k URI's which use a hash function to identify a specific file. I don't see them used much, but I'm not a big P2P'er.

    4. Re:Centralisation is why BT is so popular by thepotoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, but the interface is clumsy (pretty, but still clumsy) and there doesn't seem to be any way to read comments on the torrents. The ability to sort by seeders is nice.

      But, what I really want is a way to sort by seeders AND 4 or 5 star ratings AND filter by category AND quickly view tags (dupe, spam, nuked, wrong category, etc) on a torrent. No site lets me do this, but Demonoid comes pretty close with filters.

      Decentralization is a pretty good idea, but it's certainly a long way from being ready for prime time - things may change, and there do seem to be sort boxes for heart (which I assume is rating) and magnifying glass looking at a person's neck (which might be comments, but doesn't seem to do anything anyway).

      I was hoping this could become a great way to find legal inde mp3s (people rate and comment, I filter by good rating and read comments then download, but it doesn't look like it's going to replace Demonoid without a pretty large critical mass of people.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    5. Re:Centralisation is why BT is so popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's the related Magnet URI which is more general, but is also hardly used at all.

    6. Re:Centralisation is why BT is so popular by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The eMule network has ed2k URI's [wikipedia.org] which use a hash function to identify a specific file. I don't see them used much, but I'm not a big P2P'er.

      I didn't get from TFW whether the ed2k 'trackers' still point to servers with the files. What are now bittorrent tracker sites would be better off simply being attestation databases based on hashes (This hash represents X and Y people rate it Z), and letting the clients find the files themselves. Some sort of distributed hierarchical database probably, with the base routes distributed via bittorrent. Some folks have done research into these types of algorithms for self-managed networks.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Centralisation is why BT is so popular by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      It's still a single point of failure.

    8. Re:Centralisation is why BT is so popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would defeat the purpose of using Tribler, which is not having to visit a centralized site to read comments, so yes it is mutually exclusive. Now shut the fuck up before you make yourself look even more stupid and I have to verbally own you again.

    9. Re:Centralisation is why BT is so popular by Inda · · Score: 1

      Do people not remember sites like ShareReactor?

      I mean, jesus, we were posting links to game rips on forums 10 years ago.

      Searching in the client? That sounds like something the noobs do.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    10. Re:Centralisation is why BT is so popular by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      The main benefit I see from non-tracker searching is being able to resurrect "dead" files. Oftentimes I download things off Piratebay or Isohunt but there's no seeds, so I end-up deleting the data. Being able to search the internet for that "lost seed" could makes these files useful again.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  3. Let me see if I have this straight... by bconway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Full decentralized, search capabilities, with many people able to share pieces of the same file... I think we already have something like that.

    News flash: Centralisation is a strength of BitTorrent.

    --
    Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    1. Re:Let me see if I have this straight... by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      News Flash: New feature does not remove older.

      I just don't see how this would hurt torrents in any way. (unless you talk about cliques of people worried about their private trackers, who might be exposed to public by some seach feature, in which case solution is not use client that does that.)

      Also, Torrent was hardly centralized lately, popular cients support several tracers per torrent, user-to-user peer exchange and tracer discovery. Hell, those "centralized servers" usually just offered torrents with trackers from other domains with quite shamefull quality. Even tpb has its share of fakes.

      Quality torrents will still be avaiable thought miracle of .torrent files at directories. ED2K network worked exactly like this before life was sucked from it by torrent/rapidstuff. and it was flawless: get link from trusted source first, try search if it fails. win/win

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    2. Re:Let me see if I have this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are these tracers you speak of? Do you mean trackers?

    3. Re:Let me see if I have this straight... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I just don't see how this would hurt torrents in any way.

      It wouldn't, and nobody said it would. The point is just that nobody wants this.

    4. Re:Let me see if I have this straight... by chebucto · · Score: 1

      But BT search _is_ centralized, and search is what this article is talking about. Downloading material is much less of a crapshoot if you can reliably know who uploaded a file and see what other people say about it. I don't relish the idea of having to sift through pages of unreliable search results again a la gnutella; I'd much rather stick with what's in place.

      The decentralization you're talking about all happens after you've chosen what file to download. And it's all predicated on a central tracker, anyway, so it still doesn't fundamentally alter the character of the BT protocol.

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    5. Re:Let me see if I have this straight... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      News flash: Centralisation is a strength of BitTorrent.

      Ever since the demise of Napster and Grokster, followed by the public death of eDonkey, several large ED2K servers and various gnutella clients centralization has not been a strength and everyone has been running as fast as possible in the other direction.

      The problem with centralization is that it gives the **AA a big fat target to aim their lawsuits at. And they've quite successfully sued P2P companies into oblivion and hassled websites out of existence.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Let me see if I have this straight... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      The problem with centralization is that it gives the **AA a big fat target to aim their lawsuits at.

      I think it's called 'Sweden'.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    7. Re:Let me see if I have this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the operator of the DDOSed tracker.

    8. Re:Let me see if I have this straight... by lilomar · · Score: 1

      Everyone, except, you know, The Pirate Bay. Yay, Sweden!

      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
    9. Re:Let me see if I have this straight... by electrictroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do. Having non-tracker searching might resurrect some of my current dead torrents. I hate being stuck at 80% forever, and there might be a seed somewhere out there just waiting to be discovered.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  4. Find torrents or people? by jb.cancer · · Score: 1

    So can this plugin be used to find people hosting files and do away with centralized servers hosted in no-you-can-sue-in-this-country?

    1. Re:Find torrents or people? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      There are already decentralized mechanisms for finding peers given a torrent -- the problem that this is trying to address is a decentralized mechanism for finding torrents.

  5. Everyone should be aware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to the website, Tribler will exchange torrent downloading history by default.

    1. Re:Everyone should be aware... by EncryptedSoldier · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, and it also states it can be easily turned off by "disabling the recommender in the Preference menu".

    2. Re:Everyone should be aware... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, and it also states it can be easily turned off by "disabling the recommender in the Preference menu".

      I think you're missing the point.

      It's a stupid and arguably dangerous default setting to have enabled. The only way the company could make the **AA's lawsuit campaign any easier is to e-mail them the name of every torrent you download.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Everyone should be aware... by EncryptedSoldier · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually it is a somewhat useful setting for those of us who respect copyrights. Programs shouldn't revolve around making it easier for you to steal somebody's property and not get caught.

    4. Re:Everyone should be aware... by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Also just because your client advertises that it downloaded a file doesn't mean you 1) seeded at all (hence would not have been distributing) and 2) don't have a fair use right to a copy of that file (such as if you had already purchased it through another channel but lost the original somehow). Then finally 3) downloaded a file whose contents are what the file name implies.

    5. Re:Everyone should be aware... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Actually it is a somewhat useful setting for those of us who respect copyrights. Programs shouldn't revolve around making it easier for you to steal somebody's property and not get caught.

      Really? It's a good idea to keep broadcasting to the world that you downloaded the completely legit amateur production JackandJillfromnextdoordothenasty[avi][xvid].torrent ?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    6. Re:Everyone should be aware... by freespac3 · · Score: 1

      Programs shouldn't disclose any private information by default either...

      --
      Better to regret something you have done, then something you haven't.
  6. Researchers plans by philspear · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. Decentralize bittorrent
    2. Share pirated stuff
    3. ???
    4. profit
    5. Cure cancer?

    1. Re:Researchers plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always feel the need to correct this joke. Get rid of the ??? step as part of the joke is that it doesn't exist and ruins the entire thing. By adding the ??? step it's as if you are looking for the step when the idea is that you deny it is even needed.

      If you're always "correcting" a joke did you ever stop to think maybe you just don't get it?

    2. Re:Researchers plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The joke comes from South Park. In the South Park Episode, "Gnomes", the following sign explains the gnomes' plan to steal underpants: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/dd/Gnomes_plan.png .

    3. Re:Researchers plans by philspear · · Score: 1

      I always feel the need to correct this joke.

      Well then the joke is partially on you.

    4. Re:Researchers plans by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Do you know why he doesn't get it? Because it's not actually funny. It's just a reference, it has no humour value on its own.

    5. Re:Researchers plans by squizzar · · Score: 1

      I suggest you correct:

            joke -----> %

                            0 /|\ You
                          / \

      My ASCII art is terrible, and I don't take it seriously.

      It's a terrible shame when one with such a low uid falls from such a great height...

    6. Re:Researchers plans by squizzar · · Score: 1

      Arrgh!! Muphry's Law in action... I'll be in the corner sobbing if anyone needs me.

    7. Re:Researchers plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know why he doesn't get it? Because it's not actually funny. It's just a reference, it has no humour value on its own.

      Of course it does, otherwise it wouldn't have been funny the first time and nobody would reference it. You don't need to know the reference to infer the intent of the "???" list and understand what it means and why it's funny.

    8. Re:Researchers plans by Goaway · · Score: 1

      If you pulled it off right, it could be funny. But people don't. They just copy the list and rely on people already knowing the joke.

      The original worked because it had context. These references don't.

    9. Re:Researchers plans by philspear · · Score: 1

      Most of it was a reference. The joke was that research money is apperantly being spent on filesharing rather than, you know, curing cancer. IE it's a lower priority than fixing bittorrent. I'm not actually criticizing this though, as I'm sure this work has some value.

    10. Re:Researchers plans by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it would have been funnier if you had actually made an original joke, instead of relying on a worn-out old reference.

    11. Re:Researchers plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 1. Decentralize bittorrent
      Step 2. Share pirated stuff
      Step 3. Cure cancer via step 4
      Step 4. profit

    12. Re:Researchers plans by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Actually it does have a lot of humor value. It was a joke that was made to parody the dot com era of business plans saying 1) register a .com, 3) profit. and then selling that to VCs that were handing out cash to anyone with that as their business plan. 2 didn't need to exist.

      Anyway I do stand somewhat corrected as someone else posted there was a sign with step 2 having a '?' at one point in the episode. Always when spoken it was just completely left out.

      we are talking serious comedy here right? I also find it very amusing that people don't find an overly serous analysis of a joke amusing in it's self. Perhaps I should be less subtle and just say, "fart" or "butsecks". That should simplify the humor.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    13. Re:Researchers plans by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      1. Rely on a worn-out old reference. 2. Add a second action. 3. ??? 4. Profit!

    14. Re:Researchers plans by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Actually it does have a lot of humor value. It was a joke...

      Yes, it has humor value in its original context. However, repeating it without that context deprives it of any value other than as a reference to the original joke.

    15. Re:Researchers plans by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1

      If you pulled it off right, it could be funny. But people don't. They just copy the list and rely on people already knowing the joke.

      The original worked because it had context. These references don't.

      1. Copy list
      2. Rely on people already knowing joke.
      3. Profit!

      See that's how it's... d'oh!

    16. Re:Researchers plans by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1

      Geeze, he just missed the joke, there's no need to threaten him with some kind of horrible dismemberment!

  7. Re:Ivy League by BlowHole666 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Good to see the best minds of this generation have chosen to benefit humankind with... ...a better way to steal stuff!

    Bit Torrent is not always used to steal stuff. Its how some game updates are downloaded, and most versions of Linux offer a Bit Torrent download.

    --
    I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
  8. Re:Ivy League by SkankinMonkey · · Score: 1

    Guns aren't always used to kill things either. I mean, you can use them for target practice, right?

  9. Re:Yay! The Pirates SCORE AGAIN !! Yay!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a slashtard you spell pretty good.

  10. Solving the wrong problems by Beve+Jates · · Score: 1

    How about working on making it so that I don't have to show my IP address as downloading a specific file? That's by far the biggest problem with BitTorrent.

    Maybe a bunch common servers that then stream to you. This would be similar to news servers/NNTP except you would be pulling from multiple sources in the BitTorrent way. Also more stuff could be available if it worked like normal torrent hosts and they didn't expire (unlike news servers).

    Individual people could even act as proxies similar to Tor/Freenet except designed for a heavy load (like I2P).

    Just something, anything, that obscures the IP addresses of those downloading stuff. All the current stuff like encryption and this decentralized system do nothing to protect the users of the system.

    1. Re:Solving the wrong problems by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      Protip: It's a fundamental requirement of Internet Protocol (the IP in TCP/IP) that the machines you connect to or that connect to you need your IP address to send you data.

      If you want data from the internet, somebody is going to need your IP address.

    2. Re:Solving the wrong problems by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you want data from the internet, somebody is going to need your IP address.

      Yes, but the computer that has your IP address doesn't need to know the data, and visa-versa. That's the whole point behind onion routing; you route through one or more neutral intermediaries, and use end-to-end encryption. Neither endpoint needs to know the other's IP address, and the intermediaries don't have any idea what data is being exchanged. With two or more intermediate nodes you don't even have to disclose who you're talking to.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    3. Re:Solving the wrong problems by caluml · · Score: 1

      If you want data from the internet, somebody is going to need your IP address.

      Not necessarily so. UDP packets with spoofed source addresses (if your ISP doesn't egress filter, which most good ones will).

    4. Re:Solving the wrong problems by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      He said if you want data from the internet. You can easily send data to the internet without the end knowing what your IP address is(at least for certain protocols), but from is another matter.

  11. eDonkey/eMule anyone? by imroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it just me, or is the BitTorrent world slowly converging on features and an architecture that the eDonkey network has had for years?.

    I mean, BitTorrent started out as a way to download big files, like Linux ISO's. Then people started making big torrent search web sites, similar to eDonkey servers. Then people made BitTorrent clients that had a queue of downloads (e.g utorrent), quite similar to eDonkey clients. Now these people have made Torrent searching distributed, just like eDonkey and Kademlia.

    I've never been much impressed by BitTorrent (gee, can you tell?). Just what is it that makes it more popular than eDonkey/eMule? Is it just the reputation and hype that has built up around "Torrents"?

    1. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by fmoliveira · · Score: 5, Insightful

      with ed2k I enter in the 2000th position in 2000 different queues. with torrent my download starts almost immediatly at the top speed my connection supports. I don't like the work of emule developers at the protocol, and they aren't very receptive of suggestions. I think the users voted with their downloads.

    2. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      The difference between emule and bittorrent is that bittorrent is *effective*. Emule has always been a completely slow piece of shit. Bittorrent became popular because it's typically FAST on bandwidth speeds!

    3. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by BPPG · · Score: 1

      I've never been much impressed by BitTorrent (gee, can you tell?). Just what is it that makes it more popular than eDonkey/eMule? Is it just the reputation and hype that has built up around "Torrents"?

      I've kind of wondered this as well. I'm not a heavy bittorrent user, but it is what I mostly use for P2P.

      The only reason I can think of is that it makes sense on a browser-centric desktop, you learn about it and use it with your browser, whether it's IE or firefox or lynx.

      --
      What's the value of information that you don't know?
    4. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Timmmm · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's the fact that

      a) The torrent sites are easy to search, have good files and few fakes.
      b) The tit-for-tat algorithm does a pretty good job of ensuring people upload stuff to you. Every other P2P software I used before bittorrent was slow and unreliable.

    5. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by imroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      with ed2k I enter in the 2000th position in 2000 different queues.

      Ok, I'll give you that. It often takes a while to start a download, especially if it's not widely available. eDonkey seems to be setup for college students - run it 24/7 and everything is queued. I wonder how BitTorrent does it differently. Surely not every BT download starts immediately - there can't always be enough idle peers (with the content you want) to make that possible. Is your experience mainly with new or old content, or both?

    6. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

      I've noticed downloads in eMule files containing .torrent files and wondered why. I combined my shared directories between all my sharing programs into one directory. Then it dawned on me. When I downloaded something in a torrent where the download contained the .torrent file, eMule would share that .torrent file. So someone searching in eMule (or Limewire) could come along and fine my shared .torrent file as a source to the shared file. By the same token, I can search in eMule for a .Torrent, download it, and attempt to use Limewire to torrent download the file. MD5's are your friend here :)

      It only makes sense that the .torrents themselves have no central server. Now what would be really nice it being able to combine sources for Knoppix that are eMule, KAD, torrents, and Limewire and use all of them at one time to get Knoppix downloaded.

    7. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by fmoliveira · · Score: 1

      There doesn't need to be someone idle awaiting. If I'm already uploading, someone should already be paying me back. ed2k is just dumb.

    8. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i blame the flood of people on the bittorrent mailing list (myself possibly included) that wanted to do "cool things" with torrents, but, uh... didn't know exactly what could be cooler, or really better, really. the multi-tracker thing is kind of cool, but not sure about the rest of the crazy things. bram left that group a long time ago.

    9. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Bit torrent starts to upload literally as soon as you have data that any other peer needs. It seems to me like new peers are given some data ASAP for that very reason. And then of course, as soon as you have some data to upload, another peer/seed is relieved from uploading that particular data, giving it more upload cap to send you more data, etc. As long as people aren't too stingy with their upload it works pretty well.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    10. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well rather than waiting on a Queue, a Bitorrent connection (that just started) with a whole bunch of peers would have the seeders sending data to the first set of peers and then after a short while those idle peers would be able to get it from those first set of peers, as more and more people start getting the data, there is more available sources. Now if you're talking about very new content, it will be very fast because you'll have tons of people hitting the connection as well as those who have already downloaded the content, increasing your available pool of sources 10 fold.

    11. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Informative

      You seem to have some misconceptions on how BitTorrent works. Basically, when you start a torrent download, your client asks the tracker (a central server that's keeping track of things) which computers have the download in question. Your client then asks those computers for pieces of the whole download. The pieces come in random order, and it might take a while for you to get the whole file, but the strength of BitTorrent is that, by asking many computers for small pieces of the file, you're getting a share of the collective upload bandwidth of every computer that's got part of the file, rather than getting the complete upload bandwidth of a single computer. This lets the download start immediately, and means that even peers that don't have the complete download yet can help speed things up for you.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    12. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Goaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it just me, or is the BitTorrent world slowly converging on features and an architecture that the eDonkey network has had for years?.

      No, it's not.

      What is happening is that there are people who think that what BitTorrent really needs is to become eDonkey. And then they make a big deal about how they are going to turn BitTorrent into eDonkey.

      And then they find out that pretty much nobody wants eDonkey, and that's why they are not using it, but using BitTorrent instead. And their wonderful project slowly dies and is forgotten.

      And then we wait half a year, and the next person steps up to the plate to turn BitTorrent into eDonkey.

    13. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by imroy · · Score: 1

      If I'm already uploading, someone should already be paying me back.

      Then just who is this "someone"? The majority of home internet connections have been asymmetric for over a decade and AFAIK all modern P2P clients limit the download/upload ratio. If everyone is downloading three or four times what they're uploading, it just doesn't add up. How can BitTorrent, as it's been suggested, start downloading almost immediately when eDonkey supposedly takes longer? Is there something in the protocol/clients, or are there simply lots of BT users willing to sit around uploading?

    14. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by imroy · · Score: 0

      You assume wrong about my misconceptions. What you just described is basically, AFAIK, any modern P2P network. What did I write that made you think I don't know how P2P works? I've been using P2P since Gnutella (I never used Napster). Did you not notice my 3-digit user id? Young-uns today...

    15. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by imroy · · Score: 1

      Ok, being web/HTTP-based, BitTorrent is easier to search. But eDonkey has its own system of credits, ratings, and scores. No P2P network today would be able to survive without some way of limiting the impact of leechers.

    16. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by funfail · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And that's different from eMule/eDonkey protocol how?

    17. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      In my experience no-one rates files or even deletes fake ones from their computers.

    18. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      with ed2k I enter in the 2000th position in 2000 different queues

      You're exaggerating ridiculously, a file with 2000 sources you should start getting within a couple minutes with emule. A file with only a few sources may have large queues that take a while.

      But thats part of the design of ed2k vs BT. BT is designed for single downloads vs ed2k as batch. With BT if you're seeding 3 different torrents, you have 3 different "queues". With ed2k, when you get a queued 2000 that's probably because there's only a few sources sharing 10k+ files and the file wouldn't be present if not for these super-sharers. ed2k supports massive file shares. BT not so well, in the BT world what happens is they stop sharing, the files are unseeded and people complain that they can't get the file at all.

      So the short of it is ed2k should be where you go for rare files, while BT is where you go for popular files. But BT has gotten more refined on reseeding requests and some of the clients try to balance out so unseeded files are seeded. That with the sheer popularity, BT is competing even for rare files. So yes ed2k is kind of getting antiquated as BT gets more robust.

    19. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      The pieces come in random order

      Actually the client is free to choose the order of the pieces, which is why different cleints have different real world performances. A common trick is to first ask for anything and everything then once your d/l at full speed start looking to get the rarer pieces, which ofc leaves the end of the download getting common pieces so even though there are few of them it will not decrease the d/l speed.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    20. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're exaggerating ridiculously, a file with 2000 sources you should start getting within a couple minutes with emule. A file with only a few sources may have large queues that take a while.

      Having queues at all is the problem. Don't make people wait to participate in the swarm. Give them data immediately, so they can upload it to others.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    21. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      It would be very cool if eMule had a (compliant) BT client and would transparently handle BT hashes, DHT and this newfangled search feature. I dislike the fact that there are several disjoint sets of files because the clients don't play nice with each other. Once a client hashes a complete file it should publish that eD2k hash X is the same as SHA1 Y in its DHT. Yeah, wishful thinking, I know.
      Shareaza was a good approach, just badly implemented.

    22. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by lazy_playboy · · Score: 1

      > or are there simply lots of BT users willing to sit around uploading?

      In my experience, yes.

      If it's a new torrent then everyone gets the file at the speed of the initial seeder's upload. If it's an older torrent then most of the swarm are seeders which small amounts of upload available, which adds up to a good download speed usually.

      BT relies on a proportion of the swarm being good citizens and becoming seeders.

    23. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by StuffMaster · · Score: 0

      Many of these people keep complaining that ed2k/kad are slow. Well of course a particular file will be slower if there are 100x as many files. They don't seem to understand the original intent of p2p.

      I share 400-500 files, as do many users. Compare that to BT, where each person must be running a file's torrent for it to be shared (1-10 avg, I would guess). One is for distribution, the other is for file sharing. If you want something that's not popular enough to have active torrents at any given time, try eMule, where many files are permanently shared.

    24. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by lazy_playboy · · Score: 1

      With a very new torrent, everyone should get the file at the initial seeder's upload speed. This is usually pretty limited with ADSL, but at least that one uploader's bandwidth is not being divided amongst all the peers.

    25. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Mr2001 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've only used eMule, so I don't know how much these problems affect other eDonkey clients, but in my experience these are the big issues:

      1. You can only start sharing once you've downloaded an entire piece of the file. The same is true of BT, but eMule pieces are big and have a fixed size (around 9 MB). Torrent piece sizes are variable, and they're often less than 1 MB. This means you can start sharing sooner, especially since...

      2. ...eMule severely limits the upload speed per connection. If you set your upload rate to 30 KB/sec, you'll end up with 10 connections, each uploading at 3 KB/sec. At that rate, it takes nearly an hour to transfer an entire piece of the file, and until that's finished, the peer can't share any of the data you've been sending him.

      3. eMule's credit system is mostly only useful when you're downloading a group of files that are shared by the same users who are also interested in some similar files you have (i.e. you share S1E1 and gain credits that you redeem when downloading S1E2). BT provides immediate gratification: your uploads are almost always reciprocated right then and there.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    26. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by lazy_playboy · · Score: 1

      Comments on thepiratebay website are often useful to judge a torrents authenticity and quality.

    27. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by imroy · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you! Someone finally explained the differences.

      The larger chunk/block size of eDonkey would definitely make a difference. Perhaps it is larger in order to reduce the load on the servers, which have to track not only what files everyone has, but the parts of each file that everyone has. Having larger chunks cuts down on storage, processing, and transmission of chunk completion.

      I notice that aMule has an option to change the amount of upstream bandwidth allocated to each upload 'slot'. But the FAQ says that clients are restricted to having at least 3 upload slots. So if you're still on lowly ADSL like me, each peer is only getting 1-2 KB/s, when it would arguably be better to focus on only one at a time.

      eDonkey's credit/etc system does appear rather weak. When I first began using it, I had assumed that the servers stored some sort of 'reputation' for each client. After all, each client has a signature of some sort. But this is not the case unfortunately.

    28. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, with torrent my download never ever starts cause it's several months old, and there are no seeders. At least with ed2k I can actually get the file even if it takes a week or so. The two have quite a different philosophy. Edk2 prioritizes sharing as many files as possible at the expense of speed, while bittorrent cares more about grabbing the files one wants relativly quickly.

    29. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about instead of being an idiot edonkey fanboy, you try it for yourself and see. I couldn't tell you why it work, only that it does. i would guess it's because when you join a "swarm", everyone in the swarm is dedicated to sending/receiving the files described in the torrent. if there's 100 peers, that 100 hosts that are likely to start sending you stuff. when you first join the swarm you seem to get some charity (people send you stuff because you're new), but then you're able to send that stuff to others who reciprocate with parts you dont have. with edonkey you find your file and there are 200 sources, but every one of those sources is trying to get umteen other files that you dont have or care about, so you are unable to upload to them so you stay at the bottom of their queues.

    30. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) The torrent sites are easy to search, have good files and few fakes.

      You mean, like this?

    31. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the difference is simply in the number of files and the time period.

      torrent: open for only a few hours and for a single download. Usually for recent tv shows.

      amule: on 24/7 and am sharing out all of my anime fansubs(2000-ish individual files). Some of them over a decade old.

      My overall upload bandwidth is throttled to about the same level for each, but the upload bandwidth for ed2k is distributed amongst my entire collection of files. Therefore people have to wait a lot longer to get a particular chunk of a particular file from me via ed2k.

      So, they both have their place. torrent is appropriately named and is great for newly popular content. ed2k is great for getting the fansubs of a 95 episode anime that aired on japanese tv 10 years ago. :)

    32. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you do not understand the word "protocol."

    33. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Clarious · · Score: 1

      So you can find rarer files with Emule. The reason for it is pretty simple, all the peer in torrent have the same file set, so all the bandwidth they have go to that file, while in Emule people often keep a lot of different files, so the bandwidth have to divide between them, I have even see some people with 10+ TBs of files on Emule. Anyway, I use both of them, torrent to get the file, emule to reupload the file I downloaded from torrent to edonkey network and to find some rare files.

    34. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Bittorrent was different in that due to use of torrent files, if you found a good tracker, there was a low chance of their being fakes. If there was fakes, no one would seed them. You can also read the comments to various torrents to make sure what you're getting is good.

      The problem with the more decentralized type of P2P networks (Limewire, Kazaa, etc) - is there's no way of validating your download. It could be fake, bad quality or misnamed.

      ~Jarik

    35. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      Both are true, but AFAIK it's mostly the protocol. ED2k and its ilk are based around queueing for downloads which causes all sorts of problems.

      They're also totally decentralized, unlike bittorrent. This isn't just the decentralization of the search(as is the case with tribbler), but also of the download which means you'll never get as many sources of the file as you will with a torrent.

      This new system won't protect you from the RIAA or MPAA coming after you, but what it will do is take away the need for a tracker site. Tracker sites are the low hanging fruit of the bittorrent equation, they're static, they have verifiable owners, and they're required for large scale file distribution. They're the low hanging fruit for enforcement.

      Whether removing this low hanging fruit from the equation is a good or bad thing, I'm not 100% sure, it might make it that much harder for the copyright holders to go after people, but at the same time it might mean they start going after the actual people downloading the files more often even if it is more expensive and difficult.

      It's definitely a plus for legal content though, as it will make finding what you're looking for a hundred times easier(finding bittorrent sources of legal content can sometimes be tricky).

    36. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Wildclaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How can BitTorrent, as it's been suggested, start downloading almost immediately when eDonkey supposedly takes longer?

      Noone said that it would go fast. You'll download at about the speed of your upload (and sometimes slower when it is a badly seeded torrent) which still is far better than emule. Of course, on well seeded torrents you get higher speeds as seeders contribute bandwidth without taking any.

      However, the real difference between bittorrent and emule is trust in the system. Bittorrent users have a far higher trust that peers on the other side will share as sharing is rewarded by higher upload speeds. That trust leads to people in turn sharing more which reinforces that trust. A simple positive feedback effect of a good trading system.

      Note, that this happens even though some people can leech. As long as most ordinary good people concieve the other side as sharing, they will go to more effort to share themselves. If that trust changes, maybe by an influx of people who just leech, then sharing will start to go down.

      Contrast that with emule that claims to be a sharing network instead of trading network. What this basically means is that they pretty much don't reward sharing, and direct trading is discouraged or punished. This decreases trust in the system. Why should you share when you can't trust that the other side does. Therefore people share less and leech more.

      The idea of trust is one of the basics in economics, which unfortunally is not so well understood by most, especially politicians. The goverment should stay away from things that reduce trust in the market and instead do neutral stuff (simple taxing without a myriad of exceptions) or even positive stuff that increase market trust (jailing scammer and liers as well as generally enforce laws or creating laws that make it more difficult to lie and scam)

    37. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Inda · · Score: 1

      1. There were/are plenty of ed2k sites. Remember ShareReactor? It was as big as the PirateBay.

      The only difference now is that there are a lot of members-only torrent sites with, wait for it, old school FTP ratios.

      2. The tit-for-tat is meaningless. The way BT grew so fast was because of the download-and-delete methodology. No one shares 50gb of hard drive space on BT, or at least they didn't to begin with... Which leads to BT's main problem of short file longevity. If ed2k users only shared half a dozen files each, the network would match BT in terms of speed.

      If only there was a way of uploading a file once to an extremely fast server, that server mirroring the file with other extremely fast servers and the client downloading from there. I'm surprise no one has done this yet. Maybe it would be a good job for a university to take on...

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    38. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by raynet · · Score: 1

      I don't think the servers in eMule-protocol keep track of chucks/blocks of clients, but Bittorrent does.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    39. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by tepples · · Score: 1

      And that's different from eMule/eDonkey protocol how?

      For one thing, a BitTorrent user will on average be sharing fewer files at once than an eMule user, so the queues for any given file will likely be shorter. For another, unlike eMule, BitTorrent's prominent display of each file's share ratio has resulted in a culture of making sure you keep your client turned on long enough to send at least some percentage of the pieces that you downloaded to other users.

    40. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by GermanG · · Score: 1

      My approach is:
      * brand new and popular things -> use a torrent client
      * strange, rare or old stuff -> use an ed2k client

      Each protocol has their strengths, there's no magic bullet.

      Just my 2 pesos.

    41. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Edonkey has been doing the same since... at least 2002. You can -and do- ask for parts of uncomplete files.

    42. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Others have already explained.

      The problem with eDonkey is that it's last-in/first-out. Everyone always starts at the bottom of a 2000 user queue, so you have to leave your client connected for days continuously to download pretty much anything. This makes it totally useless for any content you might want quickly (ex. daily TV shows).

      So in order you use eDonkey you effectively have to have a dedicated server with a hardline. The same is true of many other P2P apps, like DirectConnect and Freenet. That's a huge burden for many people.

    43. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      How do you propose people send data asap when you've possibly hundreds or even thousands of people who want something from you?

    44. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by __aaxoma9971 · · Score: 1

      Want to a buy an intelligible reply to this question.

    45. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by vecctor · · Score: 1

      How does eMule not reward sharing? It has a credit system built into it - and you move faster through people's queues when you upload to them.

      --
      Why, yes I have been touched by His noodly appendage. And I plan to sue.
    46. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      The credit system is very inefficent (and the developers know it). It rewards waiting over actually sharing back. Especially the basic emule client where the credit system is extremly watered down. Any attempt to implement something more efficent is banned from the official forums.

      Especially swarming/tit-for-tat which was the big efficency improvement of bittorrent. It is looked down upon by the offical developers. The reason I think is that they want a higher percentage of the bandwidth going to rare files instead of "trading", but that reasoning is flawed. By allowing people to trade you raise their perception of the network, making them stay online longer with higher bandwidth limits. Thereby indirectly increasing the supply of rare files.

      One counterargument is that rare bittorrent files go dead, which indicates that rarity isn't rewarded. But that isn't actually true. The reason bittorrent files go dead has more to do with the centralized approach of bittorrent. The only way you can share files with bittorrent is by either finding another torrent file that contains your files, or create a new torrent file and upload it to a torrent site. Both those ways are too complicated to do all the time.

      Emule on the other hand uses a file by file system, so sharing is as simple as putting it in your emule sharing folder. That is why emule and other file p2p networks have more rare files on them. Bittorrent on the other hand relies more heavily on either a permanent seeder, however small the upload, or the torrent having enough traffic that it never reaches an abandoned state. The second alternative is why you see main torrent files that group lots of files together. That reduced the chance of a torrent file getting abandoned as you have more people on it at once.

    47. Re:eDonkey/eMule anyone? by rusl · · Score: 1

      web/http is accessible to nearly all internet users. Vs. Special client/ special search protocol means more and more barriers to adoption. These barriers may be trivial to a geeky individual, but the P2P system is utterly dependant on popularity for success and most individuals being less geeky that readers here... It's the same reason Youtube video is more sucessful than Bittorrent. My housemates will even watch a crappy flash file of a movie in their browser without expanding the window to fullscreen rather than figure out how to burn a DVD or transfer the much better version of the file that I have in my Bittorrent collection. They just gravitate to what they think they know. It's frustrating. But even though getting the file off of my computer (upstairs) down to them to watch is technically much much simpler than getting it off of the youtube server - they still prefer doing it the harder less quality way because the GUI of youtube makes it apparent what they need to do whereas files hiding somewhere physically on my computer only a few feet away are abstract and lack GUI. (Unless I put up the samba... and even then...)

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
  12. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good to see the best minds of this generation have chosen to benefit humankind with... ...a better way to steal stuff!

    Bit Torrent is not always used to steal stuff. Its how some game updates are downloaded, and most versions of Linux offer a Bit Torrent download.

    Although I wonder how many legit and mainstream uses of torrent requires a search capabilities.

  13. Re:Ivy League by compro01 · · Score: 1

    You seem to be implying that killing something is never a correct course of action. I can think of several not-uncommon instances where it is a correct action.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  14. Re:Ivy League by haystor · · Score: 1

    The games distributed by bt are tyipcally fired up from a torrent link on their site. Why would you need to search internet at large for an alternate copy of it? Oh yea, you want the free one.

    --
    t
  15. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you suggesting that the use of P2P networks can kill people?

  16. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guns are used for legal reasons ridiculously more often that BT is. Your comparison is retarded.

  17. Re:Ivy League by YojimboJango · · Score: 1

    Your analogy doesn't stand up to this circumstance because guns are used for target practice a lot more than they are to kill things.

  18. Re:Ivy League by Amouth · · Score: 1

    i don't know.. i bet more people play wow than download movies via BT

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  19. Re:Ivy League by albertost · · Score: 1, Redundant

    how can you kill 'things'?

  20. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I cannot.

  21. Re:Yay! The Pirates SCORE AGAIN !! Yay!! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Yay! The Pirates SCORE AGAIN !! Yay!!

    Yay!! I got mail!! Yay!!

    And the ignorant are fed for another day.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  22. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You don't think that if someone is about to end your life it's correct to end theirs first, to preserve your own?

  23. TPB Redundant by thewils · · Score: 1

    So does this lead to TPB (and others) becoming largely redundant? If not right now, at least the writing is on the wall for them. I mean if you can search without TPB, then why would you need to go there, apart from maybe checking out their legal pages.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    1. Re:TPB Redundant by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      apart from maybe checking out their legal pages.

      But isn't that enough reason? I mean, they have some really good advice there. Like, make sure you use a good quality retractable baton.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    2. Re:TPB Redundant by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should form some kind of association and sue Tribler users for IP infringement. They could call it ToRrent Industries Association of America (RIAA)

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    3. Re:TPB Redundant by Goaway · · Score: 1

      They didn't become redundant the last couple times somebody tried to make this, so I doubt they will become redundant now.

    4. Re:TPB Redundant by pipatron · · Score: 1

      TPB is also a bittorrent tracker, something that users mostly ignore due to lack of knowledge of the bittorrent protocol. You can get your torrents from anywhere, it will still need to connect to a tracker that will keep track of who is sharing the pieces that you want. Often people say that "lol piratebay sucks, use bigger sites like isohunt", but then fail to see that most of the isohunt torrents are using TPB as a tracker.

      The role of the tracker is somewhat going away with DHT and PXE, but is still very important for closed (controlled) trackers.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    5. Re:TPB Redundant by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Because the interface is pretty good, the comments give good feedback and you agree with their ideals (sweden is not in US jurisdiction). personally i find sites like mininova with its RSS feeds much more useful than limewire ever was for finding stuff to download.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  24. Re:Ivy League by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

    Well, you show me your 'thing' and I'll kill it!

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  25. Re:Ivy League by gnick · · Score: 1

    Guns aren't always used to kill things either. I mean, you can use them for target practice, right?

    Guns are often used for hunting - A legal, useful, and environmentally friendly way to gather food. Sometimes guns are used for legal and useful things and sometimes they're used for crime.

    Thank you - Good analogy.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  26. Stupid Question by bendodge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know this is a naive question, but how does a client find any peers to query without a centralized server to get a list from?

    --
    The government can't save you.
    1. Re:Stupid Question by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      DHT

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_hash_table

      Basically they find matches of the same BITTORRENT files, not the same FILE, and peers and seeds are connected by the hash of the bittorrent file to each other if and only if they match bittorrent hashes.

      tl;dr they connect to each other only by matching bittorrent files using a magic server.

    2. Re:Stupid Question by cjhanson · · Score: 0

      There would still be the necessity for a server, however that server could maintain only a client IPs and perhaps some sort of network topology information. Once connected to any of the retrieved IPs a client can gather more IPs and start to build a picture of what is out there.

    3. Re:Stupid Question by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      I know this is a naive question, but how does a client find any peers to query without a centralized server to get a list from?

      They query 224.0.0.1 :)

    4. Re:Stupid Question by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Of course I haven't read the article, but one might suppose there's a hosts.txt along with the client. Whenever a new connection is made, the parties remember each other and add to the hosts.txt. There's some kind of sub-protocol that lets parties exchange peer information.

      Probably some fancy math can show you that if you connect to 2, or 5, or log(n), or 1/(2^n)! random peers, you can reach everybody in your connected component with a ttl of O(f(n)) for some f, and your connected component will split with a probability of epsilon to the g(n)th.

      That's kindasorta how gtk-gnutella goes about it, if memory serves.

    5. Re:Stupid Question by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Almost right. The GP is asking how to connect to the overlay network (in DHT terms) to find peers to query, rather that how to find the peers that match a query, which is where a DHT comes into it.

      Without delving into the Tribble source I would guess the other reply below is correct that a hosts.txt lists some long-lived peers in the network to bootstrap the search from. Once one of them has been contacted then more local peers can be found, and then the DHT protocol can be run over the top.

      In fact I didn't even check the Tribble faq to see if they are running a DHT, but it seems likely given that it's the fashionable shiney new thing.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    6. Re:Stupid Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is a naive question, but how does a client find any peers to query without a centralized server to get a list from?

      Not naive at all, that's the biggest omission of the article, and technically makes this not truly decentralized.

      You need a bootstrap client -- a known client already in the 'network' which can exchange some information with you. There are many protocols (or implementations rather) which have a decentralized nature, but all still need a little help into the network via a known client. It's basically a gossip protocol, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossip_protocol

    7. Re:Stupid Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      utorrent uses 3 methods to get peers without needing to use a central tracker.

      1) DHT
      2) Local Peer Discovery
      3) Peer Exchange

    8. Re:Stupid Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually not a big deal since you aren't replacing the tracker (which has already been done with DHT, so if you're that curious about how it works, that's the topic you should be looking up). So given that you do have existing torrents, any and all users having torrents in common with you, by any degree of separation, will together form a Kevin Bacon lattice.

      So while the search function itself may be decentralized (you won't need to visit an indexing site), the peer list originates from existing BT centralization, the trackers (you will still need them to download torrents, unless they are all running on DHT).

  27. Re:Ivy League by SkankinMonkey · · Score: 1

    I think hunting still counts as killing things. My comment didn't factor in whether killing things are good or bad, and that was on purpose.

  28. DAMNIT by cjhanson · · Score: 1

    Okay, hit me with an off-topic, but can we find a way to be able to remove retarded first-posts that are actually worse than "first post!"?

    As far as TFS... I for one, am thrilled to see that torrents technology, being both beautiful in concept and on it's way to being the de-facto web content delivery method (imho), is preparing to become even more of a hot-topic red button for consumer-suing power-houses (aka, RIAA) once when this leads to bigger and better hidden piracy networks.

    Or, for those new to slashdot...

    "Sweet, more bootleg porn!"

  29. Why? by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    News flash: Centralisation is a strength of BitTorrent.

    What makes you think centralisation is a strength? I liked gnutella just much better for actually finding stuff, except that BT is faster for downloading.

    Newsflash: with a decent client that let you ban junk, and enough common sense to see the junk patterns, gnutella was (and still is) very reliable.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the RIAA can see what else you are sharing and sell the information on to other interested parties.

    2. Re:Why? by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      They can do that on any unencrypted protocol, which is the vast majority of them. As for asking users for a list of their files, most clients after the first generation prevent that, afaik.

  30. Slashdotted by UncleMantis · · Score: 0

    You would think these people would know that something is going to be like wicked popular and prepare themselves before a press release!

    --
    Uncle Mantis
  31. Re:Ivy League by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually far more rounds are expended in target practice than in killing people, meaning that target practice is a much more common use for a gun than murder.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  32. Used a lot! by vecctor · · Score: 1

    I use eMule quite a bit and the URI system is great. All the ed2k sites use it.

    sharethefiles.com and tvu.org.ru are two big ones - they do for emule what piratebay does for torrents (just using those URIs in place of .torrent files).

    --
    Why, yes I have been touched by His noodly appendage. And I plan to sue.
  33. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your reply:

    Guns aren't always used to kill things either. I mean, you can use them for target practice, right?

    To the parent:

    Bit Torrent is not always used to steal stuff. Its how some game updates are downloaded...

    If you weren't weighing in on good use/bad use, then what exactly was your point? Just some random statement that some things have two similar uses?

    Trucks aren't always used for transporting people. I mean, you can use them for towing, right?
    CDs aren't always used for listening to music. I mean, you can store data on them, right?
    /. posts aren't always used for communicating ideas and opinions. I mean, you can just randomly spout nonsense to listen to the keyboard clack, right?

    Oh, and who said that hunting didn't count as killing things?

  34. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But those sorts of downloads have an official source where you'll want to go for the torrent file, making this decentralization option unnecessary.

  35. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to be implying that killing something is never a correct course of action. I can think of several not-uncommon instances where it is a correct action.

    Then you're wrong and still have to learn a lot.

  36. Re:Ivy League by xaxa · · Score: 2, Informative

    He said something, not someone. Hunting animals for food is generally accepted, killing animals in life-threatening situations too.

  37. Re:Ivy League by gnick · · Score: 1

    Yes, hunting still counts as killing things - I never implied that it didn't. I was just trying to expand on your analogy a little bit so that it was somehow relevant to the discussion.

    I swear - Some browsers must prepend a line that reads "First off let me say that everything in your post is completely wrong." to every reply. It's the only way that I can explain posts like this.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  38. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) It Isn't stealing, IP infringement at worst.
    2) Being able to create and distribute copies of anything at low cost without centralized infrastructure is of obvious benefit to humankind. If only we could do the same with food, water, and fuel.

  39. Tribler and Cubit by BernardWong · · Score: 5, Informative

    Disclaimer: I'm one of the authors of Cubit

    Tribler takes an interesting approach to the distributed search problem -- collect Torrents in the background and perform on-demand searches locally. To improve recall, skew the Torrent collection to collect mostly from those that have similar interests.

    It does raise a few questions. Search quality for less popular Torrents will likely be affected. Searching for Torrents outside your typical interests may also be problematic. And given a Torrent may in theory be replicated to every Tribler client, there is some bandwidth concerns.

    I guess only time will tell if limiting search to only the files that have been previously downloaded by one of your peers is sufficient for most users.

    Cubit takes a different approach -- perform efficient, distributed search over all the available Torrents in a manner that is resilient to typos and spelling mistakes (from both the search string and the content). Rely on a separate mechanism (such as user comments or a reputation system like Credence) to determine good Torrents from SPAM in the search results.

    The approaches seem complimentary, and I'm looking forward to testing out the new Tribler once the website recovers from the Slashdot-ing.

    1. Re:Tribler and Cubit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's very nice, and I also hope the approaches are complementary as well as complimentary.

    2. Re:Tribler and Cubit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the main problems with Kazaa and similar systems to my understanding is that each client advertises what files it has available. So when the RIAA sues John Doe at 192.0.1.1, the RIAA already has a list of possibly hundreds of copyrighted works which are on the target - thus allowing the lawsuit to claim possibly hundreds of times the amount in damages.

      Contrast that with BitTorrent - if the RIAA (or their leashed dogs, MediaSentry) connects to a tracker and downloads the list of peers for a torrent, the RIAA only knows of a single file being downloaded by John Doe's IP address. That may make John Doe not such an attractive target for a lawsuit.

      So my worry is that if Tribler and/or Cubit turn clients into advertisers, the client may become a fat target for a lawsuit.

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  42. First?!?! eXeem was first by Carlosos · · Score: 2, Informative

    I still remember when suprnova closed down and they started development on eXeem which sounds to be exactly what they are trying to do here. That project didn't even last for a year.

    I believe that those researchers will fail the same way as eXeem failed.

    1. Re:First?!?! eXeem was first by Shabadage · · Score: 1

      You mean they'll get shutdown for indexing torrents to illegal content?

    2. Re:First?!?! eXeem was first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eXeem was non-Free/closed-source (because the guy who ran Suprnova and then eXeem was a freedom-hating ass-hole), its protocol was proprietary, and it came bundled with pretty nasty spyware. The fact that anyone with a brain actually thought it would last for more than a week speaks volumes about the stupidity of Man. As long as the researchers avoid those huge blunders that made eXeem's downfall so inevitable, I don't see a good reason to prophesy failure so quickly.

  43. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can certainly think of several instances were killing someone would be the correct course of action, but several NOT-UNCOMMON instances?

    I have no idea where you live, but man, maybe you should move...

  44. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By shooting them.

  45. Re:Ivy League by compro01 · · Score: 1

    I said something, not someone.

    For example "Grab your rifle! There's a coyote attacking the livestock!", which is not an overly uncommon thing to happen around here.

    Also the occasional human with ill intent towards me, my family, or my possessions, which is considerably more rare, but still worth being prepared for, especially being as it would take the police about half an hour to show up here.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  46. Re:Ivy League by ThatGuyJon · · Score: 1

    No, BitTorrent isn't always used to steal stuff.

    However, decentralised torrent search almost certainly will be.
    Linux distributions and game updates do not need this feature. It's a hell of a lot more difficult to defend this than the rest of BitTorrent.

    --
    I must be new here...
  47. Re:Ivy League by BlowHole666 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps bit torrent search will be used for some new technology on the horizon, and not for stealing. Just because something can be used for stealing does not mean it can not have another purpose. Maybe instead of linux distros and game sites letting their websites get slammed when they release a new update (for example open office 3.0) they can just tell the users to perform a search of their torrent.

    --
    I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
  48. About time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its about time. Now the **AA's of the world can finally get theirs. The world changed. Film companies don't sell film anymore. Kodachrome is (very soon) to be a thing of the past. Vinyl records really don't sound better than digital. Mass distribution through a very narrow, very expensive pipe is no longer sustainable. Get over it.

  49. This is NOT the first decentralized p2p! by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    The [...] project[...] is the first to incorporate decentralized search capabilities

    never heared of frost? the p2p client for freenet? it also has encryption and anonymization...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  50. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to be implying that killing something is never a correct course of action. I can think of several not-uncommon instances where it is a correct action.

    Then you're wrong and still have to learn a lot.

    Then you're a mineralatarian and do your cooking with a rock grinder. But you're destroying our continental plate and we'll drown! You're just a very slow killer!

  51. Fool me once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> And exactly how many joe averages run Opera?
    > Me, for one.

    Have you been properly vetted, or are we going to find out tomorrow that you're actually an unlicensed, tax-dodging plumber from Ohio with delusions of grandeur about how much you make? :-)

  52. THESE are Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides bittorrent styled file replication, I have always hoped that bittorrent was tunneled through FreeNET and that bittorrent became the primary means of retrieving websites and real-time data such as Stock and News information.

    btw, frost pist!

  53. obligatory star trek. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    The MAFIAA has yet to comment on this development, pundits speculate these organizations understand that no publicity is bad publicity, and feeding triblers with publicity only produces more triblers.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  54. Re:Ivy League by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 1

    BitTorrent by definition can't be used to steal stuff. There is absolutely no way, even with your full cooperation, for me to use BitTorrent to take away anything you own.

  55. Tribler, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would this happen to be named for Marshall McLuhan?

  56. Re:Ivy League by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

    The GP's analogy sucked. Guns are used to kill living things or practice to get good at killing living things. Killing things is the raison d'etre of guns. Not so with bittorrent.

    Disclaimer: I am a handgun owner, and I support banning handguns.

  57. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're comparing downloading copyrighted MP3s with murder?

    You know what you're talking about.

  58. never use tribler again by codergeist · · Score: 1

    CAUTION! Tribler uses you, the clients to distrubute .torrent files. After analyzing tcp data, and looking at cached torrent files, I can never use tribler again. Due to the nature of the content of those files, using it could easily land you in court, with your name tarnished forever. I encourage any users to check your .torrent cache if you are using tribler, and you will find what I mean. Do you really want to aid in distrubuting that crap?

    1. Re:never use tribler again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really believe you can be sued for distributing lists of file names and their respective hashes?

    2. Re:never use tribler again by UncleMantis · · Score: 0

      Is there any way to encrypt the traffic like uTorrent? Tribbler is not ready for prime time.

      --
      Uncle Mantis
  59. Re:Ivy League by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

    or practice to get good at killing living things

    Actually a lot of people like marksmanship just as a recreational activity. Not much point in spending hours and hours at the range and the reloading bench shrinking a 0.75" group down to 0.25" if you goal is simply to kill something. Most target guns are actually not much good for anything BUT target shooting. Hell it's an Olympic sport for pete's sakes. There are also many other national level shooting competitions. Do you think the top competitors in those events are really just practicing for their next drive by or something?

    The simple and plain truth is that TONS of people own, shoot, and enjoy guns with no intention or aspiration of killing anything.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  60. Re:Ivy League by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

    You're comparing downloading copyrighted MP3s with murder?

    You know what you're talking about.

    Nope. Notice I didn't mention Mp3's anywhere in my post. Heck the post I replied to didn't either. I simply pointed out that fact that a gun is far more commonly used in a perfectly legal manner than in an illegal manner. There's always an insinuation that each and every gun and gun owner is just a murder waiting to happen; the reality of the situation doesn't support this though. MP3's have nothing to do with the matter.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  61. You can't steal information by IceRa · · Score: 1

    Because when I copy it, you still have it. Got that point?

    --
    Sig? Where I go, I don't need ... sigs.
  62. Re:Ivy League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not saying your point is wrong, but your logic assumes that use is measured "per-bullet", which is not nearly the given you seem to want to make it.

  63. I2P = anonymizing P2P network by Burz · · Score: 1

    I2PSnark is their bittorrent client, check it out.

    Here is a short Howto for I2P.

    They are still trying to gain a critical mass but the network essentially works.

  64. Re:Ivy League by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

    Archery is an Olympic sport too. Arrows can be used for some other purposes than killing living things, such as sending messages, but it's still nearly true that the raison d'etre of bows and arrows is to kill or maim living things; just as with guns. We just let archery be because a bow is a thousand times less efficient at its task than a gun, and a hundred times cheaper and easier to fashion at home.

    The fact that guns are used recreationally is not a good defence of bittorrent via analogy -- bittorrent's raison d'etre is not to do harm, not even in copyright infringement. Cohen explicitly said so, and that's why he made it centralised too -- he didn't imagine that a centralised architecture could be so good for copyright infringement after Napster.

  65. Re:Ivy League by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

    but it's still nearly true that the raison d'etre of bows and arrows is to kill or maim living things; just as with guns

    raison d'être - If you're going to use French words at least accent them properly.

    That aside, I can't concur with you that the purpose of a gun is to kill. At least not universally. Sure many are used for that, but target and recreational shooting is the primary purpose and reason to be for many guns (and bows for that matter - I don't know of anyone who hunts or kills anything with carbon fiber arrows or blunt tip heads, but they are incredibly common because they're popular for target shooting).

    Take a look at http://www.rbgc.org/benchrest/benchrest.htm for example. These are benchrest guns designed and made for target shooting. Their gaudy color schemes make them stand out quite readily. Their weight makes them difficult to carry around, and their stock design is setup such that it's difficult to hold in an impromptu fashion - they're designed to be fired from mechanical rests. Most such rifles are also generally chambered for target style rounds such as the .300 Whisper or the 6mm PPC. These are designed for long range accuracy rather than energy delivery, making them not really optimal for killing things. A decent number of them are also single shot.

    There are similarly styled handguns and such too. Ever see the sights on a IPSC/IDPA competition setup handgun? They're bulky and snag on holsters and clothing way too easy for concealment. They also often feature long slides and bulky muzzle breaks to reduce muzzle jump, further reducing their use as a street gun.

    I mean, yes, you certainly COULD use one of these target guns to kill someone, just as you can use a pipe wrench to drive in a nail, but if we're arguing about something's "raison d'être", then for many guns it's most certainly NOT to kill anything.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  66. Re:Ivy League by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

    Thanks, but I won't accent an import phrase. But if you like, I'll substitute the Anglo-Saxon "very purpose". This is less familiar to non-native English speakers, which is why sometimes a well-known French or Latin phrase fits the bill. But it's perfectly intelligible without accents.

    I wasn't discussing specific models. Why were guns invented, why were bows invented, and why was bittorrent invented? Saying that the purpose of guns is to target shoot is like saying that the purpose of bittorrent is to download movies and music. I don't doubt that we are moving toward a world in which the primary purpose of guns will be target practice, because it's a fun thing to do, to measure your skill at anything, including shooting handguns or rifles.

    Look, all I am trying to point out is that the GP's analogy sucked. I think that we are basically in agreement, except I think the situation you describe is in the future. When it will be unusual to have a metal round in a gun, or in any way when using a gun to kill someone is awkward and inconvenient and difficult (perhaps because some laser gadget will have superseded firearms, like firearms superseded bows), then I will agree with you unreservedly. Until then, as far as I'm concerned, the very purpose [this is still not quite the same as raison d'etre] of guns is to kill or maim living things, and the mere fact that most round are expended in target practice does not contradict my view.

    Did you know that a bow and arrow were used in combat as recently as Dunkirk? I believe it was Mad Jack Churchill, but I do not know for sure. He got his German, in any case.

  67. Superpeers by afranke · · Score: 1

    Without delving into the Tribble source I would guess the other reply below is correct that a hosts.txt lists some long-lived peers in the network to bootstrap the search from.

    Yes, there are 8 superpeers that do the bootstraping.